Minarah College

12096

New South Wales 2178

28/01/2026

Object

Website

Hi, I have long standing knowledge of Catherine fields and many locals. I travel on Catherine fields road daily for business purposes and to visit my mother who is a local in the area. I cannot support Minarah college due to the site being flood affected, which I personally experienced. The area is a rural zoning with residential lots. Catherine fields road is not capable of a school of 1000 more people. For these reasons and more, I strongly oppose the Minarah college for the above reasons and more.

12126

Redacted

28/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development in Catherine Field. I am a regular visitor to Catherine Fields Road, where my sister lives, and through these visits I have come to understand how vulnerable this area is. Catherine Field experiences regular flooding, and during heavy rain water flows across roads and in front of the proposed site. A development of this scale, with large buildings, hard surfaces and roof areas, will significantly increase stormwater runoff and worsen existing flooding conditions. This creates serious safety risks for vehicles, pedestrians and school drop-off and pick-up activity. The site is also unsuitable from an infrastructure perspective. There is no sewer system capable of supporting a school of more than 1,000 students and staff. The combination of flooding risk and inadequate sewer capacity raises serious concerns about public health, environmental impacts and long-term site viability. Under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Council must consider whether a development is in the public interest. This proposal provides a private benefit while imposing major and ongoing impacts on the local community. The traffic, congestion and infrastructure strain will be felt daily by residents, while the school largely serves people from outside the area. The proposal will also significantly impact local amenity. Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural area, and the introduction of constant noise from outdoor play areas, sporting facilities, school bells and increased vehicle movements will undermine residents’ reasonable expectation of quiet enjoyment. Artificial lighting for security and events will introduce glare and light spill into an area that is currently dark and calm at night. Overall, this proposal is incompatible with the rural character of Catherine Field and places unacceptable pressure on an area that lacks the infrastructure to support it.

12131

Redacted

28/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to lodge a formal objection to the proposed development application for a school or college on Catherine Fields Road. I drive Catherine Fields Road and the surrounding road network every day for work and have direct, ongoing experience of the existing road conditions, safety risks, and operational constraints. Road Safety and Network Function From a road safety perspective, the proposal fails to comply with fundamental traffic safety principles, including the need to minimise conflict points, maintain consistent traffic flow, and ensure roads operate within their intended function. Catherine Fields Road is a rural, single-lane road in each direction, with no shoulders, limited sight distances, poor edge definition, and inconsistent road surfaces. It is not designed to accommodate frequent stopping, turning, or high volumes of traffic. Schools are recognised as high-risk traffic generators due to concentrated peak movements, frequent turning manoeuvres, bus activity, pedestrian crossings, and informal stopping behaviour. Introducing this type of land use on Catherine Fields Road will significantly increase vehicle conflicts, reduce reaction time for drivers, and elevate the risk of crashes, particularly during peak periods and low-light conditions. Intersection Capacity and Traffic Queuing The signalised intersections at Camden Valley Way and Catherine Fields Road, and Springfield Road and Catherine Fields Road, already operate with limited throughput, allowing only a small number of vehicles through each signal cycle. Based on my daily travel through these intersections, queuing and delays are already common. The additional traffic generated by the proposed school—including cars, buses, service vehicles, and construction traffic—will result in regular and extended queuing along Catherine Fields Road. Extended queuing increases driver frustration and is well recognised as a contributor to unsafe driving behaviour, including red-light running, risky turning movements, and sudden lane changes. These conditions significantly increase the likelihood of accidents and compromise the safety of all road users. On-Street Stopping and Parking Impacts The adequacy of on-site parking is a critical concern. It is highly likely that parking demand will exceed the proposed supply, leading to vehicles stopping on Catherine Fields Road for drop-off and pick-up. From a safety perspective, this is unacceptable. The road has no shoulder, no dedicated pull-over areas, and limited visibility. Any stopped vehicle effectively becomes a hazard, forcing through-traffic to brake suddenly or cross into opposing lanes. This type of informal stopping behaviour directly conflicts with safe road design principles and will significantly disrupt traffic flow while increasing collision risk. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety The surrounding road network lacks the basic infrastructure required to safely support pedestrian and cyclist movements. There are no continuous footpaths, no pedestrian crossings, no dedicated cycleways, limited street lighting, poor drainage, and uneven road edges. In its current condition, the network is already unsafe for non-vehicular users. Introducing a school—an inherently pedestrian-intensive land use—into this environment without comprehensive infrastructure upgrades places students, parents, and staff at unacceptable risk and further undermines road safety outcomes. Amenity and Land Use Compatibility Beyond traffic and safety impacts, the proposal is inconsistent with the semi-rural character of Catherine Field. Increased traffic volumes, extended operating hours, after-hours activities, noise, and lighting will significantly alter the amenity of the area. These impacts are incompatible with a rural road network and surrounding land uses. The assertion that the development will result in minimal impact does not align with the cumulative effects of increased traffic generation, safety risks, and operational intensity, particularly when assessed against daily, real-world road conditions. Conclusion From both a road safety and planning perspective, the proposal represents an over-intensification of land use in a location that lacks the necessary road capacity, safety infrastructure, and supporting services. Based on my daily experience driving these roads for work, I do not believe the impacts on traffic safety, network efficiency, and amenity have been adequately addressed or mitigated. For these reasons, I object to the proposed development and request that the consent authority give serious consideration to the unacceptable safety and traffic risks posed by this proposal.

12141

Redacted

28/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to lodge a formal objection to the proposed development application for a school or college on Catherine Fields Road. While I do not reside in Catherine Field, my best friend lives in the area and I visit several times each week, often during morning and afternoon school peak periods. As a result, I regularly travel along Catherine Fields Road and surrounding intersections and have first-hand experience of the existing traffic conditions, safety risks, and infrastructure limitations. Existing Traffic Conditions and Daily Experience Even under current conditions, traffic congestion is already evident during peak periods. Surrounding residential developments and recent road connections have significantly increased vehicle numbers, and delays are now a regular occurrence. When visiting my friend around school and work commute times, it is clear that the local road network is operating close to capacity, with frequent queuing and limited opportunities for vehicles to move safely and efficiently. The signalised intersections at Camden Valley Way and Catherine Fields Road, and Springfield Road and Catherine Fields Road, have limited throughput and often only allow a small number of vehicles through per signal cycle. Any additional traffic will inevitably result in extended queues along Catherine Fields Road, particularly during peak times when I and many others are travelling to and from the area. Road Safety Principles and Network Suitability From a road safety perspective, Catherine Fields Road is not suitable for an intensive land use such as a school. The road is rural in nature, with one lane in each direction, no shoulders, limited sight distances, poor edge definition, and inconsistent road conditions. Fundamental road safety principles require that traffic-generating developments be located on roads capable of safely accommodating stopping, turning, bus movements, and pedestrian activity. This is not the case at this location. Schools are well recognised as high-risk traffic generators due to concentrated peak movements, frequent turning manoeuvres, bus activity, and informal drop-off and pick-up behaviour. Introducing this level of activity onto a rural road will significantly increase vehicle conflict points and reduce overall network safety. Parking and Informal Stopping Impacts The proposed on-site parking provision appears inadequate for the scale of the development. Based on experience at similar facilities, it is likely that parking demand will exceed supply, resulting in vehicles stopping on Catherine Fields Road to drop off or pick up students. When visiting my friend, I already find it difficult to navigate this road safely at peak times. Any vehicles stopping on the roadway would create immediate hazards, forcing drivers to brake suddenly or cross into opposing traffic lanes. This type of informal stopping behaviour directly undermines safe road operation and significantly increases the risk of collisions. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety The local road network lacks the basic infrastructure required to support safe pedestrian and cyclist movements. There are no continuous footpaths, no pedestrian crossings, no dedicated cycleways, limited street lighting, poor drainage, and uneven road edges. In its current condition, the area is already unsafe for pedestrians. A school is an inherently pedestrian-intensive land use. Introducing students, parents, and staff into this environment without substantial infrastructure upgrades places road users at unacceptable risk and is inconsistent with established traffic safety and planning principles. Amenity and Land Use Compatibility The proposal is also incompatible with the semi-rural character of Catherine Field. Increased traffic volumes, extended operating hours, after-hours activities, noise, and lighting will significantly impact the amenity of the area. During my frequent visits, it is clear that residents value the quiet and low-traffic nature of their community. These impacts will fundamentally alter the daily experience of those living nearby. The assertion that the development will have minimal impact does not adequately consider the cumulative effects of traffic congestion, safety risks, and loss of rural amenity, particularly during peak periods when impacts will be most pronounced. Conclusion Based on my frequent visits to the area and regular travel through the local road network during peak times, I do not believe the site is suitable for a development of this scale and intensity. The proposal represents an over-intensification of land use in a location that lacks the necessary road capacity, safety infrastructure, and pedestrian facilities. For these reasons, I object to the proposed development and request that the consent authority give due consideration to the unacceptable traffic, safety, and amenity impacts that will result from this proposal.

12076

New South Wales 2570

27/01/2026

Object

Website

The whole development is not appropriate for this area as well as not being zoned for this type of development. The neighbouring properties have all been subjected to the same regulations that this development is trying to circumvent. The current zoning may change in the future but right now, the rules in place, are for everyone.

12011

New South Wales 2570

26/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to strongly oppose the Minarah College (State Significant Development – SSD 30759158) and call on the Independent Planning Commission to take heed of Camden Council’s strong opposition to this development as outlined below. Firstly and importantly, Camden Council is a not anti development Council. Camden has been doing the heavy lifting when it comes to new housing developments across the Sydney basin. We welcome development, particularly schools, but only when it is planned in a co-ordinated, structured, sustainable way. Across all major approvals, Camden Council has generally: • Supported development within zoned and planned growth areas • Required alignment with precinct planning and infrastructure delivery • Approved schools and community uses where servicing exists or is programmed • Concentrated major housing in released or rezoned precincts This contrasts with proposals on unserviced rural land outside finalised precinct planning, such as Minarah College. I wholeheartedly support Council maintaining its objection to the proposed school, consistent with its earlier submissions (2022, 2023 and 2024). Council officers have outlined the following key reasons: • Unsuitable Site: The proposal is for a large school (up to 980 students) on an unsewered rural property accessed by a rural road with inadequate infrastructure, including no footpaths, lighting, kerb and guttering or underground stormwater. • Inconsistent with Planning Controls: The development is incompatible with the RU4 Primary Production Small Lots zone, conflicts with zone objectives, and represents an inappropriate non rural use at this location. • Premature and Strategically Unsound: Approval would pre empt and undermine precinct planning for the South West Growth Area, hinder coordinated infrastructure delivery, and lock in land use ahead of rezoning and servicing decisions. • Infrastructure and Servicing Constraints: There is no commitment to reticulated sewer, making the approval of a high demand use inappropriate and likely to exacerbate existing infrastructure sequencing issues. • Unacceptable Wastewater and Public Health Risks: The onsite sewage management system is undersized and unsuitable, with risks of effluent exposure to children, system failure, odours, pests, and environmental contamination. • Traffic and Road Safety Impacts: Catherine Fields Road is not designed to support school scale traffic, creating safety risks and amenity impacts for residents. • Noise and Amenity Impacts: The development would cause unacceptable construction and operational noise impacts, including exceedances over a prolonged construction period extending more than a decade. • Lack of Demonstrated Public Benefit: The proposal offers no clear community benefit and is inconsistent with the public interest given the scale of community objection. • Availability of Better Sites: There are more appropriate released or rezoned precincts within the South West Growth Area that can accommodate a school of this size with proper servicing and planning integration. The proposed site for this school is unsuitable and the proposal is contrary to strategic planning, zoning objectives and infrastructure capacity. It also has very limited local support, with a large majority of the 980 anticipated student base having to be sourced from outside the local community. Local support, or in this case objection, should be given a higher weight than outside the LGA support, when assessing this and most developments. Camden residents deserve well planned, sustainable, appropriate development, that meets a community need. Camden Council staff have a solid track record of approving development which meets this criteria and is in the community interest. It is imperative that the Planning Commission take this heavily into account when making their determination. I again reiterate my objection to this development and call on the panel to reject it.

12016

Redacted

26/01/2026

Object

Website

see attached 2 page submission

Submission objecting to Minarah College.pdf (PDF, 179.04 KB)

Submission objecting to Minarah College_0.pdf (PDF, 179.04 KB)

12031

Redacted

26/01/2026

Object

Website

There are a lot of Muslim schools built on rural properties without the correct infrastructure in place. Rural properties and streets are not designed for schools. Without the correct infrastructure a new school should not be built on this land. The area is also prone to flooding.

12041

Redacted

26/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose the Minarah College development proposal for the following reasons. Transport issues relating to a secondary road with poor quality surfacing Issues relating to sewerage. Poor planning in the proposal and quite inadequate, The proposal is not appropriate for a site with the current zoning status, in that this is semi rural dedicate to primary industry.

12046

New South Wales 2557

26/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the proposal as there is no intofrastructure to accomodate the proposed devolpment.Catherine fields rd and ajoining roads of Deepfields rd and Springfields rd are in very poor conditiona and still rural roads and havr not been upgraded , There are a lot of potholes and ware and tare on all these roads that are have already seen a major increase in traffic due the oran park and catherine park estate .Aswell as no street lighting on the roads mentioned there is no kerb and guttering thus making the roads deterating at an alarming rate , With these issues aswell no sewerage in catherine field this is not the place for a school or any major project in that case

11851

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

This site closely compares to the proposal that was rejected in Camden in the Land and Environment court. The environmental and infrastructure deficit concerns should all be considered unacceptable. The ossm and ema proposal is a health hazard, the influx of hundreds of extra cars on the road is a danger, the flooding plan should be highly scrutinized and I pity the person responsible for making any decisions about holding so many humans on site or worse yet, walking them through flood waters to a hall that 1. can only be unlocked via camden council and 2. will only hold a standing capacity of 120. The deciding body really needs to investigate how many submissions that oppose this school and the depth of the submissions compared to those that support it saying that the area needs a school who haven't read one document within the proposal.

