Case progress
Carousel items
-
Referral received
-
Public hearing speaker registrations open
-
Submissions open
-
Meeting with DPE
-
Meeting with Applicant
-
Meeting with Mid Western Regional Council
-
Public hearing speaker registration deadline
-
Site inspection
-
Public hearing day 1
-
Public hearing day 2
-
Public hearing day 3
-
Submissions deadline
-
Overview
Court appeal – successfulMap showing the location
Documents
Document | Date |
---|---|
241128 OUT_Bowdens Silver Project redacted (PDF, 261.91 KB)
| 29.11.2024 |
Document | Date |
---|---|
230403 Bowdens Silver Project SSD 5765 Development Consent (PDF, 4.25 MB)
| 05.11.2024 |
03.04.2023 | |
230403 Media Release Bowdens Silver Determination (PDF, 156.85 KB)
| 03.04.2023 |
Document | Date |
---|---|
230310_Statement From Commission (PDF, 133.7 KB)
| 10.03.2023 |
230222_Statement From Commission (PDF, 140.27 KB)
| 10.03.2023 |
Document | Date |
---|---|
Bowdens Silver Referral to IPC (PDF, 255.02 KB)
| 22.12.2022 |
Bowdens Silver Public Hearing Request (PDF, 221.45 KB)
| 22.12.2022 |
Bowdens Silver Assessment Report (PDF, 13.86 MB)
| 22.12.2022 |
Bowdens Silver Recommended Conditions (PDF, 6.6 MB)
| 22.12.2022 |
Document | Date |
---|---|
230209_IN_Applicant Additional static geochemistry testing (PDF, 482.07 KB)
| 10.02.2023 |
230209_IN_Applicant_Koala Population Survey (PDF, 5.89 MB)
| 10.02.2023 |
Document | Date |
---|---|
230215 Bowdens Silver Conflicts of Interest Register (PDF, 109.07 KB)
| 15.02.2023 |
Meetings
Meeting information
-
11:00am Wednesday 15 February
Mudgee Showground Main Pavilion 11 Nicholson Street MUDGEE 2850 NSW -
10:00am Thursday 16 February
Mudgee Showground Main Pavilion 11 Nicholson Street MUDGEE 2850 NSW -
10:30am Friday 17 February
Mudgee Showground Main Pavilion 11 Nicholson Street MUDGEE 2850 NSW
Livestream and recordings
A livestream of this public event will commence at the advertised event start time. A video recording of the public event, which may be edited or redacted prior to publication in line with our guidelines, will be published as soon as practicable after the event and be available until the case is completed.
Speaker schedule and transcripts
Document | Date |
---|---|
Final Speaker Schedule Bowdens v5 (PDF, 217.82 KB)
| 15.02.2023 |
230215 Bowdens Silver Mine Public Hearing Day 1 Transcript (PDF, 636.88 KB)
| 20.02.2023 |
230216 Bowdens Silver Mine Public Hearing Day 2 Transcript (PDF, 473.42 KB)
| 21.02.2023 |
230217 Bowdens Silver Mine Public Hearing Day 3 Transcript (PDF, 304.38 KB)
| 23.02.2023 |
Speaker documents
Public hearing notification
The community will have its say on a proposal for the Bowdens Silver significant development application (SSD-5765) at a public hearing to be held by the NSW Independent Planning Commission on Wednesday 15th, Thursday 16th and Friday 17th of February 2023 at Mudgee Showground Main Pavilion (11 Nicholson Street MUDGEE 2850 NSW).
The decision on whether the Bowdens Silver Project will go ahead will be made by the Independent Planning Commission because the Department of Planning and Environment received more than 50 unique submissions objecting to the proposal.
Commissioners Peter Duncan AM (Chair), Clare Sykes and Peter Cochrane have been appointed to determine the development application.
The Commission will conduct a Public Hearing on the Bowdens Silver Project development application as a livestreamed event at Mudgee Showground Main with registered speakers participating in person or via online videoconference or telephone.
The Commission has access to all previous submissions made to the Department of Planning and Environment on this proposal, so it is particularly helpful for the Commission to also hear from stakeholders about their views on the Department’s assessment of the key issues and proposed conditions of consent. These documents are available on the Commission’s website.
Key issues identified in the Department’s whole-of-government assessment of the development application include: water resources, amenity, traffic, biodiversity, and social impacts.
The deadline for speaker registrations is 5pm AEDT on Wednesday 8th February 2023.
Written submissions can also be lodged using the ‘Have Your Say’ portal on the Commission’s website. Written submissions will be accepted until 5pm AEST on Friday 24 February 2023.
The public hearing will be broadcast live online.
Meeting information
Date and time
11:00 AM Mon 30 January 2023
Meeting documents
Document | Date |
---|---|
03.02.2023 | |
230130_Bowdens Silver_Department Meeting transcript (PDF, 178.54 KB)
| 03.02.2023 |
Disclaimer
The Commission's Transparency Policy sets out how information related to this meeting will be made publicly available.
Meeting information
Date and time
10:30 AM Thu 02 February 2023
Meeting documents
Document | Date |
---|---|
230202_Bowdens Silver Mine _Council Meeting transcript (PDF, 142.58 KB)
| 08.02.2023 |
Disclaimer
The Commission's Transparency Policy sets out how information related to this meeting will be made publicly available.
Meeting information
Date and time
9:00 AM Thu 02 February 2023
Meeting documents
Document | Date |
---|---|
230202_Bowdens Silver Mine Applicant Meeting transcript (PDF, 195.85 KB)
| 08.02.2023 |
230202 Bowdens Silver Mine Applicant Presentation (PDF, 3.38 MB)
| 08.02.2023 |
Disclaimer
The Commission's Transparency Policy sets out how information related to this meeting will be made publicly available.
Site inspection information
Date and time
12:00 AM Tue 14 February 2023
Site inspection documents
Document | Date |
---|---|
Bowdens Silver Site Inspection and Locality Tour Images (PDF, 904.43 KB)
| 20.02.2023 |
Bowdens Silver Site Inspection and Locality Tour Notes (PDF, 1.27 MB)
| 21.02.2023 |
Disclaimer
The Commission's Transparency Policy sets out how information related to this meeting will be made publicly available.
Public submissions
ID | Name | Date | Submission |
---|---|---|---|
Name Redacted | 08/03/2023 | ||
Erin Hutchiman | 08/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/03/2023 | ||
Francis Pigott | 08/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/03/2023 | ||
James Pearce | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Elizabeth Willis | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Nick Rachel Rawlinson | 02/03/2023 | ||
A Addison | 02/03/2023 | ||
Jeff Urio | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Fiona Evans | 02/03/2023 | ||
Mark James | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Vince Daspromonte | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Sandra Steele | 02/03/2023 | ||
Belinda Drysdale | 02/03/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/03/2023 | ||
Paul Macartney | 02/03/2023 | ||
Shane Carlson | 02/03/2023 | ||
Rex Plummer | 01/03/2023 | ||
Rosemarie Arthars | 01/03/2023 | ||
Chris Velcek | 01/03/2023 | ||
Earl Grey | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Mary Young | 28/02/2023 | ||
Michael Radzievic | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Pamela Dawes | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Felicity Street | 28/02/2023 | ||
Gino Castellana | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Veronica Burns | 28/02/2023 | ||
Bronwen Gradden | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Wanda Gall | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Terry Burrows | 28/02/2023 | ||
Jason Wing | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer Conlon | 28/02/2023 | ||
Linda Chrismas | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Maralyn Bennett | 28/02/2023 | ||
Peter Curtis | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Lue Action Group | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Darren Berrigan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Fiona Luckhurst | 24/02/2023 | ||
Graham Morris | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Lay | 24/02/2023 | ||
Madeleine Cannon | 24/02/2023 | ||
Mark Mlinac | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paulene Murdoch | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rasal PTY | 24/02/2023 | ||
Robert McKittrick | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sam Reece | 24/02/2023 | ||
Shiree Phillips | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stewart Henry | 24/02/2023 | ||
Aimee Feeman | 24/02/2023 | ||
Barbara Gassmann | 24/02/2023 | ||
Carolyn McKittrick | 24/02/2023 | ||
David Henderson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gary Franklin | 24/02/2023 | ||
Guy HcHugh | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jamie Agland | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jimmy Dejuousku | 24/02/2023 | ||
Lois Bray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Maralyn Bennett | 24/02/2023 | ||
Maxwell Lindsay | 24/02/2023 | ||
Mywhard Au Plessiv | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Nathan Lewis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paul Campbell | 24/02/2023 | ||
Peter Davin | 24/02/2023 | ||
Teresa Anne | 24/02/2023 | ||
Wendy Mirande | 24/02/2023 | ||
Robin King | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amanda Lewis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Donenico&Melissa Remeo | 24/02/2023 | ||
Ian Mattila | 24/02/2023 | ||
John Oakes | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kerry Davies | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Feeman | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paul Taylor | 24/02/2023 | ||
Phillip Marsh | 24/02/2023 | ||
Richard Charles | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rosslyn Thompson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stephen Mark | 24/02/2023 | ||
William Somerville | 24/02/2023 | ||
Ashton Hendriks | 24/02/2023 | ||
Darren Kitchen | 24/02/2023 | ||
Elizabeth Loneragan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Francis Madden | 24/02/2023 | ||
James Percy | 24/02/2023 | ||
John William_Darcy | 24/02/2023 | ||
Malcom Murray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Rupert | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Natalie Merz | 24/02/2023 | ||
Peta Lockyer | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sam Turnbull | 24/02/2023 | ||
Siarhei Labuzay | 24/02/2023 | ||
Swee Eng | 24/02/2023 | ||
Barrie Thistlethwayte | 24/02/2023 | ||
Dermot Alexander_Wiley | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gayford Thompson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Harpreet Singh_Bhatti | 24/02/2023 | ||
John Dipalo | 24/02/2023 | ||
Josephine Mills Dennis Kennewell | 24/02/2023 | ||
Louise Windeyer | 24/02/2023 | ||
MD Robinson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Neville Castle | 24/02/2023 | ||
Riawah Sridhata | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rosemary Francis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stefan Basson | 24/02/2023 | ||
garry lynch | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amy Reece | 24/02/2023 | ||
Bill Kempton | 24/02/2023 | ||
Christopher G_Demas | 24/02/2023 | ||
Dr_John Chong | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kevin Alderson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Martin Grainey | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Murray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Pamela Dai_Madden | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paula Kennedy | 24/02/2023 | ||
Ramie Camteui | 24/02/2023 | ||
Robert Brittain | 24/02/2023 | ||
Ryan McGregor | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sharyn Munro | 24/02/2023 | ||
Steve Grozdamov | 24/02/2023 | ||
Adam Kosminski | 24/02/2023 | ||
B Spencer | 24/02/2023 | ||
Campbell Barnes | 24/02/2023 | ||
David Denison | 24/02/2023 | ||
Elizabeth M_Dray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gregory Bray | 24/02/2023 | ||
John William_Geisker | 24/02/2023 | ||
Matt Joy | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Theodosiol | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Nataliya Spaska | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paul Amanda_Parker | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rosalyn Bray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Simon Leary | 24/02/2023 | ||
Warren DelGrande | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amanda Lewis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Evan Lewis | 24/02/2023 | ||
George Doublesin | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jason Adair | 24/02/2023 | ||
John Fitzerald | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kathleen Armstrong | 24/02/2023 | ||
Mark Cof | 24/02/2023 | ||
Martin Carver | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Nicholas Smith | 24/02/2023 | ||
Richard Barton | 24/02/2023 | ||
William Keating | 24/02/2023 | ||
Craig Flavel | 19/02/2023 | ||
Angela Davis | 15/02/2023 | ||
Brian Williams | 15/02/2023 | ||
John Sanderson | 15/02/2023 | ||
Kon Yap | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Walter Brunner | 15/02/2023 | ||
John Wood | 15/02/2023 | ||
Markus Pluss | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Sanjay Mali | 15/02/2023 | ||
Simon Strauss | 15/02/2023 | ||
Benjamin Spurgin | 15/02/2023 | ||
Jason Blomfield | 15/02/2023 | ||
Mark Frewin | 15/02/2023 | ||
Martin Croft | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Shane Noni_Buckland | 15/02/2023 | ||
Greg Dowker | 15/02/2023 | ||
Lesley Frede_Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Mark Petterson | 15/02/2023 | ||
Maryanne Roberts | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Patricia Kempton | 15/02/2023 | ||
Robert | 15/02/2023 | ||
Alan Dale | 15/02/2023 | ||
Chand | 15/02/2023 | ||
Janine Modaro | 15/02/2023 | ||
Marjorie DeCaux | 15/02/2023 | ||
Martin Breen | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Paul Koda | 15/02/2023 | ||
Peter Maroudas | 15/02/2023 | ||
Scott Boehm | 15/02/2023 | ||
Will Harrison | 15/02/2023 | ||
Glenn Birznieks | 15/02/2023 | ||
James Murnane | 15/02/2023 | ||
John Patrick_Gallagher | 15/02/2023 | ||
James Stubbings | 15/02/2023 | ||
Mark Qui | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Tarmo Rae | 15/02/2023 | ||
Chris Lake | 15/02/2023 | ||
Donald Fisher | 15/02/2023 | ||
Hugh Doug_Jones | 15/02/2023 | ||
Melissa Lameri | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Peter McNally | 15/02/2023 | ||
Ross Hawkins | 15/02/2023 | ||
Stephen Brushe | 15/02/2023 | ||
Tony Wright | 15/02/2023 | ||
Kara Statham | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-20230306_redacted.pdf (PDF, 47.82 KB) |
Erin Hutchiman
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
erin-hutchiman-20230306_redacted.pdf (PDF, 44.06 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-20230306_redacted.pdf (PDF, 41.12 KB) |
Francis Pigott
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
francis-pigott-20230306_redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.31 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-20230306_redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.66 KB) |
James Pearce
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
james-pearce-010323_redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.7 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.87 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-5-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 45.82 KB) |
Elizabeth Willis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
elizabeth-willis-010323_redacted.pdf (PDF, 51.29 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 48.69 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 45.23 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-230303redacted.pdf (PDF, 226.31 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 44.14 KB) |
Nick Rachel Rawlinson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
nick--rachel-rawlinson-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 58.76 KB) |
A Addison
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
a-c-addison-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 38.49 KB) |
Jeff Urio
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jeff-urio-010323_redacted.pdf (PDF, 148.71 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 50.06 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.05 KB) |
Fiona Evans
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
fiona-evans-230302_redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.92 KB) |
Mark James
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-james-010323_redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.31 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.6 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-230302redacted.pdf (PDF, 40.24 KB) |
Vince Daspromonte
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
vince-daspromonte-230302_redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.25 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-230302redacted.pdf (PDF, 47.51 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8-010323redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.23 KB) |
Sandra Steele
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
sandra-steele-park-230302_redacted.pdf (PDF, 210.41 KB) |
Belinda Drysdale
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
belinda-drysdale-230302_redacted.pdf (PDF, 66.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-230302redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.43 KB) |
Paul Macartney
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paul-macartney-230302_redacted.pdf (PDF, 79.77 KB) |
Shane Carlson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
shane-carlson_redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.86 KB) |
Rex Plummer
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rex-plummer-submission--230223redacted.pdf (PDF, 1.82 MB) |
Rosemarie Arthars
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rosemarie-arthars-submission--230223redacted.pdf (PDF, 148.95 KB) |
Chris Velcek
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/03/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
chris-velcek-submission--230223redacted.pdf (PDF, 97.33 KB) |
Earl Grey
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
earl-grey-submission--240223redacted.pdf (PDF, 108.08 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
03_aquatic-ecology_peter-serov_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 230.62 KB) |
Mary Young
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mary-young-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.7 KB) |
Michael Radzievic
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
michael-radzievic-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 251.82 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 253.75 KB) |
Pamela Dawes
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
pamela-dawes-submission--260223redacted.pdf (PDF, 155.07 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
06_human-health-amd-risk_barry-noller_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 528.29 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-13-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 86.87 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-6-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 335.75 KB) |
Felicity Street
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
felicity-street-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 261.44 KB) |
Gino Castellana
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
gino-castellana-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.56 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
01_surface-water_shireen-baguley_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 6.79 MB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
08_visitor-economy-supporting-data_karl-flowers_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 323.25 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-12-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.6 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 343.77 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.46 KB) |
Veronica Burns
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
veronica-burns-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 71.47 KB) |
Bronwen Gradden
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
bronwen-gradden-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 257.25 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
04_acid-mine-drainage_michael-white_february-2023_redacted.pdf (PDF, 875.56 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-11-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 61.23 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 88.74 KB) |
Wanda Gall
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
wanda-gall-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 100.79 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
07_social-impact_alison-ziller_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 250.48 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-240223redacted.pdf (PDF, 20.91 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 57.66 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 254.41 KB) |
Terry Burrows
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
terry-burrows-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 267.83 KB) |
Jason Wing
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jason-wing-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 305.86 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
02_groundwater_craig-flavel_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 3.41 MB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
09_property-value_peter-druit_february-2023_redacted.pdf (PDF, 1.78 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 348.77 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-14-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 308.72 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 257.02 KB) |
Jennifer Conlon
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jennifer-conlon-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 324.23 KB) |
Linda Chrismas
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
linda-chrismas-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 287.57 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
05_lead-dust_mark-taylor_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 830.54 KB) |
Maralyn Bennett
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
maralyn-bennett-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 255.94 KB) |
Peter Curtis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
peter-curtis-270223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 73.59 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
00_cover-letter_lue-action-group-objection-to-bowdens-project_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 277.14 KB) |
Lue Action Group
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
08_tourism-and-visitor-economy_karl-flowers_february-2023.pdf (PDF, 285.29 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-5-270223redacted.pdf (PDF, 337.54 KB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
The Australian Wine Research Institute |
---|---|
Location |
South Australia |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Australian Wine Research Institute (AWRI) was asked by the Mudgee Wine Grape Growers Association to comment on whether the Bowdens Silver mine project (State Significant Development No. 5765) might have any negative impacts on the Mudgee winegrowing region. After examination of the Bowdens Silver Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), in particular Part 2 – Air Quality Assessment (hereafter referred to simply as the “EIS”), it is clear that metals will be emitted from the mine in the form of dust and aerosols. This therefore introduces the possibility that vineyards in the Mudgee region could be exposed to metals which might result in grape metal concentrations which are elevated above their typical levels. This could occur due to exposure to metals during the growing season and also due to the accumulation of metals in the vineyard soil over time. Atmospheric particulates, especially dust and aerosols containing particles that have low volatility, have the potential to transport contaminants over long distances and have adverse environmental consequences in downwind depositional areas (Khademi et al. 2018, Csavina et al. 2012). Such transport of contaminants (i.e., via dust and aerosols) can become particularly important when it occurs over years to decades (Csavina et al. 2012). Contaminants commonly associated with particulates from mining operations are usually most concentrated in the finer particle size fraction (Csavina et al. 2012), as evidenced by the PM2.5 size fraction data reported in Tables 7.7 and 7.8 of the Bowdens Silver EIS, which indicates this size fraction contains metals including silver, arsenic, cadmium, copper, manganese, zinc, cobalt, chromium, iron, lithium, nickel and lead. It should be noted that fine particles represented by the PM2.5 size fraction travel greater distances in the environment than larger particles (Ravi et al. 2011). When the data provided in the EIS are extrapolated from predicted 1-hour average metal concentrations (µg/m3/hr) in the PM2.5 fraction to average metal concentrations per m3 per year in this fraction, it is found that the average concentrations of arsenic, zinc and iron emitted in the PM2.5 fraction during the site establishment and construction stage (SE&CS), as well as the average of the values presented for the operational years 3, 8 and 9, are in the mg/m3 range (see attachment 1 – Extrapolation of data from Table 7.7 in the Bowdens Silver EIS Part 2 – Air Quality Assessment). That is, the predicted concentrations of arsenic, zinc and iron in the PM2.5 fraction emitted per m3 per year are 0.27, 3.52 and 21.75 mg/m3, respectively, during the SE&CS stage, and 0.27, 2.74 and 35.11 mg/m3, respectively, thereafter (using the average of the data provided for years 2, 8 and 9 in Table 7.7 of the EIS). From the peer reviewed research available, it is clear that grapevines can accumulate metals in their roots, leaves and fruit due to airborne pollution from metallurgical activities (Alagić et al. 2015, Bora et al. 2020), particularly copper and zinc (Mirzaei et al. 2021). Even if such exposure to metals does not represent a health risk, metals are catalysts for oxidation and elevated levels in wine can decrease shelf-life, particularly copper and iron (Scrimgeour et al. 2017). Atmospheric modelling There are at least 29 vineyards and wineries in the Mudgee winegrowing region according to Mudgee Wine (https://www.mudgeewine.com.au/wineries-and-cellar-doors/), ranging from approximately 17 – 38 km from the project, with the approximate centre of the region being approximately 20 km from the Bowdens Silver project (calculated using Google Maps). The majority of wineries/vineyards are situated roughly northwest of Bowdens Silver (see Attachment 2a). The Regional Annual Wind Roses for 2017 (Figure 4.1 in the EIS Part 2 – Air Quality Assessment) presented for Lue Met02, which is at a more southern location and lower elevation than Lue Met02 (which is within the mine site boundary), show a prevailing wind alignment to the northwest and southeast, with a greater tendency for south-easterly winds (15% of the time). Section 4.2 of the EIS (Prevailing Winds) indicates that “nights are typically characterised by weak to no vertical mixing and the predominance of stable conditions. These conditions are normally associated with low wind speeds and, hence, lower dilution potentials.” The combination of tendency for south-easterly winds and lower dilution potential at night, allows for dust and aerosols containing metals to travel from the Bowdens Silver mine site along the natural valley followed by Lawsons Creek directly to the Mudgee winegrowing region (see Attachment 2b), particularly during the night. Receiver sites on the northwest side of the mine (e.g., R60, R73 and R76) have amongst the highest predicted annual average dust deposition values in Table 7.6 of the EIS, apart from a small number of sites that are closer to the mine site boundary (e.g., R4, R7 and R17). This data is consistent with the prevalence of south-easterly winds, showing the Lue Met02 data is the most relevant with respect to possible impacts on the Mudgee winegrowing region. Conclusion Given the Bowdens Silver mine will emit dust and aerosols containing metals, and given the prevailing south-easterly winds and local topography, it is possible that vineyards in the Mudgee region could be exposed to metals from the mine. Elevated concentrations of metals, particularly iron, can negatively impact the quality of wine and decrease shelf-life. Adrian Coulter Senior Oenologist References Alagić, S. Č., Tošić, S. B., Dimitrijević, M. D., Antonijević, M. M., Nujkić, M. M. 2015. Assessment of the quality of polluted areas based on the content of heavy metals in different organs of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cv Tamjanika. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 7155-7175. Bora, F. D., Bunea, C. I., Chira, R., Bunea, A. 2020. Assessment of the quality of polluted areas in northwest Romania based on the content of elements in different organs of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Molecules, 25(3), 750. Csavina, J., Field, J., Taylor, M. P., Gao, S., Landázuri, A., Betterton, E. A., Sáez, A. E. 2012. A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations. Science of the Total Environment, 433, 58-73. Khademi, H., Abbaspour, A., Martínez-Martínez, S., Gabarrón, M., Shahrokh, V., Faz, A., Acosta, J. A. 2018. Provenance and environmental risk of windblown materials from mine tailing ponds, Murcia, Spain. Environmental pollution, 241, 432-440. Mirzaei, M., Verrelst, J., Bakhtiari, A. R., Marofi, S. 2021. Potential use of grapevine cv Askari for heavy metal phytoremediation purposes at greenhouse scale. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 12447-12458. Ravi, S., D'Odorico, P., Breshears, D. D., Field, J. P., Goudie, A. S., Huxman, T. E., Li, J., Okin, G. S., Swap, R. J., Thomas, A. D., Van Pelt, S., Whicker, J. J., Zobeck, T. M. 2011. Aeolian processes and the biosphere. Reviews of Geophysics, 49(3). Scrimgeour, N., Hirlam, K. and Wilkes, E. N. 2017. Using cross-linked polymers to sequester metals and extend shelf life of wine. Beams, K.S., Robinson, E.M.C. (eds) Proceedings of the 16th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference: Adelaide, South Australia 24-28 July 2016. The Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference Inc., Adelaide, South Australia: 173-177. |
Attachments |
attachment-2abpdf.pdf (PDF, 174.87 KB) utf8bqxr0ywnobwvudcaxic3igjmgrxh0cmfwb2xhdglvbibvzibkyxrhigzyb20gvgfibgugn183iejvd2rlbnmgrultlnhsc3g.ashx (ASHX, 27.61 KB) |
Darren Berrigan
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
darren-berrigan-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 118.82 KB) |
Fiona Luckhurst
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
fiona-luckhurst-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.93 MB) |
Graham Morris
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
graham-morris-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 89.22 KB) |
Jayne Lay
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jayne-lay-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.69 MB) |
Madeleine Cannon
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
madeleine-cannon-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.77 MB) |
Mark Mlinac
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-mlinac-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 791.43 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.61 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-11-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 81.73 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-17-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 81.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.54 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-23-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 55.79 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-27-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 50.37 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-32-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.83 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-36-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 60.25 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-47-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 95.39 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-51-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.66 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-59-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 41.78 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-62-210223.pdf (PDF, 29.97 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 55.79 KB) |
Paulene Murdoch
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paulene-murdoch-submission--170223redacted.pdf (PDF, 143.65 KB) |
Rasal PTY
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rasal-pty-ltd-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 70.66 KB) |
Robert McKittrick
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
robert-mckittrick-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 149.27 KB) |
Sam Reece
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
sam-reece-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.94 MB) |
Shiree Phillips
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
shiree-phillips-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 7.14 MB) |
Stewart Henry
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
stewart-henry-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 69.78 KB) |
Aimee Feeman
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
aimee-feeman-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.06 KB) |
Barbara Gassmann
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
barbara-gassmann-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 115.12 KB) |
Carolyn McKittrick
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
carolyn-mckittrick-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 142.75 KB) |
David Henderson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
david-henderson-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 7.08 MB) |
Gary Franklin
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
gary-franklin-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 86.82 KB) |
Guy HcHugh
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
guy-hchugh-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 72.47 KB) |
Jamie Agland
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jamie-agland-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.23 KB) |
Jimmy Dejuousku
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jimmy-dejuousku-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.77 KB) |
Lois Bray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
lois-bray-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 245.85 KB) |
Maralyn Bennett
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
maralyn-bennett-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.23 MB) |
Maxwell Lindsay
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
maxwell-lindsay-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 59.4 KB) |
Mywhard Au Plessiv
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mywhard-au-plessiv-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 196.04 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.48 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-19-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 63.49 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-20-220223.pdf (PDF, 53.72 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-25-210223.pdf (PDF, 30.19 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-28-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 40.4 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-30-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 39.52 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-34-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.73 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-39-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 136.5 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-42-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 87.03 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-5-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-54-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 59.25 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 55.14 KB) |
Nathan Lewis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
nathan-lewis-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 117.68 KB) |
Paul Campbell
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paul-campbell-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.79 MB) |
Peter Davin
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
peter-davin-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.68 KB) |
Teresa Anne
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
teresa-anne-norris-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.54 KB) |
Wendy Mirande
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
wendy-mirande-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 87.38 KB) |
Robin King
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have concerns about the ongoing and perpetual impacts of soil air and water contamination in the water catchment area both in this locality and downstream to other localities. The contamination of our fertile soils and agricultural products. The impact on traffic and the already significant damaged roads. See more detail in attachment. |
Attachments |
document-4-2docx.docx (DOCX, 14.1 KB) |
Amanda Lewis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
amanda-lewis-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.51 MB) |
Donenico&Melissa Remeo
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
donenico-and-melissa-remeo_redacted.pdf (PDF, 96.71 KB) |
Ian Mattila
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
ian-mattila_redacted.pdf (PDF, 118.71 KB) |
John Oakes
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-oakes-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 117.08 KB) |
Kerry Davies
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
kerry-davies-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.6 KB) |
Michael Feeman
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
michael-feeman_redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.57 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 51.53 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-14-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 91.87 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-16-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 77.47 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 51.52 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-22-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.61 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-26-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.38 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 69.31 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-31-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 41.77 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-35-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.84 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-45-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 96.39 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-5-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.66 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-57-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 39.71 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-60-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.77 KB) |
Paul Taylor
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paul-taylor-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 108.75 KB) |
Phillip Marsh
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
phillip-marsh-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 131.27 KB) |
Richard Charles
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
richard-charles-sanders-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 59.94 KB) |
Rosslyn Thompson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rosslyn-thompson-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.18 MB) |
Stephen Mark
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
stephen-mark-lucock-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 77.11 KB) |
William Somerville
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
william--somerville-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 145.65 KB) |
Ashton Hendriks
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
ashton-hendriks-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 7.03 MB) |
Darren Kitchen
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
darren-kitchen-submission--170223redacted.pdf (PDF, 210.12 KB) |
Elizabeth Loneragan
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
elizabeth-loneragan-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 18.41 MB) |
Francis Madden
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
francis-r-madden-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 103.75 KB) |
James Percy
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
james-percy-thompson-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 242.98 KB) |
John William_Darcy
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-william-darcyredacted.pdf (PDF, 106.9 KB) |
Malcom Murray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
malcom-murray-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 11.1 MB) |
Michael Rupert
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
michael-rupert-marsh-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 94.92 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-13-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.51 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-15-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 66.94 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-18-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.94 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-24-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 77.53 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-27-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 41.15 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.95 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-33-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 51.58 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-37-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 83.83 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-40-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 52.24 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-48-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 39.96 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-52-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.55 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-6-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 72.67 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-63-210223.pdf (PDF, 227.64 KB) |
Natalie Merz
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
natalie-merz-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.2 MB) |
Peta Lockyer
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
peta-lockyer-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.96 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
20230221164953926-1_redacted.pdf (PDF, 72.26 KB) |
Sam Turnbull
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
sam-turnbull-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 82.51 KB) |
Siarhei Labuzay
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
siarhei-labuzay-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 75.52 KB) |
Swee Eng
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
swee-eng-chen-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.6 KB) |
Barrie Thistlethwayte
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
barrie-thistlethwayte-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.8 KB) |
Dermot Alexander_Wiley
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
dermot-alexander-wiley-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 107.29 KB) |
Gayford Thompson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
gayford-thompson-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 5.03 MB) |
Harpreet Singh_Bhatti
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
harpreet-singh-bhatti-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 79.89 KB) |
John Dipalo
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-dipalo-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 89.44 KB) |
Josephine Mills Dennis Kennewell
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
josephine-mills--dennis-kennewell-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.97 KB) |
Louise Windeyer
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
louise-windeyer-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.2 MB) |
MD Robinson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
md-robinson_redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.36 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-12-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.66 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-19-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 70.22 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-21-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 61.86 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-25-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.09 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-29-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.11 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-30-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 46 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-34-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 40.5 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.48 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-43-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 40.95 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-5-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 187.62 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-55-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-6-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.65 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 54.6 KB) |
Neville Castle
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
neville-castle-submission--150223redacted.pdf (PDF, 286.94 KB) |
Riawah Sridhata
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
riawah-sridhata-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 62.93 KB) |
Rosemary Francis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rosemary-francis-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.69 MB) |
Stefan Basson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
stefan-basson-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 69.15 KB) |
garry lynch
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
as a local land holder within the proposed mines lease area I wholly support the proposal as it will provide the local area with much needed employment in the local kandos /rylestone area there are no larger employers in this area the closest is in the ulan/wollar area which is a considerable distance away with regards to the environmental aspect i believe that all of the risks associated with the project have been addressed and the impact to the community would be minimal. as a business owner i have been associated with 4 separate greenfield mine applications and have witnessed the process required to get the project this far i first became involved with the project over 20 years ago doing rehabilitation works for silver standard also kingsgate finally working for bowdens silver over the last few years i have witnessed first hand the professional way that they have handled the exploration process i firmly believe that all environmental risks have been addressed properly as a business owner i look forward to continuing working for bowdens and growing my small business with them the local community would quite significantly improve in regards to local roads and infrastructure as a direct result of the approval of this project |
Amy Reece
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
amy-reece-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 219.13 KB) |
Bill Kempton
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
bill-kempton-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 156.62 KB) |
Christopher G_Demas
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
christopher-g-demas-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 78.73 KB) |
Dr_John Chong
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
dr-john-chong-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 109.29 KB) |
Kevin Alderson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
kevin-alderson-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 89.89 KB) |
Martin Grainey
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
martin-grainey-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 57.62 KB) |
Michael Murray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
michael-murray-pheils-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 99.63 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-11-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 106.22 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-12-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 6.92 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-17-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 66.03 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-23-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.93 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-26-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 88.93 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 72.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-32-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 48.65 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-36-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.96 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.94 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-46-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 47.73 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-50-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 40.19 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-58-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 74.47 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-61-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.05 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.1 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.78 MB) |
Pamela Dai_Madden
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
pamela-dai-madden-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.27 KB) |
Paula Kennedy
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paula-kennedy-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.05 MB) |
Ramie Camteui
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
ramie-camteui-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 76.89 KB) |
Robert Brittain
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
robert-brittain-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.45 KB) |
Ryan McGregor
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
ryan-mcgregor-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 111.68 KB) |
Sharyn Munro
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
sharyn-munro-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 138.57 KB) |
Steve Grozdamov
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
steve-grozdamov-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 48.67 KB) |
Adam Kosminski
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
adam-kosminski-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 106.32 KB) |
B Spencer
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
b-spencer-submission--150223redacted.pdf (PDF, 74.41 KB) |
Campbell Barnes
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
campbell-barnes-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 108.76 KB) |
David Denison
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
david-denison-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 149.92 KB) |
Elizabeth M_Dray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
elizabeth-m-dray-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 107.29 KB) |
Gregory Bray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
gregory-bray-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 248.33 KB) |
John William_Geisker
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-william-geisker_redacted.pdf (PDF, 103.92 KB) |
Matt Joy
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
matt-joy-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.35 MB) |
Michael Theodosiol
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
michael-theodosiol_redacted.pdf (PDF, 55.02 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.67 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-11-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.79 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-13-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.51 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-15-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.16 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-18-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 70.82 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-20-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 96.42 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-24-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.96 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-28-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.47 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-33-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 41.05 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-38-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.25 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-41-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 76.97 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-49-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 97.67 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-53-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.65 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-6-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.59 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 127.06 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.65 MB) |
Nataliya Spaska
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
nataliya-spaska-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.99 MB) |
Paul Amanda_Parker
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paul--amanda-parker-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.01 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
20230221164953926-5.pdf (PDF, 88.2 KB) |
Rosalyn Bray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
rosalyn-bray-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 264.6 KB) |
Simon Leary
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
simon-leary-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 44.23 KB) |
Warren DelGrande
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
warren-delgrande-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 58.08 KB) |
Amanda Lewis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
amanda-lewis-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 212.69 KB) |
Evan Lewis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
evan-lewis-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 85.47 KB) |
George Doublesin
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
george-doublesin-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 95.3 KB) |
Jason Adair
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jason-adair-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.6 MB) |
John Fitzerald
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-fitzerald-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 8.91 MB) |
Kathleen Armstrong
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
kathleen-armstrong_redacted.pdf (PDF, 60.05 KB) |
Mark Cof
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-cof-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.46 MB) |
Martin Carver
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
martin-carver-submission--200223redacted.pdf (PDF, 103.01 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 116.2 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 5.4 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-12-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 71.35 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-14-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-16-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 62.86 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 60.56 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-21-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 70.02 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-25-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 117.06 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-29-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 110.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-31-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 50.92 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-35-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 73.99 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 152.45 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-44-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.64 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-56-210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 38.99 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 6.99 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9-220223redacted.pdf (PDF, 52.68 KB) |
Nicholas Smith
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
nicholas-smith-220223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 86.97 KB) |
Richard Barton
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
richard-barton-submission--210223redacted.pdf (PDF, 7.01 MB) |
William Keating
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
william-keating-210223_redacted.pdf (PDF, 115.92 KB) |
Craig Flavel
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
South Australia |
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please find attached the presentation and reports summarising groundwater related matters. Considering the vague designs, outdated conclusions, misleading statements, potential consequences and the opportunity to create a 'roadmap' for similar approvals, I would be happy to discuss specifics of any of the matters raised. |
Attachments |
22001-bowdens-groundwater-review--pipeline-amendment-v40pdf.pdf (PDF, 1.75 MB) 22010ipcpresentationhydrogeologyv41pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 14.72 MB) attachment-5--fdp-review-combined4pdf.pdf (PDF, 504.31 KB) |
Angela Davis
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
angela-davis-submission--110223redacted.pdf (PDF, 110.15 KB) |
Brian Williams
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
brian-williams-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 125.5 KB) |
John Sanderson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-sanderson-submission--310123redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.62 KB) |
Kon Yap
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
kon-yap-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 112.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-12_redacted.pdf (PDF, 71.8 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-14_redacted.pdf (PDF, 69.46 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-4_redacted.pdf (PDF, 55.13 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-9_redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.24 KB) |
Walter Brunner
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
walter-brunner-submission--130223redacted.pdf (PDF, 105.19 KB) |
John Wood
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-wood-submission--130223redacted.pdf (PDF, 109.18 KB) |
Markus Pluss
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
markus-pluss_redacted.pdf (PDF, 43.73 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-11_redacted.pdf (PDF, 70.59 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-15_redacted.pdf (PDF, 64.61 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-8_redacted.pdf (PDF, 44.58 KB) |
Sanjay Mali
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
sanjay-mali_redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.3 KB) |
Simon Strauss
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
simon-strauss-submission--0902.pdf (PDF, 103.37 KB) |
Benjamin Spurgin
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
benjamin-spurgin-submission--310223.pdf (PDF, 25.19 KB) |
Jason Blomfield
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
jason-blomfield-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.29 KB) |
Mark Frewin
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-frewin-submission--140223redacted.pdf (PDF, 105.67 KB) |
Martin Croft
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
martin-croft-submission--130223redacted.pdf (PDF, 106.13 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-10_redacted.pdf (PDF, 50.3 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-7_redacted.pdf (PDF, 56 KB) |
Shane Noni_Buckland
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
shane--noni-buckland-submission--120223redacted.pdf (PDF, 91.67 KB) |
Greg Dowker
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
greg-dowker-submission--030223redacted.pdf (PDF, 128.67 KB) |
Lesley Frede_Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
lesley-frede_redacted.pdf (PDF, 45.66 KB) |
Mark Petterson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-petterson-submission--310123pdfredacted.pdf (PDF, 102.36 KB) |
Maryanne Roberts
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
maryanne-roberts-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 108.77 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-1_redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.17 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-2_redacted.pdf (PDF, 76.49 KB) |
Patricia Kempton
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
patricia-kempton_redacted.pdf (PDF, 279.97 KB) |
Robert
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
robert-submission--140223redacted.pdf (PDF, 108.24 KB) |
Alan Dale
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
alan-dale_redacted.pdf (PDF, 242.26 KB) |
Chand
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
chand--shiw-ramredacted.pdf (PDF, 67.66 KB) |
Janine Modaro
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
janine-modaro-submission--310123redacted.pdf (PDF, 85.98 KB) |
Marjorie DeCaux
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
marjorie-decaux-submission--010223redacted.pdf (PDF, 112.91 KB) |
Martin Breen
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
martin-breen-submission--080223redacted.pdf (PDF, 122.6 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-13_redacted.pdf (PDF, 96.3 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-16-_redacted.pdf (PDF, 56.98 KB) |
Paul Koda
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
paul-koda-submission--100223redacted.pdf (PDF, 104.44 KB) |
Peter Maroudas
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
peter-maroudas-submission--14223redacted.pdf (PDF, 109.78 KB) |
Scott Boehm
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
scott-boehm-submission--010223redacted.pdf (PDF, 76.68 KB) |
Will Harrison
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
will-harrison-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 106 KB) |
Glenn Birznieks
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
glenn-birznieks-submission--080223redacted.pdf (PDF, 129.27 KB) |
James Murnane
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
james-murnane-submission--010223redacted.pdf (PDF, 102.03 KB) |
John Patrick_Gallagher
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
john-patrick-gallagher_redacted.pdf (PDF, 62.72 KB) |
James Stubbings
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
james-stubbings_redacted.pdf (PDF, 75.21 KB) |
Mark Qui
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
mark-qui-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 107.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-3_redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.83 KB) |
Tarmo Rae
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
tarmo-rae_redacted.pdf (PDF, 46.76 KB) |
Chris Lake
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
chris-lake-submission--130223redacted.pdf (PDF, 59.21 KB) |
Donald Fisher
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
donald-fisher-submission--010223redacted.pdf (PDF, 83.68 KB) |
Hugh Doug_Jones
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
hugh-doug-jones-submission--090223redacted.pdf (PDF, 109.53 KB) |
Melissa Lameri
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
melissa-lameri_redacted.pdf (PDF, 77.38 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
name-redacted-6_redacted.pdf (PDF, 72.01 KB) |
Peter McNally
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
peter-mcnally_redacted.pdf (PDF, 63.26 KB) |
Ross Hawkins
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
ross-hawkins-submission--120223redacted.pdf (PDF, 110.37 KB) |
Stephen Brushe
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
stephen-brushe-submission--080223redacted.pdf (PDF, 114.71 KB) |
Tony Wright
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
|
Attachments |
tony-wright-submission--080223redacted.pdf (PDF, 110.06 KB) |
Kara Statham
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am neither for or against the mine but I do have a reasonable amount of concerns in regards to our health if this proceeds |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
De Beaurepaire Wines |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Comment |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are a significant business in the local region. We are strong proponents of sustainable agriculture and protection of the environment. At the same time, we are well aware of the significant impact on employment from the closure of the Kandos Cement Works and Clandulla coal mines. It is important to acknowledge that this project offers a significant economic boost to the region. A project of this scale and nature will raise several important issues, especially related to environmental and societal impacts. Because of this we would expect that the various regulating authorities will have undertaken intense review of these issues, and the required processes and outcomes; and put in place controls to address each of these areas. We seek reassurance that this is actually the case. Naturally we are concerned about the environmental and health impacts, especially from lead dust and water contamination. We specifically seek reassurance in these areas. We are also concerned about the potential impact on tourism for two reasons. 1. Visible environmental degradation, and 2. Significant media coverage of these issues |
ID | Name | Date | Submission |
---|---|---|---|
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Margot White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amanda Carkagis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Nick King | 24/02/2023 | ||
David Parry-Okeden | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amy Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Isabella Wightman | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sophia Derkenne | 24/02/2023 | ||
Diane O'Mara | 24/02/2023 | ||
Libby Combes | 24/02/2023 | ||
Julie Watt | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kate Newbould | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Alannah Dawson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Penny Galligan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Juile Hunter | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jorja Bentley | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rosemary Hadaway | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Tony Goninon | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kate White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Simon McKittrick | 24/02/2023 | ||
Janet Walk | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Radzievic | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Rob Wannan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Bruce Christie | 24/02/2023 | ||
Barry Noller | 24/02/2023 | ||
Lauren Freestone | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Janet Burstall | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Anne Newell | 24/02/2023 | ||
Will Gilbert | 24/02/2023 | ||
Emma Wisser | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Amber Norton-Knight | 24/02/2023 | ||
Chris Schmidt | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gina White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Hilary Crawford | 24/02/2023 | ||
Georgina Pollard | 24/02/2023 | ||
Darren Baguley | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sonia Christie | 24/02/2023 | ||
Trina Karstrom | 24/02/2023 | ||
Luciana Smink | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Georgina Pollard | 24/02/2023 | ||
Andrew White | 24/02/2023 | ||
William Brown | 24/02/2023 | ||
Graham Newell | 24/02/2023 | ||
Lucy White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Margaret Doble | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer Wingham | 24/02/2023 | ||
Beverley Smiles | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Judy Smith | 24/02/2023 | ||
Dean Knott | 24/02/2023 | ||
Les Wingham | 24/02/2023 | ||
Chris Pavich | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jack White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Philip Carkagis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Annie Crofts | 24/02/2023 | ||
Eloise Bartlett | 24/02/2023 | ||
Frank Sexton | 24/02/2023 | ||
Peter Logan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Margaret Cameron | 24/02/2023 | ||
Pat Casey | 24/02/2023 | ||
Robert, Juliana and Liam Heslop | 24/02/2023 | ||
GRAEME SALT | 24/02/2023 | ||
Annie Hood | 24/02/2023 | ||
Bill Lawson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Charlotte Kilmartin | 24/02/2023 | ||
Carole Donaldson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Hunter White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Richie Inglis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael White | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Anna White | 24/02/2023 | ||
LUE STATION LUE STATION | 24/02/2023 | ||
Marcus Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Samantha Sutherland | 24/02/2023 | ||
Phil Cameron | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Yasmin Hannouf | 24/02/2023 | ||
Joanne Irvine | 24/02/2023 | ||
Christiana O'Regan | 24/02/2023 | ||
Molly Gilbert | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Emanuel Rakis | 24/02/2023 | ||
Shireen Baguley | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Craig Flavel | 24/02/2023 | ||
Tom Combes | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Armon Hicks | 24/02/2023 | ||
Yasmin Hannouf | 24/02/2023 | ||
Robert Bleach | 24/02/2023 | ||
David Guilfoyle | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Beverley Smiles | 24/02/2023 | ||
Louise Doble | 24/02/2023 | ||
Sue Higginson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Luke Golden | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
THORNBURY VINEYARD THORNBURY VINEYARD | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stephen Swain | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jayne Bentivoglio | 24/02/2023 | ||
Isabel Butron | 24/02/2023 | ||
Jenny Kerr | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Iris Simpson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Margaret Sewell | 24/02/2023 | ||
Justin Petersen | 24/02/2023 | ||
Frank Fulham | 24/02/2023 | ||
Manuela Schuster | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Radzievic | 24/02/2023 | ||
Wendy Sandilands | 24/02/2023 | ||
Dan Hood | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gary Rush | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Virginia Hackney | 23/02/2023 | ||
Deborah Clear | 23/02/2023 | ||
ALAN HISLOP | 23/02/2023 | ||
greg viney | 23/02/2023 | ||
Clare Hamilton | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Christopher Field | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Marion Crossman | 23/02/2023 | ||
Lara Altimira | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Stuart Donaldson | 23/02/2023 | ||
Lisa Harrold | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer Wiggers de Vries | 23/02/2023 | ||
Anthony O'Reilly | 23/02/2023 | ||
Carolyn Learoyd | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Mossy Rock Alapcas | 23/02/2023 | ||
Paddy Morse | 23/02/2023 | ||
Kyla Starks | 23/02/2023 | ||
Peter Bentivoglio | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Mudgee Wine Association | 23/02/2023 | ||
Michael Norman | 23/02/2023 | ||
Lucy Meagher | 23/02/2023 | ||
Donna White | 23/02/2023 | ||
Matilda Symonds | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Brayden Mills | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Sharelle Fellows | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Deirdre Leslie | 23/02/2023 | ||
Stuart Eaton | 23/02/2023 | ||
Samuel Evans | 23/02/2023 | ||
Robert Loneragan | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Jodi Fekkes | 23/02/2023 | ||
Evie Hood | 23/02/2023 | ||
Matthew Jessop | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Patricia Amos | 23/02/2023 | ||
Jason Crawford | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Katie Thompson | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Scarlett Keddie | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Ian Preece | 23/02/2023 | ||
Luke Cameron | 23/02/2023 | ||
Judith Brown | 23/02/2023 | ||
Miriam Siebel | 23/02/2023 | ||
James Street | 23/02/2023 | ||
Katherine Thomson | 23/02/2023 | ||
James Brett Nutting | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Brian Clear | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Will Cannon | 23/02/2023 | ||
Melissa Hart | 23/02/2023 | ||
Hilary Guilfoyle | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Mark Barnes | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Barbara Sullivan | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Steve Ledger | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Robert Griffits | 23/02/2023 | ||
Peter Grieve | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Evie Hood | 23/02/2023 | ||
Rowan Mills | 23/02/2023 | ||
Kelly Wanrer | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Patrick Morse | 23/02/2023 | ||
Geoffrey Symonds | 23/02/2023 | ||
Elodie Delwaide | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Mudgee Wine Association | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer More | 23/02/2023 | ||
Robbin Binks | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Michael Southan | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Will Cameron | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Matthew Brown | 23/02/2023 | ||
Anne-Marie Raymond | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
jamie inglis | 22/02/2023 | ||
Michael Boller | 22/02/2023 | ||
Lorie Porter | 22/02/2023 | ||
Sarah and Peter Onions | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Phyllis Setchell | 22/02/2023 | ||
Annabel Combes | 22/02/2023 | ||
Sarah Page | 22/02/2023 | ||
Craig Palmer | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Maureen Boller | 22/02/2023 | ||
James Lefever | 22/02/2023 | ||
Robert and Diane Page | 22/02/2023 | ||
Megan Bennetts | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Emily Gilbert | 22/02/2023 | ||
Richard Horton | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Lizzy Hewitt | 22/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer Dixon | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Kevin Turner | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Carolyn barlow | 22/02/2023 | ||
Neil Woolley | 22/02/2023 | ||
Joel Morrison | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Stephanie Gordon | 22/02/2023 | ||
Julia Love | 22/02/2023 | ||
Grahame Hackney | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Debbie-ann Stettin | 22/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Gordon | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Janette Mills | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Rod Pryor | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
James White | 22/02/2023 | ||
bruce brew | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Ms A T Combes | 22/02/2023 | ||
Anthea Nicholls | 22/02/2023 | ||
Ted Combes | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Stevan Pekar | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Nicole Browne | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Alison BARKER | 21/02/2023 | ||
Jennifer Lloyd | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Tony Miskle | 21/02/2023 | ||
John Smidmore | 21/02/2023 | ||
Rebecca Bruton | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Sarah Inglis | 21/02/2023 | ||
Peter Combes | 21/02/2023 | ||
Miroslav Pekar | 21/02/2023 | ||
Helen Kristensen | 21/02/2023 | ||
Elizabeth Hunter née Howe | 21/02/2023 | ||
Jade Miskle | 21/02/2023 | ||
Michael Radzievic | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Jacob Stein | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Alyssa Pekar | 21/02/2023 | ||
Alexandra McCalman | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Rebecca Guilfoyle | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Lidija Pekar | 21/02/2023 | ||
Sarah McDaniel | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Merren Turnbull | 21/02/2023 | ||
Brad Wood | 21/02/2023 | ||
Felicity Griffits | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Sally Dribbus | 21/02/2023 | ||
Lachie Mcphie | 21/02/2023 | ||
Allan Leonard | 21/02/2023 | ||
Bradley Bliss | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Barry Walsh | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Kim Cummins | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
FERNTREE GULLY RESERVE LAND MANAGER :SUE Pridmore (secretary) | 21/02/2023 | ||
Michelle Pretty | 21/02/2023 | ||
Cameron Dribbus | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Bill Miskle | 21/02/2023 | ||
Philip Carkagis | 21/02/2023 | ||
Peter Bruton | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Jane Friend | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Rob Gregory | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Emily Wallace | 20/02/2023 | ||
Robert Smith | 20/02/2023 | ||
Nicola Boud | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Jacquelyn Johnson | 20/02/2023 | ||
Alexandra Cole | 20/02/2023 | ||
Dallas Rheinberger | 20/02/2023 | ||
JOHN LONERAGAN | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Olivia Ritchie | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Fred Wheeler | 20/02/2023 | ||
Hannah Bruton | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Joe Newham | 20/02/2023 | ||
Douglas Robertson | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
David Matthews | 20/02/2023 | ||
Karen Maccallum | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Rainer Rhedey | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Manon Garnock | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Tim Rohr | 20/02/2023 | ||
Lynda Tooth | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Simone Kurtz | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Kate McKittrick | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Julia Tierney | 20/02/2023 | ||
Anita Hood | 20/02/2023 | ||
Scott Miller | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Kurtz | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Toby Meagher | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Watershed Landcare | 20/02/2023 | ||
Malcolm Kurtz | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
John Lowe | 20/02/2023 | ||
Owen Kearns | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Ken Birk | 20/02/2023 | ||
Nicola Robertson | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
julie lawson | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Bethany Greenfield | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Peter Serov | 19/02/2023 | ||
Andrew Channon | 19/02/2023 | ||
Tiffany Lazarus | 19/02/2023 | ||
Therese Massa | 19/02/2023 | ||
Francis Ravel Harvey | 19/02/2023 | ||
Gerald Norton-Knight | 19/02/2023 | ||
Phillip Ridge | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Jolanta Nejman | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Peter Rejto | 19/02/2023 | ||
Andrew Miller | 19/02/2023 | ||
Julie Lewis-Phillips | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Ann Finegan | 19/02/2023 | ||
Simon Ward | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Ross Mayberry | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Dr Meredith Martin | 19/02/2023 | ||
Kirsty Fuller | 19/02/2023 | ||
Bernadette Harvey | 19/02/2023 | ||
Alison Anderson | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Helen Doble | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Edward Miller | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Janie rothery | 18/02/2023 | ||
Susie and Allan Bennett | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Georgia Flynn | 18/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Kelsall | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Toby Anderson | 18/02/2023 | ||
Anne-Marie WOODS | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Sally MacNally | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Andrew Curro | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Nicki Ashton | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Ash Rooklyn | 17/02/2023 | ||
Paul Galasso | 17/02/2023 | ||
Mick Radzievic | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Georgia Goninan | 17/02/2023 | ||
Simone Keith | 17/02/2023 | ||
Donald Recsei | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Abby Pfahl | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Brendon Flynn | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Annabelle Lehmann | 17/02/2023 | ||
Ben Nagel | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
ROGER CULL | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
liz mayberry | 17/02/2023 | ||
William Oliver | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
William Woods | 17/02/2023 | ||
Sophie Powell | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Robyn Webster | 17/02/2023 | ||
Lucy Robertson | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Emma Hayne | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Olivia Griffiths | 17/02/2023 | ||
Hugh and Leigh Hodgkinson | 17/02/2023 | ||
Mick Radzievic | 17/02/2023 | ||
Ken Jackson | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Penny Walker | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Louise Windeyer | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
David Hislop | 17/02/2023 | ||
Stefan Puskar | 16/02/2023 | ||
Aaron Jones | 16/02/2023 | ||
Claudia Hamilton | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Jason Althofer | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Isabel Trevena | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Amanda Monteith | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Diana Ridge | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Alexandra Ruse | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Maree Bensley | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
sandie baggett | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Jessica Rasmus | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Samuel Johansen | 16/02/2023 | ||
Toby Simpson | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Fiona Sim | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Meaghan Anderson | 16/02/2023 | ||
Janine Modaro | 16/02/2023 | ||
Paige Adams | 16/02/2023 | ||
Scott Terry | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Camilla Ashworth | 16/02/2023 | ||
Hayley Plummer | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Barbara Hickson | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Charlotte Bensley | 16/02/2023 | ||
Lyndall Simpson | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Sarah Scott-fell | 16/02/2023 | ||
Nicola Matthews | 16/02/2023 | ||
Heidi Noonan | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Bryden Williams | 15/02/2023 | ||
Diana MacDonald | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Stuart Hough | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Amy D | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Sabina White | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Stella Reeve | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Thibaut Irissou | 15/02/2023 | ||
shaz tinant | 15/02/2023 | ||
Toby Loneragan | 15/02/2023 | ||
Chantal Fuller | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
SAMANTHA IRISSOU | 15/02/2023 | ||
Mick Radzievic | 15/02/2023 | ||
Hannah Kadi | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Monique Carroll | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Caroline Mills | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Amy Munro | 15/02/2023 | ||
Lucy Smith | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Bobbie White | 15/02/2023 | ||
David Lynch | 15/02/2023 | ||
David White | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
harry white | 15/02/2023 | ||
Jodie Hellmich | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Teena Wright | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Scott FitzGerald | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Lucinda Jones | 15/02/2023 | ||
rhiannon peden | 15/02/2023 | ||
Tim Mckay | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Michael Gill | 15/02/2023 | ||
Rebecca Daniell | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Eliza Mackinnon | 15/02/2023 | ||
Kate Marsh | 15/02/2023 | ||
Lauren Willmot | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Neil Matthews | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Sally Killoran | 14/02/2023 | ||
Joanne Miskle | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Elizabeth Cremonese | 14/02/2023 | ||
Debra and Gregory Bush | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Angela Perry | 14/02/2023 | ||
Fiona Sinclair | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Tahlia Jameson | 14/02/2023 | ||
Tempe Onus | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Gus Armstrong | 14/02/2023 | ||
Robert Bingley-Pullin | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Julie and David Cockerill | 14/02/2023 | ||
Shinaye Burrows | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Chris Meyer-Williams | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Claire Windeyer | 14/02/2023 | ||
Wesse Jim field | 14/02/2023 | ||
Isha Menon | 14/02/2023 | ||
John Christie | 14/02/2023 | ||
Tristan Clark | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Jean Ellis | 14/02/2023 | ||
Christoph Veyder-Malberg | 14/02/2023 | ||
Bec Lever | 14/02/2023 | ||
John Forrest | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Ben O'Brien | 14/02/2023 | ||
Terry Burrows | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Jasper Williams | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Jonathon Manvell | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Nelida Pino | 13/02/2023 | ||
Martin O'Connell | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Desdemona Grudziens | 13/02/2023 | ||
Camila Cremonese | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Grace Macpherson | 13/02/2023 | ||
Mick Radzievic | 13/02/2023 | ||
Tim White | 13/02/2023 | ||
Carla Anderson | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Michael Maher | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Peta Newsome | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Matthew Swain | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Carl Jefferys | 13/02/2023 | ||
Karen Randall | 13/02/2023 | ||
Juliette Wood | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Jacqueline Luty | 13/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Anderson | 13/02/2023 | ||
Jim Lefever | 13/02/2023 | ||
Judy O'Connell | 13/02/2023 | ||
Nicola Lennon | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Hayley Tillman | 13/02/2023 | ||
Natalie Merz | 13/02/2023 | ||
Maree O'Connell | 13/02/2023 | ||
Gabrielle Asprey | 13/02/2023 | ||
Kevin Fox | 13/02/2023 | ||
Hugh Piper | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Edwina McEgan | 12/02/2023 | ||
Gemma Swain | 12/02/2023 | ||
Ron Smith | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Lee Bibby | 12/02/2023 | ||
Julia Ruth Poissant | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Holly Manwaring | 12/02/2023 | ||
Anthony Maher | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Ho Ling | 11/02/2023 | ||
Alex Mateer | 11/02/2023 | ||
Ben Nichelsen | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Luke Poissant | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Vanessa Honzatko | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Bibi Liati | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Emily Kitcher | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Sam Miskle | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Jackie Conroy | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Alex Kitcher | 10/02/2023 | ||
Sue Makin | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Wendy Griffits | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Gilmour | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
David Sargeant | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Tony Miskle | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Peter Ericksen | 10/02/2023 | ||
Jo Oloughlin | 09/02/2023 | ||
David Pearson | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Stephen Boyle | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Cameron Anderson | 09/02/2023 | ||
Sam Hamilton | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Lynda Toohey | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
David Parry-Okeden | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
DEREK FINTER | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Olivia Mulic | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Joanne Warner | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Catherine Waldron | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Lucy Roberts | 05/02/2023 | ||
Katie Christie | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
John Clarke | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Peter Roberts | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
David Innes | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
SUZANA CHANDLER | 04/02/2023 | ||
John Olip | 04/02/2023 | ||
Jenny Johnson | 04/02/2023 | ||
DAVID CHANDLER | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Ray Massa | 03/02/2023 | ||
Lesley Robertson | 03/02/2023 | ||
mal cliff | 03/02/2023 | ||
Sue Pridmore | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Susan Barling | 02/02/2023 | ||
Brendon Flynn | 02/02/2023 | ||
Rob Crosby | 02/02/2023 | ||
Michelle Boardman | 02/02/2023 | ||
Craig Field | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Marcus Cremonese | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Janine Modaro | 28/01/2023 | ||
Gregory Modaro | 28/01/2023 | ||
Michael Boardman | 28/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Hamish Christie | 26/01/2023 | ||
Paul Evans | 19/01/2023 |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I object to the Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd mine project. The Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine. In reality, it will be a lead mine. It will produce more lead than silver, with project estimates of 95,000 tonnes of lead, 130,000 tonnes of zinc and 1,879 tonnes of silver. The project could have serious impacts on the health and livelihoods of the people, and the water in the district surrounding the mine. Mined product will be trucked on B-Doubles six days per week, from 7am to 6pm, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee. This will mean up to six B-Double truck movements along the Lue Road and through Mudgee per day, six days per week. This does not include obvious increases in worker and construction traffic, or additional supply materials including dangerous processing chemicals like cyanide, arsenic and antimony. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Today, the Lue Road is a key transport link for the local community and vital to the local tourism industry. The road is regularly used by cyclists and motorbikes, and increased heavy mine traffic will jeopardise the strong tourism reputation of the area. If Lue Road becomes busier and unsafe, tourists will opt to leave Mudgee via the Castlereagh Highway, bypassing the towns of Rylstone and Kandos. This could seriously impact the visitor economy in those areas. Bowdens wants to clear 457 hectares of land. Disturbance and fragmentation of critically endangered community, the Box Grassy Woodland, will occur, as well as major changes to ground and surface water flows. The effect of the mine on Koalas may be greater than the immediate impacted area, causing fragmentation to habitat and is likely at odds with the overall objectives of the NSW Koala Recovery Plan, including to reverse the decline of Koala numbers in NSW. As well as Koalas, the region is recognised as home to critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, and the endangered Small Purple Pea (swainsona recta). Of the 52 Aboriginal artefacts surveyed on the site, 25 will be destroyed if Bowdens proceeds with the mine. Have companies learnt nothing from Rio Tinto’s act of subjecting itself to worldwide outrage after it dynamited the caves in the Juukan Gorge in 2020? This was a significant blow to both Aboriginal and Australian history. Bowdens must learn. When it comes to Aboriginal heritage, hands off. Australians everywhere will fight for our First Nations’ right to have it’s way of life left undisturbed. This application must be rejected to preserve Aboriginal heritage in the area. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Save Lue and Mudgee from potential environment disaster. Please reject this project. For the only planet we have. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Rohr Partnership |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local resident I am opposed to the Bowden Mine because of its negative impact on the quality of air and water in the surrounding area. This impact can be far reaching via the waterways of the Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River. We cannot allow the contamination of our river system because once it happens the effects are long term and affect many in the community. I really hope these concerns are taken seriously and not put vibrant diversified region under threat . Thank you |
Michael White
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was speaker #7 at the Public hearing. The IPC has my presentation. Attached please find my Supplementary submission |
Attachments |
supplementarysubmissiontotheipcbymichaelwhite24february2023pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 494.08 KB) |
Margot White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please refer to my attached PDF submission. |
Attachments |
margot-white-submission-in-objection-to-ssd-5765pdf.pdf (PDF, 229.22 KB) |
Amanda Carkagis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Amanda Carkagis and my husband and I live at East Ridge, a property situated to the east of Bowdens, with the farm house approximately 3 kilometres from the proposed site. I strongly oppose the establishment of the mine as proposed by Bowdens Silver. I am very concerned that dust blown from the mine site will contaminate our drinking water which is collected from the house and shed roofs. Any heavy metal contamination will pollute our drinking water and render it undrinkable. Our family and grandsons will have no access to fresh drinkable water. This would effectively make our property uninhabitable and greatly reduce its value. I am concerned that any airborne contaminants, particularly lead will affect our olive grove and render the business unviable. The business was established in 2003 and consistently produces award winning olive oil every year. Any detectable levels of lead or other heavy metals in the Extra Virgin Olive Oil from our grove would make the olive oil unsaleable, thus effectively closing the business. The property value will decrease considerably if the olive grove is no longer viable. Our property, East Ridge, is currently in an area zoned general rural and part of its attractiveness is the peace and quiet afforded by its isolation and outlook. Noise from the site will be a significant factor in the amenity of the area. Modelling may suggest that the noise produced from the mine site, particularly at night, will be very low. To the human ear, the current level of background noise is so low that any increase will be very significant and disturbing. This will have an enormous impact on the quality of life that we currently enjoy. Because of the significant and enduring effects to our property and business, I request that Bowdens Silver purchase our property, East Ridge, before any mining operations commence. I am concerned about the increased traffic on the Lue Road given the planned movement of trucks to transport the ore from the mine site. The road between Rylstone and Mudgee is a narrow and winding rural road with a poor road surface which is regularly patched and filled when potholes develop. It is has poor alignment in places and narrow bridges. Increased heavy vehicle movement will only add to the current hazards of driving between Lue and Mudgee and will lead to an increased risk of major accidents and loss of life. I believe that having the tailings dam with no secondary wall to contain the trapped cyanide, cadmium, arsenic, zinc and lead in the event of a wall leak or breach will present an unacceptable risk to the environment. The village of Lue is directly downstream of the dam. Any contamination of Lawsons Creek will affect all the properties between Lue and Mudgee and beyond. This presents a short term financial gain for mine owners with little regard for current and future generations that will live in the vicinity or downstream of the site. The Box Gum woodland that would be destroyed establishing the mine is home to critically endangered species which are identified under state and federal legislation. It would seem that there is no regard given to our local environment and the fauna living in the vicinity. With no plans for remediation of the site it will remain a waste land for generations. With the current focus on silicosis and the demonstrated reluctance for companies to adequately suppress dust, the amount of water required to adequately control the spread of dust and contaminants from the proposed site is significant. The volumes of ground water required are large and will have a significant affect on the availability of ground water in the area. Our water bore which is used for olive production will be affected and will quite possibly be dry when water is extracted for mining operations. The area around Mudgee is a premier tourist destination and the road via Lue, between Rylstone and Mudgee is a well-travelled path every weekend. The mines at Wilpinjiong and Ulan show that the landscape is irrevocably changed for the worse and is anything but attractive countryside to enjoy. The loss of tourist revenue in Mudgee, Rylstone and Lue will be significant and will exceed the suggested income that a mine with limited employment will produce. As a nearby resident who has worked in and enjoyed the area for over twenty years, establishment of the mine will effectively destroy our enjoyment and amenity of the area, render our property uninhabitable for my family and grandchildren and degrade the environment for generations to come. |
Nick King
Organisation |
Central West Environment Council |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Central West Environment Council objects to the proposed mine because of the unmitigated impacts on biodiversity, water, air quality and other industries through poor recommended conditions, poor cost benefits analysis and no assessment of alternatives. A detailed submission is attached. |
Attachments |
230224cwecobjectiontossd5765pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 235.88 KB) |
David Parry-Okeden
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Further to my previous submission on the effects of lead contamination on animals, I submit the following points . VETERINARY OPINION ONLY I would like to stress that this statement is made only as a qualified veterinarian of over 50 years experience. My submission is based only on my experience as a veterinarian and in no way should be taken to include human health. For example I will address the effects of minor lead intake on animal reproductive organs, (testes /ovaries) and animal fertility. I do not draw any inference to human reproductive organs or fertility. I am not a human doctor and I am not qualified to comment on lead poisoning in humans. EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS The EIS quotes average, mean, weather conditions and does not account for the extreme cases of fire, flood and drought that we regularly experience. It has been claimed by the applicant that these extremes of weather are infrequent. One way or another they have been frequent if irregular over the 50 years that I have lived in Mudgee. The risk of air and water pollution by lead is real and relevant to the EIS. AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT The EIS and the information provided by the DPE Assessment Report declares that there will be no lead contamination and no transfer of lead contaminated dust from the site to the community. The transcripts of the recent hearing records Prof Mark Taylor’s answer to a question from the commissioners. He stressed that lead contamination is a risk. He stated that contamination occurs from facilities that do not include smelters. He gave Broken Hill as an example. I refer to: Table 7.8 in the air quality assessment - RAMBOLL AUSTRALIA P/L REPORT No 429/25, shows predicted lead levels through the years as being below the goal of .5ug/cubic metre. They do not reveal how they came by these predicted figures. Did they take into account the variable and extreme weather conditions and the inevitable risks attached to lack of water for future dust suppression? I believe that the DPE Assessment is flawed in this respect and lead contamination of the area is a risk. Domestic animals, farm animals, wild animals, birds, bees and native insects will be at risk. These risks have not been addressed by the EIS nor the DPE Assessment Report as required by the SEARS agricultural assessment: Specific issues- Land - “Agricultural impacts of the development AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS LEAD POISONING IN ANIMALS Further to my previous written submission 1. The effects of lead on reproduction of animals is well documented. Domestic animals reach puberty at early age; testicular function, sperm production and fertility can be affected by skin contact, breathing and digestion of lead. For example the testicles of pet dogs owned by mine workers could be particularly affected. Those workers should be particularly cautioned to have no contact with pets when returning home. The pets should have no contact with dust from boots, vehicles, clothing or anything from the mine that may bring the animals into contact with lead contamination and dust. These matters have not been addressed by the EIS. The applicant has spoken of alarm in the community. I believe the community, including many of my clients AND THEIR INSURERS, will be genuinely concerned should lead poisoning of pets come to pass as it has around other lead mines world-wide. 2. Lead is one of the four contaminants specifically listed in the LPA fact sheet. The Livestock Production Assurance (LPA) program is the on-farm assurance program that underpins market access for Australian red meat. LPA National Vendor Declarations (NVDs) provide evidence of livestock history and on-farm practices when transferring livestock through the value chain.Property risk assessments ensure the integrity of the meat we produce, guaranteeing it's safe and of high quality. If livestock encounter persistent chemicals, the meat produced may contain unacceptably high chemical residues, impacting on food safety and market access. Repercussions of selling livestock with unacceptable levels of persistent chemicals or physical contaminants, may include failure to be paid for the livestock, and possible legal liability for the resulting costs faced by processors and the rest of the supply chain. These matters should be included under agricultural assessment of the EIS as set out in SEARS. https://www.integritysystems.com.au/globalassets/isc/pdf-files/lpa-documents/lpa-factsheets/property-risk-assessment-factsheet-and-checklist.pdf A sample of the NVD referred to in Jack White’s presentation can be downloaded at https://www.integritysystems.com.au/globalassets/isc/pdf-files/lpa-documents/nvds/sample_cattle-nvd-0720.pdf 3. BEES: Bees are a significant agricultural enterprise, both as honey producers and as pollinators of orchards and other agricultural crops. THE APPLICANT DOES NOT INDICATE HOW BEES CAN BE KEPT AWAY FROM THE TAILINGS DAMS. Neither the EIS nor the Assessment have addressed this issue. Prof Mark Taylor in a recent study showed that bees are affected by lead. They grow with smaller heads. Cognitive impairment results in loss of memory and affected bees can not find their way home to the hive. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Volume 212, 1 April 2021, 112008 “Chronic exposure to trace lead impairs honey bee learning” HIGHLIGHTS OF PAPER • Agrochemicals have been identified as important causes of pollinator declines. • But major pollutants, like metallic trace elements, have received less attention. • We exposed honey bee colonies to field-realistic concentrations of lead in food. • Treated bees had reduced head size and cognitive performances. • These sublethal effects, at trace levels, can impact populations and pollination. 4. Other pollinators Although not as significant as bees, often travel further and often play an additional role in agriculture. They have not been addressed by the EIS and would have uncontrolled access to the mine and Butterflies Moths Birds Bats 5. Page 78 of the Assessment report “AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS” It is stated: In relation to potential impacts on farm animals and agricultural produce from lead, EnRisks calculated the level of lead that might accumulate in cattle and therefore by present in meat and milk and determined that the levels would be more than 5,000 times lower than the maximum levels of metal contaminants for produce in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. EnRisks also determined that contributions of lead to soil and water would be negligible, with the incremental increase in lead in agricultural soil at the maximum impacted receptor as a result of the project predicted to be below the detection limit for lead in soil (and deposition decreasing with increasing distance from the mine site). I can find no details in the assessment or EIA to substantiate how these risk calculations were arrived at. There does not appear to be a copy of the Enrisks report in the public domain. I am told by Enrisks that the report was prepared for Bowdens. (were apiaries considered?) |
Amy Bentivoglio
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Amy Bentivoglio IPC Submission 2023 Bowden’s Mine The reasons why I object to Bowden’s Mine approval are 1. My family’s home is in Monivae and within the Lue district and close to Bowden’s Mine site. 2. I visit and work sometimes with my parents at Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press 5km from the mine site - My family will be affected by noise, light, toxic dust, odour from the mine and tailings storage facility and the ore dumps. 3. The mine will mine lead, cadmium, arsenic, zinc and silver and I am very concerned that my 4 children who are aged 6 years, 4 years and 3 years and 14 months will be affected by lead exceedances and breath the free silica dust. 4. Lead and silica dust cannot be seen or smelled and can cause permanent irreversible brain damage, in young people and silicosis in children and adults. The lead will lay down inside the growth plates of my children’s bones first and will cause major long bone growth abnormalities. 5. If the mine goes ahead my parents will not be able to live in the family home any longer due to the contamination of Lead and Silica dust and the risk to their health and will be forced to move and their home of 26 years and their business will be un-saleable. 6. My parent’s planned inheritance and succession with my brothers will be destroyed by Bowden’s mine. 7. We planted our olive trees 25 years ago, to stay in the ground for more than 300 years as in Italy they produce olives and olive oil up to 1000 years! Producing healthy extra virgin olive oil. This will all be destroyed. 8. The Carbon sink generated by the olive trees will cease. This is a bad outcome for CO2 emissions and Australia’s climate change policy. 9. No one will purchase my parents home, olive grove and olive processing plant and if they are able to sell it will have no value. 10. Bowden’s have not discussed any acquisition or compensation. 11. My wife and I, our children and my parents will be in danger driving on the Lue Road. There will be at least one truck per day of explosives on the Lue Road and over 100+ additional vehicles on the road. 12. The bore water will be inaccessible because the mine will lower the level of the water in all the bores in our area and my parents will be unable to pump water. 13. The drinking and irrigation dam water will be contaminated 14. The rainwater will be contaminated by lead. The lead will settle on the roof and be washed into all rainwater catchment tanks, the house tank alone under DPE recommendations to Bowdens approval will allow 52.9kg of total toxic dust per year and every year in our drinking water. 15. The bushland surrounding Lue and my family home where we walk and spend time will be destroyed by heavy metal dust and we will not be able to go into our grove with our children due to Bowden’s not being able to mitigate the dust. 16. The native wildlife will be scared away by blasting, vehicles, noise and activity and will die from contaminated heavy metal toxicity in the wild berries and our olive fruit and flowers. 17. The Regent Honey eater will surely be at risk due to their diet of flowers and native and cultivated fruits. 18. The creek will be contaminated and I will no longer be able to swim or enjoy the lovely areas along the creek, nor take my children to swim there, due to the DPE allowance of acid mine drainage leakage from the Tailings Dam into Lawsons Creek . 19. The impact of earthquakes due to the fault lines within the mine site is of a great concern particularly when Newcastle earthquake can be used as an example of the exacerbation of mining and drilling and the impact on Newcastle fault lines. 20. I am concerned about the Aboriginal heritage sites and I am certain that they will be destroyed, infact, Bowden’s have acknowledged 60 sites in mine and 25 at least will be destroyed. I am concerned about 1. Contaminated and heavy metal Dust in my children’s, my wife and my blood and my parents blood. 2. There will be No soft water rainwater anymore and dam water, where will the water come from to run my parents business? 3. Earthquakes? Fault lines everywhere through the mine site. 4. Contamination of Lawson Creek from Acid Mine Leakage from Tailings Dam and Waste Rock placement 5. There is no back up spillage catchment for the Tailings Dam and Waste Rock area. 6. The mine will be in production for 16.5 years, plus the rehabilitation of 7 years, however, Tony McClure stated at the IPC Public hearing that mining may continue for another 50years and the toxic dust risks and devastation to the environment will be left behind for hundreds of years. Thank you Amy Bentivoglio |
Isabella Wightman
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowden’s Silver mine due to the destruction of land, including endangered ecological groups, and the severe risk of water loss and contamination with hazardous substances such as lead. Lead contamination and poisoning is well documented and has a wide range of effects of humans. The ongoing water crisis in Michigan, USA is due to lead poisoning - let’s not be in the same position. In an area that is already vulnerable in terms of water supply, it would be foolish to open this mine which will use a incredible amount of water. I also object to this mine as the open cut nature poses a health and safety risk won many fronts - dust pollution, noise pollution (to surrounding area as well as animal life) and increased traffic. Further to this, how is the health and well-being of local Aboriginal people being considered? The destruction of land and manipulating of land for resources may negatively impact the wellbeing of Aboriginal people in terms of their connection to and care of Country. Who does this mine truly benefit? |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I spend time in this area. I love this area. The land, the open space, the traditional Australian farm houses dotted over the landscape. It's only 4.5 hours away from Sydney. It is also easy to stay in this area and then move onto the Hunter Valley or drive further west. We love staying at Camphill on the Rue Rue Road. We also participate in the Mudgee Classic Cycle Ride each year. If this development of an open cut mine was going to go ahead, I will chose not to visit this area of Rylestone and Mudgee. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi, My name is Emily French and I reside in Sydney but have been a long time visitor of the Rylstone / Lue region due to my partner and his family owning properties in the region. The Lue and Rylstone region can only be described as a pure unbothered scenic beauty of honest farms, small business and a thriving community which has so much more to offer than it already does. living in Sydney and being able to have the ability to visit these regions boasts a host of mental and physical benefits. from the crisp fresh air and the symphony of natural harmony, it truly cant be beaten. This brings me to the core of my objection argument, how can such a beautiful and tranquil environment be destroyed and tarnished for the sake of Bowdens Silver? Short answer, it cant. The Rylstone and Lue region is something every Australian should be immensely proud about, something that should be printed on postcards for the world to see, something everyone should try and visit, and most importantly, something that shouldn't be destroyed for the sake of a mine. I know that if the mine were to go ahead, visiting these areas would be something i couldn't do due to the negative impacts it would have on both my health and mental state. The NSW Government have an opportunity to pave the future here, they should do it in the way most Australian's would see fit, naturally. Do the right thing NSW Government, make the right choices, be proud of the land you have and keep it clean. The Future of natural beauty depends on you. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining industry is known for polluting the environment nearby the plant. and is also know for being greedy with water. I have concerns about this project and its repercussions on the region/locals. |
Sophia Derkenne
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed development wants to clear 457 hectares of land including areas of box grassy woodland which is a key habitat for koalas and other native species. This clearing of habitat is at direct odds with the Koala recovery plan, which is essentially as koala populations have become even more threatened since the black summer bushfires. The Bowden's mine proposal also acknowledges the exposure of community to lead. This is an enormous and untennable risk that even though acknowledged in the project proposal is based on inadequate data. The data relied upon by Bowdens in it’s EIS relating to air, dust and human health risks doesn’t properly capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. Lead poisoning is a serious issue with long term and insideous health effects including lower IQ/learning disabilities, lowered cognative function, delayed puberty and even cognitive and behavioural issures (remember leaded petrol???). This mine is going to be near Lue primary school and effect the agriculture of the community putting its members at risk. This land is Wiradjiri land and it holds sacred sites. Sacred sites. The mine development going ahead would destroy the cultural heritage of the area for few jobs and few returns. This would be another step away from healing and create not only damage to the physical health to the community but the cultural health as well. Would you knock down a church to build a mine? Please don't let this development go forward. |
Diane O'Mara
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed to this mine being opened as I consider the hazards associated with this mine are detrimental to the well-being and safety of our community and ithe natural environment. The hazards that this mine may cause are very disturbing The first of these is the risk of Acid Mine Drainage from the excavation of waste rock over a 77hectare site, and sealing the base of the entire waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. This does not fill me with confidence at all! Should this lining fail then acid water would contaminate the groundwater with downstream effects on Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. This means the water supply of Mudgee and Gulgong would all be affected, and very easily become a catastrophe. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. Further on of course the water ends up in the Burrendong Dam. The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from its base by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety on this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage including leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxicity such as lead are well-documented, having lifelong effects on children and unborn babies, and bringing on cognitive decline in adults. Another significant hazard is that of the mine site itself once operations have finished. The tailings dam and any other areas of toxicity will inevitably will leach into the surrounding environment, with repercussions on the health of people, animals and the ecosystem. There is no effective way in place of dealing with this with implications for livestock, farming and the products that make our region a top tourist area. Air pollution from lead dust is another hazard, and again is well documented. This too will threaten not just the population, but also the boutique agriculture products such as wine, olives vegetables and fruit. In my opinion these issues have not been properly addressed in the DPE Assessment Report |
Libby Combes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am a solicitor and a member of the Combes family who have been running the business of farming, agriculture and tourism on 'Lue Station' for over 100 years. My family's property is located only 2 kilometres from the proposed mine site. I grew up on 'Lue Station', and although do not live at Lue at present, I visit my family regularly who live at the property. I am deeply concerned about what the future will look like for me and my family if the Bowdens Lead mine is approved. This mine is the wrong mine in the wrong place. 1. CONTAMINATION. It is inevitable that there will be significant contamination risks to the water sources (Lawson's Creek) and the air. NO PEER REVIEW HAS BEEN CONDUCTED to assess these risks and it is completely unreasonable for a project to be considered without further assessments and tests being completed. The proposed construction of the tailings dam is INADEQUATE. It is designed to leak. How can a project be approved that accepts that it is a sure thing that toxic chemicals including lead will leak into the soil and water systems? There is no safe level of lead. WHY should the health of the Lue and Mudgee community be to the detriment of the mine? 2. AGRICULTURE AND TOURISM ARE AT RISK. WHY is a mining job more important than an agricultural job, than a tourism job, than the livelihoods of so many people living in the Lue and Mudgee district and surrounds. WHY do the lives of my family, my extended family, and the Lue/Mudgee community have to suffer at the expense of a mining company? It is the wrong mine in the wrong place. It is too close to the township of Lue. There is not sufficient water systems in place to support the operation of the mine. The tailings dam is inadequately designed. Acid mine drainage is a massive concern and was raised by so many speakers at the IPC Hearing last week. The project application is just not appropriate. Yours faithfully, Libby Combes |
Julie Watt
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
BOWDENS LEAD/ZINC/SILVER MINE This project has been a bit of a ‘sleeper’, ticking a long in the local background for many years, with changing owners, several assessment processes back and forth. Many thought this project had been shelved. So, it was a surprise to learn that it had ‘quietly’ progressed to the Independent Planning Commission stage. Like most members of the public, I’m no expert on mining and the intricate processes involved in extracting minerals from the earth. I also acknowledge there is a need to extract various minerals from the earth to produce the multitude of consumables the modern world needs. These minerals have to come from somewhere – we can’t be hypocritical NIMBYs. But I’m a firm believer that it's not about the action itself, it's about the intention and execution of that action. So like a lot of others, I’ve recently had a very steep learning curve on the Bowdens Silver Mine project and have spent a lot of time seeking out information – from both sides. Having sat in on the Public Hearing for several days and listened to experts from both sides of the fence I’ve come away with many concerns regarding the suitability, proposed methods of production and treatment of waste surrounding this project. These are outlined below. I’m also conscious that your time is precious, so rather than regurgitate reams of expert content (which you have read already) I’ll dot point my areas of concern. I should also add that I'm deeply invested in the food and wine culture of our town, having worked in many facets of the industry for over twenty years and respond predominately from this point of view. TOURISM • The tourism industry appears to have been completely overlooked in the assessment process. • Over 900 people are currently directly employed in the visitor economy in the Mid-Western Regional Council region (MWRC) • Bowdens are saying they will employ 131 people during construction and 210 on site for the period of 16.5 years, the active life of the mine. Are their mine jobs worth more than the existing tourism jobs? • In 2019 the region had 691K visitors, this grew to over 800K in 2021/’22. • Tourism is a very large part of our economy and is rapidly overtaking coal mining in terms of total regional earnings. • Our Mudgee Regional Tourism Inc. (MRTI) is a very proactive organisation with a unique structure (compared to other VICs in other councils) and they have many runs on the board. By now you will have heard that we have been awarded Top Tourism Town, not once but twice, in the last couple of years, this has never happened before. A measure of the love people have for the region. • MRTI have very successfully implemented the Mudgee Destination Plan and the next section of this plan is Wellness Tourism – strongly linked to Agritourism, Food and Wine, Health and Indigenous based tourism sections. • We are very concerned that tourism to our area will be forever damaged by the impacts this mine will have on the region’s natural beauty, with increased air, water, noise and visual pollution. • There have also been many concerns raised regarding the adverse implications for biodiversity and on waterways, bog sinks and natural springs in the area. • Dark sky tourism will be severely compromised for those in the surrounding areas because of the constant lighting of the site and vehicle movements. • Wine and food business will be forced to undertake testing of their products. This will alter their profitability and the current perception visitors to the region hold. • Accommodation providers will be required to ‘wet wipe’ walls, floors and surfaces to remove lead dust build up. As we know there is NO safe lead levels especially where children are concerned. • There are also concerns of road safety along the Lue Road, a well-travelled tourist route from Mudgee, through Rylstone and onto Kandos. This narrow winding road will be shared with over sixteen trucks a day, some carrying lead laden slurry, this could be a very dangerous situation. These trucks will pass though Mudgee and surrounds on their way to Botany Bay and to the train destined to Port Pirie. AGRICULTURE • We also have thriving agricultural, food and wine culture here in the MWRC region. • The local Mudgee Farmers’ Market is a community based NFP organisation. It is a prized tourist attraction but more importantly it’s a family affair, it’s locally based, it’s grass roots production, it’s predominately organic, it’s highly valued and it is uniquely ours! • Our guests and customers know our food products are lovingly handmade, small batch production, always locally grown, often originating from back yards, wild harvested or collaboratively grown. • This region is famous for its top-quality crops including, olives both table and oil, (internationally renowned) cherry production, pomegranates, figs, grapes for award winning wines, indigenous foods, stone fruits, vegetables and citrus. Along with cattle, sheep, poultry and pigs. • We are collectively worried about the affects this mine will have on these growers and producers, small and large, many of whom live close to the mine or along the relevant water courses such as Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. WATER CONCERNS • It appears the Lawson Creek cannot supply all the water requirements for this project as outlined. Bowdens themselves have admitted they will need to scale back during drought times. How will this affect the surrounding farmers’ water supply? • The potential for acid mine drainage seems very real. • How quickly can the mine react to bushfires and dust storms to effectively control all forms of pollution? • Nowhere in the world has the proposed 1.5 mm thick geo-tarp solution been used, nor tested in a mine of this size, the largest silver mine in Australia. What could possibly go wrong? • The Tailings Dam needs to be deep and NEVER overflow and NEVER leak. How can anyone guarantee the earth will not move or crack? Mudgee is full of houses with subsidence cracks! This dam straddles a major geological fault line (crack) above the water table at the beginning of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. • Bowdens have already recognized that leakage from this dam will continue after they have finished mining. What happens then, who becomes responsible then for contamination? • Already there is discussion on the surface area not being enough and having to widen this to achieve the required evaporation levels. Has this been allowed for dollar wise? • At the end of the project there is no plan to drain or remove the tailings dam, meaning it will remain there forever – a toxic legacy! • This project has not met the SEERS conditions – working it out ‘on the fly’ is not fair or safe for anyone. • We are very concerned the water modelling for this project in its current format has not been fully investigated. LEAD DUST CONCERNS • Dust travels!!! There may be so called ‘safeguards’ in place to limit dust travel, but dust by its very nature travels, check out any front verandah, roof or vehicle in the region! Anyone who has lived through the recent dust storms that travelled all the way to Sydney and across the Tasman will attest to this. • There are huge ramifications for Regional Producers, the fine particulate lead dust will get into the food chain in both Lue and further afield. • We saw how far smoke travelled in 2020, we saw how long it ‘sat’ in our region (over 63 days) we saw it roll in, in huge cascading waves and then suck out of our valleys. It was very visual! • That smoke was from the Gospers Mountain fire which was over 127 kms away. It was on our grapes, it was on our produce, this lead ladened filled dust will act the same way, depending on prevailing weather conditions. • The dust will also travel and infiltrate the fruit and vegetable crops grown in paddocks, back yards etc. • It will be concentrated up the food chain in the production of beef, eggs, lamb and pork. • Likewise for honey production – bees and other insects will transport the lead laden dust from flower to flower and then into the hives. Mudgee is known as the “land of wine and honey”. • The company has already admitted it will need to scale back water harvesting during drought, therefore not enough water for adequate dust suppression. • This project in my humble opinion is not ready for approval. There are many unanswered questions and untried ‘solutions’ to dealing with the waste products. I believe the assessment process is flawed and needs further investigation. God help the community of Lue with its unique little school, will they become another Bylong Valley, Wollar or Ulan Village situation? Bowdens have divided this community by acquiring or optioning certain critical properties, (a tried-and-true method) thus ‘starving’ out other residents. They purchased the local pub, further creating an ‘us and them’ culture. Will Lue suffer a ‘death by a thousand cuts’ a slow strangulation of a town till everyone is choked out and leaves – to become just a footnote in the pages of our history? This is just the thin edge of the wedge, they are already exploring further up this beautiful, agriculturally rich valley for gold and other minerals – please consider carefully the legacy this decision could leave. |
Attachments |
lue-leadpdf.pdf (PDF, 143.09 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please refer to uploaded file |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-project-pdf-email-copy-objection-2-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 77.66 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the proposed Bowdens mining operation at Lue because of the adverse immediate and long term threats to the surrounding communities, environment and thriving commercial activities. I am a frequent visitor to the NSW central west regions, including Mudgee and environs and was disappointed to learn that a consent approval had been granted in this area and that the mine owners’ claim the proposal is in-line with a non-existent NSW State policy. One can only presume that this reference is meant to be the State’s ‘Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy (2021)’. However, neither Bowdens nor the DPE have demonstrated how this mining proposal accords with the broader initiatives of the Strategy or a suitable balance between mining and community compensation for loss of quiet enjoyment and more importantly their livelihoods. Furthermore, I have always understood that strategies, policies and guidelines are subordinate to statutes. Therefore, have legislative changes been gazetted that support the initiatives of the Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy as they relate to the Bowdens mining proposal together with the supporting industry initiatives, such as, “improving assessment timeframes for mining projects and reducing red tape through the execution of the ‘Planning Reform Action Plan’”. Another disturbing aspect of the approval process I became aware of through casual contact was that the land owners that have been approached by the mining company for the purpose of land acquisition are not permitted to make public comments on the proposal without risking forfeiting their negotiation rights. This cannot be regarded a transparent process or afford them the opportunity to record their views or be represented. Many of the expert speakers against the proposal adequately demonstrated short comings in the proposal and where DPE has erred in its approval processes, including ignoring independent professional advice, reliance on dated standards and practices. To this end, I am concerned that compliance with the approval conditions will not be transparent and solutions will be re-active rather than pro-active and leave the community in disaster recovery mode when a foreseeable adverse event occurs. Accordingly, I re-affirm my opposition to the Bowdens mining proposal based on environmental, social, the lack of process transparency and acquiescence to government initiative at the expense of the community. |
Kate Newbould
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioner, RE: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT – BOWDEN’S SILVER My family moved to this region when I was 3. My parents left Sydney for a cleaner, healthier lifestyle and environment to raise their family. My sister and I grew up in the village of Lue, attending the local primary school. I returned to the city to continue studies as a teenager and to live and work. With similar motivations to my parents, I relocated back to Mudgee for my health and wellbeing at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. I am 39 years old and consider myself to be a pragmatic individual with deep concerns for our environment and the health and wellbeing of everyone in my local community. I am writing to object to the proposed Bowden's Silver Mine at Lue. I have outlined the reasons for my personal objections to the development below. The level of contention around this proposed development is extremely concerning to me. Without having the available time to read the volumes of varied expert reports and data around health, livelihood and environment, there really seems to be insufficient or clear solutions to some of the most fundamental issues or flaws in the proposal - one of the most short-sighted, for me personally, being the threat to our water supply, both in terms of the risk of acid seepage, and of course in terms of the volume of water required for the mine to actually operate. As a drought prone region, the effects of climate change are compounding year on year and the concept of running out of water for me is absolutely terrifying. Whilst the proposed development will provide some economic benefit to the region, I consider it to be secondary to the detrimental effects on local agriculture and the environment. I anticipate grave impacts on our local wildlife and bushland habitat which cannot easily adapt or recover and is permanent. Additionally, the issue of lead dust cannot be mitigated no matter how many reports are tabled and will flow into our rivers, water supply and homes. I note that the presentations by those in support of the mine focused largely on its importance and relevance in developing our rare earth minerals sector. I am not oblivious to what the future demands for certain minerals will be in terms of our advancing technologies and i do understand the value and significance of this, however the proximity of this lead mine to prime agricultural land and peoples homes and the threat to our ground and river water sources, our native animals and bushland is too great to ignore. I hope that the Commission makes the right decision. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing as I still have objections to the planned Bowdens Silver Mine, the most significant being the effects on the environment. The mine is proposed in an area which is known to have many sensitive plant and animal communities. I do not think offsets are enough as those areas already have their own communities of plants and animals to support, and any area being regenerated for this purpose will take hundreds of years to have hollows etc ready for animals to live in. It does not replace what we are losing over the next 15 years, even by clearing gradually. It is especially not enough to give Bowdens the option of just handing over money as compensation if they cannot acquire an appropriate offset site as mentioned in the report. If conditions are not met, they should not mine. The assessment report states areas affected by the 2019/2020 bushfires will be regenerated by the time the mine becomes active, but again, the hollows for the animals, the established tree cover and species numbers will not be back by then. Also where do those same animals go the next time we have fires, which will be catastrophically worse if flames cannot be kept away from flammables at the mine site. The chance of contamination is another cause for major concern as once the soil, air, or water is poisoned, it is too hard or impossible to fix, and the long term impact of the sinkhole and other issues is very worrying. There are other points to consider such as roads deteriorating quicker, pollution and heritage losses. However, once humans have made these plants and animals extinct, there is no getting them back again. Once we contaminate the planet, there is no fixing it. I do not think this project should be allowed to proceed. |
Alannah Dawson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Totally against the environmentally hazardous mining of more land in the mudgee region. Utterly awful. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Lateral Land |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to ask the IPC to refuse this project. The determinations set by the DPIE are neither based on complete information nor have in place realistic conditions that will adequately protect the local people, environment and tourism or agricultural businesses. We run a retreat centre near Rylstone. Many of our visitors follow the ‘tourist trail’ to Mudgee… right through the area of the proposed mine. As it is, the roads are not suitable for large vehicles. The mine will bring workers, large trucks carrying toxic loads and a complete change to the character that attracts people to visit. This will no longer be a desirable trip. They will stop coming. Local businesses will lose, tourism will lose and all those directly and indirectly employed. The economic review does not consider any of the negative financial impacts of proposed mine. It barely mentions tourism, one of the most vibrant local industries. As the review is not complete it is therefore worthless. In fact, the economic review does not adopt the advice of the departments’ own consultant, but rather accepts Bowdens' position instead. How can this be considered accurate information upon which to base a crucial decision – only taking one side of the argument? Of most concern, is that the Department of Planning have not fully considered nor calculated the impact of the mines’ water usage or the reality of accessing the water they need. Simply put, the project doesn't have sufficient water. Nor do they have a feasible plan of getting enough. In drought, the land already suffers, Lawsons creek goes dry. Climate models show this will only get worse. There is no realistic way they can operate without devastating local water flows and all that relies on them downstream. Nor are health concerns sufficiently addressed. Dust particles carrying lead and heavy metals can not be guaranteed to be contained within the site, and there is no clarity as to the risks they bring to local humans, livestock, flora and fauna. The potential of toxic overflows, spills or general contamination to the local water and downstream impacts is ignored. How to address acid mine drainage, and the construction and integrity of the tailings dam is not agreed upon by the Departments’ experts and Bowdens. This is a crucial failing. To let this go forward with nebulous ‘best practice’ assurances would be a dereliction of responsibility. Bowdens have never operated a mine before and have no experience in constructing or managing those risks. The local tourism industry is continuing to grow. The local agriculture produces world class beef, olives and wine. Why is a short term mine more important that the long term health and vibrancy of the local people and economy? There is not enough information to fully assess the environmental and social impacts of this project. The conditions set are too vague. As such, this project must be rejected on the basis of poor information, and its potential for irreversible environmental damage. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development. There is a number of issues I am seriously concerned about, especially with regard to the effects the proposed project could have on the environment and the people living close around. So far the proposal shows some clear weaknesses concerning the protection standards of people and the environment - especially in relation to Acid Mine Drainage and the lead dust. As explained by qualified experts, such as Shireen Baguley, the project proposal contains mistakes, is based on wrong facts, or assures to introduce protection mechanisms that are technically questionable - for example due to missing already existing implementation. This casts strong doubt on whether and to what extent the operator Bowden Silver can ensure that people and the environment are protected, not just to some degree, but with certainty. At its scale, the proposed project may have serious impacts on the environment and sensitive ecosystems, and we cannot see ourselves making any mistakes in this regard, especially in this day and age. Also, due to the above-mentioned erroneous assessments, a strong doubt has arisen as to whether further additional requirements regarding protection standards would be taken seriously in the necessary manner, or are actually feasible to implement. I have the impression that this project is putting life at risk, that people as well as valuable animal and plant species have to take the risk of being severely damaged, not only during the operating period of the project but also for many years longer. Protection of this life under the current designs does not seem to be assured, compliance and implementation of further conditions seems questionable and its importance in comparison to monetary incentives seems to be secondary - and I did not yet mention anything about how agriculture and tourism in the Mudgee-Lue-Rylstone-Kandos region might be endangered, what impacts might occur in the absence of protection of the environment and people, especially in economic and socio-economic terms. I am strongly concerned about the proposed project, and see the only solution in a final rejection. I kindly ask that my concerns but especially the assessments and objections of the qualified experts are taken seriously and considered in the decision making process, thank you. |
Penny Galligan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family has lived and managed farms in the Rylstone / Lue region for over 80 years. My family owns the adjoining property to the proposed mine and I OBJECT to the mine due to following concerns: 1. Soil contamination: Lead dust from the mine can settle on soil and contaminate it, making it unsuitable for agriculture. Lead can be toxic to plants and may affect their growth and yield. Contaminated soil may also pose a risk to human health, as lead can be absorbed by crops and enter the food chain. 2. Water contamination: Lead dust can also contaminate water sources, making them unsuitable for irrigation or drinking. This could affect crop yields and livestock farming in the area. 3. Reduced marketability: Consumers may be hesitant to purchase agricultural products grown in an area with a history of lead dust contamination. This could reduce demand for locally grown produce and affect farmers' profitability. 4. Health risks: Farmers and their families who live and work in the area may be at risk of lead dust exposure, which could cause a range of health problems, including neurological damage, anaemia, and developmental delays in children. 5. Tourism: The Mudgee region thrives on the tourist market with Mudgee winning Australia's top tourist town for the last 2 years judged by the Australian Tourism Industry Council. No mine can guarantee complete safety so any contamination or loss in reputation will have long lasting impacts on this vital industry. 6. Transport: The local roads around Lue are single lane with many old style bridges unsuitable for the heavy vehicles required to operate the mine and transport the silver. There are many crests and blind corners which will be a threat to local traffic as well as the truck drivers. With an expected economic life of 16 to 23 years, the inherent dangers and long term impacts from an open cut mine of this nature far outweigh any short term benefits from this mine. |
Juile Hunter
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed development of the Bowdens Silver Mine located at Lue. There are many reasons for this project not to go ahead: - This is not a silver mine - it is a lead mine. It is a proven fact that open cut lead mines result in dust that will end up on our roofs, in our tank water and in our drinking water. The levels of this are not safe. It will have an impact on our community, not only on the current generations though on the ones that follow. The lifetime of the devastation of this mine will cause will far out live the operational lifetime of the project. - Climate change means that we are experiencing more extreme weather events in particular flooding which will result in overflow and contamination of our river system. These extreme weather events are outside the control of the management of the mine and will lead to an environmental catastrophe. In drought there will be issues with supplying water to the mine to dampen the dust. - It will destroy a community. A lead mine 2km from the town of Lue is not feasible. - It will destroy sacred first nation sites. -It will have a negative impact in on animals in the area with the destruction of habitat as well as impacting the environment with noise, pollution and the 24 hour operation. This mine should not proceed. |
Jorja Bentley
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The safety of our environment is paramount. We need to protect First Nations peoples land. Now and always. |
Rosemary Hadaway
Organisation |
Mudgee District Environment Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee District Environment Group strongly objects to this proposal. We believe the DPE Assessment Report is flawed, and a Recommendation for Approval should not have been made. Evidence for this view is in the attached Submission, and Speakers Notes. |
Attachments |
mdeg-submission-to-ipc-bowdenspdf.pdf (PDF, 123.43 KB) mudgee-district-environment-group-presentationpdf.pdf (PDF, 86.24 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against this! |
Tony Goninon
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Object to proposal as indicated in attached formal submission |
Attachments |
bowdensminesubmissionpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 142.7 KB) |
Kate White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Bowden’s Silver Mine proposal. Please find below my submission objecting to the Bowden Silver Mine proposal. There are a number of points: • This silver/lead mine is 2 kms from the Lue village and on the water course, the Lawson Creek, that runs through to Burrendong Dam. It will be disastrous both environmentally and financially to the entire community if any major incident occurs either man made or climatic. It is an area that is booming from tourism and primary industry. A lead mine will destroy many businesses and lifestyles in Mudgee region. • The prospect of lead dust pollution is a high possibility. There has to be continuous recording of the lead levels, however, when high levels have been detected, it will be too late for the community. The damage has been done. The Lue village relies on their rooves for all water used domestically. Bowden’s have proposed to supply the village with water if there is lead contamination. This is not a proposition. It would have to provide enough daily water to very house in Lue. There are 90 houses, with 4 people, using 200 litres per day is 72 000 litres per day. So where would this water be obtained? This a very conservative estimate as no surface water can be use as it is contaminated. The livestock in the area also has to be considered. If these animals reach a toxic level of lead the product is unsaleable and must be quarantined for 18 months. That is impossible. The same must be said for the wine, fruit and honey in the region, their product is unsaleable. If the lead pollution did become a problem, a condition of the mine approval should be a buy back either from the government or who owns the mine at that time of all houses and rural properties in the affected areas at a value set prior to the Bowden's Mine Approval. • There is very limited surface water in an average season of precipitation in the Lawson Creek Valley. When the season is dry, the Lawson Creek drops back into water holes. This is not a continuous water source, so consequently when the creek reduces its flow does this mean the mine stops or is an undisclosed amount of water pumped from the artisan basin. This reducing the water table from an area where no data has been collected. • The tailing dam. The question to be asked is any tailing dam safe, how can we believe they will never break or leak. Particularly now when we look at the Acadia Mine’s tailing dam where it has broken, and all the heavy minerals have end up in the water ways. This is our concern with the Bowden’s Mine Tailing dam, poisoning our water ways. • At the present time the Federal Government has announced a buyback of water rights to allow more water to remain in the system, for environmental concerns. With the Bowden’s mine they are removing large quantities of water at the headwaters, which will be detrimental to a environmental system downstream. • We are continually being warned of Climate Change and how we must reduce our admissions by reducing coal production etc where does a lead mine fall into this category. • There must be consideration made in the event that when there is an incident, and it pollutes the water system which is destroyed who is responsible. This is a problem that is not going away for infinity, and someone has to be accountable for it. There are many more points to cover in this debate. However, it is to be stated that this mine is not a mine that should be established due to its high risk in such a prosperous region. Mining of lead will destroy what nature cannot repair. We are talking about something that generations to come will be asking the questions why this mine ever get approved, when we have no solution to repair the damage. We should be becoming more environmentally aware. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To the Commissioner I am a current resident of Mudgee and a former resident of Lue. I wish to lodge my strongest possible objection to the development of a toxic lead mine in our LGA on the following grounds: Environment – biodiversity, sustainability, water resources and climate change - Our environment is under threat - that is undisputed. Climate change is upon us. Our local ecology, the destruction of our local bushland and the threat to our native animals are of the utmost importance to us, the residents of this LGA. This mine will have an adverse effect on out wildlife and our local ecology - this is not acceptable and should not be sanctioned. The significant threat of contamination to our water source is completely unacceptable and cannot be mitigated no matter how many studies are undertaken. They may call themselves Bowden’s Silver but this is predominately a lead mine and lead is a primary hazard to our environment. Bowden's use the word 'silver' to make this seemingly more palatable - it isn't. We need to make sensible decisions that are sustainable - lead mining is toxic. The lead mine is only 2 kilometres from Lue. No mitigation strategies can protect its residents and the residents of our LGA from toxic lead dust. How can the infiltration of lead dust into our water possibly be stopped? It can't. Amenity - The impact of noise pollution on the local community cannot be understated. Having lived in very quiet rural areas I know first hand the implications of noise pollution on residents amenity and the anxiety it causes. What the EPA considers to be acceptable and what is acceptable to residents 24/7 are two very different things in my experience. What the EPA call ‘negligible effects’ are not so negligible to the residents directly affected by the significant increase in activity caused by mining and this can’t be measured by ‘one off’ and random noise readings taken during the business hours of the EPA testing officers. Traffic and transport - The impact of noise pollution on the local community will be considerable. Heavy truck traffic through our towns effects the whole community. Add to that the increase in worker, service and construction vehicles on roads that are already in heavy use and in shocking states of disrepair from narrowing and potholing is very concerning. Council cannot adequately service and repair the roads as they are. The roads are currently dangerous - adding more traffic and significantly increasing heavy vehicle movements is frankly very concerning for all of us who currently use these same roads and live in these towns. I currently live in a street directly effected by current mine service/worker vehicle traffic - the increase over the last 5 years has been significant. I can't imagine being subject to even heavier flows of traffic accessing the industrial areas of Mudgee. No increase is acceptable to residents who live in these normally quiet residential streets. Socio economic implications - Whilst it is a given that the proposed development will provide some jobs within the region, I consider this a distraction to the real environmental issues. Yes, jobs are important and valued but we already have 3 existing large mines within our LGA which are consistently understaffed - surely the promise of more jobs shouldn’t be the motivating factor on every future mine development when the implications on local agriculture and the environment are viewed as of secondary importance. Additionally, the loss of property value is a very real fear for the local community and rightly so because the mine will detrimentally effect property prices there can be no question. |
Simon McKittrick
Organisation |
Logical Livestock & Property |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live nearby the proposed mine site and am genuinely concerned about the threat to the local community and environmental impact the mine will have. I don't believe Bowden Silver Mine have done extensive enough due diligence to convince me there will be no harm intentional or otherwise. |
Janet Walk
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
uploaded PDF |
Attachments |
ipc-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 51.47 KB) |
Michael Radzievic
Organisation |
Telstra Corporation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
BOWDENS LEAD MINE CANNOT BE APPROVED -There is no safe level of lead that has been proven not to cause any health problems. --Toxic lead exposure is the most significant and prevalent disease of environmental origin in the world today. Despite all that is known. Regarding the hazards of lead exposure for innocent young children, it has taken over a century for primary Prevention to be adopted in the most highly developed countries. The rest of the world is woefully behind in the development of programs to protect children from lead poisoning. The phasing out of lead in gasoline, which began in the United States in 1972 and was completed in 1995, has resulted in almost fourfold reductions in median blood lead levels in children. Lead is NOT biodegradable, Lead is indestructible. And cannot be transformed into a nontoxic form. Once introduced into the environment, lead stays there forever. Worldwide mining each year produces over 3 million tons. of lead for consumer products. Well over half of the 300 million tons of lead ever removed from the earth has been released as contamination and is available for human exposure. Lead poisoning is largely chronic--Lead dust released in the environment during mining and smelting of lead can cause lead exposure to the population living in the vicinity of the mine. Lead exposure puts children at risk of significant health effects including developmental, learning and behavioral problems. For example, a recent study found that children living closest to the Broken Hill mine had lower school test scores and were more likely to be diagnosed with developmental disabilities. disease, resulting from long-term exposures to the lead contamination in air, soil, dust, food, and water. Lead is absorbed and largely deposited in bone. The health effects of exposure to lead can be both acute and chronic, and the problems caused by lead poisoning are particularly dangerous and severe for children. Acute lead poisoning can happen immediately and is often caused by inhaling large quantities of lead dust or fumes in the air. Chronic lead poisoning, however, occurs over longer periods of time and can result from very low-level, but constant, exposure to lead. Chronic poisoning is far more common than acute exposure and can be caused by persistent inhaling or ingestion of lead, or, over much longer periods, can result in lead accumulation in the bones. The body treat lead in much the same way that it does calcium. Although lead serves no useful physiologic purpose, it stays in the body for many years. Young children and fetuses are especially vulnerable to its toxic effects. Lead impairs the brain development of children. Lead retards the mental and physical development of children, causing behavioral and learning disabilities. Exposure to lead demonstrably lowers intelligence testing quotients (IQs) in school-age children.8,9 Epidemiologic studies have shown that a 10-f. Lg/dL increase in blood lead is associated with a 2.5-point decrease in the IQ of an exposed child. Lead is ubiquitous in nature. It affects virtually every system in the body. It can damage the nervous system, the renal, and the reproductive systems, cause high blood pressure, and affect growth and development, psychological behavior, and intelligence. Lead exposure in young children is of particular concern because children absorb lead more readily than adults and the developing nervous system of children is particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of lead. Children residing near the mine having poor socio-economic status are considered as a high-risk group to the adverse effect of lead exposure. An additional risk factor is Para occupational lead exposure to children, which can occur because of their parents working in the lead producing mine. Lead is mined in ever-increasing quantities in the world today. Toxic lead exposure is the most significant and prevalent disease of environmental origin in the world. Enforcement of lead-exposure standards in developed countries has resulted in a monumental transfer of these industrial hazards to poorer countries. Studies in developing countries Such as China, India, and Indonesia and in regions such as Latin America and Central Europe now indicate that most of the world's children are already at risk of environmental lead exposure. Regulation of lead exposure is the sole method by which countries of the world deal with the hazards of lead. Zinc occurs only in a combined state. The dominant zinc ores found in the earth’s crust is zinc blende (zinc sulphide or spharelite) ZnS, calamine ZnCO3 and Zincite, Zno. Zinc is commonly found in mineral deposits along with other base metals, such as copper and lead. Zinc deposits are broadly classified on the basis of how they are formed. The production for sulfidic zinc ores produces large amounts of sulfur dioxide (can form acid rain) and cadmium vapour. Unwanted by-products from zinc production include sodium oxide (corrosive and violent when exposed to water) and carbon monoxide (toxic to humans and animals as well as ozone-forming) and carbon dioxide. The production of zinc produces around 3 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of zinc. Water is polluted by these heavy metals. This results in some fish accumulating zinc in their bodies, when they live in zinc-contaminated waterways. When zinc enters the bodies of these fish, it bio magnifies up the food chain. In the work place environment zinc contagion can lead to a flu-like condition known as metal fever. This condition will pass after two days and is caused by over sensitivity. Zinc can be a danger to unborn and newborn children. When their mothers have absorbed large concentrations of zinc the children may be exposed to it through blood or milk of their mothers. When high levels of zinc are present in soils, such as at a zinc Mining site, the metal can seep into the groundwater. Mining also can release dust containing higher levels of zinc into the air we breathe. Eventually, the zinc dust will settle out onto the soil and surface waters. Zinc and soluble zinc compounds are harmful to the environment at current levels of exposure, the Canadian government has provisionally concluded. In particular, the substances may pose a risk to aquatic organisms through release of zinc to water from metal mining effluent. However, potentially noxious levels of Zn in soils can result in various alterations in plants like reduced growth, photosynthetic and respiratory rate, imbalanced mineral nutrition and enhanced generation of reactive oxygen species. |
Attachments |
101515mgmc20200019pdf.pdf (PDF, 657.62 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Kandos is a small, but lovely place and the thought of a mine on my doorstep with associated problems of lead dust, a tailings dam and poisons leaching into the waterways and airways is frightening. I feel strongly that Bowdens are trying to mislead people by saying Kandos and Rylstone are depressed towns that will benefit from a silver mine - a silver mine that produces a lot of lead from what I've learned. Lead dust is damaging to the brains of children and this also frightens me. I live and work - yes I have two jobs - in Kandos and go to school in Bathurst. I love the opportunities both places provide and I would hate to have to leave this place that we have grown to love due to a mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Members of the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. While I appreciate that the commission has put in place conditions for operations, and I appreciate that Bowdens have accepted these & offered information as to how they would comply by them, I have no faith that Bowdens will actually comply with them, or that the commission will effectively monitor & enforce compliance by the mines. Given this, and the history of mines caring little for the communities and the environment that they work in, I believe that it is highly likely that there will be damage to our water resources, biodiversity in the area, hazardous and toxic materials & contamination, that will not be corrected. I strongly oppose this development and urge the commission to halt all activities in this area. Additionally, the proposed mine will and has already had serious social impacts on the local community. Bowdens is located in close proximity to residential areas, 2km to our local school, which could lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine would displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. If the Bowden mine is allowed to go ahead the government will be making a deliberate decision to support commercial activity that will result in ecological disaster. In addition, the government will be complicit in destruction of communities who have cared for the region for centuries, the destruction of their livelihoods and will be putting their health and that of future generations in peril. Thank you . |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Objection (I am making a submission that objects to this proposed development going ahead). The mine will create irreversible environmental damage, which outweighs the jobs it will create. It will leave the local community with potential water and biodiversity issues long after the mine. I strongly object to the proposed development. Kind regards, Lachlan |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Will affect the local water suppy and neighbouring farms |
Rob Wannan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners - I strongly object to the Bowdens Application - This application should be refused for the reasons included in my submission and the conduct of NSW DPE should be referred to the Minister. |
Attachments |
rww-dear-commissionerspdf.pdf (PDF, 266.73 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dust pollution - I am not convinced that modelling or mitigation measures for dust suppression are adequate to prevent strong westerly winds (which already drop soil from further out west) from carrying toxic dust particles onto our property. We rely on rainwater collected from our roof areas. Dust from the minesite will end up in our drinking water and also on vegetables grown for our own consumption. There is NO safe level for lead. It has been removed from paint and petrol, keep it out of our water. I value the dark night skies here. I've been able to show our children stars, planets and constellations that pass overhead, that just can't be seen in so many polluted areas. I'm sure the mitigation proposed will not preserve these night skies. I also value the lack of noise in our area. We moved away from a very large city to enjoy a quiet lifestyle. Biodiversity - Removal of critically endangered vegetation communities is a disgrace. there is little enough left as it is. The remaining grassland still provides food source for Threatened birds such as the Diamond Firetails. The vegetation burnt in the recent fires may well recover but we need to consider that thousands of animals also burned. They didn't just jump out of the way to, hide on the minesite to return to old ground later. The Offset scheme is farcical. It hides in legislation but is just an excuse for large companies to destroy what is already disappearing with impunity. We may well be "future eaters". |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have a beautiful family property that has been in the family for generations and is within the blast zone of the proposed lead mine. My concerns are that the air, soil and waterways will become contaminated with harmful substances. I have concerns for the health and safety of my family and our future generations. The village of Lue is a small community with basic infrastructure. Developing a large scale mining project will dramatically increase the traffic on the roads, leading to further air pollution and noise pollution. The small village of Lue will be forever changed should this proposal go ahead. |
Jayne Bentivoglio
Organisation |
Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
2023 Jayne Bentivoglio WATER submission Bowdens Mine Document JB ROP has been uploaded below |
Attachments |
2023-water-submission-bowdens-jb-ropdocx.docx (DOCX, 18.41 KB) |
Bruce Christie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have lived in the area for the last 43 years with my wife and family and I have major concerns surrounding the possible Zinc/Lead/Silver mine at Lue. The longer we look into the details of this mine the more we find out how disastrous it will be for the Lue district and the community, both for those living close to the mine and others living further downstream. There is a lot of information to digest and the timing of the announcement of the IPC just before Christmas it is disappointing that we haven’t more time to submit our concerns to this organisation and to communicate this to the wider community. Also delays in the presentations going on the IPC’s Youtube channel two days before submissions are due has reduced the ability of the community to have access to speakers either for or against the mine. Having attended the IPC hearing in Mudgee I feel that there are some major issues that have not been addressed by the proponent. A primary concern is water. The proponent has modelled their available water using flawed data from another catchment ie the Cudgegong River. As a local, I know that the Lawson Creek can have increased flow very quickly, often blocking the road but is also reduces very quickly back to a small base flow and most summers there is a very much reduced flow as it travels through the cobbled bed of the creek. The modelling assumes an average flow of 2.6 mgs per day. Recent installation of a temporary gauging station has shown a flow of 0.14mgs/day which is a fraction of what they have estimated or need. Also, this current flow is on the back of two very wet years. The proponent is just being hopeful that they will have enough water to reduce dust for the project or to allow for the correct compaction of materials on site. Apart from the obvious water deficit that won’t be available for dust suppression the proponent has also not considered the issue of too much water. There have been cases of over 200mm falling in a 24hour period occurring in the last 20 years. They have not taken this into account and have not prepared for these rainfall events leaving the tailings dam vulnerable to being breached and polluting the Lawson Creek. The failing of this tailings dam will see major contaminants travelling downstream to Mudgee. This will be catastrophic for the downstream water users, not to mention the eventual drying out of the tailings dam allowing for dust to be released as was shown in the failing of the tailings dam wall at Cadia mine. They did at least have a second wall as a backup, this is not going to happen at Lue. The mine that is only going to be 2 km from the village of Lue will spell the demise of Lue. House values will crash, assuming they are saleable at all. The school must close. It is not possible to have children so close to a major source of dust and airborne contaminants. Those left in the village will surely have to test water tanks and their blood for lead levels to ensure their ongoing health. Moving away would seem more attractive than risking health issues. There are currently many existing businesses close to the mine, from bed and breakfasts, olive groves, motorcycle track, all relying on the inherent beauty of the area. Tourism has gone from strength to strength in the district and you don’t need to be a mathematician to know that the value of this industry in time will be far greater than a couple of hundred jobs over a couple of decades. These two industries are not compatible. They cannot coexist in such close proximity, one will have to move on. Agriculture will also suffer. Grazing or irrigation downstream cannot exist without water, or with contaminated products. Many of these properties are generational, but there are also a lot of new farmers that have moved to the area seeking a more tranquil livestyle than the city, or even Mudgee. They bring enthusiasm to the community and new ideas. The did not expect to be living next to a mine with a plume of lead dust threatening their well being. So when this mine finishes it’s working life we will be left with: • A toxic rock emplacement that in no way will look like a natural hill given it will not be allowed to revegetation in case it breaches the waterproof membrane. • A tailings dam that is guaranteed to leak, in fact it is designed to leak and it will be inevitable that it will eventually fail given that maintenance will not continue into perpetuity, just for the next few decades. • A toxic pit that filled with water that will be devoid of life, in fact it will be a genetic sump. Any misfortunate bird that land in this water will not do that again, according the one of the employees at the mine!! • A destroyed community. If this mine goes ahead, Lue will go the same way as Ulan, Wollar and Bylong. It will mean the end of Lue. The end to the nearby agricultural industries. The end of tourism in the Lawson Creek Valley. Is that worth 16.5 years of jobs? |
Barry Noller
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Barry Noller Report 23 February 2023 Statement from Barry N Noller BSc, MChem, PhD FRACI, FRSC, FFACS, FIUPAC on behalf of the Lue Action Group regarding the ‘Proposed Bowden’s silver mine at Lue’ (following Presentation Wed 15 February 2023). 6. Conclusions regarding EIS • The principal role of monitoring is to validate modelling as an independent measuring activity rather than place reliance on modelling alone. • Dust monitoring methods need sufficient detail to enable management measures to be put in place to assess lead exposure at Lue. • Deficiencies in lead contamination monitoring of the community that meets a blood lead level of 5 ug/dL need to be overcome and include testing for blood lead. • Monitoring of dispersion of respirable crystalline silica (as PM2.5 annual average) to the community is required to meet a suitable guideline such as that used in Victoria. • SEARS are not being met with respect to AMD in identified key ‘mine viability-determining’ areas and there is no documented plan for developing site specific water quality guidelines for effects of contaminants in Lawson’s Creek being a special category of alpine creek system. There can be no flexibility with data requirements for ensuring no risk of AMD generation. • The IPC Commissioners have not been provided with insufficient evidence to make a fully-informed decision and the project is not approval-ready. • Key unanswered questions remain regarding conditions of Consent. • It would be a failure of due process for the IPC proceed without seeing revised management plans and confirming that SEARS have been met. |
Attachments |
barry-nollerfinal-report-for-ipc-mudgee23-feb-2023docx.docx (DOCX, 274.78 KB) |
Lauren Freestone
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Leave Country alone. Protect out Aboriginal cultural sites and the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is a threats to farming and agriculture which is vital to the growing population in Australia It is a threats to water security and quality which is a scare resource It is exposing the community to lead exposure and toxic tailings dam It will have a negative social impact such as future health issue, loss of property values as a result of the site mine and increase community issues Acid mine drainage which is the second biggest problem in the world as stated by the UN Increased traffic, dust and noise pollution Biodiversity and ecological impacts from the mine sites |
Janet Burstall
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
WATER!! The Bowden's mine poses a serious risk to water quality and water security, including risks of contaminating the aquifer systems. There will be hazardous substances in the waste rock dump and tailings dam. These merit a local and detailed model of hydrogeological processes to adequately manage the proposed activity. Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead.There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. Bowdens are proposing to get all the water needed from Lue, either through building dams, using water caught and drawn into the open cut pit, taking water from the Lawson Creek or using water from the tailings dam. Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. This development is too dangerous to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Crave Natural |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local farmer, across the range from the proposed Bowdens mine, I strongly object to its development in our region. This mine would be the most environmentally dangerous project in our region, with numerous health risks due to air contamination by fine lead dust particles, land clearing, noise pollution and the unacceptable risk of water contamination both of the rivers and aquifers. This mine will predominately be producing lead and Zinc, I find it deceptive to call it a Silver mine, I am very dubious of Bowdens mines transparency. The 24hr operation will not only severely impact the local community but also anyone living along the transport routes, due to increased traffic noise, pollution and degradation of already poor roads. A mine being 2km from Lue village is unacceptable in today's day and age, Mudgee rejected a solar farm about 2km from the town due to tourism and aesthetics, a lead/silver mine, should not be allowed to exist 2km from the village of Lue and a school. My business is an organic food production farm at Apple Tree Flat, that attracts tourists, I fear that my business and my health will be negatively impacted by increased traffic and potential pollution from the proposed mine. Mudgee, Rylstone and Kandos are tourist destinations, millions of dollars are spent here each year by tourists, I believe if Bowdens mine is allowed to proceed, the whole regions tourism will be negatively impacted. The environmental risks and biodiversity destruction that would occur if the mine went ahead would be disastrous for the area and wider ecosystems. Everything is connected, especially the waterways, contamination of Lawson Creek or the aquifer will affect thousands of farms, homes and hundreds of towns and villages. This water leads into other major rivers and waterways, it doesn't stop at Lue. There are no safe levels of lead contamination. In summary, I feel that there is too greater risk to the community of Lue and Mudgee, its precious native ecosystems, finite water supply and air quality, for the Bowdens mine to proceed. No level of mitigation or hazard controls would be enough to guarantee that an environmental disaster wouldn't occur. Tourism will be negatively impacted and my business, my health and organic food production will be negatively impacted. I strongly oppose to the development of Bowdens mine in Lue and fear for the mental and physical health of its community. |
Anne Newell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family have owned a property in Lue on the Lawson Creek for over 25 years. This proposal is inconsistent with existing use and will destroy the community and existing jobs in tourism and agriculture. We also have family property in Gloucester and have seen first hand the damage done to the community with this type of proposal, the Rocky Hill Project in Gloucester was a significant case of a mine that was refused due to negative social impact. I ask you to refuse this project in Lue. |
Will Gilbert
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Bowdens Silver Mine in Lue. I live in Mudgee with my wife and 6 month old child and I have worked in the area for my families wine business for the last 13 years. I am very concerned about the potential impacts that the development of this mine project will have on the local community, the environment and the huge risks to human health. The region of Lue and its surrounds is a prime agricultural area and the base of highly productive and diverse agricultural and food production businesses. As a primary producer I am very very concerned about the development of this mine. Lead is extremely toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. Our production facility and vineyard could be subject to lead dust settling on our roof that we collect water from to use in the winery. Lead dust could fall on our vineyard, on the vine leaf, on the berry of the grape and contaminate the final product. If our wine, our product, our livelihood is contaminated with lead, what do we as winemakers do? Are our markets restricted domestically and overseas? The project already does not have adequate water on site so how will appropriate Dust mitigation be carried out, assessed and monitored? Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. Tourism plays an integral role in Mudgee and the surrounding areas and supports a huge number of individuals, families and businesses both large and small. Tourism is vital to the wine industry through direct customer spend via Cellar Door experience, ultimately increasing the business profitability and viability. The rapid rise in tourism to the area and continued success of being Australia's top tourism town for the last 2 years has seen a huge number of jobs created and maintained, far more than jobs than the Bowden mine will. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. The negative impacts the mine project will have on tourism will be very significant with the flow on affect to the community being catastrophic. Possible job losses and a decline in revenue will cause a huge impact. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region forever, leaving a huge void in the ground and a toxic tailings dam. This is in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. The negative impacts that this mine will have on on our community and its surrounds are substantial and will be everlasting. Thank you for your consideration. |
Emma Wisser
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I grew up in Kandos and I’m writing to object to the proposed Silver Mine in Lue. I am one of those kids that Anthony McClure mentions in his speech that moved away from Kandos. I didn’t move away because there were no jobs for me. I could have easily found work in the local cafes or restaurants or at the local pharmacy or IGA. I chose to leave so I could go to university. I love Kandos and hope to return because I loved living so close to swimming holes, beautiful bushland and wildlife. I found the community supportive and nurturing. I imagine that my future job in Kandos will either be in relationship to the community, the local environment or working from home. I will not be pursuing a job in a Silver Mine. The Bowden’s Silver mine is not the future I envisage for myself or for the place I call home. If the proposed mine goes ahead, the region I grew up in will be affected by lead dust. The proposal includes an ore processing plant. A huge tailings dam (storing waste heavy metals plus cyanide used to process ore) and an enormous pile of potential acid forming rock would be the mine's legacy forever. Acid mine drainage from the proposed rock pile would be an environmental problem forever. The design of the tailings dam is unproven and inadequate for the proposed size and location (effectively a swimming pool liner sitting on a geological fault line). Even the proponents admit it will leak into Lawsons Creek. It would sit above Lawson Creek and affect all downstream waterways from Lue to Mudgee to Burrendong Dam, and beyond. I hope to return to Kandos. If the proposed mine goes ahead it will irrevocably change. My friends and family will move, and the landscape that I grew up in and love will be damaged beyond repair. If Bowden’s Silver Mine goes ahead, I can’t see myself returning to this place. Please don’t approve this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerns surround the close proximity of the proposed mine being 2km from Lue and the primary school where no levels of lead exposure is safe for children and can potentially affect their development. The potential ingestion of dust and lead from the mine, accumulated from various sources such as in the air, settling on the ground where produce is grown and consumed and settling on rooftops which can potentially affect water tanks and therefore drinking water, is concerning. Ecological impacts are also worrying particularly on the native flora and fauna species of the area, some of which are threatened and critically endangered. In addition, the projected disturbance of identified sites of Aboriginal cultural heritage significance is saddening. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m concerned that this mine has been completely misrepresented to the community, which has resulted in insufficient community scrutiny of the proposal. The proposed mine should have been accurately described as a zinc, lead and silver mine, in all communications with the community, from the start. Many local community members if not most are completely unaware the mine will be mining lead. I am deeply concerned about the risks of lead contamination in dusts affecting water, soil, homes, and people. I know families whose children grew up in Broken Hill who lived with constant concerns about their children’s health. They were unable to safely allow their children to play outside, play at playgrounds, etc. To reduce risks they vaccumed every day before allowing their children on the floor. Even with these measures, on testing their children’s blood lead levels were elevated. Our community’s children cannot afford the negative impacts of lead poisoning, nor the impacts on their development of measures restricting their use of the outdoors to avoid it, should the mine go ahead and increased lead levels become pervasive in the environment. Our rural children deserve no less protection from these negative health impacts, than their urban counterparts. The local community cannot afford the risks of lead contamination and poisoning. The economic benefits of the mine stand to be negatively offset as many people will avoid the exposing their families to lead contamination and the use of the area as a tourist destination will be compromised. Likewise, water and land lead contamination has the potential to negatively impact our agricultural industries which are substantial and important. An additional consideration is that tourism is closely linked in this area to sampling and purchasing locally grown produce. Lead contamination of our agricultural industries would have a doubly negative effect- on the agricultural businesses themselves, as well as on the accomodation and foodservice industries they complement. Until technology is proposed for use at the mine which effectively reduces the risk of lead contamination in the environment and community to acceptable levels, and conditions imposed mandate immediate closure of the mine should contamination occur, the proposal should be set aside. The risks of open cut lead mining, and of the proposed containment of contaminated waste, to the people of the local community and to the environment, are too great. The proposed controls and safeguards are inadequate. The proposal in its current form should be rejected to protect children in the community, adults in the community, and the valuable long term economic activities of agriculture and tourism. Inadequate water is an additional concern. During 2019 prior to the bushfires, drought conditions prevailed and a large number of trees died or were degraded. The impact of water use by the mine has been inadequately considered. The only conditions under which extraction of lead, Zinc and silver at this site should be allowed are those in which the environment, local industries of agriculture and tourism, and the health of community members are adequately protected by the use of technology which prevents almost completely, the escape of lead contamination. The current proposal for an open cut mine is inadequate to ensure these negative impacts are prevented. I’m |
Amber Norton-Knight
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Amber Norton-Knight and I live 10 kms north of Mudgee. I object to the proposed Bowdens silver mine on the following basis. The Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) is recommending approval when the proponent has never operated a mine (little lone a lead mine). The suggested conditions include using untested technology to control acid mine drainage, which is contrary to the Department's own independent advice. Similarly the DPE have ignored their own independent advice as to the effectiveness of water suppression to contain lead dust. If previous leaseholders of this site didn’t proceed due to lack of water, what has changed? It seems to me we are potentially risking decimating the region to create 228 jobs for 16 years. We are putting our faith in a small speculative mining company to keep the region safe from lead contamination, acid mine drainage, water pollution etc. When large mining companies like BHP get it wrong, such as the Samarco mine in Brazil where their tailing dam collapsed, should we be risking this region to an inexperienced mining company. Lets at least get some certainty as to how the company can safely deal with acid mine drainage and lead dust suppression before considering whether the proposal is worth pursuing. |
Chris Schmidt
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the establishment of the proposed mine at Lue will impact my business as a local Livestock Selling Agent. The change of use of the land in the Lue area will be yet another erosion of land area available for family farming which has been the bread and butter of the livestock industry that I have worked in for decades. In addition the impact of mining on this beautiful Lawson Creek Valley will be permanent desecration of the flora and fora that will be lost from the community, never to return. There must be some other areas that the same minerals can be found without such severe impact on environmentally sensitive areas. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the potential Bowden's 'silver' mine in our locality. There are so many issues with this proposal. For starters the impacts to the environment, land, air and water. The toxins as a byproduct can contaminate all of these areas. Who would like to have their water source infiltrated with lead poisoning? I know many would not savour this in anyway shape or form. As someone with allergies, who needs more issues polluting our area? In addition, we have the largest catchment area in Australia. I am concerned that any toxic waste that leaks from the mine may affect this resource as it is vital for our community and those west of us. This would have a serious impact on so many areas and heading into a new phase of El Nina and horrendous droughts, this is sheer idiocy to contemplate the long-term damages by the mine. I comprehend and appreciate that the mine may create some jobs. But I ask for how long? What types of jobs? Is this offering long term employment for those who are beginning careers and giving them a range of skills to ensure their employability in the future? Fourthly, as I understand it, 'silver' mining is really mining lead with a scant trace of silver as an offshoot. Fifthly, our region is so picturesque and an area that is well known and established for its gorgeous vistas. Tourism is an important aspect to the Mudgee environs. People travel from Sydney most weekends to relax and explore the area. How many would continue to do so and support our region if tailings were to contaminate our environment? I think that the tourism industry could collapse, and it is an integral part of our economy. Finally, this has not only detrimental impacts to the environment, but also the economy. Any short-term gain would not be worth the long-term repercussions of the mine. For these reasons I object to the mine. |
Gina White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to this proposed development for number of reasons. GROUND WATER The use of ground water sourced from within the catchment is the most concerning to me. There is not enough understanding or consideration for the complex hydrology of the catchment to ensure that the use and subsequent treatment of the water will not impact on the rest of the catchment. Degradation of groundwater quality is not only an immediate risk to those that neighbour the mine but also to the township of Mudgee as the Lawson Creek flows into the Cudgegong Creek at Mudgee. The measures outlined in the proposal to ensure that there is no health risk posed to those working in the mine or to those neighbouring the mine are insufficient. Accidents and safety breaches happen in mine sites regularly. Often they are categorised as “near misses” but when you are dealing with Lead dust and toxic tailing dams any accident or breach will have catastrophic and irreversible consequences. The data used to estimate the available water in the catchment seems very optimistic. There is very little certainty around rainfall patterns in this area and with the impacts of climate change the numbers become even more unreliable. How is the mine going to access water in prolonged dry spells? What ground water will be available to the rest of the catchment in these dry times if the mine is consuming groundwater in large volumes even when we are in drought? SAFTEY Just this week with the accident in a QLD Nickle mine has resulted in the death of an employee. Given that Bowden have promised a Locals First approach to hiring, the community will feel the effects of any deaths/injuries caused by the mine very acutely. TRAFFIC The Lue Road is a narrow road with a lot of blind corners and sharp turns, it is not suitable for high volumes of truck and traffic. The proposed 16 heavy vehicle trips/day and 156 light vehicles is too much. SOCIOECONIMIC IMPACTS Bowdens propose to provide 320 high paying jobs. Given that Lue is a very small town all the workers will be driving in from other areas. This means that there is more traffic on the road but most importantly the wages from Bowden Mine will not be spent locally. As is the case with most FIFO and Drive In Drive Out mines, all money earned in the mines is spent outside the town the mine is located in, offering no trickle-down benefits to the local community. In the Case of Bowdens mine the Lue community will bear the full environmental burden of the mine but do not share in the economic benefits. Many mining towns lament that workers will not even so much as buy a coffee in the town they work in. LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY There is no question that there will be a huge loss of biodiversity and that fragile ecosystems will be harmed as a result of the mine. TOURISM In the proposal for the development no consideration has been made for the impact of the mine on tourism in the entire region. A Lead mine will have very negative flow on effects for region as a whole. Mudgee has experienced a huge boom in population since COVID. These people have not all moved here for the coal mines, most work in the buzzing hospitality and tourism industry that relies on the beauty of the region’s natural landscape and clean waterways. To cite an example: In 2011 Margaret River in WA fought proposals to mine in the region on the basis that it would harm biodiversity and impact on tourism. The fight was successful and the region is now a highly lucrative tourist hotspot, providing thousands of jobs annually. It is also globally recognised as a Geo Park, attracting million of tourists a year that visit to pristine landscapes and see native flora + fauna. Surely this is a better long term economic proposition than mining with positive flow effects to the local community for decades to come. LACK OF INNOVATION The proposed techniques used to extract lead and silver are very outdated and involve the use of toxic chemicals. We have so much lead, silver and Nickle that has already been extracted and often ends up in landfill because we have not innovated our recycling industry. Developing techniques/industries dedicated to re using the heavy metals we have already mined seem like a much better long term prospect than degrading the landscape further. All of the reasons that I object are interlinked. Our community, tourism, farming and well being all relies on a healthy landscape and most importantly on clean and available ground water. Something this mine puts at great risk. I feel the Conditions of Consent do not adequately address the potential risks of this mine going ahead and the application for a mining licence should be refused. This will provide some very short term benefits to a very small number of people while causing irreversible harm to a fragile landscape and to the local community. Thank you for your time. |
Hilary Crawford
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowden's LueSilver Mine Project SD-5765 My name is Hilary Crawford and I have lived in Rylstone (23 km from Lue) for almost 20 years. Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to comment on this project. I request the IPC reject the Bowden proposal for several reasons. Acid Mine Drainage Acid mine drainage (AMD) is the second largest environmental problem after climate change according to the United Nations (Stephen Tuffnell, University of Oxford in The Conversation 13.9.2017). The discharge of acid drainage into water bodies can have a significant impact on the environment and contaminate drinking and irrigation water. With the Lue Silver Mine, there is a risk of long-term contamination of Lawson Creek, with drinking water and irrigation systems threatened downstream from the mining site. There is no clear evidence that the proposed mitigation measures for AMD will be effective. In their Technical Memorandum (Expert Review 16.12.2022), Earth Systems said 'Regarding management of long term AMD risk from the PAF waste rock dump and TSF, it remains our advice that the design of these facilities will need to be updated, noting that CGL liners have a limited design life, store-and-release covers are not suitable for AMD control, and that the longevity of AMD generation from PAF waster rock is unknown but may continue for hundreds of years. These factors need to be considered in future test work.' Recommendation: Bowdens should be required to update the design of their proposed mitigation measures for AMD to ensure that there is no risk of contamination. The re-design should be rigorously assessed and peer reviewed. Tailings Dam Safety Bowdens plans to build a large tailings dam over 117 ha across a fault line at the headwaters of Lawson Creek. The dam will contain cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, all highly toxic materials. To prevent leakage, Bowdens proposes to construct a geosynthetic impermeable liner base over the 117 ha, in order to provide full permeability in the centuries ahead. Bowdens has no experience in building or operating such a dam and there is no evidence that such a design will work. It has not been done before. The Lue Tailings dam will be essentially an experiment. It May work; it may fail. Should it fail, there would be huge damage to the surrounding ecosystems - a risk that cannot be taken. What happens if the geosynthetic impermeable liner base breaks down over the years, the centuries? Who will pay to rectify the damage? Can it be rectified? Approving the tailings dam appears to be a reckless decision. The dam will remain in place forever and Bowdens admits a leakage rate of at least 1.6mL a day. There has been no assessment of the risk of chemical contamination to the groundwater. Recommendation: Bowdens should be asked to redesign the tailings dam to ensure the contents will not leak in the centuries ahead. The re-design should be rigorously assessed and peer reviewed. Risk to the quality and security of groundwater The mine is expected to use 1000 magalitcres of water each year from the Lawson Creek catchment. Yet there is no accurate information on where this water will be sourced, the effect on water availability of prolonged dry periods and the significant impact on downstream users whose water security could be threatened. Furthermore, no peer review has been conducted on the risks of groundwater contamination from chemicals such as cyanide and heavy metals such as lead. The tailings dam cannot be allowed to fail. The consequences of such failure would result in contamination of the downstream Cudgegong and Macquarie Rivers, permanently threatening the surrounding environment and communities of Mudgee, Wellington, Dubbo and the Ramsar-listed Macquarie Marshes. Recommendation 1: Bowdens 'must ensure that is has sufficient water supply for all stages of the development and, if necessary, adjust the scale of the development to match its available water supply' (DPE Recommendations, Water Supply B36). Recommendation 2: The risk of chemical contamination of the ground water needs to be rigorously assessed and peer reviewed. Lead contamination The project is called a silver mine but will produce 50 times more lead than silver. Bowdens plans to excavate 95,000 tonnes of lead at Lue within two kilometres of the Lue Public School. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. How can an open cut lead mine be allowed to go ahead when there is a school nearby? Lead is known to have a detrimental impact on the development of children's brains leading to a reduction in IQ and academic achievement. Even very low levels of lead can have lifelong effects on multiple organs, including the Sanrio-vas alar system. The future of Lue's children cannot be threatened by the effects of silver and lead mining. The data used by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust and human health does not adequately capture the potential risks to the Lue community. Not only are school children at risk, so too are agricultural producers who rely on clean air and water to raise their livestock and grow their crops and vineyards. Australian agricultural produce relies on a 'clean and green' image for its exports. How long can this last if mining companies are allowed to pollute the air and water in agricultural production areas? Recommendation: To minimise the impact of lead dust affecting the air, soil and water, the mine should be put underground. This would be more expensive than an open cut mine, but in assessing whether the mine should go ahead, consideration must be given not only to the economic advantages of the mine but to how these balance against the severe negative impacts on the environment and the local community. Agriculture has a long history in the area and employs many people. The impact of contaminated soil and water could have a devastating effect on this industry, including the loss of productivity and the consequent loss of jobs. Impact on biodiversity Bowdens proposes to clear 457 ha of land, 180 ha of which comprises the critically endangered ecological community of White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum grassy box woodland. Koalas, now in serious decline in NSW and enlisted as endangered, live in the area. Their habitat will be destroyed. This is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery Plan which includes reversing the decline of koala numbers. Two critically endangered birds, the regent honeyeater and the swift parrot, have also been detected in the area. Unfortunately, the' assessment of koalas was insufficient to categorically determine their use and density within the study area' (Stygoecologica, Review of EIS). There was insufficient survey effort to determine whether the swift parrot occurs in the survey area. Furthermore, the EnviroKey report indicated that 'it is probable that Regent Honeyeater uses the area'. All this indicates that the biodiversity impacts were inadequately assessed. Bowdens proposes to use offsets to deal with the effect of clearing 457 ha of land affecting, among other species, the endangered koala, the critically endangered swift parrot, the critically endangered regent honeyeater and the critically endangered White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum grassy woodland. However, the effectiveness of biodiversity offsetting and its ability to deliver the anticipated environmental outcomes has become increasingly under question ('Integrity of the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme', Legislative Council, Report 16, November 2022). 'The aim of offsets is to achieve No Net Loss (NNL) or preferably a Net Gain (NG) of biodiversity when projects take place. Measures that are not designed to result in NNL and preferably NG are not biodiversity offsets' (Report 16). It is not clear how Bowdens can use offsets to deal with the impact of clearing possible regent honeyeater habitat when there are only 250-350 birds left in the wild. Recommendation 1: Before the mine is approved, rigorous and peer-reviewed research must be done to establish what threatened, endangered or critically endangered flora, fauna and ecological communities exist at the site. Recommendation 2: The Bowden mine must be an underground mine, not an open cut mine. This would entail much less clearing of land and hence habitat. It would also lessen the impact of lead dust in the area around the mine. |
Georgina Pollard
Organisation |
Kandos School of Cultural adaptation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Kandos School of Cultural Adaptation is a group of 15 artists, social entrepreneurs, ecologists and social scientists, farmers and academics who live across NSW from Bellingen to Sydney, Kandos to Wollongong. We object to the proposed Silver Mine in Lue, so close to the town we have named ourselves after. The primary aim of Kandos School of Cultural Adaptation is to support farmers, scientists, communities and other future focused industries in activities that positively address the social and environmental change we are all facing due to climate change and land degredation. Our story is tied to the economic and social story of Kandos, and we have worked for the last six years with landowners, Kandos locals, farmers, scientists, traditional custodians and other indigenous stakeholders to examine the future of small towns like Kandos and the farming communities that surround it. What we have found through our sustained and deep engagement with these communities is that despite the hardships they face, they are far from the picture of despair that Bowden’s CEO painted at the public presentation. While there is disadvantage, there are also strong signs of recovering economic activity, especially in Rylstone through a bustling tourism economy that would be highly impacted by having such a massive open cut mining operation placed in the environment around it. Kandos and Rylstone have enjoyed significant increase in property values, which have over doubled in the last few years. This is driven by a demographic trend which has seen young families relocate to these towns to raise their families in the beautiful, healthy, and community minded culture of our small towns. While this has been a boon to our area, it has also driven up rental prices, which has already made it difficult for the disadvantaged of our area to find places to live. The addition of a mine will do to our towns what every mine does. It will drive up the price of properties and create a housing crisis for the very people Bowdens says their project will somehow lift. The economic advantages of Bowden’s mine will be short lived, and the two towns will have to face the same problems we have today when the mine moves on in 16 years and add to our troubles the inevitable economic collapse that occurs when mines close down. We would also add our voices to the desperation of the farmers who oppose this mine, with whom we have worked as they attempt to adjust their farming practices to make them more sustainable and resilient in the face of declining environmental conditions due to our ongoing mistreatment of our natural resources. The threats to the water system that will live on for millennia after the mine is gone, the poorly tested or understood techniques of preventing acid mine drainage or contamination of the water table from the tailings dam are cruel burdens to put onto the shoulders of these farmers after all the hardships they have met and to which they are working so hard to adapt. We believe that the future of Kandos lies in clean water, healthy landscapes and industries who focus on a sustainable, regenerative and healthy future. We strongly urge the IPC to deny approval for a project that is short sighted at best, and catastrophic at worst To see more about us visit https://www.ksca.land/about-us |
Darren Baguley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
File is attached below. |
Attachments |
bowdens-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 526.33 KB) |
Jayne Bentivoglio
Organisation |
Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Jayne Bentivoglio Toxic dust submission Bowden's Mine document is uploaded below |
Attachments |
2023-jb-submission-toxic-dust-ropdocx.docx (DOCX, 23.13 KB) |
Sonia Christie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Written submission objecting to the Bowden’s Mine at Lue My verbal submission at the IPC Hearing covered my involvement representing the community on the Bowden’s Community Consultative Committee (CCC) for over 6 years, l was also on the CCC for the previous owners, Kingsgate prior to this. I have had a long association with the development of this proposed mine from a community perspective. My focus in this written submission is in the detail of the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) State Significant Development Assessment SSD 5765 December 2022. Assessment report in italics, of which l reply to in bold. My major concern throughout this process and my perceived feeling was that DPEs role and agenda was to facilitate the approval of the mine with little or no concern for the future or wellbeing of either the environment nor the residents, nor the overwhelming technical difficulties of having a mineral mine on such a difficult greenfield site. DPEs recommendations feel like a ‘done deal’ so the details have been overlooked assuming basic boxes are ticked. DPE then also assuming the community will sit back and let this happen with no protest whilst IPC make this difficult decision. DPE have either been very out of touch with the community or believed the proponents glossy brochures. This was only reinforced when the NSW government, in 2021, released its Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy with a statement, “The NSW Government will: reduce red and green tape by providing direct project facilitation support for critical minerals projects to navigate planning and regulatory approvals.” Critical minerals and high-tech metals strategy (nsw.gov.au) Many residents have worked long and hard to try to ensure this is a fair and due process and some sadly have naively sat back in the belief that the NSW state government have their best interests at heart. I live on a grazing property 8kms from the mine site and have a background in health so understandably my concerns lie in the health and welfare of the Lue community and greater area. I have come to understand over the years that technically this mine proposes to extract predominantly lead and zinc so that the toxic legacy that this area will face after a relative short mine life and small profit margin to the state government will in no way compensate for the long term clean up costs to the environment, human health and social impact for our small community after only 16.5 years. In my attachment l have worked consecutively through the detail of the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) State Significant Development Assessment SSD 5765 December 2022. Assessment report in italics, of which l reply in bold. |
Attachments |
bowdens-ipc-submission-sonia-christiepdf.pdf (PDF, 921.76 KB) |
Trina Karstrom
Organisation |
Trina Karstrom |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a 30 year resident of the Mudgee area from 1988-2018 I still feel a deep connection with friends and associates, and visit regularly. Our property was 16 kilometres north of Mudgee, during our tenure I witnessed the major expansion of the mines north of Mudgee, from approximately 20k's away as the crow flys to about 10. The night sky went from dark to one that was continually lit up by the mines. The expansion also caused displacement of animals and birds, suddenly their natural trails/domain were disrupted forcing them into farm land and increased road kill. Not to mention the unslightlyness of the whole mine area. The mine expansion was getting to close for comfort and one of the reasons we decided to sell our organic farm. The fact that this proposal is only 2 kilometres from the village of Lue, boggles the mind. A thriving village with a school all this area will ultimately be contaminated by the lead run off in the water and air. It appears there isn't any formulated plan for the lead contamination as a result of this mine. Families in this area have been there for generations and are true custodians of the land. The biodiversity of the area will be damaged beyond repair. If it weren't for people actually raising concerns about the affects of mining, there would be one opencut mine from Gloucester to Mudgee and beyond. Is that what we really want for our state? The moon scape in the Hunter is disgusting, and that is land that has supposedly been rehabilitated. The proposed Bowdens silver mine brings absolutely no positives to the table. Is the state going to force the upgrade of a narrow winding road from Mudgee to Lue to accomodate the mining vehicles? The road can barely handle existing traffic. The area would benefit more from a "rail trail" for bicycling along the abandoned rail line than a mine. That concept would bring more activity, business and culture to the small town, than a bunch of drive in drive out miners. Also it is my understanding that there isn't any compensation being offered to surrounding homes or businesses for the damage this will cause, really? What is this company thinking. The state has to stop the continual digging up of our natural enviroment, we have to think of the future generations and what we leave behind, abandoned spent mines? |
Luciana Smink
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission regarding the Bowdens silver Mine. I am a landholder living close by the proposed mine site and object strongly to the approval for this mine for the following reasons: Seepage/heavy metals The report by the Department states the following: The Department has recommended conditions requiring Bowdens Silver to update the groundwater model every three years and to provide a closure strategy for the final void that details measures to ensure the final void remains a groundwater sink in perpetuity or demonstrates that seepage from the void would not cause adverse impacts on the receiving environment. This condition seems to be an impossibility. How does Bowdens (or the Department) propose to ensure and demonstrate that the final void remains a groundwater sink forever or that seepage would not cause adverse impacts at any time in the future - even perpetuity. Apart from natural changes o er time, one earthquake would shatter this condition. AMD cannot possibly be ‘managed’ effectively in perpetuity. This mine will leave a toxic heritage behind. Any remediation bonds that are conditional to this mine are never guaranteed. There is plenty of evidence of bonds not being sufficient, and apparently political decisions can be made after the approval is granted to reduce these bonds (as in the McArthur River mine). Water availability According to the Department’s report: “The project is designed to maximise the reuse of water and minimise clean water take on site, and Bowdens Silver has sufficient entitlement under its harvestable rights and water access licences to account for the mine’s water take. Groundwater inflows into the open cut pit would cause drawdown of groundwater levels in the vicinity of the mine. “ In Bowdens original estimate, there would not be enough local water for this mine, hence the proposal to bring it in from Ulan by pipeline. Bowdens later added in an ‘amendment’ that there would be enough water after all. This looked rather like a cynical exercise by Bowdens who knew all along the pipeline was not feasible but included it in the first plan to reassure locals about water usage, and then change it in an ‘afterthought’ amendment later on. Whether or no, water access licenses are words on paper and do not reflect the actual availability of water in the area. All locals remember too well the devastating drought of 2018-19, and with climate changing more rapidly than predicted (and a new period of drought probably already on the way) there is no way that we can be certain that water supply will be sufficient. How can the department be satisfied that Bowdens mine will not deplete the groundwater levels to adversely affect local communities, businesses, endangered ecosystems (box gum grassy woodlands) and wildlife. Lead exposure As it is universally agreed that there is NO acceptable level of lead exposure, how can this mine be approved? It is clearly going to be impacting on the people of Lue and surrounds, especially (the babies of) pregnant women and children. Should my grandchildren, 3 and 4 years old, who live about 5 kilometres from the mine site pay a very high price for temporary commercial gain? Surrounding landholders are reliant on their water tanks for drinking water. Unavoidably lead dust would settle in our tanks. Children play in the ground. Unavoidably lead dust will settle onto our properties. Surely this is completely unacceptable. El Salvador (as well as the US in parts of Minnesota just recently) banned metals mining (including lead/silver/nickel) outright. Honduras and Costa Rica banned open cut mining. The effects on the environment and community are too dangerous, as is the risk of potential disastrous outcomes (for instance what happens to the tailings dam in case of an earth tremor?) Why does the department deem the benefits outweigh the negative impact and risks? The benefit consists of temporary jobs in the mine (even the ‘permanent’ jobs only available during the 20 years of the mine’s lifespan) as well as commercial gain to Bowdens shareholders and royalties to the government. The department concedes that the financial benefit of this proposed mine is quite small and “significantly lower than a typical coal mine would generate” before then stressing the global importance of silver and zinc. Though silver and zinc are valuable commodities, this speculative reason seems to far outweigh the factual negatives of this proposal. Also, the strategic importance of zinc and silver cited is not a true strategic importance. As the silver and zinc would be exported, the sole benefit of this would be financial. (and not much at that as already conceded). The word ‘strategic’ is a nonsense word; it would be a strategic importance if the silver and zinc were to be kept and utilised within Australia. This is only about money. The negative impact in unavoidable effects, even in a best case scenario are: loss of health in (particularly the young) people of our community, loss of biodiversity (including critically endangered White Box, Yellow Box and Blakeley’s Red Gum Grassy Woodlands, including koala habitat) noise and light pollution where dark skies are now an endangered phenomenon, heavy traffic increase in a quiet rural and tourist area, negative impact on property prices and increased carbon emissions resulting in yet again exacerbating the climate crisis. And then there are the risks of catastrophic or significant damage to the area in seepage of heavy metals into Lawson Creek, and/or a shift in geological conditions damaging the tailings dam. I ask that the department do not approve this mine as there cannot possibly be sufficient guarantee, notwithstanding imposed conditions, that this mine will not irreparably damage our health and natural environment and contribute to our already dire climate situation. Luciana Smink |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am over eighty years of age and lived in this area all my life. I would like to object that the bowdens Lue Mine is finally getting the go ahead to mine. It has been rejected up until now for very good reasons. This goes ahead of water safety, which is the keystone to this mining operation, and diminishes agriculture, tourism the environment and all life. The silver, lead and zinc mining poses unforetold problems for this area. One the usage of water (I believe that the water is to be taken from the site and will directly affect Lawson Creek and the underground aquifers). This will affect any landholder downstream as he tries to mitigate the effects of any drought or flood problems as the extreme weather continues to plague us. This includes Mudgee and the area around. The water is likely to be contaminated from floods overflowing the holding/tailings dam including mercury, lead, and other toxic minerals which will be around forever . Mudgee will be affected too with the cross contamination and dry rivers and creeks. Dust is another big problem. Lue school is less than two miles away… Do we want our youngest affected by lead? Let alone the rest of the residents of Lue and surrounding areas. You can’t tell me that winds carrying lead won’t carry that far. We will all be affected Noise is another feature. Why should any person be woken or shocked by the explosions that are inevitable if the mining is to proceed. Either trucks or trains are likely to produce more noise and dust. I understand that the product is sent to Parkes and on from there for refining, can anyone guarantee that no lead and toxic chemicals will escape during this trip causing havoc to any humans or other animals and plants. There are too many insurmountable risks at this time for this mine to go ahead. I reject the proposal. Kandos has been mentioned unfavourably according to riches that the population is not supposed to have or the mediocrity of the children attending it’s schools. There has also been a disparaging comment on the number of broken homes in Kandos since the cement works closed. Is this going to be fixed by so called employment bowdens mine offers if it gets the right to operate?? I cannot see any difference except that of young ones who have newly broken up moving into the area because of relatively low cost accommodation . The water is likely to be contaminated from floods overflowing from the holding/tailings dam including mercury, lead, and other toxic minerals which will be around forever. Mudgee will be affected too with the cross contamination and dry rivers and creeks. This will be a problem for tourism and agriculture and the look and perception of the town. Dust is another big problem. Lue school is less than two miles away… Do we want our youngest affected by lead? Let alone the rest of the residents of Lue and surrounding areas. You can’t tell me that winds carrying lead won’t carry that far. We will all be affected. Noise is another feature. Why should any person be woken or shocked by the explosions that are inevitable if the mining is to proceed. Either trucks or trains are likely to produce more noise and dust. I understand that the product is sent to Parkes and on from there for refining, can anyone guarantee that no lead and toxic chemicals will not escape during this trip causing havoc to any humans or other animals and plants. I noted with interest that Chris Pavich Does not rule out the occurrence of Earthquakes especially in areas with a cracked profile as the proposed mine has. There are too many insurmountable risks at this time for this mine to go ahead. I reject the proposal. |
