Minarah College

10311

New South Wales 2557

14/01/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident of Catherine Field and I absolutely oppose the development for the below mentioned; Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This development will impact our local community terribly. It will cause major traffic and chaos to our peaceful community. We have no infrastructure to cope with this size development. Our roads are already compromised with terrible maintenance. I also want to state that these people applying for this development have out right lied from the very beginning as to what exactly is being built. We as a community were led into believing this was going to be a sports field originally and now it’s a 1500 pupils + staff school who want to operate 7 days a week outside of school hours. I am not convinced this development will end at this and believe it will continue to grow with out approval once this development is approved. This development cannot be considered and I ask as a life long resident of Catherine Field to have your support and have this application abolished

10316

New South Wales 2557

14/01/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident of Catherine Fields and I absolutely oppose the development for the below mentioned; Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This development will impact our local community terribly. It will cause major traffic and chaos to our peaceful community. We have no infrastructure to cope with this size development. Our roads are already compromised with terrible maintenance. I also want to state that these people applying for this development have out right lied from the very beginning as to what exactly is being built. We as a community were led into believing this was going to be a sports field originally and now it’s a 1500 pupils + staff school who want to operate 7 days a week outside of school hours. I am not convinced this development will end at this and believe it will continue to grow with out approval once this development is approved. This development cannot be considered and I ask as a resident of Catherine Field to have your support and have this application abolished

10336

13/01/2026

Object

Email

To the Commissioners, Dear Sir/ Madam, This letter serves to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. Catherine Field is still a semi-rural area hence such development poses significant risks to the local community. I have listed below vital issues showing my concerns: 1. Traffic Conditions and Safety Impacts • Lack of Infrastructure: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate hundreds of vehicles on a daily basis. • Safety Risks: Most pupils will depend on private vehicles which will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. • Pedestrian Danger: Lack of footpaths and lighting will make conditions dangerous for student and others. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss • Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. • Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. • Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing • Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. • Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Kind Regards, Maurie Camilleri,

10341

13/01/2026

Object

Email

To the Commissioners, Dear Sir/ Madam, I write this letter formally objecting to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. Catherine Field is still a semi-rural area hence such development poses significant risks to the local community. I have listed below vital issues showing my concerns: 1. Traffic Conditions and Safety Impacts • Lack of Infrastructure: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate hundreds of vehicles on a daily basis. • Safety Risks: Most pupils will depend on private vehicles which will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. • Pedestrian Danger: Lack of footpaths and lighting will make conditions dangerous for student and others. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss • Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. • Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. • Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing • Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. • Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Kind Regards, Dianne Camilleri,

10161

Redacted

13/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to Minarah College proposal. The increase in hard stand areas on the land will push overland flood waters away from the property and impact neighbours and properties down stream. The effluent management area seems inconsistent with the large student and staff numbers. It will cause excessive downtime after heavy and long rain periods preventing the students from having sufficient open play areas.

10196

New South Wales 2557

13/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly oppose the proposed Minarah College in Catherine field road, Catherine field, these are some of the reasons why. Catherine field road & other roads in Catherine field are in a poor state & require constant repairs, these roads are too small to support large flows of traffic. Stormwater runoff, there will be large areas of hard surfaces, roofs , playgrounds , paths, driveways, areas for loading & unloading of buses & also pick ups & drop offs. Where will all this water go? The proposed is on the high side of the road, some runoff might end up in adjacent, most of this runoff will probably drain to Catherine field road where it might cause damage to the road shoulders. Catherine field road has no footpaths or gutters & no stormwater system. A lot of this water might just cross Catherine field road & drain onto properties with a lower elevation. The hours of operation are totally unacceptable. There is currently no connection to Sydney water for sewage & waste water. I don't believe a septic system could cope with the proposed numbers of students, teachers & staff, the spray irrigation area would need to be much larger than has been allowed for. No one would argue that more schools are needed in growing areas, however they need to be built on land that is zoned for schools, land that already has the necessary infrastructure. Things like proper roads, footpaths, gutters, stormwater systems, sewage connection,& street lighting.

10206

New South Wales 2567

13/01/2026

Object

Website

I do not understand why the people that want to build the Minarah College in Catherine Field don't just buy a property that is already zoned for a school. Most of the problems they are having with the Catherine Field Rd proposal would disappear. Things like small roads in poor condition, roads not fully sealed (gravel sides), no street lighting, no footpaths, no storm water system & no sewage connection to Sydney Water. It seems to me a cheaper option was taken instead of just getting what was required to start with. I see huge problems with stormwater run off, septic systems, hours of operation, larger amounts of traffic entering & leaving the school. I strongly oppose the building & operation of the Minarah College in Catherine Field.

10216

Redacted

13/01/2026

Object

Website

The Local LGA can not withstand the traffic congestion to accommodate a school of this size. The infrastructure is not equipped sufficiently, in addition the septic sewer in this area is a concern given the sheer volume of student/ teachers on any given school day. I believe the suburb is not equipped for children in particular safety eg crossing roads/ flood zone.

10296

Redacted

13/01/2026

Object

Website

I disagree with this proposal local roads and traffic would be highly effectived

9926

New South Wales 2557

12/01/2026

Object

Website

Please see attached letter

minarah submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 60.82 KB)

9931

New South Wales 2557

12/01/2026

Object

Website

Please see attached letter.

Jamie Minarah Submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 60.3 KB)

9936

New South Wales 2570

12/01/2026

Object

Website

Sewerage Noise Parking issues Privacy Damaged roads

9941

New South Wales 2570

12/01/2026

Object

Website

Sewerage issues Parking issues Noise issues Road damage pot home issues Privacy issues

10126

Redacted

12/01/2026

Object

Website

I object based on all the reasons listed: Built form and design Flooding Land use compatibility Site servicing Traffic & parking Transport access This proposal, if approved will adversely change the rural outlook of the area. The enormous proposed population defies the recommendation of the Department of Planning and Environment of only 650 students. Letter dated 3 may 2023 from Karen Harragon, Director, Social and Infrastructure Assessments (see page 4 of the attached) To even consider this proposal to be 'acceptable' is unreasonable.

650 students doc.pdf (PDF, 77.95 KB)

10131

Redacted

12/01/2026

Object

Website

No Sewer or Water: There are zero sewer connections. The developer intends to manage waste for 980 students plus 51 FTE staff on-site in a rural zone, which is an environmental time bomb. Overland Flooding Risk: The site is prone to overland flooding. Building a school here puts students at risk and will inevitably push floodwaters onto neighboring properties. Dangerous "Infrastructure-Free" Roads: The only access is via Catherine Field road which are narrow, rural roads. These roads have no footpaths, no streetlights, and cannot handle the proposed amount of daily car movements this school will generate. Zoning Betrayal: RU4 land is protected for food production. Paving it over for a high-intensity school—without providing the necessary infrastructure—destroys our rural fringe and sets a precedent for "planning by stealth". The proposal is essentially dumping a massive population into a rural area with no way to support it.

10136

Redacted

12/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing as a local resident to object to the proposed development of Minarah College at Catherine Field (SSD-30759158). While I acknowledge the need for educational infrastructure in growing regions, I believe this specific proposal remains unsuitable for the following reasons: Infrastructure Incompatibility: The current rural road network, specifically Catherine Field Road, is narrow, lacks kerbs, gutters, and footpaths, and cannot safely support the projected traffic for a 980-student campus. Zoning and Character: The site is zoned RU4 (Primary Production Small Lots). A large-scale educational facility is inconsistent with the existing semi-rural character and creates a significant land-use conflict with neighboring primary producers. Environmental & Utility Concerns: The area lacks a connection to the town sewerage system. The proposed reliance on on-site wastewater treatment and irrigation poses risks of odor and runoff into South Creek, especially during heavy rain events. Operational Impacts: The proposed hours of operation and use of school facilities for community events on weekends will create unacceptable noise and light pollution for a quiet rural community. I urge the Commission to reject this application due to these critical infrastructure and environmental gaps.

10141

Redacted

12/01/2026

Object

Website

While the Department’s 2025 Assessment Report claims the project meets "State government priorities" for social infrastructure, I believe this assessment overlooks the significant negative impacts on the specific social fabric and character of Catherine Field. My objection is based on the following grounds: Incompatibility with Local Social Fabric: Catherine Field is a quiet, semi-rural community characterized by primary production, open spaces, and a low-density "village" atmosphere. Introducing a 980-student campus—alongside an Early Learning Centre and community facilities—will irrevocably alter this landscape into a high-activity hub, destroying the peaceful environment that residents have enjoyed for generations. Lack of Direct Local Benefit: Evidence suggests the school is not intended to serve the immediate Catherine Field population, which currently lacks the school-age density to justify such a facility. Instead, it will serve a community largely residing outside the area, forcing the local residents to bear the "social costs"—such as noise, congestion, and light pollution—without receiving a proportional social benefit. orced Reliance on Private Vehicles: The site is poorly serviced by public transport, with only one bus stop south of the site providing extremely limited service. Local children already face a lack of reliable bus services, often forcing parents to drive them. With no safe, existing pedestrian or cycle paths, and the applicant acknowledging that no new council-planned footpaths are in the pipeline, the vast majority of the 980 students will be driven in private vehicles. Localized Traffic Chaos: Estimates suggest that if 85% of students are driven, hundreds of cars will descend on Catherine Field Road in a narrow one-hour window. This rural road is narrow, lacks kerbs, and has no capacity for the "overflow" of vehicles during peak pick-up and drop-off times. Erosion of Rural Character: The use of school facilities for community events on weekends and late evenings (up to 9:00 pm) will create a "noise bomb" in a traditionally quiet area. This intensification of use is a direct land-use conflict with neighbors who have chosen this area specifically for its rural tranquility and safety. Safety and Community Displacement: The increase in traffic on narrow, substandard roads like Catherine Field Road poses a direct safety risk. This forced change in lifestyle effectively displaces the existing community's way of life in favor of regional infrastructure that the local network cannot support. "Social infrastructure" should enhance the community it sits within, not overwhelm it. I urge the Commission to prioritize the preservation of Catherine Field's unique social fabric over this incompatible development.

10146

Redacted

12/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to this proposal No Services: This is a rural zone with no [sewerage/proper drainage]. The environmental impact of a massive campus on this fragile land will be permanent. Environmental and Infrastructure Gaps: The built form requires massive earthworks (removal of ~230 trees) and an on-site wastewater treatment plant due to a lack of town sewerage. This design is high-risk; in a flood-prone area like ours, any failure in on-site treatment poses a significant health risk to the local community. Overland Flooding Risk: The site is prone to overland flooding. Building a school here puts students at risk and will inevitably push floodwaters onto neighboring farms and homes. Incompatible Built Form and Urban Design: The proposed two-story scale and high-density campus design are a "bad fit" for the RU4 Small Lot Primary Production zone. This institutional-style architecture ignores the local rural aesthetics and will dominate the low-rise, open-landscape character of Catherine Field, permanently destroying the "village" atmosphere. A development of this intensity and design is simply the wrong project for this location.

9916

Redacted

11/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to this development base on all the concerns that have been listed. The large scale size of the buildings will increase the flooding impacts on surrounding properties. Catherine Feild is a rural RU4 zoned area with vast farmland. This development is not in the public interest. The hours of operation are ridiculous & will disturb the neighborhood’s right to quiet enjoymnet. The roads will need to be widened & maintained to a higher standard to current conditions. It is unsafe for students to be expected to play on the ema field that seconds as a sports field. Camden council enforces specific toal area for the distribution of effluent with specific buffer areas from boundaries. There are no public transport facilities & one bus will NOT alleviate the traffic congestion. To expect the community to put up with excessive traffic on the rural rounds is pathetic

9921

Redacted

11/01/2026

Object

Website

I strongly oppose a development of this size on Catherine Field road. The students health will be at risk: playing on sports field with effluent disbursed only centremetres below ground, there is no safe footpaths or bicycle lanes for children to travel to school without fear of being hit by cars. The application only talks about one bus service. I note: travelling from Leppington to Minto train stations back to the site will take an hour, this will only alleviate a maximum of 70-80 students. The flood evacuation plan is risky especially for the special education centre and early childhood students. The school in Camden was rejected in the Land and Environment court many years ago. I don’t see why this development is any different. Only that there was a larger land size and less Students I urge you to reject this application for the safety of the students

9911

Redacted

10/01/2026

Object

Website

Please refer to the attached document for my submission.

Minarah College Submission.pdf (PDF, 48.02 KB)

9881

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

I would like to express my great concerns over the application that is being lodged to build a school/college on Catherine Fields Road. I am totally against any school, of any type, being built in Catherine Field. It is a very small, quiet rural town and this is why I live here. I don’t want it to change or develop. Traffic has already increased since all these estates are opening around us and the opening of the road from Oran Park straight onto Springfield Road which has further impacted the traffic and the condition of the road. I myself work in a high school and know the amount of traffic a school creates at various times of the day and evening depending on what is happening in the school calendar - buses coming and going for sports and excursions as well, and this proposed school wants to run events til 10pm at night, how is this ok?? What safety and security measures are being put in place. They have also expressed the hours of the school being much more extensive then they expressed in their very short, one time only ‘community zoom’ that they barely advertised. They have purchased three 5 acre blocks – that’s 15 acres that they will utitlised each and every day for long hours. They plan to run sporting and religious activities in and outside of school hours. This will create many problems, such as constant traffic – This will further damage our roads that are constantly filled with pot holes already – the council has no intention of fixing the roads, parking – there will not be enough parking on site, there never is in schools, so the road and surrounding neighbours will have cars constantly parked on the side of the road and blocking their driveways - this happens at every school in the surrounding areas. The amount of car spots they are putting in wont even be enough for staff, let alone visitors, students and people dropping off their kids for daycare. Furthermore this would lead to road safety concerns due to many factors. The traffic lights on Camden Valley way / Catherine field road and Springfield and Catherine field road – only let 3-4 cars out at a time – this will create a constant back up of traffic due to the increase in cars, trucks, buses (both during construction and when the school opens and afterhours) and can lead to people taking dangerous chances to get through the lights causing unnecessary accidents or fatalities. This is not fair on residence who did not move to this area to be bombarded with traffic and all the problems that comes with that traffic. Including more dangerous road –accidents, a 40km zone on a rural street, one lane each direction, where at every school I have ever seen no matter how much on site parking or long driveway they have causes cars to just stop ON THE ROAD waiting to get in to drop or pick up their kids. This would cause much distress for neighbours and road users who are trying to go about their business and don’t expect traffic jams everyday on a rural road! There is no shoulder or safe place to stop and the road is one lane each way- therefore not enough space for an increase in traffic that this school will provide 7 DAYS A WEEK. We already have an increase of traffic on the weekends due to the softball/baseball teams that play on the weekends, that are crossing the road and parking all over the place near the sporting fields. All three corridors are currently unsafe for pedestrians in the current environment. There are no shoulders.The following key issues have been highlighted: 1. No pedestrian paths – making it extremely unsafe for both students walking/riding to school and if parents park outside and walk into school. 2. No pedestrian crossings – This cannot be placed on this rural road. 3. No bike paths of safe cycle ways 4. No/limited bus infrastructure 5. No level or even access, no kerbs, no drainage, or water retention, 6. Limited street lighting 7. Poor water catchment All of these further state that it is not safe nor should these things be put on this road as it is a RURAL area that is not designed for a project of this magnitude. There is extensive damage already on the roads, when they were just repaired about 3 weeks ago. It is again full of pot holes – and you have to drive all over the road to avoid them. The pot holes and damage will only increase with more traffic and accidents will happen as it is unsafe. Pollution in general – because who knows where there human waste will go to? I wasn’t allow to put in an extra toilet at my house but this school can have 1580+ people without town sewer! This cannot be ok. Where is the waste management plan showing exactly how waste will be managed at each stage including early works component of the development including demolition works and some preliminary construction works. Flooding is a massive problem on Catherine Field Road -This is especially true directly out the front of where this site is. We have videos showing the flooding outside of this site. What will happen when the entire 10 acres is covered in concrete and massive tin roofs, where would the water possibly go! Furthermore, with the flooding on the road, often the road is closed, what will this mean for the traffic? How will people get into the site, this again would cause further delays on the road and problems for other road users and the neighbours, with people or driving on the edges of the roads- further damaging the roads and front yards of residence. How will people be affected if traffic/parking demands or noise levels change? The report acknowledges that there will be additional noise through traffic and parking demands but states this is in line with planned future development. There has been no planned future development released for this area or Catherine Field. Why can they make comments like this to justify the increased problems with traffic and parking but supply no supporting evidence. The plan does not explain how people would be affected this has not been addressed. Maybe they need to go down to Austral and watch the mess that school has caused with traffic spilling onto other roads. There is no Stormwater Management Plan because there is NO STORM water drains in Catherine field. Rain run off – just from the two halls alone would be unbelievable amount of water, the block is already on a slope and already without the roof the road in front of the proposed sites floods emensly- how will the traffic be then when you cant drive on the road as its closed due to flooding – how will the students get in and out of school in heavy rain? Shouldn’t this be fully green walled and have all roof areas with eco friendly heat reflective roofs. When something is eco-friendly, it is not harmful to its surroundings and the environment. These products and materials may also encourage green practices, such as pollution reduction and conservation of natural resources. loss of agricultural land, losing valuable primary industry lands Camden's rural character and heritage.