11856

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I understand that more schools are needed but I don't understand why the applicant thinks it is acceptable to have a proposal with so many concerns to surrounding homes and road users. The traffic that this development will generate will incur more vehicle accidents. I foresee this ocurring especially at the entry to the site with families fighting to drive into a single lane driveway to drop off their child. I also foresee more accidents as vehicles leave the site through, yet again, anoth single lane exit point that will have the line of sight to the right obstructed by a bend and buses parked in the bus parking bay. If an emergency vehicle is travelling along Catherine Field road, especially with the new and improved fire station one kilometre down the road, who will be held responsible for the delay in the fire truck or ambulance getting through due to cars queuing? There is insufficient parking, especially for open days & fetes. The flood evacuation plan puts immense pressure on the person making decisions whether the population is held on site. With the students being driven by private vehicle from out of area, there will be a delay in the children being collected. Holding the students on site will cause issues, how will the school know how much supplies to be kept on site and how often will these supplies be checked for expiry dates. I strongly oppose this proposal

11861

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

Living in a rural area myself, I can't understand how this application can be acceptable. The traffic, the lack of sewer conncetion, the lack of potable water, the overland flooding, the lack of footpaths, kerb & guttering & street lights. Overall, the safety concerns of the staff and students should be the first priority.

11866

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I appose the above development

11886

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I agree with camden council & all of their objections

11891

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly objext This is not the right site for a proposal of this size

11896

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose this project The main issue is the water, the sewer, the traffic This is not the right lication

11901

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

As a regular user of the roads in Catherine Filed, i don’t believe that the roads will handle a project of this size I object

11906

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I have major concerns about a development of this size. With no planned infrastructure, it shouldn’t even be considered

11911

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not think the infrastructure in its current state can handle a school of this size. The roads are in a bad state, the ema area under the playing field is too small, it will be a massive interruption to the current rural outlook

11916

New South Wales 2179

25/01/2026

Object

Website

This project should absolutely not go ahead: septic tank overflow is of high risk, considering it’s designed to take only days of effluent, which is entirely insufficient - suggesting the tanks will be pumped out daily is completely impractical, serves as a significant increase in exposure risk of spills, and increases waste transport on road systems using heavy vehicles that the roads are not designed to support daily. The hours of operation (early morning to late evening) indicates a currently concealed usage outside of regular school hours, including religious activities, which - if so - makes this essentially a mosque, which is not approved for on this site, and furthermore if it is to be used as a location of religious activity, it does not fit with the primary production zoning of the area, as well as being highly intrusive for current residents who should in no way be subjected to morning, daytime, or evening loudspeakers, bells, alarms, or other such noise pollution. The plan clearly demonstrates a large percentage of the land is covered with construction or sealed pavement, with only one road in or out, which clearly shows that in the event of an emergency, this location will undoubtedly overflow onto adjoining properties, with people, emergency services who cannot otherwise access the property, and increases the risk of those neighbouring properties to fire, flood, and a heightened security risk due to occupation by non-authorised persons in the event of a site emergency. The site also demonstrates a high propensity of risk for seepage/overflow/smell/health hazard due to the entirely inadequate septic tank system and proposed daily pump out, which is absolutely unacceptable, and poses not only a risk to the exisiting residents and their homes, it also poses significant risk to surrounding food production farmland to seepage, potential illicit dumping, and contamination. This proposal absolutely does not align with the current cultural, historic, or community values, held in this area for hundreds of years, and likely it may well not it align with the local indigenous customs, culture, or traditions, which must be respected, with regards to land use, land care, and respect for their connection to this country. There has also been significant disruption, intimidation, and unnecessary numbers of people who support this project attend the area, when meetings have occurred, aimed at local people, numbering around 300, vs the 100 or so local people. This is a tactic designed to intimidate the existing local people, and these will undoubtedly be the calibre of people which will be entering our communities - we adamantly oppose the intrusion of a people who use forms of violence to get their own way, since that is exactly the behaviour we would have to be exposed to if they succeed; they have already shown themselves as people who do not have any regard or respect for local customs, local people, or local right to live in peace. I implore you to see reason, and decline this proposal once and for all.

11921

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I opposed the development of the above.

11926

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose the development the above.

11931

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I opposed to the development above.

11936

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I opposed to this development project.

11951

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

please find my opposing submission attached

Submission Opposing.doc (DOC, 24 KB)

11966

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally express my strong objection to the proposed development of Minarah College at 268-278 Catherine Field Road, Catherine Field. As a concerned member of the local community, I believe this project represents an overdevelopment of a rural environment that lacks the necessary infrastructure to support a campus of this scale. Catherine Field already suffers from significant overland flow and road flooding during heavy rain. The addition of massive roof areas and hardstand concrete will dramatically increase runoff, which the current plans suggest will be diverted toward Catherine Field Road and downstream properties. Safety Hazards: There are serious concerns that existing 525mm diversion pipes are insufficient for the volume of water the site will generate. Contamination Risks: Because the site is unsewered, there is a legitimate fear that heavy rainfall could cause on-site effluent systems to overflow into natural watercourses like South Creek, creating a major health and environmental hazard. The community is deeply concerned by the total lack of reticulated services. Sewerage: The proposal relies on an on-site Wastewater Treatment Plant with spray irrigation, which is vastly insufficient for a population of nearly 1,000+ students and staff. Catherine Field Road and surrounding corridors (Springfield and Deepfields Roads) are narrow rural roads with no shoulders, kerbs, gutters, or street lighting. Congestion: The influx of hundreds of cars during peak drop-off/pick-up times will lead to dangerous bottlenecks on a road already plagued by potholes and poor surfaces. Safety: There are no footpaths or pedestrian crossings. Forcing students to walk along high-speed rural roads to reach the nearest bus stop at Catherine Field Hall is an unacceptable safety risk. Parking Overflow: Proposed on-site parking is insufficient for staff, senior students, and weekend community events, which will inevitably lead to dangerous overflow parking on narrow road verges. I urge the deciding body to eject this application

11971

New South Wales 2567

25/01/2026

Object

Website

Uploaded Letter of Objection

Peter Elston Submission (SSS-30759158)_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 266.09 KB)

11976

Redacted

25/01/2026

Object

Website

Letter Uploaded

Peter Elston Submission (SSS-30759158)_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 266.09 KB)

11421

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not agree with the islamic school being built

11426

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not want I do not want

11431

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not consent to this proposal.

11436

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not consent to tho proposal.

11441

New South Wales 2557

24/01/2026

Object

Website

Given this is semi rural farms in an area that floods on South Creek , the idea of heaving traffic is ridiculous . We don’t want major development ruining this community

11446

New South Wales 2557

24/01/2026

Object

Website

Given this is semi rural farms in an area that floods on South Creek , the idea of heaving traffic is ridiculous . We don’t want major development ruining this community We don’t need any more Islamic Schools in south west Sydney

11451

New South Wales 2567

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose to this development, not suitable location & not suitable for the community.

11486

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of Minarah College in Catherine Field. While I am not a direct resident of the immediate street, as a frequent visitor to the Macarthur region and a regular user of the surrounding road network, I am deeply concerned by the regional implications of this proposal. My grounds for objection are as follows: Incompatibility with Rural Character: Catherine Field is a unique, quiet rural precinct. Allowing a large-scale educational facility in an area currently zoned as rural—and not yet rezoned for urban development—sets a dangerous planning precedent. Such developments should be integrated into established urban centers with appropriate services, not placed in isolated rural pockets. Regional Traffic and Safety Impacts: Catherine Field Road is a narrow, two-lane rural road already under pressure from regional commuters. Adding a significant volume of school-related traffic—including heavy buses and hundreds of private vehicles—will exacerbate congestion for everyone using these transit corridors. The lack of existing footpaths, street lighting, and road shoulders makes this a significant safety risk for all road users. Infrastructure Deficit: The site lacks basic essential services, including town sewerage and adequate stormwater drainage. The proposed reliance on on-site wastewater treatment and spray irrigation is an unacceptable solution for a development of this scale, posing potential health and environmental risks to the broader South Creek catchment area. Environmental and Flood Concerns: The site is located in a low-lying area prone to flooding. The substantial increase in non-permeable surfaces (roofs and pavements) will inevitably lead to increased runoff, potentially worsening flood conditions for downstream properties and local road access during heavy rain events. In conclusion, the proposed Minarah College is a "poor fit" for the current infrastructure and character of Catherine Field. I urge the Commission to refuse this application and direct such significant developments to areas already equipped with the necessary urban infrastructure. Thank you for considering my submission.

11491

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

To the Commission, I am writing to say I do not support the plan for Minarah College in Catherine Field. Even though I do not live on this exact street, I often drive through this area and I am worried about how this big project will affect the region. Here are my main reasons for objecting: The area isn't ready for this: Catherine Field is a quiet, rural place. Building a massive school for nearly 1,000 students here doesn't fit the local feel and should be built in a town that already has proper services. Traffic and safety: The roads here are narrow and already struggle with traffic. Adding hundreds of extra cars and buses every day will cause huge delays and make the roads more dangerous, especially since there are no footpaths or proper street lights. No proper sewers: This site is not connected to town sewerage. The school’s plan to treat waste on-site could lead to bad smells and health risks, especially if the area floods. Flooding risks: This part of Catherine Field already has flooding issues. Covering the ground with buildings and big parking lots will only make the water runoff worse for everyone nearby. Please do not approve this project. It is too big for this location and the current roads and services cannot handle it.

11496

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the plan for Minarah College at Catherine Field. I do not live in this specific suburb, but I often travel through this area for work and to visit the Macarthur region. I am very concerned that this project is simply too big for this quiet, rural spot and will cause serious problems for the whole area. My main reasons for objecting are: The roads are not safe for this many people: Catherine Field Road is a narrow, two-lane rural road with no footpaths, no curbs, and no streetlights. It is already in poor condition with many potholes. Adding nearly 1,000 students plus staff and parents will create traffic chaos. I am especially worried about the school entrance, which is on a bend where it is hard to see oncoming cars, making accidents much more likely. The lack of town sewerage is a big risk: This area is not connected to a proper town sewer system. The school plans to use its own wastewater treatment and spray it onto the ground. This site is low-lying and prone to flooding; if it floods, having large amounts of waste treated on-site could lead to serious health and environmental problems for the local creeks and neighbors. It will make local flooding worse: Because the school will have large buildings and big parking lots, the rainwater will have nowhere to go but onto the neighboring properties. This part of Catherine Field already has flooding issues, and covering the natural ground with concrete will only make the runoff faster and more dangerous during heavy rain. The operating hours are too long: The proposal mentions the school could be open from early morning until late at night, and even on weekends for community events. This will bring constant noise from cars, buses, and PA systems to a place that is currently very quiet and peaceful. It’s the wrong place for a massive project: This land is zoned as rural, not residential. This kind of major school should be built in an area that already has the right infrastructure—like big roads, streetlights, and town sewers—rather than being forced into a rural area that cannot handle it. As someone who uses these roads and cares about the future of this region, I ask the Commission to refuse this application. The project is just not a good fit for this location.

