Minarah College

18796

10/02/2026

Object

Email

Good afternoon, I have been asked to forward a video in addition to submissions sent to you from Michael Sciriha from 265 Catherine Field road as he feels it an important part of his opposing submission. Can you please confirm by replying all to this email that you have received the mp4 at your earliest convenience. MP4 LINK: https://youtu.be/bgmbFLlmmx4

3336 images combined.pdf (PDF, 10.47 MB)

18236

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

This proposal is a major concern to locals. Apart from the traffic, flooding, site suitability, insufficient sewer and town water, the lack of frequent public buses and car parking spaces there are more items that need to be answered. My primary concern relates to the proposed staff-to-student ratios and the resulting intensity of land use, which I believe is unsuitable for this semi-rural location. Unrealistic Staffing Projections: According to the Minarah College project overview, the school plans to reach a capacity of 980 students with only 51 staff by Stage 3 (2035). This represents a student-to-staff ratio of approximately 19.2:1. Deviation from Industry Benchmarks: This ratio significantly exceeds the national average for independent schools, which was recorded by ACARA at 11.7:1 for teaching staff. A ratio nearly double the industry standard suggests a high-density operational model that is inconsistent with the rural character of Catherine Field. Inadequate Supervision and Safety: Lower staff-to-student ratios are a critical factor in maintaining adequate supervision. The proposed lean staffing model raises serious concerns about the school’s ability to manage 980 students safely, especially regarding on-site traffic management and emergency evacuations in a flood-prone area. Over-utilization of Site Infrastructure: The high volume of students relative to staff indicates an "institutional" scale of operation that will place unsustainable pressure on local infrastructure, including narrow rural roads that lack pedestrian crossings and adequate street lighting. I request that the Commission reject this application on the grounds that the proposed operational density—as evidenced by these staffing ratios—represents an over-development of the site that is not in the public interest.

18251

New South Wales 2560

10/02/2026

Object

Website

Hello to the panel members In short I oppose the development strongly, I travel on Catherine fields road daily to meet my boss at his home to go to work. The road is in very bad condition and I’ve been on it when it floods. I’ve been involved in most local meetings and fully support the local living in Catherine fields. I’ve also read Camden council’s submission which I filullyvagree with. I have watched the online meeting held on the 3rd February, and I cannot see how it benefits the area or locals ! Please consider all these before making a decision that the locals need to live with.

18321

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposed Minarah College at Catherine Field is not strategically necessary, as the area is already well-serviced by existing educational facilities, with at least six similar schools within a 15km radius. Existing institutions—including Bellfield College (expanding to 1,640 students), Amity College (1,000 capacity), Unity Grammar (1,160 students), Arrahman College (expanding to 800), Al-Faisal College (expanding to 5,460), and Malek Fahd—are already undergoing expansions or operating nearby to accommodate demand. With four of these nearby schools upgrading to add over 6,400 places, the proposed development represents an oversupply of private, independent schools, undermining the rural character of the area rather than fulfilling a genuine, unmet need for educational infrastructure. Furthermore, the project’s parking and traffic provisions are grossly inadequate, even for a reduced population of 980 students. The current on-site parking and pick-up/drop-off capacity is statutorily insufficient, which will inevitably force hazardous overflow onto Catherine Field Road. This narrow, single-lane thoroughfare lacks the kerbs, gutters, and footpaths required to manage such a volume safely. Without high-frequency public transport, the resulting "traffic log jams" and obstructed residential access will compromise public safety. As Camden Council and the local community have argued, the scale of this development—on unsewered land—prioritises expansion over the fundamental rural character and safety of the area. With only 30 dedicated "Kiss and Ride" spaces for a school of 980 students, what specific modelling shows these spaces can process hundreds of vehicles in a 15-minute window without causing a tailback onto Catherine Field Road? ELC & SSP Requirements: Parents of Early Learning Centre (ELC) and School for Specific Purpose (SSP) students are legally required to escort their children into the building. Where are these parents expected to park, given that "Kiss and Ride" zones do not allow drivers to leave their vehicles? If the single entry/exit point becomes blocked by a "traffic log jam" during peak hour, what is the contingency plan for emergency vehicles to access the campus? The Transport & Accessibility Impact Assessment notes there are no current plans for footpaths in the area. How can the school claim to reduce car dependency when there is no safe way for students to walk or use public transport to reach the site? Community members have noted that 80% to 90% of students are expected to arrive by private vehicle. Why has the applicant not planned for at least 100 on-site drop-off spaces to account for this reality? Considering that the road near the location may not have street lighting or footpaths, how will the safety of pedestrians and drivers be ensured during these late-night weekend periods when the sports fields are used until 9:00 PM and the multi-purpose hall until 9:30 PM on Saturdays and Sundays? What measures will be in place to prevent noise from the hall and fields from impacting nearby homes until 9:30 PM every weekend, and how will parking for these events be managed to avoid blocking residential access? Who will be responsible for managing traffic and parking flow during these weekend hours? To ensure the impacts of the proposal are accurately assessed, clarification is needed regarding the projected staffing numbers and their corresponding parking allocations. The proposal mentions a figure for full-time equivalent staff, but it is unclear how many total employees will be on-site at any given time, including part-time and casual staff across all roles. Further information is requested to understand the maximum potential headcount of staff and how this relates to the proposed number of parking spaces. Addressing any potential discrepancy and detailing how on-site parking for all employees will be managed is important for assessing the proposal's feasibility. I request that the Commission conducts a meticulous, qualitative analysis of all public submissions to ensure that a high volume of "general support" comments is not mistaken for actual planning merit. It is crucial that the Panel distinguishes between submissions that provide a technical critique—referencing the DPHI Assessment Report and its recommended conditions—and those that merely state the school is a "good idea" without addressing the specific site-suitability constraints of the Catherine Field area. According to the NSW Planning Submissions Policy, the weight of an objection should be based on the relevance and evidence provided, rather than a simple tally of supporters who may live outside the impacted rural-residential zone. Furthermore, I urge the IPC to scrutinise the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) Assessment Report, as it appears to gloss over critical infrastructure deficits. The report fails to provide a guaranteed timeline for Sydney Water sewer connection, yet it proposes an on-site wastewater management system in an area prone to overland flooding, which poses a significant public health risk. Additionally, the traffic and road safety measures mentioned in the report do not adequately address the danger of introducing nearly 1,000 students to a narrow, 80km/h rural road that currently lacks basic footpaths, kerbing, and guttering. The proposed hours of operation, extending as late as 9:30 PM on weekends is entirely incompatible with the quiet, rural-residential amenity of the existing neighbourhood. For these reasons, I believe the application should be refused in favour of a site that is already properly zoned and serviced for large-scale educational establishments.