Georgina Pollard
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed silver and mostly lead mine from the perspective of a resident of Kandos. You have received plenty of submissions outlining the inevitable and significant damage this mine will do to our air and water quality, the leachate from the huge 77 hectare tailings dam, the acid mine drainage and the devastating health effects of lead pollution on the children of this area. So I will focus on my personal experience of living in Kandos for the last ten years, why I chose Kandos as our family’s home and how Anthony McClure’s description of how terrible life is for people living in Kandos is simply not true. I am speaking from the position of someone he mentions in his speech. My family is in a low income bracket and I am one of those people with mental health issues. But lets interpret those statistics a little differently, yes? After all, if Anthony McClure is actually concerned about health, mental health, jobs and divorce rates he wouldn’t be considering a mining project that releases lead particles into our air and waterways as a legitimate solution to this problem. We are a family of two parents, two children and two grandparents that live in Kandos. Emma is 18 now, and Rufus was born here and is 5 years old. We moved from our inner city life in St Peters to Kandos 10 years ago. We did this to improve the quality of life for Emma when she was struggling at school. She went to Lue Primary school and her mental health and well-being improved immediately. Close peer relationships, caring teachers, access to National Parks and clean river systems on the weekend, stable living situation, access to a backyard where we could have chickens and dogs and an ability to grow our own vegetables. Too many reasons to list here as to why moving to Kandos improved the quality of life for our small family. All of this will change if Lue Silver Mine were to go ahead. This town is not the dumpster fire McClure claims. This is a community that can afford to look after each other and demonstrably does exactly that. With the numerous volunteer groups in Kandos, if you are in need of care, this is the place to be. To address McClure’s statistics: my experience of living in kandos is that this is an affordable area to live in if you have a low income and mental or health issues. This is one of the reasons to move here. Does lead mining improve physical and mental health? No. Simply no, and you have numerous submissions already that say exactly that. How will the mine affect mental and physical health? Healthy landscapes to walk in, growing your own food, having relationships with animals, close knit communities, these have been scientifically proven to improve both physical and mental health. McClure claims that young people are leaving because there are no jobs. Yes, my daughter Emma left here when she was 17. But, she left to go to Newcastle University and is doing a double degree in Science and Arts. She now lives with two other kids who also grew up in this community. She is in a safe and supportive sharehouse where her parents are welcome to visit and stay. I can’t imagine a more ideal situation for my child to grow into. Children should leave and explore the world! And feel safe and supported while doing so. Emma tells me today that she hopes to come back. She will get her degree and she hopes to return to contribute to this place that she loves. This is evidence of the health of this community, not dysfunction. I am so privileged and lucky to experience this outcome for my daughter on such a low income and with mental health issues. How could this have happened anywhere else? How will this change if this mine goes ahead? Emma won’t return to National parks that are poisoned from acid mining and lead in the water and air. I hope she doesn’t. Her brother Rufus is 5 yrs old and I had hoped he would grow up in this community. If this mine goes ahead I will need to protect him not only from the brain and kidney damage caused by lead pollution but also from witnessing the decline of the wildlife that he gets daily joy from. Perhaps you will find this sentimental, but for a moment put yourself in the mind of a child. For the sake of his future mental health do you think it is damaging for him to watch rivers, food systems and butterflies die? This will happen over the next 20 years if this mine goes ahead. I can’t bear to watch this. I will not subject my kid to watching it. Do you think that 15mm worth of plastic will protect our rivers? Really? As I have said, you already have evidence of the health and environmental risks in plenty of submissions. Submissions from lay people and professionals alike. My submission pertains to my perception and appreciation of this community. Anthony McClure has only listened to people who confirm his view of this community. It is not my experience of this community. To my mind, their interpretation of the statistics show that this is a community that they believe isn’t not worth caring for. This community has cared for me and I care for it. Bowden’s Silver Mine does not care about the health and well-being of the community of Kandos. |
Andrew White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our family business is located on the property Havilah North on the Hayes Gap Rd which is 25 kms by road from Mudgee and as the crow flies 12 km north west of Lue. With my wife and 2 adult children we produce fine wool merinos and beef cattle. We rely on an average 620 mm of rainfall to grow the grass to feed these animals. The clean green wool and beef that we have no trouble selling in these booming times is under threat because of the nearby lead mine. The Bowdens lead mine is the wrong mine in the wrong place. There are many reasons behind this fact. The main one being water. We take water for granted just because it falls out the sky, however it is an ever increasingly valuable commodity. It can be bought and sold on an open market. High security water licenses have increased in value over time particularly during the drought of 2017 to 2019. The water requirements of the mine are being met largely from underground sources. In the recent drought the Lawson Creek stopped flowing which is an indication that water usage from existing users is at the maximum. The addition of the Bowdens requirements can only add more stress to the current situation. In dry times the lead mine will be no different to all other water users in that a dry time means water usage more than doubles, adding stress to an already stressed system. In dry times dust levels generated by mining activities will increase requiring more water to suppress the dust. The underground water aquifer is not a measurable commodity. The amount that is taken out of it is. A bore that is drilled down into the aquifer is measured in terms of it’s flow rate. There is no figure that can that can be put onto the available amount of water in an aquifer. The Bowdens Silver mine will also increase traffic flow on all roads surrounding the mine. In the case of the Hayes Gap Road this will pose an increased safety risk as we move livestock and machinery. Along the Lue Road safety will become an issue as the proposal is to move six B-Double trucks of ore per day from Lue to Parkes. Large trucks will also be carrying dangerous chemicals such as Cyanide in the other direction to the mine. All road users will be at risk. Given the current state of the road the chance of an accident is high. While I have no experience in mining, a project of this size has the potential to ruin the water supply to Mudgee through leakages from the tailings dam down the Lawson Creek. The dam and all it's toxic chemicals will stay there forever and there are no dams anywhere in the world that would give any level of confidence that this dam will not leak. The recent failure of the tailings dam at the Cadia Hill gold mine near Orange is a prime example. The Bowdens Silver mine is a project that needs more time. Time to prove that the water supply will not affect surrounding landholders. Time to make better and safer roads around the mine. Time to prove that the tailings dam will be secure. The mine has a life expectancy of 16 years and presents some good employment opportunities during this time and in the construction process. The risks to the environment of the Lue community and the wider Mudgee region are high. In every step of the life of this mine there is the possibility of failure resulting in damage that will last forever. A failure in the lining in the tailings dam will destroy a creek system. A truck accident on poorly constructed roads will destroy lives. Is a mine that provides for a 16-year period worth the risk of permanent damage? The Bowdens lead mine will change Lue and the surrounding environment forever. The risk of an unexpected outcome from the mining activity is high. Mr Clay Preshaw who was the final speaker for the Department of Planning at the recent IPC Public Hearing acknowledged “These types of projects or mining projects are difficult, and they involve a full range of issues.” Will future generations who will be looking at a hole in the ground and a poisoned river system be left wondering how a mine with so many issues was ever allowed to proceed? |
William Brown
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is William Brown and I spoke at the hearing. I have added some attachments that the IPC requested. The DPE says that the proposed mine should match the scale of the development to the available water supply. Great idea, yet the modeling used will not come up to the expectations and needs for the mine to operate. I am upstream of the mine and have managed this landscape for the past 30 years. I strongly believe that there is not enough water for this development. In 2018/2019 Breakfast Creek did not run into Lawsons creek for over twelve months. My swamp had no inflow for that period of time. It is normal for no water to be flowing in Lawsons creek on my property. There are a few water holes that have water in them during dry times for stock to access. Pyangle road and Breakfast Creek road have recently been graded after flood damage 6 months ago. A single water truck has been pumping out of Lawsons creek at the causeway on Pyangle Lane. The truck is filling as I type. The water hole he is pumping out of is nearly dry now. He has averaged 1 load of water each day, and we have received 64.5 mm of rainfall in that time (4 weeks). I understand why flow figures from Lawsons creek are not used in the proposed plan. When it is wet it flows amazing, but sadly only for a short time as I am so close to the top of the catchment. on boxing day evening in 2021 we experienced 76.5 mm that fell between 9pm and 10pm, 1 hour of heavy rain. I would hate to imagine the proposed tailings dam dealing with that much water in such little time. Page 42 of the DPE assessment report 161 states Lawsons creek is already degraded with low ecological values. I strongly object to this statement. The aquatic life of fish, yabbies, water rats and bird life is abundant upstream. The riparian area is very healthy. The photos I have included show Breakfast Creek, which joins up with Lawsons creek on my place. The DPE should be asking the question of why Lawsons creek is degraded, and look at what measures are needed to increase the health of the creek. To decide it is too far gone, and why not then just over allocate the water licences and back a proposal which will put toxins in the water forever is not the answer. This plan is not complete and needs more risk assessments done too prevent potential harm to underground water and creek. I was woolclassing in 2014 when I got Q-Fever. I breathed in dust each time a fleece was thrown on the table that I worked on. 2 other workmates got Q-Fever at the same shed. This shed was no more dusty then any other shed, yet we breathed it in without knowing. If I choose to continue woolclassing in the Lue/ Rylstone area, and the silver mine is operating, I will be exposed to lead which will be in the wool of the sheep. Sheep are shorn every 12 months ,there for they have had exposure to a lot of "lead days ."Everyone that works in the shearing shed will have the same exposure. When the wool is processed overseas they can test for lead and trace it back to individual property. Mudgee is well known around the world as a producer of excellent superfine wool for two hundred years and there is no reason why this should not continue for another two hundred more. If lead is found to be present in the wool and meat,then this industry could suffer very bad. The proposed mine life is for a max of 23 years in the plan. A friend working in one of the Mudgee coal mines said that his mine has just had approval on the life of its mine for another 22 years. It is very confronting having consultants engaged by Bowdens, calling in at my place trying to get me to agree to a power line to run through my property without any information. They offered me money 11 months ago. I do not recommend conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. There are too many issues with this proposed plan to mention for the 3rd time. My other submissions fell on deaf ears and were not responded to. The plan does not match my values for a healthy, holistic ecosystem and lifestyle. I cannot believe that it has been considered with what they are offering our community. There is nothing positive for Lue and the surrounding area in this proposal .If this plan is given approval then it sets a precedence for other toxic developments for the area to be considered. Australia has not run out of zinc, lead or silver. Leave it in the ground until there is a safe way to extract and process the ore. This proposal is offensive to the land and people. |
Attachments |
img2067jpg.jpg (JPG, 4.41 MB) img2089jpg.jpg (JPG, 5.89 MB) imgmap-swamppdf.pdf (PDF, 850.41 KB) |
Graham Newell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family have owned a property in Lue on the Lawson Creek for over 25 years. This proposal is inconsistent with existing use and will destroy the community and existing jobs in tourism and agriculture. We also have family property in Gloucester and have seen first hand the damage done to the community with this type of proposal, the Rocky Hill Project in Gloucester was a significant case of a mine that was refused due to negative social impact. I ask you to refuse this project in Lue. |
Lucy White
Organisation |
Fox Run Cottage |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A written submission is attached along with 2 supporting documents. |
Attachments |
mudgee-area-visitor-economy-at-risk-from-bowdens-mine-proposal--submission-from-decisive-consulting.pdf (PDF, 246.42 KB) mudgee-dmp-20202025-evpdf.pdf (PDF, 10.83 MB) visitor-economy-impacts--objectionpdf.pdf (PDF, 304.59 KB) |
Margaret Doble
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the approval of the Bowden's Lead/Silver/Zinc mine for the following reasons: · I live in the community of Kandos and have friends in the town of Lue and bordering the proposed mine, who have grave concerns for the welfare of their families, the environment and their livelihoods on highly productive farm land. I too share their concern. · Even very low levels of exposure to lead can have lifelong effects on the body's systems, particularly in children and pregnant women. · Bowden’s mine will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Bowden's projected measurements for water usage are based on bolstered rain figures. · Climate change has meant that we are experiencing more severe weather patterns and with that comes flood, fire and drought. This could result in an overflowing toxic tailings dam, toxic smoke from bushfire, and marked increase in toxic dust when in drought. · There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. Bowden's have stated in their own documents that there will be a small amount of leakage from the tailings dam. This is not an acceptable risk considering the likelihood of chemicals such as cyanide, or heavy metals such as lead, leaching into the water table and waterways beyond the dam including Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. There is no coming back from that. · The clearing of Boxy Grass Woodland is completely at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery Program. This clearing could affect the survival of the local koala population and also the endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot. Is Lue to be yet another small community like Wollar, Ulan and Bylong which slowly dies as people tire of dealing with the risk of contamination in their air, soil and water while watching their properties decrease in value and their rural amenities dwindle. Let’s hope not and that approval for this lead mine does not go ahead! |
Jennifer Wingham
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a veterinarian who has spent a considerable time in the rural and urban fringe areas on NSW, I have strongly held, evidence based views on the critical need to STOP any mining or development that endangers the biodiversity of this state. The short term gains that this mine may afford will never make up for the long term effects to our endangered wildlife. |
Beverley Smiles
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project must be rejected on the basis of poor information and on clear consideration of the potential extent of irreversible environmental and social damage. A more detailed submission is attached. |
Attachments |
submissionofobjectionpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 19.21 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned that the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) done by Bowdens is inadequate to ascertain the risks to Lue and surrounding towns. The baseline data for lead concentrations in soil and dust appear to only be from the mine site which has higher concentrations of lead compared to the surrounding residential and agricultural areas. This means that the baseline will likely be higher than the actual figures which makes the relative impact of operations appear less significant than it would actually be. How have the blood lead concentrations been measured to ascertain that baseline? By whom? I have not seen anywhere that Bowdens have offered blood sampling for trace metal concentrations - if this mine goes ahead, will they fund longitudinal studies on the impacts of contaminants for residents and the wider ecosystem? The EIS does not sufficiently show how they will manage the spread risks associated with high winds - looking at Mt Isa as a comparable operation, it is evident that lead contamination impacts the surrounding community even with very little wind flowing directly from the mine site to the city. Particulates and dust are spread so easily, I do not think the harm from this toxic dust has been adequately considered. The messaging is that the impact will be minimal but it means residents won't be able to spend much time outside, no more vegetable patch due to potential lead and other trace metal contaminants. A report on the impacts of lead contamination in children at Mt Isa suggests that factors for elevated lead contamination include children having direct exposure to dirt, children who ingest particles through toys and if the family has any pets they interact with. There seems to be no getting around the contamination, even if you were to stay inside and constantly cleaning every surface of dust then it is still on your roof and getting into your water tanks! The Social Impact Assessment (SIA) done by Bowdens talks a lot about dust suppression, not considering eradication as a viable option - they acknowledge that it will have some social impact but seems to minimise this risk. There is so much evidence on how lead impacts the body, especially a child's healthy development, dust potentially contaminated with lead being released from the mine site is not a risk I am willing to stake my children's future on. What about the risks to the people working in the mines? I know there is strict regulations regarding this kind of hazardous work but will they be adequately compensated if they develop long-term health conditions through this work? Will anyone in the community be compensated for the long term health problems associated with trace metal contamination? It feels like they want to push through with this project boasting its potential economic impact (Who is getting rich off this? Not the local residents and community) and then when the impacts can be proven in a decade or two they can just apologise and make a few payouts. Another issue I have with Bowden's EIS is that they do not seem to model beyond year 9 of operations - when they have proposed a initial lifetime of 16 years, with options for extending that time. They also do not seem to adequately consider the tailing storage facility as a contamination threat. The SIA seems to propose some potential actions to mitigate impacts without indicating how they intend to follow through with any of them. Specifically for noise and vibrations they recommend homes be reinforced with double glazed windows and air-conditioning systems, do they mean for residents to fund this themselves? Are they prepared to assist in ensuring all residents within a certain radius of the proposed mine site have access to these mitigation strategies? Have they considered how the potentially lead contaminated dust will impact the wider region - the tourist economy relies on wineries and other small agricultural enterprises, how will this potentially hazardous dust impact the agricultural viability of surrounding areas? There are too many questions unanswered for me to support this mine, concerns about the associated risks to residents and potential contamination of local ecosystems. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m trained as a town and country planner and have worked in rural community development for 30 years. Now I capture the special stories of Australia as an oral historian for the National Library. Part of our family live next door to the proposed Lue lead mine, so we know the area well and love it for its pristine state, agricultural productivity and beautiful scenery. The short term gain for Bowdens company and its shareholders will count little in the future if, in the development process they destroy the water quality of ephemeral Lawson Creek, open cut 53 hectares of the beautiful Lue valley, clearing 457 hectares of wood and grassland, and affect the livelihoods and industries of farms, vineyards and such a high value tourist region. Lawson Creek is small and didn’t run at all during the drought from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting dependent agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. The proponent has not answered the most fundamental issue required for mining – whether there will be sufficient water for mining operations and for existing water users, together with the level of pollution of surface and ground water from mine activities. Two water experts have made submissions to the Department (Earth Systems and Shireen Baguley) clearly pointing out that these fundamental questions remain unanswered, and that the water source is insufficient for mining operations without draining Lawson Valley. Of great significance is the proposed tailings dam over a fault line at the headwaters of Lawson Creek. The dam itself is large, but most telling is the leakage into surface and groundwater of poisons such as cyanide, arsenic and lead particles at a minimum of 1.6ml per day, predicted by Bowdens. These are highly toxic materials. The United Nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity following climate change. Most important are future generations and the health of the children. It’s a misnomer to call this mine a silver mine – it is a lead mine projected to dig up 95,000 tonnes of lead compared to 1,880 t of silver. It is well known how exposure to lead affects the brain and cardiovascular system long term, especially of children. Lue village and school are only 2 kilometres from the mine. Presumably the owners and proponents do not live in Lue area or have children at Lue school. Each Planning Dept person, Commissioner, or Bowden’s company director will have a family whom they protect from harmful elements. This lead mine looks set to violate environmental, community and economic standards without valuing fundamental human needs for clean water, clean air and a sustainable quality of life enjoyed in this region for generations. |
Judy Smith
Organisation |
P & J Smith Ecological Consultants |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We object to the proposed development. Details of our objection, particularly in relation to unacceptable impacts on terrestrial biodiversity, are outlined in attached file (February 2023). A copy of our earlier submission is also attached (July 2020). We also attach a copy of the NSW Auditor-General's report published in August 2022 which presents the findings of their audit of the NSW Biodiversity Offsets Scheme and which is relevant to our latest submission. |
Attachments |
final--effectiveness-of-the-biodiversity-offsets-schemepdf.pdf (PDF, 3.44 MB) lue-silver-mine-smith-and-smith-feb-23docx.docx (DOCX, 87.88 KB) lue-silver-mine-smith-and-smithpdf.pdf (PDF, 170.67 KB) |
Dean Knott
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a neighbouring property to the Bowdens Project we believe we have been overlooked by Bowdens and the DPIE with regard to many of our concerns. We believe the models for noise, dust and vibration are grossly underestimated and outdated. We also believe the studies need to actually be conducted on our property and not elsewhere and then estimated. For the most accurate reading that will show how this directly affect us we believe there is no other way to accurately do the studies. BOWDENS HAVE STATED THE ABOVE MENTIONED LEVELS ARE ACCEPTABLE,BUT TO WHO? No one has asked us if it's acceptable to us, we've just been told that to them (Bowdens) and the DPIE it's an acceptable level. We have one of very few well functioning bores around Lue and we strongly believe once they start harvesting ground water this will cause our bore level to drastically reduce in capacity. We feel that the speed limit outside our residence should be lowered to mitigate the danger from high traffic levels speeding past our driveway as we try to get out, and also lessen traffic noise passing our property. We have never wanted to live next door to a silver mine ( we were not advised of the silver mines existence until after we had purchased our property) so if Bowdens goes ahead we feel as though we have no choice but to relocate out of the area. We believe a neighbouring silver mine will adversely affect property prices in the area and we will be unable to sell up and move on. |
Les Wingham
Organisation |
Wingham Holdings |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have spent time in the area at Lue and recently at Camphill. I ask that IPC protect people, and the business that have grown and developed in the area. This is a development that is not justifiable on these grounds and most of all the adverse impact on the environment. |
Chris Pavich
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Refer to emailed submission |
Attachments |
pavich-submissions-bowdens-silver-202022.pdf (PDF, 1.05 MB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Nil |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I object to the Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd mine project. The Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine. In reality, it will be a lead mine. It will produce more lead than silver, with project estimates of 95,000 tonnes of lead, 130,000 tonnes of zinc and 1,879 tonnes of silver. The project could have serious impacts on the health and livelihoods of the people, and the water in the district surrounding the mine. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning is inadequate, and does not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. The data relied upon by Bowdens in it’s EIS relating to air, dust and human health risks does not properly capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Bowdens’ EIS concludes people living in Lue will not be affected by dust issues if the mine proceeds. This conclusion is based on insufficient data and underestimate levels of community exposure which overlook concentrate, mined ore materials and tailings as sources of potentially toxic dust. It also ignores peak wind events, and relies on out-of-date guidelines regarding compliance levels for acceptable community exposure in houses. The mine will be situated approx. 2 kilometres from Lue village and primary school. It will have negative and permanent social impacts. How many small villages thrive next door to large scale open cut mines? You only have to look at villages like Wollar, Ulan, Bylong and Broke to see what happens to small communities when large scale mining developments happen on their doorstep. Although Bowdens has proposed a series of actions to migrate the impact of the mine the residents of Lue will still face the following: 1. Having to choose between tolerating unmitigated noise and dust, or living in a fully enclosed (air conditioned) dwelling. 2. Living with on-going risks to health, and tolerating regular testing for lead in soil and water. 3. Anxiety due to risks to health, particularly affecting young people and potentially realising adverse health impacts had occurred. Adverse health impacts which lead to the pain of illness and the heartbreak of lost love ones along with rising medical expenses, and the additional economic and social costs of disease. 4. Loss of many amenities of a rural way of life, including home grown food, open windows, and line clothes drying. 5. Loss of sense of place and visual amenity. 6. Anxiety due to loss of property values, and inability to realise the previous capital value of homes and property because of the proximity of the mine. 7. Loss of permanent residents despite the fall in the property values. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Save Lue and Mudgee from potential environment disaster. Please reject this project. For the only planet we have. |
Jack White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Project should be refused. It poses as a permanent, intergenerational liability to our region. Multiple independent experts have flagged major areas of concern regarding the design of this mine. The DPE has largely ignored this advice, clearly determined to stick to its agenda of developing Critical Minerals at the expense of the community and the environment. Clay Preshaw stated to the IPC hearing in Mudgee that the DPE often uses Management Plans in the post approval process to deal with mine design issues. This is disgraceful, and is not what the EIS process is intended to do. The DPE is allowing the proponent to finalise critical mine design behind closed doors, away from the eyes of the community. This is a horrendous betrayal of due process. It is up to the IPC to show the community that objective decision making still exists, in order to restore the community faith in the project approvals system. As part of its approval process, in 2022 the NSW Department of Planning & Environment (DPE) engaged expert environmental consultancy, Earth Systems, to review Acid Mine Drainage and Surface Water impacts of the Bowdens project. Earth Systems concluded that Bowdens’ proposed approach was technically unresolved and inappropriate for the management of acid mine drainage from potentially acid forming material in the waste rock emplacement (WRE) and tailings storage facility (TSF). Earth Systems stated: • “It remains our advice that the design of these facilities will need to be updated, noting that GCL liners have a limited design life, store-and-release covers are not suitable for AMD control, and the longevity of AMD generation from PAF waste rock is unknown but may continue for hundreds of years.’’ • “The waste rock dump design is unproven and appears substantially problematic, with initial indications that the site could be establishing the need for water treatment in perpetuity.” • “Store-and-release covers are used widely, but almost never in recent years for the purposes of AMD control. The proposed store-and-release cover systems are not considered an appropriate strategy for PAF waste rock or PAF tailings management.’’ Hugh Middlemis from HydroGeoLogic also identified major risks associated with the final pit lake and the unknown impacts of the geological faults beneath the mine site. • “The open cut pit would be left as a final void with appropriate design to ensure it remains a terminal groundwater sink’’ …‘’If unmitigated, there would be a more than 50% chance that the water level could increase above the level required for the pit to become a throughflow system’’. • “Figures show considerable layer deviations at the mine site, but there was no commentary provided to justify this representation … the role of the mapped fault structures is not discussed.’’ • The assertion that the perturbations would be ‘of little consequence to predictions’ is not objectively justified and is questionable’’ . • It is concluded that the model layering has been poorly executed.’’ Both independent surface water experts Earth Systems (DPE) and Shireen Baguley (LAG) recently identified that Bowden’s surface water balance model is severely flawed and raised doubt around water availability. The 2020 EIS included an external water supply pipeline from Ulan Coalfields, however when this was unable to be secured, the project was amended in 2022, claiming all water requirements could be sourced from the site. As a result, there are serious concerns around impacts to water users downstream and Bowdens’ ability to manage dust suppression with such water constraints. Bowden’s acknowledge that “during dry weather periods, when evaporation is high, more water for dust suppression would be required.” However: • Bowdens have decreased the average water requirements for dust suppression from 204ML/year (WRM 2020) to 131ML/year (WRM 2022) with little explanation as to why. • DPE’s water expert Earth Systems noted that Bowdens explanation for this was not supported by data, nor were uncertainties in dust suppression requirements considered in the sensitivity analysis of the water balance model. • “The primary means by which the project would be dispersing any heavy metals would be metal particles attached to dust, generated from the site’’ As part of its overarching design, the DPE Assessment Report claims to use the Precautionary Principle stating it has “assessed the project’s threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage using reasonable worst case scenarios”. This is challenging for two reasons. Firstly that average data has been used for all the modelled outcomes of the project and secondly, that locals have experienced extreme and isolated weather events or outliers, which are not identified using averages. When questioned around the issue of PMP or (Probable Maximum Precipitation) events, the DPE responded: • “they are extreme and infrequent events, and there’s not a lot of consideration of those in the design.’’ It is hard to see how this is Precautionary, particularly on flooding. In their final report, Earth Systems state: • “It is conceivable that floodwaters could come into contact with PAF material in the base of the waste rock dump” • “Given the potential physical stability and water quality implications, flood protection for permanent landforms should be based on a PMP design event” • ''The potential for erosion of the waste rock dump was considered, but implications for flood water quality were not specifically discussed.’’ These are just some of the many technical issues and areas of uncertaintly raised regarding the design of the Bowdens project. The Lue Action Group has detailed the extend of these in their report, which I endorse. This project must be refused. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development. There is a number of issues I am seriously concerned about, especially with regard to the effects the proposed project could have on the environment and the people living close around. So far the proposal shows some clear weaknesses concerning the protection standards of people and the environment - especially in relation to Acid Mine Drainage and the lead dust. As explained by qualified experts, such as Shireen Baguley, the project proposal contains mistakes, is based on wrong facts, or assures to introduce protection mechanisms that are technically questionable - for example due to missing already existing implementation. This casts strong doubt on whether and to what extent the operator Bowden Silver can ensure that people and the environment are protected, not just to some degree, but with certainty. At its scale, the proposed project may have serious impacts on the environment and sensitive ecosystems, and we cannot see ourselves making any mistakes in this regard, especially in this day and age. Also, due to the above-mentioned erroneous assessments, a strong doubt has arisen as to whether further additional requirements regarding protection standards would be taken seriously in the necessary manner, or are actually feasible to implement. I have the impression that this project is putting life at risk, that people as well as valuable animal and plant species have to take the risk of being severely damaged, not only during the operating period of the project but also for many years longer. Protection of this life under the current designs does not seem to be assured, compliance and implementation of further conditions seems questionable and its importance in comparison to monetary incentives seems to be secondary - and yet I did not say mention anything about how agriculture and tourism in the Mudgee-Lue-Rylstone-Kandos region might be endangered, what impacts might occur in the absence of protection of the environment and people, especially in economic and socio-economic terms. I am strongly concerned about the proposed project, and see the only solution in a final rejection. I kindly ask that my concerns but especially the assessments and objections of the qualified experts are taken seriously and considered in the decision making process, thank you. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was saddened to hear of the proposal for mining in Lue. It has been a town and surrounding areas that I have grown to love and enjoy visiting as my maternal mother’s family originated from the area going back over 100 years. I admire the town for its close community feel and welcoming to tourists and such a beautiful landscape . We can’t destroy the small towns of nsw we increasing development of mines and such we need to keep our country towns for the people who have live there and for the rest of us to visit and enjoy together. Please don’t take another small town out of nsw life. |
Philip Carkagis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, This is an additional submission to the one that I have previously lodged. My property, East Ridge, is located just under three kilometres from the proposed mine site. In my first submission, I detailed the long lasting and enduring effects to East Ridge and the olive growing business that my wife and I conduct there if the mine was approved. These effects included toxic heavy metal contamination to our land, the olive trees and our drinking water. Noise and light pollution, greatly increased traffic flow on local roads and the degradation to ground water that we rely on for our business. The cumulative effects of mining would render our business unviable and the land unliveable, greatly reducing the value of the property and the opportunity for resale. As a consequence, I request that as a condition of any approval being given to Bowdens Silver, the company purchases our property prior to any mining operations commencing. Philip Carkagis 1130 Pyangle Road, Pyangle. |
Annie Crofts
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We must protect our land and the people. |
Eloise Bartlett
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing this submission as a concerned member of the Lue community. I own a home in the village of Lue, in which i reside, and the proposed silver mine raises a plethora of concerns and fears for myself amongst many other members of this tight knit community. Personally, the proposed mine is deeply concerning for the following reasons. - Property value - the value of my home is in serious jeopardy. There is an estimated decrease in the capital value of my home by approximately $150,000 if this silver mine takes off. As a young professional, only having just afforded to purchase a home in such a competitive real estate market, it is devastating to think that i have not taken a step forward, but many steps backwards if the mines impact is as strong as predicted. One i may not be able to recover from for a long time. - Community - Lue is a tight knit and incredibly safe community. This culture was established many, many years before i moved here. From generational farming families to long term Lue village residents, the community here is productive, strong and irreplaceable. This the mine is causing ongoing undue stress and uncertainty to families and their properties, and no doubt Bowden’s employees will bring a transient population to the region and likely replace many of these permanent residents as they grow tired of the impact this mine proposes. I have no doubt that this transient population will disturb and diminish the feeling of the safe community that Lue is now. Will these employees have the same respect for our village as we do? Bowden’s silver say they would like to hire local’s first - however what locals in this direct region, morally, would support a project that is directly jeopardising their family and friends health, and property values? You aren’t bringing jobs to quality locals. The locals in this region are farming, or in pre-existing jobs that aren’t negatively impacting several aspects of their lives. I have no doubt these locals will be lost in the process. Wollar, a (previous) close knit community near by, was left to devastation and ruin after the take-off of wilpingjong mine. Locals there many years ago were filled with shallow promises and false reassurance, which lead to the villages demise - exactly what Bowden’s silver is inflicting on us today. - Noise and traffic- this is a serious concern of mine. Not only from the mine itself (which will obviously be in action 24 hours) but also from the bypassing traffic as my house is only several meters back from Lue road. What actions can be taken to reduce this? As far as i can see, none, as road traffic will be inevitable (and on its own, burden us with enough noise throughout the day and night) and the natural formation of hills around the mine is being questionably relied upon to reduce noise when production is in full swing. What research has been done to ensure that there will truly be no noise pollution from this mine? The traffic through the village will be a huge negative impact on us. No longer will it be as safe to go for a walk with our families, or our pets. And children in the village will no longer be as safe outside of their homes. The road itself to Lue is already very dangerous. It is mostly too narrow for the vehicles that already travel it. The pot holes and damage to the road is already an issue that is rarely repaired quickly and the wildlife on the road poses a constant danger now, particularly with the level of wombats around. This road would need to be widened and made much safer before any increase in the traffic, and there has been no set plans for this. - Lead - i feel as though lead as the main product of this mine barely needs an explanation. Who wants to run the gauntlet with such a toxic by-product. I do not, and will not, spend years worrying about my own health, my water supply and my animals exposure to this deadly element. What research has been done to show what our true risk is to lead toxicity? And what research can be truly relied upon to predict our level of exposure in the first place? What mechanisms have been trialed and proven to protect us? Lead being carried into our homes, water sources and our own bodies is largely at the hands of nature here - which we do not need an expert to tell us is extremely unpredictable. How many 1 in 100 year rain events have we seen even in the last decade? How can we truly predict the wind? The level of dust? Run off? And if these extreme weather events are forecast and will be increasing the amount of lead exposure, how is this going to be mitigated and using what fail proof mechanisms? We don’t deserve to be the guinea pigs, when it comes to lead there is no room for trial and error. Ensure we will be protected through trialed and tested measures and then consider going ahead. When the amount of lead in my water tank, bore water, on my kitchen bench, my roof, my pets system, or heaven forbid in my own blood stream, is at an un-safe level, how will i be alerted without repeated and invasive testing? Who is paying for this surveillance or for things to be corrected when it does occur? Will my water source be replenished? Will my medical bills be covered? Will my vet bills be covered or livestock loss compensated? From a work perspective, i am a veterinarian in the region. And luckily the days of treating lead toxicity is mostly behind us. It takes a very small amount of lead accumulation to kill an animal, and no animal is resistant to it. Stock with lead toxicity are slaughtered, as there is virtually no treatment once neurological, suffering from multiple organ dysfunction or wasting from anaemia. Small animals present neurological, anaemic, in organ dysfunction or gastrointestinal distress. Treatment may be attempted to by initiating months worth of painful intramuscular injections of an expensive drug called calcium EDTA, which is not readily available and not widely affordable. Why is there regions across the world now condemned an unusable waste land due to previous lead mines but we are being told we will all be safe and unaffected? Again, give us reliable surveillance mechanisms and credible research. One of the hardest things for me to grasp is that the home i have made and the community i have become a part of, in Lue, cannot be forever if i want to start a family without the risk of fertility issues, birth defects and a plethora of other lead related health complications. As far as I’m concerned, there is no safe level of exposure to lead, and there has been minimal reassurance that we are safe from this. - Water supply - there is no town water supply in this village. We rely on rain water - running of roofing that will one day be covered in lead contaminated dust, and bore water is drawn from the same water table Bowden’s silver will not only be draining but contaminated. How is this fair to locals? Will town water be run out to Lue well before we are affected by this? It is devastating to think that our pristine and safe water sources will be impacted forever. - Wildlife - this region has a plethora of wildlife that will be impacted in this mine. Many of us locals enjoy this region due to its tranquility and natural habitat, and this will be devastated. The koalas around the predicted mine site have been spotted by locals for years despite ‘experts’ telling us that this is not somewhere the normally reside? How is purchasing properties in a completely different area for eco credits even a logical Bandaid for this? This is where these species have resided for a long time and that is where they should be safe to remain remain. - The toxic tailings dam and ongoing acid mine drainage from this mine will be devastating. If you can truck out all of the products of mining, 7 days a week, why after the mine is finished does there need to be one large tailing dam left behind and a large amount of waste rock that is going to release toxic acids for the foreseeable future? I don’t understand why this can even be allowed to be left and not rectified. Something that will pollute Lue and Mudgee decades post production. A thin little tarp and a clay base will not protect our natural resources from this toxic waste, and that is a huge concern. No rehabilitation plan is an insulting, disrespectful and irresponsible side effect of mining projects like this. Yes, the requirements to rehabilitate these mining areas may be too large or costly to be undertaken, but doesn’t that speak volumes about the devastation the mine has on the area in the first place. |
Frank Sexton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed mine is planned to produced 50 times more Lead then Silver. The mining of Lead close to communities has a documented history of health issues and devastation of the local agriculture, tourism and associated industries. The site of the mine close to the Lue township and only two kilometers from the local primary school given the dangers of exposure from Lead dust in the air and settling on roofs where drinking water is collected. A tailing dam at the head of Lawsons Creek without doubt contaminating the water in the creek and further downstream. The water potentially being consumed by animals domestic and native risking their very survival. The mine is the wrong mine in the wrong area ! Given the previous issues I have mentioned let alone the disruption and devastation the other Key Issues listed would present conclude that the Bowdens MIne should NOT go ahead. Thank you |
Peter Logan
Organisation |
Logan Wines Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached letter outlining opposition to the proposed mine. |
Attachments |
bowdensmineletterpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 142.29 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against this |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to strongly object to the development based on the following key points: - Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. - Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. - Lead poisoning and health. - Acid Mine Drainage. - Contamination of water. - Reduced supply of water. - Economic Impact to Business. - Koala Habitat destroyed. - No compensation offered to primary producers. - Loss of property values in the surrounding area. - There is no safe level of lead for children. - Close to World Heritage Sites. - Excessive Noise for the surrounding community. - Excessive damage to local ecology. - No consideration of adjacent lands. - Noise is the most common cause of community loss. - Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. - Lue Road is narrow and dangerous not suited to increased traffic caused by mining operations - Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. - Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . - No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. - Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. - No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. - No existing infrastructure to the site. - No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. - No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. - Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. |
Margaret Cameron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the project. Please refer attached. |
Attachments |
m-cameron-objection-feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 362 KB) |
Pat Casey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Both my daughter and my grandson own properties in Lue and Rylstone. Our entire family is deeply connected to this area and all of the natural beauty that it holds. I am in my 94th year and am still an avid investor, in fact I am a significant shareholder in BHP and other such mining shares, so I am not anti-mining. In saying that, I do believe that some mining projects are not appropriate in some cases, and this is one of them. From what I have read on this project, I believe that the Department of Planning has ignored the exisiting use of this region and the sense of place it provides for this community. The fact that this mine will produce lead dust and is only 2km from a primary school is beyond belief, and makes me question if the Department of Planning has adequately assessed the project at all. This beautiful part of the world provides homes and livelihoods for farming families and those who choose to live in a small community and peaceful environment. They should not be subjected to the stress and disruption that even the suggestion of a mine like this would cause. My family and the people in their community should be allowed to continue to live their lives as they have chosen, and I ask you Commissioners to please protect these basic rights and refuse this project in its entirety. |
Robert, Juliana and Liam Heslop
Organisation |
Heslop Wines |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are a small, family-owned company growing grapes and making wine at 112 Craigmoor Road, Eurunderee, 5 kms north of Mudgee in what is at present the heart of Mudgee’s premium wine growing area. We produce small batches of handpicked high quality wines. Our aim is to ‘tread lightly’ a philosophy of conservation and moderation. Minimal intervention strategies are embraced in the vineyard and winery, such as handpicking, gentle crushing, hand plunging and basket pressing, through to the use of sustainable building materials and as such we are strongly opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine. The lead dust produced from this open cut mine is supposed to be supressed but with less water available than originally planned, there is absolutely no assurance that this suppression will be effective or maintained. Heavy dust will be dropped locally and some will reach the Mudgee area. This lead dust on our grapes and roofs that collect drinking water for ourselves and cellar door customers is absolutely unacceptable and who will cover the cost of monitoring our vines? The tailings dam that will be left as an unmonitored, permanent potential environmental hazard is unacceptable to the environment locally and to the Lawson Creek. The pit area which will be left as a permanent polluted body of water is also unacceptable. This body of water is connected to groundwater and there will be acidified water leaching into aquifers. All this environmental damage for short term gains for limited people is not acceptable to risk the health of our community, agriculture and tourism that will otherwise remain in this beautiful area permanently. No to the development of this mine! Robert, Juliana and Liam Heslop |
GRAEME SALT
Organisation |
FIRST RIDGE WINES |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
First Ridge Wines is an award winning vineyard and cellar door located in beautiful Mudgee, with what we think is one of the best views of Mudgee from a cellar door. First Ridge Wines has been owned by the same family for over 25 years. We strongly object to the proposed Bowdens mine. Our reasons are as follows:- • The inadequate management plan to deal with dust suppression. • The unproven proposed plan to deal with acid mine drainage. • The very real potential for water contamination. • Insufficient water supply for this project. • The proposed blasting schedule will impact the quiet enjoyment of Mudgee residents and visitors alike. • The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. • The proposed mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine which could have serious impacts on our health, our water and our livelihoods. Lead dust and water contamination is a very real concern. Lead dust from Australian mainland mines has been recorded in the Antarctica, so it is reasonable to assume lead dust will impact the Mudgee region. Any lead dust contamination will decimate or even destroy the wine industry in Mudgee. The flow on effect would be that the Tourism sector would also suffer. We would have to test our fruit for contamination on a regular basis. Any level of lead would result in us dumping our fruit, which means we couldn’t make any wine. The Mudgee region has enjoyed substantial growth in the Tourism sector in recent years, which has been rewarded with Industry recognition. The Mudgee wine industry has played an important role in the tourism sector. Visitors to the Mudgee region are not just Sydney based residents. We enjoy many visitors from interstate and overseas ALL our visitors comment on the beauty of our region. People will not want to visit Mudgee if it puts their health at risk. Why risk Mudgee’s enviable reputation as a tourism and lifestyle destination! Graeme Salt Manager First Ridge Wines |
Attachments |
first-ridge-submission-240223pdf.pdf (PDF, 101.28 KB) |
Annie Hood
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowdens Lead Mine. The possible short term economic gain of such a project will be utterly overshadowed by the devastating long term environmental and social consequences. The site of the proposed mine is unconscionably close to the Lue community, and the hazards from air, soil and water pollution cannot fail but impact the town in a serious, negative manner. The highly probably contamination of the air, water and soil will have detrimental consequences for not just the surrounding productive farmland, but also for Lawson Creek. This will have flow on repercussions for those downstream in Australia's largest catchment. The impact on tourism, a major businesses in this area, will also be severe. Who will want to come to see a toxic waste damn, or travel to a place where the air is filled with lead dust? The small number of jobs created locally by this project will not make up for the loss of the community, their land, health and the income of multiple businesses throughout the region. It cannot be allowed to go ahead. |
Bill Lawson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As an irrigator out of the Cudgegong River I grow fears of the water quality and incase of a spillage into the water system can not be guaranteed |
Charlotte Kilmartin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine is a risk to the health and safety of Mudgee visitors and residents. No amount of lead is safe and there’s a risk of exposure to lead with this line which could have dire consequences. As a regular visitor to Mudgee I’m extremely concerned about this mine and strongly object to it going ahead |
Carole Donaldson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have been visiting here for over 20 years and feel if it goes through it will Be ruined in so many ways |
Hunter White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Response to a State Significant Development Bowdens Silver - Development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure at Lue (SSD-5765) Submission to Independent Planning Commission Directors. 24/02/2023. Introduction. My name is Hunter White. I am a farmer and have lived in the Lue community all my life. I live less than 10 km from the centre of the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine pit. I have assisted the Lue Action Group with their submission. I am opposing the mine development as it presents a significant risk to the Lue Community, Lawsons Creek catchment and wider Mudgee region. Thank you for the opportunity to speak before the IPC Commissioners and thankyou for the opportunity to provide a written submission. This is a complex project with significant risks resulting from the mine operation and post mining legacy to water and the environment which may come at an unacceptable environmental cost. This is a greenfields mining site and the unproven technology is being tried for the first time in this region. Extra precaution is recommended. The recommendation from DPE should not be accepted as the current mining proposal presents an unacceptable risk based on social and economic factors with intergenerational risks. Residences within 2 and 3km of the mine will be most severely affected which will mean the end of the village of Lue. There is currently no water supply for the mine development including mining operations, processing and dust suppression. The impact of water use has not adequately considered other users including agriculture and the town of Mudgee. The potential for increased flood risk from a large water storage, created by the tailings dam for example, puts at risk houses along the Lawsons Creek which sit within 1M of the high water level of previous floods. This is an avoidable risk which has not been covered by the proponent or DPE recommendation. I am all for the creation of jobs and personally do all I can to create a safe and happy community. I am encouraged to hear that the Renewable Energy Zone will provide 3,200 jobs in the Central West REZ. The 200 jobs provided here or 300 during construction should not put at risk a currently vibrant community with such a strong brand. Brand Mudgee. I am sumarising below my comments about the recommendations from DPE which we have been asked to comment upon. I feel there are sufficient significant issues raised by myself and others which need consideration by the Commissioners before making a decision here. The most significant question remains about water supply and the risks of Acid Mine Drainage. Yours faithfully Hunter White Development Consent Conditions NSW Department of Planning and Environment SCHEDULE 2 Part A Administrative Conditions A1-A4 Obligation to minimize harm to the environment. Comment: this is a complex project with significant risks resulting from the mine operation and post mining legacy to water and the environment which may come at an unacceptable environmental cost. This is a greenfields mining site and the unproven technology is being tried for the first time in this region. Extra precaution is recommended. Action: the current mine application does not sufficiently address the risks to Water in NSW and should be rejected A12 Community Consultative Committee Comment: The Community Consultative Committee process has been very difficult with a high personal cost to those involved. It has been difficult to ask a question. This has not been a safe workplace or best practice. Action: independent chair is supported and can we include a grievance policy process with option for third person review to protect people involved? Part B Operations and Specific Environmental Conditions B1-B4 Construction Noise Criteria and B5-B8 Operational Noise Criteria Comment: Background noise levels are not contemporary, most of the monitoring was conducted in 2011, 2012 and 2013 although more recent data is also included from 2017. The monitoring indicates very low background levels in the order of 25 dBA. Noise levels set by the Consent recommendations sets this level at 35dBa for evening. While this is best practice compared to Government set benchmarks, the reality is that this is a significant increase on current levels and likely to lead to unacceptable conditions for close residents. The threshold for number of residences within a 2 or 3km radius may have been exceeded which would require IPC to not grant approval. Action: Reject the Mining application if this condition is not met or number of residences within a 2km distance is exceeded. Improve VLAMP conditions to acknowledge pre mining development land values where it is found necessary for a landholder to sell and relocate. B26 Air Quality Criteria Comment: Air quality criteria of 2 g/m2/month maximum increase in deposited dust level (Table 6) may allow unacceptable levels to accumulate over time. This could be cumulative and lead to unacceptable levels of lead contamination. It is not clear that sufficient water is available to manage dust on the mining site to mitigate this risk. The risk is human health issues from lead ingestion. B34 Materials Classification Verification Program Comment: risk from potentially acid forming (PAF) waste rock or Acid Mine Drainage (AMD)is not sufficiently managed. This is supported by DPE consultant Earth Systems concerns about the storage of PAF rock after mining. Action: reject the current proposal as it does not adequately address the risk of AMD B36 -37 Water Supply Comment: the applicant has not provided details on the supply of water for mining operations (Baguley 2022). The Water Balance Table does not match the water supply available. The groundwater supply is assumed in the modelling to be regular and reliable when in fact it is highly variable. Modelling of water supply is not based on local data. It does not consider climate change. It is not clear where water licences will be sourced from in an already stressed waterway. I have already had years of no allocation of water supply here for irrigation and just adequate for stock and domestic supply. The proponent also notes there is potential for more mining operations on this site beyond the current application which might involve processing gold ore and this would require even more water. Action: Mining application should not be approved as no water supply is available. B46 Water Management Performances Measures Comment: Freeboard of dam walls on the mine site may not be adequate. For example the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) 72 hour rainfall event may not be sufficient if storage facility is at 500mm freeboard level (Table 7). Rainfall modelling of high rainfall events presented by the proponent do not align with experience of local rainfall events recorded. The dam wall is 56M high which is as high as Windemere Spillway. This is a significant structure with potential to cause severe impact if it fails which would include flooding the Lawson Creek valley to record levels if this occurred during a high flow period. Action: review TSF construction and consider option to install a second dam wall to secure in event of dam wall failure B47 Water Management Plan Comment: the Site Water Balance and the Surface Water Management Plan do not accurately reflect surface water supply, particularly the high and low flow situations. The modelling appears to be based on average flow. Actual data will lead to negative water balance table events for the mine. Surface water modelling is not reflecting my lived experience which is in excess of 220mm in a 10 hour period in February 2003 which led to significant local flooding. The high flood water level saw flooding of one house on Lawson Creek and several within I M of water entering. I am an irrigation license holder on Lawson Creek. There has been no discussion with me about the likely impacts of supply of surface water to the mine site with me. There have been other significant rainfall events in this region including water going over the railway line at 20km from Mudgee on the Lue Road in Feb 6 2003, approx. 4 km from the mine site. The catchment is 7.8 sq km and volume delivered in a short period less than an hour from estimated 200mm rainfall was calculated as 1280ML. 12 mm was recorded at Havilah and 20mm at Lue. There have been similar events reported in this area in the last 20 years. On 14 November 2022 the town of Eugowra was flooded. This did not happen because the Lachlan was running at record levels approx. 500mm above the 1950 flood level record but because of local rainfall in the Mandagery Creek of approximately 100mm. This water was held up in farming country including a canola field. The water came into Eugowra with no warning and so rapidly that water levels rose to dangerous levels within ½ an hour providing no opportunity to get out. People were caught in buildings barely able to open doors to get out. The only escape was to climb onto rooves and await air lift from their position. Along Lawson Creek between the proposed mine site there are up to 8 houses that are within 1 M of the high water level of previous floods. The collapse of a tailings dam and other storage facilities on the mine site could lead to these houses being flooded with little warning. Action: identify how many houses along Lawsons Creek may be impacted by flood levels exceeding 1M above previous levels and recommend actions to be taken to manage or remove this risk Acid Mine Drainage Plan, WRE Design, Verification Plan and TSF Liner Plan have been commented upon in other reports which I have read and I share concerns raised in these reports to the IPC. B78 Rehabilitation Objectives Comment: Table 9 Rehabilitation objectives for the development require a bit more detail in the areas of Final Void, TSF, Waste rock emplacement and Water quality as this is a potential intergenerational risk in terms of damage to the water table and depende |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-recommended-conditions-hw-review--submission-v2pdf.pdf (PDF, 170.22 KB) |
Richie Inglis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a contractor and farmer in the Lawson Creek valley, 5 km downstream from the proposed mine on the Lawson Creek. I make this submission as an individual. Our property, Havilah East, has a 3km frontage to the Lawson Creek. The Lawson Creek is the lifeblood of our farm and any negative impact on this system would prove catastrophic for my livelihood. Along with a series of dams, we heavily rely on Lawson Creek for stock water. During the drought of 2017 to 2019 the dams dried up. The creek went back to holes but still provided us with water for our stock and we were able to maintain our breeding herd. I strongly object to the Bowdens Silver Mine proposal as recommended to the IPC on the following grounds. 1. WATER QUANTITY Bowdens has not proved it has enough water to operate a mine despite the fact they plan to reduce operations during times of water shortage. I refer to Shireen Baguley’s 1 presentation to the IPC where she said; • If Bowdens is allowed to proceed, 480% more rainfall and runoff will be lost than has been assessed by the Department. • Clean water harvesting is also lost to the catchment and Shireen’s analysis confirmed that Bowdens intends to harvest more than twice the clean water it is entitled to. • Bowdens have had seven years to answer the questions put in the SEARS and Shireen made it clear that the most important ones remain unanswered and uncertain. • She said there is no water quality model. • There is no water quality management plan with appropriate triggers for action. • Major uncertainties remain around final void water through flow and the consequences for contamination of Lawson Creek valley surface and ground. Importantly the department’s own water expert Earth Systems has similar reservations to Shireen. • This shouldn’t be referred to the Conditions of Consent as part of the approval process. It is vital these questions be fully answered before approving this mine. Modelling to determine water flow rates on Lawson Creek uses data from a monitor on the Cudgegong River near Rylstone, a waterway and catchment totally different to Lawson Creek. A private gauge on Lawson Creek at Phil English’s property just east of Bowdens show flow rates are currently 0.14 ML per day, the Cudgegong gauge show 2.6 ML per day; that is 20 times more than the Lawson Creek gauge. Lawson Creek will go to back to intermittent water holes during dry periods and in large sections of the creek it will be completely dry. Many of the downstream WAL holders such as Havilah and Havilah North do not exercise their license to irrigate as there is simply not enough water to sustain irrigation projects. As mentioned above, Lawson Creek sustains our farms and businesses but only with a history of conservative management of their water rights. Bowdens ambitious water plan is based on modelling that is not relevant to our catchment and does not have any consideration of the affect the mine will have on downstream water users. 2. LAWSON CREEK VALLEY HAS A HISTORY OF INTENSE AND HIGHLY LOCALISED RAINFALL EVENTS On the evening of Rylstone Show, 22nd February, 2003, 220mm fell in an intense rain event over 9 hours on my uncle, Hunter White’s property, Havilah on our western boundary. This cell moved north towards Botobolar creating an enormous flood in Lawson Creek and to the north in Pipeclay Creek flooding vineyards and farms to the west to Henry Lawson Drive. Two Two weeks earlier, on the evening of 8th February, Hunter White measured 12mm, Tom Combes from Lue Station measured 20mm and in the area where Lue Road is crossed by the railway line, an enormous and intense storm estimated over 1 hour dumped an estimated 100mm to 150mm resulting in a flood – water went over the top of the railway line. Again Mudgee Airport BOM gauge measured only 12mm. In the DPE’s assessment the DPE says in high rainfall events, excess water will be transferred to the TSF, and that although there is not meant to be a discharge from the TSF, it has a spillway and has been designed to contain all runoff up until rainfall exceeds the 1 in 100 year 72 hour storm event. This is what concerns me. Landowners who have been in this valley for generations have rainfall records and diary notes that prove that suggest there is a far greater risk of the TSF spilling than modelling indicates. 3. WATER QUALITY AND ACID MINE DRAINAGE We heard the Department’s expert Earth Systems and LAG’s expert, Michael White both agree on the unacceptable risk of Acid Drainage from the proposed mine design and the disastrous consequences of any such drainage to everyone downstream. The DPE in their own words have recommended a range of strict conditions, including a further verification process to confirm the volumes of PAF and the preparation of a detailed AMD management plan. This is not enough to ensure Acid does not get in to ground water and the Lawson Creek. A second wall or tailings dam as a back-up is not negotiable as far as I am concerned. Cadia Gold Mine is preparing to build a 3rd tailings dam as insurance against a dam wall collapse such as happened with the first tailing dam in 2018. Bowdens must be required to have a backup TSF. 4. SOCIAL IMPACT Bowdens speaks glowingly of their own sponsorship to local organisations – they have certainly been a very visible supporter of local groups. They see it as part of their community engagement, but it can be more rightly portrayed as community bribery as we know they called on the groups they have sponsored to support them at the IPC and with submissions. The mental stress and strain of dealing with a well-funded mine developer and a Department of Planning propelled by the NSW government’s Critical Minerals & High Tech Metal Strategy 2022 which a guideline to develop mines such as Bowdens is being encouraged, is taking its toll on us all. The whole planning and approval process is designed to make it as hard as possible for the community to object. The proponent can take years to produce an EIS yet we are asked to respond within weeks. The EIS for Bowdens was put on exhibition towards the end of first Covid lockdowns when we had strict conditions about public meetings. • As a nearby landowner, I received a letter from the DPE dated the 16 July 2021 alerting me to the Amendment and its public exhibition commencing four days later on 20 July 2021. The DPE’s assessment and recommendation to approve the mine was announced a day before the Christmas holidays commenced effectively removing four weeks out of the time we had to prepare for the IPC hearing. Many of our experts and our committee were away on annual holidays. The IPC was scheduled right in the middle of an election campaign so our concerns about this mine could not become an election issue. The cost to the mental health of this community should be quantified. I can only speak from my own experience; we are all exhausted. We live in a rural area where we farm our land, raise families, run our businesses, contribute to the community, we choose to live here because it is rural. The DPE recommends Bowdens develop a heavy metal mine, near our farms and homes, upstream of our precious water source and near 120 residences, most of which the mining company doesn’t have to acquire or compensate their owners. They need our water, our properties will be devalued, we will have to worry about whether lead dust gets in our water or on our crops and how long before, not if, exacerbated by the effects of climate change, the next extreme weather event occurs in this valley. This is no way to live. 6. TOURISM In their assessment, the DPE take no consideration of the value of our local tourist industry as we heard from Lucy White at the Hearing. The word “tourism” barely gets a mention, yet it contributes $200 million to the local economy each year and the region attracted 826,000 visitors in 2020-21. Lucy White presented a strong argument for the value of our tourist economy and what damage a mine such as Bowdens, both because of the type of mine and its location, could do to that industry. I endorse Lucy White’s request for the Commissioners to assess the critical economic impact of this mine on both tourism and agriculture. This is the wrong mine in the wrong place. 7. CONCLUSION The DPE notes that mitigation measures proposed by Bowdens are considered best practice. They are not and I strongly object to the Assessment prepared by the DPE and their recommended Conditions of Consent. The mine must not be allowed to proceed. • The mine poses an unacceptable risk to all those downstream landowners as the the design of the tailings dam is inadequate. • The people around Lue must be compensated if the Government and its department continue to allow this type of mining, in fact any type of mining, so close to people’s home. They cannot continue to destroy communities without placing a far higher value on those who lose out. • I urge the Commissioners to request more detail on modelling especially about surface water and creek flows, and to order the DPE experts to consider rainfall records of local farmers as the Lawson Creek valley has a history of localised, intense storms. • The DPE must consider the cost this mine will have on tourism and agriculture in the region. |
Michael White
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was speaker #7 at the Public hearing. The IPC has my presentation. Attached please find my Supplementary submission |
Attachments |
supplementarysubmissiontotheipcbymichaelwhite24february2023pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 494.08 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose this development of this project. Attached is my submission. |
Attachments |
submission-opposing-bowdens-projectpdf.pdf (PDF, 48.55 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, As close friends of a family whose cattle farm is in Lue and in close proximity to the Bowdens development site I am writing to express my concerns in regards to a repeated pattern of dubious data representations by Bowdens in a number of their submissions. For example in reference to the closing remarks made by Anthony Mclure at the Public Hearing Day 3 in Mudgee on the 17th Feb. I believe that the manner in which the data was presented in regards to the ABS Census (Kandos 2021), was misrepresented and the inferences drawn were not factually supported. I urge the commissioners not to take the analysis of Bowdens data at face value, it is misleading. For example, the statistic used by Bowdens to indicate the unemployment rate in the community was, “43.1% of two parent families have both parents not working”, however when referring to the ABS data the number of unemployed in Kandos who are reported “being in the labour force” and unemployed, is actually 44 people (12% of the labour force in Kandos). Bowdens submission did not indicate that of the population in Kandos (1263) 49% or 625 people are over the age of 60 years and potentially at the end of their working careers and potentially not keen to be working in a lead mine. I believe that the final remarks from Bowdens on the 17th were implying that they would be “saving” the Kandos community by providing them with jobs, but I think the 2021 census data actually contradicts this assumption. Further reference to the health of the Kandos population was used as a reason to “save” the community by building the mine, however the median age of Kandos is 54 and is compared to the health statistics of the rest of NSW where the median age is only 39, it is not surprising therefore that there are increased levels of health issues given the increased median age of the Kandos group. I am concerned that a consistent pattern emerges when observing the way that data is presented by Bowdens. I urge the commissioners to be mindful when accepting data as fact in all submissions from Bowdens. Another example can be found in the discrepancies of the water analysis provided as part of their submissions. In reference to the meticulous presentation of data anomalies provided by the Lue Action Group through Shireen Baguley, she has pointed out on numerous occasions where the data provided for water availability claimed by Bowdens is dubious and contradictory. Another recent submission provided by Bowdens was the response to the AMD potential and the actual nature of the rocks on the Northern end of the mine (230209_IN_Applicant Additional static geochemical testing). It is of concern that Bowdens has not provided a sample size that ensures the data analysis of the rock form is within an acceptable variance. I strongly recommend that commissioners insist on further sample testing prior to any approval and conditions of this mine. Once the rock is removed, it cannot be put back, and if the PAF factor is greater than modelled, the impacts on the environment are irreversible leaving lasting destruction to the environment. I am also concerned with the proposed mitigation strategy of “… consistent with best practice management, would progressively develop the emplacement by paddock dumping PAF material in 2m thick layers and then compacting it. This would sequentially occur up to a 10m high lift.” (pg 5 230209_IN_Applicant Additional static geochemical testing) This strategy is incomprehensible in regards to the potential of this “compacting” resulting in the release of fine silica particles which is now known to be extremely detrimental to human health. Please refer to the Lue Action Group presentation and report provided by Barry Noller in which he highlights the impacts of fine dust on lungs and the development of silicosis in humans (not to mention the noise created by “compacting” that has not been considered anywhere else in the submissions). The IPC cannot approve a mine mitigation strategy that requires further strategies to mitigate the risks associated with the initial mitigation strategy. Bowdens does not address the potential issue of fine dust particulates in any of its submissions. Essentially this omission supports other objector submissions in which it is evident that Bowdens have not met SEARs requirements in response to” Air Quality– including: - an assessment of the likely air quality impacts of the development in accordance with the Approved Methods and Guidance for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW, having regard to the EPA’s requirements (see Attachment 2A and 2B) and “Human Health – including: - a Human Health Risk Assessment addressing how the development’s environmental impacts in relation to air quality (including heavy metals) and noise may impact on the health of the local community; and - monitoring and management measures to reduce risk to human health” If Bowdens proposes dust suppression via the use of a water based mitigation strategy, this again highlights the fact that Bowdens do not have access to enough water to operate this mine in a safe way. The IPC must not approve a mine of this size and scale which is creating mitigation strategies on the fly, without full consideration of their downstream impacts. The mine cannot be approved without a full consideration and analysis of the consequences of these strategies. We are regular visitors to Lue and the surrounding towns of Mudgee, Rylstone and Kandos and we strongly urge the IPC to consider the issues raised above and not approve the mine as it is absolutely not ready to be approved! |
Anna White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed Bowdens Lead and silver mine less than five kilometres from Lue Public School should be reconsidered. If any mistakes are made the risks are too high to the health of the community and the environment. Bowdens is mostly owned by off shore investors so largely the profits of the mine would be going overseas. The main argument for the mine is that it will provide jobs for the people of Kandos. However, the life of the project is only 25 years. The current plan is closure at the same time the Ulan Coal mines will close. What will happen to the whole region then? On the third and final day (17/2/23) of the Public Hearing, Anthony McClure stated “there are opportunities for extension in the future”. These ‘opportunities’ should not be taken into consideration when approving the proposed mine as they have not been included in the proposal. Mr McClure is just trying create wind in his sales make the positive impacts of the mine appear far better than they actually are. Bowdens is only aiming for minimum standards and is doing everything possible to try and rush this mine through to be approved. The proposal is unorganised and continually changing as we have seen with the shift of the power line and the removal of the pipeline. As a community member I am not happy with this approach. This does not instil confidence that the mine will be remain accountable to their current plan and the minimum standards. There are countless examples around Australia of poor mine design that have resulted in significant failures and damage to people and the environment. This greenfield mine will have huge impacts on the environment, therefore everything should be planned for now to the highest level possible. Not just the minimum standards. The tailings dam is on a geographical fault line. Placing it at a higher risk for there to be movement in the soil and damage to the wall. Why is there not a plan to combat this? Bowdens current approach to such problems is address them when they arise or change the plan when it needs to. This is not acceptable. In 50 or 100 years’ time when there is movement in the wall and the tailings dam leaks who is accountable for the enormous environmental damage to the environment and Gulgong’s water supply? Bowdens need to plan for these types of events for the safety of the community. The weather patterns are changing and the general population is quickly growing an environmental conscience. This is not predicted to ease. With nature escape holidays and ways to reuse what we already have ever growing in popularity. Will the final void, tailings dam, risk to water security and exposure to lead dust be looked on kindly by future generations? Or will it be another bad decision made for the benefit of offshore investors? Are the effects of this mine something that we really want to live with for the rest of eternity? |
LUE STATION LUE STATION
Organisation |
Lue Station Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, - Thank you for the opportunity to write a submission opposing the Bowdens Project at Lue. - We make this submission assuming the Commission has access to all DPE reports reviews and documents and the Lue Action Group submissions to the DPE and IPC and all past and current expert reports and reviews provided and the Mid - Western Regional LEP and appropriate SEPPs. - We ask that the Commission refer to those documents when considering this submission. - LUE STATION PTY LTD IS OPPOSED TO THE BOWDENS PROJECT. - Please find our submission attached. |
Attachments |
lue-stationpdf.pdf (PDF, 1.72 MB) |
Marcus Bentivoglio
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Marcus Bentivoglio IPC Submission 2023 Bowden’s Mine The reasons why I object to Bowden’s Mine approval are 1. My family’s home is in Monivae and within the Lue district and close to Bowden’s Mine site. 2. I visit and work sometimes with my parents at Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press 5km from the mine site - My family will be affected by noise, light, toxic dust, odour from the mine and tailings storage facility and the ore dumps. 3. The mine will mine lead, cadmium, arsenic, zinc and silver and I am very concerned that my 4 children who are aged 6 years, 4 years and 3 years and 14 months will be affected by lead exceedances and breath the free silica dust. 4. Lead and silica dust cannot be seen or smelled and can cause permanent irreversible brain damage, in young people and silicosis in children and adults. The lead will lay down inside the growth plates of my children’s bones first and will cause major long bone growth abnormalities. 5. If the mine goes ahead my parents will not be able to live in the family home any longer due to the contamination of Lead and Silica dust and the risk to their health and will be forced to move and their home of 26 years and their business will be un-saleable. 6. My parent’s planned inheritance and succession with my brothers will be destroyed by Bowden’s mine. 7. We planted our olive trees 25 years ago, to stay in the ground for more than 300 years as in Italy they produce olives and olive oil up to 1000 years! Producing healthy extra virgin olive oil. This will all be destroyed. 8. The Carbon sink generated by the olive trees will cease. This is a bad outcome for CO2 emissions and Australia’s climate change policy. 9. No one will purchase my parents home, olive grove and olive processing plant and if they are able to sell it will have no value. 10. Bowden’s have not discussed any acquisition or compensation. 11. My wife and I, our children and my parents will be in danger driving on the Lue Road. There will be at least one truck per day of explosives on the Lue Road and over 100+ additional vehicles on the road. 12. The bore water will be inaccessible because the mine will lower the level of the water in all the bores in our area and my parents will be unable to pump water. 13. The drinking and irrigation dam water will be contaminated 14. The rainwater will be contaminated by lead. The lead will settle on the roof and be washed into all rainwater catchment tanks, the house tank alone under DPE recommendations to Bowdens approval will allow 52.9kg of total toxic dust per year and every year in our drinking water. 15. The bushland surrounding Lue and my family home where we walk and spend time will be destroyed by heavy metal dust and we will not be able to go into our grove with our children due to Bowden’s not being able to mitigate the dust. 16. The native wildlife will be scared away by blasting, vehicles, noise and activity and will die from contaminated heavy metal toxicity in the wild berries and our olive fruit and flowers. 17. The Regent Honey eater will surely be at risk due to their diet of flowers and native and cultivated fruits. 18. The creek will be contaminated and I will no longer be able to swim or enjoy the lovely areas along the creek, nor take my children to swim there, due to the DPE allowance of acid mine drainage leakage from the Tailings Dam into Lawsons Creek . 19. The impact of earthquakes due to the fault lines within the mine site is of a great concern particularly when Newcastle earthquake can be used as an example of the exacerbation of mining and drilling and the impact on Newcastle fault lines. 20. I am concerned about the Aboriginal heritage sites and I am certain that they will be destroyed, infact, Bowden’s have acknowledged 60 sites in mine and 25 at least will be destroyed. I am concerned about 1. Contaminated and heavy metal Dust in my children’s, my wife and my blood and my parents blood. 2. There will be No soft water rainwater anymore and dam water, where will the water come from to run my parents business? 3. Earthquakes? Fault lines everywhere through the mine site. 4. Contamination of Lawson Creek from Acid Mine Leakage from Tailings Dam and Waste Rock placement 5. There is no back up spillage catchment for the Tailings Dam and Waste Rock area. 6. The mine will be in production for 16.5 years, plus the rehabilitation of 7 years, however, Tony McClure stated at the IPC Public hearing that mining may continue for another 50years and the toxic dust risks and devastation to the environment will be left behind for hundreds of years. Thank you Marcus Bentivoglio |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
farmers quarters |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
COMMUNITY How will this mine affects our families and our business in the region. Why is there no plan to regenerate mine after finished. Loss of income from accommodation and grapes Extra traffic on Lue road and round Mudgee with trucks transporting slurry through Mudgee to Parkes partentionally past our school children How will tourism jobs be changed in Mudgee, Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Kandos. What will happen to the local Lue school? Will we have to teach our children not to put their hands in their mouths? GRAPE GROWERS & PRODUCERS How the fine lead will affect your grapes and our personal vegetable and herb gardens Absorption of this dust through leaves , soil and water. Grapes absorb heavy metals. Fine lead dust is cumulative, especially in cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc Will we need to test for base lines before mine is approved? Ongoing testing of grapes into wine. Who will cover the cost of testing. WATER Irrigation - where is the water coming from to service this mine? There doesn’t appear to be enough to realistically support the project? How often will they test their water within in the mine area and how will they ensure it does not leach anywhere? Our water could be contaminated by fine lead dust and acid mine drainage. Where will we get clean water from if our water tanks, waterways, water collection areas (roofs etc.) and dams are covered in fine lead dust, or pollutants from run off from mine? Who will compensate us for lost clean water? TOURISM Being an accommodation provider and having guest houses and personal just guests to your home - will you be able to supply your visitors with a safe environment? Can you supply them with eggs, ‘fresh’ vegies, drinking water, bathing water, local produce without ramifications? Washing cloths and bed linen on contaminated water . Residue will be in fabric. No one wants to visit a region where they may get lead poisoning. How many jobs will be lost if Mudgee become a contaminated town instead of #1 tourist destination two years in a row, will we become the destination town to be avoided at all costs? Our pristine living in rural country NSW with diminish significantly as to with land value. |
Attachments |
230213winegrowersmeetingpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 220.23 KB) mudgee-visitor-economy--submission-from-decisive-consulting-pty-ltdpdf.pdf (PDF, 241.72 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I stand with the Traditional Owners and local community members who oppose this project. |
Samantha Sutherland
Organisation |
Samantha May Wines |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a viticulture business based in the Mudgee area, I believe we will be directly effected if this mine is approved. It is evident there will be an increased level of pollution ie. potentially water contamination, dust and debri and air quality. As a business that relies on the health and vitality of grapevines in Mudgee pollution is 100% the main key issue of concern here. Simply put, no management plan could be good enough to prevent all pollution from this man made structure. My point is we have evidently 1000's of environmental and climatic based issues to face each year, we do not need the stress and destruction from a man made mine and the substances extracted and chemicals used. If the mine is approved, I also would like to highlight that day to day logistics / operations and overall the town of Mudgee/Lue's functionality will be directly affected by the road stress due to the requirements of the mine. Logistics and supply chains have directly been affected already in recent years due to covid and export issues, I cannot see why we would simply create further issues with our roads and supply chains by opening a man made mine structure. I cannot see why a man made structure that poses such risks on our local livelihood would even be considered for approval. On a personal level, I love my town and its surroundings including Lue and the fact that I feel safe living here. The prospect of a town later decimated by an open mine or a closed one is terrifying. The noise, the pollution, the already stressed out and impossible house rental market, cost of petrol, the potential to destroy a bustling and beautiful tourist town is terryifing. I cannot see a reason by a man made mine regardless of the management plan would be a positive contribution to Mudgee / Lue. |
Phil Cameron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached PDF of my objection submission. |
Attachments |
phil-cameron-ipc-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 478.74 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It poses a concern that the water that will be used by the mining operations may have an actual affect on other water users in the area in terms of quantity used and potential contamination risks. It is unsettling that there could be leakage from the toxic tailings dam into the surrounding environment long after the mine has ceased operation. The effects on the community could also be damaging with a drop in house prices and a decrease in permanent residents along with increased traffic and reduced tourism in the area. |
Yasmin Hannouf
Organisation |
Cementa Inc |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
24/02/2023 Bowden’s Silver Mine at Lue. I am writing this submission as the General Manager of Cementa Incorporated. There have been a good many submissions opposing the Bowden’s mine based on air and water quality, leachate from tailings dams and the very real environmental destruction that the mine will bring about in this beautiful part of the world. I am writing this submission in contradiction to the negative commentary from the pro-silver mine lobby, particularly as it relates to the town of Kandos itself. I want to let the IPC know that Kandos is a robust town which has survived a good many adversities and continues to thrive and adapt. It has generously welcomed a contemporary arts festival into its fold and provided the fertile ground that enabled that festival to develop into the leading regional arts organisation that it is today. Cementa Inc. itself is an artist-centred and community-driven regional arts organisation based in Kandos, on Wiradjuri Country. Since its formation in 2012, Cementa has worked to connect regional arts communities with peers across Australia through an annual program of artist residencies, special projects, and initiatives that culminate in its flagship biennial festival. We also operate various programmes that include community engagement, workshops, performances and other public outcomes. Some of our core activities include: • A biennial contemporary arts festival • A live/work artist residency program supporting over 20 artists annually • Support and facilitation of WAYOUT ARI with up to 9 exhibitions annually • Annual public program including community, youth, and general public outcomes such as workshops, artist talks and performances at Cementa Central by artists and community • Special projects that build engagement and audiences including a new biannual festival called Fermenta which started in 2021. As a leading regional arts organisation with our headquarters in Kandos, we receive support from a variety of organisations including Create NSW, Department of Regional NSW, the Department of Enterprise, Investment and Trade through the Office of Responsible Gambling and most recently were invited by the Australia Council for the Arts to submit a grant application for funding. Partly through our activity, Kandos has become a cultural hub of national significance. Not only has Cementa helped raise the profile of Kandos as a cultural destination, but our work has attracted a growing community of artists who have chosen to live here. Kandos sits in a beautiful natural environment: a meeting place between our industrial and rural histories, and holds a complex relationship to our climate futures. While the likes of Anthony McClure and Peter Shelley, amongst others, will argue that Kandos is a small regional town in post-industrial decline, the reality is quite the opposite. There is a thriving arts community in the region, a growing population of people who are employed in various freelance capacities as artists, editors, journalists, consultants and writers (just to name a few). Businesses are opening in the high streets, the real estate market is booming, the building industry is strong - if your ability to find a tradesperson is any indication, and tourists are arriving. Let’s not ruin all this with a silver mine on our doorstep. |
Attachments |
cementaimpactreport202122pdf.pdf (PDF, 2.79 MB) |
Joanne Irvine
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am worried about the impacts to the environment that will be affected by the mines and the surrounding area. The local community, farms and vineyards as well as the water supply may be contaminated |
Christiana O'Regan
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live on a property 8.9Km from the mine site. It was built recently. It was to be my retirement home. Now all that has been thrown up in the air. I am objecting to Bowdens Mine because of the lead dust and its effect on the health of the community and animals. This if of utmost importance. Lead dust is toxic to humans and other living creatures. What are we to do for our rainwater? Disconnect the pipes from the tanks every time it rains? I am not sure the people writing the DPE assessment were in the area at the time of the bushfires, but I was. There wasn't any water to spare for drinking and putting out fires let alone a very thirsty mine. The other danger is that the waste rock will catch fire putting everyone in danger. This is a silly proposal, given what the community have been through. Nobody I speak to wants their mine here. The McArthur River Mine could not stop the Acid Mine Drainage seeping into the water table. DPE have ignored Earthscience advice on this. Why? They are not going to be around for future generations who will have to deal with this mess. The mine is too close to those school children at Lue. The mine proposal should never have even got this far. Totally reprehensible on the part of DPE. Ashamed to have them as a government. |
Molly Gilbert
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Silver Mine development and am a very concerned member of the community. I live in Mudgee with my 6 month old son and husband and we, along with many others, will be directly affected by the significant impacts to the town as a result of the development of the proposed Silver mine. The risk to the community is too great from not only an agricultural sense, water availability and cleanliness but primarily the health and well being of the local population. There are extreme health concerns. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. The result of the huge excavation works along with the risk of the tailings dam being compromised due to the location and positioning of the dam on a fault is a burden on the region and contradicts the principles of intergenerational equity. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. Thank you for your time. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We travel to Lue and the Rylstone area every Easter with family friends. We have stayed at Camphill a few times. Camphill would be adjacent to this proposed mine. Camphill is a beautiful farm with a long history in the area, including the cottage that has been in place in 1860. Building a silver/lead/zinc mine adjacent to this land is simply an act of destruction not only to Camphill but also the the local community. This community has worked so hard over the years to build up a reputation in the tourist industry and it is flourishing - every year the area gets better and better with more things to offer and more and more people coming to the area to visit and enjoy what the locals have bulit. Environmental damage from the proposed mine would destroy the very thing that attracts people to the area - the beatuy of the land and the fresh air. I would think that if the mine is approved people will tend to look elsewhere for places to stay and this would damage the local community and their economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Firstly, I am very concerned about the elevation of heavy metal levels caused by the Bowdens Silver Mine and the health effects it will cause. I am 12 and lead exposure is a bigger risk for children. The Bowdens Mine is also extracting zinc along with the lead, the levels of heavy metals will rise considerably. Heavy metals, especially lead, have numerous effects on health. The community of Lue will be the most at risk as the Bowdens mine site is only a few kilometres away from the local public school but lead and zinc dust particles have the ability to travel very far and contaminents may leak into the nearby Lawson Creek which then joins into the Cudgegong River which flows into Lake Burrendong. The efffects of elevated heavy metal levels may be felt in multiple other communities including Mudgee. The Bowdens Silver Assessment Report Final Documenets staes itself: "In relation to lead, although there is no established safe level of exposure, widespread use has resulted in contamination of natural and human environments' The Bowdens Silver Mine will cause the distrubution of toxic, heavy metals which will cause health effects on multiple communities. The distrubution of heavy metal particles will not only cause health effects in communities, it will cause the loss of tourists to the Midwestern region and the loss of sales of produce. Due to the wide distrubution of lead and zinc dust particles, grown produce such as grapes will be contaminated with toxic particles. My family is a producer of livestock and exposure of heavy metals on livestock may greatly reduce the market available to sell in. Produce would not be able to be sold causing an economic loss. Tourism levels will also drop as tourists will no longer visit the Midwestern region due to lead and zinc exposure in the environment and in produce they would possibly buy eg. wine, grapes, honey. This will also cause a great economical loss for the Midwestern region. The current tourism based workforce should not be put at risk. Bowden's proposed workforce may not end up being a gain for the regions if others lose their jobs. The Bowdens Silver Mine project will also have majot impacts on the environment. Multiple Key Biodiversity Areas are within lead and zinc dust particle range. Two of these Key Areas are breeding sites for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and other rare or endangered birds that have been recorded in the area. Native flora species will have to be cleared along with other vegetation on the mine site. These include at leat two endangered species, the Silky Swainson-pea and Small Purple-pea. Vegetation that is proposed to be cleared also provides habitatation for multiple fauna species. In conclusion, the recommended conditions of consent will not be adequate to mitigate of offset any potential from the proposed development. |
Emanuel Rakis
Organisation |
Vrises Valley Organic Farm |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
An open cut lead mine will destroy the existence of our whole family farm by affecting the soil purity, clean air and clean water of the property. All being vital components for organic farming. The economic loss to us will be devastating with three families investing in the property over two generations since 1990. The farm can no longer sell produce that is organic because the lead dust and impact of polluted ground and surface water will contaminate our crop (Including Orchards), water supply and future livestock. The aim of the farm was to eventually become a leading boutique organic produce supplier in the area. The lead mine will prevent us from future organic certification. Our dams which serve as irrigation will become unuseable as the water will be contaminated. The Mudgee regio |
Shireen Baguley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see the attached file. |
Attachments |
ipc-submission-bowdens-mine-ssd-5765-personalpdf.pdf (PDF, 159.04 KB) |
Jayne Bentivoglio
Organisation |
Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Jayne Bentivoglio 2023 Submission OLIVE and OLIVE OIL IMPACTS document have been uploaded below |
Attachments |
2023-jb-bowdens-submission-olive-and-olive-oil-production-impactsdocx.docx (DOCX, 21.02 KB) |
Craig Flavel
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposal as it stands will contaminate local aquifers and reduce water availability for the indefinite future. Approving this proposal misses the opportunity to provide a 'blue-print' for how sustainable mining can be conducted throughout the Orana region. Endorsing an 'adaptive management' - or reactive mismanagement - approach is inappropriate as remediation of aquifers is incredibly difficult under best practice and almost never under leading practice management. In particular, the unsubstantiated, unqualified and sometimes outrageous statements made by R.W. Corkery & Co. are unprofessional and obfuscating. For this reason alone, this represents an excellent opportunity for the Commission to make an example of R.W.Corkery & Co. The current proposal creates significant work for the Commission to uncover the basis and implied management approach to key concerns, which is unreasonable within the assessment timeframes. Personally, I would like to see a firm development concept with firm commitments to management, including a significant security bond with Mid-Western Regional Council, to clarify expectations for the industry and environment, creating sustainable outcomes for all stakeholders. In my opinion, leaving details for approval to the post-consent stage will increase the potential for unconsidered approvals. |
Tom Combes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My Name is Tom Combes, please find my y submission attached. |
Attachments |
tom-combes-ipc-written-submission-24th-feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 328.23 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The view of the family property wich will be severely affected by the silver mine, as well as air and noise pollution which will make it insalubrious to the future generations health |
Armon Hicks
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed Bowdens Silver toxic lead, zinc and silver mine at Lue must not be approved as it is a highly risky venture that will have detrimental social, environmental and health impacts. As a frequent visitor to beautiful and peaceful Mudgee and Lue area I am appalled at the possibility of a large open cut lead mine being developed in the middle of the popular Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail. Lead is a dangerous contaminant, that severely impacts human health, which we have worked hard to remove from the environment (as per decision to ban lead in petrol). Any exposure to lead is dangerous, and chronic exposure can lead to decreased IQ and cognitive function in children - there is no safe level. The presence of lead contamination in the huge tailings dam is also a reason to not grant approval. The risk of leakage or spills to farms and other economic activity downstream of the mine can not be mitigated or repaired if it occurs. There are fewer and fewer places in NSW not already despoiled by open-cut mining, including in the Central West and Upper Hunter which have carried more than their fauir share already. And finally, the destruction of the beautiful headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee., will never be put right as Bowens Silver intends to leave a massive void once finished mining. |
Yasmin Hannouf
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
24/02/2023 Bowden’s Silver Mine at Lue. SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT I moved to Kandos in 2019 and in the past three years have fallen in love with the vibrant communities of Kandos and Rylstone, the beautiful landscapes that we inhabit, the thriving art and cultural scenes and the enduring First Nations history. In the numerous submissions that have been lodged against the Bowden’s Silver Mine at Lue the negative impacts on air quality, water and ecology have been well addressed. I would like to focus my submission on the fact that 1. Bowden’s Silver Mine is not the “only industry that can help us in the very near future to stop businesses closing” (Peter Shelley, IPC Hearing 15/2/23) 2. The existence of the Bowdens Silver mine will, in fact, have a very negative impact on the towns of Kandos and Rylstone; towns that are already experiencing their own cultural and economic revival led by various factors including an influx of home buyers from cities and larger regional towns, optimistic business proprietors and artists. 3. Tourism which is part of this revival, will be destroyed by the presence of an open cut mine on the towns’ doorsteps. Any argument put forward from Bowden’s Mine that they will save the local economy that is in threat of collapse with the decline in coal mining is spurious, misleading and insulting (ABC Radio interview 14/2/2023). Since moving here with my family in 2019 I have been in full time employment almost since the day we arrived. Not once has that employment been derived, or in any way directly supported, by the mining industry. Additionally, my children (16 year olds) have been engaged in part time employment in a local café for the past year and more recently with the Mid-Western Regional Council as trainee pool attendants. I have found that, in many ways, my children’s opportunities, as well as my own, have been broadened by our move to Kandos from Brisbane. While some may argue that Kandos is a small regional town in post-industrial decline, the reality is quite the opposite. The following is some of our social and economic realities in Kandos: • Kandos hosts a biannual festival, Cementa, that attracts thousands of visitors and hundreds of thousands of dollars to the region. In 2022 there were over 40 artists and 1,500 visitors to Cementa22 bringing a direct economic impact of more than $400,000 to the wider region. • Kandos will host a biannual festival, Fermenta, which is gaining traction locally and is attracting attention from the food industry in both Sydney and other regional towns. The inaugural Fermenta Festival in 2021 was supported by the Mid-Western Regional Council. • There is a thriving artists community with regular activities that attract artists and visitors from both the regions and Sydney on a regular basis. The local art space, WAYOUT, will host at least 9 exhibitions during 2023 of both regional and Sydney artists. • There have been four local businesses which have opened for business in the past 12 months in the main street of Kandos, with a further business in the process of fitting out and a restaurant which is currently going through final DA approval with Council. • In neighbouring Rylstone there have been several new businesses open for business in the past 12 months. National media celebrity, Katrina Rowntree recently visited the area as part of Australia Day celebrations and happily appeared on social media platforms as a patron of these businesses while enjoying the restaurants and beauty of the historic town of Rylstone. • Average house prices in Kandos have more than doubled in the past three years in line with national trends, with a regional drift from the cities which is supported by increased opportunities for working from home. • The Kandos Hotel has recently changed ownership and is being managed by NSW Hotels which also manage hotels in Sydney and regional NSW. • Weekend visitors to Kandos and Rylstone have grown in the past few years with the main street of Rylstone full of cars, the cafes and shops full of people What a mine brings to a small town is a range of negative factors that impact on the quality of life of its inhabitants and adversely affect their way of life. I personally would not want to live in Kandos if there was a mine in Lue. I would move myself - and my daughters - away from the area, and rather than risk losing value in my property I would do it sooner rather than later. After all, who wants to live in a place where you will have to deal with: • lead dust and associated risks to the health of my family • cleaning and anxiety about dust settling on my house and substantial vegetable garden • increased traffic from b-doubles • loss of property values • loss of friends who will move away • loss of the beautiful town of Lue that I regularly travel through on my way to Mudgee In the past two years Mudgee has been awarded Australia’s top tourist town. If Bowden develop an open cut mine 20-minutes or so drive from Mudgee it is hard to imagine Mudgee will win this award in 2024 or any other year going forward. The villages of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos are part of the tourist experience of the Mid-Western Region and the previously mentioned weekend visitors to the cafes, shops (and short stay accommodation) are economically significant to the towns. With a lead mine on their doorstop, the recent tourist led economic recovery experienced by many businesses in the region will be reversed. This will bring additional hardship to people who have already experienced drought, bushfire, COVID-19 and flooding in recent years. ENVIRONMENT & AMENITY Bowdens (Lead) Mine: According to Bowdens projections, ore volumes of lead from the mine will be 50 times more than silver over the life of the mine. It is widely understood that exposure to lead at any level is a risk to health and is cumulative as the body cannot excrete it. Among some of the known impacts: • decreased IQ and cognitive function in children • blood cell development kidney function and neurological problems • in adults lead causes high blood pressure and damage to liver, kidneys and brain. I have no faith that Bowden have given due consideration to the issue of lead dust, nor have they been transparent about the impact of developing a lead mine on the doorstep of a community, a community which includes a growing population of children and a primary school. Similarly, the issue of Acid-Metalliferous Drainage and the proposed methods used for containment and the tailings dam requires more consideration than the Department of Planning or Bowden’s Mines have given it, including consideration of who will manage AMD for future generations: • The longevity of AMD generation from potential acid forming (PAF) rock is unknown but likely to continue for hundreds of years • The store and release covers used for the tailings dam and waste rock emplacement have been described by Earth Systems (environmental consultancy firm) as unsuitable. • There is no provision for maintenance of the tailings dam after the mine is closed and no proof that Bowden’s containment strategy will actually work on the scale of the proposed dam. • Bowdens proposal acknowledges a leakage rate of 1.6 megalitres per day which will continue after mining ceases. This tailings dam will prove a toxic intergenerational legacy that future generations will be forced to live. I am very much opposed to the Bowden Silver (Lead) Mine for the reasons stated above and appreciate the opportunity to lodge this submission. Yasmin Hannouf |
Robert Bleach
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission. Please also see my earlier submissions and presentation at the public meeting. BENEFITS ARE IN FACT MINOR WHEREAS RISKS ARE SIGNIFICANT AND LIKELY NOT ALL IDENTIFIED. The mine should not be permitted to proceed given that the DPIE assessment overstates the benefits, understates the risks and imposes conditions that are not specific and comprehensive enough. Benefits overstated in DPIE assessment. - CIE (engaged by DPIE) estimates total NPV benefits of 32 -38m. DPIE report in para 467 concedes this is low - includes company tax payments of 10 -12m. This seems based on an averaging approach of ATO data, and notes no detailed review of Silvermines actual accounts. Those accounts reveal significant booked and unbooked potential tax losses. Given this and the propensity of mining companies not to pay much income tax, these supposed tax benefits should be ignored. - CIE notes no wage benefits! And there is much debate about any net employment increase. - CIE notes other discrepancies with GE (engaged by proponent) report - DPIE notes strategic importance of silver. But if the silver is exported and/or there are no guarantees it will be reserved for NSW (likely impossible in practice) that potential advantage is lost, and the benefit is just financial as addressed above. The above are very small $ and no compensation for digging up the land, disrupting community, risking health and livelihoods, destroying amenity and leaving behind longterm/forever risks. Risks understated or not addressed in DPIE assessment: - water security for the valley, especially in times of drought that has been experienced recently and likely to be more prevalent - safety of tailings dam. Eg untried structure and risks of leakage of contaminants into public waterways and areas. Residue of deadly - lead poisoning. There is no safe level of exposure. Broken Hill and Mt Isa (and Mt Arthur?) have had very negative impacts. - Noise. All machinery should be fully enclosed and sound proofed (DPIE report/conditions allow for partial enclosure) - Does Bowdens have the experience and capability to safely operate the mine, manage all risks and remediate now and in the future. - Financial bonds should be substantial and not be able to be reduced eg by ministerial waiver - Obligations fianancial and otherwise should attach as well to Silvermines Ltd and the directors, ie companies etc with assets. Any corporate or contractual restructure needs to be notified to the Dept for advance review/approval to ensure safeguards remain in full - Given the history of the site being explored and onsold, any onsale by Bowdens of the site/rights should be subject to advance review/approval by the Department to ensure the acquiror assumes all the obligations and conditions, and has the operational and financial capacity to fulfil them There is much debate and experts cannot agree on the level of harm and risk. Some countries - eg Honduras, El Salvador and parts of America - ban silver/metals mining. Given the negligible real benefits, significant risks and unknowns, untried technology and the fact that the site is completely greenfields the IPC should treat safety and risk as paramount and refuse the mine. IF, however, the mine is deemed appropriate to proceed all conditions should be reviewed from scratch for completeness and real strength. This requires: - an assessment of what is required for there to be ZERO harm from all aspects of the mine and analysis of why Bowdens cannot achieve. (The department's conditions are generally limited by what is feasible or what risk is residual or insignificant, and these terms are open to interpretation and not precise.) - most if not all conditions imposed by the Department require further plans/management actions to be prepared by Bowdens and approved by the Planning Secretary or other person. All these should be prepared and evaluated NOW, with public review and independent assessment before any approval is given. I am happy to provide further comment if required. Thank you |
David Guilfoyle
Organisation |
Guilfoyle |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowden’s lead mine submission My name is David Michael Guilfoyle, married to Rebecca Guilfoyle. I run Rawdon Kerr Pastoral Partnership. As a farmer being situated approximately five kilometres southeast from the proposed silver/lead mine site our family of five, who are fourth generation farmers, includes myself, my wife and two boys who are seventeen and thirteen and our daughter who is fifteen. All are keen to be part of agriculture in one way or another and I am finding it very difficult to understand why a proposed silver/lead mine which is only operational for sixteen to twenty years is being contemplated. As concerned farmers and graziers we feel a lot of questions have not been answered…... 1.If the dust from this silver/lead mine was to drift and get into the pastures that our sheep and cattle are grazing on, does it affect the meat of the animal once it has been slaughtered for human consumption? And if so, are we to be compensated for our loss of income which is our livelihood and our children’s livelihoods in the future. 2.Are crops such as wheat, canola and barely, which are all grown in the Lue district for human and animal consumption, going to be affected by dust as well? The obvious answer is yes!!! People this day and age want to know where their produce comes from, testing is on the rise. An example of this was our canola was tested at the crusher plant. They rang me to inform me of what the consequences could be if any contamination was found in the crop. They gave us the results and in one truck load we had an unusual reading of fertilizer which came from the auger we were using to load the truck. 3.If we lose all these agricultural markets due to our produce being unsalable, a lot of farming families in the district will be left economically ruined and will have to find alternative land to farm. 4.The midwestern region has to many things to lose in Agriculture and Tourism both socially and economically. 5.The health of our children who are the future of our businesses are very important and the impact of lead dust is unmeasured and there is no safe quantity 6.Water contamination is very concerning as this has the potential to affect many different businesses and ecosystems all the way out to the western country. If anything was to leak into Lawson’s creek it would be unrepairable and devastating. Underground water, stock water, drinking water - how is it going to be replaced if unusable? 7. More heavy trucks on our local roads is unsafe as we have a lot of traffic using the Lue road already, we cart our own grain to Dubbo and find that the roads is very narrow in spots and blind spots are a real concern. Dave Guilfoyle |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed to this project for the reasons I stated above. Specifically, the environmental impact on the area would be devastating, as environmental regulation in this country continues to allow areas worth protecting to be destroyed for short term profit. |
Beverley Smiles
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Inland Rivers Network recommends that Bowdens Silver Project be rejected on the basis of lack of evidence on water impacts for a merits based decision. Not all SEARs on water assessment have been met. The proposed conditions of consent will not mitigate impacts on water quality or stream flow. The costs benefits analysis has not considered lack of water supply or impacts of climate change. A detailed submission is attached. |
Attachments |
inlandriversnetworkobjectiontobowdenssilverprojectpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 186.74 KB) |
Louise Doble
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the approval of the Bowden's Lead/Silver/Zinc mine for the following reasons: · I live in the community of Kandos and have friends in the town of Lue and bordering the proposed mine, who have grave concerns for the welfare of their families, the environment and their livelihoods on highly productive farm land. I too share their concern. · Even very low levels of exposure to lead can have lifelong effects on the body's systems, particularly in children and pregnant women. · Bowden’s mine will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Bowden's projected measurements for water usage are based on bolstered rain figures. · Climate change has meant that we are experiencing more severe weather patterns and with that comes flood, fire and drought. This could result in an overflowing toxic tailings dam, toxic smoke from bushfire, and marked increase in toxic dust when in drought. · There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. Bowden's have stated in their own documents that there will be a small amount of leakage from the tailings dam. This is not an acceptable risk considering the likelihood of chemicals such as cyanide, or heavy metals such as lead, leaching into the water table and waterways beyond the dam including Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. There is no coming back from that. · The clearing of Boxy Grass Woodland is completely at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery Program. This clearing could affect the survival of the local koala population and also the endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot. Is Lue to be yet another small community like Wollar, Ulan and Bylong which slowly dies as people tire of dealing with the risk of contamination in their air, soil and water while watching their properties decrease in value and their rural amenities dwindle. Let’s hope not and that approval for this lead mine does not go ahead! |
Sue Higginson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached submission. |
Attachments |
230224-bowdens-silverletterheadpdf.pdf (PDF, 328.34 KB) |
Luke Golden
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project should be rejected. It has been poorly researched with regards to the environmental impacts. The risk to the environment is too severe to ignore. The human impact will be unconscionable. The short term economic game will be swiftly super seeded by the long term damage to soil, water, air, biodiversity and the community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a local Blayney resident and farmer and I have been heavily involved in opposing the McPhillamy's project for about the past 4 - 5 years. I have aslo recently been following this project through the IPC process. We frequently visit Mudgee and the area about twice a year for the Mudgee field days and a few days away as we consider the Mugee area one of the best areas to visit in NSW. I oppose both mining projects and the more that look at the two I have noticed a lot of similaraties and I would suggest that a lot of documents for both projects from both DPE and the mining companies have been copied and pasted and used for both projects. I note that in both projects the preliminary environmental assessment were both written by R.W. CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED within a few months of each other (July 2018 for the McPhillamys project) and the DPE responded with a very similar document in request for the EIS. Since then bothe projects have been modified to gradually get a tick of approval from each state government department resulting in a 5 year + drawn out process and thousands of pages of documents and reports. I note that both projects are fairly similar in being located in an existing farming area with local communities / residences within a few km of the proposed mine site, and with a lot of negative impacts to the enviroment, agricultural farming land, the water system and social impacts. The mines are promoting jobs and an economic boost to the region with a lack of understanding on how the proposed mines would impact the local areas. The DPE appears to have similar staff working on both projects. I also not that Clare Sykes is on the IPC pannel for both procects which I can only see as a positive thing to see the similarities between both proposals. At the McPhillamys hearing and final IPC submissions we were fortunate to have support from both the EDO and Warwick Giblin and various other proffessionals and I believe that a lot of the inforamtion could easily be very rellevant to this project aswell. I also note that in the past few days both projects have now been approved and extenstion of time untill after the state elecetion has passed and a final determination will not be seen untill early April. I would suggest that the IPC combine resources and look at both projects more as one as there is so much overlap and the Bathurst Area which already supplies a lot of staff to the local Cadia mine would be supply a major part of the proposed staff as it is within a bit over an hours drive to all three mines. I am a firm believer that both projects should be rejected and an investigation should also be had into how both projects with so many negative effects have been allowed to get so far an all the way to the IPC hearing stage. Thanks for taking the time to read my submission. My full 16 page submission for the McPhilamys mine is on the IPC portal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Environmental concerns |
THORNBURY VINEYARD THORNBURY VINEYARD
Organisation |
THORNBURY VINEYARD |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners - Thank you for giving us the opportunity to make a submission regarding the Bowdens Project. - We object to the Bowdens Project at Lue. We are are large privately owned vineyard at Gulgong. - Groundwater, Surface Water and Health experts report that this mine at Lue near Lawsons Creek has the potential to pollute Lawsons Creek, the ground water in the region and lead dust may cause pollution that can reach long distances. - Any activity that may cause pollution and damage to, or even be perceived to damage or pollute, the wine grape and tourism industries in the region should be rejected. - Would the DPE agree that in the instance of contamination of local agricultural produce occurring the losses could far exceed the applicants Market Capitalisation and that in this instance would the Department agree that the State is then liable for the losses incurred by local producers. ** THE BOWDENS PROJECT SHOULD BE REFUSED. ** |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this development because of the environmental damage that it will create. The dust coming from the mine will be dangerous to the community and to the existing businesses in in the locality including contamination of the air, to the aquifers, to local dams, to local crops, to livestock that will not be able to marketed. There will be noise and light pollution from the 24 hour operations. The high amount of lead that will be extracted, processed, and trucked from the site, causing contamination to the communities all the way to South Australia. There is also damage to roads and a higher risk of road accidents from these trucks every day. There is also residual contamination from arsenic and cyanide from the processing operations at the mine. These contaminates are to be stored in waste material dams on site for many decades with no expectations of these being monitored for ever. There have been very high rain events in recent years that would have caused the waste dams to overflow, leading to river contamination and contamination of water supplies for the towns all the way to South Australia, hardly worth the risk to all those communities. We do not need the proposed jobs from this development, as there are hundreds of job vacancies in the nearby mines, Council and Businesses. Over the life of the mine there will be over 130,000 tonnes of zinc (57%), 95,000 tonnes of lead (42%) and 1,884 tonnes of silver (1%) produced. Lead is a major health concern for the local community especially with this greenfield mine being about 2 kilometres from the local Primary School. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The economic realities of the Bowdens Silver Project are clear, the project will not only provide zero net benefits to the State it will likely have a net cost to the State and the LGA. Given current data, the reports provided by GE for the applicant and the CIE for the department show that the project would provide a likely cost to NSW of $61.5m (minimum using scope 1 emissions). The risks from the project are substantial and at a minimum further analysis is required particularly on the viability of the project. Whilst based on the guidelines the economics of the project are not taken into account the viability of the project throughout its life is of critical importance given the potential risk that Ag/Pb/Zn mining represents. Using observed real world data the thresholds given by applicants specialist consultant the for providing benefit to the State of NSW have been breached. The decision by the DPIE to approve the project is perplexing, favouring mining of a dangerous and abundant mineral over food and agriculture is significantly out of touch in the global context given the facts on the ground. The evidence is clear multiple studies show that Ag/Pb/Zn does not mix with agriculture and certainly should not exist in such proximity to a community. Detailed review of CBA is included in the supporting files. |
Attachments |
submission-to-the-independent-planning-commissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 321.47 KB) |
Stephen Swain
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is too close to the villiage and school at Lue to even consider approving such a long term, potentially toxic development. |
Jayne Bentivoglio
Organisation |
Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Jayne Bentivoglio Health submission is an uploaded file below |
Attachments |
2023-ipc-submission-health-jb-ropdocx.docx (DOCX, 22.84 KB) |
Jayne Bentivoglio
Organisation |
Bentivoglio Olives and Rylstone Olive Press |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
2023 Jayne Bentivoglio Acid Mine Drainage Impact submission document has been uploaded below |
Attachments |
2023-amd-jayne-bentivoglio-bowden-submission-jbdocx.docx (DOCX, 13.66 KB) |
Isabel Butron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been visiting Lue for 20 years and love the natural landscape and it is a place for agriculture and tourism and not mining. I contemplated in buying property in Rylstone but I would not do so should the mine go ahead because of fear of exposure to led dust and subsequent of drop around property values. |
Jenny Kerr
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Jennifer Kerr. In partnership with my family, we own the property – Monivae West, just two kilometres from the proposed Silver mine site. Our family has been farming in the local district for over 75 years, enhanced the land, employed many people from the local community and put lots of money into the local community. My main concern is the livelihood and health of my children and grandchildren. My main objections to the Silver Mine at Lue are: 1. Damage to Agriculture – If dust particles with high contents of lead blow in the wind onto surrounding properties, will grain and animals be affected? There is a lot of testing done now before animals and grain can be sold and if contamination is found there will be no buyers or penalties will be enforced. 2. Water Contamination – If dust particles with high contents of lead get into the water supply, will the water supply for human and animal consumption and irrigation be effected? During the recent fires the water supply in our area was contaminated due to smoke particles that travelled in the air and landed in our gutters, in the water and were washed from land into the water supply. Will this be the same for lead and other damaging particles from the Silver Mine? Can this be guaranteed? 3. Roads- the road is narrow, windy and not suitable for high levels of trucks who will damage it and cause potential accidents. 4. Environment – It has always given me a lot of pleasure to know Koalas in their native habitat. I am also concerned about the degradation of areas close by such as World Heritage sites – Blue Mountains and Wollemi National Park. 5. Tourism business impacts – I am concerned about the impacts on tourism. For the last two years Mudgee has been NSW biggest tourist destination. Tourism provides a huge amount of jobs and money for our region. If issues occur to the water supply, then tourism will be affected. Local tourism is also important for wellbeing of our community and many people enjoy Windamere Dam. If the water is contaminated will people be able to swim or fish here? 6. NO guaranteed jobs for locals 7. Concern if cover over dam breaks. I believe a cover of the size planned has never been done before and that it will be very thin. If it does break, then irreversible damage will happen to the surrounding area. I don’t think this is worth the risk. 8. No compensation offered. If this mine goes ahead, then compensation plans need to be in place in case disasters happen and locals are impacted financially. 9. Health – I have a major concern that cognitive and other health issues can occur from Lead poisoning and I am concerned for my family and all local families. 10. Long term impacts - I would like our family business to continue to be a going concern for generations to come and I am concerned that this 23 year project could result harm that can not be fixed and will adversely affect my children and grandchildren and their peers throughout the district. I do not believe the conditions of consent adequately cover my concerns. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object strongly to the approval of this mine. Having read the assessment of the Department of Planning and Environment, I still have grave fears about the consequences of a Silver/Lead and zinc mine in the Lue district. I feel the Conditions of Consent that have been imposed by the DPE don’t go far enough and haven’t addressed all the concerns raised in the earlier submissions. Water supply and the applicant’s Water Management Plan doesn’t seem to account for Climate Change. Surely averaging climate records over 130 years does not adequately insure us against extreme droughts, El Nino and tumultuous rainfall events like East Coast Lows and La Nina. According to the DPIE website global climate models are good at predicting temperature and evaporation but not rainfall. They also predict that we will get higher temperatures and less rainfall in the future making our water supplies less secure. (nsw-climate-model-report. p11) Bowdens’ predictions for a constant source of harvestable surface water from rainfall are unrealistic. I don’t believe that Lawsons Creek can supply the water that has been allocated as water licences. The water, in dry years, is just not there. Lawson Creek water licences are unregulated. To move/purchase water licences downstream for use upstream seems unreliable as there is less water available, including at the site of the proposed mine. Will the construction of a big pit at Bowdens further accelerate the increases in local temperatures and evaporation of the water sources? We need to think about these things. We live on a farm 10km east of Lue. Agriculture is our business. I have lived here for 42 years, my husband’s family have been here since 1880. We have 7 houses on the property. We rely on the Lawson Creek for our livestock and houses. We fear for the contamination of this reliable water supply, being downstream of the mine. We have read about the chemicals needed to process the ore and that the TSF is designed to leak 1.6Ml/day We are worried about the effects that mining will have on the groundwater. The experts for both sides at the IPC hearing could not agree on what could happen to the groundwater. Their modelling came to different conclusions. This makes me think it’s too big a risk to take to carry out such a major project in this environment of fractured rocks in a delicately balanced environment. The uncertainty regarding the proponent’s design for containment of PAF and waste storage has not been satisfactorily resolved. There is too much risk of AMD and contamination through leakage or failure of the TSF. A major fault line is on the project site. The fact that we are being left with such potentially disastrous toxins in our catchment forever is extremely unfair. We need to do better if we want to continue to live healthy lives on this planet into the future. As was suggested at the IPC hearing, why not leave the silver where it is and extract it when a safer method is invented. We need to protect our natural environment, the wildlife and their habitat, the box, gum woodland. Surely we can re-cycle silver, lead and zinc. The State Government has a duty of care to the residents of Lue, local workers, businesses, farms and others who will be exposed to dangers associated with this mine. The safety of the Lue Road will be doubtful with 16 heavy vehicle trips/day and 156 light vehicles. We, the community, are laden with the burden of monitoring lead, water and noise. The TSF and final void will be there forever and if the containment methods for these toxins fail, we will be receiving them into our creeks, rivers and aquifers to do irreparable damage. Property values will decrease. Tourism will suffer. I feel the Conditions of Consent do not adequately address the potential risks of this mine going ahead and the application for a mining licence should be refused. Thank you for your time. |
Attachments |
bowdens-mine-svl-24223-final-1pdf.pdf (PDF, 75.97 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the lead mine being built in Lue |
Iris Simpson
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine is proposed for my friends' Traditional Country. To approve this mine would mean massive disrespect to country and community. There are health, environmental, and social impacts that would adversely affect the local area, and would inhibit Traditional Custodians access to and ability to care for country. There is strong community backlash against the project, and the community should be listened to. This mine should not be approved. |
Margaret Sewell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The effects of increased lead levels on reduced growth and learning difficulties have been known for many years. Having retired as a teacher and sessional university lecturer in education, I am very concerned about the risks to the village of Lue, and in particular the children, with the school located close to the mine area. Although Bowdens proposal is for a silver mine, much more lead will in fact be extracted. The Assessment Report, in stating that lead levels will not rise much in the local area, dismisses the health risks. Experiences from Cadia mine have shown that airborne dust cannot always be controlled, and the spread of lead dust over a large area must be avoided. This lead dust would affect animals as well as humans, and render tank water undrinkable. Tailings dams do at times fail, including in the local area, and this is another potential source of contamination, including of the river system. Increased risk of earthquakes follows blasting. Speakers at the IPC hearing have addressed the inadequacy of assessment of Aboriginal heritage issues, as well as of the lead dust issue, and of course water supply. Life as they know it for townspeople and surrounding farmers will be badly affected (as indeed it already has by mental health issues resulting from the stress), and the utility of this area as a major tourist destination will be severely reduced. If mining is approved, Bowdens Silver needs to be held accountable for the damage this will do, on many fronts, and for many years past the life of the mine. The Assessment Report does not make the company sufficiently accountable, with too much left to be decided post-approval. I urge the commissioners to reject this proposal. |
Justin Petersen
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will ruin our town and destroy its cultural significance. |
Frank Fulham
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
See attached document. |
Attachments |
ipcsubmissionbowdenssilverfxfpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 49.86 KB) |
Manuela Schuster
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i feel like a Lead mine in the beautiful township like Mudgee, can destroy such a vibrant ever growing town. I personal work in the wine industry and i'm really worried about the environment hazard that will bring. the community depends, on all the resources water is hard to get by all over Australia. WE DONT WANT TO DESTROY what amazing place we have. So i STRONGLY disagree with lead mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
You know the science, youve seen the data. Youve heard of how crippling Bowdens would be to ALL LIFE in the Central West NSW area. On a high wind day that could include parts of Sydney. There are thousands of people who will be negatively affected. You know there are NO SAFE LEVELS OF LEAD EXPOSURE. To approve this is EVIL AND WICKED. Only those with humanity can truly claim to be human. The hypocritical govt claim to want to save the Koalas and have an open dialogue with First Nations People. While supporting the decimation of our local Koala population, and their habitat, and sacred sites of great importance to the First Nations and Australia itself. Why do the govt print lead awareness posters to be displayed in local councils highlighting the dangers of lead while actively supporting the very opposite? To approve the sacrifice of Gods creations would be the work of the devil. Please know the stress from this already has cost many their health. There will absolutely be suicides as a direct result of you approving this. KNOW THAT. There will be so much blood soley on 3 pairs of hands. Please make a decision that will benefit all life, not just the bank accounts of a relative few You know full well 80% of our region do not support this, like Bowdens claim. You know Bowdens are exploiting the silence of the ignorant 80%. Bowdens and the govt have done an appalling job of educating their pending victims. As is the tradition of govt and mining companies. 3000 people working in the hospitality and tourism industry will lose their jobs. So you understand where I’d tell Bowdens where to stick their mouldy dangling carrot of a couple hundred jobs. Of course it will keep school levers in town. Where are they going to go now that exposure to lead has created a generation that are categorised as mentally disabled due to lead exposure as a child? What happened to their opportunities? Were they sold out by you in exchange for 200 jobs in an industry that creates silicosis in 1:100 people? Thanks Satan! What generous offer. Those against this wickedness dont believe three strangers, let alone govt departments, have the right to consent on the behalf of thousands to the poisoning of our land, air, water, children, and ourselves. In 2023 consent is apparently of paramount importance. We dont consent to the violation of Bowdens upon us all. Putting white mans laws aside, you dont ethically or morally have the right to consent to that on our behalf. How would you like it if the mid-western area of NSW decide what we’re going to do in your backyard, with or without your consent. How about we increase your childrens chances of giving birth to your dead grandchild? How bout we make a buck off creating mental disabilities for your grandchildren ? No? What about if we tell you theres 200 job opportunities as payment for retarding them before birth? I beg you to make your decision based on whats fair and just, without allowing dismissive excuses cloud your judgement. Thank you for you time, Kirrily Duff |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed location for this mine is far too close to established communities & farms in Lue, NSW. This is a region that NSW is incredibly proud of - with a high percentage of tourism with bushwalks, vegetation and wineries all reliant upon the health of the natural environment around them. The environmental concerns with the establishment and operation of this mine could be catastrophic to the region, especially if they are not managed adequately. The mining industry has a history of blatant mistakes in operating within the controls of any environmental policy - and have been responsible for multiple disastrous events. The locality and community of this region would be negatively and irreversibly affected by this mine in its currently proposed location. In particular I have close friends who live nearby on a farm, which would be irreversibly affected by the environmental affects of this mine being established. Their liveihood and business will be taken from them by a corporation who will not adequately compensate them for this liveihood. I am incredibly disappointed that the Mudgee/Lue region would be subjected to this immense change, and that NSW will suffer the consequences of a beautifully natural region that will not be attractive to tourists in the future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a 16 Year old girl and have been living in Kandos for little more than 3 years. Though it is a small town it has been a wonderful experience for me and my family. We live in a beautiful part of the world and I would hate to see it destroyed by mining so close to where we live. I am worried about lead dust and would hate to think that the beautiful road we drive often to go to Mudgee is destroyed by the presence of a mine. I hope the mine does not go ahead, and we do not have to move. And in answer to Mr Shelley's negative commentary about Kandos. I board in Bathurst in order to pursue educational and sporting opportunities. I board from Monday to Friday but would hate to think I could not come back on the weekend to spend time in my new home town. I will, one day, go away to university but I would always like the opportunity to come back here if I choose to - and not have the region destroyed by mining. I am 16 years old but work in a local cafe and am an employee of the Mid Western Regional Council. I have more work opportunities than I am able to consider, particularly given that I am also studying for my HSC and pursuing music and swimming. No silver mine for Lue! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a resident in the Mid West area and and am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed ‘silver mine’ near Lue. First of all let me state that I am not ‘anti-mining’, I am aware of the need for such resources and the potential economic benefits for the local area however I am also aware of the potential hazards associated with open cut silver (lead) mines and the reason I object to this particular mine is the location given this mine will be so close to established towns, schools and farmlands. To my knowledge Bowdens has not adequately addressed all of the concerns regarding the potential air pollution relating to lead particles and dust or the concerns relating to the local water supply and I believe two questions remain largely unanswered… 1) Will our waterways be contaminated? 2) Will there be enough water to sustain the mine and the towns? I read a supportive submission from an alleged representative of Bowdens who states that - “Modelling has been done to determine any impacts that the mine may have and the design of the project has been shown to be acceptable under the standards of all the appropriate industry authorities.” Models are very rarely accurate and more often than not fail when compared to real world results, often by a large margin. Is anyone surprised that Bowdens' models support the requirements of the project? Would anyone expect a different result if a group who were opposed to the mine did their own modelling? The other area of concern in that statement is the part that claims everything they are proposing is "acceptable under the standards of all the appropriate industry authorities." I’m sure it is but what these industry authorities deem acceptable in terms of the environmental impact in the area could be vastly different to what local families consider acceptable especially when there is a lot of evidence to suggest that NO LEVEL of exposure to lead is safe. It is fair to assume that one party's primary concern in this debate is profit, the other’s is their health so it's also fair to assume that the industry authorities acceptability bar with respects to the exposure to lead and other toxins associated with lead mining is set somewhat lower than that of the locals in the area. In conclusion - Until an independent environmental study by relevant qualified experts (with no conflicting interests in the operation) can support the claims from Bowdens relating to the air and water concerns with rock solid proof to back up their claims it is my opinion that this mine should not be approved. |
Michael Radzievic
Organisation |
Telstra Corporation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
BOWDENS SILVER LEAD ZINC MINE CANNOT BE APPROVED --Mining has a large impact on the environment because minerals are contained within the Earth. Earth must be removed in order to extract the minerals. When the minerals are close to the surface, the earth is removed, causing destruction to the shape of the land and the flora and fauna living in that area. Lead and zinc are indispensable nonferrous metals in the current industrialized society because of their position as raw materials for various industrial products. However, the massive environmental burden imposed by the activities of the lead–zinc industry will trigger potential social impacts. A recent study systematically evaluated the environmental and social economic burden of lead–zinc production activities at the national level during the entire industrial chain via life cycle assessment coupled with economic assessment method. China, the world's largest lead and zinc metal producer, was used as an example. Results demonstrated that in 2018, the national values of the potential threats to human health, ecosystem quality, and social economy were 3.55 × 105 DALY, 1.27 × 104 species. yr, and 3.90 × 1010 $, respectively. The potential social economic impact of China's lead–zinc production increased by 49% from 2008 to 2018. Direct emission was the primary contributor in most environmental impact categories (i.e., freshwater ecotoxicity, particulates formation, non-carcinogens, and carcinogens), except for global warming, in which electricity generation was the main contributor. Heavy metals emitted during the mining and dressing stage provided the predominant contribution to ecosystem quality degradation. Copper discharged into water was identified as a key substance that accounted for 59% of the overall potential threats. Henan, Hunan, and Yunnan provinces were the dominant provinces contributing to the overall social economic impacts of lead–zinc smelting. Additionally, association analysis indicated a significant correlation between the lead–zinc smelting activities and multiple cancers (e.g., stomach, brain, liver, and colon cancers). This study evaluated the environmental and social economic impacts of in lead–zinc production in China via LCA coupled with social economic assessment. Direct emission is a dominant contributor to the particulate's formation, non-carcinogens, and carcinogens categories (64%–89%) in human health, and likewise has a prominent impact on the freshwater ecotoxicity category (95%) in ecosystem quality. Temporal variation analysis demonstrated that the social economic impact of lead–zinc production. . Itai-itai disease, one of the world's most well-known public health crises, is attributed to the long-term absorption of cadmium derived from slag and wastewater that are discharged during lead–zinc mining and smelting (Aoshima, 2022). Additionally, electricity consumption during the mining and smelting stages is the main driver of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Farjana et al., 2019b). To date, many studies have revealed the association between heavy metals and multisystemic diseases, but they have yet to trace specific industrial activities (i.e., lead–zinc production). The proliferation of shallow mine pits and indiscriminate dumping of mine tailings in the environment due to artisanal Lead-Zinc mining activities within the study area puts the immediate environment at risk of lead toxicity. Considering the adverse effect of Lead toxicity on humans, it has become imperative to evaluate the availability of Lead within the environment and to ascertain the potential pathway through which the contaminant can enter the human body. |
Wendy Sandilands
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed safety measures and design for the mine and tailings dam is laughable if it weren’t so potentially devastating and deadly. The very poor record on mining companies providing adequate safety measures must be seriously taken into consideration. A massive area of farms, towns, hamlets, surface water, ground water, water supply dams, National Parks, endangered flora and fauna and recreation ares are all at very high risk of permanent damage or destruction. To put all this at risk is untenable. I don’t want my precious area, community, family and friends put at this sort of risk. The proposed mine completely flies in the face of of humanity trying desperately to ameliorate world environmental degradation. |
Dan Hood
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The polution of a waterway and distruction of more landscape is not worth the profit of the development. |
Gary Rush
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I ask the Commissioners to reject this project |
Attachments |
objection-bsmpdf.pdf (PDF, 139.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
HB & SA White Partnership |
---|---|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We run a sheep, cattle grazing business on our farm producing high quality lamb, beef and wool. Our farm is located 10 km west of Lue and the proposed Silver/lead and zinc mine. Our water source for stock and residents of the farm is Lawson Creek. It has never failed us. We have a 125Ml water licence that is unregulated. We have not accessed water using this licence for at least 40 years as the water availability is not there. Most of the irrigation from Lawson Creek comes occurs on the creek flats closer to Mudgee. Our main concerns having read the DPE assessment report and the recommended conditions are -Availability of water for the mine. The affect it will have on the flows in Lawsons Creek. The impact of mining on the ground water and subsequent supply for residents and businesses relying on ground water. -Contamination of the waterways due to leakage/seepage from TSF and final void. -AMD. The design for containment of PAF is not proven to be risk free or guaranteed to work forever. Monitoring will not help the environment once the toxins start to leach into the water catchment. -Lead dust. We are west of the mine so will get dust coming from the mine when an easterly wind is blowing, as it has been this week. Lead dust will contaminate our soils, waterways, dams, rain water from our roofs. In the 2017-19 drought and subsequent bushfires in the summer of 2019-2020 we had many days of strong winds including dust storms when the dust or smoke would hang in the air for days. We cannot add lead to the list of contaminants in the air or on our surfaces. Lead does not disperse in soil. Will we have to monitor our blood levels for lead in the future? Will we have to filter/monitor our drinking water, creek and dam water for lead? How do we protect our animals and wildlife? Is our livelihood at risk? -Lue Village. Lue is 2km from the mine site. There is a thriving primary school at Lue. Dr Mark Taylor has told us that there is no safe level of lead for human health and that children are especially at risk. -Noise. The Conditions of Consent indicate that the mine is allowed to operate 24/7 once it starts mining. This is very unfair to the people of Lue. Even though there have been restrictions on the level of noise, it is unacceptable to have to listen to or anticipate the noise created by heavy industry, day and night. Our house is more than 20 meters from the Lue road but we hear the traffic. The DPE assessment states that once mining starts there will be an increase of 16 heavy vehicle trips/day and 156 light vehicles/day on our road. Such an increase will be very noticeable and a major disturbance to us. The Lue Road is not safe now. There are lots of tight corners and it is quite narrow in some places. I think the $110K/year agreed to by MWRC for the upkeep of this road will not go far with the number of heavy vehicles that it will now have to carry. I feel the site is unsuitable for such a mine. The cost to the community seems too great. There is too much to lose for the sake of mining royalties, mining jobs and profits to shareholders. -Social. As a business we contribute to the local community and further afield in our region. We participate in the local Agricultural Shows, Bush Fire Brigade, Landcare, local charities and cultural events. We also are involved in assisting school and tertiary education students in their studies through our support of the RAS Foundation and the Country Education Foundation. Please do not allow a mining licence for this project. - |
Virginia Hackney
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have family who live in the Lue/Mudgee area. They are farmers with young children at primary school. As a concerned member of the community I object to the Bowdens silver project for the following reasons. Toxic dust - An open cut mine in this farming area, 2 kms from the Lue Primary school is a major concern for the local community with resultant toxic lead dust polluting the area and affecting the health of families and children. Water security - the mine will be using water for its operation that will be taking water from farmers, households and irrigators. Acid drainage - drainage of water via waste rock from the mining operation will pollute water used by households and irrigators along the Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River. This is turn will affect the quality of any food which is being grown in the area. What has been a pristine farming area will be damaged forever. Storage of poisonous materials in the mine tailings dam - storing cyanide, arsenic and lead particles in a dam that is surrounded by a farming community is a travesty. The State Government should be ashamed of itself allowing a mine like this to go ahead in this farming community. Whoever is responsible for encouraging this should be aware of the damage that is being done now and into the future. |
Deborah Clear
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Elephant Mountain House and Wines As a resident of Pyangle Road, Lue., I am strongly opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine. We are a multi purpose farm of 173 acres 3.7 kms from the middle of the pit. NOT ONCE have we had a visit from Bowdens Silver, or their specialist team to discuss what we do here, and who this mine will be affecting. Our family moved to this beautiful part of the world 8 years ago. We were drawn to the beautiful valley and the peace, the fresh air and welcoming community after city living. We have a large family 4 adult children with partners and 10 grandchildren. We have a flourishing wine business, where we employ 14 people on a part time or casual basis. We have an award-winning vineyard with all our wines being acknowledged as some of the best in NSW and Australia. We also have a 6-bedroom guest house which hosts over 350 regional visitors per year. These visitors are bringing into the Mid Western region a spend of approximately $150,000.00 using the average figures supplied by Mudgee Regional tourism of average spend per person of $398.00. We employ Lue and Rylstone locals for housekeeping and help in the gardens. We also run a small herd of cattle numbering 35, who drink from our 3 dams and graze in the paddocks. We also have chickens that supply us our guests with eggs, nothing like fresh farm eggs. We rely on tank water for drinking, bathing, laundry for both the guest house and our own home. We have an extensive vegetable garden, this produce is use to make jams, chutneys, relishes we sell in our cellar door in Mudgee, also we offer our guests fresh vegetables during their stay or when there is an abundance to take home. We employ a local lady to help us out with is garden. So now you have a picture of our life busy as it is, what will become of all of this if the mine is to be approved? Bowdens are saying they will have a trigger response to incidents of escaping dust. This will be after the fact, We can expect fine lead dust to be dispersed throughout the valley. But as Bowdens will have us believe it will not affect us. We think 3.7km is not far enough away to keep us safe - so our dams (irrigation for grapes, vegetable garden, stock) tank water, building roofs (from which we get our household water). Our paddocks (feed for cattle), Grapes will also be covered as well as the soil from which they draw nutrients. Who would want to stay with us when there will be blasting 6 days a week, noise travels in the valley and Bowdens will have us believe we will not hear the noise. You can hear a gunshot tens of kilometres away it reverberates off the hills and bounces around the valley, imagine a blast from mine site plus vehicle movement. Light pollution will also be a factor as we are on an elevation and at present, we can see the lights of the Ulan mine 30 plus kms away. So, 3.7 kms we will have a nightly light show (not a good one). One of the big draw cards for visitors is the star show every clear night, they often comment how beautiful the night sky is. This will be gone once Bowdens start up, no more ‘dark site’ sky scenes Vibration of earth moving equipment and blasting, guests will not want that, they come for the peace and quite of the country setting. We wash all linen in the tank water, how do we sell the fact they will be sleeping in linen enhanced with fine lead dust and bathing in lead contaminated water. We will no longer be able to offer local produce from our garden or eggs from the chickens for fear of lead contamination. Our farm stay business will no longer exist, our income will be severely compromised, who will compensate us for this loss, and supply us with fresh water? Our grape and wine producing business will also be compromised as we cannot sell contaminated grapes nor produce wine from contaminated grapes, no winery will take our fruit. We would have to test grapes, leaves, soil at all stages of growth. Who will pay for baseline testing and DPI testing? This is not a cheap exercise and would have to be done throughout growth and production. No one wants to buy contaminated wine. So, after we sell all our existing pre mine stocks we will no longer have an award winning winery. Our cellar door will have to close, along with those jobs. Who will compensate us for loss of income, and testing? Our cattle drink from our dams and feed on grasses from our paddocks, with fine lead dust having settled on dams and paddocks the cattle will ingest this and meat will be contaminated, we will have to have cattle tested regularly for lead levels. The market will not buy or process contaminated beef. Who will compensate us for lost of income and testing? After our livelihood has been decimated, no longer tourism operator, food producer, grape grower, wine producer and cattle producer who would want to buy our beautiful property, we have been advised we would lose 30% of our valuation at present, that is if anyone would every buy it.. Who will compensate us for loss of valuation? This is true of all of Lue and surrounds we will become a waste land, people will leave and ANOTHER vibrant community will be destroyed. We have seen this happen in the Bylong Valley, Wollar and other communities. Bowdens own specialists are unable to give us a straight answer when it comes to: *Dust suppression, when there is not enough water. *Leakage of tailings dams. *Rehabilitation even after mining cessed Voluntary Acquisition, should be offered to anyone living within 6kms of the mine. Health of Grandchildren numbering 10 ages 10 months to 12 years old, my own children, their partners, myself and husband, is of a huge concern. THE PEOPLE OF LUE AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS OF RYLSTONE, KANDOS, MUDGEE AND GULGONG SHOULD NOT BE TREATED AS GUINEA PIGS FOR A MINE THAT HAS SO MANY FLAWS IN THEIR PROPOSED PLANNING. NO TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS MINE |
ALAN HISLOP
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The site of the proposed mine is an unspoilt area and assists in attracting tourists to the district. It will be ruined by an opencut mine with its associated infrastructure and traffic requirements. Environmental and pollution issues are of growing concern in the community and are major challenges facing this country. Water is a scarce resource and will become even more important as the climate changes. To be using it from the proposed site for the purpose of mining lead is poor use of a scarce resource. When that is compounded with leakage from a tailings dam, it will be disaster for this beautiful area. |
greg viney
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Greg Viney.I am not a member of the Lue Community,however,I am a regular visitor to the Rylstone District. I am opposed to the proposed Bowden mine for the following reasons; The ground water quality will be definitely affected. The potential for lead pollution in the area. The loss of habitat and biodiversity. The effect of the development on regional tourism and property values. I strongly recommend that this development should not be allowed to proceed. Kind regards Greg Viney |
Clare Hamilton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
If the Lue Lead mine is approved, as the first sod is turned it will signal the death of the Lue community; send a signal to surrounding agriculturalists that their business and future in the valley are limited; and a death warrant will be issued for numerous ecological communities and threatened species. And the beneficiaries - a relatively small number of Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd shareholders. Both science and history backs this up, evidenced even recently by the catastrophic impact of lead mining in Queensland. Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd has failed to address the concerned raised about environmental impacts particularly with regards to the suppression of toxic dust and the treatment of toxic waste in the tailing dams. Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd are neither trustworthy nor honest and should not be allowed to proceed with their proposal as they have not acted with integrity when communicating with the community. A recent survey undertaken by Bowen Silver was so blatantly skewed towards the development it demonstrated the lengths to which the company will go to to achieve their end. What lengths with they continue to go to to deceive the community and planning authorities for their own gain? It appears the only argument Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd can mount to defend their position is the creation of jobs. Jobs that are not needed in the Lue, Rylstone, Mudgee or even NSW economy. Our local aged care facility is unable to secure workers be they nurses, unskilled labour or tradesmen and handymen. Local agricultural businesses are running short staffed, mining jobs remain unfilled across the Region. Tradesmen report the same problems in being unable to secure workers. The argument of fly-in fly-out provides no value to the local community or businesses and will put even more pressure on the housing shortages in our Region. We are a region and community with a diverse balance of nationally recognized natural environments, agriculture, tourism and mining. To allow a lead mine that will not only erode the fabric or our community but cause untold damage to the health of our people and environment in unthinkable. Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd should NOT be allowed to proceed with the development of the lead mine at Lue. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a property owner adjoining the mine I am concerned regarding the lead issue, the leakage of the tailings dam and the blasting. Our building may be affected our water qualuty and our breading cattle. We rely on our property for income and want to leave this to our cildren and grandchildren. Far too much is unknown regarding type of mining and i am strongly oppised to this operation. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please, help to keep our community and environment healthy by stopping this propose development to go ahead that will affect this area for a long time to come. We have all that needs to keep thriving as community with our environment around. I’m very concerned, I say no to this propose development in my name, my children's name, our ancestors, our community, waterways, wild animals, trees and all the living things that will be affected by it. Mother Earth have had enough of so much destructions we humans are causing to her. Please, leave all the elements of the earth alone. Stop the greed! |
Christopher Field
Organisation |
Taurean Gardens |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Mine will only provide 200 jobs but there are agricultural farms, olive farms, vineyards & accomodation and the corresponding jobs that will be highly affected if they are forced to cease trading due to the dust pollution and potential toxic waste creeping into the Lawson Creek. There are already several hundred job vacancies at the nearby coal mines as well as numerous job vacancies in the town of Mudgee itself due to people opting to work at the nearby coal mines. So to say that this should go ahead as it will create jobs in the area, well, there are already jobs waiting to be filled. There is also the issue of the lead concentration in honey supplies as the bees will be affected (see attachment) |
Attachments |
maquarie-university--bees--leadpdf.pdf (PDF, 78.07 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Bowden's Silver (i.e. Lead) proposed development from ever proceeding - reasons attached. |
Attachments |
submissionobjectingtobowdensproposalpdf.pdf (PDF, 26.97 KB) |
Marion Crossman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live on a property directly east of the proposed mine and the prevailing wind blows from the west. If the mine goes ahead it is likely that our water supply (rain water) will be tainted by lead contained in the dust which will inevitably settle on our roof and then be washed into the tanks. I have 2 young grandchildren who visit 2 or 3 times a week and I would be very concerned of the effects of lead on them and potential brain damage. Leaving that aside, the ludicrous and untested idea that the waste will be covered by 1.5mm of plastic to mitigate acid mine drainage is a huge flaw in the planning. The problem of acid mine drainage has devastated communities all over the world and made rivers undrinkable and unable to sustain aquatic life. There is not enough water in Lawson Creek to water cattle most of the time and definitely not enough to keep an industry going. The use of water from Lawson Creek will deprive the local area of water for livestock and wildlife. This are prides itself on its beauty and promotes itself as a tourist destination. The benefits of tourism in this area is easy to see and the numbers of people here each weekend attest to its attractions. These people come from Sydney and Newcastle to visit wineries, enjoy farm stays, explore the historic towns and enjoy the many restaurants and cafes. They do not come to visit mines. Anyone who has driven through the Hunter Valley is appalled by devastation wrought by mines. Once beautiful and agriculturally rich areas are an eyesore and will never recover. If it is true that Bowden’s is not required to rehabilitate the area once it has extracted the zinc, lead and tiny amount of silver we will be left with a ruined and arid landscape fit for nothing. Bowden’s will be there for 16 or 17 years, the damage they will do will last for ever. How is it worth it? |
Lara Altimira
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Lara Altimira and I am a resident of Lue and I am opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine Project I live in Lue Village next to Lue Piblic School so 2 km from the mine site. I have a four year old daughter who is the 5th generation of the Brown Family to be raised in the area. My main concerns with this project are the negative impacts on our health and lifestyle, long term acid mine drainage and ecological damage. On our property we have a large vegetable garden and chooks Like many residents of Lue our lifestyle is a quiet outdoors and healthy way of life. I run and cycle regularly around Lue. I run along cox street and down Bara Road or in the opposite direction I go down Pyangle Road in the direction of my Brother in Laws property so directly past the mine. I take my daughter to play in the public park in Cox street. Will we still be able to safely do these activities if the mine is approved? I have grave reservations about this. The DPE report was very vague on addressing the concerns from the community regarding the health concerns. They use outdated lead health risk levels. There is no safe level of lead exposure. Also the DPE recommend a condition that “Bowdens Silver to monitor metal concentrations in deposited dust at representative residences” and further “Bowdens Silver to develop a blood lead level monitoring program”. When will these conditions be required? If given approval then Bowdens Silver should be given a direct timeline for this to protect the community. I am concerned that dust from the mining activities will drift onto our house, garden and the Lue Village. This dust is likely to be contaminated with lead as there is going to be 50 times more lead than silver extracted from the mine. Bowdens claims this is a Silver mine based on predicted revenue percentages not on the facts and they attempt to confuse the public on their website with their use of varying measurement units. The buffer zone from the mine to the village is completely inadequate. 2 kms is too close! In Bowdens Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) they claim people living in Lue will not be effected by dust but these claims are based on insufficient data. The EIS was vague and unclear regarding dust transmission and community exposure. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. If this mine goes ahead my daughter will be exposed to dangerous levels of lead. Lead is a neurotoxin that can stunt growth, lead to learning difficulties, behavioural problems and blood and gut issues. We have a large vegetable garden and fruit orchard. We live off the products we grow. If the mine goes ahead will consuming these still be safe? How about working in the dirt as part of gardening or eating eggs from chooks who scratch in lead dust daily? Will all these important activities be safe and healthy? Like most in Lue our water supply for household consumption is rain water. What will we drink when this water and our tank is contaminated with lead dust? Again in the DPE Assessment report there is no clear reassurance that if our water is contaminated what will be the solution. Bowdens in their EIS claim the dust wont carry and they will suppress the dust with water. However there is not enough water to do this. The water supply is limited in Lawson Creek. We lived in Lue through the recent 2017-2020 drought when Lawson Creek was dry and dust regularly blew across from Western NSW to Lue and beyond. Dust will blow from the proposed mine site to Lue Village when it is only 2 km away. The NSW government Dustwatch program, research shows that dust storms are occurring more frequently. How will we be protected from contaminated dust from Bowdens mine? High impact wind events were overlooked in the EIS. They need to be considered as a risk. Furthermore what provisions are in place to guarantee mine dust suppression beyond the 17 year life of the mine? My daughter starts school next year in 2024. How will I feel confident of her safety if Lue Public School is 2kms from a mine site. Lead dust will contaminate the classrooms and playgrounds. How will this be mitigated. Will the school be one of the residents where they monitor the metal concentration deposits? When will Bowdens Silver inform people if there are dangerous levels of metal concentrations in the air or on surfaces? There needs to be clarity around this. Not just a recommendation for a condition. Water security is a further concern. On our property we have a water bore. We use the water for our garden. Without the bore we would not be able to have a garden in dry times. A garden is a major part of my lifestyle. I am concerned that with the mine we will lose our ground water supply. I do not agree with the PDE report that only 1 residents bore may be impacted buy the mining work. All of Lue’s groundwater was impacted in the drought. Most residents who have a bore on their property had limited water supply during the drought as the water table dropped. The data relied on by Bowdens in the EIS which the DPE based their report on, to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. A further concern is the noise and light pollution from the 24hour operations of the mine. The trucking of toxic mined deposits, dangerous chemicals, supplies and mine workers will lead to a significant increase in noise in the community. Heavy vehicle traffic and noisy mine blasts will have a major impact on our rural lifestyle. We will no longer be able to enjoy a quiet country existence. Constant noise raises stress levels and will consequently lead to mental health issues. My family loves the tranquillity and beautiful country that is Lue. As we are 2km from the proposed mine site I fear for the safety of my family and there is no way we would want to continue to stay in Lue if the mine goes ahead. But how will we sell our property? Property prices will fall. No one will want to buy a property so close to a lead mine. A condition of consent should require that Bowdens Silver offer voluntarily acquisition contracts to everyone in the village and surrounds, at current pre-approval market prices. Bowdens Silver needs to compensate residents for their losses in property value and livelihoods. I am very concerned about the risks associated with Acid Mine Drainage. I do not think the 1.5mm thick liner is enough to protect waste rock from leaking toxic waste into the environment and waterways. There is no evidence of the success, effectiveness or safety of this method across this scale from any other mine sites. I think the risk is too great. It will be a toxic legacy for years to come. Overall I do not think this mine should be allowed to proceed due to its proximity to the local community. It is not in the public interest to destroy a community, prime agricultural land and the many tourism opportunities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lue is a small country town with a small school that offers the support that children need that a bigger school environment can not provide for these children a mine this close to a school will endanger the longevity of the school environment hence affecting the education of the children there |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I visit that area for years. Will not do do if there is a mine. Shameful. |
Stuart Donaldson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been visiting this area for 20 years and enjoyed the beauty of the region. This mine will change this irreversibly and will extinguish the area as a place for tourists to continue to enjoy. It will be a disaster for Lui and their community a d one that should be avoided at all costs. |
Lisa Harrold
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the immense amount of clearing of native vegetation (almost 500 hectares of habitat lost forever), I object to the impacts on connectivity with other adjoining habitat areas and the impacts on fauna movement through the landscape. I object to the impacts on threatened species including Koala and Regent Honeyeater, migratory species such a grey headed flying fox. I object to the contribution this project will make to the demise of native species . I object to the increased roadkill as a result of the increased traffic generated by this mine. There is nothing proposed that will mitigate these impacts. The community should not have to tolerate such losses in these areas which have already absorbed too much destruction of landscape as a result of mining for the sake of profit. I urge the IPC to reject this mine that will impact the amenity of the township of Lue and the properties nearby. Sincerely Lisa Harrold |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not support the Bowden’s Silver Project. I am not against mining, I just think as with everything it has its place, and 2km’s from a public school situated in an already productive valley, is not a place for a mine. This area incorporates and is surrounded by fertile grazing country suitable for farming. People have suggested that the approval of the project will bring jobs, economic growth and a future for generations to come. My argument for this is that the agricultural sectors that utilise this land already bring economic growth to the local community, if the mine was to be approved the majority of economic growth would be to shareholders having little to no benefit to the local community. As for opportunities for future generations, they have the right to a ‘safe and healthy’ school environment to enjoy now, not have to contend with a mining operation on their doorstep. The idea of bringing employment opportunities to the area suggests there is a gap to fill when in fact there is no gap. I work at a small school outside of Orange and in my 15 years of teaching I have never witnessed the shortage of staff across schools that is currently happening. This staff shortage isn’t limited to education, it is happening in almost every industry. I fear that yet another mine will only increase this shortage and yes while we will have plenty of staff working within the mining industry who is working in the hospitals, classrooms, early learning centres, coffee shops, hardware store, building sites, mechanic shop and so on? Everything has its place, this just isn’t the place for a mining operation. |
Jennifer Wiggers de Vries
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A town of Lue will become uninhabitable Mudgee’s water supply will be contaminated The surrounding farm land will be contaminated with lead. |
Anthony O'Reilly
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
23/02/2023 Dear Sir/Madam I object to the development of the Bowden’s Silver Project SSD-5765:- the development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure for a number of reasons listed below:- The proposed mine is in a greenfield area The major mineral extracted from the mine will be lead The toxic and long lasting effects of lead once released from the ground The extremely well documented risk to the health of all people exposed to lead particularly babies and children. The Lue Village and Public School being within 2km of the proposed mine The contamination of surface and ground water supplies and flow on effects on the agricultural industry The destruction of habitat of a number of endangered plants and animals The impact on tourism which is an important industry in the area And not least, the negative impact on the local community Please do not allow this silver mine to be approved and go ahead Thank you Anthony O’Reilly |
Carolyn Learoyd
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the application on the grounds that an open cut mine should not be considered in this location due to its potential adverse health and environmental effects on the nearby school. This is especially so if Bowdens also mines lead as has been suggested will occur. With an open cut mine, It is likely that the local school would experience deposits of air borne noxious particles which if ingested could affect the health of students. The area is currently a popular tourist destination with a range of environmentally based activities such as bird watching and hiking attracting visitors. The historic streetscapes of nearby towns also attract tourists and provide income for locals. Tourism will be reduced if thia area becomes known more as a mining location. Our decision makers should be looking to encourage the transition to a low impact, low carbon economy instead of facilitating more mining. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are the closest privately owned residence to the east of the proposed mine site and we do NOT support this mine. Our residence is the closest privately owned residence to the east, and will be the most negatively impacted privately owned residence in terms of depositional dust and any associated health impacts. Furthermore we will also be negatively by impacted blast damage, visual amenity, noise, light pollution, increased traffic interactions, potential water draw down (we rely on alluvial ground water), and proposed power line upgrades (60metres from our house). I feel that our residence has been ignored and disregarded because the building has previously been vacant. HOWEVER we are currently in the process of undergoing works restoring the existing structure (an original 1860s stone cottage). This is a project very close to our heart, and is intended to be a family home. It breaks my heart to think of the potential repercussions of this mine on this dream home of ours. We had hoped to raise our children here. The looming threat of this mine is causing great anxiety. A heritage building of this age and stone construction will be most susceptible to blast damage. It will be 2km from the open cut. The draft conditions of consent should factor in blast monitoring at this residence. We have not had any consultation regarding this residence. If Bowden’s is approved, the conditions of consent need to have provisions for our residence to the east. Furthermore, we have recently installed a number of new rainwater tanks on this property. Bowden’s have not undertaken any baseline water quality testing on these tanks. We are gravely concerned regarding the health risks to us, our children and the surrounding community. The fact that they are proposing this mine when it lies less than 5km from a children’s school, is absolutely disgraceful. There is no safe level of lead exposure. Lives are being put at risk. Furthermore, we are highly concerned for the negative impacts on the surrounding environment and ecology - including the waterways, the wildlife and the native flora. Amongst many other important species - platypus and koalas populate the area. In addition, the negative impacts and effects on the tight knit Lue community will be devastating. The Lue community does NOT want or need this mine. The committee largely fears and rejects this proposed mine. This area also has rich historical and cultural significance, which will be damaged by the existence of this mine. |
Mossy Rock Alapcas
Organisation |
Mossy Rock Alpacas |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a primary producer and now our business is at great risk. We run a successful alpaca stud with an aim to breed exceedingly high standards in fleece and animal health. Our livestock relies on clean drinking water that will be contaminated by the mine as our property is within the 6km radius. This is unacceptable and could be detrimental to our ability to produce healthy and thriving livestock. Bowdens should not be allowed to destroy so many other businesses. This is what will happen if it goes ahead. Even if we were to sell our property, which perish in their right mind would want to buy land in our region in the vicinity of a lead/zinc mine. |
Paddy Morse
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Paddy Morse Objection (I am making a submission that objects to this proposed development going ahead) |
Kyla Starks
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed lead and zinc mine in Lue . As a frequent tourist to the area and someone who values the importance of preserving our natural environment, I believe that this mine will have a significant negative impact on tourism in the area. I am from Sydney and have been several times to the region and stayed at the beautiful farm stays in the region. Tourism is a crucial industry in the Lue region & its surrounding areas], bringing in a great deal in revenue each year and providing employment opportunities for many local residents. As Visitors we come to the area to experience the natural beauty of the region, including its stunning landscapes, unique wildlife, and pristine waterways. We also come to participate in a range of outdoor activities, from hiking and fishing. However, the proposed mine would pose a significant threat to this thriving industry, which I don’t Blencoe has been adequately addressed or taken into consideration. The environmental impacts of the mine, including air and water pollution, noise and dust, and destruction of wildlife habitats, would detract from the natural beauty of the area and make it less attractive to visitors. Additionally, the mine would require extensive infrastructure which would further disrupt the natural environment and negatively impact the tourism industry. I urge you to reconsider the proposed lead and zinc mine in light of the significant negative impacts it would have on the tourism industry in Lue and it’s surrounds. Instead, I encourage you to invest in sustainable tourism initiatives that will protect and preserve the natural environment while also providing economic benefits for the local community. By doing so, we can ensure that Lue remains a vibrant and attractive destination for visitors from around the world. Thank you for your attention to this matter. |
Peter Bentivoglio
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My letter Dr Peter Bentivoglio submission against Bowden's Mine is uploaded below |
Attachments |
dr-peter-bentivoglio-bowden-submission-23-feb-2023docx.docx (DOCX, 18.11 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I find it unbelievable that we are considering mining anywhere nears natural watercourse! Lead was removed from paint in the 1970’s (50 years ago), because the health risks & environmental contamination factors were recognised and now a whole town is going to be subjected to the health risks. Outrageous!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident on the Lawson Creek Farming Pastures I would like to submit my major concerns in objection to the Bowdens Lead Mine. This is my future and my main concern is the lead contamination that could easily occur as a result of negligence or human error or natural causes in my water table and source affecting the livelihood of my family and the local community. Mines often have incidences of water contamination and the trust is no longer there. Open cut mining is dangerous to water sources and wildlife. The local experts have expressed there concerns with the catchment dam and area and have been ignored due to government and corporate greed this is not their home! Furthermore if an incident did occur the mobile connectivity in the immediate area is not stable or even there so how could any accident or failing be reported in adequate time. I am only just starting my adult life and this is a real and dangerous threat to our generations future- PLEASE STOP MINING UP OUR REGIONAL COMMUNITIES!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposal due to its adverse impact on the surrounding area and the habitants, animals and the environment, my main issues include: The impact on the local water supply, the risk of reduced water supply The danger of exposure to lead leading to health issues, decreased IQ and cognitive function in children. The negative socioeconomic impact, devaluation of property prices, destruction to the community through noice pollution vibrations etc. Increased traffic, noise and dust, which will further impact the pollution in the local area impact on biodiversity and ecological impact |
Mudgee Wine Association
Organisation |
Mudgee Wine Association |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
MUDGEE WINE ASSOCIATION SUBMISSION Regarding the BOWDENS SILVER MINE To whom it may concern, Thankyou for the opportunity to provide a submission in regards the Bowdens Silver mine in Lue NSW. The Mudgee Wine Association is a not-for-profit organisation located within the Mid-Western Regional Council. We have a total of 66 members consisting of 35 Full Members, all are wineries. The is remaining Associate Members – consist of beverage and food producers, restaurants and accommodation providers. Our organisation with just its Full Members employs 857 people in various facets of the grape growing, manufacturing and wine distribution. These include owners, managers, cellar door staff, direct sales, vineyard employees and contractors for spraying, harvesting, pruning, transport, winery production staff plus staff for events run by MWA. These figures do not include any jobs in other tourism industries nor our Associate Members. Bowdens have stated they will provide 250 jobs over the extended period of 23 years. Our question is “at what cost to the jobs that already exist in our already thriving industry, the wine Industry.” The regional visitor economy has been building rapidly in recent years with Mudgee named Top Tourist Town in Australia for two years running – in both 2021 and 2022. These visitors come for the incredible local wine, some of the best foodie experiences in the state, heritage sites and to enjoy the regions natural beauty. Visitation to the region has increased from 691,000 in 2016-‘19 to 826,000 in 2020-‘21 this has resulted in considerable growth in spending in our region. Using figures supplied by Mudgee Regional Tourism Inc. (on their website) the average spend per person is $398, this includes accommodation, entertainment, food and wine. This brings upwards of $300 million for the Mid-Western Regional Council’s economy. Mudgee Regional Tourism Inc. has just launched their new Wellness Tourism Strategy featuring nature, healthy activities, good food and wine experiences - this is one of the fastest growing tourism sectors globally. Visitors are looking for sustainability in the products they consume, human health and wellbeing. They want to relax in a clean healthy environment, drink beautiful wines, eat wholistic, locally grown food - also known as the ‘Paddock To Plate’ experience. They love the story Mudgee Region brings to their experience, how are the grapes grown, how the wine is made, who made the wine and especially how it tastes. They love to experience everything from simple cellar doors located on back roads to beautiful meals in stunning surrounds with all the trimmings. All of our wine businesses are family run enterprises, even the largest ones. Along with this aspect, many are either accredited or practising organic grape growers and wineries. Our visitors love to meet the people behind the brand and feel they have a part to play in the success of our small businesses, which is what they take home. Mr Huon Hook can’t be wrong, we are a region that has the ‘best of the best’ and that can’t be put into a dollar figure. We strive for perfection in all our operations and endeavours. What price this mine? If this mine is allowed to go ahead it will have a domino effect. Firstly visitation to the region would decrease - not many people want to spend their hard-earned cash in a region that has fine lead dust contamination in their food, wine, water and environment. This will have the knock-on effect of hospitality, cellar door and eventually winery staff being be laid off. Can the region afford to lose any of these ‘clean' jobs, only to be replaced by ‘dirty’ jobs? These ‘proposed’ jobs have long term ramifications for our natural environment, community affinity, generational and historical businesses. Then we come to the actual growing of grape vines and wine production. It is well documented that fine lead dust can and does travel 1,000’s of kilometres. Lead dust from both Port Pirie and Mount Isa can be identified by their ‘DNA’ and it has been found in the Antarctic. So a mere 40 kms into Mudgee and beyond is nothing. This fine lead dust can and will settle on the vine leaves. This can and will inhibit photosynthesis. This can and will affect general vine health - vines will fail to thrive. This can and will impede fruit set. Lead can and will be absorbed into the fruit. This can and will impact overall production of wine across our region. Obviously, the above situations will have a sliding scale of affects and degree of damage. But no one will know for sure without testing. Our people, our family-owned businesses will be asking themselves ………….. Is my fruit contaminated? Do I take the chance to harvest this fruit, this year? Can I afford to take the chance of trying to make good wine with suspect fruit? Are my vines permanently damaged? If so to what extent, will they recover next year or will this repeat again next harvest? Can we continue to go on producing wine with this potential, ongoing threat continuously hanging over us? Jobs will be lost in all sectors of the industry and people will leave the area. Some may say we are overly exaggerating the situation. Those that suggest we are overstating the imposed risk associated with this Lead Mine project don’t have the collective lived experience we do. In our very recent wine history (2020) we have had a whole of region vintage wiped out due to Smoke Taint. This contamination of our grapes and subsequent cancellation of production has caused an ongoing financial burden to many, especially the smaller producers. All of this occurred due to a bush fire located over 127 kms away. So a lead mine on our doorstep is of great concern to all with future consequences and a source of financial insecurity. We have a large number of organic growers; this process takes years to become certified. What will happen to their livelihood, who will compensate them or other growers for loss of income? Base line testing of uncontaminated fruit will have to be undertaken by all producers within a certain radius of Lue prior to the mine commencing. Then ongoing testing of fruit to identify contaminants and their levels will continue each year. This will depend on the prevailing weather conditions in the lead up to harvest. Again yet another financial and time cost for producers to carry. That is if this mine was to go ahead – currently we don’t have this impost and financial burden. The Australian Wine Research Institute and NSW Wine will discuss further effects on fruit production and quality in more depth in their own submissions. This mine sits near Lawson Creek and feeds into the Cudgegong River and then onto the Burrendong Dam. This is the main source of irrigation water for a substantial number of wineries along the catchment from Lue to Gulgong and beyond. We also have some very serious concerns regarding the effects of potential Acid Mine Drainage. Acid mine drainage, acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD), or acid rock drainage (ARD) is the outflow of acidic water from metal mines this mine being lead and zinc and silver Acid rock drainage occurs naturally within some environments as part of the rock weathering process but is exacerbated by large-scale earth disturbances characteristic of mining and other large construction activities, usually within rocks containing an abundance of sulphide minerals. Areas where the earth has been disturbed may create acid rock drainage. In many localities, the liquid that drains is be highly acidic, and in such cases it is treated as acid rock drainage. This liquid often contains highly toxic metals, such as copper or iron. These, combined with reduced pH, have a detrimental impact on the streams aquatic environments. Acidic drainage is detected within 2–5 years after mining begins, whereas at other mines, it is not detected for several decades. Content testing is required to determine the leaching. In addition, acidic drainage may be generated for decades or centuries after it is first detected. For this reason, acid mine drainage is considered a serious long-term environmental problem associated with mining. The leaching from this rock when the lining is compromised will go into Lawson Creek and into the Mudgee water system down stream. No irrigation can be drawn from the river as it will be a toxic stream. Who will supply us with fresh water for producing and processing some of Australia’s finest wines? Bowdens have stated that once mining has ceased they will cover the waste rock with a 1.5 mm plastic tarp covering or Geotech and then a thin layer of soil. No trees can be planted on this site as this could compromise and penetrate the lining. We are not experts, just simple grape and wine producers, but the experts have told us this proposed mine has the potential to have a huge effect on the Mudgee Wine and Visitor economy especially as some aspects are trial systems, not yet proven. Say goodbye to our community amenity - no more swimming in rivers and definitely no irrigation on the grapes. This will have a huge impact on a historic, proven, viable, intergenerational, family based manufacturing businesses and the potential to destroy the Mudgee Wine and Grape industry along with our reputation as the #1 Top Tourist Town destination in Australia. We, the Mudgee Wine Association, are strongly opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine proceeding in the proposed current format. You, the IPC Commissioners have the power to shape and determine if the state goes for short term financial gains over long term community livelihoods in this, our little part of the world – please consider well. |
Attachments |
mudgee-wine-assoc-final-subdocx.docx (DOCX, 84.23 KB) |
Michael Norman
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I beliveve that the project's benefits do not outweigh its negative impacts, particularly on the environment and neighbouring community. |
Attachments |
doc230223copypdf.pdf (PDF, 215.81 KB) |
Lucy Meagher
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the development of the Bowdens project. I have read the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report on the project, and have the following concers: - The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. - Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. - Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. - Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. - The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. - Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. - The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. This mine should not be allowed to be developed and I really hope that the Independent Planning Commission will see the serious issues with the Assessment Report and will move to OBJECT the project. Thank you for your consideration. |
Donna White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
See attached document file. |
Attachments |
ipcsubmissionbowdenssilverd4pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 58.62 KB) |
Matilda Symonds