11511

New South Wales 2557

24/01/2026

Object

Website

As a resident of Catherine Field for more than 25 years, I object to the proposed Minarah College at 268-278 Catherine Field Rd, Catherine Field NSW 2557. I have reviewed and acknowledged the amended plans and documents concerning this development and so want to address the reasons for my decision. *The proposed development is not in keeping with the existing character of the local area. The area is a rural/semi- rural part of Catherine Field. *The land use zoning for this site is RU4 Primary Production so how is a school considered 'primary production'. How can the zoning be changed for one proposal and not others in the Catherine Field area. Without a change of the area to residential zoning (there appears to be nothing in the near future) why is there a need for a school in Catherine Field when the surrounding residential suburbs have new suitable schools ? *Recent Flood Mapping shows the proposed site is not suitable for development unless major storm water and sewer works are completed. The Flood Mapping report states .."The flood risk at the site consists of overland flow at the site and the potential of isolation in relatively frequent events, even after the proposed drainage works, as areas to the east and west are subject to flooding from South Creek and Rileys Creek". *The road access in Catherine Field is really only 3 local roads and 1 temporary narrow residential road moving traffic in and out of Catherine Park/Oran Park. For that have for as long as I have lived in the area the roads been in poor, deteriorating condition and constantly needing temporary patch up repairs by Camden Council. They are extremely narrow, poorly line marked, if marked at all, have no shoulder, no kerb and gutter, no footpaths, no cycleways, dangerous sharp bends with no barrier protection for resident's homes and in times of heavy rain most of the roads are flooded and inaccessible. Especially the section of Catherine Field Road where the site of the proposed development is. *The area has little or no street lighting making visibility at night dangerous particularly during times of heavy rain and fog. *Traffic flow has increased substantially since the re-opening of the 'temporary road' on to Springfield Road from Oran Park. Morning and afternoon peaks are increasingly noisy and busy with many vehicles using this as a short cut to Bringelly Road and Leppington station. Increased numbers of cars, buses, large trucks and semi-trailers, many travelling above the speed limit, use Catherine Field local roads especially Catherine Field and Springfield Rd. Many vehicles still travel at high speed regardless of the new 60km/hr signage so walking, cycling or even parking on the roads is dangerous. *In the last 2.5 years there have been 3 major accidents on Springfield Road alone that I am aware of. All of them due to high speed. One of them being a fatality in front of my property. The next week on 2 separate occasions I witnessed vehicles losing control at speed and skidding in to my neighbour's property. This has also occurred many times in front of my own property. Since I have been living in Catherine Field I know of other accidents on Catherine Field Road including a fatality. Most residents of Catherine Field don't walk,cycle or park on the roads out of concern for their own safety. *Extra traffic generated by such a large development would be a major concern to all. Especially during the peak times of 5-9am and 3-6pm M-F. *Vehicles queueing to pick up and drop off students would cause traffic congestion on Catherine Field Road. This road is too narrow and unfit for any increased traffic. *Traffic congestion trying to access the proposed site would mean vehicles idling, whilst waiting to pick up and drop off students, emitting exhaust fumes that are detrimental to the surrounding neighbours. *General school noise is an issue for the local area including regular school bells and announcements over the outside PA systems. Especially affecting neighbours adjoining the proposed development. *Neighbouring properties will lose their privacy and peace. *Properties located opposite the proposed site would definitely incur flooding by storm water and septic overflow onto their land. It is unfair to allow that to happen to residents who have built and resided opposite the site unaware their homes would be compromised. Septic runoff and storm water overflow is already a major problem for most residents of Catherine Field. What happens in times of heavy rain when the septic system of such a large development will be affected by water ingress and overflow into the natural water course ie. South Creek causing cross contamination? We as residents of this part of Catherine Field have a right to expect we will not experience hazardous untreated septic overflow onto our roads and properties. Surely the EPA wouldn't accept this. The State Government has a duty of care to make sure this does not happen. After living here for so long I can state that illegal and poor septic discharge is the major issue most residents experience in this area. *In times of heavy rain there are flooded roads. Especially the section of road in front of the proposed school site. Eventually the flooding of South Creek occurs, which borders the rear of my property and many others opposite the proposed site. With such a large development having multiple roof tops and large concreted areas and with the slope of the land, the excess rainwater has no way of being absorbed by the land. This has to compound the water run off problem significantly. *The removal of trees is an issue that is of concern being that some of this vegetation is considered 'protected' environmentally. No trees in a 'green belt area' have previously been able to be removed for any reason. For these reasons I believe the proposed development of Minarah College is unsuitable for Catherine Field and will have a substantial negative impact on our local community. It is not 'fit for purpose' in my opinion. Therefore I oppose the development.

11516

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am deeply concerned that this massive project will permanently destroy the safety, peace, and environment of the neighborhood. My grounds for objection are as follows: Serious Traffic and Safety Risks: Catherine Field Road is a narrow, two-lane rural road with no street lighting, no curbs, and no footpaths. It is already under pressure from regional traffic and is often in poor condition. Adding nearly 1,000 students, plus staff and heavy school buses, will create daily traffic chaos. The proposed entrance is located on a dangerous bend with limited visibility, making serious accidents much more likely for everyone using this road. The "Noise Bomb" Effect: This proposal includes operating hours from 7:00 AM to 9:30 PM, seven days a week, including weekend community events. For a quiet rural area, this will be a "noise bomb." The constant sound of school bells, PA systems, and thousands of idling vehicles will replace our current peace with industrial-scale noise pollution, ruining the lifestyle of everyone living nearby. Infrastructure and Health Concerns: This site is not connected to a town sewerage system. The plan to treat the waste of over 1,000 people on-site and spray it onto the land is a major health risk. Since Catherine Field is a low-lying area prone to flooding, this treated waste could easily wash into local creeks and neighboring properties, causing foul odors and environmental damage. A "Poor Fit" for the Area: This multi million-dollar development is an urban-scale project being forced into a rural zone that doesn't even have basic services like streetlights or sewers. This school belongs in an established urban center with the proper infrastructure to support it, not in the middle of a quiet rural street. I urge the Commission to listen to the people and protect the future of Catherine Field by refusing this application. Thank you for your consideration.

11521

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

To: Independent Planning Commission NSW / Department of Planning and Environment Subject: Formal Submission of Objection – Minarah College (SSD-30759158) Date: January 24, 2026 I am writing to formally record my strong opposition to the proposed Minarah College development in Catherine Field. As a concerned community memeber, I believe this project represents an inappropriate overdevelopment of a rural-residential area that lacks the necessary infrastructure to support a school of this scale. My objections are centered on the following critical issues: 1. Inadequate Road Infrastructure and Traffic Safety The local road network, specifically Catherine Field Road, is fundamentally unsuitable for the volume of traffic this school will generate. Poor Road Condition: Current roads are narrow, lack proper shoulders, and are plagued by persistent potholes that the council struggles to maintain. Lack of Safety Provisions: There are no existing footpaths, cycleways, or street lighting along Catherine Field Road. Forcing nearly 1,000 students and over 50 staff into an area without pedestrian infrastructure is a severe safety risk. Intersection Congestion: The intersections at Camden Valley Way and Springfield Road already experience significant backups. Adding hundreds of additional vehicle movements during peak school hours will lead to gridlock and increase the likelihood of accidents at these points. 2. Insufficient Potable Water and Sewerage Services The site remains unsewered and lacks connection to critical town services. Infrastructure Deficit: There is currently no town sewerage connection, and Sydney Water has provided no definitive timeline for when these services will become available. Unreliable On-Site Systems: The proposal to use an on-site wastewater treatment plant with an ema area is unacceptable for a population of this size. During heavy rain, there is a significant risk of untreated effluent washing into neighboring properties and local waterways. Water Supply Concerns: The lack of reliable potable water infrastructure raises serious questions about the school’s ability to meet health and fire safety standards for over 1,000 people on-site. 3. Insufficient On-Site Parking The revised plans significantly reduce the provided parking, which will inevitably spill over into the surrounding rural streets. Dangerous Street Parking: Because Catherine Field Road is narrow and lacks kerb and guttering, overflow parking will force vehicles onto unstable road shoulders, obstructing local residents' driveways and visibility. Event Overflow: The proposed use of the sports field and hall for community hire until 9:30 PM will create parking chaos well outside of standard school hours, further disrupting the tranquility of the rural neighborhood. 4. Severe Flooding and Stormwater Risks The site is subject to major overland flow, often described by residents as a "flowing river" during heavy rain. Downstream Impact: The proposed drainage plan aims to redirect water to Catherine Field Road via pipes and culverts. This does not solve the flooding; it simply pushes water faster onto downstream properties that already have a history of flooding. Increased Runoff: Replacing rural land with large roofs and paved parking lots will vastly increase stormwater runoff. The current "On-Site Detention" (OSD) designs are insufficient to protect neighboring homes from inundation. Conclusion The Minarah College proposal is an "excessive scale" development for an unsewered, rural-zoned property. Until the necessary road upgrades, water connections, and flood mitigation strategies are fully funded and implemented, this project must be rejected.

11526

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

Submission Objecting to the Proposed Minarah College Development – Catherine Field NSW I write to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field on environmental grounds, particularly the significant impact caused by the heavy reliance on private vehicle travel for students and staff. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural community with limited public transport and infrastructure. Due to its location, the vast majority of students and staff attending the proposed school would be required to travel from outside the local area. This would inevitably result in hundreds of additional vehicle trips every day, primarily during peak morning and afternoon periods. The environmental consequences of this level of car dependency are substantial. Increased vehicle use will lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change and undermining local and state sustainability objectives. The proposal is fundamentally inconsistent with responsible land-use planning, as it promotes a development that is not supported by public transport and instead relies almost entirely on private cars. In addition, the increased volume of traffic will contribute to air pollution in what is currently a low-density, semi-rural environment. Residents have chosen to live in Catherine Field due to its cleaner air, open space and reduced congestion. The introduction of a large, car-dependent school threatens to permanently degrade these environmental qualities and erode the rural character of the area. The development also places unnecessary pressure on local roads that were not designed to handle sustained high-volume traffic. Congestion and vehicle idling during drop-off and pick-up times will further worsen emissions, noise pollution and fuel consumption, compounding the environmental harm. Approving a development of this scale in a location that requires extensive daily car travel contradicts modern planning principles that prioritise environmental protection, reduced emissions, and sustainable transport options. Schools of this size should be located in areas with adequate public transport, existing urban infrastructure, and the capacity to support active or shared transport modes. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development and urge the consent authority to refuse the application due to its unacceptable and avoidable environmental impacts on Catherine Field and the broader community.

11531

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field on environmental grounds, particularly the significant impacts arising from the proposal’s heavy reliance on private vehicle travel for students and staff. I visit Catherine Field on an almost daily basis to see close family members who live in the area. As a result, I am deeply familiar with the local environment, the existing traffic conditions, and the semi-rural character that makes Catherine Field a desirable place to live and visit. These frequent visits have given me firsthand experience of the area’s limited road capacity, lack of public transport options, and the peaceful, low-traffic conditions that currently define the locality. Due to its location, the proposed school would draw the vast majority of students and staff from outside Catherine Field. This would inevitably result in a significant increase in private vehicle movements every weekday, particularly during peak morning and afternoon periods. From my regular travel through the area, it is clear that the existing road network is not designed to accommodate this level of daily traffic without serious consequences. The environmental impact of this increased car dependency would be substantial. Hundreds of additional vehicle trips each day would lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions, directly contributing to climate change and conflicting with state and local sustainability objectives. Increased congestion and vehicle idling during school drop-off and pick-up times would further exacerbate emissions, fuel consumption, and air pollution. As someone who spends time in Catherine Field almost every day, I am concerned that the clean air, open space, and quieter environment that currently benefit residents and visitors alike would be permanently degraded. The cumulative impact of traffic-related pollution would fundamentally alter the character of the area and diminish the environmental qualities that families, including my own, value. Approving a large, car-dependent school in a semi-rural location with minimal public transport is inconsistent with contemporary planning principles that seek to reduce vehicle reliance and protect environmentally sensitive communities. Schools of this scale should be located where public transport, active travel options, and appropriate infrastructure already exist. For these reasons, and based on my ongoing personal connection to the area, I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development and urge the consent authority to refuse the application due to its unacceptable environmental impacts on Catherine Field and the wider community.

11536

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose this development Traffic and Road Infrastructure Narrow Rural Roads: Catherine Field Road is a narrow local road with no shoulders, kerbs, or gutters, and it is frequently plagued by potholes. It is physically unable to support the hundreds of daily vehicle movements generated by 980+ students and staff. Safety Risks: There are no existing footpaths or cycleways. Forcing school traffic onto these roads endangers local residents and students who rely on public transport or walk in the area. Intersection Gridlock: The added volume will cause significant delays at already congested intersections, such as those at Camden Valley Way, particularly during peak morning and afternoon drop-off times. Potable Water and Sewerage Services Lack of Town Services: The site is not connected to town sewerage, and there is no confirmed timeline from Sydney Water for future connection. Inadequate Wastewater Management: The proposed on-site wastewater treatment plant ane effluent management area is a major health and environmental risk. In times of heavy rain, untreated or partially treated effluent could wash into neighboring properties and local waterways like South Creek. Insufficient Water Supply: Without reliable town water infrastructure, the site cannot guaranteed the required potable water or fire safety standards for a population of over 1,000 people. Having to truck it in after 9pm or 5am is ridiculous Insufficient Parking Overflow into Rural Streets: The reduced parking provision on-site will force cars onto the narrow shoulders of Catherine Field Road, obstructing resident driveways and creating blind spots for drivers. After-Hours Use: Proposed use of the sports fields and halls until 9:30 PM will create chronic parking shortages and noise pollution in a quiet rural setting well beyond school hours. Flooding and Stormwater Risks Increased Runoff: Replacing rural land with large roofs and paved parking lots will significantly increase stormwater runoff. The current land is already subject to "flowing river" conditions during heavy rain. Downstream Flooding: The proposal to divert water via pipes and culverts to Catherine Field Road will simply push flooding onto downstream properties, creating hazards for those owners. Isolation Risk: Recent flood mapping indicates the site can become isolated during frequent rain events, even with the proposed drainage works, making it a dangerous location for a school.

11541

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field due to the significant and lasting environmental impacts that will result from the proposal’s heavy reliance on private vehicle travel. I visit Catherine Field almost every day to spend time with close family members who live in the area. These visits are part of my regular routine and have given me a deep, personal connection to the local environment. Catherine Field is a place where the roads are quiet, the air is clean, and daily life moves at a slower, more rural pace. It is these qualities that draw families to the area and that make time spent there meaningful and enjoyable. Through my daily travel to and from Catherine Field, I experience firsthand the limited capacity of the local road network and the absence of realistic public transport options. The area is not designed to support large volumes of commuter traffic, and even small increases are immediately noticeable. The introduction of a large school that will rely almost entirely on students being driven in from outside the area will fundamentally change this environment. Every school day would bring hundreds of additional vehicle movements through roads that are currently used by local families, residents, and visitors. Morning and afternoon congestion, extended idling during drop-off and pick-up, and constant traffic flow would become a permanent feature of the area. This would significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, directly undermining the clean, open environment that currently exists. As someone who spends time in Catherine Field almost daily, I am deeply concerned about the impact this will have on both the environment and on everyday life. The increase in traffic and pollution would not only degrade the natural surroundings but would also disrupt the simple, quiet routines that families rely on — whether that is visiting relatives, walking along the road, or enjoying time outdoors without constant noise and exhaust fumes. Approving a large, car-dependent school in a semi-rural location places convenience for a single development ahead of long-term environmental protection and community wellbeing. It contradicts planning principles that aim to reduce car reliance and protect areas that lack the infrastructure to support high-density, traffic-generating uses. Based on my ongoing personal connection to Catherine Field, and my concern for the environment and lifestyle of those who live there, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. The environmental cost of this proposal — driven by daily, unavoidable car travel — is too great for a small, semi-rural community to absorb.