9886

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. The scale and intensity of this proposal are fundamentally incompatible with the established semi-rural character of Catherine Field and present unacceptable risks to local residents and road users. My objection is based on the following key planning and community impacts. 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Road Safety Impacts Inadequate Rural Road Infrastructure Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road with no kerbs, gutters, footpaths, or safe road shoulders. It was not designed to support the level of traffic generated by a large-scale educational facility. The projected 700+ additional daily vehicle movements far exceed the safe capacity of this road. Severe Safety Risks and Congestion The proposal relies overwhelmingly on private vehicle access, with up to 90% of students expected to arrive by car. This will result in significant congestion and unsafe queuing at the single site entry and at major intersections, particularly Camden Valley Way. Emergency vehicle access during peak periods is also a serious concern. Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians and Cyclists There is no existing pedestrian or cycling infrastructure, and no street lighting along Catherine Fields Road. This makes any form of active transport impractical and unsafe, particularly for children, and further reinforces the unsuitability of this location for a school. 2. Loss of Rural Amenity and Noise Impacts Unreliable Noise Assessment The noise studies submitted with the application were undertaken during COVID-19 lockdown periods and do not reflect normal ambient noise conditions. In addition, key monitoring locations are missing, rendering the assessment unreliable as a basis for approval. Ongoing Operational Noise The proposed operating hours from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm, including weekend activities, are wholly inconsistent with the quiet, low-intensity rural living environment of Catherine Field. Daily school operations, events, and after-hours use will result in a permanent loss of rural amenity for surrounding residents. Excessive Construction Impacts A construction period of approximately 224 weeks, with noise levels reportedly reaching up to 86 dB, is unreasonable for a site located adjacent to residential and rural properties. This prolonged disruption would significantly impact the health and wellbeing of the local community. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing and Environmental Risk Lack of Sewer Infrastructure The site is not connected to Sydney Water’s sewerage network. Reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment system to service nearly 1,000 people raises serious concerns regarding system failure, odour, and the risk of effluent runoff into neighbouring rural properties. Flooding and Stormwater Impacts The extensive earthworks and increased hardstand areas proposed will worsen existing flooding issues in the locality. The development risks altering natural drainage patterns and increasing downstream impacts on surrounding land. You can see by the photos attached the flooding that occurs out the from of this site. Conclusion The minor reduction in proposed student numbers does not address the fundamental land-use conflict created by placing a large, high-intensity school in a semi-rural location lacking appropriate infrastructure. The proposal is unsafe, unsustainable, and incompatible with the established character of the area. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety.

611160679_10165778172968128_7344870327488917086_n.pdf (PDF, 168.52 KB)

9891

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. The scale and intensity of this proposal are fundamentally incompatible with the established semi-rural character of Catherine Field and present unacceptable risks to local residents and road users. My objection is based on the following key planning and community impacts. 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Road Safety Impacts Inadequate Rural Road Infrastructure Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road with no kerbs, gutters, footpaths, or safe road shoulders. It was not designed to support the level of traffic generated by a large-scale educational facility. The projected 700+ additional daily vehicle movements far exceed the safe capacity of this road. Severe Safety Risks and Congestion The proposal relies overwhelmingly on private vehicle access, with up to 90% of students expected to arrive by car. This will result in significant congestion and unsafe queuing at the single site entry and at major intersections, particularly Camden Valley Way. Emergency vehicle access during peak periods is also a serious concern. Unsafe Conditions for Pedestrians and Cyclists There is no existing pedestrian or cycling infrastructure, and no street lighting along Catherine Fields Road. This makes any form of active transport impractical and unsafe, particularly for children, and further reinforces the unsuitability of this location for a school. 2. Loss of Rural Amenity and Noise Impacts Unreliable Noise Assessment The noise studies submitted with the application were undertaken during COVID-19 lockdown periods and do not reflect normal ambient noise conditions. In addition, key monitoring locations are missing, rendering the assessment unreliable as a basis for approval. Ongoing Operational Noise The proposed operating hours from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm, including weekend activities, are wholly inconsistent with the quiet, low-intensity rural living environment of Catherine Field. Daily school operations, events, and after-hours use will result in a permanent loss of rural amenity for surrounding residents. Excessive Construction Impacts A construction period of approximately 224 weeks, with noise levels reportedly reaching up to 86 dB, is unreasonable for a site located adjacent to residential and rural properties. This prolonged disruption would significantly impact the health and wellbeing of the local community. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing and Environmental Risk Lack of Sewer Infrastructure The site is not connected to Sydney Water’s sewerage network. Reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment system to service nearly 1,000 people raises serious concerns regarding system failure, odour, and the risk of effluent runoff into neighbouring rural properties. Flooding and Stormwater Impacts The extensive earthworks and increased hardstand areas proposed will worsen existing flooding issues in the locality. The development risks altering natural drainage patterns and increasing downstream impacts on surrounding land. Conclusion The minor reduction in proposed student numbers does not address the fundamental land-use conflict created by placing a large, high-intensity school in a semi-rural location lacking appropriate infrastructure. The proposal is unsafe, unsustainable, and incompatible with the established character of the area. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety.

9896

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

see attachment

Submission .pdf (PDF, 127.46 KB)

9901

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed school development at Minara college on the basis that the application fails to adequately address the significant and foreseeable traffic and access impacts that will result from this development. The proposal does not demonstrate that the surrounding road network has the capacity to safely accommodate the volume of additional vehicle movements generated during peak school drop-off and pick-up periods. Local streets in the immediate vicinity are already constrained in width, visibility, and parking availability, and are not designed to support sustained increases in traffic associated with a development of this scale

9906

Redacted

09/01/2026

Object

Website

I write to formally object to the proposed school development at Minarah colleague on the basis that the application fails to adequately address the significant and foreseeable traffic and access impacts that will result from this development. The proposal does not demonstrate that the surrounding road network has the capacity to safely accommodate the volume of additional vehicle movements generated during peak school drop-off and pick-up periods. Local streets in the immediate vicinity are already constrained in width, visibility, and parking availability, and are not designed to support sustained increases in traffic associated with a development of this scale

9791

New South Wales 2557

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I am a local resident of Catherine Field and I object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. My objection is based on the unsuitability of the site and surrounding infrastructure for a large school development, particularly in relation to: • Poor and unsafe road conditions on Catherine Fields Road • Traffic congestion and traffic safety risks, especially for children • Inadequate wastewater treatment arrangements relying on on-site systems • Flooding risks, evacuation safety concerns, and downstream flood impacts These issues are not theoretical. They reflect existing and ongoing conditions experienced by residents. In my view, the proposal places an unacceptable burden on local infrastructure and creates risks to public safety that cannot be adequately mitigated through conditions of consent. Local Context Catherine Field remains a largely rural area with limited infrastructure. Catherine Fields Road is a rural road that already experiences safety and access issues, particularly during wet weather. The area is not yet fully released or serviced as part of the South West Growth Area, and essential infrastructure such as upgraded roads, footpaths, sewer services and flood-resilient access are not in place. Approving a major school in this location prematurely introduces a high-intensity land use without the necessary supporting infrastructure. Road Conditions – Catherine Fields Road Is Not Suitable Catherine Fields Road is narrow, poorly surfaced in sections, and lacks adequate shoulders, lighting and pedestrian infrastructure. The condition of the road deteriorates further during and after heavy rainfall, with potholes, surface degradation and water pooling commonly observed. As a local resident, I regularly experience and observe the following issues: • Narrow carriageway forcing vehicles to cross the center line • Poor road edges and drop-offs • Potholes and uneven surfaces • Water pooling and debris after storms • Limited visibility and lack of street lighting • Limited line of site with road geometry and co-located small hill These conditions already present safety risks for everyday users. Introducing a large school will significantly increase traffic volumes, turning movements, and driver stress during peak times, further increasing the likelihood of accidents. I remind the planning commission of 4 separate road fatalities in the local area within the last 10 years, that are well known incidents. Traffic Safety and Congestion Impacts A school generates concentrated traffic during short morning and afternoon peak periods. This includes: • Parent drop-off and pick-up vehicles • School buses • Staff vehicles • Delivery and service vehicles • Visitors and after-hours event traffic Even with on-site drop-off areas, real-world experience shows that overflow queuing, illegal stopping, U-turns and unsafe manoeuvres occur when road capacity is limited. Catherine Fields Road does not have the capacity or safety margins to absorb these additional movements without increasing risk to residents, students and other road users. Pedestrian Safety and Lack of Footpaths The surrounding road network lacks continuous pedestrian infrastructure. There are no safe, continuous footpaths extending beyond the site frontage, meaning children, staff and visitors would be exposed to traffic risks if walking to or from the site. This lack of pedestrian infrastructure is particularly concerning given that children are involved and that evacuation planning has already identified problems with safe pedestrian movement during flood events. A school should not be approved in a location where safe pedestrian access cannot be guaranteed. Limited Public Transport Access The site is not well served by public transport. The nearest bus stop is a considerable distance away and services are limited in frequency. As a result, most trips to and from the school will be by private car, further increasing traffic pressure on Catherine Fields Road and surrounding local roads. Wastewater Treatment and Public Health Concerns The site is not connected to reticulated sewer infrastructure and instead relies on an on-site wastewater management system. This is a major concern for a high-occupancy use such as a school, which generates large and variable wastewater volumes daily. On-site systems are inherently vulnerable to: • System failure or under performance • Wet-weather impacts and waterlogging • Odour and amenity impacts • Reliance on pump-out services during high storage periods Any failure or overflow has the potential to cause serious public health risks and environmental harm, particularly given the proximity to local drainage lines and waterways. In my view, a development of this scale should not proceed without connection to reticulated sewer infrastructure. The site for the College drains into the Wianamatta–South Creek catchment, which forms part of the larger Hawkesbury-Nepean river system. This catchment has been the focus of multiple government studies because water quality and ecological health is generally poor in many reaches, particularly where urbanization and stormwater runoff concentrations occur. Independent assessments have identified that the current condition of blue grid elements (including streams and riparian corridors) across the Wianamatta–South Creek catchment is generally poor, with degraded water quality in many sections and stress on water dependent ecosystems. Flooding and Access Constraints Flooding presents a fundamental constraint to the site and surrounding road network. Catherine Fields Road is subject to inundation during relatively frequent flood events, restricting access and egress. This raises serious concerns regarding: • Safe access for daily school operations • Emergency vehicle access • Evacuation of children and staff during flood events A school is responsible for the safety of large numbers of children, including very young children who cannot evacuate independently. Reliance on “shelter in place” or complex evacuation scenarios is not appropriate in this context. Downstream Flood and Stormwater Impacts The development will introduce large areas of roof and hardstand, increasing stormwater runoff. While detention measures may be proposed, there remains a risk that altered overland flow paths and system exceedances during extreme rainfall events will worsen downstream flooding impacts. Local residents should not be exposed to increased flood risk as a result of this development. Why Conditions Are Not Sufficient This proposal suffers from threshold issues that cannot be resolved through conditions alone: • The road network is fundamentally unsuitable for a major school • Flooding compromises access, safety and evacuation • Wastewater servicing relies on ongoing high-risk management • The surrounding precinct infrastructure is incomplete Conditioning cannot eliminate these risks; it merely defers or redistributes them. This submission reflects the lived experience of a local resident who understands the limitations of Catherine Fields Road and the surrounding area. The proposal introduces unacceptable safety, infrastructure and environmental risks that outweigh any benefits of the development at this location. Thank you for considering my submission.

9796

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

We are rural and our streets and sewer are not connected

9801

New South Wales 2557

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I wish to formally object to the proposed school development at Catherine Field. The existing road infrastructure in Catherine Field is not capable of supporting the significant increase in traffic that this development will generate. Local roads are already in poor condition, with potholes and general deterioration evident despite current low traffic volumes. Introducing school-related traffic, including private vehicles and buses during peak hours, will place unacceptable strain on roads that are not designed for such usage, creating congestion and safety concerns for residents. Catherine Field remains a predominantly rural area, and the proposed development is inconsistent with the established character of the suburb. Increased traffic, noise, and activity associated with a school will permanently alter the quiet, low-density nature of the area. There are also concerns regarding impacts outside standard school hours. After-hours activities, events, and staff movements will result in ongoing noise and traffic, interfering with residents’ amenity and right to quiet enjoyment of their homes. The nearby suburb of Austral demonstrates the consequences of rapid development without adequate infrastructure planning. Austral has experienced ongoing congestion, road capacity issues, and reduced liveability due to excessive population growth and multiple school developments. Catherine Field should not be subjected to the same outcomes. Catherine Field has always been a small, original suburb, and many residents have chosen to live here specifically for its rural character and limited development. This proposal does not appropriately consider the capacity of existing infrastructure or the long-term impact on the community. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposed school development and request that it be reconsidered.