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been observing the progress of the proposed development of Bowden’s Mine near Lue N.S.W for some time now, and I am absolutely amazed that it has been allowed to come this far. The mine would be a huge mistake on so many levels, for so many different reasons. The mere fact that the planned mine is an open cut silver, lead and zinc operation in such close proximity to the village of Lue should have precluded any advancement of the proposal from the very start. The toxicity of the dust raised during the mining process and the transport of the mined ore poses a truly unacceptable risk to the health and well being of the residents of the area, and, most particularly the children attending the local school, only 2 kilometres away. Waste disposal from the proposed mine will also constitute a major threat to the environmental health of the area. The possibility of leakage of toxic substances into the surrounding water catchments is positively frightening. Issues in this regard do not seem to have been adequately addressed in Bowden’s application. Mining management can never, ever be able to fully guarantee the absolute safety of the containment of waste discharged from their activities. As has occurred recently in the instances of Whitehaven and Santos mining projects to the N.W. of this area, “accidents”do happen. This would be disastrous for the nearby water catchments and the industries that this water supports. The Mudgee district’s prosperity is based on its clean, green image, its thriving agricultural industries along with the world famous wineries of the area. Tourism is another vital industry around Mudgee, Rylstone and Lue. This would be placed in great jeopardy if this mine was allowed to proceed. In closing, I would like to state my unreserved opposition to this most dangerous proposal. The threats it poses, toxic dust, possible compromises to water sources, noise pollution, destruction of Aboriginal artefacts as well as the local pristine environment, combined with the terrible impact on the physical and mental health of the local population, make the whole proposition not only absurd, but totally unacceptable. I have been a frequent visitor to Lue for over 50 years, and it is an area very close to my heart. It would be an absolute travesty to see that beautiful countryside destroyed due to a mining company’s greed and the incomprehensible myopia of the N.S.W. Department of Planning as illustrated by their current Assessment Report. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a regular Visitor to Lue over the past 16 years. It is a beautiful, peaceful place to visit, and the near by town of Rylestone is one I frequent, regularly. If the proposal goes ahead I feel it would negatively impact tourism in this area. I would not visit if this area was to be overtaken by noise, machinery and industry that would detract from these wonderful surroundings. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against the mine going ahead worried about the LEAD CONTENT AND WATER AND RUN OF CONTAMINATED WATER |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the implementation of a lead mine in Lue, 25 minutes east of Mudgee, would cause a variety of negative, inadequate impacts and consequences. The common causes that have probably already been established include dire health risks including seizures, delirium, coma and of course the worst cases, death. These are all caused by the severe exposure to high concentrations of lead. However, these are just some of the many impacts, that could be avoided if the mine is not implemented. The open-cut layout of the mine when it is implemented, can leave this area of the region looking messy and unorganised, not to mention the constant contamination of water and air throughout the life of the mine. Additionally, once the mine's resources have been drawn from the ground and there is no longer use for the 'hole in the ground' what will the mine's purpose be? This unused mine may likely eventually erode, causing nearby terrain to be disturbed and disrupted, the land possibly being farming land of families who are providing crops, cattle or sheep to local businesses. This can be a threat to the community. Throughout the duration of the mine, the lead drawn from the area can contaminate rivers and air, not to mention there being a primary school 2km from the mining area. If the area's rivers, for example Lawson Creek which sits close to the area, are contaminated, there is little ways of decontaminating it. This creek may be a main water source for many farmers, and as mentioned above, can cause negative impacts on the local community. In addition, if the rivers are contaminated and the mine causes catastrophic damage to natural resources nearby, infiltration plants will cost lots of money, which the local community and government may not feel comfortable addressing. Furthermore, the towns community has already been disrupted, as seen by the multiple protests within the region. The implementation of the mine, will just cause more corruption of the community. Ultimately, I believe the land on which the mine is being implemented should be left untouched. Although I am from Bathurst, about 1.5 hours from the construction of the mine, I have family friends who will be greatly impacted by this project, that may have more risks than benefits. 2KM IS TO CLOSE!!!!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Full detail of submission - attached pdf No Stakeholder Engagement has occurred with the Lue Residents, existing land users and surrounding tourist operators. The Generational Landholders, existing businesses and custodians are to be traded for a total 23 year mine life, should this project go ahead. How can this possibly be justified? How short-sighted is this? Bowdens say that they have had an open-door policy. This does not equal community consultation. Sponsorship of events or activities does not equal community consultation. In this instance, it is more consistent with a “modern-day” bribery rather than good corporate citizenship. Poor representation of community by Bowdens Employment “Jobs, Jobs Jobs,” is the constant mantra we hear from Mining proponents. It is an arrogance that suggests these mining and mine related jobs are more important than any other aspect of life. Currently there are more than 360 jobs available in our region just in the areas of mining and local government alone. Hospitality offers many more. Employment will not be a gain from this mining venture. Furthermore, it creates a detrimental 2-speed economy. • Who is the mining company Bowdens are seeking approval for an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine There is no evidence that Bowdens will operated this mine. Will this approval be on-sold and to who? The argument that “it’s better for this hazardous processing to happen here under Australian regulations,” doesn’t serve our country, economically, environmentally, from a health perspective or socially. It flies in the face of what we know to be true. • Health – We have been mortgaging the health of future generations to realise economic and development gains in the present (Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, Boltz F, Capon AG, de Souza Dias BF, et al.) Environmental pollution contributed to an estimated 9 million deaths and significant losses across the world in 2015 and in fact, The Lancet Commission on pollution and health identifies pollution as the largest environmental cause of disease and premature death. Metalliferous mine dusts and associated potentially toxic elements released into the environment through dust generating mining activities cause adverse health effects to humans. This is especially the case in regions where historic mining has left a significant legacy of exposed metalliferous mine wastes. (Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu NN, et al. 2108). The WHO has declared air pollution to be the world’s largest environmental health risk. There are no safe levels of exposure to particulate matter and even short-term exposure can have adverse effects on health. Our health, our visitor and animal health, and our operation, that is faming and tourism, will suffer because of this mine. • Lead - is toxic to humans, and it's a universally accepted fact that there is no safe level of exposure to Lead (WHO). Lead is a cumulative toxicant that affects multiple body systems and is particularly harmful to young children. The proponent, Bowdens, suggest that water will be used to suppress the lead dust, however, evidence of an insufficient water resource, especially in times of reduced rainfall, indicate that this will not be possible. This was highlighted by civil engineering and natural resource management, presenter, Shireen Baguley • Mental health, as a number of the medical doctor presenters indicated, it is a highly significant impact to the local community. Evidence shows that people can experience high levels of anxiety and stress when there is a threat to their region, economic stability, and devaluing land values, even at the proposal stage of a mine. Psychological impacts continue with landscape changes, such as those that occur with large scale mining developments. People suffer solastalgia - the distress that is produced by environmental change impacting on people while they are directly connected to their home environment. This Community have already suffered with drought, bushfires, Covid, Floods and now a mining threat. • Lack of Technical detail and supporting data o Ground and surface water - Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report. Refer to Shireen Baguley’s Report Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. Townships such as Gulgong will have their town water supply at risk of poisoning. Acid mine drainage (AMD) Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. AMD risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. There is a substantial disparity between Bowdens statements for AMD management and Earth systems statistical analysis. The tailings dam will leak – there I nothing to stop it. It’s not if, it’s just when. o Bowdens Mine is an Uneconomical Proposition. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Tourism and the visitor economy represents $170 million to our region and which we, personally, are part of. o Lack of Due Diligence by the NSW Department of Planning (DPE) A significant cost and burden has been placed on the community with the additional huge costs of employing the IPC to do the due diligence we expect and pay DPE to do. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the DPE are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. There are no penalties for exceedances. The DPE are tasked with the responsibility to make critical assessments and seek clarity from applicants that answer key issues. “Streamlining processes” to allow for faster approvals, is irresponsible, especially where activities will have consequences in perpetuity. The approval with conditions, given to Bowdens’ Lead, Zinc & Silver mine demonstrates an extremely poor quality assessment. Assessments such as this, bring a distrust to the system and makes one question if corruption is involved. Current “Best Practice” is now clearly NOT good enough. Practice needs to be brought up to date with our current knowledge and expectations of safety, social impact and environmental impact. It is time to make a stand. I, along with many others, ask the Commissioners to bring about, a lifting of the bar, so that mining practises consider appropriately, the real impact on people and landscape. The current standards or “Best Practice” are no longer acceptable. Stop the rape and pillage of the land for” critical minerals,” minerals of significance,” “rare earth minerals and their potential economic opportunities.” It seems the state is in a drunken stupor, “streamlining processes” for an artificial and questionable, economic gain. The real costs are being ignored. o Transport Inadequacies/lack of Risk Mitigation Mined materials and processing chemicals will be moved as a slurry, by B-Double truck, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee. No upgrade to the road, no procedures for accidents and spills, no mitigation for the risks. o Aboriginal Heritage Destruction Of the 52 aboriginal artefacts surveyed on the site, 25 will be destroyed if the mine proceeds. A local Wiradjuri Elder asked “How many more funerals do we have to go to?” The trauma to the land, the destruction of songlines, rock shelters and sites of significance. When will this assault stop? Commissioners, please speak with our local Wiradjuri people and please stop the “gag orders by mining proponents.” Gag orders effectively prevent Aboriginal people objecting to destruction of heritage sites. o Rehabilitation – It is unsatisfactory that this mine has no rehabilitation plan. According to a report, The Dark side of the boom: What we do and don’t know about mines, closures and rehabilitation in New South Wales (2017), by the Australian Institute, adequate funding has not been allocated for rehabilitation. “The costs of rehabilitating the mines in NSW run to billions of dollars. The public cannot afford to leave this, and blindly trust in mining companies, and government departments are not facilitating the transparency this issue deserves.” “There is no example of a major open cut mine site being successfully rehabilitated in NSW. There are, however, hundreds of abandoned mines in the state, with the NSW Auditor General expressing concern that derelict mines ‘may represent the largest category of contamination liability for the NSW Government.’” While there is a huge financial liability to the state, there is a much greater real cost to our people and our environment. It is prudent of the Commissioners to have Bowdens submit an appropriate rehabilitation program and set aside the funds as a bond for this. If this is done in a meaningful way, and if the economic value presented at the hearing is correct, this mine will not be an economic proposition. Bowden’s economic viability is only such because this cost amongst others has not been accounted for. Commissioners, we the people impacted, are asking for fair and just practices. Accurate assessments, with complete detail and data need to be in place before any approvals are sought. The mere fact that several other well-funded proponents have walked away from this proposal should send up red flags. The key issues are the key issues - Whether there is one or one thousand submissions |
Attachments |
bowdens--objection-docx.docx (DOCX, 27.5 KB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
. |
Brayden Mills
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To keep running the family farm safe and healthy |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development. There is a number of issues I am seriously concerned about, especially with regard to the effects the proposed project could have on the environment and the people living close around. So far the proposal shows some clear weaknesses concerning the protection standards of people and the environment - especially in relation to Acid Mine Drainage and the lead dust. As explained by qualified experts, such as Shireen Baguley, the project proposal contains mistakes, is based on wrong facts, or assures to introduce protection mechanisms that are technically questionable - for example due to missing already existing implementation. This casts strong doubt on whether and to what extent the operator Bowden Silver can ensure that people and the environment are protected, not just to some degree, but with certainty. At its scale, the proposed project may have serious impacts on the environment and sensitive ecosystems, and we cannot see ourselves making any mistakes in this regard, especially in this day and age. Also, due to the above-mentioned erroneous assessments, a strong doubt has arisen as to whether further additional requirements regarding protection standards would be taken seriously in the necessary manner, or are actually feasible to implement. I have the impression that this project is putting life at risk, that people as well as valuable animal and plant species have to take the risk of being severely damaged, not only during the operating period of the project but also for many years longer. Protection of this life under the current designs does not seem to be assured, compliance and implementation of further conditions seems questionable and its importance in comparison to monetary incentives seems to be secondary - and yet I did not say mention anything about how agriculture and tourism in the Mudgee-Lue-Rylstone-Kandos region might be endangered, what impacts might occur in the absence of protection of the environment and people, especially in economic and socio-economic terms. I am strongly concerned about the proposed project, and see the only solution in a final rejection. I kindly ask that my concerns but especially the assessments and objections of the qualified experts are taken seriously and considered in the decision making process, thank you. |
Sharelle Fellows
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to object to the conditions of consent, in particular regarding water. My concerns are twofold : 1.I understand that the necessary water is to come from Lawson Creek and that in times of drought compensatory water for agriculture is to be provided . The impracticality of this measure seems obvious. The last drought was so severe in this area that native vegetation was severely impacted let alone adequate water for pastures and stock. Where is this water to be found ? For an extended period of time Burrendong dam was in the minus % capacity and there was discussion of the necessity to excavate the bottom of the dam to extract whatever water remained. Water restrictions were severe throughout the Central West. Windamere Dam was also similarly drastically low. The prospect that a city the size of Dubbo could run out of water was all too real . 2. The modelling of water / rainfall patterns does not seem to take into account extreme drought or current unprecedented floods. The recent flooding in this area in October 2022 particularly was extreme - lifetime residents had no recollection of such flooding . Modelling doesn’t account for these “once in a thousand year events “ that have occurred repeatedly in the last 12 months. Given the unpredictability of climatic events guaranteeing that Lawson creek is not contaminated in the event of a major flood does not seem possible . The Cudgegong river is our water supply . The proposed lining of the tailings dam has been questioned as being inadequate. The possibility of acid spillage and contamination would do irreversible damage to the environment. The issue of potential lead contamination so close to a village and school is of utmost concern . Given the recent emphasis upon silicosis, dust suppression measures need reassessing. While many of the complex technical and scientific aspects are contested amongst expert opinions water supply as a central issue remains. Water is needed for this mine to operate . Lawson creek in extended drought will not be apply to supply the mine. The compensatory water for agriculture may simply not exist. Similarly in extreme flood events ensuring there is no contamination of the Cudgegong River which is the lifeblood of water supply for the region seems difficult to guarantee. We cannot risk possible contamination of our water. I ask that the commission consider the increasingly unpredictable cycle of prolonged drought and/or intense flooding and reject this proposal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the development for several reasons. The threat to water security and quality. Dangerous lead exposure, exacerbated by the proximity of the mine from Lue Public School and the dangers of lead exposure to children. Toxic tailings dam with daily leakage of at least 1.6ml of dangerous substances such as arsenic, lead particles and cyanide. Permanent negative social impacts such as destruction of community, decline in property values, noise, vibration and traffic issues and lead in water and dust. A major acid mine drainage risk above Lawson Creek water table. Biodiversity and ecological impact due to plans to clear 457 hectares of land, including critically endangered ecological communities. In a completely greenfield area in the middle of the Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail, Bowdens is trying to build three open cut pits across 52 hectares, and a huge tailings dam with a 56 metre high wall. It will leave a 53 hectare hole behind, forever together with permanent negative impacts on the regions environment and community. If approved this will make my family reconsider living in the region with young children and is likely to impact the tourist trade which will impact jobs in other industries in the tourist town. It will also reduce our enjoyment of life in the region. |
Deirdre Leslie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mine should not be allowed on a site so close to a community due to the well known hazards associated with lead mining. I am an experienced child and family health nurse and have worked in Broken Hill, where many babies and young children have high blood lead levels due to contamination from lead mining. I am aware that Mt Isa community have similar issues. The well known consequences of this are very significant for individuals and families, and for the wider community. Child development is negatively impacted by lead exposure, and the consequent economic impact on families, health and education systems is ongoing. The mining company if allowed to proceed with the development proposal near Lue, will make its profit and leave ongoing costs for the community and tax payer funded health and other services. |
Stuart Eaton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE MINE GOING AHEAD AS FOLLOWS:- 1. Mudgee/Lue is a pristine and beautiful area, which regularly wins tourism awards (i.e. you love to visit it!) 2. Imposing a lead mine 2 kms from the village of Lue is wrong - it’s the wrong mine in the wrong place 3. The proponent’s intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small ephemeral creek which didn’t run at all for the 2 years from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. 4. The proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. |
Samuel Evans
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining activities increase the volume and rate of exposure of sulfur-containing rocks to air and water, creating sulfuric acid and dissolved iron. This acid run-off dissolves heavy metals such as copper, lead and mercury which leach into ground water aquifers and surface water sources, harming humans and wildlife. |
Robert Loneragan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am 5th generation whose family have lived in the Mudgee Rylstone area since 1870. There are many issues associated with this proposed mine that make it a totally inappropriate, environmentally unacceptable and a socially dangerous project. The following points are of greatest concern to me: 1. THE IMPACT RELATING TO WATER SUPPLY IS A PRIMARY CONCERN. The Lawson Creek water supply is not a permanent water supply and even in average rainfall years the creek does not have a continuous reliable flow. A project such as this especially requires a reliable supply of water to minimise dust emanating from the mining process. 2. Lead contaminated dust that will be transported in the prevailing westerly winds will be dispersed over a vast area of highly productive farming land and most importantly water catchment terrain. The water catchment to the east of Lue and Rylstone feeds into the Cudgegong River and then into the Rylstone resevoir which then flows further down stream to Windermere dam and then onwards to the Mudgee valley and further west. There are some 3,000 people living in the Rylstone Kandos area who are supplied by the Rylstone reservoir. The population of the Mudgee area is something in the order of 30,000 people, many of whom rely on the water delivered via the Cudgegong River and treated water from the Mid Western Regional Council water supply. There is no information in Bowden's proposal relating to the effectiveness of Town water filtration processes to safely remove lead and heavy metal contamination of domestic water supplies. Thereby protecting the people that live in the area. 3. The method of storage of Toxic tailings to prevent Acid Mine Drainage would appear to be totally inadequate with no permanent surety to prevent dangerous downstream toxicity. This legacy for future generations is socially criminal and unjust. 4. The potentially dangerous impact on the Mudgee, Lue and Rylstone's primary production and wine industry together with the damage to tourism, is nothing short of tragic. There are thousands of people and businesses whose economic survival depends on the purity and unpolluted environment. 5. The lack of remediation to the post mining operation will leave the landscape scarred forever and open to further toxic contamination on a large-scale basis. 6. Lead poisoning and the danger to humans is well known and documented. Use of wide scale lead in paints and automotive fuels has been discontinued due to the harmful affects on humans. 7. I am a resident at the Rylstone Airpark. There are 63 Lots associated with this development. There is no town water supply to this aerodrome and all Lots rely on rainwater. Around 70% of the Lots in this subdivision are sold. When fully occupied there will be a population of some 120 to 150 people who will depend on their drinking and domestic water supply from rain collected from the roofs of their houses and aircraft hangars. The potential of lead buildup in rainwater tanks from the dust fallout on the roofs presents a hazardous risk to health. It is considered that the risk of lead poisoning is such a concern that it could jeopardise the future viability of the Airpark. 8. The road infrastructure of the Lue road is inadequate for the safe us by mining trucks to convey ore. Any upgrade to the road and its ongoing upkeep would be a significant cost to the local Council and rate payers. IN SUMMARY I feel with great passion that the beauty, purity and pristine nature of the Rylstone/Kandos/Lue/Mudgee area is so important that we all have a great responsibility to ensure that these qualities be preserved. The far reaching consequences and damage that will be caused by the development of the Bowdens lead mine, behoves that all of us must take responsibility for the damage that will result. There are a great many people whose health and livelihood stand to be adversely affected if this mine is approved. In essence this proposal is inappropriate and of such alarming and far reaching impact that any economic benefits are far outweighed by the long term harm to so much and to so many and as such provides the Commission with significant cause to decline an approval. It is respectfully requested and hoped that the Commission will, following it's review of the submissions provided by so many, especially those most directly affected, determine that there is a compelling and morally justifiable case that the project should not be approved to proceed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
- What’s going to happen to neighbouring farms and properties that have been in families for 7 or 8 generations? -if these farms go, the price of food and living expenses is already to high what’s going to stop it going up again after taking out cattle and sheep farms as the water tables will be destroyed by run off. - you say they are going to create job? These jobs wont be filled by anyone local if they get filled at all. We have plenty of mines around us in Ulan that have a vacation or looking for someone to fill the position in every single roll. If they cant fill rolls what makes you think another mine is going to be able to find workers? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family are regular visitors to the Mudgee, Lue and Rylstone region for recreational/ tourism purposes. We are very concerned to hear of the proposed Bowdens lead, silver and zinc mine proposed for this beautiful, pristine and picturesque valley and we strongly oppose this mining development. On a recent visit in spring we took a walk along Pyangle Road where the proposed mine is situated on either side of the road and alongside Lawson’s Creek. Not only did we have the privilege of sighting a koala, but we came across a small cluster of the endangered native orchid species called Diuris pardina (commonly known as the Leopard Orchid). No doubt a more detailed study would uncover other threatened and rare species if undertaken at the right time of year. The biodiversity in this once pristine area is invaluable and should not be sold off for mining profits. We have one earth and with the wanton destruction of the Australian environment in just over 200 years, it is imperative that we leave some minerals in the ground in order to protect what is left of the environment and the precious native animal habitat. I have read through the proceedings of the 3 day hearing by the IPC in Mudgee and noted that the majority of the voices spoke against Bowdens mine. Their expert contributions were well researched, factual and compelling. Submissions from local farmers, doctors, teachers, nurses, vets, successful local agri businesses, wine makers, olive oil producers, tourism operators amongst others painted a story of an innovative, strong community dedicated to their business and employing many thousands of people. These businesses are under threat should this proposal proceed. Those few who supported the mine were primarily employees of Bowdens or locals who had benefited from Bowdens largesse; their statements were much the same citing 200 or so jobs in mining and royalties for the government. Big deal. Weigh this against the many hundreds of long term employment offered in a myriad of local businesses in agriculture and tourism. As tourists to this area, we will not be returning to an area punctuated by explosions, dust, noise, trucks. This mine will destroy the reputation of the area for eco tourism and clean and green agricultural products. Please do not approve this mine, the risks are too great and benefits dubious. |
Jodi Fekkes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think all the issues listed in the question above should be able to have equal billing. I think all the issues related to this project are of equal importance. I am a keen naturalist/environmentalist by nature, and have been growing food organically for thirty years, (which includes growing plants for birds, bees and other insects to form a complete ecosystem conducive to growing food without chemicals). I was hoping to expand on my already extensive gardens, but I am not sure at all that I will want to live here if the mine goes ahead. I am healthy, happy and active, as is my partner, a 6th generation local farmer. We work, swim, walk, cycle, hike, entertain and relax on our property. Everyone who visits here remarks on the natural beauty of this region. We love the peace and quiet, and the healthy environment we have created here. We particularly love to watch the phases of the moon and the beautiful starry nights we have here. It is very stressful to have this project proposal before us. It is particularly concerning that lead dust could be anywhere in our environment and we wont be able to see it. We all know about lead and the dangers it presents. Its very hard to believe that this mine will somehow not have unsafe levels of dust. We have lived in the country for a long time and are very familiar with dust and its ability to permeate everything. I have read a lot of the DPE Assessment Report, and it seems to me that the Government, at all levels, support this type of proposal. The main reason seems to be for profit. I am saddened to think that we haven't learnt to look after, what little natural environment we have left, yet. Ironically when I went to the DPE website, to read their report, there was a page I could go to regarding saving Koalas. Here we have a existing Koala population and environment, but we are happy to "sell out" and just buy some Koala credits instead. There has been a lot of emphasis on job creation from Bowden's, and yet there are job vacancies across all areas of the workforce since the Covid Pandemic. I completely agree people need to work, but they need meaningful work, suitable to their interests, and sustainable industries, that don't damage our environment. Building sustainable housing would be a great industry to have locally, and no need to risk the environment at the same time. There seems to be a lot of risk involved in this project. I also find myself wondering why we have been teaching our children in school how to care for our environment, (for decades), and yet we do not follow through with our actions. There was a lot of emphasis on Kandos in Anthony McLures closing speech at the IPC hearing lat week, in relation to high unemployment and other social issues. There are a few very good reasons for this, one being that Kandos was a place where people were housed, who were on probation, after serving time in prison, so naturally there are going to be a higher rate of complex social problems. Another reason is that housing is cheaper, so attracts a lower socioeconomic dynamic. I hope there can be a range of services offered to these people, not just a job in a mine. I also hope there will be help in Kandos for people who need it, whether the mine goes ahead or not. There are a lot of phrases in the DPE report that I find underwhelming, such as "best practise", "mitigation", "modelling", and so on. These phrases do not inspire hope in me. In layman's terms, they say, we will do the best we can, as long as we make lots of money, and there will be some cost (to health, the environment etc) involved in that, but it can't be helped. For example in the DPE Assessment Report, 4.15 Tailings Storage Facility, it is stated " in response to submissions and comments received on the matter, Bowden's Silver has committed to add further design elements to the TSF that are focused on providing additional seepage mitigation". I am wondering why these measures were not already in place considering Bowden's "commitment to the highest feasible environmental standards". Maybe the reason is in the word "feasible"- meaning possible to do easily or conveniently. I think that if for any reason at all, the Bowdens project is adversely affecting local landowners, they should be willing to purchase the property at pre-construction market values. If Bowden's are as confident as they say they are, that there will be no adverse effects on landholders in the district, then it shouldn't be a problem to offer a guarantee for these people to be able to leave and relocate elsewhere. I am particularly concerned with my partners mental health, as this is causing him a lot of stress. To conclude, in my opinion, the conditions of consent do not adequately prevent, or mitigate the possibilities of adverse impacts from the proposed developement. |
Evie Hood
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am 12 years old and this mine, if it goes ahead, will destroy our home. We are close to the farm, have beautiful animals we care for and this will not only hurt them, but all the other wildlife. It also means we will need not be able to live at our farm as that the dust from the mine is harmful to our health. Please stop this mine from going ahead. It’s unsafe and not the right thing to do. |
Matthew Jessop
Organisation |
NSW Wine Industry Association |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission is attached. |
Attachments |
nsw-wine-ipc-submission--bowdens-silver-minepdf.pdf (PDF, 158.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live with my young family along the Lawson Creek, roughly 10 kilometres downstream from the proposed Bowdens mine. I object to the Bowdens proposal, and would like to raise three issues: 1. Strategic context 2. Post approval management plans 3. Human health and baseline lead levels Strategic context: I acknowledge the New South Wales Government’s Critical Minerals Strategy and vision to position NSW as a major global supplier and processor of critical minerals and high-tech metals. It is clear in the DPE Assessment Report that this strategy is being used as the wagon to which the half-baked Bowdens proposal has been hitched. The strategy is logical, however to shoehorn a project with flaws as fatal and long lasting as those at the Bowdens site into it because of convenience and timing seems reckless and should be seen as such by the Commission. The Government’s haste to mark its territory over the critical minerals revolution should not come at the cost of due process, proper, proven and technically resolved mine design or thorough impact assessment. Further, it’s not appropriate for the NSW DPE to cherry pick the parts of the strategic context that suit its agenda, while ignoring others. When speaking of strategic context, the NSW DPE Assessment Report fails completely to address the elephants in the room which are the thriving and vibrant tourism and agriculture industries in the Mudgee region. These are industries which are more than just a government thought bubble. They are flourishing, creating thousands of jobs and bringing millions of dollars into the regional and state economy. These jobs already exist. They are sustainable. They are valuable. They don’t risk people’s health. These industries have been ignored in the DPE Assessment of the Bowdens Project, as have any impacts to them as a result of the mine. Post-approval management plans: At the IPC hearing in Mudgee from 15-17 February, the NSW DPE outlined it was common practice for proponent’s to have dozens of management plans developed and implemented post-approval to guide the management of certain elements of the operation. It is nonsensical to propose that key aspects of mine viability which have not yet been established can be satisfactorily resolved through post-approval management plans. How can you manage something if you haven’t yet identified it, let alone assessed it’s impacts. To push the requirement for specific detail around key aspects of mine operation like waste rock classification and management, water supply, water quality and water quantity impacts is completely unacceptable and thwarts due process. The number of holes in the Conditions of Consent proposed by the NSW DPE, and the critical elements they relate to (like water supply and AMD management) make them a carte blanche for the proponent. This is unacceptable. Human health and baseline lead levels: The modelling relied on by the Proponent suggests any increase in lead levels for those surrounding the mine site would be acceptable. They are not saying lead levels won’t increase, just that they will increase by an acceptable amount. So, “we’ll expose you to toxic material, but only a little bit”. This is unacceptable. It can not be allowed that in our haste to extract these “critical minerals” we endanger the health of individuals who if and when they decide they don’t want to live with that risk, are unable to sell their properties because there are no buyers wanting to live next door to an open cut lead mine. I urge you, please do not give the Proponent a license to poison the people of Lue. Even if it is just a little bit. |
Patricia Amos
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My Patricia AMOS letter submission against the Bowden's Mine is uploaded below |
Attachments |
patricia-amos-submission-23-feb-2023docx.docx (DOCX, 15.35 KB) |
Jason Crawford
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family and I have been keen visitors to the area. And To put it bluntly- if this mine were to go ahead, we would NOT be visiting. In fact, in this day and age… being so climate aware, why are we debating this? This will destroy the region if it goes ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Because it is just two kilometres from the Lue Primary School, in the middle of the popular Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail, it will directly impact the health of Lue, Mudgee and Rylstone/ Kandos With lead leaching into the environment by air and water. The impact on those poor children, teachers and families living in Lue will include health issues, noise issues, impacts to their food and wine business, impact to their views and increased truck traffic on a small local rd. Add natural disasters to that, and the impact is even more dreadful. Workers may not be aware how it will affect them either. Sick people in a community will not be living prosperously. People are less able to work when sick. Lue, Rylstone, Mudgee are known for food and wine production and outstanding environmental features attracting tourists to the Wollemi national park, wineries and surrounds. This is a growth industry and it is beginning to boom. These communities are already recovering from flood and fire. Its not wise or compassionate to add to devastation to the environment, with climate change and rising temperatures. We need to be planting more trees to cool the air, and leaving the existing trees in tact for habitat that has already diminished too much for local fauna and flora. I bought a house in the Rylstone area because of the environment, the growing food, wine industry and growing creative and tourism industry. It is so disappointing to hear about this proposal. |
Attachments |
2040c5604e91493ea60bfa375e41687ejpeg.jpeg (JPEG, 467.03 KB) 4df89e30e7894718b7cb5969aa21aa5cjpeg.jpeg (JPEG, 1008.21 KB) f815375e02f748378409a4891dc0189djpeg.jpeg (JPEG, 1.04 MB) |
Katie Thompson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is time council and governments put the people and the environment first. The devastation this mine will have on both is distressing. The beauty of Lue will be lost forever and and the contamination and damage to the environment will scare the country side forever. The koala habitat in NSW is already under enormous pressure and this mine will further decrease their natural habitat placing even more pressure on this endangered species. We need to protect these very special native animals. Please stop this mine before its too late and the future generations have to suffer from wrong decisions made today. Save our environment, save our animals, save our people and stop Bowdens Silver mine from going ahead |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I don't see how any open cut mines 20km up and down wind corridors, from primary/secondary schools, agriculture and livestock farming in towns or 3kms from local primary schools are a GREAT IDEA! In the Bowden’s proposal local residents are expected to put up with lead dust blowing from an open cut mega mine down a wind corridor through beautiful towns settling on water catchments, meat producing farmland and towns with schools. Lead dust that settles on roofs washes into rainwater tanks, poisoning humans and animals who drink it or wash in it. And also breathed in by our children. The wind corridor that runs from the Pilliga scrub through Dubbo and Mudgee Via western plains and then down the Henry Lawson creek valley through Lue, where the proposed massive open cut mine is, further down the valley around Tong Bong mountain to Rylstone and Kandos and all the way down the Cappertee valley to Glen Davis, a few hundred kilometres at least, is a path that many dust storms have regularly taken, these dust storms pick up and in some cases strip the topsoil from the surrounding farmland and in the Lue area and carrying it to the towns of Rylstone etc, blanketing the area falling/settling on roofs and in water catchments. It is ludicrous that Bowden’s are to be responsible for blood sampling of individuals when we know there is NO SAFE LEVEL of lead contamination in blood, despite the many historic cover-ups of the mining industry and their medical professionals when monitoring mine workers blood levels and health, eg recent cases of 'black lung ' in Hunter valley coal mining. I know no open cut minerals mine ever has a 'no particle escape record' and very few have an appropriate, mitigation strategy, this is why Broken Hill mines are underground, even then the blood test results are this bad! The residents of Rylstone or Kandos don't have to isolate their children from the outdoors and will have no defence against air borne lead dust, to have many generations of children affected by high blood/lead conditions is a tragedy. I have an idea, how about ALL of the board of directors and their families and grand children agree to move to Lue and live there for the proposed duration of the mine in exchange for approval. I don't see that happening, because they know of the dangers the dust poses from mining such dangerous material. This proposed mine will DESTROY a century and a half old farming, eco tourism and local economic system. It will strip away its wealth and the money will all go elsewhere! The local economy will change to a mining economy. Businesses with organic certification and livestock and agriculture farming near the mine will have to cease as lead and other dusts and liquids contamination will prevent the animal welfare and quality continuation that currently exists. Tourists will simply not come. Another risk is the water supply, the Henry Lawson Creek runs through the town of Lue and all drinking water in the town is from Bores. The creek continues to Mudgee where drinking water is also drawn from bores, and during wet weather ( when the risk of tailings ponds overflowing is high) the entire water course system of the viticulture and Sheep and beef farming plains of Lue, through to Mudgee and the other direction to Rylstone in flood .It is unreasonable by historical fact to assume there will never be consequences to the water supply of 15 to 20 thousand residents of the area and their livelihoods from farming and agriculture destroyed. The tailing ponds design at Lue can only result in an environmental disaster, sooner or later, due to the mines own admission that they will leak, stated at a very low estimated rate However their location, directly above Lawson creek and the figure suggested as an accurate residual amount is not reasonable or anywhere close to best case, and during recently more common extreme weather events all of the dams in the area overflow. So when there is a drought we will be exposed to air borne lead contamination and when we have high or any rainfall (when the drought is over) we will be exposed to contamination via drinking water. I think if Bowden’s mine was to gain approval and they were made to compensate all citizens with a million dollar payout within a radius of 50kms of their massive open cut mine. I would sell up and move out anyway. As it stands I will be at odds with rising property prices to move to a comparable area to protect my children from the same fate as Broken Hill! WE DON’T NEED ANY MORE MINING IN OUR AREA. ALL WRONG! Bowden’s can go somewhere else where they won't affect a thriving local community, the Australian minerals NSW opportunities are shown here, Bowden’s statement "Largest undeveloped silver project in Australia' is misleading if not a lie, the purest and largest undeveloped silver project is Drake at Mt Carrington at almost twice the size and purity and more easily and safely extracted. The nearest town is 5kms away and the mine site itself is shrouded in bush land. Lue is 2 kms away from the proposed Bowden’s mine site via cleared farmland. Mines and industry partners consistently abdicate their contamination responsibilities to those affected by the consequences of wealth extraction, who are the people living in contaminated communities. Dangerous metals mine proposers always re-submit EIS's until authorities make a decision based on economics of the local area and the nation, not public safety of the local population, and then after the damage is done throw a paltry amount of money at it to try and make the problem go away. People die from less contamination than Bowden’s proposed mine admits to and have very poor health outcomes that cost them not only health but the government dearly. Bad economic decision. I love my local area, I have good friends and family living there. Their health is important to me. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is with great disappointment and concern that I am writing to you in regards to the Bowden's Silver Mine. THIS DEVELOPMENT MUST BE REFUSED! To think that an open cut mine will be less than a mere 10km upstream from farms and families is far too terrifying to comprehend. River water quality, dangerous lead exposure, toxic leakage, huge ecological impacts, the destruction of Aboriginal land, acid drainage, property value & tourist declines, are just some of the impacts that will threaten the entire area. Open cut lead, zinc and silver mine will have SERIOUS impacts on the health, water and livelihoods of the community. Lead is toxic to humans, and it's a universally accepted fact that there is no safe level of lead exposure for people. Disappointingly this has not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. In addition the Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The complete lack of regard for our First Nations People is concerning. The irreparable damage of destroying 25 out of the 52 Aboriginal artefacts surveyed on this sacred site to exploit it for its minerals is fundamentally so very wrong. Not to mention the impact on the innocent flora and fauna of the area. The diverse collection of native flora and fauna, in particular the Koala, Regent Honey Eater, Spotted tail Quoll, Swift Parrot and Box Gum Woodland, which are all expected to be significantly impacted by the project. Has any consideration been given to the future? We should be protecting our land instead of pillaging it. This project should be refused. Charlotte Berney |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the permanent destruction of good farmland for a mine. Which has no net community benefits. It only provides profits to a select few and destroys the environment permanently. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
-why? -what’s going to happen to the water table and how will it impact framing and wines and tourism? Who’s going to fill all these so called jobs? Where are the big business the are building the mines going to come from? No money made from wages there will be spent in the town of Lue or surrounding areas. |
Scarlett Keddie
Organisation |
Home |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the development |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The interference of Aboriginal Sacred Sites is distressing m. As someone who lives near the mine and of Indigenous heritage, I am greatly disturbed by the idea that 25 cultural sites will be removed. That goes against everything this country is trying to stand up against in this day and age, yet Bowdens & the DPE think this is an acceptable practice? So much is wrong with this mine. The close proximity and the minerals it plans to mine. It’s a catastrophic disaster wait it to happen. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As an adjoining neighbour to the Project, we're certainly not supportive as it directly hinders our long term goals. We are looking to expand our farming operations and acquire adjoining properties, something we believe we could and would have already been achieved at reasonable market value if the Bowdens Project didn't exist. All adjoining properties have now either been acquired by the Mine (above reasonable market value) or those that haven't are holding out to squeeze the mine for compensation once operational or waiting for that premium forced acquisition price tag once the Development Consent conditions have been breached. Our family also have a dream to restore the 1860's Stone Cottage on our property and make a little retreat / family home within the next 1-2 years. The looming threat of a mine with its associated Dust, Noise, Traffic, Health Impacts, Blast Damage Risks and Adverse Visual Amenity Impacts is not congruent with those dreams or current ambience of the area. The Lue community will not recover from this. The town and close knit community was be eternally altered and the quaint nature of it destroyed. We do not want it. WE DO NOT WANT OR SUPPORT THIS MINE. |
Ian Preece
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My letter of objection to the Bowden's Mine is as an attachment uploaded see below please |
Attachments |
ian-preece-submission-23-feb-2023docx.docx (DOCX, 15.08 KB) |
Luke Cameron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose Bowden's mine proposal. My family have owned a small farm in Lue for my whole 20 years of life. I grew up there on most weekends and school holidays learning about farm life and animals. I have developed a love for animals, our farm and the environment. It's my special place that I can escape to. I have formed great friendships and learned to appreciate how hard people on the farm work. I would be devastated if the mine is approved as I will never travel to my farm again as I do not want to be near a Lead mine and its dangers. Please reject the proposal so farmers, businesses and the people of the Lue/Rylsone/Mudgee region to get back to doing what they do. I have watched the stress that this process has caused my family and it is not right to do so! I ask the Commissioners to please refuse this mine. |
Judith Brown
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Judith Brown this is the second submission I have written against The Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue. I have lived in the aria within the eight Kilometer circle for 58 years, my ancestors 0n the paternal side have lived dotted along the Lawsons Creek for 150 years from Havilah to Mudgee. The Brown Family has been in the Lue and surrounds for 5 generations. One of my main concerns is still the Tailings Dam, following on from my last submission. I want to include the collapse of the tailings wall at the Cadia mine near Orange in 2018. they did have a second wall in place incase that should happen and it DID, Lue does not have such security in place, the wall collapsed because of a 2.7 earth quake. The Lue mine is on a FAULT line, so that is sure to happen. I personally felt the Newcastle earthquake, I was in the very same house as now, I remember thinking a huge truck was coming in my drive and then the glass vertical window in my kitchen started rattling as it never had before and my son said what is going on, it wasn't till I put the TV on that we realised what it was. I do remember at the time hearing people saying that they had noticed cracks in their homes that they hadn't noticed before. We must always expect the unexpected every day we in the world are hearing of natural disasters happening all the time when we are dealing with led poison that lasts forever we just cannot take risks. How many times do we hear of the 1 in 100 year records being broken. I have seen with my own eyes the result of what can happen in Ireland while visiting my cousin I noticed this huge dam and at first glance I thought it looked great until she said nothing can drink from it as it is poisoned with led. Every animal bird bee etc who drinks from a tailings dam will die and that is forever. The mine is called Silvermines they piped their tailinges18 kilometers to their tailings Dam, when they stopped using it it dried out and then there was a dust storm and blew led dust with terrible results. This means Bowden's tailing dam must never for ever go dry and seeing they haven't got enough water how can we be sure that will never happen. We all remember the recent drought how the dust from the far west landed in Sydney and the smoke from the Bushfires contaminated the grapes in Mudgee and a whole vintage was lost on some vineyards. Just imagine if that was led dust, If any of our exports like grapes Olives meat wool and numerous crops are found to have led they will be banned authorities are testing all the time for contaminates. When the Lawsons Creek gets contaminated it will then go into the Cudgegong and then Burrundong Dam and it will be for ever, imagine what that will do to NSW, The Government took the led out of petrol in 2002 because it was dangerous they had already taken it out of paint and pencils. There hasn't been a silver mine opened since, so why now when we know how dangerous it is. The Lue road is already too busy for the state of the road it is narrow vey few places to safely pass needs re sealing put 6 B doubles a day loaded with toxic material on it and there is sure to be an accident. There has to be a power line built which there is no mention where they plan to build it, are they waiting for it to go through and then they will put it where they like and the land holders will not have a say. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my concerns on the Bowden's Project. |
Miriam Siebel
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm living outside mudgee but working on a vineyard close to town. This proposal is a health risk to the mudgee community and it's environment which I believe would impact my health at work and most likely the winery business which could put my job at risk. My role is on the sustainability side of the business and as we are using water from the river I believe it would also impact the land (soil), biodiversity and wildlife on the farm. I'm most concerned about the lead byproduct of the proposed mine and the water contamination risks involved. |
James Street
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I cannot understand why a mine with as much risk associated with it even being proposed for such a beautiful area as Lue - Mudgee. The risks of an environmental disaster caused by this mine far outweigh the potential economic benefits for this local region/state/country. Whilst I understand the need of mining Zinc I am totally against the need to do it at this proposed site. Some ( not all) of these risks are: • Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. • Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. • Lead poisoning and health is a major risk ie There is no safe level of lead for children. • Acid Mine Drainage and Contamination of water. This is the most serious risk of all ie Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. • Reduced supply of water to local village and farms • Economic Impact to all Business's in the Lue area . • Excessive damage to local ecology • No consideration of adjacent lands. all of this risk for what? A corporate group of investors putting together a DA to flip it to another company that will run the mine! Where is the risk responsibility handover for all of this. ie we are getting promised by the developers that all will be good but they will not do the mining ! Lue is one of the nicest communities and places in NSW. They are committed farmers and community people. They look after each other and when the farm they do so in a very sustainable way. This is supported by the strength of their local Landcare community. I personally have been visiting this area on a very rgular basis for the last 55 years . It would be a travesty to see the community and local farms ruined for ever. I personally think that this would be one of the Governments worst decisions in the name of the States prosperity. It does not make sense ! I am happy to be contacted if my submission needs further explaining. Just don't do it ! |
Katherine Thomson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This area is a precious agricultural area and for me, an area I visit as a tourist having 'discovered' it some years ago. As I understand it Bowdens acknowledges the tailings dam will leak heavy metals including cynide which will destroy many local agricultural enterprises. Scarce water will be used to manage the mine and wildlife will lose habitats. This is not the place for a lead mine. Let alone an open cut lead mine. Please let us maintain our agricultural areas close to the city basin. |
James Brett Nutting
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners Thank you for your time. The proposed mine project as an open cut operation at Lue, in the Central Tablelands, disturbs , me very much. Having acquainted myself with the various expert opinions regarding a poorly sited tailings dam above Lawson Creek, I am fearful of a disastrous chemical spill which could severely affect the heath of not only the water flowing to Burrandong Dam but the entire population of everyone living downstream. Surely the vineyards, agricultural enterprises and other businesses flourishing in the region would be devastated, as well as the general wildlife, should the tailings dam fail. The proposed mine site would fail to meet adequate safety criteria in many ways. For the above reasons I am very much against the Bowden's Silver mine development. Thank you for your service to the community. Yours sincerely James Brett Nutting ⬛⬛⬛., Kandos 2848 |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Project has been marketed as a benefit to the local and regional communities... Additional demand for a skilled workforce sounds appealing and sounds like a positive outcome for the local areas however the LOM of the Project is not congruent with long term economic stability of the area. Approving the development of the Bowden's Project now only going to exacerbate the scheduled economic collapse of the area as it falls in line with all other local major employer scheduled closures. It would be a different story if Bowdens was to come on line as another major employer goes into closure and the workforce can be transitioned. However, this will not be the case as Silver Mines has already advised share holders that the Bowdens Project is scheduled to break ground in 2023 (subject to Approval). Employment demand is at an all time high in the region, salary competition between the local major employers is currently out of control (largely due to record coal prices over the past 12 months). The local mines are ALL having major issues with attraction and retention of employees. Large retention bonuses and significant salary increases are occurring throughout all of the local mines to try and entice more workers. Positions are remaining unfilled simply due to lack of candidates. Any one that is suitable for employment is already employed in the local mining sector... The sustainable local small businesses and agricultural employers are being hit the hardest by the increase employment demand and associated salaries paid by the mines. Local small business and farmers are already struggling to find workers and cannot compete with the remuneration levels offered by the larger companies. Kandos is the only town that, on paper, appears to benefit from the potential Bowdens Employment. However, in reality ~50% of Kandos residents are welfare recipients. If the currently unemployed residents of Kandos haven't found work in the current high employment demand market, unfortunately they probably aren't going to... What we are presented with is the classic Boom-Bust scenario where all major employers LOM closure plans are within close proximity of one and other... The writing is on the wall and in 15-20 years time the Mudgee/Rylstone district will feel the pain. It would be a mistake to add to the current/future problem by approving Bowdens without contingencies to prevent the inevitable economic collapse of the region. Breaking ground on Bowden's in 2023-24 will only exacerbate the future socioeconomic issues of the region. Contingencies from Planning/MWRC need to be put in place now to mitigate this issue. Mitigation strategies could include funding of certain sustainable employment opportunities (agriculture, small business, tourism, eco-tourism, local events and attractions). Unfortunately, a Lead Mine is not congruent with the tourist appeal of Mudgee/Rylstone district. People visit the area for the historic rural charm, fresh air, and the world renowned food and wine. Would a lead mine hamper this? Time will tell but it certainly won't improve it. Hi-vis clothing, hi-vis vehicles, bulk heavy vehicle movements, these things are not what makes the area so appealing to tourism... What would be detrimental is if Bowden's had an environmental of health related incident. Regardless of material harm, the reputational aspect alone would be potentially catastrophic to the tourist, food, wine and wine trades. Then where are we at long term without this sustainable cash injection? Imagine what a few headline articles for lead contamination would do to the marketability of these businesses. People tend to err on the side of caution when it comes to heavy metals exposure regardless of the science... The point is, I've reviewed this from multiple angles and cannot see how an argument can be made to support the Bowden's Project being good for the local community. Globally through increased commodity, potentially, although Bowdens is a relatively small player. Locally, absolutely not (unless controls are implemented to mitigate the above concerns). I've been supportive of the Project for a lot of years however that optimism has faded with time and in the current economic climate I cannot see any local social or economic benefits beyond short term money grabs. I'm more than supportive of a state significant development if the overall benefits outweigh the harm. I do not view this to be the case with the Bowdens Project. It appears that the marketed benefit will actually be another nail in the future regional socioeconomic coffin. So if we remove this falsely marketed 'employment benefit' what we are left with a host of negative impacts throughout the 17years of operation... Regional Reputation Risks, Health, Dust, Noise, Visual Amenity, Light Pollution, Blast Damage, Increased Traffic Accidents, Company Bankruptcy/pre-mature Closure and all of the associated issues that comes from the fall out of that.. I fear we will look back on this one with regret and wish we left this can of worms in the ground. I would certainly heed caution in making your decision on this project. |
Brian Clear
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a resident of Pyangle road, my property is situated 3.7 kms from the mine. I am opposed to the mine for many reason but front and center is the impact it will have on our business and the people of this vibrant community. My wife and I grow grapes that are made into award wining wines. We also run cattle and a 6 bedroom guest house. We have extensive vegetable gardens, chickens, in other words we are living the dream. We are in the process of becoming energy neutral, with solar panels and batteries so we can lead a sustainable existence. If the mine were to go ahead, we would no longer be able to offer our guests the peace and quite they crave when visiting our property, not with 6 day a week blasting, lead mine dust , light from the mine. We can see the lights of the Ulan mine 30 plus kms away, 3.7 kms we will have to put up block out curtains. We would no longer we able to offer our guests vegetables from the garden, eggs from the chickens or water from the tanks for fear of lead contamination. Our drinking, bathing and washing water would all be contaminated. Lovely lead enhanced sheets and towels. I would like my children and grandchildren to be able to ride their bikes, swim in the pool or dam, eat the fruit off the trees, play footie on the grass without fear of lead contamination. The community of Lue has been torn apart by this mine project, people who have been friends since childhood are no longer speaking to each other. The propaganda coming from Bowdens is absurd, they will have everyone believe that they have the communities of Rylstone, Kandos and Lue behind them, this is just not true. This mine will destroy businesses, fracture communities, turn people away from the region and leave a permanent scar on this beautiful landscape. NO TO THE MINE Attached is reports from the McArthur River mine in the NT . Reading this report and affects of these types of mines on the environment, people and community rings very true with what could happen here. |
Attachments |
mcathur-river-minedocx.docx (DOCX, 418.75 KB) themcarthurriverprojecttheenvironmentalcaseforcompletepitbackfill1pdf.pdf (PDF, 5.26 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The fact there are so many reasons why this should not go ahead should be the basis of rejecting this absurd proposal. Bowdens he bribed everyone with their sponsorship in order to appease what they’re really doing. It shows yet again what power and with money can do. It’s corrupt should NEVER have got this far in the first place. Let’s hope the IPC see through this madness. |
Will Cannon
Organisation |
Rylstone Aerodrome Air Park |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a drive in drive out contractor who works for Rylstone Aerodrome Airpark I am concerned about lead dust fallout on and around the airport, the local farms and township. I am exposed to dust / pollen as it is and do not need lead dust added. |
Melissa Hart
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Do not agree with damaging the land and the on going affects the led will have on our community and up stream communities |
Hilary Guilfoyle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the mine being developed because it has many negative attributes for one, its extremely close to towns and working properties. For example, its only 2km from a primary school with children as young as 4 and my family's farming property. There are problems with proximity, noise pollution, threatened property values, trucks, water, possible lead poisoning, dust, and possible acid mine drainage. I find this all extremely concerning because I am a school student and have lived in Rylstone on a farm with a property in Lue since I can remember. I understand it can create job opportunities, but thats an extremely small factor compared to the overall negative impacts on peoples, health, roads, children, parents, water, and many more factors. 23 years might seem like a long time but if you put it in perspective its really only a short period of time where only one generation will be employed, then it will all be over. Once its finished what will they do, just leave a big hole in the ground and decrease the farms values from around them as well. I find it extremely concerning by how young boys and girls like me are aware and disturbed by this. We all are conscious of the consequences it can have on both our communities, farms and animals. Being aware just proves how far this has gone and how it's a large threat to the communities surrounding the mine. 2KM IS TO CLOSE !!!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My submission is contained in the attached Word Document |
Attachments |
objection-bowdens-lead-minedocx.docx (DOCX, 19 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. Lead poisoning and health. Acid Mine Drainage. Contamination of water. Reduced supply of water. Economic Impact to Business. Koala Habitat destroyed. No compensation offered. Loss of property values. There is no safe level of lead for children. Close to World Heritage Sites. Excessive Noise. Excessive damage to local ecology. No consideration of adjacent lands. Noise is the most common cause of community loss. Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. No existing infrastructure to the site. No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. |
Mark Barnes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My Mark Barnes letter submission document against the Bowden's Mine has been uploaded below |
Attachments |
mark-barnes-submission-23-feb-2023docx.docx (DOCX, 16.16 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My main concern centres around the exposure to lead and other heavy metals, and the possible imact upon the health of my family, (including three children) and livestock on a farming property. The property is not in the path of prevailing winds but could none-the-less have dust settle, particularly during years of drought where dust storms tend to occur. As a university trained educator I am well aware of the risks associated with lead exposure, particularly for children. Lue Public School was an option that we had previously considered for our children but decided not to start them there until we knew the outcome of planning assessments around the Bowden's Project. I have reviewed NSW Department of Health guidelines and while it is generally accepted we may all have some exposure to lead already, the experience and available information on the lead in Port Pirie, Mt Isa and NSW's Broken Hill all show that there is inevitable exposure in areas surrounding operations at a site, AND that the exposure may be above recommended levels. Any contamination of livestock, which may be picked up through random audits at abbattoirs would result in stock not being able to be sold for meat processing at all, casuing a financial loss in our family agricultural business. My family and I are frequent travellers along Lue Rd, sometimes passing through multiple times a week to attend educational, physical and social activities in Mudgee. We also access Mudgee for health appointments, banking, shopping and other services. Lue Rd is already in a state of disrepair and the additional vehicle movements would likely degrade it further. If a number of the proposed workforce were people relocating to the area to take up positions, there will be additional strain on already burdened services. I don't see how Bowden's can help mitigate this. After having lived in the area for fourteen years I am well used to the way sound travels for kilometres, particularly during the colder winter months. Although not within very close proximity of the proposed mine site, I do have some concern that with the planned 24/7 schedule this is something that may have a potential impact. Although hoping that the project will not proceed, if it were too, I would prefer to see a curfew imposed that takes into account a minimisation of noise from late night to early morning. Having looked over the recommended conditions of consent and other content in the DPE Assessment Report I have little confidence that adverse impacts will all be offsest or mitigated. In fact, the sense I got from the report is that in view of royalties from ventures such as coal mining soon to dwindle the NSW Government is looking to make up the forthcoming shortfall and that the risks from potential hazardous materials and the immediate and long term effects of the project on the local community really haven't been taken seriously. Thank you for your consideration of this submission. "When one looks at [the mine's] environmental authority, it is clear that they are meeting the requirements of that authority," he said. "However, in meeting those guidelines it is evident that those guidelines are still too lax. "I think it's evident that they have a licence to pollute, but that licence is probably not strict enough." Professor Mark Taylor in an interview for ABC news online speaking in regrds to lead levels in children in Mt Isa, June 2018. |
Barbara Sullivan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am appalled that Bowdens are pushing ahead with an open-cut lead mine, with a 72 hectare toxic tailings dam, in such close proximity to the town and in the middle of a very productive agricultural and tourist area. The hazards presented by this proposal are simply unacceptable and the science does not support proceeding with a project that is clearly injurious. - The government seems to place secondary value on the health and welfare of the community - any amount of lead dust is deleterious and residents WILL be affected. The local residents should not have to make the choice of staying or leaving for their health. I ask that anyone in the government signing off on this proposal consider whether they would want their families to live in the midst of lead dust and toxic waste? - Farmers and agricultural enterprise owners have been there for generations building their businesses with the finest products - fine wool, beef, wine, honey, olive oil to name a few. The government has no right to jeopardise (a) the exceptional quality and reputation of this produce and therefore the livelihood of these people, and (b) the value of their property, in favour of a mining company that has never undertaken a project. - How can the government find it acceptable that the tailings dam will leach 1.35 megalitres of toxic waste per day into the acquifers and waterways? - The increase in big trucks operating 24 hours on the country roads around Mudgee, Rylstone and Lue is a recipe for disaster. There WILL be accidents, there always are in such circumstances. I am also surprised that the government has not learnt from the experience with silica dust. The mine should NOT be given permission to proceed as planned. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the impact this mine will have on our thriving tourism and wineries. And very concerned about the environmental impact it will have on our water resources and air quality. I believe the existence of this mine will have severe impact on our local environment. |
Steve Ledger
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the potential for lead contaminated dust affecting the surrounding community, especially the Lue school. The affects of lead on children are well documented. Minimising the dust would require an excessive amount of groundwater which would negatively impact the local environment and agricultural production. The proposed site is in a beautiful, agricultural productive valley and this development will destroy this environment forever. Thankyou |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live 15km from the proposed lead mine site and I fiercly object to the proposal on many different grounds - some of which are outlined below. The proximity to the Rylstone town water supply being Rylstone Reservoir is a mere 15 - 16 km away from the proposed site. The assessments on the groundwater contamination from dangerous chemicals such as heavy metals and cyanide seem to be inconclusive. But notwithstanding this, there is a great risk of tailings dam leachate entering the groundwater system. Studies of the impact that the mine will have on the drinking water drawn from Windamere Dam and the Rylstone Reservoir in Lue, Rylstone, Mudgee and surrounding towns needs to be more fully addressed to allay fears that the water will become contaminated. Additionally we live in a historically low rainfall area and the proposal that the water required for the mine should come from Lawson Creek is unconscionable. All the water users downstream will be severly impacted by the extra burden on Lawson Creek. In the dry times it would make landholdings and businesses unviable because they would be left with no water. There are no safe levels of exposure to lead. The Bowdens submission completely sidelines concentrate, tailings or mine ore materials as potential sources of lead dust and does not analyse the effect of peak wind events. Apart from being a mere 2km from the Lue primary school, there are many individuals and businnesses in close proximity (including us and 26 other families on the airpark) that would be severely affected by the proximity of the lead mine. Our aerodrome development 2km towards Lue from Rylstone we believe will be severely impacted by the mine from many points of view. We personally and our "target market" being city people and retirees who want to be able to fly their aeroplanes and enjoy the pristine, peaceful and scenically beautiful landscape will all be adversely impacted. We are 'stand alone', not conncected to the town water supply or electricity. However and evenso, there are many negative and social impacts that we envisage will influence the attraction of our airpark. Our land is on the Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail, and to have three open cut pits over 52 hectares of land between the two towns - operational for 23 years, with no plans to fill in the pits after they leave (just leaving behind the open wounds) beggars belief. The negative impact the air pollution will have on the quality of the drinking water (collected from the roofs), the potential for exposure to harmful levels of lead in the air, the increased mine traffic through Rylstone, the change that a mine will inevitably have on property values and the destruction of the wellbeing and health of the Lue and Rylstone communities are all serious reasons for not proceeding with the Bowdens proposal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this project going ahead for a number of reasons, including; Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage. My family personally uses bore water fed from the Lawson Creek to water our garden, our children play under the sprinkler, and on the lawns. A 10.9% loss of flow, along with the contaminants released through tailings dam leakage can result in both loss of ground water entirely, or our children playing in toxic water. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. To build a tailings dam on a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which will contain cyanide, arsenic and lead, and which will leak a minimum of 1.6 mega litres per day into the Lawson Creek (as per Bowdens own predictions) seems ridiculous and irresponsible. As recently as July 2022, the Lawson Creek and Cudgegong river flooded the multimillion dollar Glen Willow sporting facility, our families and children play on these fields, and there is potential for further floods and said leakage contaminating these sporting fields. The proposal is based on insufficient data, and underestimates the levels of community exposure, overlooking concentrate, mined ore materials and tailings as sources of potentially toxic dust. The Mudgee region is a top tourist location, tourism will be affected by this mine, meaning loss of income and potentially loss of jobs. Bowdens plan to extract 95,000t of lead. I am from South Australia, I have seen what lead exposure does to a community. There is no safe level of lead, and exposure leads to decreased academic achievement, delayed puberty and decreased kidney function, increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function, reduced foetal growth and increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. The proposed mitigation of the impacts relating to exposure completely undermine the country way of life. . This mine will destroy the township of Lue, and have everlasting effects on Mudgee, Rylstone and the entire region. People live in the country for fresh air, a pristine enviroment, minimal pollutants and less congestion. This mine is a threat to all of these things. |
Robert Griffits
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly against the mine due to the environmental impact on the town of Lue. Also I fear the water supply to Mudgee will be contaminated. There are organically grown olives which will be unviable, the rich grazing land will also be contaminated with lead. |
Peter Grieve
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
23rd Feb., 2023 Dear Sir/Madam I object to the development of the Bowden’s Silver Project SSD-5765 The development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure at Lue in the Central West of NSW would be an environmental disaster for the local and wider region. To open a mine in a greenfield area at this late stage in the environmental game would be nothing short of irresponsible. The locality of Lue offers prime agricultural country which will be greatly impacted if not completely destroyed if contamination levels of heavy metals, in particular lead occur, and they will. Bowdens Silver admit that 1.6ml of leakage of cyanide, arsenic and lead particles will occur daily and this is a ‘best case’ scenario. Contamination of surface and groundwater downstream and its detrimental impact must also be considered. The major mineral extracted from the mine will be lead and its destructive impact is everlasting once released from the ground. The only safe action with lead is to leave it undisturbed in the ground where it came from. Lead is toxic to humans with even low levels of long- term exposure. The serious effects on adult and child health and foetal, baby and child development are very well documented. The locality of Lue is in the heart of the Mid- Western region and in the middle of the Mudgee Rylstone Tourist trail. Tourism and it’s long- term sustainability will be seriously impacted by a mine and all it entails. Bowdens Silver must not be allowed to go ahead with this mine, please record my objection. Yours faithfully Peter R Grieve |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Evie Hood
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am 12 years old and this mine, if it goes ahead, will destroy our home. We are close to the farm, have beautiful animals we care for and this will not only hurt them, but all the other wildlife. It also means we will need not be able to live at our farm as that the dust from the mine is harmful to our health. Please stop this mine from going ahead. It’s unsafe and not the right thing to do. |
Rowan Mills
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am part of a family farming business involving 2 properties. One down stream of the mine on Lawson creek & the other west of the proposed mine, (with a nearest boundary approximately 2km away from Bowdens) The property downstream relies solely on Lawson creek for Domestic use , irrigation and water for stock . Put simply , if the silver mine had been operational during the drought of 2017-2019 we would not have survived because there would have been no water remaining in Lawson creek. The property I live at (with the boundary 2km away from Bowdens) in the words of the previous mine owner "Kingsgate" is a natural ampitheatre & due to the weather predominantly coming in a westerly direction -we would not be able to live here due to the noise & dust. I am sure the State Government acting on the best information given to them sought to "green light" the project . The State Government also acting on the best information available information also "green lighted" Spanish trains that wouldn't fit through the tunnels, ferries not fit for purpose & a light rail system in Sydney still with ongoing problems. They also recommended not to "green light" the Hawkins/Rumker coal mine which is only a short distance from Bowdens, on the grounds that it was "to beautiful an area for mining & the coal price would make in uneconomical at the forecast price. Since their decision ,coal mining has never been more profitable. It appears to me the only thing the state Government got correct on the pre mentioned topic after all the expert advise was the fact that it is to beautiful an area to be mined. From memory I think it was Rob Stokes -if not Rob Stokes it was certainly one of his colleague's who said he travelled through the area several times and it was "to nice an area for mining", when making the decision regarding the Hawkins/ Rumker coal mine . I am strongly of the opinion this mine should not be allowed to go ahead. |
Kelly Wanrer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Objection (I am making a submission that objects to this proposed development going ahead) I don’t want the mine anywhere near my family |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed silver mine at Lue on the basis of the very negative impacts it will have for human health and on the surrounding environment. The recommended consent conditions fall far short of adequately preventing, mitigating or offsetting any adverse impacts from the operation. While much support has been generated for the mine, respectfully, the support is ill informed and based on the misapprehension that the mine will generate significant employment for the region. It is my respectful submission that the available information does not support such a finding. |
Patrick Morse
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I don’t not agree having a mine so close to the community or a School!!! |
Geoffrey Symonds
Organisation |
RG Symonds & sons |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am forwarding this submission in objection to the development of such a mine in such close proximity to the established community. The potential for contamination of water, air and sustainability of the surrounding community cannot be understated. There can be no full guarantee that this will not happen, The local community cannot accept a social license to go ahead with this project as planned knowing the real destruction of lifestyle and sustainability. that will occur. I would respectfully ask for a reconsideration of this proposal |
Elodie Delwaide
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver project is a disaster waiting to happen, and the DPE has failed to protect Lue from mining projects like Bowdens Silver Mine. Bowdens EIS provides data analysis that is made up of averages and modelling, Failing to provide confidence for a safe living and working environment for surrounding households and businesses with many lifelong effects like Lead poisoning, acid mine drainage and failure of the tailings dam. The Bowdens Silver Project used incorrect and inacurate modelling for all major concerning factors to the mine’s operation, including water usage and catchment availabilities and lead exposure to the neighbouring community . Lead exposure at any rate is a major health risk and poisonous for people living close by. The Lue village is only 2km from the mine, with lead blood levels seen to increase dramatically to up to 5km from the source. Lue and its surrounding area are extremely quiet in the evening and night. The mine will impose on the social livelihoods of the surrounding community living in an area we expect to be reasonably noise free. I moved to this area to live with my fiancé, to live a peaceful life, away from mines, lead pollution and clean water. This mine will ruin this for me. I strongly oppose the Bowdens Silver project and recommend its proposal be overturned. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object the proposal for multiple reasons, the key ones are: - Lead is toxic to humans and animals. - Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site.The Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. - Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. - The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. - The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. |
Mudgee Wine Association
Organisation |
Mudgee Wine Association |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
MUDGEE WINE ASSOCIATION SUBMISSION Regarding the BOWDENS SILVER MINE To whom it may concern, Thankyou for the opportunity to provide a submission in regards the Bowdens Silver mine in Lue NSW. The Mudgee Wine Association is a not-for-profit organisation located within the Mid-Western Regional Council. We have a total of 66 members consisting of 35 Full Members, all are wineries. The is remaining Associate Members – consist of beverage and food producers, restaurants and accommodation providers. Our organisation with just its Full Members employs 857 people in various facets of the grape growing, manufacturing and wine distribution. These include owners, managers, cellar door staff, direct sales, vineyard employees and contractors for spraying, harvesting, pruning, transport, winery production staff plus staff for events run by MWA. These figures do not include any jobs in other tourism industries nor our Associate Members. Bowdens have stated they will provide 250 jobs over the extended period of 23 years. Our question is “at what cost to the jobs that already exist in our already thriving industry, the wine Industry.” The regional visitor economy has been building rapidly in recent years with Mudgee named Top Tourist Town in Australia for two years running – in both 2021 and 2022. These visitors come for the incredible local wine, some of the best foodie experiences in the state, heritage sites and to enjoy the regions natural beauty. Visitation to the region has increased from 691,000 in 2016-‘19 to 826,000 in 2020-‘21 this has resulted in considerable growth in spending in our region. Using figures supplied by Mudgee Regional Tourism Inc. (on their website) the average spend per person is $398, this includes accommodation, entertainment, food and wine. This brings upwards of $300 million for the Mid-Western Regional Council’s economy. Mudgee Regional Tourism Inc. has just launched their new Wellness Tourism Strategy featuring nature, healthy activities, good food and wine experiences - this is one of the fastest growing tourism sectors globally. Visitors are looking for sustainability in the products they consume, human health and wellbeing. They want to relax in a clean healthy environment, drink beautiful wines, eat wholistic, locally grown food - also known as the ‘Paddock To Plate’ experience. They love the story Mudgee Region brings to their experience, how are the grapes grown, how the wine is made, who made the wine and especially how it tastes. They love to experience everything from simple cellar doors located on back roads to beautiful meals in stunning surrounds with all the trimmings. All of our wine businesses are family run enterprises, even the largest ones. Along with this aspect, many are either accredited or practising organic grape growers and wineries. Our visitors love to meet the people behind the brand and feel they have a part to play in the success of our small businesses, which is what they take home. Mr Huon Hook can’t be wrong, we are a region that has the ‘best of the best’ and that can’t be put into a dollar figure. We strive for perfection in all our operations and endeavours. What price this mine? If this mine is allowed to go ahead it will have a domino effect. Firstly visitation to the region would decrease - not many people want to spend their hard-earned cash in a region that has fine lead dust contamination in their food, wine, water and environment. This will have the knock-on effect of hospitality, cellar door and eventually winery staff being be laid off. Can the region afford to lose any of these ‘clean' jobs, only to be replaced by ‘dirty’ jobs? These ‘proposed’ jobs have long term ramifications for our natural environment, community affinity, generational and historical businesses. Then we come to the actual growing of grape vines and wine production. It is well documented that fine lead dust can and does travel 1,000’s of kilometres. Lead dust from both Port Pirie and Mount Isa can be identified by their ‘DNA’ and it has been found in the Antarctic. So a mere 40 kms into Mudgee and beyond is nothing. This fine lead dust can and will settle on the vine leaves. This can and will inhibit photosynthesis. This can and will affect general vine health - vines will fail to thrive. This can and will impede fruit set. Lead can and will be absorbed into the fruit. This can and will impact overall production of wine across our region. Obviously, the above situations will have a sliding scale of affects and degree of damage. But no one will know for sure without testing. Our people, our family-owned businesses will be asking themselves ………….. Is my fruit contaminated? Do I take the chance to harvest this fruit, this year? Can I afford to take the chance of trying to make good wine with suspect fruit? Are my vines permanently damaged? If so to what extent, will they recover next year or will this repeat again next harvest? Can we continue to go on producing wine with this potential, ongoing threat continuously hanging over us? Jobs will be lost in all sectors of the industry and people will leave the area. Some may say we are overly exaggerating the situation. Those that suggest we are overstating the imposed risk associated with this Lead Mine project don’t have the collective lived experience we do. In our very recent wine history (2020) we have had a whole of region vintage wiped out due to Smoke Taint. This contamination of our grapes and subsequent cancellation of production has caused an ongoing financial burden to many, especially the smaller producers. All of this occurred due to a bush fire located over 127 kms away. So a lead mine on our doorstep is of great concern to all with future consequences and a source of financial insecurity. We have a large number of organic growers; this process takes years to become certified. What will happen to their livelihood, who will compensate them or other growers for loss of income? Base line testing of uncontaminated fruit will have to be undertaken by all producers within a certain radius of Lue prior to the mine commencing. Then ongoing testing of fruit to identify contaminants and their levels will continue each year. This will depend on the prevailing weather conditions in the lead up to harvest. Again yet another financial and time cost for producers to carry. That is if this mine was to go ahead – currently we don’t have this impost and financial burden. The Australian Wine Research Institute and NSW Wine will discuss further effects on fruit production and quality in more depth in their own submissions. This mine sits near Lawson Creek and feeds into the Cudgegong River and then onto the Burrendong Dam. This is the main source of irrigation water for a substantial number of wineries along the catchment from Lue to Gulgong and beyond. We also have some very serious concerns regarding the effects of potential Acid Mine Drainage. Acid mine drainage, acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD), or acid rock drainage (ARD) is the outflow of acidic water from metal mines this mine being lead and zinc and silver Acid rock drainage occurs naturally within some environments as part of the rock weathering process but is exacerbated by large-scale earth disturbances characteristic of mining and other large construction activities, usually within rocks containing an abundance of sulphide minerals. Areas where the earth has been disturbed may create acid rock drainage. In many localities, the liquid that drains is be highly acidic, and in such cases it is treated as acid rock drainage. This liquid often contains highly toxic metals, such as copper or iron. These, combined with reduced pH, have a detrimental impact on the streams aquatic environments. Acidic drainage is detected within 2–5 years after mining begins, whereas at other mines, it is not detected for several decades. Content testing is required to determine the leaching. In addition, acidic drainage may be generated for decades or centuries after it is first detected. For this reason, acid mine drainage is considered a serious long-term environmental problem associated with mining. The leaching from this rock when the lining is compromised will go into Lawson Creek and into the Mudgee water system down stream. No irrigation can be drawn from the river as it will be a toxic stream. Who will supply us with fresh water for producing and processing some of Australia’s finest wines? Bowdens have stated that once mining has ceased they will cover the waste rock with a 1.5 mm plastic tarp covering or Geotech and then a thin layer of soil. No trees can be planted on this site as this could compromise and penetrate the lining. We are not experts, just simple grape and wine producers, but the experts have told us this proposed mine has the potential to have a huge effect on the Mudgee Wine and Visitor economy especially as some aspects are trial systems, not yet proven. Say goodbye to our community amenity - no more swimming in rivers and definitely no irrigation on the grapes. This will have a huge impact on a historic, proven, viable, intergenerational, family based manufacturing businesses and the potential to destroy the Mudgee Wine and Grape industry along with our reputation as the #1 Top Tourist Town destination in Australia. We, the Mudgee Wine Association, are strongly opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine proceeding in the proposed current format. You, the IPC Commissioners have the power to shape and determine if the state goes for short term financial gains over long term community livelihoods in this, our little part of the world – please consider well. |
Attachments |
mudgee-wine-assoc-final-sub-002docx.docx (DOCX, 91.89 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I object to the Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd mine project. The Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine. In reality, it will be a lead mine. It will produce more lead than silver, with project estimates of 95,000 tonnes of lead, 130,000 tonnes of zinc and 1,879 tonnes of silver. The project could have serious impacts on the health and livelihoods of the people, and the water in the district surrounding the mine. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. It is a universally accepted fact that there is no safe level of lead exposure for people. The only safe place for lead is in the ground. Even very low levels of exposure can have lifelong effects on multiple organs including the cardiovascular system. It is particularly dangerous for children. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The mine would use roughly 5 megalitres of water every day. Earlier plans indicated Bowdens intended to pipe this water from the Ulan coalfields, as there was insufficient water at Lue to meet requirements. Now, they are proposing to get all the water needed from Lue, either through building dams, using water caught and drawn into the open cut pit, taking water from the Lawson Creek or using water from the tailings dam. I question the use of water from a tailings dam. What kind of contamination will people, wildlife and biospheres be exposed to from it’s use? Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% from the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Therefore, the data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Save Lue and Mudgee from potential environment disaster. Please reject this project. For the only planet we have. |
Jennifer More
Organisation |
Rylstone District Environment Society |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see the attached PDF file. |
Attachments |
rdessubmissiondpebowdensprojectfeb2023pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 116.67 KB) |
Robbin Binks
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
20th Feb 2023 Peter Duncan (Panel Chair) Independent Planning Commission NSW Government Dear Mr Duncan, Re SSD-5765 Development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure and Lue NSW I strongly object to the development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure at Lue in the Central West of NSW on the grounds discussed below. Any mine which involves the extraction of lead takes contamination issues to a whole new level. It is well documented that exposure to lead, even low levels, offers severe lifelong health risks especially, to developing babies and children. Fifty times more lead will be extracted from this ‘Sliver Mine’ than actual silver over the mine’s lifetime. Lead will be handled at several stages during the extraction and production process leading to the inevitable and far- reaching contamination of water, air and waste rock. In other silver/lead mining areas it is recommended that even filtered rain water is not drunk and that children do not play outside in areas not tested and protected from lead contamination. The mine is to be developed within 2 kilometres of the Lue Primary School. Dust has been identified by Bowdens Silver as the primary pollutant from the mine (Bowdens Silver 2020). There are no established safe levels of lead exposure. Would you send your child to this school if Bowdens Silver/lead Mine becomes operational? There is serious risk of lead and heavy metal contamination of surface and groundwater. Much more assessment needs to be conducted to establish how far reaching this risk is. Surrounding agricultural country will undoubtedly be jeopardised and production will be impacted negatively. A long term sustainable agricultural industry is surely more valuable to the region than a short term mining venture. The mine is to be situated in a greenfield area in the middle of the Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail. Again, consideration of how tourism, another long-term and sustainable industry will be impacted by the short-term greed of a rapacious silver/lead mine needs to be made. The extraordinary physical beauty of the area should not be dismissed either. A large tailings dam is to be constructed by Bowdens Silver across a fault line at the head of the Lawson Creek. This Creek meanders its way through some of the most productive country between Lue and Mudgee and ultimately enters the Cudgegong River west of Mudgee. Contamination of this Creek and all that is downstream (all the way to SA) would be nothing short of criminal. Bowdens Silver have admitted that conservatively 1.6ml of leakage of cyanide, arsenic and lead particles will leak into the water daily. The mine should not be allowed to go ahead on these grounds alone. Did I mention Koalas? 475 hectares of box grassy woodland will be cleared as a result of the mine. And what of the impact on the endangered species in the area and our wonderful native animal habitat? I guess lead poisoning by air, water and soil won’t be a problem if they have nowhere to live. It would appear, from the independent reports performed on the Bowdens Silver EIS, that much further investigation is needed regarding the short and long term impacts of a silver/lead/arsenic/zinc mine going ahead in such a pristine, productive and beautiful area as Lue. Please do not approve Bowdens Silver’s development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure at Lue. By: Robbin Binks |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Money Deceit Lies Corruption |
Michael Southan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reputation of the Australian olive industry for producing the highest quality Extra Virgin Olive Oil is at risk, because:- Lead will be released during the mining operation with the greatest potential for plant and crop uptake via the roots from the soil water (not covered in the assessment report) This will give the olive oil importers the opportunity to position imported product as superior to the Australian product How will this project protect the reputation and profitability of the Australian olive and other agricultural industries? |
Attachments |
australian-olive-industry--bowdens-public-hearingpdf.pdf (PDF, 695.35 KB) ipc-public-hearing-australian-olive-industrydocx.docx (DOCX, 1007.9 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached submission and article - Dark side of the boom |
Attachments |
borden-silver-submission3pdf.pdf (PDF, 176.86 KB) dark-side-of-the-boompdf.pdf (PDF, 960.5 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this to be a totally unacceptable project that is being proposed by Bowdens. Lue and it's School are in the direct vicinity where people including young children will be directly vulnerable to lead poisoning and water contamination. This mine will severely reduce local productivity and have long term and severe economic effects in the region.. Hasn’t there been enough global evidence to prove that we should protect our environment and ecosystem? Please stop and listen to the local and wider communities. Many thanks Deanne Chapman |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Objection (I am making a submission that objects to this proposed development going ahead) My granddaughter attends Lue public school and I don’t want her to be effected by the lead |
Will Cameron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family have owned a farm in Lue for over 25 years. I spent my childhood on the farm riding motorbikes, exploring the Lawson Creek, camping out under the stars and enjoying the peace and beauty that my farm offered. As an adult, I felt so connected to this region that I bought my own first house in Rylstone. I have watched Rylstone and Kandos become busy and prosperous towns over the past few years as the tourists visit and spend money in all the shops, pubs, cafes and restaurants. I fear for the future of our properties and our way of life. This region is so much a part of my life and I am devastated at the thought that it will be taken from us in favour of a new green field mine that is so against everything that we love about this region. I fear that the tourists will stop coming, that my house will go backwards in value, that I will be unable to raise a family in Rylstone for fear of lead dust. I understand that the Department of Planning have done nothing to help us and it worries me for the future. I ask the IPC to please refuse this project and protect everything that my family and I have worked towards. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development. There is a number of issues I am seriously concerned about, especially with regard to the effects the proposed project could have on the environment and the people living close around. So far the proposal shows some clear weaknesses concerning the protection standards of people and the environment - especially in relation to Acid Mine Drainage and the lead dust. As explained by qualified experts, such as Shireen Baguley, the project proposal contains mistakes, is based on wrong facts, or assures to introduce protection mechanisms that are technically questionable - for example due to missing already existing implementation. This casts strong doubt on whether and to what extent the operator Bowden Silver can ensure that people and the environment are protected, not just to some degree, but with certainty. At its scale, the proposed project may have serious impacts on the environment and sensitive ecosystems, and we cannot see ourselves making any mistakes in this regard, especially in this day and age. Also, due to the above-mentioned erroneous assessments, a strong doubt has arisen as to whether further additional requirements regarding protection standards would be taken seriously in the necessary manner, or are actually feasible to implement. I have the impression that this project is putting life at risk, that people as well as valuable animal and plant species have to take the risk of being severely damaged, not only during the operating period of the project but also for many years longer. Protection of this life under the current designs does not seem to be assured, compliance and implementation of further conditions seems questionable and its importance in comparison to monetary incentives seems to be secondary - and yet I did not say mention anything about how agriculture and tourism in the Mudgee-Lue-Rylstone-Kandos region might be endangered, what impacts might occur in the absence of protection of the environment and people, especially in economic and socio-economic terms. I am strongly concerned about the proposed project, and see the only solution in a final rejection. I kindly ask that my concerns but especially the assessments and objections of the qualified experts are taken seriously and considered in the decision making process, thank you. |
Matthew Brown
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Matthew Brown and I own a rural property approximately 8.5 km from the proposed mine site. I also live in Lue Village 2 km from the proposed mine site. I object to the Bowdens Silver mine proposal. My main concerns with this project are the impact of lead dust, water contamination, health risks to children, noise pollution from the 24 hour operation and the environmental impacts of acid mine drainage I am worried that lead dust from the mine will contaminate our household water in Lue as we only have access to rain water. Also food from our garden will be contaminated with lead and other heavy metals. I have a small child and I am worried about the health risks from lead contamination on the air and water. On our property we have a bore. I am concerned about reduced or no water supply from the proposed mines activity drilling into the groundwater table, on our bore. Without the bore we cannot grow a garden. A further concern is acid mine drainage. The mine is situated on a fault line and the mine is being built using technology that has not been tested on this scale. I don't think a 1.5mm liner is going to hold the waste rock and prevent acid leaking for eternity. With the tailings dam there is no back up if it breaks. If it does break, the environmental impact will be devastating. Furthermore, the land wont be able to be rehabilitated. The damage to the land will be permanent. The threat of acid mine drainage will be forever. I am concerned about the loss of property values. A condition of consent should be that rural property owners like myself whose livelihoods will be impacted by this mine be compensated. Bowdens Silver should be made to offer voluntary acquisition contracts to everyone in the surrounds at current pre-approval market prices. Lue road is not big enough for the additional traffic the mine will cause. Lue Road is a small country road any extra traffic especially large trucks will be a safety issue. Not to mention the noise this will cause in the Village. I don't believe this mine will bring appropriate employment to the area. There are already jobs here on farms and in other small businesses. These jobs will likely disappear if the proposed mine goes ahead as these rural businesses will be negatively impacted by the mine. Existing farmland, horticulture and tourism and other businesses will not be able coexist with the mine. |
Anne-Marie Raymond
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a community member who has stayed in Lue in the areas directly affected I object to this proposal wholeheartedly. The environmental and economic impact will be detrimental to those who live, visit and make their livelihoods in the region and should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THE BOWDEN MINE Too close to the township of LUE and the Lue School They do not have enough water to compress the lead dust I grow grapes and am heavily involved with the tourist industry and if the water table drain is effected and if the tourist drop off then we are deep trouble. Not only can we rely on the water to water our grapes AND it could be contaminated, but also tourist will not come to the area if there is any doube of Lead in the air. Also our tourist accommodation will be effected as will our cellar door. |
jamie inglis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a farmer who will directly feel the impact of mining at Bowdens.. I welcome and appreciate the opportunity to have my say.. I strongly object to the Department of Planning's recommendation to proceed with Bowdens Mine and also object to the Conditions of Consent. My submission is attached as it was too large to fit in this space. |
Attachments |
jamie-inglis-submssion-to-the-ipc-22nd-february-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 93.97 KB) |
Michael Boller
Organisation |
Catholic Education - Polding |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Sent via email to: [email protected] My submission contains 9 photographs of Koalas. I felt strongly that the Commissioners need to see those photographs. |
Lorie Porter
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi there, Myself and my family have been guests at the lovely WYUNA farm and this mine would be heartbreaking to their business and family property . The community of Lue is no place for this mine . Please reconsider. Regards Lorie Porter |
Sarah and Peter Onions
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Two years ago we chose to move to the beautiful region of Rylstone and surrounds due to it's stunning landscape and thriving local community. Over the past two years we have built a successful farm-stay business and have had many visitors to our property from all around the world who are looking to experience the pristine bushland and the daily life of an Australian farm. We have also hosted a family wedding and many other family events. Our farm has two different types of accommodation and we also offer camping in a secluded area, as well as managing a neighbouring property's farm-stay business for them as well. There are significant financial and personal losses to be made if this mine goes ahead. All of our reviews and guest comments have been around how quiet, peaceful & beautiful the region is and they are very taken with the unique geology and native animals. We are very concerned that the proposed mine will seriously impact the environment and decimate the agricultural and tourism industries that thrive in this region. My brother is a personal friend with Professor Mark Taylor and we know from his research that there are NO SAFE LEVELS OF LEAD. Surely that one sentence and fact is enough for the IPC to stop this ridiculous proposed mine going ahead. Yet it seems sadly that money is again being put ahead of the welfare of local children, their families and homes, tourism and agricultural production. We all enjoy living here for the beautiful outdoors, grow our own food and enjoy having many pet & farm animals. All of this would end with the approval of the mine. We would most likely have to sell our property, losing a great deal financially from the investments we have made in our farm and move away, as we would not want to be responsible for the harm to any of our guests, family and in particular grandchildren. We would need to rehome our many animals to prevent them coming to any harm. I previously worked in the education sector as a Director of Enrolments for a large independent private school, as well as three Indigenous schools they opened. Student welfare and health were priorities of ours, and in particular having to cater for children with special needs. Prevention is the key! I cannot understand why the IPC would allow a mine to be built that will affect the development of our precious children and cause undue sorrow to families and additional costs to our Government to provide healthcare and support for them for life. Professor Taylor's research in this area is crucial in understanding the harm to our children and their futures. Additionally in September of this year we are hosting the NSW Orienteering Championships on our farm, along with our neighbours. This will lift the profile again of this diverse and unique landscape, and there is talk of us hosting many other events and even perhaps a World Championship in this region - which would bring many hundreds, perhaps thousands of global visitors to the region. All of this would be lost if the mine goes ahead and the environment is damaged. Who would want to run and explore through bushland where there is a very real possibility of your being affected for life just from breathing in the contaminated air? The fact that the tailings dam is to be built directly over a fault line will contaminate the water supply of Lawson Creek and therefore the Cudgegong River - how many thousands of people will have their farm and home water supply contaminated as a result, and the additional loss of native wildlife will be catastrophic. We strongly object to this mine proposal going ahead and hope that the IPC will see fit to stop this madness before another area is decimated by this mining at the cost of lives & the environment mentality. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have serious concerns regarding the direct impact that lead and other such hazardous materials will do to the environmental, water & air quality. The impacts of such cannot be quantified or controlled. No concern is being applies to the impact this will have on surrounding farms, villages and the children's school. Not to mention Mudgee as a whole. I do not wish to raise my child in a place where he is directly or indirectly exposes to lead. Would you be happy for your loved ones to ve exposed to toxic chemicals? I imagine the answer is no. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposal will significantly alter the town and locality of Lue. It is close to many farms, houses and families and the hazards and how they impact the locality is my primary concern. I also worry about the traffic impact and the impact to the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Not only have I spent time at WYUNA, one of the local farms in the area and enjoyed the natural beauty of the area, i have been visiting Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Ilford for years. The area has only just regenerated and is thriving now but many local businesses were doing it extremely tough through the drought, loss of tourists from covid and the loss of jobs. The area is of extreme vulnerability to this development and the impact will be felt for many years to come on local farms, local businesses, local families, local communities, local wildlife and nature. This development should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong objection to the Bowdens Silver Mine proposal on the grounds that the proposed method of sourcing water is not viable and poses a significant threat to the environment and surrounding properties. As a regular visitor to Lue and the surrounding towns of Mudgee and Rylstone I have seen the Lawson Creek in both drought and flood. I am aware that Bowdens Silver has indicated in the latest revision of the EIS that it intends to extract all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site itself. This is a major concern as Lawson Creek, a small ephemeral creek, which is the proposed source of water, did not run at all for two consecutive years from 2017 to 2019. It is therefore not a reliable source of water for the mine. The fact that Bowdens and all other mining companies prior to them purchasing the site recognised that water is the show stopper on this site, and initially Bowdens intended to pipe that water from the coal mines north of Mudgee. To suddenly change their mind on this, after recognising that the coal mines were not open to the agreement, and suddenly finding enough water on site is of serious concern and not substantiated in their modeling. The data provided by Bowdens on the water availability is dubious, and the Department of Planning's own expert "Earth Works" has requested that improved modeling be conducted. The Independent Planning Commission must not approve a mine where there is so much uncertainty in the modeling that has been provided. If the Commissioners did, I and many others would lose confidence in the Independent Planning Commissions' processes and due diligence. I would like to request that this mine is not approved until there is clarity on the availability of water. The extraction of water from the creek, aquifers, and surrounds, will have a significant impact on the environment, including flora and fauna, the health of Lawson Creek, and the local community. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to carefully consider the environmental impact of the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine and to not approve until there is clarity on the availability of water. The long-term consequences of hasty and poorly informed decision-making could be severe, and we owe it to ourselves and future generations to make the right decision. Conditions proposed after approval do not make sense, particularly in the case of water availability. Please consider the fact that Bowdens has been unable to clearly articulate how they will be able to access the amount of water required to maintain the mining process without the establishment of a water supply from another site such as the coal mines. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development due to the long lasting and for the most part irreversible effects it will have on groundwater contamination, community health and the rural landscape. The impact of contamination by increased levels of lead and poisonous chemicals such as cyanide and arsenic is immeasurable on the natural and human environment. With an infants school a short distance away, concern for the children's health must be considered of prime importance as well as that of the local community with properties close by. There is no safe level of exposure to lead ! I believe that the mine should not go ahead in this area where the adverse environmental and health impacts outweigh any potential employment and economic opportunities. |
Phyllis Setchell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Attached are My PDF Submission of Objection and the Presentation I made to the hearing |
Attachments |
hearing-presentation-feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 112.55 KB) submissionrebowdensprojectluefeb2023pdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 126.43 KB) |
Annabel Combes
Organisation |
Almost Anything Emporium |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
IPC submission from Annabel I oppose this mining project. My family have lived in Lue for 100 years, my extended family have lived at Havilah for longer. Both these properties are run by families, it is their life. This Lead mine will destroy generations of work and will destroy these properties for future generations. Not to mention the destruction to existing and future residents of the Lue village. Bowden’s cannot guarantee they will not poison the air and water. They can’t get enough water to supress the lead dust. They mentioned they have bought enough water rights, that is great but if there is no water, there is just NO water. The tailings dam is on a “fault line”. Why would you put a dam full of toxic waste on an unstable piece of ground? Then there is the weather, we are experiencing unusual amounts of rain, what are they going to do when the toxic dam overflows into Lawson Creek? Who is going to fix that mess? And how are they going to fix that mess? Not to mention what are they going to do when the dam wall breaks? Which it will. Who is going to provide the residents of Lue with an alternate water supply? The lead dust will land on the rooves of houses poisoning their tank water. Most of the residents grow fruit and vegetables, who is going to compensate them when they have to buy fruit and vegetables because their crops have been poisoned by lead dust? Who is going to compensate the families when their children attending Lue school all get sick from lead poisoning? Who is going to compensate the pregnant women who have children with birth defects due to lead poisoning? Let alone the miscarriages. Is Bowden’s going to support these people? What if they are employees of Bowden’s? Is Bowden’s going to provide for cancer treatment due to lead poisoning? Who is going to compensate my family when our farming and grazing businesses are poisoned? Bowden’s does not seem to have much of a risk assessment, why not? Why is there no rehabilitation going to be done? The Department of Planning and Environment clearly don’t care or are they just too lazy to do the work to stop this? Or are they all just Bowden’s puppets? Is this going to be the “Erin Brockovich” of Australia? Or are we just going to be known as the “Chernobyl” of Australia? These questions, and many more need to be answered before this mine is allowed to proceed. Who is going to make Bowden’s do that? |
Sarah Page
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Adverse effects on community |
Craig Palmer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have spend time in the area and enjoy everything that Lue and surrounding area's have to offer. We feel that a lead mine will be detrimental to the area and community and will destroy businesses that have been built from the ground up. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Human community is our number 1 resource and mining that destroys community, culture, heritage and environment is never a good thing. We know how fragile our ecosystems are, koalas in particular, and to destroy yet another koala habitat is terrfying to think about. communities living near by will suffer from the threat of lead and all that that entails. Large companies tend to trample over the people who make these areas their home whether it be for a few years or for many generations. This is another example of this. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Response to Bowden Report Thankyou for the opportunity to contribute concerns re proposed mine at Lue. I am a sibling of my sister who has resided in Lue for 30 years and fostered biodiversity on her property consistently over this time. She will be severely impacted by mining development, with her property only 2 km SW of site and has a Lawson creek frontage. Despite local community concerns/questions being voiced over many years through Lue Action Group re environment degradation and pollution - noise, visual, air. Ecological sustainability concerns..social impacts etc ( imput from experts to assist in reviewing EIS, Amendment and Assessment documents - please refer to Lue Action Group submission re technical detail). Community as a whole remains opposed to the mine development on the following grounds • Lack of management plans with no decisive site restoration plans post project period. Subsequently failing ecological sustainable development principles • Water availability is a major concern and the notion that Bowdens project would decrease processing in response to drought is untenable and naive at best • Insuffient data regarding levels of lead contaminants in air, land and water and how that would be mitigated • Preservation of Box Gum woodland remnants - one of the rarest ecological communities in Australia recognised by NSW and Commonwealth Governments as species in extinction crisis. The NSW Auditor General report of August 2022 states the biodiversity offsetting scheme is failing to protect threatened species and without urgent changes clearing for development will drive further extinction Lue is also a key koala area, and this project is at odds with koala recovery programmes - please refer to p@J smith ecological review public submission 2020. Regards Andrew Coombe |
Maureen Boller
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In failing to provide rigorous oversight of this project the DPE and its officers have failed in their obligations to the people of the Mudgee region. It has wilfully recklessly ignored irrefutable evidence that the project will cause harm and leave a toxic legacy to families, farms, land, water, and whole communities. The DPE was apparently unable to locate and consult Australia's foremost lead experts, Prof Mark Taylor and Prof Barry Noller, deferring rather to barely qualified in-house "health experts" or unsubstantiated assertions from the proponent. It has been left to the community to engage and pay for truly independent expert advice on lead, water and social impacts. The DPE has unquestioningly accepted laughable "modelling" from the proponent in relation to water when the merest glance at the situation on the ground around rainfall and creek flows would have shown much of this modelling to be fantasy. It has supported the proponent in its decision that Groundwater Dependent Endangered Ecological Communities immediately to the east of the site should be ignored. The DPE continues to collude with the proponent in the inexplicable but unquestioned assumptions that permanent, sustainable jobs in agriculture or tourism are less important than temporary jobs in mining, that offsetting is anything but a sham, that people directly affected by this project have been adequately consulted and informed, that the Mudgee region needs or will need more mining jobs and that it is ever acceptable to increase exposure of communities to lead poisoning and waterway contamination. The DPE continues to insist along with the proponent that this project's effects on other industries such as agriculture and tourism don't need to be considered. The DPE along with the proponent continues to promulgate the indefensible claim of "balance", that it's acceptable to cause lasting loss and harm to whole communities because some others may benefit. The speakers from the department were unconvincing and unconvinced, as well they might be. This is a lead mine. The value of the tiny proportion of Silver may be of interest to Mr McClure and his fellow shareholders but it is of no relevance to the people of Lue, Mudgee and the Lawson Creek Valley. Most consequentially, around half of what will be dug up, processed and transported through several towns is lead. Lead is poisonous to humans to the extent that there is no safe level of lead in the blood. The proponent's own data show increased risk over a wide area, particularly for those families to the east of the site, several with young children. This risk cannot be avoided, managed, mitigated or made acceptable. The suggestion that because a small risk of exposure to lead exists in the community it is acceptable to increase that risk is unconscionable. Any attempt to impose this increased risk on families would be subject to vigorous resistance through all avenues. Offsetting is a sham. It is dishonest and the collusion between proponents and governments to pretend it is anything other than a total failure to protect environmental values is shameful. SVL might buy already protected land containing koalas but the koalas on and around Bowdens will still die. They might buy already protected land containing endangered woodland flora and fauna but the Box trees on Bowdens will still disappear. SVL modelling around water bears little relationship to the situation on the ground in the Lawson Creek Valley as could have been easily ascertained by the DPE if they had any inclination to do so. Both SVL and the DPE have ignored sets of meticulously kept records of actual rainfall in the immediate area going back many decades and generations. They have relied on averaging of modelled rainfall and water flows which tells you nothing about the situation on the ground at any given time. They have relied on modelling of flows in Lawson Creek when an actual water flow monitor in the Creek right now shows even in ideal times such as the present, the flow in Lawson Creek is a fraction of the average flow offered by SVL and uncritically accepted by the DPE. They have predicted a drop in flows in Hawkins Creek of 1 or 2 metres when any one who has actually laid eyes on Hawkins Creek knows that such a decrease would cause it to disappear. This again is inexplicably lazy and incompetent on the part of the proponent and the DPE. The proponent continues to claim an excellent record of community consultation. They have certainly spent a lot of time consorting with people and organisations who have been promised or provided with jobs or regular payments of various kinds. Not so much with the people immediately affected by the project. When the project was planned to encroach on our land, we were not told. When it was changed, we weren't told that either. At least not by the proponent. The families who face the biggest increases in exposure to lead were not told by the DPE or the proponent. It is not good enough when such information is buried in a mountain of other information accessible through a link on a website. It is not good enough to proclaim an open door policy when people affected by the proposal are left to guess there might be something they need to ask questions about. SVL sending out a few people to say they are receiving money from the proponent and wish to continue receiving money from the proponent throws no light on anything and must be ignored. Like so much else, their consultation is a sham. The quality of leadership is a gift and a curse. Tom Combes and the members of the Lue Action Group and the Bingman Catchment Landcare group have been awe inspiring in the monumental task of oversight and then resistance to this devastating project. This task should never have fallen to them and the NSW Planning system must be condemned for the fact that it did fall to them. They would be entitled to seek recompense. They are clearly tired and will get more tired. It is also clear they will pursue all avenues of resistance to this devastating proposal and never ever give up their fight for the families farms, businesses and communities of Lue, Mudgee and the Lawson Creek Valley. |
James Lefever
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my objection to the proposed Bowdens Silver mine, and to urge you to reject its approval on the basis that it will have a negative impact on tourism and health in the Greater Mudgee area, including Lue and Rylstone townships. Significant evidence has been put forward at the open Hearing held in Mudgee last week that the proposed mine will have a significant impact on the environment, which is a key drawcard for tourists to the region. The project will involve extensive land clearing, excavation and transport, which will damage natural habitats and scenic landscapes. This will not only reduce the attractiveness of the region to tourists, but also impact the visitor economy, which is a significant contributor to the local economy. Additionally, the mine will pose a risk to public health. Mining activities are known to produce dust and pollutants that can cause respiratory problems, skin irritations, and other health issues. In this particular case, the impact of Lead and other pollutants in the wind-borne dust will be significant and the proponent has shown little to no effective strategies that will ameliorate the dispersal of this dust to the surrounding areas. The transportation of the extracted minerals will also require the use of heavy vehicles, which will increase noise and air pollution levels in the surrounding areas. These factors will not only impact the health of residents but will also discourage tourists from visiting the region due to concerns about air quality and safety. Moreover, the Bowdens Silver mine will lead to the depletion of natural resources, which are essential to the region's long-term sustainability. The project will consume vast amounts of water, which will impact local waterways and ecosystems, and result in the depletion of an important resource for the region's agriculture and viticulture industries. My wife and I are recently retired and it has been our plan for some years to set up short term tourist accommodation on our property given the increasing influx of tourists to the region. We had earmarked a considerable sum of our savings to be able to build this accommodation and, indeed, were within six months of initaiting the build. However, we are now on hold until we find out the decision of the commission. Should the decision be one of approval, we will be forced not only to cancel the project as we do not believe tourists will come to area where there is a Lead/Zinc/Silver mine. This cancellation will impact local tradesmen who would otherwise have been involved in construction and future maintenance and also hardware and other stores in the area. We will also be in the very difficult position of selling our home and moving from the region as we cannot remain and potentially be impacted by lead dust and other chemical contaminants in the air. In conclusion, I must trust and believe that faced with overwhelming evidence as to Bowden's lack of specifics in managing the risks as well as the other considerable impacts, you will decide to reject the approval of the "Silver" mine. The project will have a negative impact on tourism and public health, as well as the sustainability of the region. I believe that the long-term costs of the project will outweigh any short-term economic benefits it may bring. In the end of course, history will be the judge of us all. Will it be because we have saved an area of outstanding beauty, natural resources, agriculture, viticulture and tourism; or will it be because we have turned that same area into a region impacted with lead contamination and loss of tourism jobs that far outweigh the small number of jobs that Bowdens state they will create? Thank you for considering my objections. |
Robert and Diane Page
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Pages 11 and 12 of the Bowden Silver Assessment Plan present a very strong case for the proposal to be rejected. In summary it is our view that the disturbance and damage cannot be justified by “increased employment and economic opportunities”. The main product in the proposal is lead. Arsenic and cyanide would be used in processing. We object to the proposed development because: 1. Increased traffic on Lue Road. Lue Road is a small country road. The proposed trips by 16 B-doubles, 28 shuttle buses and 28 light vehicles 6 days a week, would cause delays and disruption for commuters and tourists travelling in both directions. We regularly travel to Mudgee via the Lue Road. 2. Water. Lue residents and many rural families in the area are on tank water. The mining dust containing toxic particles will settle on the roof of people’s homes and contaminate drinking water. Prevailing winds will carry toxic dust to our roof and our grandchildren will suffer the damaging effects of drinking lead contaminated water. 3. Social impacts. The proposal indicates that the people of the Lue community would suffer disturbance from heavy vehicles driving through the village 6 days per week and lose their sense of community and their rural lifestyle. No attempt by Bowden to minimise that harm can mitigate the damage to body and soul caused by living with lead. 4. All the towns and villages in our Shire thrive because of the clean, green lifestyle, tourism and agribusiness. In the likely event of heavy rain and subsequent flooding, like the one we had in November 2022, toxic chemicals from the mine will leak into the waterways and dams and contaminate Lawson Creek, and downstream, the Cudgegong River, Burrendong Dam and the Macquarie Marshes. Glen Willow sport fields would be lead contaminated as would vineyards and crops. Mudgee’s status as number one tourist town in Australia will suffer. The wine and grazing industries will find it impossible to market lead contaminated products. We are in the grazing industry. 5. Biodiversity. Disturbance to the environment can never be offset by the relocation of species which are endemic to that specific location. There would be irreplaceable losses of endangered native flora and fauna at a time when preservation is key Government policy. 6. The removal and storage of 25 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage sites is disrespectful to our First Nations community. To imagine that these significant artefacts can be relocated in the disturbed landscape is ludicrous. |
Megan Bennetts
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have spent time at WYUNA farm - a beautiful part of the world. The value of this area is in the environment, and whole communities and business will be affected by this development. I ask the IPC to protect the farm and the businesses |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
where the mine is located is within 5k of an infants school and the exposure to lead would be detremental |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have read and considered the issues raised in the DPE Assessment Report. The most significant reason to not permit the development of the proposed silver mine at Lue is the very grave, and legitimate, concern for groundwater contamination and the exposure of the community to high lead levels. After taking account of all the evidence available, both nationally and internationally, I am of the view that any changes that would attempt to mitigate the impact on the community would not be enough to counter the potential damage to the environment and local community health. And, NO, the conditions of consent outlined would absolutely not mitigate the catastrophic damage the mine would cause. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a local doctor at mudgee. I, and many, have serious concerns about the inappropriate and unproven measures that are being used to keep the surrounding people safe from waste products from the mine. The fact that there is no good evidence to support the containment of acid mine drainage is dangerous. Before the mine is approved, we request that the DPE do their job and ensure the technology to contain acid mine drainage is fit for purpose. This should be shown now, not after the mine is built. Additionally, the lead dust is a big concern to myself, my children, and the people of Lue. The Macquarie university study shows concerns that the exposure to lead will be above what is modelled by Bowdens in their report. Many of the numbers that Bowdens used in their environmental impact statement were outdated. One only has to look to Mt Isa for the serious dangers of lead. The risk to the economic prosperity of Mudgee and Lue is also of great concern. Tourism is a big industry here, and will be harmed by fears of lead, arsenic and acid mine drainage. Additionally, noise and the visual pollution of a mine will be detrimental to the near by tourism industry. There are hundreds of locals who are outraged that the proposal has got this far. There is a real feeling, and I believe it is clear that the DPE have failed in their role of assessing the real environmental impact of this mine. Sincerely, Edward Lee |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed to a lead mine at Lue. * This mine has not been assessed correctly by the DPE due to the Applicant and their consultants providing inaccurate and incomplete information to the DPE. * Please see the attached submission regarding false and misleading information in relation to greenhouse gas emissions. * Please also find attached advice from the EPA in response the the EIS. * The recommended conditions do not adequately prevent, mitigate or offset the adverse environmental, social and economic impacts of this lead mine. |
Attachments |
epaadviceoneispdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.27 MB) ipc--greenhouse-gas-emissions--feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 392.19 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mining of silver has potential to cause serious damage to the environment by contamination to air and water. I am further concerned that the Silver Mines Limited recent disclosures to the ASX (example attached) indicate that the proposed site also contains references to gold onsite, which likely is intended be exploited and mined in addition to the silver. I would like it confirmed that current environmental reports and other plans do adequately address the mining, environmental impacts and remediation of the site after mining of gold (as they appear to only related to silver mining). Particularly, the effects of water which can be significant in gold mining. There is also the potential for use of cyanide in gold mining, which should be specifically addressed as a health hazard to the workers and neighbours. The Hazard Analysis prepared in May 2020 indicates only a small amount of cyanide will be used, as the mine is a silver mine. The addition of gold mining will presumably alter this situation and should be expressly reported upon. |
Attachments |
bowdens-silverpdf.pdf (PDF, 1.47 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My Name is Valerie Elizabeth White and I Object to the proposed Lead, Zinc and Silver Mine. I moved to the district in 1956 where I married a 4th generational sheep and cattle Grazier of Havilah North, which is 7km west of the Lue township. We called Havilah North Home before moving to Mudgee 6 years ago. My children, grandchildren and great grandchildren reside on the property and rely on the income from their agricultural practices to survive. The reasons I object to the mine: 1. Mine does not align with the region's identity The Mudgee region (which includes Lue) is known for its tranquility and beauty in the natural landscape. Its fertile soils, bubbling creeks and rolling hills makes for perfect conditions for agriculture including an abundance of vineyards, orchards, livestock and crop production. It is these very reasons that the Mudgee region attracts many tourists. Winning the most popular tourism town in 2 consecutive years, tourists come to the region to escape the noise and pollutants of city life and in turn give back to our community by supporting local businesses. Bowden's LEAD, ZINC and Silver Mine is in the wrong district. Pollutants, dust, toxic waste and noise which will be produced by the mine DOES NOT Favour an environment to created tourism. 2. Traffic Hazard I see the increased traffic from the mine a safety hazard from Lue to Mudgee. These roads are not suited to heavy machinery. There is no doubt that with this mine will come the daily transport of trucks carrying explosives and other toxic chemicals. The heavy vehicles in town also raise safety risks due to the heavy vehicle route being close to schools (Lue and Mudgee). 3. Health Hazard I believe the risks to human health have not been properly assessed and consider this a serious concern. It has been firmly established that lead is a highly toxic metal. The toxic levels of lead that will be prevalent in dust particles and in the water is too detrimental to the health of the locals in the community. In addition, Lue sits at top of the catchment. The water quality raises concern not only for the people but also for the many farms that rely on this water for agricultural practices. As stated by many health professionals; there is a direct link between communities in mining areas and health issues. Pollutants aside, another concerning issue is stress and anxiety, often associated with the sheer exposure of the day-to-day activities of the mine, the noise and dust. The mine is situated 2 KM from Lue…. THIS IS TOO CLOSE. This tells me that Bowden's is only worried about making money rather than worried about people's lives. 4. Water Having resided on Havilah North for many decades and now seeing my grandchildren work the land, I know the importance of the Lawson Creek. It is our lifeline for all producers up and down stream. In addition, it creates a habitat for hundreds of species of flora and fauna. Water is a precious resource, and my fear is that Bowden’s requirement for water is too great. It is NOT a viable solution for a mine of its size to rely on the Lawson creek. The leaching of toxic waste into the waterways will also have detrimental effects on not only the people in the community but also the flora and fauna that relies upon it. 4. Aboriginal Artifact. I, along with many residents in the district feel proud to call this area our home. The region is steeped in Aboriginal history. It is clear as to why the Aboriginals chose to settle in this region, due to its abundance of flora and fauna, hidden amongst a poetic landscape of rolling hills, rocky ridges and creeks and tributaries. To destroy over 50% of the Aboriginal artifacts on the mine site for a mine that is short lived can only be described as DISGUSTING. The reasons stated above as to why I object to the mine are only a portion of the concerns that the Bowden’s mine will have on the community and environment of Lue and its surrounding regions. Bowden’s own predicted ore volumes show 50 times more that than silver? Any amount of lead exposure is harmful. We need to protect our people to ensure a thriving future for generations to come. I was married to a 4th generational farmer and now my great grandchildren are the 7th generation to reside on Havilah North. How devastating will the impacts be for them and the generations to come if this mine goes ahead? I thank you for your time. Mrs V E White. |
Emily Gilbert
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The lead mine is too close to schools. I have stayed at Wayuna which is a neighbouring property and the whole essence of the property will be effected. It will no longer be a quiet hideaway from the business of life and that is an absolutely devastating thought. |
Richard Horton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have a 40 year history working in/on primary industry (ag, mining, power) projects across Australia and internationally. I am familiar with the unspoilt nature of the Lue area. I make my submission brief. Please do not diminish its weight by virtue of its brevity. I could submit much more but the essence is simple. The support data is quite apparent within the proponents' documents. 1. Lead dust. Any amount of dust containing heavy metals released into the surrounding atmosphere is detrimental to health and unacceptable. This is not Port Pirie of the last century. The people of Lue, and especially the children attending Lue school are not sacrificial lambs for slow poisoning. We know better. There can be zero tolerance - from airborne emissions and from seepage. 2. Water: the mine will unacceptably interfere with the area's above and below ground water levels and flows. It is no longer acceptable to destroy water courses. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining lead has never had a good outcome for the environmental and human health |
Lizzy Hewitt
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel like the mine will not only impact the natural landscape, but also the health and biodiversity of the local inhabitants. There are also important indigenous sites in the area, which would also be irrevocably impacted; their importance cannot be understated. |
Jennifer Dixon
Organisation |
Private rural property |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The extreme likihood of poisonous contamination to water sources, air and general environmental degradation of nearby sites will be harmful to the human residential population. Consider the vulnerable school children. Consider the land where food is produced by grazing, orchards, and cropping. These are all in danger from leaching, tailing, acid waste, dust and detrius of the mine. No safety measures can prevent the death and disability which will result. The economic destruction, poverty and dispossesion that will crush this region will last much longer, and cost the nation far more than the stated value of the mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly opposed to a lead mine at Lue. * This lead mine is too close to homes * This mine is incompatible with current land use. * Please find attached my submission. * The mine will be one of the worst polluters in NSW history and will not be rehabilitated but instead pollute the land, air and water surrounding the site for hundreds of years. * There are no conditions that can protect, mitigate or offset the adverse impacts to the environment, society and the economy. * Our state cannot afford this project and therefore this mine must be refused. |
Attachments |
ipc--bdw-submission--water--feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 815.76 KB) lag--reports-combined-incl-fdp-summarypdf.pdf (PDF, 10.53 MB) lagsubmission3apr22bdwpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 660.66 KB) |
Kevin Turner
Organisation |
Kevin A Turner |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine being given approval due to the following reasons. - Concern over drawing down and contaminating ground water supplies. We operate a small farm on the outskirts of Lue and depend heavily on our bore for stock and domestic purposes. - Concern of dust from the mine site contaminating household supplies of water collected from roofs of dwelling and sheds which may lead to poor health outcomes to my family. - Concern of dust contamination of pastures causing livestock grazing too not being saleable thus causing a loss of income. - Concern that increased heavy vehicle traffic on a poorly maintained country road will lead to an increase of accidents. - Concern that during prolonged dry spells or excessive rain events that systems in place will not mitigate the hazard of pollutants escaping the mine site. I am currently employed at an open cut mine near Wollar and seen first-hand discharges of contaminated water leaving site and dust storms depositing large volumes of dust over neighboring properties, - Concern that property prices in the area will fall. We have made a large investment in making our property a productive small holding and worried that our investment may be harmed. - Concern over the social fabric of the community will be destroyed, Look at Ulan. Wollar and Bylong, their villages have all but disappeared due to the effects of mining. One of the things Bowdens are crowing about are jobs. Where are all these workers coming from? All the coalmines in the area are struggling to employ enough skilled staff and resorted to fly in/out workers to fill the gap. Where will the workers live. The area has already a housing problem which will lead to people on low incomes further disadvantaged. Kevin Turner Tandara |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It concerns me greatly that the economic gain from the proposed mine will have significant detrimental effects for local residents health, their future economic well being and the environmental damage to local habitat, waterways, air quality. The location of the mine and the impact on local towns comprising of schools, shops, and homes has not been addressed sufficiently to guarantee that no detrimental effects will arise to people's well being. Literally, the mine could ruin local community, or reshape the make up of it significantly. My concern stems from the fact I lived in a nearby town to the proposed mine for the previous 2 years, and feel for many residents who oppose the mine going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Apposed to new mine proposal for multitude of reasons, namely: - negative impact on environment especially with regards to climate change - concerns for lead exposure/pollution - close vicinity to infant school and neighbouring farms/community - |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Almost Anything Emporium |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
IPC submission from A-Bel8 I oppose Bowden’s mining project at Lue. After being present and listening to all 81 presentations at the IPC hearing I am stunned that the IPC can even consider allowing this project to go ahead. The speakers opposing the mine were by all appearances well educated, intelligent people, who had all done their homework. They all spoke eloquently, some from the heart, but all with knowledge of the environment they live in and the destruction this mine will cause. The speakers for Bowden’s didn’t seem to have much to say other than “we can provide jobs”. We don’t need more job vacancies, we already have to many jobs up for grabs in the district. Bowden’s would know this if they had done their homework. I am not against mining. I am against mining that is not done safely and with consideration to the environment and the people that live and work in it, which is exactly why I am against this mine. I listened with interest to a gentleman who has been a mining engineer for 40 odd years. He explained very clearly how Bowden’s could not possibly succeed with the model they where using. How can this possibly go ahead? I am no expert, but after listening to these people speak, I have gained some knowledge. I listened to another gentleman who had his own business, he employed more people than Bowden’s will and his turnover was greater than the predicted earnings of the mine. He is doing all this with no harm to the environment. It seems very clear to me Bowden’s have not done their homework, and until they do, this mine should not go ahead. I am not sure where “the buck stops”, but if the IPC lets this mine go ahead the devastation it will cause will be on your head! |
Carolyn barlow
Organisation |
Rylstone District Environment Society |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is about Acid Mine Drainage because for me, it is the biggest reason that Bowdens Mine must not be approved. Dr Haydn Washington, esteemed science academic, science writer and long-time resident of Rylstone wrote two submissions on Bowdens mine proposal last year. As a metallurgist with the CSIRO, Haydn had investigated Acid Mine Drainage at both historic and currently operating mines. He said that this mine must not go ahead because Bowdens had not acknowledged the potential risk of Acid Mine Drainage. Nevertheless, it was recommended. This is not surprising. In Bowdens’ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), there is a mind-boggling amount of technical information to distract the reader, but curiously, there is no specific mention of Acid Mine Drainage. I am a retired educator, President of the Rylstone District Environment Society and representative of the society on the Central West Environment Council. I also have children and grandchildren living in Mudgee and Rylstone. In the Conversation on 6th September 2017, Acid Mine Drainage was called “the global environmental crisis you’ve never heard of”. I will be telling you what it is, the environmental problems it causes and the potential danger for Lawson Creek and our community. Then I will show you how Bowdens’ Environmental Impact Statement has failed to acknowledge or address potential risks. Acid Mine Drainage is a world-wide problem, wherever sulphide bearing rocks are mined. When the rocks are exposed to air and water and naturally occurring bacteria, a strong acid solution is formed and heavy metals dissolve into the groundwater and move into nearby creeks. Creeks become lifeless, often foul smelling, pinkish green or even orange drains. Some heavy metals such as cadmium can easily remain in solution more than 20km from their source. Others settle out sooner but can move in a flood and again dissolve in an acid environment. At Sunny Corner, near Portland, where silver ore was mined, there is still little biodiversity in the creek 22km from where it drains out of the mine. Acid Mine Drainage is still happening there, even though mining ceased 100 years ago. At Captains Flat, near Braidwood, millions of dollars were spent on rehabilitation, yet Acid Mine Drainage is still occurring. You will find little mention of Acid Mine Drainage in Bowdens’ Environmental Impact Statement. Instead, you will find plenty of technical information which leaves you with the impression that “there is nothing to see here”. It would be a miracle if this were true. Bowdens would be the only sulphide mining operation in the world with no significant Acid Mine Drainage. The sad thing is, the environmental impacts of Acid Mine Drainage usually do not show up for years, even decades after mining ceases. What’s more, Acid Mine Drainage continues for tens, hundreds or even thousands of years, as in Spain where silver was mined by the Romans about two thousand years ago. By the time our community is aware of Acid Mine Drainage, Bowdens will be long gone. Acid Mine Drainage causes heavy metal contamination of waterways. There is a long list of serious, life-threatening human diseases in which heavy metal contamination is implicated. If it happens and it is likely that it will, heavy metal contamination will severely impact the Lawson Creek area, affecting native vegetation, irrigation crops and all animal life in the area, including native animals, bees, cattle and humans who eat meat from the cattle. Mudgee’s water supply may also be affected as Mudgee is barely 26km downstream of the site. Bowdens Environmental Impact Statement has shortcomings. Much of the rock excavated will be waste rock. Of this, 54% will be potentially acid forming (PAF). Bowdens claim that leakage will be prevented because the potentially acid forming (PAF) rock will be encapsulated by non-acid forming rock. However, over time, water can seep through rock into small underground channels. A 2016 Australian Government publication says that for encapsulation to be successful even in the short term, very skillful and careful management is required. It is unlikely that Bowdens will successfully encapsulate all potentially acid forming waste rock for more than sixteen years. Even if they did, would encapsulation still be effective decades later? Bowdens’ EIS says testing shows that over a thirty-day period, acid water at the site returns to the same pH as soil treated with agricultural lime, implying that because of this, there will not be a problem. However, a researcher at Waterloo University in Canada states that Acid Mine Drainage does not wait for thirty days. It begins immediately after rock exposure and only gradually decreases. In other words, heavy metals will begin dissolving immediately. Will Bowdens encapsulate all waste rock immediately? I doubt it. Bowdens have avoided using terms like “heavy metals” or “acid mine drainage”. I wonder why. Could it be that these words alarm people? What they have given us is an Environmental Impact Statement with hundreds of pages of technical information. However, if you look at it carefully, you will see that the risks of Acid Mine Drainage and heavy metal contamination are very high with this mine. References Dr Haydn Washington’s Submissions to the Department of Planning and the Environment on Bowdens Mine Proposal Bowdens Feasibility Study Bowdens Website Bowdens Environmental Impact Statement Earth Science Australia, Energy and Minerals, Acid Mine Drainage Australian Government September 2016 “Preventing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage” www.uwaterloo.ca Wat on Earth, Acid Mine Drainage: past, present …… future? Wed March 11, 2006 The Conversation 6th September 2017 “acid mine drainage: the global environmental crises you’ve never heard of” www.USGS.gov “How does mine drainage occur?” US Geological Survey www.dcceew.gov.au Australian Government, Department of the Climate Change, the Environment, Energy and Water 1997 “Acid mine Drainage in Australia: Its Extent and Future Liability” U-tube Dr Rob Benson, Adams University, USA “Acid Mine Drainage” January 28, 2016 Mudgee Guardian 20th January 2023, Michael Kelly, Expert warns of mine risks |
Neil Woolley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed lead, zinc, and silver mine in our community. While I understand that mining activities can provide economic benefits, I firmly believe that the potential negative impacts on the environment, including biodiversity, sustainability, water resources, and climate change, must be taken into account. Firstly, mining activities can have significant impacts on local biodiversity. Lead, zinc, and silver mining can result in the destruction of habitats and ecosystems, leading to the loss of important biodiversity. Additionally, the use of chemicals and other pollutants in mining operations can have toxic effects on local flora and fauna, leading to long-term harm to the environment and the species that depend on it. Secondly, sustainability is a key issue that needs to be considered when evaluating the potential of a lead, zinc, and silver mine. Mining operations require significant resources, such as energy and water, which could lead to unsustainable use of these resources, particularly in regions where they are already scarce. Additionally, the waste generated from mining operations can have a lasting impact on the environment and lead to long-term contamination of soil and water. Thirdly, water resources are particularly vulnerable to the negative impacts of mining activities. Mining operations can result in the contamination of water sources, which can have severe consequences for human health and the environment. This contamination can also have lasting impacts on the surrounding ecosystem, affecting biodiversity and sustainability. Furthermore, as a regular visitor to the region, I would personally stop visiting if the mine were to be approved. The potential negative impacts of mining on the environment would significantly impact the region's natural beauty, and as a visitor, I cannot support activities that could have such devastating consequences. In light of the potential negative impacts on the environment, I urge you to carefully consider the long-term consequences of approving the proposed lead, zinc, and silver mine. Instead, I encourage you to invest in sustainable industries that promote the long-term health of the environment and support the well-being of our community. Thank you for your consideration. |
Joel Morrison
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The involved lead product will be a detrimental impact, not only to the local community but also to the wildlife of the area (including the already threatened koala population). There would also be impacts on Aboriginal cultural sites, which need to be protected as the foundations of Australian heritage. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed to a hazardous and poisonous lead mine being developed in an area which is already occupied by people, agriculture, tourism, lifestyle properties, animals, koalas and other threatened and endangered animals and plants and a village. * I am opposed to a lead mine within 2 kilometres of Lue village and Lue Public School. * I am opposed to a lead mine causing damage to the environment, society and the economy of this area. * I am opposed to a lead mine in a greenfields area which will not be rehabilitated after closure. * I am opposed to a lead mine polluting the air and water of this region for future generations * I am opposed to a lead mine near a creek. * I am opposed to a lead mine that does not have a secure water supply. * I am opposed to a lead mine that will add to greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to climate change * I am opposed to a lead mine at Lue and recommend it be refused as there are no conditions that would adequately prevent, mitigate or offset the adverse impacts on the environment, the people of Lue, the tourism businesses, the agriculture, the animals, the wildlife, the water supply and the air at Lue. * The impacts of noise and light cannot be mitigated and therefore must be prevented. * Please find attached a submission and accompanying attachments opposing a lead mine at Lue. |
Attachments |
bylong-coal-project-ssd-6367--statement-of-reasons-for-decisionpdf.pdf (PDF, 3.52 MB) hawkins-rumker-advisorybodyforstrategicreleaseabsrrecommendationtonotreleasepdf.pdf (PDF, 35.59 KB) ipc--submission-mwr-zoning--feb-23-v2pdf.pdf (PDF, 8.92 MB) |
Stephanie Gordon
Organisation |
Wilgowrah Partnership |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
OPPOSITION TO BOWDEN MINE I am the owner of Wilgowrah, 499 Lue Road, Milroy, 2850 NSW. I OPPOSE Bowdens Silver on the grounds that it will have a long term detrimental impact on Mudgee and surrounds as follows:- • Negative Environmental Impact • Negative Impact on Mudgee Valley from increased traffic • Negative Impact on Tourism, Wine Industry, Agricultural Industry from Lead Dust Contamination • Increased noise and road deterioration from additional heavy vehicle use • Desecration of a pristine area-impact on Wiradjuri Heritage and Environment • Desecration of pristine farming area Personally this project will have a detrimental impact on my current business and the pristine Lawson Creek Valley. Firstly, our tourist accommodation and farming (haymaking and cattle operation) relies on clean, unpolluted, reliable ground water supplied by Lawsons Creek and wells below the proposed mine. The business has a 60 megalitre irrigation water licence attached to Lawsons Creek. In addition we have a Stock and Domestic Water Licence drawing water from the Lawson Creek aquifer to provide water for Stock and Domestic use as follows:-domestic tanks, haymaking, cropping and cattle production. Due to the resent drier seasons water from these sources has been unreliable and will be even more so when Bowdens commence using the proposed 1000 Megalitres of water each year water from Lawsons Creek catchment. It is imperative Lawsons Creek and the entire water table remains pristine--free of any contamination or pollution from the proposed mine. The proposed tailings dam will be built less than 1km from Lawsons Creek providing no guarantee that leakage will not occur in the future. Thus, rendering any tourist accommodation, farming or livestock business on Wilgowrah NULL AND VOID without a reliable supply of clean, uncontaminated water. Secondly, our property offers tourist accommodation attracting visitors wishing to experience a quiet, tranquil and pristine environment. Increased noise and traffic from mining equipment and trucks transporting ore from Bowdens Silver Mine along Lue Road will have a negative impact on our tourist business. In addition, our home is situated 15 metres from Lue Road and any increase of heavy vehicle traffic will have a significant impact on our lifestyle. We will no longer be able to enjoy a quiet country existence with the constant rumbling of trucks, heavy equipment and the increased traffic flow from mine workers. Finally, I challenge Bowden Silver Mine to guarantee compensation should their operation cause any loss of business, property value or impact on lifestyle should any part of their operation cause contamination, depletion of water or bad publicity for the renowned tourist town of Mudgee and surrounds. |
Julia Love
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am very concerned with lead mining going close to the farmlands of people I know and love, not to mention an infant school 5 kms away. Lead dust in air , soil and water is highly toxic. Dont you realise that lead poisoning was partly responsible for the fall of the Romsn Empire? They had leadline pipes and many of the last leaders went mad, so they were easily attacked and defeated. |
Grahame Hackney
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The health of local citizens and the school children at Lue, in the immediate vicinity is paramount. Wind borne lead dust is lethal and must not be allowed to happen. An open cut mine cannot continuously prevent this material and the consequent health problems will have an adverse effect on all species including humans. This area has an enviable reputation and should remain unspoilt by this unnecessary mine. In a continent that is drying out, water resources must be prioritised and more highly valued, having a polluted residual tailings dam is a future time bomb. It is sobering to realise what future generations will need to cope with a degraded environment in the mined areas of the Hunter Valley, It seems that the mining businesses who are responsible for Hunter Valley rehabilitation have a long way to go to actually do this. Do we really want this situation in this area? If this pollutive, despoiling development proceeds the people responsible must have their names recorded in perpetuity for future generations to acknowledge. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will affect the local waterways and tourism. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Whilst I personally do not permanently reside in the area, I have family and friends who do. It would be a disservice to the local community in and surrounding Lue were a mine to be developed nearby. I personally find the area my favourite escape from the everyday routine and cherish just how much land surrounding my family property is untouched, glorious bushland accompanied by wonderfully arable farmland hosting a variety of outputs. There is significant arable land in this region and it seems illogical to destroy such a biodiverse region with mining. I am aware of the long term impacts on environment that mine rehabilitation has, causing disruption to the soil profile and chemistry which in turn wreaks havoc on plant life. The Lue region is also home to many wombats, a population of which I consider myself lucky to be able to experience. Wombats face enough difficulty with sarcoptic mange risk among other things , we don't need to add industrialisation to the list of threats to the species' viability. Along with wildlife, Lue is agriculturally rich. We are more in need of primary producers than ever with the costs of overseas trade and population increases. Again I see no logic as to why there would be little significance applied to the generational and new farmers in the area by potentially destroying and harming the environment on which they so heavily rely to produce their chosen output. The agriculture in the area also contributes to the economy of the region by attracting tourists. Socially (and economically) with the area being such a short distance from Sydney, it is commonplace for people to travel to the region for the weekend in search of farm stays, wineries and escapes into the peaceful nature of the region. Tourism is growing in the region and surely the production of a mine so close to everything with have a negative impact on the blooming attraction. History is included in the social impact. The towns nearby are historical in themselves and are a delight to experience. Old homesteads nearby also. Outside of white Australian history there is a rich and ancient history from our indigenous populations. Many areas of great importance to the nation who's land you seek to build on may very well exist. To disturb this history is disrespectful to all those who have come before us. We have already destroyed so much across the country, it is not needed to cause more damage. Whilst the mine is a silver mine, there are still biproducts from every mine that will cause harm to surrounding waterways through leaching and unintentional leakages. Our weather has been uncharacteristically wet and if patterns are to be believed I am sure it will not be the last history breaking rain. With big rain comes big damage. Excess water and run-off from the mine can travel kilometres distance, contaminating waterways and soil as it moves. This would be entirely detrimental and possible fatal so organisms if they were to ingest toxic run-off. Just to name one of the possible problems. A primary school is but a mere 2kms away from the proposed site. It is unsuitable to have children so close, especially as the mine grows. The increased traffic can cause a danger along with the environmental impacts like air and water so close to the children. I implore you to reconsider the construction of a mine in this vicinity. It will be detrimental to all who love the Lue region, local and from afar. It is a budding destination with a tight-knit community. I cannot hope to see the area and the people destroyed by the construction of this mine. |
Debbie-ann Stettin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
All watercourses are linked by a Web underground . There is no guarantee to stop leeching of pollutants. Why must they contaminate a healthy environment. for money the route of all evil. |
Thomas Gordon
Organisation |
Wilgowrah Partnership |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Objection to The Proposed Silver,Lead and Zinc Mine at Lue by Bowden’s INTRODUCTION My name is Thomas Roderick Gordon and I am married to Stephanie Marion Gordon. We own and operate a rural property, “Wilgowrah”, located at ⬛⬛⬛ Milroy NSW. It is 193 hectares in size. We have a 1.9 km double frontage to Lawson Creek and a 1.5 km single frontage to Lue Road. The properties are zoned RU4 rural – intensive agriculture. We have a 60mg water licence from Lawson Creek. Our operation is two fold. Firstly we have agricultural businesses of beef cattle breeding, fattening and trading business, and haymaking. Secondly, we operate 3 short term accommodation (STA) properties on “Wilgowrah”. The NSW Government STRA numbers are 6323, 6326 and 6327. We are members of the Lue Action Group (LAG) and support its submission(s) and objections, and rely upon the expert evidence provided to LAG by its expert consultants in our own submission. We are also members of the local land care group. Over the past 12 years we have invested heavily into our property. In summary this includes The refurbishment of ou water supply system. This includes relining our well, and installation of tanks and a solar pumping system. The installation of a property wide network of underground pipes over 5 km with troughs for livestock. Concurrently we invested in subdivisional fencing to improve livestock management, health and performance. We have fenced off Lawson’s Creek to enable the restoration of the riparian areas in addition to an ongoing tree planting program. This is encouraged by the NSW Government with financial and expert advice via Landcare. We have restored 2 buildings for STA one being a heritage listed small church and the second being a cottage adjacent to the homestead. We have also invested in a new purpose-built property,”Gawthornes Hut”, which was awarded most unique stay by Airbnb in Australia and New Zealand in 2021. All the above has been with the purpose to develop our rural property into a sustainable and profitable enterprise embracing environmentally responsible practices. KEY ISSUES TO US WATER Our water supply for domestic, including the 3 STA accommodation properties is drawn from a combination of rainfall catchment (15%) and underground water from a well. (85%). Stock water is dependent on some dams and but primarily from underground water. This water is drawn from gravel seams approximately 7 meters from the surface and the amount is dependent upon the flow and level of Lawson Creek. It is the same water source that all people along the Lawson Creek Valley rely upon for domestic, rural properties, vineyards, lucerne hay growers and other intensive agricultural pursuits. It is noteworthy that NSW State water imposes restriction on the use of water from Lawson Creek so as not to reduce the flow of the creek. The photo shows the flow in Lawson Creek at our on-farm creek crossing on the 20/02/2023. This after a year of record rainfall and major flooding where the country has been totally waterlogged and aquifers totally filled. It really is just a trickle. In an average year Lawson Creek has stopped flowing and dried to water holes. In dry years the creek can and does totally dry up until recharged by significant rainfall. LAWSON CREEK IS NOT AN INEXAUSTABLE WATER SUPPLY. NSW WATER PLACES RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION FROM LAWSON CREEK. WHY DO NOT THE SAME RESTRICTION APPLY TO BOWDENS. THE HIGHEST DEMAND FOR WATER FOR DUST SUPPRESSION AND OTHER MINE OPERATIONS WILL BE WHEN IT IS HOT AND DRY WHEN OTHER CURRENT LANDHOLDERS NEED IT MOST. WHY BOWDENS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO PROVIDE/SOUCE WATER FREE OF THE LAWSON CREEK CATCHMENT. WINDAMERE DAM (a State managed water supply) IS JUST 14 KM AWAY. They were going to pipe it from Ulan? NOISE POLLUTION. Our home and 2 of the 3 STA’s are located within 40 metres or Lue Road. The increase in road noise will increase dramatically from heavy vehicles (including B Doubles) and 4 wheel drive vehicles. And it will be 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. IT DOESN’T TAKE MANY BAD REVIEWS (such as “We found the road very noisy and had difficulty sleeping” OR “Mudgee was a great place until they opened a lead mine.) TO RUIN YOUR BOOKINGS AND THE TOURIST INDUSTRY. OTHER CONCERNS We are as concerned as all others are to the reality and very real threat of TOXIC POISONING OF OUR AIR AND WATER RUINATION OF THE VITICULTURE AND TOURIST INDUSTRIES FURTHER MINE DEVELOPMENT (test drilling already taking place at Botobolar) A DECISION TO APPROVE BOWDENS MINE IS A DECISION TO RUIN THE ECONOMIES AND REPUTATIONS OF OUR ALREADY ESTABLISHED INTENSIVE RURAL AND TOURISM INDUSTRIES. THERE IS ALSO TOO MANY UNCERTAINTIES AND REAL RISKS FOR A SOUND DECISIONTO BE MADE. WE HUMANS JUST CAN’T HELP RUINING OUR PLANET- OR CAN WE? Thank you Thomas Gordon 22/02/2023 |
Attachments |
lawson-creek-crossingjpg.jpg (JPG, 3.68 MB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
No, I am submitting on my behalf only. |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please protect the little WYUNA farm. I stayed in this farm previously and love this area. I believe with mining activity in this area will not only means this peaceful area in Lue will be destroyed, but also the increased traffic (both during construction and operation stage) will definitely introduced hazard to local resident. Also the local businesses that growth over years will be destroyed as well. I requested that the proposal be revisit, identify alternative location which will not disturb this Lue area for the mining activities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family own a property located on the Lue Road, 9km from Lue township itself and through which Lawson Creek flows. My father is the fifth generation farmer to farm his family property. If Bowdens are permitted to mine the local area as they intend to do, this will have devastating impacts for our family property. The consequences of permitting a lead/silver mine to operate in the area are catastrophic because of lead poisoning and associated health risks (noting there is no safe level of lead for children and I have a 7 year old, a 4 year old and an 8 month old baby who would be impacted), acid mine drainage (the impacts of which remain forever), water contamination (noting that this water is used for drinking water in the local area), destruction of the habitat for local flora and fauna such as koalas, rehabilitation of the site will be minimal (where the pit, WRE and tailings dam will also remain forever and have everlasting impacts), existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with the mine (significantly diminishing my family's ability to earn a livelihood from the land now and into the future - something my family has been doing for the last approx 140 years), there will be no ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms and the mine will close or reduce productivity during drought (noting that Australia is one of the most drought ridden continents on Earth and any inability to farm during drought will destroy many people's livelihoods). It is beyond comprehension that the NSW Government is considering permitting Bowdens to operate the mine when it will have such catastrophic consequences to the local people and the environment, particularly in circumstances where in the current landscape, climate change should be front of mind and the Government should be looking to preserve the land and surrounding environs rather than destroying it forever. It is a particularly short-sighted view to just say, it will be good for the local economy and create (temporary) jobs for the area. That is not enough and those jobs will go once the whole of the land has been mined for all its worth leaving miners unemployed and additionally, those in the surrounding area also unemployed. If Governments continue to permit such activities, we will have nothing left to give our children. Also, the Government needs to give future consideration to the costs it may incur as a result of those in the local community suffering associated health issues and any potential claims made for the economic and associated losses incurred as a result of permitting the mine to operate in the area (such burden on social services where people can no longer earn an income, on the Healthcare system as a result of associated health issues and potential class action litigation relating to the health and wellbeing of the people in the local area). It is on this basis that I implore you not to permit the mine to go ahead and operate in this area. |
Janette Mills
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live near a disused silver/lead mine in Tipperary, which although closed in 1989 is still causing on going problems for all locals, especially farmers. Local dairy farmers have had their milk refused at daires for containg too much lead. Sheep are particularly vulnerable as they ingest dirt with grass at a greater rate than other livestock. Millions have been spent and yet dangers remain. There are already 80,000 mines in Australia and there is already great concern about the clean up after use ceases. As s well known in scientific and academic circles it is nearly impossible to mine lead with any degree of safety.The dangers being the other toxins involved in the production of lead, cadmium which comes up with lead is a huge danger to water sources. The main danger to water sources is the acids used to extract it and all this before we get to cleaning up the mess and toxins after the mine ceases to be cost effective. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/tarnishing-the-silvermines-1.1037517 This is a link to the Tipperary site in particular. I am at a loss, well I am not...The mining company will roll out the old argument about job creation with next to little discussion of the realities of the processes involved in the mining , let alone what happens when the mines cease to be productive. I am just a lay person yet I can lay my hands on hundreds of reports why this mine should not go ahead. I would be particular concerned about the dry conditions in Australia. Twice in Silver mines the huge dead area of water left has dried out and the resulting spread of dust from said run off has been catastrophic. How the hell, in the dry conditions in this area is the dust remains to stay in the ground......When this happened, in Ireland, a very, very, wet country special grass was planted at no little cost to keep the dust from spreading again should conditions become dry again. The land was then rented to a sheep farmer, just an ordinary fella with no idea of the need to keep this precious ground cover there. The sheep ate the grass at the same time ingesting large amounts of the toxic soil. How there is even a question that this mine should go ahead beggers belief. I could throw up hundreds of reports from all around the world stating this is never a good idea. Profit and jobs in the short term, environmental disaster in the long term. There have also been many cancers in the Silvermines area, maybe this has not to do with the mining but imagine the stress and worry on the local community. Worried, are their homegrown vegetables safe to eat, worried that should there be another dust storm their milk will be returned from dairies for containing too much lead. The continued monitoring of too much lead in the locals bloods, especially their children's blood. I could provide you with hundred of reports from all around the world on the negativ impacts of said mining on the environment and folks health. But I am only allowed three. I am just an ordinary person and I can find many reports on why this is a really bad move. Profit for a company in the short term should never come before the people who live in the area, on their continued ability to provide an income for their families future. Indeed on the future..... I pray commonsense prevails and this mine does not go ahead. You only have to look at the devastation in the local of Silvermines,in Tipperary at the huge unnaturally green colour of the run off water, where nothing lives, no birds, no vegetation. Then there is the negative impact on the roads of the increased use of heavy goods vehicles. Too many concerns that must be addressed before this mine should open. Out of this, sprang a grass movement, called "People before Profit", which has gone on to fight many battles against corporations whose bottom line is profit. As I said, I pray commonsense, compassion and care for our land and our children's future will always come before Profit. https://www.mindat.org/gl/41261 image of run off water in Silvermines |
Attachments |
inbound5843069049259785625pdf.pdf (PDF, 1.23 MB) inbound6157591862767721732pdf.pdf (PDF, 1.49 MB) inbound8665637473349032018pdf.pdf (PDF, 114.14 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Members of the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. I am deeply concerned about the potential environmental, social, and health impacts that this project could have on the surrounding communities and the wider environment. From an environmental perspective, the extraction and processing of lead is known to have significant impacts on the local ecosystem, including soil and water pollution, the destruction of wildlife habitats, and the release of greenhouse gases. The mining process is also energy-intensive, which would result in increased carbon emissions and further contribute to climate change. Additionally, the proposed mine would have serious social impacts on the local community. The mine would be located in close proximity to residential areas, which could lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine would displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. I thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to hearing your decision on this important matter. Sincerely, Fiona Tham |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposal on the basis that it will adversely impact the amenity of the area, and potentially contaminate the air and water. |
Rod Pryor
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There are so many issues that are wrong with this proposed development and any single issue would be enough to impose severe conditions on the proponent to protect the community from risk, put together they add up to enough that warrants the project is rejected outright .In fact it is concerning that it progressed this far. It appears the proponent has overstated the rainfall At the site using data not site specific and understating their water needs in fact reducing the amount they need for dust suppression by near a half with out explanation.Water is one of the key problems this project will face and the detrimental impact of their water take on not only surrounding users that need it for stock and domestic use but also ground Water dependent Ecco systems that have not been included in the EIS. The Tailings Storage facility is a disaster in the planning,an unproven design that is going against recommendations from their own experts but also the Environmental Protection agency that recommends a greater depth of clay liner than the proponent plans to use.The synthetic liner that is proposed has not been tried on this type of tailings dam and has an unknown life expectancy.This is completely unacceptable.This dam will leak and because of the high sulphide content or the rock it will creat an unacceptable Acid Mine Drainage problem transporting heavy metals including toxic lead and cadmium with cyanide and arsenic in solution that will over time accumulate in the water course and surrounding vegetation and migrate through irrigation into the produce of the Biophysical strategic agricultural land not that far down stream.This will be an Accumulative impact not accounted for. The proximity of the mine will be the destruction of the community and village of Lue not just the usual impacts of mining (noise, light ,traffic and dust) but the dust will be toxic polluting over time the rainwater people are dependent on ,contaminating the soil making home grown produce unsafe.No one could stay under these conditions.This will benefit the proponent as it is not in a mine’s interest to have residents living nearby as people tend to make the industry stick to their conditions and remain compliant.There is no economic or social benefit for Lue just the opposite. The proponent states they will create jobs for the area .The simple truth is Mid Western Region doesn’t need more jobs ,we have full employment with proposed development currently unable to fill vacancies and this is likely to continue for some time .It is not an exaggeration to say that there are in excess of 500 unfilled vacancies as I write and hundreds more in the pipeline.There is nowhere for these workers to live and a real housing shortage in the area.This housing shortage will only be exacerbated by the loss of over a hundred dwelling in the Lue area unliveable because of this mine. The footprint of the mine will have far reaching impacts on biodiversity not just the Koalas on site and the undocumented upland wetlands (bogs and Marshes dependent on the water table)but noise light and traffic.The loss of habitat ,there is no like for like biodiversity offset. Lastly I will comment on the traffic .Lue Rd to Mudgee is as narrow country road, winding with sharp bends and narrow bridges.This road is hardly suitable for b doubles carrying a hazardous slurry on through the urban centres of Mudgee to Parkes.The workers travelling to and from will pose enough of a hazard. In conclusion I don’t believe that the DPE have looked at this closely enough they have not exercised a duty of care to the community or the environment,they have not assessed the true risks of this project to the viable and sustainable agricultural and tourist industries that are dependent on a clean image. Industries that provide far more income and employment than this project ever will. The project will have a direct impact on me personally with greater pressure on the infrastructure I use and a hazardous material transported through my town with the prospect of Accumulated heavy metal dust in my immediate environment .I would seriously consider moving myself and young family if this gets approval. I urge the commissioners to weigh up all the facts ,the risks this poses to the region and its future prosperity and NOT approve this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To who it may concerns, I heard this Bowdens Silver project from my dear friend. I was in enormous shock. And I still am. My friend’s family has lived in Lue and Mudgee for over 100 years. Grew up with lots of joys and memories, my friend always shares with us how wonderful this area is. Sadly, this could be completely ruined into dust as soon as Bowdens Silver takes place. Living in Australia for 15 years, I was always impressed by Australia’s strong focus on humanity and people right. Being fair, healthy and supportive, has always been the absolute priority in Australian society. And I personally and continuously benefit from that in various situations. Therefore, I feel sad when I saw local farmers protesting and raising concerns about the Bowdens project. And if we ignore that and still let the mining business take over their lives and trucks run over their human right? I probably do not understand how this business was put on the table as an option, as it never should. But at least we can stop human tragedy from happening. Thank you for your consideration. Your sincerely Amanda Du |
James White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sirs, I understand the mine is dependent upon a water source not available and Lawsons Creek certainly lacks sufficient flow there for the purposes and the degree of imposition on local water supply would be significant. If the mine lacks water then how will it process, how will it manage dust? Noise will be a significant problem for the local community and dust must be strongly managed. I am extremely concerned about the potential toxicity for the local area plus those downstream from the lead mined therein. I have strong reservations about the financial and managerial ability of the company to adequately develop this resource and thereby to manage and preserve the environment over time. Who will be responsible for the mine once it is exhausted or will Lue and those on the Lawson Creek, the Cudgegong river and ultimately the Macquarie river be burdened with a long term environmental disaster arising from a short term gain? Jobs are spoken of but once a mine is in production few are employed plus with the uptake of automation and artificial intelligence in mining even less will be employed particularly of the traditional mining employee. This project will not feasibly uptake miners displaced from other mines for these reasons. Mostly I have extreme concerns about the toxicity of the tailings and waste, I am not cognisant of well developed plans to remediate and to manage these environmental headaches and in the absence of such surely it is perilous for this mine proposal to proceed further. The actions of the developer in acquiring neighbouring lands and the only commercial facility in Lue is a low strategy and has served to divide a community on matters that are not amenable to fostering goodwill in the area. I do not and can not support this mine in any way, I would be devastated to see it proceed and do not embrace the economic pipe dream which in reality only masks an environmental headache that will be generational. To what end does approving this in any way benefit our grand children’s grand children? Are we so short sighted that a grab of an illusionary dollar now is worth burdening tax payers in decades to come? Please do not approve this proposal now matter how bright and shiny the metals. We do not need to risk poisoning our food bowl. |
bruce brew
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My concern relates to the likely high levels of minerals especially lead that will exceed safe levels in drinking water. Please see attached for a full explanation |
Attachments |
20230221bowdenminereportpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 505.2 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerns about the health and safety of the community, especially those who reside near the proposed build site, especially those with young families. Also the impact on environment especially the animals, not to mention the indigenous sites and the effect this may have on them. The health and safety of the residents is f most importance to me. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a First Nation traditional owner the cultural heritage sites that will be distributed are sacred and having worked in the mining industry, i have seen first hand that there is no regard for environmental impacts or cultural issues whilst operations are happening. |
Ms A T Combes
Organisation |
Almost Anything Emporium |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
IPC submission from Almost Anything Emporium I oppose the Bowden’s mine project. I am a business owner in Rylstone and have had a number of businesses in the village. I moved to Rylstone with my husband in 2003, to be closer to my family. We bought an old sandstone house that needed a lot of work. We hired local people to help us restore the building. I ran a childcare business for 15 years out of our home. We grow our own fruit and vegetables; this will stop as the lead dust will end up on our property. My father and I bought another old house in the village, it needed a lot of work as well. We again hired a lot of local people to help restore the building. It now houses an Italian restaurant and my retail business that sells all locally handmade and produced products. It works a bit like a co-op. I provide the space, the artists supply the products. There are around 30 local artists who showcase their talent in the shop. I have provided this space for 5 years and it continues to grow. Where and how are these artists going to showcase their talent if their land is poisoned? This is a lot of people’s livelihoods Bowden’s is going to destroy. Who is going to compensate these people? Bowden’s seem to think the wind doesn’t blow in this direction, or will get this far to destroy these people’s lives, have they been living under a rock? As a resident and business owner for 20 years in Rylstone I have seen a lot of things come and go. I saw the cement works close down, I saw the coal mine close down. Both these things affected a lot of business in the village. My childcare business suffered. We are a resilient lot here. We did not all fall in a hole we got up and turned Rylstone into what it is now, a thriving tourist destination, with great shops and restaurants. Rylstone has always had a thriving agriculture industry. We have been hit by a lot lately, drought, bush fires, covid, then floods. We have not given up, we are all struggling to get our business back on track and we will do it. A lead mine will not save us! It will destroy us. Who is going to compensate us? One interesting thing Bowden’s seems to think they have on their side is providing “jobs” we do not need more jobs, a lot of the local businesses are screaming for employees, and Bowden’s intend to take what employees we have and put them in a toxic poisonous environment. Mr McClure mentioned Kandos, one of the lowest socioeconomic towns in NSW. He quoted census statistics for 2022 and 2016, stating nothing had changed, blaming cement works and mine closures. The cement works closed in 2015, before the 2016 census. Kandos has been on the low socioeconomic list since I moved here in 2003. Sadly, that is the nature of the town. The people who want to work find work, the others just complain or wait for a handout. This is an incredibly sad reality. Is Bowden’s going to provide that handout? There is now a thriving art community in Kandos, I know they are not happy with the Bowden’s proposal. If Mr McClure and his community liaison officer had done their homework, they would know that as well. What kind of jobs are Bowden’s going to provide? Are they going to spend the time and money training inexperienced people to fill those places? I imagine they will hire “crews” for drilling etc, all qualified. What is the quota for unqualified workers? Where is the list of available jobs? What is Bowden’s promising? Is this all fluff and preying on the less educated to get the vote? Promising something that Bowden’s may not be able to deliver, thus further demoralising a group of people who were promised “jobs”. Has Bowden’s done any research into the available talent? The recent floods were a terrible blow to our thriving tourism industry, roads were cut or such a mess they became nearly impassable, some still are. Our roads are “country roads” a bit narrow in places, but that is part of the beauty of a drive on a country road. The Lue Road is the No 2 tourist road in The Mid-Western region. It is a mess. I heard Mr McClure say he was going to work with council to ensure the Lue Road was maintained to council standard. If the current condition of the road is any indication of councils standard Bowden’s won’t have to do much! 4.7 million dollars Bowden’s is promising the council. Is that money guaranteed to go to upgrading the road? And provide clean water to the residents of Lue? I doubt it, and it is not enough to do any job over the life of the mine, 16 years (sort of maybe) it is not much. All the bridges will need to be upgraded to be able to handle the extra trucks on the road not to mention the road itself. What happens when a truck tips over and dumps a toxic load on to the road? not to mention if a truck dodges a pothole and runs another car off the road? Another interesting council issue, one of Mid-Western Regional Councils councillors owned the local news agency and post office in Rylstone, he is also an employee of Bowden’s, a conflict, maybe? The councillor assures us he is not corrupt. I went into the councillors business, as I did often, to get some photocopying done, he looked at what I wanted to copy, threw it at me and called me and my family⬛⬛⬛ liars. This was not the first time I had been sworn at in my local newsagency. I was working with the councillor to build a new playground, the playground is very nice, except they had forgotten to provide a bin. I used to take the children in my care to the playground, I would take a garbage bag with me, the children had to wait until I had picked up all the rubbish before they could play. I asked the councillor when we might get a bin? He told me to stop⬛⬛⬛ whinging, you got your⬛⬛⬛ playground take your⬛⬛⬛ rubbish home! There have been many other instances. He often swears at customers, oh but its all a joke we get told. If this is how Bowden’s “Community Liaison Officer” behaves I am not sure about their ability or care to run a mine. This councillor/business owner has bullied people to the point they would rather drive 50 kms to Mudgee than go into his business. He had generic submissions forms for Bowden’s in his business, he would bully people into signing them, some had no idea what they were signing or were too scared to say anything. This councillor spoke at the hearing, making it quite clear he was not speaking on behalf of the council, he said what a great bunch Bowden’s were, he rattled off all the businesses and events they had “sponsored” I think we call that “pork barrelling” I do know this is not illegal, it is just a bit frowned upon. If this is the kind of environment potential employees are going to work in it is not only toxic physically it will be toxic mentally. If this is such a great project, it should speak for itself through honesty, integrity, and transparency. Why the need for bullying and buying people off? How can the IPC approve this mine under these conditions? |
Anthea Nicholls
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The potential environmental changes are not reversible, and with the pit & tailings dam ( with the 2850 tonnes of cyanide ) remaining forever. The risk this poses either from an earthquake or a rain event cannot be mitigated with 100 % security. Clean Reliable water is life to this farming community and the ecosystems Koalas are critically endangered and are found along with 20 other vulnerable & unique species at this site. The belief that this ecosystem can be relocated or off set by buying up adjacent farmland show a disregard to how interrelated this ecosystem is. The stress of being translocated or living adjacent to the noise light & vibrations of a mine would be disastrous to this species |
Ted Combes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the Bowdens Silver project and recommend its proposal be overturned, and to cease operation indefinitely. The Bowdens Silver proposal has proven itself to the Lue and greater community its failure to provide a safe living and working environment for surrounding households and businesses, without extensive failures causing irreversible disaster. The DPE have failed in their obligation to protect communities like Lue from mining projects like Bowdens, from wiping clear the beautiful valley in which we live and work and have proven that a short-term mining project is far better than the jobs, homes, and legacy that the Lawson Creek Valley holds, in which can never be replaced and can never be compensated for. I have lived in Lue for my 30 year life, my family, over a century, and we live and work on the sustainable and continually flourishing Lue Station, which has been with our family for 100 years this year. It is an absolute travesty that the possibility of a project like Bowdens Silver can turn up and destroy everything we have built and live for. The DPE has failed to correctly assess the proposal, which used incorrect and irrelevant modelling for all major concerning factors to the mine’s operation, including water usage and catchment availabilities, lead exposure to the neighbouring community and village, only 2kms from the mine site, and construction plans, which have also never been proven suitable or possible for a project of this size, equalling a catastrophic potential for devastation, despite recommendations from the DPE’s own experts hired for further assessment to the proponents EIS to be not suitable. Lead exposure at any rate is a major health risk, and the without correct and precise data analysis, the proponent has not been able to prove to the community the operation will not cause a major increase in lead poisoning. It is laughable that Bowdens Silver has placed data studies into their EIS, which were also approved by the DPE, that show no relevant water level flows through Lawson creek, because their data analysis was not taken from correct locations. The proponent also continuously used a series of averages to predict water availability, when it is quite clear their averages are not an accurate representation of the actual yearly rainfall. Every landholder in the area is able to identify that the Lawson Creek valley is susceptible to extreme weather events, both with high acute rainfall events and extended dry periods. The Bowdens Silver project will not only have major water issues in controlling hazardous lead dust from poisoning our rainwater, which we all collect for drinking, but from overflows of their tailings dam and run off through their waste rock emplacement in high rainfall events. Lue and its surrounding area are extremely quiet in the evening and night. We have Low traffic on roads, and no close by construction or machinery operations. This is a major favouring factor for all people who wish to visit the area, benefiting in the major increase to tourism is the area. A mine like Bowdens would have a detrimental effect to the tourism industry if approved, which already provides an extremely high amount of jobs to the area, and a great monetary benefit to the area, including Kandos, Rylstone, Lue and Mudgee. These being much higher than what the mine will provide. I run with my family an offroad motorcycle complex here at Lue. We have over 15 employees, bringing over 30,000 people to the local area Annually, and have been operating for 30 years. This is just our business. Many others in the area are the same. We have to run under strict noise guidelines for the sake of the community. Operating times are between 9am and 5pm Friday, Saturday and Sunday, which minimises noise annoyance to the neighbouring community. We also have regular weekends closed to help over minimise noise. I do not see why Bowdens cannot do the same. We have extensive knowledge in dust suppression and know water in the area is extremely valuable due to its limitations. We are a small water using operation compared to what Bowdens predicts to use during its life. The water is just not available. We rely on local businesses to provide accommodation and food to our customers, alike they rely on us to provide the customers for their business. We work closely together to create a thriving industry in the beautiful Lawson Creek valley. An operation like Bowdens DOES NOT FIT. It will provide no benefit to local businesses, farming enterprises and tourism in our area, yet only decimate its existence leaving nothing but itself. I strongly oppose the Bowdens Silver project and recommend its proposal be overturned, and to cease operation indefinitely. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lue and Mudgee have had much to do with my adult life and my children’s growing up. I have many family and friends that will be directly impacted from this project and strongly object. It is such a beautiful part of our country, why ruin it? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development on the following grounds COMMUNITY 1. How will this mine affects our families and our business in the region. 2. Why is there no plan to regenerate mine after finished. 3. Loss of income from, Grapes, beef, accommodation etc 4. Extra traffic on Lue road and round Mudgee with trucks transporting slurry through Mudgee to Parkes 5. How will tourism jobs be changed in Mudgee, Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Kandos. 6. What will happen to the local Lue school? 7. Will we have to teach our children not to put their hands in their mouths? GRAPE GROWERS & PRODUCERS 1. How the fine lead will affect your grapes, olives, fruit etc? 2. Absorption of this dust through leaves , soil and water. 3. Grapes absorb heavy metals. 4. Fine lead dust is cumulative, especially in cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc 5. Will we need to test for base lines before mine is approved? 6. Ongoing testing of grapes into wine. Who will cover the cost of testing. WATER 1. Irrigation - where is the water coming from to service this mine? There doesn’t appear to be enough to realistically support the project? 2. Our water could be contaminated by fine lead dust and acid mine drainage. 3. Where will we get clean water from if our water tanks, waterways, water collection areas (roofs etc.) and dams are covered in fine lead dust, or pollutants from run off from mine? 4. Who will compensate us for lost clean water? TOURISM 5. If you have an Air BNB, guest house or just guests to your home - will you be able to supply your visitors with a safe environment? 6. Can you supply them with eggs, ‘fresh’ vegies, drinking water, bathing water, local produce without ramifications? 7. Washing cloths and bed linen on contaminated water . Residue will be in fabric. 8. No one wants to visit a region where they may get lead poisoning. 9. How many jobs will be lost if Mudgee become a contaminated town instead of #1 tourist destination two years in a row, will we become the destination town to be avoided at all costs? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine which could have serious impacts on our health, our water and our livelihoods. Lead is toxic to humans, and it's a universally accepted fact that there is no safe level of lead exposure for people. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report. Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. The mine will be situated approx. 2 kilometres from Lue village and primary school. Mined materials and processing chemicals will be moved by B-Double truck, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee!! |
Stevan Pekar
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Other Key Issues that are important to me Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. Lead poisoning and health. Acid Mine Drainage. Contamination of water. Reduced supply of water. Economic Impact to Business. Koala Habitat destroyed. No compensation offered. Loss of property values. There is no safe level of lead for children. Close to World Heritage Sites. Excessive Noise. Excessive damage to local ecology. No consideration of adjacent lands. Noise is the most common cause of community loss. Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. No existing infrastructure to the site. No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. Project location is too close to my home. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concern regarding lead exposure to citizens and school children |
Nicole Browne
Organisation |
Media Opps Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family were, until recently, long-term residents of the area and I still have many friends living and working in the region - I know the area well. I have previously made an objection and am stunned this development is still being considered. I have 3 key points in my objection - all of which are focused on the FUTURE for generations to come. 1. The mine will have an unavoidable, direct and tragic impact on the environment of this unique natural landscape and the fauna within it. This pristine bushland will be destroyed and the natural water sources WILL be affected. The native fauna will be left without homes, without food sources, with impacted water sources and battling increased human activity and traffic - they will DIE. There is no benefit for them. They will disappear. If you approve this mine, will YOU take in the animals which will be left homeless and left to die???? Think about that. 2. The health risks for the people of the area are immense. Reports and studies are always weighted in favour of development - the reality of what lead/zinc/silver mines and tailings in particular produce has been seen around the world time and time again. Do not make the same mistake others have. The health of people and fauna far outweighs any short-term gain. If you approve this mine, when children start to develop health issues, what will YOU say to them and their families? Think about that. 3. The economic opportunities in the region currently rely on agriculture, tourism and 'tree-change' movements. The environment itself is what allows these opportunities to thrive - take away the pristine bushland, the soil fed by pure water, the clean air, the biodiversity which fosters pollination and soil health and the unique beauty in this rural community and you are taking away everything that makes this community possible. If you approve this mine, when visitors stop coming, when crops fail, when vines stop producing, when sheep and cows are affected, when bees disappear, when soil and water is toxic, when businesses close, what will YOU say to everyone who loses everything? Think about that. This mine does not belong in this area. We cannot continue to carve up the planet from under us, destroying everything around us in the process. We cannot continue to wipe out species of flora and fauna. We cannot continue to close our eyes, cross our fingers and hope there is no toxic impact for people and the landscape. We cannot allow this mine to replace the beauty and natural wonder of what is already in place. If you approve this mine, what will YOU say to future generations who will have never seen a wombat, never smelled fresh rain in a Eucalypt Forest, never heard morning birdsong across the paddocks, never seen a crystal clear running creek and never known this area other than ripped apart and poisoned. What will YOU say? For the land, the plants, the animals, the people, the closely knit communities and for everyone's future.... OPPOSE THIS MINE. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Martins Hill Organic Wines Mudgee |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My husband and I are proud to be the owners of a certified organic vineyard in Mudgee. We work hard to maintain a toxic-free environment for the abundant bird and wildlife in our region. I have read the submission for the proposed Bowdens Mine Project which has raised many concerns. The risks of lead mining, including lead poisoning and acid toxicity are worrying. Acid mine drainage, impacts to ground and surface water as well as air quality could negatively impact our future and that of our children. This concern isn’t just for our community, but also for our natural world. Please say ‘no’ once and for all to this project. Help retain some clean land for the generations to come. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the proposed development. for the following reasons:- Contamination of groundwater by dangerous substances including lead is a huge concern if this project goes ahead. Leaching from the tailings dam of poisonous chemicals like cyanide and arsenic will be ongoing and the impact underestimated with further mine extensions and no plans for removal of the dam after mining ceases. High lead levels are extremely detrimental to a community's health especially children's development. With an infant school within 5 kms of the proposed mine, this is a major community concern. Levels of lead in soil and groundwater cannot be fully evaluated at this time and will pose inestimable problems for years to come. There will be detrimental impacts on village life and surrounding properties, the values of which will fall dramatically. With increased heavy transport, excessive noise and dust pollution the surrounds will be greatly adversely affected. There will be a costly environmental impact on the currently pristine Cudgegong River as well as the creeks that flow into it. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Members of the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. I am deeply concerned about the potential environmental, social, and health impacts that this project could have on the surrounding communities and the wider environment. I regularly visit my family’s cattle property at Lue and am still very surprised that there is still planning in the pipeline for this mine to go ahead, what are you really thinking???? From an environmental perspective, the extraction and processing of lead is known to have significant impacts on the local ecosystem, including soil and water pollution, the destruction of wildlife habitats, and the release of greenhouse gases. The mining process is also energy-intensive, which would result in increased carbon emissions and further contribute to climate change. The complete damage to the local water supply is a no brainer. The pollution/poison will cause destruction to the environment. Affecting vineyards, agriculture, tourism, and life within the waterways system itself, and the nature that it is supporting. Just leave it all alone! Again, the total effect to the natural environment that will be uprooted and mismanaged. All this for a mine that will be poisonous to all, the human life, the animal life, the air, the trees, the water, the birds and the lists goes on…. Additionally, the proposed mine would have serious social impacts on the local community. The mine would be located in close proximity to residential areas, which will lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine will displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. The Mudgee area is one of NSW highest tourist visited locations. The jobs that are created through tourism far outweigh the few jobs that will be created by the mine. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. Of particular concern are the children at the local Lue Public school and the families in the town that have young children. The Department of Planning’s claim that the SEARs have been met is incorrect and irresponsible. Bowdens has not answered the most fundamental of issues required for mining – whether there will be sufficient water for mining operations and for existing water users, together with the level of pollution of surface and ground water from mine activities. Two water experts have made submissions to the Department (Earth Systems and Shireen Baguley) clearly pointing out that these fundamental questions remain unanswered and indeed, they confirm that water is severely limiting and insufficient for mining operations without draining Lawson Valley. It would be such a shame for the IPC Commissioners to become complicit in this process and indeed it would be a failure of due process. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. I thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to hearing your decision on this important matter. |