11546

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally record my objection to the proposed Minarah College development. I believe this application is premature and represents a significant failure of strategic planning. My opposition is based on the following grounds: 1. Total Absence of Strategic Precinct Planning The proposal is being pushed forward in a planning vacuum. While surrounding areas are part of the South West Growth Area, this specific site currently lacks a finalized and coordinated Precinct Plan or Indicative Layout Plan (ILP). Premature Development: Approving a school of this scale before broader precinct planning is finalized is irresponsible. Infrastructure like major road widenings, shared paths, and trunk drainage must be planned at a district level, not property-by-property. Isolated Urbanization: This school would sit as an urban "island" in a rural-residential landscape. Without a precinct-wide master plan, there is no guarantee that the school will integrate safely with future residential growth or that the necessary services will ever be delivered. 2. Inadequate Road Infrastructure and Traffic Hazards The local road network is fundamentally unsuitable for the traffic volumes predicted by 2035 (980 students and 51 staff). Unsafe Access: Catherine Field Road is a narrow rural road with no shoulders, street lighting, or kerb and guttering. No Pedestrian Provisions: There are no footpaths or cycleways planned for this area, meaning students will be forced to walk on unpaved, dangerous road verges shared with heavy vehicles. Intersection Failure: The added traffic will cause total gridlock at the Camden Valley Way intersections, which are already failing during peak hours. 3. Insufficient Potable Water and Lack of Sewerage The site is entirely unsewered and lacks connection to critical town water infrastructure. Environmental Risk: The proposed reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant is unacceptable for a population of 1,000+. In heavy rain, effluent runoff into South Creek and neighboring properties is a major health and environmental hazard. No Timeline for Services: Sydney Water has not provided a definitive timeline for when town services will be extended to this specific rural pocket. 4. Severe Flooding and Stormwater Impact The site is located at a low point and currently functions as a natural overland flow path during heavy rain. Downstream Consequences: Replacing rural land with over 11,000sqm of roofs and hardstand will vastly increase runoff. The plan to pipe this water to Catherine Field Road will simply flood downstream residents. Hazard Categorization: Residents have witnessed the site turn into a "flowing river." The proposed mitigation measures are insufficient for a major flood event. 5. Chronic Lack of On-Site Parking The reduced parking layout is insufficient for the school's needs and community use. Dangerous Overflow: With no legal street parking available on the narrow road shoulders, staff and visitor vehicles will obstruct local access and create "blind spots" that increase accident risks. Conclusion This project should not be considered until a comprehensive Precinct Plan for Catherine Field is completed, funded, and implemented. Approving this development now would place an unfair and dangerous burden on the existing community.

11551

New South Wales 2570

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the school going ahead, traffic will be a concern.

11556

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I have just recently found out that this massive school that does not suit the area in the least is trying to be built on Catherine Fields Road. This massive structure has no place in this semi rural town with damaged roads as it is and this would only cause much more damage and make it very dangerous for local residents that have no use for this at all, clearly this is for residents outside our LGA, in saying that no school should be build in an area without the proper infrastructure required to deal with this amount of people everyday. I recently drove down this street when we were having the heavy rain and the site in question had a river running across the front of it, clearly with all the planned concrete and large roofs that it would be increased as there is no storm water for it to run to, this seems very dangerous for cars to collect and drop of children or kids walking down the street. I have an elderly mother living in Catherine Field, if she was to have an emergency situation around school time I doubt emergency services would be able to get to her, especially if there were heavy rain.

11576

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

To the Assessment Officer, I am writing to formally record my objection to the proposed development. I acknowledge the need for educational facilities in growing regions, this specific site and proposal are fundamentally unsuitable for the following reasons: 1. Land Use Compatibility and Rural Character Zoning Inconsistency: The site is zoned RU4 Primary Production Small Lots. The scale of a 980-student facility (plus early learning and special needs centers) is a significant departure from the intended agricultural and rural-residential use of this zone. Amenity Impact: The proposal introduces an intensive "urban" use into a quiet semi-rural environment. The high-density built form, associated noise from PA systems, and night-time lighting are incompatible with the existing low-density landscape. 2. Lack of Site Servicing and Infrastructure Sewerage Constraints: Catherine Field is currently not serviced by town sewer. The reliance on an onsite wastewater management system and subsurface ema area is a major concern, particularly regarding potential odours and health risks during wet weather periods. Infrastructure Deficit: The area lacks essential urban infrastructure, including kerbs, guttering, streetlighting, and footpaths. Building a large school before these services are established places an unfair burden on the existing environment and safety. 3. Traffic and Parking Safety Road Capacity: Catherine Field Road is a rural road not designed for the heavy traffic volumes generated by nearly 1,000 students and staff. The influx of one singular bus and hundreds of private vehicles will lead to severe congestion at peak times. Safety Risks: The increase in heavy vehicle movements on aged rural roads poses a direct risk to local residents and existing pedestrians. Furthermore, the proposed 9 odd parking spaces are insufficient for a school of this size, likely leading to dangerous overflow parking on narrow road shoulders. 4. Flooding and Stormwater Management Overland Flow: Recent flood mapping identifies the site as subject to significant overland flow. Large-scale development will increase hard-stand surfaces, leading to substantial runoff that risks flooding neighboring properties. Isolation Risk: During heavy rain, local roads in this area are known to flood, potentially isolating the school. A "shelter in place" strategy is an unacceptable risk for a site catering to hundreds of young children. The proposed Minarah College development is a clear case of "over-development" for a rural precinct that lacks the necessary infrastructure to support it. I urge the Commission to refuse the application.

11586

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of Minarah College at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural locality characterised by low-density land use, open space, and a predominantly rural landscape. The proposed development is inconsistent with the existing and intended character of the area and represents an inappropriate intensity of land use for this location. A significant concern is the site’s susceptibility to flooding and stormwater runoff. The area already experiences water movement issues during periods of heavy rainfall. The construction of a large institutional development, including extensive hard surfaces, risks exacerbating runoff, placing pressure on surrounding land, roadways, and downstream properties. I am not satisfied that the proposal adequately addresses these flooding and drainage risks. Additionally, the proposed development appears inconsistent with the current zoning and land-use objectives for Catherine Field, which aim to preserve its semi-rural nature. Introducing a development of this scale sets a concerning precedent for further urban intensification in an area not designed to support it. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and have firsthand experience of the narrow rural roads, limited infrastructure, and existing traffic conditions. Increased traffic associated with a large school would further strain local roads and negatively impact safety and amenity for residents and visitors alike. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposal and request that it be refused or, at minimum, substantially reconsidered in light of its impacts on flooding, land use compatibility, traffic, and the character of Catherine Field.

11596

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to lodge an objection to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural community that has retained its rural character despite surrounding growth. The scale and intensity of the proposed school development is not appropriate for this area and would significantly alter the nature of the locality. Flooding and stormwater runoff are major concerns. The land and surrounding areas already experience water flow issues, and further development with large buildings, car parks, and hard surfaces will increase runoff and flooding risks. This has the potential to negatively impact nearby properties, local roads, and the broader environment. The proposal also represents an incorrect and incompatible use of land in a semi-rural setting. Developments of this size belong in areas with established urban infrastructure, not in a locality that lacks the road capacity, drainage systems, and services required to support them. I regularly travel through Catherine Field when visiting family and am familiar with the existing road conditions. The roads are narrow, semi-rural, and not designed for the significant increase in traffic that a school of this size would generate. Increased congestion and safety risks are inevitable, particularly during peak drop-off and pick-up times. This development would fundamentally change Catherine Field and diminish the qualities that make it a semi-rural community. I respectfully request that this proposal be rejected in order to protect the character, safety, and environmental integrity of the area.

11601

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

My concerns about this proposal are as follows: Traffic and Road Safety: The existing road infrastructure on Catherine Field Road is inadequate for the projected increase in vehicle movements. I am concerned about congestion, lack of safe pedestrian crossings, and the potential for increased accidents on these rural roads. Infrastructure and Wastewater: The site currently lacks connection to town sewerage. The proposed on-site wastewater management system and spray irrigation raise serious concerns regarding environmental impact and potential health risks, especially during high-rainfall events. Flooding Risks: Catherine Field has a history of flooding. I am concerned that the increased hardstand areas from this development will exacerbate runoff and increase the risk of flooding for neighboring properties. Rural Character and Noise: The scale of the college and its proposed hours of operation are incompatible with the quiet, rural character of the area. The resulting noise and light pollution will significantly impact the amenity of long-term residents. I urge the Commission to carefully consider these impacts and the strong community opposition before making a final determination.

11611

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area, and the scale of this proposal is not suitable for the existing character or infrastructure of the locality. The development represents an inappropriate land use and is inconsistent with the semi-rural nature of the area. Flooding and stormwater runoff are serious concerns. Increased hard surfaces will worsen runoff and heighten flooding risks in an area already prone to water issues, potentially impacting surrounding land and roads. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with the narrow rural roads and limited infrastructure. The additional traffic generated by a large school would significantly reduce road safety and amenity. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposal and request that it not be approved.

11616

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area, and the scale of this proposal is not suitable for the existing character or infrastructure of the locality. The development represents an inappropriate land use and is inconsistent with the semi-rural nature of the area. Flooding and stormwater runoff are serious concerns. Increased hard surfaces will worsen runoff and heighten flooding risks in an area already prone to water issues, potentially impacting surrounding land and roads. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with the narrow rural roads and limited infrastructure. The additional traffic generated by a large school would significantly reduce road safety and amenity. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposal and request that it not be approved.

11621

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly oppose the building of this school in the rural town of Catherine Field. This area is very prone to flooding and road closures, I have often had to divert due to road closures. Even a massive tree fell across the road right near this site due to the wet ground the tree could not stay in the ground. This area is not safe for people to be parked on the side of the road to pick up students or students to walk down the side of the road. Catherine Field also have a very high volume of snakes that can be seen on the side of the road due to the long grass, my niece and nephew have almost been bitten a few times whilst walking home from school. Not to mention the amount that would be on site regularly. There are also many possums and turtles that live on this street and cross the road regularly. This is not good for the local fauna especially since they are saying they will hold events til 10pm at night. This submission is not conducive to the local area or environment to say the least. Don't be fooled this is a cheap way for them to acquire a lot of land and not care about anyone else living or using this quiet space.

11626

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural locality that is environmentally sensitive and not suited to large-scale institutional development. A key concern is the site’s flooding and stormwater runoff characteristics. The area already experiences significant water flow during heavy rainfall events, and further development will increase runoff, erosion, and downstream impacts. The construction of extensive buildings, car parking, and sealed surfaces will reduce natural absorption and worsen flooding conditions on surrounding land and roads. This raises concerns not only for environmental damage but also for public safety and long-term infrastructure resilience. The proposal also represents an incorrect land use for this location. Catherine Field has not been planned or serviced to accommodate a development of this size, and approval would undermine land-use planning objectives intended to protect semi-rural areas. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and have observed firsthand how the area functions as a rural corridor rather than an urban centre. The proposal would place unreasonable pressure on local roads and significantly alter the character of the area. For these reasons, I object to the proposed development and request that it not be approved.

11646

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. This proposal is inconsistent with the semi-rural character and strategic planning intent for Catherine Field. The scale and intensity of a large school development is not appropriate for an area that has historically been low-density, rural in nature, and limited in infrastructure. Flooding and stormwater runoff present serious risks that appear to be underestimated. Increased impervious surfaces will intensify runoff and place additional strain on drainage systems that are already limited. Once developed, these impacts cannot be easily reversed. Of further concern is the precedent this development would set. Approving a large institutional use in Catherine Field risks opening the door to further inappropriate developments, leading to incremental urbanisation without proper planning or infrastructure upgrades. I regularly travel through Catherine Field when visiting family and am familiar with the existing road network. The roads are narrow and rural in design and are already constrained. Increased traffic associated with school operations would negatively impact safety and accessibility. This proposal should be refused to protect the planning integrity, environmental conditions, and rural character of Catherine Field.

11651

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I urge the Commission to reject this proposal in its current form due to these unresolved infrastructure and safety The existing road network is completely inadequate for the projected increase in vehicle movements. Catherine Field Road is narrow, lacks adequate shoulders, and has no footpaths or safe pedestrian crossings, making it a dangerous environment for both students and local residents. I am also concerned that the on-site parking provisions will be insufficient during school events, leading to dangerous overflow parking on rural roads that were never designed for high-density traffic. The absence of a mains sewerage connection for a facility designed for nearly 1,000 students is a major oversight. The proposed reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant and spray irrigation is entirely unsuitable for this location, especially given the historical flooding risks in Catherine Field which could lead to environmental contamination. It is irresponsible to approve such a high-occupancy development before the state government has provided the necessary public infrastructure to safely manage waste.

11656

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to provide my feedback on the proposed Minarah College development at 268-278 Catherine Field Road. While I fully understand and acknowledge that more schools are desperately needed to support the growing population of the Camden area, I believe this specific site is currently unsuitable for a development of this scale due to critical infrastructure and traffic safety concerns.

11661

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the proposal to build Minarah College at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area and this development is far too large and intensive for the location. It does not fit with the existing land use or the character of the area and would permanently change it. Flooding and stormwater runoff are major concerns. The land already struggles during periods of heavy rain, and adding large buildings and car parks will make these problems worse. This creates risks for nearby land, roads, and the broader environment. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with how quiet and rural the area is. The roads are not designed to handle the volume of traffic a school of this size would generate, particularly during peak school hours. This development is the wrong use of land in the wrong location. I strongly urge the consent authority to reject the proposal in order to protect the safety, character, and environmental conditions of Catherine Field.