9806

New South Wales 2557

08/01/2026

Object

Website

1–Our roads in the area are not capable of servicing such a development with all the traffic the proposed development would likely cause. 2– The conditions of our roads are in such poor condition to cater for all the traffic the development would definitely create.? 3– No sewer in the area is a major problem for such a major proposed development. 4– It’s a Rural area therefore is no place to build a major school

9811

New South Wales 2176

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts 1. Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. 2. Safety Risks: The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. 3. Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss 1. Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. 2. Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. 3. Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing 1. Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. 2. Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Regards

9816

New South Wales 2557

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts 1. Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. 2. Safety Risks: The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. 3. Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss 1. Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. 2. Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. 3. Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing 1. Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. 2. Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely, [redacted]

9821

New South Wales 2556

08/01/2026

Object

Website

To the Commissioners, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts 1. Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. 2. Safety Risks: The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. 3. Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss 1. Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. 2. Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. 3. Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing 1. Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. 2. Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely, [name redacted]

9826

New South Wales 2556

08/01/2026

Object

Website

To the Commissioners, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts 1. Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. 2. Safety Risks: The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. 3. Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss 1. Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. 2. Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. 3. Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing 1. Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. 2. Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely, [redacted]

9831

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

Please find attached submissIon OPPOSING Minarah College

MINARAH COLLEGE - OPPOSAL SUB.pdf (PDF, 152.43 KB)

9836

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

please find attached submission OPPOSSING Minarah College

MINARAH COLLEGE - opposal SYB.pdf (PDF, 2.82 MB)

9841

New South Wales 2557

08/01/2026

Object

Website

strong objection to the construction of this school. see attached submission for opposal

MINARAH COLLEGE - OPPOSAL SUB.pdf (PDF, 152.43 KB)

9846

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

please find attached opposal submission

MINARAH COLLEGE OPPOSAL DAB.pdf (PDF, 82.28 KB)

9851

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

please find attached opposal submission

MINARAH COLLEGE OPPOSAL CHB.pdf (PDF, 83.49 KB)

9856

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident who lives in the near vicinity of the proposed Minarah College and strongly oppose the proposed MINARAH COLLEGE project I oppose this for many reasons some being: TRAFFIC: Catherine field road is a narrow road with no kerb and gutter, the roads in catherine field cannot take anymore traffic, cars are constantly avoiding pot holes and road wear. The proposed site has only proposed to upgrade the front of the school. There will be traffic banked up in either direction trying to get into the school as there is only one way in and one way out of the school. This will cause major traffic concerns and congestion. SEWERAGE: No sewerage in catherine field this would be a concern for the size of this project. They propose to have the sewerage underneath the play sports field, where children will play, sit etc. This could be a health hazard. How will this sewerage cope with the amount of people in the school as well as visitors on special occasions. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE PROPOSED PROJECT.

9861

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

My family have lived in Catherine Field for 23 years I OPPOSE the Minarah College in Catherine Field. I oppose for many reasons some of which are: NOISE: The proposal states that the school Hall and playing field will be used till 9.30pm including weekends. This is not normal school hours. We the neighbouring properties will have constant noise and activity, especially on special events on weekends with constant noise parking issues, no privacy and peace. FLOODING: The proposed site is a natural water catchment for the neighbouring properties, the catchment flows like a river, where will all this water go when the land is excavated and fences are put up, the neighbouring properties will flood due to the restriction of water flow. Will council permit this. The Storm water flow onto the road will also cause a concern due to the extra water this property will disburse onto the road for drivers and low lining properties where the water will flow to, we already have a major concern with the road flooding in this area and around Catherine Field, this is a major safety hazard to all vehicles on the road. I oppose this project

9866

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

I live at and use Catherine Field Road on a regular basis and object to the proposal of Minarah College in Catherine Field. Catherine Field Roads are wearing away with pot holes and continuously are being repaired by council workers until the next time. Catherine Field Road is not wide enough to handle traffic of this extreme. There will definitely be traffic congestions around the school area, which is one of the main roads to access Camden Valley Way and Oran Park. I have also seen this road flood with water. The proposal states that there will only be 95 car park spaces, this is not enough car parks for a school to accommodate for visitors, especially hiring of the hall and sports field, special events/occasions etc. They have only allowed, 6 general car spaces. Catherine Field Road is a very narrow road, with no street lights or foot paths and lots of pot holes, the congestion of parked cars and traffic is a big safety hazard. The proposal is stating that road upgrading, footpaths, lighting etc will take place in front of the school only, what about the rest of catherine field road, how is traffic supposed to flow, no overtaking lanes in traffic congestion, the proposal states that the development is expected to generate 450-550 vehicles per hour in each direction during the busiest periods of the day, this is ridiculous, how can our roads cope with this and how are pedestrians supposed to walk and cycle to school without footpaths beyond the boundaries of the school, where is the safety factor. I OPPOSE.

9871

Redacted

08/01/2026

Object

Website

268 & 278 Catherine Field road is not a suitable location for any development, especially of this scale. I understand that more schools are needed, but the health & wellbeing of the students has not been considered carefully. The effluent management area is concerning, allowing children to play on a field where effluent is being discharged only centremetres below the soil. The more the buildings and population grows, the less ema area will be available. The Flood evacuation plan doesn't consider the safety of the 30 SSP students that may need extra assistance in the case of evacuation or shelter in place. The deciding body should really take on board the consequences that if approved and there is danger of injury or in worst case, loss of life. The thought the lead the students through flood waters which, during heavy rainfall can cause the road to be closed by Camden Council is a danger in itself. In 2016, there was a death in the floodwaters of Anthony road, Leppington when his car was washed in the causeway. https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/macarthur/two-found-dead-in-floodwaters/news-story/dc93cd28a7312e99e689c5e9ba19861f . Anthony road is a common access road to drive to Bringelly road now that you can no longer turn right onto Bringelly road from Allenby road. I could assume that if approved, families would move closer to the school but students would still need to be driven to school by car as there is no safe footpaths, rather there are large culverts to the side of the road that are overgrown and students would have to walk on the road which is too narrow and is an accident waiting to happen There is insufficient parking spaces to accomodate school events. There is no exact details of the grandstand or the flood lights that will light the sporting field, not to mention whether there will be pa speakers for commentators during sport events. Overall, this school will not beenfit the community. With high colorbond fences, this more or less defies the rural nature of the town. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to deny this project for the safety of the students

9996

07/01/2026

Object

Email

Department of Planning and Environment Locked Bag 5022 Parramatta NSW 2124 7th January 2026 Application Number: SSD-30759158 - Minarah College Subject Location 268- 278 Catherine Fields Road I Melissa Bugeja of Catherine Fields Road STRONGLY OPPOSE the above application To whom it may concern, After taking some time to view the application and supporting documents on exhibition I am writing to you in relation to the abovementioned application on the street I live (Catherine Fields Road). I would like to outline just a few concerns (though not limited to) I have below in for you to review. • Student numbers were originally 1500, and have since been reduced. Department of planning had recommended an approximate number of 650 students. This is concerning, if approved who will control number quickly increasing without the necessary infrastructure • Please view flood mapping of the area, the proposed site is at the lower point of Catherine fields Road which is subject to flooding. How will the stormwater be handled? It seems there will be more pressure put onto Local catchments. Can the catchments handle this? Also to add in the case of a flood, children are to be walked to Catherine Fields Hall, this is over 500 metres. How can adults or children walk that distance in a flood with no footpaths, kerb and guttering or upgraded infrastructure to suit? This possess a risk and danger to the children, staff not to mention local residents • Camden council has clearly stated there will be no upgrades to Catherine Fields road In the near future, we don’t even have an Asphalt sealed road. Only a short term fix (chip seal) with regular potholes needed maintenance • The proposed site is on a curve – bend on Catherine Fields road, bringing further danger to motorists. Again no upgraded infrastructure to suit this hazard is planned • There is No mains sewer for the proposed site. Management of sewer seems inadequate for over 1000 people. A children’s play area will be in effluent area as per documents. Also creating run off during rain, will this end up in neighbouring properties and is there a potential to cause sickness to the children or neighbours? • Traffic issues will be created by the movement of vehicles in and out of the college, putting a huge load onto the local roads have not been properly addressed. Viewing plans for the college, there will not be any type of roadworks or turning lane into the college until the final stage of construction, what will traffic do or how will Catherine Fields Road handle this until then? • A close suburb is a perfect example of what not to do, Austral. When schools went in before infrastructure the roads were a disaster! Creating many road issues. We are already unable to take certain vehicles of ours out on the road when it is really hot days as the temporary fix that is done to our road ends up melting and causing damage to our vehicle with the tar sticking to them.. • Speaking with locals and neighbours from the area, we are struggling to see how this will benefit anyone local. If so it has not been indicated • We as residents are under the understanding there will be not contributions paid to either local Camden council or the state. Will we as residents have to foot the bill for any immediate or future infrastructure for the school or caused by the school ? • It has been raised Catherine fields is not a priority within the South West Growth Area, In this case when will the area have sufficient infrastructure to support a proposal like the College • Current Zoning in Catherine Fields is still RU4 Primary Production, we as residents cannot by council regulation build a granny flat on our properties. Being 1 acre or 5 acres. How can this proposed college be considered • There are many local sites with Zonings and infrastructure already in place to allow a development such as this, why do Catherine Fields residents in a rural zoning need to be impacted There are many more points to be raised as I strongly believe in every way this will negatively impact the locals and area. I believe I have made my point to strongly oppose, much more planning and investigation needs to be conducted before any developments can be considered in Catherine fields. In completing I would like to confirm I OPPOSE the proposed Minarah College I accept the Departments disclaimer and declaration Note - I declare that I have not made any reportable political donations. Sincerely, Melissa Bugeja Resident Catherine fields road Catherine fields 2557

9766

Redacted

07/01/2026

Object

Website

Please encourage Australian schools this is our country - let’s keep it that way before it’s too late . Save and protect the future Australia

9771

New South Wales 2179

07/01/2026

Object

Website

(submission)

9776

New South Wales 2557

07/01/2026

Object

Website

Department of Planning and Environment Locked Bag 5022 Parramatta NSW 2124 7th January 2026 Application Number: SSD-30759158 - Minarah College Subject Location 268- 278 Catherine Fields Road I [name redacted] of Catherine Fields Road STRONGLY OPPOSE the above application To whom it may concern, After taking some time to view the application and supporting documents on exhibition I am writing to you in relation to the abovementioned application on the street I live (Catherine Fields Road). I would like to outline just a few concerns (though not limited to) I have below in for you to review. • Student numbers were originally 1500, and have since been reduced. Department of planning had recommended an approximate number of 650 students. This is concerning, if approved who will control number quickly increasing without the necessary infrastructure • Please view flood mapping of the area, the proposed site is at the lower point of Catherine fields Road which is subject to flooding. How will the stormwater be handled? It seems there will be more pressure put onto Local catchments. Can the catchments handle this? Also to add in the case of a flood, children are to be walked to Catherine Fields Hall, this is over 500 metres. How can adults or children walk that distance in a flood with no footpaths, kerb and guttering or upgraded infrastructure to suit? This possess a risk and danger to the children, staff not to mention local residents • Camden council has clearly stated there will be no upgrades to Catherine Fields road In the near future, we don’t even have an Asphalt sealed road. Only a short term fix (chip seal) with regular potholes needed maintenance • The proposed site is on a curve – bend on Catherine Fields road, bringing further danger to motorists. Again no upgraded infrastructure to suit this hazard is planned • There is No mains sewer for the proposed site. Management of sewer seems inadequate for over 1000 people. A children’s play area will be in effluent area as per documents. Also creating run off during rain, will this end up in neighbouring properties and is there a potential to cause sickness to the children or neighbours? • Traffic issues will be created by the movement of vehicles in and out of the college, putting a huge load onto the local roads have not been properly addressed. Viewing plans for the college, there will not be any type of roadworks or turning lane into the college until the final stage of construction, what will traffic do or how will Catherine Fields Road handle this until then? • A close suburb is a perfect example of what not to do, Austral. When schools went in before infrastructure the roads were a disaster! Creating many road issues. We are already unable to take certain vehicles of ours out on the road when it is really hot days as the temporary fix that is done to our road ends up melting and causing damage to our vehicle with the tar sticking to them.. • Speaking with locals and neighbours from the area, we are struggling to see how this will benefit anyone local. If so it has not been indicated • We as residents are under the understanding there will be not contributions paid to either local Camden council or the state. Will we as residents have to foot the bill for any immediate or future infrastructure for the school or caused by the school ? • It has been raised Catherine fields is not a priority within the South West Growth Area, In this case when will the area have sufficient infrastructure to support a proposal like the College • Current Zoning in Catherine Fields is still RU4 Primary Production, we as residents cannot by council regulation build a granny flat on our properties. Being 1 acre or 5 acres. How can this proposed college be considered • There are many local sites with Zonings and infrastructure already in place to allow a development such as this, why do Catherine Fields residents in a rural zoning need to be impacted There are many more points to be raised as I strongly believe in every way this will negatively impact the locals and area. I believe I have made my point to strongly oppose, much more planning and investigation needs to be conducted before any developments can be considered in Catherine fields. In completing I would like to confirm I OPPOSE the proposed Minarah College I accept the Departments disclaimer and declaration Note - I declare that I have not made any reportable political donations. Sincerely, [name redacted] Resident Catherine fields road Catherine fields 2557