Alison BARKER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have concerns in relation to the proposed Bowden Silver Project. Primarily I am concerned that the water from Lawsons Creek would be totally inadequate due to lack of water through drought conditions which are occurring more frequently (we are talking 23 years of mining!!). The cost of any water coming through pipelines from Ulan would need to be investigated more fully but I would guess it is prohibitive due to the infrastructure costs. I do not believe it is fair to the Lue local community and surrounds that their water supply should be affected due to the company wanting to put profits ahead of precious clean water supply. I also have serious misgivings in relation to the company's "adequate mitigation measures to be put in place" that should this proposal eventuate, that safeguarding water used and waste product into a tailings dam can ever be "safe". I am certainly in accordance with Mid-Western Regional Council letter to your department dated 27 July 2020 re SSD 5765 Environment Impact Statement. In my opinion I do not believe the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. I urge you to consider very carefully all the submissions opposing this project. Sincerely Alison Barker |
Jennifer Lloyd
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It would be a huge mistake to allow the Proposed Development - Bowdens Silver Mine to proceed. It will have massive negative impacts, both environmentally and socially to the Lue community and beyond including the thriving township of Mudgee, named both NSW and Australia’s top tourist town in 2022. The Mudgee district is well known for its fabulous wineries and delicious fresh food and produce grown locally. Holidayers go there in droves to escape built up big cities and pollution, to enjoy the wide-open spaces of hilly countryside and wetlands. All of which will be jeopardized by the Bowdens Silver Mine proposed to be constructed in the nearby district of Lue. The location of the proposed silver mine is in the heartland of productive farming country. The mine will create a major risk to the animal production and cropping of surrounding farms. The livelihoods of those farming in the area will be at serious risk. It is widely known that mines cause erosion, contamination and alteration of soil profiles, contamination of local streams and wetlands, and an increase in noise level, dust and emissions. Once the mine is there, the waterways and soil contamination will be there forever. It is also well known that mining infrastructure built to support mining activities, such as roads and power lines, can affect migratory routes of animals and increase habitat fragmentation. The Lue Road on which the proposed mine will be on, is narrow and totally unsuitable for the big machinery. It would make the road extremely dangerous and hazardous for everyone driving along it. The Bowdens silver mine will have a negative impact on the health, wellbeing and living standards of residents within the mines vicinity. The mine will impact the Indigenous people of the Wiradjuri land living in nearby communities potentially creating many harmful social and public health consequences. Nothing is more important than the good health of our people, animals, the land and vegetation we all live on. Please have the courage and foresight to reject all planning proposals for the Bowdens Silver mine. Do so for all of us including our children and future generations. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will have significant impact on surrounding farmland & on the natural environment. Lead poisoning & water pollution are of significant concern |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object this mine going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live in a nearby village. I cannot understand how this could even be thought of in this day and age when we know how harmful Lead is. Let alone putting future generations at risk of contamination. The risk is just to high. Not just for us but also for the environment. Our lovely area is well known for many beautiful things like wine, meat, rare Birds and plants. We don't want our land to be poisoned by this mine. Many people who have come to this area have come for a better quality of life away from the city smog. Now to be at threat of being poisoned is extremely unfair after purchasing property which will now be of very little value to anyone. I object to this Lead mine going ahead for myself , my family and everyone's future families that will be harmed from this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowden silver mine as I live in mudgee with my children and grandchildren. The mine is too close to where i live and this will effect the locals and the visitors alike this will have detrimental effect on us all as mother and a grandmother I am concerned about the overall harmful and damaging consequences this mine will have I oppose to the mine being built in this area |
Tony Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Object to the mine - see attached my letter of objection |
Attachments |
mine-submission-tony-miskledocx.docx (DOCX, 22.44 KB) |
John Smidmore
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a frequent visitor to the Mudgee area, and also specifically to the Lue area over many years. I have enjoyed the the natural beauty of the area, and the level of development that has been undertaken in the area to date in terms of the agricultural and farming development and the development of the wine industry in the area, together with the careful and sympathetic development of the town of Mudgee and the smaller townships in the area, in particular Lue. Im most concened that the proposed minw will have a disaterous impact on all of these facets of the area. i'm amazed that it is proposed to have a mine within 2kms of the Lue township. Despite the proponent's assertions, I believe the majority of the expert evidence that has been presented, supports the conclusion that the mine will have a seriuos impact on all aspects of the local environment. The proposed use of water from Lawson's creek is most concerning. It has been noted that creek did not run at all between 2017-2019 and the mine's use of thsat scarce resource will worsen an already fragile ecological situation. it will negatively impact all of the wine, farming and grazing activities in the area. This would have a significant direct economic impact to those who have established farms and vineyards in the area and have a significant economic impact on the important tourism industry in the area. Mudgee was recently named as one of the best tourism areas in Australia. That industry could face ruin if the mine proceeds. My interpretation of the expert evidence put forward suggests the mine will cause significant ecological damage - necessitating the clearing of nearly 500 hectares of land,. The tailings dam willcreate an eyesore, as will the large open cut pits. There will be leakage from the tailings daminto surface and groundwater. Even more concerning is theconsquential acid mine drainage that will have porentially significant impact on agriculture, farming and vineyards and even drinking water. in addition there will be increased airborne polotion affecting both the rural and urban areas. the noise, vibration and heavy vehicle activity will negatively impact both residents and tourists - having a negative impact on the locals and the significant tourism industry. in short the proposed mine will signifcantly and permanently damage all aspects of this fabulous area of New South Wales, and indeed the world. |
Rebecca Bruton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident of Mudgee, I am 100% opposed to the further development of the Bowden Silver Mine in Lue. As we now understand the silver component is an insignificant portion of the actual mine extraction with the two major contributories being Lead and Zinc. There is plenty of data on the long term and major health effect of lead exposure that will not only compromise the local residents of Lue, but the surrounding villages and towns as well. Bowden’s Mine life span is estimated at 16 years, which is short term in the scheme of things but would leave long-term devastation for future generations with the acid mine drainage system that is unproven and inadequate. They will boost employment in the area for the duration of the mine, however there are already 100’s of job in the region that can’t already be filled, from hospitality, coal mines and council heavily recruiting. It has been documented that Lead traces have been found in the Antarctic that originated from Port Pirie in South Australia. Lead dust will travel and affect the surrounding agricultural farming lands of this region, that will in turn diminish not only the land values but the products it produces such as wine, olives, cherries, beef and sheep that are at the economic heart of this region. With potential water ingress from the toxic tailings dam (that lies on a fault line) would be irreversible and devastating to the area with the flow from Lawson Creek eventually finding its way to Burrendong Dam (that supports recreational activities not only for Mudgee, Wellington and surrounds district). This cannot be ruled out given the significant rain and flooding events as seen in this region in 2022. Mudgee’s first grapes went in in the 1850’s and with a rich history and passionate producers who have built an industry and reputation that has seen the town of Mudgee named Top Tourist Town 2 years running. The further development of this mine will see a significant decline in the tourist visitation as people will not want to travel to an area where they could suffer potential health risks to the exposure of Lead or eat and drink locally produced products that have been diminished by such contamination. Bowden’s have secured support for this venture within the community by the sponsorship of sporting teams and clubs but in return have asked that the parents post a submission in support of this mine. I personally feel many of these submissions have thwarted the process as consultation and understanding of the potential harmful effects of Lead exposure as some critical information has not been passed on to these unsuspecting parents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
hazardous to my health and to the whole local community. Risks from exposure to lead outweighs any benefits. |
Sarah Inglis
Organisation |
JR SJ Inglis |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a farmer 5km downstream on the Lawson Creek from the proposed mine site and I am deeply concerned about the prospect of this mine after following the progress of this development over many years. I have read the Department of Planning's Assessment and Conditions. I object strongly to the mine. I question both the method by which the Department made its assessment and many of their recommended conditions. I value this opportunity to make a submission to the Commission. My full submission is in the attachment. |
Attachments |
20232-sarah-inglis-ipc-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 160.61 KB) bureau-of-meteorology-data-200321022023pdf.pdf (PDF, 910.13 KB) |
Peter Combes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silver Mine is a mine that is too close to our village. Lue is 2KM from the main site and a school being within that region. The proposed mine should in no way go ahead. It will disrupt a tight community that have been here for generations, and also the environment that surrounds it. I have grown up in Lue and my family has been here for over 100 years, to see this mine take over a place we love and cherish would just be an outrage. Go have a look at towns like Ulan, just to see the incredible impact the mine has had on the town. Everyone has packed up and left. Lue would turn into a ghost town. Apart from destroying the villages community, Bowdens Silver Mine will ruin the environment. It is plain and simple. We are supposed to be protecting our incredible environment, but instead we are destroying it. We have spend 100's of years ruining this planet and finally everyone is making a change for the better and getting earth back to normal. But here comes Bowdens ruining a valley a lovely flowing steams, rolling hills and more wildlife than you can count. THIS MINE IS IN THE WRONG PLACE! The water supply in Lue just isn't there. Look back a few years ago to a drought that went for 7 years, whats going to happen to the mine if that drought starts again tomorrow? How are those supposed jobs going to be held? How will you get water? The Bowdens Site will ruin the land it sits on and surrounding land for many many miles. The Rehabilitation of the site will be extremely minimal and will remain there forever. The water will be heavily affecting by the lead and acid rock poisoning coming from the ground extractions and this will heavily affect the entire community, including Mudgee. This is just too close to a bubbling community of heritage families and farming wealth. The agricultural production in the valley is very strong and putting this mine there will change it until the end of time. You will not fix it. Please I'am begging you, do not let this mine ago ahead. the damage will be irreversible. |
Miroslav Pekar
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Other Key Issues that are important to me Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. Lead poisoning and health. Acid Mine Drainage. Contamination of water. Reduced supply of water. Economic Impact to Business. Koala Habitat destroyed. No compensation offered. Loss of property values. There is no safe level of lead for children. Close to World Heritage Sites. Excessive Noise. Excessive damage to local ecology. No consideration of adjacent lands. Noise is the most common cause of community loss. Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. No existing infrastructure to the site. No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. Project location is too close to my home. |
Helen Kristensen
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Having attended a number of Information Gatherings, I am very concerned about the destruction the Silver/Lead Mine will cause our Region. I live locally and have been privy to the purchase by Bowden of a number of properties within the surrounds of the proposed mine area, and the "restoration" of the Homesteads with the obvious view of housing mine workers into the future. This says to me that the "hundreds of jobs" spruiked by Bowden, that will be taken up by locals, is in fact not the case. Fly- in workers requiring accommodation will not add dollars to the local economy. Additionally, many now productive farming properties will become uneconomic due to the Lead Dust, reduced water availability, noise, heavy traffic and the overall ugliness of an Open Cut Mine in what has recently become a Award Winning Tourist destination. From a personal view, as my property is located East of the proposed Open Cut Mine, I will be impacted by Westerly winds depositing Lead Dust. I strongly oppose the Lue Mine Development. |
Elizabeth Hunter née Howe
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am submitting my objection to the Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue. My family has lived in Rylstone for over 100 years. It is a fact that the open cut mine will cause devastating health problems to all who work and live in the surrounding areas. It will have a negative impact on the water, on animals, on rivers and the future generations of my family. Please stop this mine from proceeding. |
Jade Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowdens Silver Mine - see attached objection letter |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-objection-letter--jadedocx.docx (DOCX, 24.68 KB) |
Michael Radzievic
Organisation |
Telstra Corporation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Proposed Bowden's Lead /Zinc mine at LUE NSW Mining will be an extremely destructive practice that will amount to very negative impacts on the surrounding environment. Because the material that is mined for is surrounded by other ore and rock, mining creates large amounts of mineral waste in the form of waste rock and tailings. Waste rock consists of all of the earth surrounding the ore that must be removed in order to access the desired minerals, metals, and gems. Tailings are the waste material from the ore processing phase, and often contain toxins left over from the ore separating process along with small amounts of heavy metals that were not fully removed. Lead is almost always contained in sulfide ores as galena or lead sulfide45. Waste rock material from mines that contain metal sulfides can lead to sulfuric acid drainage when left out in the open air. Tailings also contain minerals and materials that can lead to dangerous runoff and water contamination when stored improperly. Some mine waste and tailing dump sites are structurally unsound and often overflow and break, allowing contaminants to spill out over the surrounding environment. In some cases, mines will have long pipes or waste canals that carry tailings to waterways for dumping. Waste rock and tailings from mining and ore processing are not always stored or disposed of properly, and lead toxins in this material can leach into the soil and nearby water systems, impacting agriculture and water resources. In some cases, waste and tailings are dumped out in the open and near residential areas where people may come into contact with contaminants, or children may play near or on toxic material. Because lead can be absorbed through dermal and mouth contact, this form of exposure can be particularly dangerous for children. Miners are also at risk of exposure if they do not have protective equipment and frequently come into direct contact with ore containing lead. Miners can also inhale lead as dust during the mining and crushing processes. He health effects of exposure to lead can be both acute and chronic, and the problems caused by lead poisoning are particularly dangerous and severe for children. Acute lead poisoning can happen immediately and is often caused by inhaling large quantities of lead dust or fumes in the air. Chronic lead poisoning, however, occurs over longer periods of time and can result from very low-level, but constant, exposure to lead. Chronic poisoning is far more common than acute exposure and can be caused by persistent inhaling or ingestion of lead, or, over much longer periods, can result in lead accumulation in the bones. Health problems associated with lead poisoning can include reduced IQ, anemia, neurological damage, physical growth impairments, nerve disorders, pain and aching in muscles and bones, memory loss, kidney disorders, retardation, tiredness and headaches, and lead colic, which impacts the abdomen. Severe exposure to high concentrations of lead can lead to dire health risks, including seizures, delirium, coma, and in some cases, death. Neurological damage is especially pronounced in children suffering from lead exposure, with even small amounts of lead poisoning capable of causing lifelong developmental and cognitive problems. Exposure to lead in utero can also cause birth defects. After China, Australia is the world’s largest primary lead producer, with the world’s largest lead smelter located in Port Pirie, South Australia. This smelter, built in 1889, processed ore brought by train from the Broken Hill lead mine, NSW - a mine that is still operational today. The city of Mount Isa, Queensland, also has an operational mine and a lead and copper smelter. Each of these three cities has between 13,000 and 23,000 people living in the immediate vicinity of the mining and/or smelting operations. In addition to these sites, there are also smaller active lead mines in Tasmania and the Northern Territory. Please do not approve this mine development at LUE NSW --the community overwhelmingly does not support this economic venture ---do not approve this toxic waste legacy for the community that will last forever and destroy pristine farmland. |
Attachments |
s1294001500859pdf.pdf (PDF, 473.83 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the impact this will have on both the environment and the health of those that are local to the area due to potential for lead exposure of which there a no safe levels of exposure. This is particularly concerning as it is close to farming land as well as infant schools |
Jacob Stein
Organisation |
Robert Stein Winery Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee is my home town and have lived here for 13 years, only about 15 kms north west of the proposed lead mine site. As a local and father of two young boys I love the freedoms they get to grow up in, with a town full of natural beauty, clean air, wide streets, heritage buildings, heaps of local produce, wine, cheese, with pristine parks and a wonderful community. Tourists love our town too. They also come to escape cities, to enjoy our hospitality and to visit our fabulous cafes, restaurants, wineries and other unique attractions. We have a reputation for being 'clean and green' and this is the reason Mudgee has won 'Best Tourist Town in Australia' for two consecutive years. This award defines Mudgee and is something to cherish. However, this could all change if the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine Project at Lue is approved. Although miss appropriately called a 'silver mine' it is really a LEAD mine. To extract the silver, 95,000 tonnes of lead will need to be removed, and with that come all the potential health hazards of lead exposure to our pristine habitat and threatens our future. This would not only be devastating for the town of Lue but equally devastating for the pristine town of Mudgee. The lead near Lue must stay in the ground, as, once exposed, there is serious risk of lead dust affecting the air and compromising the health of all residents in Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Mudgee, especially children and pregnant women. Bowdens plan to transport this lead (plus the dust) along the Lue Road and through Mudgee on B-Double trucks, all day, six days a week. This will seriously affect Mudgee’s reputation for being 'clean and green', and will probably cause the death of very important tourism to our town. The proposed number of jobs that Bowdens is proposing will be nothing compared to the loss of jobs in the tourism and hospitality area in Mudgee, let alone the 250 jobs which are currently advertised on ' seek'. This is a horrible, dirty mine and must not be approved. It would be devastating to the environment, and it would be terrible to see Lue and Mudgee go the same way as Broken Hill and Mt Isa where many of their residents are suffering many health issues from toxic lead poisoning. This is an insensitive proposal that has drastic impacts on the greater Mudgee community and our way of life. The potential impacts of lead are alarming with potential for contamination within the local environment, farm land and adjoining waterways. I don't believe there has been sufficient detail about how the potential for lead contamination has been mitigated or the level of post development testing and reporting that will be provided. There should be far greater transparency to the local community for ongoing testing and reporting as people's livelihoods are at serious risk due to the risks posed by contamination. The amount of polluted water proposed to enter Lawson Creek is alarming. I don't believe there are sufficient safe guards in place to monitor water quality or the potential downstream impacts from contamination. Overall this is an inappropriate development that should be refused on the basis of its direct impact on the village of Lue alone and that is before you even consider climate change and potential contamination. On a more personal and business level • The fine lead will affect my grapes, livestock, water quality • Absorption of this dust through leaves, soil and water could reduce or eliminate export potential. • Yes, Grapes absorb heavy metals - and the recent 2019/20 bushfires decimated our industry by losing our grape crops for a whole season. • Fine lead dust is cumulative, especially in cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc • Will we need to test for base lines before mine is approved? • Ongoing testing of grapes into wine. Who will cover the cost of testing? I don't believe there are any inclusions available for us. This lead mine is only proposed to last 16 years, and the jobs proposal is a joke considering tourism already employs 4 times the amount of positions the mine is proposing. We always support economic development, but this proposal to poison our community is not the answer. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not agree with the mine going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our property is directly next to the proposed lead mine site. As the closest neighbours, we will be the individuals and the property most directly affected. I strongly oppose this mine going ahead. I am gravely concerned for the negative impacts on our health (there is no safe level of lead exposure), and our water quality (both for us, our animals, the wildlife and dependent ecosystems), as well as the impact on our quality of life, our livelihood and the wide negative impacts on the Lue community. The effects of this mine on the delicate ecosystems will be devastating. There are also numerous sacred Indigenous artifacts within the proposed mine site, and others on the surrounding neighbouring properties. To go ahead with this mine, would mean damage, desecration and likely destruction of these culturally important sites. This mine will destroy the beautiful rural community of Lue and will endanger the health of all its inhabitants. For goodness sake - there is a children’s infants school less than 5km down the road. Additionally, it will be a dusty, dirty, ugly, noisy mine that nobody wants next door. |
Alyssa Pekar
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Other Key Issues that are important to me Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. Lead poisoning and health. Acid Mine Drainage. Contamination of water. Reduced supply of water. Economic Impact to Business. Koala Habitat destroyed. No compensation offered. Loss of property values. There is no safe level of lead for children. Close to World Heritage Sites. Excessive Noise. Excessive damage to local ecology. No consideration of adjacent lands. Noise is the most common cause of community loss. Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. No existing infrastructure to the site. No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. Project location is too close to my home. |
Alexandra McCalman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the local Mudgee community, I am deeply concerned about the health ramifications on myself, my young son and all of the local community should this development go ahead. I am hoping to send my child to school in the near future in this area and the development being within 5km of the school is of great concern. Lead and silver mines have no place so close (if at all) in a community where people live and build their lives. The damage this proposed development will have on health of citizens and the environment for short term mining is inexcusable and only satisfies the needs of a small group of people with a vested financial interest. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to lodge my concerns for bowden development .I Have major Concerns for residents health and safety of neighbouring properties. Unknown Effects to young families,to livestock used for human consumption. Concerns of use and contamination of ground water which is used and consumed by living beings thru natural springs .the area already struggles with effects of drought &low average rainfall.we should be protecting grazing land not destroying it.If this goes ahead much consideration should be given to land purchase from neighbouring properties and done quickly. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Having recently experienced a devastating 3 year drought and the resulting dire lack of water, I am most concerned about this proposed mine proceeding. Water is a VERY valuable resource in a country like Australia and any even small possibility of this mine causing water contamination, reduced supply of water plus acid mine drainage is definitely a step too far. Such effects would be irreversible. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Just don't want it, leave the environment the way it is. No more mining... why ruin our country for greed? |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The water quality of our food producing regions should never be compromised l |
Rebecca Guilfoyle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Rebecca Guilfoyle, wife of David Guilfoyle, daughter of Jennifer Mary and John William (Bill) Kerr (dec). We have lived in the Rylstone area for four generations. We run a mixed farming operation with cattle, sheep, canola, wheat, barley, oats and lucerne. Our property, 'Monivae West' would be approximately two kilometers from the mine site. OBJECTION - I object to this proposed development going ahead. After reading the State Significant Development Assessment from December 2022, I was disappointed and in my opinion did not feel it was was a fair representation on behalf of the Lue Action Group. I also, attended the public hearing in Mudgee for three days. My feelings through out were consistent, that being the project is just way to short term for the damage and destruction it would cause. As we are farmers/graziers i have so many concerns with what has been proposed. The proposed project will destroy agriculture in our area, if the mine should go ahead our produce would become unsaleable in many cases our prices will drop with dangerous lead being discovered in crops and animals, the animals would be drinking contaminated water and eating contaminated grass which would then get rejected by the abattoir and if not passed onto the consumer with lead poisoning. We have concerns about water security and water quality on our properties, even though the department considers Bowdens Siver has demonstrated they have enough water to meet the demands of the project except during very dry periods. I'm not convinced. How will Bowdens Silver filter our reduced supply of water? We don't want to start having to live with on going risks to health and tolerating regular testing for lead in our soil and water. The properties would lose value, no one wants to live near a mine. We have large trucks and machinery using the Lue Road already and certainly they try to avoid peak times, the roads are winding, narrow, and rough at times with the Tongbong Road entrance of the Lue Road being extremely dangerous for truck drivers, should the road ever get re routed to Rylstone. The noise and lights of the mine all day and night are also a concern for the property. Such fabulous little community's, Lue, Rylstone, Ilford, Mudgee, Glen Alice, Hill End, Gulgong, Dunns Swamp, The Blue Mountains (a world heritage site) Capertee Valley, Wollemi National Park and so on, all serving a purpose. It would be a great shame to destroy these smaller towns and sites that rural Australia is so proud of. We have already seen and heard what happens to small communities when large scale mining developments happen on the doorstep and surrounds. It's been lovely to watch the blossoming of the tourism industry amongst these towns and sites. This would certainly have a detrimental and economic impact on these areas and businesses. What a shame to destroy the agriculture industry and the Tourism Industry. I also have concerns Bowdens Silver Mine could be two kilometers from Lue school, no one in the city would put up with this. I also have concerns with the flora and forna. I'm concerned about acid mine drainage damaging the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur for ever and that the tailings dam cover will not be good enough, the cover has never been done before. We heard several times at the public hearing that the mine has always done everything they can in a safe manner. In my opinion the risk of the cover is to great and it would be unsafe. I also think it's easy for some of the community to get excited and overlook this whole project when they hear the mine could bring economic benefits including jobs, youth training opportunities ,community sponsorships and increased infrastructure and development to our region. They are loosing site of the terrible loss and devastation a mine would bring to our region. Our Children would not be able to farm in this region. In my opinion the mine should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The land on which this mine is proposed , and the land around it in neighboring country is precious and beautiful. It shouldn't be spoiled for commercial greed. However its dressed up in planning reports, that truth is mines such as this are dirty, dusty, polluting and ugly. They are a blot on the landscape. I have cherished my time in this unspoiled rural country for more than 40 years. Please don't allow this unnecessary development to proceed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the coal mine as chemicals can get the the water ways and affect us down stream from Mudgee |
Lidija Pekar
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Other Key Issues that are important to me Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. Lead poisoning and health. Acid Mine Drainage. Contamination of water. Reduced supply of water. Economic Impact to Business. Koala Habitat destroyed. No compensation offered. Loss of property values. There is no safe level of lead for children. Close to World Heritage Sites. Excessive Noise. Excessive damage to local ecology. No consideration of adjacent lands. Noise is the most common cause of community loss. Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. No existing infrastructure to the site. No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. Project location is too close to my home. |
Sarah McDaniel
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My partners family have been living in Lue for over 100 years and it would be such a shame to see the land be harmed in anyway and affect the local community. I regually visit my partners parents in Lue and we plan to bring our baby here when he or she is born. I will not feel safe nor comfortable having my baby exposed to the elements when visiting in Lue incase of any danger or dangerous chemical exposure. -the project location is way too close to the house. -Lue is 2km from the main site -Lead Poisining and health issues |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i do not want this mine in our local area with all the health |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was originally optimistic that the Project would result in a net benefit to the broader community however that optimism has waned with time. A 16 year LOM with those levels of employee numbers will only exacerbate the scheduled economic collapse of the area as it falls in line with other local major employer LOM closure plans. The potential to extend LOM by transitioning to U/G ops after the open cuts is pie in the sky plans at this stage. There is no real validity to this that I can see other than trying to build long term shareholder confidence. I've reviewed the EIS, draft conditions of consent, Silver Mines financials and ASX announcements etc. From my >10 years experience working as an Environment & Community Superintendent in mining approvals, community liaison and operational compliance etc (in the Mudgee district), this project has hairs all over it. Looking at the proposed operational design vs the draft conditions of consent, Bowden's will struggle to comply or be forced to dramatically alter operations in order to maintain compliance. The Bowdens Project can be dressed up with optimism from core samples as much as they want but the reality is that it has a very real chance of bankrupting the company (or whoever develops it if sold)... For a greenfield site, the Mudgee/Rylstone district is far more challenging than basically most of Australia. It appears that these social pressures have not been appropriately factored into the feasibility study. It's easy for these on-going compliance, environmental monitoring and social licence costs/risks to be overlooked when presented with favourable drilling data. On a personal level, our ~500ac farm directly adjoins the mine and we have begun restoring an 1860's Stone Cottage on our property and make a quaint little retreat / family weekender. The looming threat of a mine with its associated Dust, Noise, Traffic, Health Impacts, Blast Damage Risks (the Cottage is within 2km of open-cut) and Adverse Visual Amenity Impacts is not congruent with those dreams or current ambience of the rural Lue area. Additionally, we are heavily reliant on groundwater from a historic well that's approximately 1km from a planned opencut. This well has never run dry and was the only water left on the farm at the end of the 2019/20 drought. Any draw down in that alluvium groundwater source would mean the loss of our only supply of stock and domestic water during the next drought. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There is no safe level of lead exposure. I am concerned re our health, our children and communities health, as well as the impacts on the environment, pristine natural waterways, livestock and wildlife, our community, as well as the effect on known indigenous sites and artefacts. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I grew up in Lue and it make me so upset to see that this mine is meant to go in. It is just up the road from my family’s farm and I am super concerned about the environments impacts that this mine will have. It will be so close to the small villages and this is not fair to the people that live there. |
Merren Turnbull
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerns for neighbouring properties for their water quality and supply. Nearby childrens education site also close by affecting their air quality. |
Brad Wood
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I don’t agree if this mine |
Felicity Griffits
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our family farm is in Lue. On the property lies the ashes of my grandmother, grandfather and their two sons (my uncles). Throughout my life I've seen my family pour years of time, effort and dedication to this farm and I believe the farm's value will become worthless as a result of this mine opening and that the livestock, if sold, would present a risk to human health. I'd even be concerned about visiting given the lead dust contamination and noise pollution. Whilst the mine itself will only be operational for 16.5 years the environmental impact will be irreversible and potentially disastrous. I'm particularly worried about the children in the region as well as the livelihoods of those who depend on tourism and agriculture. Will the owners of the mine be compensating those who see demand for their products and services decline dramatically due to the negative PR and environmental concerns voiced in the press? Will parents and children be able to seek cover for unforeseen medical issues that arise in the long term? Once done, the damage cannot be reversed. I do not believe this mine should go ahead due to it's proximity to the local school, community and farmland. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I object to the proposed development. My family has owned property in the Lue area for more than 25 years. We've been lucky enough to enjoy the peace and beauty of this area, visiting from Sydney, when we can. The proposed development will: - Have significant environmental impacts: this is unarguable, the land clearing required alone will destroy habitats and cause irreparable damage to ecosystems. Not to mention the by-products of the actual mine and the disruption to water tables and water availability. We live in a world where we can see the impacts of climate change, erosion and drought every day, I cannot fathom how this proposal, allowing this damage to take place, can be allowed. Prevention is better than a cure. We can appreciate that silver plays a role in developing electric cars etc negating some of these impacts, but silver is also used to make the latest and greatest iPhone. - Create socioeconomic instability: the proposal outlines some 300 jobs, a portion of which will be filled by locals. Except the local people already have jobs, farms to run, families to raise, futures to make outside of Lue, businesses to start from home etc. This mine will end up employing FIFO/travelling workers from the city, who are there to make a quick dollar and then leave. If this project goes ahead, visitors to Lue won't want to visit - the airbnbs and local businesses will suffer as a direct impact. - Lead: It is appalling to think a mine can be opened 2kms from a school, that can potentially leech toxic lead dust into the lungs of children. This is just not the kind of thing we allow in this day and age. We have a duty to protect our environment and community, but we also have to balance these needs with economic interests. Balance has not been achieved by the proposal - the impact on the environment, local economy and health far outweigh any revenue. |
Sally Dribbus
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The impacts on the community of Lue and the surrounds are immense and this should not be going ahead! Families that have been in this area for many generations should not be subjected to this development! |
Lachie Mcphie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to object to this proposal on a number of grounds. Firstly the process is flawed in that the charter of the Department of Planning is to make sure development proceeds after due process is followed, this bias is not independent and unfairly damages the community’s ability to be fairly heard and their views given the consideration they deserve. There has been no mention within the Sears or EIS relating to Natural Capital, Natural capital being the natural resources that are managed for the benefit of business’s, families and society. It includes soils, remnant native vegetation, productive pasturelands and crop lands, riparian areas, water resources, environmental plantings, domestic and native animals. Natural capital has greater value to society today than any quick mineral fix, these natural resources which include humans are irreplaceable and will be the real resources that will allow the environment to remain diverse and for society to flourish long into the future. In the DPE assessment report they fail to consider the silent value present in natural capital, the report only considers the monetary value of the mine and this fiat contribution to jobs as though this is the holy grail. To add insult they recommend acceptance of a biodiversity offset plan which is so contrary to community standards it beggars belief. Biodiversity offset is robbing peter to pay paul and yet current emerging research shows the significant impact improving all biodiversity has in improving environmental outcomes which will improve society and by default natural capital. Biodiversity as assessed appears to be only concerned with threatened species, yet the potential impact across all species of flora and fauna including insects is alarming. The government is currently creating a biodiversity market showing that they consider this issue of vital importance. I would ask that this issue is considered in your assessment. To approve a new mine which by any measure will have significant effects on the local and broader environment, human and natural must be untenable as the required conditions for approval are based on modelling and assumptions. The failure as evidenced by experts at the community meeting at Mudgee in February show that the conditions imposed are just means of mitigating probable, I stress PROBABLE negative outcomes. The emphasis on mitigation to allow a project to proceed is defeating the potential opportunity to enable true consultation and create solid evidence based outcomes that may alleviate some issues, such as the issues in this assessment regarding deficiencies in water investigations, and methodology for dealing with the tailings dam and acid bearing soils leaching, all having the potential for severe impact on health both human, animal and environmental. Their appears to be a lack of evidence supporting the absolute requirement for these metals, given the short projected lifespan of the mine these resources will be mined, utilised, discarded and the human and environmental damage will remain for a much longer period, lead exposure could filter down through the generations via epigenetic expression, acid leakage could filter through both surface water and underground systems, again leaving long term toxicity. This is are is extremely concerning as they do not appear to have concrete evidence that the proposed plans will work, if and when there is an issue it will be to late, this is the major reason why even conditions of consent are not adequate. Once there is any failure everything is in trouble, water is more valuable to society than minerals which are not absolutely necessary for life, just required so we can enjoy a certain standard of living. Jobs that will be created, where will this workforce come from, where will the experience be found when the resource industry is already struggling under massive labour constraints that will only continue as the world continues growing. This argument is supported by comments re the Ulan mines currently looking for 300 workers, this leads to issues re transport with that many people travelling on narrow substandard roads raising the real risk of more vehicle accidents. To the point around conditions of consent, they are not adequate, this was evidenced at the community meeting in February regarding everything is predicated on modelling rather than considering actual conditions and previous experiences, of note the tailings dam risk of leakage has been shown to be a failure at many other sites and if a catastrophe occurs the damage downstream is not recoverable. Water supply is also deficient in actual quantity once agin from modelling and any sudden intense rainfall event could likely have disastrous overflow impacts as is evidenced by recent flood events across the nation. To summarise I object to this proposal in its current form and ask the IPC to consider wether an economic outcome is really greater than a safe secure regenerating natural capital environment that can benefit society for generations to come. |
Allan Leonard
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowdens Silver Mine - see attached letter of objection |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-objection-letterdocx.docx (DOCX, 24.68 KB) |
Bradley Bliss
Organisation |
Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Members of Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation who have Apical Pre Eurpoean Ancestry to this project area Strongly Object to this Project of Heritage, Health, Environmental and Social grounds. |
Attachments |
wvwacsubmissiontotheipcforbowdenssilveratluepdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 450.77 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is endangering the health of workers, neighbours, the children and staff at the local school and the environment in which we live in. Do you really think the short term benefits of mined lead outweighs the sustained benefits of natural environments and healthy Australian citizens?? |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have personal concerns for lead exposure and pollution and the impact on the environment. It’s also within 5km radius of a school |
Barry Walsh
Organisation |
BirdLife Australia Southern NSW Branch |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
BirdLife Southern NSW's view are contained in the uploaded written submission. |
Attachments |
birdlife-australia-southern-nsw-submission-on-bowdens-silver-mine-february-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 315.65 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our property is directly next to the proposed lead mine site. We are their closest neighbours and I strongly oppose this mine going ahead. My primary concern is the negative health impacts For both our family, the community, our livestock and the wider ecosystems and environment. There is no safe level of lead exposure), and our water quality (both for us, our animals, the wildlife and dependent ecosystems). Our creeks and waterways are pristine - our cattle, ourselves, and our wildlife all drink from this. These waterways are the lifeblood of the ecosystems in our area. This mine will also destroy the beautiful rural community of Lue and will endanger the health of all its inhabitants. For goodness sake - there is a children’s infants school less than 5km down the road (again - no safe level of lead exposure). There are also numerous sacred Indigenous artifacts within the proposed mine site, and others on the surrounding neighbouring properties. To go ahead with this mine, would mean damage, desecration and likely destruction of these culturally important sites. The effects of this mine on the delicate ecosystems will be devastating. We do not want a noisy, dusty, dirty mine next door endangering our health, ruining our community and polluting our environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have previously lived and worked in a town where I saw how lead levels can affect both adults and children. I do not believe this should be built within such close vicinity to farms and schools. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A mine which has the the ability to expose and distribute lead in any way at all is totally unacceptable. Lead is a recognised deadly poison and all ways has been, no amount of profits or supposed benefit to the community from this mine could counteract the dangers caused by opening this can of worms. I live in Rylstone, we moved here many years ago to enjoy this pristine and beautiful environment as did most of the community. I don't want to be part of a profit based society that is willing to risk the health and safety of future generations by destroying this magnificent site for profit. I don't want my one year old grand daughter asking me in a few years why this was allowed to occur, we are but travelers here. Nothing good will come from exposing hazardous materials and destroying a sacred place which should clearly be left alone. |
Kim Cummins
Organisation |
Kim Cummins |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The environmental & potentially hazardous impacts of a lead mine in proximity to small villages, farms, waterways, could be devastating on residents, landholders, our flora & fauna. This Independent Planning Commission cannot allow this mine to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned regarding the development of this new mining site. My concerns are related to the environmental impact, and possible health effects that could come about. The proposed site is fertile farming land with significant water tables leading into major water catchments. Within 5km of the proposed cut site, there is a local primary school, which is just not appropriate. As I'm sure you're all well versed in, the long term health effects of lead poisoning are astronomical. Even small amounts of poisoning can lead to lifelong developmental and cognitive problems, and birth defects |
FERNTREE GULLY RESERVE LAND MANAGER :SUE Pridmore (secretary)
Organisation |
FERNTREE Gully Environmental Reserve Land Manager |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the chance to express our opposition to the proposed developments of the Bowden Silver Mine . Though FTGR is not directly attached to the area planned for the Mine , we remain affected . Our Reserve is part of a far greater area,that provides the habitat, breeding grounds and corridors for our beautiful, and vulnerable Australian Wildlife and plants Bowden's claims are part of this greater area. The Barrigan Heritage Land Reserve, 25.000 hectares, practically connects FTGR with all that goes on within the Barrigan Reserve, which is on Bowen's doorstep. We know this, because our own properties are intertwined with these wild, sandstone areas too. Koalas are re- establishing themselves throughout these areas, recovering from past history of being hunted. Powerful owls have sanctuary here too. These are examples of valued wild life that require large tracts of safe bushland. All plans to harness water and clear further land for this Mine will bring further serious restrictions on the wild life and environment as a whole. 2022 rain and flood events affected this whole region as never before. From Lue to Bylong, and everywhere in between, the chaos of climate destroyed properties, infrastructure, roads, and of course, wildlife habitat, We had to close the very popular FTGR for months, due to these destructive forces if Nature. Personally we too can speak from experience, as we were flooded in for 9 weeks, just recently able to drive on to a public road, and , like others, experienced mini tornado that brought down trees in domino fashion. Our wildlife were traumatised as habitat lost. These flood waters occurred as result of dormant springs and underground water systems were activated. The springs opened up at the top of the ridges around this region and created unprecedented flooding . We know, because the springs on top of Jimmy Jimmy and other ridges, came to life and flooded down the gullies into our own house. We live in a valley east of Pyangle Road, close enough to Lue to hear the Lue Bike track occasionally. These underground water systems have been dried for decades. During the 2021-22 bushfires, all our region was desperately dry, thanks to the 3 years of drought prior to Easter 2022 when the rains began. These dry then wet times have wrought havoc for the wildlife. Little nectar in blossoms, hardly any seeds/nuts on trees, plus wild wind storms, hot and cold roller coasters for food for both wildlife, for fertilisation of flowers, honey for bees, and crops for our farmers Wildlife cannot speak for itself. And so those of us who manage the FTGRLM , try to be a voice for them. We also own our own personal land in which we live and protect our wildlife and trees and plants. We are volunteers, appointed as Board members on Terms of Five years by the Dept. Crown Lands. Our experience ,since the Reserve was officially created in 1994, is that its natural beauty is treasured by the public. It too, like other areas in the Rylstone Area, was badly affected by the latest bushfires, and then the 2022 year of rains and storms. In short, we are living in times of new climatic behaviour, affecting both our natural environment and our expanding needs and demands of the expanding human race. It is well established that us humans need a healthy environment in which to live, but we don't quite understand where or when to stop, or what are our essentials. Except, we do know we are dependent on our natural environment, in one way or another. We have lived here for 50 years, and witnessed the then Lue Silver Mine working towards approval to extract the silver/ lead. We have also witnessed the destruction of the surrounding landscape,as bushland is cleared, and tampered with, and also the destruction of many residents' lives as they have felt they had to leave their homes, for one reason or another . The mining , it is well known, produces much more lead than silver , and scientists have established the extremely serious affects of lead on all things living nearby and down wind.It is hard to fathom the thinking that Lue residents, including children with their lives ahead of them, will not be contaminated. As for the other affects of the .ine only 2 kms from Lue town, they are well documented, and they are not good news. We see there is no real positive aspect of having a silver mine in this area, and too many negatives. These have been covered by other people who have presented the science of a mine that is far more lead than Silver, and the social costs to Lue, very possibly its demise, and the rippling negative effects on the farming industry including the extremely significant organic olive industry. Finally, we believe that our natural environment is intrinsically invaluable, and economically the greatest drawcard to this area,through a variety of tourism, eg BnB, Farm Stays, bush walking, camping, bike riding .Its going from strength to strength. But it relies totally on the protection of our water supplies, our unpolluted skies, our wildlife bushlands, our peace, our roads being safe from wear and tear of mining vehicles, and so on. I end this submission on behalf of the FTGRLM and the beautiful, natural, world of this region, giving reason to our opposition to Bowden's Silver Mine proposals. Susan Pridmore, (Secretary , FTGRLM) |
Michelle Pretty
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
None of the mines in Australia has protected the surrounding areas from contamination, nor properly rehabilitated the site. I therefore object to any new mine until such time as the issues above are rectified. Australia is number one on the world leader board for mammal extinctions. Opening more mines makes no sense |
Cameron Dribbus
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please do not proceed with this mine. It's a very simple argument It destroys the land on which we live for the financial gain of corporations Thank you |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We directly border proposed mine site to the east putting us the closest. Winds are predomently from the west so any dust,lead, noise etc will impact us.l estimate we would be within 2kms of the blasting area so am concerned what impact that could have on buildings. High usage of underground water for washery has the potential the lower our local water table.We run up to 140 head of breading cattle when seasons permit and part of their water supply is from Lawson Creek.As for employment,sure the mine will create jobs,but local businesses can't get employees now let alone tradesman.Local farmers are in the same position. As there is so much unknown regarding this rock crushing mine we are not in favour of the proposal. We depend on our farm for income and are concerned about lead contaminating our cattle and grandchildren and waterways. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reason I am objecting to the mine are for the health of the local people, the serious issue of water resources being polluted. This is a hazardous industry and would impact the people living in the area. Although I don't live there, I do live in rural NSW and I am very aware of the trauma caused by big companies coming into an area and destroying the environment which generations of local people have cared for. If we don't make a stand and prevent this from happening what sort of country will be end up with. The rural areas are Australias greatest asset and the reason people want to visit this country. We must protect it. But even more importantly is the issue of water. Without good water, we are literally finished! How could it even be considered, if it is going to pollute the water. Water is No 1 nothing matters more than water. Stop this mine from going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a mother of young children, viticulturalist/winemkaer and cattle breeder, I strongly oppose this mine as I value first and foremost the health and safety of our children and future generations, the health and safety of our community as a whole, and the pristine environment in which we live. This mine will devastate the environment with negative impacts on water resources integral to the life blood of the region caused by the by-products of lead and zinc. It is a fact that the lead dust can not be contained and worryingly will have a negative impact on our children, our community and the agricultural industry in which we base our livelihood on, Viticulture and beef production. There would be catastrophic effects of the lead dust being ingested not just into the inhabitants of the community, but also into the plants and animals. Our children and community deserve to live in a safe space, free of heavy metals that have been introduced and accelerated within their living environment due to the creation of mines that are driven purely for profit and the benefits of shareholders, not the direct benefit of communities they impact. I urge anyone who is championing this mine to really think about the detrimental consequences it will have on our community. One driven by tourism based on its pure beauty, and Viticulture industry. But most importantly I urge them to think of our health. We live here to maintain and live a clean healthy lifestyle that is positive for our family and the growth of our children. Don't gamble with their and our future. I am certain that they would not want a mine in their backyard. |
Attachments |
img1311jpg.jpg (JPG, 165.07 KB) screenshojpg.jpg (JPG, 112.03 KB) screenshot20230221092533messagesjpg.jpg (JPG, 160.94 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed to the proposed mine development the vicinity of quality rural grazing land and the concurrent impact for property value in this area. In addition I'm concerned regarding the environmental impact near the small community in the area, inclusive of the development being proposed within close vicinity of a school. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i wish to object to this mine bring such health hazard to our local area .Are there not enough mines around here that have so much particles flying in the air for us humans to have to absorb Thelma Large |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed mine because of the negative impact this mine will have on climate change. Our planet is in the middle of a global crisis causing world wide water shortages and this is predicted to only get worse in the future. The Bowden silver mine will use an unacceptable amount of this precious resource (water). |
Bill Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the mine application - it will be a direct threat to my cattle property and livelihood as I am only 10km for the site I also fear for not only my own health but my children and grandchildren |
Philip Carkagis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Phil Carkagis and my wife and I own East Ridge, a property just under three kilometres from the proposed mine site. I am firmly against the establishment of the mine for a number of reasons. Bowdens Silver may give the community comforting words of encouragement about the safety of their intended operation but Australian history demonstrates that companies do not fulfil their obligations and local communities and the environment suffer irreversible damage. Bowdens proposal is for the establishment of a lead mine. Environmentally, establishment of the mine will have long lasting and far reaching effects from heavy metal and toxic chemical contamination of the soil at the mine site and leaching and pollution of Lawsons Creek, from Lue to Mudgee and beyond if the tailings dam were to ever fail or leak. Again, historical evidence of tailings dam failures from uranium mines in Australia’s north to copper mines in the south show irreversible contamination of the environment. Bowden's have no plans to remediate the area after ceasing operation. There is always dust produced from mining operations and I do not believe that the water supply will be sufficient to prevent dust from the site containing lead and other heavy metals contaminating the surrounding farmland. The studies done a number of years ago on wind strength and direction were flawed as the time period was not truly representative of the prevailing weather. As an olive grower, my business will be destroyed by any contamination of the soil or fruit by any heavy metals. Our award winning ,grove which we established twenty years ago will be worthless as there is no provision in any Australian or international standard for olives or olive oil to contain heavy metals. Our property value will plummet as a result. Similarly, our domestic tank water supply will be contaminated and undrinkable. We will have no usable water on the property. This problem of contamination will affect all the surrounding landholders and the residents of Lue. Volumes of ground water taken for mining operations will deplete the current supply and will have an adverse impact on local bores leading to reduced flows or drying of the bores. Our own bore will be affected and may well be dry as a result of volumes of ground water being taken for mining operations. Noise pollution is also an issue with the proposed twenty four seven operation. Despite assurances that the noise level will be reduced during some night hours, the resulting noise will be clearly carried by the wind and heard for kilometres around the area resulting in a significant degradation in quality of life for nearby residents. The roads around Lue will carry significantly increased volumes of heavy traffic. These are narrow rural roads, they have poor alignment in places, they have rough and broken surfaces and they have narrow bridges. An increase in heavy vehicle traffic will cause a very noticeable reduction in road safety leading to an increased risk of major accidents and loss of life. Mudgee and the surrounding area is without doubt a premier tourist destination. And the tourist trail between Rylstone and Mudgee via Lue is well travelled every weekend. The establishment of an open cut mine, as witnessed at Wollar and Ulan is anything but attractive and is something that many visitors would prefer not to see. The estimated benefit to the local economy of establishing a mine is far less than the loss of income to the area if visitor numbers are reduced. I believe that the Bowdens Silver proposal should not be approved. |
Peter Bruton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident of the Mid-Western Region I am strongly opposed to the further development of the Bowden Silver Mine in Lue given the potential hazards and health risks that would occur from the exposure to lead dust and toxic water ingress. The economic impact to the region in all areas of business would be devasting affecting tourism, agriculture and land values. The toxic tailing dam, I understanding, has been untried and untested in its proposed size and posses a high risk of leakage into the Lawson Creek and local water supply of Lue ultimately making its way to Cudegong River, Burrundong Dam and beyond. The testing of lead levels in local residents would be a major health concern and impact the resourses that are already in high demand and inadequate in the region. The flora and fauna in the area will also be greatly impacted by the affect of potential water contaminated as well as the disruption of migration corridors for the local wildlife. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue due to it's close vicinity to residential dwellings, farmland and most importantly schools that educate children in the K-6 age bracket. The existence of an open cut mine that extracts silver, lead and zinc in this area cannot possibly ensure that no exposure to these minerals will occur, and research has shown in particular the negative impacts of regular exposure to lead upon normal development of children. I am not confident that the explanation that there will be minimal impact of lead exposure in the DPE Assessment report based on the proposition that lead already exists in the environment is acceptable. Requiring only a trigger action response is not adequate as any lead exposure for children is unacceptable and irreversible and can have significant impact on the future quality of life for the individual and their carers. The recommendation that Bowdens should undertake regular blood testing and monitoring suggests to me that lead exposure is expected to be a problem and placing the onus on Bowdens to self monitor is concerning. I also believe that the negative impacts that are described in the DPE Assessment Report that relate to loss of farming land, Aboriginal Heritage and social wellbeing are also significant and have been referred to only briefly in the Report with no real consideration to how to actually minimise these impacts. The Report presents these issues as less important than the perceived potential economic benefits that have been overemphasised in order to garner support for the project. This community has already suffered the negative impact of the potential development of the project and I can only surmise that the actual project while have much greater and long lasting negative impacts. |
Jane Friend
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
At some point we just have to say enough is enough.. We have to leave the environment be… we CAN NOT keep digging it up, we have to leave the water alone.. keep our water clean.. Thank you, please do not approve this mine, the Lawson creek is the life line for so many, the Lue Road can not take the extra traffic.. just leave it. Way to much to lose. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our ecosystem, in particular the water table, is so fragile and fluctuating. This mine would be a total disaster |
Rob Gregory
Organisation |
SLOWFOX WINES |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I personally object to the Bowdens Silver mine as owners of land and producers of grapes and reliance on tourism and have concerns of the byproducts and environmental management and impact on our and our children's lives. We are in the Lawson river catchment area. Lists of concerns with the whole community: COMMUNITY How will this mine affects our families and our business in the region. Why is there no plan to regenerate mine after finished. Loss of income from, Grapes, beef, accommodation etc Extra traffic on Lue road and round Mudgee with trucks transporting slurry through Mudgee to Parkes How will tourism jobs be changed in Mudgee, Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Kandos. What will happen to the local Lue school? Will we have to teach our children not to put their hands in their mouths? GRAPE GROWERS & PRODUCERS How the fine lead will affect your grapes, olives, fruit etc? Absorption of this dust through leaves , soil and water. Grapes absorb heavy metals. Fine lead dust is cumulative, especially in cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc Will we need to test for base lines before mine is approved? Ongoing testing of grapes into wine. Who will cover the cost of testing. WATER Irrigation - where is the water coming from to service this mine? There doesn’t appear to be enough to realistically support the project? Our water could be contaminated by fine lead dust and acid mine drainage. Where will we get clean water from if our water tanks, waterways, water collection areas (roofs etc.) and dams are covered in fine lead dust, or pollutants from run off from mine? Who will compensate us for lost clean water? TOURISM If you have an Air BNB, guest house or just guests to your home - will you be able to supply your visitors with a safe environment? Can you supply them with eggs, ‘fresh’ vegies, drinking water, bathing water, local produce without ramifications? Washing cloths and bed linen on contaminated water . Residue will be in fabric. No one wants to visit a region where they may get lead poisoning. How many jobs will be lost if Mudgee become a contaminated town instead of #1 tourist destination two years in a row, will we become the destination town to be avoided at all costs? |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lead is ubiquitous in nature. It affects virtually every system in the body. It can damage the nervous system, the renal, and the reproductive systems, cause high blood pressure, and affect growth and development, psychological behavior, and intelligence. Lead exposure in young children is of particular concern because children absorb lead more readily than adults and the developing nervous system of children is particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of lead. Blood lead levels (Pb-B) as low as 10 μg/dl (microgram/deciliter) are associated with harmful effects on the children’s learning and behavior.[1] Elevated BLL can result in learning disabilities, behavioural problems, and mental retardation. My reson to object to this proposed development is because my grand children hope to raise families in the Lue area as their grandparents did with safety |
Emily Wallace
Organisation |
Cameron Anderson Architects |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed mine is inappropriate to the Local area, which is reliant on tourism & agriculture. The proposed open cut lead, zinc and silver mine could have serious impacts on our health, our water and our livelihoods. |
Robert Smith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident of the Lue area, I am deeply concerned by the fact that Bowden’s mine will affect the environment in many ways. These include fauna and flora biodiversity, contamination of water resources and the constant noise that will be associated with this mine. |
Nicola Boud
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this mine because: 1. Safety: Lead exposure - There is no safe amount of lead exposure. 95,000T of lead will be dug up or exposed in a lovely village, 2km from a primary school. 2. Safety: Toxic Tailing Dam at Lawson Creek - cyanide, arsenic and lead will be in this dam - Leakage is planned in, major flooding like we saw this year could result in a catastrophe. - I do not want to risk poisoning the cudgegong river 3. Adverse impact on other land use and value - this will destroy Lue - this will threaten the entire Mudgee region, currently a thriving tourism and farming community. Even if we believe the claims re job creation in construction and servicing the mine, why is a mining job better than a pre-existing farming job or a tourism job? Who exactly do they think they will recruit given the massive labour shortage? Will they take workers away from existing sustainable operations? I also strongly object to Bowdens cynically cashing in on their sponsorship of the Mudgee Wombats, by asking the club to ask all members to write a submission in their favour. Grubby. I own and operate a vineyard and winery in the Mudgee region. Established in 1969, we have been contributing to the local economy via employment (15 employees plus casuals) and expenditure. If our water is impacted, we will cease to operate. If lead is detected in our grapes through the soils or water we will not be able to operate. Mudgee’s attractiveness as a rural weekend retreat will be undermined by this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a grazier/stockbroker who does not live in the area but has several friends there and visits regularly. I am concerned that this proposal, if approved, will create a dangerous precedent for the approval of mines in this and other agricultural areas. We need to identify and segregate our best farming land so that it cannot be ruined by mining. Food security should have priority over mining rights. This is especially so given the anticipated huge increase in mining that will be necessary due to the planned transition to renewable energy. The claimed economic benefits of this project are not justified by the risks it creates for the environment and the community. The major risk of this project is Acid Mine Drainage escaping to the surrounding environment during mine operation and after mine closure. Of the waste rock excavated during the mine life, 57% is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF). The 30 million tonnes of tailings produced over the life of the mine is also classified as PAF and will contain most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemicals added during ore processing. Some of these chemicals are highly toxic. The tailings will also contain 17-20% of the lead, zinc and silver mined due to losses during ore processing. Other metals present in the tailings will include arsenic, antimony, fluorine and manganese. If these highly toxic metals escape into the water table or into Lawson Creek (which runs into the Cudgegong River, then the Macquarie River, then the Darling River) significant damage could be done to some of the best agricultural land in New South Wales. Heavy metal pollution of river systems accompanies mines like this for hundreds of years after the mine closes. According to the scientific experts, once you disturb a metal sulphide deposit and allow water and oxygen to enter, acid mine drainage occurs and continues until the sulphide is all converted. There is no known solution to this reality, and acid mine drainage can continue for hundreds of years. The EIS is totally inadequate because Bowden Silver downplays the risk of acid mine drainage and fails to outline adequate plans to prevent it happening. The steps outlined by the proponents of the project have been judged by scientific experts to be entirely inadequate to protect the downstream environment. Given this, the project should not proceed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a property owner in Kandos I have been watching the Bowdens Silver mine progress and I am deeply concerned about the process of approval by the Department of Planning and their neglect to ensure that all SEARs requirements are fully met prior to recommendation and consequent potential approval by the Independent Planning Commission (IPC). Referring to the transcript of day 3 of the hearing and Mr Preshaw’s response to Commissioner Duncans questions raised re both the general rules and the specific matters in the SEARS “on both of those fronts, we are comfortable that the EIS addresses both the statutory matters and the SEARs” On review of the SEARs listed in June 2019 the following special matters do not appear to have been addressed in the EIS nor any subsequent submissions by Bowdens: Land – including: An assessment of the compatibility of the development with other land uses in the vicinity of the development in accordance with the requirements of Clause 12 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007, paying particular attention to the agricultural land use in the region; There is no reference to the impact on the Mudgee Tourism industry and the locally established tourist lodges and other establishments such as Louee Motorcross. These land uses have not been considered in any of the submissions and is a failure of Bowdens to meet the requirements of this specific matter listed in the SEARs. Also of note is that there is no review of the economic and job losses that will occur from these industries. Why is a mining job better than a Tourism job? Water – including: an assessment of the likely impacts of the development on the quantity and quality of the region’s surface and groundwater resources (including, but not limited to, Lawsons Creek and Price Creek), having regard to the EPA’s, DPI’s and OEH’s requirements (see Attachment 2A and 2B); - an assessment of the likely impacts of the development on aquifers, watercourses, riparian land, water-related infrastructure, and other water users, including: o a detailed site water balance, including an assessment of the reliability of water supply imported to the site, and management of excess water, supported by sensitivity analysis; and o an assessment of the water quality and management of the imported water, including spill/leak management. Bowdens has not answered the most fundamental of issues required for mining – whether there will be sufficient water for mining operations and for existing water users, together with the level of pollution of surface and ground water from mine activities. There have been two independent technical expert reviews of the submission by Bowdens in this area and both Earth Systems and Shireen Baguley have indicated that these questions remain unanswered. In both reports they indicate that the modelling provided by Bowdens is incomplete and raises concerns re its validity. Both reports conclude that the amount of water available onsite is insufficient for mining operations and existing water users. They both identify that, following the decision to move away from the Ulan pipeline and instead to obtain all necessary water onsite, the volume of water allocated to the incredibly important process of dust suppression was reduced by 1/3 without any explanation for doing so. Clearly the proponent is reserving their severely limited water supply for maintenance of mining operations at the expense of the health of their employees as well as the residents of Lue and surrounds. When challenged with the idea that water may not be available to continue mine operations, Bowdens responded by saying that they would shut down the operations until water was available. Given the recent drought of 3 years, this is a long period of time and is likely to occur again during the early years of the mine. How does this approach support job security, and management of the site while it is shutdown. We would be naïve to think that the closure due to lack of water would be of short duration, ie a couple of hours as indicated by Bowdens, it will likely be for months or years. Both Land use and Water specific matters in the SEARs are not being met. As the independent adjudicator, the IPC must recognise that the response by Mr Preshaw at the hearing, that all SEARS have been met, is not supported by evidence detailed in the expert reports. I urge the IPC to be very cautious in their recommendation based on the comments of Mr Preshaw but to ensure that they undertake a thorough review of the evidence as provided by the technical experts in this area. It would be so disappointing to see the 3 IPC Commissioners become complicit in this misrepresentation of the facts that are so plainly evident. A mine of this size and it’s reliance on water cannot be approved unless all specific matters of the SEARs are clearly and precisely addressed and presented. |
Jacquelyn Johnson
Organisation |
The Nature Conservation Council of NSW |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see file attached. |
Attachments |
230203submissionbowdensilverminepdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 94.82 KB) |
Alexandra Cole
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The building of this mine will impact my friend's family home, the surrounding community, and the environment. The proximity of the proposed mine is a problem. |
Dallas Rheinberger
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My concern is for the health of not only my family but for the whole community. Our dependable water resources, the high possibility of contamination and the question of air quality is at great risk to all in the area being affected. I believe health should come before the greed of wealth. |
JOHN LONERAGAN
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Good afternoon Commissioners, Do any of the "independent" planning commissioners live within 2km from a proposed Silver/lead mine? If so, then I'm sure they will SERIOUSLY consider the objections of the Lue Action Group and its panel of experts as well as other objections to this proposal. If not, then I ask the simple question: Are you really placing yourself in the shoes of the those whose future is at stake here or have you convinced yourselves that the proposal must be approved 'come what may' because it is 'state significant' and a few extra conditions and layers of approval will be enough to discharge your duties as commissioners. Just because the proposal meets the criteria of 'state significant' does not mean it should be approved when compelling and pressing evidence of serious harm to communities is before you. Do you just 'take it into consideration' but come up with the same result? If so then what is the purpose of you as commissioners even playing a role in all this? I don't need to rehash all the submissions and expert evidence that has been laid out before you so comprehensively by the Lue Action Group and its experts. I simply ask how can you possibly live with yourselves by approving such a stinker of a mine so close to an existing village in a farming environment and then drive off back to wherever you come from never to be heard of again but with the permanent knowledge that your actions will destroy the lives and communities around Lue and you had the chance to stop it happening but chose not to. If you don't live with 2 km from an existing/proposed lead mine, why don't you place yourselves in the position of the community that does and assess this proposal from their prospective. Thank you John Loneragan Mudgee and former Lue resident for over 35 years |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My objection to the proposed Mine development has been made with findings from Chris Pavich - a well-respected local geomorphologist. A geological fault line exists below the proposed Bowdens Silver Tailings Storage Facility (TSF). Faults have the potential to transmit large volumes of water. Any failure of the TSF liner could lead to flowthrough of water with pollutants to Lawson Creek. Five hundred or more years of continuing integrity of this liner is essential but cannot be assured to avoid this outcome. This is significant for Gulgong folk because... Lawson Creek enters the Cudgegong River downstream of Mudgee domestic town water supply intakes. However Gulgong draws its domestic town water from the Cudgegong River downstream of the Lawson Creek confluence. Consequently the planning and management of Bowdens Silver project facilities is of critical significance to Gulgong and Mudgee residents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
With such a fragile ecosystem sitting below this potential toxic disaster, common sense would hopefully prevail in stopping this. Time to stop thinking about the dollar and think about the future of our water supply and environment. |
Olivia Ritchie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lead dust has terrible effects on the health of the community |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Water is the most important resource and we cannot let Bowdens use it for their own benefit that doesn't benefit anyone else! Not only will they use water we don't have, they will potentially taint the water that feeds our precious town. We cannot let this happen!! |
Fred Wheeler
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a landholder with a home 15km from the proposed mine site. I object to the location of the mine and its proximity to Lue village, particularly Lue Public School. I am concerned about noise from the mine impacting the children at school. I am worried about the impact of lead dust on the children's development. It is universally accepted that there is no safe level of lead exposure for people and it has a greater impact on children. I am concerned about the truck movements past the school and the safety of the children. I object to the detrimental effect of the mine on the peaceful enjoyment of my property. I believe noise from the mine will directly affect me. I rely on rainwater harvested from my rooves for drinking water. This will be contaminated by dust containing heavy metals and will impose an unacceptable additional burden on me to maintain the rainwater harvesting system beyond what is currently required. I object to the volume of water that will be required to be drawn from Lawson's Creek and groundwater. Lawson creek quite often runs dry at my crossing and can ill afford to have more water drawn from it. I object to the destruction of ever-dwindling koala habitat. I object to the destruction of a number of already endangered floral species. Lue Rd is narrow with poorly formed shoulders and the increase in B-Double movements will pose a serious risk to other road users, particularly the many cyclists that use the road. I object to the proposal to have only one tailings dam and its location above Lawson Creek. Failure of the dam poses an unacceptable risk to the environment of Lawson Creek and all the water downstream. Lack of maintenance on the site beyond the life of the mine increases this risk. Acid Mine Drainage poses a similar risk and trying to mitigate this risk with builder's plastic is unacceptable. This will burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. I object to the destruction of aboriginal sites and artefacts. I object that there is no proposal for the rehabilitation of the site. I object that a number of conditions of approval appear to be proposed without detail from the approving authority or commitment from the proponent. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. |
Hannah Bruton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This will ruin a community DO NOT GO AHEAD |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I refer to the State Significant Development Assessment SSD 5765 which confirms that the current proposal would disturb approximately 381.17 ha of native vegetation of which 180.17 ha of this vegetation meets the definition under the BC Act for the critically endangered ecological community (CEEC) White Box, Yellow Box, Blakely’s Red Gum Woodland (Box Gum Woodland). 146.72 ha of this community also meets the definition of a CEEC under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Project's biodiversity assessment report admits that the Project could impact 13 threatened species that are listed as ecosystem credit species and six threatened species that are listed as species credit species, including Koala, Silky Swainson- pea, Small Purple-pea, Large-eared Pied Bat, Squirrel Glider and Regent Honeyeater. The State Significant Development Assessment also admits that Box Gum Woodland is distributed across the site, and accepts that there are limited opportunities to further avoid the woodland. The Department of Planning and Environment confirmed that the project is considered likely to have a significant impact for Box Gum Woodland and Regent Honeyeater however these impacts would be acceptable with the implementation of the proposed biodiversity offset strategy. Biodiversity Credits are simply an excuse to be used where it is clearly shown and agreed by all parties that a project will have a significant impact on endangered communities. My objection to this proposal is that the Assessment disregards the admitted impact on critically endangered ecological community in favour of what it perceives to be the public good. The purpose of identifying classifying endangered communities and species is to protect them against projects such as this, for their own, rather than the public good. Biodiversity credits will not bring back the lost communities, and as such this is a very sad loss for a short term gain to the "public good". I submit that the proposed project should not be allowed to mine within the area of land that is specified as critically endangered. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Object to the Bowdens Silver Mine Project - see attached my letter of objection |
Attachments |
mine-submission-elizadocx.docx (DOCX, 19.67 KB) |
Joe Newham
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerned about air quality as we are not Far East of the site, use water tanks for drinking water, Zinc and Lead dust with prevailing westerly winds. I'm concerned about water quality in Lawson creek, run off in times of flooding as we saw in 2022. Road traffic through towns on a road network in poor condition. |
Douglas Robertson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver Mines Ltd (SVL) proposal to mine in the Lue area is a simple case of wrong mine wrong place. The Lawson Creek catchment is a sensitive resource that is strategically important to the Agricultural industries in the catchment that rely on the water source. The Lawson Creek catchment has been sustainably managed by the local farming community for many years and cannot safely or sustainably cope with the added demands of this competing and destructive extraction industry. In addition the potential risk of contamination to the waterways and local community is unacceptable. The independent consultant engaged by DPE itself outlined serious concerns regarding proposed management of acid mine drainage. This proposed mine will cause irreparable damage to this already sensitive water source. The potential risk of contamination will destroy the livelihoods of many farming businesses that have been operated for generations on these lands as well as present health risks to the local community. Any level of exposure to lead is an unsafe level. It’s important that the NSW Government and the Planning department value our Agricultural food producing land and water and protect it for a sustainable future; and protect the health of our communities and not destroy either for short term mining industry gains. I oppose this mine in this location. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. I have made submissions for the EIS and the two amendments. I have been a Lue resident for 30 years. My property is one of the closest to the project and has a Lawson Creek frontage of just under one km. My property will be affected by noise, light and air pollution, elevated lead levels, the effect on the creek, and powerline views. Due to my concerns for my property, community and environment, i strongly oppose the development. The EIS, amendments and DPE assessment have not allayed my concerns. There seems to be contradictory information within each of the documents, lack of management plans and no firm decisions made about site maintenance after the project finishes and doesn't meet the principles of ecologically sustainable development. It has not been stated who will manage the TSF or monitor it in perpetuity. For there to be any chance of failure of the TSF is not in keeping with the precautionary principle of intergenerational equity. This project is a risk to the continued existence of critically endangered vegetation communities and species. Also, efforts of groups or individuals will be undermined as they work to protect biodiversity. There are numerous flaws in the proposal. On behalf of the community, Lue Action Group has engaged experts to review EIS, Amendment and Assessment documents, please refer to these for technical aspects. DPE Assessment. 3.2, point 18... i accept the need to move from energy produced by coal/gas but we cannot destroy the environment to save it. We cannot continue to see the demise of environment and community as we have seen in coal mining. 3.2 point 27...consideration of future expansion is required as there will be further environmental impact. point97..Lawson Creek flow, below Hawkins Creek has been overestimated at 19.5ml/day. Flow studies have never been conducted on the creek, with flow studies of the Cudgegong river above Rylstone being used, being highly inappropriate due to different geology, rainfall, catchment etc It is typical for Lawson Creek to have no surface flow at times, especially in summer. In the recent drought, by end of 2019, on my section of the creek, there was no flow and no seepage. (please see attached image).In October 2022 we had two major flood events, with the creek rising here, around 4 metres, with considerable inflows from Prices Creek ( site of WRE) and Walkers Creek (site of TSF). For further technical details, refer to Earthsystems Surface Water Report and Shireen Bagleys report(points 132-140) point 109...Bowdens project, being marginal, would not tolerate a decrease in processing rate(water supply being a prime factor) Point 116-121..Dr Peter Serov--"stygoeclogia" states the section on stygofauna is incorrect, please refer to Lue Action Groups "IPC Stygoeclogia Review Submission" point 141...water quality and acid mine drainage has been covered in detail by Earthsystems and LAG's submission "WRE TSF and final void" point 161... to claim that Lawson Creek is already degraded is no excuse to allow seepage into the creek, there are significant numbers of users of the water for domestic purposes, it is appalling that DPE supported this statement. point193...water supply has always been a major issue for this site, all previous owners stated there was inadequate water for the project to proceed. e.g. Kingsgate proposed (1) transporting ore to the old cement works at Kandos and using water from Dunns Swamp.....not viable.. (2) water pipeline from Ulan Coal...unable to guarantee supply (3) water pipeline from Cudgegong River....not viable. 6-2 Health And Amenity point 208... information required to assess dust transmission to the village is hidden or excluded, and insufficient to validate the conclusion that Lue would not be affected. Bowdens claim that residents will not be affected by airborne contaminants, particularly lead particulates. This conclusion is based on insufficient data, underestimated levels of community exposure, and, overlooks ore and tailings as sources of exposure. There is no accepted level of lead, we should not be exposed to any lead or heavy metal particulates. Blood test analysis is too late, the damage has already occurred. Lead has been removed from paint, petrol etc - so why should we tolerate it being added to our environment? Amenity... Submissions have been made by Professor Noller and Professor Taylor in regard to amenity. Noise is the factor that drives residents from communities. Not just noise, but the anticipation of noise, how long it will last, the stress of reporting exceedances, as well as the effect on mental health. Noise increases risk of ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, sleep disturbance and mental health issues. Noise modelling can be shown to be incorrect on many occasions, e.g. Wollar , Cumbo Valley, Wilpinjong. Lue is approximately 100mt downslope in elevation of the site, making it and my property vulnerable to ongoing unacceptable noise and dust impacts. My home faces a gully that runs right to the SW corner of the proposed pit. point 262..the community was informed for many years that the plant was to be fully enclosed in a sound proofed building (refer to EIS Noise Report by Wilkinson/Murray, point 3.4(risk assessment)). point 264..modelling would be affected by the under estimation of equipment used. point 280..mitigation such as double glazing and air conditioning are not suitable for my home, being a mudbrick, passive solar house. point 305..my property will be affected by the realignment of the powerline. Presently i have no view of any 500kv powerline or towers. 364.. The SIA is outdated. It was attended before the EIS and two amendments. Bowdens conducted a survey in 2022, where one was required to apply to do the survey and selected applicants were paid $100 to complete the survey. 376..any exposure to metals as a result of the project is not acceptable, negligible is not nil! 377.. to state "the perceived risks are high", does not acknowledge that a significant number of residents have researched this project(and others) and that is why they have concerns. 379.. the community does not want to be in the situation where they continually have to be aware of monitoring and take blood tests...the solution is----no mine. 385.. since this SIA, it is a fact that the region has undergone a housing crisis, being extremely difficult to secure a rental property and the cost of buying has increased markedly. 387.. medical services in Kandos/Rylstone are very limited, with the "hospital" being a multi purpose facility. Services are also stretched in Mudgee. 408.. it has been stated that in drought periods, processing would need to decrease due to water availability. There would be an effect on employment, causing stress, anxiety and uncertainty for employees with financial commitments. 417..box gum woodland is one of the rarest ecological communities in Australia. In the central west, 95% has been removed. Clearing box gum woodland contravenes the recovery plan which seeks to negate net loss of this ecology. The relatively large remnant woodland at Lue is highly significant, and vital to Regent Honeyeaters and koalas for foraging. NSW and Federal govt's recognise the extinction crisis of species, to remove the vegetation is not in keeping the objective. 418.. these studies show a rich diversity of flora/fauna species and threatened species. It will take hundreds of years to reestablish these communities. 422.. there are significant areas where the vegetation has not recovered due to the heat of the recent fires. 424..critically endangered ecological communities from which trees have been removed, are considered important and as such are afforded legal protection. 425.. a report 30/08/22 by NSW Auditor General shows that NSW biodiversity offsetting scheme is failing to protect threatened species and without urgent changes, ongoing clearing for development will drive further extinction 434..a number of studies here were attended at the wrong time of year. 438.. there will be a net loss of box gum woodland and fauna. Assessment of koalas has been insufficient, it was minimal and underestimates the use of the site as a corridor. Numbers of sightings are incorrect and requires updating. Lue area is known as a key koala area and this project is at odds the objectives of koala recovery programmes. Please refer to the EIS public submission by P&J Smith, ecological consultants. 467.. The resource may be high tonnage but is low grade, and, the federal department, Austrade, does not regard silver or zinc as critical minerals. Aboriginal cultural heritage... It has been ignored that aboriginal parties consider all sites to be of high cultural significance. Wellington valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Co-operative is not in agreement with the findings of Heritage NSW and their concerns remain re. the assessment methods and consultation. DPE technical guidelines are not equitable, e.g. noise policy for industry and Vlamp- they favour the proponent. it appears that DPE has failed to consider the advice from Lue Action Group experts. The community feels they were not considered and the whole process is indeed complicated for the general public. Due space constraints, i have attached a file with further comments regarding noise I strongly oppose this project.... thank you |
Attachments |
conditions-of-consent-1pdf.pdf (PDF, 497.41 KB) lawson-creekpdf.pdf (PDF, 710.12 KB) wilkinsonmurraypdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 384 KB) |
David Matthews
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The destruction of aboriginal artefacts and the open cut mining of lead ore will be detrimental to every one Please find some where else to destroy. |
Karen Maccallum
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I purchased a property in Mudgee in 2018 based on the Central West being – and the Mudgee region in particular – a community and environment focused on physical and mental wellness, recognised as the agricultural gourmet heartland of NSW, an emerging wine and food hub, a tourism magnet and for the physical health benefits that come with country living. I present this submission from a pragmatic perspective, strongly objecting to approval of the application for what is fundamentally a LEAD mine. I am a businesswoman who supports innovation, development when managed properly and opportunities for growth and employment, however that cannot come at the expense of sustainability and the health of our land and our people. I attended the Public Hearings in Mudgee and I have read the DPE’s Assessment Report and Recommendation, the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by R.W. Corkery & Co, the Macquarie University report prepared for the Lue Action Group and other expert reports relating to the proposed Bowden Silver (Lead) Mine. Although 70% of the revenue will come from silver extraction, 42% of the extraction will be lead and as documented by experts with far more knowledge than I, there is NO SAFE LEAD EXPOSURE for children (noting a primary school only 2km from the proposed mine) and adults. One deeply disturbing fact coming out of my research is the DPE’s willingness to recommend approval for a project at a greenfield site prior to having detailed Management Plans that would set out how a range of factors relating to this project would be managed, either as part of establishment and running of the project, or in the event something goes pear-shaped and urgent remedial action is required. Unless I’ve missed something in my review, the DPE approval is recommended with the expectation that the Applicant will, at some later date, provide full details for the following – Water Management Plan, Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Management Plan, Noise and Blasting Management Plan, Management of Cyanide, Disaster Management Plan, Heritage Management Plan, Rehabilitation Management Plan, Fire Management Plan, Landscape Management Plan and Accommodation and Workforce Strategy. It is incomprehensible that such critical information was not required from the Applicant as part of the analysis to inform the DPE so they could comprehensively determine the health and social impact on the local community, prior to providing a recommendation. In reviewing the process for other mining applications in the local area, I note a “Preliminary Regional Issue Assessment Report” was required as part of the process for the Hawkins and Rumker Coal application (as required under the Strategic Release Framework for Coal and Petroleum Exploration) on the edge of Wollemi National Park. If such a report is required for a coal mining application to determine the local impact, how can it be argued that a similar report is not required for what is fundamentally a LEAD mine with as many (or more) risks than that presented by a coal mine. Particularly when the application is for a greenfield site and incompatible with current land use. At a time when pressures on our health system continue to grow, it is inconceivable the NSW Government would consider approving a LEAD mine just 2km from a primary school and village, 30km from a major tourism hub and in the middle of prime agricultural land where there is no guarantee the impact of the lead exposure will not filter into our food and water supplies. How does this align with the Premier’s Priorities of “striving for health and wellbeing and environmental resilience”, “improving the health system by reducing preventable visits to hospital by 5% by caring for people in the community” and “well connected communities with quality local environments”? Other considerations that negatively impact the region are sourcing enough people to fill the vacancies (local businesses across all industries are struggling to find staff), finding accommodation to house people brought in from elsewhere (as much as the Applicant is claiming to want to employ locals the reality is we don’t have the population to support this) and additional pressure on roads that are already suffering from significant wear and tear with erosion and potholes that are damaging the locals’ vehicles. The EIS prepared by R.W. Corkery seems to have several unanswered questions and missing information, resulting in this project not currently being in an “approvable” state. I find it inconceivable that the DPE could ignore that, and recommend approval. It would be staggering for the IPC to compound that error by endorsing the recommendation with the application in its current form. A recommendation to approve this project appears to be a very short-sighted grab for cash. The royalties will be welcomed by NSW Government, but at the expense of the local agriculture and tourism industries, physical and mental wellbeing of locals and irreversible damage to biodiversity, water security and quality, and an environment and reputation built on being a clean, healthy place to raise a family and visit to experience quality country living. When 42% of the extraction will be lead it’s misleading to call this a silver mine. Taking 70% of the revenue from silver doesn’t change that fact. Should the IPC believe approving this lead mine is justifiable (although not in the best interests of the environment or local communities), at the very least additional conditions should be applied to the Applicant as set out very succinctly in Tom Combs’ closing presentation at the Public Hearing on Friday 17 February. The additional conditions he proposed are more than reasonable and might go some way to mitigating the glaring risks that are currently presented by this application. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There are already jobs in Mudgee that can't be filled, why do we need more jobs that also won't be filled and where are these people going to live? This mine can not go ahead! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I want to object to the development of the mine because it will possibly effect the quality of my drinking water as I have to collect it from my roof and store in rainwater tanks. I've worked in the mining industry for 38years and the end result of mining is never the same as what is proposed in their submissions to develop. |
Rainer Rhedey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dangerous lead exposure not only to the local school and community but also to the many tourists who now frequent the area. Increased traffic, dust and noise, Lue Rd is already unfit for the amount of traffic and heavy vehicles that traverse it, this project will only make that worse. Threats to water security, there are already issues with water supply to locals and this project will only make that worse. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Gooree Park Group of Companies |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that the independent assessment made by Macquarie University in this matter has merits . A lead mine will be devastating for Lue and its surrounding areas creating issues not only on the groundwater and surface water flows but also affecting the landscape of the region . |
Manon Garnock
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My concern with this project is the impact it will have on the health of the community surrounding the mine especially as the planning do not impose significant controls or protection for the community. The long term affect it will have on agriculture in the local area, as the lead is not only toxic to humans but to animals as well. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am the owner of Blue Wren Farm, a working farm with an onsite restaurant and wedding venue. We have enormous concerns about the Bowdens mine going ahead due to the impact it will have on the environment, and subsequently on the tourism industry here in Mudgee. We rely on tourism for our business, and the mine would have an extremely negative impact on our tourism industry. This is a lead mine. Bowdens' own projected ore volumes show 50 times more lead than silver will be produced over the life of the mine. There are no safe levels of exposure to lead. The data Bowdens uses in it’s project proposal underestimates community exposure levels of lead. It ignores concentrate, mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust and fails to analyse the effect of peak wind events. We also have great concern over the long term socioeconomic impacts of the mine, and what it will do to Mudgee as a region. In my opinion the recommended conditions of consent do not adequately prevent, mitigate or offset the adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a person who was brought up in the area (my Grandfather once owned the Lue Hotel, and I have many friends and family still in the area ) I dont think enough has been done (or considered) with regard to either the biodiversity or impact on local residents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Mudgee regions and surrounds are a major tourist drawcard with natural beauty and fresh air and waterways. If this open cut mine is allowed to go ahead, the area will face irreversible damage, environmental pollution, tourist loss and a major loss of its beauty. This must be reviewed and stopped for current and future generations. |
Tim Rohr
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the following concerns must be addressed in a satisfactory manner which would lead to the conclusion that this mine proposal has too many risks to the Cudgegong valley’s environment and wellbeing of it’s residents and could have a devastating impact on the tourism businesses of the region once our waters and produce become polluted . Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine which could have serious impacts on our health, our water and our livelihoods. Lead is toxic to humans, and it's a universally accepted fact that there is no safe level of lead exposure for people. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report. Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. The mine will be situated approx. 2 kilometres from Lue village and primary school. Mined materials and processing chemicals will be moved by B-Double truck, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee. Of the 52 aboriginal artefacts surveyed on the site, 25 will be destroyed if the mine proceeds. Thank you for consideration of the community’s concerns and please stop this from being developed. |
Lynda Tooth
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned that mineral mining may degrade the water courses in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Surely the preservation of the environment, community and local area is of more benefit to humanity than increasing the balance sheet of BOWDENS SILVER PTY LIMITED What the proposed mine means for the people of Lue: Having to choose between tolerating unmitigated noise and dust or living in a fully enclosed (air conditioned) dwelling. Living with on-going risks to health, and tolerating regular testing for lead in soil and water. Anxiety due to risks to health, particularly affecting young people and potentially realising adverse health impacts had occurred. Loss of many amenities of a rural way of life, including home grown food, open windows, line clothes drying. Loss of sense of place and visual amenity. Anxiety due to loss of property values, and inability to realise the previous capital value of homes and property because of the proximity of the mine. Loss of permanent residents despite the fall in the property values. Water: Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Please do not proceed with this mine – it is a disaster waiting to happen. The damages completely outweigh any perceived benefits. |
Simone Kurtz
Organisation |
Balmoral |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this proposal mainly because of the significant and unpreventable danger of an envronmental disaster that the large amounts of lead may cause. I live approx 20 kms from the site but there is lot of people who will be affected in Lue along Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong. Surely such a proposal in a pristine area is ludicrous. Please reject this proposal no matter how much money is thrown at it. Where are the profits going? |
Attachments |
053a9282bjpg.jpg (JPG, 7.83 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lead dust and acid rock drainage exposure will destroy that lovely part of the world, and we must try to protect whatever is left for future generations, agriculture, tourism, and for flora and fauna to flourish..enough damage has been done to countryside already! |
Kate McKittrick
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have many concerns in relation to the proposed Silver Mine at Lue, NSW however will focus my submission on one main personal concern. Exposure to dust. I have previously worked on a mine site so I know first hand the fine particles of dust the workers and local residents are subject to. Four years ago I suffered a health crisis and am now required to live in a dust free environment. If the silver mine goes ahead I will be put in the position of having to move and considering I am now Vision impaired this is a stressful, expensive and overwhelming process. I have read through the documentation and believe that Bowden’s information on dust is based on insufficient data and that they have completely underestimated the levels of dust we as a community will be exposed to. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
n/a |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Serious impacts on our health, our water and our livelihoods and overall environment |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear IPC I oppose the proposed Lue Mine. I have spent my time between Sydney and Olinda, which is close to Lue, for over 15 years. I am a researcher and engineer. I have been part of the Rylstone and Olinda community and worked, lived-in, and explored the area. The warm, close and diverse community; the exceptional scenic value; the natural environment and the wildlife it supports; and the community in the area are something I care about. Lue and surrounding communities support a vibrant and diverse local economy. These elements will be irreversibly changed if the Lead mine goes ahead in the area. *Environmental and water concerns The visual amenity also provides a home to some significant flora and fauna. On our property we have a number of protected and threatened fauna, including Gang-Gang Cockatoo, Glossy Black Cockatoo, Scarlet Robin, Powerful Owl, Spotted-tailed Quoll and Yellow-bellied Glider. Below I outline my key concerns and reasons I ask the Department to not approve the mine The environmental impacts of the mine are concerning. This includes threats to Lawson Creek, the Cudgegong river connected groundwater, threats to other water users and agricultural production. Water access is an ongoing issue for farmers in the region. Like others in the region, the property I have worked on continued to struggle through the recent drought. I am concerned about the spring fed dams on ours and other properties in the area. It’s hard to imagine that in times of water scarcity and unpredictability we are considering an industry that consumes roughly 5 megalitres of water every day. What will happen in our next drought if there is a mine using so much of our water? *Impacts on visual amenity The mine threatens the visual amenity of the area, and is part of a broader cumulative environmental and amenity impact of mining in the region which can be seen in nearby Mudgee. New open cut mines risk transitioning the area from an exceptional area of farming, wineries, National Parks to a mining region. This comes with significant impacts: clearing, dust, noise, clearing etc. The result is an impact on the environment and threats to the tourist and agricultural-based economy the area supports. *Social and economic impacts I’m concerned about the social impacts of mining, particularly impacts on the social fabric of the area. This is field I specialise in. The social amenity of the area will be negatively impacted by the proposed mine should it go ahead. The unique natural environment also supports a similarly unique community of people. Mining may bring temporary jobs, mainly for people from outside the community. However, any potential jobs related to mining also come at significant costs. This includes a loss of social capital within the towns. Previous research on mines in smaller towns has shown the loss of care between citizens associated with mining . This is likely to be particularly the case in the area because of the recent trauma from bushfires. In addition, new mines are likely to place stress on the limited housing in the area, driving up prices and making the area unaffordable for the poor and vulnerable and people who have long-lived in the area. On a personal note, I’ve seen in Mudgee how mining can take over the economy of a town and undermine the social fabric of a community. Unfortunately, the economy tends to shape itself around mining creating an economic and social polarisation. I believe it’s partly to do with the inevitable disconnection with the land that supports us as it’s subject to blasting, excavating, and polluting from mining activities. Experience in other locations show a focus on mining can be damaging, creating social dislocation along with impacts on the natural environment. The mining industry is environmentally destructive, but people continue to work and value it as an industry often because it’s viewed as the only option. Such impacts are socially destructive to a sense of place as well as distorting local economies. Impacts on social cohesion are not something that can be ‘fixed’ through community grants provided by mining companies. This does not offset the damage that is done. *“Mining jobs” rhetoric ignores the diverse actual and potential local economy Positive impacts from mining are generally economic focussed, creating jobs and economic inputs into a region. Although these are often “boom” or “bust” industries, I acknowledge jobs and economic inputs are an important outcome. Mining ignores the diverse skills, talents and natural, physical, heritage and cultural assets contained within the region, many of which are latent and could be leveraged as alternative and diverse forms of economic opportunities with limited support. Use and support of these assets can in turn support resilience and flourishing in a community. We are starting to see some of these in the region, for example, creative approaches to tourism , farming of unique crops , promotion of local food producers , and alternative energy production (solar farms) that emerge ‘bottom-up’. I would like our young people in the area to enjoy and be sustained by the land which has supported the community. I want our farmers to not be forced to battle a desctructive, extractive industry after just going through the trauma of bushfires. I'd like the elders of the area to not see their community change drastically and their rents rise. As our government / public servant representatives, please rejecting any Lead mining or exploration in Lue. --- 1 Lockie, S., Franettovich, M., Petkova-Timmer, V., Rolfe, J. & Ivanova, G. 2009, ‘Coal mining and the resource community cycle: A longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 330–9. 2 Franks, D.M., Brereton, D. & Moran, C.J. 2010, ‘Managing the cumulative impacts of coal mining on regional communities and environments in Australia’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 299–312. 3 www.bubbletentaustralia.com 4 https://www.caperteesaffronaustralia.com.au/ 5 https://www.rylstonestreetfeast.com.au 6 https://www.mudgeeguardian.com.au/story/4818727/new-solar-farm-is-planned-for-region/ 7 Jotzo F, Mazouz S, Wiseman J.(2018). Coal transition in Australia. Preparing for the looming domestic coal phase-out and falling export demand. 8 https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/coal-s-days-are-numbered-top-government-adviser-says-20181022-p50b50.html?_ga=2.35144289.132708839.1540756960-1194319978.1538859968 |
Julia Tierney
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
If this mine is open cut it will impact environmentally with dust, noise, and destruction, not only the area it covers but for an even larger area surrounding it. Even if it is underground it will still impact and dust will still blow from it, poisoning the people, landscape, farm and native animals, crops. The ugly site of it along the tourist drive between Rylstone and Mudgee will not create more jobs for the area, but destroy them. Who wants to be out and about enjoying the regions natural beauty when you have to be forced off the road with giant noisy, dirty trucks wanting to overtake you. The time for a development like this disappeared at least 10 years ago. The region has moved on from needing such a mine. The area has gained many tree changers since, who have moved to the area for peace and quiet, people who are interested in organic farming and enjoying nature. Being in a tourist region with easy access from Sydney, there is plenty of clean work. People do not have to risk their health working in a filthy, toxic mining site. Mining silver, lead and zinc is not a vital need for the community, nor the nation. It is more dangerous and undesirable than useful. |
Anita Hood
Organisation |
InToTheWild Escapes |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
IPC hearing Letter I am writing today to express my strong objection to Bowdens Mine. I have owned my property since 2016. My husband and our two children have a strong attachment to our place and it’s surrounding areas. And my property is only a mere 5.75km away from Bowdens Mine. We are active contributors to the region - we run a successful alpaca farm and operate a thriving sustainable off-grid accomodation farm stay. We decided to partner with a well known nation-wide tourism brand, IntoTheWild Escapes, so that we could combine this vision and ethos of sustainable tourism to our region. Furthermore, InToTheWild Escapes significant social media following appealed to us - with a total of 130,000 followers, we knew people would be instantly drawn to the region. It is clear that regional tourism is the rapidly increasing in popularity. It is a huge movement and it is the future. I have also attached links/images so that you can see the full picture of our business. Ultimately, we provide sustainable, off grid high end luxury escapes to people who need remove themselves from the every day stresses of city life. We have had well known, reputable people stay at our place - chefs, artists, TV presenters and journalists. And, along with other accomodation stays in our area, our business is booming. In fact, to keep up with demand, we have considered expanding our business on our property with another off-grid stay. We have had months where we are fully booked; a conservative estimate would be that we welcome between 400-500 guests annually. We always employ locally - water cartage services, plumbers, electricians and handymen and other tradespeople. We purchase firewood from local suppliers. We employ a local cleaner and various tradespeople to help maintain our business. We are in constantly making monetary transactions with local businesses to keep our own business going. And in doing so, we are keeping those jobs going. The typical profile of our guests would be that they are high earning professionals from Sydney. Our guests visit Lue, Rylstone and Mudgee and appreciate the beauty and peace of the natural surrounding landscapes. They also enjoy spending their time in front of a camp fire by the stillness and silence of the stars. They are eco-conscious and climate passionate. And they love to spend big dollars in our region. Not just because they have the money to do so; they do so because they understand the value of our region, they seek natural landscapes, they appreciate being part of the inherent beauty and peacefulness of our region. Thus, the flow on effect is significant - they visit wineries, cafes, restaurants and other tourist attractions. I can say with certainty that my business contributes greatly to the economic success of the region. However, it is abundantly clear that these same guests DETEST mining. And let’s face it- how can these guests even consider a getaway to a place where this monstrosity sits only 5.75km away? The idea is incongruous and paradoxical - it makes no sense. The irony of an nature getaway within a stone’s throw of lead and zinc mine does not or will not go unnoticed. It’s simply impossible for these two to co-exist. Not now, not ever. So, in planning my submission, I looked to Bowden’s response to this and more importantly, the DPE’s justification of sacrificing the “tourism” of the region when they made the mine “approvable.” However, to my bewilderment and surprise, this issue appeared to be largely ignored. In fact, the word “tourism” was barely mentioned in the public documents. This has left me wondering then - who will compensate me and the surrounding businesses when we can no longer operate if the mine goes ahead? And when it cripples us, it will cripple the region. I am also critical of Bowdens acknowledgement of 25 indigenous cultural sites to be removed and then placed in a “keeping place.” The DPE also seemingly found this a satisfactory resolution. My husband, who is of Indigenous heritage, finds this unfathomable and unacceptable. We would like to know why Bowdens considers this as a sensitive and thoughtful gesture, as it indeed is not. To say we are really unsettled about this interference of sacred sites, is an understatement. We strongly believe that Bowdens and the DPE have downplayed the enormity of removing and tampering with these sites. The environmental impacts need to also be considered. The fact that DPE acknowledges that ’the vegetation in and around the site also provides a habitat for a variety of fauna’ and that clearing of ‘180.7 ha of vegetation meets the BC ACT for critically endangered’ means that approving this mine is unacceptable and likely to cause irreversible damage. Finally, the health impacts to the community must NOT be ignored. It is ludicrous that Bowdens and DPE have agreed that there will be minimal health impacts from exposure to lead dust, despite the contrary evidence from several experts. Again, the data and awareness we have about lead dust, as per WHO’s guidelines, states ‘ there is no level of exposure to lead that is known to be without harmful effects’ (who.it 31 August 2022) . The risk is too great for our community. Health and well-being far outweighs a promise of “jobs.” I urge the IPC to PLEASE reject this mine as there are too many risks if this project goes ahead. I hope the IPC is sensible and sensitive to the community - the only way is the reject this mine. We deserve the right to be healthy and safe, free from all the anxiety, stress and fear that comes with having a mine next door. We MUST do what is right and ethical. And to those who support this project, how would you feel knowing this was in your backyard? |
Attachments |
132e34466ece47fda1a2f22faad25f9ajpeg.jpeg (JPEG, 5.54 MB) tiny-harry-2pdf.pdf (PDF, 7.69 MB) |
Scott Miller
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
- |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm deeply concerned for the Mudgee Region of the possibility of a fully operational Open Cut LEAD Mine on our door step. This is NOT OK for many reasons! There is enough evidence around to suggest LEAD is NOT safe for Humans, we all know this! Its poisoning that CAN NOT be reversed. This is a foreign owned company, why are we considering to support this?! Mudgee has been awarded Top Tourism Town in Australia 2 years in a row now for very good reasons. Mudgee will become worse than Cessnock if this goes ahead. No one will want to live here, let alone visit. It was will an absolute disaster for the region. The thought of Lead being trucked through Lue and Mudgee plus other towns is just asking for long terms NEGATIVE and IRREVERSIBLE effects. Please think about the long term effect on the people and environment rather than a couple of hundred jobs. The Mudgee Region is a beautiful place to live and raise a family, lets keep it that way. I DON'T support this and I DON'T know anyone that does! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lawson Creek, which neighbours the site, contains a plethora of wildlife, it waters native species and is an untouched waterway - this mine will impact on it and the surrounding areas viability in a negative way that will be immediate and long lasting. Irreversible if you will. This mine is unnecessary and will change the biodiversity in the area in a negative way. |
Daniel Kurtz
Organisation |
Balmoral |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Live approx 20km from the site. In my job I install pumps and am often working in these waterways. The potential for environmental damage is just way too high. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My key concerns are listed below: Threats to water security and water quality Dangerous lead exposure Toxic tailings dam Negative and permanent social impacts Acid mine drainage Increased traffic, dust and noise Biodiversity and ecological impacts The Mudgee region is a beautiful and precious natural landscape. In addition to the moral obligation we should all feel to preserve and protect out natural world, the regions large tourism industry is reliant on the area's rustic and agricultural character. this proposed development endangers that character and so threatens the countless jobs that rely upon it. In addition, the health, amenity and environment of local people, who have chosen to live in this area in part because of it's unspoiled, rural character would be unacceptably impacted and degraded. One only need's to look to the Hunter Valley where blighted terrain and heavy construction traffic seriously diminish the character of the local vineries and farmland. Part of Mudgee's success is in offering a more bucolic and less commercialised alternative for tourists. This unique strength is seriously under threat from this proposal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I often travel to mudgee and its surrounds for holiday. The produce there is prized for their quality. As someone who frequents Lue/Rylstone as a tourist and spend money there, I wouldn't want the local flourishing community to be affected by the mines' impact on the landscape and its produce. It appears that there is inadequate assessment to ground and surface water from this project. I find this deeply troubling. Also, of the 52 aboriginal artefacts surveyed on the site, 25 will be destroyed if the mine proceeds. It feels shameful to destroy so much cultural artifacts when we don't fully understand their significance yet as a society |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the mine due to all of the above listed issues especially concerning the pollution to the local river ways, water ways and creeks |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The long term risks and degradation of this proposal to the broad community and environment far outweigh the short term economic benefit to the relatively small group who will profit from its development. Our community is already responsible for allowing three coal mines in our region. Enough is enough. It is time for us to put our environment first. It is time for the Mid-Western Council area to mature away from being a mining economy and continue with their strong progress towards and tertiary and tourism focused economy. Tourists do not flock to Mudgee to see holes in the ground and contaminated tailings. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The area where the proposed mine is going in is beautiful, unspoilt, pristine and it will be ruined. Not to mention the impact this will have on tourism to the area and then the flow on effect from this. People will lose their jobs that they rely on from the tourism trade and also people won't want to come to a place that has been tainted by the mine. Noone wants this mine, we don't need it and it will only ruin our beautiful area. This can't happen! |
Toby Meagher
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a frequent visitor to the Lue area over the last 10 years, and Im frustrated to have followed this entire mine proposal process over the last few years. If the long term sustainability of the environment, the sustainability of the local economy, and the health and safety of the residents, is even partly considered, than this mine doesn't get a look in. If private interest and pressure from mining companies continues to shape decisions of this magnitude, it's a blight on what the planning commission sets out to achieve. Mudgee has developed an economy that is moving away from the mining industry, why drag it backwards with this mine? An Open cut lead mine, with clear problems in the way impacts have been assessed. There's huge issues with the way the impacts of the project have been reported on. Why is there any space for risk in the consideration of an open cut led mine. The risk of a permanent, toxic legacy is far too high to even consider this project. How can Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos and Lue continue to develop their fantastic tourism with an open cut lead mine and all the associated risks, in the middle over the map? It's a stunning area, with clear environmental value. There's so many surrounding residents that would clearly be affected. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. My kids love the area, and the idea that a poorly planned, high risk project like this could potentially happen is just devastating. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I own and run a small hospitality business. My industry relies on tourism to the area. The lure of clean country air, wide open spaces and a good cleanse away from city pollution and hustle and bustle is why people visit this region. The hospitality industry is struggling to staff outlets post pandemic due to high wages from mining already on offer in our region making hospitality less appealing to workers. Without our cafes, restaurants, hotels and experiences there is no way of serving our visitors. Sadly our hospitality providers are already reducing services and trading hours due to under staffing. The lure of a weekend mining job that pays double a full time hospitality job is going to see many businesses shut shop. So many are already feeling the hopelessness of their situation. This new mine cannot go ahead. Our population cannot staff it yet the mine claims to hire locals. The local infrastructure cannot support it. The impact on our natural landscape will be catastrophic. Our housing situation within mudgee is at capacity. It is illogical to see this project approved. |
Watershed Landcare
Organisation |
Watershed Landcare |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Watershed Landcare is a community organisation whose vision statement is “Healthy Landscapes, Healthy Communities”. This proposed Bowden’s Mine does not align with this vision statement as water quality, threatened ecosystems, soil health, biodiversity and agriculture could all be adversely affected. |
Malcolm Kurtz
Organisation |
Balmoral |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live within 20 km of the proposed site. I strongly object to this proposal because of the very real potential of significant environmental damage |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am the owner of Blue Wren Farm, a working farm with an onsite restaurant and wedding venue. We have enormous concerns about the Bowdens mine going ahead due to the impact it will have on the environment, and subsequently on the tourism industry here in Mudgee. We rely on tourism for our business, and the mine would have an extremely negative impact on our tourism industry. This is a lead mine. Bowdens' own projected ore volumes show 50 times more lead than silver will be produced over the life of the mine. There are no safe levels of exposure to lead. The data Bowdens uses in it’s project proposal underestimates community exposure levels of lead. It ignores concentrate, mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust and fails to analyse the effect of peak wind events. We also have great concern over the long term socioeconomic impacts of the mine, and what it will do to Mudgee as a region. In my opinion the recommended conditions of consent do not adequately prevent, mitigate or offset the adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object and do not support this proposed development as it will be detrimental to the the environment and lives of the people that reside close to the site. Livelihoods will be destroyed as well as the health of residents and animals. I have personally moved to the area about 18 months ago to heal from the rat race of the big smoke. To choice to move to regional NSW was not made lightly and if this proposal goes ahead I will have no choice but to move away and loose my investment in my own home. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A lead mine will have lasting negative health effects on the surrounding communities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this mine located in the midst of a rural community, regional tourist destination and highly productive pastoral and agricultural lands. I regularly visit my family who have beef and fine wool merino sheep on properties near Lue. All of these uses rely on healthy air and water systems, peaceful rural ambience and biodiversity protection. I also object to the impacts to tangible and intangible aboriginal cultural heritage of the Wiradjiri people that may not yet be fully understood or identified, based on the precautionary principle. The intensity of mining in the upper Hunter and now in the Mudgee area is having a significant cumulative impact on the pre and post contact heritage of these early settlements and must be stopped. Please leave our beautiful country pristine without the inter generational risk of lead, arsenic or other heavy metal poisoning hanging over future generations of regional families. The impacts to this local community and its environment cannot be mitigated by conditions. Please refuse in its entirety this unsustainable and highly unsuitable mine. |
John Lowe
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Having investigated other lead mining operation it is my belief the the proposed development will leave a significant negative outcome for the region and local community. the sighting of the tailings dam has a high potential to contaminate local ground water devaluing the surroundings properties and potentially putting tourism and agricultural businesses out of business. The issue of lead dust will continue long after the mine has closed, creating a toxic legacy for years to come. The operational and post operational treatment of lead dust is questionable. This could be to the detriment of the local community for generations to come. The EPA response to lead contamination has previously been very poor and I am concerned that regulatory supervision could be superficial at best and most likely inadequate. Remediation of the mine site will require care for decades to come and most likely that cost will be born by the state and local residents; if any remain. This mine will probably only benefit those with a direct financial interest in the mine to the detriment of local residents, businesses and tourism operators. It appears that the water requirements are unsustainable at this scale and will adversely affect other users. Ground water contamination will not be reversible with impacts for the greater catchment |
Owen Kearns
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m against this development and I work in the mining sector. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam I am writing to present my objection to the Bowdens Silver mine at Lue. This mine will have impacts on water resources and biodiversity of the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Having read the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report on Bowdens Silver, I do not think that this project should go ahead. I know a number of people who live Lue-Mudgee area whose businesses and livelihoods are put at risk by this proposed development. Here are some of the reasons: Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to all living creatures. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The Assessment Report does not mention or explore of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-assessment-reportpdf.pdf (PDF, 13.86 MB) |
Ken Birk
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am just an average "Joe Six Pack" that resides in Mudgee and I Fish Cudgegong River for Fish to eat. I am horrified to think that Lead is going to go down Lawson Creek and then into Cudgegong River and then into the food chain of many people. This development is totally unsuitable for this region and is driven purely by Greed. |
Nicola Robertson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the development of an open cut silver mine and associated infrastructure – Bowdens Silver Reference Number SSD-5765- at Lue, NSW. My opposition is based upon the following social, environmental and economic impacts (negative) this development would have on the local area: • Agriculture – the existing agricultural industry in the area has operated for 200 years producing food and fibre and providing a sustainable future for generations to come. This mine would threaten the existence of agriculture through potential significant risks to water security/quality; air quality; and environmental damage due to inadequate/flawed management of waste products. The agricultural industry in this area should be valued accordingly for its ongoing economic input and sustainability – providing employment and livelihoods in perpetuity; unlike short term employment for a mine (which has a finite life) and which concurrently negatively impacts the environment. • Health – High potential risk for community exposure to lead especially high risk for young children and pregnant women. This mine is located in close proximity to community residences and schools. Methods proposed by the proponent to contain acid mine drainage are not evidence based or proven - placing the environment and community at significant risk. • Tourism – similar to Agriculture this industry is a proven and sustainable one in the local area. It is also a strong employer and it draws huge numbers of visitors to the area annually. Development of the mine and its impacts would place Tourism at significant risk of downturn due to health, air quality and water quality concerns. • Water security and quality – the development puts at risk the water resources of landholders due to the lack of a formal risk assessment and contamination risk due to inadequate/unproven acid mine drainage management • Environmental Damage – independent consultant engaged by DPE (Earth Systems) identified serious concerns with proposed containment method for acid mine drainage. There is no previous evidence substantiating the success of the management methods proposed. • Community and Lifestyle – potential loss of community members from local area due to above outlined risks/concerns leading to decrease in community participation/engagement in local organisations, community division (e.g. RFS engagement as outlined during IPC presentations), stressors (noise/dust/light/water pollution) on permanent, long term residents, decrease in property values (financial stress) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly opposed to this mineing proposal due to it being an open cut lead mine that will affect the people and the environment. It is well known that lead dust travels quite some distance and is extremely detrimental to the health of people, and being so near to a primary school is a distressing thought. We are supposed to protect and nurture our children, not deliberately put them in danger. Lead poisoning is not reversible and and everyone should be protected from it. Furthermore our environment should also be protected and cared for. Water is precious and essential. If there is even the slightest risk of anything damaging or poisoning a water source then it should not be given the go ahead at all. All life depends on water. There is also the movement of trucks and vehicles to consider and the dust and noise they would cause. We live in a rural area for the lifestyle this offers. A mine such as this would be completely disruptive on so many levels such as, the people the water the environment on everything. This mine will cause to damage and should not be given approval. This is our backyard that will be sacrificed and it is not wanted. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There are three reasons why I am opposing this development proposal. They are: 1) Health consequences caused by damage to the environment; 2) Environment issues generally; and 3) Economic damage to the wider agricultural and hospitality community which far surpasses any direct economic benefit to the NSW Government. Below I set out detailed reasons. 1) Health - (a) Lead dust - the mine operates continuously with the dispersal of small particles of lead, arsenic, cadmium, silica and cyanide. These particles have significant and well documented problems that the community understands. For example, lead is known to reduce the IQ of children, increase behavourial problems, abortion in pregnancy. In adults, brain cognitive impairment leading to early onset dementia, Parkinson's disease, kidney disease and hypertension. (b) Acid mine drainage - large acreage of a tailings dam. Toxic water leaching into the environment. Note there are earthquake lines that run under the dam and therefore sealing is problematic. Please see www.lueactiongroup.org (c) - Chemicals being brought into the area - cyanide in significant quantities will be trucked into the area posing additional health risks. 2) - Environment - rehabilitation of the mine - toxic open cut lead mine will be there forever. Massive environmental issue! For example, acid mine drainage is a significant risk to the water course throughout the Mudgee region. The drainage will also contaminate Lawson Creek, the Cudgegong River - all the way down to the Murray Darling Catchment. 3) Economic devastation to the region - Given the above points I have made - the damage to the farming and hospitality community that benefits from the wine, olives, beef, sheep, cheese making etc far exceed any benefit that could be gained by allowing this mine. Even a perception of lead dust will stop tourists and deny growers markets that would otherwise be available given the current clean environment. The clean green agricultural branding of the area will be destroyed and this cannot be allowed given the shear number of families that rely on these industries. Many of these businesses are small family operated and cannot endure damage to their business interests. I note the current unemployment in the Mudgee area is presently only 0.07% so there is no argument supporting additional employment opportunities in the region. While I live in Neutral Bay, I visit family in the region regularly and I would be concerned about lead dust contamination and its impact on my health. Many others will think like me. |
julie lawson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee are highly populated by tourists visiting our beautiful countryside in the central west. I’m a local airbnb owner which is my self managed superannuation fund. Without this income my retirement is looking grime. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a frequent visitor and tourist to the area, I would no longer visit Lue, Rylestone or Mudgee as I would be concerned for my health and that of my Family. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live in the local area and have friends and colleagues who live in the vicinity of Lue. From what I’ve read And heard, Bowdens cannot guarantee that the mine tailings dam won’t leak. If this is so, the environmental impacts downstream in the catchment would be devastating to the local environment, fish populations, and the local communities relying on this water. Fishing in local waterways is one of the major pastimes of many local people, especially young boys as an after school and weekend activity. Should the local waterways be impacted and polluted by leachate from a tailings dam, leading to fish kills or contaminants in the water or fish taken for food this would be really sad. Seeing these kids outside undertaking a meaningful activity, rather than staring at screens, is fantastic and it would be sad if this is taken away through a leak in a dam for a short term project and profit. The water is used for irrigation purposes and for stock. Farming is a major industry in the local area and any contamination of the local waters would be detrimental to farmers. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This should not go ahead |
Bethany Greenfield
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We would like to lodge our objection to the proposed mine at Lue. We run a family farm 25km north west of Mudgee in the Piambong area. We have been living at this location for approximately 10 years. We moved to the Mudgee region from South Australia. We sold our farm between Port Pirie and Port Broughton because of lead contamination in our home and elevated blood lead readings in our children. The source of the lead contamination was the Port Pirie lead smelter which processes the lead railed over from Broken Hill. Before purchasing the Port Pirie farm the lead smelter company’s environmental section ensured us that at 16km south of the smelter we would have no lead pollution issues. We purchased the farm and proceeded with an extensive renovation of the farm house before we moved in with our young family. We installed new water tanks, had a new corrugated roof installed, new guttering, new paint and new carpets. When our children’s blood tests revealed elevated lead contamination, we had testing undertaken. Lead contamination was found in all areas of our newly renovated home, in our water tanks and even in the yolks of our chooks’ eggs. Upon discussing the issue with our neighbours they revealed that lead contamination was commonplace on their farms and that grain harvested on these farms was routinely mixed with grain from other areas to reduce overall lead readings. We were unwilling to continue to live in an area where our children’s health could be compromised by lead contamination and where we were encouraged by the lead smelting company not to grow and eat our own leafy vegetables, not to eat our chook eggs and to thoroughly scrub any fruit that we grew. We sold our farm. We left the massive investment in time that was a newly renovated homestead that we carried out ourselves. We walked away from living next to our family and the support they provided us with very young children. We walked away from careers in the area, and a very significant role in the succession of the family business – a large livestock and farming enterprise. It was a heartbreaking and financially costly decision. We could not afford another farm that met our requirements in South Australia and eventually found a new home in NSW at Mudgee. We are, in essence, environmental refugees. We have happily raised our family here, building a new business in this wonderful region. To have the threat of lead contamination in our back yard again is unthinkable. We understand from first hand experience the pervasive nature of lead dust and the resulting permanent contamination it causes. While we may not be directly exposed by dust contaminated with lead at our farm, we will be in the townships of Mudgee and Gulgong. In these towns, and obviously in Lue and Rylstone, dust and mud will be bought in on trucks, contractor and private vehicles, on the clothing and shoes of personnel working for the mining companies and locals with the misfortune of living within the immediate foot-print of the mine. The dust WILL contain lead and it WILL end up in the public buildings, spaces and playgrounds, on supermarket floors and trolleys, in schools and childcare centres. We again will be exposed to heavy metal contamination. We are very concerned for the community in the direct vicinity of the mine, the unique natural and farming environment both at and near the site and the massive risk of contamination to the waterways that this mine with adversely influence. This mining activity is too high a risk for this site. Its too high a risk for the environment, for existing agricultural and tourism industries and for the community. It is too high a risk for our family. Bethany Greenfield and Don Leadbitter |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are very behind in environmental protection in Australia. It’s about time we took protection of our land seriously. This region is a beautiful landscape, it Is possible to set up a wonderful tourist industry incorporating a rail trail |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
19th February, 2023 To Whom It May Concern, I am objecting to the proposed development going ahead of the lead, zinc and silver mine only 2.5kms from Lue Village. I have lived happily Lue since 1985 and believe this development will impact on me personally and environmentally and it is an extreme worry to me with the proximity of the mine being so close to my home and to waterways to Lawson Creek. Lead has been identified to be extremely detrimental to us all and this mine is just too close to the village along with an extreme contamination risks to the environment and Lawson Creek. Not just for the life of the mine but forever into the future and long after the mine will be held accountable or responsible for future generations to come. LEAD POISONING – I don’t believe the lead dust issue has been adequately addressed to guarantee the safety and wellbeing of residents in Lue or the surrounding areas. Such a big site and in my opinion, possible water issues, I truly believe strong hot drought driven winds will be an unstoppable problem. Our household relies on rain water collected from our roof, as does everyone in Lue as there is no town water or large supply out here. If evidence does become apparent that we, our home, water supply or land are affected from lead or toxic contamination, there has been no broad scale base line testings offered so there would be no base line to work from if this was to happen. This should be offered to alleviate any complications with our rights, should contamination occur. ENVIROMENTAL CONTAMINATION RISKS – As reported in local media, a study prepared by independent mining consultant, Michael White, highlighted the concerns of acid mine runoff being a potential risk of polluting the surrounding catchment area, especially after the mine closure. I feel this potential catastrophe has not been adequately addressed. Not just during the life of the mine but for future generations. WATER– I do not believe the water problem has been addressed adequately. The mine representatives admitted there was a water issue from the start and talked about piping water from elsewhere and a plan for a dam was shown to us. Now water will all be totally drawn from what was initially thought to be inadequate local water. I feel there will be water shortages over time to sustain the extreme daily usage that the mine requires. This would mean disaster for keeping the mine area safe for the village and surrounding areas and for the mine to continue. CLIMATE CHANGE – Science reports that this is to further affect the whole world and I do not believe it has been factored into the investigations for the mines continued water requirements and feel unprecedented times ahead will affect this with devastating results. REHABILITATION – I am so worried and appalled for the lack of respect for future generations with the plan for rehabilitation of this mine site. Rehabilitation usually means restoring to something like before but this is not what is planned for this mine. None of this is going to be restored to its original state. As I see it, there are so many elements that could contribute to a future disaster for the local area and further and the mine will be long gone and no longer responsible or accountable for a future contamination catastrophe. LOSS OF PROPERTY VALUE – This is a very big concern to me and I feel the approval of the mine will adversely affect our long term plan of being financially able to move to a bigger town with better medical facilities and greater access to all required amenities if and when we need to in the future and into our senior years. With the mine so close and a constant potential of contamination in the equation I believe this will affect the value of our property. I feel this is unacceptable and has the ability to cause us loss and hardship. TRAFFIC AND LUE ROAD – This is another big concern to me. Lue Road is narrow with rough edges and is often in bad condition. Increased heavy vehicles from the mine loaded with Lead, Zinc and Silver, will be a major contributor of further deterioration and add to the problems of upkeep of this busy but inadequate little road. There are no overtaking lanes and very few areas that it is safe to overtake any vehicle, let alone increased amounts of long trucks. Lue Road is not only used by Lue residents but also Kandos and Rylstone residents and a growing number of tourists. I feel Lue Road will become very dangerous with added mine trucks. LUE PUBLIC SCHOOL –as lead poisoning is documented to be particularly detrimental to children’s health and well being, this is a very big concern for Lue School. Thank you for the chance to voice my objection as all these problems are a serious concern to me. With the contamination risks created by this mine, the risk of water shortage, local financial loss of property value, lack of any base line testing for future reference and lack of safe and thorough rehabilitation, please consider the very real possibilities that the risks presented are far too great a risk to take. |
Peter Serov
Organisation |
Lue Action Group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Independent Desktop Review of the Bowdens Silver Pty Limited for the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine: EIS Review Updated February 2023 for the Lue Actions Group by Dr Peter Serov Documents Reviewed This review was conducted for the Lue Action Group. The documents reviewed were: 1) Part 5 – Groundwater Assessment. State Significant Development No. 5765. 2) Part 10 – Aquatic Ecology Assessment. . State Significant Development No. 5765. 3) FDP, (2022). Review of Bowden’s Response to Groundwater Questions: Bowdens’ March 2022. Amendment Report Version: 4.0, 04 July 2022. 4) Baguley, S. (2022). Independent Review of the Bowdens Silver Pty Limited Surface Water Assessment – Updated May 2022. Summary of Significant Points of Concern from Additional Documentation 1. Potential groundwater and surface water contamination from waste rock emplacement (WRE) designed to flow to a leachate dam located north of Lue. (FDP, 2022). There is potential for leakage into groundwater and spillage into the downstream waterways such as Lawsons Creek that flow through the townships of Lue and Mudgee. (FDP, 2022). 2. Potential groundwater and surface water contamination from acid leachate from the tailings storage facility (TSF) located to the west above a Lawsons Creek tributary that will flow into Lawsons Creek and through the townships of Lue and Mudgee. (FDP, 2022). Contamination of groundwater and surface waters would result in the subsequent and permanent reduction of catchment biodiversity and availability of water for community stock and domestic usage. 3. The underlying aquifer is unconfined with highly heterogenous; fractured rock and the proposed tailings storage facility (TSF) lies on mapped faults with one fault trending southeast through Lawsons Creek. (FDP, 2022). Therefore, there is a high probability of connectivity between the groundwater and surface water resulting in a high probability of impact exchange both between the water sources but also a considerable distance downstream of the proposed facility. This has serious, long-term implications for human and ecosystem health. 4. No predevelopment groundwater monitory of groundwater levels or water chemistry has been conducted between the edge of the proposed site and Lue village bores, therefore there is no understanding of natural groundwater level and water chemistry fluctuations to determine future changes in these parameters as result of the proposed mine and contaminated water storage facilities. 5. Proposed increase in reliance on local surface and groundwater supplies to meet all project demands thus increasing the potential drawdown of groundwater and a reduction in streamflow downstream that would reduce or eliminate permanent, relictual aquatic habitats with a subsequent reduction of catchment biodiversity and availability of water for community stock and domestic usage. 6. Mine weather data (rainfall) significantly and incorrectly demonstrates higher rainfall predictions than the BOM and local authorities suggesting surface water and groundwater levels will be higher than in reality. The environmental implications of this is that with increased usage of local water sources by the mine will increase the depth and longevity of drawdowns on groundwater and reductions in flow and permanence of surface waterways with reduced availability to the community and environment. (Baguley, 2022). 7. Baguley, (2022) reports that there is a high number of springs, peatlands, bogs, and montane mires adjacent and within and adjacent the Bowdens site as well as throughout the Upper Cudgegong and Upper Lawson Creek catchments. These are likely to listed under protected Montane Peatlands and Swamps Endangered Ecological Community (EEC) listing under the NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and the Temperate Highland Peat Swamps on Sandstone EEC Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 listing. Under the current mine proposal, these EECs, and potentially other associated listed species such as habitat for the Listed Threatened Species Petalura gigantea or Southern Petaltail or Giant Dragonfly as well as the many short-range emndemic species that are associated with this wetalnds and subterranean environments have not been considered and are at high, potential risk of impact from the drawdown of groundwater and reduction in surface water from the proposed mine. It needs to be stated that although NSW government has legislation in place to supposedly protect all GDE's, including wetlands and subterranean ecosystems as well as aquatic ecosystems including invertebrates this has seldom if ever been actually done. I have worked on many EIS's for a range of government departments, develpment companies and Conservation action groups developments and in all cases where data identified rare, unique and endangered ecosystems and species, the decision was always in favour of the developer and no legislation was enacted to protect the surface and groundwater environments. This has to change. Although these threatened communities have not been considered and the EIS states there are no listed High Priority GDE's in the area, the NSW Risk Assessment Guidelines (Serov et al 2012) states that if a GDE has not been listed and assessed as a formal High Priority by government but contains either previous conservation status such as being an obligate or entirely dependent ecosystem and/or species or occurs in a national reserve or has been recognised as a Listed threatened or endangered community, it qualifies as having High ecological Value (HEV) and therefore of High Conservation Value (HCV) and is open for consideration as a High Priority GDE. The Water sharing plans provide rules for the protection of GDE’s such as setback distances and no drawdown rules for water supply works from high priority GDEs, ie. those GDE’s of High Ecological Value (HEV) that have been selected by an interagency expert panel to be listed within water sharing plans. The provisions within Water sharing plans therefore protects both high ecological / conservation value GDEs from development and extraction as well as providing water for all (non-high value) GDEs in general (Serov et al, 2012). As the EIS does not recognise these ecosystems or species further identification of these EEC needs to be conducted as a matter of priority prior to any development of the mine proposal. The springs and other surface wetlands, stream fauna and subterranean ecosystem urgently needs to be resurveyed by an independently from the mine and by experts in the field who understand these environments and are able identify the fauna to species. Allowing mines to conduct these surveys themselves has, for many years, allowed for biased reporting by inexperienced companies and people. A new procedure needs to be urgently implemented to prevent this from occurring. 8. Inappropriate and outdated definition and understanding of groundwater and GDEs. 9. Misidentification of obligate GDE's, particularly among terrestrial vegetation species. 10. Incorrect conclusions on stygofauna significance and distributions based on poor identification and background knowledge. 11. Significant stygofauna diversity is recorded east in both streams (Hawkes and Lawsons Creeks) with the highest diversity recorded in Hawkes Ck; 12. There is little to no discussion of the ecosystem health significance of the fauna found which demonstrates the authors lack of knowledge on the subject: 13. There is no discussion on hydrological connectivity issue between the aquifers and surface water ecosystems; 14. There is no discussion of the significant stygofauna taxa recorded; 15. It is stated in Table 3.12 that stygofaunal are largely absent from the proposed open pit area even though Syncarida (significant stygofauna taxon) were recorded. 16. The listing and discussion of the potential threatened invertebrate species is inadequate as no taxa were identified to species. |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-eisgw-and-aquatic-ecology-reviewpserov-2023-finalpdf.pdf (PDF, 230.62 KB) |
Andrew Channon
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a farm worker on a large property in the Lue locality I have a very particular concern over the potential human health risks associated with a lead mine. I work outdoors all day and the thought of unwittingly being exposed to contaminated air and dust (on very windy days) worries me greatly. It appears that any exposure to lead is unsafe. I feel my fears must pale into insignificance compared to those of the families within the Lue village and residents on the Mine’s doorstep. I can’t see how living in constant fear of potential health risks can be sustainable for Lue residents. For example, it is laughable to suggest that house windows should be kept shut to minimise risk. Hardly the idealic rural life many would be content with. Furthermore, the inevitable loss of property values because of a purposely planned outside influence is absolutely terrible for those that will be affected. For an area rich in local history and generations of farming families this is heartbreaking. I have already witnessed firsthand the anxiety, stress and torment the Mine proposal has caused to people I care deeply about. Should the Mine go ahead I am genuinely fearful of the effect it will have on the long term mental health of people who did nothing to deserve it. |
Tiffany Lazarus
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
COMMUNITY * How will this mine affects our families and our business in the region. * Why is there no plan to regenerate mine after finished. * Loss of income from, Grapes, beef, accommodation etc * Extra traffic on Lue road and round Mudgee with trucks transporting slurry through Mudgee to Parkes * How will tourism jobs be changed in Mudgee, Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Kandos. * What will happen to the local Lue school? * Will we have to teach our children not to put their hands in their mouths? GRAPE GROWERS & PRODUCERS * How the fine lead will affect your grapes, olives, fruit etc? * Absorption of this dust through leaves , soil and water. * Grapes absorb heavy metals. * Fine lead dust is cumulative, especially in cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc * Will we need to test for base lines before mine is approved? * Ongoing testing of grapes into wine. Who will cover the cost of testing. WATER * Irrigation - where is the water coming from to service this mine? There doesn’t appear to be enough to realistically support the project? * Our water could be contaminated by fine lead dust and acid mine drainage. * Where will we get clean water from if our water tanks, waterways, water collection areas (roofs etc.) and dams are covered in fine lead dust, or pollutants from run off from mine? * Who will compensate us for lost clean water? TOURISM * If you have an Air BNB, guest house or just guests to your home - will you be able to supply your visitors with a safe environment? * Can you supply them with eggs, ‘fresh’ vegies, drinking water, bathing water, local produce without ramifications? * Washing cloths and bed linen on contaminated water . Residue will be in fabric. * * No one wants to visit a region where they may get lead poisoning. * How many jobs will be lost if Mudgee become a contaminated town instead of #1 tourist destination two years in a row, will we become the destination town to be avoided at all costs? |
Therese Massa
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I vehemently object to this mine as I am seriously concerned about the polution associated with the management of extracting the lead and the detrimental affect to the community 's health and future generations |
Francis Ravel Harvey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
For myself, at 92 the impact will be minimal, but for my ten grandchildren, and for all other citizens of Planet Earth the impact will be profound. Do we learn nothing from examples like Easter Island, or the rape of the cedar forests in Australia? I am amazed that the Labor Party whom I helped vote into office would even consider the opening of 118 new coal mines, including this one. WAKE UP AUSTRALIA, and GROW UP! |
Gerald Norton-Knight
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowdens Mine for the following reasons: 1. The unsatisfactory plan to deal with dust from the lead extraction. 2. The untested proposal to deal with acid mine drainage. 3. The potential for water contamination. 4. Insufficient water available for this project. We run a vineyard, cellar door, art gallery, sculpture garden, breed cattle and run a guesthouse 10 km north of Mudgee. The uncertainty of Bowdens being able to address the above issues satisfactorily is of significant concern. This region is heavily reliant on tourism and any change to our green and clean image will have a detrimental effect to visitation to the district. Trying to deal with lead dust in the vineyard is problematic. Installing overhead sprinklers to wash fruit and leaves for 9 months of the year is not only expensive with additional infrastructure and significant increase in water useage, the lead if washed off the leaves etc would end up on the ground. This lead could then be taken up through the roots. The bottom line is we would not be able to sell wine and/or fruit from a lead contaminated vineyard. If lead is in the vineyard it will affect the other segments of our business. It will also affect most businesses in the area, particularly those relying on tourism. We cannot risk being branded as a lead contaminated area. Therefore in my opinion the DPE have failed in ensuring Bowdens have a workable plan to deal with lead contamination. Independent experts have advised the IPC that the proposed water suppression will not work. We need to be confident that what ever method is used it is going to work. We are relying on a small mining company that is yet to operate a mine to keep this mine safe. The consequenceses are dire if they get it wrong. The same can be said for the proposed dealing with acid mine drainage. Is it reasonable to ask residents to accept an untested strategy to deal with acid mine drainage. Once again I think the DPE have failed in their responsibility to correctly assess this mine to ensure there are no harmful consequence to the community. The Mudgee region has enjoyed unprecedented growth in the last 10-15 years, culminating with the award of best tourist town in Australia for the last 2 years. We are in a golden period partly due to our clean and green image. We are the envy of regional Australia. Before approval is even considered for this mine I feel the Proponent and the DPE need to go back to the drawing board to ensure if this mine ever operates the residents of this valley can be assured of its safety. |
Phillip Ridge
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am enormously concerned for the detriment of the environment and human health should this mine proceed. This is a productive agricultural area that provides a living for many people, both owners and employees, that could be hindered or even terminated if the mine exists. Tampering leading to environmental issues in 2023 is not acceptable - society has moved on. I understand that existing mines are needed to provide product to make our services achievable, but to create a new environmental/health disaster is inadvisable. The potential health risks to those that live in the Lue region and downstream of the Lawson Creek (myself included) are too great for any rational decision to approve of such a mine . Lead is not user friendly! From my research, the anticipated economic benefits of the mine are outweighed by the environmental and health issues. There is insufficient evidence that the mine will provide a significant boost to the employment and economic advantage of the greater Mudgee region. Another area of great concern is the safety of motorists and pedestrians in the Lue vicinity. The topography and road network of the area is not conducive to heavy and increased traffic. Another huge cost to improve it to adequate state, and a further diminishment of profitability. There is significant heritage value , both aboriginal and white settlement, in the area that would be detrimentally impacted by the mine proceeding. Personally, I wish the mine to not proceed as my property is on the Cudgegong River downstream of where the Lawson creek enters. Both Mudgee town and us landholders further downstream will be unfavourably impacted by contaminated water leading to livestock suffering in addition to our own health and gardens (being dependent on river water for all) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed mine will be an environmental disaster that cannot be undone. Best case scenarios put forward by Bowden are unacceptable in their own right. For example, 1.6mL daily leakage from the tailings dam! That’s unacceptable and could likely be worse. Stacking 26 M tonnes of waste rock, which is potentially acid forming, above a water course. 52 hectares of open cut mines - never mind the roads and other infrastructure needed. 457 hectares of land clearing. Traffic! The toxic dust falling over our beautiful area, so many farms with stock and crops - that lead falling from the sky will mean those farms will be unviable. An exceptionally high number of water tanks and catchment for drinking water for human and animal consumption - we don’t want lead in our drinking water. Lue School is only 2 km from the site. This school is essential for local families. Our area is also becoming an increasingly popular tourist destination. This mine will kill that stone dead. This will have a direct affect in property prices. And sustainability - once lead is introduced to the environment it stays there forever. While I know that our push for renewable energy, including EVehicles, means an increase in demand for lead, we need to be pushing for alternatives to mines. Recycling, revisiting tailings dams, etc is where the focus should be. When lead was removed from petrol and paints, it had a measurable impact on preventing lead exposure health issues - and Bowdens wants to put it into the environment (not in the Executives’ home areas of course). Lead poisoning is largely a chronic disease, including neurological impacts particularly in children. (Remember the school only 2km away). I vehemently oppose this development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a member of the Mudgee community for the last 10 years working as a doctor at a local Medical Centre in addition to working at the local hospital. Like most of regional Australia our health services in the Mudgee region are already under significant strain. Despite trying for years we continue to struggle to recruit and retain doctors and other health staff to the region. Given the Australia wide critical shortage of rural doctors and nurses this is an important consideration which will not be easily resolved. My colleagues and I are already over stretched and are unable to manage existing workload demands let alone increased workload from more workers in addition to managing health complications in the community. We have been continuously trying to recruit more doctors without any significant success. I am concerned with short comings in the assessment of risk from lead exposure. Any lead exposure particularly to pregnant women and children is harmful. This mine is 2km from a primary school. I have lived in Port Pirie South Australia where environmental lead exposure has had a devistating impact on the health of the community. It was not safe to leave clothing on an outdoor washing line overnight, windows had to be kept closed and children were not able to play in the dirt. In Port Pirie we did not rely on rain water however the community in Lue do. WIll they need to change to relying on bottle water with the associated environmental impact of that? Trucks will be travelling through Mudgee will dust from these as well as that carried by the wind contaminate the environment in the larger community of Mudgee too? Having lived through the recent drought can we afford to risk available water to contamination? The plans for a toxic tailings dam with recognised daily leakage is not acceptable when it is at the head of the Lawson Creek which feeds into the Cudgegong river then flowing through Mudgee. How many farms are going to be impacted by contamination downstream? The proposed mine is recognised to put endangered flora and fauna at further risk. After the drought and bush fires, more than ever do we need to be protecting any habitat for our endangered flora and fauna including koalas and regent honey eaters. They can not afford to have their available habitat further fragmented. Paying to protect habitat in another region can not replace what is lost and no regeneration is going to be able to replace the environment to what it was. The plans are clear that they are not able to return the land to what it was with a 53 hectare hole planned to be left behind at the end of mining. I am concerned about the impact on the community of Lue. I have friends and patients who live in Lue. This is a small but vibrant community. If the impact of other mines in the region on their local villages are any indication we will lose yet another community. From discussions with these friends and patients they are very concerned about this mine so close to their village is going to have on their community. The Mudgee region is increasingly reliant on tourism for jobs and prosperity. This mine in the middle of the Rylstone - Mudgee tourist trail is likely to put this at risk. Contamination risks our vineyards and olive groves as well as the other farmland in the area. In my opinion the Bowdens mine places the community and environment at signficant risk and should not be allowed to proceed. |
Jolanta Nejman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am totally opposed to the submission because: Lead and children are not a good mix, the mine is too close to school Tailing dam with all our recent rains is too dangerous, not only will it leak but it will probably spill if there’s too much rain again The possibility of the mine drainage leaking into the drinking water is unacceptable. People before profit. The roads are bad enough without big trucks tearing it up further 3 open cut pits in a tourist area are a turn off for tourists, and tourist have no love of huge holes, no one is, except the mine owners looking for profit at the expense of locals and visitors |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
19th February, 2023 To Whom It May Concern, I am objecting to the proposed development going ahead of the lead, zinc and silver mine only 2.5kms from Lue Village. I have lived happily Lue since 1985 and believe this development will impact on me personally and environmentally and it is an extreme worry to me with the proximity of the mine being so close to my home and to waterways to Lawson Creek. Lead has been identified to be extremely detrimental to us all and this mine is just too close to the village along with an extreme contamination risks to the environment and Lawson Creek. Not just for the life of the mine but forever into the future and long after the mine will be held accountable or responsible for future generations to come. LEAD POISONING – I don’t believe the lead dust issue has been adequately addressed to guarantee the safety and wellbeing of residents in Lue or the surrounding areas. Such a big site and in my opinion, possible water issues, I truly believe strong hot drought driven winds will be an unstoppable problem. Our household relies on rain water collected from our roof, as does everyone in Lue as there is no town water or large supply out here. If evidence does become apparent that we, our home, water supply or land are affected from lead or toxic contamination, there has been no broad scale base line testings offered so there would be no base line to work from if this was to happen. This should be offered to alleviate any complications with our rights, should contamination occur. ENVIROMENTAL CONTAMINATION RISKS – As reported in local media, a study prepared by independent mining consultant, Michael White, highlighted the concerns of acid mine runoff being a potential risk of polluting the surrounding catchment area, especially after the mine closure. I feel this potential catastrophe has not been adequately addressed. Not just during the life of the mine but for future generations. WATER– I do not believe the water problem has been addressed adequately. The mine representatives admitted there was a water issue from the start and talked about piping water from elsewhere and a plan for a dam was shown to us. Now water will all be totally drawn from what was initially thought to be inadequate local water. I feel there will be water shortages over time to sustain the extreme daily usage that the mine requires. This would mean disaster for keeping the mine area safe for the village and surrounding areas and for the mine to continue. CLIMATE CHANGE – Science reports that this is to further affect the whole world and I do not believe it has been factored into the investigations for the mines continued water requirements and feel unprecedented times ahead will affect this with devastating results. REHABILITATION – I am so worried and appalled for the lack of respect for future generations with the plan for rehabilitation of this mine site. Rehabilitation usually means restoring to something like before but this is not what is planned for this mine. None of this is going to be restored to its original state. As I see it, there are so many elements that could contribute to a future disaster for the local area and further and the mine will be long gone and no longer responsible or accountable for a future contamination catastrophe. LOSS OF PROPERTY VALUE – This is a very big concern to me and I feel the approval of the mine will adversely affect our long term plan of being financially able to move to a bigger town with better medical facilities and greater access to all required amenities if and when we need to in the future and into our senior years. With the mine so close and a constant potential of contamination in the equation I believe this will affect the value of our property. I feel this is unacceptable and has the ability to cause us loss and hardship. TRAFFIC AND LUE ROAD – This is another big concern to me. Lue Road is narrow with rough edges and is often in bad condition. Increased heavy vehicles from the mine loaded with Lead, Zinc and Silver, will be a major contributor of further deterioration and add to the problems of upkeep of this busy but inadequate little road. There are no overtaking lanes and very few areas that it is safe to overtake any vehicle, let alone increased amounts of long trucks. Lue Road is not only used by Lue residents but also Kandos and Rylstone residents and a growing number of tourists. I feel Lue Road will become very dangerous with added mine trucks. LUE PUBLIC SCHOOL –as lead poisoning is documented to be particularly detrimental to children’s health and well being, this is a very big concern for Lue School. Thank you for the chance to voice my objection as all these problems are a serious concern to me. With the contamination risks created by this mine, the risk of water shortage, local financial loss of property value, lack of any base line testing for future reference and lack of safe and thorough rehabilitation, please consider the very real possibilities that the risks presented are far too great a risk to take. |
Peter Rejto
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern: As a recent land owner at the Rylstone Aerodrome I spent in excess of $1,000,000 building a new home on the Aerodrome. This property is entirely off grid and all water is collected via rain water. The thought of possible lead contamination through dust on roof structures has me deeply concerned, not just for myself but for the entire community in this pristine region of NSW. Water. Contamination would not only personally effect me but the entire area. I do not believe that recommended conditions of consent properly address this extremely serious concern. A travesty will be committed if this project receives approval. Sincerely, Peter Rejto 4 Eagle Road Rylstone |
Andrew Miller
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The environmental impact of this dam is not fully understood and there are insufficient guarantees that the environment eg water quality , lead contamination will not be adversely affected |
Julie Lewis-Phillips
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It surprises me that the local government is even considering this proposal. The potential for peoples health to be impacted is very real, which will then impact on our over worked and understaffed health services we already have in this area. Plus the extra cost to the government in extra health scans etc that are going to be required to check for possible lead related health issues. Which is highly probable with an open cut mine. There is a high risk of contamination to people, land ,waterways, livestock etc. Through floods, damaging winds/storms and of cause bushfires. The effects of toxic exposure is very high in fire situations and considering we have just had six bush fires in this area in one night (18/02/23), should send out alarm bells for such a mine to go ahead. Any benefits that we think will be obtained by this mine is well out wade by the risks not only to the environment but the cost to the lively hoods and business that will/could be negatively effected by it. This mine is going to be around for 25years? While we have thriving business now that have been around for generations and will be around for generations to come, if we look after the land etc around us. We have the best tourism industry in Australia & the world for the last three years bringing in millions of dollars to our area. Which we could maintain and improve if we only look after the land , waterways etc around us. A toxic lead mine is not a good look or incentive to encourage people to come and visit us or move into the area. The Mudgee area is a thriving business area and only getting busy-er by the year. Do we really need to even consider taking on this risk in our lovely area. I consider this proposal to be more negative than positive for our towns. |
Attachments |
leadsdspdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 42.87 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Loving and working at the Rhylestone Airpark, we all catch and use the water from our large surface hangar roof areas, we are geographically situated just under10 nm downwind from the mine site and with the prevailing NW winds, we will be highly exposed to the contaminated dust generated by the mining operations. Aside from the obvious health implications, the Lead Mine has the potential to taint our beautiful area in many negative ways, particularly having a significant effect on our property values and our appeal as a tourist destination. |
Ann Finegan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dr Ann Finegan 18 Angus Avenue Kandos 2848 19 February 2023 OBJECTION: proposed Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, I am writing to strenuously object to the approval of the Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue. My reasons are many, but first and foremost the lack of address of the impact on the local groundwater is by far the worst oversight. In the light of contemporary studies this negligence is indeed appalling. Where is the science? I have been objecting to this mine for a number of years now, and cite from the submission of respected environmental scientist Hayden Washington. Acid mine drainage into the groundwater and soils is the core issue, and I quote at length: "This is highly irresponsible of RW Corkery (ignoring well known science) and Bowdens who has accepted this report, but also by the EPA and Department of Water Resources who failed to raise issues about acid mine drainage. I am aware nobody other than Dr Ian Wright of Western Sydney Uni is currently carrying out research on heavy metal pollution from mines, however the science of this has been well documented both in Australia and around the world. The EPA at the very least should be aware of this and refer to it. Acid mine drainage from sulphide metal mines can continue for hundreds of years (see my original submission for details, re-attached here). Mines that closed many decades ago in Australia such as Rum Jungle, Sunny Corner (on which I worked) are still producing acid mine drainage full of heavy metal pollutants. The same goes for those closed more recently such as Woodlawn (on which I worked). The only reason that the closed Captains Flat mine near Canberra now produces less heavy metal pollution as over $2 million was spent to improve this as it drains to Lake Burley Griffin and Canberra (however some pollution remains even so). No sulphide heavy metal mine in the world has been 100% successful in stopping heavy metal pollution in acid mine drainage. I note that Bowdens claims they will treat wastewater, but for how long? After a decade or so, they will stop, the company will be disbanded, but the pollution can go on for hundreds of years." All of Dr Washington’s core points require address. Furthermore, in respect of the confirmed chemistry of mine contamination, I quote again from Dr Washington: "(O)nce a sulphide metal deposit (as in the Lue site owned by Bowden Silver) is opened up to air and water, the bacteria Acidithiobacillus lives by breaking down the sulphide minerals to sulphuric acid. This liberates the heavy metals such as zinc, copper and cadmium, which are highly toxic to aquatic life (in particular all gilled animals plus most plants). " Given that the understanding of this process is now widely accepted scientific knowledge, why has “acid mine drainage from sulphide metal mines” not been adequately addressed in the EPA? Specifically, in respect of Lue, the proposed site of the silver mine: Water, and groundwater levels, is already a significant issue in an area where water is in short supply. The proposed mine will evidently need water. Where will the additional water come from, if not groundwater? Where are the assurances that water levels won’t be affected? What can be done? Secondly, when a contamination problem develops – as surely it must – how is the damage to be remediated, and what compensation will follow? As Dr Washington underscores, the contamination will not only be ruinous to the area’s local graziers, viticulture and agriculture, but can go on for hundreds of years. This is unacceptable. Furthermore, a silver-lead mine in Lue will have disastrous impacts on the development of the nearby villages of Kandos and Rylstone, now steadily building up their cultural capital and tourism profiles. Cementa Contemporary Arts Festival in Kandos, of which I was a founding member some ten years plus ago, is going from strength to strength, with a steady stream of people from the creative industries now buying into the area. This includes a number of highly significant artists and the most recent winner of the Archibald prize. Many festival patrons, having discovered the attractions of the region, including Ganguddy and the wildlife, are now regular visitors to Kandos-Rylstone and the surrounding wineries in non-festival periods – attracted by the area’s green credentials. Mudgee now has its own Arts Precinct. Should this mine go ahead, the negative impacts will be felt across the broader region, including the area that stretches from Kandos-Rylstone to Mudgee - via Lue where the proposed mine will be located - and out to Ganguddy in Wollemi National Park. Surely protecting the broader environs of the home of the Wollemi Pine, a valuable asset in the nation’s natural capital, should be a priority. Additionally the proposed mine will impact negatively on the historic and artistic heritage of Lue, increase the likelihood of poor health issues (water contamination, dust), and general amenity, including more industrial traffic on the roads. Therefore, I wholeheartedly urge that this mine not be granted approval to go ahead. Yours Sincerely, Dr Ann Finegan |
Attachments |
bowdenssubmissionwashingtononsubmissionsreportpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 627.75 KB) |
Simon Ward
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The local area is a magnificent area, which regularly wins tourism awards for good reason - Why mess that up? Imposing a lead mine 2 kms from the village of Lue is just wrong - it’s the wrong mine in the wrong place. I am not against mining per se, but please find somewhere in this big country that minimises its risks to the local community and visitors. Not here please! The intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small irregular creek which didn’t run at all for the 2 years from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. Why take this clear likely risk? The proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulphur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. Why do this when climate change is clearly with us for the long term? Finally, have we not learnt anything in the last 20 years about this type of enterprise? Australia is a great and lucky country, that does not need risky and speculative mining developments close to tourism areas and local villages that live of this sustainable industry. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Family members that live by will affected by the mine and wish for it not to go ahead |
Ross Mayberry
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have a number of objections to the proposed Bowdens Mine at Lue: 1) My first objection is that the company has been very devious in the naming of the mine, calling it a "silver" mine when in fact it is largely a zinc and lead mine. 2)The impact of the mine would disastrous for the residents of the small village of Lue, especially the small school there. The levels of noise, dust and poor air quality would make living in Lue very unhealthy and undesirable. My opinion is that a lot of the residents of are living in Lue because of the peace and quiet but largely because they are able to afford to buy (or rent) a residence compared to living in the surrounding larger towns like Mudgee and Rylstone where prices are beyond a low wage earner's capabilities. 3)The potential threat of contamination of the waterways especially Lawson's Creek is too great to live with. The proposed 117 hectare tailing dam which will hold poisons like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles poses a threat to all the water systems downstream. Lawson's creek joins the Cudgegong River which in turn flows into Burrendong dam which is used for agriculture (irrigation) and to keep the all important bird breeding ground of the MacQuarie Marshes topped up. This water then flows on to join to the Darling which then joins the Murray and onto the ocean. The ecological disaster which would be caused by a possible breach of this tailing dam should be enough to stop this project. 4)The threat to the local farming and grazing community (who are the main industry in the area) is dangerous. A lot of sheep, cattle and some goats are bred and raised for their meat in this area. The threat of contamination from lead particles in the air is a real one and must be taken seriously. Australia has a good reputation worldwide for its clean meat and we cannot afford to damage it. There are also olives and cereals grown in the area and likewise they could be adversely affected by contamination. Dust and poor quality air will also have an adverse on the local graziers who rely on wool production. The dust gets into the wool and results in a reduced price at auction. As a retired farmer I feel agriculture is still a very important employer and importantly a major contributor to our economy. 5) The road leading to Lue from Lue to Rylstone in one direction and Mudgee in the other is very poor. It is narrow and winding at best and passing is very difficult. There is already too many large trucks using this roads making it dangerous and breaking up the surface. Any increase in traffic which would result from Bowdens Mine opening would make the situation worse. Also as a recreational cyclist, I and many others like to ride on the districts roads for enjoyment and health. The road to Rylstone, passing through Lue, is scenic but dangerous enough now because there are a lot of blind corners and narrow parts to it. Any increase in traffic, especially large trucks would be disastrous for motorists and especially, cyclists. Please stop this mine before its too late. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have family in the area who have made us aware of this awful proposal. The ultimate concern is lead poisoning effecting the health especially of the local children. There can be no excuse for this exposure to a community in a country like Australia, this is not third world, or is it? Next the contamination of the water supply to the local community, the forefront being the rural community who make their livelihood out of providing food for our table, which will in turn be contaminated. Along with the effect on the supply downstream and the river system. There are obviously a lot more reasons that you already know about that make this a nobrainer ... Please make a sane decision, not based on $$$ but on brains! Thank you! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowdens Silver mine on the grounds that it poses a significant threat to the environment, in particular the safety of Lawson Creek, the Cudgegong River, and the Mudgee region. As a keen and regular visitor to Lue and Mudgee, I am heartbroken to think that a mine that appears to be so poorly planned would be approved in this region. Having reviewed a number of the documents on the IPC website, I have noted that over 50% of the rock to be extracted from the mine will be acid forming. Bowdens acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and groundwater will occur. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is therefore highly probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks and geology. According to the United Nations, AMD is humanity's largest single problem after climate change. I am also aware from Bowdens EIS that the tailings dam is positioned directly over a geological fault line, and with the increase in seismic activity, as recent as this week in New Zealand, this proposal with the tailings dam in this location, above a fault line, and above the Lawson Creek should not be approved. It is also clear from the EIS that the modeling used to project the amount of potentially acid forming rock is dubious, and the Department of Planning's own experts "Earth Works" have concluded that further testing of the rock to be extracted from the mine must be undertaken to determine if it is acid-forming, which is most likely the case. The lack of appropriate data provided by Bowdens is concerning, and approving a mine of this size with the potential for such high volumes of acid production would be unconscionable. The suggested mitigations of “wrapping” overburden in a plastic tarp and lining both the tailings and leachate dams in this same sort of liner, will not stave off AMD for the hundreds of years it will last in the mine site. The proposed mine cannot be approved given this very high likelihood of AMD. It is irresponsible to approve a mine of this size and then request Bowdens meet "conditions." Monitoring of the acid forming environment is too late. Once the rock is removed from its current location the damage is done when it comes to AMD. The best “condition” to apply would be to leave the rock where it currently is and not disturb it. The impact on the environment, including flora and fauna, and the health of Lawson Creek and ultimately the Cudgegong River, cannot be overemphasised. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission not to approve the proposed Bowdens Silver mine. The potential consequences of this mine are far too severe, and we must prioritize the protection of our environment, Lawson Creek, and the community’s health. |
Dr Meredith Martin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a long term resident of Rylstone and Bylong Valley I strongly object to the risks to our community with the approval of Bowdens Mine as it is proposed. 1. I have taught children affected by Lead in the US and Australia. It is tragic and unnecessary! The cost to society of supporting these children is very high and their contribution to society is ruined. They cost us. They are gorgeous kids whose life has been ruined by greed. The risk is too great to sacrifice both young and old with Lead contamination in the air and water and soil. This lasts a life time way beyond the mine's life. 2. As a current bee keeper I object to the impact on my bees. 3. My partner has worked in mining for over 50 years. The stories I hear about abuses of the environment make me weep. The monitoring is very poor. Regulation is a joke until something happens and then action is taken to appease the 'greenies'. 4. The only argument for the mine is 'jobs, jobs and more jobs'. The current and predicted future of the local job market is a good indicator of the difficulty (ie impossibility) of getting full time workers even with offering above award wages. We cannot get workers on our Bylong property, the restaurants in Rylstone are desperate for staff and I cannot get a trades person of any description to come in less than 2 months and sometimes up to 6 months. We are desperate and the mines in the past strip good workers from properties and from the community. 5. I am not opposed to some mining but this proposal is beyond consideration. Of course Bowdens are 'good citizens' NOW but the risks are too high especially re the tailing dam issues and access to water. It is only 3 years ago that I watched platypus dying in our Cudgegong river as it was reduced to puddles in the drought. We are now entering another drier/normal period and the level of our river is dropping noticeably every day. I would be happy to show you. Obviously DUST Elimination, noise control, traffic on our main road to Mudgee and water availability MUST be adequately addressed. |
Kirsty Fuller
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to object to the Environmental Impact Statement for Bowdens Silver Mine. I west of Moree and am involved in the agribusiness industry working on the family farm with my husband. I also have good friends who live six kms downstream from the mine site on Lawson Creek. These friends have a stud beef herd and rely on the Lawson Creek for their water. Potentially Acid Forming waste rock will be dumped on site forever. This dump will be 77 hectares in size. A large percentage of this rock will break down leaching heavy metals and acidic water in to the water table and Lawson Creek. Bowdens plans a massive toxic tailings dam with a single wall less than one kilometre from Lawson Creek. This tailings dam will be full of chemicals from processing (cyanide etc), tailings from ore processing and heavy metals. This will be here forever and is designed to leak 1.58 megalitres a day in to Lawson Creek. Agriculture and tourism are the main drivers of the Lue economy. This mine will destroy tourism and severely impact agriculture. Lawson Creek and its tributaries and the ground water are the lifeblood of this community. This mine plans to use 2000 megalitres of water each year. There is not enough water in the valley so Bowdens propose to pipe polluted recycled water from Moolarben and Ulan mines. This is water from another catchment (not good policy) and will require a pipeline through valuable farm land. The risk is that this pipeline will leak, polluting these farms. Bowdens Mine, should it go ahead, will mean the end of the village of Lue and clean air, tank water, ground water and creek water for the whole valley. Whilst this is no direct impact to me personally, I am here showing my objection to the project in support of our friends. If this Mine was to go ahead, our friends and their neighbours will not have a viable business. |
Bernadette Harvey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object strongly to the submission made by Bowdens Silver. We have invested our life savings in a property in Rylstone, just 10nm from the proposed site. We live off grid and rely on our rooftop for our water. Bowdens threatens the safety of our drinking water with the hazardous toxins it will release into the atmosphere through its mining process. It will leave behind another huge, gaping and ugly hole when it abandons its project at the end of its life, scarring our beautiful surroundings forever. The danger it represents to the health of the children attending primary school at our neighbouring community of Lue should be enough to shut this dangerous project down once and for all. |
Alison Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My main concern is water contamination in and around Lue which will impact the water table from which we draw water for our stock and home use. The idea of lead contamination in our environment is positively frightening and should be avoided at all costs. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live east of Lue in the Rylstone area. My primary concern is the potential impact on me and others of airborne lead dust blowing east on the prevailing and dominant westerly winds in this area. There is nothing in Bowden's submissions that allay this concern. I am not aware that total dust suppression had been achieved by any lead mining operation anywhere, and I can't see how Bowden's think they can. I am also generally concerned about the impact of mining in an area that depends increasingly on eco tourism from Sydney and further afield. The introduction of an ecologically questionable enterprise in the middle of the region will certainly have negative impact on tourism to the area, and the financial prospects of many businesses in the area. I am convinced that job losses in the local area resulting from Bowden's mine will greatly outweigh any new employment opportunities created directly by Bowden's, resulting in a nett loss of jobs and income. I am not against mining in general and I recognise the benefits as well as the risks. I do however believe that mining should be restricted to areas away from populated areas where the inevitable risks to people and the built environment can be more effectively mitigated. A mine, with all that entails, on the outskirts of a vibrant small town in a productive agricultural and tourism region surrounded by population centres like Mudgee and Rylstone is far too risky and damaging to contemplate. I respectfully ask that approval for Bowden's Silver (and zinc and lead) NOT be granted on the grounds of certain negative impacts on the local community and businesses, and the unacceptably high risk of adverse health and environmental impact in the longer term. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the pollution of groundwater and the effect on the health of the environment and anything living in the vicinity. I live in the inner west of Sydney and know the long lasting effects of lead in the atmosphere and in the soil. It is toxic and dangerous. Why pollute an area that has high tourist value and agricultural significance for this toxic development. |
Helen Doble
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the approval of the Bowden's Lead/Silver/Zinc mine for the following reasons: • I live in the community of Kandos and have friends in the town of Lue and bordering the proposed mine. They have grave concerns for the welfare of their families, the environment and their livelihoods on highly productive farming land and I too share their concern. • Even very low levels of exposure to lead can have lifelong effects on the body's systems, particularly in children and pregnant women. • Bowden’s mine will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Bowden's projected water availability measurements are based on bolstered rain figures. • Climate change has meant that we are experiencing more severe weather patterns and with that comes flood, fire and drought. This could result in an overflowing toxic tailings dam, toxic smoke from bushfire, or toxic dust when in drought. • There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. Bowden's have stated in their own documents that there will be a small amount of leakage from the tailings dam. This is not an acceptable risk considering the likelihood of chemicals such as cyanide, or heavy metals such as lead, leaching into the water table and waterways beyond the dam including Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. There is no coming back from that. • The clearing of Boxy Grass Woodland is completely at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery Program. This clearing could also affect the survival of the endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot. Is Lue to be yet another small community like Wollar, Ulan and Bylong which slowly dies as people tire of dealing with the risk of contamination in their air, soil and water while watching their properties decrease in value and their rural amenities dwindle. Let’s hope not and that approval for this lead mine does not go ahead! Kind regards Helen Doble |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a rate payer and member of the community that would be impacted upon by this proposed mine, I strongly object to the proposed Bowdens mine. My concerns relate to the effect of the resultant lead dust on young children and unborn children in and around this proposed mine. The World Health Organisation has claimed there is no safe level of lead for any individual. Surely the well being of the community members must be considered when making any decision about this proposed mine. |
Edward Miller
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this mine due to its potential impacts on local farms, residents and wildlife. Toxic runoff and dust will damage the local area significantly. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed lead mine as it will negatively impact the livelihood, health and environment of the local area, population, flora and fauna. Lead is toxic. This mine should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I don’t want it to go ahead because of my daughter’s health |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I find it quite abhorrent that a lead/silver mine can be allowed to happen here. I am not a resident of the area but visit several times a year. I ask you to consider the necessity of this mine going ahead. I think it will certainly decrease tourism in the area and for the residents it must certainly affect their normal lives - traffic, environment destruction, noise pollution etc. I therefore object to having this mine. |
Janie rothery
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Threats to water security. Dangerous lead exposure Toxic tailings in waterways Negative and permanent social issues including loss of health and community Acid mine drainage Biodiversity and ecological impacts Increased traffic dust and noise |
Susie and Allan Bennett
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a pristine and beautiful area, which we regularly visit. The mine would certainly detract from the appeal of the area, I’m sure we are not the only people who would be less inclined to visit should it proceed. We also have concerns regarding the environmental impact of the mine, we have no scientific background. However, logic just seems to tell you that this type of activity can’t be healthy for the environment and the people living and visiting there. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the volume of waste water that will be stores and how it can be guaranteed that there will not be any seepage or overflow in the event of heavy rain. I am also concerned about the amount of blasting that will be occurring. This will impact on the future of our family's alpaca farm both from noise and possibly vibrations. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against this mine as a member of the community having property here in lue |
Georgia Flynn
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a mother and community member in a Mudgee. I strongly object to a lead mine so near our local community and essential water source. |
Thomas Kelsall
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee/Lue is a pristine and beautiful area, which regularly wins tourism awards Imposing a lead mine 2 kms from the village of Lue is wrong - it’s the wrong mine in the wrong place The proponent’s intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small ephemeral creek which didn’t run at all for the 2 years from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. The proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowdens Silver Mine going ahead because it will be drawing water for use by the mine from the Lawson Creek and catchment, which will mean less water for the people who need the water from the Lawson Creek. Also those on the Creek or the Cudgegong River that the Lawson Creek flows into, will have their water contaminated. |
Toby Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My Bowdens project concerns are threats to water security and water quality, dangerous lead exposure, toxic tailings dam and negative and permanent social impacts. |
Anne-Marie WOODS