18341

Camden Residents' Action Group Inc

New South Wales 2570

10/02/2026

Object

Website

Please see attached file

10 February 2026 Minarah College proposal Catherine Field Redacted.pdf (PDF, 515.5 KB)

18346

New South Wales 2557

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I live in Catherine Field which is in the south west growth area and have been waiting for the planning to be done for the area. Catherine Field is a rural residential area without kerb and guttering, narrow rural roads, adequate street lighting and sewerage, which are all major safety issues for a development of this size, as detailed in Camden Councils submission after extensive research. The roads surrounding the school often flood after a heavy downpour of rain, especially in front of the proposed site and can cause road closures and always new potholes and erosion of the roads which then have to be repaired by Council. The development does not have adequate onsite parking especially when they have functions and using the field for sports events etc. these cars will end up having to park on the narrow roads surrounding the site and will cause traffic congestion. The development is not in character with a rural area and should have the same restrictions as the local homes in the area as in fencing,lighting,height restrictions etc.

18366

New South Wales 2179

10/02/2026

Object

Website

After listening to the Forum on 2 February and the case put forward by supporters of this school I am not at all satisfied with their responses to ongoing concerns and objections raised by Council and the community. The supporters did not refer to any of the Planning objections or safety risks. Instead, I feel that they only spoke about the need and the quality of the school which is irrelevant considering the site unsuitability. Furthermore they did mot address any of the traffic, safety, flooding risks that this type of development would pose on this rural unserviced site. It is simply not acceptable that the applicant gains a private commercial benefit prior to precinct planning at the expense of the wider community. There are sites in Leppington already zoned for a school with sports fields adjacent that they could have purchased instead of this cheap rural unserviced and not ready site. If this school is approved in any capacity I feel that it is going to pose huge unacceptable risk to the students and to the wider community.

18371

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

According to the DPHI Assessment Report, the government has recommended approving Minarah College, but the flood plan still has major safety gaps. The report confirms that the southern part of the site is prone to flooding, which can wash directly toward the road. While buildings are designed to stay dry so students can shelter in place, this is only meant to be a last resort. Experts worry that leaving over 1,000 people trapped on-site is dangerous, especially since the final safety plan has not been fully signed off by the NSW State Emergency Service (SES). The main plan is to close the school early, but if that fails, the plan suggests everyone should walk about 1km to safety. This is a major concern because local residents and Camden Council point out that the roads don’t have proper footpaths or gutters and can turn into fast-moving rivers during a storm. Additionally, since the area doesn't have a public sewer system, the school will use its own underground sewage plant. If a major flood hits, there is a risk that sewage could overflow and contaminate the water, creating a health hazard for students and the community. Finally, with only one way in and out, any evacuation could quickly become blocked, leaving students with no safe way to leave.