11666

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

Until adequate infrastructure is planned, this school should not be approved

11671

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area with limited road infrastructure and services. A development of this scale is not appropriate for the location and does not align with the existing land-use character of the area. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with the narrow rural roads and limited visibility in parts of the area. These roads are not designed to accommodate the increased traffic, buses, and peak-hour congestion that a large school would generate. This raises serious concerns regarding road safety for local residents, visitors, and students. Flooding and stormwater runoff are also significant concerns. Heavy rainfall already affects the area, and additional hard surfaces will worsen runoff, potentially causing flooding of nearby roads and land. The proposal represents an incorrect and incompatible land use for a semi-rural setting and would have lasting negative impacts on safety, amenity, and the character of Catherine Field. For these reasons, I object to the development and request that it be refused.

11676

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I write to formally object to the proposed development of Minarah College at Catherine Field. This submission is made on planning, environmental and public safety grounds, and reflects both my direct experience of the area and the broader incompatibility of this proposal with the existing rural environment. Flooding Risk and Access Constraints Catherine Field is a low-lying, semi-rural area that is highly prone to flooding and frequent road closures during periods of heavy rainfall. I have personally experienced numerous occasions where access through this area has been cut off, requiring significant detours due to flooded roads. These conditions present serious concerns for the safe and reliable operation of a large educational facility that would rely on daily vehicular access for staff, students and emergency services. In addition, the instability of the land in wet conditions poses a genuine safety risk. A large mature tree recently fell across Catherine Fields Road near the proposed site due to saturated ground conditions. This highlights the vulnerability of the area and raises concerns about roadside safety, infrastructure resilience and risk management during adverse weather events. Road Safety and Traffic Impacts Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road with limited shoulders, no continuous footpaths and inadequate infrastructure to safely accommodate increased traffic volumes. The proposal would introduce a substantial number of vehicle movements, including drop-off and pick-up activity, resulting in vehicles stopping along the roadside. This would create unsafe conditions for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists. The road environment is not suitable for students walking along the roadside, nor for vehicles parking on verges in an area already affected by poor visibility, flooding and soft ground conditions. These risks are unacceptable, particularly in a rural setting that was never designed to support an intensive institutional use. Environmental and Fauna Impacts The area supports a range of native wildlife, including snakes, possums and turtles, which are regularly observed crossing the road and inhabiting roadside vegetation. Snakes are particularly prevalent due to long grass and surrounding bushland. My niece and nephew have narrowly avoided snake bites on several occasions while walking in this area, demonstrating a real and ongoing safety risk. The establishment of a school would significantly increase human activity, disturbance and habitat fragmentation. The proposal to host events extending until 10:00pm raises further concerns regarding noise, lighting and night-time disruption, which would negatively impact nocturnal fauna and further degrade the local ecosystem. Incompatibility with Rural Character Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural locality valued for its low-density land use, natural environment and sense of openness. The scale and intensity of the proposed development are fundamentally inconsistent with the established character of the area. This proposal represents an overdevelopment of rural land for an institutional purpose that does not align with the capacity, infrastructure or environmental sensitivity of the site. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, the proposed Minarah College development is not suitable for this location. It poses unacceptable risks to public safety, exacerbates flooding and traffic issues, threatens local fauna and undermines the rural character of Catherine Field. The proposal cannot be considered consistent with sound planning principles or the long-term interests of the local community and environment. I respectfully request that the consent authority refuse this application.

11686

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is valued for its semi-rural character, open landscape, and low-density environment. The proposed development is out of scale with the area and would significantly alter its character and lifestyle amenity. Flooding and stormwater runoff remain a major concern. The area already experiences water issues during heavy rain, and the introduction of large buildings and car parks will reduce natural drainage and increase runoff. These impacts will affect not only the site but surrounding properties and road networks. I regularly pass through Catherine Field when visiting family and have observed that the area functions as a quiet rural corridor rather than an urban centre. Increased noise, traffic, and activity associated with a large school would permanently change the nature of the locality. This proposal is not suitable for Catherine Field and does not respect the existing environment or planning intent. I strongly object to its approval.

11706

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, pursuant to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. This submission is made on the basis that the proposal is inconsistent with sound planning principles and will result in unacceptable environmental, traffic, safety and amenity impacts that have not been adequately addressed. 1. Flooding Constraints and Site Suitability The subject locality is known to experience frequent flooding and associated road closures during periods of moderate to heavy rainfall. Catherine Fields Road and surrounding access routes are regularly impacted, resulting in loss of connectivity and reliance on lengthy detours. This raises serious concerns regarding the suitability of the site for a large-scale educational facility that requires safe, reliable and continuous access for students, staff, visitors and emergency services. The instability of the ground conditions in wet weather has also been demonstrated through recent incidents, including the collapse of a large mature tree adjacent to the proposed site due to saturated soils. This highlights risks associated with soil stability, roadside safety and the resilience of infrastructure within a flood-affected rural environment. The proposal does not demonstrate that flooding risks and access limitations have been adequately mitigated, as required under Section 4.15(1)(a)(i) of the EP&A Act and relevant provisions of the Camden Local Environmental Plan and Development Control Plan. 2. Traffic, Access and Public Safety Impacts Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road with limited shoulders, no continuous footpaths and constrained sight distances. The existing road network is not designed to accommodate the traffic volumes, peak period congestion and stopping behaviour associated with a school of this scale. The proposal will result in a significant increase in vehicle movements, including drop-off and pick-up activity, likely leading to vehicles stopping along road verges. This presents unacceptable safety risks, particularly in flood-prone conditions where road edges are softened and visibility is reduced. Further, the absence of pedestrian infrastructure makes the road environment unsafe for students walking along the roadway. These impacts are inconsistent with the objectives of safe and orderly traffic movement and indicate that the proposal represents an overintensification of use for the existing rural road network. 3. Environmental and Biodiversity Impacts The locality supports a range of native fauna, including snakes, possums and turtles, which are regularly observed within roadside vegetation and crossing Catherine Fields Road. The presence of long grass, bushland and nearby waterways provides suitable habitat, particularly for reptiles. The proposed development would significantly increase human activity, vehicle movements and disturbance, resulting in heightened risks to local fauna through habitat disruption and vehicle strike. The likelihood of human–wildlife conflict, particularly involving snakes, presents both environmental and public safety concerns that have not been adequately addressed. The proposal also seeks approval for events operating until 10:00pm. Extended hours of operation introduce additional noise and artificial lighting impacts that are likely to adversely affect nocturnal fauna and further erode the environmental values of the area, contrary to ecologically sustainable development principles under Section 1.3 of the EP&A Act. 4. Incompatibility with Rural Character and Amenity Catherine Field is characterised by its low-density, semi-rural landscape, minimal built form and quiet amenity. The scale, intensity and institutional nature of the proposed development are incompatible with the established character of the area. The proposal represents a form of development that is not commensurate with the environmental constraints or infrastructure capacity of the locality. It would result in a permanent and adverse change to the rural character of Catherine Field, contrary to the objectives of the applicable zoning and the Camden DCP provisions relating to rural and semi-rural development. 5. Conclusion Having regard to the matters for consideration under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed Minarah College development is unsuitable for the Catherine Field locality. The proposal fails to adequately address flooding constraints, traffic and access safety, environmental impacts and character compatibility.

11711

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of Minarah College at Catherine Fields. Catherine Fields is a semi-rural community that has, to date, retained its low-density character, open spaces, and quieter lifestyle. These qualities are central to the identity of the area and are highly valued by both residents and regular visitors. Large-scale institutional development of this nature is not consistent with the existing character of the locality and would significantly alter the area’s present state. I visit Catherine Fields regularly and have firsthand experience of the local road network and traffic conditions. The proposed development would inevitably lead to a substantial increase in traffic volumes, particularly during peak morning and afternoon periods associated with school drop-off and pick-up times. The existing roads are already limited in capacity and are not designed to safely or efficiently accommodate a significant increase in daily vehicle movements. This would result in congestion, reduced road safety, increased noise, and inconvenience for local residents. In addition to traffic concerns, the development would place added pressure on local infrastructure and detract from the semi-rural environment that residents have chosen and worked to preserve. The scale and intensity of the proposed college are more appropriate for an urban setting with established transport links and supporting infrastructure, rather than a semi-rural community such as Catherine Fields. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development and urge the relevant planning authority to give due consideration to the character of the area, the impact on traffic and infrastructure, and the concerns of the local community who wish to preserve Catherine Fields in its current form. Thank you for considering this submission.

11716

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural locality that is not suitable for a large institutional development. The proposal is out of scale with the surrounding area and does not align with the existing land-use pattern or rural setting. A primary concern is flooding and stormwater runoff. The land and surrounding road network are already affected during heavy rainfall events. Further development involving extensive buildings and sealed surfaces will increase runoff and worsen flood risks, potentially affecting neighbouring land and public infrastructure. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with the local conditions. The existing rural roads and limited infrastructure are not designed to accommodate the traffic volumes associated with a large school, raising safety and accessibility concerns. This proposal represents an inappropriate land use for Catherine Field and would result in long-term negative impacts. For these reasons, I object to the development and request that it not be approved.

11731

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. The proposal is not appropriate for a small, semi-rural area and represents an incorrect use of land. The scale and intensity of a large school are incompatible with the existing character and infrastructure of Catherine Field. Flooding and stormwater runoff are serious concerns. Increased hard surfaces will worsen runoff and flooding in an area that already experiences water-related issues during heavy rain. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with the narrow rural roads and limited capacity of the local network. The additional traffic generated by this development would create safety and congestion issues. For these reasons, the proposal should not be approved.

11741

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. I was very concerned to recently learn that such a large school is proposed for this location. Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural area with limited infrastructure, and this type of development is completely out of place. A school of this size does not suit the character of the area and will place unreasonable pressure on roads, safety and access for local residents. Catherine Fields Road is already in poor condition and is not built to handle a high volume of daily traffic. Adding school drop-off and pick-up traffic would only cause further damage and create dangerous conditions for people who live in the area and rely on this road every day. There are no footpaths, limited road shoulders and poor drainage, making it unsafe for pedestrians and vehicles, particularly during peak school times. Flooding is a major issue in this area. During recent heavy rain, I drove along Catherine Fields Road and saw water flowing across the front of the proposed site like a river. This shows how vulnerable the area already is. With the amount of concrete, hard surfaces and large roof areas proposed, stormwater runoff will only increase. There is no clear capacity for this water to drain safely, which raises serious concerns about road safety, property access and the risk to children being dropped off or walking along the road in wet conditions. I also have an elderly mother living in Catherine Field. If she were to experience a medical emergency around school peak times, particularly during heavy rain, I am genuinely concerned that emergency services would struggle to reach her due to congestion, flooding and road closures. This is not an acceptable risk for residents. Overall, this proposal does not benefit the local community and appears to be intended for students travelling in from outside the area, placing the impacts entirely on local residents. Catherine Field does not have the infrastructure needed to safely support a development of this scale. For these reasons, I strongly oppose the proposed Minarah College development and hope the planning committee have actually gone out to this site at various times to see what this area is like. Don't ruin the peoples lives that live here. I especially worry for the older generation who have no idea about these things going on in their town that will have a huge impact on their everyday lives forever. this is just one decision for you but a lifetime of crap to deal with for the residents.

11746

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. I was very concerned to recently learn that such a large school is proposed for this location. Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural area with limited infrastructure, and this type of development is completely out of place. A school of this size does not suit the character of the area and will place unreasonable pressure on roads, safety and access for local residents. Catherine Fields Road is already in poor condition and is not built to handle a high volume of daily traffic. Adding school drop-off and pick-up traffic would only cause further damage and create dangerous conditions for people who live in the area and rely on this road every day. There are no footpaths, limited road shoulders and poor drainage, making it unsafe for pedestrians and vehicles, particularly during peak school times. Flooding is a major issue in this area. During recent heavy rain, I drove along Catherine Fields Road and saw water flowing across the front of the proposed site like a river. This shows how vulnerable the area already is. With the amount of concrete, hard surfaces and large roof areas proposed, stormwater runoff will only increase. There is no clear capacity for this water to drain safely, which raises serious concerns about road safety, property access and the risk to children being dropped off or walking along the road in wet conditions. I also have an elderly mother living in Catherine Field. If she were to experience a medical emergency around school peak times, particularly during heavy rain, I am genuinely concerned that emergency services would struggle to reach her due to congestion, flooding and road closures. This is not an acceptable risk for residents. Overall, this proposal does not benefit the local community and appears to be intended for students travelling in from outside the area, placing the impacts entirely on local residents. Catherine Field does not have the infrastructure needed to safely support a development of this scale. For these reasons, I strongly oppose the proposed Minarah College development and hope the planning committee have actually gone out to this site at various times to see what this area is like. Don't ruin the peoples lives that live here. I especially worry for the older generation who have no idea about these things going on in their town that will have a huge impact on their everyday lives forever. this is just one decision for you but a lifetime of crap to deal with for the residents.