9781

New South Wales 2557

07/01/2026

Object

Website

Department of Planning and Environment Locked Bag 5022 Parramatta NSW 2124 7th January 2026 Application Number: SSD-30759158 - Minarah College Subject Location 268- 278 Catherine Fields Road I [name redacted] of Catherine Fields Road STRONGLY OPPOSE the above application To whom it may concern, After taking some time to view the application and supporting documents on exhibition I am writing to you in relation to the abovementioned application on the street I live (Catherine Fields Road). I would like to outline just a few concerns (though not limited to) I have below in for you to review. • Student numbers were originally 1500, and have since been reduced. Department of planning had recommended an approximate number of 650 students. This is concerning, if approved who will control number quickly increasing without the necessary infrastructure • Please view flood mapping of the area, the proposed site is at the lower point of Catherine fields Road which is subject to flooding. How will the stormwater be handled? It seems there will be more pressure put onto Local catchments. Can the catchments handle this? Also to add in the case of a flood, children are to be walked to Catherine Fields Hall, this is over 500 metres. How can adults or children walk that distance in a flood with no footpaths, kerb and guttering or upgraded infrastructure to suit? This possess a risk and danger to the children, staff not to mention local residents • Camden council has clearly stated there will be no upgrades to Catherine Fields road In the near future, we don’t even have an Asphalt sealed road. Only a short term fix (chip seal) with regular potholes needed maintenance • The proposed site is on a curve – bend on Catherine Fields road, bringing further danger to motorists. Again no upgraded infrastructure to suit this hazard is planned • There is No mains sewer for the proposed site. Management of sewer seems inadequate for over 1000 people. A children’s play area will be in effluent area as per documents. Also creating run off during rain, will this end up in neighbouring properties and is there a potential to cause sickness to the children or neighbours? • Traffic issues will be created by the movement of vehicles in and out of the college, putting a huge load onto the local roads have not been properly addressed. Viewing plans for the college, there will not be any type of roadworks or turning lane into the college until the final stage of construction, what will traffic do or how will Catherine Fields Road handle this until then? • A close suburb is a perfect example of what not to do, Austral. When schools went in before infrastructure the roads were a disaster! Creating many road issues. We are already unable to take certain vehicles of ours out on the road when it is really hot days as the temporary fix that is done to our road ends up melting and causing damage to our vehicle with the tar sticking to them.. • Speaking with locals and neighbours from the area, we are struggling to see how this will benefit anyone local. If so it has not been indicated • We as residents are under the understanding there will be not contributions paid to either local Camden council or the state. Will we as residents have to foot the bill for any immediate or future infrastructure for the school or caused by the school ? • It has been raised Catherine fields is not a priority within the South West Growth Area, In this case when will the area have sufficient infrastructure to support a proposal like the College • Current Zoning in Catherine Fields is still RU4 Primary Production, we as residents cannot by council regulation build a granny flat on our properties. Being 1 acre or 5 acres. How can this proposed college be considered • There are many local sites with Zonings and infrastructure already in place to allow a development such as this, why do Catherine Fields residents in a rural zoning need to be impacted There are many more points to be raised as I strongly believe in every way this will negatively impact the locals and area. I believe I have made my point to strongly oppose, much more planning and investigation needs to be conducted before any developments can be considered in Catherine fields. In completing I would like to confirm I OPPOSE the proposed Minarah College I accept the Departments disclaimer and declaration Note - I declare that I have not made any reportable political donations. Sincerely, [name redacted] Resident Catherine fields road Catherine fields 2557

9786

New South Wales 2557

07/01/2026

Object

Website

Department of Planning and Environment Locked Bag 5022 Parramatta NSW 2124 7th January 2026 Application Number: SSD-30759158 - Minarah College Subject Location 268- 278 Catherine Fields Road I [name redacted] of Catherine Fields Road STRONGLY OPPOSE the above application To whom it may concern, After taking some time to view the application and supporting documents on exhibition I am writing to you in relation to the abovementioned application on the street I live (Catherine Fields Road). I would like to outline just a few concerns (though not limited to) I have below in for you to review. • Student numbers were originally 1500, and have since been reduced. Department of planning had recommended an approximate number of 650 students. This is concerning, if approved who will control number quickly increasing without the necessary infrastructure • Please view flood mapping of the area, the proposed site is at the lower point of Catherine fields Road which is subject to flooding. How will the stormwater be handled? It seems there will be more pressure put onto Local catchments. Can the catchments handle this? Also to add in the case of a flood, children are to be walked to Catherine Fields Hall, this is over 500 metres. How can adults or children walk that distance in a flood with no footpaths, kerb and guttering or upgraded infrastructure to suit? This possess a risk and danger to the children, staff not to mention local residents • Camden council has clearly stated there will be no upgrades to Catherine Fields road In the near future, we don’t even have an Asphalt sealed road. Only a short term fix (chip seal) with regular potholes needed maintenance • The proposed site is on a curve – bend on Catherine Fields road, bringing further danger to motorists. Again no upgraded infrastructure to suit this hazard is planned • There is No mains sewer for the proposed site. Management of sewer seems inadequate for over 1000 people. A children’s play area will be in effluent area as per documents. Also creating run off during rain, will this end up in neighbouring properties and is there a potential to cause sickness to the children or neighbours? • Traffic issues will be created by the movement of vehicles in and out of the college, putting a huge load onto the local roads have not been properly addressed. Viewing plans for the college, there will not be any type of roadworks or turning lane into the college until the final stage of construction, what will traffic do or how will Catherine Fields Road handle this until then? • A close suburb is a perfect example of what not to do, Austral. When schools went in before infrastructure the roads were a disaster! Creating many road issues. We are already unable to take certain vehicles of ours out on the road when it is really hot days as the temporary fix that is done to our road ends up melting and causing damage to our vehicle with the tar sticking to them.. • Speaking with locals and neighbours from the area, we are struggling to see how this will benefit anyone local. If so it has not been indicated • We as residents are under the understanding there will be not contributions paid to either local Camden council or the state. Will we as residents have to foot the bill for any immediate or future infrastructure for the school or caused by the school ? • It has been raised Catherine fields is not a priority within the South West Growth Area, In this case when will the area have sufficient infrastructure to support a proposal like the College • Current Zoning in Catherine Fields is still RU4 Primary Production, we as residents cannot by council regulation build a granny flat on our properties. Being 1 acre or 5 acres. How can this proposed college be considered • There are many local sites with Zonings and infrastructure already in place to allow a development such as this, why do Catherine Fields residents in a rural zoning need to be impacted There are many more points to be raised as I strongly believe in every way this will negatively impact the locals and area. I believe I have made my point to strongly oppose, much more planning and investigation needs to be conducted before any developments can be considered in Catherine fields. In completing I would like to confirm I OPPOSE the proposed Minarah College I accept the Departments disclaimer and declaration Note - I declare that I have not made any reportable political donations. Sincerely, [name redacted] Resident Catherine fields road Catherine fields 2557

9721

New South Wales 2557

06/01/2026

Object

Website

I Strongly oppose as a Catherine Fields Road resident. Please see attached submission

Minarah College Submission January 2026.pdf (PDF, 513.1 KB)

9726

New South Wales 2557

06/01/2026

Object

Website

I Strongly OPPOSE the Minarah colleges development application. Please see below attached submission

Minarah College submission Jan 26.pdf (PDF, 379.11 KB)

9731

Redacted

06/01/2026

Object

Website

the school population will be too large to be serviced by the planned sewer waste management proposal. they should wait until Sydney Water start making plans for sewer mains connections

9736

Redacted

06/01/2026

Object

Website

I have been a resident of Catherine Field for over 50 years. I object to this proposal

9741

New South Wales 2557

06/01/2026

Object

Website

Catherine Field does not have the infrastructure to support a K-12 school. The traffic from opening up Oran Park onto Springfield Road is already a strong indication that the roads cannot cope. Adding more traffic is ridiculous. The roads are hazardous to drive on as is, there is no curb and guttering, when it rains the roads continue to fall apart, adding a school's worth of traffic to Catherine Field Road is dangerous. The proposed car parking allocation of the school means Catherine Field Road will be filled with cars during events as there is not enough spaces to cater for the school community. The sides of the road are not fit for parking and cause major safety issues to member of the public on this road. There are not adequate services for a school to this parcel of land. What happens in terms of water, sewage, internet, etc. Catherine Field already has many 'black outs' when it is hot imagine adding an entire schools electricity to our grid. Catherine Field is zoned 'rural', that's why we built here. If we wanted to be surrounded by buildings/shops/schools etc we would have purchased in Narellan or Oran Park. Why does a school need to be built in Catherine Field? It will completely change the feel of the area, yet not benefit locals in any way. I strongly oppose a school being built in Catherine Field as does the local council. And you would think that the council has access to significant information in order to make their informed decision of NO!

9746

New South Wales 2557

06/01/2026

Object

Website

Catherine Field is a suburb specifically zoned as semi-rural, a designation intended to preserve its low-density character, landscape, and infrastructure limitations. The proposed construction of a large K–12 school accommodating more than 900 students is inconsistent with this zoning and would have significant negative impacts on traffic safety, essential services, and the visual character of the area. 1. Inadequate Road Infrastructure and Traffic Safety Risks The existing road network in Catherine Field is not designed to support high-volume traffic. Roads are typically one lane in each direction and lack curbs and guttering, features that are essential for managing increased vehicle flow and pedestrian safety. During peak school hours, morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up, traffic congestion would increase dramatically. This would not only inconvenience residents but also create serious safety risks for students, parents, cyclists, and local drivers. Emergency vehicle access could also be compromised during these peak periods. 2. Insufficient Capacity of Local Services and Utilities A school with over 900 students, in addition to teaching staff and support personnel, would place substantial strain on local services. Water supply, sewage systems, waste management, and power infrastructure in semi-rural areas are typically designed for low-density residential use, not for large institutional developments. The sudden increase in daily demand could lead to service disruptions, costly upgrades, or long-term reliability issues affecting both the school and existing residents. 3. Incompatibility With Semi-Rural Character and Zoning Intent Semi-rural zoning exists to protect the environmental and visual qualities of an area, including open space, lower building density, and a natural or agricultural backdrop. A large K–12 school complex would be visually intrusive and inconsistent with the surrounding landscape. Its scale, design, parking requirements, and associated infrastructure would be an eyesore against the semi-rural setting, undermining the character that attracted residents to Catherine Field in the first place. 4. Precedent for Further Overdevelopment Approving a development of this scale could set a precedent for additional high-density infrastructure in the area. This would gradually erode the semi-rural nature of Catherine Field and lead to incremental overdevelopment without the necessary long-term planning or infrastructure investment to support it. While schools are essential community assets, their location must align with zoning, infrastructure capacity, and community character. The proposed K–12 school in Catherine Field fails to meet these criteria. Due to inadequate roads, insufficient services, and incompatibility with the semi-rural environment, the development is unsuitable for the area and should be reconsidered in favour of a more appropriate location.

9751

New South Wales 2557

06/01/2026

Object

Website

The proposal to construct a large K–12 school in Catherine Field raises serious planning, infrastructure, and environmental concerns that make the development unsuitable for this location. As a semi-rural suburb, Catherine Field lacks the capacity, services, and urban framework required to support a development of this scale without causing lasting negative impacts to residents and the surrounding environment. A school catering for more than 900 students represents a major urban-style development. Such facilities typically require extensive buildings, large parking areas, bus zones, lighting, and fencing, all of which are incompatible with the low-density, open character of a semi-rural landscape. The size and intensity of the development would fundamentally alter the area, conflicting with the purpose of semi-rural zoning and the expectations of the local community. Catherine Field’s roads are narrow, single-lane in each direction, and lack curbs and guttering. These roads were never intended to handle the concentrated traffic surges associated with school drop-off and pick-up times. The addition of hundreds of daily vehicle movements, including private cars and school buses, would likely result in congestion, unsafe conditions, and increased accident risk. Local residents would experience reduced accessibility and amenity, particularly during peak hours. Semi-rural infrastructure is generally designed to support smaller populations. The daily presence of students, staff, and visitors would place excessive pressure on utilities such as water, sewerage, electricity, and waste services. Any required upgrades would likely be disruptive, costly, and inconsistent with the current servicing strategy for the area, potentially impacting existing households who did not anticipate such demand. The visual impact of a large institutional building would be significant. Extensive built form, car parks, and artificial lighting would contrast sharply with the natural and rural backdrop of Catherine Field. This development would diminish the visual appeal of the area, contribute to light and noise pollution, and reduce the sense of openness that defines the suburb. The proposed K–12 school is disproportionate to the scale and function of Catherine Field as a semi-rural community. Its impacts on traffic, infrastructure, visual amenity, and zoning integrity outweigh any potential benefits of the development in this location. A more suitably zoned and better-serviced area should be considered to ensure responsible planning outcomes that respect both current residents and the long-term vision for Catherine Field.

9756

Redacted

06/01/2026

Object

Website

As a prior resident of Catherine Field, I still frequently travel along Catherine Field road. I observe the poor quality of the roads that are narrow and continuously have pot holes and are being repaired by council. The roads have seen an already increase in traffic without the addition of a school population that will mainly travel by private vehicle increasing the damage to the roads, not to mention the heavy vehicles that will further damage the roads. They only talk about one bus, that will not alleviate the problem. The children will be playing on top of the ema area, we had enough trouble in a five people household with the septic during very wet periods. This will be unsafe and unhygenic for the children, especially during peak times where families are welcomed to the site for parent/ teacher nights, Eid celebrations etc. There is insufficient parking on site to accomodate all staff and families during these events. The cars that park outside the side are at risk of driving their car into the may deep culverts along the side of the road that are unkept and often not visible. The roads at night are very dark with no street lights, kerb or guttering. During rain the roads become flooded in many sections of Catherine Field road and Council have on many occasions closed off the road to prevent drivers entering flood waters.

combined submission.pdf (PDF, 1.03 MB)

9761

New South Wales 2030

06/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose this development

9981

04/01/2026

Object

Email

I am a resident of Catherine Fields and I absolutely oppose the development for the below mentioned; Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This development will impact our local community terribly. It will cause major traffic and chaos to our peaceful community. We have no infrastructure to cope with this size development. Our roads are already compromised with terrible maintenance. I also want to state that these people applying for this development have out right lied from the very beginning as to what exactly is being built. We as a community were led into believing this was going to be a sports field originally and now it’s a 1500 pupils + staff school who want to operate 7 days a week outside of school hours. I am not convinced this development will end at this and believe it will continue to grow with out approval once this development is approved. This development cannot be considered and I ask as a life long resident of Catherine Field to have this application abolished. Thank you. Regard's Louise Ciappara

9986

04/01/2026

Object

Email

I am a resident of Catherine Fields and I absolutely oppose the development for the below mentioned; Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This development will impact our local community terribly. It will cause major traffic and chaos to our peaceful community. We have no infrastructure to cope with this size development. Our roads are already compromised with terrible maintenance. I also want to state that these people applying for this development have out right lied from the very beginning as to what exactly is being built. We as a community were led into believing this was going to be a sports field originally and now it’s a 1500 pupils + staff school who want to operate 7 days a week outside of school hours. I am not convinced this development will end at this and believe it will continue to grow with out approval once this development is approved. This development cannot be considered and I ask as a resident of Catherine Field to have this application abolished. Thank you. Regard's Emmanuel Ciappara

9991

04/01/2026

Object

Email

I am a resident of Catherine Fields and I absolutely oppose the development for the below mentioned; Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This development will impact our local community terribly. It will cause major traffic and chaos to our peaceful community. We have no infrastructure to cope with this size development. Our roads are already compromised with terrible maintenance. I also want to state that these people applying for this development have out right lied from the very beginning as to what exactly is being built. We as a community were led into believing this was going to be a sports field originally and now it’s a 1500 pupils + staff school who want to operate 7 days a week outside of school hours. I am not convinced this development will end at this and believe it will continue to grow with out approval once this development is approved. This development cannot be considered and I ask as a life long resident of Catherine Field to have this application abolished. Thank you. Regard's Melissa Precivich

9621

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

After reviewing the State Infrastructure Strategy 2022-2042, I don't think Catherine Field has the necesarry infrastructure to support a development of this capacity. "Future demands on the NSW Government budget will continue to be significant. Many important new projects remain to be funded and investment in the maintenance of existing assets is set to increase. The NSW Government will regularly consider the rate and sequence at which infrastructure projects should proceed. This also provides an opportunity to consider projects that will improve transport connectivity in regional, rural and remote areas". The current road network—characterized by dangerous sharp bends and a lack of pedestrian facilities—is not equipped to handle school-related traffic. Approving a high-intensity development before the necessary precinct planning and infrastructure upgrades are completed for the South West Growth Area is premature and unsafe. The proposed stormwater detention measures are insufficient to mitigate the impact of massive roof and pavement areas. Diverting excess water toward Catherine Fields Road will exacerbate existing flooding issues for properties on the lower side of the road, which currently lack adequate drainage infrastructure. I object to the proposed use of an On-site Sewage Management (OSSM) system for a development of this scale. The site is located in an unsewered rural area, and the reliance on spray irrigation or on-site storage is inappropriate for nearly 1,000 students and staff. This poses an unacceptable risk of effluent runoff into South Creek and neighbouring properties during the heavy rain events common to this region. The site remains fundamentally unsuitable for a large-scale school until reticulated sewer and water services are available and the local road network is fully upgraded to urban standards. I urge the Commission to reject this application.