18376

New South Wales 2557

10/02/2026

Object

Website

To whom it may concern, I would like to express my continued opposition to the proposed K-12 Minarah College. The revised proposal does little to address the concerns of the community and minimise the considerable challenges which this project would impose upon the area. As previously outlined, my position as a resident of Catherine Field for 20 years allows a deep understanding of the issues that this proposed school would pose and that continue to be blatantly ignored by their proposal. Before outlining my various concerns I would like to request that my private information (name and address) not be disclosed. This project at any scale is incompatible with the area due to the topic of rurality. There is a reason why you do not see small lot residential subdivision having taken place at the location in question — it is not ready. This decision has not come lightly to anyone — whether it be the local council, developers, or the state government — but it has come after careful consideration of the land and insufficient resources available to accomodate potential residents. In fact, the Department have not identified Catherine Fields as being a priority within the South West Growth Area and deemed that until a point of time that this occurs no significant development should occur in the area. So, if various authorities have deemed the current state of this area inappropriate for further development then why should a development such as Minarah College proceed? If with all the pressure and demand for housing that persists this, this land is still not being developed then why should this development proceed? If the rest of the area is to maintain the objectives of RU4 primary production small lots, why should this development not have to abide by such objectives? The 2021 census states that the population of Catherine Field was 2,609 (I believe Catherine Park slightly contributes to this). Even if we were to assume that the entire figure of 2,609 was residents of Catherine Field, (who, might I add, live on land only recently transitioned from rural to large lot residential) with a school of 980 students and 51 staff you are talking about an almost 40% increase in the number of individuals within the area. Yet there’s still no improved roads, no drainage, there’s a reliance on septic systems, and conveniently the developers for this project will avoid making any contributions that can contribute to improvement of this area’s assets. They will argue that they are not living at this school and the resources expended by the residents is significantly more. Yet, we are talking about a school which will operate from 7am to as late as 9-10pm potentially 7 days a week, as they wish for this development to be at least a 35% commercial enterprise and hire out the hall and field late at night and on weekends. With the average resident of Catherine Field currently not being at home for majority of the week, whether they be at work or school, the attendees of Minarah College will be spending a substantial amount of time in the area despite not holding the responsibilities of typical residents. Yet they get to avoid making a contribution to the local resources, whilst simultaneously degrading them with overuse. It is claimed that the reduction in the number of students, with a staggered increase in the schools operational scale, addresses these concerns of degrading local resources and such. Yet the revised proposal demonstrates various inconsistencies which disprove this claim. For instance, the reduction in student numbers is not reflected in the scale and density of the development. Although the student numbers have reduced by nearly 600 students, the amended proposal indicates only a net deduction of 1,363m2 of GFA from the original EIS. The negative ramifications of overusing the community resources is evident with similar private schools such as Bellfield College located in Rossmore and Unity Grammar in Austral also inadequately considering the rural environment, especially with such a strong community use of the school similarly occurring at these schools. Both schools have significantly burdened the local services, particularly the roads, and little effort has been made other than what Minarah College similarly proposes now in Catherine Field across over a decade of operating. Considering the similar rural environment of the proposed school in Catherine Field to both Austral and Rossmore, with no proposed improvements to local infrastructure or redevelopment currently scheduled or expected within at least the next five years, the precedent of these nearby schools indicates a negative outlook for the Catherine Field community and poses unnecessary complications for future town planning should the construction of Minarah College proceed. The proposed solutions to address these traffic concerns remain inadequate, with the widening of the road, a bus bay and parking spots proven as inadequate solutions again by the above mentioned schools but also through a knowledge of the local area. The 2021 Census revealed that only 4.8% of the local population identified their religious affiliation as Islam, with not all being school-age individuals that could attend this school of course. Considering the sheer scale of the Camden LGA, this would imply an ever smaller number of students available in the vicinity of the school in Catherine Field, Oran Park, Gregory Hills, etc. The Social Impact Assessment even identifies that “the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the immediate vicinity and the suburb of Catherine Field indicate that the population is generally older”, highlighting the lack of school-age residents to populate the school alongside the smaller population density of the area compared to other locations. The discussion of disadvantage within this assessment also suggests a lack of economic resources for local students to attend a private school, which can amount to thousands of dollars in school fees each year, with recent economic and inflationary pressures likely worsening this greatly. Therefore, the school would place exorbitant pressure on the local roads and environment as students would need to travel greater distances to attend their school. With limited parking spaces and drop-off/pick-up spaces available, especially when taking into consideration the 51 staff members who will likely travel in from outside of the area and occupy the spots, there will likely not be sufficient spaces to accomodate the parents of the many students forcing parking to take place on Catherine Field Road. As has been recognised previously, “High private vehicle ridership has been observed, with a substantially