11751

New South Wales 2557

24/01/2026

Object

Website

Submission to the Independent Planning Commission Re: State Significant Development Application SSD-30759158 – Minarah College Proposed Location: 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW 2557 Date: 24 January 2026 To the Chair and Panel Members, I am a resident of Catherine Field who uses Catherine Fields Road daily for travel to work. I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College (a K-12 school for up to 980 students, plus Early Learning Centre, with extended hours and events). My concerns centre on the four key issues below, including significant environmental impacts during the multi-stage construction process (potentially over 200 weeks), such as earthworks, vegetation clearing, erosion/sediment runoff, dust generation, noise from machinery, and temporary stormwater changes: 1. Flooding
 Catherine Fields Road frequently floods during heavy rain, often becoming impassable and isolating streets in the area. I have experienced this multiple times, preventing travel toward the proposed site or to nearby suburbs like Rossmore and Bringelly. The development would add more impervious surfaces (buildings, car parks, fields), increasing runoff and pressure on local catchments. Combined with on-site wastewater systems, this risks worsening flooding for residents and creating dangerous conditions for school traffic, students, and emergency access during wet weather. During construction, extensive earthworks and site disturbance would increase erosion and sediment runoff into local catchments, potentially exacerbating overland flow and flooding risks before any final mitigation measures are in place. 2. Traffic & parking
 The road is narrow, unsealed or chip-sealed, with no kerbs, gutters, footpaths, shoulders, street lighting, or turning lanes. It handles low traffic now, but the school would generate hundreds of extra daily vehicle movements (mostly private cars, buses, and staff), especially during peak drop-off/pick-up. This would cause severe congestion, queuing, delays, and safety hazards on an already substandard road. Camden Council has stated no upgrades are planned in the near future (only short-term chip-seal fixes for potholes). Similar issues in nearby areas like Austral show what happens when schools precede road infrastructure— chronic chaos that would directly affect local safety and daily commutes. Construction traffic (heavy vehicles, machinery deliveries, and earthmoving equipment) would add further short-term congestion, road deterioration, dust generation from unsealed surfaces, and safety risks on this narrow rural road. 3. Land use compatibility
 The site is zoned RU4 Primary Production, designed to protect rural and agricultural character with limits on intensive developments. A large school with two-storey buildings, extensive parking, sports fields, and operations from 7:00am to 9:00pm (plus weekends/events) is incompatible. Catherine Field is peaceful and quiet, noise carries easily across open land, and this would disrupt the rural amenity, low-density living, and tranquility that make the area special. Most students would come from further away (e.g., Liverpool/Green Valley), bringing external impacts without serving the immediate local community. Construction-phase disturbance, including vegetation clearing (tree removal impacting local habitat and rural landscape), bulk earthworks, and prolonged noise/dust from machinery, would further erode the rural character and biodiversity values during the extended build period. 4. Site servicing
 There is no reticulated sewerage, limited public transport, and inadequate road infrastructure to support this scale. Reliance on on-site systems increases environmental risks (e.g., effluent issues), while the poor road condition (regular potholes, no asphalt sealing) would deteriorate faster under construction and operational traffic. Approving this prematurely burdens existing residents without matching upgrades, as seen in other Western Sydney growth areas. The construction phase would introduce additional environmental pressures like dust and noise from heavy machinery, potential erosion/sediment control failures during earthworks, and increased stormwater runoff before final systems are operational, adding to the site’s servicing inadequacies and long-term impacts. In summary, these issues - including the amplified environmental burdens during construction make the site unsuitable. The high volume of prior objections (over 699, mostly against) reflects shared community concerns. I respectfully request the Commission refuse consent for this development. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Very concerned Catherine Field resident

11756

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of Minarah College at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area that has historically been characterised by low-density development, open land, and environmental sensitivity. The proposed school is inconsistent with the existing and intended land use of the area and represents an over-intensification that does not align with the current character of the locality. Of particular concern are the flooding and stormwater runoff impacts associated with this development. The area is already susceptible to flooding during periods of heavy rainfall, and the introduction of large-scale buildings, hard surfaces, and increased traffic will likely exacerbate runoff issues. This raises serious concerns regarding downstream flooding, erosion, and broader environmental impacts. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family, and I am familiar with the local road network and surrounding landscape. The roads are narrow and semi-rural in nature and are not designed to accommodate the increased traffic volumes that a large school would generate, particularly during peak drop-off and pick-up times. Given the inappropriate land use, flood risk, and incompatibility with the semi-rural character of Catherine Field, I strongly urge the relevant authorities to reconsider approval of this development.

11761

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

To Camden Council, I am writing to object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. This objection is made with consideration to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including the requirement for Council to assess whether a development is in the public interest. In this case, the proposal delivers a largely private benefit while imposing significant and ongoing impacts on the wider community, making it unsuitable for this location. Public Interest and Community Impact While educational facilities can serve an important role, this proposal is not appropriately located or scaled for Catherine Field. The development is intended to serve a broader population beyond the local area, yet the negative impacts — traffic congestion, noise, light spill and loss of rural amenity — will be borne almost entirely by local residents. Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural area valued for its open space, low background noise and limited development. Introducing a large institutional use into this setting would permanently change how the area functions and feels. When a development creates ongoing disturbance and degrades the amenity of an established community, it cannot reasonably be considered to be in the public interest. Noise and Operational Impacts The proposed operation of a large school raises serious concerns regarding noise impacts that cannot be adequately mitigated in a rural residential setting. Daily school operations would introduce constant noise from outdoor play areas, sporting fields, bells, public address systems and increased vehicle movements. In addition, emergency vehicle sirens accessing the site would further contribute to noise intrusion. These impacts would directly affect nearby residents’ ability to enjoy their homes and surrounding land. Given the open nature of the area and the lack of existing urban noise buffers, there is a real risk that acoustic impacts will extend well beyond the site boundaries. This would significantly undermine the quiet enjoyment of nearby properties and is incompatible with the existing low-noise environment of Catherine Field. Lighting and Light Spill Impacts The proposal also raises concerns regarding artificial lighting, including security lighting and potential sports field or event lighting. In a semi-rural area with minimal ambient lighting, light spill and glare can have a substantial impact on nearby properties. Extended hours of operation, including evening events, would introduce light intrusion well beyond typical residential hours. This would affect residents’ privacy, disrupt sleep patterns and detract from the rural night-time environment. Once introduced, these impacts are ongoing and difficult to reverse. Loss of Rural Amenity and Green Space The development would result in the loss of open, semi-rural land and replace it with a large built form, hard surfaces and infrastructure more suited to an urban setting. This loss of green space and rural character is contrary to the expectations of residents and erodes the environmental and visual qualities that define Catherine Field. Conclusion When assessed against the matters for consideration under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed Minarah College development fails the public interest test. The scale and operation of the school would create unacceptable noise, lighting and amenity impacts, while delivering limited benefit to the local community. I often go to Catherine Field as many of my family live in this area, I also travel through their for work.

11766

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to lodge an objection to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural community, and the scale and nature of this proposal are not appropriate for the area. The development represents an incorrect land use that is inconsistent with the existing character and infrastructure of the locality. The site and surrounding areas are prone to flooding, and there are serious concerns that increased hard surfaces and altered drainage will worsen stormwater runoff and flooding impacts. These risks have not been adequately addressed and pose potential harm to both the environment and nearby properties. I regularly travel through Catherine Field to visit family and have firsthand experience with the local roads and conditions. The current road network is not suitable for the significant increase in traffic that a large school would bring. For these reasons, I object to the proposed development and request that it not be approved.

11771

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to express my objection to the proposed Minarah College development in Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area with a distinct character that is valued by residents and those who regularly pass through the area. The proposed school is not consistent with this character and represents an inappropriate land use for the location. I am particularly concerned about flooding and stormwater runoff. The area already experiences water issues after heavy rain, and the scale of this development risks worsening runoff, drainage, and flood impacts, both on-site and in surrounding areas. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and have seen how the area functions day-to-day. The roads and surrounding infrastructure are not suited to the increased traffic, noise, and disruption that would come with a major school development. I believe this proposal would significantly and negatively impact the area and urge decision-makers to consider more appropriate locations for such a development.

11776

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural locality, and the scale of the proposed development is incompatible with the established character and intended land use of the area. The proposal represents an inappropriate intensification that does not align with surrounding uses or existing infrastructure. Significant concern exists regarding flooding and stormwater runoff. The area is known to experience flooding during heavy rainfall events, and the introduction of extensive hard surfaces and altered drainage patterns is likely to worsen runoff and flood impacts. This poses risks to neighbouring land, local waterways, and road safety. I regularly drive through Catherine Field to visit family and am familiar with local conditions. The road network is narrow and rural in nature and is not designed to safely accommodate the increased traffic volumes associated with a large educational facility. For these reasons, I object to the proposed development and request that approval not be granted.

11781

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to submit an objection to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural area, and the proposed development is not appropriate for the location. The land use is inconsistent with the surrounding environment and will place undue pressure on infrastructure that is not designed for large-scale institutional development. Flooding and stormwater runoff are serious concerns. The area already experiences drainage issues, and the development is likely to increase runoff, raising the risk of flooding and erosion. I regularly travel through Catherine Field when visiting family and have firsthand experience of the local roads. Increased traffic associated with student drop-offs, pick-ups, and staff vehicles will negatively impact road safety and accessibility in an area that currently functions as a quiet rural corridor. I respectfully request that the proposal be refused or relocated to a more suitable site.

11811

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development in Catherine Field. I am a regular visitor to Catherine Fields Road, where my sister lives, and I spend a great deal of time in the area visiting her and her family. Through these visits, I have come to value Catherine Field as a quiet, semi-rural community where peace, safety and open space are part of everyday life. Introducing a school of this scale would completely change the area and create significant risks and disruptions. This submission is made with regard to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including the requirement to consider whether a development is in the public interest. While this proposal may provide a benefit to the school operator, it would impose ongoing and serious impacts on the local community and those who regularly use and value this area. Failure of the Public Interest Test The proposed development serves a largely private benefit while placing major burdens on local residents. With more than 1,000 students and staff expected, the traffic, noise, light spill and pressure on infrastructure would be overwhelming. These impacts would be felt daily by local residents, while the benefits flow largely to people from outside the area. Flooding and Infrastructure Limitations Catherine Field is highly flood-prone. During heavy rain, water regularly covers roads in the area, including in front of the proposed site, and this creates dangerous driving and pedestrian conditions. The proposed development with large buildings, hard surfaces and roof areas will dramatically increase stormwater runoff. Without adequate drainage, this will worsen existing flooding issues and create serious hazards for children being dropped off, pedestrians, and local traffic. There is also no existing sewer system capable of supporting a development of this scale. A school with over 1,000 students plus staff would place an enormous strain on local sanitation, with the potential for public health issues and environmental impacts. Combined with the flooding risk, this makes the site highly unsuitable for such an intensive institutional use. Noise and Loss of Quiet Enjoyment One of the defining qualities of Catherine Field is its quiet, semi-rural nature. The proposed school would introduce constant noise from outdoor play areas, sports fields, school bells, public address systems, and increased vehicle movements. In a rural setting, sound carries further, and there are no surrounding buffers. Residents’ reasonable expectation of quiet enjoyment would be permanently disrupted. Light Spill and Night-Time Impacts The development would introduce artificial lighting for security and sporting or event purposes. In a semi-rural area, light spill and glare would significantly impact nearby homes, affecting privacy, sleep, and the character of the night-time environment. Extended hours of operation would make this impact continuous. Loss of Rural Character and Green Space This proposal would replace open land and green space with large buildings and infrastructure more appropriate to an urban area. From the perspective of someone who regularly visits family here, the change to the landscape and rural character would be immediate and irreversible. Residents chose Catherine Field for its quiet, open nature, not to live alongside a major institutional facility. Conclusion When assessed against Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed Minarah College development fails the public interest test. The scale and operation of the school would create unacceptable flooding, noise, lighting, amenity, and infrastructure impacts that far outweigh any benefit to the community.

11816

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD-30759158) because I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 9. Traffic, Transport & Accessibility have been satisfied by Ason Group's "Surveyed Traffic Volumes" as it was conducted during Covid-19, being a 'pandemic event' as declared by the World Health Organisation. Ason group themselves state on pages 24-25 "This has a potential impact on the integrity and consistency of any traffic surveys undertaken during this period"  Increased Traffic – If the Minarah College proposal goes ahead, this will cause major disruption to the residents of Catherine Fields. Increased traffic flow will cause major disruption to families trying to take children to school in the morning and afternoon pickup from school. Furthermore, families travelling to work in the morning will be greatly impacted by the increased volume of traffic as well.  Of major concern is that as the roads in Catherine Field are only single lane roads, the exit to Bringelly Road or Camden Valley Way Road will be clogged up with the cars from parents and buses coming and going from Minarah College. Minarah College, is planned to accommodate 1,580 students. That’s a lot of cars and buses coming into Catherine Field and lining the streets to exit Catherine Fields. I am highly concerned of the longwait times, I and other families in the Catherine Field area will have to endure. “We will be stuck” in our own street trying to get children to school and ourselves to work”.  In addition, I am concerned of my ability to get to work on time and my children to school on time. I am concerned of loss of employment as a direct consequence of being late to work and children receiving late notes from the school for being late to school.  If the state government passes the Monarah College proposal, it would cause so much disruption and heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields.  This is very unfair for the State Government to place such a hardship on the residents of Catherine Fields. Once again, I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 11. Noise and Vibration have been met as the assessment carried out by Day Design Pty Ltd's "Measured Ambient Noise Level', for the following reasons. (a) The noise and vibration assessment were conducted during Covid-19 lockdown and (b) secondly due to their admission of a missing noise logger at 'Location A' for 18 days out of the 25 days.  I am of the strong view that this report is inaccurate, false and misleading and incomplete.  I feel this report fails to accurately represent completeness, accuracy, quality, and clarity of the information in the EIS. I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD30759158) because the proposal is out of character to the area, as it is altering a rural landscape to one of commercial.  Page 11 of the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) lists the feasible alternatives that were investigated. One of these scenarios was the “Do Nothing”, approach which will result in “the site remaining predominantly rural, unplanned, and unserved”. I strongly support the Do‐Nothing approach, which leaves the site “predominantly rural”. I chose to live in Catherine Field because its rural and have lived here for 15 years, enjoying, and appreciating the beautiful rural region with my husband and children. Since the day we heard about the Minarah College proposal, we now live in fear that this proposal will greatly transform and ruin this beautiful rural place we have lived in and will take away and transform Catherine Field into something commercial.  As residents of Catherine Field, we are left feeling that our rights and wants are no longer valued and ignored by both local and state government. How can state and local governments stand by and cause such heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields. When has it become ok that those with deep pockets can go about their business and change and ruin a beautiful rural area and the poor residents from Catherine Fields, most from working class families, farmers, elderly people feel that they have no rights because they do not have deep pockets to fight such cashed up organizations. This is so not Australian. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.Governments talk about the importance of protecting and conserving the environment, its eco systems and wildlife. If this submission (Application Number SSD-30759158) goes ahead it will ruin the beautiful environment in Catherine Field. With the developments in Oran Park, Harrington Park, Gregory Hills, Smeaton Grange, many animals, and wildlife have become displaced. This is evident today by the fact that in Catherine Fields you see so many red belly black snakes, brown snakes, turtles, wallabies, and kangaroos roaming in the area. 10 years ago, this was not the case. Why? Because their natural habitat has been taken away and destroyed because developers and governments are more interested in making money then preserving and protecting the environment.  As a government, please consider not approving the “Minarah College” proposal as once the development goes ahead, the place is destroyed and the beauty that was once Catherine Fields will be gone forever and can never be returned. Please leave Catherine Filed as a “rural, unplanned and unserved” area with no College/School in it. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.The Catherine Field community does not have a Fijian Muslim community residing in it. It simply doesn’t exist. The Minarah College will be serving a community that resides outside of Catherine Field. Hence, the people residing in Catherine Field will not benefit from this school, Minarah College. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.