9626

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

The Minarah College proposal is an "over-development" that ignores the strategic context of Catherine Field. Its built form is too large, its infrastructure is insufficient, and its design is unsympathetic to the existing community. I urge the Commission to reject this application in its current form. My objection is based on the following concerns regarding the project's built form and its failure to integrate with the existing semi-rural character of the Catherine Field area. Incompatibility with Local Character and "Semi-Rural" Setting The proposed two-story educational complex represents a massive urban shift that is fundamentally incompatible with the existing semi-rural landscape. Scale and Massing: Despite recent student population reductions to 980, the building footprint remains excessive for a site located in an area characterized by low-density rural residential dwellings. Aesthetic Impact: The modern, institutional built form does not reflect the "rural and semi-rural" brief of Catherine Field. It imposes a high-density aesthetic on a community of roughly 1,600 people, effectively urbanizing the area prematurely. The development appears to deviate from the established Camden Council Development Control Plan (DCP) for the Catherine Field Village. Insufficient Setbacks: Local guidelines require a minimum front setback of 20 metres where no adjoining dwellings exist. Bringing large-scale institutional buildings close to boundaries—specifically on three sides of neighboring properties—creates an unacceptable "jammed" effect that compromises the privacy and outlook of long-term residents. Privacy and Overlooking: The height and scale of the proposed two-story structures will lead to direct overlooking of private open spaces in adjacent homes, failing the standards set for residential privacy in this precinct.

9631

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

My primary concern is the project’s inadequate management of flooding and stormwater, which threatens the safety of students and the property of neighboring residents. The flood risks associated with this site have not been adequately mitigated. The proposed design relies on outdated assumptions and places an unfair burden on existing residents. I urge the Commission to reject the proposal due to these unresolved safety and environmental impacts. Increased Risk to Downstream Properties- The proposed development will replace permeable rural land with massive rooftops and large concrete surfaces, The current proposal to divert stormwater through pipes under Catherine Field Road will significantly increase the volume and velocity of water flowing toward properties on the lower side of the road, Excess runoff will compound existing flooding issues in South Creek, which already borders several residential properties, Inadequate On-Site Detention (OSD) Design- The proposed OSD system is designed only to ensure peak flows do not exceed "pre-development" levels. Given the known flooding history of Catherine Field Road, a "neutral" impact is insufficient. The community expects a development of this scale to provide a net benefit by over-designing OSD to reduce existing flood risks, There is currently no piped stormwater infrastructure in the suburb to handle the concentrated discharge from a major school. Environmental and Health Risks from On-Site Sewerage- Because the site is not connected to town sewerage, it relies on an on-site wastewater treatment plant. In heavy rain events, which are frequent in this area, there is a high risk of wastewater treatment systems becoming inundated. This could lead to untreated effluent washing into natural watercourses and onto neighboring properties, creating a significant public health risk. Safety and Access Concerns during Flood Events- Local flood mapping indicates that even with proposed drainage works, areas to the east and west of the site remain subject to flooding from South Creek and Rileys Creek, potentially isolating the school during frequent events, The "Shelter-in-Place" plan for large-scale floods is a secondary response that places nearly 1,000 students at risk if primary evacuation routes on Catherine Field Road become impassable. I object to thsi school

9636

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

Attention: NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Subject: Objection Regarding Unresolved Traffic, Parking, and Pedestrian Safety Risks I am writing to oppose the amended development application for Minarah College at 268-278 Catherine Field Road. While I acknowledge the reduction in student numbers from 1,580 to 980, the project still presents unacceptable impacts on local traffic and remains fundamentally unsuited to the existing rural road infrastructure. 1. Continued Reliance on a Deficient Road Network Catherine Field Road is a narrow, rural collector road that lacks the infrastructure required for an institutional-scale development. Capacity Issues: Even with the reduced student cap, the school will still generate hundreds of daily vehicle trips on a road that is already under stress from regional growth and "rat-running" between Camden Valley Way and Bringelly Road. Infrastructure Gaps: The road lacks formed kerbs, gutters, and street lighting. Expecting a rural road to handle high-frequency school bus movements and peak-hour drop-off/pick-up traffic is a recipe for congestion and safety hazards. 2. Inadequate Parking and Overspill Risks The proposed on-site parking remains insufficient for the diverse needs of a K-12 school, early learning centre, and community hub. Visitor and Event Parking: The current allocation does not adequately account for major school events, sporting matches, or the proposed community use of facilities on weekends. Impact on Road Verge: Without sufficient on-site parking, overflow vehicles will be forced onto the grassed verges of Catherine Field Road. This will not only damage the local environment but also obstruct sightlines for residents exiting their driveways. 3. Severe Pedestrian Safety Concerns The proposal fails to provide a safe "Active Transport" environment for students and residents. Lack of Footpaths: There are currently no footpaths connecting the site to the wider Catherine Field village or existing bus stops. Safety of Vulnerable Users: Forcing students to walk on unlit, grassed road shoulders alongside high-speed traffic is a major safety risk that has not been adequately mitigated by the proposed on-site upgrades. 4. Flawed Traffic Modeling I am concerned that the traffic assessments continue to underestimate the reality of the area. Private Vehicle Dependency: Estimates that 80-90% of students will arrive by private car are realistic, yet the resulting "bottleneck" effect at the school's single entry point remains a critical safety flaw for emergency vehicle access. Intersection Failure: The intersection of Camden Valley Way and Catherine Field Road is already at capacity; adding school-zone traffic will cause significant queuing that ripples through the entire suburb.

9641

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

There has been no consideration for the safety of staff or students with the risk of snakes and the potential for snake bites. The site is located in a rural area that has been known to have sightings of both eastern brown snakes and red bellied black snakes. Considering the surrounding bushland at the rear of the property and the proposal of an onsite sewage treatment plant I think this should also be discussed. it clashes with the area's rural character, lacks adequate infrastructure (roads, footpaths, sewers) to support a large school, creates significant traffic and safety hazards, and is seen as an incompatible land use for land zoned for primary production, conflicting with zone objectives for a peaceful, semi-rural lifestyle The site is zoned RU4 Primary Production, aiming for sustainable farming, not a large-scale educational facility that changes the area's rural nature. a large school is will be a disruptive, excessive development that destroys this serenity. A school operating seven days a week contrasts sharply with the rural setting and adds to noise and traffic concern

9646

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

A school or any development of this size does not suit the proposed location in its current condition without adequate sewer connections. The fact that the children will be playing on the sports field which sits above the ema area is a concern. The report doesn't clearly outline the output of the sewer during highly populated events. The current Green Valley campus often holds events where parents attend, how will the sewer system cope with so many extra people using the toilets and hand washing facilities, no to mention the extra output from the canteen.

9651

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

As a regular user of Catherine Field road, I am worried about the condition of the road with all the extra cars and heavy trucks using it. The additional load will cause even more damage to the surface and create more roadworks for Council to spend more money on repairs. The road is narrow and there are no kerb or gutters, nor is there anywhere to park on the side of the road due to deep culverts that are often disguised behind unkept tall grasses and weeds. In addition, there is no safe walking footpaths for students to travel to school. The school says they will only install these footpaths along the frontage of the site. One can only assume that if the school goes ahead, families will hope to move closer so their children can walk to school. How will this be safe with no footpaths. Why should it be the responsibility of council to spend funds on footpaths for a development that was outside of the planning procedures, when the funds could be further spent on roads and further improvements of Catherine Field. The planning panel should put a lot of consideration into the safety of the children before making any final decisions.

9656

New South Wales 2557

04/01/2026

Object

Website

1. Concerned with the traffic coming in and out of Catherine Fields. The School will cause road congestion. Heavy traffic will impact my ability to get my children to school on time and will impact my ability to get to work on time. I will be stuck in a traffic jam your peak hour. This will impact me greatly. 2. Heavy traffic that will result if the school is built puts people’s lives at risk. Will impact the ability of emergency vehicles getting through the heavy traffic. Putting people’s lives at risk. 3. Noise from the school. 4. Impact on the environment. There are a lot of Kangaroo’s appearing in people’s back yards because there habitats have been destroyed from all the developments happening in the area.

9661

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

Very concerned about the heavy traffic that will flow in and out of Catherine Fields. Concerned about the safety of the residents and there children residing in Catherine Fields. Concerned that the traffic congestion will put people’s lives at risk as they would not be able to reach the person in need on time as they will be stuck in a traffic jam. The quality of the roads in Catherine Fields are poor full of pot holes. Increased traffic into the area will just make this situation worse. Concerned about noise pollution. Concerned about the environmental impacts the school will cause

9666

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

Concerned about the heavy traffic that will flow in and out of Catherine Fields. The influx of students and teachers in and out of the school will cause road blockages in Catherine Fields. The roads in Catherine Fields are already busy where the round about is on Springfield road from cars coming from Oran park. Nowadays you have to wait a minute or more during peak time to make it to the other side of the road. The further damage the school will have on the Roads in Catherine Fields. The roads are full of pot holes everywhere and this problem will just become worse with the influx of students and teachers attending the school. There are safety issues to consider both for the residents of Catherine Fields and the Students that will be attending the school. I feel peoples lives will be put at risk if emergency vehicles cannot get through the traffic jam.

9671

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

The design report "appendix I" dated March 2024 on page 24 lists 'grandstand seating'- what is the height and capacity of this grandstand seating? Where exactly will it be located? The design report "appendix I" dated March 2024 on page 24 lists 'swimming pool with change rooms'- where will this be located? why isn't there any reports on water safety, cpr charts and how will the water levels be managed. The design report "appendix I" dated March 2024 on page 24 lists in the Early Learning Centre 'student toilets', 'staff toilets' & kitchen. As well as the Student Special Eduaction School having 'toilet and laundry facilities' & 'kitchenette' including sink. Also listed 'food tech' rooms within the Primary School and the High School consisting of 3 x 'preparation kitchens', 3 x 'science labs'. Not to mention the "Shared Facilites" including: 'whole of school staf room for eating', 'wet/dry area for art therapy', 'kitchen' and a separate 'cafe', 'changing rooms including showers'. Have all of these areas that include the use of water and wastewater been included in the reports outlining the expected water usage? Are the report accurate and acceptable according to requirements? The reduction in student numbers is not reflected in the scale and density of the development. The amended proposal shows only a net deduction of 1,363m2 of Gross Floor Area from the original proposal. It is inconceivable that the development would still need the floorspace or capacity within the school despite a net reduction of 600 students and 39 staff. Further information is required to ensure the school is not simply retaining a large portion of the existing built form to simply modify the application at a later stage under a section 4.55(1A) or 4.55 (2) modification which cannot be assessed by the Independent Planning Commission.

9676

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

I am concerned about the heavy traffic that will result in the area if the school goes ahead. I am concerned about the safety of the residents residing in Catherine Fields as a result of the heavy traffic. I am concerned on the impact the traffic congestion will have on the ability of emergency vehicles to reach a home to save someone's life or home, because the new school will create road blocks on the roads that are only one way. I have a medical condition and from time to time rely on the ambulance services for life saving help and treatment. I am concerned about my children's ability to get to work on time as they will be caught in the traffic jam during peak times. I am concerned about my grand children ability to get to school on time as buses will be caught up in the traffic jam during peak time. There are already big delays on Springfield Road at the road about from all the cars coming in from Catherine Park and Oran Park. The school will just make the situation worse. I am highly concerned about the impact the school will have on the environment. There has been an influx of Kangaroos, wallabies and other Australian wildlife appearing on peoples backyards having being displaced from all the surrounding areas such as Oran Park, Gregory Hills, Harrington Park, Emerald Hills etc. Please help the residents of Catherine Field preserve the environment, save the Australian Wildlife and save the ecosystem that will be destroyed if the school goes ahead.

9681

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

I am concerned about the heavy traffic that will result in the area if the school goes ahead. I am concerned about the safety of the residents residing in Catherine Fields as a result of the heavy traffic. I am concerned on the impact the traffic congestion will have on the ability of emergency vehicles to reach a home to save someone's life or home, because the new school will create road blocks on the roads that are only one way. I have a medical condition and from time to time rely on the ambulance services for life saving help and treatment. I am concerned about my children's ability to get to work on time as they will be caught in the traffic jam during peak times. I am concerned about my grand children ability to get to school on time as buses will be caught up in the traffic jam during peak time. There are already big delays on Springfield Road at the road about from all the cars coming in from Catherine Park and Oran Park. The school will just make the situation worse. I am highly concerned about the impact the school will have on the environment. There has been an influx of Kangaroos, wallabies and other Australian wildlife appearing on peoples backyards having being displaced from all the surrounding areas such as Oran Park, Gregory Hills, Harrington Park, Emerald Hills etc. Please help the residents of Catherine Field preserve the environment, save the Australian Wildlife and save the ecosystem that will be destroyed if the school goes ahead.

9686

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

Until the local Council or State Government complete holistic strategic planning and infrastructure delivery for the region, development of this scale and impact should not be accepted or endorsed. The flow on effects for the local community will be significant and therefore the project is not in the public interest. This amended proposal provides no benefit to the existing local community.