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In the past my family's farm was located in Rylston. It is a beautiful area with significant Historical value; now well known and visited by tourists. I strongly object to the establishment of the Bowen Silver/Lead mine near Lue. It will have a substantial irreversible and dangerous environmental impacts on the local farming community and landscape. The water supply and quality must not be compromised. The dangers of lead poisoning are well documented and must not be treated lightly. The long term devastation of the environment ,fauna and farming community's health and well being can never be compensated by the short term gains of an open cut mine. This Mine is not in the right place. Yours Sincerely Anne-Marie Woods |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I disagree with the Bowden's Silver Mine going ahead. As a Mudgee resident, I feel that Bowden's have been very dishonest in presenting the mine as a "Silver mine" when the majority of production will be Lead and Zinc. Looking at the recent Commodity prices, the investors will be receiving more for there buck with Lead and Zinc. Understandably so, but I bet that they don't realise the impact they will have on Lue Village or any of the other surrounding towns. Do the investors have any idea on how close this mine will be to a small public school that educates young children. The future impact that these hideous chemicals will have on these children and their future children and for how generations going forward. Not to mention, families in the towns and villages that surround Lue. Mid Western Regional Council is well known for its fresh produce from the towns and villages that make up the regions boundaries. People come here to experience the food, wines, stay in the towns or Farm stays. I'm sure if experiencing a week / weekend farm stay in the Lue district, they would love to hear all the noise, horrid dust clouds (and whatever nasties are in those), oh and by the way.... make sure you pack enough water - you will need to drink and also for showers, as the tap water is now contaminated after the collection ponds on the mine site leaked into Lawson Creek and the groundwater system. Since moving here in 1980 the town and rapidly changed to a tourism mecca, with people flocking here, for repeated visits, or moving here. We don't receive our high accolades in Tourism because of a "Silver Mine" that will ruin our ecology and pollute our waterways. With the current coal mines that are here and our tourism, Mudgee and surrounds already suffer with a shortage of affordable housing for families that currently live here, that don't work in the coal mines. These people have regular employment at cafes, dress shops, pubs, offices. Therefore any young people that decide to move out on there own, need multiple people living in the houses to be able to afford the rent. This causes the local streets to be clogged, as they all have their own car and not enough space in garages etc. Therefore needing to park on the streets. In small streets, this causes congestion and unsafe for children playing. With another mine opening, more people moving here, less houses for people to live in, inflated rental and buying/ selling prices. This was evident during COVID, with the influx of people leaving Sydney. This also effects availability at childcare, Pre-school (which is already bad), Primary and Secondary schools. Bowden's have been involved with sporting clubs around the district. I was very unhappy to receive an email from Mudgee Wombats, guilting me in supporting Bowden's because they were instrumental in the Canteen at the new Clubhouse. My son has played Rugby for 5 years now. Just because he has done so, doesn't mean that I have to support Bowden's mine venture. The majority of my canteen funds were spent at the canteen at the old clubhouse anyway. |
Sally MacNally
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this proposal; my views include all of the above; noise dust pollution to the community. Not to mention lead exposure-there are no safe levels. Environmental concerns including water security and quality especially as we have come out of a huge drought, floods and bushfires; we have lost so much already! Why should this be added to with this mine??? Toxic tailings which will contaminate existing water ways as will acid mine drainage. The list is long…! Destruction of a community… health and social issues that affect communities. Already rural communities are struggling to find appropriate healthcare workers to support their needs… Please do not let this mine go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My main objection is the large storage of tailing water. This large ammount of poluted water will be reliant on the membrane not being damaged to allow seapage into the ground water. If this happens it will obviously cause poluted water to run into down straam dams from which cattle will be using. It would also take a very long time to repair any breach the membrane. There can not be any guantee that in an extreem weather event there will not be overflow from the dam. Having invested money with my family in an alpaca herd which I would like to increase in size it makes this investment doubtful. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose to this! as the result of mining our local water and air quality will be effected. My family suffers from asthma an other breathing problems. Please stop this from going ahead!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Property in lue this will effect the community |
Andrew Curro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local farmer and father to 3 young boys, I’m deeply concerned that this project is even being considered. Our beautiful valley is home to some amazing farm land and amazing people. The impact this project will have on our community and the Mudgee area is just simply not acceptable. Putting the issues of noise dust and the traffic aside (Which are a disaster in themselves) Why and how can something so risky be considered so close to a community, school and a major water way which serves the whole west of nsw . I’m not against mining, I have 3 boys who will need jobs. But I ask you to ask yourself one thing. If you can’t guarantee 1 million % that nothing could ever possibly go wrong then how can you approve something that would cause irreversible damage? Have we not learnt anything from our past? Once something has been destroyed it can’t always be rebuilt,once that river is contaminated it can’t be undone. Once my kids suffer from the dangers of lead will you help them? When I can’t drink my water will you supply me with water? Think about the risks here, This isn’t a matter of not wanting a mine in our area, It’s a matter that the risk is just too great |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Lue region, along with its neighbouring communities in Kandos and Mudgee, has experienced marked economic and cultural growth in the last decade, based on cultural and eco-tourism, globally significant regenerative agriculture projects and promotion of the area’s outstanding natural beauty and heritage values as reflected in the World Heritage status of nearby Wollemi National Park. This has led to an increase in land and property values and a resurgence of community and tourism activity around celebrated local events such as the Cementa Festival and Mudgee wine and heritage tours. The identity and environmental integrity of this remarkable but fragile region must not be sacrificed for short-term private gain. The risks associated with large-scale open cut lead, zinc and silver mining described in both the DPE report and the scientific evidence compiled by the Lue Action Group are clear and urgent, and have been realised in countless open cut mining projects situated in environmentally sensitive areas and adjacent to rural and remote communities across Australia: the risk of groundwater contamination, of widespread wind-borne pollution detrimental to human and ecosystem health, the risk to human and ecosystem health of long-term unremediated contamination of tailings ponds and abandoned mine sites, the risk of direct harm to the brain development of children, the certainty of destruction of extremely threatened grassy box woodland and of koala habitat; these all threaten the lives, livelihoods, economic resilience, natural capital, and watershed health of places and people in perpetuity. Bowdens has experience in exploiting natural resources over limited time spans but the company does not have the expertise and knowledge of complex systemic interactions referred to by independent experts in their assessments of the potential harms caused by the mine, or those possessed by farmers, indigenous communities and other local residents in and around Lue. It is astonishing that the DPE report acknowledges the breadth and scale of potential harms, and the uncertainty surrounding ongoing impacts of mining at this scale in an environmentally and hydrologically sensitive region, and then dismisses the evidence against the proposal and the objections of local and regional communities as being of no merit. The precautionary principle, as outlined in the Stockholm Declaration, must be followed to avoid severe damage to public health and the environment in a case of scientific uncertainty. Under the precautionary principle, the onus is on Bowdens to prove the proposed activity will not be harmful to the local environment, communities and their economic, social and physical wellbeing. But the company is unable to make such claims, and its own statements about the likelihood or, if necessary, mitigation of future harm have in places been inaccurate, contested or misleading. Neither Australia’s international obligations to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions nor our responsibilities to current and future generations in environmentally sensitive food-producing regions justify such a high-risk mining venture. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Here are the reasons why I am opposed to the Bowdens Silver mine; 1. It is too close to the Louee, Rylstone and Mudgee community. 2. It is an open cut mine which is a 'dirty' mining process irrespective of new technologies. Contamination of our waterways is a given which leads to grave health concerns for the local community. 3. It is a direct slap in the face to the indigenous community within this region to desecrate their land. 4. The damage caused to the local environment/biodiversity not to mention the energy required to mine far outweighs the benefit of unsurfacing a metal that may be used in new 'greener' technology. Ironically the energy consumed in the construction of this new 'greener' technology, not to mention the toxic waist produced in it's production and disposal is now very much under question. There is no guarantee that this will be the best step forward for reducing our environmental impact globally. 5. Personally, I enjoy and value living in a quiet country town and do not welcome an increase in traffic/population etc. 6. Mines are not a long term sustainable way of managing employment in our region, as this mine will be short term. 7. If our country is so concerned about China monopolising mining resources then we should stop selling our land and resources to them. I am not satisfied with Bowdens reassurances as this is a man made endeavour and even with the best of intentions mistakes and unforeseen circumstances (man made or natural) will result in short term and long term contamination to our local environment. Once done there is no going back and reversing the damage made. It is just to close to thriving communities. |
Nicki Ashton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to submit my strong objection to this development going ahead. I have serious concerns for the environmental impact on the community, specifically the acid mine drainage causing contamination of Lawson Creek Valley and Cudgegong River.. I am concerned about the exceedance of lead in blood from fine particle lead dust which may cause a loss of IQ and behavioural problems in children as well as protein plaques in the brain causing impaired cognitive dysfunction and very high risk of early onset dementia. It would be a shame to lose the clean green environment of the Mudgee area which would also see a loss in tourism. Please consider my submission in stopping the development of the mine. I do not believe that the recommended conditions of consent address any of the above issues and I strongly oppose this moving forward. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The development will result in excess noise, destruction of local flora and fauna, pose a major threat of contamination of local water systems and the release of contaminated dust being released into the air cause health impacts for local residents. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Kaama Joy |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to the development of the mine at Lue for the following reasons: 1. Dangerous lead exposure I have had direct experience with a child with heavy metal poisoning and the impact on my child's health required years of medical intervention. We know that any exposure to lead is dangerous, and chronic exposure can lead to decreased IQ and cognitive function in children. Bowdens plans to dig up and disturb 95,000 tonnes of lead at Lue, two kilometres from the primary school and this is an unacceptable risk for the community. 2. Toxic tailings dam Bowdens plans to build a large tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. Holding poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every single day (best-case scenario). 3. Acid mine drainage More than half of all waste rock excavated (26 million tonnes) will be potentially acid-forming. Bowdens wants to stack it above the Lawson Creek water table over 77 hectares, creating a major acid mine drainage risk. Acid mine drainage can threaten drinking water supplies and irrigation systems downstream from a mining site. 4. Increased traffic, dust and noise Anyone who regularly uses the Lue Road and some Mudgee residents can expect a significant increase in noise and traffic, with the material being trucked from the mine site on B-Doubles along the Lue Road and through Mudgee, six days per week. Not to mention daily construction and worker traffic. 5. Biodiversity and ecological impacts Bowdens wants to clear 457 hectares of land, including some Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Grassy Woodland. In a completely greenfield area in the middle of the Mudgee-Rylstone tourist trail, Bowdens is trying to build three open cut pits across 52 hectares, and a huge tailings dam with a 56-metre high wall (that’s higher than the Colosseum). It plans to leave a 53-hectare hole behind, forever. 6. Negative and permanent social impacts Loss of property values. Destruction of community. Noise, vibration and traffic. Lead in dust and water supply. These impacts are real. |
Ash Rooklyn
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The works will have a largely negative affect on local water sources, natural lands & surrounding community. It would be a shame to destroy a beautiful part of our country that attracts so many |
Paul Galasso
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed open-cut mine will threaten the families of the region in so many ways, including the following: - Threats to farming and agriculture - Threats to water security & water quality - Dangerous lead exposure - Toxic tailings dam - Negative and permanent social impacts, including loss of property values, health and community issues - Acid mine drainage (United Nations called acid mine drainage the second biggest problem of our world, bested only by global warming) - Increased traffic, dust & noise - Biodiversity & ecological impacts Not to mention that it will be situated just 2Kms from a primary school as well as extremely close to, and impacting the Mudgee region’s famous vineyards and agricultural farmland and will be contaminating the local waterways. The main points are: - There will be no water for dust suppression. - No site rehabilitation. - No compensation for displaced families and businesses. Or to make their homes liveable much less their tank-water drinkable. - Tucking acid-leaching hazardous materials away under a tarpaulin. - A tailings dam that's all-but-guaranteed to end up in the Lawson Creek during the next flood event (the Havilah Bridge on the Lue Road was under water last October) - 25 sites of Aboriginal cultural significance will be destroyed. - The wind blows from the west in Lue - depositing their lead dust in Dunn's Swamp, Rylstone Dam and the Cudgegong river (which the town-folk drink) - lead particles from Mt Isa mine have been found as far as Antarctica! This mine can not be approved as it will be devastating to the community and surrounding region. |
Mick Radzievic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining can be an extremely destructive practice that often has very negative impacts on the surrounding environment. Because the material that is mined for is surrounded by other ore and rock, mining creates large amounts of mineral waste in the form of waste rock and tailings. Waste rock consists of all of the earth surrounding the ore that must be removed in order to access the desired minerals, metals, and gems. Tailings are the waste material from the ore processing phase, and often contain toxins left over from the ore separating process along with small amounts of heavy metals that were not fully removed. Lead is almost always contained in sulfide ores as galena, or lead sulfide45. Waste rock material from mines that contain metal sulfides can lead to sulfuric acid drainage when left out in the open air. Tailings also contain minerals and materials that can lead to dangerous runoff and water contamination when stored improperly. Some mine waste and tailing dump sites are structurally unsound and often overflow and break, allowing contaminants to spill out over the surrounding environment. In some cases, mines will have long pipes or waste canals that carry tailings to waterways for dumping. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have close friends who live and work in the vicinity of the proposed open cut silver, lead and zinc mine at Lue NSW. If this mine is approved, it will have a significant detrimental impact on their lives and livelihood. The people residing on the Liverpool Plains NSW were given strong promises that it was not going to be mined. The protests of landholders were ignored, and the landholders now cannot trust the resource sector. These protests have been ongoing for a decade with no assurances that mining will not occur as previously promised. The residents of Lue and the surrounding area are now facing a proposed open cut mine which could spill over into their agricultural land. There is also the impact of the mine exposing residents to lead. As a special education teacher with a master's degree in special education I am well aware of the potential harmful effects the exposure to lead can have on children, particularly children under 7 years old. As the proposed mine is 2 kilometers from Lue primary school this could pose dire consequences for the children. The effects of lead poisoning include a decrease in cognitive abilities as lead affects the brain and central nervous system resulting in intellectual disability behavioral disorders and learning problems. Protecting children from exposure to lead, even low levels such as from breathing in lead dust is of paramount importance as this could lead to the possibility of permanent impairment in a child's abilities and outcomes. I live in an adjoining regional council area and am objecting to this silver mine as it will impact on my friends and colleagues lives as well as affect the lives of children living in the district. The risks and potential impact of this open cut mine to the residents and their land is too great to be approved. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
No development should cause inconvenience to the water, and local farms they are the roots of human civilization |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have friends that have lived in the Central West, more specifically, Lue and Mudgee, NSW, for over 100 years. They have spent their whole lives as farmers. A proposed open-cut mine would threaten their family and the region in so many ways, including the following: - Threats to farming and agriculture - Threats to water security & water quality - Dangerous lead exposure - Toxic tailings dam - Negative and permanent social impacts, including loss of property values, health and community issues - Acid mine drainage (United Nations called acid mine drainage the second biggest problem of our world, bested only by global warming) - Increased traffic, dust & noise - Biodiversity & ecological impacts Not to mention that it will be situated just 2Kms from a primary school as well as extremely close to, and impacting the Mudgee region’s famous vineyards and agricultural farmland and will be contaminating the local waterways. The main points are: - There will be no water for dust suppression. - No site rehabilitation. - No compensation for displaced families and businesses. Or to make their homes liveable much less their tank-water drinkable. - Tucking acid-leaching hazardous materials away under a tarpaulin. - A tailings dam that's all-but-guaranteed to end up in the Lawson Creek during the next flood event (the Havilah Bridge on the Lue Road was under water last October) - 25 sites of Aboriginal cultural significance will be destroyed. - The wind blows from the west in Lue - depositing their lead dust in Dunn's Swamp, Rylstone Dam and the Cudgegong river (which the town-folk drink) - lead particles from Mt Isa mine have been found as far as Antarctica! |
Georgia Goninan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned that there is not enough evidence to suggest that any potential benefit of this mine would outweigh the very real and serious health, environmental and economic impacts of this project going ahead in the Lue Region. Primarily, I consider that insufficient technical detail across key aspects of mine viability combined with the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. There was not an adequate assessment of the impact to ground and surface water (which will be significant) in the EIS and this was also not addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. There is inadequate and unresolved key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. The risks of acid mine drainage from this project are too serious to consider proceeding with this project. This would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the significant role that tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. Lastly, should this project be approved the conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. This must be rectified if this project is to go ahead safely. |
Simone Keith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a potential risk to all health of human animals and vegetation lead is poisonous sianide etc are deadly in even small doses and to be constantly subjected to this is absolutely wrong |
Donald Recsei
Organisation |
N|A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a regular visitor to the area and deeply appreciate the environmental qualities plus the pure agricultural and heritage qualities of this unique area. It is clear that the proposed development would degrade and negatively impact the region and hence is totally inappropriate and should be rejected. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is not safe for the community members in the area and unfair to do this to families that have been on these rural properties for generations. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerned about the environmental impact of the mine. In particular contamination of water and soil with heavy metals including lead and the impacts this will have on the health of residents, as well as on agriculture and tourism. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Im opposed to the project! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The risk to our local waterways I have seen first hand the impact a mine can have on a small village or community such as Wollar The way it will affect our local tourism The way it will affect the local agricultural enterprises And the health risk to those surrounding the proposed site This proposed mine makes coal mining look clean!!! |
Abby Pfahl
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My concerns in particular regard the fact that acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the Lead mine as it will impact the environment significantly and also the health and wellbeing of the community of Lue and other communities. |
Brendon Flynn
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My property and livestock and house hold water is wholly bashed around the Lawson creek, my children stand on the lue rd to wait for the bus and the negative impacts that this mine will have is so so detrimental to our livelihoods that it just can’t go forward. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I want to try and save the Lue and wider Mid-Western region from the serious and permanent impacts this lead mine will have on our health, environment and livelihoods. Lead is toxic to humans, and there is no safe level of exposure. |
Annabelle Lehmann
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. The conditions and assessment report put forward by the NSW Department of Planning are inadequate, and do not impose sufficient controls or protections for the community. |
Ben Nagel
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family’s farm is in the region and I think the general consensus of the whole local community is that there has been a lack of due diligence and any thought as to the actual environmental impacts, and the potential for environmental disasters. If one of the pipes taking away the waste water underground happens to crack or burst, that whole area of country will be hugely affected for decades/generations. Not to mention the air pollution too. Like a lot of mining, this appears to be a quick buck with no thought to the longer term impacts. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the needless destruction of beautiful land scape for profit I object to the needless destruction of beautiful landscape, and the risks of contamination locally and more broadly I object to the needless risk to human health I object to the needless risk to other well established industry. I object to the ruining of amenity for such a great little town, and its fabulous pub, for profit I approve of this mines licence being revoked so that when I return later this year, there will be no open cut mines interrupting such a beautiful part of the country. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We don’t need more mine here. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I've lived in Mudgee for majority of my life and used to own a farm in Lue just down the road from where the lead mine is. If the lead contaminates our rivers it will destroy Mudgee, and that mine will be there forever, whether or not its still in use. Go elsewhere, your not welcome here!! |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Eurambeen Farming Company |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
• Mudgee/Lue is a pristine and beautiful area, which regularly wins tourism awards (i.e. you love to visit it!) • Imposing a lead mine 2 kms from the village of Lue is wrong - it’s the wrong mine in the wrong place • The proponent’s intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small ephemeral creek which didn’t run at all for the 2 years from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. • The proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. |
ROGER CULL
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
• My wife and I love to visit the beautiful Mudgee/Lue area, which regularly wins tourism awards! • The proponent’s intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small ephemeral creek which didn’t run at all for 2 years, from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. • The proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United Nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. It’s the wrong mine in the wrong place to impose a lead mine 2 kms from the village of Lue |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The environment impact will be irreversible. |
liz mayberry
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
contamination of ground water fallout of lead particles in the air |
William Oliver
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the development of the lead and silver mine at Lue as I am concerned about the impact the mine will have on the local community due to the threats to water security and water quality from contamination, dangerous lead exposure especially to children in the area and the potential destruction of the community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The construction of this mine and the use of the proposed chemicals will have significant impacts on the destruction of waterways, the natural biodiversity and the animals in surrounding communities. Not to mention the potential to contaminate the underground tablelands which connects the entirety of NSW water supply and the entire agricultural industry potentially destroying NSW’S food production. |
William Woods
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear IPC, I have been a visitor to the area many times throughout the past. The agricultural and tourism benefits of the area are plain to see and are a sustainable benefit to one and all. Mining has a short life . They are not a sustainable benefit. The locals would have a heavy burden to carry if this mine goes ahead. Lead contamination is a no brainer at just 2 km from a school ! Water requirements cannot be sustained particularly if there is a drought and that will certainly occur again in the future. The roads and transport infrastructure will be heavily hit. The area is of high historic value and I'm sure there is Aboriginal Cultural Heritage to also consider. I urge you to consider the issue from a long term perspective. Australia already has sufficient mines supplying the minerals sought from this project. Please prevent this mine from happening, Regards, Bill Woods |
Sophie Powell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In complete opposition |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this mine will ruin a small close knit community. Too close to town and ruining natural landscape |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the proposed mine would be an extreme detriment to the environment and health in the Lue and surrounding communities. Research suggests, as heard by the Independent Planning Commission, that any lead exposure is an extreme risk to the environment and its peoples, the water tables, flora and fauna and there is absolutely no justifiable reason to allow such risks to be placed upon the community. The wrong mine in the wrong place. |
Robyn Webster
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine (the project) in the MId-Western Region Council area. I am a property owner in the town of Kandos and the project raises huge concerns around the high potential to release toxins such as lead into our waterways and air, and hence a huge potential to risk the health and wellbeing of local people, fauna and flora. I have read the NSW Government’s Bowden Silver Assessment Report and conclude that even a small risk for this type of mine in such close proximity to the town of Lue, Mudgee and the Kandos/Rylstone region is not worth the risk. And this is not a small risk. How the company can say that an open cut mine would not negatively impact the waterways and air for this type of mining belies belief. It is essential that the longer term environmental considerations for the area are properly assessed, not just short term financial gain for a single company. Evidence including from the CSIRO (1) clearly shows that mining discharges water into the environment. The proposed evaporation ponds have attracted concern over leakage of water into soils, aquifers and rivers. Hence this project has a high potential to penetrate the drinking water in the local district. Additionally, to reduce the dust and other particulate matter being exposed to the environment, and as proposed in the assessment, a large amount of water will be redirected to the mine and be contaminated. Considering climate change and increasing temperatures which are higher in inland areas, it is crucial that we protect our groundwater systems for water dependent ecosystems now and into the future. Negatively impacting these water systems now may have longer term negative impacts than the assessment has considered. Financially speaking the numbers simply don’t add up. Employment of approximately 300 people for a short term financial gain of the mine is completely outweighed by the longer term financial and community gains for the region including agriculture and tourism which is currently on the rise. If this project goes ahead, it will decimate the attraction to the area and the number of jobs lost I believe have not been considered. While I am not aboriginal I do have connections to the local community and understand the impact the mine would have to their country is entirely distressing. I support the local aboriginal community in their expressions of concern around the impact to their cultural heritage for this site and the surround area. In conclusion, I do not believe the recommended conditions of consent would ensure that the project complies with contemporary criteria and standards in protecting the local environment. The recent rejection of the coal mine near the great barrier reef (2) is a precedent of logic that should be considered. The similarities include the impacts of open cut mines, the impacts to tourism and the environmental impacts, including local water. While the area of Lue is not heritage listed, the value of the land is no less important to the local communities as well as tourists and visitors to the region, as well as aboriginal heritage. In particular, Kandos is in a period of transformation in attracting visitors who are interested in the local flora and fauna, as well as a blossoming arts and cultural precinct. It also has historical interest and is one of the few affordable areas outside of Sydney for young families and individuals. The property I purchased recently is to promote and this local area, and as a short term leasing property for the next 5 years, I aim to employ local people in the care of the property for these purposes. If this mine goes ahead, I believe this will negatively impact the attraction to the area and hence reduce employment opportunities both directly for the accomodation as well as local businesses that will be promoted along side the accommodation offering. I hope you consider my objection to the project and highly consider the longer term positive impacts to the local area if the mine does not go ahead. Your sincerely Robyn Webster 1. https://www.publish.csiro.au/ebook/chapter/9780643103283_Chapter_10#:~:text=Mines%20that%20go%20beneath%20the,and%20other%20groundwater%2Ddependent%20ecosystems. 2. https://apnews.com/article/politics-australia-government-queensland-business-60404ea8780de8aa157abb3bca2d1555 |
Lucy Robertson
Organisation |
Burra Bike & Board |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioner, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed new silver mine in Lue. I grew up in the Mudgee region and regularly visit family and friends there, as well as conducting business there as a filmmaker and writer. In this capacity, I believe this project would have devastating consequences for both the natural environment and local community, including the valuable sectors of tourism, agriculture and the arts within the Lue region. I would like to outline my specific concerns according to the following key points: 1. Bowdens Silver has no previous experience or proven capacity to mitigate the serious environmental impacts that this mine would present to the community, especially related to water quality and security. Based on the flawed rainfall modelling and inadequate environmental assessments provided by the company in its submissions, it seems Bowdens Silver is unable to adequately predict and plan for the risks associated with the proposed tailings dam and water table near the mine site. Even small mistakes coming from these flawed models would have dire and long-running consequences for neighbouring properties and the wider community. The potential benefits from this new mining operations come nowhere close to outweighing the devastating risks of water contamination from toxic chemicals like lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and sulfuric acid to the hundreds of residents along Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River. As far as I can tell based on submissions by Bowdens and expert opinion during IPC hearings, the company has not sought input of independent third-party auditors to ensure the accuracy of the rainfall data and water modelling used, and therefore should not be allowed to test their cherry-picked theories on the local community. 2. The regional area of Lue, Rylstone and Mudgee is no place for a toxic mine, specifically including the tailings dam detailed in the proposal. This area has a rich history of thriving traditional cultures and generations-old agricultural operations, as well as a growing tourism sector, that does not align with any large-scale mining operations, let alone one as toxic as silver and lead. The company’s proposal for a tailings dam is of particular concern, given its own predicted allowance of 1.6ml daily leaching of toxic waste into the surrounding environment. The close proximity of regenerative farming operations, organic vineyards, world-class tourism and hospitality ventures, and children’s facilities including Lue’s primary school, does not make this site appropriate for a tailings dam that is expected to leach at least some amount of lead, arsenic and cyanide, even if the company’s lowest estimation of 1.6ml per day are correct. As far as I can tell from Bowden’s proposal documents and information from the Lue Action Group, there has been no offer of compensation or details for potential repatriation of these toxic substances to neighbouring property owners or residents who will have to live with them. In considering the risks associated with the proposed Bowdens Silver tailings dam, I note the following social and environmental disasters associated with silver mining operations that use tailings dams within our living memory: - Mount Morgan Mine (Queensland, Australia): The Mount Morgan Mine, which operated from 1882 to 1981, was one of the largest gold and copper mines in Australia. However, it also produced large amounts of waste material, including tailings containing heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, and lead. In 1992, heavy rainfall caused a breach in the mine's tailings dam, resulting in a significant release of contaminated water into the Dee River. The spill caused widespread damage to aquatic ecosystems and led to the deaths of thousands of fish. - Broken Hill Lead Mining (NSW, Australia): The Broken Hill Lead Mining area has been one of the largest lead mines in the world for more than a century. However, the mine has also been associated with significant environmental and health impacts, including soil and water contamination, elevated blood lead levels in local residents, and the death of birds and other wildlife. In 2009, a spill at a lead processing plant operated by the mining company Perilya led to the release of lead-contaminated material into a nearby creek, causing damage to local ecosystems and prompting health warnings for nearby residents. - Golden Cross Mine (Coromandel, New Zealand): The Golden Cross Mine, which operated from 1991 to 1998, produced gold and silver. However, the mine's waste material, including tailings, was stored in a dam that was prone to leaks and breaches. In 1995, a breach in the dam caused a significant release of contaminated water and sediment into a nearby stream, leading to the deaths of fish and other aquatic life. Can Bowdens Silver, or the governing environmental and health authorities tasked with assessing compliance and performance of the mine site, honestly guarantee that its tailings dam will not end up being a similar disaster? It seems unconscionable to allow a company with no experience in managing such a waste resource to test its theories in such a valuable region, when we already have so many recent and local examples of what can go wrong. We need to learn from past mistakes such as these, especially given the volatile weather patterns and increased flooding risk associated with ongoing climate change. 3. The mine threatens several endangered species that have a much higher preservation value than the profit potential of the operation. Across the proposed 457 hectares of native habitat to be cleared, there are several vulnerable or endangered species and some critically endangered communities that will be put at risk. It is staggering that planning departments would even consider such a large scale mining operation in a completely greenfields site when it seems to be so starkly contrary to the NSW Koala Recovery Plan, let alone one that proposes razing a tract of critically endangered Box Grassy Woodland communities, as well as destroying known habitat of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot. While it is clear that any mining operations in this area would certainly not pass the ‘pub test’ based on environmental concerns, I would urge the commission to consider the independent and expert findings of Dr Michael Aberton and Dr Peter Serov in the report already submitted, which detail the flawed methodology and insufficient datasets provided by Bowdens Silver in the environmental assessments of the project. In particular, this report notes that the company has: - Failed to adequately identify nesting tree hollows and mitigate losses of this vital habitat for threatened barking owls, squirrel gliders, and other fauna; - Failed to meet the criteria of the NSW Koala Recovery Plan in preventing further fragmentation of suitable koala habitat; - Failed to consider all potential reptile and amphibian species within the proposed site; - Failed to adequately define and mitigate losses of critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot habitat within the proposed mine site; - Failed to represent the high value of critically endangered ecological community, Box Grassy Woodland, within the mine site, as well as underestimating the impact of reduced groundwater of remaining communities near the mine site; and - Failed to account for or adequately predict the full, long-term impacts of its mining operations on the surrounding environment over the life of the project. Given these considerable failures, I would urge the Commission to reject the Bowdens Silver mine proposal based on its significant environmental impacts. The risks to several species of flora and fauna vastly outweigh the potential profit benefits of the mine for a small group of stakeholders and benefactors. 4. Bowdens has no capacity to provide net positive benefits of this mine. When balancing the risks and benefits of mining with the existing social and economic interests of the community, it is current global best practice for mining companies to aim for a ‘net positive’ approach to managing the operation over the life of the mine. That is, rather than simply seeking to minimise negative impacts of the project, mining companies should aim to create a net positive impact on the environment and local communities. This goes above the expected employment opportunities or increased economic stimulation brought by the mine and may involve investing in restoration and rehabilitation projects, supporting local economic development, and promoting sustainable tourism and agriculture. In my personal review of the company’s proposal and submissions to date, I have not seen any such attempts to provide a net positive approach to the community in this project. Nor have I been able to find any evidence that Bowdens has sought to satisfy other best practice outcomes that balance the competing interests of the company and community, such as authentic consultation with landholders or traditional owners, compensation or investment for affected residents, or proven experience in managing similar operations. For these reasons, I urge the Commission to reject Bowdens Silver’s proposal for a State Significant Development in its Silver Mine at Lue. Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns. Sincerely, Lucy Robertson. |
Attachments |
submissionopposingbowdenssilvermineinluepdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.81 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowdens Mine as the impact from it would be so detrimental to the beautiful pristine environment of the Mudgee area where it is proposed. The impact on children will be substantial as it will be only 2km from Lue school, and the detriment to the natural environment from acid contamination and environmental degradation will be significant. What legacy does this leave for the next generation? To allow this mine tp proceed would be such a huge mistake as the negative impact would be permanent in an area which is known for its agriculture and tourism. Please don't allow this proposed Bowdens Mine to proceed... this is an urgent request to preserve the Lue and Mudgee region and not allow this destruction of environment and degradation to occur. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The environmental consequences are unacceptable. As someone familiar with the local area I know that irreparable damage will follow with effects reaching further than just the site. |
Emma Hayne
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine would destroy people, local natural environments and cause such harm. For an area that has a rich and a long history in farming, destroying it and people’s livelihoods is not acceptable in order to extract minerals. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not support this development, and think it will be harmful to the surrounding community and environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining operations can have significant and lasting impacts on the environment, which can be harmful to the natural world and its inhabitants. Therefore, it is reasonable to object to a mine being developed if it poses significant environmental risks. One of the primary environmental impacts of mining is the disruption and destruction of natural habitats. The process of extracting minerals and metals often involves the removal of large quantities of topsoil, which can lead to soil erosion, loss of vegetation, and the displacement of wildlife. Additionally, mining can result in the contamination of soil, water, and air with toxic chemicals, heavy metals, and other pollutants, which can have far-reaching and long-lasting effects on ecosystems and human health. Another concern is the use of large amounts of water in the mining process. In areas where water resources are scarce, this can lead to competition with other users, including communities, agriculture, and wildlife. Furthermore, the transportation of extracted minerals and metals, which often involves the use of heavy machinery and vehicles, can also have significant impacts on the environment. This can include habitat fragmentation, noise pollution, and increased greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change. In conclusion, the environmental impact of mining operations can be severe and long-lasting. It is important to consider these impacts and take them into account when deciding whether to develop a mine or not. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
JBWere |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have visited the area and I am very concerned that the proposed mine is totally inappropriate given the proximity of the mine to town water supply and housing. As I understand it there are 126 houses and a school near the proposed mine facility. This means that these groups of people are very vulnerable to toxicity of the local water supply through potential lead poisoning and this would last forever. Remediation of any problems or failings would be astronomical and too late for farming communities who rely on the water supply and would be ruined permanently. It is clearly inappropriate to put the existing community at risk at all no matter how unlikely any failings on the part of the mine operator who are making undertakings that can never be guaranteed. No matter how good this project is it needs to be in a region that would never affect or risk the amenity of the local community |
Olivia Griffiths
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Good afternoon Commissioners Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission, as part of your assessment of the Bowdens project at Lue. My name is Olivia Griffiths. I am a resident of Sydney but I have friends in the Lue area. I am not anti-development or anti-mining, but I care greatly about the impacts from the proposed mining operations to friend’s homes and properties. I support the work of the Lue Action Group and the independent outreach of Mrs and Mr Susannah and Jack White. As you would be aware Commissioners, the Bowdens project is situated in a spectacular greenfields landscape, on an elevated site, at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek which is a major tributary of the Cudgegong River. The mine is proposed within just 2km of Lue, a beautiful village between the thriving agricultural and tourism towns of Rylstone/Kandos and Mudgee, which was voted Top Tourism Town in Australia for 2021 and 2022. For their community, the development approval process of the Bowdens project has been drawn out. It has been riddled with amendments and examples of often clumsy and unclear data analysis which has been heavily criticised by independent experts commissioned by both Lue Action Group and the DPE. To assist the Commission in making its assessment now, Lue Action Group has coordinated a group of eight independent experts in their field to outline their analysis and assessments of the project across the following several key areas. Our view is that the combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. I will now briefly touch on the key shortcomings of this proposal. ISSUES Surface Water Bowdens do not have an adequate water supply. The EIS document from 2020 states clearly the project is not viable without an external water supply. As you would be aware, Bowdens initially proposed to pipe water from the Ulan coalfields. In 2022, they lodged an amendment to their application to remove this water supply pipeline and source all water from the site, i.e. from the Lawson Creek catchment. Earth Systems have raised concerns around the data supporting the site water balance. Our expert Shireen Baguley will elaborate on this today. This Project does not have sufficient water, and the true water quantity and water quality impacts of the current proposal have not been adequately assessed. Ground water On groundwater, this project raises more questions than it answers. The Middlemis review of the project consistently raises questions about the potential role of mapped fault structures beneath key mine site infrastructure like the tailings dam. Bowdens dismissed these concerns as being of little consequence. Groundwater expert Craig Flavel will talk about how this is just one example of the lack of clarity around impacts to groundwater from the mine, the corollary of this being the issue that adequate risk assessments have not been completed and the project should not be approved. Acid Mine Drainage Other than perhaps lead poisoning of humans and animals, acid mine drainage from the site bears the largest and longest-lasting risk to all stakeholders. We see three significant problems attached to this project in terms of acid mine drainage, each of which have been plainly called out by Earth Systems and will be elaborated on today by mining expert Michael White. Briefly: • The current design of the Waste Rock Emplacement is inappropriate and not fit for purpose; • The design of the tailings storage facility will allow seepage into the water table and is an unsuitable long-term solution with no appropriate mitigation strategy • The final void pit lake is accepted by Bowdens and the Department to have a greater than 50% flowthrough risk. The mitigation strategy proposed of increasing the size of the lake by 50%, has not had it’s impacts assessed and is not something that should be worked out in the conditions of consent post approval. Dust Suppression You need water to suppress dust. On an already water constrained site, we have concerns around the prevention of dust and dust-borne contaminants like lead and heavy metals leaving the site. The DPE itself identified dust as the key pathway for heavy metals to leave the site. Bowdens acknowledge that ‘’during dry weather periods, when evaporation is high, more water for dust suppression would be required’’, yet Earth Systems identified that now with all water to be drawn from the site, Bowdens have actually reduced the allocation of water for dust suppression from 204 to 133 megalitres a year, with no explanation or assessment of the impacts. I put to you commissioners this is just one example of the proponent shuffling numbers around to retrofit an inadequate water supply strategy to their broader mine design. Human Health Given that dust particles carrying heavy metals could leave the site, and that this project will produce 50 times more lead that silver, there are uncertainties around the modelled risks to human health. The intrinsic link between an elevated site location and uncertain water availability raises serious doubt around the accuracy of the modelled outcomes for human health. Barry Noller and Mark Taylor will speak to this shortly. But it’s important to remember the greenfield context here and the elevation of the minesite in relation to the village of Lue and numerous surrounding residents. Whichever side of the baseline modelling fence you land on Commissioners, I urge you to remember the fact that today, as we stand here, lead contamination is not a burden currently carried by the people of Lue, or the people downwind or downstream of Lue. If this mine goes ahead, it will be. Mine Precedents There are countless examples of poor, unproven mine design resulting in significant failures and damage to people and the environment. Chris Pavich will elaborate on this, but the complexity and technical resolution required to execute effective mine design is challenging for even the most experienced mining companies. Not only are their proposed designs inappropriate with no track record of success on this scale, but Bowdens have never operated a mine before and have no experience in constructing or managing these significant risks. Add to this the challenges posed by a tight balance sheet, and it’s not difficult to see why we have little confidence in their ability to operate the mine safely. Social Impacts Alison Ziller will talk about the social impacts of this mine. We have seen firsthand as villages like Wollar, Bylong, Bulga, Wybong and Ulan become ghost towns as a result of either the threat or reality of open cut mining on their doorstep. The lived reality of residents subjected to noise, vibration, traffic, dust, health risks and declining property value is always worse than modelling can account for. The potential for this project to harm and hinder is too great. There are alternatives to this mine that would better serve the economy and health of the region. Please reject the proposal for this mine to go ahead. Sincerely Olivia Griffiths |
Hugh and Leigh Hodgkinson
Organisation |
Access for All |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There is an undeniably high risk that water resources in the area will be compromised or drained altogether, destroying valuable primary industry.. A mine would adversely affect the local tourist industry with truck movements, dust and other pollutants and thus the overall amenity of the area. All tailings dams leak to a certain extent Noise |
Mick Radzievic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining is the extraction of minerals and other geological materials of economic value from deposits on the Earth. Mining adversely affects the environment by inducing loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, and contamination of surface water, groundwater, and soil. Mining can also trigger the formation of sinkholes. The leakage of chemicals from mining sites can also have detrimental effects on the health of the population living at or around the mining site. In some countries, mining companies are expected to adhere to rehabilitation and environmental codes to ensure that the area mined is eventually transformed back into its original state. However, violations of such rules are quite common. |
Ken Jackson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My objections to Bowden's mine are listed below but firstly it is beyond belief that any sane rational person would consider it safe for our health and the environment. Location of proposed project is less than 1 kilometre from my house. Site design has been shown to be faulty and dangerous. Effects on our water supply from Lawson creek and bores will be catastrophic with them drawing water from creek and water table. I have personally seen and photographed Koalas within site area, the destruction of their habitat is contrary to NSW State Government's stated policy to protect them after devastating 2019 fires. Lead is deadly and dust settling on our roof tops will contaminate our drinking water. Lue road is dangerous now the increased traffic of B-Doubles carrying dangerous chemicals will make it a death trap. Project is going to drastically affect my holiday cabin rental business. Building a huge tailings dam over a know geographical fault line is sanity. Potential leakage from acid mine drainage will effect Lue, Mudgee and surrounding areas water supply. Potential negative effect on regions wine growing and primary producers industry is huge. Bowdens disregard and contempt for people who live next door to their project is disgraceful and divisive to the community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Acid mine drainage causing chronic contamination of Lawson Creek Valley and Cudgegong river Exceedance of lead in blood from fine particle lead dust causes loss IQ and behavioural problems in children and protein plaques in brain causing impaired cognitive dysfunction and very high risk of early onset dementia |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that the proposed mine will pose unacceptable environmental, health and safety risks to the community and local environment. Not only will the mine destroy the environment at the site itself but noise, light and physical pollution will impact flora, fauna and people in areas adjacent to the mine. In particular there is an unacceptable risk to health of the community through exposure to lead dust. While environmental protections will be in place these are never fool proof and are prone to failure with disastrous consequences (Take the Peabody mine that washed coal dust into the Royal National Park just last year). The mine should not be allowed to proceed. |
Penny Walker
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
-Lead is toxic to humans and animals. Modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. -Groundwater impacts will be significant for downstream water users, who will have less water to use and face serious risks of water contamination as a result of toxic tailings seepage and/or acid mine drainage upstream. -Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. -Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the Department's Assessment Report. -Key technical detail surrounding the Proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. -The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the mine would have an adverse impact on the local ecology and environment. In addition to this the living conditions of locals will be eroded by increase noise, dust, traffic and decreased biodiversity and wildlife impacts. I strongly object to this development |
Louise Windeyer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
word doc attached in 8 |
Attachments |
bowdens-lead-mine--luedocx.docx (DOCX, 13.22 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This proposed open-cut mine is threatening people, the region and broader community and environment in so many ways, including the following: - Threats to water security & water quality - Dangerous lead exposure - Toxic tailings dam - Negative and permanent social impacts - Acid mine drainage (United Nations called acid mine drainage the second biggest problem of our world, only behind global warming) - Increased traffic, dust & noise - Biodiversity & ecological impacts Not to mention that it will be situated just 2kms from a primary school as well as extremely close to, and impacting, the Mudgee region’s famous vineyards and agricultural farmland and will be contaminating the local waterways. The main points are: - There will be no water for dust suppression. - No site rehabilitation. - No compensation for displaced families and businesses. Or to make their homes liveable much less their tank-water drinkable. - Tucking acid-leaching hazardous materials away under a tarpaulin. - A tailings dam that's all-but-guaranteed to end up in the Lawson Creek during the next flood event (the Havilah Bridge on the Lue Road was under water last October) - 25 sites of Aboriginal cultural significance will be destroyed. - The wind blows from the west in Lue - depositing their lead dust in Dunn's Swamp, Rylstone Dam and the Cudgegong river (which the residents drink) - lead particles from Mt Isa mine have been found as far as Antarctica! Given the multitude of risks this mine poses, it should be rejected. |
David Hislop
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object because Mudgee/Lue is a pristine and beautiful area, which regularly wins tourism awards . It stagers me that the proponent acknowledges that leakage from the tailings dam into surface and ground water will occur. This means Acid Mine Drainage is therefore probable due to the high sulfur content of the local rocks/geology. After climate change, the United nations rates Acid Mine Drainage as the largest single problem facing humanity. The risk of huge damage to this healthy community is not adequately protected by the proponent's plans. The proponent’s intention to take all the water needed to run the mine from the mining site is not viable. Lawson Creek is a small ephemeral creek which didn’t run at all for 2 years, from 2017-2019. This mine will drain Lawson Creek valley, putting agriculture, viticulture and tourism out of business. It is just wrong to have this mine 2 kms from the village of Lue. |
Stefan Puskar
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m OPPOSING the mine, as it will impact locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production and impact the water into the Lawson creek - also impacting the wine production in there area to irrigate vines in the region. |
Aaron Jones
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To put it briefly, I believe the ecological harm/risks far outweigh the economic benefits. While the mine would not impact me directly, it will affect some of my friends who live on a farm which borders the proposed mine. I'm deeply concerned about the impact this project will have on water quality (both from an availability perspective as well as contamination), as well as the risk of lead contamination. Not to mention the affect it will have on Lue's biodiversity. |
Claudia Hamilton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am the fourth generation on my family farm which has been operating in the Lue/Rylstone region for over 100 years. My siblings and I have every intention of continuing our families legacy for years to come. Like many others, my family loves what we do and where we do it, and are extremely passionate about the agriculture, tourism, small businesses and history in this area. This mine has been causing serious stress and worry for my family for several years. However, it wasn’t until I began to research the impacts the Lue Lead Mine will have that I really understood the risk facing our community. The site that has been chosen for the mine is located only 2km from the village of Lue where families live and a school is located. The site has also not only taken over prime agricultural land, but it surrounded by many other farms that will directly be impacted. The site is also extremely close to the Hawkins Creek and Lawson Creek. This has surfaced many other unsafe risks for the community. For example, the design of the mine shows that once the dam on site is full, it will trail into the creeks carrying highly toxic chemicals. As a result of this, wildlife around and in the creeks will suffer from poisoning as well as farms that utilise the creeks as a water source. The mine also plans to use the water from these creeks in their operation. This would be an unfit plan of action considering the water demand of the mine is much higher than the natural catchment of the creeks, meaning either the mine will not have enough water or our creeks will be run dry. The go ahead of this mine would bring a significant amount of traffic to our local area, causing difficulty and danger for individuals such as farmers and children. Moving livestock across roads is something often done by many farmer in the region. We move large mobs of sheep and cattle across the Lue Road regularly, this causes delay for all passing traffic and can become a dangerous task when large machinery and trucks pass without slowing down. Just as, if not more importantly, an increase in traffic poses a risk for our locals. The main road used to access the mine will run directly through Lue Village and straight past the school where children are coming and going at different times throughout the day. Our tourism industry and local businesses are also at risk of closure. Our economy already shows that we have too many jobs available and not enough employees. By bringing this mine to the region, small businesses will be forced to close as they may loss employees. Alternatively, the mine will move people from outside the region in. This will heavily impact rent prices which will leave many of our existing residents without homes. An example of this is my grandfather. He lives independently in Rylstone, however if rent prices were to go up, he would be forced out of his home. Luckily for him, my family would be able to support him during this. But for many elderly people, they would be left without adequate housing and in serious trouble. Our region thrives from of tourism due to our beautiful landscape, wineries and communities. By bringing more people into our community permanently, industries such as the air bnbs would be forced to sell. Our wineries and landscape would also suffer extremely from the air pollution that this mine will create, making products unsafe to sell. I am currently studying to become a teacher and would love to pursue my career in the country. After doing research I found out the affects that this mine will have directly on the students on Lue School, it is terrifying. The lead that will be produced from this mine will then be carried into the air, causing air pollution. With the local school only 2km from the site, this means all the students are at seriously high risk of suffering from the potential lead poisoning. Lead has been proved to have serious implications of the IQ of young people particularly. There have also been cases of individuals developing learning disabilities from lead. This mine will have similar effects on the families that live in Lue and on the surrounding farms. Not to mention the risk that this mine would be putting their own employees at every day! As a member of the next generation, this leaves me with the decision of whether or not I want myself and my future family exposed to health issues that could've been prevented. Experts have proven that there is no safe level of exposure to lead and that young children are the most at risk. The air pollution will surround Lue, Mudgee and Rylstone and travel to the local farms. This will affect grazing pastures for livestock, making them unfit for production. Settle on grapes, causing them to not be safe for consumption and most importantly, can have lifelong effects on multiple human organs and the IQ and cognitive thinking we develop. I personally think the fair question is to ask, are you willing to raise your children in an area where they are exposed to air that will cause such significant health problems? Not once were our local communities asked what they think about this mine going ahead. It has already raised so much stress and trouble for the locals and if it was approved to this would only increase. It is my generation and the generations to follow that will be forced to face the consequences of this mine. For these reasons I object the Bowden Silver Mine and ask that you please stop it so that our future communities are able to live safe and healthy lives in the region that we love. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this mine should not go ahead due to the negative impact on the local community as well as the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
N/a |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to Bowdens silver mine My family’s farm is in an amphitheatre ,proposed high dust area & will overlook the mine pit. For the past 70 years our family have enjoyed the tranquility & fresh air ,that will no longer be possible if this proposed mine is allowed to go ahead. We have always found comfort in the thought that our future grandchildren will have the wonderful upbringing as their fathers and grandfathers had -being blessed by being raised on our beautiful farm & the lifestyle this brings- learning to work hard, to care for animals & enjoy a simple life. The comradery that comes from village life (,where if anyone is in need -the village rallies around to attend to these) will be lost ,as small villages near mines do not survive as we have seen with other villages such as Wollar & Bylong I urge that this mine not be approved |
Jason Althofer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My concerns are with the water Aquifer around Lawson Creek and what impact it will have further down the creek and how it impacts my farming practices and I’m a Lucerne farm that Relies on that water source |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
If this project goes ahead it could be catastrophic to all of the neighbouring properties and anyone down stream from the Lawson Creek which then joins the Cudegong and heads through part of Mudgee and onto the Burrendong Dam. That is a lot of people and a lot of businesses at risk. Not to mention the health of all of those people! I think the risks outweigh the rewards in this case and I hope you can see it too. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
ATTENTION: The independent planning commission in relation to the Development of an open cut silver mine and associated Infrastructure. Reference Number: SSD-5765 To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my opposition to the planned development of the Open cut Silver mine in Lue, near Mudgee NSW. While developers and government representatives alike assure us that the proposed technologies at the mine will eliminate risk of environmental contamination from this proposed development, there has yet to be a mine site to achieve this. Additionally, the impact of failure to do this far exceeds the economic benefits of continuing to allow this development to proceed. Please find below a detailed and evidence-based outline the significant risks posed by this development. A peer reviewed journal article published in “science of the total environment conducted a comprehensive review of 403 articles, mapping the global impact of mining activities on food sovereignty (Blanco et al 2023). A hundred and six articles reviewed contained a detailed ecotoxicological analysis of food resources used by Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLC) in mining areas. Of all documented species, 52.9 % vascular plants species, 40.3 % fish species and 6.8 % of mammals in areas surrounding mines were contaminated, presenting substantial scientific evidence of the contamination of food systems of IPLC as a direct result of mining (Blanco et al 2023). This research highlights the significant risk the Bowden’s Mine poses to food production, food-based tourism, animals as well as indigenous locals who already experience significant disadvantage as result of lack of input into decisions affecting their local communities. Another peer reviewed article in the Journal of Environmental Impact and Remediation of Heavy reviewed how the presence of heavy metals that infiltrated food crops and the effects this had on human health. It stated that for groundwater and plants, soil serves as both a source and a sink for the presence of Heavy metals (Vanisree et al 2022). These toxicants get accumulated in the land soil and has become a serious concern. Crops are essential part of diet of individuals and are vital source of important nutritional components like minerals and vitamins. Crops grown on contaminated lands with Heavy Metals, these metals accumulate in the plants edible parts, which are then ingested by humans. Because heavy metals are resistant from degradation, and have long half-life periods, this makes them difficult to excrete out. Many metals are hazardous at low doses, making Heavy metal poisoning a major problem in crops. Long-term exposure to heavy metal contaminated crops can result in a variety of health problems, including bone thinning, skin problems, improper endocrine gland function, blood pressure, neoplastic growth, impairment of sexual characteristics, asthma and other respiratory issues, heart diseases, and brain impairments. Heavy metal contamination in crops is a concern worldwide that leads to toxidromes and a variety of illnesses in humans, flora and fauna, when polluted soils and food crops are consumed. Not only is this of concern for an agricultural, food producing area but also will likely lead to extra pressure on an already strained rural health care system. 40% of amphibians species globally are threatened, along with 26% of mammals and 13% of Birds (IUCN Red List). In Mudgee 21 of Australia’s 81 tree frogs live, 1 of which is listed as vulnerable and 1 of which is listed as endangered, 20 out of 121 Southern Frogs species of which another species are listed as endangered. Vulnerable species such as these have already experienced extreme pressures as a result of harsh droughts, habitat destruction from floods and bush fires. To place further pressure from them from habitat destruction during development as well as environmental contamination from heavy metals is a severe exploitation of our environmental stewardship. Remediation of environmental contamination is extremely difficult, unreliable and expensive. A peer reviewed article published in Community Based Research and Innovations in Civil Engineering. Found that here were significant limitations in the implementation of physical and chemical methods such as the development of secondary contaminants one has to invest more in their removal other than the process itself, which make those methods expensive (Karn et al 2021). Industries are now opting for biological remediation techniques. The main concern with much of the bioremediation literature is that there is no precise and reliable method for remediating polluted rivers and streams. It is a much-anticipated necessity to eliminate heavy metal pollutants in large water bodies. Unfortunately, it is also a major concern that existing bioremediation techniques neglect the usage of immobilised microorganisms for heavy metal removal in large water bodies like rivers. Furthermore this project is in direct opposition of several of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Including; SDG 2 Zero hunger: by threatening a large food production region with environmental contamination SDG 3 Good health and wellbeing: by threatening the health of local communities. SDG 6 Clean water and sanitation: by threatening to contaminate key local water resources. SDG 8 Decent work and economic growth: by threatening to negatively impact several key local industries, the negative impacts of which will be felt long after the mine has closed and the economic benefits it may provide dry up. SDG 11 sustainable cities and communities: mining is not a sustainable practice and its contamination of local natural resources will inhibit other local practices that are sustainable. SDG 12 Responsible consumption and production: mining on non-renewable resources does not foster responsible consumption or production. SDG 13 Climate action: mining is known to have negative impacts on climate, it is not enough to just offset emissions, we need to act to capture greenhouse gasses. SDG 14 Protect live below the water: Environmental contamination from mines is known to have negative impacts on aquatic ecology. SDG 15 Protect life on land: terrestrial species have also been seen to suffer negative consequences as a result of heavy metal toxicity from environmental contamination from mines. Locally, The Australian Government pledges to end deforestation by 2030, yet this project will destroy a diverse and rich area of natural habitat that stretches far beyond the proposed mines gates. An indication that, if the development is to proceed, the governments values are not inline with the global community, the local community or their own messaging. I hope the arguments presented, along with the concerns of my peers are taken into heavy consideration when deciding whether this project moves forward, Sincerely, Michelle Old |
Isabel Trevena
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the development going ahead |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Not only will the environment be significantly impacted, so will those who’s lives and livelihood will be affected in the local community! |
Amanda Monteith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not agree with this. It will ruin the look of our countryside. Silver mining is arsenic. Very bad for environment. My group do motorcycles riding through there. We do not want to see this. Just want to see beautiful countryside. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Opposing the mine as it will affect all wildlife in area |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is a place where tourist want to visit when coming to Australia. This will have huge complications for the tourism industry and the surrounding environment of natural species. No one will want to visit this beautiful area |
Diana Ridge
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reason for my objection to the proposed development at the Bowden's mine at Lue is mostly due to the lead poisoning of the Lawson creek which leads to the Cudgegong River and then onto a huge Macquarie River basin. the ruination of the water will have detrimental effects on the local communities downstream of the mine sight. Lue Road is a narrow and the dangerous at the best of times and with the increasing use of the road this will place many local lives at risk. Existing farmland and tourism will no longer be able to coexist with the mine local areas and the job and benefits to the community will be minimal. We have a small farm on the Cudgegong River and we use the water for animal and irrigation for our animals and garden & vegetables - if the water is poisoned, we will be unable to use the water for stock and domestic |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We should not be building additional mines at this point in time. I firmly believe we should be investing and supporting different initiatives. It is a beautiful location, a land mark wine region even. I feel a mine will greatly deface and disrespect the region. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Topfruit International Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are a local orchard and rely on water supply from Cudgegong River, we have concern about potential hazards esprecially water pollution. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
No to toxic mine. Save current homes |
Alexandra Ruse
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not support the proposed Bowdens mine for the following reasons: Lue is located just 2km from the mine site. Residents and people living across the region will be negatively impacted through risks to health and well-being, including physical, mental, social and emotional. This is not an acceptable risk, as evidence has demonstrated in other areas such as the Hunter Valley. As recently as last week the Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek formally rejected a proposed open cut mine based on the risk of damage to freshwater creeks and groundwater. This decision is significant. Research has determined suspended particulate matters and respirable particulate matters are pollutant products generated through open-cut mining. These are more harmful than emissions from vehicles. This is not acceptable. In addition, traffic will be increased and current infrastructure is not compatible with the proposed increase to heavy transport. Noise and damage to local ecology will put flora and fauna (including koalas) at risk. My understanding is that should the mine proceed that rehabilitation will be minimal. This is not acceptable. Farming and mining are not compatible. The production of food and fibre will be compromised. Will there be compensation offered to people directly affected by the proposed mine should it go ahead?It's likely tourism, a major source of income for the region will also be impacted. In conclusion, this mine would substantially affect the soil, water, air and people living in the region. This is not an acceptable or responsible risk. The mine should not be given approval to proceed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
. |
Maree Bensley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have a family farm in between Lue and Rylstone and my father spoke today. Cameron Scott fell. We would be devastated if this went ahead. Please please please put a stop to this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Object the development |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
HWL Ebsworth |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My parents-in-law farm own a property located on the Lue Road, 9km from Lue township itself and through which Lawson Creek flows. My father-in-law is the fifth generation farmer to farm his family property. His son (my husband) is sixth generation and our three sons will be the seventh generation. If Bowdens are permitted to mine the local area as they intend to do, this will have devastating impacts for our family property. It will not only ruin the livelihoods of my parents-in-law but the future livelihood of my own family, a property that is the birth right of my husband , his sister and brother and our sons. The consequences of permitting a lead/silver mine to operate in the area are catastrophic because of lead poisoning and associated health risks (noting there is no safe level of lead for children and I have a 7 year old, a 4 year old and an 8 month old baby who would be impacted), acid mine drainage (the impacts of which remain forever), water contamination (noting that this water is used for drinking water in the local area), destruction of the habitat for local flora and fauna such as koalas, rehabilitation of the site will be minimal (where the pit, WRE and tailings dam will also remain forever and have everlasting impacts), existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with the mine (significantly diminishing my family's ability to earn a livelihood from the land now and into the future - something my family has been doing for the last approx 130 years), there will be no ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms and the mine will close or reduce productivity during drought (noting that Australia is one of the most drought ridden continents on Earth and any inability to farm during drought will destroy many people's livelihoods). It is beyond comprehension that the NSW Government is considering permitting Bowdens to operate the mine when it will have such catastrophic consequences to the local people and the environment, particularly in circumstances where in the current landscape, climate change should be front of mind and the Government should be looking to preserve the land and surrounding environs rather than destroying it forever. It is a particularly short-sighted view to just say, it will be good for the local economy and create (temporary) jobs for the area. That is not enough and those jobs will go once the whole of the land has been mined for all its worth leaving miners unemployed and additionally, those in the surrounding area also unemployed. If Governments continue to permit such activities, we will have nothing left to give our children. Also, the Government needs to give future consideration to the costs it may incur as a result of those in the local community suffering associated health issues and any potential claims made for the economic and associated losses incurred as a result of permitting the mine to operate in the area (such burden on social services where people can no longer earn an income, on the Healthcare system as a result of associated health issues and potential class action litigation relating to the health and wellbeing of the people in the local area). It is on this basis that I implore you not to permit the mine to go ahead and operate in this area or AT ALL. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
By approving this mine you are ruining some of the most beautiful country/farmland in Australia |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
These mines will have an impact on the health of those living nearby, especially pregnant women and young children. It will greatly impact the wineries in the area, not to mention Mudgee’s tourism industry. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
New mines should not be occurring in this day and age. This will detrimentally affect the environment and will pose a hazard to people and animals in the area. My objection is based on the negative environmental impacts in a time where our climate is already suffering, but also the damage it will do to the image of our wonderful region. |
sandie baggett
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
POISON POISON Lead poisoning occurs when lead builds up in the body, often over months or years. Even small amounts of lead can cause serious health problems. Children younger than 6 years are especially vulnerable to lead poisoning, which can severely affect mental and physical development. At very high levels, lead poisoning can be fatal. And Bowdens think this is appropriate to have this mine in close vacinity of Lue School ... We have seen throughout history things go wrong. Dampening the dust is not a guarantee this dust will not travel. Nothing could dampen dust that 100km hour winds is whipping up in a storm of nature. Through Flood, fire, storms .... This is Australia every element is thrown at us and Bowdens will not be able to guarantee the safety of those in the Lue / Mudgee region. And as noted above 'even the smallest amounts of lead can be fatal".... The impact of my Friends at Lue will be outrages and devistating... Having to choose between tolerating unmitigated noise and dust, or living in a fully enclosed (air conditioned) dwelling. Living with on-going risks to health, and tolerating regular testing for lead in soil and water. Anxiety due to risks to health, particularly affecting young people and potentially realising adverse health impacts had occurred. Loss of many amenities of a rural way of life, including home grown food, open windows, line clothes drying. Loss of sense of place and visual amenity. Anxiety due to loss of property values, and inability to realise the previous capital value of homes and property because of the proximity of the mine. Loss of permanent residents despite the fall in the property values. Just to name a few!!! I object to this mine in the highest order. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish for the proposed development to not go ahead due to the impact it will have on the environment and multiple species of animals that live in that environment. Where are the animals going to go? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area. Separate to the aforementioned environmental considerations. I am concerned about what the mine will do to the appeal of the area for tourists and visitors. Currently the area is quite picturesque and it is common for individuals and families to visit the area over a weekend. Should the mine go ahead the area and the surrounds will be damaged and polluted causing the tourism in the area to decrease. This could affect the economy in those areas resulting in an impact on the family. If the mine goes ahead, I doubt the company will make the environmental reparations that are required. When a mine is finished the land is supposed to be rehabilitated using the original soil and plants to encourage growth. The recent move in Hornsby by the local council shows that when mines are depleted this is not always done. This has a tremendous impact on the wider environment and ecology. I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine shouldn’t be built due to the damage it creates to the surrounding areas and their biodiversity. |
Jessica Rasmus
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not support the mining of silver in proposed area when what is extracted is so low. It’s not worth the environmental, human and health impact. Please do not go ahead with this |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To put it simply - I'm scared! Firstly - how is Bowdens getting away with calling it a Silver mine when they are mining way more lead and zinc than silver?? I'm scared that I'm not going to be able to drink the rain water that fills my water tanks when there is lead in the air! Or water the plants and the stock, not to mention the wildlife?? And in that light how safe is it going to be to drink wine made in our local area when it's contaminated by lead? Think how knowing a lead mine is in close proximity is going to impact our local wine industry. Mudgee prides itself on being a wonderful tourist town but don't you think that will change when the wine crops start poisoning people? Actually I don't know whether to be more worried about the condition of the water or the fact that Bowdens is going to use it all up and there wont be any left in the rivers and creeks around the area for anyone to worry about..... The tailings dam is a cause of nightmares to anyone who cares about the environment - this toxic material will be there long after you and I and our kids and their kids and their kids are all dead - but it will still be toxic - how can we be assured that it will stay in the dam and not one little bit is going to leak into the ground and therefore the waterways? Why cant they just leave things as they are? The answer is money of course - Bowdens tell the locals "oh we'll provide jobs for the locals" but you know what - there is already jobs for the locals - we don't need any more. Take a look around Mudgee and see how many signs are up looking for staff - actually go in to the shops and talk to the locals - they cant get enough staff as it is - try to get a fence put up - it will take you months because the workers are all so busy, then the powder coaters haven't got enough staff to get it done, then the hardware don't have enough delivery drivers to get it delivered and so on and so on. WE HAVE ENOUGH JOBS - WE DON'T NEED BOWDENS! On an environmental side of things I don't know the fancy names of the wildlife but I know that in that area there is a lot of wildlife including struggling species that rely on the area as it is. And it's not just the wildlife that will get displaced by the actual mine - they will have to find somewhere else to live but still have to put up with the noise and the pollution too. On that note - people come to visit the area and some choose to stay and live here for the peace and quiet! And to enjoy seeing kangaroos and wombats wander around and listen to the birds. They don't come here to listen to mine blasting. You know how quiet the area is - think how far the noise will travel on quiet day and think about if you'd like to stay here? Don't even get me started on Lue Road - have you driven it? Apart from the potholes which you know are going to get a whole lot worse when B double trucks start using it but I also worry about the danger of trying to get around the trucks. There is only a couple of spots that are safe to overtake as it is but when trying to get around a long truck like that - it worries me that impatient people are going to do dumb things because they are in a hurry and pay for it with their lives. I also worry about how many kangaroos and wombats will be killed or left for dead on the side of the road with possibly young in their pouches because trucks can't avoid wildlife as easily as cars and then have the excuse of being too big to stop so they don't even check if they have left something just injured and lying there terrified waiting for the next car to hit them. Please leave our area alone - I'm begging you....... |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not believe this mine site should go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The main aspects of the Department of Planning's assessment report that concern me are those of the health risks and impact on tourism. Firstly, modelling detailed in the EIS and relied on in the Department's Assessment Report fails to adequately assess the risk of lead contamination to Lue and surrounding residences, particularly in terms of dust and the adequacy of dust suppression measures on a water constrained mine site. The means of calculating the incremental increase in lead exposure from the mine (reportedly from 28% to 30% for young children at an arbitrary location close to the mine. I may have missed it, but where is R4? Is it upstream or downstream from the mine? There also does not seem to be any mention of how this value would change as rainfall changes, and our period of La Nina inevitably returns to an El Nino weather event. On a personal level, as a medical practitioner specialising in ophthalmology, I am particularly concerned about the potentially irreversible toxic optic neuropathy that can arise from lead poisoning, which is not dose dependent in a linear fashion. The suggested community monitoring similarly does not screen for toxic ophthalmological effects. The Assessment Report excludes any meaningful mention or exploration of the role tourism plays in the Lue and broader Mudgee, Rylstone, Kandos region, and in turn fails to assess the impacts of an open cut lead mine on the future viability and sustainability of the visitor economy and tourism sector. As a frequent visitor to the Mudgee region, I would be devastated to see any impact on the progress that has been made in creating a regional hub for wine and agriculture tourism. To reiterate, this is not explored in any meaningful sense. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please do not do this to our beautiful mudgee region! Take this elsewhere |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Members of the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. I am deeply concerned about the potential environmental, social, and health impacts that this project could have on the surrounding communities and the wider environment. From an environmental perspective, the extraction and processing of lead is known to have significant impacts on the local ecosystem, including soil and water pollution, the destruction of wildlife habitats, and the release of greenhouse gases. The mining process is also energy-intensive, which would result in increased carbon emissions and further contribute to climate change. Additionally, the proposed mine would have serious social impacts on the local community. The mine would be located in close proximity to residential areas, which could lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine would displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. I thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to hearing your decision on this important matter. Sincerely, Bella Mcmahon |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Not only will the environment be significantly impacted, so will those who’s lives and livelihood will be affected in the local community! |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Central west cycle trail Inc |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the central west cycle trail we are looking right now and extensions of the trail from Rylstone to Mudgee. The proposed route is up from TongBong Road to near Lue and through the village of Lue. For many reasons noted elsewhere the silver lead mine will not encourage not retain the existing environment for cycle tourism. Air quality, quiet back roads, and bush land quality are hallmarks of our successful trail to date. The mine will be very detrimental to any plans for this cycling trail. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed Bowdens Silver mining project in an otherwise untouched greenfield area. An area with ever growing tourism on a route touted as a must-do drive. As a local that regularly drives from Rylstone to Mudgee through the Lue area I will be directly impacted by this this deeply flawed proposal. Health Lead is inescapably toxic. Regardless of the recommended conditions set, Bowdens can never guarantee that all the lead dust will be contained within the site. They can never guarantee that all lead that is transported or disposed of without some being released into the atmosphere. They can never guarantee that extreme weather conditions will not cause spillage of the acid tailings dam. These are very real concerns for locals and the wildlife and ecosystems that exist around and downstream of the proposed site. There is already disagreement between Bowdens and the expert advice given to the DPIE about the Waste Rock Emplacement (WRE). If this proposal is given the green light, these differences of major importance will not be resolved before it is too late. Bowdens will always do what they can to assuage concerns about acid waste and seepage, whether they are effective or not. Even one minor spill or leak or accident or miscalculation will have long lasting and detrimental impacts. It is not worth the risk. Amenity/Tourism Driving to Mudgee will now include potentially following large trucks transporting dangerous chemicals and mine spoils… the roads are windy and hilly, big trucks will add to frustration among drivers and destroy the desirability of traveling on such a route. This is a route that is touted as a ‘must-drive’ road. Is the impact on tourism and the resultant loss of jobs adequately taken into account? Are they offset with the jobs created? Noise Residents will be impacted by highly significant increases in sound levels that will be extremely annoying, disruptive and will impact on the existing amenity of private properties. There is no increase in the level of noise that is acceptable to a rural community. In quiet, serene rural areas where sound can travel in the silence of night across tens of kilometers, heard from a great distance away from their source. There is no escaping it’s impact and potential to negatively affect people’s health and well-being, both directly and indirectly. Water This is of great concern. Bowdens have always struggled to find the water required to give this lead mine any potential to be viable. Now, suddenly, they are able to find the water they need in-situ! Why the plan with the waste water from the Ulan mines if it was here all along? Apart from other shortcomings, their flawed modeling conveniently leaves out the low rainfall 2019, when we were in drought. The extreme floods and droughts of the last years shows how unpredictable our rainfall is becoming. Climate modeling shows times of drought will get more frequent and more severe. This is a semi arid area. There is simply not enough water for a mine. And any water they use will have massive impacts on removal of downstream flows, the water table and the habitats for human, plant and animal, that rely on this precious and scarce water resource. There is a major cost to opening such an unrealistic proposal. It is far greater and longer lasting, than any short term benefits. Please listen to the people that will be affected. Those that will have to live with the actual impacts, not the idealised benefits touted by people that have no connection to the land or area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerns over the toxic exposure to health not to mention the loss of tourism. |
Samuel Johansen
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The silver mine will directly effect local residense…some of whome have resided in the area for generations. Not to mention the degradation of wildlife areas that will have catastrophic effects on the local flora and fauna. |
Toby Simpson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dangerous to families and properties around the area, this will stop the growth of wineries and cropping and livestock properties in the area, also very dangerous for young children and pregnant mothers. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose this development due to the negative impact it would have on the beautiful land there already. It is simply unacceptable to tarnish the country with yet another mine whilst endangering local flora and fauna. Keep Australia beautiful! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
No to toxic mine. Save current homes |
Fiona Sim
Organisation |
Salamander Productions Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a local resident of the Rylstone/Kandos area and I strongly object to this mine proposal. I am very concerned about the level of contaminants, including lead particles, which become airborne and settle in nearby homes or schools. While I am not a close neighbour, I am worried about others in the community, and there is the possibility of wider contamination in dry times when the wind can blow dust particles for many kilometres. Downstream water users of Lawsons Creek may be concerned that the extraction and use by the mine will mean less water availability or a degradation in the quality of the water. As a farmer and local resident, I empathise with this fear. It is well founded, and will have devastating consequences for locals. I am also very concerned that if the planned tailings dam fails, the surrounding ecosystems could be irreparably damaged. This is simply not a risk that can be taken. Should the tailings dam fail, contamination to downstream Cudegong and Wambuul/Macquarie Rivers would permanently threaten the environment and downstream communities, including Mudgee, Wellington and Dubbo and down to the Ramsar-listed Macquarie Marshes. The legacy this mine will be irreversible environmental damage in this area. This is unacceptable on many levels, not least of which is that the devastation this mine will cause, the environmental damage and the robbing of precious water resources will affect future generations. We cannot think just of short-term benefits to people living now, but all planning like this must take into account intergenerational equity and fairness. In February 2022, koalas were listed as an endangered species, and that the mine will cause the destruction of precious Koala and other native wildlife habitat. White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland, an ecological community defined as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, has been identified on the site, and 180 hectares of its habitat will be destroyed. This is completely unacceptable and goes against the legislation. Both locals like myself and visitors to our beautiful part of NSW love the rural aspect and feel to this community, which will be changed with a distinctive miners' town feel while the mine is in operation. The mine must not go ahead. It is ill-planned, will rob huge amounts of precious water from a dry landscape, and has the potential to poison large tracts of land, including several large towns in the area, as noted above. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is significant impact to the environment and those in this community |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My biggest worry is the health of our community and environment as I have seen the issues that have raised in other towns that have these mines near them. For starters it is putting our children at risk as no level of lead is safe. We do not have the health system in our community to cope with the conditions that will arise from this project. We have up to 1 month wait to see a doctor now as it is so how are they going to cope with people who will have to start getting their lead levels tested regularly. Then we have the issue of our community becoming a test dummy for the safety measures that have never been test anywhere before now. Then there is the issue with our waterways being effect by the mine as there is no way it can 100% be said there will be no contamination to our waterways from all the lead and chemicals they will be using. I would like to know what the process is for if the chemicals that will be transported in our area if there is an accident and a spill. |
Meaghan Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to submit my disapproval of the Bowden Silver mine due to my family living with a couple of kilometres of the site and the impact this will have on their health due to lead in the air and the known harm this can do. My son Daniel Anderson and his wife Carla Anderson have two young children age 4 years and 8months, they all spend a lot of time outdoors and would be breathing in the lead dust produced by the mine. This can’t be good for anybody’s health but even more harmful for young developing lungs. Please reconsider this planned mine and take it somewhere else where less people are at risk. They will have to drive past the mine entrance to get to town, with the danger of extra traffic and trucks on the road which is not suitable for such traffic and also dangerous. This is not the the site for such a mine with so many people impacted and peoples lives at risk. I want to see my children and grandchildren grow up and be healthy, not having the health risk that lead dust can bring. I implore you to please re-consider. Surely health is more important than silver. Regard on scared mother and grandmother. |
Janine Modaro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a taxpayer and homeowner in Rylstone NSW. I am writing to you to express my concern about the planned proposal from Bowdens for a lead and zinc mine, marketed under the auspices of Bowden’s Silver Mine. I have recently learned the details of the consequences that will result from a lead mine in our region and thus wanted to bring my concerns to your attention with urgency, given I understand a decision on this mine will be finalised shortly. I understand Bowdens are referring to the mine as a silver mine; however, the reality is that only a small percentage of proceeds will be silver, with the majority of the proceeds being zinc and toxic lead. My husband and I have relocated from Sydney to Rylstone after a years-long acquaintance with the area where we fell in love with its natural beauty and the potential to be a part of expanding viticulture, agriculture and tourism. It was wonderful to see the Mudgee area being recognised as the premiere tourist destination in NSW, I suspect in part due to your advocacy. However, our dream of participating in the development of this region is now under threat. I have a family background in mining. My ancestors were miners in western Pennsylvania USA who received jobs and opportunity via the coal industry in the early 20th century. I note that they sacrificed their own health and wellbeing to provide futures for their children and children's children. I also note that none of their children, who received good educations and saw the health impacts of mining on their parents, chose to pursue mining as a career, though they stayed in their home town and increased their economic fortunes in other industries. I am deeply concerned that the people in our community who view this mine as providing jobs are completely unaware that, unlike coal mines, lead mining will destroy not only their own health through ingestion of lead dust, etc., but will compromise the health of their children in ways that are heartbreaking and will completly decimate the natural envionment and the commerce in the entire Mid-Western Council area. Unlike my ancestors, they and their children will not be able to stay in this area once the environment is impacted by lead and Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) for eternity. As someone who has invested in property in the area, I am also saddened at the impact this mine will have on property values. It occurs to me that people who may want to leave the area due to the adverse impacts of the lead mine will not be able to afford to live elsewhere due to the falling values of their existing homes. It feels like the true scope of the consequences are only recently coming to light within our communities. I am appealing to you to make sure that we do not walk blindly into a decision with life- and area-changing consequences. If a lead mine appears in our area, we will, by default, ruin the industries that offer the promise of a safe and properous future for us, our children, our agriculture and our natural environment. |
Paige Adams
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee is a beautiful community and the lead mine would destroy the town |
Scott Terry
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have lived and worked in this region for over 35 years. I work in the water industry with pumps and irrigation. I have worked on almost all the properties around the proposed Bowdens lead mine area. I have worked closely with properties along the Lawsons Creek. I have seen this creek run dry time and time again. The suggestion by Bowdens, as stated in the Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA), that water for the operations will come from Lawsons Creek is ridiculous! There won’t be enough water from that source. Therefore, I would suggest, Bowdens has either not adequately done their homework, or they have some other solution to the problem, of which they have not communicated to the IPC! Where do they think they will get their water from? The surface water issue is one point for concern, but another is the groundwater. If this project goes ahead, as stated in the PEA, they will be digging a pit covering up to 68ha and disturbing an area of approximately 550ha. The water table and underground rivers will be destroyed, and what for? A short term profit! Our environment is worth much more that 17 years of toxic profit! It’s a disgrace to think we share this planet with such narrow minded, financially driven, poorly advised people, who would rip up an environment and then walk away. This project is not welcome. It is not ethical. It is not workable. The Bowdens Lead Mine application must be rejected. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our family friends have a farm right near this proposed site and we visit here often. This would have significant environmental and health impacts to the area and we strongly oppose the development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
No more mines our environment and community do not need it |
Camilla Ashworth
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family has lived in Lue, Havilah, and Mudgee, NSW, for over 100 years. They have spent their whole lives as farmers. This proposed open-cut mine is threatening my family and the region in so many ways, including the following: - Threats to water security & water quality - Dangerous lead exposure - Toxic tailings dam - Negative and permanent social impacts, including loss of property values, health, and community issues - Acid mine drainage (United Nations called acid mine drainage the second biggest problem of our world, bested only by global warming) - Increased traffic, dust & noise - Biodiversity & ecological impacts Not to mention that it will be situated just 2Kms from a primary school as well as extremely close to, and impacting, the Mudgee region’s famous vineyards and agricultural farmland and will be contaminating the local waterways. The main points are: - There will be no water for dust suppression. - No site rehabilitation. - No compensation for displaced families and businesses. Or to make their homes liveable much less their tank-water drinkable. - Tucking acid-leaching hazardous materials away under a tarpaulin. - A tailings dam that's all-but-guaranteed to end up in the Lawson Creek during the next flood event (the Havilah Bridge on the Lue Road was under water last October) - 25 sites of Aboriginal cultural significance will be destroyed. - The wind blows from the west in Lue - depositing their lead dust in Dunn's Swamp, Rylstone Dam and the Cudgegong river (which the residents drink) - lead particles from Mt Isa mine have been found as far as Antarctica! It is mind-blowing to me that this mine has been considered AT ALL given the multitude of risks it involves (health, environmental, community, livelihood among a mere few), all for a measly bit of profit that goes into the hands of a mere few - important to note here, that these aren't locals, never have and never will be. In summary, I vehemently oppose this mine, and in my opinion, the recommended conditions of consent do not adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. Camilla Ashworth |
Hayley Plummer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Central West is a friendly place. Don't mistake friendliness for foolishness (they haven't put lead in our water, yet). We always knew a lead mine in Lue was a terrible idea. The applicant must take us all for fools (IPC and DPE included) with the tripe they've served up in this Environmental Impact Statement. The applicant knows it (judging from their submission), the locals know it and I hope like hell the IPC Commissioners know it - there is not enough silver in those hills (as opposed to Lead and Zinc) for this mine to be feasible. At least not with any measures in place to protect our health, environment or the fabric of the Mudgee community. Bowdens are asking the IPC for the deal of a life time - paid for by the good folk of Mudgee, Lue, Rylstone and Kandos. No water for dust suppression. No site rehabilitation. No compensation for displaced families and businesses. Or to make their homes livable much less their tank-water drinkable. Tucking acid-leaching hazardous materials away under a tarpaulin. A tailings dam that's all-but-guaranteed to end up in the Lawson Creek during the next flood event (the Havilah Bridge on the Lue Road was under water last October) Let's just forget about those 25 sites of Aboriginal cultural significance. Chuck a paltry sum in a biodiversity conservation trust for the koalas and threatened Box Grassy Woodland The wind blows from the west the west in Lue - depositing their lead dust in Dunn's Swamp, Rylstone Dam and the Cudgegong river (which the town-folk drink) but let's just believe conflicting data from weather stations on the applicants site and call it an easterly. Don't worry I hear you say - the lead dust won't travel far - they've only found lead particles from Mt Isa in Antarctica!! Who do they take you for, Commissioners? What good are a couple of jobs and some mining royalties when tourists no longer visit for our "famed gourmet experiences and picturesque countryside"? https://www.visitnsw.com/destinations/country-nsw/mudgee-area/mudgee Who is going to quaff Mudgee wine that's full of lead? Will lead-affected bees still be capable of making that famous Mudgee honey? Who thinks it's a good idea to blow lead dust into the atmosphere 2km away from a primary school anyway? Oh that's right - they did it in Mount Isa - "Research in Mount Isa has documented elevated concentrations of lead in soil, dust and air as a result of mining and nonferrous metal smelting" What gives them the right to make a fortune by robbing it from this community? Is it having Councillors on their payroll?⬛⬛⬛⬛ Eddie Obeid and Ian McDonald thought they had the right in the Bylong Valley (just down the road) - then Jamie Gibson (Ian McDonald's former Chief of Staff who got done for travel rorts) got a job with Kingsgate, who owned the site at Lue before the applicant - is that a little bit whiffy? I'm sure that the United Nations were mistaken when they called acid mine drainage the second biggest problem of our world, bested only by global warming (plus the applicant has that tarp to cover the rocks) This application doesn't just rob the people of Lue. The entire Mudgee region is being asked to bear the risk. If the applicant has faith that the environmental risks can be mitigated, let's make it a condition of their approval that the management team and shareholders have to drink a glass of water from the Lawson Creek each week for the 16.5 years that the mine will be in operation. That would test their confidence. My husbands family have lived in Rylstone and Lue for many years. This mine will leave the next generation with no option but to abandon the land of their ancestors. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This cannot go ahead - with water contamination and lead poisoning as two major impacts. This would be dangerous for both the people of the area and the environment. Mudgee is also a much loved tourist town, with many locals relying on visitor’s business. If this goes ahead, tourism will plummet. |
Barbara Hickson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Lawson Creek that runs through the area of the proposed mine at Lue continues on and through Mudgee. The creek has been the home of platypus and they have been sighted at mudgee. Has the water in the vicinity of the mine been checked for their presence. This can be done with biological sampling as their DNA is left behind where they swim. The blue mountains city council have recently tested their creeks and can advise! Platypus are vulnerable to extinction if not managed properly. It is extremely important that water eats they inhabit are managed to maximise a rich variety of water bugs where they live. This water health is crucial to them and other species and it must be checked and maintained. This means ensuring chemicals and sediments are kept out of their path. Can this be assured !? Have proper checks been made ? |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object this proposal due to the negative impact it will have on the surrounding environment and local community members. |
Charlotte Bensley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Threats to water security and quality Dangerous lead exposure Toxic tailing dams Acid mine drainage Biodiversity and ecological impacts |
Lyndall Simpson
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This absolutely cannot go ahead, putting big company greed ahead of the health and well-being of future generations for a start. The impact on agriculture, waterways and tourism for the Mudgee district and surrounds would be devastating. I cannot imagine B Double trucks navigating and manoeuvring on the Lue road. This is ludicrous. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
No to toxic mine. Save current homes |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am extremely concerned about the effect this will have on the water system in the area, the risk to children in the area from lead poisoning in relation to proximity to facilities. The impact on wild life in the area. I do not trust the safety measures implemented by the mining industry as it has proved inadequate too many times to be tolerated and we can’t risk water resources. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee has held onto its crown for Australia's top tourism town for a second year running, proving the first time was no fluke. I believe that the Bowdens LEAD mine will be detrimental if it were to go ahead. The toxic waste that will be pumped into the man made tailings dam can simply not be overlooked. To think that a membrane will last without getting a puncture or having a leak is just silly. The cost to fix such an issue would heavily outweigh the “profits” they’re so called making. The point I’m getting at is if you’ve got something good going near and around (Mudgee tourism) why on earth would you want to risk losing far more money than this mines going to make.. Seriously cmon guys!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
- Threat to water security and water quality - dangerous lead exposure - toxic tailings dam - acid mine drainage - biodiversity and ecological impacts - community impacts such as loss of land/ culture - loss of homes |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe it is disgusting to bring such a thing to a place that is so naturally beautiful and un touched! Save our environments not hinder them |
Sarah Scott-fell
Organisation |
Lur action group |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Iam opposed to this mine as it there are the health risks . The increased traffic dust noise . How could the CEO of bawdens say that there are no risks of lead exposure |
Nicola Matthews
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine is going to ruin my families properties. We have lived in the Lue, Rylstone, Mudgee areas for over 100 years. I have multiple cousins who are now running our great grandparents properties and all the y have worked hard for will be lost. My children will not be able to visit their family due to potential lead poisoning from the dust and the water. My family will lose the livestock they have worked so hard to bring up and become Australian leaders in the process. I am not against mines or progress but I am very much against those thing’s causing harm to hard working people of the land. These areas will never be the same again, and neither will the people. We have the opportunity to stop this proposal which has not done enough or provided enough evidence of the impact on the people, animals or environment that it will ruin. They say it will bring jobs, but jobs for non locals who don’t care about what they are taking in the process, who don’t fully understand what work has gone into making this area as amazing as it is today. |
Heidi Noonan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The fact that it is so dangerous to young children and pregnant women should be a good enough reason to stop the go ahead, also the fact that it will kill all the wineries, cropping and livestock properties if it enters the water systems in the nearby area which it will. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is such a beautiful area. This should not be happening. It will have huge impacts upon the local community and local flora and fauna. |
Bryden Williams
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I thoroughly object to any new mineral or precious metal mines in this region. The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Diana MacDonald
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the development of Bowden Silver Mine as it will destroy the natural environment effecting the wildlife in the area. Especially as we are already facing the extinction of the Koala population and birdlife. Being a close relative to people who live in this area I am concerned for their quality of life with increase transport of heavy vehicles and the pollution to the air and ground in the area. Mudgee has been voted the best tourist destination for NSW for 2 years running. I do think that this mine will effect the number of people wanting to choose Mudgee and surrounding areas as a vacation due to the development of this mine. This will effect the businesses in Mudgee and surrounding towns. The surrounding wineries could be effected by the pollution that the mine will create. Overall the Bowden Silver Mine Development runs the risk of changing the character of the area which has had a rich and beautiful history. We have seen this in other places that have been popular to live and visit but destroyed by heavy industry. Numerous Aboriginal Sacred Sites have been destroyed in WA due to mining. I sincerely hope you will take my submission and others opposing this Development in serious consideration. Yours sincerely Diana MacDonald ⬛⬛⬛⬛, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. I am deeply concerned about the potential environmental, social, and health impacts that this project could have on the surrounding communities and the wider environment. From an environmental perspective, the extraction and processing of lead is known to have significant impacts on the local ecosystem, including soil and water pollution, the destruction of wildlife habitats, and the release of greenhouse gases. The mining process is also energy-intensive, which would result in increased carbon emissions and further contribute to climate change. Additionally, the proposed mine would have serious social impacts on the local community. The mine would be located in close proximity to residential areas, which could lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine would displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. |
Stuart Hough
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
What stupidity to allow this to go ahead, just look at the problems with the tailings dam at the Cadiia mine near Orange . This will happen to this place if allowed to go ahead….. Will the owners live next to the mine?? AND HOW MANY CHILDREN will suffer the effects of lead poisoning. The owners of the mine will say none, just have a look at the records of the BHP mine at Broken Hill. When the ground water becomes poisonous how will the owners of the mine fix it ? , if you could find them. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Huge negative impact to the environment and risk of exposure to lead. |
Amy D
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee does not need this mine- The mine will impact locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production and impact the water into the Lawson creek - also impacting the wine production in there area to irrigate vines in the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a disgrace. I am strongly OPPOSING it! It will not only impact the locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production but it will also impact the water into the Lawson creek. Which has a knock on effect towards the irrigation of our vineyards and the production of our wines which are part of the Mudgee economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens proposed Lead/Zinc/Silver Mine will have ever lasted devastating effects for this area. The issues including the Acid Mine drainage, the toxic legacy of the mine and their proposed water usage (with the added risk of contamination, )will be a disaster for the whole community...People, Animals, endangered species, Flora and Fauna will have life long devastating affects. Close to World heritage Sites, Excessive Noise,Lead poisoning and health, excessive damage to local ecology, Habitats for local wildlife being destroyed are many of the reasons I object to this proposal. Please can we stop destroying this beautiful country. |
Sabina White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object the proposed development of an open cut lead mine due to the threats to water security and water quality for those living in the area and the dangerous lead exposure. My family has been farming in the area for many generations and I am concerned about the impact the mine will have on them and their local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
New mines should not be occurring in this day and age. This will detrimentally affect the environment and will pose a hazard to people and animals in the area. |
Stella Reeve
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Members of the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. I am deeply concerned about the potential environmental, social, and health impacts that this project could have on the surrounding communities and the wider environment. From an environmental perspective, the extraction and processing of lead is known to have significant impacts on the local ecosystem, including soil and water pollution, the destruction of wildlife habitats, and the release of greenhouse gases. The mining process is also energy-intensive, which would result in increased carbon emissions and further contribute to climate change. Additionally, the proposed mine would have serious social impacts on the local community. The mine would be located in close proximity to residential areas, which could lead to increased noise pollution, dust and air pollution, and decreased property values. Furthermore, the mine would displace local residents and disrupt the tight-knit community, causing social and economic stress for those affected. Finally, I am also deeply concerned about the health impacts of the mine. Lead exposure is known to have serious health effects, including brain damage, reduced IQ levels, and developmental problems in children. The mine would expose both workers and local residents to elevated levels of lead, putting their health and wellbeing at risk. In light of these concerns, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Bowden's lead mine project. The environmental, social, and health impacts of this project are simply too great to ignore, and the potential consequences are far-reaching and long-lasting. I thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to hearing your decision on this important matter. Sincerely, Stella Reeve |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This area holds a lot of value for the local community. A large part of its appeal is the undisturbed landscapes and the local wildlife. A mine in this area will not only cause significant detriment to local habitats and the environment, it also has a large impact on the local community who have enjoyed the unspoilt and undamaged surroundings of their home for many generations. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There should not be a mine put this close to a children's school, in my experience mines do their best to control dust but are not always successful in the weather conditions we are faced with in this area. The mine should pay to move the school to the other side of town and provide them with new and updated facilities. They also shouldn't be allowed to add extra trucks onto our roads that can barely handle the population of the town and surrounding towns. The local council are already incapable of adaquate repairs and many vehicles are already damaged on a daily basis. The current mines in the area rail out their coal, the roads can absolutely not handle it. |
Thibaut Irissou
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom it may concern Please find below list of reasons that I am opposed the development proposed: My father in law owns a farm on Lue Road next to the proposed site, we are planning to start farming organic beef in a very soon future and we believe that the mine would impact the quality of the water resources available on my father in law property. Noise and polution are likely factors to impact the surrounding environment of the local community. The mine would also bring more heavy traffic and it would also impact the great biodiversity the area is well known for. The Bylong Valley and Rylstone are the gateway to the Mudgee wine region and the implatation of the Bowdens mine would have a negative impact on the tourism industry such as the availability for accomodation for people visiting the area. The assesment report often does not reflect sometimes the negative aspects likely to arise after the decision has been made. There are so many exemple Australia wide of unexpected issues not presented, and not taken into consideration that have drastic impact on local communities fro the many years to come. This is why I am opposed to this project as it will put to death the close knit community I am lucky to be part of . Kind Regards Thibaut Irissou Ps: Please forgive my poor English as I am not originally from Australia. |
shaz tinant
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am passionate about the environmental impact on flora and fauna that this mine will cause. When is Australia going to protect our natural heritage which flows on to protecting the entire planet from climate change? |
Toby Loneragan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir or Madam. I write in relation to the Bowdens proposal for a lead mine in the Lue valley and to formally register my strongest possible OBJECTION to any approval for this proposal. As a local land owner and community member my concerns may be divided into those that relate directly to me, and those that relate to the health and well being of the local community and environment. Aside from the concerns that I have about airborne particulate contaminating the air and soil at my property the concerns I have for the children of the local community must come foremost. As the parent of two small children - Ella 2 and Jack, not even 1 yet - this matter must dominate all other concerns. *Lue school would be one of the best options for our children to attend. The DIRECT implication on children should be well noted by all parties considering this application. I refer to the attachment "The world's most toxic town the terrible legacy of Zambia's lead mines Pollution The Guardian.pdf" which attached. We certainly do not want anything resembling this in Lue, a place of remarkable beauty and heritage, with the ensuing affects on the children. It is well documented that proximity to lead mines, in particular open cut mines, causes significant statistical damage to the educational outcomes and developmental progress of children. Broken Hill, Port Pirie and Mt Isa being prime examples. It would be negligent not to take into consideration peer reviewed papers such as "Environmental contamination in an Australian mining community and potential influences on early childhood health and behavioural outcomes" Chenyin Dong, Mark Patrick Taylor, Louise Jane Kristensen, Sammy Zahran (also attached in abstract) available here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749115300841 Notwithstanding the smelter component of the comparison, the abstract from this paper reads as follows: "Arsenic, cadmium and lead in aerosols, dusts and surface soils from Australia's oldest continuous lead mining town of Broken Hill were compared to standardised national childhood developmental (year 1) and education performance measures (years 3,5,7,9). Contaminants close to mining operations were elevated with maximum lead levels in soil: 8900 mg/kg; dust wipe: 86,061 μg/m2; dust deposition: 2950 μg/m2/day; aerosols: 0.707 μg/m3. The proportion of children from Broken Hill central, the area with the highest environmental contamination, presented with vulnerabilities in two or more developmental areas at 2.6 times the national average. Compared with other school catchments of Broken Hill, children in years 3 and 5 from the most contaminated school catchment returned consistently the lowest educational scores. By contrast, children living and attending schools associated with lower environmental contamination levels recorded higher school scores and lower developmental vulnerabilities. Similar results were identified in Australia's two other major lead mining and smelting cities of Port Pirie and Mount Isa." It is noted that in addition to the scores of homes located within close proximity to the mine, the town of Lue (2 kms from the proposed mine site) and most importantly, the Lue School is just 2 kms from proposed mine site. While I daresay your determination for this mine will rest on the litany of other facts that make this mine manifestly un-approvable (included objections of which I list out below), if there is one thing you should return to in the final analysis weighing up this project it is the impact on the developmental / educational milestones of the children living nearby. To those in a position to approve or reject this proposal I cannot state it more plainly than this: Please do not allow a reduction on the developmental or educational outcomes of the children of this unique rural community to stand as a permanent mark against your name and good conscience. Please accept this submission as a formally registration of this significant concern. The rejection of the Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area, recently refused for Coal Exploration, should also be paramount in consideration as the same concerns exist with respect to Bowdens proposal namely, the large number of landholders that could be affected the broader Rylstone / Kandos / Lue community and the ability of the community to be able to absorb the social impacts, community opposition, first nation peoples concerns and heritage concerns, not to mention those listed below: - Lead poisoning and health particularly of children.: There is NO safe level of lead for children. - Acid Mine Drainage / Contamination of water to the Cudgegong river system, downstream to Burrendong. This damage would be permanent. - Reduced supply of water to the Cudgegong which already experiences stain in times of drought. - Economic impact to the community and business. Tourism for example is just starting to recover after Covid. - Loss of property values. This is an unfair additional burden for the local landowners to bear. - Increased trucking to Lue Road which is already narrow and dangerous. - Zero benefit to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. I strongly urge you to permanently reject this proposal. Sincerely, Toby Loneragan |
Attachments |
environmental-contamination-in-an-australian-mining-community-and-potential-influences-on-early-chil.pdf (PDF, 360.09 KB) the-worlds-most-toxic-town-the-terrible-legacy-of-zambias-lead-mines-pollution-the-guardianpdf.pdf (PDF, 12.94 MB) |
Chantal Fuller
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is known that mining impacts the communities, land and environment in significantly negative ways. Australia and the world is moving away from mining and to approve this would go against the majority population. This site will negatively impact the farming communities, the tourism communities and the national park land that is close by. Do not approve this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this project on the basis of: - environmental grounds i.e. the ongoing impact that this mine would have on the environment, both in the short term and for hundreds of years. In particular to surface water and groundwater for the life of the mine plus for hundreds of years ongoing. Our future generations will pay for our lack of foresight should this development be approved. I am well familiar with the NSW approvals process and the environmental assessment of impacts of mines. - the personal impacts on me and my family would probably be minor (potential groundwater contamination plus increased traffic on our small local road, being Rocky Waterhole Road) however there are countless people who do not understand the issues at play who will not object - if 100% of the surrounding community plus 100% of those downstream etc were fully aware and educated on what this would involve (and trust that their objection would be meaningful and not 'a waste of time') there would be many more objections. Lack of understanding breeds apathy to object. The impact on Rocky Waterhole Road from increased traffic is unknown however this road is used as a pseudo Mudgee bypass on the eastern side i.e. on the mine's side of Mudgee. The road is not fit for its current traffic use including a single lane bridge with no sides - this road must be suitably protected in the Traffic Management Plan for the mine. - I would consider dropping my objection if the independent experts and consultants could verify that there are no ongoing environmental impacts from this project however I know this is not possible given my prior knowledge of the impacts of mining - the recommended conditions of consent don't adequately prevent (or mitigate) adverse impacts from the development. I'm not interested in offsetting as this means that there are defined environmental impacts being allowed. - Drawing on just one issue, the predicted ongoing leakage from the tailings dam is unacceptable. If the tailings dam cannot be guaranteed to have no leakage this is an unacceptable position (noting that a watertight tailings dam is still an environmental liability in perpetuity). The Department's report noting that "Lawson’s Creek is already degraded" and therefore that "seepage from the Tailings Storage Facility would not lower the beneficial use of the creek" is staggering - the willingness to further degrade an environmental asset is surprising, let alone the downstream impacts unbeknown to many more. I could spend hours reading all of the literature and come up with more detail than this. Therefore I object. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live in the Greater Lithgow area, however I work in the Rylstone region and spend recreational time in the area as well, and have done for many years. I am objecting to this proposal with my concerns below: -The proximity of the proposed mine to Lue and the direct impact through mining operations will have on the health and well being of residents in this town and surrounding areas. Ongoing noise and contaminated dust, in the greater region's air, land and water is inevitable and unacceptable. Lead exposure is greatly concerning. Families and businesses both in the town of Lue and the surrounding agricultural areas will be impacted negatively; their health, their livelihoods and tourism which is growing in the area will be affected. - the toxic legacy of a tailings dam highlights further risks to the water table and environment and ensures issues of contamination will live on well after the mining is completed. The impact on the environment will be irreversible. Given the extreme patterns of weather becoming the norm, most recently the big rain event, one has to question; what is in place and can be 100% guaranteed to ensure seepage, leakage and collapsing of ponds and the dam and that the structural safety of such operational structures are permanently sound? - clearing of woodland forests for this mine is not feasible. Given the loss of habitat and masses of woodland areas decimated across the state with the fires of 2019 /2020 the removal of remaining forests for the mine is a reckless act and does not consider the needs of people, fauna and the environment. This is mindless human destruction on a large scale which will deliver an uninhabitable area in the longer term and make conditions unliveable for current residents. - I have been considering moving to this area, I have friends and work colleagues there, but now will most certainly not unless this mine proposal is knocked back. Medical facilities in regional areas are below par and this is a major issue being currently discussed with forthcoming political elections. Life in the bush now delivers shorter life expectancy than urban areas, a compete turnaround of the statistics of 20 - 30 years ago. Proposals like this one will add to the stresses on health care. Overall this proposal is shortsighted and has no consideration for the current people residing there, nor for the environment which sustains all life. I urge that this mine be knocked back and careful respect and consideration to the environment and the local people with their families, and future families. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Out with finite resources!! Get with the times and start investing in renewable energy. It’s absolutely ridiculous! Think of the world you’re going to leave for your grandkids and great grandkids if we keep killing this earth. We’re sick and tired of always fighting for the Earth. NO MORE COAL MINES! RENEWABLE ENERGY NOW! |
SAMANTHA IRISSOU
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am the owner of a 300 acre property that will be impacted by the mine going ahead and I also own a B&B home in mudgee. With the mine going ahead it will directly impact tourism for the area as so many of the B&B homes won't be able to provide accomodation for the Rylstone & Kandos area, therefore tourism and visitors to the area will go down and the town will not be profitable and become a ghost town. We have an abundance of visitors to the area and having a mine consuming the land and the surrounding ares will impact the region detrimentally. My father is elderly and live son our farm with our animals. He can't be moving at his age to another home. This mine will impact our farm as its only 5km from him. We will producing beef in the next 12-36 months on our family farm, if we don't have access to clean water AND THE USE OF SURROUNDING FARMS BULLS, WE OWNT BE ABLE TO PRODUCE BEEF IN OUR MUDGEE REGION. I highly OPPOSE the mine. |
Mick Radzievic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Despite claims by Bowens that there will be no adverse environmental or health issues with the proposed development is in fact false and should be dismissed as a contrived report. A mine that will be extracting these heavy metals will have an immediate and sustained negative impact on the in place and surrounding ecosystems, waterways, air quality as has occurred in every mine of this type in the world. A clear and present danger exists if this mine development goes ahead ,future generations will endure a very negative legacy of environmental damages that will have far reaching detrimental factors that will outweigh any perceived economic benefit broadcast by Bowen's.The over whelming scientific evidence suggests that this type of development if approved would be reckless and negligent of all bodies authorised to give approval to the |
Hannah Kadi
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
After months of campaigning against coal exploration in the area, this would be devastating to the local community. It would directly affect the wellbeing of residents, deteriorate the environment which would in turn would diminish tourism in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have concerns about the Tailings Storage Facility proposed for the site. I have followed information provided to me regarding the proposed TSF, detailing the facts of seepage and the risks of greater seepage due to naturally existing faults in the land. My understanding is that these toxic dams can lead to pollution of ground water for many kilometres around the site, and, stand contaminated, for hundreds of years, well past the time when the mining company will hold physical or financial responsibility for leakage and remediation. The long term effects of the TSF will sit with the local residents and affect them and their children for many many years to come. Following on from my concerns about the TSF I have general concerns about the entire mine site and its proximity to local villages and towns, particularly the village of Lue. The impact of the mine and its air qualities; the proposed solutions and funding to residents to help insulate homes against air quality fall well short of the huge impact that this mine will have on residents. I have friends living in the area who will be impacted by this mine personally. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Opening this mine under the guise of silver is a lie. 25kg of lead are expected to contaminate the local water supplies for local farms and residents every year. The health snd environmental implications of opening this mine are appalling, and would damage our already fragile ecosystem and cause further losses of habitat and wildlife. Do not let this open. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir / Madam, I am writing to express my shock and horror with regards to the development of the proposed Bowden Silver Mine, planned to be developed near Lue, NSW. The proposed area is one of outstanding national beauty, situated in one of the world’s finest wine producing regions, with a long-standing agricultural heritage. Prior to the arrival of the European colonists, the land had remained untouched since the dawn of time. The proposal to irrevocably alter the landscape with an open cut mine, that will produce noise and nuisance throughout it’s life, use massive amounts of the limited water supply (that will also be polluted beyond recognition long after the mine is closed and gone), produce untold carcinogenic waste……all no less than 2km from a children’s school, must be stopped. We live in a world beset by demand for precious metals – that we understand – but the desire to make a “quick buck” should not be given into at the cost of robbing future generations of Australians of the right to enjoy this area of outstanding countryside, were we to let this proposal go ahead. The impact of concentrate mines is long and sad – show me one concentrates mine that has had a long term positive impact on the communities health, economy or landscape; and I’ll show you ten where the opposite is true. This asinine proposal will, at best, put some money in the pockets of a select few. At worst – well, we’ve all seen what can happen then. I leave you with a quote from the well know environmentalist Wendell Berry, where he discussed adapting a forward thinking, long term view of the environment: We can learn about it from exceptional people of our own culture, and from other cultures less destructive than ours. I am speaking of the life of a man who knows that the world is not given by his fathers, but borrowed from his children; who has undertaken to cherish it and do it no damage, not because he is duty-bound, but because he loves the world and loves his children… |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a former resident of Mudgee I am fully aware of the impact this mine will make to the Lue community and to the region in general. My main concerns are to do with health and the environment. Water supply and contamination is at risk, particularly with acid mine drainage. Koala populations may be impacted. Tourism will be affected due to scarring from the mines. Any attempt at rehabilitation is never successful in returning an area to its former state. There is danger of lead poisoning and there are children in a school in close proximity. No level of lead is safe for children. And this is all near farming lands. On a lesser concern transport is an issue with Lue Road being narrow and dangerous. There will be noise pollution. I implore you to reject the proposal for the development of this mine |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining will affect the community of farmers, their water & quality of land for animals farmed. The local community does not support mining. |
Monique Carroll
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly OPPOSING the mine, it will impact locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production and impact the water into the Lawson creek - also impacting the wine production in there area to irrigate vines in the region. Please please do not do this |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was born and raised in Mudgee. Although I no longer live in Mudgee I have many friends who still live in Mudgee, Lue and Rylstone. I strongly oppose the Bowdens mine and the negative impact it will have on the area and the people who live there. Please do not let this go ahead, |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
With a close personal connection to the Lue region over the past forty years I am extremely concerned that the proposed Bowden silver mine will destroy the pristine greenfield area forever. At this time in our nation's history we should be preserving our precious prestine land not destroying it. The government cannot ignore the negative ecological impact that clearing the mine will have, the threat to water security for the surrounding communities who rely on it for their livlihoods. Even more concerning is the threat to the health of the local community from dangerous lead levels and the toxic tailings dam. It cannot be ignored that the mine will be just a few kilometres away from the Lue School when it is a well known fact that lead poisoning has very serious and long lasting health implications for children in particular. It is hard to fathom that the health and wellbeing of young children and their families would knowingly compromised by the government and the supporters of the Bowden mine. If the Bowden mine is allowed to go ahead the government will be making a deliberate decision to support commercial activity that will result in ecological disaster. In addition, the government will be complicit in destruction of communities who have cared for the region for centuries, the destruction of their livlihoods and will be putting their health and that of future generations in peril. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are the closest neighbouring property, so this mine would affect us the most out of everybody. I have a young child and am concerned about the impacts on both her, and the water that feeds us, our livestock and the wildlife and ecology of the area. It will also destroy and eternally alter a beautiful rural community. It will become busier, dustier, polluted, and it just simply is not something that should occur in this day and age. We do not want this next to our family. We do not want this near our kids. We do not want our tight knit rural community torn apart. The ecology in this area does not need this level of threat and contamination. Please consider all the impacts that this mine will have on our local children, community, livestock, and environment. |
Caroline Mills
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the extended community of Lue (my family lives in Lue and I spend most school holidays there with my three children aged 3,5 and 7) I strongly object to the development of the Bowdens Silver mine for the following reasons; Hazards The mining of lead at the site is of particular concern due to the risk it poses to life in the region. As stated by the World Health Organisation on their website "There is no level of exposure to lead that is known to be without harmful effects". The inevitable contamination of air and/or water sources around Lue from the mining of lead poses significant risk to residence of Lue and those that spend significant amounts of time there. Socioeconomic Impacts The town of Lue is situated on a popular tourist trail and has many thriving businesses within and surrounding the town. The mine will completely destroy the prosperity of countless businesses that rely on the tourist trail, including businesses in Rylstone and Mudgee as well as Lue. Environment The impacts to the environment will be dire. Many Australian native species that live within the proposed are will be at risk. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to you today to express my strong opposition to the proposed lead and zinc mining project in the beautiful town of Lue, New South Wales. As a concerned local , I implore you to reject this project for the sake of our environment, our economy, and the health and wellbeing of our community. Lue is a town known for its natural beauty, with stunning landscapes and an abundance of flora and fauna. The proposed mining project would have a devastating impact on this natural environment, causing irreversible damage to the ecosystem and the local wildlife. The use of harmful chemicals and the release of heavy metals into the environment would pollute our waterways and soil, leading to severe consequences for the health and wellbeing of our community. In addition, the tourism industry is the backbone of our local economy, bringing in revenue and providing jobs for our community. We must protect this. The mining project would have a negative impact on this important sector, as visitors are unlikely to want to come to a town that has been marred by environmental destruction and pollution. This could result in significant economic losses for our town, with businesses forced to close and jobs lost to a mining corporation. Furthermore, the health and safety of our community must be a top priority. Exposure to lead and other heavy metals can cause a range of health problems, including developmental issues in children and respiratory problems in adults. This is not a risk that we should be willing to take, and the potential long-term consequences of the project simply cannot be justified. The proposed lead and zinc mining project in Lue poses a serious threat to our environment, economy, and community. I urge you to reject this project and protect the wellbeing of our town and its inhabitants. Let us work together to create a sustainable future for Lue, one that prioritizes our natural environment and the health and prosperity of our community. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I disagree with the Bowdens project due the incredibly negative and permanent impacts the development will have on the environment and community of Lue and Mudgee. The threats are too great and can have devastating effects on the livelihood of humans and animals in the area, as well as impacting the spaces in which they live. Any project with such a threat to society should never be given the possibility of being approved, especially when it can be so widespread and catastrophic. In a world where we have already ruined so much of our world's natural beauty and considering the diminished the future potential of our generations fixing past mistakes, we as humans should be doing all that we can to protect ourselves and our surroundings, not invading environments and putting people (and our children) at risk. On a personal level, I have friends who will be directly impacted by this project and so I am in full support of their objection to this work being approved. Consent (rather, objection) from the community should be seriously considered in this particular case. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I reject the proposal as it will directly impact local farming production and impact water flowing into the Lawson creek. |
Amy Munro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This will affect the animals the livestock and all the waterways. This needs to stop!! |
Lucy Smith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Bobbie White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Bowdens Silver Project due the environmental and health impacts this project will have to Lue, NSW and the greater Mudgee region and its community members. After review of the DPE Assessment Report, I believe this project will be hugely detrimental to my community. I have been qualified as Registered Nurse for past 9 years and a Registered Midwife for 2 years. During this time, I have worked within many health care sectors and have extensive knowledge of pathophysiological process of injury and disease. I am concerned of the health impacts on the Lue and Mudgee residents from accidental and inadvertent exposure to lead – a known carcinogenic which is capable of inducing tumour formation (Nowak & Handford, 2014, p.160). Khalid & Abdollahi (2019, p. 235) state that lead exposure during different stages of development has demonstrated dose, duration, sex and tissue-specific pathophysiological outcomes due to altered epigenetic regulation. Furthermore, lead-induced alteration of epigenetic regulation causes neurotoxic and extra-neurotoxic pathophysiological outcomes; such as dysfunction of memory and learning, behavioural disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, aging, alzhemier’s disease, neurodegeneration altered body weight, metabolic disorder, cardiovascular disorders, hematopoietic disorder and reproductive impairment (Khalid & Abdollahi, 2019, p. 235). Bowdens Silver Project, is attempting to mine and transport this chemical element 2 kilometres from a primary school and residential community – exposure to which is known to cause either early in life or at any stage of development negative pathophysiological outcomes with tend to sustain and maintain for the duration of human life. It seems clear that minimising the introduction of lead into the environment – by rejecting this project – will reduce future health issues on Lue residents. A potential burden to the health care sector for years longer than any benefits this mine might have the economically. We simply cannot let this project proceed. The cost is too great to our families and community. |
David Lynch
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to strongly object to the Bowdens mine proposal. To allow such a development that, inter-alia, has the potential to contaminate Lawson Creek, a prime water source for not only the local agriculture industries, fauna and flora, but also the very real possibility that should the Lawson creek suffer contamination it would naturally affect the wider Mudgee district. I am aware of the issues addressed in the report, but would point out that the best and safest way of ensuring that a failure of the tailings dam would not happen, is not to proceed with this proposal. Surely this issue alone is sufficent to raise serious concerns, and particularly given that some of the best dams globally still fail or leak into the surrounding terrain. Our environment is sacrosanct and to risk that is just irresponsible in the extreme. David Lynch |
David White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is David White, I am a 29-year-old male engineer living in Sydney with a large amount of Family in the Lue area and most of my childhood spent in the neighbouring farms to this proposed disastrous mine. The reasons why I object to this proposal are 1. This mine is 2km from the Lue township and a primary school 2. The mine will produce 95000 tonnes of lead - a highly toxic mineral. There is no safe level to exposure of lead especially for children and this mine is just 2kms from Lue School. Lead is a cumulative toxicant that affects multiple body systems. 3. The mine will operate 24 hours a day seven days a week with blasting allowed 6 days a week - this is totally unacceptable and reasonable for the residents of Lue 4. A deadly cyanide processing plant will operate on site. 5. A highly toxic large tailings dam will be constructed less than a kilometre from Lawson Creek and will be there FOREVER long after the mine has been abandoned - these dams have been known to fail. The result would be an environmental disaster for Lawson Creek which feeds into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. It will pollute our water supply forever. Tailings dams regularly fail around the world, in fact there 23 tailings dams have failed in the world in the last five years including the dam at Newcrest Mining’s Cadia Gold Mine near Orange NSW. 6. 227000 tonnes of ore will be trucked along the winding and narrow Lue Road through Mudgee town ship. Our local road is already very busy and quite dangerous as people drive too fast for the road’s conditions. Many people from Rylstone use Lue Road to commute to Mudgee and beyond for work. Currently B Double Trucks are restricted yet I believe that ore will be moved by B Double Trucks. The road must be upgraded significantly should the mine go ahead. 7. The water level in Lawson Creek will drop by one metre rendering much of the Creek dry for all other users. Bowdens Mine will use more water from the Lawson Creek catchment than all current users combined. 8. Ground water levels on the mine site will drop by 25 metres. The open cut pit will continue to draw on ground water for up to 100 years after the mine has been abandoned. 9. The mine will produce two massive dumps of 56 million tonnes of acid forming rock and tailings (crushed ore remnants post processing) above the water table and local creek catchments of Price Creek, Hawkins Creek and Lawson Creek. 26 million tonnes of rock is PAF potentially acid forming which will be stacked over the water catchment covering 77 hectares. These waste dumps will most likely leach into our water table and the surrounding catchment. 10. Over 16 years to extract ore 43,700 tonnes of chemicals will be added (EIS S2.7.3 Reagent Management, Table 2.4, p2-37) to process the ore including 2850 tonnes of Sodium Cyanide. Many of the chemicals are toxic and will end up in the tailings dam along with 30 millions of crushed ore remnants which is 117 ha. This will sit above Lawson Creek catchment forever. Tailings Dams regularly fail around the world. Newcrest’s Cadia Gold Mine at Orange failed in March 2018 – 1.33 million cubic metres of tailings escaped to be contained within another tailings dam on the mine site. I believe it was caused by an earthquake. Bowdens does not plan to have a second tailings dam should the first one fail. I recommend they have a second tailings dam for safety. 11. Tailings dams fail during significant rain events. We have rain records showing 225 mls overnight in February 2002 which caused major destruction in the Lawson Creek catchment. We regularly have large floods in Lawson Creek which dissipate very quickly. Bowdens would be subject to the same variations and suffer the consequences of extreme rain events. 12. The economics of this mine do not add up. (EIS Vol 5, Part 16C_ Closure Cover Design, Appendix A, p.24) Assumed silver price in the EIS is US$20.91/oz, (EIS S 4, Table 4.84 Key Assumptions Underpinning the Economic Assessment, p. 4-373) over the last 5 years the silver price has never reached this level and if production costs increase, the mine will be even less viable. A financially unviable mine represents an even greater threat as they may look for ways to cut corners which could affect safety. 13. The mine cannot source enough water locally so is relying on water from Ulan or Moolarben mines via a 58km pipeline through mostly private farm land, this supply has not been guaranteed and most likely will only be available when seasons are good - in drought those mines will not have excess water. (EIS S2.10 Water Supply p.2 -62) 14. 5-16 tonnes of explosives and oxidising agents will be transported along Lue Road (EIS S2.4.3.2 Drill and Blast P2-23) 15. Bowdens does not offer a suitable plan for rehabilitation of the mine. When the mine closes the tailings dam and all the PAF will remain forever. 16. The mine covers areas habituated by koalas and Regent Honeyeater. It is also has Grey Box Grassy Woodland which will be destroyed by the mine. I hope that you consider my submission and others prior to reaching your decision. The mine is a short-term benefit for an area which many others hope to sustain throughout the long term for future generations. The area will continue to grow and does not need something as destructive as this mine. Regards, David White |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this development based on the negative environmental impacts this will pose to neighbouring properties and communities. |
harry white
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To whom it may concern I write this submission in regard to the proposed Bowdens Lead mine I and my family are fully opposed to this mine, it poses so many risks and threats to my family and my lively-hood and a great many like it that it should not even be considered. As a young farmer and father, my greatest concerns are around: -water safety and security: Water is the key to our survival. A mine that threatens to use 1000 mega liters from our catchment would most certainly have negative effects on our agricultural productions. Acid drainage into the water course that provides my house with water, all of my livestock with water is a disaster, in my opinion NOT an option. -Proximty to a school A lead mine throwing dust all over the village of lue and with in it, the Lue Public School, which my boys will soon attend is shcoking. Exposer to lead is dangerous, chronic exposure can have significant side effects on children. AGAIN, NOT and option. - A permanent toxic legacy The proposed tailings dam, to be built across a fault line at the head waters of the lawson creek, is far less than ideal for a farmer who lives down stream. Last i checked arsenic in the water and beef production do not go hand in hand. |
Jodie Hellmich
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Just stop!!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the Mudgee Community I am concerned at the proposed lead mine in Lue being built. The environmental impact of a toxic mine could be catastrophic for Lue and Mudgee. The greedy shortsightedness of the local councils and the NSW government is disappointing with profit being their primary consideration when considering projects such as this. With the Mudgee region being an agricultural and wine region the risks of the mine outweigh the rewards. Please deny this application and put the interests of the people of the Mudgee before profit. |
Teena Wright
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowden silver mine near Lue because I believe the ecological and social impacts are far reaching. Whenever a mine takes precedence over the environment and the community, the complex structure of these is overlooked. In my opinion remediation and offsetting for mining sites and social consultation of the community are green washed corporate speak and do not mitigate the impacts. Communities and ecosystems are fractured by mines and the Lue and Mudgee community are fully aware they do not want what is offered in return for corporate profiteering by Bowden. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please think again on the people that lives in the surrounding area and their health. |
Scott FitzGerald
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against this mine. It is most certainly not suited to the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a travesty to the local environment and should not proceed. |
Lucinda Jones
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the silver mine for various reasons. Firstly I have family that visit regularly and they have just started their families. They would not come here if there is any risk of lead poisoning. Secondly the tailings dam is going to be opposite property I am high up on a hill and I will have a horrible view of the dam. Thirdly I am worried about the risk of all the contamination from the dam leaching into a beautiful area and the Lawson creek. This creek is used to water crops and animals. Also if the are taking the water from the creek there will be none left for agriculture. The long term effect on the area including Mudgee will destroy tourism and the wine industry. If the mine goes through I would sell and move and I think I would have a hard time selling with a mine going ahead This would be very upsetting for me and my family as we have done a lot of expensive improvements and my family we’re planning on keeping the property for their futures. |
rhiannon peden
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m Concerned the mine will impact locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production and impact the water into the Lawson creek - also impacting the wine production in their area to irrigate vines in the region. |
Tim Mckay
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m a resident and I believe that this project will affect the land I live on and work on. It will polite the feed my cattle eat and the water table my family drink from along with my live stock. Please take into consideration the impact this mine will have on the community and for those making a living. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Michael Gill
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Having been involved in concerns over a coal mine nearby, I am surprised that there is now a new proposal for a "silver" mine. All the reasons that applied to the refusal of coal mining in this area remain relevant. It might well be called a silver mine, but the volume of mineral proposed for mining is much more lead. I assume that silver was chosen for public purposes because lead has so many characteristics that are highly damaging to health when distributed above ground or into water. The Bowden site is in a sensitive environment that is not suitable for mining. It would permanently alter the landscape and create a wide range of risks to public health. It is not clear that the social value of such mining is in any way proportionate to the damage and risks. |
Rebecca Daniell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have children born in this town and cannot bear the thought of the legacy this mine will leave in terms of irreversible environmental damage in this area. It absolutely frightens me that if we have floods and overflow the same as we have had in 2022, the mine will not be able to cope with this and the overflow into the Lawson Creek would eventually lead it's way to my children's sporting fields eventually affecting their health and safety. It's absolutely disgusting and frightening that these inept decisions made by the Government have been allowed such a mine to have processed this far. Not only is the health and safety of our children and families in danger, but the sustainability of our native wildlife habitat. I am upset by the fact that White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland, an ecological community defined as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, has been identified on the site, and 180 hectares of its habitat will be destroyed. I am also concerned that the listing of koalas as endangered in February last year, and that the mine will cause the destruction of Koala and other native wildlife habitat. Please listen to the concerns of the community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
New mines should not be occurring in this day and age. This will detrimentally affect the environment and will pose a hazard to people and animals in the area. I object to this development based on the negative environmental impacts this will pose to neighbouring properties and communities. I have close friends who grew up in the area , whose family still resides there. I personally have loved visiting the area multiple times enjoying the beautiful surroundings, fresh air and picture perfect views. I have friends who visit the area purely for the same reasons as above. I feel a mine in the area will destroy the tourism as well as the beautiful countryside. |
Eliza Mackinnon
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am dumb founded that Bowdens would be calling this a silver mine when only <1% of what will be mined will be silver, the rest being lead. This mine will have a major impact to the water table and the surrounds. Not to being the longevity of the mine only being 15-20yrs. Lue and the mudgee region isn’t struggling for work, like Bowmen’s have mentioned that this will create many jobs, the mines in mudgee are looking for workers. Mudgee is a thriving tourist destination and is no need of extra employment opportunities. The direct impact this mine has on the township of Lue is major. The road infrastructure, noise pollution from machinery/ transport trucks etc. |
Kate Marsh
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed the mine for many reasons. A few being; the mine will impact locally farm, beef , goat and lamb production and impact the water into the Lawson creek - also impacting the wine production in their area to irrigate vines in the region. This cannot go ahead |
Lauren Willmot
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I know families that will be devastated by this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I lived at Havilah for 50 year and my family continue to live on the property which is located 10km from Lue and will be impacted by the proposed mine. I object to the proposed mine for the following reasons - Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. - Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. - Lead poisoning and health. - Acid Mine Drainage. - Contamination of water. - Reduced supply of water. - Loss of property values. - There is no safe level of lead for children. - No consideration of adjacent lands. - Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . - No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. - No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Growers Network |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design - The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. - Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. - Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. - There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. - The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. - There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity - The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. - Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel uncalculatable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. - The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. - This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. - Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental - Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. - The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. - The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? - Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. - The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. - Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. - For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. - Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards - Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. - Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. - 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. - Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? - The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. - Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. - The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. - The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic - With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. - The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. - If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. - Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. As a young person who has long family history in the area and an intent to raise a family here, this proposed mine is extremely alarming. I strongly oppose the mine and believe there are several holes and oversights in the assessments and designs put forward by Bowden's. The communities of Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee will all feel the effects of the mine FOREVER if it should go ahead. In such a beautiful part of the world where people come to live and enjoy a rural lifestyle the worst thing that could happen is for the water and soil to be poisoned by toxic dust. I don't want to live in fear. NO LEAD MINE FOR LUE. 2KMS TOO CLOSE. TAKE YOUR TOXIC LEGACY SOMEWHERE ELSE. |
Neil Matthews
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We spent ten years travelling through remote Australia and visited many old mine sites. What we saw without exception was destroyed landscaped. Never any attempt at rehabilitation. Overburden dumps that are unusable. Poisonous water. We feel there is a real potential hazard of atmospheric pollution from mining dust around the mine site and neighbouring region, together with possible leakage from road transport. The local roads are inadequate for the amount of ore that will be transported, and the 24hour nature of this transport is unfair to people living in the region. A better alternative would be to repair the train line between Rylstone and Lue and transport the ore by rail via Lithgow. There is a short period of benefit by local employment, but Lue can never benefit from a lifetime of destroyed and poisoned environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was very disappointed to discover that the people of Lue and Mudgee along with other communities in our area have been deceived yet again. The proposed Bowden Mine has now announced they are planning on mining for Lead, Zinc and Silver. Lead being their primary product when our local community was led to believe it was to be Silver only. Due to the well-known impact of lead on the environment it is now of great concern to me. Water contamination due to leaching of the tailings dam into Lawson Creek, not to mention the water table. Dust contamination, not only in the Lue area but any area that transport vehicles will be traveling through to carry product too other towns / cities for processing is also of great concern. The impact to our viticulture, farming and livestock industries in the Mudgee region will be devastating. Loss of jobs due to loss of production in these areas will far out way the benefits that Bowden Mine employment has to offer. Water contamination due to carcinogens leaking into Lawson Creek and inevitably the Cudgegong River along with air born dust particles will devastate our already prosperous agricultural industries which will lead to a loss of jobs not to mention the blow it will eventually have on our amazing tourism industry. No one has the right to contaminate water ways for profit. No one has the right to contaminate the air we breathe, no matter how small an area they try to convince us it will be. I also believe that, regardless of the employment opportunities that this venture may offer Mudgee and its surrounding areas, the health threats to the people of our community will far outweigh any advantage that their employment may offer. We all need to make money, I respect that, however, to put at risk the health of any individual or to impact the livelihoods of others, in what would only be in a detrimental way, is wrong. After taking into consideration issues addressed in the DPS Assessment report I do not believe that the complete impact of this mine, especially in the Lue area, has been taken into consideration. The health and well-being of the people of our community, children in particular, must be of the highest priority. Any impact to our local flora, fauna and agricultural industries must be taken into serious consideration. The loss of production to the Lue and Mudgee area not to mention the flow on effect to other communities downstream could be devastating. In closing I want to state that it is my opinion that there would be no conditions of consent that would adequately prevent, mitigate of offset any adverse impacts that the Bowden Mine will have on the Lue area or the surrounding communities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Sally Killoran
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing this submission to express my deep opposition to Bowden’s proposed lead, zinc and silver mine within kilometers of my pastoral company. My husband and I have been landholders in the Mudgee region for the past 15 years. We run a sheep, cattle and cropping operation near Mudgee, dependent on an environment free from toxic chemicals leeching into our valuable water tables. I am deeply concerned about the impacts this mine would have on my family, my livelihood, my health, the greater community and ultimately, the environment. Farming depends on soil and water quality – Bowden’s mine would have a disastrous impact on the water table, through deep excavation and pollution, as well as toxic chemicals and heavy metals used in mining seeping into the ground water, contaminating dams, rivers and aquifers in the region. The Bowden’s Project is located within Lawsons Creek catchment, in the eastern headwaters of the Macquarie River basin. Lawsons Creek flows in a NW direction and drains to the Cudgegong River near Mudgee – which directly affects our property. Acid forming materials would have a detrimental effect to the pastoral land downstream of the mine, causing large amounts of water with low pH and high concentrations of heavy metals such as manganese, iron, nickel, copper and zinc. I am extremely worried and concerned about the disastrous consequences of Bowden’s acid drainage, directly harming my family, the animals on our property, and the thousands of people who consume the produce generated by my pastoral company. Providing agricultural produces to the mass market is our livelihood, and Bowden’s Silver has not fully contemplated the ramifications of multi-pathway exposures produced by the mine. The dust generated by the proposed activities at Bowden’s Mine may deposit onto the ground on our property, where metals and arsenic present in the dust may accumulate in topsoil, in household dust or be deposited onto a roof where it may then be washed into rainwater tanks. My family, and the thousands of people we feed throughout Australia may then be exposed to these metals and arsenic via ingestion through direct contact with soil and dust on a property, and/or drinking rainwater. Once deposited to soil, any home grown fruit and vegetables, eggs from chickens, milk and meat, may accumulate these metals. The community may be exposed to these metals through the ingestion of this produce, with ingestion of home grown produce of most significance. On a personal note, my son Harry has cystic fibrosis – a lung disease affected detrimentally by dust in the air, causing a build-up of mucous and increased inflammation. Not only would the impact of trucks damage the roads and environment but it would also personally put my son’s life in danger through the assimilation of toxic dust in the environment, causing him to have more frequent lung exacerbations and increased time spent in hospital. The Bowden’s Project is an open cut mine and the most significant emissions to air are likely to be dust generated from activities that remove soil and rock, and the metals (including lead, silver, cadmium, copper, manganese, zinc, cobalt, chromium, mercury, lithium and nickel) and metalloids (arsenic) that may be present in the dust from mining extraction and processing. Not only would the increased dust around the mine site affect my son, but it could cause chronic illnesses in the greater community, as evidenced in mine sites in Broken Hill and Mt Isa, for which there is there has been a long history of dust deposition within the towns, the communities are exposed to both naturally elevated levels of lead and re-dispersed historical deposition. Bowden’s Air Quality Assessment is not thorough, does not assess people living in the area with chronic illnesses and also does not look at what happens when micro-particles are ingested. This is not good enough. I am also deeply concerned about the mine’s lasting effect on the water table, the environment and the community long after the minerals have been extracted. Have you contemplated the future of the town after its soil and water has been polluted, and its tourists driven away by this environmental hazard? Have you considered that the environment, the health of the ecosystem and the quality of life- and health – of residents far outweigh any money-grabbing benefits of a mining company? The Mudgee region is world-renowned for its high-quality produce and its tourism. Please do not destroy our livelihood, destroy our health, and destroy our town. Yours sincerely, Sally Killoran |
Joanne Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached my letter objecting to the mine proposal |
Attachments |
bowdensletterdocx.pdf (PDF, 82.42 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this development based on the negative environmental impacts this will pose to neighbouring properties and communities. |
Elizabeth Cremonese
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lead dust can easily travel from Lue to Rylstone, where I live. Existing farmland, horticulture and tourism will not be able to coexist with an open cut mine. |
Debra and Gregory Bush
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission - Bowdens Silver Mine - Lue We are opposed to the Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue which needs to be stopped now! Our reasons and/or how it will impact us are outlined below: We are both in our late 60’s and retired, we have owned our property for 20 years and have been living in Rylstone for 12 years. We chose Rylstone to be our new place of residence as we were seeking a change in lifestyle that was quiet, in the Australian bush and away from the hectic pace on the eastern sea board. Our observations over the past 20 years include that the towns of Kandos, Rylstone & Lue have steadily grown with tourism and have shifted away from dependency on major employers such as the Australian Cement Co. On any given weekend most accommodation is full and the main streets are busy – this is surely an indication that tourism is the way forward for our towns not mining. Water- It is well known and proven that one of the greatest threats to our region’s precious water supply is mining. This area is rich in natural springs and bores. Exploration and mining can have significant impacts on the water resources of a local area. Drilling can crack and drain underground aquifers once the water is gone, it is lost forever. Without water, there is no life. There are no communities. There is no agriculture, no tourism, nothing to fight bushfires with. Of greater risk is contamination of water courses and catchments with dangerous chemicals such as cyanide and heavy metals like lead. There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the ground water system. Flora and Fauna - There are many endangered flora and fauna species as well as endangered ecological communities which could be lost. NSW BioNet has recorded 293 threatened or endangered species in the Mid-Western Regional Council LGA.Waterways would be disturbed or destroyed, and this would lead to a loss of fish habitat and threatened fish species. Aboriginal Heritage - We have a duty as a nation to protect these sites. Impact on current local economy-The proposed mine will ultimately lead to loss of agricultural lands, farms will lose their water. The people in the region have built long-term sustainable economic stability for this region. This revenue stays in the pockets of our local businesses. Businesses that have helped build the tourism industry in the region include vineyards, olive groves, horse studs, beef and sheep farms, eco-tourism, short stay accommodation, restaurants, cafes, antique shops, soft furnishings and knick-knacks for example. These businesses are incompatible with mining. Just the threat of new mines being developed decimates many of the existing businesses as people stop investing or move away. Local towns close once the mines move on as they no longer have the income from the mines they were dependent on; and unemployment and associated issues such as crime, increase. Social & health implications brought about by mines - Air, water, soil and noise pollution, do not stay within the boundaries of mining sites! The neighbouring Hunter Valley is now a pollution ‘hotspot’ and has some of the highest rates for respiratory and cardiac conditions in NSW. Mining brings about increased traffic, including heavy vehicles on our local and rural roads, which are already poor and not suited to aheavy load traffic. Lue Road is a rural single lane road with very little shoulder or verge with dangerous visibility for overtaking or passing, the road seal is poor and not suitable heavy B Double trucks transport. Noise and vibration will dramatically increase with blasting, heavy earthmoving equipment and machinery operating in the mines 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The Health effects are real and are already being felt as people experience anxiety and stress about the threat to their region and economic stability. Yours sincerely, Gregory Bush & Debra Bush |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My late mother & her family grew up in this area and I grew up a little further north at Birriwa. I am a regular visitor to the region and have many personal friends in the area and greatly enjoy our regular visits to what has become a major tourist attraction. I dread the thought of the negative impact that such a mine might have on the area. Tourism is such an important part of our economy, attracting foreign visitors to our shores & creating important employment in rural & regional Australia. We should not do anything to jeopardise that & I fear that this mine will. |
Angela Perry
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The conditions of consent for the mine no not adequately mitigate the likely adverse impacts from the mine. Many of these will have permanent effects on the local community and wildlife eg acid mine drainage in the river system downstream to Burrendong . Also the proposed rehabilitation of the site is grossly inadequate. Bowdens have no experience in building the type of tailings dam proposed and has acknowledged that leakage from the dam will continue after mining finishes and impact the local environment forever. The mine will lead to over 10% loss of water flow to Lawsons Creek. This will have a serious negative impact on the local farmers and other users of water from the creek. Tourism which is an important local industry will be greatly impacted by the mine through excessive noise. |
Fiona Sinclair
Organisation |
Queen's Square Chambers |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To approve the development will have a negative impact on this beautiful unique part of the Australian country and will set back the aims of us all to work with and to improve nature and to enhance the natural environment The local community are vehemently opposed and their wishes should be respected In my opinion the recommended conditions of consent do not adequately address how the land will benefit and how the rivers, waterways and surrounding areas will be protected. The development does nothing to address natural capital. The development will have an adverse impact on the local soil and vegetation. The development will have an adverse impact on local wildlife. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I work and live in the Mudgee community that will be directly impacted if this goes ahead. The thought of the environment taking another hit in our local area is devastating. Let alone trying to grasp the idea of how and where you will be able to accommodate the amount of people working in another mine in our area. We do not have the infrastructure to support this, and we do not want it regardless. Our community does not need nor want this to happen. We are a community that lives on wiradjuri land and you have torn up enough of it. This will greatly devastate our local wildlife which is already struggling due to the 19/20 bushfires in the area. We want to rebuild and rejuvenate, not tear apart and decimate. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
the hazards of the mine tailings are not properly addressed the environmental consequences are enormous and devastating with the current proposal STOP THE MINE |
Attachments |
bowdens-silverpdf.pdf (PDF, 50.38 KB) |
Tahlia Jameson
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose this proposed development as it is ruining sacred indigenous land and is harming the environment of this country. |
Tempe Onus
Organisation |
Tempe J W Onus |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My main objection to the proposed mine in the Lue area is the probable water table contamination on the Lawson Creek. The proposed site is surrounded by highly productive agricultural businesses, supporting families whose lives and livelihoods will be adversely affected by the mine both short term and long term. Surrounding property values will be affected, along with standards of living due to the dust, traffic noise etc, |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Skimstone wine Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am the vineyard manager and winemaker for Skimstone wines as well as a member of the local community. I am opposed to the development of the Bowden mine in Lue for multiple reasons. - risk for our environment with the development of lead loaded dust, this will put at risk our fruit, crops and rainwater supply by increasing drastically the levels of heavy metals on the vines, the fruit and our rain water catchment. - high water consumption in an area where there is not enough of it, the Lawson creek as shown extreme dry conditions during the drought and it is clear that the water needed won’t be supplied by the local area. This will impact farmers in the area and at a greater extend, farmers in the central west. - high risk of chemical contamination, storage of heavy chemical loaded rocks will be a potential issue in the future for our region as well as storage chemical loaded water used on the site. We’ve recently seen floods in the Mudgee region from the cudgegong river and Lawson creek, floods that have impacted the town of Mudgee and its surrounding. It is already terrible enough to see farm land under water in the middle of spring. Thinking of that water being loaded with heavy metals and chemicals isn’t a dream but could become a reality if this project go ahead. - impact on tourism, Mudgee thrives with tourism which is directly related to the wine industry. Having potential risks for our visitors to get exposed to lead dust isn’t appealing and will result in a down in tourism industries. - high health risk mostly in kids and seniors. Raising children in the Mudgee region is a blessing and a joy. Putting those kids at risk with long term exposure to lead isn’t possible and any common sense should be enough to call of this project just for this reason. During last winter/spring floods, we’ve seen the grounds of Glen Willow sports ground under water. An area where a lot of Mudgee kids go every week for sports. - real estate suffering. Real estate in Mudgee is good and adding a lead mine in the area will not help this industry either. Those are the main reasons for me to be against this project, as a business manager, business owner and member of this community. I deeply wish that people taking the final decision in this project will use common sense and their heart to make the right choice. It would be shameful otherwise and it would impact our society on so many levels. Economy, tourism, social, health, farming and lifestyle. Please make the right decision for the benefit and safety of our region. Thank you. |
Gus Armstrong
Organisation |
WAYOUT Artspace |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Robert Bingley-Pullin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have seen in Africa the absolutely devastation that a mine such has this will result. Children that have limited learning power, pregnancies that have to be terminated, adults with constant medical problems, drinking water that is contaminated from the lead dust and more. No matter what promises the mine owners make, experience has shown that there are immediate medical problems which become more serious as time go on. Additionally, on completion the mine simply walks away and we are left with a seriously contaminated abandon mine and an enormous hole in the ground. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a really terrible project and will pollute our area for hundreds of years. |
Attachments |
ipc--submission-form-feb-2023pdf.pdf (PDF, 123.87 KB) |
Julie and David Cockerill
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We were long time rural residents of the Mudgee region until retiring to my birth state of South Australia and are saddened that our previous community is being threatened once again by a mining proposal so close to the booming tourist towns of Mudgee and Rylstone. No regard seems to be made to the proximity of the Wollemi National Park or The Goulburn River National Park and the amazing amount of wildlife endemic to the area (the area already has one of the highest amounts of roadkill ,with current traffic levels, in Australia ). The township of Lue is far too close to the actual mine for noise and pollution levels not to have a serious effect The Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River are 2 of the most pristine waterways in NSW with significant platypus and native water rat populations. Any fly fisherman will reluctantly tell you that apart from in The Snowies they provide the best trout fishing in NSW. The Lue road is a nightmare to travel on the quietest days Please don’t allow this mine to go ahead Yours sincerely. Julie and David Cockerill |
Shinaye Burrows
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It’s going to be devastating on our wildlife and local animals as well as our health. We already have a large amount of everything that is planing to get extracted it’s not worth our health our lives for this to go head. Cyanide contamination is not worth risking for non-precious or needed materials. Our lives and health are worth more. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Seems mad to me, it’s like mining for mining sake, without regard for the environment, water, toxic side products. Who will clean it all up? In my opinion I do not see these issues addressed adequately in the reports and thus object to the proposal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine is too close to valuable farming land with risk of contamination of water especially with risk of flooding and potential overflow of the tailings dam which is a possibility as we have seen with recent floods in this area and NSW . Lead toxicity is another risk . It is also too close to Mudgee a vibrant tourist town which has been awarded multiple times for its tourism . Mudgee has much to offer including the viticultural industry and a clean image as the Ulan coal mines are well away ie 40 km from our town and are not a risk to our local environment . Night light and noise pollution are other factors that will impact the local area. The economic benefits of this mine are outweighed by these factors and the destruction of the local community of Lue . We have a large population who live in the surrounding areas of Mudgee and this mine will disrupt their living conditions. |
Chris Meyer-Williams
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
NO LEAD MINE FOR LUE.docx Site & Design The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel incalculable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It's incredible how many times we have had to and will have to say - NO NEW MINES. The future is not coal. We are in a climate crisis, only idiocy would allow this to go ahead. And on top of that, every mine rips up and destroys Aboriginal land, land will so much history and biodiversity that is already struggling under the weight of colonialism. We do not, and will never, need a new mine. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Growers Network |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Site & Design - The proposed location for the mine is 2KM from Lue village and Lue Public school. This proximity to the mine poses severe risks to residents from toxic lead exposure via dust particles. The operations of the mine will result in dust. Although efforts may be made to suppress it, the dust particles will inevitably travel through the air and collect on nearby roofs, contaminating drinking water and soils. Children, unborn babies and the elderly are the most vulnerable to lead toxicity, and there is no safe level of lead exposure. - Bowdens have never operated a Tailings Dam like the one proposed for Bowdens Mine. The tailings dam will hold highly toxic materials. This dam will be there forever and WILL leak. There is no plan to manage leaks or any long-term plan to address environmental impacts. Bowdens proposes to reap the land and leave a toxic legacy behind, impacting the region for our children and future generations. - Bowdens' groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks. - There is a significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. - The proposed mine site sits on top of a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. In the case of an earthquake or tremor, this could have catastrophic impacts on the regional water supply. - There is a significant risk of Acid Mine Drainage at Bowdens Mine during operation and after Bowden's walk away. The UN has labelled Acid Mine Drainage the world's second biggest problem after global warming. Acid Mine Drainage causes irreversible damage to the environment and its animals and people. Amenity - The Bowdens mine will directly cause disruptive light & noise pollution. Pollution negatively impacts local residents and affects tourism and real estate prices. - Air pollution is a significant concern. Dust particles in the air carrying particles of lead and other toxicities can travel uncalculatable distances. Residents will no longer be able to drink from their rainwater tanks without fear of lead poisoning. - The data relied upon by Bowdens in its EIS relating to air, dust, and human health risks don't adequately capture the true nature of the potential risks to the Lue community. - This is of great concern for those living in Lue, young children attending the Lue primary school and agricultural producers who rely on clean air and contaminant-free water. - Visual pollution will affect local land and real estate values and negatively impact tourism. What compensation will be given to those whose real estate values are affected? Environmental - Environmental impacts are too many to list here. Of priority concern is the severe risk of groundwater contamination and the downstream effects on Lawson Creek, a tributary of the Cudgegong River. The Cudgegong River is the main water supply for the nearby town of Gulgong. The Cudgegong River feeds Windemere Dam, the main water supply for Mudgee. - The proposed mine plans to rely solely on the water in the environment for operations. This is stealing water from the local environment, agriculture and downstream use and enjoyment. - The mine would use roughly five megalitres of water every day. This is in an area wherein 2019, Lawson Creek was bone dry. Drought is imminent in this landscape, and every drop is needed to keep communities alive. How will farmers and local communities be compensated when their access to water is restricted because Bowdens has stolen it all? - Bowdens' activities will result in a flow loss from 10.9% of Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. Not to mention wildlife who rely on this water too. - The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an inflated monthly rainfall average and an understatement of the frequency of dry years. - Impacts on Ground Water due to use by the proposed mine are unforeseen and cannot be accurately predicted. A decreasing water table often results in plant water stress and reduced live biomass. No one knows how long it takes for groundwater to be restored to its natural level. In times of drought, farmers rely on groundwater to survive. - For the mine to go ahead, an area of 457 Hectares will be cleared, including areas of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Gum Grassy Woodland. With 95% clearance of Grassy Woodland Community in the central west, the importance of the remaining communities cannot be understated. - Lue has been an area with several recent Koala sightings. This mine is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery plan. Hazards - Hazards associated with the risk of acid mine drainage are of alarming concern. - Over 16 years, the Bowdens project will excavate 46.4 million tonnes of waste rock. - 57% (26 million tonnes) of this is classified as Potentially Acid Forming (PAF) because it contains iron sulphide minerals with more than 0.3% total sulphur. - Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a "capture and contain" strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77-hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. How is this a suitable long-term strategy? What measures are in place to ensure this plan does not fail, and when it inevitably does fail, whose responsibility will it be to deal with the catastrophic consequences? - The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of this method's success, effectiveness or safety across this scale from any other mine sites. - Pollution of our water sources by Acid Mine Drainage and/or leakage from the tailing dam is a severe hazard to local people, animals and the environment. Exposure to toxic materials such as lead can have lifelong effects on children and unborn babies and induce a cognitive decline in adults. - The mine site itself is a significant hazard. After proposed operations cease, the tailings dam and any other on-site toxicity will slowly leach into the surrounding environment and negatively impact the health of animals and people. And with no effective mechanism in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit, there is no way to ensure that Lue will be a safe place for people to live after mining. - The risk of contamination of agricultural soils and enterprises by lead and other toxic elements is worrying. Lue is home to many farming enterprises, and nearby, there are vineyards, olive groves and people's veggie gardens. This is people's livelihoods that are being threatened. Socioeconomic - With the mine being an eyesore on the horizon and as awareness grows around the dangers of proximity, real estate values will undoubtedly be affected. - The area is home to ecotourism destinations and agriculture, which will be negatively affected by pollution and loss of access to water, resulting in a loss of income for operators. - If the mine was to go ahead, you're asking residents to go on living with the constant anxiety of health risks; the impact on mental health cannot be understated. - Impacts on physical and mental health put a further burden on local medical systems, which are already understaffed and challenging to access for remote residents. As a young person who has long family history in the area and an intent to raise a family here, this proposed mine is extremely alarming. I strongly oppose the mine and believe there are several holes and oversights in the assessments and designs put forward by Bowden's. The communities of Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee will all feel the effects of the mine FOREVER if it should go ahead. In such a beautiful part of the world where people come to live and enjoy a rural lifestyle the worst thing that could happen is for the water and soil to be poisoned by toxic dust. I don't want to live in fear. NO LEAD MINE FOR LUE. 2KMS TOO CLOSE. TAKE YOUR TOXIC LEGACY SOMEWHERE ELSE. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Mudgee Region is now well established as a popular tourism and lifestyle destination promoting itself as a clean, safe, peaceful and beautiful area to enjoy locally-grown good wine and food. The development of the Bowdens Silver Mine in Lue threatens to disrupt our reputation as well as the lifestyles of those of us fortunate to live here. My main objection is the threat to our fragile natural environment with the potential to contaminate our water, air, vegetation and wildlife. Plans to dig up and disturb 95,000 tonnes of lead just two kilometres from the primary school; build a large and toxic tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek; use roughly 5 megalitres of water every day; clear 457 hectares of land, including some Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Grassy Woodland, and scar and deface the land surrounding the mine will impact our community forever. In the short term the noise, dust, traffic, vibration and pollution will have a huge effect on the people and properties in the area. In the long term we will be left with a risk of lead poisoning, water contamination, loss of critical habitat and potential loss of wildlife as well as an unsightly 53 hectare hole. Just the recent flooding of the Cudgegong River has very visibly impacted the platypus and native fish populations leaving a river filled with carp. The changing weather patterns we are experiencing are already leading to incredible stress on our natural environment and we should be doing everything in our power at this time in history to protect it rather than destroy or even threaten it. This proposal fills me with horror at the prospect of what it will do to our beautiful area. Please do not let this proposal go ahead. |
Claire Windeyer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Re: Bowdens Project – Submission to Independent Planning Commission The Bowdens Project should be rejected as it is not in the public interest. It fails to meet the precautionary principle , a standard to which all development projects should be scrutinised. Effective measures, with regards to this project, can only be achieved by rejecting the development application. I have lived in Mudgee for most of my life. This region holds a portion of my family history. I do not want to see this beautiful region damaged and destroyed for a short term financial gain. The Bowdens Project is to be located adjacent to Lawsons Creek, as well as over the fault boundary between the Sydney Basin and Lachlan Fold Belt. This project has the potential to negatively impact both surface water and ground water. With the extraction of the silver product, Bowdens Project will also be extracting “…sulphides of iron, arsenic, zinc and lead. ” The treatment and disposal of these toxins carries a significant and highly probable risk of contamination to the air, water, and soil of the immediate area, as well as further surroundings and downstream. Lawsons Creek feeds into Cudgegong River. This flows on to Macquarie River, moving on out west to Macquarie Marshes and on through the Murray-Darling Basin. The Bowdens Project has the potential to leach toxic waste throughout Australia’s largest catchment system; the water source for the food bowl of Australia. Despite the proposed usage of a high density polyethylene liner along the base of the tailings storage facility (TSF), there is no way of predicting the long term integrity of this preparation in the containment of the toxins and by-products from the mining venture. The only surety of environmental integrity is to not disturb the site in the first place. The assumption that a company will prepare a site for waste capture and processing is appropriate only to the extent that they will presumably operate within the required limits of any regulation. It could be argued that a company, with its obligations primarily to its shareholders, will not operate beyond the minimal expectations of any regulatory restriction. Shareholder expectations are the benchmark for any company and to expect or anticipate that the company will act beyond this scope, particularly with regard to external elements such as environmental integrity, is perhaps assuming well beyond reality. Mining and processing at this site have been estimated to go for “…at least 17 years. ” At the conclusion of this enterprise, what is the intergenerational plan for managing the TSF? Who is financially and environmentally responsible for ensuring the integrity of the high density polyethylene liner? Will the shareholders take responsibility for this ongoing and necessary protection, or will it simply disintegrate into a public disaster, requiring public money to clean up the mess? During operation, “Bowdens’ own proposal acknowledges a leakage rate of 1.6mL per day. ” This is unacceptable! What will the potential leakage rate be once the company has completed operation and has walked away? According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Elevated lead in the environment can result in decreased growth and reproduction in plants and animals, and neurological effects in vertebrates. ” In addition to this, the World Health Organisation states that “there is no known safe blood lead concentration; even blood lead concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/dL may be associated with decreased intelligence in children, behavioural difficulties and learning problems. As lead exposure increases, the range and severity of symptoms and effects also increase. ” Why would a planning organisation allow for such a significant risk to be approved, potentially impacting the health and wellbeing of our entire community, both now and into the future. The intergenerational impact is too big, too risky and completely unethical. On page 27 of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment , it states the management commitments to combat “Air quality, Lead, and Health Risks.” The commitment includes “Apply water to roads and trafficked areas using water trucks to minimise the generation of dust. Install and operate water sprays on crushing equipment. Water stockpiles to maintain moisture content and minimise the generation of dust. ” Where is this water going to come from? During the normal el nino cycles, this is a very dry part of Australia. There is not an abundance of surface run-off, or under-ground supplies, to perhaps meet the demands of this operation. This is an area of concern which requires significant investigation and planning. The suggestion that it will come from Lawsons Creek is a disaster waiting to happen. Has there been a consideration of what happens in Australia at the height of an el nino cycle, the common trend of Eastern Australian weather patterns? Lawsons Creek has a small flow rate at the best of times, with a significant reduction during normal to el nino cycles. With farming and other uses along the Lawsons Creek, extraction rates and licences will be significantly impacted if the Bowdens Project goes ahead and drains the creek dry before it has even had a chance of moving further downstream. This issue needs further investigation and realistic measurements of a worst-case scenario. Australia is a signatory to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. While lead, arsenic, zinc and iron are all natural products, they are problematic when relocated in our environment, so as to become persistent organic pollutants. If the federal government found it prudent to sign this international agreement, why are we prepared to allow for a project to be approved which will go against the ambitions and intentions of the international agreement. This is completely averse to the precautionary principle under which all government and other agencies should be operating. “Implement waste rock and tailings management measures to minimise the potential for contamination of land, surface water and groundwater .” This acknowledges that there is the potential for contamination from this project. The type of contamination is potentially highly toxic and irreversible. Not only is the contamination possible on a surface level, but it is also possible on the sub-surface. Leaching into the groundwater and soil is equally possible and significantly destructive to the environment, both immediate and distal. With the project site being located over several geological zones, the risk of leaching is high. The flow leads to more than one catchment, both inland and coastal. Finally, the suggestion that this project has an economic benefit to the region is concerning. According to the Preliminary Environmental Assessment, the construction phase will employ “approximately 200 persons,” while the operational stage will employ “approximately 150 persons. ” While there is an argument that any industry can have a positive multiplier effect on a region, the environmental and health implications of the operation significantly outweigh any economic gain to be had. And with the life of the operation being documented as “…17 years, ” the economic gain will be eradicated by the environmental and health impacts and ramifications which will last indefinitely. Judge Preston in the case landmark case Gloucester Resources Limited v. Minister for Planning (2017) stated that the development was “…in the wrong place at the wrong time. ” While that case was about a coal mine, and the development application was successfully stopped in relation to Australia’s commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement, key arguments relevant and related to the Bowdens case at hand include “…planning impacts…visual impacts….noise and dust…social impacts…outweigh the economic and other public benefits…the project is contrary to the public interest. ” Bowdens lead mine development is unethical and should be declined. We should not be investing in industries which risk long term irreversible environmental destruction from a short lived economic venture. I have lived in this area, specifically Mudgee, for most of my life. This is my community. This is my home. This is my environment. We are located in a spectacular part of the world, in an environmental area of beauty and serenity. I want to see this area preserved and protected for generations to come. I want to see others care for this environment in a way that is genuine and not from a superficial regulatory perspective, as way of meeting minimal requirements only. References: 1. Felix, Jose. “The Precautionary Principle.” International Institute for Sustainable Development, 23 October 2020, https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/precautionary-principle . Accessed 12 February 2023. 2. Corkery, RW. “Preliminary Environmental Assessment for the Bowdens Silver Project.” Bowdens Silver, 26 November 2016, https://bowdenssilver.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Bowdens-Silver-Project-Revised-Preliminary-Environmental-Assessment-Nov-2016.pdf - page 8. Accessed 12 February 2023. 3. Ibid, page 1. 4. Lue Action Group. “Protecting Lue and Mudgee from potential environmental disaster.” Lue Action Group, https://www.lueactiongroup.org/. Accessed 12 February 2023. 5. United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Basic Information about Lead Air Pollution | US EPA.” Environmental Protection Agency, 26 July 2022, https://www.epa.gov/lead-air-pollution/basic-information-about-lead-air-pollution . Accessed 12 February 2023. 6. World Health Organisation. “Lead poisoning.” World Health Organization (WHO), 31 August 2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health Accessed 12 February 2023. 7. Ibid 2. 8. Ibid, page 27. 9. Ibid 2. 10. Ibid, page 1. 11. Ibid. 12. Environmental Law Australia. “Gloucester Resources (“Rocky Hill”) case.” Environmental Law Australia, http://envlaw.com.au/gloucester-resour |