11821

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD-30759158) because I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 9. Traffic, Transport & Accessibility have been satisfied by Ason Group's "Surveyed Traffic Volumes" as it was conducted during Covid-19, being a 'pandemic event' as declared by the World Health Organisation. Ason group themselves state on pages 24-25 "This has a potential impact on the integrity and consistency of any traffic surveys undertaken during this period"  Increased Traffic – If the Minarah College proposal goes ahead, this will cause major disruption to the residents of Catherine Fields. Increased traffic flow will cause major disruption to families trying to take children to school in the morning and afternoon pickup from school. Furthermore, families travelling to work in the morning will be greatly impacted by the increased volume of traffic as well.  Of major concern is that as the roads in Catherine Field are only single lane roads, the exit to Bringelly Road or Camden Valley Way Road will be clogged up with the cars from parents and buses coming and going from Minarah College. Minarah College, is planned to accommodate 1,580 students. That’s a lot of cars and buses coming into Catherine Field and lining the streets to exit Catherine Fields. I am highly concerned of the longwait times, I and other families in the Catherine Field area will have to endure. “We will be stuck” in our own street trying to get children to school and ourselves to work”.  In addition, I am concerned of my ability to get to work on time and my children to school on time. I am concerned of loss of employment as a direct consequence of being late to work and children receiving late notes from the school for being late to school.  If the state government passes the Monarah College proposal, it would cause so much disruption and heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields.  This is very unfair for the State Government to place such a hardship on the residents of Catherine Fields. Once again, I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 11. Noise and Vibration have been met as the assessment carried out by Day Design Pty Ltd's "Measured Ambient Noise Level', for the following reasons. (a) The noise and vibration assessment were conducted during Covid-19 lockdown and (b) secondly due to their admission of a missing noise logger at 'Location A' for 18 days out of the 25 days.  I am of the strong view that this report is inaccurate, false and misleading and incomplete.  I feel this report fails to accurately represent completeness, accuracy, quality, and clarity of the information in the EIS. I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD30759158) because the proposal is out of character to the area, as it is altering a rural landscape to one of commercial.  Page 11 of the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) lists the feasible alternatives that were investigated. One of these scenarios was the “Do Nothing”, approach which will result in “the site remaining predominantly rural, unplanned, and unserved”. I strongly support the Do‐Nothing approach, which leaves the site “predominantly rural”. I chose to live in Catherine Field because its rural and have lived here for 15 years, enjoying, and appreciating the beautiful rural region with my husband and children. Since the day we heard about the Minarah College proposal, we now live in fear that this proposal will greatly transform and ruin this beautiful rural place we have lived in and will take away and transform Catherine Field into something commercial.  As residents of Catherine Field, we are left feeling that our rights and wants are no longer valued and ignored by both local and state government. How can state and local governments stand by and cause such heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields. When has it become ok that those with deep pockets can go about their business and change and ruin a beautiful rural area and the poor residents from Catherine Fields, most from working class families, farmers, elderly people feel that they have no rights because they do not have deep pockets to fight such cashed up organizations. This is so not Australian. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.Governments talk about the importance of protecting and conserving the environment, its eco systems and wildlife. If this submission (Application Number SSD-30759158) goes ahead it will ruin the beautiful environment in Catherine Field. With the developments in Oran Park, Harrington Park, Gregory Hills, Smeaton Grange, many animals, and wildlife have become displaced. This is evident today by the fact that in Catherine Fields you see so many red belly black snakes, brown snakes, turtles, wallabies, and kangaroos roaming in the area. 10 years ago, this was not the case. Why? Because their natural habitat has been taken away and destroyed because developers and governments are more interested in making money then preserving and protecting the environment.  As a government, please consider not approving the “Minarah College” proposal as once the development goes ahead, the place is destroyed and the beauty that was once Catherine Fields will be gone forever and can never be returned. Please leave Catherine Filed as a “rural, unplanned and unserved” area with no College/School in it. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.The Catherine Field community does not have a Fijian Muslim community residing in it. It simply doesn’t exist. The Minarah College will be serving a community that resides outside of Catherine Field. Hence, the people residing in Catherine Field will not benefit from this school, Minarah College. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.

11826

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD-30759158) because I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 9. Traffic, Transport & Accessibility have been satisfied by Ason Group's "Surveyed Traffic Volumes" as it was conducted during Covid-19, being a 'pandemic event' as declared by the World Health Organisation. Ason group themselves state on pages 24-25 "This has a potential impact on the integrity and consistency of any traffic surveys undertaken during this period"  Increased Traffic – If the Minarah College proposal goes ahead, this will cause major disruption to the residents of Catherine Fields. Increased traffic flow will cause major disruption to families trying to take children to school in the morning and afternoon pickup from school. Furthermore, families travelling to work in the morning will be greatly impacted by the increased volume of traffic as well.  Of major concern is that as the roads in Catherine Field are only single lane roads, the exit to Bringelly Road or Camden Valley Way Road will be clogged up with the cars from parents and buses coming and going from Minarah College. Minarah College, is planned to accommodate 1,580 students. That’s a lot of cars and buses coming into Catherine Field and lining the streets to exit Catherine Fields. I am highly concerned of the longwait times, I and other families in the Catherine Field area will have to endure. “We will be stuck” in our own street trying to get children to school and ourselves to work”.  In addition, I am concerned of my ability to get to work on time and my children to school on time. I am concerned of loss of employment as a direct consequence of being late to work and children receiving late notes from the school for being late to school.  If the state government passes the Monarah College proposal, it would cause so much disruption and heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields.  This is very unfair for the State Government to place such a hardship on the residents of Catherine Fields. Once again, I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 11. Noise and Vibration have been met as the assessment carried out by Day Design Pty Ltd's "Measured Ambient Noise Level', for the following reasons. (a) The noise and vibration assessment were conducted during Covid-19 lockdown and (b) secondly due to their admission of a missing noise logger at 'Location A' for 18 days out of the 25 days.  I am of the strong view that this report is inaccurate, false and misleading and incomplete.  I feel this report fails to accurately represent completeness, accuracy, quality, and clarity of the information in the EIS. I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD30759158) because the proposal is out of character to the area, as it is altering a rural landscape to one of commercial.  Page 11 of the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) lists the feasible alternatives that were investigated. One of these scenarios was the “Do Nothing”, approach which will result in “the site remaining predominantly rural, unplanned, and unserved”. I strongly support the Do‐Nothing approach, which leaves the site “predominantly rural”. I chose to live in Catherine Field because its rural and have lived here for 15 years, enjoying, and appreciating the beautiful rural region with my husband and children. Since the day we heard about the Minarah College proposal, we now live in fear that this proposal will greatly transform and ruin this beautiful rural place we have lived in and will take away and transform Catherine Field into something commercial.  As residents of Catherine Field, we are left feeling that our rights and wants are no longer valued and ignored by both local and state government. How can state and local governments stand by and cause such heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields. When has it become ok that those with deep pockets can go about their business and change and ruin a beautiful rural area and the poor residents from Catherine Fields, most from working class families, farmers, elderly people feel that they have no rights because they do not have deep pockets to fight such cashed up organizations. This is so not Australian. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.Governments talk about the importance of protecting and conserving the environment, its eco systems and wildlife. If this submission (Application Number SSD-30759158) goes ahead it will ruin the beautiful environment in Catherine Field. With the developments in Oran Park, Harrington Park, Gregory Hills, Smeaton Grange, many animals, and wildlife have become displaced. This is evident today by the fact that in Catherine Fields you see so many red belly black snakes, brown snakes, turtles, wallabies, and kangaroos roaming in the area. 10 years ago, this was not the case. Why? Because their natural habitat has been taken away and destroyed because developers and governments are more interested in making money then preserving and protecting the environment.  As a government, please consider not approving the “Minarah College” proposal as once the development goes ahead, the place is destroyed and the beauty that was once Catherine Fields will be gone forever and can never be returned. Please leave Catherine Filed as a “rural, unplanned and unserved” area with no College/School in it. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.The Catherine Field community does not have a Fijian Muslim community residing in it. It simply doesn’t exist. The Minarah College will be serving a community that resides outside of Catherine Field. Hence, the people residing in Catherine Field will not benefit from this school, Minarah College. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.

11831

Redacted

24/01/2026

Object

Website

I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD-30759158) because I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 9. Traffic, Transport & Accessibility have been satisfied by Ason Group's "Surveyed Traffic Volumes" as it was conducted during Covid-19, being a 'pandemic event' as declared by the World Health Organisation. Ason group themselves state on pages 24-25 "This has a potential impact on the integrity and consistency of any traffic surveys undertaken during this period"  Increased Traffic – If the Minarah College proposal goes ahead, this will cause major disruption to the residents of Catherine Fields. Increased traffic flow will cause major disruption to families trying to take children to school in the morning and afternoon pickup from school. Furthermore, families travelling to work in the morning will be greatly impacted by the increased volume of traffic as well.  Of major concern is that as the roads in Catherine Field are only single lane roads, the exit to Bringelly Road or Camden Valley Way Road will be clogged up with the cars from parents and buses coming and going from Minarah College. Minarah College, is planned to accommodate 1,580 students. That’s a lot of cars and buses coming into Catherine Field and lining the streets to exit Catherine Fields. I am highly concerned of the longwait times, I and other families in the Catherine Field area will have to endure. “We will be stuck” in our own street trying to get children to school and ourselves to work”.  In addition, I am concerned of my ability to get to work on time and my children to school on time. I am concerned of loss of employment as a direct consequence of being late to work and children receiving late notes from the school for being late to school.  If the state government passes the Monarah College proposal, it would cause so much disruption and heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields.  This is very unfair for the State Government to place such a hardship on the residents of Catherine Fields. Once again, I do not believe that the SEARs requirements of 11. Noise and Vibration have been met as the assessment carried out by Day Design Pty Ltd's "Measured Ambient Noise Level', for the following reasons. (a) The noise and vibration assessment were conducted during Covid-19 lockdown and (b) secondly due to their admission of a missing noise logger at 'Location A' for 18 days out of the 25 days.  I am of the strong view that this report is inaccurate, false and misleading and incomplete.  I feel this report fails to accurately represent completeness, accuracy, quality, and clarity of the information in the EIS. I OBJECT against the proposal “Minarah College” (Application Number SSD30759158) because the proposal is out of character to the area, as it is altering a rural landscape to one of commercial.  Page 11 of the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) lists the feasible alternatives that were investigated. One of these scenarios was the “Do Nothing”, approach which will result in “the site remaining predominantly rural, unplanned, and unserved”. I strongly support the Do‐Nothing approach, which leaves the site “predominantly rural”. I chose to live in Catherine Field because its rural and have lived here for 15 years, enjoying, and appreciating the beautiful rural region with my husband and children. Since the day we heard about the Minarah College proposal, we now live in fear that this proposal will greatly transform and ruin this beautiful rural place we have lived in and will take away and transform Catherine Field into something commercial.  As residents of Catherine Field, we are left feeling that our rights and wants are no longer valued and ignored by both local and state government. How can state and local governments stand by and cause such heart ache to the residents of Catherine Fields. When has it become ok that those with deep pockets can go about their business and change and ruin a beautiful rural area and the poor residents from Catherine Fields, most from working class families, farmers, elderly people feel that they have no rights because they do not have deep pockets to fight such cashed up organizations. This is so not Australian. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.Governments talk about the importance of protecting and conserving the environment, its eco systems and wildlife. If this submission (Application Number SSD-30759158) goes ahead it will ruin the beautiful environment in Catherine Field. With the developments in Oran Park, Harrington Park, Gregory Hills, Smeaton Grange, many animals, and wildlife have become displaced. This is evident today by the fact that in Catherine Fields you see so many red belly black snakes, brown snakes, turtles, wallabies, and kangaroos roaming in the area. 10 years ago, this was not the case. Why? Because their natural habitat has been taken away and destroyed because developers and governments are more interested in making money then preserving and protecting the environment.  As a government, please consider not approving the “Minarah College” proposal as once the development goes ahead, the place is destroyed and the beauty that was once Catherine Fields will be gone forever and can never be returned. Please leave Catherine Filed as a “rural, unplanned and unserved” area with no College/School in it. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.The Catherine Field community does not have a Fijian Muslim community residing in it. It simply doesn’t exist. The Minarah College will be serving a community that resides outside of Catherine Field. Hence, the people residing in Catherine Field will not benefit from this school, Minarah College. On this basis I STRONLY Object to the Minarah College proposal.