9691

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

I am concerned about the traffic congestion the school with cause in Catherine Fields and my ability to get to school on time. Already the road is busy on Springfield Road where the roundabout is as a result of the cars coming into Catherine Fields from Catherine Park and Oran Park. I shouldn't have wake up really early in order to get to school before the traffic jam starts only to sit outside the school on my own waiting for other students to arrive. lack of supervision at the school would put my life at risk and in danger. How will the NSW Government protect me if i am forced to go to school early just to get there on time. I am concerned about my mums ability to get to work on time as she too would be caught up in the traffic jam. I am concerned on the environment impact the school will have on the fragile eco system in Catherine Field. I a have noticed a large number of Kangaroos, wallabies and other Australian wildlife appearing in my back yard and neighbors back yards. These animals have been displaced from all the surrounding areas such as Oran Park, Gregory Hills, Harrington Park, Emerald Hills etc as a result of the developments that have occurred there. The natural habitants of these animals has been destroyed as a direct result of mass developments that have occurred in the area. Please help SAVE CATHERINE FIELDS from further environmental destruction by blocking the development of the school. I am concerned about the noise the school will generate after school hours, this will impact my ability to concentrate and study. I am concerned about the safety of the residents living in Catherine Field as a result of the traffic congestion the proposed new school will cause. So many cars on the road would pose risks. The Street in Catherine Field are always full of pot holes. The increase number of cars coming into Catherine Fields to attend the school will further cause damage to the fragile roads in Catherine Fields. Catherine Field roads are not built for the influx of some many vehicles.

9696

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

I am concerned about the traffic congestion the school with cause in Catherine Fields and my ability to get to school on time. Already the road is busy on Springfield Road where the roundabout is as a result of the cars coming into Catherine Fields from Catherine Park and Oran Park. I shouldn't have wake up really early in order to get to school before the traffic jam starts only to sit outside the school on my own waiting for other students to arrive. lack of supervision at the school would put my life at risk and in danger. How will the NSW Government protect me if i am forced to go to school early just to get there on time.

9701

New South Wales 2557

04/01/2026

Object

Website

As it stands, the roads in Catherine Field are completely inadequate for our current traffic conditions. Chisholm road is a perfect example of a road that, as a result of a new school being build down the road, will consequently have double the traffic back and forth, but also cara parked (probably unsafely) and family's having to talk at peak times. Chisholm road was recently re-done after the conditions being so terrible, residence had their tyres popped trying to avoid an accident. The road was pot hole after pot hole and was no where near wise enough for a truck and a car to pass safety at the 60km/h speed limit. (Residents of Chisholm road own trucking companies and to large trucks are are daily occurrence) After Chisholm road was repaired l, I was say not even six months passed before the road started to fall apart again. It's only a matter of time before it's back to its original, inadequate state. If Council were to completely transform the roads of Catherine Field ( and I mean all of Catherine Field) to curb & gutter l, with footpaths and street lights, then maybe it could support such a large addition to the community. But as it stands having a school built would be irresponsible and absolutely negatively effect all neighboring residents, but also put the lives of school children and residents at risk.

9706

Redacted

04/01/2026

Object

Website

I am worried about the traffic and parking In a standard NSW Kiss and Ride school zone, parents have a maximum of two minutes to drop off or pick up their child. Key Timing Rules • The 2-Minute Rule: Drivers may stop for a maximum of two minutes. If your child does not arrive at the vehicle within this timeframe, you are legally required to exit the zone, drive around the block, and rejoin the queue. • Attendance: You must remain in or within three metres of your vehicle at all times and cannot leave it unattended. If there are only 30 designated kiss and drop spots to drop off and collect the children and there is talks of staggering the start and finish times for the primary and secondary schools, this is most certainly going to impact on traffic. Especially when there is a pedestrian walkway right in the middle of the DOPU zone adding more time for parents to drop off or collect their children. If a vehicle has remained idle for more that two minutes, a 'drive around the block' will impact Catherine Field road, Chisholm road and Deepfield road. Drivers often ignore the 2-minute limit, treating it like a regular stop, causing backups and frustration, Without constant monitoring (e.g., traffic wardens, bollards with messages), enforcing the strict time limit is difficult, If not used correctly, vehicles queuing to drop off/pick up can create significant traffic jams, especially at peak times, Overstaying can force children to cross busy zones or cars to illegally stop in 'No Stopping' areas, creating risks for pedestrians and other drivers, Congestion can spill onto adjacent streets, exacerbating existing parking problems or creating new ones, How will this be policed? If drivers are entering the driveway from two opposite directions, will there be a traffic warden to ease the risk of collisions? How many lanes are at the entry driveway? If there is only one driveway to exit the DOPU zone, how will potentially three lanes of traffic (including from the southern carpark) be controlled. This proposal is merely too large to be supported by the current infrastructure. There is no current or future planning for this section of Catherine Field. Camden Council have stated that their focus is purely on the developments within Leppington and along The Northern Road.

9606

Redacted

03/01/2026

Object

Website

I object to this proposal I believe the children will be at risk of harm without safe walking facilities & the absence of footpaths. There should be more parking onsite rather than the need for queuing during dopu

9611

Redacted

03/01/2026

Object

Website

I oppose this development based on transport, flooding, site suitability & all other factors that make this proposal not suitable for the site

9616

Redacted

03/01/2026

Object

Website

Without sewer connections I do not feel this is the site for a development of this soze. The fact that the ema area is reduced and the students wont have a sufficient area to play on during wet periods.

9576

Redacted

28/12/2025

Object

Website

I am writing to object to the proposal. The roads are currently in poor shape with no allowance in the application to expand or improve the roads beyond the school itself. Catherine Field road is a narrow rural road that is approximately 4.5kms long. There is approximately 2.6km from Camden Valley way to the site. The reports constantly show that traffic will be LOS F with or without the school on the Camden Valley way intersection. They have not taken into account the possible future developments along Camden Valley way & Raby road etc. Building is not keeping with the rural nature of surrounding properties. There is no clarity around the cost of hiring the hall & sporting facilities. The site is floor prone. I don't believe that the application will ease the effects to downstream properties, only make it worse. The idea of the ema area on the sporting field is concerning. I do not believe this project will benefit the community in its current location

9581

Redacted

28/12/2025

Object

Website

I object to this proposal I believe the traffic that is projected will be an ongoing issue. I also believe that the DOPU area is insufficient for the proposed amount of students. There will definately be queuing along Catherine Field road in both direction causing a disruption to all road users. There is no definitive report on how cars will enter the DOPU area from two opposite directions. Upon leaving the DOPU areea, the driver's view of oncoming traffic will be blocked by buses parked at the bus bay. The implementation of a concrete barrier in the middle of the road in front of the school will limit immediate neighbours from turning right out of their own driveway. The projected traffic generation is "conservatively estimated". I believe there should be a more accurate report conducted that will focus on Catherine Field as the base subject and not Green Valley which is in another jurisdiction. The report from Dept Planning claims that the proposal 'promotes the orderly and economic use of the land'. Yet, there is no infrastructure in place or even planned to support a project of this size. "From stage 3 onward, without the rear sports field of 6,992m2, the outdoor play area will provide only5.69m2 per PS student and 5.82m2 per HS student which is below required 10m2 per student"! The current Green Valley campus, like most schools, hold events where families of students are invited. How will parking be managed with only 95 car spaces? I could only imagine how soggy the ema area will be with 1,200 plus people on site all in one day!

9586

Redacted

28/12/2025

Object

Website

I obhect to the proposal due to the restrictions of parking & the traffic concerns. The roads in their current condition cannot handle the predicted volune of traffic. There is currently no sewer connection to the site & Sydney Water cannot exactly say when they will have it connected. Parts of Leppington, George road have been waiting for services for over 15 years after being promised sewer connection & are still yet to deliver due to planning, staffing & financial constraints. The school should wait until the correct infrastructure is at least planned & available

9591

Redacted

28/12/2025

Object

Website

I agree with Camden Council’s objection to the amended proposal. The applicant is putting the cart before the horse in thinking a proposal of this size is suited tot he current nature of CatherIne Field without any infrastructure in place or at least in planning stages

9596

New South Wales 2557

28/12/2025

Object

Website

Dear IPC, This submission is in relation to the Minarah College development application in Catherine Field NSW. The development has followed a box ticking exercise with regards to community engagement, and in my opinion, has failed to properly engage or address community concerns. Without getting into details of each of the concerns raised by the community, during the engagement process, I would like to point out the lack of accuracy of information used for the development application. I have some concerns in relation to the information presented in relation to the number of submissions, including objections and supporters. The document on the planning portal site called: "Amendment RtS - Appendix A Submissions Register" shows: 109 submissions Object to the project and 296 support the project, with 10 comments. This means that, as presented, 26% of all submissions object to the project. However, The planning portal itself, when you filter for the same categories has a different set of numbers. There are 302 Objections and 393 support, with 4 comments. This puts it at 43% of submissions object to the project. When you drill down further, there are about 72 supporting submissions that are virtually word for word (including "I support the project" with variations that include adding a full stop, or changing "the" to "this" and changing "project" to "school". If you treat these minor variations as one submission, given they are "copy paste" type submissions, the objections are around 50%. I am also concerned that the number of objections from the local community in Catherine Fields may be underestimated, as some community members found the use of computers to be quite challenging and struggled to use other means. Also, as I have been following this project from the early stages, I kept a record of the number of submissions made in 2022, and my notes indicate that the objections in the first round far outweighed the support. My notes indicate, that the 2022 submissions were: 190 Objections, and 90 supporters, demonstrating that 68% of all submissions lodged in 2022 were objecting to the project. I am happy to supply the working data I have extracted from Appendix A and the Planning Portal for your reference, along with some pie charts from the attached spreadsheet showing the discrepancy between Appendix A, the data currently on the Planning portal and the initial responses in 2022. However, I would need you to request this information and I can supply it directly, as I don't want it traced back to me for fear of backlash. I don't understand how the Appendix A report show less objections that have been lodged in the planning portal. I was intended to request from the DPHI a concise list of all submissions, perhaps in a spreadsheet, so I can compare with the data presented in Appendix A, however it appears the project is now with IPC, so I have not made an enquiry to DPHI. I don't know if there is an explanation on why there is a discrepancy between the information? As you can understand, the community is concerned that the data presented is painting a more optimistic picture in support of the project, than the groundswell of objections within the local Catherine Fields community. When counting the information I have been able to extract from the Planning portal, when I look at objections and supporters from the local Catherine Fields community (including the following suburbs of Catherine Fields, Leppington, Kearns, Raby, Oran Park, Denham Court, Gregory Hills and Gledswood Hills) the data shows submissions of 92 local objections with 27 local supporters. That is a 77% local objection to the total local submissions from Catherine Fields and neighbouring suburbs. What this data confirms is that the locals don't want this development to go ahead, and support for this project is coming largely from outside the local community. I don't think this development should go ahead, given there is a strong local objection, and the applicants effort has been more focussed on increasing the sheer number of supporting submissions than it has been in addressing local concerns. The data seems to be skewed in making the project look like it has more support than it really does, failing to show the initial and sustained local backlash, and even not presenting accurate information. It appears that from the initial stages of the project, the applicant has been more concerned with going through the process of minimum required engagement as part of a "box ticking exercise", dismissing local concerns by referring to their need not to address items as they have "achieved certain standards". The applicant has failed to obtain the social licence to operate a school in Catherine Field and the school will largely serve a community that resides outside of the local area. If even at this stage of the project the applicant has failed to get the local community on side, then what hope does the local community have in engaging with the school with real concerns during construction and operation of the school.

9601

New South Wales 2557

28/12/2025

Object

Website

I do not support the development. We will be lending our local rural lifestyle to a community that largely resides outside of our community. We moved in the area in 2021, having lived near a busy high school, we enjoy the quieter lifestyle of a rural area for a considerable high purchase price. I will be paying this home off for a very long time, and its not right that I have to now put up with a school in our area (busier roads, which are already falling apart, with no support to council to spend more money on these roads that will fall apart quickly with the increased traffic). It just looks like Minarah college has looked at a planning loophole to purchase cheap rural zoned land, rather than building in an area (such as Leppington or Austral) with a town plan and zoning suitable for a school. This is a failure on planning in the area, as Catherine Field is without a town plan, being a small area between two zoned development areas of Oran Park and Leppington. Without this town plan, the rural pocket of Catherine Field is susceptible to development applications such as the one for Minarah college. What's to stop further schools going up in our area. I would like to propose this development gets stopped, and that no further similar applications be considered until a town plan is put in place, showing land use intentions including parks, shops, schools, housing, work places etc. I suggest a town plan be put in place before the area becomes littered with similar State Significant developments, on an adhoc basis and ruining the rural or development potential, for the area before its too late. We cannot allow Minarah college development to be the developed cart that comes before the planning horse. The local demographic does not support a muslim school, and the school should be located close to the community it will serve. Please reject this application. The only reason Catherine Field was chosen is because the land here is cheap compared to land with a proper development town plan, and not because there is a local need. A public school would better serve the multicultural demographic of the area, provided a proper develop town plan is mapped out before any school is built.