Attachments |
ipcsubmissionrebowdensprojectdocx.pdf (PDF, 134.17 KB) |
Wesse Jim field
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please don’t carve up another magical piece of nature, people in that area have been doing incredible bush regeneration and native habitat works for years and it’s like you’re spitting in their faces by going through with this. http://www.birdingnsw.org.au/regent-honeyeater/ Please don’t destroy |
Isha Menon
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This development directly contradict the wishes of Traditional Owners of the land, and will threaten the integrity of their sacred sites and connection to Country. As the oldest continuing culture in the world, Aboriginal cultural sites are invaluable and irreplaceable. Additionally, this country is under enough duress from increasing climate events related to climate change without continuing activity that has been scientifically proven to contribute to climate disasters. |
John Christie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed mine is far too close to a town and school. Lead dust is dangerous to both humans and livestock and there is no safe level of exposure to it. Should the 117 hectare toxic tailings dam fail it would be an environmental disaster. A section of the Newcrest Cadia Mine’s northern tailings dam wall failed in 2018. The Cadia mine had a second wall which the Bowden’s Silver Mine proposal does not. There is potential for polluting both the Cudgegong River and Lawson Creek from a failing of the Bowden’s tailings dam and also from dust. Any new road that is built for the mine should be completed before any construction of the mine is commenced and not “in the first six months of the project”. Lue will be an unsafe place to live, and it will also be undesirable due to the noise, dust and traffic generated by the mine. The value of properties will inevitably fall. |
Tristan Clark
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not think that an open cut lead mine will be good for our community. Lue and the Mudgee region is a prime agricultural and tourism destination. We don't need the extra jobs. We can barely find the staff to fill the current jobs in the region. I do not think the water management plan is sufficient to mitigate the potential anal risks associated with digging this huge open cut mine. The potential risks of heavy metals leaching away from the mine through dust or water is too high. This mine is only proposed to last 16 years. Who is going to look after the mine for the next 500 years after thousands of tonnes of acid rock is dug out of the ground. It is irresponsible to let this mine go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver makes up only 2% of what they will be mining; the rest is toxic Lead & Zinc. This is a Lead mine. Dust from the mine threatens to contaminate rainwater tanks, soils and local environment with lead, The wind only needs pick up and you could be breathing lead particles! There is no safe level of exposure to lead; it can cause lifelong cognitive disabilities in children and unborn babies and cause cognitive decline (dementia) in adults aswell as cardiovascular disorders. The mine is proposed 2KMS from Lue Public School. Their tailing dam is proposed just upstream from Lawson Creek, which is a tributary of the Cudgegong River (Gulgong's water source). When the tailings dam leaks (all tailings dams do eventually), this will mean irreversible damage to our waterways. The operation life is proposed at 16 years; after that they will walk away, leaving three open cut pits across 52HA of previously productive farmland. With no plans to fully remediate the site and with a toxic tailing dam and acid-forming rock on site. A toxic legacy that will affect future generations. Bowdens proposes to source all the water they need locally, pumping from ground water and the Lawson Creek (Lawson creek was bone dry in 2019). This is stealing water from farmers downstream and effecting wetland ecosystems. |
Jean Ellis
Organisation |
Your Dream |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is being referred to as a Silver Mine, because the value of silver is greater than the other minerals extracted, but the lead is the greater quantity, fifty times as much, and the mine is only 2kms away from the Primary School. Lead contamination is very dangerous to the minds and bodies of children, which is why lead paint was outlawed decades ago: how can such a risk of exposure be justified now? Apart from the amount of water being taken from the catchment for the operation of the mine, which reduces the water available to the landholders downstream, there is great risk of pollution INTO the water from the wastes and tailings, which will make the water those landholders require for their crops and stock, downright poisonous. Then there is the 117ha set aside for the tailings dam, so that it can be permanently poisoned with cyanide and arsenic. This is an agricultural area of outstanding natural beauty, with no monetary value great enough to compensate for its loss, and Bowdens Mine cannot be allowed to destroy it for mere vested interests. |
Christoph Veyder-Malberg
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Environmental concerns |
Bec Lever
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This proposal is detrimental to the environment. The impact that this mine will have on the community & the environmental future has been ignored. I strongly protest this mine. |
John Forrest
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The open cut toxic mine will operate 24hrs a day and will have uncontrolled continuous dust dispersal of small particles of Lead, Arsenic, Cadmium, silica and cyanide that will be blown out from the mine in all directions. The mine model contains an enormous acreage of a tailings dam of waste water treatment that will, as Government has accepted, leach 1.3 megalitres, that is 1.3 million litres of toxic water every day into the ground because there is an earthquake fault line runs under the dam and it will not seal. Acid mine drainage is the greatest risk to the watercourses through Mudgee. The drainage will contaminate, Lawson Creek, the Cudgegong river all the way down to and into the Murray Darling catchment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see my attached pdf submission document |
Attachments |
submission-to-ipc-re-bowdens-silver-minepdf.pdf (PDF, 62.46 KB) |
Ben O'Brien
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The construction of a Lead mine will so close to a community and river system is a detrement to the health and safety of locals and wildlife. |
Terry Burrows
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My submission is the attached PDF for Terry Burrows |
Attachments |
terryburrowspdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 80.85 KB) |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Quick Thinking Communications |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
An open-cut lead, zinc and silver mine will create enormous environmental and degradation to the Lue and Rylestone area including noise and light pollution, lead dust, and leakage of the tailings dam into Lawsons Creek, potentially affecting all water downstream from Lue to Mudgee. Lue is a regional farming community - known for its unspoilt beauty and quietness. It and nearby Rylestone are tourist and wedding destinations. The mine will affect this economic activity as well as the pristine amenity and aesthetics of the region. It is unlikely the mine will generate much employment for the local community as mine workers will likely come from elsewhere. Given the current regional housing crisis, where will workers be housed? The main beneficiaries of the mine will be the proprietors of Bowdens Silver, who have been currying favour with the locals by providing sponsorship to sporting clubs and the local street feast. The degradation of this very special part of the world, with untold environmental consequences for decades to come, does not provide enough benefit to the community to outweigh the cost. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not live in the area but have friends there and visit regularly. Other issues of concern to me in addition to those listed above: • Lue is 2 kms from the mine site. 126 houses will be in the vicinity of the mine. • Lue School is 2 kms from mine site. • Lead poisoning and health. • Acid Mine Drainage. • Contamination of water. • Reduced supply of water. • Economic Impact to Business. • Koala Habitat destroyed. • No compensation offered. • Loss of property values. • There is no safe level of lead for children. • Close to World Heritage Sites. • Excessive Noise. • Excessive damage to local ecology. • No consideration of adjacent lands. • Noise is the most common cause of community loss. • Acid Mine Drainage will damage the river system downstream to Burrendong and will occur forever. • Lue Road is narrow and dangerous. • Rehabilitation of the site will be minimal, pit, WRE, Tailings Dam will remain forever. • Existing farmland and tourism will not be able to coexist with mine . • No guarantee of jobs & benefits promised. • Adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for Coal Exploration. • No benefits to existing land use, jobs, ecology, heritage or environment. • No existing infrastructure to the site. • No compensation offered to existing properties and businesses that will be negatively impacted.. • No ability to provide water to impacted properties and farms. • Mine will close or reduce productivity during drought. • Project location is too close to the home of friends of mine. |
Jasper Williams
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission to Bowden Silver Mine project SSD-5765 I am a resident and home owner within the Rylstone township. I live with my defacto partner and three year old child. My partner and myself are both classified as ‘essential workers’ and work locally in the Rylstone/Kandos townships, myself as a Paramedic and my partner as Carpenter. We moved here with the intention to live and work in the area for a minimum of 10 years. This submission has been prepared by my partner, I fully support the opinions herein and submit it on my own behalf. I oppose the Bowden Silver Mine on the basis that the EIS is scientifically inadequate, the Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. I also believe the mine will directly and negatively impact myself and my family’s livelihood. The Bowden Silver EIS is scientifically inadequate. I refer to the Submission made by Dr Haydn Washington, environmental scientist, dated 16th July 2020 which raised various issues with acid mine drainage. The Bowden Silver Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. The above report prepared by The Department of Planning and Environment states “The human health risk assessment also showed that total exposure to all metals except manganese would remain below the threshold values for adverse effects”. No reference has been provided for the evidence of safe threshold levels for lead. While it seems there is a consensus worldwide amongst relevant authorities that levels of lead above 10 µg/dL has negative health impacts, below that, there appears to be no general consensus, therefore I struggle to understand how the above statement can be made. According to the World Health Organization “There is no known safe blood lead concentration; even blood lead concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/dL may be associated with decreased intelligence in children, behavioural difficulties and learning problems” (WHO, 2023). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2021, stated “Protecting children from exposure to lead is important to lifelong good health. No safe BLL in children has been identified” (CDC, 2021). Further to this, Bowdens is relying on a single review published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2015 to justify their stance that no evidence exists that lower levels of lead exposure pose health risks. I believe this is a misleading and oversimplified statement for the following reasons: a) The above study that they base their statement on actually states “The available evidence suggests that blood lead levels between 5 micrograms and 10 micrograms per decilitre are associated with reduced IQ and academic achievement in children” b) The above study also states “There is weaker evidence of an association between blood lead levels of less than 5 micrograms per decilitre and reductions in IQ or academic achievement in children”. Weaker evidence is not no evidence! c) The above study explains the confounding factors that make gathering data in the lower level exposure brackets very challenging, which meant they only analysed a very small amount of studies within those brackets. This would indicate that the lower level exposure brackets have not had sufficient studies carried out to draw STRONG evidence either way. We must remember that just because something wasn’t proven to be unsafe, does not mean it is inherently safe! d) The above report was published 8 years ago and included research from as far back as 17 years. It risks becoming outdated research before the mine would even open. The mine will directly and negatively impact myself and my family’s livelihood. Of particular concern to me is the possibility of lead dust falling on my home’s roof and entering harvested rainwater. We moved to Rylstone in 2018 during the drought. We were under water restrictions during this time. Although our home is connected to town water supply, we have been planning to increase our water security for future droughts. To do this we have made plans to install a large water tank to harvest rainwater. The water would be used primarily for irrigating our own home grown food crops in spring and summer, for maintain water supply to non-edibles (home to much biodiversity) as well as for drinking water and feeding back into the home, should water restrictions become more strict in the future. Water security is amongst the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (“clean water and sanitation”). Water is necessary for life on earth. The lead dust poses a direct and unstoppable risk to water security for my family as we, as a global community, move further and further into greater climate change and risk of drought. References 1. US CDC Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. CDC updates blood lead reference value to 3.5µg/dL. Atlanta: US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 (https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/news/cdc-updates-blood-lead-reference-value.html). 2. World Health Organization, Lead Poisoning, viewed 12 Feb 2023, (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health) |
Attachments |
submissionjasperwilliamspdf.pdf (PDF, 103.79 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a Traditional custodian from Dabee wiradjuri country. I strongly object to this proposal as it puts Lawson creek at risk and therefore the cudgegong river and would cause serious harm to the environment which in my opinion couldn’t and isn’t being mitigated. This would cause harm to the local community and traditional owners. |
Jonathon Manvell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have grown up in this local area and my wife's family reside in this area still. I have always dreamed of bringing our family back and enjoying the beautiful surroundings, fresh air and picture perfect views. I have friends who visit the area regularly just to enjoy the reasons stated above. I feel a mine in the area will destroy the amazing tourism we have here on offer and will not help the local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have concerns about the damage to the local waterways and environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is with great distress that I have read about the Bowdens silver mine proposal at Lue and I would like to submit an objection. I have lived in Mudgee for 34 years and have worked in health for 40 years. I am very concerned of the impact of this mine on the community's health with contamination to the local water supply. The environmental impact would be enormous: it's proximity to the Lawson River , local homes and school, damage to local fauna and flora, noise and pollution from vehicles coming into our beautiful tourist town. Our roads are already overused by heavy vehicles from the Ulan mines and require constant upgrading. It is very difficult and dangerous for these massive trucks to co exist with weekend tourist traffic and cyclist that come to enjoy their weekends away from large cities. I would urge to to think of the Mudgee, Lue and surrounding residents that have live in and cared for this land for many decades. |
Nelida Pino
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a landholder in the Camboon valley. I strenuously object to the planned proposal on the following grounds: 1. High risk of Lead poisoning. The only safe place for lead is in the ground. Even very low levels of exposure can have lifelong effects on multiple organs including the cardiovascular system. It is particularly dangerous for children. Chronic exposure can lead to: a. Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children b. Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age c. Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function in adults d. Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. The data Bowdens uses in it’s project proposal underestimates community exposure levels of lead. It ignores concentrate, mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust and fails to analyse the effect of peak wind events. (see citation). No existing, large, multi-element mining operation, which processes lead can demonstrate an absence of off-site impacts. (see citation). The maximum acceptable level of lead (and other heavy metals) in drinking water has been established by the NHMRC in the "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines" at 0.01 mg/L. The EIS allows for 4g of dust/sqm/month containing contaminant; How is Bowdens going to guarantee that these levels of lead in the "acceptable" dust on my roof aren't exceeded? This is hugely concerning to myself and my wife who have had the property for over 14 years and enjoyed safe drinking water throughout this time. Not only will this directly impact my and my wife's health as well as our property and plans for it, it will also have a negative impact on tourism, viticulture and agriculture throughout the region. A region that heavily depends on all those areas. Will we all be required to have regular lead testing of ourselves, our food products? What will happen to the wine industry when it becomes contaminated with lead, chromium and other chemicals? Bowdens is planning a 16.5 year lifecycle for the mine but the impacts will be generational in scale. Data cited from report: Taylor, M.P., Isley, C.F., Fry, K. 2020. Comments and assessment of potential lead exposure risks reported in the Bowdens Silver EIS (May 2020). Macquarie University, NSW, Australia 2. Water Contamination risks. Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The hazardous nature of substances in the waste rock dump and tailings dam merit a local and detailed model of hydrogeological processes to adequately manage the proposed activity. 3. Water Security The mine proposes to use roughly 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. Earlier plans indicated Bowdens intended to pipe this water from the Ulan coalfields, as there was insufficient water at Lue to meet requirements. Now, they are proposing to get all the water needed from Lue, either through building dams, using water caught and drawn into the open cut pit, taking water from the Lawson Creek or using water from the tailings dam. Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an over-inflated monthly rainfall average and a significant understatement of the frequency of dry years. Patently they have not done the necessary groundwork to understand where they will gain water from during dry/drought years. This in turn will lead to an impact on increased dust generation impacting health through contaminated substances being windborne. If they are unable to generate satisfactory water holdings to provide dust mitigation, etc, will operations at the mine be suspended or will this all just be a "tragic result of climate change" and therefore no fault on the mine, even thought it is clear that the problem already exists. 4. Toxic Tailing Dam The proposed dam will hold approximately 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing. Many of these are highly toxic, including sodium cyanide, arsenic, caustic soda, copper sulphate, zinc sulphate, lead and zinc collector. It will also hold 17-20% of the lead, zinc and silver mined that is lost during processing. The dam is proposed to be based on a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. it is proposed to have a footprint of 112.5 hectares, across uneven ground. Bowdens is proposing to construct a continuous geosynthetic impermeable liner base over this large area, in the hope that it will provide full impermeability for centuries to come. This seems highly unlikely, and of real concern is what happens once mining is finished? Whose responsibility will it be to maintain the liner and ensure the dam isn’t leaking toxic chemicals into the environment? Equally importantly how can this be checked without potentially damaging the liner when checking it? There is no track record to provide proof that containment designs like this work across this scale or timeframe. In other words, it’s never been done before. Bowdens’ own proposal acknowledges a leakage rate of 1.6mL per day, at best. The dam is designed to leak, and if this mine goes ahead that will be something the community has to live with and impacts that will negatively impact tourism and agriculture almost in perpetuity. 5. Acid Mine Drainage Bowdens proposes to prevent acid drainage by a “capture and contain” strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77 hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. The builder's plastic I use underneath my floating flooring is about the same thickness. I certainly would not be trying to contain 77 hectares of waste rock with such a product. To put it into context, that means that Bowdens proposes to cover 190 football (soccer) fields with a plastic binliner that is 1.5mm thick and expects that to last for lifetime prevention of the creation of acid mine drainage. I recognise that everyone has experts to prove one side or another but I use a weedmat that is almost as thick and yet I get weeds penetrating that every other week. How can they possibly believe that this will work? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is absolutely no evidence of the success, effectiveness or safety of this method across this scale from any other mine sites. Bowdens proposal uses predictive modelling and small scale field trials to claim its containment designs will prevent acid drainage today and for generations to come. There is absolutely no way they can guarantee this. Even if they could is 16.5 years of production really worth lifetimes of risk? 6. Traffic and transport Today, the Lue Road is a key transport link for the local community and vital to the local tourism industry. The road is regularly used by cyclists and motorbikes, and increased heavy mine traffic will jeopardise the strong tourism reputation of the area. If Lue Road becomes busier and unsafe, tourists will opt to leave Mudgee via the Castlereagh Highway, bypassing the towns of Rylstone and Kandos which could seriously impact the visitor economy in those areas. Also, mined product will be trucked on B-Doubles six days per week, from 7am-6pm, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee. This will mean up to six B-Double truck movements along the Lue Road and through Mudgee per day, six days per week. This doesn’t include obvious increases in worker and construction traffic, or additional supply materials including dangerous processing chemicals like cyanide, arsenic and antimony. Additionally what is the proposed risk mitigation for accidents involving slurry trucks full of lead/zinc and other chemicals? There is absolutely no way to plan for 100% accident free transport over the life of the mine. 7. Environment/Biodiversity 457 Hectares is proposed to be cleared in what is in essence, an area of natural beauty. As a result, disturbance and fragmentation of Critically Endangered Communities, Box Grassy Woodland, will occur, as well as major changes to ground and surface water flows. The effect of the mine on Koalas may be greater than just being limited to the immediate impacted area, causing fragmentation to their habitat and is likely at odds with the overall objectives of the NSW Koala Recovery Plan, including to reverse the decline of Koala numbers in NSW. It is all very well for Bowdens to effectively plan on utilisation of "Koala offsets" however the fact is there will be a direct and real impact on live koalas in the area which no amount of "offsets" will ever replace. As well as Koalas, the region is recognised as home to critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, and the endangered Small Purple Pea (swainsona recta). Species which will be directly impacted by both the area being cleared as well as light and noise pollution. |
Martin O'Connell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission to Bowden Silver Mine project SSD-5765 I am the father of a resident of Rylstone and proud grandfather to her daughter. I frequently visit the area to see family and for tourism. This submission has been prepared on my behalf by my daughter and contains opinions that I fully and completely share and I submit on my own behalf. I oppose the Bowden Silver Mine on the basis that the EIS is scientifically inadequate, the Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. I also believe the mine will directly and negatively impact my daughter and granddaughter’s livelihood. The Bowden Silver EIS is scientifically inadequate. I refer to the Submission made by Dr Haydn Washington, environmental scientist, dated 16th July 2020 which raised various issues with acid mine drainage. The Bowden Silver Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. The above report prepared by The Department of Planning and Environment states “The human health risk assessment also showed that total exposure to all metals except manganese would remain below the threshold values for adverse effects”. No reference has been provided for the evidence of safe threshold levels for lead. While it seems there is a consensus worldwide amongst relevant authorities that levels of lead above 10 µg/dL has negative health impacts, below that, there appears to be no general consensus, therefore I struggle to understand how the above statement can be made. According to the World Health Organization “There is no known safe blood lead concentration; even blood lead concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/dL may be associated with decreased intelligence in children, behavioural difficulties and learning problems” (WHO, 2023). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2021, stated “Protecting children from exposure to lead is important to lifelong good health. No safe BLL in children has been identified” (CDC, 2021). Further to this, Bowdens is relying on a single review published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2015 to justify their stance that no evidence exists that lower levels of lead exposure pose health risks. I believe this is a misleading and oversimplified statement for the following reasons: a) The above study that they base their statement on actually states “The available evidence suggests that blood lead levels between 5 micrograms and 10 micrograms per decilitre are associated with reduced IQ and academic achievement in children” b) The above study also states “There is weaker evidence of an association between blood lead levels of less than 5 micrograms per decilitre and reductions in IQ or academic achievement in children”. Weaker evidence is not no evidence! c) The above study explains the confounding factors that make gathering data in the lower level exposure brackets very challenging, which meant they only analysed a very small amount of studies within those brackets. This would indicate that the lower level exposure brackets have not had sufficient studies carried out to draw STRONG evidence either way. We must remember that just because something wasn’t proven to be unsafe, does not mean it is inherently safe! d) The above report was published 8 years ago and included research from as far back as 17 years. It risks becoming outdated research before the mine would even open. The mine will directly and negatively impact my daughter and granddaughter’s livelihood Of particular concern to me is the possibility of lead dust falling on my daughter’s roof and entering harvested rainwater. She moved to Rylstone in 2018 during the drought. She was under water restrictions during this time. Although the home is connected to town water supply, she has been planning to increase her family’s water security for future droughts. To do this she has made plans to install a large water tank to harvest rainwater. The water would be used primarily for irrigating home grown food crops in spring and summer, for maintaining water supply to non-edibles (home to much biodiversity) as well as for drinking water and feeding back into the home, should water restrictions become more strict in the future. Water security is amongst the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (“clean water and sanitation”). Water is necessary for life on earth. The lead dust poses a direct and unstoppable risk to water security for my daughter and her family as we, as a global community, move further and further into greater climate change and risk of drought. References 1. US CDC Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. CDC updates blood lead reference value to 3.5µg/dL. Atlanta: US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 (https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/news/cdc-updates-blood-lead-reference-value.html). 2. World Health Organization, Lead Poisoning, viewed 12 Feb 2023, (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It’s incredibly insensitive and further disrespectful to aboriginal communities for this development to go ahead |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident of Lue, I object the proposed development. The development will not only have huge environmental impacts, but will also have a negative socioeconomic impact on the community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Stuff this! Near vineyards and we don’t need another mine |
Desdemona Grudziens
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Concerned about water and air quality due to to processing. Concerned about effect on flora and fauna due to storage at dam site. Concerned about road quality and upkeep due to increased heavy vehicle movement on roads surrounding mine |
Camila Cremonese
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
potential lead poisoning - lead dug up 2km from public school and housing. Dust from mining can reach nearby towns of Rysltone, Mudgeee, Kandos, etc. large trucks on small country road, which is already not brilliant, will impact traffic and cause more wear and tear on road contamination hazards - airborne or water. major public health issue environmental issues - loss of native flora and fauna in the region devaluation of property in the area I'm sure this is all things other people have already written about so i'm not going into details. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We need to protect our land, not continue to mine what’s in it. |
Grace Macpherson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The hazardous nature of substances in the waste rock dump and tailings dam merit a local and detailed model of hydrogeological processes to adequately manage the proposed activity. Even very low levels of exposure can have lifelong effects on multiple organs including the cardiovascular system. It is particularly dangerous for children. Chronic exposure can lead to: Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children; Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age; Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function; Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. The dam has a footprint of 112.5 hectares, across uneven ground. Bowdens is proposing to construct a continuous geosynthetic impermeable liner base over this large area, in the hope that it will provide full impermeability for centuries to come. This seems unlikely, and of real concern is what happens once mining is finished? Whose responsibility will it be to maintain the liner and ensure the dam isn’t leaking toxic chemicals into the environment? There is no track record to provide proof that containment designs like this work across this scale or timeframe. In other words, it’s never been done before. Bowdens’ own proposal acknowledges a leakage rate of 1.6mL per day, at best. The dam is designed to leak, and if this mine goes ahead that will be something the community has to live with. Although the mine is proposed to operate for 15 years, Bowdens will likely apply to extend this in some form (based on their communications to investors). No mechanism exists to ensure Lue residents are fully protected from lead particles; No effective mechanism is in place to ensure full rehabilitation of the pit; No way to ensure that after mining, the village will be a safe place for people to live. Bowdens propose to prevent acid drainage by a “capture and contain” strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77 hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is no evidence of the success, effectiveness or safety of this method across this scale from any other mine sites. Bowdens’ EIS concludes people living in Lue will not be effected by dust issues if the mine proceeds. This conclusion is based on insufficient data and underestimate levels of community exposure which overlook concentrate, mined ore materials and tailings as sources of potentially toxic dust. It also ignores peak wind events, and relies on out of date guidelines regarding compliance levels for acceptable community exposure in houses. Today, the Lue Road is a key transport link for the local community and vital to the local tourism industry. The road is regularly used by cyclists and motorbikes, and increased heavy mine traffic will jeopardise the strong tourism reputation of the area. If Lue Road becomes busier and unsafe, tourists will opt to leave Mudgee via the Castlereagh Highway, bypassing the towns of Rylstone and Kandos. This could seriously impact the visitor economy in those areas. The effect of the mine on Koalas may be greater than the immediate impacted area, causing fragmentation to habitat and is likely at odds with the overall objectives of the NSW Koala Recovery Plan, including to reverse the decline of Koala numbers in NSW. As well as Koalas, the region is recognised as home to critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, and the endangered Small Purple Pea (swainsona recta). This can not and should not go ahead. |
Mick Radzievic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine development should NOT go ahead due severe and permanent damage to the immediate and surrounding districts from the effects of heavy metal mining. NO sustainability plan with no direct economic benefits to the community or generation's hence forth |
Tim White
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Midwestern council area is made up of several small towns which in great part rely on tourism as a key business. (We sometimes joke about mines and wines). The existing coal mines provide a blight on our landscape but are a particular reminder of our need for that mining to occur. Those mines do not contaminate downstream, they don’t run the risk of polluting with a systemic poison. Lead is persistent both in the environment and in people and other animals. The risk is too great. A spill or contamination would persist in the environment for a long time, and that would lead to huge damages to our tourism industry, which while perhaps not bringing in as much money it does employ a large number of locals in a sustainable, future focussed industry. |
Carla Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a young growing family we are very opposed to this proposed Lead/silver mine. We live less then 2kms from the proposed mine site. We have 2 young children & have been building our home/property here for the last 11years. This proposed silver/lead mine is not a place we want our growing family to live next to. We brought this property as our forever home and know we aren’t sure if it will be. We currently hear machines drilling and see dust plumes from our home daily/weekly. There is extra traffic on the roads which makes the area not the quite, safe area we wanted to be living In. This proposed mine impacts the selling value of our home. We aren’t sure if we would be able to sell our property and does this lead to us being stuck next to this toxic mine. The impact on the cattle/sheep farmers that neighbour us. The mental health of everyone in the community and the destruction of a beautiful community that is Lue and surrounding areas. The levels of lead that the Bowdens silver mine are allowing to be SAFE. This mine will be so devastating for the area and can’t understand how they would want to destroy such a beautiful area that should be left for farming for our future for food supply. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The toxicity of the natural water sources and air will be a direct danger to the health and wellbeing of the community. The proposed site is too close to residential and farming settlements. The waste disposal is unsatisfactory as it will expose the area for decades or even more as lead waste and acids used in the process will continue to seep into our water systems and soil. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My objections to the project are primarily concerned with potential health impacts of the proposed project (primarily from lead) and from impacts on water resources, amenity, traffic, biodiversity, and social impacts. Submissions in support on the economic benefits of the project, including employment generation and the payment of royalties to the NSW Government are fallacious and fanciful. The risks posed by the proposed project to health, safety and environment far outweigh the benefits suggested by any submissions in support. Dangerous lead exposure - any exposure to lead is dangerous, and chronic exposure can lead to decreased IQ and cognitive function in children. Bowdens plans to dig up and disturb 95,000 tonnes of lead at Lue, two kilometres from the primary school. Threats to water security and water quality - if you live near the mine site, or anywhere along the Lawson Creek, there is a real risk you will have less water to use, and whatever water you do have could be contaminated. I live in Mudgee @ 500 metres from the Cudgegong River and do not want any of thie pollution in the river! Toxic tailings dam - Bowdens plans to build a large tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. Holding poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every single day (best case scenario). Negative and permanent social impacts - loss of property values. Destruction of community. Noise, vibration and traffic. Lead in dust and water supply. These impacts are real. |
Michael Maher
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will damage the land that belongs to my family and my culture, and pollute this beautiful eco system |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I grew up in the local area and my family still reside in the area. I have always dreamed of bringing my family back and enjoying the beautiful surroundings, fresh air and picture perfect views. I have friends who visit the area purely for the same reasons as above. I feel a mine in the area will destroy the tourism as well as the beautiful countryside. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
- risk of exposure to lead - exposure to lead is dangerous - chronic exposure can lead to significant cognitive and behavioral issues in children - open cut lead mine will be situated 2kms from Lue Primary school - mine is a major threat to water safety and security; the acid drainage from the mine could potentially pollute the water used by households and irrigators, and there being a real risk that there will be less water to use if you live near the mine site or along Lawson Creek. - permanent toxic legacy of dam built by the mine, as the dam with hold poisonous materials forever. |
Peta Newsome
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a Mudgee resident with family members that own and reside on a farm near the village of Lue, that is in proximity to the proposed mine. Me and my children spend a lot of time there and are hugely concerned about several harmful outcomes of the open cut lead mine being approved under the disguise of mining sliver. - Bowdens plans to build a large tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. Holding poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every single day (best case scenario). - Any exposure to lead is dangerous, and chronic exposure can lead to decreased IQ and cognitive function in children and be extremely dangerous for pregnant women and their unborn foetus. Not only is the mine site extremely close to a public school, the livelihood of the community, but all families that reside or spend time in Lue, including my own, will be dangerously affected. Are we to say that their lives aren't valued because they live on affluent land? - I am aware of many Aboriginal cultural artefacts that have been found on my family's property. It would be naïve to think that the same heritage artefacts would not be found on the proposed mine site. There are so many more significant and damaging impacts of this proposal including Acid mine drainage, the impacts of land clearing, threats to water security and quality, I am astounded that this has even gotten this far. Value our lives, value our children's lives, and value our environment for generations to come. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I disagree with this project as it will impact in negative ways on the environment, the native life, on air and the land quality. Please save this site from unnecessary exploitation in the name of greed. Let’s retain this land for all who will come in future generations. Thank you Kind regards Sandra |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam My wife and I own a property on Lue Rd Mount Frome. Having read the information available I can only feel that this will be a disaster based on other similar mines. River/Creek Water quality , dangerous lead exposure, toxic leakage, huge ecological impacts, acid drainage, property value & tourist declines, are just some of the impacts that will threaten the entire area. I see nothing positive for this mine for the community and only feel that it will end in a sad situation wishing it was never approved. Please stop this mine. |
Matthew Swain
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please don’t cut a gaping irreparable wound into my sacred and traditional lands just to exploit it for its minerals on behalf of a few wealthy, greedy business owners. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Helping a mate |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons we strongly object to the proposed Bowden Silver mine. Biodiversity. Koalas. Should the proposed mine go ahead the habitat will be irreversibly negatively affected. Koala habitat will be damaged and koalas populations will struggle to survive. The Bi-Centenary Trust should be buying this country and protecting it for our native flora and fauna. It should not be mined. Runoff will negatively affect the environment and all inhabitants downstream forever, contaminating water and the environment. People. The negative affects o people living nearby or near enough to have health problems from polluted air, ground and water with lead poisoning and other industrial chemicals used in mining industry. The value of properties will be negatively affected for those families and businesses in the area. Children are particularly susceptible and irreversibly affected by lead poisoning. World Heritage sites and the First Nations sensitive areas will be ruined. Once damaged always damaged. No reverse at all possible. None. History of Mining impact on land. To date there has not been a mine in Australia that has rehabilitated the land to its former state. Mining companies do a slap dash patch up attempt at environmental repair, declare it rehabilitated, take a minor fine; (the fines are never enough and what is money when the damage is done. it does not mend the broken land, it only goes to government), and walk away or they close their doors and declare they can't afford to do what was promised and were contracted to do. The rehabilitation part of any mine contract isn't worth the paper it is documented on. In short it is a proposal for short term gain and will have long term negative impact on all of us, no matter where we live. |
Carl Jefferys
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to register my strong objection to the propsed Bowdens Lead Mine for the following reaons: The propsed mine is projected to produce 50 x more lead than silver over the life of the project. The data that Bowdens uses in its project proposal underestimates community exposure levels of lead. It ignores concentrate, mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust and fails to analyse the effect of peak wind events. Even very low levels of exposure can have lifelong effects on multiple organs including the cardiovascular system. It is particularly dangerous for children and there is a school less than 2km from the prosed mine. On the basis of this point alone, I think that any individual who was aware of this, and still supported the project, must be lacking a basic sense of what is right and what is wrong. I live on Cox's Creek Rd near Rylstone and rely on rainwater. I do not wish to have my drinking water poisoned by the toxic chemicals in the fallout from this project. Further, the impacts of Acid Mine Drainage, Contamination of water, reduction of water supply, noise, traffic along Lue Rd, the destruction of Koala Habitat and what appears to be totally inadequateplans for rehabilitation of the site are only some of the key reasons why I believe that th IPC should never approve the Bowdens Silver Mine. |
Karen Randall
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to proposed mine because the whole region will be affected by lead dust. This is dangerous and can lead to decreased IQ and cognitive function in children. The Lue Primary School is only 2 kilometres away. These children and any future children cannot speak for themselves but their rights must be the first consideration. I also object to the the tailings dam on Lawson Creek. The dam would hold poisonous materials and Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every day. The dam will be there forever, with no plan to remove it, which is a toxic intergenerational legacy. This is an unacceptable threat to water security and water quality. In conclusion, the negative impact on water, property values, destruction of community, noice, vibration and traffic would be putting profit before this pristine environment and the people who live there. |
Juliette Wood
Organisation |
Melbourne University |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this proposed development that is taking place on sacred Wiradjuri Country. This Country holds the history, stories, culture and identity of Wiradjuri people. Building this mine would contribute to the ongoing destruction of this Country, of the environment. It will endanger the lives of community members through exposure to toxic lead, especially given its close proximity to a primary school. It has the potential to limit water supplies and possibly contaminate water supplies for community members. I also object to the clearing of endangered Box Grassy Woodlands, as well as any areas of ecological sensitivity. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Bowden Silver mine going ahead. It will have devastating effects on the environment and on the livelihood of the local community. It is toxic and must be stopped. Thanks |
Jacqueline Luty
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please do not go ahead with this development, the community do not want it and it has so many negative impacts on so many people, animals, plants, the land and more. |
Daniel Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a young growing family we are very opposed to this proposed Lead/silver mine. We live less then 2kms from the proposed mine site. We have 2 young children & have been building our home/property here for the last 11years. This proposed silver/lead mine is not a place we want our growing family to live next to. We brought this property as our forever home and know we aren’t sure if it will be. We currently hear machines drilling and see dust plumes from our home daily/weekly. There is extra traffic on the roads which makes the area not the quite, safe area we wanted to be living In. This proposed mine impacts the selling value of our home. We aren’t sure if we would be able to sell our property and does this lead to us being stuck next to this toxic mine. The impact on the cattle/sheep farmers that neighbour us. The mental health of everyone in the community and the destruction of a beautiful community that is Lue and surrounding areas. The levels of lead that the Bowdens silver mine are allowing to be SAFE. This mine will be so devastating for the area and can’t understand how they would want to destroy such a beautiful area that should be left for farming for our future for food supply. |
Jim Lefever
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a landholder in the Camboon valley approximately 15 kms from the proposed mine. I strenuously object to the planned proposal on the following grounds: 1. High risk of Lead poisoning. The only safe place for lead is in the ground. Even very low levels of exposure can have lifelong effects on multiple organs including the cardiovascular system. It is particularly dangerous for children. Chronic exposure can lead to: a. Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children b. Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age c. Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function in adults d. Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. The data Bowdens uses in it’s project proposal underestimates community exposure levels of lead. It ignores concentrate, mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust and fails to analyse the effect of peak wind events. (see citation). No existing, large, multi-element mining operation, which processes lead can demonstrate an absence of off-site impacts. (see citation). The maximum acceptable level of lead (and other heavy metals) in drinking water has been established by the NHMRC in the "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines" at 0.01 mg/L. The EIS allows for 4g of dust/sqm/month containing contaminant; How is Bowdens going to guarantee that these levels of lead in the "acceptable" dust on my roof aren't exceeded? This is hugely concerning to myself and my wife who have had the property for over 14 years and enjoyed safe drinking water throughout this time. Not only will this directly impact my and my wife's health as well as our property and plans for it, it will also have a negative impact on tourism, viticulture and agriculture throughout the region. A region that heavily depends on all those areas. Will we all be required to have regular lead testing of ourselves, our food products? What will happen to the wine industry when it becomes contaminated with lead, chromium and other chemicals? Bowdens is planning a 16.5 year lifecycle for the mine but the impacts will be generational in scale. Data cited from report: Taylor, M.P., Isley, C.F., Fry, K. 2020. Comments and assessment of potential lead exposure risks reported in the Bowdens Silver EIS (May 2020). Macquarie University, NSW, Australia 2. Water Contamination risks. Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The hazardous nature of substances in the waste rock dump and tailings dam merit a local and detailed model of hydrogeological processes to adequately manage the proposed activity. 3. Water Security The mine proposes to use roughly 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. Earlier plans indicated Bowdens intended to pipe this water from the Ulan coalfields, as there was insufficient water at Lue to meet requirements. Now, they are proposing to get all the water needed from Lue, either through building dams, using water caught and drawn into the open cut pit, taking water from the Lawson Creek or using water from the tailings dam. Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. The data relied on by Bowdens to conclude there will be no significant impact on other water users in the area is inaccurate. It is based on an over-inflated monthly rainfall average and a significant understatement of the frequency of dry years. Patently they have not done the necessary groundwork to understand where they will gain water from during dry/drought years. This in turn will lead to an impact on increased dust generation impacting health through contaminated substances being windborne. If they are unable to generate satisfactory water holdings to provide dust mitigation, etc, will operations at the mine be suspended or will this all just be a "tragic result of climate change" and therefore no fault on the mine, even thought it is clear that the problem already exists. 4. Toxic Tailing Dam The proposed dam will hold approximately 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing. Many of these are highly toxic, including sodium cyanide, arsenic, caustic soda, copper sulphate, zinc sulphate, lead and zinc collector. It will also hold 17-20% of the lead, zinc and silver mined that is lost during processing. The dam is proposed to be based on a major geological fault line above the water table at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. it is proposed to have a footprint of 112.5 hectares, across uneven ground. Bowdens is proposing to construct a continuous geosynthetic impermeable liner base over this large area, in the hope that it will provide full impermeability for centuries to come. This seems highly unlikely, and of real concern is what happens once mining is finished? Whose responsibility will it be to maintain the liner and ensure the dam isn’t leaking toxic chemicals into the environment? Equally importantly how can this be checked without potentially damaging the liner when checking it? There is no track record to provide proof that containment designs like this work across this scale or timeframe. In other words, it’s never been done before. Bowdens’ own proposal acknowledges a leakage rate of 1.6mL per day, at best. The dam is designed to leak, and if this mine goes ahead that will be something the community has to live with and impacts that will negatively impact tourism and agriculture almost in perpetuity. 5. Acid Mine Drainage Bowdens proposes to prevent acid drainage by a “capture and contain” strategy, which would involve sealing the base of the entire 77 hectare waste rock emplacement with a 1.5mm thick liner. The builder's plastic I use underneath my floating flooring is about the same thickness. I certainly would not be trying to contain 77 hectares of waste rock with such a product. To put it into context, that means that Bowdens proposes to cover 190 football (soccer) fields with a plastic binliner that is 1.5mm thick and expects that to last for lifetime prevention of the creation of acid mine drainage. I recognise that everyone has experts to prove one side or another but I use a weedmat that is almost as thick and yet I get weeds penetrating that every other week. How can they possibly believe that this will work? The tailings dam is proposed to be partially sealed from beneath by a 450mm thick clay liner. There is absolutely no evidence of the success, effectiveness or safety of this method across this scale from any other mine sites. Bowdens proposal uses predictive modelling and small scale field trials to claim its containment designs will prevent acid drainage today and for generations to come. There is absolutely no way they can guarantee this. Even if they could is 16.5 years of production really worth lifetimes of risk? 6. Traffic and transport Today, the Lue Road is a key transport link for the local community and vital to the local tourism industry. The road is regularly used by cyclists and motorbikes, and increased heavy mine traffic will jeopardise the strong tourism reputation of the area. If Lue Road becomes busier and unsafe, tourists will opt to leave Mudgee via the Castlereagh Highway, bypassing the towns of Rylstone and Kandos which could seriously impact the visitor economy in those areas. Also, mined product will be trucked on B-Doubles six days per week, from 7am-6pm, along the Lue Road and through Mudgee. This will mean up to six B-Double truck movements along the Lue Road and through Mudgee per day, six days per week. This doesn’t include obvious increases in worker and construction traffic, or additional supply materials including dangerous processing chemicals like cyanide, arsenic and antimony. Additionally what is the proposed risk mitigation for accidents involving slurry trucks full of lead/zinc and other chemicals? There is absolutely no way to plan for 100% accident free transport over the life of the mine. 7. Environment/Biodiversity 457 Hectares is proposed to be cleared in what is in essence, an area of natural beauty. As a result, disturbance and fragmentation of Critically Endangered Communities, Box Grassy Woodland, will occur, as well as major changes to ground and surface water flows. The effect of the mine on Koalas may be greater than just being limited to the immediate impacted area, causing fragmentation to their habitat and is likely at odds with the overall objectives of the NSW Koala Recovery Plan, including to reverse the decline of Koala numbers in NSW. It is all very well for Bowdens to effectively plan on utilisation of "Koala offsets" however the fact is there will be a direct and real impact on live koalas in the area which no amount of "offsets" will ever replace. As well as Koalas, the region is recognised as home to critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, and the endangered Small Purple Pea (swainsona recta). Species which will be directly impacted by both the area being cleared as well as light and noise pollution. |
Judy O'Connell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission to Bowden Silver Mine project SSD-5765 I am the mother of a resident of Rylstone and proud grandmother to her daughter. I frequently visit the area to see family and for tourism. This submission has been prepared on my behalf by my daughter and contains opinions that I fully and completely share. I make this submission on my own behalf. I oppose the Bowden Silver Mine on the basis that the EIS is scientifically inadequate, the Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. I also believe the mine will directly and negatively impact my daughter and granddaughter’s livelihood. The Bowden Silver EIS is scientifically inadequate. I refer to the Submission made by Dr Haydn Washington, environmental scientist, dated 16th July 2020 which raised various issues with acid mine drainage. The Bowden Silver Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. The above report prepared by The Department of Planning and Environment states “The human health risk assessment also showed that total exposure to all metals except manganese would remain below the threshold values for adverse effects”. No reference has been provided for the evidence of safe threshold levels for lead. While it seems there is a consensus worldwide amongst relevant authorities that levels of lead above 10 µg/dL has negative health impacts, below that, there appears to be no general consensus, therefore I struggle to understand how the above statement can be made. According to the World Health Organization “There is no known safe blood lead concentration; even blood lead concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/dL may be associated with decreased intelligence in children, behavioural difficulties and learning problems” (WHO, 2023). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2021, stated “Protecting children from exposure to lead is important to lifelong good health. No safe BLL in children has been identified” (CDC, 2021). Further to this, Bowdens is relying on a single review published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2015 to justify their stance that no evidence exists that lower levels of lead exposure pose health risks. I believe this is a misleading and oversimplified statement for the following reasons: a) The above study that they base their statement on actually states “The available evidence suggests that blood lead levels between 5 micrograms and 10 micrograms per decilitre are associated with reduced IQ and academic achievement in children” b) The above study also states “There is weaker evidence of an association between blood lead levels of less than 5 micrograms per decilitre and reductions in IQ or academic achievement in children”. Weaker evidence is not no evidence! c) The above study explains the confounding factors that make gathering data in the lower level exposure brackets very challenging, which meant they only analysed a very small amount of studies within those brackets. This would indicate that the lower level exposure brackets have not had sufficient studies carried out to draw STRONG evidence either way. We must remember that just because something wasn’t proven to be unsafe, does not mean it is inherently safe! d) The above report was published 8 years ago and included research from as far back as 17 years. It risks becoming outdated research before the mine would even open. The mine will directly and negatively impact my daughter and granddaughter’s livelihood Of particular concern to me is the possibility of lead dust falling on my daughter’s roof and entering harvested rainwater. She moved to Rylstone in 2018 during the drought. She was under water restrictions during this time. Although the home is connected to town water supply, she has been planning to increase her family’s water security for future droughts. To do this she has made plans to install a large water tank to harvest rainwater. The water would be used primarily for irrigating home grown food crops in spring and summer, for maintaining water supply to non-edibles (home to much biodiversity) as well as for drinking water and feeding back into the home, should water restrictions become more strict in the future. Water security is amongst the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (“clean water and sanitation”). Water is necessary for life on earth. The lead dust poses a direct and unstoppable risk to water security for my daughter and her family as we, as a global community, move further and further into greater climate change and risk of drought. References 1. US CDC Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. CDC updates blood lead reference value to 3.5µg/dL. Atlanta: US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 (https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/news/cdc-updates-blood-lead-reference-value.html). 2. World Health Organization, Lead Poisoning, viewed 12 Feb 2023, (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health) |
Nicola Lennon
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
First of all, why is it that grown arse adults get to continually decide the future of young people. A coal mine will be detrimental to our environment and the world in which YOU have already done enough irreversible damage to. Not only is it unsustainable and damaging to the earths ecosystems it also shows a complete lack of regard or care for our First Nations people. But allowing this to go ahead you are actively disregarding the rightful owners and caretakers of the land and is basically saying F U to our indigenous population. Have we not done enough damage? If you need jobs or energy or money then build a wind farm or subsidise solar power and push for sustainable and rentable energy options. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I visit this community on a regular and cannot believe that you would risk the fragility and natural beauty of this area for the greed and profit of a few. too many times we have capitulated to business at the expense of the local commuity and the environment. Ask a few questions: 1. What will it delivery the local community and enviroment? Answer - disruption and devistation 2. What will it deliver the share holders of Bowden Silver? Answer - $$$$$ It seems we never learn! |
Hayley Tillman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to this mine for the reason listed above. For the risk to the land and country that is irreversible. Aboriginal heritage will be destroyed and it should be saved and protected |
Natalie Merz
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the Bowdens Silver mine development. Considering the information from renowned experts in the field as well as the DPE assessment report, I am staggered that the proposal wasn't knocked on the head in the beginning. The thought of the air and water at Lue and most probably Rylstone and Mudgee being poisoned with lead and cyanide is terrifying. Detrimental effects to the children of Lue Public School would be unavoidable should this plan go ahead and there is also the threat of dementia caused by lead exposure. I am planning to build a house on my property at 3142 Lue Rd this year but I worry not only of the health implications but of over capitalizing should the mine go ahead and our property become worthless. Our stud beef cattle running on the block are also at risk and I worry that I will be putting lead into the food chain via our once clean and green beef. People from overseas buy Australian products because of they are thought of as being clean and green. What would they think if they knew that we polluted our waterways with acid and fed lead laden pasture to our beef cattle. I realise that someone has to mine silver but they quality of the ore here is so low and the risks to health and the environment are so high that I am certain, THERE SHOULD BE NO SILVER MINE AT LUE! |
Maree O'Connell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a resident and home owner within the Rylstone township. I live with my defacto partner and three year old child. My partner and myself are both classified as ‘essential workers’ and work locally in the Rylstone/Kandos townships, myself as a Paramedic and my partner as Carpenter. We moved here with the intention to live and work in the area for a minimum of 10 years. I oppose the Bowden Silver Mine on the basis that the EIS is scientifically inadequate, the Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. I also believe the mine will directly and negatively impact myself and my family’s livelihood. The Bowden Silver EIS is scientifically inadequate. I refer to the Submission made by Dr Haydn Washington, environmental scientist, dated 16th July 2020 which raised various issues with acid mine drainage. The Bowden Silver Assessment Report is not evidence based and reference to safe lead exposure levels are misleading. The above report prepared by The Department of Planning and Environment states “The human health risk assessment also showed that total exposure to all metals except manganese would remain below the threshold values for adverse effects”. No reference has been provided for the evidence of safe threshold levels for lead. While it seems there is a consensus worldwide amongst relevant authorities that levels of lead above 10 µg/dL has negative health impacts, below that, there appears to be no general consensus, therefore I struggle to understand how the above statement can be made. According to the World Health Organization “There is no known safe blood lead concentration; even blood lead concentrations as low as 3.5 µg/dL may be associated with decreased intelligence in children, behavioural difficulties and learning problems” (WHO, 2023). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2021, stated “Protecting children from exposure to lead is important to lifelong good health. No safe BLL in children has been identified” (CDC, 2021). Further to this, Bowdens is relying on a single review published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2015 to justify their stance that no evidence exists that lower levels of lead exposure pose health risks. I believe this is a misleading and oversimplified statement for the following reasons: a) The above study that they base their statement on actually states “The available evidence suggests that blood lead levels between 5 micrograms and 10 micrograms per decilitre are associated with reduced IQ and academic achievement in children” b) The above study also states “There is weaker evidence of an association between blood lead levels of less than 5 micrograms per decilitre and reductions in IQ or academic achievement in children”. Weaker evidence is not no evidence! c) The above study explains the confounding factors that make gathering data in the lower level exposure brackets very challenging, which meant they only analysed a very small amount of studies within those brackets. This would indicate that the lower level exposure brackets have not had sufficient studies carried out to draw STRONG evidence either way. We must remember that just because something wasn’t proven to be unsafe, does not mean it is inherently safe! d) The above report was published 8 years ago and included research from as far back as 17 years. It risks becoming outdated research before the mine would even open. The mine will directly and negatively impact myself and my family’s livelihood. Of particular concern to me is the possibility of lead dust falling on my home’s roof and entering harvested rainwater. We moved to Rylstone in 2018 during the drought. We were under water restrictions during this time. Although our home is connected to town water supply, we have been planning to increase our water security for future droughts. To do this we have made plans to install a large water tank to harvest rainwater. The water would be used primarily for irrigating our own home grown food crops in spring and summer, for maintain water supply to non-edibles (home to much biodiversity) as well as for drinking water and feeding back into the home, should water restrictions become more strict in the future. Water security is amongst the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (“clean water and sanitation”). Water is necessary for life on earth. The lead dust poses a direct and unstoppable risk to water security for my family as we, as a global community, move further and further into greater climate change and risk of drought. References 1. US CDC Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. CDC updates blood lead reference value to 3.5µg/dL. Atlanta: US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 (https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/news/cdc-updates-blood-lead-reference-value.html). 2. World Health Organization, Lead Poisoning, viewed 12 Feb 2023, (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health) |
Attachments |
submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 103.51 KB) |
Gabrielle Asprey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to strongly object to the Silver Mine at Lue. My understanding is that silver is mostly found as a secondary by-product and must be removed from lead and other types of metal such as zinc through a liquid-to-liquid extraction procedure. You will have received many objections from people far more qualified than I to explain the many detrimental environmental impacts of this process. In reading a sample of about 30 Support submissions, it is plain to see that the support is mainly around the possibility (NOT GUARANTEE) of jobs for the local area. Surely with a 16 year lifetime of the mine (as I understand it), that doesn't materially affect those who might be employed in any substantial way. It is completely misleading. Mudgee, Lue, Kandos and Rylstone are all towns that will be gravely affected by the mine - and when I say towns, I mean the people, the tourists, the environment, the waters, the sky, the land - everything. A mine where profits head elsewhere is not something that has a justifiable benefit to the district. Sadly, it has too many detrimental and dangerous consequences. Lead kills people - it maims people and has a lifetime of health problems - leading to an enormous burden for the persons affected, their family, their community and the taxpayer. Bowdens themselves admit there is a very real risk of environmental contamination and continued leakage of toxic material from the tailings dam. Groundwater will be affected for too many years to contemplate. Downstream water users will lose their water due to the need for the mine to use up water supplies in the extraction process. Surely, this short-sighted, irreversibly damaging mine can be stopped. Stop it for the people, young and old. Stop it for the environment - the plants, animals, water and sky - there are already at risk - for example the koala has lost habitat throughout the country for far too long. They are at a critical point - if the koala corridors are further eroded, there will be no koalas left in a very short space of time. Don't let the short-term lure of possible jobs and money for only some override these real risks and realities. Thank you Gabrielle |
Kevin Fox
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the local community I strongly object to the proposal on the following grounds: LEAD - mining is hazardous to the community and environment in the proposed locality ACID METALLIFEROUS DRAINAGE (AMD) - from mining operations, the TAILINGS DAM and effects on GROUNDWATER are all significant negative environmental impacts SURFACE WATER - usage and impoundment will have significant negative impact on both the local and downstream environments and communities KOALA populations, habitat and efforts for rehabilitation will be negatively impacted TOURISM - will be negatively impacted because of the specific location and nature of the proposal EMPLOYMENT - any claimed benefits to employment will be outweighed by negative impacts on the local community and socioeconomic stability please do not approve the proposal on these grounds |
Hugh Piper
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly opposed to mining that has the potential to contaminate pristine land. A region that is renowned for its wines and scenic landscapes. We are already seeing the impacts of climate change and digging up a large swathe of the land isn’t going to help that! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Who is their right mind would dare to allow a lead and zinc mine to go ahead, 2kms from the community and a primary school? And I beg to ask the DPE and IPC, who in their right mind would want their loved one or themselves to live, visit or stay at a place or area with this happening in their backyard? Let’s remember that beyond economic reasons, the most important thing we need to ask ourselves is what would we be feeling if this was in close proximity within our home? We all know the answer is NO WAY!!!! But who would want to buy my home now that the mine is my backyard? The answer is NOONE. I truly hope that the IPC see the hideousness of this mine as I am dead certain they would never ever accept this proposal if this was in their backyard. |
Edwina McEgan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There is no evidence on how the proposed to manage the acid mine drainage. I worry about the long term effects on water quality and supply, the local primary school community will be exposed to dust causing cognitive impairment and bone density damage. |
Gemma Swain
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a traditional owner I work with a local aboriginal tourism business as well as other local cultural businesses and services in the area and the purposed mine will directly impacted both the tourism and ecosystem that these businesses rely on. On a personal level, it's my families tradition lands and my father along with other family members live in the area and directly downstream from the purpose mine. |
Ron Smith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed Bowden mine going ahead. Silver/lead/Zinc mines have a reputation as being very "dirty" as they cause pollution to water resources, the atmosphere, and to the landscape. This will adversely affect local residents as well as local flora and fauna. Residents in the Mudgee area have worked hard to become a #1 tourist destination with award winning food and wine production being a huge part of their success. This will be adversely affected if this development goes ahead. I think that it is grossly unfair on local residents who have invested in the area to have their future impacted in this way. Surely it is possible to find other sites where the impact of mining would not be so catastrophic. Even if the level of pollution is only perceived and not actual it will still have a damaging affect on tourism and hence the viability of local industry and the quality of life for local residents. Please do the right thing and reject this proposal! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Who is their right mind would dare to allow a lead and zinc mine to go ahead, 2kms from the community and a primary school? And I beg to ask the DPE and IPC, who in their right mind would want their loved one or themselves to live, visit or stay at a place or area with this happening in their backyard? Let’s remember that beyond economic reasons, the most important thing we need to ask ourselves is what would we be feeling if this was in close proximity within our home? We all know the answer is NO WAY!!!! But who would want to buy my home now that the mine is my backyard? The answer is NOONE. I truly hope that the IPC see the hideousness of this mine as I am dead certain they would never ever accept this proposal if this was in their backyard. |
Lee Bibby
Location |
Northern Territory |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Moving towards a sustainable future Australia will need projects like Bowdens to supply much needed green metals for Ev's and solar panels that one day could be produced here rather than having to rely on imports from maybe not so friendly Countries. The economic opportunities locally and more broadly across Australia could be tremendous should this project go ahead. Covid taught us the fragility of international supply lines and the need for better integration of producers and manufacturers locally for a more robust local supply of goods critical or otherwise. Silver is a critical metal for our future. Sincerely- Lee Bibby. |
Julia Ruth Poissant
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing this letter to express my strong objection to the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine. I am extremely concerned about the impact this mine will have on the environment and the local communities, especially considering the fact that the mine produces more lead than silver. Lead is a highly toxic substance that can have severe impacts on human health and the environment. Acid mine drainage from the mine will pose a significant threat to the surrounding water sources, leading to a loss of aquatic life and potential contamination of drinking water for local communities. Additionally, the presence of lead in the environment can have long-lasting impacts, as it does not break down over time and can persist for decades. This can have detrimental effects on the health of local residents and wildlife. I have friends who are farmers in the area and their livelihoods would be extremely negatively impacted or even destroyed by lead contamination on their land. Based on current mining practices, it is not a question of if something goes wrong, but when. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to take these concerns into consideration and reject the proposal for the Bowdens Silver Mine. I believe that the potential risks associated with this mine far outweigh any potential benefits, and it is imperative that we prioritize the protection of our environment and the well-being of local communities. Thank you for considering my objections to this proposal. I look forward to hearing your response. Sincerely, Julia Poissant |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There are too many reasons why this proposed mine goes ahead. It far outweighs the so called pros. This is not a remote area- its potential to have catastrophic impacts on tourism, health of people and wildlife should be at the forefront of any approvable recommendation. Climate change is not going away, and this monstrosity simply serves to add to it. A significant portion of our community can see how Bowdens and DPE have acted unethically in order to boost this proposal. It’s too close, too dangerous and hideous to believe we are still having to fight this. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Lead is dangerous and poisonous. I’ve lived in Broken Hill and it directly effects people there in a very negative way. It is not right for children and infants to be exposed to this level of lead in the air/environment which is what will happen if this proposal goes ahead. Also have the traditional custodians of the land been consulted!? I am strongly opposed! |
Holly Manwaring
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a WIRES volunteer for the Central West WIRES branch, and although I am NOT writing on the organisation’s behalf, I strongly object to the Bowden’s silver mine for the following reasons. 1. Clearing and destruction of box grassy woodlands will lead to further fragmentation of wildlife habitat and: 2. will have the negative knock-on effect of possibly sealing the fate of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot. 3. Clearing of box grassy woodlands is at odds with the NSW Koala Recovery Plan. 4. I am a Mudgee resident and regularly take my dog and son to the Cudgegong River for a swim. There is a high risk of cyanide, lead and other heavy metals contaminating the river. This will lead to negative short- and long-term impacts on animal and human health. 5. The building of the tailings dam will be a toxic eye sore and will ruin this pristine environment. Bowden’s own proposal has acknowledged a daily leakage of 1.6 megalitres. This is completely unacceptable and will devastate biodiversity. 6. The proposed tailings dam will be a hazard for all wildlife that may attempt to drink from the water. I do not want to be called out for a WIRES rescue of any wildlife that gets stuck in this toxic dam. 7. Climate change has meant we are now experiencing more severe weather events such as flooding, bush fire and drought. All of these will present an unacceptably high risk of contamination in some form or another. E.g. flooding = contaminated water, fire = toxic smoke, drought = toxic dust. 8. Lue residents will suffer physically and mentally if this mine goes ahead. They will have to deal with noise, traffic, air, and visual pollution. Their homes will decrease in value. The community will slowly die, just as the villages of Wollar, Ulan and Bylong have done. I support my fellow Lue community members in opposing this mine. |
Anthony Maher
Organisation |
Dabee Wiradjuri |
---|---|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am against the mine for environmental and Aboriginal Cultural Heritage reasons |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To allow a lead mine in this location is crazy. It is too close to a primary school (and we know the effects of lead on children) and the tailings dam if and when it should leak will pollute the local creek. |
Ho Ling
Organisation |
Intertia |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Alex Mateer
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My husband and I live about 35 minutes from Lue but we feel closely connected to the community as our children shared many activities with Lue PS - small school sports days, swimming lessons, school visits etc. We have been watching the development of this mine for years and have been shocked that this is something that is being seriously considered for this area. The threats that this project brings with it for water quality, and the degradation of the surrounding agricultural land are substantial. It is not appropriate for our community and our environment. All of our small communities in the district are struggling to reinvent themselves as our economic base shifts from broad acre agriculture and mining. Our biggest asset is the natural beauty, and the relatively pristine environment within driving distance from Sydney. Most of the viable small businesses that are emerging depend on these. The development of a toxic lead and silver mine is a huge threat to a sustainable future in this area. |
Ben Nichelsen
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: -Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children -Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age -Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function -Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area, let alone the impact this will have to the people who live in the area if this toxic material was to seep out into the environment. I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please STOP pillaging our earth for her resources. Please STOP putting profits over plants, animals and people. We do NOT require these resources to be mined to continue the human existence, we do need clean water and healthy children. We do NOT want more trucks on the roads or dust in the air. Employment can come from other areas, create a recycling plant instead, do something good for the earth and the community 🙏 Please say NO to the 'Silver' mine. |
Luke Poissant
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I regularly visit my partner’s family cattle grazing property at Lue and am surprised at the lack of professional behaviour by Bowdens Silver in failing to adequately plan the supply of essential resources such as water and power for their proposed mine. The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Macquarie University |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The main concern I have with this development are water pollutants - tailings dam leakage, and overuse of vulnerable bore/table water. This development is too close to the Lue community and poses a risk to nearby children, in particular the toxic air pollution that they will be exposed to. The other issues are the disturbance to the rural community - eg night lights, traffic, and dust. This development will lead to loss of eco tourism - value of natural environment and the relocation and destruction of Aboriginal artifacts. This is a beautiful area to visit for tourists - especially Sydney (where I live) and it will impact on tourism in this area which generates income for the locals. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. Overall, the negative impacts of this mine far outweigh any profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: - Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children - Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age - Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function - Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area. I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There is next to nothing to like about this mine. Bowdens has used money and power in an attempt to lure the community into a false sense of what this mine really means. The social impacts are significant - and they have failed to address this. Pyangle Rd is in itself a scenic tourism drive - coupled with all the lovely nearby tourist accomodations, farm stay, agricultural farms and wineries - and yet Bowdens will irrevocably destroy this for everyone if this goes ahead. Climate change is here. The government purports to supports this- and yet Bowdens some how have clawed their way through - with their propaganda, sponsorships and money. Get out of our community. We don’t need you. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the proposed development because of the negative impacts to the environment and biodiversity, Aboriginal cultural heritage sites, and the local community and visitors to the local area. The environmental impacts particularly on Australian natives and endangered species have not been fully addressed in the reports or conditions as the proposed development would have a significant impact on these fauna. The impacts on the local community have not been properly addressed, the disruption to the local community cannot be dismissed by providing regular communication. Encouraging wildlife to not drink from contaminated water sources or assuming that wildlife smaller than livestock could withstand similar contamination levels is not enough. I strongly believe the development should no go ahead as the environmental and community impacts have not been fully investigated. No decision should be made without further independent, peer reviewed impact reports that consider the real world impacts on individuals, communities, flora and fauna are conducted. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine in this location is totally unsuitable. The tailings dam will leak heavy metals into nearby Lawson's Creek. This will be an environmental problem forever. The mine will produce more lead than anything else and it is only 2 kms from Lue where there is a primary school. The district, including the school, will be covered in lead dust. Please do not allow this dangerous mine. |
Vanessa Honzatko
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This area should be protected as it is a rich biodiversity and essential part of Australia that should not be ruined for many and future generations for the temporary profits of the few. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please do not allow this mine. It is totally in the wrong place. Too close to a small village primary school and a creek which could easily be contaminated. We know a lot about lead toxicity now and lead dust from this mine would fall over the local district. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is raping the land once again for monetary gain. Ignoring the impact it will have on the environment and quality of life as we know it. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write regarding my objection to the Bowdens Mine near Lue NSW. I have many worries, amongst them is water and land quality, long and short term. I have read and agreed with a local action group, so please excuse my copy-paste from their concerns, as they are mine too: Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. More than half of all waste rock excavated (26 million tonnes) will be potentially acid forming. Bowdens wants to stack it above the Lawson Creek water table over 77 hectares, creating a major acid mine drainage risk. Bowdens wants to clear 457 hectares of land, including some Critically Endangered Ecological Communities like Box Grassy Woodland. Bowdens plans to build a large tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. Holding poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every single day (best case scenario). Forever. The area already suffers from drought, this will not help future issues with water, it will in fact make them worse and a lot riskier. There are other worries too, but I feel like just getting a few of my objections is better than nothing. Please reconsider this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To develop a lead mine in this location is environmental vandalism. We need mines but they must be developed in areas that have minimal environmental damage. Lawsons Creek will, if not now, in the future, be affected by run off from the mine and tailings dam. Lead dust will fall in the local area; there is a primary school within a very short distance and we know what effect lead dust has on children. Please do not allow this mine to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There is next to nothing to like about this mine. Bowdens has used money and power in an attempt to lure the community into a false sense of what this mine really means. The social impacts are significant - and they have failed to address this. Pyangle Rd is in itself a scenic tourism drive - coupled with all the lovely nearby tourist accomodations, farm stay, agricultural farms and wineries - and yet Bowdens will irrevocably destroy this for everyone if this goes ahead. Climate change is here. The government purports to supports this- and yet Bowdens some how have clawed their way through - with their propaganda, sponsorships and money. Get out of our community. We don’t need you. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Back In Motion |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The degradation of the environment and negative health impacts far outweigh any perceived economic benefits. To say this is a silver mine is misleading, as by far the most abundant metal to be mined will be lead. Many studies have shown how detrimental lead is to humans and when released into the environment the long term impacts of lead are there permanently. Not only will the local populations suffer health impacts, the surrounding environment will have traces of lead, for many kilometres surrounding the mine and routes to and from the mine. The mine will draw on significant amounts of pristine water, and the heavy metals mined and chemicals used during the mining process will end up in a vast tailings dam, which will, by the admission of the mine operators, leach these chemicals into these pristine waterways, and into significant water catchments downstream. This will impact drinking water for native animals, drinking water for farm animals produced for human consumption, water used for recreational activities such as fishing, swimming, boating, etc. Once in the water supply, these heavy toxins cannot be removed. The 24 hour operation of the mine will have significant impact on local fauna, domesticated animals and humans via, dust, noise and light pollution. This will be further exacerbated by increased traffic to and from the mine, again 24 hours per day, generating more noise, dust and light pollution. I note that this has been marked as a state significant development. NSW simply does not need a development which is so heavily polluting. With a virtually zero unemployment rate, (2.2% in late 2022 in the Mid Western region) there are many other industries which can employ the local populations. Proximity to Mudgee and Rylestone, are both significant wine and tourist areas, these industries are struggling to attract workers so there is no need for a heavily polluting mine to provide employment. it would be far better to invest in these industries than than a lead producing mine. As a regular visitor to the Lue, Mudgee and Rylestone areas I can’t object strongly enough to allowing this mine to proceed and ask that you reject the mine outright. |
Name Redacted
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to the Bowdens Silver Mine. The proposed mine will be unacceptably close to water sources, schools and woodland tourist areas. The proposed tailings dam which will hold cyanide, arsenic, lead and other poisonous materials which will have leakage of some sort. The proposed clearing of land, in which there are critically endangered plants, is unacceptable. The mine's 23 year life (as reported by Bowdens) will leave behind - a substantial loss of woodland and habitat, forever. - a 50 hectare open cut pit hole, forever. - a huge tailing dam containing toxic waste, forever. THIS IS FOREVER PEOPLE !!! There are some things that are more important than profit. This is not the place for an open cut mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The last thing the area needs is trucks loaded with lead and other ore driving on local roads and through towns. The roads are in poor condition already. I don’t want extra trucks going down my feeder roads and town. The mine is up against a disused railway line. Put the rocks in covered wagons on trains! |
Bibi Liati
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will be too close to Louis school, Major threat to water safety and security Permanent toxic legacy This is mine should definitely not go ahead it is a very big Health has it to our planet |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have family members who live in close proximity to this proposed mine. They and we are extremely concerned by the damaging environmental effect the mine and associated works will have on Lawsons Creek and the village of Lue. Have we learnt nothing from history? |
Emily Kitcher
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – It has been seen before in the central west that water supplies have been mismanaged for mining and affected local communities. The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated! No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am opposed the approval of a mine that will result in lead being leached into our waterways and soil. The proposed mine is only 2km from the township of Lue and the primary school. Lead is a know dangerous poison and there is no safe level of lead for children. The waterways in the area should be protected, no contaminated with mine run-off - acid mine drainage will travel downstream to Burrendong and have long-lasting damaging effects on the river system, beyond the life of the mine. The mine will also effect water supply, which is a huge concern in an area that has been previously devastated by drought. The mine will also devalue local properties and fertile farmland - even if there were compensation to be offered - is it worth the damage and degradation of our environment? In other considerations, the Lue Road is not built for mine traffic. It is narrow and dangerous. The Mudgee Region is considered one of Australia's top tourism destinations - don't poison it. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a proud Wiradjuri man having young children it is so upsetting to see our country being destroyed by so many mines. The future generations should be able to enjoy what we have the way it is we should be preserving not destroying. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine, it’s a lead mine. It will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. I do not support this proposal going ahead. |
Sam Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the mine going ahead, due to the potential health risk of the local community - lead and other mineral exposure could be catastrophic for local families Negative and permanent environmental impact due to flaws in the site planning - tailings dams can have serious impact |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have relatives living in the area directly impacted by the negative environmental impacts that mining will bring. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The environmental impact these unnecessary open cut mines will have is irreversible. The water is precious in area and the mines will take a huge risk in damaging not only the immediate surrounding area but the farmland downstream from the river. The hazardous impact to the water table is real and should be reason enough. |
Jackie Conroy
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am extremely concerned about the impact this mine will have to our region short and long term. Primarily the potential health issues related to lead are extremely concerning especially as a mother. There are serious health repercussions from lead. Why should a whole region be exposed to this potential. Contamination to our waterways will have a far reaching negative impact on us all, I also have major concerns for the wildlife in this area. As a home-owner in the region I am also concerned that long term the value of our properties could be impacted by the go ahead of this mine. This is a region that is highly dependent on tourism, people won't visit a region that has contaminated waterways, lead levels etc I do not feel there has been adequate consultation with the Mudgee Region residence and business' which could be directly impacted by this mine going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My biggest concern is the damage to our environment and contamination of our waterways. There's no fixing that problem. Not to mention any airborne pollutants. I don't approve of this site . |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am very much against this mine. It is not safe. Lawsons Creek will be contaminated and the village and district will be covered in lead dust. |
Alex Kitcher
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
While I appreciate that the commission has put in place conditions for operations, and I appreciate that the mines have accepted these & offered information as to how they would comply by them, I have no faith that the mines will actually comply with them, or that the commission will effectively monitor & enforce compliance by the mines. Given this, and the history of mines caring little for the communities and the environment that they work in, I believe that it is highly likely that there will be damage to water resources, biodiversity in the area, hazardous materials & contamination, and visual damage that will not be corrected. As such I strongly oppose this development and urge the commission to halt all activities in this area. Yours in faith. |
Sue Makin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Availability of water during a drought. Major floods which may risk spreading hazardous chemicals. Having lived in the mudgee area for 47 years the extremes of climate Will have a direct impact on the workings of the mind, transportation of the ore and disposal of the waste. The weather pattern is not stable and cannot be relied upon. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose the development of the proposed Bowdens mine. I am very familiar with the region as my daughter has a property in close proximity to the site and will be severely impacted. The issue of rehabilitation has not been adequately assessed in the DPE assessment due to lack of management plans. How can a determination occur without management plans. It is not possible to rehabilitate a site in 6.5 yrs. Who is responsible for ongoing management of site? Grassy box woodland being an endangered ecological community is one of the rarest ecological communities in Australia. There are many examples of communities who have been severely affected by close proximity to a mine site. To sacrifice a community for a mine is not acceptable . If we do not have healthy communities and environment, we do not have a healthy economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have great concerns about pollution of the waterways in a farming community |
Wendy Griffits
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel strongly that it would be an absolute travesty to allow a lead mine in this area. The amount of silver is tiny and the amount of polluting lead is huge. The water supply to Mudgee would be contaminated. The town of Lue would be completely unliveable. Agriculture and tourism would be ruined for a huge area. The supply of water for running the mine is not guaranteed and this means the ability to keep dust down will be affected. I hope sanity will prevail and this mine will not be allowed |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am very concerned about the huge increase of lead and zinc dust in the local environment, saspecially so close to Lue Primary school. |
Thomas Gilmour
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to Bowdens Silver mine in Lue because of the following: - high risk of contamination of water in the Lawson Creek, destroying the environment in and around the creek and poisoning our waterways. - Contamination of water that is used for food and livestock production and the potential to decrease the food availability through lack of clean water. - Dangerous lead exposure to children and families. The mine is situated close to the community and school. Lead is dangerous for health, cognitive function and developing foetuses. There is no safe level of lead exposure as even low levels of lead exposure can impact vital organs, especially in children. - A toxic tailings dam that will be in the community forever. It is situated in a place that if any leakage occurs can impact the water table from Lawson Creek and into the Cuggegong River. Bowdens acknowledges that there will be leakage from this dam. It is toxic to the community and the wider environment. - Acid mine drainage leaching heavy metals and threatening drinking water supplies and irrigation downstream. Personally, Lue is a beautiful community that we visit regularly with visits into the Mugee Region. If this mine were to go ahead, we would not be visiting and brining our money directly into the community. I live in a coal mining community. I have developed asthma since living here through poor air quality management, even though I have never had any respiratory complications my entire life until now. The risk to children is apparent through the communities high rates of respiratory illnesses. For the people of Lue to have this risk of toxic exposure will be detrimental to the health of everyone living or working nearby. I have personally reported events to the DPA in my community, but once the damage has been done, it cannot be undone with community complaints. The health risk has been increased. This mine should not go ahead, it is a lead mine, and the by-product is silver. In my opinion, the safety of the local and wider community has not been taken into consideration in the reports written as there is no guarantee that toxic contamination will not occur through the water and air quality. I vehemently object to this lead mine and it must not go ahead. |
David Sargeant
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to object to Bowdens “Silver” mine proceeding on the grounds of insufficient acknowledgement of this project’s long-term environmental impacts and no evidence that future generations will not be left with disastrous major environmental legacies arising from the extensive use of toxic materials to extract the lead, zinc and silver this mine will produce. There is little doubt this project will leave a legacy of environmental contamination that will impact future generations for years to come. In material released by Bowdens, it is noted the DPE states, “On balance, the Department considers that the benefits of the project outweigh its residual costs and that the project is in the public interest and is approvable, subject to strict conditions of consent”. In other material Bowdens make the point that silver, amongst other things, is used in the production of solar panels and electric vehicles, all the while playing down the relatively small volume of silver that will be produced compared to the large amount of lead and zinc. It is difficult to understand how the DPE can conclude that on balance the benefits outweigh the residual costs and that the project is in the public interest, when one of the known perpetual residual effects is an uncovered tailings dam, full of toxic material that is contained by a membrane just 1.5mm thick. What consideration is given to the possibility of this membrane never being punctured and allowing toxic material to leach into the surrounding countryside and ground water? Where is the evidence that this can’t happen? One must ask what, in the view of the DPE, is the public interest. Is it the immediate short term benefit of 228 jobs and economic activity or the long term benefits after the mine has been expended? I suspect it is more short term than thinking of future generations. I wonder how thankful future generations living in the region and, elsewhere, will be of this generation for allowing this mine to proceed. Behind Bowdens comment about silver being a component of solar panels and electric vehicles lies an implication that this mine will play its part in addressing climate change as the world moves to net zero emissions. How ironic, that to save the planet this generation will allow mining of this nature to recover rare earth resources and use extremely toxic extraction processes so renewable energy can be generated, while at the same time leaving a legacy of environmental contamination by way of toxic tailings dams and contaminated landscapes. Surely this generation (as do all generations) has an obligation to leave the world in a better place than when it came into the world. It is hard to reconcile this with current activities that create products that can’t be recycled i.e. solar panels and wind turbines, while using extremely toxic extraction processes. The legacy for future generations of the Bowdens mine and its tailings dam will be a perpetual with a disastrous environmental risk long after Bowden’s shareholder have pocketed their profits and moved on. This then comes to the DPE’s requirements that the mine is approved “subject to strict conditions of consent”. How long do these conditions of consent apply? Is it in perpetuity, long after the mine closes and shareholders moved on? Is this cost carried by Bowdens and if so what evidence is there that they have the financial strength to meet such a requirement? Otherwise where will the costs fall? MWRC rate payers, NSW taxpayers, Federal taxpayers? Bowdens acknowledge that the tailings dam will contain toxic material. It is known that this will include cyanide and acid of various kind. Once the mine is closed what will be the requirements on the mine’s promoters to guarantee sufficient resources to ensure proper maintenance of the site and there is no leaching of materials onto adjoining farmland and downstream into Mudgee and beyond? I suggest this will be impossible to enforce, and future generations will be left with the consequences and carry the long-term costs arising from a short-term project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My family is very concerned about the environmental risks this mine will produce. Lawsons Creek will be polluted and lead dust will fall on the surrounding area which includes a primary school which is very close to the mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine should not be allowed to go ahead. It will have a drastic impact on the health & wellbeing native flora & fauna as well as nearby residents. |
Tony Miskle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I object to the Lue silver mine proceeding due to the health implications of my family - we live 10km from the mine there is no possible way of effectively managing all dust compression - potentially poisoning our home and water for human consumption and stock consumption It will also adversely effect our property value |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reasons I object to the proposed development are listed below: Water security – The ground water around Bowden’s is a water supply for many agricultural properties around Lue. Bowden’s have done no peer review to determine the risks of ground water contamination by dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. This could lead to poisoned groundwater, which will poison people, animals and the environment. They also plan to get all the water they need from Lue, 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. This will result in a loss of flow of 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. I have seen this creek barely flow at all during droughts, this could mean no water supply to many farms that depend on it. Lead exposure – This mine is not a silver mine it’s a lead mine, it will take out 50 times more lead than silver. There is no safe level of exposure to lead. Chronic exposure to lead can lead to: • Decreased academic achievement, IQ and specific cognitive measures in children • Delayed puberty and decreased kidney function in children over 12 years of age • Increased blood pressure, decreased cognitive function • Reduced foetal growth, increases in spontaneous abortion and preterm birth. Toxic tailings dam - 30 million tonnes of potentially acid forming tailings, including most of the 43,700 tonnes of chemical used in ore processing and this will all end up in a tailings dam. This dam will sit on a major geological fault line about the water table at the top of Lawson creek. Tailings dams have failed before, resulting in massive destruction to the environment and agricultural processes around it. This will also impact the local wildlife, it will cause fragmentation to the habitats of local koalas and threaten critically endangered birds like the Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot, that live in the area I strongly believe this mine should not go ahead and that the actual environmental impacts have not fully been investigated. No decision should be made based on the poor evidence that has been supplied. The negative impacts of this mine far outweigh the profits that will be made by a private company. |
Peter Ericksen
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Environment is critical to our survival |
Jo Oloughlin
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our flora and fauna deserve better! |
David Pearson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My wife and I moved to the area 4yrs ago to escape polluted city living and start a family. We have a 2yr old and another on the way. We are extremely unhappy about the bowdens lead and silver mine proposal for many reasons. Firstly our health and particularly the health of our children. Our only drinking water comes from rainwater tanks which will become contaminated and will only increase its toxicity over time. Our son has allergies and sensitive skin, which will be severely affected by the increased dust and toxins emitted from the mine. The increase in truck traffic on lue rd will only increase the risk of fatal traffic accidents due to speeding trucks and increased damage to the road surface. We rely on our stock for income and food, soil and water contamination from the mine to nearby properties like us will mean decreased stock values and contaminated meat. We have invested all our savings to own our own little patch of paradise here on pyangle rd, and if this mine goes ahead our property value will decrease and it will become next to impossible to find anyone to purchase the property should we need to leave. Local wildlife will also be greatly affected from airborne toxins as well as from feeding and drinking on or near the mine site which will then enter the food chain. Was any attention paid to the endagered bird sanctuary area next to the mine. I don't believe that the environmental impact studies that have been carried out truly indicate the devastation this mine will cause to all living creatures in the area including humans. Bowdens believe that they are providing employment and bringing cash to the local communities. This cannot be further from the truth, they will bring in qualified employees from out of area to work on the mine who will then move on after the mining lease expires. This mining operation is owned and run by people with no connection or care for the local communities or environment. They only care about making as much money as they can for themselves and their investors during the duration of their lease before moving on to the next community and environment to rape and pillage with not a second thought for the toxic void left behind that the local people,animals and environment get left to live with forever after. I'd like to know if any of the owners or investors of this operation would be prepared to live and raise children next door to this toxic project? Shame on you bowdens! Think about the actual reality of what you are proposing and not the feeble falsities created behind a desk by people who aren't living in the local area and who only look at profit, not the well being of local families animals or environment! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Luke and surrounds are a vibrant tourist destination. The proposed development of the mine would impact our biodiversity, food and water, natural habitat and become unattractive to tourists. The local economy will suffer as a result. |
Stephen Boyle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Am concerned that ongoing maintenence of mining area at end of mine life is not planned. The tailings dam in particular. Also concerned about capability of Bowdens to manage mine that is so new to them. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i wish to object to this mine going ahead, i find it deplorable that a lead mine can go ahead so close to a community and school. Also, it concerns me, the idea of a toxic tailings dam being set up in a waterway that runs to Mudgee and the Macquarie Marshes. I understand this company has no experience in mining, which is also a great concern and i find it concerning to see more mining in a rural lifestyle/tourist region. My concerns have been pointed out in the assessment which i found to be a difficult article to understand.. Thank you |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I whole heartedly object to the proposal of a lead mine in Lue. This will poison our waterways, the land, the local people and completely destroy the area for a mine that is making Australia go backwards in its approach to climate change. There is no safety measures whatsoever in place for the health of not just the local communities of Lue, Rylstone, Mudgee and continue down stream of the Lawson Creek and Cudgeegong River but also for any workers that would be working in this lead mine. The use of the Lawson Creek to manage the water usage in this mine is not sustainable in a drought recovering part of the Central Tablelands. In 2019, the Lawson Creek Valley was completely bone dry, no water for the local communities to use from the rivers, let alone the wildlife in the area including 13 threatened species identified. Plus all the farming land and cattle, sheep that irrigate from this river. Completely dust dry. So how could a huge lead mine rely on a river that will dry up again? How do you expect people to stay in live surrounded by a lead mine that has taken all the water from their river. There is also the horrific levels of lead dust that will settle on families water tanks, das for their animal stock and places where wildlife drink from. This would be a slow death of lead poisoning for all. The proposed storage of waste acid rocks DOES NOT provide a safe and detailed way of making sure they are stored out of harms way for the waterways, the land, the soil, the local community, the wildlife for them not to breathe and drink the poisoning of the lead for the rest of their remaining years of being there. The acid mine drainage would poison the waterways and damage all native vegetation in the area, contributing drastically more to the arid landscape that has been seen here in many drought stricken decades. I have grown up in this region and swam in beautifully crystal clear rivers, have had good heath all my life and am now expecting my first born child who will be born here. This lead mine is extremely harmful to children with their lungs and health if they breathe lead dust or drink contaminated water. I would not feel safe to have my family within a 300km radius of this mine and therefore would have to vacate the area of 3 generations living here. I am a local Primary School Teacher and know that the Lue Public School would be forced to close because NO-ONE would want their child to go to school EVERYDAY 2km away from a lead mine. Would you send your child there? The proposal of the tailing dam suggests there is no safety measures in regards to overflow of toxic water from the lead mine if there is heavy rainfall in the area. 2022 saw this area hit hard with 3 big floods which would mean a huge overflow of water from this proposed tailing dame running straight into the Lawson Creek, into the Cudgeegong River catchments, into the soil, local communities growing their own food would be forced to chuck all their food away from contamination from these overflows. This does detail anywhere how the lead mine would respond to such flood events. Nor has it detailed how it would respond in terms of drought for the WHOLE region, not just some locals downstream of the Lawson Creek. This lead mine will NOT be of any economic value to the local area as we have plenty of jobs being created in the region from environmental, agriculture, tourism, wineries, farming and local services. This lead mine would drive EVERYONE away that would be smart enough to leave, meaning this whole region would be a toxic wasteland once the mine finishes in 16 years. This is in no way a better and brighter future for the area or for Australia in fact. What this whole lead mine lacks is any common sense to the health of humanity, to our planet earth, our water and wildlife. |
Cameron Anderson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is an insensitive proposal that has drastic impacts on the greater Mudgee community. This proposed mine is far to close to the existing village of Lue which will result in a serious loss of amenity for the local community. Why a mine can be considered this close to a village like Lue in the first place is a disgrace. The potential impacts of lead are alarming with potential for contamination within the local environment and adjoining waterways. I don't believe there has been sufficient detail about how the potential for lead contamination has been mitigated or the level of post development testing and reporting that will be provided. There should be far greater transparency to the local community for ongoing testing and reporting as people's livelihoods are at serious risk due to the risks posed by contamination. The amount of polluted water proposed to enter Lawson Creek is alarming. I don't believe there are sufficient safe guards in place to monitor water quality or the potential downstream impacts from contamination. Overall this is an inappropriate development that should be refused on the basis of its direct impact on the village of Lue alone and that is before you even consider climate change and potential contamination. I am all for appropriate economic development, but this proposal is farm from appropriate. |
Sam Hamilton
Organisation |
Hamilton Family Trust |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission. This is the second submission I have made objecting to this proposal. In the first I outlined my major concerns mostly around the hazard, environmental and amenity impact I believe this project will have on both the local and wider community. I see the proponent has made an attempt to address some of these issues which is commendable however they fail to successfully deal with the major impacts of lead and other chemical contamination, water requirements and wast management any one of which make this project completely unworkable. However in this submission I intend outline my opinion on the social impact of the development. I gather the vast majority of those in favour of this project site job creation as the main reason for their support. This I find an extraordinary argument at a time when the local district and wider regional NSW is essentially at full employment. In fact almost all industries, professions and trades, that I am aware of, are having great difficulty filling current positions including the mining sector itself. There is already plenty of evidence of businesses either restructuring or closing due to a lack of suitable workers. To add another major job development to the area will only make this position worse and force more business closures. If it is intended to resource workers from outside the local area I would be interested to know where they will be coming from as I understand the worker shortage faced locally is a national problem. If it is intended to relocate workers to the area for this project (if in fact they can be found) the consequence to local housing and accommodation would be dramatic, forcing up rents and removing tourist accommodation. Major rental increases will impact the elderly and most disadvantaged in our community forcing many to relocate (if they are able to find somewhere) or into poverty. I strongly believe there are more than enough available jobs in the local community both now and going forward. I am personally unable to name any employable person who is or has been without work for an extended period. The Mudgee, Lue and Rylstone districts are well known and popular tourist destinations. This is no doubt based largely on the aesthetic and clean green image the area so justly deserves and this tourist trade provides well for the local economy. To allow a lead mine to operate and hence pollute the local environment will correctly put this entire trade and the districts reputation in jeopardy. The region has historically produced a range of agricultural products that form an important part of the local economy. All of these are dependant on adequate amounts of clean water and clean air for their operation. If this development goes ahead all these will also be placed in jeopardy. In summary we are lucky enough to live in a beautiful part of the world with a thriving economy based around tourism, agriculture and existing mining. Our population is fully employed and our businesses buoyant. To jeopardise this with a project with highly doubtful in some cases untried and under researched mode of operation would seem unacceptable. While I realise the coal mining sector is currently facing an uncertain future based on its environmental impacts and climate change this in no way should validate the approval a mining operation with potentially worse environmental outcomes. I therefore urge you to reject this project Sam Hamilton |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to object to the development of the Bowden silver mine for many reasons. The mine is predominantly a lead mine and will contaminate the water sources and air locally but also downstream where we make a living off the land using our creek water. This mine will impact directly family members living below the tailings dam and ruin an historic homestead and village community that makes up the fabric of our local region. The potential negative threats to the environment will have enormous future generational consequences in one of NSW prettiest tourist regions and certainly outweigh any financial benefit that will come to this community from this lead mine going ahead. |
Lynda Toohey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am totally opposed to the mine. No mine should be only 2kms away from a community but especially one polluting the air with lead dust. There is no safe level for exposure to lead dust for children . With a school so close to the mine site the danger to them is immense. The children won't be wearing protective gear, unlike workers at the mine. The Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River are already at risk from climate change but the mine will be a worse danger. Any leak from the Tailings dam will be disastrous for both of them. The mine will be operating 24/7 which means noise will be constant for people living nearby.. The tailings dam and the environmental dangers associated with it will be ongoing and be a problem long after the mine is no longer economically viable. Once it is no longer viable there is no compulsion on the company to stay and repair and rehabilitate the environmental damage the mine has caused, |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to this mind. It doesn’t align woth Mudgee and it’s tourism attractions. I run a profitable short term accomodation holiday farm stay within a 6km radius of the mine. Who will want to come and stay now? Who will compensate me when my business closes or when my guests no longer want to spend their dollars in the region? It is just shattering and the long term social impacts is all we will be left with. And land that no one wants to buy. Bowdens needs to leave. Economical reasons are simply not enough. This is a perilous idea that will not go unnoticed: especially in the media. And possible law suits could arise from negligence and loss of business. The whole Mudgee region will feel these impacts.. 2kms is too close. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Being of Aboriginal descent and a former childcare business owner I am disgusted with the idea of a mine and lead tailings dam being so close to children, the environmental impact is of utmost concern, especially in dry times where the threat of a lead dust cloud polluting a large area is real,let alone the threat of leached lead especially in the wet destroying our land and all lifeforms dependant on it. Thankyou for accepting my submission. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The so called 'appeal' ( Its appeal is in no small part due to its proximity to nearby towns with access to infrastructure, water supply, the power grid and a highly skilled, local workforce) of this mine is to the detriment of the surrounding towns and villages that it will take from, damage and destroy before the owners line their pockets and move on to the next location that they can exploit, leaving a trail of destruction behind them. Not only will this project cause environmental destruction, it will also massively hurt tourism in the area which is worth $171m to the local Mid western region economy. (The March 2019 LGA Profile for Mid-Western Regional Area reported 660,000 total visitors (995,000 overnight visitor stays) in the Mudgee Region, worth a whopping $171M to our local economy! That's an astronomical 26% increase in visitors over 5 years.) However, if this mine goes ahead, people will not want to visit this region, it's pristine, historical and cultural reputation will be tarnished, there will be more road damage, more unnecessary congestion that has no value to the region and the thriving nature of our LGA will be no more. This mine needs to be stopped. The benefits you talk of such as, 'economic investment into the local communities and support for local development, educational and sponsorship initiatives' is otherwise known as bribery! Also, why do we need silver? What will the materials actually be used for? It would be great if someone could look into recycling existing silver that no longer has use before we bring more materials unnecessarily into the world. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Boden Silver mine proposes an unacceptable risk with limited and untested mitigation in place. Heavy metals in the mine tailings can be transported into soils and groundwater through precipitation, surface runoff, and wind-erosion, resulting in the surrounding aquatic and terrestrial environment being contaminated with heavy metals of greatest concern lead. Liquid, i.e., precipitation, had been identified as the most important driving force for the migration of heavy metal contained in mine tailings (Desogus et al., 2013). Mitigation of flooding the tailings dam has not been sufficiently designed to accommodate significant rainfall events in the region. Environmental impact on water ways from the contamination extend beyond the local region to the Murray-Darlin Basin. Independent Review of the Bowdens Silver Pty Limited Surface Water Assessment – Updated (Shireen Baguley, March 2022) "The Bowdens surface water assessment data appears to show a monthly average that exceeds75mm over summer. This is incorrect, as evidenced by the rainfall data from Mudgee (26km west ofthe mine site), Rylstone (22km south of the mine site) and Lue Station." Further to this the intedded water usage of the mine does not vary to accommodate for seasonal changes or droughts, therefore drawing on other sources at a time when other land users will be reliant on that water. The site encompasses a number of endangered flora and fauna indigenous to the area including koalas. There is insufficient health services in the local communities to monitor for lead exposure or levels. The transportation routes proposed include roads with limited access and travel directly through the heart of populated areas. Not only would this lead to great congestion, in the event of an accident or accidental spillage the contamination and consequences for the communities could be significant. |
David Parry-Okeden
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
INTRODUCTION I am a qualified veterinarian. I have practiced in the Mudgee, and Rylstone districts since 1970 and have witnessed the effects of lead poisoning in animals over the years My professional life has been absorbed with the health of pets, farm animals and wildlife in this area. I believe that I am particularly qualified to address this subject. I am concerned that widespread lead contamination of the environment will occur in times of floods and droughts and this will particularly effect not only human health but also animal health and welfare. 1. DOMESTIC ANIMALS AND PETS. Most animal species have a shorter lifespan than humans and therefore may show signs of daily lead contamination earlier in their life. Many animals, particularly cats and dogs, groom themselves regularly, and will as a result ingest proportionately more lead on a daily basis than individuals that do not lick their fur. Symptoms range from gastro-intestinal to brain damage and painful death. Young puppies and kittens are particularly susceptible. It is now unlawful to sell paint containing lead, so poisoning from this source is rarely seen now. 2. FARM ANIMALS AND LIVESTOCK (a) In the past when husbandry practices on farms were less particular than they are now, we would diagnose cases of lead poisoning in cattle and sheep. Farmers no longer throw lead batteries down the gully and lead paint is no longer used in barns where animals become attracted to the sweet taste As a result mad cows and herds suffering from gastro-intestinal symptoms. are now rarely seen. I do not look forward to return of such cases. (b) Government agencies are now more aware of the untoward results of lead residues in our meat products and work with farmers towards prevention. Our meat export markets would be in jeopardy if residual lead levels were found livestock from this area. Many of my clients produce quality beef particularly for export and selective grass fed domestic markets. These would be jeopardised at the suggestion of lead contamination in this district. 3.WILD ANIMALS Wild animals, particularly marsupials cannot be contained nor prevented from grazing close to an area of maximum contamination. Such wild life would thus be prone to higher levels of poisoning. When I first became a veterinarian over 50 years ago, there was little consideration given to the health or suffering of kangaroos and other marsupials . However there are now many people, in our more enlightened society, both in Australia and overseas, that take such matters very seriously. 4. WILD BIRDS AND WATERFOWL I am not an expert on birds and will leave it to the committee to seek advise on bird health However as I drive around this district on my rounds as a veterinarian, I am in awe of the flocks of birdlife, particularly the Pink and grey Galahs , Sulfa-crested cockatoos, Corellas and Rosella parrots that are in abundance in the Mudgee-Rylstone area. These and other wild birds would be in contact with the proposed mine. 5. CONCLUSION Animal health and welfare will be effected if this mine goes ahead. The welfare of all creatures both domesticated and wild must be considered when granting licences which may result in their suffering. Bibliography Lead toxicity in Cattle By Barry R. Blakley , DVM, PhD, Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan Last review/revision Jun 2021 | Modified Nov 2022 Lead Toxicity in Birds by Dr Ross Perry, BVSc BSc (Vet) FACVSc (Avian Health). Registered Bird Specialist Veterinary Surgeon, at Homebush Animal Hospital Lead Toxicity in Dogs andCats by Jill E Maddison BVSc, PhD, FACVSc and Christine G. Hawke BSc(Vet), University of Sydney |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bowdens Silver/Lead/Zinc mine in Lue, NSW. I believe that this project poses a serious threat to the environment and local communities, and that it should not be approved. The mining process will have a significant impact on the environment. The excavation of minerals will result in the disturbance of land and the release of toxic chemicals into the soil and water. These pollutants can have long-lasting effects on the local ecosystem and wildlife, including contamination of drinking water sources, soil degradation, and reductions in air quality. Is this not alarming already? The possibility of harm, and possibly catastrophic impacts should be enough reason. It’s just too close. And in the Mecca of sustainable eco tourism. Furthermore, the mine will also have a major impact on local communities. The increased traffic and noise from heavy machinery will disrupt the peace and quiet of the area, and the influx of workers could lead to overcrowding and other social problems. In addition, the mine will consume large amounts of water, which could lead to water scarcity in the region and negatively impact agriculture and other industries that rely on this resource. In light of these concerns, I urge you to consider the potential consequences of this project and to reject the proposal. There are alternative methods of economic development already in place that do not involve the exploitation of our natural resources and the degradation of our environment. These are providing long-term benefits to the local community and the environment. I hope you will take my concerns into consideration and make the right decision to protect our environment and communities. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As someone with an indigenous (aborignal ancestors) background, an owner of a property in the 5km radius, my objections are abundantly obvious. My voice should mean more than this. The potential destruction this will cause, ironically because of “responsible mining” is an incongruent notion. The catastrophic impact this could have on my torus business, health and connection to my land & culture, is unacceptable. It’s a one sided plan - all about money. The rest seems unimportant or perhaps, justifiable by both Bowdens and the DPE. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The risks that could come with this mine is significant. Too close to Lue, too close to people, to close to our kids. Is that not reason alone? It will destroy communities and this will have a cumulative effect to the Mudgee surrounds. Mudgee region will not look favourable to others - and we will see tourism impacted significantly, |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing this letter to express my strong objection to the proposed Bowdens Lead/Silver mine in the region. As a concerned citizen, I believe that the establishment of this mine will have a catastrophic impact on tourism, which is a vital part of the local economy. The region where the mine is proposed to be built is renowned for its scenic beauty, rich history, and diverse wildlife. Thousands of tourists visit the area every year to enjoy its natural wonders, including the stunning mountains, and unique wildlife. The establishment of a mine will not only mar the natural landscape, but also increase traffic and create noise pollution, thereby deterring tourists from visiting the region. Furthermore, the increased truck traffic from the mine will pose a risk to the safety of tourists on the roads and in the local communities. This will result in a decrease in tourist numbers and a corresponding decline in the local tourism-based economy. The region will lose the valuable revenue generated by the tourism industry and the livelihoods of local residents will be threatened. Tourism is a sustainable source of income that benefits the local communities, the environment, and the economy. Our region already has this! Why are trying to ruin this???? It creates jobs, promotes local businesses, and protects the natural beauty of the region. The establishment of a mine will permanently destroy this valuable resource and will result in long-lasting economic and environmental consequences. I strongly urge the IPC to consider the devastating impact that the Bowdens Lead/Silver mine will have on the tourism industry and to reject the proposal. Instead, Iook at the sustainable tourism options that will provide long-term economic benefits while also protecting the environment and communities. |
DEREK FINTER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is potentially the most disastrous mining proposal in recent NSW history. The issues on which I object to this development are as follows. The mislabeling of the project as a Silver mine is dishonest. The quantity of silver is tiny compared to the zinc and lead that would be extracted. The unavoidable problem of acid mine drainage that would blight the area forever is not acknowledged. . A final void that would fill and pose an everlasting hazard to wildlife and humans alike. Lead dust migration that would seriously, and perhaps fatally affect the area. The threat to children attending Lue School is particularly dangerous. Toxic runoff into Lawsons Creek then into the Cudgegong River would blight agricultural activities in the area forever. The potential negative effect on the region's tourism is inestimable. Serious damage to real estate values in the region is likewise immense. Trucks carrying mine output would pose threats to traffic, not only locally, but all the way to Port Pirie. where mine output would be treated. Likely damage to roads used would cause expense to local Councils. The transport of the huge amount of Sodium Cyanide and other chemicals required at the site would pose unacceptable risks to road users. Twenty four hour mining operations, causing noise, light pollution, and vibration would cause immense disruption to local residents and all wildlife in surrounding areas. The project cannot, and must not, proceed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The proposed mine will have an unreliable water supply. My understanding is that the water source for the mine will be from the Lawson creek, sky (rain) and the ground. In the drought the township of Mudgee and surrounding communities were on level 4 water restrictions. This indicates that water is not a resource that is ALWAYS plenty. Considering that the Lawson creek is already identified in the NSW Stressed River Assessments to be in the most seriously stressed category with a high level of environmental stress as well as a high extraction rate, it is a SIN to extract water for a mine that poses not only environmental harm but also toxic harm to humans through the leaching of led into the community’s water source. In addition the traffic being diverted around Mudgee runs straight through schools; this is a hazard. Our children are our future and as our children become the 7th generation on the family farm it would be heart breaking to watch the effects of this mine impact our place and the many others in the district. |
Olivia Mulic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed silver lead mine in the Lue region of Regional NSW. This mine, if approved, will have significant and far-reaching consequences on the local environment and community, and it is my belief that the risks far outweigh any potential benefits. Firstly, the extraction of silver and lead from the mine site will result in the release of harmful chemicals and pollutants into the environment, which will have devastating impacts on local water sources, wildlife, and air quality. This will pose a threat to the health and well-being of the community, as well as to the local ecosystem and its delicate balance. Furthermore, the mine will cause significant disruption to the local community, including increased traffic, noise pollution, and a negative impact on property values. This will result in a loss of quality of life for local residents, and will likely drive people away from the region. In addition, the mine will put enormous pressure on the already fragile local infrastructure, such as roads and utilities, which were not designed to accommodate the demands of a large-scale industrial operation. This will result in further disruption to the community and could result in permanent damage to the infrastructure. Finally, I would like to emphasize that there are alternative sources of revenue already for the region that would not result in such negative impacts on the environment and the community. Sustainable tourism, for example, is already create jobs and economic growth while preserving the natural beauty and environmental health of the region. In conclusion, I urge you to reject the proposal for the silver lead mine in Lue, NSW. The risks to the environment and community are simply too great, and there are better ways to support economic growth in the region. Thank you for your time and consideration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Increased road noise through rylstone and kandos is a big concern and Any railway infrastructure they plan to renew in the future will make the area very noisy, and be very difficult as there is a lot of shift workers and elderly in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our farm is located within a 5-6km radius of this mine. I fear for my health, the health of my loved ones and what it could do to this beautiful region. We have endured droughts, floods and bushfires: and now this abhorrent idea. The a great deal of community of residents have been blindsided by Bowdens and it the manipulation continues- throwing money away to keep our mouths shut is not good enough. Who will compensate us when we can’t no longer live at our property? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom it may concern I am a farmer that has lived in and around Mudgee for the majority of my life. I currently live in Mudgee and travel out to our on the Hayes Gap Road every day. I love riding horses, working dogs and growing healthy clean high-quality beef and wool for the population to consume. I am not one to object to all mines and I am not anti-development because I love a strong community with a low unemployment rate but I do object to Bowden’s Silver Mine. If this mine goes ahead its going to put the local and wider community at great health and economic risk. These being lead dust, tourism down turn, the tailings dam, the pipeline and the water consumption. The lead dust is defiantly a concern to me but I feel it should be a concern to the wider community. I do understand that lead is a valued material and it needs to be mined but it has it risks in a highly populated area. The boarder of the mine is only 2 km from the Lue school. The international guide lines is 5km and from the test of lead travelling out of the Broken Hill mine is quite concerning and taking to account that kids absorbed as much as 50% of the lead that they come into contact with. It has also been said that there is no safe level of lead to be consumed. This is a great concern to me and my family and I feel it should be concerning for any family in the Mudgee region. I say this because the trucks fill with lead are going to be driving through Mudgee, Wellington and over to Parks. Even if the tucks are sealed which I’m sure will be a requirement. I’m concerned about the dust that lands on the trucks while being loaded at the mine and then blown off on the commute to Parkes. Is every truck going to be washed of lead before it leaves the mine and past my home? The most concerning factor to me is this proposed project is going to affect our access to water and the quality of it. Knowing firsthand how scarce water in the Lawson creek became during the most recent drought. Farmers within the region were selling their stock because they had run out of water. Bowden’s Silver projected that they will use 2050 mega litres year and pump 780 litres of that is going to come from the Lawson creek valley dropping the water table by 25m. A fully grown lactating cow can drink up to 120 litres on a hot summer’s day. If Bowden’s silver were watering cattle with all at water, they would be able to water 46666 lactating cows in total in the middle of summer. The water pulled from the Lawson creek valley would water 17808 lactating cows alone. To put that into perspective the avg cattle herd size in Australia is 276. Bowden’s will use enough water to water 169 avg size cattle farms. |
Joanne Warner
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This proposal scares me. I feel it is far to close for comfort to even conterplate the idea. Hasnt any lessons of the past been thought of here. To risk our water in anyway is maddness and its to close to the school, lead and children dont mix . We live in a area of growth however this isnt the way to go. To many risks are out weighing the good another mine would offer. Please consider the children, the water and all the creatures that would be forever more affected by crazy plan. Yours sincerely Joanne Warner. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I refer to the NSW Government, Bowdens Silver Project, State Significant Development Assessment SSdD 5765 December 2022 written by NSW Department of Planning and Environment (the Assessment) and note several errors and omissions made by the assessors. In the Executive Summary, Strategic Context, of the Assessment the DPIE stated “The area surrounding the proposed mine site is predominantly rural agricultural.” While it is true that the area surrounding the proposed mine site is predominantly rural agriculture the DPIE has failed to additionally note • immediately adjacent to the mine site is very popular and successful tourism accommodation with other tourism businesses close by • other agricultural enterprises and working farms are also adjoining land held by the proponent • over 98 residences are in the close vicinity • Lue village is 2 km from the mine site • Lue Public School is 2 km from the mine site • The area surrounding the site is untouched bushland and Koala habitat. • The mine-site itself is a Koala habitat While mining might be a key industry in the Central West it is not a key industry in this area with the adjoining Hawkins Rumker area recently refused for coal exploration. Nearby Kepco at Bylong was also refused. This deposit may be the largest undeveloped silver deposit in Australia at December 2022 but this statement is unproven and once the mine is developed this deposit is no longer the largest undeveloped silver deposit and as there are currently silver mines in Australia not operating it is one of the more ridiculous statements made by the proponent and copied by the assessor. It would be rather like someone at Lue saying they have the largest undeveloped strawberry farm in the world, or the largest undeveloped cattle feedlot in Australia, both would be allowed in this area, unlike a lead processing plant. All food production at Lue and in this Region will be at risk if this lead mine is developed. 1. Please see the attached letter to the IPC being my objection to the proposal. 2. Please also see the attached - LAG - Comments - Power Line Response v4 Combined, being the document from the DPIE website outlining views expressed in my letter which can be found on the DPIE website. 3. Please find attached - Bowdens Newsletter 2022. The Bowdens Newsletter 2022 has been added to this submission as an example of the lack of Community Engagement. You will note in this glossy publication that the reader is not informed of the distance from the mine site to Lue village, what is being mined, the accurate health impacts of the project, given there is no safe level of exposure to lead for humans and many other facts. Almost every statement made by Bowdens is inaccurate or has no detail. The reader is given the impression that Bowdens is Australian owned which is untrue. Thank you in advance for your thoughtful assessment of this project and it is hoped that you will rightly refuse this project and ensure the NSW Government will not have years of compensating residents, workers, business operators, nearby farms and others who have been exposed to this dangerous project and its easily foreseen consequences. |
Attachments |
bowdens-newletter-2022-smaller-versionpdf.pdf (PDF, 4.64 MB) ipc--i-refer-to-the-nsw-governmentpdf.pdf (PDF, 591.37 KB) lag--comments--power-line-response-v4-combinedpdf.pdf (PDF, 1.72 MB) |
Catherine Waldron
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This proposal fails to adequately consider the safety of the local community particularly the most vulnerable young children, Among many environmental impacts (run off, toxic waste, air/noise pollution, traffic congestion etc) of most concern it fails to consider the inability to safety and economically provide water for the operation of the proposed mine. If it went ahead it would have significant and lasting detrimental impacts on all local trade and would have systematically ignored the will of the local community. Proposals of this nature need more scrutiny, hence and simply should have been rejected much sooner. Sincerely Catherine Waldron |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The impacts of the project are serious and damaging to the community and environment. I worry for the people living close by to the project that rely on the water supply for their farms etc and the health effects of having a lead mine this close to Lue and Mudgee. This project means Lawson Creek water users will have less water to use, and the water they do have is at serious risk of contamination from acid mine drainage and heavy metal pollution. The dam will hold poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles. The dam will be there forever. Who will maintain it when mining ceases? |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to voice my opposition the the Bowdens Mine on the following grounds - misleading information as to the mine's true purpose. - environmental issues - health issues - transport issues within the MWRC and other local authorities - socio economic impacts Misleading information Bowdens public relations material constantly promotes this mine as a Silver MIne. While Silver is one of the materials that will be extracted it is a mere .008% of the mine's annual output. Accordinging to Bowdens own material the mine will annually produce 6100 tonnes of zinc, 5900 tonnes of lead and 3.4 million ounces of Silver - just 98 tonnes of Silver. By using mixed volumes of measurement in the information Bowdens are not comparing apples with apples and while the traditional measure for silver is in ounces the volume needs to be converted to comparable amounts to fully understand the comparative volumes of material produced. Bowdens need to be more transparent with the community and advise it that, in fact this is a lead/zinc mine of which silver is a by-product. Environmental issues Bowdens have either downplayed various environmental issues or attempted to provide assurances that they will have measures in place to manage environmental risks. However I believe not enough is done to address potential downstream environmental issues, particularly the potential for flooding along Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River and the adverse impacts this can have on vineyards and farmland that might be flooded. In November 2022 Mudgee experienced a significant flood following heavy overnight rains upstream in the catchment area of Lawson Creek and Windemere dam. This downpour caused both the Cudgegong River and Lawson Creek to flood through Mudgee and out onto farmland including vineyards. What guarantees can Bowden give that in a similar event their treatment dams and the contaminants held in these won't flood and overflow into Lawson Creek and eventually into Mudgee and surrounding farm land? As well how can they ensure that dust, lead and zinc contaminants won't escape the site and finish up in Lawson Creek? Health Issues As the real purpose of this mine is to produce lead and zinc with silver as a by-product a number of serious health issues arise. Experience in Port Pirie (SA) and Mt Isa (Qld) points to serious community health issues in the immediate local areas around these mines and treatment plants. Bowdens claim dust from blasting and operations will not be an issue but the reality is they will have little or no chance of containing dust from blasting and operations. Airborne contaminants in Pt Pirie and Mt Isa have created significant health issues for children and adults in these towns. Bowdens downplay these risks but the fact is they cannot be escaped. Transport issues Bowdens comment that lead/zinc and silver concentrates will be transported by road using B doubles to either Forbes or Parkes and then by rail to Pt Pirie. Presumably this will be via Lue Rd through Mudgee and then onto its final destination. How many additional heavy vehicle movements a day will there be through Mudgee and what is the proposed route? Local roads in the MWRC are already under severe strain and deterioration through lack of money and maintenance. The addition of more heavy transport will only add to this and pose increased risk for motorists. Who bears the responsibility for the upgrade and maintenance of roads along the proposed transport route? Have neighbouring local authorities been advised to expect an influx of additional heavy vehicles and the associated impact on their local roads? What is their reaction to this, with little or no economic or community benefit. Will the cost of upgrading roads fall to Bowdens, local ratepayers or the NSW government who have deemed this project of State Significance? As well what assurances are there that this hazardous material can be transported safely by road and what assurances are there, that in the event of an accident it can be safely contained and cleaned up? Where else in Australia are lead, zinc and silver concentrates transported by road over long distances and through towns and local communities? Or will this be a first? At a time of climate change and when we are being urged to consider our carbon foot print is seems absurd that this material will be transported by road to a rail head around 200k from its source. Socio economic impacts Bowdens claim this project will create 380 jobs in the construction phase and 220 on going jobs during operations. These are hardly significant numbers when compared to the economic and employment benefits coal mining brings to this region Already there are severe labour shortages in this region and for resource projects in general, so where will the labour force come from. Where will these additional workers and their families be housed. Already there are severe housing and accommodation issues in the region and this mine will only add to that, pushing up rental and house prices to the detriment of the local community. In the scheme of things, the economic and employment opportunities from the Bowdens mine is a pimple on the proverbial elephants backside and significantly overstated. Bowdens promote how they are already contributing to the community via local grants and assistance. This is can only be seen as a cynical move by Bowdens to get the community onside, while covering up the true purpose of this mine and it's potential adverse impacts on community health, water resources and the environment. There are also significant threats to other important and thriving activities in this area, namely agriculture, tourism and wine. Who will want to visit Mudgee, purchase "clean green" local produce from local Farmers Markets in Rylstone and Mudgee or buy beef or lamb produced in the neighbourhood of the largest open cut lead, zinc and silver mines in Australia. The Bowdens mine rather than adding to the social and economic strength of the Mudgee region threatens to undermine it and do irreparable damage to the community and environment. Summary In summary this mine proposal should not be allowed to proceed. Despite the benefits Bowdens claim the project will bring to the region, the true reasons for this proposal have been masked behind promoting it as a silver mine with little or no adverse impacts on the community and local environment. However when the true purpose and activities involved with the production of lead, zinc and silver as a by product are exposed, only then do the detrimental impacts of this project become apparent. It poses to big a risk to the region to be allowed to proceed. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Blind Wines |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the affects to the local environment, loss of water (with which levels are already low) and potential hazards to community health. This mine should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This proposed development will ruin the community of Lue and surrounds. It cannot go ahead. Lue, Mudgee, Rylstone and Kandos are major tourist attractions in NSW. This proposed development will have the potential to destroy the pristine environment the draws up to 13,000 visitors to the area each week. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Department of Planning has failed to implement adequate conditions or controls for the project, and as such it poses too great a risk to the community, environment and other industries like agriculture and tourism and should not be approved. In particular, the issue of acid mine drainage is significant and not adequately mitigated against under the current proposed management strategies. Acid mine drainage poses an intergenerational risk to those in the Mudgee region. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Kandos School Of Cultural Adaptation |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing in objection to the Bowdens Silver Mine proposal on the grounds that it poses serious threats to the health of local community and to the unique environment in which it is situated. These impacts begin with the proposal to locate a silver mine in this prime agricultural country and next to a world heritage wilderness area. The mine, with its significant toxic biproducts, including lead and zinc which will pose air born hazards while the mine is in operation and create a toxic legacy that will pose leakage threats for many generations to come. The scale of the proposed tailings dam is particularly distressing: Given the low rainfall in the area, and the regular instance of drought, the significant water allocation that will be needed to run this mine and its processing plant will harshly impact the farming industries that are traditional to our area. The scale of the dam and the uncertainty as to its reliability in terms of leakage is alarming and the long term legacy it will leave, after the mine has finished its operation, with no reliable assurances as to who will manage its upkeep is a red flag to members of our community who care about the future generations of this area. The mine will also impact some very beautiful country, a resource that feeds our not insignificant tourism industry, which will be impacted by the placement of a large mining operation in the rural farming landscape in which we live. I am also concerned for the impacts and threats that this mine would pose to the nearby Wollemi wilderness area. The destruction of native fauna habitat and the disruption of Koala migration corridors also argue against the approval of this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to submit my objection to this project. I live in Rylstone but spent 5 years in Lue. If this mine was proposed to be built 2km from Mudgee, it would be rejected outright. Why does a village like Lue, or in fact others, like Wollar and Hunter Valley villages, not get the same consideration or respect? I thought the Mudgee region was moving to a cleaner, greener theme, with tourism as the big draw card. This will do little for the community other than one or two jobs, the rest will be sourced outside the region,with the main beneficiaries being a few shareholders and the directors....all for short term gain. The assessment is a big and difficult thing for me to absorb, but, a big issue is the proposed tailings dam, and the toxic legacy it will leave....forever... One thing I have deduced, is that there appear to be many instances where “ experts” and the DPE are in disagreement, and also, it seems the mining company hasn’t produced its “ homework assignments “, yet has been given approval because the mining company promises to sort it out later!! If things aren’t done properly now, what guarantee do we have it will ever be? It seems the miners, lobbyists and certain government departments can push these things through at the expense of small communities and the local environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I oppose this mine proposal as I believe it doesn’t have the long term interests of the community in mind. Inevitably, it will impact the environment and also have a detrimental impact on the health of the surrounding community. It is already directly impacting on the mental health of people in the community through the unknown. |
Lucy Roberts
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a school teacher who works with many local children. I have been a teacher within the local Small Schools Community and as such am very familiar with Lue School. Research has identified that lead exposure adversely affects cardiovascular, immune, endocrine, and reproductive systems. The proposed mine site is less than 2km from Lue School. Our children run a greater distance during their cross country carnivals! Any exposure to lead is dangerous. Research has linked even small amounts of lead exposure to heightened risk of lower IQ's, Attention Deficit Disorder and poorer academic performance. In older children lead exposure can result in puberty delays and renal effects. The language of Bowden Silver's website is carefully worded to include terms such as: minimise, reduce and aim to avoid. This does not fill me with confidence when discussing the potential spillage of toxic chemicals into our waterways. The risk to our children's health from adding toxic chemicals such as lead, cyanide, and arsenic to our environment is far too great. The school is a central component of a small town. Families use it as a meeting point to share news and help each other in hard times. We have seen the detrimental impact of the introduction of a mining company to the community of Ulan and Wollar. The schools are no longer operational and the community struggles to continue together. I am concerned that this story could be replicated within the Lue community. Our local community is very concerned about the prospect of Bowden's mine beginning operations in our region. The Lue Action Group should be congratulated for their hardwork researching and sharing important information regarding these proposals. Bowdens’ groundwater assessment considers groundwater availability around the site, but no peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. Current plans do not appear to include adequate safeguarding strategies in the even of faults. Faults have the potential to readily transmit large quantities of groundwater. This failure to plan includes the leachate management dam and sumps. The throw on some faults may be hundreds of metres. The township of Lue relies on water supply, yet there is no hydrostratigraphic section, nor cross section, between the proposed mine and Lue. This decision will impact our area for the foresable future. We need to be aware of the risks in terms of water quality and quantity now and into the future. An appropriate resolution groundwater contour map post mining, 50 years post mining and 130 years post mining would help confirm the groundwater flow gradients aroun he pit lake. d the pit lake and beneath other key site infrastructure such as the TSF and leachate management dam. Particle tracking using the groundwater flow model or a solute transport model would also confirm that potential seepage from the TSF and WRE reports to Our community has struggled through an endless plight of draught, fire, flood. The livelihoods of many depend on the quality and quantity of Lawson Creek. We have all seen recently just how easy, and the magnitude of sudden water level increases connected to Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River. The impact of contamination in this water supply would be catastrophic and permanent. Bowden's best case scenario predictions are 1.6mL leakage every day. This will be a quiet but deadly impact to all in our region. The loss of usage for stock, crops, fishing and recreation would almost certainly be a death sentence for our local area. Would you let your child wade through Lawson Creek waters, knowing Bowdens were upstream? Not only are we risking our ability to depend upon the quality of water within the Lawson Creek and Cudgegong Rivers we are also unable to exclude the potential for loss or severe lowering of water supply. The mine would use roughly 5 megalitres of water (two Olympic sized swimming pools) every day. Earlier plans indicated Bowdens intended to pipe this water from the Ulan coalfields, as there was insufficient water at Lue to meet requirements. Now, they are proposing to get all the water needed from Lue, either through building dams, using water caught and drawn into the open cut pit, taking water from the Lawson Creek or using water from the tailings dam. We all know too well that water is not an endless resource. Bowdens’ activities will result in a loss of flow from 10.9% of the Lawson Creek. This will have a significant impact on all downstream land and water users. We need to ensure planning includes data from drought years as well as recent increases in rain levels. What will become of the Lue township if we return to drought and all the available water is servicing this mine? The Bowdens surface water assessment data appears to show a monthly average that exceeds 75mm over summer. This is incorrect, as evidenced by the rainfall data from Mudgee (26km west of the mine site), Rylstone (22km south of the mine site) and Lue Station. The data for the Bowdens site needs to be presented numerically so it can be clearly understood. The number of very low rainfall years is clearly not reflected in the Bowdens’ surface water assessment annual rainfall data, which has only three years of less than 400mm. This in part seems to be a deliberate attempt to distort the data, as it has excluded 1888 and 2019, both of which are very dry years. Actual long term rainfall data recorded by landholders in the region show there has 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 02004006008001000120014001600 Percentile Average annual rainfall (mm) Rainfall cumulative distribution frequency RylstoneMudgeeLue regionPage | 10 been nine (9) years where rainfall of less than 400mm has been recorded between 1887 and 2021; and 23 years where rainfall of less than 500mm has been recorded in this period. The Australian climate is extreme, characterised by both short-term variability as well as medium to long-term wet/dry cycles. The extremity of these cycles will only be exacerbated as climate change continues influence weather patterns. In the past decade the region has seen both the wettest and driest periods in recorded history. Lawson Creek is identified in the NSW Stressed Rivers Assessment to be in the most seriously stressed category – with the highest level of environmental stress as well as a high extraction rate16. As there has been no interventions to improve the water stress Lawson Creek was subject to in 1998, it is expected that the situation will have only deteriorated since this time. My children have Wiradjuri heritage. The Wiradjuri people are known as the people of the three rivers. Indigenous Custodians have looked after this land for more than 60 000 years. They are the oldest known culture in the world. We cannot allow greed to contaminate a sacred source of life. Our region is increasingly recognisable across wider Australia and even the world. It is our duty to protect these resources to ensure their beauty and sustenance is available for future generations. Thank you for reading my concerns. Lucy Roberts |
Katie Christie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose this mine. It would be such a shame for the local communities and surrounding regions, with inevitable damaging environmental and health impacts. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our family lives on a Olive tree farm along the Cudgegong River. The Bowdens Mine plans to build a large tailings dam across a fault line at the headwaters of the Lawson Creek, which flows into the Cudgegong River at Mudgee. Holding poisonous materials like cyanide, arsenic and lead particles, Bowdens predicts 1.6mL of leakage every single day (best case scenario). This will directly affect our family, our children and everyone in this region! They need to be stopped now! |
John Clarke
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My objections to the Bowen's Silver Project are as following. *The proposed mine site is only 2 kilometres from the village of Lue with all the noise, dust and vehicle movements that come with mine operations. Also it is to be a 24 hour operation so there will be continuous disruption to local people. * There is the real risk of heavy metal contamination coming from the tailings dam that Bowden's plans to construct. Contaminated water could find its way into Lawson Creek, a local waterway and on into Mudgees water supply. *The mine has proposed operating life of 15 years afterwhich the tailings dam and the open cut workings will have to be left there in perpetuity as the workings will be too contaminated with heavy metals. This means the mine site will have to be quarantined for many generations to come as lead is stable compound that stays active for a long time. *There is the risk of dust contaminated with lead blowing off the site and into surrounding areas. *The project plans to obtain water on site which means using dewatering bores to pull up groundwater to help in processing ore. This puts at risk local water supplies for agricultural enterprises in the local area as mine projects are gross consumers of water resources |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
13 311 079 265 |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to express deep concern about the DPE Assessment report and objection to the mine site based on the following points: • There are major health risks associated with lead exposure due to Bowdens project ore volumes of lead 50 times more than silver over the life of the mine. Bowdens have seriously underestimation the level of community exposure to lead particles and failed to analyse the effect on surrounding communities of peak winds conditions. • There is also substantial disparity between Bowdens statements for AMD management and Earthsystems statistical analysis. There is enormous potential for tailings dam leakage and toxic impact for future generations, with no proof that Bowden’s containment designs work across this scale of dam. • There is also significant risk of tailings dam leachate which will bypass seepage collection pounds and enter the ground water system. Existing groundwater contouring is not well explained by Bowdens and the fate of leachate if it reaches the water table has not been demonstrated. • Bowdens assessment of the mine site’s impact on koala communities is insufficient. Its effect on koalas will be fragmentation to habitat which is at odds with other objectives of NSW Koala recovery which includes the reversal of decline in koala numbers. • The mine site will be only 2-3kms from Lue village. There are many examples of communities who have been severely affected by such proximity. Lue is the central point on the #2 tourist drive for those visiting Mudgee. Rylstone/Kandos have flourished in recent years due to an increase in tourism. This is evidenced by an increase in property values and the opening of new businesses, shops and restaurants and week-end traffic.In late 2022 NSW DPE amended planning laws to allow the fast tracking of agri-tourism in recognition of the need for supplementary income for farmers experiencing hardship due to natural disasters. • Bowdens have failed to accurately account for the employment insecurity to the workforce during periods of drought and lack of water where production becomes untenable. |
Peter Roberts
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Peter Roberts. I am a general practitioner who has been practising in Mudgee for the last 35 years. I wish to object to the Bowdens Project in Lue on numerous medical grounds. I have read the Environmental Risk Sciences Report into the health effects of this mine and their conclusions. My main concern is the anxiety and social dislocation this project will and has caused to the people of Lue and surrounds. Over the years I have looked after patients from Wollar and Ulan who have been significantly impacted psychologically by the direct effects of mining. I have seen significant anxiety and depression manifest in these populations leading onto them leaving their communities and struggling with ongoing loss and helplessness. Wollar community particularly is unrecognisable to what it was when I came to the region. This anxiety and helplessness in the face of a relentless mining company I now see in the people I know from Lue and its surrounds. This psychological disturbance has not been addressed by the Environmental Risk Sciences Report. One of the main concerns expressed by residents is noise disturbance. From my experience any level of noise disturbance is psychologically damaging when the source is related to an unwanted mining project. Furthermore there is considerable concern about lead levels particularly in relation to young children and pregnant mothers. The World Health Organisation states that any lead level in the blood may be hazardous. Port Pirie although a smelter and not directly related to Bowdens is currently recording the highest levels of lead in children in decades. This is despite multiple reassurances from the industry and after spending $291million to mitigate risk. It is no wonder there is a high level of concern regarding mining industry reassurances. A Macquarie University study stated that every rise of 10 usg/dl in the blood leads to a drop of 13 points in IQ. Even low levels of lead in children’s blood can lead onto reduced growth, learning difficulties and behavioural problems. The parents of children in the Lue region will be understandably extremely anxious despite any reassurances from the mining industry. There is also widespread concern about the potential contamination of water tables and water ways in the community. Any modelling in the environmental study cannot possibly predict the potential devastating effects of climate change on flooding risk and future extreme weather events. Having seen the social and psychological devastation to rural towns such as Wollar from the mining industry I do not want to see this happen to the people of Lue. My opposition to this project is holistic and looks at the real threats to the psychological wellbeing of a thriving rural village and surrounds. Reference: Wasserman G.A. et al Child Neuropsychology 2003. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please do not proceed with this mine, our biodiversity and environment is suffering greatly because of mines like this proposed mine. We do not need another mine ! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Huge concerns regarding environmental impact to threatened species and their habitats examples koalas etc. Furthermore the threat of lead seepage into our pristine waterways. |
David Innes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In 1985 my family moved from 'Tong Bong' Lue to Ryan St, Railway Town , Broken Hill. Our pet Kangaroo Josephine died shortly after. The local vet said the symptoms were lead poisoning. Friends involved in organic agriculture have already left the Cudgegong Valley. Forget the misinformation 'SILVER', the mine is lead and nickel dangerous to the community/environment. Short term monetary gains are wrong. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I object to the mine proposed by Bowdens Silver at Lue. My main objection is based on potential contamination particularly by lead via both water and air. Bowden’s Silver have not considered correctly all potential sources of lead contamination nor have they assessed correctly the breadth of its spread. Bowden’s assessments do not consider mine ore materials or tailings as potential sources of lead dust, nor do they consider the extended contamination that could be spread by peak wind events. The proposed “Tailings Dam” guarantees contamination, not only from lead but other toxic substances used in mining process such as cyanide. There is no long term plan to eradicate this contamination, the plan long term is just to leave it there … forever (yes really – check Bowden’s submission) and then hope it does not spread too far via groundwater. Apparently the assessments Bowden’s proposal relies on does not even consider a fault line that would dramatically increase potential contamination, so their assessment of contamination is flawed. In addition, leakage is already admitted to by Bowden’s but with no plan to fix this and no plan to remove this contamination …ever. This is unacceptable. A small community containing children and a school is within a few kilometres of the mine. This community and the surrounding areas will most certainly be exposed to unacceptable contamination by lead, potentially via water contamination, but most certainly via air contamination. The negative health impacts of lead, (particularly on children) is well documented. To consider a mine this close to schools and a community is totally unacceptable. In addition there is potential to contaminate water in all areas downstream from Lawson’s creek, as well as other areas subject to dust spread via wind. Many people could be effected in much larger communities (eg Mudgee) located downstream along with agricultural producers who use this water for stock and irrigation (this may lead to contamination of stock and crops that feed people across a wider area of NSW and Australia). I also consider it deceptive that Bowden’s Silver has presented this mine to the community as a “Silver Mine”, when in fact the major minerals mined are lead and zinc. See flyers on Bowdens website that make no mention of Lead mining or potential contamination from lead ( https://bowdenssilver.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/BOWD001-Bowdens-Silver-Project-Brochure_A4_v1.5-Web2.pdf ). The consequences of contamination from lead mine within 3km of a school is totally predictable and should be totally unacceptable to the Independent Planning Commission. It is in Bowden’s Silver’s interest to understate potential contamination, but applications that ignore sources of contamination, underestimate contaminate spread and blatantly plan to leave contamination onsite forever should be swiftly rejected by the Independent Planning Commission. Please do the right thing and reject this application. Thankyou. |
SUZANA CHANDLER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm writing as a retired GP with a knowledge of the dangers of lead exposure. There is no level of exposure to led that is known to be without harmful effects. Young children are particularly vulnerable to the toxic effects of lead and can suffer profound and permanent adverse health impacts particularly on the development of brain and nervous system. Lead also causes long-term harm in adults including high blood pressure kidney damage and possibly dementia . Exposure to a pregnant woman causes multiple problems. We have eliminated lead from paints and petrol but we are happy to allow mining which disperses the substance into the air and waterways. Besides the effect on people there's also possible contamination into our cattle which drink the contaminated water and eat the contaminated grass. No amount of assurance by the mining company makes me feel comfortable about lead exposure in our area, we are 2km from the processing plant. My next concern is the water situation. There will not be enough water here for the mine and the surrounding farmers. This is an area of severe droughts with not enough water to go around and at other times heavy rains like recently risking overflow of tailings dams with all the toxins entering Lawsons Creek. Tourism is very important to this area. How beautiful would it be with a huge hole, dangerous dust and noise as well as large chemical-laden trucks on the narrow roads? We have been here for 40 years in a peaceful area where friends and family including grandchildren visited. No more! Who would come here and who would buy my contaminated farm. |
John Olip
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is unbelievable that given the "project would directly impact 25 Aboriginal cultural heritage sites comprising artefact scatters and isolated aboriginal items, two scarred trees and a rock shelter with potential archaeological deposits" it is proposed to " salvage the objects at all sites and store them on-site in a 'keeping place' before eventually replacing them in rehabilitated areas". This is very wrong. A mine that produces a silver/lead concentrate and a zinc concentrate and is only 2kms from a local town with a school is far from ideal. There is no coming back if you are exposed to and absorb too much lead. Think of future generations please and those who would be directly affected! I also have concerns for the health of Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River, plus surrounds. Tailings stay for ever and are toxic. The new section of Maloneys Road should be constructed before anything to do with the mine is started. Not completed up to 6 months after. |
Jenny Johnson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To have this mine go ahead will impact from Lue to the mouth of the Murray River, and the entire eco system, with areas like Macquarie Marshes, the Menindee lake system, the demise of Murray cod, and numerous birds, and Crustaceans |
DAVID CHANDLER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In the big picture the New South Wales government is keen to phase out coal mining and they are desperate to find other mining revenue such as from the proposed Bowdens lead, zinc and silver mine. Too bad that the mine would expose sulfates which can form sulfuric acid and leak into Lawsons creek. Too bad that they would use toxic chemicals that stay in the tailings dam forever, that is if anyone is naïve enough to believe that it won't fail. Too bad that the site and ecology of the area would be destroyed forever. Undamaged by humans for 60,000 years destroyed by this mine in 15 years. We have carried out Beef cattle production on 1400 acres known as Gulgowra for the last 40 years, our property is approximately 2km from the proposed processing plant. This proposed mine will increase lead exposure on our property, it may decrease and contaminate the bore water that we use for irrigation and cattle to drink, the noise from the extraction and processing would be 24 hours a day. If this propose mine goes ahead the Lue school will have to close as it is immoral and inconceivable that children would be exposed to the lead dust from this mine. The original proposal was to pipe water from Ulan but this has been changed to extract all water from the site. Common sense is that climate change will cause worsening extremes of weather both droughts and water deluges. It has been stated that the normal water leases will not supply enough water and in a long drought this will not only impact on the proposed mine but on existing land-holders who have been in the area long before any discussion of a proposed mine. This proposed mine has the potential not only to turn our property from a peaceful haven to an unpleasant area to live but also to affect the tourist industry, less people will visit a place with ugly scars on the landscape, toxic lead in the air and big trucks carrying dangerous chemicals. Unfortunately decisions are made by short sighted politicians and their rubber stamp organisations who are prepared to risk the health, water and livelihood of people in the Lue and Mudgee areas. It is a pity they cannot be held responsible for their decisions. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I directly oppose any and all new developments of the mining sector in and around the mudgee region. I am a direct descendant of a founding family in this region and I am an aboriginal descendant. This region is already inundated with mining and earth moving projects. I don’t believe this area will benefit from a new mine. There is already a stark lack of community facilities, services, and resources due to overcrowding via fifo/dido and tourism which has been pushing locals out of their own towns. I was born here, I can’t afford to live here now because of the mining and tourism. Driving the housing market insane. Des might be happy but the rest of us are starving. |
Ray Massa
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly object to the proposed Bowden’s mine. I have grave concerns for our local environment particularly Lawson Creek and it’s associated biodiversity. The increased potential for toxic airborne pollution also concerns me. I also do not want any further heavy vehicular traffic on our local roads which were primarily built and designed for local access and services traffic. |
Lesley Robertson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee is my favourite town in Australia. I have lived here for 33 years, and I love its natural beauty, clean air, wide streets, heritage buildings, pristine parks and wonderful community. Tourists love it too. They come to escape the rat race, to enjoy our hospitality and to visit our fabulous cafes, restaurants, wineries and other unique attractions. We have a reputation for being 'clean and green' and this is the reason Mudgee has won 'Best Tourist Town in Australia' for two consecutive years. This award defines Mudgee and is something to cherish. However, this could all change if the proposed Bowdens Silver Mine Project at Lue is approved. Although called a 'silver mine' (the proposed amount of silver extracted is 1,880 tonnes) it is really a lead mine. To extract the silver, 95,000 tonnes of lead will need to be removed, and with that come all the potential health hazards of lead exposure. This would not only be devastating for the town of Lue but equally devastating for the pristine town of Mudgee. The lead near Lue must stay in the ground, as, once exposed, there is serious risk of lead dust affecting the air and compromising the health of all residents in Lue, Rylstone, Gulgong and Mudgee, especially children and pregnant women. Bowdens plan to transport this lead (plus the dust) along the Lue Road and through Mudgee on B-Double trucks, all day, six days a week. This will seriously affect Mudgee’s reputation for being 'clean and green' and will probably cause the death of tourism to this town. The proposed number of jobs that Bowdens is proposing will be nothing compared to the loss of jobs in the tourism and hospitality area in Mudgee. This is a horrible, dirty mine and must not be approved. It would be devastating to the environment, and it would be terrible to see Lue and Mudgee go the same way as Broken Hill and Mt Isa where many of their residents are suffering many health issues from toxic lead poisoning. Let Mudgee remain clean and green. |
mal cliff
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live next to the river and am aware that this will effect water quality. Gas exploration has proven leaching cannot be avoided so it is just a matter of time, It is an accident waiting to happen, it is not if it is when. Those who approve it must be held financially, legally and morally responsible for its eventual failure. |
Sue Pridmore
Organisation |
Nil |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose Bowen's silver mine, for many reasons. I have written opposition to it in the past. It will impact severely on health of Lue residents, school children, community all round. I believe it really to be a lead mine. It has already destroyed much of our bushland , and will destroy much more . Our colony of koalas and other wildlife overflow from the Barrigan Heritage Land Reserve and will be affected. Our skies and water supplies will be polluted by noise, lights , air quality and re-arrangement of landscape. Our roads are unable to take increased vehicular traffic. We are a farming, food growing , wilderness and wildlife region, which both locals and outsiders love and honour. This mine will impact severely on quality of life for both humans and wildlife. I believe that the authorities planning the mines development are either inadequately informed, or prefer not to look reality in the face and see that lead is the main by -product of silver mining, and life around it, in every form, is endangered by proximity to lead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a young member of this community and if this proposed development goes forward it will directly impact my future and the futures of generations to come. My future should not be compromised because of a company that wants to pillage the land for money. The health risks involved in having a lead mine so close to a town, and the effects that an open cut mine will have on the environment regardless of the location, are incomprehensible. In regard to the environmental and biodiversity loss that will undoubtedly occur if this development goes ahead the region is known to be home to multiple endangered species including the koala, a nationally recognised symbol of Australia of which there should be more procedures in place to protect not only this species but its natural habitat as well and the regent honeyeater, a critically endangered bird which is as important as the koala to the biodiversity even if it does not have the cultural significance. The exposure to lead over a long period of time has proven health risks that are especially harmful to children and pregnant women. In the age that we live in it is necessary for those in power to start thinking of not only about how they can make the most money but also how it will affect the environment, location and health of the surrounding people for the future generations. |
Susan Barling
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly oppose Bowdens Mine at Lue NSW. I feel it’s important to draw focus in particular to health and safety. Lead is poisonous ….. It can damage the nervous system, the renal, and the reproductive systems, cause high blood pressure, and affect growth and development, psychological behavior, and intelligence. The mine is way to close to existing farming communities, it should not be allowed to go ahead. |
Brendon Flynn
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi, We Lara Hooper and Brendon Flynn live on the Lue Road, 722 Lue Road. Our house backs onto the beautiful Lawson Creek, which feeds our stock and waters our gardens. We strongly oppose this mine and the potential pollution of the waterway, change of the water way, mine accident now or into the future. Lara Hooper |
Rob Crosby
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am strongly against this |
Michelle Boardman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to STRONGLY object to the proposed Bowden Silver Mine going ahead!!!!!! I am a new member to this regional community, we have owned property for three years that we purchased after visiting the Mudgee/Lue/Rylstone area as tourists and falling in love with it. Seeking our dream of a “tree change”we finally committed to moving up to live full time just over a year ago. A very big and long term decision to move our young family, change schools, invest in local community and live a healthy lifestyle more connected to country. The plan to now introduce a Silver/Lead mine just 6.3km from our property has made us SERIOUSLY question if we made a horrible mistake. On the reputation of Mudgee becoming #1 tourist destination with award winning food and wine production being a huge part of the area we felt supported in beginning our plans to create businesses and a lifestyle taking full advantage of this. My husband has opened a unique “old school barber shop” business in the local township of Rylstone that relies upon tourist trade and locals alike. The future growth of his business is directly linked to growth of tourism in the area and the hope of more young fresh families being inspired to make the move, as we did, in years to come. I truly believe that the development of a Silver/Lead mine will contradict everything country life embodies and erode tourism as well as the confidence of prospective “tree changers” considering the Mudgee/Lue/Rylstone area. Living out here now we see every day the reliance on and lack of water. Risking damaging water quality of the precious water we DO have with leaking from the tailings dam, fine lead particles travelling on the winds easily up to 60km is ludicrous. Exposing all the community to toxic, unusable water, soil & food production will leave the area shutting businesses down and the tourist trade drying up, who wants to visit, live or stay in an area that has lead exposure!???? Even the possibility of this plays on peoples paranoia. They have other options of destinations to go and the world is getting more and more health and environmentally conscious, you can be sure that they WILL go elsewhere and the #1 tourist destination that we currently hold will drop away. Me, my husband and two girls aged 8 and 10 have moved here with a long term plan in place, to hand this property down to our children and build security through property based businesses. Our plans are to set up nature stay Air BnB accommodation as another form of income, hoping to employ locals and grow this to branch out into other businesses and collaborations such as artist workshops, contributing to the rich artisan culture that currently exists here but now, with the mine hanging over the horizon, we truly believe we would be investing in failure. Who would stay or spend time where they know a lead mine is poisoning the area? We MUST ask the questions - How can we be in support an unsafe mine in our area? How can we provide the water this mine requires when water is so scarce in regional NSW? How can we dare to even THINK of risking contaminating the precious existing water we DO have? How can the NSW government and MWRC contradict themselves so much with all efforts to “go green”, “protect the environment”, “support endangered species” and then poison a major tourist destination, native species habitats, food and wine area with a mine they know CANNOT be guaranteed safe. The DPE needs to also be sure that this will absolutely have a negative financial impact on tourism as it is not just the booked accommodation that will decline but the money these tourists spend in the area while here, why replace whats already working? The proposed bookings created by the mine coming are already being met by existing businesses! And counting!! Accommodations are increasing already as the areas tourist destination becomes increasingly popular. Tourists make conscious choices to spend knowing their spending impacts regional communities with online campaigns such as #buyfromthebush, #shoplocal even our own #mudgeeregion encouraging awareness that spending while travelling keeps these unique rural areas alive. Why are we even creating these campaigns with one hand and then killing them with plans to poison the area with the other!? The Bowden Mine in my mind is short term money for long term disaster, it dies not compliment any of the businesses or lifestyles that are already running, employing people and now just starting to see success with the seed of tourism taking off, now those in power are going to kill it by putting an environmental disaster open cut lead mine just kilometres from the main vein that connects this wonderful region. Another point to consider is that this is a confirmed area for koalas and with the distances the lead contamination travels as well as water reduction/contamination surely we are risking more koala habitats after they already have suffered incredible losses with the bushfires. There is a thriving flora and fauna native environment here that will be seriously harmed by the effects of this development. I am also concerned about the noise pollution and road degradation that will be a negative both living permanently and staying as a tourist in the area. The roads will literally collapse with 24hr trucks using already dilapidated surfaces that are not able to cope with current usage. The appeal of just how serene and quiet it is will be destroyed by the noise leveled that seem to not even be a subject of concern to the DPE Assessment. In summary, I know that if this mine goes ahead our family will be reconsidering our future in this area, as will many surrounding property owners and any prospective families looking for their tree change destination. We are not opposed to development but this avenue is not the future we want to create in this area, no benefits now will outweigh the long term devastating effects this mine will have on the community, surely this is as obvious to the deciding members as it is to all that live in proximity and beyond that Bowdens Silver Mine should NOT go ahead now or in the future. |
Craig Field
Organisation |
Craft Works Distillery |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hello, This will directly impact my business Craft Works Distillery based in Capertee if Mudgee Region is negativlty impacted on tourism including markets. Would you not consider the Lead/zinc/silver mine, ‘open cut’, to have a more deleterious effect on Tourism than a Solar Panel Farm? The effect on Tourism will need more attention than has been given to date! What is critical is the differing views concerning fine particle lead dust dispersal with prevailing winds and water contamination! Will Mid-Western Council (MWRC) and the Chamber of Commerce support Tourism and maintain adequate drinking water for all visitors to the region, without harmful fine particle lead levels accumulating in their water systems? The harmful effects of even fine particles of lead in the environment are well known, (read NSW Health Fact sheets on lead). Mudgee Regional Tourism (MRT) Strategic Development plan is projecting 200,000 more Tourism nights for the area surely this Tourism expansion alone will create more jobs in our region and more jobs than Bowden’s Lead/Zinc/silver ‘open cut’ mine plan to create? Where is the Mudgee/Rylstone Chambers of Commerce and the MRT’s duty of care to Tourism? Will the President and the CEO of MRT make representation at the IPC Hearing in February to support Tourism and Tour Operators in our region? Will they state the obvious, if their strategic plan is worthy, that ‘more jobs are created by Tourism’ than Bowden’s Mine states they will create. Bowden’s Mine Health assessment report have reduced the health risk levels for ingestion of lead from a true 100% to 50% ( it looks better!) and based on soil samples taken without mining as yet and reporting the upper level of lead in unmined soil samples of 53.8% yet they scale this figure down to an average of 33% to make their figures look better. Will Mid-Western Council (MWRC) determine their ‘conditions of consent’ for the mine to go ahead? Will MWRC require adequate drinking water for all residents and Tourism visitors to the area? Is it not their duty of care to provide safe drinking water and environment for all? Who will cover these costs? Will regular monitoring of lead levels be required for all humans, animals, grapes, cherries, olives, crops and home grown vegetables? If regular monitoring is required does this not imply that there is an ongoing risk of contamination and therefore that the whole area will be under constant threat for the life of the mine and beyond? What will be the significant adverse effect with locals and visitors reluctant to consume local produce for fear of low, but, enduring levels of fine lead particle contamination and what effect will there be on export of local produce, cherries, grapes and olives outside the region for the same reason? If MWRC allow this mine to go ahead do they have a contingency fund to cover any Whole Permanent Impairment suffered by any Tourism visitor to the area, or resident, that may suffer kidney, brain or bone marrow damage from the accumulation of lead contaminated drinking water with fine lead particles? Do you know Lead, even in the most minute amounts cannot be effectively excreted from your body? Are you aware, fine lead particle exposure accumulation in children causes behaviour and learning difficulties and affects their growth and IQ? Are you aware, fine lead particles ingested by pregnant women passes through the placenta and affects their unborn babies? Once the mine is approved will MWRC financially cover every Tourism visitor to the region for baseline blood lead analysis? Surely that is the only way to mitigate the liability this fine particle lead dust hazard brings to our region? Is it not time to evaluate the risk to visitors to the region with a toxic open cut mine just a short distance from Tourism and located on the #2 Tourist drive? Will Tourism operators adhere to lead pollution practices that must be followed to keep local residents and tourism visitors in the area safe? Are you aware that from the time the mine starts your duty of care is to wet dust your homes and your accommodation facilites? Will MWRC have a contingency plan to cover losses to business’ in the event of an unexpected episode of contamination from fine particle lead dust including Public Liability claims against them? Is Mudgee Regional Tourism (MRT) answerable to the regional Tourism Operators for preserving the industry as it exists at present as well as expansion in the future? If so, shouldn’t we expect MRT to have significant input into the Independent Planning Committee Hearing in February and in particular putting forward ‘Conditions of consent’ on behalf of the MRT Tourism Operators? Therefore, shouldn’t the MRT be immediately calling on Tourist Operators for submissions regarding the mine and calling an extra-ordinary Board meeting prior to 8 th February to discuss relevant issues related to Tourism but which, in fact, will be relevant to the whole community? What injuries will be suffered by tourists and residents? Will MRT #2 Tourist drive become a major accident ‘black spot’ on our roads? Are you aware of the risks of driver distraction on the #2 Tourist drive with the toxic mine waste rock pile to be a highly visible, poorly engineered geometric mound higher than the Sydney Opera House? Kind regards Craig Field Craft Works Distillery |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please consider the environmental and social Impacts on our land and community members. |
Marcus Cremonese
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I've read enough descriptive material and am not convinced of the safety of this project due to its proximity to a village, pasture areas and water sources. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is obvious to all concerned that this mine should not be allowed to go ahead for all the reasons as put forward by Lue Action Group. I strongly object to this devolpment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The operations of the mine in my opinion will have an immediate adverse effect on not only the environment but also on the Lue community. The longer term & further afield negative impact will be again to the environmental & to those that draw water from the Lawson Ck & its catchment. The fact that the mine will need to draw a large amount of water from the Lawson Ck coupled with the fact that mining will impact the land pressure therefore the pressure on the water table reducing both substantially. This with the fact that we have just come out of a major drought & the annual rainfall figures provided by Bowen's do not in my mind warrant the withdrawal of already fluctuating water resources. The potential of leachate entering the ground & water systems in very real & irreversible. The Cudgegong Valley is a beautiful natural region & had made substantial gains in the tourist industry which sits well with the already existing agricultural industry. To approve a mine that has such a high risk attached to it does not have my support. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The lead mine will pollute Lawson Creek and water is our most precious commodity. Water cannot be manufactured. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A mine only 2kms from a local town is too close. Concern for the health of Lawson Creek and Cudgegong River Who looks after the environment after the mine has finished operating? The Tailings Dam of 117 hectares will be there after the mine is gone with potential to damage the environment with its toxins. There is no safe level of lead exposure for children. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do not believe the economic benefits (for a few individuals) outweighs the environmental damage. Please note I no longer live in the area (but have been a ratepayer for 16 years and was a resident for 12). I hope to return. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have experienced and am aware of the dangerous health and safety issues of the exposure to lead for humans. This would also relate to animals in the Lue area which I own and my Father-in Law's property on Powells Road. I was previously forced to vacate my home which was a Police Residence following an inspection that discovered lead paint on the internal walls of the house. This heritage listed Police house was decommissioned and is now unliveable, because of the lead and risk of exposure to humans and for which I had to have blood tests to measure the levels of lead in my body. Although the proposed mine for Lue is called Bowden's Silver mine, I am very aware of the other metals that would also be extracted from the ground with a very high percentage of it being lead. I know the mining company CANNOT guarantee all of the lead dust with be contained within the site and transported or disposed of safely without some being released into the atmosphere. This would be especially dangerous if mining occurred when wind was blowing over and around the mine site. These lead particles could travel some distance, would enter the local waterways, be deposited onto nearby private properties, onto local crops and into humans and animals bodies. This toxin would have massive health implications and could even be deadly, just like what occurred with asbestos in the past. Another serious concern I have, is what could happen to the natural water sources around the proposed mine site in Lue. I have walked around some of the properties in Lue recently, before and after the recent flood and rainfalls. I am familiar with where and how much water flows in these areas. Digging deep into the earth, disrupting, diverting, polluting and possibly destroying this water table would be an environmental disaster. It could also force local farmers, including my Father-in-Law to sell his animals including my cattle, as they need daily drinking water to survive. If the mine absorbed or used this water source, this would destroy the Farmer's life, their income, job and the value of the properties would plummet. This would not be acceptable and action would have to be taken to close the mine. I have seen the 'Registered Indigenous Sites' on the properties in Pyangle/Lue. They have been there for hundreds or thousands of years which is extremely significant. Neither the businessmen, investors, staff, employees, management, surveyors or anyone related to this proposed mine have contacted some of the local property owners to view or discuss these resources, items and properties that are very close to the proposed site and could be seriously affected. I really hope these considerations are listened to and taken seriously. This mine in Lue should not go ahead despite how much money is involved or how many jobs it may create. It is not worth the health, safety, environment and other risks of the local residents who have lived nearby, way before this mining site was proposed. It goes way beyond extreme greed and selfishness. I strongly object to Bowden's Silver mine in Lue! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Borden’s have always been dishonest claiming a silver mine, as it is predominately a silver producer with an idnordinant amount of damage caused to the population and environment. They have managed to secure a vote on the local council by surreptitiously employing a councillor.. |
Janine Modaro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have recently moved to the area, and we object to the proposed Bowdens Silver mining project. A lead mine at Lue is not inline with the identity of the surrounding community and thus will erode the value of living in this area for people, wild life and businesses. I moved to this area for its natural beauty and close community. I hope to establish a small hospitality business. If this mine goes ahead, local small business will be negatively impacted. The surrounding small business rely heavily on passing traffic and holidaymakers as a source of income. Travellers primarily come to our region to relax in our natural surroundings, escape the industry of the city and give a little back to their rural communities. A mine in our area will make the option of visiting our community less appealing to holiday makers. This proposed project is too big for the infrastructure of the small rural communities to take on. I want to see our communities grow by welcoming tourists enjoying the nearby wineries, restaurants and shops rather than expanding to meet the needs of this proposed mine. This project will alter significantly the character and ethos of our town and stop its progress toward being an inviting destination. Every day I am grateful for the rich animal and bird life in this area. I do not want to see the wildlife habitats in this area to be eliminated and poisoned by lead. Lead is a toxic metal and any level of this byproduct is unacceptable to me. I strongly object to this project. |
Gregory Modaro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have recently moved to the area, and I object to the proposed Bowdens Silver mining project. A lead mine at Lue is not inline with the identity of the surrounding community and thus will erode the value of living in this area for people, wild life and businesses. I moved to this area for its natural beauty and close community. I hope to establish a small hospitality business. If this mine goes ahead, local small business will be negatively impacted. The surrounding small business rely heavily on passing traffic and holidaymakers as a source of income. Travellers primarily come to our region to relax in our natural surroundings, escape the industry of the city and give a little back to their rural communities. A mine in our area will make the option of visiting our community less appealing to holiday makers. This proposed project is too big for the infrastructure of the small rural communities to take on. I want to see our communities grow by welcoming tourists enjoying the nearby wineries, restaurants and shops rather than expanding to meet the needs of this proposed mine. This project will alter significantly the character and ethos of our town and stop its progress toward being an inviting destination. Every day I am grateful for the rich animal and bird life in this area. I do not want to see the wildlife habitats in this area to be eliminated and poisoned by lead. Lead is a toxic metal and any level of this byproduct is unacceptable to me. I strongly object to this project. Greg Modaro Rylstone |