11341

Redacted

23/01/2026

Object

Website

Over 20 years I have visited or lived on Heatherfield Close. I am aware there is no sewage infrastructure to support such a use for the property. Additionally, the roads and parking situation will not support the concept of a school complex. Previously zoned as a farm, and with intense micro-homes having been built locally, it is important to keep locations as enclaves rural. This is necessary not merely due to the all the infrastructure of water, sewage and traffic, but for the environment. Although it might seem far-fetched,multiple less developed land, as farms will become critical to balance the population explosion recently in this region, although clearly planned from the late 1980's. The imminent environmental problems we face now and in the near future depends upon protecting regions. This land has had few developments to date over time, putting it in one of the best positions to preserve not develop. Although I do not live here now, I have over the years. It is still a home to wildlife where there are so few spots in the area left for animal life.

11376

Redacted

23/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly object to the proposed development of a school for 980+ students at this site for the following reasons: • Flooding and Safety Concerns: The site is known to experience flooding. This creates safety hazards for students and staff and increases the likelihood of septic failure and pollution during heavy rainfall. • Severe Traffic Impacts: The one road in/out cannot safely handle the traffic associated with a school of this size. The development would create congestion, reduce road safety, and impact emergency access and residential amenity. • Septic System Risk: A development of this scale should not operate on a septic system. The waste load significantly increases the risk of system failure, overflow, and environmental contamination. • Overall Site Unsuitability: The combined infrastructure limitations, flood risk, and road constraints make this site fundamentally inappropriate for a school of this scale. For these reasons, I strongly urge Council to reject the development application.

11386

Redacted

23/01/2026

Object

Website

The proposed project and plans is incompatible with the current infrastructure, with no plans to add to it. There is insufficient parking, sewage, traffic flow and road surface, and no walkways. The project will substantially negatively impact the local residents and community structure

11216

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed construction of Minarah College in Catherine Field, NSW. Catherine Field is a small, semi-rural community that has historically been characterised by low-density development, open land, and a quiet residential environment. The scale and intensity of the proposed Minarah College development is not consistent with the existing character of the area and would represent a significant overdevelopment of a semi-rural township. Of particular concern is the impact this development would have on local infrastructure. Catherine Field and the surrounding road network are not designed to accommodate the increased traffic volumes associated with a large school, including daily drop-off and pick-up congestion, staff vehicles, buses, and ongoing service traffic. This raises serious safety concerns for local residents, especially during peak hours. Additionally, the proposed development risks placing pressure on local services and utilities that are already limited in a semi-rural setting. Noise, loss of amenity, and the reduction of open space will negatively affect the lifestyle of existing residents who chose to live in Catherine Field due to its rural character and lower population density. While education facilities are important, they must be appropriately located and scaled to suit their surrounding environment. In this case, the proposed Minarah College is not suitable for Catherine Field and does not align with responsible or sustainable planning for the area. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the proposal be reconsidered or refused, and that the semi-rural character and capacity of Catherine Field be properly protected.

11231

New South Wales 2557

22/01/2026

Object

Website

The cathrine field suburb is not adequately equiped to support such developments

11236

New South Wales 2557

22/01/2026

Object

Website

Catherine field suburb cannot support this development

11241

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

# Submission to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) **Re: Proposed Minarah College School, Catherine Field** I am writing to lodge a formal submission opposing the proposed Minarah College school development at Catherine Field. My opposition is based on significant planning, environmental, infrastructure, and land‑use concerns that have not been adequately addressed and that pose long‑term risks to the local community and surrounding rural landscape. --- ## 1. Built Form and Design The proposed built form is inconsistent with the established rural and semi‑rural character of Catherine Field. The scale, massing, and intensity of the development are more characteristic of a metropolitan educational facility rather than a low‑density rural setting. The visual bulk of buildings, hardstand areas, fencing, and associated infrastructure would result in an intrusive development that diminishes the open landscape values of the area. In addition, the design does not adequately transition between the school site and neighbouring properties, many of which are rural residential or agricultural in nature. This lack of appropriate setbacks, buffers, and landscape screening will negatively impact visual amenity, privacy, and the overall character of the locality. --- ## 2. Flooding Flooding is a significant concern for this site. Catherine Field is known to experience flood events, and development of this scale increases the risk of adverse flooding impacts both on‑site and downstream. Extensive hard surfaces such as buildings, car parks, and driveways reduce natural infiltration and increase stormwater runoff. There is insufficient confidence that proposed mitigation measures will effectively manage flood risk during major rainfall events, particularly as climate change increases the frequency and severity of extreme weather. Locating a school—where large numbers of children and staff are present—on flood‑prone land raises serious safety concerns. --- ## 3. Land Use Compatibility The proposed school is not compatible with the existing and intended land uses of the area. Catherine Field has a predominantly rural and low‑density residential character, with land uses focused on agriculture, lifestyle properties, and limited local‑scale development. Introducing a large school will fundamentally alter the nature of the area, creating conflicts between rural activities and high‑intensity institutional use. Noise, lighting, traffic, and ongoing operational impacts are likely to affect surrounding landowners and reduce the rural amenity that residents expect and value. --- ## 4. Site Servicing Concerns remain regarding the adequacy of site servicing, including water, sewer, stormwater, electricity, and waste management. Rural areas are typically not designed to accommodate the servicing demands of a large educational facility. Upgrading or extending infrastructure to support the development may place an unreasonable burden on existing systems and could result in future costs being transferred to the broader community. There is also concern that servicing requirements will further urbanise the area, undermining its rural planning intent. --- ## 5. Traffic and Parking Traffic generation associated with a school of this size will be substantial, particularly during morning drop‑off and afternoon pick‑up times. Local roads in Catherine Field are not designed to accommodate high traffic volumes, buses, or increased turning movements. Insufficient on‑site parking and vehicle queuing capacity will likely lead to congestion, illegal parking, and unsafe conditions on surrounding roads. This presents safety risks to students, staff, local residents, cyclists, and pedestrians. --- ## 6. Transport Access The site is poorly serviced by public transport, making the development heavily reliant on private vehicles. This is inconsistent with sustainable planning principles and will further exacerbate traffic and parking issues. Limited footpaths, cycling infrastructure, and safe pedestrian crossings in the area mean that active transport options are not realistic for many students and families. As a result, car dependency will be high, placing ongoing pressure on local road networks. --- ## 7. Other Considerations – School in a Rural Area Locating a large school in a rural area sets an undesirable precedent for further institutional and urban development in Catherine Field. This undermines long‑term strategic planning objectives aimed at protecting rural land, agricultural productivity, and environmental values. Schools of this scale are more appropriately located within established urban areas where supporting infrastructure, public transport, and services already exist. Placing the school in a rural setting shifts the impacts and costs of urban development into an area not intended to support them. --- ## Conclusion For the reasons outlined above—built form and design, flooding risk, land use incompatibility, inadequate site servicing, traffic and parking impacts, poor transport access, and the inappropriateness of a large school in a rural area—I respectfully request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. This proposal does not represent orderly, sustainable, or compatible development and poses unacceptable risks to the character, safety, and long‑term planning outcomes of the Catherine Field community.

11246

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

# Submission to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) **Re: Proposed Minarah College School, Catherine Field** I am making this submission to formally oppose the proposed Minarah College school development at Catherine Field. My opposition is based on a range of serious concerns relating to planning suitability, infrastructure capacity, environmental risk, and the long-term impact on the local rural community. As a local resident, I work in the area and am raising a young family in Catherine Field. The proposed development raises significant issues that would directly affect the safety, liveability, and future character of our community. --- ## 1. Built Form and Visual Impact The size and intensity of the proposed school are not appropriate for the rural setting of Catherine Field. The development represents a substantial built form that is out of scale with surrounding properties and inconsistent with the open, low-density landscape that defines the area. Large buildings, extensive hardstand areas, fencing, and associated infrastructure will create an urban-style footprint that is visually dominant and incompatible with neighbouring rural and semi-rural land uses. The proposal does not adequately protect the visual amenity or rural character valued by local residents. --- ## 2. Flood Risk and Safety Flooding remains a major concern for this site. The Catherine Field area has a known history of flooding, and increasing site coverage with buildings and paved surfaces will reduce natural drainage and increase runoff. The placement of a school on land affected by flooding presents unacceptable safety risks, particularly for children. There is insufficient assurance that flood mitigation strategies will be effective during extreme weather events, which are becoming more frequent. --- ## 3. Land Use Conflict The proposed school is not a compatible land use within this rural locality. Catherine Field is characterised by agricultural land and low-density residential properties, where residents reasonably expect limited noise, traffic, and large-scale activity. A high-intensity educational facility will introduce ongoing impacts such as increased noise, lighting, and activity levels that conflict with existing rural uses and diminish the quiet enjoyment of neighbouring properties. --- ## 4. Infrastructure and Servicing Constraints There are ongoing concerns regarding the ability of local infrastructure to support a development of this scale. Rural areas are not typically equipped to service large institutional uses, particularly in relation to sewer, stormwater, power, and waste management. Any required upgrades risk placing pressure on existing infrastructure and contributing to the gradual urbanisation of Catherine Field, contrary to its intended planning outcomes. --- ## 5. Traffic and Parking Impacts The traffic impacts associated with the proposed school have not been adequately addressed. Daily drop-off and pick-up periods will generate significant congestion on surrounding local roads, which are not designed for high traffic volumes or frequent bus movements. Limited road capacity, combined with insufficient on-site parking and queuing space, is likely to result in unsafe traffic conditions, increased delays, and parking overflow into surrounding streets. --- ## 6. Transport and Accessibility The site is poorly served by public transport, meaning the school will rely heavily on private vehicles. This level of car dependency is not sustainable and is inappropriate for a rural area with limited transport infrastructure. Pedestrian and cycling access is also inadequate, with a lack of footpaths and safe crossings. This further reinforces reliance on cars and adds to safety concerns for families and local residents. --- ## 7. Broader Rural Planning Considerations Approving a large school in a rural area sets a concerning precedent for future development. It increases pressure for further urban-style uses and infrastructure, eroding the rural character and purpose of Catherine Field over time. Schools of this size are better located within established urban areas where appropriate transport, services, and supporting infrastructure already exist. For the reasons outlined above, I respectfully urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the proposed Minarah College development. The proposal is not appropriate for its location and would have lasting negative impacts on traffic, safety, infrastructure, and the rural character of Catherine Field. As a local resident, worker, and parent of young children, I am deeply concerned about the long-term consequences this development would have on our community.

11251

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

# Submission to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) **Re: Proposed Minarah College School, Catherine Field** We are writing to lodge a submission opposing the proposed Minarah College school development at Catherine Field. We live in the nearby suburb of Leppington and regularly visit Catherine Field to spend time with our children and grandchildren. While we do not live directly within Catherine Field, we have a strong connection to the area and are concerned about the long-term impacts this development may have on the rural character of the locality and the safety and wellbeing of families. --- ## Impact on Rural Character Catherine Field is valued for its rural setting, open spaces, and quieter environment. The proposed school represents a large-scale, urban-style development that does not reflect the character of the area. We are concerned that approving a school of this size will change the nature of Catherine Field permanently, leading to increased traffic, noise, and pressure for further development. Once rural land is lost to intensive uses, it is very difficult to restore. --- ## Safety and Access for Families As grandparents, our primary concern is safety. Increased traffic, particularly during school drop-off and pick-up times, will make local roads busier and potentially more dangerous. We regularly travel to Catherine Field to visit our grandchildren, and we worry that congestion and road safety issues will make these trips more difficult and less safe for families, particularly for young children. --- ## Impact on Community and Future Generations We believe it is important to protect rural areas like Catherine Field for future generations. Large developments that are not suited to the area risk changing the community feel and placing unnecessary strain on local infrastructure. Schools of this scale should be located in areas that already have appropriate transport, services, and road networks, rather than rural locations that are not designed to support them. For these reasons, we respectfully ask the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Field. We believe the proposal is not appropriate for its location and will negatively impact the rural environment, local families, and future generations. As grandparents with close family ties to Catherine Field, we are deeply concerned about what this development may mean for our grandchildren, family connections, and the long-term character of the area.

11291

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

The is no infrastructure planned to support this development - no sewerage, road upgrades, parking or walkways planned. The local roads are already saturated with other developments nearby, there are better locations for large establishments such as this school with better traffic flow and access to connecting transport. The planned location will cause excessive gridlock and would be better placed closer to areas with direct access to trains. The area is serviced by sewage systems and cannot cope with an establishment that would create so much waste. There are no footpaths or walkways for kilometers, nor parking. The proposed project needs to be moved to a more appropriate location and would cause very significant to residents in the area.

11301

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

I have read Camden Council opposition to the amended application and agree with all of their concerns. Due to this section of Catherine Field no where near being in any precinct planning, I object. The ema area is too small There will not be enough potable water There will definitely not be enough car parking spaces onsite One shuttle bus will not fix the road and traffic issues The noise throughout construction and during school time & after hours & weekends will be at unacceptable levels The building will not fit the current characteristics of the rural area

11306

Redacted

22/01/2026

Object

Website

I have concerns over the amount of children that will be driven to school from out of area. The influx of vehicles will cause queuing and unnecessary traffic along the roads. The public buses are not consistent enough to service the school and one 12.5m bus will not make a difference. The roads are often closed and dangerous due to flooding. The infrastructure that is there will not be able to hold a development of this size