9571

New South Wales 2557

27/12/2025

Object

Website

Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties

9561

Redacted

26/12/2025

Object

Website

Please refer to the attached file Proposed School Development – Catherine Field Project: Minarah College SSD 30759158 Position: Strongly Object/Against Submitted by: Name: [name redacted] Address: [redacted] 1. Introduction and Scope of Submission This submission objects to the proposed school development at Catherine Field on planning, infrastructure capacity, and site suitability grounds only. It does not oppose the proposal based on the type, identity, or faith of the school. The objection is confined to whether the existing and planned infrastructure can safely and sustainably accommodate a development of this scale and intensity. For the reasons outlined below, the proposal fails to satisfy key requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), particularly sections 4.15, 4.16 and 1.3, and should be refused. 2. Statutory Framework Under section 4.15 of the EP&A Act, the consent authority must consider: • the likely impacts of the development (s 4.15(1)(b)); • the suitability of the site for the development (s 4.15(1)(c)); and • the public interest (s 4.15(1)(e)). In determining the application, the Commission must also ensure that any approval is capable of being lawfully conditioned under section 4.16, and that the decision is consistent with the objects of the Act in section 1.3, including the promotion of orderly and economic development and community welfare. 3. Scale and Intensity of the Proposal The proposal seeks approval for a school accommodating up to 980 students, comprising: • 505 primary school students (Kindergarten to Year 6); • 385 high school students (Years 7 to 12); • 60 Early Learning Centre places; • 30 SSP enrolments; and • 51 full-time equivalent staff. The development includes an OOSHC facility and multiple buildings, sports facilities, and community-use infrastructure. This scale represents a high-intensity institutional use, generating substantial daily traffic movements and ongoing operational impacts. 4. Traffic Generation, Access and Road Safety (s 4.15(1)(b)) All vehicular access to the site is provided via a single entry and exit point onto Catherine Fields Road, with no alternative access or redundancy. The site layout includes: • 30 on-site pick-up/drop-off (DOPU) bays (13 + 17); • 7 indented bus bays; • private on-site bus parking; and • operation of 12.5-metre chartered buses. These facilities are designed for high-turnover, short-dwell movements, resulting in intense merging and re-entry demand onto Catherine Fields Road during peak periods. While internal circulation is provided, all vehicles ultimately enter and exit via Catherine Fields Road, concentrating impacts on a road already experiencing growth-related pressure and commuter demand. The reliance on internal queuing and on-site circulation does not address external road network capacity constraints, particularly at key intersections connecting Catherine Fields Road to the broader network. The proposal therefore gives rise to unacceptable traffic efficiency and road safety impacts, including increased congestion, queuing, and conflict between private vehicles, buses, service vehicles, and vulnerable road users. 5. Extended Operating Hours and Cumulative Impacts In addition to standard school operations, the proposal includes: • community use of the sports field between 8:20am and 9:00pm on weekdays; • weekend use of the sports field between 9:00am and 9:00pm; and • community use of the multi-purpose hall until 9:30pm on weekends. These extended hours confirm that traffic impacts will not be limited to school arrival and departure periods but will occur during evenings and weekends. This results in cumulative traffic and amenity impacts, increasing pressure on the local road network beyond what is typically associated with a school operating solely during standard hours. 6. Infrastructure Servicing Constraints and Prematurity (s 4.15(1)(b) and s 4.15(1)(c)) The site layout confirms reliance on an on-site sewage treatment plant and Effluent Management Area (EMA), rather than reticulated sewer infrastructure. A development of this scale, intensity, and duration of use is not appropriately serviced by interim or private infrastructure solutions. The reliance on non-reticulated servicing introduces ongoing risks relating to capacity, maintenance, environmental performance, and regulatory compliance. The absence of guaranteed, fully delivered essential infrastructure at the time of operation demonstrates that the site is not suitable for the proposed development and that the proposal represents premature development. 7. Conditions of Consent Cannot Resolve the Impacts (s 4.16) The identified impacts cannot be resolved through conditions of consent without reliance on: • future infrastructure upgrades beyond the control of the consent authority; • deferred funding or third-party delivery; or • ongoing operational management to compensate for infrastructure inadequacy. Conditions cannot guarantee the timely delivery of major road or servicing infrastructure, nor can they cure fundamental network and servicing constraints. Where acceptable outcomes depend on matters outside the certainty of the approval, consent cannot lawfully be granted. 8. Public Interest and Objects of the Act (s 4.15(1)(e) and s 1.3) Approving the development would transfer the burden of infrastructure shortfall and safety risk onto the local community. This outcome is inconsistent with: • promoting the social welfare of the community; • facilitating ecologically sustainable development; and • ensuring orderly and economic use and development of land. The proposal is therefore not in the public interest. 9. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, the proposed development: • will result in unacceptable traffic and infrastructure impacts (s 4.15(1)(b)); • is not suitable for the site (s 4.15(1)(c)); • cannot be adequately addressed through lawful and enforceable conditions (s 4.16); and • is not in the public interest (s 4.15(1)(e)). Accordingly, the application should be refused. Kind regards, [name redacted]

Proposed School Development_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 110.97 KB)

9566

Redacted

26/12/2025

Object

Website

Purpose of This Summary This summary outlines planning-based concerns only regarding the proposed school development at Catherine Field. It does not oppose the proposal based on the type, identity, or faith of the school. The concerns relate solely to whether the existing and planned infrastructure can safely and sustainably support a development of this scale, in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act). Key Planning Issues 1. Traffic and Road Safety (EP&A Act s 4.15(1)(b)) • The school will accommodate up to 980 students and 51 staff, generating significant daily traffic. • All vehicles enter and exit via a single access point onto Catherine Fields Road. • The proposal includes 30 pick-up/drop-off bays, 7 bus bays, and operation of 12.5-metre buses, creating high-turnover traffic during peak times. • Traffic impacts will coincide with existing commuter peaks on a road network already under pressure. These factors give rise to unacceptable congestion and road safety risks. 2. Extended Operating Hours and Cumulative Impacts (EP&A Act s 4.15(1)(b)) • The sports field and hall are proposed to operate until 9:00–9:30pm, including weekends. • Community use means traffic impacts will occur outside normal school hours, increasing cumulative impacts on local roads and residents. 3. Infrastructure Servicing Constraints (EP&A Act s 4.15(1)(b) and (c)) • The proposal relies on an on-site sewage treatment plant and Effluent Management Area, rather than reticulated sewer. • A development of this size is not appropriately serviced by interim or private infrastructure. • This demonstrates the site is not suitable for the proposed intensity of use. 4. Prematurity and Site Suitability (EP&A Act s 4.15(1)(c)) • If the school were to open today, the surrounding road and servicing infrastructure would not operate safely or efficiently. • Reliance on future infrastructure upgrades makes the proposal premature. 5. Conditions Cannot Resolve the Impacts (EP&A Act s 4.16) • Conditions cannot guarantee the delivery of major road or servicing upgrades outside the control of the consent authority. • Where acceptable outcomes rely on uncertain future infrastructure, approval cannot be lawfully granted. Public Interest (EP&A Act s 4.15(1)(e)) Approving the development would shift infrastructure risk onto the local community and compromise road safety. This outcome is not in the public interest. Conclusion For the reasons above, the proposal results in unacceptable impacts, is not suitable for the site, cannot be resolved through conditions, and should be refused.

9546

New South Wales 2197

25/12/2025

Object

Website

Farzana kausar

9536

New South Wales 2557

23/12/2025

Object

Website

I believe the proposal if it goes ahead will greatly affect the Catherine Field community. In particular, the residents and road users specifically that live or drive along Catherine Field road. With the proposed increase in traffic and restricted on site drop off/ pick up area, the morning and afternoon peaks will definately cause queuing in both directions as the vehicles enter the site. There is discussion about a right turn lane for those approaching from Camden Valley way but nothing about a turning lane from those approaching from the opposite direction. The traffic report hasn't been accurate. Also, there was no evidence of a new noise report from the initial that was conducted during covid & it was evident that there were missing 'noise loggers'. I find this to be misleading. The site is subject to flooding and there is no evidence that this development will not impact neighbouring properties downstream, it will only increase the flooding risk. The proposed building does not fit with the rural nature of surrounding properties. The reduction of the GFA was minimal considering the teacher numbers were almost halved and the student numbers were dramatically reduced. Having the onsite effluent irrigation management area under the sports field where children will be playing. Having a 'no play' time during wet seasons will heavily reduce the amount of time children will have open play space. I object to this proposal

9516

Redacted

22/12/2025

Object

Email

Submission to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Project: Minarah College (SSD-30759158) Position: Strong Opposition Due Date: 5:00 PM, Tuesday, 10 February 2026 To the Commissioners, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point on Catherine Field Road. There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making transport for students impossible and dangerous The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. Relying on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighbouring properties. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely,

9526

Redacted

21/12/2025

Object

Email

Dear Sir/Madam My name is Michael Dimech and I am opposed to the new school that is proposed for Catherine Field Road, Catherine Field. I do not believe the area is suitable to have a school due to zoning, infrastructure and Flooding. The following concerns also need to be addressed and resolved before any school is built in the area. 1) Infrastructure - Roads. The proposed location Catherine Field Road is a major Thorofare for traffic and is used by many vehicles including heavy vehicles that reside in the area. Catherine Field Road, Barry Ave, Allenby Ave, Deepfield road, Springfield Road and Chisholm Road are all in poor state of repair and any increase in traffic will see these roads deteriorate. Who is responsible to maintain these roads? Will the increase in traffic related to the school contribute to the road maintenance or upgrade. As Catherine Field Road will now have a 40 k/h speed limit many vehicles will begin using other roads namely Chisholm rd. / Deepfield rd, as a rat-run. Also, there are NO footpaths or bike lanes along any roads in this area so any Parents/Children walking or bike riding will be at high risk. 2) Parking. Will enough parking be provided for all Teachers / pupils & visitors including special events such as Christmas / Easter / End of year events that may occur as any vehicles parking on the streets will be placed in a dangerous situation as little room exists on many of these roads and any rains will result in further danger as vehicles possibly getting bogged / people slipping again due to poor road width. 3) Drop-off, Pick-up Has enough been provided here to as the real world has shown there needs to be minimum 2 lanes as parents come to pick up their children some will take longer than others, and these pick-ups, drop-off lanes will be clogged very quickly resulting in traffic overflowing onto Catherine Field Road. 3) Sewer. Another concern is sewer. Since every property in the area has their own septic system due to no town system how will a system for a school be consider hygienic since the location is part flood zone and no doubt the septic will be located in the lowest part of the property. 4) Hour of operation We were informed the school will operate 7 days a week up to 10pm. Any people living within close proximity who moved into the area moved into a Rural location, NOT an urban location. No other businesses operate these hours in this area. Allowing these business hours threatens the lifestyle of those who moved into the area. This includes excess noise, extra traffic and general disruption to the area. I feel it is total inappropriate to have ANY school or business in this area and total object. I have never made any political donations to any political party, ever. Signed,

9481

New South Wales 2557

17/12/2025

Object

Website

I oppose the building of this school in this location as it is being built in a residential area and the road going in and out of the area is narrow and not capable of carrying the traffic that a school would generate. It would also be very challenging for me to exit my street and turn right onto Catherine Field Road with the increased traffic, particularly in the mornings and afternoons. There is not enough infrastructure to support a school, sewerage would be an issue and the area floods. Having a school there with all the cars it would attract would take the feel of the suburb away and change it irretrievably.

9501

Redacted

16/12/2025

Object

Email

To the Commissioners, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts • Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. • Safety Risks: The high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students) will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. • Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss • Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. • Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. • Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing • Wastewater Management: The site currently lacks connection to Sydney Water’s sewerage system. The reliance on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighboring properties. • Flooding Concerns: The proposed earthworks and increased hardstand area will exacerbate existing local flooding issues. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it safely or sustainably. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely, Resident

9506

Redacted

16/12/2025

Object

Email

Dear Commissioner , I wish to formally object to the proposed Minarah project and the establishment of a school within our street Catherine Field Road , Catherine Field . This proposal is fundamentally inappropriate for our location and demonstrates a clear disregard for the existing rural residential environment . Our street is a quiet rural residential area and is entirely unsuitable to accommodate a development of this nature. The road infrastructure is wholly inadequate to manage the significant increase in traffic that a school would generate. The street is effectively one way in and one way out, with no capacity for traffic dispersal. There are no footpaths, shoulders, gutters, or adequate road width to safely manage vehicles, pedestrians, or school-related traffic. As a result, the development would inevitably cause traffic congestion and back-ups extending onto Camden Valley Way. The absence of footpaths and street lighting presents a serious safety risk, particularly for students, pedestrians, and residents. Increased vehicle movements combined with poor visibility and inadequate pedestrian infrastructure would significantly heighten the risk of accidents and injury and a seriously unsafe environment . The proposed operating hours of 7:00am to 9:00pm, including weekends, are entirely incompatible with the existing residential character of the area. Such extended hours would result in ongoing disturbance and would destroy the quiet, peaceful nature and community atmosphere that residents currently enjoy. In addition, construction noise and ongoing operational noise would further disrupt the amenity of our street, causing sustained disturbance and materially diminish our residents quality of life . Furthermore, our area has a history of serious flooding. The extensive earthworks required for this development would likely exacerbate existing drainage and flooding issues, posing further risk to surrounding properties and infrastructure. This risk has not been adequately addressed and should alone be sufficient grounds for refusal . Placing a school in the middle of our quiet rural residential street is a planning failure . The proposal is unsafe , poorly sited and totally incompatible with the existing infrastructure , character and capacity of the area. For these reasons, we strongly oppose the proposal. Once again we reiterate the introduction of a school into the middle of our quiet rural residential street is inappropriate, poorly planned, and fails to consider the safety, infrastructure limitations, and wellbeing of the existing community and we urge you to reject proposal outright ! Kind Regards

9511

Redacted

16/12/2025

Object

Email

To the Commissioners, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. This proposal is incompatible with the existing semi-rural character of Catherine Field and poses significant risks to the local community. My objections are based on the following critical issues: 1. Unacceptable Traffic and Safety Impacts • Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips. • Safety Risks: Most students will attend by private vehicles (up to 90% of students) this will create severe bottlenecks at the single entry point and critical intersections like Camden Valley Way. • Pedestrian Danger: There is a complete lack of footpaths and lighting, making active transport for students impossible and dangerous. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss • Inaccurate Data: The noise assessments were conducted during COVID-19 lockdowns and are missing data from critical logging locations, making them an unreliable basis for approval. • Operational Disturbance: The proposed 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM operating hours, including weekend use, will destroy the tranquility of this rural area. • Construction Noise: A 224-week construction timeline with noise levels reaching 86dB is unreasonable for a residential-adjacent site. 3. Inadequate Site Servicing • Wastewater Management: Relying on an on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health concerns regarding runoff into neighbouring properties. • Flooding Concerns: The area is prone to flooding, earthworks will increase this issue. Conclusion A facility of this size in a location that has no essential infrastructure cannot be supported. The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve its sustainability, safety or the fundamental land-use conflict. I urge the Commission to refuse this application in its entirety. Sincerely

9521

Redacted

16/12/2025

Object

Email

To the Commissioners, My name is Alex and I am writing to personally object to the current development application of the Minarah College development at 268–278 Catherine Fields Road. As a 35 year veteran of the Catherine field/ Leppington area I strongly object as the proposal i believe is not in keeping with the existing semi-rural character of my area. It is based on the following reasons although not exclusively. 1. Poor Traffic and poor pedestrian Safety and traffic bottlenecks • Bad roads: Catherine Fields Road is a narrow rural road without kerbs, gutters, or adequate shoulders. It cannot safely accommodate the projected 700+ daily vehicle trips and in fact applies to Chisholm road and Springfield roads also as vehicular traffic to avoid bottlenecks will use this road to get their children to school. This will overload the road and cause significant risks to those who live close to the school on this road. Due to no lighting or curbs and guttering on any of the roads mentioned it is a significant safety risk to the school children and adults. There is significant litigation risk to Camden Council if anyone was to be hurt due to these poor conditions! I don’t have the money to pay exorbitant council rates to fight any court cases. • Road Safety Risks: This DA has in its verbatim an acknowledgment of the high dependency on private vehicles (up to 90% of students). As I’ve said in earlier submissions this will create severe bottlenecks at the school entry point (one only) on Catherine field road. The kiss and drop is far too small as can be seen on the Unity College at Austral fourth ave College. Because most students will be dropped of around 830-0900 am the left in lane onto Catherine field road will hold up peak hour traffic on Camden Valley Way and is therefore a major collision risk. Cars will undoubtedly then use the Deepfields road entry and cause similar problems. Catherine field road and Chisholm roads cannot cope with the increased traffic numbers. 2. Significant Noise and Amenity Loss The noise assessments were carried out during COVID-19 lockdowns. The data relied upon is now outdated and therefore useless in determining a DA’s approval or otherwise. The noise that will be generated during construction is advised to reach 86db and during night time will also be very High and over the weekends. We are used to little or no noise 24/7 in this area and is unfair to now impose this on us. We have dutifully paid our rates to keep this area as tranquil as possible. 3. Timeline is improper This area is yet to be developed. If this is to go ahead wait for the infrastructure to catch up first and then create a structured and logical community development incorporating all necessary utilities and ammenities. The new school, MINARAH college is not in keeping with the rural nature at present of the Catherine Field area zoned RU4 primary production ie the production of food. We the residents are all aware in future that we are part of the Catherine Field North part of the South West Growth Centers SWGA. The development of the school without the corresponding development of the Catherine field North area at large will result in a disjointed and potentially dangerous situation. If it is allowed to go ahead it should be developed strategically and holistically with all required housing and industrial and shopping and entertainment precincts at large. The area has not been rezoned and as such any schools and early learning centres placements may change in the area and if built now will be in inappropriate places of the master plan. The placement of this school will probably unduly influence the placement of ammenities and other infrastructure required for the SWGA, and the resources that are necessary are already stretched will not go far enough without significant waste. 4. Inadequate Site Servicing The site currently is not connected to Sydney Water’s residential sewerage system. An on-site wastewater treatment plant for nearly 1,000 people raises serious environmental and health risks regarding runoff and ground water contamination for neighbouring properties. This will be exacerbated due to the handstand area of the school and also will increase water runoff and thereby flooding to down stream properties in major storms. It doesn’t take a genius or reference to reports to figure this out. Councils localised current flood maps will be outdated if this goes ahead. Conclusion The minor reduction in student numbers does not resolve the fundamental land-use conflict. This large-scale educational facility is being proposed in a location and at a time that lacks the essential infrastructure to support it. I urge the Commission to please stop the Minarah College development application in its entirety. Please retain our rural tranquil nature of living that we chose. Sincerely,

9461

New South Wales 2557

16/12/2025

Object

Website

I do not want an Islamic school in our area. This is rural farm land. It does not belong here. Build it somewhere else.