Michael Boardman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing today not for myself but for the future of my children and all future families of this region. The effects that mining has on its environment are destructive and devastating which in time causes a dark cloud to linger above our future generations to come. I moved to the Mudgee area with my family to start a healthier cleaner lifestyle which will be impossible to do with a mine so close by. Its easy to say at this point in time that mining is great because it creates more jobs for people but at what cost? I have come to the Mudgee region to put down long term roots, I am investing in my community by starting up a business in my local town of Rylstone and know that the lead mine will mean there is no long term future for my property or business. We moved here with the promise of this region focusing on tourism and started building our lives geared towards that, encouraged by the region being rated 1# tourist destination and yet NSW government are setting us up to fail by tainting this beautiful area known for its clean living and natural abundance by now taking the easy money of mining. NO TOURIST WILL VISIT A LEAD MINE INFECTED AREA. You will see a consistent closing of long term and new businesses as the effects of this silver/lead mine start to take show. It is a longer road to go the tourism route but at least it's not the dead end road mining leaves us all with. No future for anyone and no legacy to leave. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am confident the devastating consequences of mining lead so close to a village, school and vital waterways will be demonstrated by experts engaged by the community so I am writing this submission on my own behalf. After 10 years dealing with government and the mining company it still shocks me that neither even pretend to care what happens to us as we contemplate retirement from farming or to our land which is a treasure trove of environmental and cultural values. If this project proceeds we face the situation where we will be unable or unwilling to continue living and farming here and unable to sell our property. Our land includes endangered peatlands and swamps, stands of endangered and vulnerable trees, endangered and vulnerable birds and animals, underground water, native grasses, restored wetlands, remnant vegetation fenced off and protected, restored woodlands, and hugely significant registered indigenous sites. These things have been here for thousands of years. No one from Silver Mines Limited has ever asked to monitor or even see any of them. Our experiences with government and the mining company make it clear that our interests and our remarkable property will not be protected or even considered should this devastating project be allowed. So many homes, families, farms and businesses around Lue and along Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River to Mudgee and beyond will have a story like mine. I ask you to reject this devastating project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned about the dangerous health and environmental impacts of a heavy metal mine, mining lead and silver and cadmium and all sorts of toxic substances so close to an existing community, I am also concerned that the long time frame for this to progress to this stage will mean many people will have lost momentum and not put up enough of a dispute for the mine to be rejected. Farmers and Lue township locals will be impacted the most. Detrimental impacts over time will outweigh any short term financial / employment benefits to the community. Overuse of valuable table water resources with water quality degradation from tailings dams that always eventually leak, not to mention the hazardous air pollutants which will adversely impact lives and the value of farms, businesses and assets must be considered. Loss of a sense of place and rural way of life with the predicted light, noise and traffic invasion will be enormous. Moving indigenous people’s artifacts is also sacrilegious. Please respect these sites and leave them for future generations to remember and respect the longest continuous culture on earth. Say NO to the Lue Silver ‘Lead’ mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I grew up in Lue (Pyangle). My parents own the property I grew up on Powells Road. I am also a joint lease owner of land that neighbors the proposed Bowden's Silver Mine with my parents. I am in objection of the mine going ahead. The land in which my parents reside on and which I will inherit one day is of deep importance to our family. We have experienced family loss on this property with the passing of my brother. Personally, I cannot bear to think that if this property was taken over by mines, or if the property became unlivable what that would do to our family. I have grave concern for the waterways (which are downstream from the mine site) where my parents are located. My parents use this water for their household water system. They also rely on rainwater for their drinking water, which with mining dust from the mines would cause contamination of the water for both their household and drinking water. My parents run horses, cattle and sheep and they also use the cattle and sheep for their own consumption. Water contamination would impact on the way they are able to run their stock (if even able to run at all). They also use this stock as part of their income. We have a number of identified Aboriginal Heritage Sites listed on our property that are both important to my family and the Indigenous Community, my family has gone to efforts to have these sites protected. I am concerned about the traffic that would be using the road in this area. The road infrastructure is not designed for heavy/large traffic. It is a quiet area and is also not designed for large traffic congestion. I am concerned that while this is being marketed as a silver mine what is not advertised is that there will be up to 50x the amount of lead that is also produced. I am concerned about the lead getting in the waterways, in the air and causing the area to be unlivable and having a negative health impact on residents, their stock and the neighboring communities. Lue township itself has a school, hotel and motocross business that thrives on community living there as well as tourism. The potential for this area to become unsafe health wise is great. We also have the neighboring community of Rylstone which has a number of tourist attractions including wineries, restaurants, and unique stays that attract a number of tourists every year this is also down stream to the proposed mine site. If lead gets into these waterways it will destroy a number of properties and how people live. Personally, I will be devastated if this mine goes ahead and takes away a land that is so important to me. The property owned by my parents on Powells Road and the leased land that I am part owner of is important to me and my family. My brother passed on this land and for me this place holds many memories that can never be replaced and is for me a sacred area. The adverse impacts that this mine will have on the community could cause unsafe living for residents, for us to leave this land is destroying part of my family history. |
Hamish Christie
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a lue local and have lived here my whole life. I understand that this lead mine will affect the health of the local community and of the kids at the local school will drain the lawson creek that is full of indanged blackfish and plenty mor native wildlife. I believe that the negative impact if this lead mine much out ways the positive impacts. |
Paul Evans
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Object |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. I have lived in the region for over 30 years, working in earthmoving and quarrying, with the last 7 years as a stockmarket trader, with particular emphasis on speculative mining explorers. I have made 2 submissions previously and wish only to respond here in summary as other respondents will adequately identify concerns from the DPE assessment. My primary concerns are to do with the tailings dam, waste rock management, and, light and noise. Firstly the tailings dam, a major concern for many folk on the creek system.I refer to the points 149 to 161, page 32 of the DPE assessment. Bearing in mind that Lawsons Creek partially supplies Mudgee's water supply (via the gravels and well systems), i was surprised to note that point 161 claims that as the creek system is "degraded" then seepage would have no effect on the creek.....surely, there should be no leakage or seepage of any toxic materials? The waste rock emplacement.....it would appear that there is not currently a satisfactory solution to the waste rock problem, primarily due to the lack of suitable material (non acid forming ((NAF)). In the case of the TSF and WRE, there is also concern of their reliability and effectiveness during high rainfall events such as we have recently endured despite the claim by Bowdens that during that rain event, no water left the minesite.I do wonder then, where the water came from to close the causeways at Walkers Creek (downstream from proposed TSF) and the causeway at Bingmans crossing, which is downstream from the proposed WRE ! Surprisingly, in this case, as well as others in the document, there appears to be a failure to provide adequate management plans, yet, the DPE has rubber stamped several areas on the condition that adequate plans etc are provided at a later date....this gives me the impression of a student being passed for an exam on the proviso they submit the answers at a later date... The post mining void....page 35, points 179,180....Bowdens is required to design and manage the void for the long term, yet those conditions can be negated by any plan to mine underground. Noise and light.....i have a property around 14km from a coal mine and it is affected by light and noise, and my quarrying background gives me reasonable understanding of noise from blasting and drilling. Despite the "desktop" studies, i am not convinced that the properties where i am residing, in Lue, as well as the rest of the village, will not be affected by night time illumination as well as the noise from continual production drilling and daily blasting. The main issue here being the proximity of the mine to the village as well as the fact it is around 100 metres higher than the village, effectively overlooking the residential area. Pages 46 to 49 describe the noise factors etc and claim to be negligible. Page 25, points 108, 109 mentions the need for Bowdens to adjust the scale of operation according to water supply, a nonsensical determination as a mining operation such as this would not tolerate such disruption and would simply take steps to increase water supply. While economics and the ability of the company should not be factors in deciding approval, nevertheless some comment is warranted as part of the consideration. Page 18, points 18 to 20 attempt to highlight the project as having a "critical" status, however, despite the NSW governments' vision, the federal department, Austrade has recently released a Critical Minerals Prospectus, which does not mention silver or even the Bowdens project. Indeed, silver is still regarded as an industrial metal only. My concern here is that being a "silver play", or basically a silver mine with only minor credits for lead and zinc, the project whilst claimed to be feasible, does not demonstrate to be a robust project. The risk here, and a concern of some folk in the area is the chance of mining being ceased to completion with the risk of abandonment. Wonawinta (near Cobar) and the Texas silver project on the Qld border being typical examples of failure. Along with this risk is the question of the ability of the company to maintain care and maintenance of a ceased operation. Many are concerned of the ability of the company and its board in managing a mining operation, given the board may have experience running speculative explorers, but not operating and managing mining operations. Concerning points 388 to 392, page 64. Mention is made of accommodation and the belief that the workforce could be accommodated with existing housing stock. Given the additional demand from renewable energy projects in the region, i find this viewpoint could be in error. A risk here is that demand will push up housing costs, exacerbating the stress on long term residents who pay rent, offsetting any economic benefits bought to the region. It should be noted that the construction workforce is likely to be sourced from outside the region, again, reducing any economic benefit to the local area. Any permanent staff for operation are likely to come from "outside" as well. Lastly, the local community have lived under the shadow of this project for 30 years, under various owners (and i suspect, further owner(s) to come), it failed to bloom in the major mining boom of the early 2000's and may very well fail again. The local community as such are fatigued and will no doubt give up in their arguments against the project as they feel powerless. I hope the commission considers this when reviewing the number of respondents Again, there are other concerns, however, other respondents will have far better ability to provide a response in those areas....thank you. |
ID | Name | Date | Submission |
---|---|---|---|
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Matthew Teague | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Purcell | 24/02/2023 | ||
andrea gaudiosi | 24/02/2023 | ||
Georgie King | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Anne Simpson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Richard Larkins | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Mitchell Morri | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Falvey | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Keith Perrett | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Darren lacy | 24/02/2023 | ||
Lynn and Richard Robinson | 24/02/2023 | ||
Paul Leonard | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Glenn Eades | 24/02/2023 | ||
Joel Ray | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stella Xiao | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Georgie King | 24/02/2023 | ||
Anthony McClure | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kym Hancock | 24/02/2023 | ||
Michael Moore | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Stewart Mason | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Blake Hjorth | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Gordon Bray | 24/02/2023 | ||
James Boddy | 24/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Nursey | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Kristen Podagiel | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Kevin Penno | 23/02/2023 | ||
Grant Gjessing | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Richard Pugh | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Steven Rodenburg | 23/02/2023 | ||
Michael Coote | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Cody Hulme | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Anne Gillies | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Mark Kent | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
John McLean | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Ernie Smart | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
William Rowe | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Aaron Dolanski | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Dobre Angeleski | 23/02/2023 | ||
TROY LOWE | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Ben Henri | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Euan Farquhar | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
G Parsons | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Trevor Hamilton | 23/02/2023 | ||
Wilson Sy | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/02/2023 | ||
Robert Parrott | 22/02/2023 | ||
Peter Brun | 22/02/2023 | ||
Troy Leathem | 22/02/2023 | ||
Jane Munro | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Liz Leary | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Troy Leathem | 22/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Schmidberger | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Ken Hornery | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Thelma Large | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
Jo Hornery | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
LEONARD LEARY | 21/02/2023 | ||
Pablo Corsaro | 21/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/02/2023 | ||
David Cook | 21/02/2023 | ||
MICHAEL SWEENEY | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Jacob Edmonds | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
David Bradley | 20/02/2023 | ||
Steven Mitchell | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/02/2023 | ||
Glenn Swan | 19/02/2023 | ||
Paul Deegan | 19/02/2023 | ||
Lesley Whitton | 18/02/2023 | ||
kristopher best | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
James Egan | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Ian Slapp | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Wayne Taylor | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Johanna Rosarius | 17/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 17/02/2023 | ||
Gillian Purcell | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Michael Russell | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Gordon Barnes | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Jessica O'Brien | 16/02/2023 | ||
Dominic Jones | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Lill Stocks | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 16/02/2023 | ||
Neil Harding | 16/02/2023 | ||
Dianne Mundey | 16/02/2023 | ||
Brooke MAO | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Ian Freeman | 15/02/2023 | ||
Renee Mao | 15/02/2023 | ||
Darryl Holmes | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Tony Wruck | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
Malcolm Naylor | 15/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/02/2023 | ||
PETER KING | 15/02/2023 | ||
Lindsay Authers | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Tim Gleeson | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Kurt Lancaster | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Joaquim Cardoso | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Alan Gray | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 14/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
jack faigenbaum | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Aaron Newman | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Tim Rawson | 13/02/2023 | ||
Alexander MCDONALD | 13/02/2023 | ||
Atanas Simonovski | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Hiedi O'Neill | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Robin Sanders | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Judith Stemp | 12/02/2023 | ||
Lyn Wren | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Brett Westall | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Jian Mao | 12/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 12/02/2023 | ||
Michaelsweeney Sweeney | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Terry Trotman | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 11/02/2023 | ||
Patrick Morrissey | 11/02/2023 | ||
James Gauci | 11/02/2023 | ||
tony oxenbridge | 11/02/2023 | ||
Amanda Murray | 10/02/2023 | ||
Dale Harding | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
brad tulloch | 10/02/2023 | ||
David Powers | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Desmond Taylor | 10/02/2023 | ||
Sophia Louison | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 10/02/2023 | ||
Rojena Taylor | 10/02/2023 | ||
David Wood | 10/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Brendan Vowles | 09/02/2023 | ||
Vincent Vine | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Kim Coll | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Rachel Johnson | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Mike Evans | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Willem Thierry | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Mark Brown | 09/02/2023 | ||
David Arden | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
CHRIS LANCASTER | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Peggy Leonard | 09/02/2023 | ||
F Smith | 09/02/2023 | ||
Cheryl Slapp | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Christopher Warner | 09/02/2023 | ||
Chris Blundell | 09/02/2023 | ||
Bob Proestos | 09/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 09/02/2023 | ||
Suzy Clark | 08/02/2023 | ||
Alan Gall | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Matheww Baker | 08/02/2023 | ||
Peter Flanagan | 08/02/2023 | ||
Gary Wilson | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Raminder Josan | 08/02/2023 | ||
Scott Jarvis | 08/02/2023 | ||
Kenny Yeung | 08/02/2023 | ||
Robin Qiu | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Paul Mullins | 08/02/2023 | ||
Russell Mayer | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Joshua Johnston | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Storch | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Liam Robinson | 08/02/2023 | ||
Cherylene Smith | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Ned Stolz | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 08/02/2023 | ||
Jade Miller | 08/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Ken Bartrim | 07/02/2023 | ||
Dan Clark | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Michael CARTER | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Sharon Fulmer | 07/02/2023 | ||
Tracey Perks | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Robert Burroughs | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Michael Burnicle | 07/02/2023 | ||
Katie Dicker | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Sandra Clews | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Aaron Gleeson | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Siegfried Mehl | 07/02/2023 | ||
Tony Rudge | 07/02/2023 | ||
Cameron Quarmby | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 07/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Heath Montgomery | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Minto | 06/02/2023 | ||
Benjamin Coburn | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Peter Veleski | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Gregory Bartrim | 06/02/2023 | ||
Cameron Bailey | 06/02/2023 | ||
Erica Guo | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 06/02/2023 | ||
Sharon Taylor | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Andrew Schneider | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
David Bradley | 05/02/2023 | ||
Daniel Mann | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 05/02/2023 | ||
Brock Dunlop | 05/02/2023 | ||
Maddie Gleeson | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
Simon Parmiter | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
Matt Walsh | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
Garry Robertson | 04/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 04/02/2023 | ||
Douha Ali | 03/02/2023 | ||
STEPHEN MALLYON | 03/02/2023 | ||
Li Jiang | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Steve Richardson | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Kar Chua | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Michael Glendenning | 03/02/2023 | ||
Andrew Tito | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Peter Langworthy | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Robin Rankin | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 03/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Sarah Spice | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Oksana Kholod | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
jeremy barlow | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
tony Hope | 02/02/2023 | ||
Paul Smith | 02/02/2023 | ||
Peter Waterhouse | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Robert Kan | 02/02/2023 | ||
Dr Ian Pringle | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Sarah Bennett | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Stephen Raines | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Thomas Wall | 02/02/2023 | ||
Tye Milson Atkinson | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 02/02/2023 | ||
Chris Battye | 02/02/2023 | ||
Josh Betts | 02/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Colin Betts | 01/02/2023 | ||
Aleesa Gosbell | 01/02/2023 | ||
Adam Nolan | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Allan Waters | 01/02/2023 | ||
Matthew Stirzaker | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Sherry Lindsay | 01/02/2023 | ||
Peter Davis | 01/02/2023 | ||
Darren Bonham | 01/02/2023 | ||
DOREEN Shelley | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 01/02/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Colin Hackett | 31/01/2023 | ||
Peter Tumminello | 31/01/2023 | ||
James and Janne Walker | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Daniel Winberg | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Max Bolte | 31/01/2023 | ||
Michael Fisher | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Rahul Gupta | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Euan FARQUHAR | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Craig Smith | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
richard bury | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Barry Henderson | 31/01/2023 | ||
Tom Radovanic | 31/01/2023 | ||
Heath King | 31/01/2023 | ||
Richard Lillie | 31/01/2023 | ||
Clive Ottaway | 31/01/2023 | ||
Colin McQueen | 31/01/2023 | ||
Matthew Carpenter | 31/01/2023 | ||
Robert Goddard | 31/01/2023 | ||
Jamie Nipperess | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Alan Middleton | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 31/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Ann Leonard | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Matt Harrington | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Matthew O’Hare | 30/01/2023 | ||
Michael Harrington | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 30/01/2023 | ||
Keith Garbutt | 30/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 28/01/2023 | ||
Mr Wade | 28/01/2023 | ||
Luke Vanderzee | 28/01/2023 | ||
Eva Ford | 28/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Ian Hinton | 27/01/2023 | ||
Garry Johnson | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 27/01/2023 | ||
Hephzibah Crossing | 26/01/2023 | ||
Margot Crossing | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Damian Mousley | 26/01/2023 | ||
Kipling Crossing | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Lalnunmawii Crossing | 26/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 26/01/2023 | ||
Robert Klein | 26/01/2023 | ||
Grahame Heap | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Mark Wojciechowski | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Ricky Jackson | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Owen Thomas | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
BILL Williamson | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Leonie Armstrong | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 25/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Robyn CURTIS | 24/01/2023 | ||
Bruce Kerney | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 24/01/2023 | ||
Helen Battye | 24/01/2023 | ||
Steve Mini | 24/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 23/01/2023 | ||
Rudyard Crossing | 22/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 22/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 21/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 20/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 19/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 18/01/2023 | ||
MICHAEL SWEENEY | 17/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 15/01/2023 | ||
Tom Klein | 13/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/01/2023 | ||
Matthew Butterworth | 13/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/01/2023 | ||
Name Redacted | 13/01/2023 | ||
Joel Leonard | 13/01/2023 |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In favour of the project. -jobs -investment/economic benefits -more mining royalties for the govt -silver and zinc critically important for green energy transition |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel the project will be adequately assessed by industry professionals to ensure that all regulations are abided by along with continued monitoring and scrutiny. In my opinion the community concerns are simply because they don't want to see their once sleepy town become an expanded suburban lay out, long term this project will only benefit the town by giving locals jobs, the youth a future that can lead to engineering jobs, property valuation increases, better town services and community income increases which cause a flow on affect. This project will become an Australian commodity growth benefit also, exporting more overseas and adding to our overall GDP, there is so much benefit by allowing this project to go ahead, it will also contribute to securing Australia's silver reserves for future green energy purposes, long term this project will assist Australia in become carbon neutral. |
Matthew Teague
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local Mudgee resident of 10 years, I am writing to express my support for the Bowdens Silver Project. This project has the potential to bring significant economic benefits to the region while maintaining a strong commitment to environmental stewardship and community engagement. The Bowdens Silver Project is a proposed mine that would extract silver, lead, and zinc from the ground using modern, sustainable mining techniques. The mine would create hundreds of direct and indirect jobs during construction and operation, injecting much-needed capital into our local economy. Silver is an essential metal in our modern world. It has a wide range of industrial applications and is used in the production of electronics, solar panels, batteries and medical equipment. With its unique properties and wide range of uses, silver plays a vital role in many sectors of our economy and is an essential commodity for continued economic growth and development. In addition to the economic benefits, the Bowdens Silver Project is committed to minimizing its impact on the environment. The project team has conducted extensive environmental studies and are committed to using best practices in water management, land rehabilitation, and biodiversity conservation. The project has engaged extensively with the local community, including holding multiple public meetings and consultations. The team has taken into account the concerns of stakeholders and has made changes to the project design to address these concerns. They have also committed to ongoing community engagement throughout the life of the project. The Bowdens Silver Project has already received significant support from the local community, with many residents recognizing the potential benefits to the area. Mudgee is well known for it's resource rich landscape and our town is supported by the local mines and the jobs they create. I believe that the Bowdens Silver Project represents a unique opportunity for the region to benefit from responsible resource development. The project has the potential to create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and contribute to the development of a sustainable, diversified economy in Mudgee and the surrounding areas. I urge you to consider supporting the Bowdens Silver Project and the positive impact it could have on the region. Sincerely, Matt Teague |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver and zinc are important metals decarbonising our society. Silver’s use in electronics and medical technologies makes it an essential commodity for decarbonisation. projects such as these help build resilience and diversity in our regional towns through increased employment and economic growth. The townships close to the Project such as Kandos and Rylstone have been heavily impacted by the closure of various industries such as the Kandos Cement works. Bowdens will provide hope for school leavers and displaced workers. Locals need work! Bowdens Silver have demonstrated environmental and social responsibility, an important consideration in my support. Minerals projects will be required into the future to generate Government revenue (which funds our key health and education programs) and provide critical minerals for societal growth. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of the project. It provides plenty of job opportunities and economic development. Silver is also good for the electrical cars that will help to reduce the co2 emmissions , thus improves the enviroment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write in support of the proposed planning approval for the development of the Bowdens Silver project. I have been in and around this project for a number of years, through engagement with Silver Mines Limited and Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd. I have always seen there approach to community first and the support of the broader community of Lue (through direct assistance to the school), Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee through support of sport, local businesses and employment opportunities. With the approval for the development of the Bowdens Silver project, I believe this will provide a signficant uplift in the already significant support that Bowdens Silver provides to these communities. I think it is also important to look to the state and federal governments focus on critical minerals, which the Bowdens Silver project falls in line with. Mines like the Bowdens Silver project a crucial to being able to progress on these stated initiatives of government at all levels. From my review of the recommended conditions, I believe they adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Franklin Webber |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I endorse the approval of Bowdens Silvers' open cut mine project. After considering all submissions, the DPE has recommended its approval, taking into account both support and opposition, along with their respective arguments. As per the state's regulations, the project will be subjected to stringent conditions that will be closely monitored. The potential impact of the mine has been assessed through modelling, and the project design has been found acceptable by relevant industry authorities. In addition, the mine will be obligated to perform ongoing rehabilitation of mined areas and ensure the safety and stability of waste rock and tailings, addressing long-term biodiversity concerns. Bowdens Silvers has submitted their proposals to the DPE, which has been reviewed by experts in the field, and recommended for approval with conditions. The project will create job opportunities and generate income for local families for several decades, benefiting communities such as Lue and Rylstone. Therefore, rather than a threat, it should be perceived as an opportunity for both the local community and the project to thrive in partnership. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support because: Metals for transition to renewables as identified by NSW government. Additional jobs for Kandos and Rylstone who were negatively impacted by the closure of the cement works. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver will be required to help us transition into a greener lifestyle. I believe the use of silver via solar energy panels will help future generations to repair the damage previous generations have done to our planet. That is simply all I have to say, that these types of projects should go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Jackaam Pty Ltd ATF Henderson Suoper Fund |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the Bowdens Silver Project if managed appropriately will be a boon to the people of the central west of NSW. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Iam a member of the local area, which i have to work away for 10 days at a time, so i don't get to spend time with my family. i would like this mine to go ahead as it would provide me with a job so i would be able to spend time with my family every day. everyone talks about green energy and if we are going to get there, we need these minerals, which are in short supply. most people don't understand that most electric vehicle requires a lead acid battery to keep important safety functions operating. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a shareholder in Silver Mines Limited. I have reviewed the proposed development of the Bowden Silver Project and believe it has been carefully and responsibly planned to mitigate its potential environmental impact.. I believe it will have a long term positive social and economic impact on the town and the surrounding district. It will be an important replacement industry when the adjacent coal mines close. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Enrizen Accounting |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project as it is one of the largest undeveloped silver mines project in Australia. This project will create job opportunities and support local economics including local small businesses and royalty income to local governments. Our daily needs including solar cells, medical devices, are all rely on minerals. Silver is one of the crucial minerals that we (human) cannot live without it. |
Thomas Purcell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This submission supplements the issues discussed in my presentation to the IPC hearing on 17 February 2023 in support of the Bowdens Silver Project. There is no denying the importance of the metals to be mined by Bowdens Silver. Silver is to be used in renewable energy, electronics, medical dressings, and water purification. The average silver used per hybrid or battery electric vehicle is 15-50grams, silver remains the world’s best conductor and its higher oxidation resistance put it at a level of its own for use in electronics operating in harsh environments, every house in Australia has silver contacts in the switches the anti-oxidation properties prevent fires. Zinc is to be used in batteries as mentioned in my previous submission, galvanization of steel, alloys for diecasting, skin creams, paint, plastics, and ceramics. Lead is to be used in lead acid batteries, solders, ammunition, cable sheathing, and radiation protection. These are valuable materials essential to progress in Australia. The economic benefits to the project are also undeniable, with 300+ jobs during construction and 200+ ongoing jobs, not to mention the many indirect jobs which are based around mining, such as in technology, equipment, and services. I would also add that the benefits of the high levels of disposable income from people directly and indirectly employed in mining are, in my opinion, the reason Mudgee has been able to develop such an attractive tourist industry. Boutique shops, restaurants, and cafes cannot survive on weekend tourist foot traffic alone, it is the residents who can afford to buy food and products from these establishments that sustain them, many of these are directly employed by mines or indirectly through the many mining support businesses located in Mudgee. With the planned rundown of the Coal industry worldwide, Mudgee must diversify, or it will suffer significantly. Regarding the finding of the DPE as outlined in their assessment report and the proposed conditions of consent. As this project warrants and the NSW community would expect, a huge amount of effort and work has gone into assessing the impacts of the project and evolving the design to what we see today. The EIS has been prepared by a group of industry experts with vast experience in impact assessment and mining. In addition, the company engaged the services of several independent peer reviewers to ensure that no stone was left unturned. This work has been assessed by government departments including the Department of Planning and Environment, The Environment Protection Agency, DPE water, Biodiversity Conservation Division, Crown Lands, the Department of regional NSW, Mining, Exploration & Geoscience, NSW Resources Regulator, the Department of Primary Industries (Agriculture & Fisheries), Transport for NSW, NSW RFS, Heritage NSW, Dam Safety NSW, NSW Health and NSW Education. The Department of Planning and Environment subsequently engaged several independent experts to assess more complex technical sections of the EIS with all queries being dealt with by either the response from Bowdens Silver or by the recommended conditions of consent. I have listening to community concerns throughout the hearing process, read written submissions on the IPC website and those raised during the submissions process for DPE assessment, listened to concerns raised during community consultation by Bowdens Silver at CCC meetings, local shows, and community information days during the preparation of the EIS. I firmly believe that all issues raised have been soundly dealt with and can be appropriately managed through management plans including the requirements Bowdens Silver has accepted in the proposed conditions of consent, this position is supported by the DPE in their assessment report. On the recurring themes of community submissions. Lead - Lead risk is a major concern for residents however this concern appears to ignore the findings of the EIS. Experts engaged by community groups have unfortunately negated to inform the community of the comparatively minor risks of a mine site that does not include smelting operations. The EIS shows that the actual risk from the project is negligible, nevertheless, DPE has recommended stringent monitoring systems capable of real-time alerts be implemented to ensure that no risk from lead-contaminated dust occurs. Biodiversity - in this respect I believe that the EIS has been very comprehensive and that the project will result in some excellent long-term benefits to the area from a Native Ecosystem perspective. I have attached an image of the Lue area from 1965 obtained using the NSW government Historical Imagery spatial viewer on 23 February 2023, (https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=f7c215b873864d44bccddda8075238cb) This image shows the high level of clearing in the Lue district at that time including the mine site and should give some indication of the high level of historic impact that has occurred in and around the mine site. You will be able to orient yourself by the location of Pyangle and Maloneys Road. The Biodiversity offset scheme along with rehabilitation of the mine site and screen plantings along Hawkins Ck will remain a long-term benefit to biodiversity in the region. Water (surface and groundwater) - similar to the issues around lead water impacts from the project remain a recurring theme of submissions, however, these seemingly ignore the findings of the EIS. The methods proposed to manage and mitigate any identified risks are proven, industry best practices, and the stringent monitoring scheme required by the conditions of consent will ensure the project does not have adverse impacts on water. I would also like to reiterate to the commission the responsibility of NSW to ensure that recovery of these materials does not cause environmental and social impacts as can happen when they are obtained from projects located in areas where assessment, approval, and management systems are not as sophisticated nor well-funded as they are in Australia. Australia and particularly NSW is the best place to conduct mining in the world, mining businesses, and the government departments responsible for the oversight of these operations are sophisticated, well-funded, and focused on continually improving methods to protect the environment and to keep people safe while producing the raw materials we require now and into the future. Finally, I cannot ignore the benefits that working in the mining industry directly and in a mining, support business has given me. I have for the last 10-plus years benefited from the comparatively high wages in the mining industry, this has allowed me to put down roots in the Mudgee region get married, start a family and build a property, I would like other people to have that privilege also. |
Attachments |
lue-1965-aerial-imageryjpeg.jpeg (JPEG, 6.14 MB) |
andrea gaudiosi
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Shareholder support for the Bowdens Silver Project |
Georgie King
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission attached. |
Attachments |
submission-gkpdf.pdf (PDF, 44.89 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The community needs more economically viable resource projects like this to continue to support the community, and help the community to continue to thrive |
Anne Simpson
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I add my support for the mine to go ahead: To provide employment For workers to learn new skills To provide valuable assets These things will help the local community NSW and Australia in many ways I believe the recommended conditions of consent do adequately prevent mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development |
Name Redacted
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that Australia will benefit from this project adding real value to our Nations wealth. Not only is silver a monetary metal at a time when the World is moving inevitably towards asset backed currencies it is also an outstanding electrically conducting metal with utility for many industries including health. We are entering an electrical age and Australia needs projects like this. I am a small investor in this project and I only ever invest in Australian projects. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Bowdens Silver |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a supporter of this project as a shareholder. It is obvious that the economic benefits of this project are clear as silver is a highly sought out material used for a wide range of globally necessary industrial use as well as a precious metal. The communities will benefit from employment opportunities as well as supporting local towns businesses etc. I also know that Bowdens comply with all environmental procedures and mine in a responsible manner. I'm sure that the benefits overwhelmingly outweigh any other concerns if there are any. Thanks. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mocean Art |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe in and support this project as it would provide potential for employment and for economic growth for the local communities. The Bowden's Silver mine should follow stringent environmental protocols to be sustainable. Silver is crucial for Australia's immanent renewable energy transition. This project can benefit that happening and should go ahead. In my opinion the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Richard Larkins
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a shareholder in Silver Mines Ltd. My research on the project indicates that it will have many benefits, the largest of which is the direct and indirect employment to members of the local community. Silver Mines Ltd has a good record in community support and management of the environment. The Company provides an opportunity for the production of silver which has significant benefit to environmentally sustainable industries, such as, solar panels and industry in general. Silver Mines has my very strong support for the application that has been lodged. Richard Larkins 0417 895562 |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have watched the development of Bowdens Silver Project, seen the site planning/changes and approvals and thought it to be a thorough process. The discussions and the reports on local resident and regional authorities approval of the development means long term opportunity for jobs in work and contracts and local business growth. The project has been well supported by companies and private financial funds and is a critical metal for the increase in technological change for communications, electrical industries, computer industries, electronic vehicles etc. This being one of the largest resources of silver in the world I wish it every success in getting in to production and contributing to Australian and the Worlds future of reduced greenhouse emissions and increased sustainability. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support. |
Mitchell Morri
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
With coal mining slowing down and the closure of many mines by 2030, we need to find new sustainable assets for a greener future, by using Australia's natural resources for self reliance. Australia has been sitting on many deposits of rare earth minerals which is included within silver and zinc.This mine will take away from fossil fuels, and coal mining, and help produce electronic cars, phones and many other high tech goods. The mine will provide employment for the region within Lue, whilst boosting the NSW economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached my submission in support of this project. |
Attachments |
submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 120.92 KB) |
Michael Falvey
Organisation |
Graduation Regalia Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have no issues regarding the Bowdens Silver Project. I do believe it will enhance employment and commercial opportunities in the local area. This will help to stop the drain of people from rural Australia to the cities. And in my opinion, the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
-create jobs -investment/economic benefits -more mining royalties for the govt -silver and zinc are critically important for green energy transition |
Keith Perrett
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As Chairman of Silver Mines Limited, I would like to provide the following personal submission for consideration by the Independent Planning Commission for the assessment of the Bowdens Silver Project. Firstly, I refer to the Department of Planning and Environment’s Assessment Report and consider it essential to acknowledge the following references made in the referral: 1. The NSW Minerals Strategy (February 2019). This strategy notes that NSW “has significant expertise in mining, abundant mineral resources and regulations that ensure our minerals industry operates in an environmentally and socially responsible way.” The significant untapped resources of a range of minerals within NSW makes the State well-placed to meet not only our domestic requirements, but the increasing global demand needed to support advances in a range of industries and technologies and the development of renewable energy solutions. 2. Australia’s Global Resources Statement (2020). The Statement sets out the government’s policy and long-term reform agenda and vision for the Australian resources sector and highlights the government’s commitment to lowering Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions using a technology-led approach and to developing strategies to minimise our reliance on coal and fossil fuels. The approach emphasises the importance of boosting new resources projects, supporting new industries, best practice regulation, pursuing environmental outcomes and supporting communities and families. 3. The NSW Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy (November 2021). This strategy outlines the NSW Government’s vision and commitment to build on NSW’s potential to become a major global supplier and processor of critical minerals and high-tech metals. Under the strategy, the NSW Government will “Establish Australia’s first Critical Minerals Hub in the Central West; Promote exploration for critical minerals resources, Activate the industry through the proactive development of supply chains; and Attract investment for critical minerals resources, downstream processing and recycling.” The Bowdens Silver Project is well-placed to form an integral part of these strategies, in particular as a project that will aid diversification in the State’s mining sector when pressure on coal mining activities increases over the coming decades. As a State Significant Development and as a robust project with strong possibilities for future expansion and growth, the Bowdens Silver Project will play an important role in the growth of the economy of our State. Although Bowdens Silver products are targeted to be sold as concentrate products, there is potential for these products to be refined in Australia to be used by our existing and emerging manufacturing industries for final products. With increasing geopolitical pressures it is also relevant to note that Australia currently relies on many critical minerals and high-tech metals sourced from challenging jurisdictions. Security of supply for these critical minerals and metals is a key rationale for the NSW Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy. The other point I would like to comment on in the Assessment Report is that the Department of Planning and Environment notes the strategic context of the scale of the Bowdens Silver Deposit, being the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia and one of the largest globally. The report states “With improved silver pricing, greater resources definition, and refinements in processing, more of the resource may be economically extractable…” The Company will continue to significantly invest in further work and studies including expansion opportunities across an expanded open-pit, an underground operation or a potential new nearby development. This is an ongoing commitment of the Company. I also like to make some comments regarding the Bowdens Silver Public Hearing held in Mudgee on 15-17th February 2023 at which I was present throughout. I make these comments as a person who has held significant positions of leadership within Government and the Agricultural sector. I was the President of the Grains Council of Australia, (the peak body for representing grain producers across Australia), Chairman of the NFF Trade Committee, Board member of the NSW Farmers Association, Chairman of the National Rural Advisory Council and Chairman of the Grains Research and Development Corporation. I am still first and foremost a farmer based near Gunnedah in North West NSW. The cornerstone of my leadership was to provide honest and accurate information to all stakeholders at all times, sadly it is apparent that many of the residents in the Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee areas have been misled. This has caused unnecessary but genuine angst and concern for some of these residents. It was deeply concerning to hear that some of the negative representations made during the IPC hearing included false or misleading information. Although I understand that this issue is apparent at other public hearings for similar mining and other projects, it was distressing to see the perpetuation of this false information, despite the large amount of information in the EIS document, the information provided through the Community Consultative Committee (CCC), open days and other forums which addressed many of the issues raised as concerns and clearly outlined the measures the company has taken to mitigate any adverse impacts and ensure the health and wellbeing of those residents and the strengthening and continuity of their communities. The community representation seen at the Hearing was not representative of the community at large. The majority of the presentations at the hearing objected to the Project, whereas the results from our comprehensive community work over the years, the Social Impact Assessment, EIS Submissions, the recent independent public survey all confirmed that the Project has considerable local support. I can also say that the community representation was not indicative from my personal interactions with the community over the years through attendance at our Information Open Days, attendance at sponsored events and shows, and my participation as a member of Community Consultation Committee meetings from 2016-2019. I would also add that the CCC was extremely disappointing as much of the detailed information provided by the Company in the CCC meetings as well as by our specialist experts did not make it into the community via the members of that committee. My belief was that the CCC was to be a conduit of information from the Community to the company and vice versa. I would like to comment on one particular presentation at the public hearing. A young man, Corey Armstrong-Lane spoke of the opportunity mining had given him as an apprentice with Moolarben Coal and how other youth in the area should have the same opportunities now and in the future. I believe he was introduced to the mining industry through work experience at Bowdens when he was a student at Kandos High School. I know his sentiments sum up the views of many of the young from that area. I am also extremely proud of our small contribution to his success and I am sure our programs will expose the youth of that area to the many opportunities that are available. Finally, I have every confidence in the Department’s assessment of the Project that it is in the public interest and that the Company has achieved a good balance between maximising the recovery of a mineral resource of State significance while minimising any potential environmental impacts. I can have this confidence because I am fully aware of the many peer reviews by ourselves and the Department’s experts over a considerable time frame to ensure the rigour of not only the process but the eventual recommendation. I would like to take the opportunity to acknowledge and thank our Bowdens Silver team and all our consultants who have undertaken their very thorough processes over the past 6.5 years to reach this point of project determination. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write in support of the Bowdens Silver project. There has been much negative media coverage and opportunistic political leveraging surrounding mineral extraction and it's impact on the environment. Until our country's demand for and reliance on minerals is not required we should look to the most economically efficient, environmentally sustainable manner in which we procure our natural resources from the ground and commit to it's ongoing improvement during the mine's lifecycle. This statement will of course not prove popular with those focused purely on the environment however there are larger factors to be considered. The Bowdens project has satisfied the strict requirements required by the DPI and as such will also be closely monitored for adherence. The job opportunities, injection of investment and prosperity into the region cannot be underestimated. Regional communities are too often left out of government investment, infrastructure and health improvements - the mining investment will pick up that shortfall. The mine will prove a responsible community member, consisting of local community employees who will be held to account for the protection of the environment as much as possible, for long-term benefit. Environmental impact and conservation is a priority for mines and most individuals who work for the mines understand and support protecting our environment, but until we do not require the procurement of minerals from the earth we must work together in respect and partnership with the environment as much as possible. Mines are not evil, greedy big corporates focused on making money for their shareholders. They are an essential service who we should work together with to our mutual benefit. In addition Sliver Mines Ltd are an Australian resource company - a great benefit to the Australian population vs an international company. I fully support the Bowden's project approval, on balance its total merit outweighing it's cost. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a small share holder in Silver Mines Limited, and previously a regular visitor to the Mudgee area, I would like to add my support to the proposed Bowdens Silver project located near Lue in NSW. The broader Mudgee area is a unique and beautiful regional area within NSW with a number of the towns and villages emanating the quintessential Australian ‘small town’ country charm. In my opinion, some of these areas are being transformed with the uniqueness lost in the name of progress in our fast changing world. Having said that, it is imperative that regional Australian towns remain economically and socially viable. To this end, I believe the Bowdens Silver project will strike the necessary balance between preserving the amenity and uniqueness of the area while ensuring the survival of the region and, more broadly, secure Australia’s access to a high quality source of silver. While there already exists a number of mines in the area, I believe the significance of the Bowdens Silver project is that it is primarily centred around the extraction of silver. Silver is essential in the development of new industrial and technological applications, not least of which is in the environmental sphere. Indeed, the use of silver in the greening of world energy supplies is manifestly important and it will be absolutely essential in this regard. Additionally, silver has a long history as a precious metal and store of wealth. In the current uncertain economic climate, and with political tension increasing with China, I believe it is imperative that Australia has access to a high quality long term supply of silver. This is not just from the standpoint of its industrial application and its use in emerging technologies, but also undeniably in terms of its position as a precious metal. I appreciate that this last point may not resonate with parties depending upon their view of the mechanics of the the world economy, however I feel the strategic potential of silver to re-emerge as an economic store of wealth should not be dismissed. I believe the successful development of the Bowdens Silver project is a matter not just of local and State importance, but more broadly a matter of significant national security. It is my opinion that Silver Mines Limited has been very thorough in developing this project to date and I remain confident that should approval be granted for construction of the proposed mine, it will be operated with appropriate sensitivity to the local community and the surrounding environment. The recommended conditions of consent will aid in this endeavour. The project has the potential to bring significant economic benefit to the region specifically, and Australia more broadly, and to this end I believe the Bowdens project should be approved by the Independent Planning Commission. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a resident of the Mid-western region and have a long standing interest in agriculture and how rural communities respond to change. Sequential change in land utilisation in the Lue Valley or other regional areas in Australia is a daily event and part of how we adapt to new conditions and opportunities. Big changes cause fear; small changes barely noticed. Lue locals have been aware of drilling activity in local tenements for 20 or more years so the recent planning for future exploration at the mine site should come as no surprise. That said, I have nothing but sympathy for families that live close to the mine, many of whom are understandably worried about the future, as this is a big project with the potential to disrupt. Land values especially. Lue has seen change previously in the mid 1990s when a local farming family bravely commenced a hugely successful rural tourism business on land with little agricultural potential. Known as Louee Enduro, it was dusty and noisy on weekends with high numbers of vehicle passes. Local residents that rallied against this development quietly or not so quietly moved away. The nearby dolomite mine was another initiative that successfully supplied much needed lime & dolomite fertiliser to the agriculture sector. The land in question was not suitable for agriculture either. It too caused grief to those who lived closest. The downside was explosions, truck passes, dust and noise, not to mention the visual impact it has had. Further afield, the villages of Ulan and Wollar faced massive disruption as each became encircled by coal mines. Both were surrounded by land with unimpressive agricultural credentials. Some saw massive opportunity in the accommodation sector, others evacuated. Adaptation has many faces. No-one could deny the wealth generated by coal in and around the Mudgee region and the effect it has on our standard of living. Over time government planning and environmental regulations have become significantly tougher. Really tough! Worker safety and environmental protection practices of mining companies in the region have been impressive. The land occupied by Bowden Silver has limited agricultural potential and is unseen from the Lue Rd. It too will have a number of vehicle passes, dust and noise all of which seem to have been addressed in their submission to the Department of Planning and Environment (DPE). I cannot see how the mine will affect tourism other than make the road busier. Over the last 6 years or so, Bowden Silver has built up an impressive portfolio of scientific data on flora, fauna, topography, hydrology and geology. The data has been collected by committed employees and consultants who have impressive academic and practical qualifications. This research has been paid for by the shareholders. The data has been freely available to members of the public. Those of us who live in the area have much to be thankful for as our knowledge base of the local environment has been significantly enhanced. In the last 12 months, I have read nearly every report that the company has released to the ASX under the ticker SVL. I am not a shareholder, you don’t need to be, as these reports are freely available. The company has analysed hundreds of core samples as a result of their drilling activities. The reports are complex and very technical especially the geological explanations - most of which I could not understand. Despite that, three things leapt out:- (1) Calling this a lead mine (or even a silver mine) does not do justice to the mineral wealth that has been uncovered or the number of precious metals found. The concentration, purity and accessibility of these ore bodies is extraordinary. (2) If mined, the wealth generated in 20 years could easily surpass that from agriculture in the valley over the last 200 years. The trickle-down effect to the Mudgee and especially the Rylstone / Kandos community and NSW might turn out to be a game changer. (3) Silver, lead, zinc and copper are all essential industrial elements needed in decarbonising rural NSW. Gold is a bonus. I do not pretend to have detailed knowledge about the project as it is enormously complex and very technical. On reflection, I was quite naïve to write about my concerns for water purity in Lawson Creek and the downstream effects on agriculture a year or two ago. At the time, like many locals, I was nervous about the mine's potential impact. Since then, I have read Bowden’s newsletters & updates. I attended a community information day last year and had interesting and transparent discussions with Tony McClure and an array of friendly staff and consultants. It was well organised but sadly not attended by as many people as they may have been hoping for despite widespread public invitations to attend the event. Sometime later, I met with the two impressive Corkery (QLD) consultants for an hour or so. They work on mining projects all over Australia. My fears of leakage from the mine into Lawson Creek were quickly allayed by descriptions of water and solids recycling, bituminous membrane linings to be used in dams, sealing membranes & use of sub-surface moisture technology to detect possible leakage. I was also sceptical of the oversight of mines by governments. I asked if they thought the NSW DPE had the skills, tenacity and resources to monitor the development stages of the mine to protect the environment against dubious activities. It was heartening to hear them speak highly of the DPE. I got the impression from our discussions that we are lucky to be in NSW rather than some of the other states in which they have worked. I was further reassured after hearing a representative from the DPE & Corkery speak at the hearing last week. It appears as though some very strict planning conditions have been included in the approval process and I'm confident that the DPE will ensure these are adhered to by Bowdens. In my humble opinion, there is a lot of very good science that has been carried out as part of the DA. The arguments against the mine do not appear to counter the research that has been conducted in what appears to be a highly professional manner. This research has come at considerable cost. Bowden Silver should be congratulated on what they have achieved and the way they have conducted themselves. They have possibly raised the bar on all future mining applications in NSW. Our local community should be thankful and I hope that the next stage is managed as successfully as the first. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am concerned for youth future employment in the local area and the sustainability of the local towns. Projects such as Bowdens Silver are required in rural areas to provide jobs so that more people than ever do not have to leave the country for the city OR finish up on the dole with no hope in the future for them to progress. Silver is the best conductor of electricity and along with Zinc will be required in the future if Australia is to continue down the path of renewables Environmental and social responsibility is being demonstrated by the Bowdens Silver. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Lue Hotel and Leisure Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please note that this MAY be a duplication and disregard if it is. The website timed out during the previous attempt. |
Attachments |
luehotelsubmissionipcpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 36.55 KB) |
Darren lacy
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the development as it will in turn support our community in a positive way. |
Lynn and Richard Robinson
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in full support of the Bowdens Silver project as I believe it will bring life and secure a future for the lue region through job opportunities. Itll also help to boost the local economy and supply a sustainable future for the region |
Paul Leonard
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is in Australia’s interest to progress with materials that are used for the transition to electrification, also jobs will be required for when coal mines are closed this is a win win for the community and Australia. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly believe the economic benefits of the submission will boost employment and jobs in the local community and the region. |
Glenn Eades
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will be good for the community for work and the surrounding businesses. The additional money will be able to support local business. if people listened to the correct information, they would understand that the mine will be a positive thing. |
Joel Ray
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
See attached file. |
Attachments |
ipc-submission--joel-raypdf.pdf (PDF, 158.01 KB) |
Stella Xiao
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I firmly believe this project will provide benefits to our community and support economy in general. Minerals and metals have a significant impact on our daily life. For example, Silver is a powerful antimicrobial agent and can help fight infections heal wounds, aid in cold and flue prevention. They have become a critical component for modern living, Not they are used to benefit human wellbeing, but also creating job opportunity by promoting this project to develop in the mining industry further. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mining Industry |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowden Silver Project will bring in future economic benefit to the community as it creates good wages and opportunity for workers, potential investment for local business, and environmental benefits for the community. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Crydon Capital |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In support, will bring a number of Jobs to the area. Boost for a little community. |
Georgie King
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission attached. |
Attachments |
submission-gkpdf.pdf (PDF, 44.89 KB) |
Anthony McClure
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please see attached |
Attachments |
anthony-mcclure-ipc-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 236.19 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Bowdens Silver project to be given mining approval, the benefit for the local community will be enormous. Thankyou |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the development going ahead. It is critical we continue to encourage investment in NSW to create jobs and boost economic growth. Also, zinc and silver are critical minerals for the green e ergy transition. This mine will help Australia's decarbonisation efforts |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In my professional opinion Bowden Silver Limited has covered and met all aspects of the eight (8) "Key Issues" item 6 above in its submissions to the DPE and born out is the "Assessment Report prepared by the DPE and its recommended conditions of consent" I have visited/inspected the site on a number of occasions with the Companies professional staff and found their presentations and deliberations open, indepth and informative.of all aspects of the project. The Community engagement by Bowden Silver through "open days and community meetings have been well attended and received. The Company has been an excellent Corporate Citizen in numeous ways, including the support of sporting bodies and other organisations in the Mudgee region. I have no doubt that this project will be of great benefit economically and socialy to the Mudgee Lue area and the Midwestern Region of NSW. This project has my total support. Mike Blake Former Lecturer Environmental Studies & Landcare NSW Western Institute of TAFE Consultant Natural Resource Management Ass & BA App. Sc Deg Natural Resource Management/Ecology Post Grad. studies Ornithology /Ecology |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to offer my support for The Bowdens Silver Project. The project offers significant and substantial economic, social, community and national and competitive benefits that will be delivered to local communities, as well as the broader Mid-Western Regional area of NSW; and the Australian population. I believe the benefits of the project far outweigh the perceived costs, which are reasonably minimal in the context of what this project will deliver. |
Kym Hancock
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silver Project ranks globally as one of the largest undeveloped silver mines. It has a 23 year life span which could possibly be extended. As such this project will provide significant long term economic and social benefits to the local communities and NSW's mid-western region. As a member of The Australian Conservation Foundation I support this project as it is environmentally responsible. I disclose that I am a small Silver Mines Limited shareholder after being impressed with this company and the enormous potential of the project. |
Michael Moore
Organisation |
Variscan Mines Limited |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would consider myself as someone who is supportive of the mining industry here in Australia as it has provided me with a very rewarding and varied career over the past 25 years. My job has taken me to most States and Territories here in Australia and I have seen first-hand the positive benefits that mining can bring to remote and rural Australia. In this country we are in a unique position to be able to help deliver the transition to a low carbon economy and do it in a way that respects the local environment, heritage and the communities in which we operate. Here in Australia, we have a well-regulated framework of laws by which mining companies must operate and companies wishing to secure the metals that we mine can do so safe in the knowledge that the metals have been extracted in a socially and environmentally responsible way. Silver and zinc are key metals in societies drive to decarbonise the global economy. For remote and rural economies, I have seen first-hand the significant opportunities that mining can bring in terms of well-paid jobs, opportunities for youth employment and training (apprentices) as well as great benefits to local businesses. Mining companies are very focused on ESG and as such place a great deal of emphasis on enhancing the local communities where they operate. The towns of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos can look to benefit from, sponsorship, community projects, upgrading of local infrastructure and increased biodiversity by virtue of having a mining operation in the local area. Mining can help deliver real long-term sustainable benefits to local communities that remain long after the mine has ceased to operate. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
private |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project as it continues to add to the robust state of Australian business in general, and also contributes to the stability of general employment and financial gain by not only the companies that develop these types of enterprises, but creating an on-flow of business to add to the wellbeing of this countries population and to boost up the ability of Australian companies to manufacture and produce goods and services. The more We can produce home grown products and services, the less reliance the country as a whole will have on offshore supply. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am supporting the conditional approval of the proposed development. I believe that the Project is in the public interest. This Project is a significant asset to NSW. It is the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia and one of the largest globally with a 23-year life. The Team at Bowden's has delivered an environmentally responsible project and the referral by the DPE to the IPC is recognition of the significant long-term economic and social benefits that the Project will deliver to the local communities of Lue, Rylstone, Kandos and Mudgee as well as the broader Mid-Western Regional area of NSW. There are benefits of long-term employment, training and business opportunities for the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am an earth scientist with a post graduate qualification. The location of Bowdens Silver is expected to have limited impact on groundwater due to its geographic location and geoechnical measures to be taken. The project will provide long term local employment opportunities because there are established communities with convenient commute distances. The silver produced by the project will provide additional scarce resource for use by the solar photovoltaic industry. Almost all solar panels currently is production utilise silver for electrical connections. Approximately 8% of silver production goes into solar cell production and as worldwide use of photovoltaics increases, demand for silver might reasonably be expected to increase. https://resourceworld.com/how-much-silver-is-needed-for-the-solar-panel-industry/ |
Stewart Mason
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The project would provide a robust jobs boost for the region whilst also assisting to create a sustainable future via production of key minerals and resources to help produce batteries and other essential components for a greener future. Safety, environmental and sustainability metrics will be in place to ensure the operation adds value to all stakeholders. I therefore support the development of the mine and production plant |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Denying a country the ab to develop locally would be doing it great injustice. China is preparing to cut off solar wafer exports and its technology so developing a more substantial homegrown industry is vital. Svl had taken all the necessary steps to protect the local community and environment. This submission is in support of the development of this mine so our quest for renewables can move forward. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am supportive of the development; it is great for the region. I have spent a lot of time in the region and believe the proposal is very compelling and should go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have reviewed the assessment report and proposed conditions of consent and am confident the project will deliver the expected benefits to the people of NSW with low risk concerning the key issues identified in the assessment process. I am also confident that the proponent will work diligently to fulfil their approval obligations as I have been aware of the proponents performance in the exploration and resource definition phases of mine development. As a former regulator of the NSW exploration and mining sector, I am aware Silver Mines Ltd. demonstrated a track record of professionalism in compliance with their exploration licences. Silver is a strategic metal for the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy and this project promises to bring to the people of NSW and Australia the economic benefits of meeting the climate challenges. I also disclose I am a small shareholder of Silver Mines Ltd., acquiring the shares as part of an investment portfolio in retirement. My confidence in the Company’s commitment to social and environmental sustainability was a pre-eminent reason for investing in it. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support. |
Blake Hjorth
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please find attached my submission in support of Bowdens Silver. |
Attachments |
blake-hjorthipc-submissionbowdens-silverpdf.pdf (PDF, 118.61 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
- Living in close proximity to a coal mine I can say that it has very limited if any on day to day life. The community I live in thrives from mining and agriculture together, without both it would be a shadow of what it is today - Silver is an important metal for renewable energy. Particularly solar panels and electric cars plus many more. - Silver is gaining more importance and uses in the medical industry which is very exciting. - It provides many jobs for the local communities especially as coal mining is being forced to wind back, these communities need projects like these to keep them going. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am for as it will bring a number of jobs to the local area |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to provide my full support for the Bowdens Silver Project. I have been aware of the Bowdens Silver Project for a number of years now and believe it will provide many benefits to Lue and the Mid-Western Region. The company has conducted extensive environmental and social assessments which have been peer reviewed by experts and government and ultimately, the DPE has recommended approval of the project after an intensive and thorough assessment. The DPE has also proposed a range of consent conditions that will be enforceable and ensure the mine is run in a way that meets industry and best practice requirements. The approval of this mine will provide jobs and diversity for our region. The wider area has lived side by side with mining operations and seen how mining can provide benefits while not negatively impacting other important industries such as agriculture, hospitality and tourism. Mining provides a pathway for our region’s residents to form long and meaningful lives in the region now and for generations to come. The approval of the Bowdens Silver Project will help that positive legacy continue. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We believe that this planned project should go ahead and proceed on the grounds of it's significance as being a major employment prospect not only for the mine its self but the the economic benefit for the community around it. Over the years, they have been open and frank about all due processes and stages and appear to support the culture of the local community. Recent negative reports of the mine destroying prime agriculture land is certainly incorrect as this land, at its best, could only be described as marginal agricultural land. The benefits of this project going ahead certainly outweigh the negative. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver Mines should be allowed to proceed with the mining of Bowdens, because of the economic benefits to the local economy and the national economy. The product produced would provide material for the development of “green” energy needed to reduce greenhouse emissions |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Jackaam Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the Bowden's Silver Project if managed appropriately will be a boon to the people of the central west of NSW. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Silver Mines Limited, Parent Company of Bowdens Silver |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Commissioners I wish to make a submission in regard to the Bowdens Silver proposed mine. I live near Gunnedah where we operate a farming business. We have a coal mine approximately 3 km from our property. I have read and heard comments from people who claim that this mine will destroy the area around Lue. From my experience living in a community with mining and agriculture, it is plain to see that mining and agriculture can live side by side and mining can actually benefit agriculture and the community substantially. Many of the services we use for our business and also our lifestyle would not be available if mining was not in this area. If Gunnedah had to rely on agriculture solely it would be a backwater, instead it is a thriving town and community. I remember many of the negative comments when Whitehaven was developing operations around Gunnedah, none have come to fruition. Apart from a few of the older generation or the very financially secure the vast majority would be up in arms if it was suggested Gunnedah could do without mining. I fear for this community's future when coal mining winds back or ceases, we will wish we had a Bowdens Silver to fill the void and sustain our community. Katherine |
Gordon Bray
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To whom it may concern The approval process for the Bowdens project has been a long and arduous journey but I congratulate management on its clarity and transparency despite a false and carefully orchestrated misinformation program designed to skittle the outcome. As a shareholder, I maintained a forensic overview of the process and was always impressed with management’s efforts to keep the community and other stakeholders informed of progress and plans and its ongoing willingness to overcome any obstacles. I have a close family connection with agricultural production and am therefore very conscious of environmental impacts and to that end I applaud Bowden’s focus on preserving the status quo around the project. As we transition to green energy, Bowdens will make a significant contribution through its prime silver and zinc resources. The company also runs sizable stock herds in the precinct and has taken painstaking steps to ensure the local community will have maximum benefit in this sphere of farming activity. How exciting to think that Bowdens will move to mining approval status whilst adhering with the strictest environmental regulations. Boasting the largest silver deposits in the Southern Hemisphere, the mining licence approval will harness a plethora of economic, welfare, productivity and financial advantages for the local community whilst preserving the integrity of their lifestyle. I wish to thank all parties for their patience and thoroughness and I look forward to approval of this project which will eventually provide a significant boost to the New South Wales economy, greatly increase mining royalties for the government and help enhance Australia’s reputation as a profitable mining destination for international investors. |
James Boddy
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to recommend that this project goes ahead as the company from my reading has a environmentally responsible project and it will bring benefits to the local community with employment when economic are getting tough. Australia also needs these minerals to build a decarbonised energy resources in Australia |
Thomas Nursey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom it may concern, I have lived in and visited the Central West region encompassing Lue, Rylstone, Kandos, Ilford and Mudgee for over 35 years. I have a deep connection and interest in the area. I am firmly in support of the Bowdens Silver Project located at Lue. I have followed closely the process and submissions for planning and DPE approval and commend Bowdens for their transparency, engagement with the local communities and faultless, best practice science based approach. I have witnessed the social and economic marginalising brought about by the closure of the Kandos cement works and the Charbon Colliery, not merely through loss of direct employment but the knock on effect of loss of support industries, local development , economic activity and resulting marginalistion of the local communities. With the movement to clean energy and eventual closure of Ulan, Moolarben and Wilpinjong coal mines where will the jobs come from with these closures, which supports 15% of Mudgee alone's, workforce? Bowdens Silver project will provide around 300 ongoing operational jobs post construction which will help to alleviate the aforementioned closures and provide economic stimulus and much improved social and community infrastructure. Particularly to the town of Kandos - once known as 'the town that built sydney' - now perhaps 'the town that Sydney forgot'. The mine is first and foremost a silver mine, contrary to claims by some who appose the project, with some by products of zinc and lead. Best practice, peer reviewed site and wider area research, planning and consultation has been a key feature of moving this project to a final determination by the IPC. This includes but not limited to indigenous mapping and considerations, water management, minimising environmental impact, long term re habilitation post mine life and deep community engagement and support. I am firmly in support of the project and the move to re juvinate the local communities whom will benefit from the project. Your's faithfully Tom Nursey direct employment, the supply of support industries, economic investment into the local communities and support for local development, educational and sponsorship initiatives. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to express my strong support for the Bowdens Silver Mine. For at least 100 years there has been mining around the Mudgee region and it has had nothing but positive impacts on the town. Mudgee has grown and thrived and the surrounding coal mines have not had negative impacts on wine growing or tourism, which I understand are some of the concerns being expressed now. Mining has evolved and continues to evolve. It is safer, more environmentally sound, better at extracting and maximising. If we take those facts into consideration, and the fact that the region needs jobs and economic support, we need to strongly ask the question of why SHOULDN'T the silver mine be approved? Covid has shown that Australia can be vulnerable when we rely on other countries for critical supplies and that makes me concerned for the future. We need to invest in what we have. As far as I'm concerned, this is progress and the move away from fossil fuels is inexorable. If the DPE thinks it is sound and in the public interest, you cannot ignore what's needed for the greater good, for the sake of a noisy minority. Please do the right thing and take into consideration the bigger picture and the future of us all. |
Kristen Podagiel
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support appropriate environmental controls and safeguards being in place with respect to the Bowdens Silver development. Having reviewed them in detail, I believe that the proposed conditions of consent provide the necessary and appropriate safeguards and controls. In the course of my life I have seen, lived in communities impacted by, worked with and reviewed a wide variety of mining and other development projects. I feel confident that the proposed conditions of consent for Bowdens Silver ensure the appropriate balance between a development necessary to meet Australia’s urgent need for responsibly sourced critical minerals to assist our energy transition, and the need to protect the amazing country we live in. I firmly believe that we cannot achieve what we seek to achieve in decarbonising our society without the very product - silver - that this development seeks to produce. Silver is and will continue to be a critical component in the electronics and solar cells and medical technologies that will form a very large part of our future. We also cannot afford to rely on the supply of critical minerals such as silver from countries where sovereign risk and political instability is high and where there are - unlike New South Wales - insufficient environmental protections in place. I am also excited by the significant positive socio-economic opportunities this development can bring to the areas of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos. I am separately a co-founder of a charity (UNIQ You) which aims to inspire female high school students to pursue roles in industries such as construction and resources which provide economic stability and opportunities. I know first hand from that work, what wonderful opportunities this development will bring to the local community’s young people. These opportunities are especially important as the local area begins to experience the effects of Australia’s energy transition including a loss of opportunities in the local coal sector. I am proud of the way Bowdens Silver has productively and continuously engaged with the community. It is the most positive example I have seen in that regard having been part of the industry for over 20 years. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
24/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I understand that Silver Mines Limited has diligently progressed to this point in time for its support for the Bowdens Silver Project with the local community (of which will benefit economically from this project) and addressed environmental concerns adequately. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
None |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I object to the Bowdens Silver Pty Ltd mine project. The Bowdens mine will be an open cut lead, zinc and silver mine. In reality, it will be a lead mine. It will produce more lead than silver, with project estimates of 95,000 tonnes of lead, 130,000 tonnes of zinc and 1,879 tonnes of silver. The project could have serious impacts on the health and livelihoods of the people, and the water in the district surrounding the mine. Impacts to ground and surface water will be significant and have not been adequately assessed in the EIS nor addressed in the NSW Department of Planning's Assessment Report. No peer review has been conducted on groundwater contamination risks from dangerous chemicals like cyanide and heavy metals like lead. There is significant risk of tailings dam leachate bypassing the seepage collection ponds and entering the groundwater system. The hazardous nature of substances in the waste rock dump and tailings dam merit a local and detailed model of hydrogeological processes to adequately manage the proposed activity. The discharge of acid drainage into water bodies could cause an instant threat to the biota and ecological balance. It would also threaten drinking water supplies and irrigation systems downstream from the mining site. Key technical detail surrounding the proponent's acid mine drainage management is inadequate and unresolved, as highlighted by the Earth Systems review detailed in the Department's Assessment report. Acid mine drainage risks would burden the region with a toxic, permanent legacy, in contradiction to principles of intergenerational equity and ecologically sustainable development. No plan was presented by Bowdens to drain or remove the tailings dam. Does this mean it will remain in situ forever? Bowdens has acknowledged leakage from the dam will continue after mining stops, but there is no plan in place to fix this problem or even manage it. This means the New South Wales government will permit Bowdens to build and operate this dam and sentence the region to a toxic intergenerational legacy. The dam will be there forever, and generations to come will have to live with the consequences of leakage of toxic chemicals into a currently pristine environment. And it will also be allowed to leave a gapping 53-hectare hole behind too, forever. If this mine was, unfortunately, allowed to go ahead it must be ensured that corporate responsibility is a hallmark of this project. Bowdens must remove the dam at the closure of the mine and return the ground under it to it’s former pristine state. They must also refill the hole according to environmental regulations and return the area to it’s former state. A company does not get to make huge profits and leave only devastation behind. The combination of a lack of technical detail across key aspects of mine viability and the complex nature and location of the site means the Bowdens Project should be refused. Save Lue and Mudgee from potential environment disaster. Please reject this project. For the only planet we have. |
Kevin Penno
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel that Bowden Silver mine shows nothing but positive impact upon the local community and further, it demonstrates the ability to provide local employment and the opportunity for local adults and youth to better them self with permanent and part time employment in many different fields and trades. The longevity of all of this will show reductions in crime and unemployment benefits. Myself being a local resident of Lue I am excited to see that Bowden Silvermine can bring so much life back into the community and infrastructure . |
Grant Gjessing
Organisation |
Strait Up Projects Pty Ltd. trading as Strait Up Cranes and Rigging |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I, Grant Gjessing, wish to register my positive support for the Bowdens Silver Project. I am the Managing Director of a local business called Strait Up Cranes & Rigging which has employed, empowered and trained locals in our area since 2008. I am a true local born and bred residential of Mudgee and my parentage on both sides of my family were also born and raised here. The Gjessing name may be unusual to people outside our area but the name has been longstanding with our community for generations. Not many submissions would have two Great uncles forever immortalised on the cenotaph for their ultimate sacrifice to their town and country during WW1. I grew up in a sleepy Mudgee where not much opportunity existed and not many were keen to stay after schooling here. Compare this with present day Mudgee, where local businesses and the town has grown extensively to accommodate the real reason for Mudgee’s prosperity which is growth in the mining sector. I have built my business on supplying a service to the local coal mines and have grown this little business into the heavy lift specialist that Strait Up Cranes is currently. The local coal mines are in my eyes good local corporate citizens which help our local community in any way they can, from sponsoring local sports teams to helping after natural disasters and donating to local charities. I feel that Bowdens will also be good community corporate citizens as they are already heavily involved in local sports and charities. They also seem to have strong and sustainable engagement practices with local businesses. With these mines comes local business opportunities for support and supply services. I have seen from previous mine construction in Ulan, that contractors work on the project at construction phase and stay to raise their families in our local area. Unless these infrastructure projects are undertaken within the region, they may not have had a reason to come to the area in the first place. Small businesses such as Strait Up which services these larger corporations also employ, train and provide opportunities for school leavers to start their career. Who doesn’t want to drive a massive crane at a construction site. We pride ourselves on our employment of Trainees within the local community and the work that such mining projects provides enables us to provide opportunities to the younger generation to get into specialised industries such as ours. We in turn at Strait Up Cranes support other local businesses by purchasing materials, equipment, site vehicles, trucks, PPE and uniforms, and utilise service companies that help us spend our dollar locally such as: Double R, McCarroll Ford, Mudgee Toyota, Petries Mitre 10, Bunnings Mudgee, HiTech IT, Brand Me Mudgee, Bisec to list but a few. We at Strait Up Cranes also support local charities and sporting groups. We also support smaller sporting groups such as in Coolah, Dunedoo and Gulgong. I take pride in the fact that our staff are heavily engaged in community activities for the benefit of all. I trust that Bowdens will be accountable and faithful to their planning approvals and development application commitments. They have environmental guidelines in which to operate their business. This will be regulated by the mining regulator who are fair and just in their directive to ensure compliance. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this submission in support of the Bowdens Silver Project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this project |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Jobs Community Security,KeepingSmall towns vibrant |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is critical to so many green technologies, including electric vehicles and renewable energy. There is a significant predicted shortfall of silver and this mine will go a long way to helping the planet move away from fossil fuels. Direct negative local environmental impacts are massively outweighed by the benefits that the mine will have |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Mine has one of the largest silver deposits in Australia. Silver is such an important metal in existing and emerging technologies and may well be in short supply in the near future. This would escalate the price provide the state and the country a rich flow of revenue. It would be a great benefit to the local community during construction and operation. It could well be on the scale of the Cadia Mine near Orange,which has contributed so much to the Central West. |
Richard Pugh
Organisation |
Strickland Metals Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm fully supportive behind the development of the Bowden's Silver Project. I believe it will have a significant, positive socioeconomic impact on the local community and the wider economic benefits from developing the largest undeveloped silver mine in Australia, would only drive the EV/renewable energy revolution forward. Mining is regarded as being the backbone to Australia and having an Australian owned and operated miner that is conscious of both the environmental and social aspects of this project, further enhances my support. My main concern surrounding the lack of immediate development is if this project is not approved at this time, the foreign investment risk surrounding such a lucrative project for both the state and the wider nation increases dramatically. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is Joshua Mao. I am the CEO and Director of a boutique private equity firm with offices in Perth and Melbourne. I believe that the Bowden’s Silver Project will position Australia as one of the major silver suppliers globally and be a major asset for Australia going forward. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. • Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. • Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and regional jobs in the order of: o Estimated 320 Construction jobs. o Estimates 280 permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on effect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace, and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine to realise the benefits mentioned above. Kind regards, Joshua Mao |
Steven Rodenburg
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in full support of the submission |
Michael Coote
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the project proposed by Bowdens silver will be beneficial for the local economy, as well as generating local jobs and growth for the region |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Adding additional jobs to the community. Translating to; Additional investment/economic benefits, more mining royalties for the government The silver and zinc mining is critically important for green energy transition |
Cody Hulme
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the approval of this project. As a person who has always lived in Lue and currently still does and also being an employee of Bowdens Silver, I have seen both sides of the project and have heard all arguments from both sides. I personally believe that the good out-weighs the bad. A lot of people have mentioned that there are a large number of jobs available in the other mines in our area currently but have failed to mention that most of these jobs require you to already have the skills required for the job which I have experienced first-hand before starting with Bowdens. Being forced to work part time in multiple jobs to make up for not having a full-time job. A large number of people against this project have never been in that position before, therefore don't know how hard it is to get your foot in the door of an industry you wish to work in with no prior experience. The approval of this project will give that opportunity to a lot more people that are in the same position. I have worked at Bowdens silver for the past few years and have seen how involved and willing to help the people in the local area where it is needed. Which coincides with the small community that has always stuck together through times of need. It is good to see such a big company willing to help the little people even with the smallest things. Which to me is a lot more than what others that claim to be active community members have done in the past. There are some concerns within the community about the proposed mine, but with the adequate controls put in place none of this can be a problem. There is no reason that this small town and a mine that will bring so much to the surrounding areas that are in need (Kandos) can't live and prosper side by side. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think this is an important mine as silver is a very scare resource worldwide. Demand for silver far exceeds available supply, and it is an important component of solar panels, computing, high tech and defence capabilities. It is important the mine be built to NSW & Australian standards, with regard to protecting the environment, maintaining air quality, relocating any habitat, and ensuring that hazards are well managed. It will be a solid employer for the local area which is very positive, as well as bring revenue for the state and local governments. Any aboriginal culture should be respected if possible. Health and safety of the workers must be of utmost importance. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
NSW will be closing umpteen Coal Mines in the near future due to climate change and legislation and a 20 year Operational Silver Mine would undoubtedly assist some Mine Employees transfer from coal to Silver. Also the amount of Government revenue from such a venture would not be insignificant. I am presently a small Retail Shareholder in Silver Mines Limited (5000 shares only) and have no further interest in the outcome of the outcome of the mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Support the economic growth it will bring to the area |
Name Redacted
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This seems like a decent proposal and as Australia goes into economic downturn and the electrification of the world requires more metals projects like this will be essential for both jobs and reducing carbon emissions in the economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this project will generate 1000s of jobs, increasing many families quality of life. This will generate more income for not only the government but also local businesses for many years to come. Silver is a huge part of our clean future, used in electric vehicles, solar panels and so much more. There are so many benefits to this project, both short term and long term, for the local community and for the state. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think that Bowen is going to give the mineral resources we need for day to day living and also moving into a greener future. It’s going to create many jobs for a little town and regional who is losing people. It’s going to be a great way to support local people and businesses |
Anne Gillies
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a long term local resident to the village of lue! I support the bowdens silver project going ahead! I believe that it can only have beneficial impacts on lue and surrounding areas through employment opportunities both direct and indirect, as well as help the local facilities such as the school to stay open and other local small businesses such as cafes, pubs and clubs and much more, it will boost the local economy through moving more people into the region and keep the town moving forward! As the coal mines within the region slowly decline in operation, and the world looks towards a more sustainable and renewable future mudgee and surrounding towns and villages will slow down too, the bowdens silver project will not only supply life and the possibility of growth within the region potentially bringing small towns such as kandos and rylstone back to their former glory! And supplying a secure future of jobs for locals within the region for many years to come! It will also supply us with the necessary metals and deposits required to build and create infrastructure such as solar panels and much more to allow us to move into a more sustainable future! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Seeing the recent media surrounding the project I don’t have worries about the potential environmental problems |
Mark Kent
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm undertaking this submission after being invited to do so a shareholder in silver mines limited. My interest with Bowden's started after seeing the many benefits that silver as a metal product can produce and deliver. These products will assist with many industries including climate change. silver has many applications. Given there is massive demand worldwide and known supply shortages, this project is well placed to deliver significant returns. and benefits to all stakeholders. My initial research prior to investing was thorough and I believe the board and management have consulted well with local communities, and their representatives. The company's board and management have liaised well with their shareholders promoting a sustainable and safe project with a number of benefits to the local communities, and therefore would ask that the IPC support the DPE and their recommendations for the project to proceed |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent any adverse impacts from the proposed development |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a shareholder of Sliver Mines and I believe the silver mine project will benefit the economy and provide local jobs. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Silver Mines |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like the project to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to support the Bowdens Silver project for the following reasons: - The project will create local jobs for rural NSW - The project will help lure new people to Mudgee and the surrounding communities which will strengthen the local community/ economy - The project will boost the NSW economy and help diversify away from coal mining. - The Company will help to build new infrastructure for the local community and invest in community projects. - Silver is a key component for the batteries required in EV's, for solar panels etc. There will be a global shortage as the Electrification movement continues. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe in an Australia that contributes to renewable energy sources. We can be a powerhouse in this area for many years to come. Silver is an important part of that, and it’s incumbent upon us to mine it responsibly and to develop a resource that contributes to green energy. I’m personally reassured by the DPEA’s submissions in regards to the concerns raised by the local community, and believe it’s in the state’s best interests — environmentally and economically — for the project to be approved. |
John McLean
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Progress Australias economic development |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to see the Bowdens Silver mine go ahead as it will generate more jobs and growth in the area, particularly for the younger generation and have the opportunity to stay in their local area and not have to move away so far from home. I believe that the conditions imposed on the mine will ensure that no harm will impact on the local environment and that the ones who are against the mine are scaring the public with miss information. Bowdens have given back to the community by supporting many services in the area and this is what will keep our local community going. |
Ernie Smart
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing in full support ofthe Bowdens Silver Project. I have been a resident of Lue since 1997. I have seen Bowdens develop through different owners over time to what it is today. I think the mine will bring plenty of job opportunities and economic benefits to Lue and the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
100% support Bowdens silver mine going ahead, have lived here nearly 23 years. Have seen small local businesses open and close down within months (some only stay open for approximately 12 months) families up and move there's nothing here for young adults, travelling 45 minutes or longer for work you are lucky to be able to get a job in Kandos or Rylstone. I have a 4 year old daughter that has to attend daycare in Mudgee due to not being able to get a spot at the local Preschool. Bowden silver mine will do our small community a world of good bring more job into the community. Also bring more families to our community, new shops opening. If Bowdens doesn't go ahead families will lose their jobs having to travel for work, or if they can't get another job local they'll have to move to make it more affordable for their family. Some small businesses rely on tourism and big industries to help keep their businesses afloat, if not they have no choice but to close their doors. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The project meets all proper planning & environmental conditions, & it is important economically to encourage responsible economic projects |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed Bowdens Silver Project for the following reasons: - Comprehensive assessment has been undertaken and potential impacts and benefits have been presented to Government and local community - Community feedback received on the Project's EIS has been considered, including by engagement with NSW Department of Planning and Environment, and proposal refined to optimise water management and supply, and enhance economic and social outcomes, maximise benefits and mitigate impacts - The project will invest in infrastructure improvements that benefit the local community, and has and will continue to invest in the local community through its community investment and sponsorship programs - The project will create a significant number of jobs in the local area, including ongoing employment, and create many indirect benefits to the local economy as a result throughout the 23 year life of the project - The lifespan of the project has the potential to increase if underground mining opportunities prove feasible, potentially extending socioeconomic benefits - The project prioritises local employment outcomes and enjoys strong local support, and stakeholders are committed to ongoing engagement - The project will produce minerals recognised as critical by the Government's Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy and with wide ranging application, as global demand and supply deficit increases, and as we all transition to renewable energy solutions - The project has a safe and sustainable water strategy, which was of high priority for the local community |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to see the development succeed . |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In favour of the project. -jobs -investment/economic benefits -more mining royalties for the govt -silver and zinc critically important for green energy transition |
William Rowe
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to support the approval of silver mine's Bowdens project. Australia will need significant amounts of silver for solar panels as well as the numerous items that silver is required for. The scarcity of silver will increase with the passage of time. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed mine developement at Bowdens. Human consumption requires the extraction of minerals. The minerals in the ground can not be relocated and therefor must be mined where they occur. I trust the engineering used to contruct the mine will enable the extraction and processing of ore with minimal environmental impact. I am employed in the mining industry and support further mines to increase jobs. |
Aaron Dolanski
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this project will benefit the region for years to come. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a member of the local community I do sympathise and understand why the people living in the immediate vicinity of the proposed mine site are so adamantly objecting. No-one likes to see any sort of development on their doorstep, particularly a green field development of this magnitude. Apart from the Dolomite and Lime quarry and the Louee Enduro bike track close by, the area has been a very peaceful, idyllic environment for all those fortunate enough to live there. However, I think in this case - having read the report and watched the hearing - the pros outweigh the cons in my mind. Despite being sceptical initially, I now believe that this project has been extremely well investigated over the many years of exploration and am very confident that any potential health and water issues have been addressed fully and will continue to be stringently monitored. I am confident that the IPC will ensure that any health concerns that are being raised by the local residents are nothing to be concerned about as outlined at the hearing. Over time, I've come to believe that Bowdens are an honest and trustworthy organisation. I now have complete confidence in them and believe they would do the very best they can for the community if this project proceeds. My real concern at the moment is the volume of scare mongering going on in the local community about the health effects for us all and the impact it could have on tourism. We keep hearing about what damage this mine would cause, yet it's important to remember that we have become the top tourist destination in New South Wales despite having 3 very large coal mines on our doorstep. In fact, It is the mining industry that has enabled our area to go from strength to strength and provide our visitors with such wonderful amenities. I am not involved in the mining industry but can recognise the huge contribution it has made to this area. This includes contributions to community groups, events and schools as well as infrastructure such as roads etc. Economically it has helped the area substantially. I do not feel we should be turning down another opportunity of this kind with all the benefits it will undoubtedly bring to the community as detailed in Bowden’s submissions. The existing mines have had flow on effects predominantly in Mudgee and Gulgong. I was pleased to see in the hearing that this one would focus its efforts on the declining Rylstone/Kandos area (and was shocked by the recent census statistics). The proposed mine would bring considerable employment to areas such as Lue, Rylstone and Kandos which would help the people who lost their jobs when the Cement works and the Charbon mine closed down. I was impressed with Bowden's commitment to employing locally - with no suggestion of FIFO style employment - and picking up some of the slack as the coal mines wind down. I do understand everyone’s concerns as we all would love to live as we are now, with very little noise disturbance and pollution that comes with any development. However, the reality is that we all need to make the most of any available resources. Provided we can be assured the strict planning conditions are adhered to, I see this as a hugely beneficial project for the region. As previously mentioned I feel the current owners of the proposed mine are very decent people and would do everything they could to ensure everyone was safe. Given the scope of this project and it's potential contribution to Australia's renewable future, it is much better having people we have come to know, than ending up with an unscrupulous possible foreign developer coming to the area in a few years time. Bowdens and their consultants have done a wonderful job in explaining all the possible problems that could occur and how they will be managed . I did have initial concerns about water issues and possibly lead fallout, but the DPE conditions of consent have addressed these issues. Furthermore, I followed the hearing closely and I was satisfied with the explanations presented. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Employment |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We need silver to make solar panels and the mine will create jobs. The land where the mine is proposed is worthless scrub. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project due to the undoubtedly positive impacts it will have on the local community and more broadly Australia both economically and societally. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development because, “Overall, the Department considers that the project achieves a balance between maximising resource recovery and minimising impacts, and the benefits of the project outweigh its residual costs. The Department also considers that the project is in the public interest and is approvable, subject to the strict conditions of consent.” |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you to the commissioners for reading my submission. I am 19 years old and as a member of the younger generation, I have grown up feeling constant worry about the future of our planet. All that my generation constantly hears is that our world is dying due to greenhouse gases which is causing climate change and how its up to us, the younger generation, (who have barely had a chance to work out how the world works), to change the way things are done and to help the planet survive!! I read what I can about renewable energies and alternatives and what possibilities there are for the future. Mining is going to happen no matter what, because everything we do and everything we use is pretty well reliant on what we take out of the ground. So it makes sense to mine for metals that will help us move away from fossil fuels and towards more sustainable alternatives. Silver and zinc are really important for that. I know everyone keeps talking about the lead, but when I looked up how much lead Bowdens says they’ll produce and compared it to Mt Isa and other lead mines in Australia it’s a fraction of that and Bowden’s won’t have a smelter on site so I think the health issues aren’t the same. Lead is just being used as an emotional issue to make people worried and scare them into objecting. If the government doesn’t approve these kinds of mines in Australia going ahead, how do we, the younger generation, make the changes that the next generation is going to wish we that we had made. |
Dobre Angeleski
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver mine will provide long term employment for the local area and the wider regions. |
TROY LOWE
Organisation |
na |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver project is yet another project "required" to progress through the governments/WEF'S own thoughtless decisions. We need this project to proceed in order to fulfil the governments promises. It's not a question of if it should go-ahead, it's a MUST go-ahead, but do so in a way that has minimal impact on mother earth. I support this project along with many others as we need them in order to shore up the future commodities doomed to be in deficit in the near future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support the project for the sake of NSW regional economies |
Ben Henri
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The approval of the Project is an important step for the economic development of the region. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
RPM Enterprises Australia ATF The Kennedy Family Trust |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm in favour of the mine to be approved for mining as silver is a vital resource to help against climate change |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project. Local jobs, positive economic impact. A valuable, non renewable resource in silver utilised in many applications. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the mine will provide economic benefits and jobs. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
n/a |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the mine will add economic benefit to the local area. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Kandos Bakery |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name Philip, I am the owner of Kandos bakery in Kandos. I have lived and run the bakery in Kandos for more than 9 years. Since the cement factory closed in 2011 and a few other coal mines closed after that, Kandos’s population has decreased dramatically. Kandos locals have no job and many of them have moved away to find a new place to live, others are travelling far away from home to work. Students after year 12 have no options to stay, they all go every year. Many businesses in Kandos have closed down, our bakery can not open much longer and will be closed down soon if this mine is rejected. Most of people who come and protest the mine are from many different areas, they do not really care about our life here, they protest the mine and they disappear, they do not give any solution for our community to survive. I know the mine somehow will affect the envirnoment but the benefit will much outweight. I hope that every member of the board can come and have a look at Kandos during the day, all members willl see how bad is our situation. Please approve this sliver mine, this is our last chance to survive in Kandos. Thank you for reading my opinion on this matter. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support the mine to go ahead. The key issues highlighted - "Environment, Socioeconomic impacts and Hazards" are all well-balanced. Australia needs this silver mine, so that as a nation we are self sufficient and can be world leaders in tackling climate change (with application of silver). We need to mine to decarbonise for the renewable future. Furthermore, silver is a useful form of commodity, which will become more valuable in uncertain geopolitical times. Unfortunately, this will become important in the future. The socioeconomic benefits have been highlighted in the recent submissions and will be great for the local and wider community. There have been concerns regarding the lead exposure, water impact and the acid tailings. However, this all depends on how you perform the studies (with relevant definitions and methodologies), and where you sit on your moral fence. This is a well-balanced project. Multiple advisors, consultants and departments have reviewed the process and have deemed the project to be more than safe - with provisions and contingency plans. Moving forward, these issues should be tackled as an ongoing basis as with all other mining companies that are currently operating in Australia. Australia has the world's highest standards in sustainability and maintaining the best practices (as it should). I'm sure this will be the case for this project, as outlined by the stakeholders of this project. Overall, this project appears to be of a more benefit for the majority of people, then the few that oppose it for their own personal reasons. Thank you for your consideration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A few points that might help with ideas… - Sustainability and resilience of local towns of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos - Hope for school leavers who head away for jobs or go on welfare - Environmental and social responsibility is clearly demonstrated by Bowdens Silver - Coal mining will close at some point so we need these projects to get up not only to save jobs but continue to provide revenue, royalties and taxation to the county and State. - Silver and zinc are metals that are required in moving forward with a decarbonising society. Silver in particular has a big future in electronics and medical technologies - We need to produce more of the metals here rather than the ever increasing reliance on countries like China and Mexico |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowden Silver mine as it will create more jobs in the area and give more prospects for me to apply for another job in the area, and hopefully my nephew will get a job and stay in the area. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Longreach Capital |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We believe the development of the Bowdens project will have material social and economic benefits to the region. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mining Industry |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver project could bring in more jobs opportunity and have significant economic benefit in the community. This mining project not just bringing more mining royalties for the local government but also increasing the productivity of rare resource such as silver and zinc for our green energy transition in near future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project would be an exciting opportunity for the local economy |
Euan Farquhar
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My submission is that Australians must prosper in their own right on their own land. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of the development for the good of NSW and Australia |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project has outstanding potential to deliver critical precious metals urgently needed to support decarbonisation of the economy through provision of essential raw materials. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have concerns around all mining and I am sure that these concerns will be alleviated if company and regulating authorities ensure all requirements will be met. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would greatly appreciate it if this mine went ahead in a timely fashion. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write to support the proposed development for the following reasons: As a visitor to the area on many occasions (including the Lue Pub), I feel that the project will bring multi-faceted socioeconomic benefits including - employment opportunities and associated benefits to the region - provision of critical minerals which will have far reaching effects for NSW, Australia as a whole and is of global importance with our trading partners - especially Europe - in the context of the geopolitical situation with Ukraine, Russia and China. - I believe that the NSW Government and responsible agencies have undergone rigorous processes on consultation, planning, assessment on all key issues and understand that the project has met the strict criteria for approval. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the project on the following grounds: - job creation -investment/economic benefits -more mining royalties for the govt -silver and zinc critically important for green energy transition |
G Parsons
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I make this submission in favour of the Bowdens Silver Project as a person who has worked extensively in the minerals and nuclear industries in Australia and overseas. The project has already been approved by the DPE after rigorous and extensive assessment and has therefore passed the requirements for development under the current stringent regulations and rules. When one looks at the development of Australia to now, it was built on the back of the mining & processing industries and agriculture. This must continue to the benefit of all Australians, particularly with a resource of such significance as Bowdens Silver Project. The project will bring significant economic benefit to the area through employment and provision of services and more facilities. For comparison, look at the city of Orange and its "nearby" Cadia mine. Silver is also a vital metal in a number of low emission technologies and its world-wide production must increase to service these industries. There has also been, and still are existing quarrying in this general area of the state. The rest of my submission is basically to counteract the negativists who oppose the project, since I have had some experience in these situations. Although mining and farming progressed this country, it is worth noting that mining "disturbs" a minimal amount of land compared to farming, yet usually cops a lot more flack from negativists. Look at other areas in the state with extensive mining such as Broken Hill, Cobar and Orange and many smaller areas of mining. Farming still carries on in close proximity to many of these areas, if not in bushland. Claims of opponents of particular wild life aspects, or effects on farming, generation of dust and noise, or particularly the escape of toxicity to anywhere are grossly exaggerated or false. I have lived in mining towns and on mine sites so I have familiarity in this regard and it is not that significant. Since the ore is a mixture of lead, zinc and silver minerals these are recovered in their same chemical form to concentrates. These minerals are present as sulphides, and in this form the lead is much less toxic. It is only when the galena (containing lead and some of the silver content) is oxidised in roasting and smelting that it becomes much more bio-available. As stated, the concentrates will be shipped away for further processing that will change the chemical form. The use of particular wild life in an area has become a popular technique of opponents to development, but in my experience, I have found this skewed to make their case more sad and sorry. Such assessments should be professionally based. So, in summary, there are many reasons to proceed with development and minimal evidence for the case not to proceed. The project should, and must go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
n/a |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Sustainability of the local towns of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos Opportunities for school leavers who move away for employment or worse go on welfare Environmental and social responsibility is clearly demonstrated by the team at Bowdens Silver Coal mining will close or wind down going forward at some point so we need these projects to get up not only to save jobs but continue to provide revenue, royalties and taxation revenue to pay for all the services society demand. Silver and zinc are metals that are required in moving forward with a decarbonising society. Silver in particular has a big future in electronics and medical technologies We need to produce more of the metals in Australia rather than being increasingly dependant on countries like China and Russia. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In support of the mine for job creation and economic benefits that follow from a development such as this |
Trevor Hamilton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Fully support of employment creating activity at Bowden |
Wilson Sy
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowden project has been well researched, environmentally planned and community consulted. The project will stimulate and benefit the local and Australian economy. Earning foreign income from mineral exports, at a time when the country has enormous external debt, is a national necessity. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Economic benefits to the local community as well as the state. Minerals are required for ongoing green transition. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
23/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver Mining National Importance I am writing to express my support for Silver Mines Ltd Bowdens Silver Project and to highlight the national importance of the commodity silver to Australia. Silver is a critical commodity with a wide range of industrial and technological applications. It is used in the production of electronics, solar panels, batteries, and medical equipment. Moreover, silver is a critical component of many products that are vital to our modern way of life. As the demand for silver continues to rise, it is crucial that Australia develops and expands its silver mining industry to meet this growing demand. Silver Mines Ltd Bowdens Silver Project represents a significant opportunity for Australia to expand its domestic production of silver and contribute to the global supply chain. Furthermore, the Bowdens Silver Project has the potential to create jobs and stimulate economic growth in the local community and beyond. The project is expected to create hundreds of direct and indirect jobs, generate revenue for the government, and support local businesses. This will contribute to the economic development of the region and benefit the wider Australian economy. In addition to the economic benefits, the Bowdens Silver Project has been designed with a focus on sustainability and environmental responsibility. Silver Mines Ltd has committed to reducing the environmental impact of the project by minimizing the use of water, implementing responsible waste management practices, and rehabilitating the site once mining is complete. In conclusion, the national importance of silver cannot be overstated. As such, it is imperative that Australia supports the development of domestic silver mining projects like Silver Mines Ltd Bowdens Silver Project. The project has the potential to provide significant economic benefits while promoting environmental responsibility and sustainability. I urge you to support this critical project. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert Burd |
Robert Parrott
Organisation |
Liquor and Gaming |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have recently taken over the operation of a Hospitality business in Kandos, as well as another couple of Hospitality businesses in Lithgow and Wallerawang. This is my first foray into Regional/Country towns. I have been surprised by the lack of activity in town, especially Kandos. Towns like Kandos appear to be in real need of an injection of people plus jobs and money into town. This will also bring more small business to town and therefore bring a new vibrancy to the town that I currently do not experience. From looking at the proposal from the Mining people, I feel it will greatly benefit the local community by providing jobs, opportunity and much needed infra-structure. I can only see more jobs and money and opportunity being a good thing for now and into the future. |
Peter Brun
Organisation |
No |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a shareholder in Silver Mines through a family investment company, I recognise that the company has done a great deal to minimise the undesirable impacts the project may have on the local community, and the benefits it may draw from this project. There are always many more objectors to such projects than supporters, despite the incredible advances that have been made in recent decades, in meeting objections. If such projects were disallowed, many would not go ahead to the long term disadvantage of communities as a whole. |
Troy Leathem
Organisation |
Troy Leathem Constructions |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We suport the job creation |
Jane Munro
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a Mudgee resident and I write in support of Bowdens Silver SSD-5765 EXH-39437454. My reasons for supporting the proposed development are set out below. 1. The proposed recycling of water through the process circuit and Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) management will support the proponent's commitment to "no competition for water with local agriculture and no impact on environmental flows" and its paramount commitment to protection of Lawson Creek from impacts associated with the proposed development. 2. The proposed development's water management and TSF design has been subject to extensive and rigorous technical scrutiny and peer reviews. 3. Approval of the proposed development will be a significant diversification to the regional economy which is currently focussed on fossil fuels. This is particularly important given that the life of the three coal mines in the Mudgee region is limited. Loss of direct and indirect employment due to likely coal mine closure in the next decade can be significantly offset by the approval of the Bowdens Silver project. 4. The silver and zinc produced by the proposed development will form an essential raw material critically required to ensure the viability and efficiency of renewable energy technologies leading to reducing global carbon emissions and global warming. I urge the IPC to approve the project with rigorous conditions of consent requiring the development to be constructed, managed and monitored in line with world's best practice for the management of acid mine drainage and the construction and management of the tailings storage facility so as to protect Lawson Creek and groundwater resources. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel that all of the new technologies that we rely on, including renewable energy industries, need the raw materials that this mine will provide, including the lead. Australia has the best mining practices in the World, and thes minerals will be mined somewhere in the World if not here, so we may as well ensure these materials are mined in the most sustainable methods possible. It’s just not right to say ‘not in my backyard’ but then expect others to make a sacrifice if we intend to utilise the minerals and the technologies that come from those minerals. Also, Australia and our region needs the jobs that this proposal will bring, with the prosperity and the standard of living that we would all like. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The attributes of silver in relation to science, technology, medicine and as a financial asset do not need to be re-stated. Just one example of silver usage is in solar panels- two thirds of an ounce in each panel. World events indicate that Australia would be wise to have a strong domestic supply of silver. For disclosure, I hold shares in this company. As I approach most things I like to see win-win situations for all parties including Australia, local people and the environment. |
Liz Leary
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silver Mine has a lot going for it including- Job opportunities now and into the future also the economic benefits and support to the local businesses in the towns surrounding the mine. A lot of small towns like Mudgee need these sort of developments to help continue to grow and prosper. The size of the mining are doesn’t seem to be excessive and as long as there is strict control over all the amenities including noise, dust, traffic and any chance of water contamination especially to the area directly surrounding the mine and they also have some regard and continued consultations / support and address any issues that may be a concern with the local community surrounding the mine continuing into the future. I do believe the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the mine. If it goes through, my husband might be able to apply for a job amd work 20mins from home not 50. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Wade Charlton Electrical |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
An opportunity for more resources |
Troy Leathem
Organisation |
Troy Leathem Constructions |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I suport the project |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern I am a licensed builder and understand the importance of supporting building developments which create local jobs and this Bowdens Silver Project will certainly do this strengthening the local community. It will support local business's and being a business owner myself I understand how important this is. I support this development & hope the government will do well with the relevant stakeholders and this project bring a good strong positive outcome to many people and businesses. |
Daniel Schmidberger
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Good day. I work for an international renewable energy company, but I am here making representation on my own behalf. Silver is a critical component in the renewable energy market (esp. solar PV), and we will soon be facing significant supply shortages as the world ramps up the "New Energy Revolution". Every solar panel requires approximately 20g of silver and substitutes have been hard to find as efficiency is key and silver has the highest electrical conductivity of all the metals. As of 2018, the solar panel manufacturing industry used about 8% of the world’s annual physical silver supply. But this demand will be eclipsed as within Australia alone, there is over 100GW of solar PV projects in the pipeline and simply not enough silver in production to meet this demand. So, I ask that you please consider the greater good and help me and my colleagues with the materials we need to fight climate change. Thank-you and Kind Regards. Daniel. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the progress of this project as Silver Mines Limited approaches the project responsibly. It will bring long term employment and business opportunities to a rural community. |
Ken Hornery
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to provide my support for the Bowdens Silver Project. The company approached us years ago and have kept us informed of the project and any potential impacts to my property. We have also been offered mitigation measures for any potential noise. We have been provided with plenty of communication, phone calls and newsletters as well as personal meetings. I have seen Bowdens start rehabilitation and use the land appropriately. Along the way, they have been good neighbours and helped with our fencing and driveway. I've already seen them employ a number of locals and think future jobs will benefit Lue and the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a great opportunity to grow the area. Giving working opportunities to family’s. They have an environmental plan to minimise the impacts to the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the conditional approval of the proposed development of the Bowdens Silver Project. Going forward in the renewables space we need all the silver we can mine and, if anything, may not be able to find enough to meet the needs of the solar panel and electrical vehicle industries. The zinc and lead to also be mined at Bowdens are too needed to make renewable products for wind turbines and electrical vehicles. The jobs and skill set growth the mine will bring are the very things regional Australia wants and needs to keep country towns populated and prosperous. |
Thelma Large
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
with all the mines around there is really enough lead and other particles in the air to just wipe out a village and its surrounds.i worry for future generations coming along to find our beautiful areas have been mined into obliviation |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to express my support for this important regional development project. Resource projects such as this are extremely important for building and maintaining our local regional communities. They provide meaningful employment directly, and business support indirectly, to the communities in which they are based. They also support our society at large by providing the resources our civilization needs, and by providing the economic productivity that pays for our prosperity. Increasingly, there are ill-informed public campaigns mounted against resource projects on the basis they are bad for the environment and communities. The motivations for these campaigns are many, but most are fueled by activists who are antithetic to the principles of a free market-driven democratic society. Such campaigns do not have the interests of our regional communities at heart, and if successful will see people worse off in the future. The projects meet and exceed all of the environmental criteria required. Their long term impacts on the environment are negligible. I hope that the wellbeing of our communities and our society will be put first, and not the narrow political interests of activists. Best regards, |
Jo Hornery
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We have been kept in the loop during the whole process in relation to our property and generally and fully support them. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
MBA |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver Project is significant for our community and our country, if the project is approved it will create jobs for our society. The benefits of the project will provide long-term employment, training, and business opportunities to the local area near Mudgee the Mid-Western Region. The project will benefit our school system and bring in more funding and resources for our future generation of manufacturing, and many more opportunities for our business to venture into a better business environment. The project will provide more funding to the local community's charity work to assist and bring in all people from other areas, this will create a community hub to benefit all kinds of populations whether young or elder. The benefit is huge as this will bring in more revenue for our government's treasury to provide its funding. |
LEONARD LEARY
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE BOWDEN SUBMISSION AS IT WOULD CONTRIBUTE THE FOLLOWING:- 1. PROVDE EMPLOYMENT DIRECTLY FOR OVER 500 JOBS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND LATER IN AN OPERATIONAL MODE. 2. PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT BOTH DURING CONSTRUCTION AND THEN AS AN ONGOING OPERATION INDIRECTLY WITHIN THE MINE AND VIA LOCAL SUPPORTING INDUSTRIES. 3. WOULD GIVE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR BOTH ESTABLISHED AND NEW SMALL INDUSTRY TO STRENGTHEN THIER POSITION IN THE WORK PLACE BY PROVIDING JOBS IN SUPPORTING THE BOWDEN MINING OPERATION 4. BOWDEN BY BEING A GOOD CORPORATE CITIZEN IN THE LOCAL AREA SUPPORTING AND SPONSORING CHILDREN’S AND ADULT SPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AND SPENDING FUNDS WITHIN THE LGA. 6. THE PROPOSED BOWDEN PROJECT WILL ASSIST IN DIVERSIFYING THE CURRENT LOCAL MINING INDUSTRY WHICH IN TURN WILL HAVE A STRENGTHENING AND POSITIVE FLOW ON OF THE ECONOMY WITHIN THE LGA . 7. THE PROPOSED BOWDEN PROJECT WILL SUPPORT THE NSW GOVERNMENTS IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTION OF SILVER AND ZINC AS CRITICAL MINERALS WITHIN ITS HIGH TECH METALS STRATEGY 8. PLAY A PART IN STRENGTHENING THE MUDGEE LAG DUE TO THE FACT THAT SILVER IS A HIGH DEMAND MINERAL ITS INDUSTRIAL USES BEING CRITICAL IN RENEWABLE ENERGY, ELECTRICAL VEHICLES AND COMMUNICATIONS. 9. IN PROVIDING WORK BOTH IN MUDGEE AND ALL THE SURROUNDING SMALLER TOWNS AND VILLAGES IT WILL GIVE THE LOCAL CITIZENS THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK AND STAY IN TOUCH WITH FAMILY AND NOT HAVE TO MOVE FROM THE AREA. THIS WILL HAVE A POSITIVE FLOW ON EFFECT AND ESTABLISH A FEELING AMONGST THE COMMUNITY OF PERMANENCY. 10. BOWDENS HAVE OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS SHOWN THAT THEY ARE PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH ALTERATIONS TO THIER PLANNING AS DIRECTED BY THE NSW GOVERNMENT AND ITS DEPARTMENTS AND SHOWN GOOD FAITH BY IMPLEMENTING SUCH DIRECTIONS RESULTING IN THE NSW GOVERNMENT AND ITS NUMEROUS DEPARTMENTS NOT FINDING ANY ISSUES FOLLOWING WHAT APPEARS TO BE A THROUGH AND RESPONSIBLE PLANNING AND EVALUATION. 11. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BOWDENS PROJECT BY WAY OF ITS IDENTIFIED MINING DIRECTION WILL PLAY A (SMALL) PART IN ASSISTING THE ENVIRONMENT WORLD WIDE. IN SUMMARY I BELIEVE THAT THE COMMITMENT MADE BY BOWDEN AND THE FACT THAT THE NSW GOVERNMENT AND ITS NUMEROUS DEPARTMENTS NOT FINDING ANY ISSUES FOLLOWING WHAT APPEARS TO BE A RESPONSIBLE APPROACH BY BOWDEN AND THE POSITIVE IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE ON THE LOCAL AREA AND ITS CITIZENS THE PROJECT NEEDS TO BE APPROVED. |
Pablo Corsaro
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is a critical mineral for the environment . Australia has all the know-how to mine is a sustainable manner minimising the impact on the surrounding environment keeping the ecosystem. Closing the door to this kind of investments means operate mines in countries where there is less surveillance a more risk for the environment. As the world is one we will miss a business opportunity (as Silver is in great needs for the next decades) plus we anyway pay the consequences of mine activity operated not in respect of the ecosystem |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of this project. The DPE's assessment report shows that Bowdens Silver have thoroughly assessed the key community and government issues. DPE and all of their departments including the EPA have not raised any issues and the conditions of consent appear to be suitably strict. Local jobs both in the mine and in surrounding towns in businesses that support the mine and mine workers will benefit the area. |
David Cook
Organisation |
National Pump and Energy |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
21/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this project needs to go ahead to support the local communities and towns surrounding the area. The coal industry won’t be around forever and in this region there is a huge reliance on the 3 coal mines in the area for supporting the community. This project will allow and enable the towns to prosper long after the coal mines are completed and with world currencies going to digital in years to come gold and silver will be the backing tools for this to occur. Silver is going to be much more valuable and required commodity in the future and this project will inject much security and value into not just nsw but the entire Australian economy into the future. Businesses like National pump and energy wouldn’t exist without these new projects coming on board and with natural resources being our nations biggest revenue generator we must keep allowing new projects like this to come to fruition to ensure our country’s future. |
MICHAEL SWEENEY
Organisation |
Mudgee Region Rail (inc) ................... we hope in future to carry the product(s) by rail |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mudgee Region Rail (inc) MRR is a community group proposing to re activate Rylstone-Gulgong rail line for freight ,Passenger& tourist trains We have identified 100,000 TPa of logs from New England forests ,ongoing which could use the line . At present this tonnage is road freighted through Mudgee. Bowdens estimate of 60,000 Tpa of mineral concentrate presently is destined for road transport from the mine site to Port Botany or Parkes (Port Pirie) This is a large tonnage passing through Lue ,Rylstone, Blue Mountains Mudgee and other towns. We propose the containers could be loaded at the re built Maloneys Rd where it intersects the sail rail line. All road haulage through towns as above would be eliminated. MRR Has an engineering report from respected rail constructors " L******ium" cost bestimate $32 Mto to activate the line. Time from start to run 8 months. With logs100,000Tpa and concentrate 60,000Tpa an economical case for the line is made. What rail does best is high tonnages point to point. Not even to mention environmental and safety benefits. We ask that Bowden adopt this option in the best interests of the project,the community,&and the environment. Michael Sweeney ,(Chair) Mudgee Region Rail 0427 731 248 |
Attachments |
documentfinalmudgeeregionrailincmarch2022docx_redacted.pdf (PDF, 969.75 KB) log-path2jpg.jpg (JPG, 1.01 MB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It seems it would be a great employment opportunity for locals of Rylstone,Kandos and Lue. As well as Mudgee where I now reside. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Very supportive of the current plan; and environmental plan and recovery plan. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local land holder and a retired business owner I believe Australia and New South Wales needs this development to proceed for both the economic and mining works that will recover these mineral and ores under Australian supervised controls to ensure world best results. If these works were not to proceed and resources are developed in third world countries where the cost of human and environment compliance may not be regarded as important. This being a new development it would be scene changer for the mining of Silver and other ores in both compliance and reporting and being performed in Australia be monitored with world best practices. I am of the believe that with the closing of coal fired power stations and the flow on effect of coal mining this country is going to go backwards. Also the advancing EV world and needs associated on precious metals will not abait and I want Australia to be a growing force in the evolving technology.. I am a firm believer that approving this mine will provide far more benefits for NSW and Australia.then declining the development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i support this project as an employment opportunity for the local community |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a local business we are in support of The Bowdens Silver Project as it will provide 320 jobs during construction and 228 ongoing jobs during operations. For every job created in the mine, rule of thumb shows another 2.5 will be created in supporting industries and the wider community, bringing wide ranging benefits to the region. We believe this will not only be beneficial to the sleepy village of Lue but also to the regional towns of Kandos, Rhylestone, Mudgee, Gulgong and other surrounding settlements. This brings opportunities for support industry such as our own metal fabrication business. Flow on effects are investment in local community and infrastructure, not only from the Bowden Silver Project, but also those businesses and individuals who prosper due to its operation in the area. We are happy that enviromental issues have been addressed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will bring jobs to Mudgee which I think is a good. Country towns need projects like this to keep them growing otherwise they end up dead like so many country towns and I have seen a few in our travels which is so sad. |
Jacob Edmonds
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I see this mine as a great opportunity for my community and will creat jobs for the local people. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I want to make the following submission in support of the Bowdens Silver Project. As we transition to clean energy, Australia will need vast quantities of critical minerals and metals to achieve its targets. Silver will play a critical role in this transition. It has been suggested that silver will play an even more fundamental role than cobalt, lithium and nickel across many green energy technologies. Some of silver’s uses in this transition are: • Electric Vehicles - In an article by Maria Smirnova dated 17 February 2021 called ‘Silver’s Clean Energy Future’, Ms Smirnova says “silver’s superior electrical properties make it hard to replace across a wide and growing range of automotive applications, many of which are critical to safety and to meeting increased environmental standards”. With the transition to EV’s the demand for silver is likely to increase significantly. • Solar Panels - Governments around the world are encouraging and incentivising people to install solar panels and each solar cell requires a certain amount of silver. As the number of solar panels increases the demand for silver must also rise. • 5G Cellular Network Rollout – another big driver of silver’s industrial demand is the gradual rollout of 5G technology across the world. Among 5G components requiring silver metal are semiconductor chips, cabling, microelectromechanical systems, etc. Also, the race to 6G wireless is well underway and it would not be surprising to see an even higher level of silver demand when the next generation of wireless rolls out in the future. My understanding is that the supply of silver is struggling to keep up with demand so that’s where Bowdens Silver Project would be an invaluable asset to NSW. I also note the by-products of zinc and lead both make significant contributions to renewable energy technologies. Wind turbines rely heavily on zinc for corrosion protection as do solar panel structures not to mention the steel structures that support the energy grid such as transmission towers also requiring protection against corrosion. Zinc also plays an important part in energy storage systems and batteries. A benefit of zinc is that it can be recovered and reused again and again without a loss in quality which lightens the load on landfill. Lead too has its place being an important part of current and future solar panel design. Lead is part of the alloy used to coat the PV ribbons used inside solar panels. If the Bowdens Silver Project were to be approved the benefits to the local community would be substantial. Job opportunities both during construction and ongoing jobs during operations would have a flow-on effect to the whole community boosting local businesses, contractors, suppliers and service providers which would be so good for the Mudgee and surrounding areas. There is no denying fossil fuels contribute vast sums of money by way of taxes and royalties to the Governments which in turn help fund our schools, hospitals, NDIS, etc. As we transition away from fossil fuels the Governments will need to replace these funds from other sources so if the Bowdens Silver Project is successful, in time, what a great boost this could be to Government revenues. As the DPE assessed the Project as being in the public interest and noting the amazing benefits of silver, zinc and lead in the clean energy transition, I support this Project and hope that my submission in some small way will contribute to a favourable decision by the IPC. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am for the mine as it will provide more jobs |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support Bowden's project for a number of reasons. Firstly, I would find it hypocritical to oppose the project when I live in a modern society, enjoying all its benefits, most of which have come about because of the unparalleled properties of silver. Modern medicine, phones, computers, the internet, solar panels, motor vehicles, even the food we purchase from Woolworths or Coles have all been produced and delivered using silver components. They would not exist in their volume, quality or quantity without silver. Secondly, I find it impossible to expect some primitive savage in a far-off land to mine silver, and die in many cases, for the above benefits to me. These distant countries have rampant corruption and ignore the few regulations they have. Here in Australia, we can ensure any mining is conducted safely environmentally and follow all WHS requirements. Thirdly, the Kandos, Rylstone and Lue district community is literally dying for a lack of opportunity for employment. Since the works and local mines have closed the area has been subsisting on government grants. The younger generation has left and the area is rapidly being reduced to retirees or tree changers from the city who contribute little or nothing to the local area. The Bowdens project would encourage families back into the district and would reinvigorate the local economy by not only directly employing people but also creating many secondary job opportunities for locals. Since European settlement, the Kandos Rylstone Lue district has had a rich history of mining. These enterprises employed many people and ensured the future of the district. Few, if any, of these mines are operating today. The district needs Bowdens to return to its former glory. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mudgee Region Rail (inc) ................... we hope in future to carry the product(s) by rail |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
test submission, pls advise if recd. |
David Bradley
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Gas Transport Solutions Pty Ltd 18 Portsea Rise, Mosman Park, WA 6012, Australia ABN 70 101 355 720 February 20, 2023 To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for the Bowden’s Silver Project My name is David Bradley, and I am in strong support of the Bowden Silver Project. I am Managing Director of an energy consulting business - Gas Transport Solutions. Working in the Energy Industry, I have become very aware of the critical and essential role silver plays in the renewable industry including: • A key ingredient for Photovoltaic (PV) panels. Silver is an essential ingredient in solar PV panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • For the electric car industry, silver is also an essential ingredient, used in car battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia, and one of the largest in the world. Now more than ever, this resource needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing, and essential renewable energy industry manufacture of PV panels and electric cars. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and reginal jobs. o Estimated 320 Construction jobs, and 280 Permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years and vary likely longer. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on affect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • The NSW Department of Planning and Environment has performed a rigorous assessment of the Bowden’s Silver project and have concluded the project is recommended for approval. The DPE will have considered the science of the project, as opposed to the negative sensationalized typical NIMBY responses of some local community members which has little or no science. I strongly urge the IPC to consider the facts and the science of the project and to disregard the sensationalized NIMBY baseless claims, and to Approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine in order to realize the benefits mentioned above to help combat climate change. Very Truly Yours, David M. Bradley Managing Director, Gas Transport Solutions Pty Ltd m: +61 (0) 439 854 328 e: [email protected] |
Attachments |
bowdenssilverprojectsubmissiongtsfinpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 195.63 KB) |
Steven Mitchell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the Bowdens Silver Project. As a [relevant professional/individual], I have had the opportunity to closely examine the project and I am confident that it will be a great success. The Bowdens Silver Project is a significant investment in the future of the mining industry. It promises to deliver a significant amount of silver and other valuable minerals, which will have a positive impact on the economy and provide employment opportunities for the local community. In addition, the project has been designed with a strong commitment to environmental sustainability, which is crucial for the long-term success of any mining operation. I have been particularly impressed by the approach that the Bowdens Silver Project team has taken in engaging with the local community. They have demonstrated a deep commitment to working closely with stakeholders and ensuring that the project is developed in a responsible and transparent manner. This is essential for building trust and securing support from the community, which is critical for the success of any project of this kind. Overall, I believe that the Bowdens Silver Project has the potential to be a model for responsible and sustainable mining practices. I would strongly encourage you to support this project and to help ensure that it can move forward as planned. Thank you for your consideration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia needs to put more money and effort into producing resources, and investing in the future of the mining industry. The BSP team has positively engaged with stakeholders this far, which is fantastic |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am rates payer from the Mid-Western Regional Council LGA and I support the Bowdens Silver mine project for the following reasons: 1. Socially, there is constant concern regarding burning fossil fuels to create energy with a shift towards renewable energy and electric vehicles to phase out petrol and diesel vehicles being regularly discussed. To manufacture electric vehicles and other renewal energy sources, silver must be mined. 2. With the coal mines within the LGA reaching end of life; the LGA needs new industry to maintain population numbers, maintain support of local industry and small business and visitors. The LGA cannot rely solely on Tourism. With industry comes visitors and with the establishment of the Silver Mine and a new workforce, more people will either visit the LGA for the first time, relocate to the LGA or have family regularly visit. Since the extension of the Wilpinjong, Ulan and Moolarben Coal Mines (during the time I have lived in the area) the LGA has dramatically changed and tourism boomed. I know personally that prior to moving to the area I had not heard of the area, as had none of my immediate family who are now regular visitors. 3. The EIS submitted by Bowdens Silver effectively manages the impacts associated with mining and any Approval will be subject to strict conditions. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to see the Bowden’s Silver Project approved. I have been following this Project for some time and note it is the largest known undeveloped silver mineral resource in Australia. If it were to be approved what a great benefit it could be for Australia but more particularly for NSW both financially and for the jobs it would create – what a boon for the local area. We live in uncertain times especially noting the military conflict in Europe and this means the demand for safe havens will remain high in the near term. On top of this we are in the midst of soaring inflation around the world. After gold, silver is considered a hedge against inflation. Add to this the huge quantity of silver required in the renewables space and in the field of medicine, etc., the potential benefits for the silver produced by this mine are enormous. NSW desperately needs a project like this especially noting silver’s role in future technologies. The possibilities are endless not to mention the outstanding financial benefits. The resultant tax revenue would do wonders to help meet the State’s obligations and responsibilities. I do hope the IPC will see their way clear to approve the Bowdens Silver Project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Mr Duncan AM, I am writing in support of the above project being undertaken by Silver Mines Limited (SVL). The above project is the largest undeveloped silver mine project in the world with almost 320 million ounces of silver with a life expectancy of about 23 years (company information). Last year, the Federal Government passed its Treasury Laws Amendment (Electric Car Discount) Bill, which will provide up to $2000 off the purchase price of battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles, as well as fringe benefits tax (FBT) exemptions for fleets and novated leases. The Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, has stated: “The time has come for Australian households and businesses to reap the benefits of cheaper, low emissions transport that is fit for the 21st century. He has also previously stated, "The Albanese Government is delivering on its election commitment to develop Australia’s first National Electric Vehicle Strategy to unlock the nation’s EV potential and reduce transport emissions.” In addition, the New South Wales Government has established the 'Electric Vehicle Strategy' to accelerate the State’s vehicle fleet of the future, to increase the uptake of electric vehicles (EVs) to ensure New South Wales shares in the benefits. Therefore, both State and Federal Government's have created a precedent to implement cheaper and cleaner energy sources. The materials used to manufacture new EV's will require the following materials - nickel, copper, lithium, manganese, cobalt, graphite, steel and SILVER. Therefore, to support of the national legislation and the global demand required to manufacture EV's, with a state supported strategy, you should highly consider the above project. Regards |
Name Redacted
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in full support of the Bowdens Silver project going forward. Silver is a critical industrial metal used in hundreds of industries including healthcare, renewable energy and Electric Vehicles. The discoveries of new silver deposits in the world has been falling over the last 20 years and mine supply has been dropping within that time as well. Most silver is produced as a byproduct of lead, zinc and copper mining, NOT from primary silver mines. Bowdens Silver is an extremely important project for the future of Australia in my view and will create thousands of jobs for the local area over its long mine life. Also, silver is a monetary metal and has been used for thousands of years for that purpose, and I do believe there will be a severe shortage of silver if mines like Bowdens are not allowed to develop and produce. Thank you. |
Glenn Swan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver Project is extremely important for the continued development of renewable energy in Australia and in the fight against climate change. Silver is extremely important in all renewable energy technology, especially solar and electric vehicles. With the Australian Government and others across the world pushing for more renewable energy and electric vehicles, this cannot be achieved without increased production of silver and Australia is in a good position to be able to produce its own and avoid being totally reliant on other Countries for both raw materials and finished products. The Governments own climate targets for Electric vehicles in the future will not be able to be met without increased silver production from somewhere. The environmental impacts of this development cannot be assessed without consideration of the end use of the silver and benefits this provides with production of solar panels and EV's. If no silver mines existed, there would simply be no solar or EV's, so to argue against this mine proposal simply on the basis of climate change is nonsensical. Australia should welcome the increase production of silver here which will only increase in value over time with the global push for more renewable energy technology. |
Paul Deegan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the proposed mining in the area. It is of most concern to me that the amplification of scare mongering about this mine is as a result of selfish baby boomers who have come out to the country to enjoy the place. They have no regard to where all the resources come from that support their existence. Australia needs to mine. I trust that the regulations that are already in place will safeguard many aspects of any concern that is listed by others. The credibility of any "Action group" should be closely looked at. Unethical communications, inaccurate predictions should be called into question. It is just pure selfishness "not in my backyard" attitudes. The next generation deserves better. |
Lesley Whitton
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Li submit for Bowden silver to go ahead |
kristopher best
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
as a member of the general public , i am in support of the mine proposal , on alternative energy grounds and economical benefits to the local region the nation and from an alternative energy position , silver is a critical material moving into a carbon neutral world , also from a jobs security aspect , after listening to the submisions and considering all the concerns , i do believe in australia with the use of best practice this proposal can be economicaly , socialy and enviromentally responsable |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
18/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Clean energy is available mines should no longer be developed |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I totally support the approval of the Bowden silver mine in Lue. I believe it will be good for the region . |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I and my whole entire family support Bowdens Silvers open cut mine (the project) going ahead. The DPE has looked over all submissions and recommmended that this project should be approved. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A significant silver deposit that would aid in the production of an industrial material, which is vitality needed for such products as photovoltaic products and liquid waste management. If we are serious about meeting future energy targets, projects of this scale need to comply with DPE standards and then be developed as soon as practicable. Having a resource of this size within Australia also has ecomical benefits not only to the local community, but the Australian supply chain and the economy in general. I do not have any objections to raise in regards to the proposed Bowdens silver development as of this date. |
James Egan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support the Bowdens Silver Project as I believe the project will bring significant socioeconomic benefits to the surrounding communities. The metalliferous mining industry can be a challenging industry to work in due to the remote location of many mine and exploration sites throughout Australia. This requires individuals within the industry to make a difficult choice - commit to a fly in fly out roster and spend a significant amount of time away from their families or relocate their families to remote towns which often sacrifices the educational opportunities available to their children. These are choices and realities which many mining families accept due to the financial opportunities that well-paid mining jobs offer, however Bowdens is a unique opportunity as it would offer long-term employment at a world-class orebody in a highly desirable location. With hundreds of potential jobs on offer if the mine is approved, this would give hundreds of families and their children the opportunity to have both their parents home every night of the week in a community where you can also balance a healthy, family-friendly lifestyle. These families would spend locally and have their children educated locally, in turn making their contribution in stimulating the local economy for years to come. I believe this is a highly significant benefit of the project. Greenfields mining projects are inherently difficult in nature and not all stakeholders will agree, however I agree with the DPE's assessment - the benefits of the project certainly outweigh the impacts. We need to plan the careful extraction of these critical minerals in order to transition towards a cleaner future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Letter of support for the Bowdens Silver Project 16 Feb 2023 I have been involved in process design and construction for base and precious metal for over 50 years, working in Australia and overseas. I have worked on mine site developments across Australia, Africa, South America, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia and the Philippines. I have witnessed remarkable progress in safety, environment, training, health, equal opportunity and community development. I am proud to be part of this awakening and push towards higher levels of responsible mining. The working environment of my early years bears little resemblance to the mining and process plant checks and balances of today. Mining legislation over the years has dramatically improved all facets of the industry to ensure resources development is safe, responsible and accountable. Outside of the mine operations area; health, family values, training, education and sport are some of the community benefits I have witnessed. I am of the belief that good communication, clear objectives and responsible mining practices are key to the success of mining projects. I am a shareholder with Silver Mines Limited because I feel they instil these values and objectives. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales to approve this mining development. It’s the right thing to do, for all the right reasons. Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this project. As a shareholder of Silver Mines Ltd and after scrutinising the DPE submitted, I am convinced that it has addressed all areas of concern adequately. As a shareholder, I, together with other shareholders, shall hold the company's Board accountable in adhering to all Conditions stated in the Consent for the Project. Thank you. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Will be a great employment opportunity for the area |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
With the need to mine, refine and produce products domestically, Bowdens-Silver project is ideally placed to help fulfill the urgent need for minerals that are in growing need for our move to renewables. I trust measures are in place to protect any significant Historical items from this area of Australia's earliest inland settlement. In my opinion, I do consider the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate and offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Ian Slapp
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have no concern or issue with the project. I support it 100% It will be great for our community. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Bowdens Silver |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowdens Silver proposal on the following grounds- The risks and impacts presented environmentally and socially are able to be suitably addressed through engineering and design. The tribal divisions that are apparent within the community appear to be driven by rank fear and personal biases. Not on the realities proposed and recommended for approval. Alternatively looking at a rejection of such a project pushes the impacts of industrialised society elsewhere in the world with less stringent regulation. In short, it would be a failure of our society to take responsibility for necessary inputs into a renewable or simply prosperous future. In terms of inter-generational equity failure to approve this project based on local concerns from an elderly populace hamstrings the younger populations opportunities to upskill to solve the problems of tomorrow. Minds are equally distributed, but opportunity and ore bodies are not. Forcing the younger generation to move away from the region into the least affordable areas should they wish to upskill and build meaningful lives in the name of appeasing vocal residents is both cruel and destructive to the social fabric of the community, that will be torn apart as coal mining within the region winds down over time. Let the idea that a united and strong community exists not be overstated, there is a fierce division at many fence lines and even fiercer between the haves and the have-nots. A zero-sum mindset of a few should not prevent the majority from prospering. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM ORIGINAL SUBMISSION. A little bit about myself, My wife and I moved to Capertee in 2008 from Sydney and I lived and worked in the small community of Capertee as the local NSW Police officer. I was in the town for 4 years from 2008-2012, During this time I saw first-hand the positive socioeconomic impact that the local coal mine had on such a small town like Capertee for the local businesses. While in Capertee my wife and I had two children who were both born in Mudgee Hospital. In 2012 I secured employment in a coal mine to the North of Mudgee near Ulan and I resigned from the police and moved to Mudgee. It was this employment in the coal mine that brought me and my family to Mudgee. My children are now 12 and 14 and both go to school in Mudgee and my wife works in well-being support at Mudgee High School. We have lived in Mudgee and I have worked in the coal mines for more than 10 years. My family loves the region and we regularly visit the smaller towns around the local area on weekends for family outings. Living in Mudgee and visiting the surrounding towns, the communities and the region have been the best days of our lives and we intend to remain for the rest of our days. I would like to note that 4 months ago in October last year I started working at Bowdens but for the record today I am representing myself and my family as a rate payer for the local government area and a resident of Mudgee. I am not representing any companies or organisations that I am affiliated with now or have been in the past, this is my submission. Leaving the coal industry was a family decision, not a financial decision, the coal industry is very lucrative so my decision wasn’t based around a wage from Bowdens, my decision was based around lifestyle and discussions with my family because we no longer wanted to be part of the fossil fuel process anymore. We also believed that there will be a decline in coal mining in the future and job security may become a problem for our family if I stayed employed in the coal industry. So with this in mind my wife and I thought that working for Bowdens would be a great opportunity to join a successful company in its early stages and grow with them as they start a Silver mine that could secure my employment until retirement. From such things that we had heard about the Bowdens Silver Project mining much needed critical minerals of Silver and Zinc from one of the largest undeveloped silver projects I was not aware until I started working for Bowdens that silver has more uses than just jewellery. I didn’t realise it was used to make solar panels, mobile phones, day-to-day household appliances, medical applications, water filtration or added to carpets and air purifiers to kill harmful bacteria, and that is just to name a few uses. My personal view about mining as a whole is that I believe it provides community growth and progress, it is what brought me to Mudgee in the first place and like I touched on earlier I saw it first-hand in Capertee with their businesses benefitting from employees and families of the local coal mine. I whole heartedly agree with the comments from the DPE in their recommendations that said “the Bowdens Silver Project would provide employment and economic benefits to the local and regional economies, royalties to the NSW government, and would be consistent with the NSW Minerals Strategy”. The entire local government area stands to secure significant economic benefits from the Bowdens Silver Project either directly from the project or indirectly from the workers and families drawn to the area as a result of the project with the predicted 320 workers for construction and 228 workers for operation. The Bowdens Silver Project will give my children and other young members of the community the opportunity to seek employment locally and stay in the region. Like so many before them young adults are driven away from their family seeking careers and opportunities that they cannot find locally. With the approval of the Bowdens Silver Project bringing families to the area there will be an increase in local jobs. All of the local schools, child cares, Café’s, butchers, bakers, builders, plumbers, council workers, delivery drivers, mechanics, car salesman, anyone and everyone, the list is endless as to the number of businesses that will benefit and expand and require more staff as a result of the workers and families drawn to the area due to the Bowdens Silver Project. I reiterate this was evident at Capertee when I was living and working there as the local police officer. With the decline in coal mines in the area planned to begin winding down in the next decade The Bowdens Silver project is exactly what the region needs when the coal mines are no longer here to support the town. Without Bowdens I don’t have a job, my family are not supported, I would have to try and look for employment elsewhere. I am sure there will be people that say the Bowdens Silver Project is only looking to make money from silver for their investors. Are we as people no different, is it not in everyone’s nature to work for a living and to make a profit from any business or employment, isn’t that why we all go to work each day to have an income to support our family. The Bowdens Silver Project is no different from all of us, they are looking to make a living, looking to support their families, and in doing so provide Australia and possibly the world with a much-needed critical mineral that will soon be in short supply. In closing I would like to again state that I fully support the Bowdens Silver Project. Thank you, Commissioners for your time today and allowing me the opportunity to have my say. Thank you |
Wayne Taylor
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Bowdens Silver Project for the following reasons: 1. New mines are required to meet society's demands for a range of commodities - Bowdens has the capacity to add to this critical supply. There is often a disconnect between those that use the commodities and support for their production. 2. There are recognised direct and indirect benefits associated with the project being developed in the form of employment, skills development, community support, local business participation, state royalties and federal taxes. 3. The resources industry has evolved to be far more responsive in mitigating impacts and managing project risks which is also supported by a stringent regulatory framework. 4. There are many good examples of where mining projects have co-existed with other non-associated industries and businesses - its doesn't have to be one or the other. 5. NSW needs to actually support an industry that it says it does, there is a risk that project refusals demonstrate a 'closed for business' position for an industry that has been a significant contributor to insulating Australia from global economic turbulence. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Supercheap mudgee |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Need to go ahead with it |
Johanna Rosarius
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed development. The Bowdens Silver Project will bring employment opportunities to the area and strengthen the local economy. Moreover, silver is a crucial component in a wide range of industrial applications, including electric vehicles and solar technology. Within the next few decades silver will be widely needed to support decarbonisation projects worldwide. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
17/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think it’s going to be good for the whole community |
Gillian Purcell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to add my support to the Bowden Silver Mine project and encourage its going ahead. The DPE report found no reasons environmentally why this project should not go ahead. According to this report there is no threat to the air or water quality of the environment. I am familiar with the environmental standards and projects being undertaken at Bowden, including seed saving and revegetation of native species. In fact, I am confident that the natural environment will be better after these plans and projects are put in place, as much of the land on which the mine is situated is at present degraded farmland. I am aware that Bowden staff are working closely with local First Nations members to ensure the integrity of Indigenous values and sites. This project will provide much needed socio economic stability and opportunity, especially as we see other mining opportunities close down. This mine is not a fossil fuel mine, and will provide key minerals vital to our clean energy future. Bowdens Silver Mine has my full support. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Boost local economy, local jobs, infrastructure and services support to small towns and surrounds |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposal, creating new jobs in the local area and NSW state. |
Michael Russell
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write in support of the approval of the Bowden’ s Silver mine. I have been a investor in this company since mid-2019. I was attracted to the company because of the emerging need for silver, especially in the increasing use solar panel and other renewable energy uses. I note the NSW has placed silver on it critical minerals and high tech metals as an indication of the value of such a product. It is great that this potential mine is in Australia, and not overseas, which will not only generate wealth for this nation but also create employment and other benefits the local community. My reading would indicate that the company has done due diligence with regard to ecological issues, such as water usage and environmental impact and has consulted with the local community. It would appear that the company has ‘ticked the various boxes’ and now awaits your final recommendation. I would be grateful if you would include this short email as being hearty support for this project as you make your decision. Thank you |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Let it be approved. The towns of Rylstone & Kandos, & in particular Kandos have suffered with the closure of the cement works in Kandos in 2011, Charbon Colliery not far behind. These closures cost almost 200 jobs directly & hundreds indirectly, a huge flow on effect. To see another industry take off in the area would be great, providing jobs & opportunities again directly & beyond. Yes I understand there are environmental issues, however the rules that would apply to the project would be strict & couldn't afford to be broken. Tourism in the area is great, but really only the cream on top, this was clearly seen during COVID , with no local workers in a big industry to stick around town, local shops felt the pinch. The area needs something to look toward, create employment opportunities, & bring people to town. If I can say the many organizations, community groups etc that Bowdens have supported with quite substantial amounts of money is quickly taken, but want to jump up & down & have this project declined, do they think about that ???? Bring it on, hopefully we can see some positive news in the very near future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This site is very important for the local community. This development can help to grow the local community with job opportunity and income increase. It can help to support children with increased income. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We need to move forward with such a viable project. |
Gordon Barnes
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining is a critical contributor to the economic well being of local communities, state and the country. The risks of the proposed development have been comprehensively assessed. The metals produced from the development are required for the energy transition. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I agree to have Bowden's silver mine as it gives work in the area for the young generation and the now. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Boost local economy, local jobs, infrastructure and services support to small towns and surrounds |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Good for our community as a whole |
Jessica O'Brien
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this is project will only benefit our community. |
Dominic Jones
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is required for the production of solar panels as well as other electronic goods. As the world experiences further deglobalisation, the ability to secure valuable metals for manufacturing these goods such as silver becomes increasingly important. Whether it be for Australia's future as a supplier of these metals or provide the means for us to develop these products onshore. Either scenario delivers an important picture for the future of Australia. Whether it be economic, environmental, or both. This project is therefore important to continue in it's development and this approval stage. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In favour of project, ecomonicly for employment and bring people to area |
Lill Stocks
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Boost out local economy! Will build up all small surrounding towns bringing new family’s and new faces! Offer new job opportunities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am supportive of the project as it benefits a regional area, and Australia more broadly, by creating employment and economic activity. Importantly, many of the jobs and skills involved in mining are diverse and high level ranging from geologists and engineers to operational jobs. In a regional economy mining also has a substantial economic multiplier effects as it brings revenue from outside the region into the economy to then circulate to retail and service businesses. At a broad level, silver is an increasingly important metal for industrial uses including the increasing electrification of the the economy. Mining silver in Australia using sound environmental practices is far better than having silver mines primarily located in regions within, for example, Central and South America where such safeguards are not so strong. The Bowdens project has been thoroughly planned and has striven over recent years to meet every environmental requirement set for it. It is very important to Australia's future that mining projects that show such good practice and intent are supported through the planning and approval practice to the point of being given mining rights. Should approval to mine not be forthcoming it will send a very negative message to other projects throughout Australia with major (but not obvious to the casual observer) economic consequences. Australia and in particular regional Australia's economy and society remains strongly based on primary industries such as agriculture and mining. This importance can tend to be downplayed and too much political and media weight be given to other sectors that actually contribute much less. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project because it will definitely provide economic benefits to local community, and money earned can be used to reinvest in serving local community better. Also, silver mines Limited has a professional and outstanding mining team that works hard on reducing pollution and damage to local environment to a largest extend. I really appreciate the decision maker can approve this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I agree to have Bowden's silver mine as it gives work in the area for the young generation and the now. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Go ahead with the mine. More jobs for locals |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a share holder of Silver Mines Ltd, we have a strong interest in their ongoing activities in particular the Bowden Silver Project. We believe that Silver Mines will deliver significant ongoing social, economic benefits not only to local communities but to NSW in general. We therefore support Silver mines application for planning approval of the Bowden Silver Project. |
Neil Harding
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia is dependent upon our resources to maintain our living standards. With every decision on whether a mine should proceed needs to be balanced between the risk to our environment versus the benefits to our society. The Department of Planning and Environment has assessed this project as being in the public interest. I agree that the project achieves a balance between mining our country's resources against the residual costs of mining, in this instance. Silver Mines Limited appears to be a responsible entity that has developed a responsible project for this mine. This project should not only bring significant benefits to the local community, but also to the wider Australian community. In the difficult circumstances that we have all had to suffer over the last few years, a positive step is something we all need & deserve. The benefits for all need to be taken into consideration and not just the concerns of a few. |
Dianne Mundey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
16/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of this proposal as this area needs further employment for our area to grow. Mines support our communities through schools, local shows and other charity groups which funding does not cover from our government. Mines also contribute to our roads upkeep of which our council can not afford to maintain. Minority groups are calling this a lead mine which it clearly is not. It is a silver mine which is false information from these minority group. These days Mines operate under strict environmental conditions and I can not see this project not adhering to their conditions. |
Brooke MAO
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is Brooke Mao. I am a post graduate university student in my last year of medical school at Sydney university. I am a shareholder in SVL and have a strong desire to see the Bowden’s Silver Project progress. I believe that the success of the Bowden’s Silver Project will position Australia as one of the major silver suppliers globally and be a major asset for Australia going forward. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. • Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. • Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and regional jobs. o Estimated 320 Construction jobs. o Estimates 280 permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on effect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace, and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine to realize the benefits mentioned above. Kind regards, Brooke Mao |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Right now, Australia is in an interesting time and place both domestically and globally. I believe the USA (and the Federal Reserve) have for many years made demonstrably inappropriate and poor decisions in most arenas, domestic policy, Covid handling, geo-politics, world events and the USA is headed for years of, in particular, economic disaster - probably starting with a recession this year. That said, the age old saying of "USA sneezes and Australia catches double pneumonia" ring true. As the USA and other European countries falter, Australia, rich in natural and mineral resources needs to prepare to take care of its own self in a much bigger way. Irrespective of what we each personally believe about mining, it is a global industry that sustains billions. Australia has an incredible niche in this particular Bowdens Silver mine that needs to be allowed to run to its full conclusion. Not only will it be a part of assisting Australia (and FAMILIES - coz thats what Australia is - families that work, live, laugh, love and care for each other) moving forward but it will also help shore up our increasing manufacturing need for metals as we escalate the green agenda of renewables. This mine is incredibly smart and vitally needed on SO many levels - I really DO VERY STRONGLY ASK IT RECEIVES THE FULL SUPPORT OF EVERYONE AT EVERY STEP ALONG THE WAY. I lived in the Hunter Valley for 35 years and have recently moved to Tasmania, so I do know the Hunter very well. I was never involved in mining myself but did witness first hand the genuine far-outweighing benefits of having mining versus not having mining. Again, I strong support this Bowdens Silver project going forward - on so many levels, not simply financial. Thank you for allowing me to express my views. |
Ian Freeman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowdens Silver Project on the basis that the positives of progressing this project significantly outweigh the negatives aspects. The Project will provide substantial long term economic and social benefits to local communities in the Mudgee area along with the broader Mid West regional area of NSW. An area that is in need of significant assistance following several recent climate events. The Project is strongly supported by the local communities for the long term employment, training and business opportunities it will bring to the region. It has also been assessed by the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) as being in the public interest and approvalable subject to strict conditions of consent. As the DPE assessment report states, "the Project achieves a balance between maximizing resource recovery and minimizing impacts and the benefits of the Project outweigh its residual costs". The strict conditions of consent can be used to ameliorate the negative aspects and residual costs of the project going ahead. I urge the IPC to take a positive view when assessing the Bowdens Silver project and look at the long term benefits for a region and its economy that is in need of assistance. The positive aspects of this Project significantly outweigh the negatives and consequently it should be approved. Thank you. |
Renee Mao
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is Renee Mao. I am a film and television director based in Sydney. I am a shareholder in SVL and have a strong desire to see the Bowden’s Silver Project progress. I believe that the success of the Bowden’s Silver Project will position Australia as one of the major silver suppliers globally and be a major asset for Australia going forward. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. • Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. • Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and regional jobs. o Estimated 320 Construction jobs. o Estimates 280 permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on effect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace, and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine to realize the benefits mentioned above. Kind regards, Renee Mao |
Darryl Holmes
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to support the Bowdens Silver Project because I think it will provide the local community with not only jobs associated directly with the mining operation but indirectly uplifting all the local businesses. It will also have the added benefit of increasing the GDP of the country. Silver is going to be in huge demand in the coming years with the drive to Green Energy and this project will be able to meet some of that increased demand. The folks running the project are knowledgable, and I have no doubt that they will make this project a success and take into consideration the environmental impacts of mining in the region. In summary, this would be a great project to uplift the local community and Australia in general with little long term impact on the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a share holder of Silver Mines Ltd, we have a strong interest in their ongoing activities in particular the Bowden Silver Project. We believe that Silver Mines will deliver significant ongoing social, economic benefits not only to local communities but to NSW in general. We therefore support Silver mines application for planning approval of the Bowden Silver Project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We need to do everything we can to maintain resource, energy security as well as manufacturing and supply chain security. Silver is a key commodity for the energy transition and I would much rather be paying my fellow countrymen to mine it here rather than buying it from offshore. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a person who works in the NSW mining industry, I fully support the Bowdens Silver Project as we move towards a decreased reliance on coal, silver has many applications in health and renewables. There will be many skilled workers who could make the transition from coal into hard rock mining of silver which would be of enormous economic benefit to the surrounding Mudgee region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia absolutely needs silver mines for the years ahead. There is a global supply deficit of silver, and for the electrification of the world and to help make out country more environmentally friendly we NEED silver to accomplish this. Without silver there will be no solar panels, no electric cars, no computers or no phones. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project in many ways as this will be a massive boost to the local towns that miss out and have no major infrastructure for major employment since the smaller mines and cement works closed down.. It will bring alot more opportunities for the young generation that what a head start in life with a local mine so close to home and not having to travel. Will also bring alot of business to the smaller towns with day to day living and accommodation. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the proposed silver mine at Lue will greatly benefit the local community through employment of staff to run the mine and the economic benefits those employees will add to the wider community. I also believe the mining of precious metals is an essential element of our country’s future economic progress. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Assay engagement and resolution pty ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to support the approval of the Bowdens Silver Mine at Lue. Mining and metals are the backbone of modern life. Every electronic device contains these metals making every single Australian and end user. As a consumer, I would prefer that the metals in everyday objects I use were mined safely, responsibly and with minimal environmental and social impacts. I've worked on major projects (mining, gas and infrastructure) in NSW and Qld for over 20 years and know how rigorous the conditions placed on mining are. Mining is an industry I'm proud to work in. It brings great benefits to communities and allows young people to stay in town. I encourage the Commission to approve the project on the grounds that benefits to the community far outweigh and risks which are managed by strict conditions that will be enforced. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Critical project ensuring stable silver supply for Australian industries and regional growth. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the proposed development because of the overall benefit to the greater community of NSW & Australia. With the ever growing demand for silver as part of the green energy transition, it's vital this project and any like it are approved and commissioned asap. |
Tony Wruck
Organisation |
Ausimix Concrete |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support this project going ahead. The world needs much more silver and zinc in order to decarbonise. Australia needs to be part of this. Please note the protesters in the tractors have lead batteries.... |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a local resident to Mudgee. I live here with my husband and my two children. I support the Bowdens Silver development as I feel the Mudgee region requires diversification and the Bowdens Silver mine will enable transition to a low carbon economy whilst keeping many people locally employed as the coal mining industry down sizes. I understand that there will be some environmental impact, as with all development, from coal mining to wind farms, but this impact will be able to be managed in an environmentally and sustainable manner. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Will be great for jobs, just concerned about the state of the road |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Aurumin Limited |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is a future facing metal, and the best electrical conductor of all metals - critical for electronics in general and the technology that will support a low carbon future, such as solar panels and batteries. NSW should support and assist companies that will support and assist NSW. This is a big picture project, and the Bowdens silver Project should be supported. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi, I am in favour of the proposed development of a open cut mine. I believe the construction and ongoing maintenance of the mine will provide many jobs for us locals, now and into future generations, and this will also bring in skilled workers from other areas which will benefit the area immensely. I believe that if the correct procedures are put in place and followed then it can only bring good things for us all.I also think that it would help NSW to become a big stake holder in the clean energy future as silver is a critical element for the manufacturing of solar panels and EV’s which is the way of the future. Please approve this development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project, in my opinion is a fantastic opportunity to support future goals in regards to a Greener future. Silver is reportedly in short supply world-wide, and its use in renewable energy products is well documented. The requirements will only increase as we push toward a more sustainable future. We need to act sooner rather than later to meet the Silver demand required to achieve these goals, this project is exactly what is needed to do so. Regards, Glen Mack. |
Malcolm Naylor
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The economic benefit of allowing the Bowdens Silver project will be large and go on for many years not just benefitting NSW but also Australia. It will provide jobs for people and taxes for government. Roughly 25 to 50 grams of silver is required in the manufacturing process for an EV and it is estimated that about 140 million EVs will be produced in the world by 2030. A 2 square metre solar panel requires about 20 grams of silver and annual solar panels providing solar electricity production is growing all the time. This silver must come from somewhere and if some of it does not come from wealthy nations then all of it will come from the poorer nations where environmental standards and safety standards are generally much lower. If this project goes ahead it will demonstrate how NSW & Australia can continue to lead the world in a sustainable & safe approach to green energy not only as a solar panel consumer & electric car consumer but also a producer of raw product that go into these technologies. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support this submission by Bowdens Silver mines as Australia needs to be recognised as a strong and growing country in the mining industry. The employment opportunities that will be opened up for people both locally and from other states. In NSW wales there are approximate 40,000 jobs across the state through mining. Also the royalties to the state government, helps the country financially. Silver is needed to secure a strong future for Australia and the fact that gold has also been found within this site is an extra bonus. It appears from the documentation addressing the issues that they have been carefully considered and addressed at each level of development. I would like this submission to go through as in my opinion it is extremely positive for the future of Australia both at home and globally. |
PETER KING
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
15/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The world is using more silver, in its bid to become ‘greener’, than it is able to produce. Produced as a ‘bi product’ from other metal mining operations, the amount of silver created is at the whim of mining operations is dependent on the price (and availability) of the commodity they are mining. This new mine will be a dedicated silver producer, producing much needed silver for Australians, not to mention the additional jobs created to support country NSW based families and local businesses. Provided they satisfy the stringent regulatory requirements, I see no reason why this much needed project should not be given the green light and the full support of Local, State and Federal Govt. I support this project 110% and trust you will as well. |
Lindsay Authers
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to put forward my support for the Bowden silver mines. I think it will create employment for the 20 years expected life of the mine. Which can only help improve peoples lives. Silver is a commodity that for centuries has been sought after next to gold so the benefit to Australia economically will be huge. I am certain the the company will do all the right things pertaining to sustainability, climate, vegetation etc and Im certain the state will hold them accountable. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this project which will have significant long-term economic and social benefits that will be delivered to the local communities as well as broader Mid-Western Regional areas of NSW. This project will bring long-term employment, training and business opportunities to the region. |
Tim Gleeson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowdens Silver project (ss5765) I have lived in the local area all my life and have seen how the local community thrive from a mix of mining, tourism and farming. The Bowdens project will add a much needed boast to the local area, with community funding, local and National taxes and royalties, and employment, including jobs for local youth which is desperately needed. Having worked in the Mining industry for 30 years I know first hand the legislative requirements the department monitor and enforce. I have confidence in the Environmental management systems and control plans Bowdens Silver have in place to control Environmental risk, and this project will no doubt be heavily monitored by the department regulators. This project must be approved as it will have a major positive impact in our local community with both direct/indirect employment as well as supply a much needed commodities to move forward with renewable energy. Regards Tim Gleeson |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Moto Adelaide |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As the world moves forward with EV's and solar power silver is a key component in both areas as well as having many other industrial purposes. A project like this will give Australia locally produced silver thus lowering the need to import such an important metal giving Australia a strategic advantage globally. Apart from the above the project will create local high paying jobs. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Quantum Fire Technology |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Local business in full support of the project and continued growth in the Mudgee region |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Cardoso Enterprises |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this project which will have significant long-term economic and social benefits that will be delivered to the local communities as well as broader Mid-Western Regional areas of NSW. This project will bring lon-term employment, training and business opportunities to the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project will provide an employment opportunities to local communities and will be very helpful to the future generations. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project as I believe it will deliver significant long-term economic and social benefits to the community. I also believe that being the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia, it can be a great asset for the state of NSW. I believe the DPE Assessment Report is accurate and I fully support the approval of the project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this project which will have significant long-term economic and social benefits that will be delivered to the local communities as well as broader Mid-Western Regional areas of NSW. This project will bring lon-term employment, training and business opportunities to the region. |