9466

New South Wales 2557

16/12/2025

Object

Website

I object to the building of an Islamic school in this rural farmland area. After the Bondi terror attacks it is just more proof that Islam does not belong here. But besides for that we do not have the infrastructure for it. The area is farm land. It has not been released for development so how can such a large school be developed. We still all run on septic and we are in an area that floods and has atrocious roads full of pot holes so bad the area is nick named pothole central. The roads could not handle the extra traffic it would create and it would not benefit the local community as most locals in this area are catholic or have no religious beliefs.

9346

Redacted

13/12/2025

Object

Website

I don’t believe this proposal will benefit. If the current Green Valley school doesnt have buses with so many stidents travelling from afar. Why are they proposing one bus to bring students from two train stations when the round trip will take 45 minutes in peak hour. The flooding hasn’t been addressed & nearby neighbours will be impacted. The direct neighbours will not be able to turn right out of their own driveway. How will they manage the morning & afternoon peak with parents entering the carpark from tow different directions on Catherine Field road. I do not believe that Catherine Field road has the infrastructure yet to support a development of this size

9146

Redacted

09/12/2025

Object

Website

We need more houses not a building that is beneficial for only a small percentage of the population. Rather a sporting facility would be better suited as it is for everyone and not the minority

8816

Redacted

08/12/2025

Object

Website

Harrington Park

8501

New South Wales 2557

07/12/2025

Object

Website

The area is not suitable for a large school, the infrastructure is not there, no footbaths, roads have pot holes and gravel edges, sewerage is still septic. Another concern would be the high volume of traffic to this rural area which is not designed for this kind of volume, It will cause chaos to the local community. The roads are only going to get worse with this high volume of cars and safety will be a major concern, especially when children are involved. I can imagine how many cars will be lining up to pick up kids, especially considering the quantity of 900 students who are going to be at the premises. How's this rural area going to handle this mass volume of cars and busses, it doesn't make sense. Imagine the noise that this will bring to this peaceful rural community. This college will have a very negative impact to this area and to the locals and not to forget the unpractical and dangerous aspects that come from an area that is still rural with no proper development and infrastructure. Bad idea?

8396

New South Wales 2557

06/12/2025

Object

Website

It is not an area for this kind of establishment yet. Roads aren’t ready for the amount of traffic it will implement to this rural lifestyle, the roads are already heavy with traffic from the surrounding developments. This should not be imposed onto the residents of Catherine field

8416

New South Wales 2557

06/12/2025

Object

Website

We need more schools in the area that will take on non Muslims. This school only takes on muslims and our community is majority non muslims. There is no racial discrimination here just that the overall community needs to be looked after.

8431

Redacted

06/12/2025

Object

Website

The site is not a suitable place to build a school. The road would be dangerous for school traffic and pedestrians. The school would cause major delays for other residents and residents of surrounding areas at peak times as it is a through road .

8436

Redacted

06/12/2025

Object

Website

Please do not let this school pass.

8441

New South Wales 2567

06/12/2025

Object

Website

Don’t want my area turning into a [redacted]

8446

Redacted

06/12/2025

Object

Website

It will deeply affect the area as im against this way of life in Australia

8451

Redacted

06/12/2025

Object

Website

This Islamic school will ruin the reason many people love harrington park, seeing the nature and trees when entering. [redacted]

8146

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

To the council It is built in the middle of a housing area that will affect and put the area in danger I am not racist but putting a Muslim school is only for there religion This is a growing area and if a school is being made It should be made for the public Children around the district But I find it were it is Is dominating one religious race and won’t befit the community They have as far as I know 2 schools Rossmore and other is on ( forth ave ) Small

8156

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

I am not in support of this our roads flood all the time and where they are planning on building this road floods so easily when it rain that the first to go under water. Also were will the waste go we don’t have sewage we have septic This will not fit in with our community

8161

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

Infrastructure cannot handle the proposed development

8166

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

The proposed school development does not align with the established objectives of the RU4 Primary Production Small Lots zone. This zoning is specifically designed to support activities that contribute to the long-term viability of primary production, ensuring that land is utilised in a way that supports agricultural and other rural activities essential for local economies. The key objectives of the RU4 Primary Production zoning include: Enabling sustainable primary industry and other compatible uses: The RU4 zoning is tailored to prioritise sustainable primary industries, particularly agricultural enterprises that rely on smaller lots for intensive forms of production. This sustainability aspect not only focuses on environmental preservation but also on ensuring that agricultural businesses can thrive over the long term. By allowing activities that are compatible with primary production, the zoning seeks to ensure that rural land remains dedicated to food production, resource cultivation, and other essential rural industries. Encouraging diversity and employment opportunities in relation to primary industry enterprises: Another critical objective of the RU4 zoning is to foster employment opportunities within the realm of primary industries. This includes promoting enterprises that are smaller in scale but require a more intensive level of production. These enterprises might include niche agricultural ventures such as organic farming, specialty crops, or intensive horticulture, which can generate significant employment in rural areas. By encouraging a variety of agricultural activities, the zone is designed to support a diverse and resilient local economy that can offer jobs to the rural population. Minimising conflicts between land uses within the zone and adjacent zones: A significant concern in land-use planning is the potential for conflicts between different types of land uses. The RU4 zone aims to minimise these conflicts by ensuring that the activities permitted within the zone are compatible with one another and with neighbouring zones. For example, allowing residential or industrial developments in a primarily agricultural area could lead to issues such as noise complaints, odor concerns, or water resource disputes. By restricting incompatible uses, the zoning aims to maintain a balance where primary industries can operate without interference, while neighbouring land uses can coexist peacefully. The proposed school development, however, appears inconsistent with these objectives. Firstly, it does not contribute to the sustainability of primary industries. Schools, by their nature, are not part of the agricultural or rural economy and do not directly support the land's primary purpose of food production or resource management. In fact, the construction of a school on land designated for primary production could potentially limit the availability of land for agricultural enterprises, particularly for those that require smaller lots for intensive production. The presence of a school might also introduce infrastructural needs—such as roads, utilities, and parking—that are not compatible with the long-term sustainability of agricultural uses. Secondly, the proposed development does not foster employment opportunities related to primary industry enterprises. While a school does provide employment opportunities, these jobs are in the education sector, not in the realm of primary production. This runs counter to the zoning's objective of encouraging diverse employment within the agricultural sector. The introduction of a non-agricultural enterprise like a school could divert focus from the goal of supporting small-scale, intensive primary industries that are better suited to the RU4 zoning. he proposed school development, however, appears inconsistent with these objectives. Firstly, it does not contribute to the sustainability of primary industries. Schools, by their nature, are not part of the agricultural or rural economy and do not directly support the land's primary purpose of food production or resource management. In fact, the construction of a school on land designated for primary production could potentially limit the availability of land for agricultural enterprises, particularly for those that require smaller lots for intensive production. The presence of a school might also introduce infrastructural needs—such as roads, utilities, and parking—that are not compatible with the long-term sustainability of agricultural uses.

8171

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

I completely object to the development as it completely does not blend into the rural aspect of the area. We do not have the infrastructure to cope with the influx of traffic. The speed limit will suddenly become 40. Catherine field Rd is struggling to cope now as it is. A big NO from a very concerned resident.

8176

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

I object to the proposal. This is a rural area. The school does not belong in this area. There are plenty of areas that have already been released for developed where it could be built. We do not have the infrastructure to support the school and all the extra traffic that it would bring. Our roads are terrible as it is, we still run on septic systems and the area floods. The size of the school and the hours of operation ie. weekends is not acceptable either. I also don’t believe we have the numbers in Islamic population to support an Islamic school in the area. This means the students will be coming from out of the area and will be of no benefit to the local community. The large school will take away the rural feel of the area.

8181

New South Wales 2570

05/12/2025

Object

Website

Catherine Field, Oran Park and surrounding suburbs are not being developed to allow for increased traffic in the roads that currently serve the area and future roads to be developed will just add to congestion. School hours are the busiest in the area with limited public transport and a need for parents to drive as well as other people just trying to get to work. These suburbs can not afford any more congestion from any school of any kind or any more major businesses.

8241

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

We are small quiet country village rural area; the area doesn't have the infrastructure to accommodate a massive development/school like this. Our small roads won't be able to handle the influx of thousands of cars and bus, traffic for the local will be horrendous especially pick up and drop off times. We don't have sewage so with so many people in one area, especially when it floods and raw sewage travels down to the small local creeks in the area.

8261

New South Wales 2567

05/12/2025

Object

Website

Another one of these schools is definitely not needed. They should [redacted] the community like the majority of us have.

8266

New South Wales 2567

05/12/2025

Object

Website

Another one of these schools is definitely not needed. They should [redacted] into the community like the majority of us have.

8276

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

Given Catherine Field is still a traditional "rural" suburb offering all local residents a peaceful, safe and family friendly community atmosphere, the idea of have a K12 school built in the area seems totally out of character with that described. The other key factors that seemingly continue to be overlooked or ignored are: 1. Value to local community? One has to feel it is near zero as by Minarah's own submissions state that some 80 - 90% of attendees will come from out of area (not local surrounding suburbs but much further afield) 2. While reworked submissions state the development and subsequent attendance by works and students of the school will still number some 200-300 then rising to some 900-1000 at all stages end. a. The noise generated will certainly shatter the quite, peaceful and safety living qualities currently being enjoyed by the local community. Further, the times and days proposed for operation means that no-one in the area gets any respite from the noise that will be generated. b. During heavy storms, Catherine Field Rd, specifically that section where the school is proposed to be built, is notorious for flooding whenever there are storms and heavy rain fall. Given the design of the school, specifically roof spans, the lack of (i.e. only current rudimentary) storm water management in the area, one has to the expect and accept that Catherine Field Rd will be totally inundated AS will the properties across the road during any storms and down pours. Who is then liable for damages to the road and properties? c. Catherine Field Rd at best can only be described as a pot-holed mess. In barely struggles with through traffic now. I fail to understand how it will cope with a further 200 - 1000 vehicles travelling through in the morning & afternoons. i) Will the school pay for a full major road upgrade to 4 lanes (not referenced in the submission, but suggestion for a service lane for school access) - totally insufficient, unless local residents are to accept they may not be able to get into their homes due to kilometer long traffic ques. Further, the reality is that the full length of Catherine Field Rd should be fully upgraded to 4 lanes, is Minarah College offer to pay for this OR will this be left to Council (local rate payers)? ii) Noting given location of the school, limited local transport, number of access service roads to Catherine Field (Springfield, Chisholm & Deepfield & Allenby Rds, noting the current road surface quality are as per Catherine Field Rd and in some cases worse). Will these also be upgraded and who will pay for this? iv) To the final point of the roads - it is Safety and Duty of Care - again who will be responsible and liable every time a student is struck? I make this point given the current volume of traffic, that also as would be experienced if the school was to go ahead and not just cars but the 5 - 50 ton trucks travelling through these roads (doing the rat run) hourly / daily. 3. Lack of existing critical Infrastructure i.e. Stormwater manage as stated early. i) Sewerage non currently available and from recent SWC notice, not proposed to be put in place for another 5 - 7 years. That in mind, I highly doubt the suggested on-site treatment plant will suffice, and more importantly land available for treated discharge (ground playing fields - really?) will non doubt be saturated in short space of time, couple with storm rain I suspect in time there may be an increase in reported chemical / bacterial infections (kids on the grounds playing sports having cuts or abrasions), likewise the spread to down-stream family properties. ii) Town Clean Water - pressure. Noticed drops over past 15 years already, given the many surrounding housing sites developed. As stated early, I cannot see any tangible value this school, or any other development of this scale or type, at this time will bring to the Catherine Field suburb and its residents. Further, in this case it appears that this college has seized on the opportunity to purchase parcels of land cheaply (relative to the proposed development and revenues it will generate), leaving all other necessary external supporting infrastructure issues to be addressed, developed and paid for by others (State and local council and all funded by the public taxes).

8296

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

[redacted]

8301

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

More public schools required. Too much traffic already for yet another private school.

8356

Redacted

05/12/2025

Object

Website

another Islamic school is not needed in the area. There are plenty schools [redacted]

8371

New South Wales 2567

05/12/2025

Object

Website

We do not want an Islamic school in Catherine Fields

8376

New South Wales 2557

05/12/2025

Object

Website

The proposed development is not appropriate for the area. Our roads have no curb and guttering. The are not of a standard to allow for the increased flow of traffic related to this large development. There are no foot paths and no bike tracks, no regular bus/train access so it would be assumed that most children will be driven to the school with 1 lane in and 1 lane out. There is no facility for a turning bay to the school to attempt to reduce the impact of large volumes of traffic all congregating at school start times. You only have to look at the school on 4th avenue Austral to get the idea of volumes of traffic and the chaos that it creates. There is no sewerage system in place in catherine field. We all have our own septic system. The proposed sewerage system for the school is inadequate for the over 1000 people that will be on the property. The amended sewerage system has it competing with sporting grounds. It is unhygenic for children to be around that type of fluid run off. The hours that the school is to operate (although amended )are still excessive and not indicative of just school activities. No school run on the weekend but this school is planning on being open until late into the night on weekends. There is no benefit to the surrounding population who will be bearing the brunt of the impact of the development and the operation of a such a school. All in all we will be extremely disappointed if this proposal is allowed to go ahead as it will irrevocably destroy the nature of the area. We are a rural area not a high density development area. We have plenty of development nearby that would be a much better fit for this development.