Kurt Lancaster
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thr impact upon the local environment is a major concern. I am still not clear on the environmental management |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a supporter of the development. The primary reasons being the economic benefits from such a mine to the local economy and the important of silver in the manufacturing of renewable energy infrastructure, specifically solar panels. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Absolutely support the development, it is great for the community, supports local development and is a good alternative to the current major industries in the area. |
Joaquim Cardoso
Organisation |
Cardoso Enterprises |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowden Silver Project that will create significant long term socio and economic benefits to support the local community and businesses. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support Bowdens silver to go ahead providing local residents health and well being not affected and environmental impact is minimal. I think the jobs that it will create as well as bringing in money to the community will be highly beneficial. |
Alan Gray
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project has more benefits to the community, especially a long term employment and business benefit. Today's stringent mining processes make the safety of all aspects of such operations a key factor in assessing the impacts on the community as a whole. Future demand and price for silver is bullish, a considerable opportunity and asset to the state. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Wholesale Group International Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowden's Silver Project. Silver Mines are a very mature, responsible mining company that has a commitment to the local community and environment. It will create jobs and support the local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a NSW mining professional, I support the development of new employment opportunities within the state |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver Mines Ltd have been working on this project since 2016 and have delivered an excellent DA. The DA addresses all relevenat issues, including water usage, accessibilty, and design. Silver, is a critical minerals in the fight for climate change and is is used extensively in solar panels, stirage batteries, EV cars etc. It is time to put this excellent depsoit at Bowdens River to good use. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
14/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Bowdens Silver mine. I believe the economic benefits to the local community will be significant and ongoing during the life of the mine. These benefits include both direct employment and the positive flow on effects of a mine operating in the area. With the econcomy moving away from fossil fuels, Mudgee needs to move towards minerals and metals of the green economy. This mine has the potential to provide well paying jobs in the Mudgee community during the transition away from coal to renewable energy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
this project is in the public interest hence in the interest of Australia |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly agree and support SVL to develop this project |
jack faigenbaum
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of the Bowdens Silver Project. Economically ( workers ,for the country and the company ) and the area it is ano brainer butto allow he project to proceed As a medical Dr, Medically I see very little danger for the communitry nor workers . Dr JACK FAIGENBAUM |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this development as it will bring employment and economic opportunities to the local area. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is important to support private investment in projects which have applied appropriate diligence to maximise benefits and minimise negative impacts, such that benefits significantly outweigh the potential impacts. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowden's Silver Mine project in Lue presents a tremendous opportunity for socioeconomic development in the area and the surrounding community. The project aims to create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and provide critical infrastructure and services that will improve the quality of life for residents. The project will not only create jobs during the construction phase but also provide ongoing employment opportunities for locals once the mine is operational. The development of the mine will require a diverse range of skills, providing employment opportunities for people with a variety of backgrounds and education levels. This will help to reduce unemployment and poverty levels in the area and create a sustainable economic base for the community. Furthermore, the project will provide essential infrastructure and services to the community. The development of the mine will require improvements to the local road network, water supply, and power infrastructure, which will benefit the entire community. Additionally, the mine will generate revenue for the local government, which can be used to fund further infrastructure projects and community services. The Bowden's Silver Mine project is a significant investment in the region and represents a unique opportunity for socioeconomic development in Lue and the surrounding community. It will create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and provide essential infrastructure and services to the community. I wholeheartedly support this project and believe that it will have a positive impact on the area for generations to come. |
Aaron Newman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a strong advocate of the Bowdens Silver Mines proposed development moving forward, which through adequate risk mitigation, environmental sustainability and strong management, this mine will have a positive impact to the economic, social and financial outcomes of the local community and region, giving growth and future, enabling more job opportunities, support for local business and the production of Silver the Australian economy demands. Bowdens Silver, with its high application to WHS and Environmental impacts to its operations, I'm sure will continue to show transparency across all boards of development bringing the infrastructure the local region calls for. I believe it is in the community's best interest to support the development to allow the region to strive. Thus, giving my support to approve the application. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am for the mine. It would be good for employment. Silver is a very useful metal. |
Tim Rawson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Support the mine |
Alexander MCDONALD
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Investment will be dead in NSW. Investors like myself on seeing NSW will opt out of investing in this state Land it offers to mines to investigate its potential. Millions are spent in doing so. Only to be shown the door. Many investors have put their hard earned SMSF into projects. If the mine shows it is capable and willing to use all precautions to protect the environment. Which I'm sure they have please approve this mine. I would like to continue supporting development in NSW. |
Atanas Simonovski
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed development |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support any developments that creates local jobs and helps rural economy |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As per above this proposed development will continue to benefit the community and employment in the region. Silver Mines Limited have a proven track record and are responsive to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment’s Assessment Report and recommended conditions of consent and this development should be approved. |
Hiedi O'Neill
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am aware of the health implications from mining and lead contaminates for miners today. but I am sure with todays work, health and safety and environmental authorities impact studies that majority of the risks are managed appropriately. Let's face it, no workplace is one hundred percent safe, no matter the profession. I understand Health education materials need to clearly state health risks from lead across developmental stages and for sensitive populations, integrate a primary prevention perspective, and provide comprehensive evidence-based recommendations for reducing lead exposure in and around the home. Families rely on information provided by online public education materials that are important in protecting families and children from exposure to lead and strategies for doing so. I choose to believe that there will be transparency in the information provided by Bowdens, and that families then need to be responsible for their actions and choices once they have the information to make informed decisions. Mankind needs to be more diligent on self education, self preservation and being responsible for self care. Bowdens mining needs to go ahead for our communities. So many families have husbands, fathers, brothers who work away from home, because of the limited options for employment in our area. So many trades qualified workers, who don't even work in their hometown due to lack of opportunities for employment. The impact of the socioeconomics of our area is appalling, schools suffer, older children suffer due to lack of prospective businesses in the local towns, resulting in no work experience, no life experience. The loss of business from within our local towns is heart wrenching. The historic buildings closed and becoming derelict due to misuse is harrowing. When I was a teen in Kandos, the main streets were bustling, every store front contained a business from groceries, many eateries, fashion stores, gift shops, car sales and all the clubs and pubs were the place to be each night. Every person was employed by major industry, from the local cement works, lime quarries and engineering businesses, Our largest local employers are in health and the local supermarket. Today, they have limited days and less hours of operation when they are open, due to the lower population and lack of support because unemployment is higher and nobody can afford to support the business that struggle to remain open, and rely on weekend tourist trade, Having employment opportunities within our local towns, will encourage familiies to remain and build the towns employment and education possibilities. Family members of our communities can travel up to 3 hours round trip a shift travelling to mine sites outside of Mudgee. For some that means a 14-15 hour day. The risks associated with the travel, to keep their jobs is worrisome, especially with the unkempt roads currently. To have a large company, employing local members, that reduces travel time, would be benificial for our area. To summarise I believe Bowdens needs go ahead for the mental wellbeing of our local people and to build our townships back ups to the proud, bustling towns they. were when employment in the area was higher. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining has had, and always will have, a major part in Australia’s future. The resources we have made our country it is today, benefiting so many Australians in every way. It’s nation that I’m proud of and love living in. I believe Bowden’s Silver Mine, at Lue, will also add to the resources wealth, not just the local area, but NSW and Australia. Silver is used in so many products we use in day to day life. It’s probably the best electrical conductor of the metals, it’s use in the medical, electronic and jewellery industries is vital. With the phasing out of fossil fuels and the impact of climate change, Australia, and the world, are looking for cleaner alternatives. Silver will be a major factor in producing these alternatives. The Bowden’s team have done an extensive environmental study showing that it will minimise the impact on the local area, and in my opinion, will enhance the Lue area during and after completed operations. Towns all over Australia rely on local business for their survival. Bowdens will provide employment for several hundred people and in turn will benefit local schools, retail stores, sports clubs etc. I believe the Bowdens Silver Mine will have a positive input into the local, state and federal economies. |
Robin Sanders
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
For the 21st century and beyond to meet the needs of the future green economy silver is a critical metal delivering superior performance for electronic equipment internal connections. It is a key component of computers, mobile phones, control equipment, solar panels and all places where improved electrical connectivity is required. In time it will be seen to be as critical to our future as rare earth elements. Bowdens Silver deposit offers a chance for Australia to maintain a strong internal supply for such a critical resource |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project provides jobs and supports growth in the local community. Not only that, but the mine will produce important minerals that help with the growth of sustainable energy resources and supporting future technologies. |
Judith Stemp
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hello. I know people who work there. I can reassure you all the animals (and specific droppings) positions and trees are recorded . All native plants are noted and seeds collected for the restoration process. You can't restore a site's plant life if the water is tainted. So no need fear. Judi. |
Lyn Wren
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is Dr Lyn Wren. I am the owner of a large general practice clinic in the outer metropolitan area of Perth. I am a shareholder in SVL and have a strong desire to see the Bowden’s Silver Project progress. I believe that the success of the Bowden’s Silver Project will position Australia as one of the major silver suppliers globally and be a major asset for Australia going forward. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. • Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. • Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and regional jobs. o Estimated 320 Construction jobs. o Estimates 280 permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on effect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace, and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine to realize the benefits mentioned above. Kind regards, Dr Lyn Wren |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project for its socioeconomic impacts to the local communities and NSW. The project should be assessed and mitigated for environment, heritage and community risks but should proceed as proposed. |
Brett Westall
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this project is very important as it will provide a long term supply of silver which is increasing being used in the production of climate friendly power production and EV's. Having a project of this size will help Australia and it allies secure consistent supply's and make us less dependent on other countries. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to submit my support for the proposal. I think that the mine will benefit the community and Australia as the demand for Silver is set to increase with the move to low carbon. I defer to the Department's guidelines and advice for making the proposed development safe and considerate of other interests. Sincerely Trevor Byass |
Jian Mao
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is Dr Jian Mao. I am the owner of a large medical clinic in the outer metropolitan area of Perth. I am a shareholder in SVL and have a strong desire to see the Bowden’s Silver Project progress. I believe that the success of the Bowden’s Silver Project will position Australia as one of the major silver suppliers globally and be a major asset for Australia going forward. My reasons to support the project are summarised below. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: The project is 100% Australian owned. The project will develop significant local and regional jobs. Estimated 320 Construction jobs. Estimates 280 permanent jobs. Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on effect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace, and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine to realize the benefits mentioned above. Kind regards, Dr Jian Mao |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
12/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hello, I would like to submit support for this project as it will provide employment and growth in the local community. |
Michaelsweeney Sweeney
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Zinc,lead,silver are directly or indirectly used by the whole community, every day Supporting this proposal steers us away from import reliance on these critical metals Buy Australian, made in australia |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
All Organics Distribution |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Some of the reasons for my support of this project include: jobs for the local community, and future sustainability in the application of silver in the fields of solar panels, computing, electric car manufacture just to name a few. |
Terry Trotman
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to add my support to the Bowden Silver project , I can see that it would be an important economic benefit to the community |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Reasons I support this project include; *Job creation opportunity for locals during both construction and ongoing operations. *Locals benefitting from investment and stimulation from having a significant project in the area as well as the state of NSW. *Securing a critical resource for NSW and for all Australians. *Silver is utilised across many faucets of high tech industry specifically renewables, electric vehicles, electronics, medical field and various other technologies. *Advances to date in the mining sector will minimise impacts whilst maximising resource recovery. Hence, project benefits will significantly outweigh residual costs. *The NSW DPE assessment outcome similarly resonants the importance of Bowden silver project to the region and state as a project that is in the public’s interest. With all submissions and assessments considered, I’m anticipating NSW IPC will arrive at a positive conclusion granting green light for what will ultimately be an invaluable project for local communities in the region and ultimately for the state. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish to support the application for mining approval based on consideration given to the selected criteria in item 6 above. As i understand the DPE considers the project beneficial and in the public interest. I would recommend final approval based on this. |
Patrick Morrissey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a member of the community for the past 67 years and have seen my town struggle with employment opportunities since the closure of 2 cement plants and 2 coal mines , I would like to see work opportunities for the people of this region |
James Gauci
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the bowdens project moving forward. I feel it will benefit the local and federal economy. This project has great resources at the site to warrant the development of a mine, which will benefit many parties for a long period. |
tony oxenbridge
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
11/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Through my own research and interests it is clear that the metal SILVER is a vital and necessary element in providing us with so many things that allow us to enjoy our modern lifestyle, such as mobile phones, computer devices, electric vehicles, uses in medical equipment and procedures. It is essential in the production of solar panels which should be used as much as possible for our energy production. Indeed, it is my belief that the mining of this silver project will bring great benefits to the local community through job creation as well as providing one of the materials crucially needed to benefit all of us with a modern, progressive society. |
Amanda Murray
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowdens Silver Project and am confident Silver Mines Ltd will invigorate the local area. Australia needs to support industries that will not only bring local employment opportunities but also embrace the local communities and invest in their future. |
Dale Harding
Organisation |
MCP - Administration |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is yet another great opportunity for a local community to grow and prosper on the back of a mining development that will promote local jobs, increase customer base for local residents and create opportunities for the youth in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
my understanding is that the cultural heritage report has been endorsed or supported by the indigenous communities of the area. I am therefore in full support of this project being approved as the benefits of this mine are far reaching through employment, local community funding, improvement of local facilities, development of new technologies and help in supplying a vital material needed for the electrification of vehicles, homes, manufacturing & transport to help lessen our need for fossil fuels. |
brad tulloch
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
any development that is required for the planet to move forward in a clean way is a must ! our way of living requires employment and minerals to develop the future and silver is required to do this ! its good for local employment and good for the planet. |
David Powers
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing primarily in relation to socioeconomic impacts, in particular the shortage of silver and its importance in electronics, biotreatment, and medical technology, and in particular in positive green solutions to environmental issues: batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, electric cars, etc. Apart from its use in jewelry, its malleability, electrical conductivity, and resistance to corrosion make silver an essential industrial metal. Its biocidal properties give it an important role in water management and medical contexts. The combination of these properties and others makes it a uniquely suited to a variety of roles in medical technology, including electrodes/prosthetics that interface with the human body. Unlike gold, which is largely stored in vaults and not "used", most of the demand for silver is for purposes other than its role as a bullion/coinage metal, and as shown in the Silver Institute's annual World Silver Survey, demand outstripped supply in 2021 and 2022, and demand can be expected to grow exponentially over the next decade, with increasing requirements for electronics, batteries and green power technologies, particularly photovoltaics – which are expected to grow to require 85% of global silver reserves by 2050 or earlier (Progress in Photovoltaics study by UNSW). There is a particular issue for Australia in the current political and socioeconomic climate. Most of the World's silver is mined in three countries: Mexico, China and Peru - with Australia a distant fourth (Silver Institute mining production stats for 2020 and 2021). Tob bring this into focus, it should be noted China retains much of its silver, and usually silver exports are fairly closely balanced by imports (within 10% in 2017 and 2018 according to Trend Economy's Annual International Trade Statistics). In addition, China exerts considerable control on the precious metals markets, so availability and pricing of these metals is dependent on policies of the Chinese Government. It is important for Australia to have access to its own supply of silver. With the Bowden Silver Mine online, Australia's silver production would significantly reduce the gap versus China and Peru production levels, and the ongoing exploration of underground mining opportunities could close the gap further. Most silver (close to 75%) is mined as a byproduct of mining for other metals (including gold, copper, zinc and lead), with only about 25% of silver coming from mining projects where it is the primary source of revenue. This does not make for reliable supply. The Bowden's silver project is thus very strategic for Australia as a country. It provides a guarantee for our own silver needs, and fills an emergent void in the world supply of and demand for silver. The social, environmental, traffic, transport and other issues are directly mitigated by silver's critical role as a component in electronics, electronics vehicles and other green technologies. These issues can be addressed using the recommended techniques and technologies as has proven effective for other mines. It is to NSW's and Australia's benefit to facilitate the development of Bowdens Silver project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed project. The proposed mine offers economic and social benefits to the local communities and in a broader context the proposed operation provides for recovery of a significant resource with minimal impacts to the environment. Given the high demand for silver to support so many essential applications and green energy initiatives such as production of solar panels it is vital that Australia has the capacity to recover this resource. The Bowdens project provides this opportunity and should be supported. |
Desmond Taylor
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write this submission supporting the Silver Mines at "Bowdens" for these reasons: 1). The creation of jobs for the communities surrounding the mine, providing an economic benefit for the community and also the State and Country 2). Diversification away from coal mines and approving a mine that will benefit industry 3) An overall shortage of Silver globally for industry, being used in electronic devices as well as the coming link of precious metals to currencies. 4) Largely, overall community support 5) The location, having a hill between the mine and the closest community, will provide a buffer both visually and also for noise etc 6). The benefit of income to the State I believe that the recommended conditions of consent adequately protect, prevent any adverse impacts on the surrounding communities, while providing exceeding benefits for all in the community. |
Sophia Louison
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowdens Silver project as it will provide numerous benefits to Lue and the Mid-Western, including; The generation of long-term engaging employment opportunities for residents and for the close by towns of Kandos and Rylstone. They currently have high unemployment due to closure of the cement works and more recently, other small businesses impacted by COVID. This would enable local youth to remain within their communities, keeping families together and the opportunity to give back to their communities instead of having to move away to find long-term engaging employment. It will also assist the current working population who must travel long distances for gainful employment. Bowdens Silver already have in place a generous community support model for local events, education providers, sporting clubs and community groups. This is appreciated and welcomed by all affected locals, and as the company moves forward into production stage this will only increase. There is a growing demand for silver and zinc, it’s a versatile mineral commonly used in technology, medical applications and more importantly than ever, renewables. The Department sum it up in their Assessment Report. Stating the significance of the resource and the increasing focus on minerals mining, due to the decline in reliance on coal and fossil fuels. There is a growing demand for silver and zinc due to development and transition to renewable energies. I understand that Bowdens Silver have gone above and beyond to meet the requirements of all facets for the project to go ahead in a responsible and environmentally safe manner. Team this with the Departments recommendations, I have no doubt that the project will operate successfully and viably, leaving minimal adverse environmental impact. What I do envision is an ongoing positive social and economic impact for the locals, the communities and the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a significant asset to the state, an undeveloped silver project which is one of the largest globally and will have long reaching benefits both economically and socially for the local communities and the state |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As part of the transition to a renewable energy economy the need for precious metals to support the renewable sector are required and only going to increase and Australia needs to be self sufficient. In conjunction with this the local coal mining sector is set to decrease which will result in the loss of many hundreds of jobs. The Bowdens Silver mine would provide both precious metals and would support the local community via employment. For these reasons I support this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
If Bowden Silver satisfy Goverment Agency Departments criteria with nil overall harm to the environment, I support the Silver Mine proposal for the reasons of: 1) Community funding support. 2) Local employment for our younger generation so they are not required to leave the area to seek employment. 3) Employment for our existing families so families can live together without a parent required to commute long distances or live away from home & their children to seek employment to support the family. 4) Strengthen our small local towns economy. 5) Assist substain our small school student enrolments, creating more positions within the education department. 6) Potential for replacement employment as other employment industries cease to exist in the local area. 7) Stenghten our existing Engineering workshops to create ongoing employment & apprenticeships etc. 8) Strengthen the need for improved medical facilities if our towns benefit from increased employment & residence. 9) Assist improve our social economic challengers by creating more local employment (more houses with more jobs). |
Rojena Taylor
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write this submission supporting the Silver Mines at "Bowdens" for these reasons: 1). The creation of jobs for the communities surrounding the mine, providing an economic benefit for the community and also the State and Country 2). Diversification away from coal mines and approving a mine that will benefit industry 3) An overall shortage of Silver globally for industry, being used in electronic devices as well as the coming link of precious metals to currencies. 4) Largely, overall community support 5) The location, having a hill between the mine and the closest community, will provide a buffer both visually and also for noise etc 6). The benefit of income to the State 7) The planning to protect any indigenous findings I believe that the recommended conditions of consent adequately protect, prevent any adverse impacts on the surrounding communities, while providing exceeding benefits for all in the community. |
David Wood
Organisation |
n/a |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
10/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have direct experience of a regional (NSW) polymetallic mining project and the positive impacts that it can have on a rural community This example is the Lake Cowall project based at West Wyalong My submission for a positive ruling is based on the flow on effects that a secondary industry can have on a mostly rural based economy. My direct experience is that the farming workforce is shrinking due to mechanization and cost of labor. Having alternate industries (such as long term sympathetic mining) within the LGA can be the difference between a rural heading into decline or stagnating or a rural town growing and providing employment/pathways for the youth and next generation of rural farming families. It is that simple really. More diversity of employment, more chance of a thriving rural economy and options for the future generations of families. The flow on effects are enormous, decentralization of industry and people, less pressure on the cities, better quality of life for the rural communities and so-on |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposal so that people who would fulfill on the project get to keep their jobs. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the submission |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to support the approval of the Bowden’s Silver Mine. As the coal industry winds down, there is a skilled mining workforce that is able to work in the critical metals and minerals industry. Keeping those people in regional NSW is good for them, their families and communities, and the economy. Silver is an essential part of modern life and all Australians enjoy the benefits of silver. The metals we use and export need to be produced to the highest environmental, and lowest emissions, standards possible. Australia does that. I encourage you to approve the Bowden’s Silver Mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver project is one of the largest Silver assets in Australia. The project has an estimated 23 year life which will provide significant long term benefits locally in terms of employment, Training, business opportunities, investment and stimulus to the regional local economy as well as significant earnings for Local, state and Federal Government in Royalties, taxes etc. It is a robust and environmentally responsible project maximizing resource recovery and minimizing impact. Bowdens Silver (Silver Mines SVL) is also a Public company with the majority of shares held by Australian individuals who will also benefit from the project. |
Brendan Vowles
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I was a miner/drillers offsider, lived at upper Botobolar (within the region)& now a shareholder and am in favour of this mine being approved due to: the mines site and access : living there I know exactly where it will be won't impact many if any as the population around the proposed mine being minor and the access will be suitable as there is little to no traffic on the proposed road. The Design has been thoroughly thought out and is to standard of any current mine around the area. Eg the coal mines which have been approved in the past. I believe the minor population won't be affected any way in amenity as: Sufficient planning and extreme care was taken in the planning process to ensure measures are put in place to enforce the mines amenity as to please the public's interest and health. The environment shouldn't be affected due to the sufficient planning ect. It won't impact the environment as much as the coal mines in the surrounding area and rehabilitation will be made to the environment during the mines life and once the mines life is exhausted and care should be taken to minimise the harm to the surrounding wildlife. Traffic and transport: The Mudgee roads are shocking I believe the mine would put money into the region improving the quality of road to accommodate the extra traffic and transport as seen when the mines at Ulan went in. Extensive upgrades were made to the road only due to the mine being there. Hazards: Can't see any in all the information provided by silver mines ltd. Aboriginal cultural heritage and historic heritage: Being a miner/drillers offsider we had Aboriginal people looking for artifacts. I'd expect the same as stated . Any historical buildings ect shouldn't be affected if so measures would be put in place to preserve it. Socioeconomic impact: There is nothing negative about this mine it will provide local people with jobs and businesses will be busier and will need to employ more people to meet the mines demand. It will only have a positive impact to the region and all of Australia. In my opinion the recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. Having worked in , lived in and now invested in. I see only positives in the mine being approved and can't see negatives. In my view the mines approval should be approved. All measures are to be made to make sure the mine complies to rules, laws and regulations. It would be a positive for the local population and Australia. |
Vincent Vine
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a holder of a small number of shares in Silver Mines Limited and have held those shares for some years. I am expecting the Bowden Silver development to be a profitable one as demand for silver appears to be increasing (e.g. needed in EV vehicles). Australia's prosperity has for some time relied on the export of our commodities. Given that the Bowden Silver project meets government requirements, the mine operators should be encouraged to implement production plans as soon as possible as without the continuing export of commodities, the future for a prosperous Australia will be diminished. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We believe strongly in this project and consider this a crucial infrastructure project to improve the economic outcomes in this rural area. It will provide crucial employment opportunities and expenditure within a region that will benefit greatly for investment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As an Australian resident and looking forward to the decarbonisation of the economy, it is largely contingent on an increase in demand for all commodities. SVL are now safely environmentally able to begin mining a very valuable and much needed commodity, ie Silver and Zinc in the decarbonisation of the new economy. There is already an expected outstripping of Silver versus supply in the next couple of years so looking forward any new supply of Silver and Zinc coming on stream can only be good for this process. Full disclosure, I own shares in SVL |
Kim Coll
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the Bowden's Silver project is an important aspect of ensuring the ongoing future of Kandos, Rysltone and Lue. There is currently no (or very limited) industry in the area and work is extremely difficult to find within a reasonable distance for people living in these areas. The prospect of having a large employer accessible to residents is something we can't turn down. The negatives of this project are far outweighed by the positives - any biological or environmental hazards are able to be reduced or controlled with appropriate management and supervision. The site location is such that it will not cause any amenity issues, and the site design is suited to the environment. I understand that mining is not for everyone - but the community is in dire need of a project such as this. I am afraid that refusing this project will cause the small communities within the Mid-Western LGA to become non-existant in the near future |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
After reviewing the DPE Assessment Report and taking all into consideration, I am 100% in full support of the proposed development. This project will provide and delivers long-term socio and economic impact to the wider local economy and communities in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the local development of high value resources in order to better 1) protect Australia’s future growth prospect 2) ability to locally produce tangible ‘money’ equivalent assets protecting against rising inflation 3) support the development of rural communities and towns 4) provide employment opportunities 5) remove dependency on foreign critical supply chain resources 6) enable and promote in country creation of high value downstream tertiary products. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish show my support for the Bowdens Silver Mine, because of the economic benefits for the local community including local employment, also the state of N.S.W. |
Rachel Johnson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Please let this project go ahead. As a long term local 4 generation I have seen and witnessed the changes that our community has been through. From highs to lows the impact of jobs on the schools, the health system the community. I feel that by the go ahead of the project it would create jobs, which has a snowball affect in a small local community not just jobs, but support in and around our school, health system, infrastructure, community events, our local retail and business which will allow our children and future generations somewhere to call home. Currently my husband has to work away leaving behind his wife and 3 children whilst he travels 5hours a week to be away for 7 days. This works at present for my family so we can have food on our table and a roof over our head but unfortunately not everybody can live life this, I have a support network which allows us to continue. By allowing Bowden project to continue I see hope for our community today and beyond. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Northern Territory |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hello, i am in support of this project. I have faith in the DPE, which has given its approval, as i also agree this is a strategic long term project for the betterment of Australia as a whole. Growth in the area, Jobs with security with a expected life span of 23, Investment in pant and equipment, maintenance, possible expansions with underground, and possible advances in technology, it is a internationally required product, naturally with environmental controls etc, this makes it a must do for NSW and Australia as a whole. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver Mining Ltd has been involved with encouraging growth and education within the mining industry while adhering to all regulations. We have been shareholders for some years now, after a thorough research into the company and have been very pleased with it's progress to date. We have seen other companies in other countries who do not value the environment and cultures, only the financial outcome for them. My husband and I do believe that the submission will only provide Australia has a major player in silver mining, while enhancing employment and education. We strongly support the submission. |
Mike Evans
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The benefits of the project are well understood and are supported by the local communities with the recognition it will bring long term economic and social benefits to the mid western regional areas of NSW. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
• Bowdens Silver will create 320 direct construction jobs and 228 ongoing operational jobs • It will also support many indirect jobs through local businesses in the Central-West • The mine will produce silver that can be used in mobile phones, TVs, solar panels and more |
Willem Thierry
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I view the proposed Bowdens Silver Project as an opportunity for local participation, thus adding to important longer-term economic and human welfare benefits; including special skills development, job training and employment. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
none |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This type of industry and project is needed for the good of Australia |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will provide Employment opportunities and growth of the local economy. Why would it be prevented from beginning, it benefits all. |
Mark Brown
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a commodities and precious metals investor and have been a long term backer of this project. I believe it is of not just state significance but potentially national. Silver is the most undervalued metal in the world at the minute but this will not be the case for much longer. The demand for silver in ESG applications such as solar panels and electric cars to name a few will grow exponentially in the coming years and there is not enough silver being produced to satisfy even half of the projected future demand. Single play silver mines / deposits are a rarity globally, as most is attained as by product in gold, copper and nickle mining operations. The ratio of large discoveries has tracked downwards for decades, making supply ever tighter and prices higher. The Bowdens deposit has the potential to be worth huge sums in the future, both for the company and the state through royalties. In the coming few years silver will unquestionably re-value much higher, simply due to overwhelming supply demand dynamics. |
David Arden
Organisation |
President, Royal Victoria Regiment Association |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is critical to the economy, and they have factored in all the relevant aspects, so that it will be environmentally all right, whilst creating many jobs and other advantages to the both the local and national communities. The recommended conditions of consent adequately prevent, mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
ehsan vossough |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am all for it, provided above restrictions are implemented. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My submission is in support of the conditional approval of this proposed development |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support this development on the basis of the substantial economic and employment benefits it will bring to regional NSW. |
CHRIS LANCASTER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The reason for my support is that this Mudgee is going need a broader employment base as in time the coal mines wind back.I feel this development would decrease traffic on surrounding roads as traffic that would normally go from Lue/ Rylstone to Ulan mines would be able to work closer to home. It is hard to believe that people argue against this development when it will produce the exact items that will be required as part of the green transition. Silver being a critical component of all electronics and to a lesser extent lead these are both items we can produce here or have to import. One thing that the pandemic has shown us is that we need to be more self sufficient in the products that we would normally import into this country. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
A shareholder of Silver Mines Limited |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining silver will be a great asset for Australia. To back up the currency and for industrial use |
Peggy Leonard
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed development as it would boost employment opportunities and also be great for the local community. |
F Smith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a community member, I support the mine. They have optimised their design in many ways to meet community concerns. It is great to see a company work with the community, instead of against it! It will provide alot of jobs for the local community and the wider mining industry |
Cheryl Slapp
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowdens Silver Mine in my community as it has and will provide several benefits, including job creation and increased economic activity. By brings investment to the area, the mine will provide employment opportunities and stimulate growth in the local business community. It will attract young families into the area and keeping the local schools in Rylstone and Kandos open. The mine will help to ensure the viability of the schools and other important community services and this will create a more vibrant and sustainable community for future generations. It is also frustrating when I hear misleading information by certain action groups in the area giving misleading information about the silver mine being a LEAD MINE and the impacts it will have in the community. I know for a fact from working in a manufacturing plant that the EPA and the Mines Department will be have strict conditions and they will be monitored very closely, this ensures we have sustainability. Bowdens Silver Mine has supported our local community for a lot of years now and have always been transparent, this is another reason as to why I fully support having the mine in my local area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project for the following reasons: * Provides job opportunities for the local community * Supports local businesses * provide income through taxes for the Government. * improves local infrastructure that is of benefit to the community |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm submitting as a shareholder, but I'm only a shareholder as I believe the resource and silver itself is an essential element for the world to go forward into a green future. We know that it's an essential part of the move to a greener future, and I believe it's far better to have this mined in a place which has such environmental and local concerns taken into consideration in Australia, than another part of the world where such things aren't taken into consideration. I think the economic benefits to the local, state, and national economy would be a massive benefit if the mine was given approval, and I'm fully in support of this. I don't live in the area, but I would definitely consider moving to, and working in the area if this was given the go ahead. I live in a part of the world where such a project would be a huge benefit, and it would be a shame if it wasn't to go ahead, as it not only benefits locals, but the entire planet if it does so. Thank you for reading my submission. |
Christopher Warner
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This will be a great boost for the local community |
Chris Blundell
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project is already been given a tick of approval from the NSW Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy, my submission is largely in support of that decision and to encourage final approvals. This will have a huge Economic benefit to the Mudgee area and indeed all of NSW and finally Australia. This is not a short term hole in the ground, current mine life is reasonably expected to be in excess of 16 years and this is likely to be extended with all the drilling the company has invested into proving this mine as not just viable but needed. "Plant capacity is designed for 2.0 million tonnes per annum with a mine life of 16.5 years. Life of mine production is planned to be approximately 66 million ounces of silver, 130,000 tonnes of zinc and 95,000 tonnes of lead". Too often it is assumed this open cut will just be another scar on the environment, completely dismissing existing laws that mean the land has to be restored and waste managed safely when this important project reaches the end of its life. There has been unprecedented public support for the mine with the EIS process, I do not imagine there will be much against this project but wanted to make this submission to support because I think it is important, not just to me. The benefits far outweigh any negative concerns. I want to spell out I am not employed by Silver Mines Ltd or any Associates or Contractors in the area that might benefit from work. Nor am I looking to be employed by the mine in the future. |
Bob Proestos
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a local farmer and I am making a submission that supports the conditional approval of this proposed development for the following reasons; . Mudgee and the surrounding area needs the employment opportunities in its future. . Silver, Zinc, Lead and Gold are critical minerals that will be required for electronic vehicles, household solar and battery storage. . The local coal mines at Ulan currently employ a large number of young people, both male and female, helping with the economy of our local area. . Renewal energy is the future. . Bowdens Mine will be a key supplier of critical minerals required for a renewable energy future and will offer employment opportunities for all those workers laid off from the coal mining sector in years to come. . I believe Bowdens will make every attempt to work in with local farmers in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
09/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project as an investor and hope that approval can be provided. I support the continued growth of our economy and businesses as a business owner myself. |
Suzy Clark
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe it will have little to no environmental impact and will provide thousands of jobs etc. |
Alan Gall
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project should it pass all necessary planning and environmental assessments has the potential to make a significant contribution to efforts to mitigate climate change. Silver due to its conductive properties is going to be much in demand for uses in batteries for vehicles and storage as well as transmission equipment required to decentralize the grid. The impact on the local area will be significant in the opportunities it will provide for local families and businesses which will be of critical importance for the next decade. I fully support the Bowden's Project and consider it vital for the community and the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Help with jobs |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Silver Mines Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir or Madam, I am in support of making the submission, as long is it does not negatively impact the environment! As a share holder I like to see it being approved. It will bring money in the local areas, reduce unemployment. Local communities will benefit from the mine and the NSW State Government will also benefit economically when the mine start producing. If adhered to rehabilitating the land afterwards it will be win win situation for every one involved. I thank you for the opportunity to have my say in this matter. Regards, Jan van der Waal |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Elbargon Investments |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Significant Silver deposits at this site are of great value in our battle against climate change. Silver, as a unique conductor, is an essential mineral in manufacture of EV cars, storage batteries, solar technology, windmills etc. Now is the time to put Australia's silver deposits to good use. Silver Mines Ltd have worked hard since 2016 to produce an excellent Development Application which, whilst mitigating relevant environmental risks, enables the development of this site at a critical time for our world. I strongly support this application. |
Matheww Baker
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens will bring jobs to the local area, and contribute to the local economy in a big way |
Peter Flanagan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in full support of this project. Regional NSW needs these sorts of projects to help communities with employment and growth. I believe the environmental conditions are appropriate and will ensure necessary protections are in place. |
Gary Wilson
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This mine will be a great step forward for the entire country of Australia |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have reviewed the DPE's Assessment Report. It is clear that the project has been well-planned with thorough consideration of local, environmental and long-term impacts. It will clearly be of great benefit to the local communities around Mudgee and will be of great wider economic benefit to our state. I strongly support the approval of the project. |
Raminder Josan
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe climate change is the most fundamental challenge facing us all today . Silver will be a key metal in meeting this challenge through its use in solar panels, electric vehicles & other related goods. This project is an excellent way for our country to meet this challenge. Please see some other points that I submit in favor of the project: - Approval of the mine will create jobs for locals (320 jobs in construction and 228 during operations). The region has experienced significant and economic hardship. - The mine will also be beneficial for the local and wider communities as for apart from direct employment, the mine will create increased business and supplier opportunities. In addition, the Company provides support for local events, clubs and charities. - Silver Mines is an Australian company. - It is important that Australia invest in our own assets and not be reliant on other countries for critical minerals. |
Scott Jarvis
Organisation |
RMS - RAMELIUS RESOURCES LIMITED |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowdens Silver Project, on the basis it deliver economic value considered in an overall ESG framework. NSW and Australia are well placed and should undertake these sorts of mining projects if it wishes to keep in touch with contributing to a better future, such as to support technological advancements including for obtaining energy transition targets. Whilst also, the economic benefits derived will help sustain our local to national community, and further underpin ongoing capacity to fund an evolving array of initiatives and advancements into the future. |
Kenny Yeung
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a shareholder of SIlver Mines Limited I have weighed in the prospects and risks involved with this project and can see that the idea of approving this will heed long term economic and social benefits within the surrounding local communities. |
Robin Qiu
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver is the largest silver development project in Australia and one of the largest globally with a current JORC-compliant Resource base of 318 MozAg Eq. The project will provide hundreds of jobs in the local community the local communities, improve the infrastructure in regional area, boost the local small business. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is far better environmentally than coal and is a local boost to the economy once the coal mines fade out. Silver and lead are key to a green future. For the small percentage of land it may disrupt the pros far out weight the cons on this development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Help the community grow with employment |
Paul Mullins
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My wife and I support the Bowdens Silver mine application. Silver is an increasingly indispensible industrial commodity used in everything from anti-bacterial / odour limiting clothing, deodorant and cosmetics to vehicles, electronics, photovoltaics / batteries /fuel cells to name but a few. This silver and to a lesser extent the other industrial resources this project will produce will benefit Australian manufacturers and hopefully support the creation of downstream value-added processing/manufacturing. The silver will also aid the many foreign manufacturers of products which Australian industry and indivduals consume. The positive socioeconomic impacts, in our view, outweigh any perceived or actual cons, many of which can be mitigated or negated. |
Russell Mayer
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is used in many medicines. Also it’s antibacterial uses in medical equipment. Silver’s industrial uses in environmentally friendly Solar Panels, EV’s etc. It is such an important resource. I believe in time to come, there will be a shortage of Silver. Silver Mines Limited, have an exceptional, well managed project, and I am satisfied that after following all they have carried out with their environmental side of things, that they tick all the boxes. I believe that even with this Mine, we will need more Silver in time to come. This project has such a significant amount of Silver, that can make a good contribution and difference to the shortages predicted by experts in time to come. I strongly support this project. Russell Mayer Further comment if required, call me on ⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m very supportive of mining projects and this one in particular. The mine will strengthen local industry as well as providing many skilled jobs. |
Joshua Johnston
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have lived in Kandos since I was 6 years old. I have seen many industries come and go, such as centennial and big rim coal mines and the cement works. The impact it has on our local community is absolutely devastating. I would love to see more jobs created in our region and may even apply, myself as I currently drive 1.5hrs to and from work before and after a 12.5hr shift. Please make an informed decision and not one based on greens/environmentalists as there needs to be some sort of middle ground. Cheers, Josh |
Name Redacted
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The project will help Australia become more autonomous and self sufficient in providing for a green future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this silver resource is perfect timing for the renewables boom that is happening and only getting bigger. The coal mines in the Mudgee region will eventually close so this silver mine will be a boost to jobs, the local economy and local businesses. |
Daniel Storch
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been following the exploration of the resource closely and am impressed by the diligent and professional way the company and its leadership have gone about the project. I am confident that Bowdens will be developed; once given approval, with respect to ecological, historical and community features in the area. As an additional benefit I can see that the project will provide much needed regional employment and capital to the local community. I believe that all parties involved in the project have investigated the risks with proficiency and diligence and such risks particually to the ecological surrounds have been minimised or eliminated. I see lots of reasons why the project should progress to the next stage of development and no reason why permissions would not now be granted. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
More jobs for the area |
Liam Robinson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a Lue local and an employee at Bowdens Silver, I support the project going forward! As part of the team at Bowdens, I see first hand the commitment and dedication that is made to ensure the project meets all its requirements and does so in the best possible manner! I believe that the project will be successful in boosting the local economy and businesses within the region, through supplying a large number of jobs both directly and indirectly around the area. It will bring more family’s into our region helping to support our local facilities such as schools and sporting teams/events and much more! As well as supply a large amount of locals with more job opportunities. For those locals living or working away from the area the project can potentially move them back home and supply them with job opportunities as well! I hope to see the project progress and keep on supplying jobs and support for the local community Thankyou |
Cherylene Smith
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We need more opportunities for work for the locals and it's important to get businesses started in the area. Development of the rural areas is important. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the project as it shows development in our rural towns and the business it will bring to the local towns. Those not affiliated with the towns have no right to make a complaint considering they don't understand the impact such projects like these will bring to these towns. It should be straight forward to think those who propose and implement these projects has already addressed the sustainability and environmental concerns before they proceed with it. The community has been looking forward to this project and will be disappointing if it did not go ahead. |
Ned Stolz
Location |
Australian Capital Territory |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silver will diversify the economic base of the region away from farming and tourism, and support local contractors and suppliers. This will increase the economic resilience of the region and provide alternatives for residents to gain employment. Bowdens Silver will improve the road and other infrastructure in the region. Bowdens Silver will show that mines can be developed in NSW and hence boost the exploration industry in NSW and employ more geoscientists. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear IPC Members, I begin by stating my support for this proposal. Silver mining is a lucrative proposition moving forward, both as a monetary and industrial metal. Silver plays a vital role in the production of solar panels and electric vehicle battery systems. Conservative estimates suggest a 10X increase in mining production for silver (and other critical minerals such as lead, lithium, cobalt, nickel) is required to support the increasing trend towards renewable solar energy and electric vehicles (i.e., the green revolution). Once again, I fully support the proposed mining operation in outback NSW. Yours sincerely, Dr Nicholas Plusnin |
Name Redacted
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the progress of the Bowdens Silver Project which will benefit all Australians. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am supporting the decision in cooperation with friends who live and work in the area |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Oneyuan Investment Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support the project as long as adequate measures have been set up to prevent any contamination. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project has been de-risked through a rigorous process with local community representatives, public debate, rigorous environmental impact assessment and now the NSW Department of Planning and Environment has deemed this to be in public interest. This project will generate jobs over several years for the community and tax revenue to support social programs that support tax payers. All of these factors combine to suggest a project that is designed to be successful in all aspects. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the project. It will not only provide job opportunities for local community but also try their best to protect the environment and achieve constant development. |
Jade Miller
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
08/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think this is a great thing for the community and it’s future for a our families and kids |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Now, more than ever, we need a healthy Australian mining industry because, in addition to other primary production, it is the ONLY thing that saved Australia from the 2008 Global financial crisis. We are right now, with rising interest rates and excessive and grossly unnecessary Covid debt, heading into the exact same waters as we were a little over ten years ago. It is ironic that the only industries which pay for the welfare state and the exponentially growing bureaucracy which is employed to support it, are punished as the 'bad guys' again and again. Without mining and to a lesser degree our other primary industries, Australia would be an impoverished basket case. This is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of mathematics and as such, is provable. The 'green energy transition' makes the case for mining stronger than it has ever been. More so for the mining of silver and copper. While of course, mines may be problematic by their nature, our choice is to maintain our standard of living and continue to support the growing number of government dependents, including the government itself and its bloated 'facilitators', or to become a backward and impoverished hell hole. Fantasies are lovely. I have a few of my own. Nevertheless they are best avoided when making policy and facing reality. Thank you. |
Ken Bartrim
Organisation |
Greg's Tyre and Mechanical service |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
this is a must go ahead in order for our local community to grow and proper |
Dan Clark
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I hereby submit my support of the Bowdens Silver Project as I believe it to be in the best interests of the community and I feel that the project will go ahead with careful consideration and execution with regard to environmental impact. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed development as it is providing work not only myself but for many others. It provides vital components needed for many manufacturing areas. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Bowdens Silver Project - Silver Mines Limited |
---|---|
Location |
Victoria |
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this proposed development. I believe Bowden Silver Project will greatly benefit NSW communities and Australia as a whole. As Silver and Zinc are listed under the critical minerals as listed by the NSW government. It is a incredible opportunity for Australia, as we enter a green energy era these minerals are crucial for a smooth transition. |
Michael CARTER
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am for the mine as i believe it will be great for the local economy. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Supercheap mudgee |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Don't have an issue |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel this os to a benifit of the nation of securing our own silver supply. |
Sharon Fulmer
Organisation |
Greg's Tyre & Mechanical Service |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this project is a must go ahead for the advancement of our community and jobs |
Tracey Perks
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this will be beneficial for employment in not only in Lue but all surrounding areas |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am all for more jobs in the community |
Robert Burroughs
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Im a shareholder in Silver Mines |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver project is crucial to the future of country NSW, NSW and Australia. It is great for jobs. It's development would also have fantastic economic benefits for Australia and for Australians. And, it is great for exports. Furthermore, Silver has got heaps and heaps of really important uses. Silver is a vital component in the production of so many products. There are almost no other Companies in Australia who mine for Silver. So, Silver Mines is an incredibly important Company for the future of this country. Thank you. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Caerleon Mudgee |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to you, on behalf of Caerleon Mudgee, to formally support the approval of the Bowdens Silver Mine Project. Caerleon Mudgee is a proud supporter of the town of Mudgee and its future growth. The opportunity to continue this growth, with large infrastructure projects like Bowdens proceeding, with the support of the town’s local council, Mid-Western Regional Council, is a huge boost for the area and something many country towns can only dream of as they face declining populations, increasing unemployment and rising socio-economic problems. Personally, Mudgee has been a big part of my family since the early 2000’s. Over the years my brother has been married in Mudgee, my family has spent many weekends in and around the town and made many trips to the incredible wineries around the area and in 2011 we started the process of identifying and then securing a large parcel of land within Mudgee which we have since rezoned to allow for the future housing supply of the town. In fact, over the next decade we hope to deliver over 2000 new homes – from standard residential houses through to rural-residential homesteads – within our Estate. The large infrastructure projects - from mines to renewable energy projects - around Mudgee have proven over the years to work hand in glove with the town and its community. These projects, along with the incredible development in recent years of Mudgee as a tourism mecca, have been successful in providing a large number of jobs to the local workforce, increasing the population by bringing outside workers and their families to the town and giving back to the community with grants and sponsorship. The opportunity to have another mine operating in the Mudgee area is something that should be embraced with both hands by the town. It will create further employment opportunities, increase the town’s population which in turn will create further employment opportunities, and increase the economic standing of the town immeasurably. While it is obvious that a new mine will help with the continued success of our project, Caerleon Estate, as more people to the town will mean more houses are needed, the multiplier effect of an increased population with more jobs will have a huge benefit to the town as a whole. As regional areas and country towns around NSW and in fact, all of Australia, face economic hardship as populations decline, young people move away and socio-economic problems start to rise, not decline, Mudgee has an incredible opportunity to buck the trend with the approval of the Bowdens Silver Mine Project. This new mine presents the town with the chance to continue to grow and get stronger – creating more jobs for the current population plus the future residents that are attracted to the Mudgee area. Based on research that says one mining job creates 2 or more new jobs in sub/supporting industries, the approval of this mine stands to benefit even those that don’t work in the mining industry within the township. More people in town means you will see more people employed at places like restaurants and cafes, more retail shops, more cars sold and more people in general shopping and being employed by local businesses to keep up with the increase in demand a growing population creates. All these things are a huge boost for the local economy and an incredible opportunity for the town of Mudgee and its people. It is for this reason I am formally writing to you to support the Bowdens Silver Mine Project. |
Michael Burnicle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of the project. This is a very important project for Australia, NSW, Mudgee and the local area. As a local resident i feel the positives outweigh the negatives for the project and the employment of local people in construction and the life of the mining workforce, also all the Local businesses in Mudgee and Lue surrounding areas to benefit . |
Katie Dicker
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Bowden Silver mining project as it provides further diversity of industry to our region. The resources that are to be mined are required for many materials within our society. My household income is provided by the mining sector. I feel that the process that each potential mine site has to undertake, before they begin operation, provides adequate opportunity for all sides concerns to be heard, considered and addressed. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
GBauto |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to support the proposed development due to the need to grow our community and ensure the long term growth of Mudgee. With the correct checks and measures as shown in the coal mining industry in the area I would be confident in the government departments and guide lines in legislation to mitigate any adverse impacts. I feel this proposal would give another diversity to the Mudgee community. |
Sandra Clews
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe there are benefits for the local communities & that it will bring long-term employment, training and business opportunities to the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project benefits the National Economy through the provision of regional employment in an era of migration of jobs to the big cities and major regional centres. It will also benefit the National economy through the generation of income through local and international sales of the processed ores at a time of high demand from technology related industries. I endorse the Silver Mines proposal and emphatically support the conditions of consent as adequately preventing, mitigating, and offsetting any adverse impacts. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mudgee Dolomite & Lime |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Our company is in support of Bowden Silver going ahead as it will provide more employment and benefit the local businesses which in turn benefits local families. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a previous community member to Lue, with it being my home town, with family still living in the area, I believe the mine will bring great benefit to the town. Infrastructure, jobs and revenue are all important to small communities, something Lue has been lacking, and the mine will assist in securing this for the future of the town. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
PJP Plumbing |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed development as it is providing work not only myself but for many others. I am a business owner and Bowden's Silver Mine helps to support my business and my employees. It provides vital components needed for many manufacturing areas. |
Aaron Gleeson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project will only have beneficial effects on all local communities. It will boost the local economy through the creation of both direct and indirect jobs within the community. It will allow local towns to grow back to if not exceed how they were before the previous industries and employment ceased. This creates employment opportunities for the younger generation as they leave school. This will allow them to remain in their local communities opposed to being forced to move away. With the study and testing that has been conducted, there is no risk of any environmental or social impacts. The Government regulations do not allow for any possibility of this. Silver is a muchly needed resource for medical uses and renewable energy. With the steady withdraw of coal mining, the need for materials required for renewable energy will greatly increase. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mine is a good idea as it will help the region transition away from coal mines and provide jobs and local work, diversifying the local economy. Provided there is robust management of groundwater systems there should less environmental impact than the numerous coal mines in the region. |
Siegfried Mehl
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a long standing Share holder of Silver Mines and suporter of the Bowden mining project I submit the following reason the DPE approval to be considered, 1 / Silver Mines have Explored Australia wide to select and invest Australian and others shares holdings in this particular recourse & region to develop a tier One World Class mining asset, 2 / Investing Millions of shareholders moneys to investigate all aspect of the silver, lead and Zinc quality of resource to bring it to a potential mining operation, 3 / With community engagement, environment considerations and Working with local and state government through each and very stage to finalize approval, 4 / Given the regional development of infrastructure for local towns and communities that will continue far beyond a mine start up as the Mine grows well in to the future, 5 / The added benefit of decentralization and investment for industries out of coastal Cites to much needed vibrant Country towns, 6 / Employment from the mine Build to the future mining operations, Also employment to associated mining support industries for very aspect of it's operation, 7 / The enhancement of education and Training facilities for now and future tradespersons in the region, Especially youth opportunities, 8 / Investment in local towns for housing and accommodation for he growth of mine and support industry employment, 9 / Stimulus to local businesses creating a new economy that not there now, 10 / The support of Renewables industry in Australia and for Export as Silver is a major and critical element for electrification systems and technology, For all of these reasons I fully support the approval of this proposed Silver Mines Development, |
Tony Rudge
Organisation |
Thunderstone Energy |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thunderstone Energy has been previously engaged by Bowden's Silver to undertake a seismic survey. This was designed as a non-invasive geophysical exploration method to image the Bowden's ore body prior to the development of the pit. The Bowden's staff and management were extremely focused on Health, Safety and Environment. There was a comprehensive site induction that was conducted with the seismic acquisition crew prior to commencing work. I was involved in the design of the survey, scouting of the proposed lines and acquisition of the lines and in my opinion it was conducted in an extremely professional manner. Bowden's consulted with all relevant stakeholders prior to the survey being carried out and I have no doubt that this methodology would be carried out in all aspects of their exploration and subsequent design of the mining of this ore body. This extends to understanding the nature of the mining, its environmental impact and mitigation of this and the ongoing mining and processing of the resource. On the completion of the survey there was a comprehensive look at the survey, any impact it had and what could be conducted better next time. The Bowdens resource is an important mineral resource to the state of NSW, particularly in the provision of minerals to help Australia meet its movement towards Net Zero. The minerals present in this ore body are used in the manufacture of solar panels and as we move into the future these will become vital and more valuable. This will provide the state with an important diversification of income through royalties, mining permit rents and payroll tax. It will also provide Australia with a source of tax, as Bowden's moves into becoming a profitable commercial enterprise. In my opinion Bowden's is well placed to move this resource into the next phase of development, they have the appropriate management in place, the staff to undertake the work program and the corporate framework in place to do this in way which is minimally environmentally invasive, and is respectful of other stakeholders. |
Cameron Quarmby
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to see this proposal be approved, this will bring much needed employment to the Kandos/Rylstone area and ensure the stain ability of our area. I understand this project will be under strict environmental regulations and if these are followed the project can be a massive benefit to our region for years to come. Cameron. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
07/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is essential for renewable energy |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Greg's Tyre & Mechanical Service |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i act as director and manager of Greg's Tyre & Mechanical Sevice. We believe whole heartedly in the sustainable development of our region and in particular the Bowden's Silver Mine proposal, located at Lue. Without responsible development such as the Bowden Project and similar projects then i believe our region would simply not be in a position to continue growing and allowing progress to continue in a way our local residents would like to see. This project will bring a lot of jobs to our district directly and indirectly which all goes well to the future or our area. |
Heath Montgomery
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Good for employment and getting better infrastructure to the area. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mudgee Rugby Union Club |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Happy to support Bowden silver mine as it will encourage more employment in region and the company has supported local sports with sponsorship |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Supporting submission. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I totally support the Bowden's Mine project, for the following reasons. The towns of Kandos, Rylstone and Lue have high unemployment and no economic growth since the closing of various mines, cement Aust. and associated lime industries for over 10 years. We have empty shops and loss of teachers due to families (with children) not being attracted to our areas due to lack of employment opportunities without having to travel 1 -2 hours a day to do a 10 or 12 hour shift. The DPE approval is correct in saying there are more benefits of this project for the region then not. Being a local business, I get to talk to people from all aspects of life in our community. The is a general feeling of excitement which has not been around for many years. Please support us |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think that the development of new mines in region areas are important for the local and state economy, especially in regional areas |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Project will provide work opportunities outside of the coal industry. Too many people are going straight to the coal mines for work due to the high pay, creating a skilled labour shortage in the area. I'd like to see Bowdens implement a similar system as the cement works in Kandos, whereby upon the completion of an apprenticeship, the newly qualified tradesman would be encouraged to leave the plant and work in the 'real world', thus gaining real life experience and developing their skills. this program increased the amount of skilled labour available to the local community. |
Daniel Minto
Organisation |
Mudgee Wombats |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Bowdens silver mine |
Benjamin Coburn
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi, My name is Benajmin Coburn and I support the Bowdens Silver Project. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Kandos Rylstone Men's Shed |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Community support by Local business groups is important for the ongoing operation of organisations such as ours. Bowden's Silver have proven to be supportive of many community groups in our area. Our Men's Shed partnership with Bowden's was instigated, through a circular from them inviting organisations to apply for assistance. We have benefited from such support over the past 4 years. It has been greatly appreciated by our organisation, who work in the community, supporting the community |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this development |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project going ahead as it will enhance the socioeconomic development of mudgee and environs in general |
Peter Veleski
Organisation |
Tori Peter Group P/L |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Attached PDF Bowdens Silver Project supporting positive written submission |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-project-positive-written-submissionpdf.pdf (PDF, 172.02 KB) |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Mining is a key industry in Australia and nsw, and many regional towns depend on it |
Gregory Bartrim
Organisation |
Greg's Tyre & Mechanical Service |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I as a resident born and bred in the central west regional district would like to support such initiatives as the development proposed by Bowdens Silver proposal at Lue. It is this sort of development which is desperately needed in order to support continued growth and prosperity within our community |
Cameron Bailey
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowden silver have been a major sponsor of the Mudgee Wombats for several years supporting the local community. |
Erica Guo
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development of Bowdens silver |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Wombats rugby club |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We would like Bowden silver to continue sponsoring for the major events for the rugby club it’s a great organisation |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
0c0d2f5f6f701100ec5befdc5d3ee4f4 |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I work in the mining industry and fully support this project proceeding to support local economy and the industry in general. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowdens project as it will increase job opportunities and contribute to improved roads (MWRC having forgotten how to build a decent road, as well as how to maintain them). My main concern is the suitability of the tailings facility. If this structure should overflow or otherwise fail, I fear the damage that would caused to infrastructure and livelihoods downstream, not to mention toxicity. The Bowdens mine may come to an end in 50 years, but the dam and the contents will be here effectively forever. I trust that the DPE and IPC have given adequate consideration to this concern. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Wombats rugby club |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
06/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We would like Bowden silver to continue sponsoring for the major events for the rugby club it’s a great organisation |
Sharon Taylor
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Boost our local economy. Boost employment in the local community. Without a major industry in our local community the towns will die. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that what Bowdens has to offer the community with job opportunities will be great for the region. The benifits for local schools and community groups is also very generous. It will offer great opportunity’s in many ways to many people |
Andrew Schneider
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in favour of the silver mine going ahead, it will provide more work in the area which is struggling now since the closure of the Kandos Cement works and Charbon Colliery. Kandos as a town is stuggling with a lot of the shops in the main street closing up, Kandos residents, the one's that have stayed are having to travel long distances for work, with fatigue management being an issue. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I note that the DPE approved the Bowdens Silver Project and I support the next stage approval from the IPC. It is established that the mine is, on balance, a worthy and positive project. My position is that rural Australia (in this case NSW) needs investments such as this for its viable future. The key factor here is employment in the Lue and the surrounding areas. It has my support. |
David Bradley
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Exmouth Power Station Pty Ltd Suite 11, 336 Churchill Ave Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia February 5, 2023 To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of New South Wales Re: Support for SVL’s Bowden Silver Project My name is David Bradley. I am a shareholder in SVL, as well as an owner of a remote power station in Exmouth, Western Australia. My power station is currently undergoing a conversion to majority renewable energy generation – with the target of achieving 80% renewable generation by 2024. My work in the power industry and the emerging renewable energy sector has led to my investment in SVL and my strong desire to see the Bowden’s Silver Project progress. The Bowden Silver Project will aid the reliable supply of silver into the burgeoning (and essential) renewable energy and electric car industries. • Silver is an essential ingredient in the manufacture of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels which are the current leading source of renewable energy. • Silver is also an essential ingredient in the manufacturing of electric cars which require silver in their battery packs, electric engines, and battery management systems. • Bowden’s Silver Project represents the largest single silver resource in Australia and needs to be brought into development to aid and stabilize the supply of silver into the rapidly growing renewable energy and electric cars industries. I further support the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine for a number of other reasons: • The project is 100% Australian owned. • The project will develop significant local and reginal jobs. o Estimated 320 Construction jobs. o Estimates 280 permanent jobs. o Jobs are estimated to continue for 23 years, but very likely we continue further into the future as Bowden considers high-grade underground mining options in the future. • Capital Development expenditure of $250 million will have a positive knock-on affect to local and regional suppliers and service industries. • Water Supply has been managed such that it will be self-contained and not impact or impede or compete with local or regional agricultural. • The development of this project will result in significant taxes for the State of NSW. • Importantly - this development will support the production of key materials needed in the rapidly developing renewable energy and electric vehicle, aerospace and general electronics industries. I strongly urge the IPC to approve the development of the Bowden’s Silver Mine in order to realize the benefits mentioned above. Very Truly Yours, David M. Bradley Managing Director, Exmouth Energy m: +61 (0) 439 854 328 e: [email protected] |
Attachments |
bowdens-silver-project--submission-db-finpdf.pdf (PDF, 127.23 KB) |
Daniel Mann
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I’m doing this to support a friends employment status |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Robyn & Paul Fameli Superanuation Fund |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mine is extremely well planned and designed to minimize any perceived impacts on the local community. The recommended conditions of consent will adequately prevent or offset any adverse effects of the proposed development Objections by the local community to any change in the status quo is understood, however I strongly believe the belief that the existing land uses in the surrounding local area as grazing operations for sheep and cattle, and a motor cycle recreational park as producing more environmentally friendly impacts on the land, groundwater and air quality, than such a highly controlled and planned mine operation is both extremely naive and not based in science or scientific evidence. The positive impacts on the local and regional community of the additional employment and injection of capital cannot be understated. Unfortunately this may not be realized by the local community until the project is underway. The requirement for Australia to produce critical metals such as Silver Zinc and Gold (and to a slightly lesser extent Lead) is critically important to make possible adequate levels of sustainable renewable energy production and technological developments particularly in the area of energy use and transportation in the immediate future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in favour of the silver mine going ahead I believe it will help the area with jobs in return bring more spending to the towns of rylstone and kandos also the support Bowen's offer the local community groups help keep the small town alive |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the going ahead of the Bowdens Silver Mine because it will offer employment of people and families in Lue. A significant investment of this type will provide broader socioeconomic improvements as the benefits flow through to the wider community. Country areas need investment and the various industries that require silver will be (potentially) supplied Australian sourced raw material. Thank you. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The backbone of the Australian economy is based on industry such as Bowen's silver. The technology used to even submit this application would not be possible without industry such as Bowen's is proposing. In this day and age, all if not most environmental factors can be accounted for accordingly. The jobs this mine provides will give such a huge boost to the Mid Western Shire and provide many people the opportunity to achieve their goals while also boosting buisness for the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Keeps friends and family in work and supporting the local community |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I'm sure others have already expressed this, but it makes sense to increase the amount of renewable materials to support Australian in leading emission targets. If we're serious about a renewable and sustainable future we should be more receptive of these projects in several others. Understand there might be a small impact to locals but overall it has to be better for our economy and future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think that this would provide good employment opportunities for the surrounding communities. |
Brock Dunlop
Organisation |
Durock Drilling |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
05/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Durock Drilling believes that the approval of Bowdens is key for local community and and the Resourses industry. It will create opportunities for local people and businesses. |
Maddie Gleeson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This submission is in support of the Bowdens Silver project. I believe that its critical to our local region that the Bowdens Silver project is approved. As a young person myself I see that our region is in direr need of an industry such as this due to the lack of employment opportunities around the area. If it goes ahead there will be up to 300 jobs in the development stage and 200 production employees. This will bring a much-needed boost to the local and regional economy. This will create a knock-on effect to the local businesses which will create indirect employment due to the mine's approval. The benefits of this approval will far out way the minimal risk of environmental impact due to strict regulations and Bowdens commitment to environmental management. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The approval of Bowdens Silver Mine is important in contributing to our transition to renewables and green energy. Silver will be increasingly in demand as the country and the world turns towards more solar technology and electric cars.It seems as well, that the local community is mostly in favour of the project going ahead as it will provide much needed economic growth to the area. We need to support such projects if we are to embrace green technology and not be negative just because "mining" is mentioned. |
Simon Parmiter
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Mudgee region has been reliant on coal mining for decades, but the local industry faces an uncertain future with the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Projects like Bowdens Silver have a role to play in the energy transition, with silver being a component of renewable technology including solar panels and wind turbines, and will provide continued local employment opportunities for mining industry workers who will otherwise likely leave the region. Bowdens has been an active participant in the local community, including sponsoring the local rugby club, and has demonstrated its commitment to hiring locally. Within the grounds of the environmental and community conditions imposed on the project in the DPE report, and subject to Bowdens' continued compliance with those conditions, I support the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think for the betterment of the community, Bowden silver should be allowed to go ahead with its mining operation in the Lue area as I believe it will bring prosperity to all. |
Matt Walsh
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is vital to the region that the Bowdens project is fully approved. The socio economic future of the area depends greatly on the approval of this project. This area is an industrial area. The nearby town of Kandos is solely an industrial town. In the past 25 years the local community has witnessed the closure of the Kandos cement works, Kandos coal mine, Charbon coal mine, Charbon open cut and the Kandos quarries. These closures lead to the closure of Ray Odgers engineering, Martins engineering and dozens of businesses in Kandos. Families had to either relocate to seek employment or travel considerable distances to find work. The once thriving town of Kandos is a shadow of its former self. The Bowdens Silver mine would assist in rejuvenating Kandos and the local area by providing employment opportunities for local workers, attract working families to the area and provide employment opportunities for the future generations of Kandos, Rylstone and Lue residents. Please consider the voices and families of local miners and workers who desperately want to see this project go ahead, and not be swayed by those living in the city or not in the local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development of any infrastructure that supports local economy and residents. My only concern is ensuring that there is an enforced environmental rehabilitation plan that ensures the land will be able to be reclaimed by native flora and fauna once the mine life is complete. |
Garry Robertson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this Will provide the Communitys, Lue, Rylstone, kandos and Mudgee area with a Much needed boost to the local economy's since Kandos Cement works and Charbon coal mine closed a lot of people had to move for work or sustain life. I believe the company will maintain the environment and provide the proper measures needed to keep everyone happy. I have been in mining for six years as a Blast hole Driller and Trade assistant and seen how a lot of the mines from central north QLD, Hunter valley, and Mudgee areas have operated and they do it very well, i believe the experience around the community will also shine through as many do live and work the land around the proposed mine. I had to move from the area for work and would possibly consider coming back if something like this was passed. Dust and noise monitors work, and environmental officers that check and maintain the environment also work, with a Rehab plan once mining has finished. I have Supported this proposed Development since I had first heard about it, and would continue to if passed. Kind regards Garry |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
04/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The opening of this mine will provide many benefits to the Mudgee area. This includes the diversifying of the local economy, producing minerals needed for transition to net zero, employment of the local community and community benefits from mine investment. Mudgee has benefited greatly from previous/existing mining operations in the area. It has a diverse economy which is supported by the mines directly through local investment and indirectly through the employment of locals and other employees, all who spend money throughout the town. A number of independent businesses providing mining services exist in the area, the opening of this mine will support these businesses for years to come. |
Douha Ali
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Approval of the Bowdens Project would have many positive effects on both the local and wider economy and on environmental sustainability moving forward. As we move further away from reliance on traditional fossil fuels and focus on renewable and battery powered energy, Silver becomes an important and critical mineral, especially in battery manufacturing among other uses. A project the size of the Bowdens Project would put NSW on map globally with respect to silver production and fostering a focus on renewable energy. The project would also benefit the local community by creating 100s of local jobs and the government would benefit from state royalties. Approving the project is a no-brainer given the current economic and environmental climate. |
STEPHEN MALLYON
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a former mining executive who provided technical and commercial mining advice to the Warrabinga Nation between 2019 and 2022. I had the opportunity to review the EIS for Bowdens and the mineplan and post mine rehabilitation. While most mining projects will have an impact on the environment these impacts have to be measured along with the economic benefits. The greater Mudgee region has demonstrated its resilience throughout the challenging COVID and bushfire impacts through a well diversified economy of which mining is a cirtical component. Tailings containment, waste storage, concentrate transport and handling systems are all based on well proven technologies. Teh change to closed cycle water retention was a game changer given the vulnerability of sourcing water from offsite areas such as the Uhlan coal operations. AS the mine will be underground for many years the surface impacts are relatively manageable. Overall the project is already demonstrating a positive economic impact, particularly the revival in the nearby town of Lue. Drilling, habitat studies, re-vegetation, surveying and many other activities are providing jobs and training opportunities for locals. As a result I support the approval of Bowdens Project. |
Attachments |
drilling-bowdensjpg.jpg (JPG, 893.08 KB) |
Li Jiang
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I do support because of economic issues to NSW and to our country. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
G'day, I have been in the coal industry for around 13 years now and a large part of that has been in the mudgee/Ulan area. My push for this to go ahead is for the reason of the need to move to renewable source of energy. This project will play a huge roll in this in many years to come. A major component of large scale renewable projects need precious metals like silver Nicole,copper and also metallurgical coal to achieve this future. This project will employ more then just locals, it will bring more growth to the area and employ more people into the industry and that is a major point that should be considered. If all the people are against this truly are for the environment then I ask you to question how we transition to a renewable future if we keep protesting to stop such projects?. This can be not only a win for the working people of the mudgee region but also a win for our state to leed the need for more approvals of such projects. We truly need to be serious about this if we are to achieve a clean future and look at the real facts as to why this is a must. Please I urge you to consider the benefits this could have on the area for employment. |
Steve Richardson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I wish for the project to go ahead, It will be an asset to the community for jobs and business to the town Thanks |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the approval of the Bowdens Silver Project as a source of employment and regional development in the area. Silver is also a crucial material to support the energy transition as a key component in solar panels and in electronics generally. I am a geologist working in the mining industry in Central West NSW. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project is so important to the local community in terms of local jobs to offset the hardships this area has faced over the last few years. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I agree with the Bowdens Mining Project being given approval. I approve of the project as it: Supplies the critical mineral silver for use by the community and industry Diversifies employment and industries in the Mudgee - Rylstone district Provides long term and short term employment to the local community Is bound by strict conditions of operation that limit any adverse environmental or community impacts Provides income through royalties to the State Government and the greater community for spending on community assets and services |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This submission provides a key economic benefit to the region, however, the ability for Australia to contribute to clean energy with silver being a key input to most of the current solutions. In addition, Silver like Gold are traditional sources of money/value. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am of the opinion that the proposed development will benefit the local community and its surrounds. I am satisfied Bowden Silver Mines have worked towards the required guidelines in a proficient and diligent way. |
Kar Chua
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project will provide local community job opportunities and support local economy via various methods including royalties income for the state government. Aside from supporting thousands of jobs, the mining industry provides raw materials, minerals and metals critical to our economy. They provide the foundations for modern living, innovation and engineering achievements. Silver is critical mineral for our day-to-day. Renewable energy technologies rely on minerals. Silver is one of these mineral. Solar cells use silver to conduct the electric charge out of the cell and into the system. Life-saving medical devices would not exist without many of the metals and minerals that are mined. There are even medicines that doctors and patients rely on every day that would not be available. For example, minerals are crucial materials to operate CAT scan devices. Silver is one of the mineral to support these. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
MGV - MUSGRAVE MINERALS LIMITED |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have had a review of the site and the proposed project and think it would be of considerable to the area. With the phasing out of operating coal mines the Mudgee area is going to need projects like this to provide employment going forward. As long as the aboriginal heritage issue are accommodated, which i think they are I am in favour of the project going ahead. |
Michael Glendenning
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am for the proposed development. |
Andrew Tito
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to show support for the Bowdens Silver Project since the closure of the Kandos Cement Plant & Charbon Colliery I have watched a slow decline of our community due to no large employer in the area able to attract families & other skilled people. I have lived in Kandos all of my life the economic & social benefit for the community of Kandos & Rylstone would be massive, allowing more employment in the area & hopefully drawing new & diverse people to the community. The mine has developed strong environmental policies & adhered to will have very little impact if not a for benefit to the area. Attracting a large employer to the community brings opportunity to the district which I can see as a positive for the future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Great opportunity to contribute to the community and tackle Climate Change. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support bringing diversity to the local economy, with a de-carbonisation in the world economy will have a big impact in the Mudgee community. Also with the drive for renewables metals will be required in abundance. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed development as it will provide locals with employment opportunities. Let the mine go ahead! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
While the benefits and safeguards of this development have been well set out in the proposal, it is worth noting 2 additional points in support which are not explicitly referred to but which are greatly in the public interest: 1) Silver is not only our valuable metal which will add to Australia's export income, it is also a crucial element in air conditioning and water supply systems required already in hospitals and commercial aeroplanes, because it has anti-viral and anti-bacterial properties. Given the impact of covid, the value of silver is immense in updating more aircon systems to counter any future epidemic threat. 2) Silver is a significant element in electronics, including electric cars. Accordingly as the world transitions to a more environmentally sustainable future through increased electrification, silver will be increasingly in demand. Accordingly this project will play its part in providing the silver required for that future. Accordingly, I strongly support approval of the project. |
Peter Langworthy
Organisation |
OMNI GeoX Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
Western Australia |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowden's Deposit is a large-scale and important silver deposit with lead and zinc by-products. It will diversify the economic base of the area in the face of pressure on coal mining activities. The detail of the technical and planning work has been completed at a very high standard with all issues raised through a long and extensive process addressed and dealt with in my opinion. From a personal perspective it is important that quality mineral resource projects are approved and that the government demonstrates support for the industry as a whole. Mineral wealth is a key part of Australia's and NSW's economic prosperity and is critical to maintaining that. The standards to which the project is being held to are appropriate and will mitigate or offset any adverse impacts from the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe to have the silver mine there will greatly benefit the community. Work possibilities and community support from the mine which they have already done in various ways. The mine doesn’t have a negative effect on the environment there and appear to be conscious of leaving no trace through regeneration etc. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am supportive of the Bowdens Silver Project on the basis of the necessity of Silver in Australia's push for a cleaner, greener economy. The requirement for Silver (amongst other metals) in the global push for EVs and more environmentally friendly operating machinery is significant. I am supportive of removing supply of critical minerals from being a potential reason for slowing such advancement - particularly with the current momentum from governments and major institutions. I further see material benefits to the local economy, in particular job creation. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this submission because i think it will be beneficial not only for the local economy but also for the total Australian economy. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Jillicious Cakes |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
There would be various positive implications on the community if the mine goes ahead. |
Robin Rankin
Organisation |
GeoRes |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Commission. I would like to register my strong support for development of the proposed Bowdens Silver mine. I speak as a practicing geologist (+40 years experience), operating an independent geological consultancy in NSW (Bowral) mostly providing Mineral Resource estimates. I have no connections to the Bowdens project, and do not live in the immediate area but do live in regional NSW (Southern Highlands where mining successfully co-exists with agriculture and other land uses). My general support for the project is based on my belief that the world increasingly needs supply of metals, many of which are critical to high-tech applications. I believe the mine would supply some of those, thus increasing general human well-being. Although I have not studied this DPE report I also trust that NSW has the laws, regulations and safe-guards in place to assure that the mine would be built and operated safely and environmentally (to account for the "key issues" I selected above). I have detailed experience of a local limestone mine and see government oversight and regulation working. Thank you. Robin Rankin, Feb 2023. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in favour of the above project provided all the safety and health issues are resolved. I am sure that the outcome of the decision to approve this mine will be beneficial to the Lue community in many ways including employment. Some members of the Lue community are against this project as a result of a lot of misinformation and stirring by non Lue residents. I have found the management of this project to be helpful in their responses to my questions and wish them all the best in their project. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Alkane |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
03/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this mine going ahead as it is critical that NSW keeps approving these types of mines to allow for energy transition, increase socioeconomic outcomes for inland towns and remain a mining friendly state. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would love to see the Bowden's mine reach development. It would provide long term regional employment opportunities as well as community engagement and potential for infrastructure developments of the surrounding towns. As someone who is involved in the region for work, I believe this will be of benefit to the local population as a new source of income to the area. It will also provide critical minerals required for the future of green energy. |
Sarah Spice
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe it would be a wonderful opportunity for jobs within our community. For local people to venture into new career opportunities and paths they may have never thought about before, or may have never had the opportunity! To help our smaller communities become more known, visited and appreciated by the communities within this region. I believe it is wonderful and I fully support the going ahead of the project and it operations! |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Hi Silver is very important to green and clean energy, opening a silver mine is a great investment for the future of solar panels and EV's. Not only is it a great investment but it will create good quality and long lasting jobs for Australia's economy. I think allowing this mine to go forward is positive. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the project |
Oksana Kholod
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is my belief that the project will deliver significant benefits to the community, such as new employment opportunities, business opportunities, and overall economic value. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
N/A |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project will employ 225 people. That will be a big help to Kandos, Rylstone, and Mudgee, for the next 25yr,s |
jeremy barlow
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Ever since the NSW government stopped CSG exploration in the state, its reputation as a place to invest risk capital has deteriorated. We currently see the following examples of negative policy in NSW: 1. Delay in final approval of Narrabri, reflected in rocketing prices of gas 2. No more domestic exploration for gas, either onshore or offshore 3. Failure of the government to support the coal industry in terms of production for export or as fuel for domestic base load power stations 4. Delay in final approval for McPhillamy's gold project - this has made the State Government the laughing stock of investors in the gold industry 5. Expected delay in Bowdens Project - completely irresponsible to delay this well planned mine supported by the local community 6. Quite apart from the political reluctance to approve projects, the government's energy policy and high electricity costs thanks to so called renewables threaten the viability of all mining developments. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the Project. I believe it will have great impacts on the growth on reginal NSW. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is an important component in solar panels. Australia still produces most of its electricity using fossil fuels. As we transition to an emissions free method of producing electricity the supply of silver is critical. This is one of the largest undeveloped silver mines in the world and should go ahead. It will also provide social and economic benefits for the region. I am not pro all mining. I believe all coal mining should be stopped immediately and mining other fossil fuels phased out. |
tony Hope
Organisation |
hoji Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
Tasmania |
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a retired mineral exploration geologist who was instrumental in the Arumpo Bentonite and Ginkgo heavy mineral deposits early exploration and development. The proposed Bowdens Silver project is obviously of importance to both the State and regional community and I hope the "anti developers" do not deter from proceeding with this important development. |
Paul Smith
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
A very worthwhile project which will provide much benefit to the local comunity and state and Commonwealth. Well-designed and designed t have minimal impact on environment. |
Peter Waterhouse
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
After review and assessment of Bowdens Silver project, my consideration of the information has let me to support the project. Of course I'm assuming that there will be feasible and appropriate operational conditions placed on the approval for the project to proceed, but having studied considerable information, the benefits resulting from approvals to proceed, far exceed any negative aspects. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Diversifies local industry |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Thank you for for considering my submission, As a resident of the Kandos region for the last 19 years, watching the community once thriving with the cement works, and seeing the effects on our town and families with closure of the cement works in 2012, the devestation it left on families, having to relocate their families for employment, As a mother of 5 children upon their completion of school they all had no choice but to move away for employment opportunities, i believe the opening of Bowdens silver mine will be a great asset to our community bringing more employment to our area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed development as it will greatly help the economy of the local community, the state, and Australia as a whole. I believe the environmental impact concerns will be addressed appropriately. |
Robert Kan
Organisation |
Transnational Services Alliance |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project due to the downstream financial benefits it will offer to small local Australian businesses such as ours in terms of supply and local engagement |
Dr Ian Pringle
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a scientist I have worked on this project and know that the project's footprint is limited in size and covers mostly stony, scrubby ridges which have only very low value for agriculture activities. It is also quite remote from habitation compered with many industrial developments. More than 30,000 full time people were employed in mining in NSW in 2020/21. Development of mineral projects such as the Bowdens Silver Project, are critical to maintaining the longevity of the NSW mining and exploration industry of which we are all affected and to showcase the success which our industry can achieve. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My name is Bradley Lane and I support the Bowdens Silver project going ahead. I am a member of the community. I have been a keen supporter of this porject for some time given the significant positive impacts this will have on our community and overall nation wellbeing for the environment moving foward. Silver is a necessary component for the decarbonisation and electric vehicle program the NSW and Federal Government support. This approval of this project will provide significant benefits for the local community and at the National level to enable not only Australia, but the world to benefit from silver. Silver is a key ingredient for decarbonising and electrification process currently being undertaken by all major developed countries around the world and Australia is no different. The use of our natural resources in a sensible and controlled way that benefits the community and environment (for the reasons already provided by the company and prior submissions) is simply overwhelming. NSW and Australia should not miss the once in a generation opportunity to unlock the power of silver and its benefits for all. For these reasons I strongly support hte apporoval of the mine, so lets move this along and start the next phase in this exciting mining development project. |
Sarah Bennett
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Open the mines! Bring the town back to life. More jobs!! |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I don't have an issue. I think this will be great for the local community and potentially provide employment opportunity |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have read the DPE Assessment report and consider their considerations to be balanced, economically prudent and respectful. Key to my support is Bowden's management broader engagement with the NSW Government New Frontiers Exploration Program. This engagement focuses the alignment of State and Federal Government's policies to promote Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals development strategy. The Bowden's project can be a multi generational mine embracing and benefiting many communities. The social and economic varied opportunities for the local emerging workforce is what needed to keep communities viable and to attract new residents. |
Stephen Raines
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the development of the Bowdens Silver project. I'm looking forward to the opportunities the project will bring to this region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live in Camboon, 10 minutes from the Bowden Silver (BS) site. As a local I have seen the enormous impact and difference that BS has made in my town and the greater community. BS have done this, not just by providing employment and supporting local businesses, but they have continuously worked with, and listened to, the concerns of the population (over the last 6 years) and have addressed these concerns. Following the exploration of the site, the DPE has assessed this project and recommended that the operation should proceed. BS have demonstrated through government and independent assessments that the mine will pose no health risk to the local community or surrounds. It is disappointing to see a handful of people try to distress local residents with false and misleading information about Lawsons Creek, acid drainage and the amount of lead that will be extracted from the mine. This type of fear mongering claims that BS has ignored their pleas and concerns to take action on these issues. To use the phrase ‘working with’ the community, does not fairly describe the hard work and negotiations that BS has conducted on a range of matters. These claims of inaction from BS can easily be refuted from the amount of community activities and meetings that BS has conducted with local residents and the region. There have been Open days, stalls at community events, group meetings and one-on-one discussions. In my opinion, BS has been very pro-active and understanding of every issue that has been raised. Personally, at first, I was concerned about the mine whilst living in a drought effected area and how BS was going to supply water to the site. BS were initially going to use a pipeline to supply water to the mine. But from listening to locals raise this concern, BS have now updated this strategy to replace the pipeline with a water supply sourced solely from within the site. My apprehension about water shortages were put to rest once this change was announced. Perhaps a larger mining company, with disregard to upsetting farmers, would have said that there was nothing they could do about the pipeline. But BS did not take that stance and made a change that provided a good outcome for local landowners. The future and opportunities that this mine will provide for this struggling small town will not be limited to just employment, education, or infrastructure. Nor will these opportunities be held to a fixed deadline like other mines in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the mine for more local jobs and a future for my kids |
Thomas Wall
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To whom it concerns, If approved, the Project will create hundreds of jobs, deliver significant economic and social benefits to communities across the Mid-Western region, and continue to support the exploration industry in NSW of which I'm directly employed in. The towns of Rydal, Lue and Mudgee would benefit hugely from the development of the project, a world class silver mine alongside the traditional farming enterprises in the area. Excellent examples of the benefits metalliferous mining can bring to farming towns and the residents nearby include Orange, Parkes, West Wyalong, and Cobar. Kind Regards, Tom |
Tye Milson Atkinson
Organisation |
Barko Security |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We are a supplier of standalone Solar Powered Cameras and have been approached by Bowden Silver to help keep a visual on the overall project which includes many of the key issues selected above. We are a business that would not only benefit from the mine going ahead but we feel we can be a key player in the ongoing monitoring of many aspects of the mines development. As a company we are very supportive of the mine been fully developed. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowens Silver project and agree withe the DPE assessment of the project, which states. “Overall, the Department considers that the project achieves a balance between maximising resource recovery and minimising impacts, and the benefits of the project outweigh its residual costs. The Department also considers that the project is in the public interest" |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We support Bowdens Silver project as it will inject $ into our community through employment, hire of local contractors who then in turn employ others and spend in the town. Bowdens have also been very generous in supporting local sporting codes with donations and sponsorships. |
Chris Battye
Organisation |
oxley resources limited |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is a critical metal, required for a greener future for New South Wales |
Josh Betts
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
02/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To Whom it May Concern, I am from Kandos, i grew up here and lived here till i had to move off to gain a trade (i now live in Perth). Mining forms an integral part of these small rural towns. Without mining they wither and die. I had to leave this area as a kid to gain education and work elsewhere due to lack of jobs and opportunity. To keep these towns alive we need opportunity for people like me to be able to have a choice to stay in the area if they want. I understand peoples concerns about environment and cultural heritage but i work in mining in WA and like all mining in this country we are bound to very tight regulations to ensure that pollution and impact to non mining areas and adjacent water waters is not a factor. People must remember that almost all rural towns in this country are propped up by a mine or providing stable wages and the ability to raise a family away from the city and carve out a beautiful exitance in a rural setting. If they cancel this mine, where do the youth go to work?? how do these towns survive? Kind Regards, Josh Betts |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowdens Silver Project. The substantial benefits of silver mining to the community are the boost in royalties, taxes and charges paid by the mining company to the governments. These revenues are then returned to local people in the form of services such as schools and hospitals, infrastructure, and policing. Plus the job opportunities for the locals will be plentiful. I believe that the mining company will contribute significantly to social and community groups and not-for-profits. I am sure that silver mines are highly aware of their responsibility to regional communities and will probably have local purchasing and procurement strategies in place to boost the local economic benefits. Plus I see silver as a critical metal being adopted in industrial applications especially in sustainable developments and therefore as Bowdens Silver will be one of the most resource rich projects Australia, NSW and the local community will benefit greatly from this development provided the company remains honest and adheres to the development conditions and operates the mine and the tailing operations in a environmentally and safe manner. Which in todays technically developed and advanced mining methodologies should not be a problem. As the saying goes. Where there is a will there is a safe way. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Submit that this project will go a long way to help the Local and National economy providing much needed local jobs and bring in much needed monies from foreign countries from exports of materials. I believe that Bowdens has reviewed the risks and issues and put into/or will put into place suitable infrastructure and systems to offset any potential detrimental effects. This is an important project that needs the broader communities support. I am in full support of this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Socioeconomic Impacts Increasingly it is becoming more uncertain as to whether most heavily indebted western countries (including the USA) will be able to repay their public, corporate and private debts. This is due to exponentially increasing debts exacerbated by recent significant increases in benchmark interest rates (which were necessitated by persistent high inflation). Based on a rational assessment (as a person who has attained an economics degree from Sydney University with honors) it will not be possible for most western governments to repay their debts. They will therefore face a choice; either to default on the debt and seek a restructuring, or electronically create new money with which to meet principal and interest obligations. History indicates that government will almost certainly choose the latter option, which will inescapably lead to the accelerated debasement of the local currency and to higher and accelerating inflation. Both these options therefore lead only to economic crisis and likely depression like conditions for a prolonged period (much like the collapse of the Soviet Union). When this happens, precious metals (including silver) will be one of the very few life-rafts that the Australian people will have available to them to preserve their wealth as their currency falls sharply in value (see Turkey today). The ability of some prudent Australians to preserve wealth (via ownership of precious metals) will inevitably benefit the nation as some pools of real savings will still be available to spur some economic growth. However, the ability of Australians to preserve their savings as these events unfold in the future, will be hamstrung if the supply of precious metals is too low. It is important that this supply be increased in the near term for the benefit of the Australian people as a whole. I note here that many central banks (which are often privately owned institutions contrary to common belief) in the last two years have purchased large quantities of precious metals. Physical precious metals need to be available to the general public when crisis arrives, not years later when mining production slowly ramps up due to overwhelming demand. Also please note that in an economic crisis the precious metals miners will be one of a few sectors that will be able to offer stable and profitable employment to local communities and tax revenues to government. Because of this counter-cyclical nature precious metals miners should be highly valued by the Australian people even in good economic times as they act as a quasi economic insurance policy or a hedge against economic crisis. Environmental I accept that all forms of mining have negative environmental impacts (to varying degrees). However silver is special in its contribution to the response to climate change. Silver is extensively used in a multitude of applications such as solar panels and efficient electrical motors and advance battery systems. In some cases there is no viable substitute for silver for these applications due to its unique chemical properties. Worldwide mine supply of silver (and other important elements and minerals) needs to be increased to facilitate the economic adoption of the required technology to address climate change. For these reasons I believe there is a net environmental benefit from this project. Thank you for your consideration. I believe any statements of fact (rather than forecast) above to be correct. I believe any forecast above to be plausible based on logic and past economic empirical evidence. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silver is essential for medical and enviromental damage control. We need to approve and produce these materials immediately for the production of infrastructure to combat climate change. The hypocracy of those against this state significant project is astounding and should be given very little weight to the IPC decision. Please look at the big picture and put our community first. |
Colin Betts
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a resident of Kandos and after loosing our main industry in 2011-12 i think the Bowden's mine would be a great asset to lift employment in the area as kids now leaving school have to move away which has an impact on the towns shops sporting clubs. I'm hoping it will go ahead Regards Colin. |
Aleesa Gosbell
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens silver will bring jobs and people to the area boosting the economy and helping businesses to grow. |
Adam Nolan
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have been a local resident and property owner in the Mudgee region for over the past 20 years during this time I have witnessed a dramatic change to the region due to the reduction in industry and there for employment it has been terrible for the local economy. The Bowdens Silver project would be a great boost to the regions economy and the increase in local job opportunities , and a great boost for surrounding businesses it is what is needed to stimulate the growth of the declining Mudgee region. The location of the proposed mine is well out of the way and would have no impact at all on tourism to the region or create any environmental of concern. Bowdens Silver have my full support on there proposal. Adam Nolan |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Mudgee Rugby Union Club |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the submission. Bowdens have shown great support to the community |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this mine will be of great economic benefit to the NSW & Australian Economy and will create a lot of new jobs for the area. I thoroughly support the Bowdens Silver Project. |
Allan Waters
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Employment for the local younger generation |
Matthew Stirzaker
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is an important commodity to facilitate the ESG transformation especially utilised in production of solar panels. This asset is of vital importance to Australia meeting emissions targets in the future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project for the economic stability it will provide to the local economy and the employment opportunities it will create for the younger generation. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a tertiary educated New South Wales resident who has previously lived in Mudgee and currently live in Sydney. I studied both Geography and Law at The University of Sydney and I believe the Bowdens Silver Project would be an amazing resource for New South Wales to benefit from. Moreover, I genuinely think that this specific project would be a relevant and effective way to transition away from coal in a very coal dominated area. Silver is also used in renewable technology, such as solar panels and electric vehicles (to name a couple of examples) and therefore Bowdens Silver Project offers an effective and realistic transition model that would absolutely benefit employment in a far more renewable energy area. Due to this and secondary, to the employment of many workers (who more than likely currently may work in local coal mines), I am of the opinion that Bowdens Silver Project would also obviously benefit the local economy in the region as well. Bowdens Silver Project is too good an opportunity for the region to miss out on and predominantly is a beneficial transition away from coal in the area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This submission is in the public interest, it is environmentally responsible and has long term economic and social benefits to the local communities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Bowdens Silver project. I strongly believe that this project has the potential to bring numerous benefits to the region, including economic growth, job creation, and increased tax revenue. The silver mining industry is a well-established and highly regulated sector, with a proven track record of responsible and sustainable operations. The proposed project has undergone extensive environmental assessments, and I am confident that the necessary measures will be put in place to ensure the protection of our natural resources and the well-being of local communities. Additionally, the economic benefits of this project cannot be overstated. The creation of new jobs and the influx of investment into the region will have a significant and positive impact on local businesses and the economy. The increased tax revenue generated by the project can be used to fund much-needed infrastructure improvements, including roads, schools, and public services. In conclusion, I strongly encourage the IPC to consider the numerous benefits of this project and to support its approval. I believe that the Bowdens Silver project has the potential to bring significant and long-lasting benefits to the region, and I urge the IPC to give it the consideration it deserves. Thank you for your time and consideration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the mine proposal should be allowed to go ahead with respect to the recommendations. It seems Bowdens have done the right thing by undertaking studies into environmental impacts on land,animals etc. I was brought up in the Kandos/Rylstone area and am looking to move back in the near future. The silver mine would be of great benefit to the whole community by providing jobs for locals and bringing money into the district. Many locals struggled to find work after the closure of the Cement works and coal mines. I believe the benefits would outweigh any concerns re environmental impacts. |
Sherry Lindsay
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would like to express my support for this project. We need these metals and resourses for our green infrastucture, we need the silver and zinc for solar panels, wind turbines, industry and to fight climate change. It is imperative that we have the resourses that this developement will produce for our enviroment. |
Peter Davis
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development as it will provide jobs for many people. |
Darren Bonham
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think it’s very important that the project goes ahead to support the local mining industry and local businesses with coal being on the way out and the need for minerals to convert the world to much better green power source. |
DOREEN Shelley
Organisation |
RYLSTONE NEWS AND POST |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have owned and operated the Rylstone Newsagency and Post Office for the last 20 years, before that I owned Hair Dressing Salons in both Rylstone and Kandos. I have witness what happened to our towns after our major industry packed up and left town. The devastation was wide spread from business down sizing, closing and the exodus of working familys and the high unemployment in our region, the effects are still being felt and though tourisim has increased it by no way compensates for a stable employment that industry supplies. I want our community to survive and prosper, the only life line that is even on the horizen is Bowdens Silver. I have objectively read all available studies, submissions etc and though I do have some concerns regarding the impact of this mine, which is only natural, I am convinced the real benefits far out weigh any negative impacts that are purley subjective and I am satisfied that Bowdens have answered all my concerns and will put in place world best practise proceedures and infrastructure that mitigates any of my concerns. As a community we need to support that Bowdens brings to our community and they have shown a genuine willingness to support our community. Please accept this submission in your considerations and I pray for our community that you approve this project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
01/02/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing in support of the Bowdens Silver Mine for the following reasons: - To transition to renewable energy we need silver and zinc. To be secure in our silver and zinc supply we need to develop silver and zinc resources within Australia. The Bowdens Silver Mine will produce silver and zinc. - As our region and nation transition towards a renewable future the thousands of coal mine workers in the region will need alternate employment. To keep their skills in the region and keep these workers close to their families they will need employment. The Bowdens Silver Mine will provide over 200 ongoing jobs, helping keep workers at home with their families. - The Bowdens silver-lead-zinc mineralisation can be seen outcropping at surface. It is not oxidised at the surface, showing that the sulphur in the rock is not readily oxidised and the risk of acid runoff is minimal. Given that we need silver and zinc for our future, the environment as a whole is far better off if we mine it from an orebody that does readily oxidise such as Bowdens. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will be good to have a mine in precious metal and other materials that are found in this process. All conditions must be adhered with very low impact to the environment animals fauna and flora and living societies that are habitual. This includes any heritage sites indigenous or not. All chemical wastes (toxins) shall be dealt with properly and contained and destroyed off site if necessary where it does not harm the environment. All responsibility will be held with the company /corporation with the running of administration protocols, sharemarkets losses and any dangers, disturbances to the environment with a proper fix to the cause, not a band aid procedure. |
Colin Hackett
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development of the mine by SVL the proposal has been exhaustively prepared and will add a valuable vital resource for the local community in these times of economic regional rationalisation the environmental and cultural issues have been adequately considered and addressed The regional locals (some of whom) are known to me will benefit and have asked for my support |
Peter Tumminello
Organisation |
The Natural Medicine Centre |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i have an interest in mining and its socioeconomic, technological and strategic impact on developments in Australia and the world.. I see that successful development of the Bowdens silver and base metal deposit is most valuable economically for local, state and national interests. It also has very significant impact on future strategic and technological development and so the. health of our nation. As a nation in the 21st century, silver and is vitally important in electrical technologies - its place in technologies for climate action and strategic strength is unique and cannot be replicated by other metals. I fully support the long, exhaustive exploration, developmental planning and careful approval undertakings pursued by Silver Mines. It is a vial nation building project and I wholeheartedly support its approval. |
James and Janne Walker
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We as Shareholders support the development of the Silver Mine. We think it will create many jobs and supply important metals to the Australian Industries and Royalties to benefit all Australians. We believe the Company has addressed all the forseeable impacts. With the economy struggling and coal mines diminishing we think the silver, lead and zinc will be an asset to Australia. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia has virtually no industry. Australia is very good at Mining and farming. With Coal and Gas slowly being phased out, we need additional sources of export revenue. Australia's minerals are what will keep Australia afloat. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I write in support of the Bowdens mine as it will assist in supporting the communities and local economies of the region, ones that are soon to see less and less investments owing to the wind down of coal mining and associated industries on both sides of the range. This application has been recommended for approval, the benefits of the products to be mined are those which NSW and Australia should ensure are locally available for long term resilience of the economy and general well being of the community through security of supply for industrial uses and manufacturing in a deglobalizing world. One would naturally expect ongoing consideration of local concerns however the project as assessed should proceed to ensure that this region can maintain a diversity of well paying jobs for young families to have a secure future and thus support the towns and communities in the region that would benefit from their moving into (or staying) to make a life in the region. |
Daniel Winberg
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
My understanding is that silver is required for many applications and technologies, including those required to further the net zero agenda. If the issues of concern are adequately addressed, I don't see how Australia can leave such a large and significant resource in the ground. A small amount of research will show the projected silver production deficit in the coming years. I support the proposal. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I strongly support Bowden Silver mine. Whether we have a prosperous and technological future (demand for silver and metals) or a recession to rival the GFC (desire for precious metals and economic output of a functioning mine) Australia will benefit from having this mine. Thank you |
Max Bolte
Organisation |
Australian citizens |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project as very positive for NSW and the Mudgee economy. |
Michael Fisher
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In support of the world wide concquest to transition from fossil fuel to alternative energy, I strongly believe that there remains now and into the future a pivotal role for the Bowen's Silver mine to progress the process of sustaining silver demand. I therefore lend my full support for this proposal, particularly given the inadequate supply of new silver mines comming to the market in the forseeable future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is necessary for Australia to continue to be doing what it is the best in the world. Could not be more supportive of Bowden Siler . |
Rahul Gupta
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Support |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am writing to show my support for this silver mine and its production. It is an enviromentally friendly proposal that will bring 20+ years of work to our area in a time where a global recession is right around the corner. We need all the support and work in this area as possible. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mine must minimise environmental impacts on surrounding areas. I am comfortable with provisions made in the proposal that the mine is taking environmental issues seriously and is trying to address identified issues. I support the mine because of both the socioeconomic and industrial benefits for the region and Australia. |
Euan FARQUHAR
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this mine will be good for Australia providing employment, purpose, and prosperity to the community, Australia and shareholders who have the vision and belief in the current and future of all Australians |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project has enormous potential to bring new jobs/employment, support local industries / communities ;and to uncover untapped resources potential. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am fully support the project development as it brings benefits to local community. |
Craig Smith
Organisation |
Personal |
---|---|
Location |
Queensland |
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think this is a great mining resource which will add benefits to the local comminuty and for the broader economic benefit of the Qld economy. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To better support the movement |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposed development for the following reasons: Employment opportunities for local families so they can continue to live and work in their community by prioritising locals for jobs and offering quality training opportunities. Opportunities for local businesses, contractors, suppliers and service providers to partner with Bowdens Silver. $4.7 million towards community infrastructure and road maintenance in partnership with Mid-Western Regional Council, plus other new road and bridge investments. $250 million capital investment delivering economic benefits for regional communities. Continuation of support for community initiatives and organisations through the company's Community Investment Program, which has already invested over $500,000 into the local community. The Project’s water supply will be sustainably sourced on site and will not compete with local agriculture or affect environmental flows. Silver and zinc have been recognised by the NSW Government as part of its Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy as highly-valued metals with wide-ranging applications in fields such as electronics, solar power, aerospace, electric vehicles and medicine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
We should be supporting businesses that will add to our economy and employment. This is a brilliant project that should not be held back. Australia has a great industry in resources which should continue into the future by supporting projects like this one |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project is a nationally significant resource extraction opportunity which will allows Australia to be increasing self-sufficient in important industrial material. On balance, the assessment report and the extensive and comprehensive recommended conditions of approval indicate that any potential adverse impacts from mining operations cam be ameliorated or mitigated. Approval of the project will have significant direct and indirect benefits for the local community over a significant time period. The proposed development of the Bowens Silver Mine should be approved as recommended by DPE |
richard bury
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowden Silver mine will be one of the largest in Aus and globally, as such will bring economic revenue into Aus and meet the world wide demand for the industrial metal. Economic investment to local communities, direct employment to local communities as the project will employ 320 people in the set up phase and an ongoing workforce of 230. Viable farming in the community will continue unaffected. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I would love to see the Bowden's silver project go ahead. It will provide key silver resources to Australia and internationally especially given the increased needs for more silver for the green transition and electrification. I believe the Bowden's silver project will provide jobs,.resources, and community growth for the modgee area and will be a positive contributer to the Australian economy. Please approve the development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
In this uneasy economic climate we need to be looking at our future balance of economic and environmental input to all our futures. Stoping resources from extraction stops our future opportunities but considering the lasting impact of mining is also our immediate responsibility. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Great for jobs |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
An approval would provide great opportunity for both the government and economy, much needed resource in many aspects and a great asset. Also providing jobs. |
Barry Henderson
Organisation |
Henderson International |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Submission to Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales (IPC) Dear Members of the IPC, We are writing this submission as a shareholder of Silver Mines Limited to express our support for the company's Bowdens Silver Project in New South Wales. We believe that this project will bring significant economic and social benefits to the local communities and the Mid-Western Regional area of NSW, as well as long-term employment, training and business opportunities. The Bowdens Silver Project, which is the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia, has undergone an extensive and rigorous assessment process and has been referred to the IPC for a final determination. Our team has done a great job in delivering a robust and environmentally responsible project and the referral by the DPE is a recognition of the long-term benefits it will bring to the region. As a shareholder, we believe that the Bowdens Silver Project is not only important for Silver Mines but also for the entire State of New South Wales. The mine’s 23-year life, including 16.5 years of silver production and by-products of zinc and lead, underpins significant value potential and the ongoing exploration activities for potential underground mining opportunities could further extend the life of the Project. We strongly encourage the IPC to consider the positive impact that the Bowdens Silver Project will have on the local communities and the wider community. It is our belief that the benefits of the project far outweigh its residual costs and it is in the public interest to approve this project. Thank you for considering our submission. Sincerely, Barry Henderson Sydney NSW |
Tom Radovanic
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This will create badly needed jobs in the rural area |
Heath King
Location |
Tasmania |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This great project will be a terrific employment opportunity for the area and Australia in general, we need to encourage more of this or get left well behind |
Richard Lillie
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing this letter to express my support for the Bowdens Silver Project, the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia and one of the largest globally. The project has a rich history, with its discovery dating back to the 1980s, and has been subject to extensive exploration and development studies. Its proximity to nearby towns with access to infrastructure, water supply, the power grid, and a highly-skilled, local workforce makes it highly appealing. Silver Mines Limited acquired the project in 2016 and has since recommenced activities with plans for condensed and enhanced development. The integration of the mining development and viable farming operations will bring numerous benefits to the district in terms of direct employment, support industries, economic investment in local communities, and support for local development initiatives. After making my own enquires I am satisfied that the New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) has assessed the Bowdens Silver Project as being in the public interest and approvable. I also note that the DPE has stated that "On balance, the Department considers that the benefits of the project outweigh its residual costs and that the project is in the public interest and is approvable, subject to strict conditions of consent". In summary, there are numerous compelling reasons for the approval of the Bowdens Silver Project, which include: 1. Significant long-term benefits for local communities and the wider Mid-Western 2. Delivers long-term employment and training opportunities for the local communities 3. Offers business opportunities for the region 4. Balances resource recovery and impact minimization 5. Approved by the DPE under strict conditions 6. In the public interest 7. Benefits outweigh residual costs 8. Recognized by the DPE as a robust and environmentally responsible project 9. Well-understood and supported by local communities 10. Supports Australian economic growth by reducing dependence on foreign sources 11. Provides a secure source of precious metals for domestic industries 12. Increases local job creation and economic development 13 Boosts local and national revenue through the production and export of precious metals 14 Contributes to the growth of Australia's mining and resources sector. In conclusion, I strongly support the Bowdens Silver Project for its recognition of the significant benefits it will bring to local communities and the wider Mid-Western Regional area of NSW, such as long-term employment, training, and business opportunities. The project strikes a balance between maximizing resource recovery and minimizing impacts and is approved by the DPE under strict conditions. Thank you for considering my views on this matter. |
Clive Ottaway
Location |
Victoria |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia and the world need this mine, it's that simple. |
Colin McQueen
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the project on socio-economic grounds. Modern mining and rehabilitation techniques can mimimise disruption to the local area. The Bowdens silver deposit is very large and mining and selling it will bring good jobs and prosperity to the area for decades. |
Matthew Carpenter
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Through the operation of the mine, the local community and neighbouring towns will see a much needed boost in long term employment and development opportunities. Adding to the already exiting need for silver, this will also support Australia's ability to provide the world with a much needed source of metals for sustainable technology which is acquired in an ethical manner. I see this as being a positive for the immediate communities, New South Wales green commitments, and the future of the next generation in the Lue community. |
Robert Goddard
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Support this project in trust Of securing a better outcome for future generations in accessing and providing the World with home grown resources the World needs enabling future generations employment. |
Jamie Nipperess
Organisation |
Silver mines |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support silver mines proposal |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in full support of this project which helps to get more resources and brings jobs to the local community. Our rural and regional towns are full of resources but undeveloped. By supporting such protect, we can develop our rural community. |
Alan Middleton
Location |
Northern Territory |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have worked closely with Indigenous First Nation Australians since 1996, mostly in the Top End. I am very aware that Aboriginal peoples across the nation wish to access economic opportunities and that this shy majority is repeatedly undermined by a traiterous (to the First Nations involved) loud and radically motivated few. In terms of the environment, Australia is amongst the most strict environment controlled mining and processing countries in the world. Countries such as China have very low controls, both environmental and labour laws, which results in devasting environmental and labour outcomes. It is far better for mining and mineral processing to be undertaken in Australia, for the globe and for Australian communites. The local socioeconomic benefits are significant and far outweigh percieved risks and costs. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
submitting my support for the project |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development as it will provide the following regional benefits: • Employment opportunities • Opportunities for local businesses, contractors, suppliers and service providers • Investment in local infrastructure |
Name Redacted
Location |
South Australia |
---|---|
Date |
31/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens Silvers' potential to reduce climate change is critical, and can not be understated! Silver, and all precious metals, are now in much demand to supply the future needs of renewable energy sources and meet ESG requirements. The supply will support not just Australia, but the whole world and in many different industries. Bowdens offer a long mine life, therefore securing Australia's own needs for silver for many years and be less relient on other nations (eg china) to produce our own goods. Further more, it creates many jobs and upskilling opportunities for Australians. Sure there will be some environmental impact, but with todays standards for monitoring and professionalism to do the right thing, I am sure that this mine will exceed industry standards. I fully support this venture and not impeed its progression. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe it’s great for the economy of a small village as I run my own small business here and have been gaining support from the bowdens crew, however the issues I’ve chosen in the previous question are something I’d like to see addressed with careful consideration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project can give jobs to the locals which will be ongoing during the construction process and when the mine is up and running. Not only will it create jobs at the mine it will also give support to the suppliers and businesses in the area, which can only improve the economy. I have been to the area and spoken to the locals and most of them don't have a issue with this mine going ahead . A silver mine will give more options to the mining industry and might move away from relying on coal. Silver is used in so many areas and is a valuable resource for things such as medical appliances, electronics and solar technology. This is an Australian company and that alone should get support from the government. Bowdens already supports local events and clubs and I'm sure this will continue. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I know and regularly deal with multiple groups in the community who believe they will be positively impacted by this development in the form of employment and increased business. For this reason I just wanted to submit a positive application as it appears to mean a lot to them. |
Ann Leonard
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Support for local jobs |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I think that this mine is going to be good for the local economy (it will employ many people, and the silver mined will help Australian businesses). Their plans on mitigating and rectifying the impact on the environment seem to be better than even the government would do. The roads to the mine could use some improvement. Please let this mine go ahead. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Williamson Geotechnical |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the Bowdens Project will be of benefit and boost employment of local people, particularly young people in the Lue, Rylstone and Kandos area. Opportunities for professional development in this area is lacking and often people will have to move away to find work. For the hope of young people in the area to be gainfully employed thsi project should go ahead. |
Matt Harrington
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that the silver mine will be good for local employment. The coal mines only have ten years worth of life and the silver mine will provide employment beyond that. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The site design looks appropriate and concievable The amenities are appropriate and fit the neighbouring areas well |
Matthew O’Hare
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the building of the Borden’s silver mine in the Lue area |
Michael Harrington
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will bring jobs to the local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This an Australian company which should be encouraged. It will create local jobs while the mine is being constructed and during the operation. It will support communities both local and wider reaching and be good for that economy. Suppliers and businesses will be among those to benefit. Having looked into this project it seems it has wide ranging support for it to go ahead . It will diversify the local mining industry away from coal. Silver is a valuable resource which is utilised in so many different areas, renewables and medical appliances to name but two. This company has given ongoing support to local events and clubs. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this is an opportunity to create more jobs for surrounding locals with minimal travel times . |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
More jobs in the region |
Keith Garbutt
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
30/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am a strong believer in Bowden Silver project as it will boost the local economy and create employment for the local people. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens will offer local job opportunities which our small surrounding towns such as Kandos Rylstone and lue are in need of. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support Bowdens Silver |
Mr Wade
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
To the Minister or responsible persons. If we are to green our economy and transform to cleaner energy we need Silver in the electronics like never before. Currently the World Silver Council data says we have a 200 million ounce deficit per year, and we haven't even started replacing our vehicle fleet. Provided all environmental conditions and monitoring is met, I urge the minister to approve this project as soon as possible. It will still take around 2 years to build the plant and start mining. Please make a Good decision for all Australians. If any Copper projects come across your desk, we need them too. Thank you. Mr Wade |
Luke Vanderzee
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bring jobs to the area |
Eva Ford
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
28/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that Australia desperately needs to develop home based, Australian owned industries. The Australian nation is rich in mineral resources and it seems obvious to me, that we take every opportunity to seriously consider projects such as this. I'm also in favour for more job opportunities, in regional areas, be encouraged. Jobs for our future generations, which build and support national as well as personal identity. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a great opportunity for Australia to supply a precious metal which will support the global move to green technologies. This mine is a win/win for the planet and the economy. My 9kw solar system is estimated to have saved 6.5 tonnes of Co2 being pumped into the atmosphere in the last 12 months alone. Based on the DPE assessment that the project minimises “The associated impacts on the surrounding landholders and the environment”, I support the approval of this mine because of the overall net benefit to the planet. Act Local, Think Global |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens mines will be great for the region with the decline in coal mining. This is a critical metal that is in short supply |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This project would be of great benefit to the local and wider community, with coal on the decline and the area being dominant by coal this project would bring added stability and variability for the community and surrounding areas. This project has a huge potential to be one of the biggest deposits of silver, plus various other commodities, and for the future providing diversity economically on a local scale and within Australia. With current advances in technology and increase for renewable minerals Bowden's Project would provide a huge contribution both on a local scale in terms of jobs etc but also to the Australian mining industry. |
Ian Hinton
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Project for future generations to prosper and in turn the Lue village will prosper again. I also think that the relocated Maloneys Road will benefit me greatly and also mean traffic won't go through the village. |
Garry Johnson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the development by Bowdens Silver for the mine as it will create local jobs which will support the local communities and Australia. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Bowdens mines will be great for the region with the decline in coal mining. This is a critical metal that is in short supply |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
27/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project as it will create numerous jobs for the dying local economy |
Hephzibah Crossing
Organisation |
Hephzibah Crossing |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It's going to revive Rylstone town with the 350 jobs created during construction. I am passionate about keeping people and jobs in rural towns in Australia. Without these jobs there is a trend of decline in the rural population. Further silver has many purposes and it's in Australias best interest to support Australian companies who will extract silver. |
Margot Crossing
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The NSW government is very positive about the proposed development by Bowdens Silver. The development is being proposed by an Australia listed company with a shareholding predominantly of Australian shareholders. The company has a management team with: - a proven track record of successful mining project developments, - a focus on environmentally responsible mining practices, - a desire to provide benefits and opportunities to the local community, - a clear objective of building wealth for shareholders which will benefit the Australian people. Denying this proposal risks the mine being bought by larger mining conglomerates who do not have the interests of the Australian public at heart. In a market of increasing silver price it is an inevitable outcome that the silver deposit will be developed. It is critical that the NSW IPC keeps this resource in responsible Australian ownership. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It will be a huge financial and therefore social benefit to the region. |
Damian Mousley
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The project would be good to develop local jobs and local industry. Silver is a key material needed to drive for electification iniatives. |
Kipling Crossing
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the mining of silver in Australia and the development planned by Bowdens Silver for the Bowdens Silver Project. This project has the approval from the NSW DPE who understand the need for this project to be developed. I have family employed by Bowdens and believe in the company as a responsible operator both environmentally and socially. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe this development provides a great opportunity for employment in a time of financial uncertainty for many. It will also provide a boon to the local rural towns economies in the years following some of the most disasterous floods in recent memory. The development also serves to strengthen one of Australia's most productive industries to further solidify us as a global power in mining exports. Silver is essential in so many products and services so there can be no doubt regarding the demand for what will be produced by this development, especially during a time where so many are impacted by global shortages. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a chance for NSW to contribute to the global push for green, electrified energy. Silver is in a global deficit and it’s now longer and more difficult to find. If there is no silver, there is no green energy revolution. Alternatively, the substitute for silver involves severely more harmful mining processes for inferior minerals, with inferior end products with unsustainable lifecycles. SVL has undergone extensive studies for a proven resource, and has investigated all critical paths to arrive at the most ecologically conscious methods - therefore I highly recommend is given permission by NSW to extract and distribute for a necessary carbon-minimalist future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the proposed mine would bring a great deal of jobs and socio economical benefits to our local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the project proposed by Bowdens silver will be beneficial for our economy, as well as in generating local jobs and growth. |
Lalnunmawii Crossing
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It is important for Australia to continue to develop mines for the extraction of silver, particularly with Australia's recent free trade agreement with India. India are projected to be the largest importer of silver and the development of the Bowdens Silver Project will ensure the economic survival of the mid western region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of the proposed development for the following reasons: The recommended conditions of consent adequately mitigate any adverse impacts from the proposed development. The mine would create much-needed jobs in Mudgee (320 jobs in construction and 228 during operations) and subsequently benefit the local and wider community economy. There is wide-ranging local support for the project to go ahead. It will diversify the local mining industry away from coal. Silver is a crucial part of the NSW Government's Critical Minerals and High-Tech Metals Strategy. Silver is a valuable resource utilised in renewables and medical applications. This is an Australian company who will be providing support for local events and clubs. |
Robert Klein
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
26/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Sufficient consideration has been given to remediation of the site, impact on native wildlife and control of by-products and tailings. The positive impacts on the community include employment and business opportunities that flow on from such a facility. Silver is also an important resource used in modern technology and increasingly important for the national interest so it's importance will make it a valuable addition to infrastructure. |
Grahame Heap
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel that the proposed Bowden's Silver will have a positive and lasting impact on the social and particularly economic value for the families in the region. In a region that is already well versed in the ways of mining, the negative impacts wwould be largely obscured. Further, mining a high value ore such as Silver makes sense when considering the region's diversity portfolio. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the Bowden's Silver Mine should be approved. It will provide crucial resources when we need them. It will provide jobs to locals and mining experts. We should be producing minerals, not importing them... |
Mark Wojciechowski
Organisation |
KASOM GROUP |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It’s a good project for the local area It’s providing key minerals that are important in the production of goods to achieve net zero targets |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
While I appreciate there are concerns with any mining project, I think it's important to recognise that the region surrounding the proposed location of the mine could use the economic boost that would come with this project's approval. Lue and Rylstone have been on the decline for years in regards to the services and jobs available. This has become more problematic for long term locals in recent years with the rapid increase in property prices due to Covid-19 and the urban to rural migration that has followed. The job creation that Bowdens would likely provide if this mine is approved would certainly give some stability to the local community on this front. Furthermore, of all the mining companies out there I think Bowdens seem like a good fit to manage the environmental issues that come with any mining project. They seem like a well educated team who I'd like to think are committed to addressing any local concerns as they crop up and ensuring the project progresses in an ethical manner with the natural environment surrounding the mine cared for responsibility, with sustainability in mind. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Western Australia |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is a critical element needed for the electrification of vehicles and used in solar panels, so it will play a vital role in lowering carbon emmissions and acheiving both Australia's and the global climate change objectives. It will also provide much needed revenue to the Australian residents through royalties and also the local community through additional employment opportunities in a regional area. |
Name Redacted
Location |
Queensland |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Those involved in the Bowdens project have shown real concern for the local community, the environment and the historical Indigenous people. I believe this project should be approved for many reasons, including providing the local community with jobs, provide a better standard of living to the local area, prove Aus is providing for the greener world and hopefully make us (all of Australia) more self sufficient and less reliant on others for our sustainability. |
Ricky Jackson
Organisation |
Maxfield Drilling Pty Ltd |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have followed this project for several years and am Impressed with the effort and desire of the management team to deliver real positive outcomes on environment, social and economics for the the community they work in. Bowdens Silver Mine project will be professionally managed and deliver real positive return for the community. Mining in todays environment of high expectations on all these concerns means real effort and expenditure is required prior to any development. The management team have not only done the work and spent time effort and money but having spoken to several of them they believe in it. With the high level of community support that has been derived from real and honest community consultation I believe it should be approved. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I Believe this development will be beneficial to the local community and to NSW and to Australia as a whole. This is a very important resource which is needed for its industrial and sustainability applications i.e. solar panels. It will generate local employment opportunities. And provided that the development satisfies all the conditions in the EIS and is carried out with care then there should be no objections to it proceeding. |
Owen Thomas
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver is gonna boom. You like tax $$$. This will provide lots. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe the proposal will be delivering significant economic and social benefits to communities across the Mid-Western region of Lue/Mudgee and the overall state and Federal government as we look to continue our push into renewables age |
BILL Williamson
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the proposal because I believe the NSW Planning policies and the proponent will achieve sustainable development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Support for.local jobs |
Leonie Armstrong
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I hereby wish to register my support for the Bowdens Silver Project. I have been a regional local all my life and I have seen many businesses flourish when there are active industrial, manufacturing or mining operations in the local area and conversely fail when those kind of operations cease. The satellite businesses that support the main industry and usually employ many locals, cease to be a viable endeavour when the commerce created by having a thriving workforce no longer exists in a small town. We have all experienced the impact that losing large business can have on regional communities. Power station closures, coal mine closures, cement plant closures, abattoir closures as well as the technological advancements in agriculture which reduced the need for so many station hands, have all contributed to the loss of many families from our area. People have had to relocate to other areas to find work and therefore a healthy economy goes with them. All of the schools, clubs, hospitals, sporting clubs etc have been negatively impacted by the loss of industry in our region. To gain employment with a coal mine has long been a coveted career path, especially for young people, as the benefits are obvious and include things like apprenticeships and traineeships and all sorts of training to improve their future employment prospects and career paths in meaningful, purposeful roles. As coal mines are getting phased out, I wonder where our children will be afforded such valuable gainful employment in the future? Manufacturing in Australia isn't what it used to be. I firmly believe that operations like Bowdens Silver are essential to the future generations and that this company has an ethical and robust approach to this endeavour, providing employment for hundreds of people and supporting businesses. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver proposal represents an excellent opportunity for the Mid Western Regional Council area and surrounds. It will provide a range of employment opportunities across the area, and due to its proximity to Kandos and Rylstone, it will provide key employment in these small towns. They have long suffered since the closure of both the cement works and Charbon coal mine, which has had significant social impacts to the towns. It will also bring additional people to the Mudgee area, ensuring additional skills are brought to town for the type of mining being proposed. Small and medium sized business in town will benefit and will be able to make a risk reduction by lowering the exposure to the local coal mines. In line with the climate goals of NSW, Australia and the world, this is the largest known silver deposit in Australia. As such, the worldwide social benefits through a reduction in carbon emissions provudes a massive benefit to Mudgee, NSW and the economy. These resources will be required in ever increasing amounts to meet the production levels for electronics and solar, renewable energy manufacture, medical and other manufacturing uses. As much as no one enjoys seeing mining, it is a part of our life and the resources must come from somewhere. It should be Mudgee, as we have the best mining and environmentally sustainable mining operations in the world. Implementation of controls to risk mitigate spillage will provide surety to long life of mine and possible expansions in the future once coal has been finalised. The benefits outweighs any issues, all of which can be effectively controlled and monitored. It will provide a transition from coal in the area and ensure Mudgee continues to be a strong regional town for everyone. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
25/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The company involved in this project has done an excellent job in all aspects to date. I support the company and the project. It will create employment and wealth for the community and do this responsibly to the highest standards of environmental stewardship. The project has a relatively small footprint, compared with open cut coal as for example, and it has a projected mine life that could well be extended by further successful exploration. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Silver mining in Australia is an important industry that significantly contributes to the country's economy. Not only does it generate jobs and revenue, but it also plays a crucial role in the global production of silver - with many of the uses related to energy production (solar cells) and battery energy storage hence the approval of The Bowdens Silver Mine project would help our transition towards green energy. This proposed mine will also provide local jobs and boost the local economy as too contribute to the State economy thanks to significant royalties. I am in full support of the project. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The greater Mudgee region, I believe, needs this project to go ahead in light of the pending Coal mine closure. This is also an opportunity for Australia to take control of its strategic resources, particularly Silver which is used extensively in green energy products worldwide(Particularly Solar panels). In order for Australia to kick Coal energy for good(and its mining), the Bowdens silver project is a "must have" to assist in Australia's development of its green energy future. We can either continue to live the status quo with Crude oil/fossil fuels, or take control of our future and bring Australia's largest silver deposit to the green energy future. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As an occupant of the land which forms part of the mine I am satisfied with the information provided by Bowden silver and satisfied with the provisions that they are undertaking to provide a safe and hazard free environment during the life of the mine and also thereafter. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Stripes Industrial supplies |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
i support this program as i know for our small business based in Mudgee Bowden's silver has already and will continue to show support. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
It`s common knowledge that Silver is used for cars. More than 36 million ounces of silver are used each year in auto manufacturing, according to the Silver Institute. Solar cells, also known as photovoltaic (PV) cells, convert sunlight into electricity. Silver plays a part in making that conversion happen. Silver shows up in almost every electronic device, according to the Silver Institute. Silver is a soldier when it comes to soldering and brazing. The next time you board an airplane or helicopter, give some thanks to silver. Jet engines and helicopter engines rely on this metal to keep running. Believe it or not, silver helps fight germs, just like pills and shots. It`s actually a longtime go-to antibiotic. You`ll also find silver in many of the millions of water purifiers sold each year. Time does not allow me to elaborate on the use of Jewellery, Tableware and Precious Metals that Silver presents. In conclusion the CEO of Silver Mines Limited, Anthony McClure has maintained on many occasions that significant long term planning regarding ecological and environmental factors have been met, so there shouldn't be any major issues concerning the commencement of mining at Bowdens. Also the benefits to the community in relation to jobs, revenue to the Govt. and as highlighted above, the monumental amount of products that Silver has in modern day production significantly outweighs any pitiful objection to approvals not going ahead. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support this project. It will be wonderful for our community financially and to create more jobs for our locals. With the future of silver looking so bright (pardon the pun) and lucrative this would secure the future of many current businesses in our region and create a pathway for many new businesses for many years to come. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The EIS is a comprehensive and favourable analysis on the Bowden's silver project which will serve the locals, NSW and Australia's national interest for self sufficiency, ethical mining and leading the world in renewables . Silver is a critical component in solar panels, and generally a 'Tech' metal which , globally is going to enter a substantial shortfall in the coming years due to a decade of poor pricing, lack of investment in new mines and resource depletion. Australia is in a highly favourable position to benefit from the wholesale uptake of renewables as the world moves to electric vehicles, solar generation and energy storage solutions. Australia is also in a position where it needs to take hold of and get behind projects like Bowden's Silver and drive Australia's economic recovery in a post Covid-19 environment. I believe the assessment and recommendations have been covered extensively, but must not adversely hinder the operational requirement of the applicant as you cannot simply move the resource to a more convenient location. I do not believe this project should be held up or rejected by a vocal minority with unsubstantiated grievances, and falsehoods thrust at the application which if rejected, would severely impact the prospects of all future developments of this type for NSW, and leave Australia behind in a wider transition off of fossil fuels. I wholly support the project and look forward to seeing this come to fruition. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
This is a good initiative for the area, we need growth and employment to make our community safe |
Robyn CURTIS
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As a resident of Kandos for the last 10 years I really think we desperately need this mine to be approved. A lot of people are struggling to keep this town alive. Approval of this mine would really help by providing extra employment and investment to these 2 towns. Our young citizens have to leave the area to obtain employment which only leaves the elderly. Approval of this mine would mean a great start to the recovery of our town. |
Bruce Kerney
Organisation |
Bylong Creek 4x4 Park |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Strongly support as the area contrary to outside influences who have no connection to the local area or economy has always been an industrial mining area. With 3 Coal mines in Kandos for nearly 100 yrs as well as mine at Charbon.. a quarry at Clandulla for the Cement Works as well as Lime Plants at Running Stream and Windamere , this area needs this continued industry support The local charitable support to schools and local events,,, Rylstobne Show, .. Charity Shop and numerous others have suffered greatly from the gradual demise of this support from the Vocal Minority not even living in the local area... This was clearly evident with the KEPCO Mine not being approved and the money for the previously 10 or so years going into the local economy Mudgee Gulgong and Ulan are well served for employment by the Ulan Mines but the satellite towns of Kandos Rylstone missing out due to commutable travelling The Prtinciple of Kandos High School expressed concern and frustration during the KEPCO application that there is no major local Industrial employment for the areas youth. From clerical office duties to the more field based equipment operators to field support staff If anyone in some distant Sydney city office actually gets out of your confortable city office cubicle and comes out and witnesses the decline of Kandos main street business area to see how critically important the approval this is to the wider community and not so objecting protestor from out of the local area Yes I have a vested interest in the Mine also as a Shareholder of the company on the ASX ... Yes I've put my money where my mouth is by investing what tiny bit I can to support ther employment of local youth |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have no issue at all with this mine, it is a great opportunity for a struggling community offering jobs and making our beautiful area sustainable for families to live |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Kandos/Rylstone areas need this opportunity from the closure of the local cement and other local large employers. The bymong mine would have helped but that is not going ahead so this is the only other opportunity. |
Helen Battye
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I thoroughly support the Bowdens Silver project. As a local Lue resident supporting my village by donating my time to the community and it’s future. I support the mine proposal going ahead to ensure the survival of Lue with providing employment and new infrastructure within and around our village. Definitely within the current climate there are next to zero employment opportunities for locals and surrounding areas. We need economic growth and this proposal will bring that. I would like to ensure that our community will remain intact and flourish within from the benefits that this mine will attract. |
Steve Mini
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
24/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I believe that the mine would be great for the surrounding community as it will provide ongoing employment for local people. I work in the coal mining industry and understand the lengths the mining companies go to to protect the environment and also the amount of work that the companies go to to ensure the mines do not affect the surrounding residents. I am a strong supporter of this mine going ahead |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Would be excellent for the community local employment opportunities and other local areas |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
23/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The mine is not a dirty coal mine which we don't support however the silver mine is a different story... it will create jobs for locals (320 jobs in construction and 228 during operations), several other key points include the mines support that will be offered to the community, silver is used in renewable energy and medical applications, therefore an important aspect of our societies necessary functions. It is an Australian company which is great for the economy. The mine assures us it will offset ecological damages with current best practice techniques. Kind regards, Bart |
Rudyard Crossing
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
22/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support the Bowdens Silver Project as the mine will provide crucial jobs for the local workers and economic support for the towns and the state. Silver is a critical mineral that is needed for the more than 10,000 applications in modern society that it has. The NSW DPE is correct in their approval and that the broader benefits to society outweigh the potential impacts. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
22/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I want this project to go ahead to create work for locals and to create an alternative to coal. I have many friends who live in the Mudgee and think this project will be hugely beneficial for the local community. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I feel Bowden have the best interests of the farmers and local people. They will provide .such needed work for the local people. They have taken on board all the climate and natural environment into account and will minimise the impact on the environment. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
21/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As my property forms part of the mine, I believe that Bowdens Silver has done a marvelous job at assessing the Environment needs regarding water management, protection and relocation of fauna and flora within and surrounding the site. They have been listening to suggestions for the post mine site to be a water reservoir which can be used for fighting bushfires as well as drought proofing the native animals. They plan to plant more eucalyptus trees post mining to help re- establish the local koala population. The site has been well designed to reduce impact on their neighbours by use of noise reduction barriers, efficient use of water, and reduce dust as dislayed in their DPE report. The people will be trained to help fight as well as provide resources to fight bushfires and protect neighbouring homes and properties. They will be providing new infrastructure such as roads, jobs, prioritising locals as locals would not only benefit financially, but would also care about their neighbourhood as they and their children would live in it. The Bowdens Silver will not only be training their employees for their job skills as well as OH&S but First aid, as I have been told that each vehicle has a snake bite kit. Recently I have seen a large Brown snake and a Red Belly Black snake, an if bitten, I wouldn't make it to Mudgee in time as it takes 30minutes to get to Mudgee, but would be dead in less than 20 minutes, so knowing that they carry these kits would not only benefit my family but other locals as well. The Silver mine would not only benefit the community from a financial point of view, but Australia in general. Not just economically, but also for the use of the Silver and it's associated products in the production of Solar panels and batteries to store the energy, for houses, factories, cars, (trains, boats, trucks, etc in the future), which would produce cleaner energy, and a cleaner environment. Compared to the previous mining company which I unfortunatly had to deal with, I find that Bowdens Silver has been more honest, friendly, and willing to take on board suggestions and recommendations that I have made, as well as I have learnt from them as well. They have my complete trust not only from myself but my family as well. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
20/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The entire district is dying with all the young people leaving to seek work elsewhere. We need a large employer to keep our children working in the area. Bowdens will do this. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Outotec |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
20/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Being a mining professional for several decades, I have seen many proposals over those years and note that this development has many positives for the community and our country. I support the Bowdens Silver mine as it provides an opportunity for the greater Hunter region to diversify away from coal and will provide much needed jobs to those looking to transfer out of coal. I believe there will be over 300 jobs created during the construciton phase and many more to those who supply equipment and services to the mine during construciton and into opertaions. It is clear that the demand for Silver is increasing and feeds many future proof industries like medical, renewables and tech. There is wide ranging support for this mine in the community so it is a no brainer to approve this development. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
20/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The socioeconomic impact on the local community would be positive. The opening of the Bowden's Silver Mine would create flow on jobs for the local community. Which currently it does not have many of. Silver is important for almost literally everything we as society think is important. From renewable energy to medicine. With a plethora of modern technology inbetween. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
MSP Photography |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
19/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of this submission for a number of reasons but mainly due to the jobs that it will create for the area. It will benefit the local and wider community and not only provide jobs directly for those involved with the mine but will have a knock on effect for the area and benefit local businesses and suppliers. It is also an Australian company and they appear to be doing a lot to support the the local community by getting involved in local events and club activities. |
Name Redacted
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
19/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I fully support the Bowden silver mine, it will help and provided great opportunities for young families with employment and would provide a great opportunity for families that want to engage with this industry. It will also provide support and diversity to the region. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Hilly Developments |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
19/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Great for more local employment in the region. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Being connected to the community for many years I believe the local community would benefit greatly from this mine through employment opportunities. There will be employment opportunities for those working directly with the mine and the wider community. Moving away from coal and investing in the critical minerals industry is essential for the longevity of our local community. I support this mine. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
18/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I have no issues to the proposed silver Mine, I think we need more industry(mines) that are NOT coal and give hundreds of locals job opportunities. Silver is a crucial mineral used in renewables and medical application’s. Bowdens is an Australian company who support local events and clubs in Mudgee and the surrounding area. We need more Aussie companies like Bowden who keep locals and the environment in mind while supplying extra jobs . |
MICHAEL SWEENEY
Organisation |
Mudgee Region Rail (inc) ................... we hope in future to carry the product(s) by rail |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
17/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
Australia needs Zinc (Colorbond) for our buildings '" " Lead (our cars start first kick,Lead batteries) " " Silver In everything electrical ,from major switch stations to our mobile phones( as well as table ware and jewelry) Would those opposing the project suggest we do without all of the above? ELSE Rely on Importing the materials. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
NA |
---|---|
Location |
|
Date |
15/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
WE need to invest and reap the benefits of our own natural resorted. Pics |
Tom Klein
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The Bowdens Silver Project represents a first-class mineral discovery by very talented geology professionals in 1989, under the success of Conzinc Riotinto of Australia (CRA Exploration). In the space of 34 years this greenfields mineral discovery is now at the point of development. “Mining is a non-renewable industry and so every ounce produced must be replaced through new discoveries to sustain production” – CSIRO 2017 on 21st Century gold. Further, Richard Schodde of MinEx Consulting states that “given that the average delay between discovery and mine development is around 13 years – and getting longer over time – when a company builds a mine it effectively has to immediately start to find its replacement”. This is in relation to gold mining in Australia, where the bulk of gold is mined in Western Australia where exploration and development are assessed faster than in NSW. Globally, the average mine takes nearly 30 years to reach production from time of discovery according to S&P Global Market Intelligence in 2020. By this definition, there is no such concept as “Sustainable Mining” of which the best we can achieve as a global society is a mine project where the benefits (both local and global) substantially outweigh the costs and the environmental impacts are as low as possible. A new mine project in the highly advanced state of NSW in Australia is guaranteed to be operated with industry leading, best practice environmental management and community engagement. When evaluating the timeframe for the Bowdens Silver Project from discovery to development in the context of the statements made by Richard Schodde, it is important to keep in mind the macroeconomic differences between gold and silver where longer term price fluctuations have differed. While gold’s major use is as a store of wealth, silver has some of the most wide-ranging uses of any metal produced. Silver has a high malleability, a high ductility, the highest known electrical conductivity and the highest known thermal conductivity of any metal. With global inventories of silver at the largest deficit in decades and with demand increasing substantially, the price for silver is set to increase sharply. This increase is mostly going to come from industrial demand with the transition to green technology. The Bowdens Silver Project, being the largest undeveloped silver project in Australia and one of the largest globally, will be crucial for the global silver production to keep pace with demand. Mineral exploration itself is a major contributor to the economies of many regional NSW towns and residents. A survey by the NSW Mineral Council found that over 30,000 full time people were employed in mining in NSW in the 2020/21 survey year, with around $14.6 billion of direct investment into the state (https://www.nswmining.com.au/expenditure-and-jobs-surveys). The low frequency of project development applications for mineral mines (due to the complexity in discovery and funds required for definition of resources) means that the mines MUST be approved where the resource is. Mineral resources cannot be relocated to suite a minority of residents who are generally emotionally or ideologically motivated in their objections. The needs of the broader society should outweigh the minor and manageable impacts experienced at the local scale. The DPE assessment summarises that "The Department also notes significance of the project’s resource, the increasing focus on minerals mining with decreasing reliance on coal and fossil fuels in the mining and energy sector and the associated growing demand for raw materials (including silver and zinc) due to urbanisation, electrification, a range of technological development and transition to renewable energies. The Department considers that the project would result in considerable economic benefits to the region and to the State of NSW through employment and royalties.” Were a project such as this to be rejected on the basis of more insignificant impacts to things like Aboriginal cultural heritage, Amenity, traffic and transport, LOCAL biodiversity values, and GHG emissions, then the downstream impacts on the broader mineral exploration and mining industry in NSW will be heavily, negatively impacted. I strongly SUPPORT the development application by Bowdens Silver Pty Limited for the Bowdens Silver Project for the following reasons: - The interests of the broader NSW, Australian and global society should be held above that of the minorly impacted local stakeholder interests. - The owners of a mineral mine in NSW will adhere to strict environment controls and world class management practices to prevent harm to the environment. - Mineral resources cannot be relocated to more “suitable” locations for the extraction and production of globally critical metals. The extraction of silver is far less complex than that of the critical Rare Earth Element deposits which require chemical autoclaves, and intensive water and power usage. This in time may cause silver to be utilised in place of other metals for critical industrial purposes. - The Project will deliver substantial economic growth to the three closest townships of Lue, Rylstone and Kandos in a time where cost of living pressures are increasing at rates not seen in a generation. - The mine will provide training and upskilling opportunities to a vast number of local young people where the opportunities to develop are limited, if at all present. - The Bowdens Silver Project represents a complex hydrothermal mineral system and where there is potential for further resource deposits to be found in the region. If the result of exploration is a development project being rejected, then the incentive for further exploration is removed. - Local objections to the development are generally emotionally and ideologically motivated. The major contributors to the Lue Action Group have disseminated misinformation and disinformation to persuade the broader community and IPC panel members. Some of these false hoods include there is more lead than silver, that the Tailings Storage Facility is built on a fault line, and that Bowdens Silver has not kept the community informed of the details and constant updates on the project development. Their objections need to be assessed for what they are: false and fear driven concerns. - There is generally only one shot at getting a right decision, it takes courage to disappoint the minority and please the silent majority, where the interests of the minority will have unintended negative consequences on society. |
Name Redacted
Location |
|
---|---|
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
The approval of the The Bowdens Silver Mines project would contribute towards our transition towards green energy in achieving Net-Zero. The key minerals that will be produced such as silver is essential to the development of solar technology and electronics. The project would stimulate positive socio-economic outcomes by creating more job opportunities, supporting small local businesses, as well as the contributing towards the broader Australian market. |
Matthew Butterworth
Organisation |
Bowdens Silver |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I support Bowdens Silvers open cut mine (the project) going ahead. The DPE has looked over all submissions and recommmended that this project should be approved. This is after considering submissions of support and objection and the numerous arguments that go along with it. As with all mining operations within this state, the project is subject to strict conditions that will be monitored rigorously. Modelling has been done to determine any impacts that the mine may have and the design of the project has been shown to be acceptable under the standards of all the appropriate industry authorities. With regards to long term biodiversity concerns, there is an obligation for all minesites to have ongoing rehabilitation of mined areas as well ensuring the safety and stability of waste rock and tailings. These issues have been addressed in Bowdens submissions to the DPE. They have been scrutinised by industry experts and the project has been recommended to be approved subject to conditions. The project will employ many local people and provide income and stability for local families for decades. For communities such as Lue and Rylstone this should be seen as an opportunity rather than a threat. In partnership, both the local community and the project could thrive and therefore should be approved. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Special Projects |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I live in Mudgee and I believe that the Bowdens Silver mine will be great for the region to boost local business and create more employment opportunities for the area. Knowing how small Lue is and seeing that in the past there was a butcher and a baker and stores that over time have closed down it would undeniably be a great boost for the town to hopefully return these businesses back to Lue and increase the population and growth of the town as a whole. From speaking with a large number of people that I know in the the area the township of Lue as a whole seem to be excited for the potential growth in Lue as a result of the mine. |
Name Redacted
Organisation |
Bowdens Silver |
---|---|
Location |
New South Wales |
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
As an employee of Bowdens silver, I am completely confident in all of the work done here to make sure this project is completely environmentally, ecologically, socially, etc., and believe that the socioeconomic impacts that the project would have on the region are extremely positive, both short term and long term. With the world moving away from fossil fuels, the Mudgee region and NSW will struggle with the closure of the coal mines that currently provide jobs and money. Hard rock projects like Bowdens silver will help mitigate these problems that will arise, as well as help with the decarbonisation of Australia and the world. The majority of objections raised against the project have been disproven or are completely false, and any legitimate potential problems raised have been addressed by amendments. Weighing up the positive impacts in the Mudgee area, regional NSW, and even broader, with the very minor impact it would have, it's obvious to everyone what the correct response should be. |
Joel Leonard
Location |
New South Wales |
---|---|
Date |
13/01/2023 |
Submitter position |
Support |
Submission method |
Website |
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed development as it will provide locals with employment opportunities and will boost the local economy, it will also boost the local businesses. |