lesser reliance (close to zero) on public transport options for the Green Valley Campus”. Catherine Field is a rural area and thus public transport is limited. The school may offer rather limited bus options but students will likely have to be transported by their parents driving them to school. The proposed staggered start times will also do very little to alleviate traffic concerns, instead ensuring that traffic is generated by the school for more hours throughout the day. This will provide no breaks in the traffic generated for the local residents, business owners and local wildlife. Moreover, any proposed facilities that will be open to the community after school hours or on weekends will only ensure that this traffic persists consistently. The proposed right turn bay will also do little to alleviate traffic concerns, with few cars able to fit in such a turning bay. Unfortunately, the roads are also not safe and there is no suggestion that this will be improved any time soon. In fact, the roads have only worsened since the original application for this development, with the road being riddled with pot holes and being barely more than dirt at times— one must only look to the adjacent Chisholm Road to see the completely inadequate conditions available to local residents. There is an extreme bend in the road on Catherine Field Road near the proposed site of the school which poses a great risk to both drivers and attendants of the school. The proposal indicates that only metres away from this bend on Catherine Field Road will be the main site access point. No proposed school or community facilities with such great numbers of potential occupants should think to make such a location the setting of their facilities if they genuinely prioritise the safety of individuals. Vehicles consistently speed on these roads due to the rural nature of the area, regardless of the speed limit, including trucks and heavy duty vehicles from the multiple businesses located in the area which are forced to use Catherine Field Road due to the decision to make no right turn available from Deepfields Road onto Camden Valley Way. Even if these vehicles did travel the speed limit, which local residents can personally assure that they don’t, the sheer number of vehicles on a road with children proposed to walk the pathless and streetlight-less streets of Catherine Field Road is a severe risk. Section 3.4.1 of The Transport & Accessibility Impact Assessment clearly states “Currently there are no provisions for footpaths along the Catherine Fields road” and that “There is no anticipated footpath works planned for the Catherine Field area”. This does not meet the Environmental Assessment Requirement “identify any infrastructure upgrades required on-site & off-site to facilitate the development & any arrangements to ensure that the upgrades will be implemented on time and be maintained”. There are no pedestrian footpaths or crossings other than those proposed within the kiss and drop area, so the school itself obviously will not take responsibility for this either. Parents who attempt to pick up children outside of school, because there will not be enough parking spaces, will be unsafe walking or parking on the sides of roads, additional to the impact on traffic this will have. Only mere years ago was a driver killed nearby on the end of Springfield Road due to speeding, poor road conditions and a similar road bend as that on Catherine Field Rd. Another consideration is that due to substantial deforestation and development of the Camden area in recent years, the presence of local wildlife within Catherine has greatly increased. Suddenly increasing the car traffic within the area through the development of this car-dependent school would come at a substantial cost to local wildlife, which would not occur should there be local students who can actually walk to their school or utilise public transport to minimise the number of cars on the road. Moreover, the school would require greater efforts to address local wildlife than Minarah College has currently proposed, especially due to rural nature of the location. Catherine Field residents are currently required to utilise fencing on their properties that allow for wild animals to make their way across the land through the fencing. Would the school consider such factors and be equipped to have wild animals such as foxes and snakes, which is commonplace within Catherine Field across the year, roaming through the school grounds? The reduction to 980 students barely reduces the negative impact on directly neighbouring residents. Local residents would still be forced to live next to a school which is processing the sewerage of nearly 1000 individuals through septic tanks next to their properties, with the smell certain to be a considerable nuisance for them and even the students. Locals are able to vouch that the smell of pump-out septic tanks pollutes the air and this is in relation to households with only a few mere individuals, not hundreds of students and staff. Moreover, the telecommunication networks are insufficient as it is in Catherine Field — one can only imagine the negative impact hundreds of students and staff will have on the local internet and telephone supply in a rural area when the existing service is already poor and we have only been connected to the NBN in the last few years. The substantial shift to working-from-home and high prevalence of at-home businesses must be considered when discussing the major impact that this school will have on these services, with the proposal lacking any suggestions to alleviate this and the government providing no future proposal to improve the services. Flooding should also be considered, with the the existence of a natural overland flow towards the Heatherfield Close side of this site raises concerns for neighbours regarding where this water will move once diverted for the sake of the school’s construction. Also, flooding is expected within the carpark at the exit gate where the overland water flows and the flood safety plan provided (which is very likely to be used based on the environmental events of recent years) offers absurd solutions. It would either keep the children on site or asks that they walk the students through flood waters to Catherine Field hall which cannot hold 980 students plus 51 teachers and which will have no footpaths or safe roads to accommodate this journey. Unfortunately, it is abundantly clear that despite promises of a safe and inclusive environment Minarah College will not include the local population in their operations as private religion-based schools do not provide opportunities to those who do not follow their religion. Yes, greater educational services and job opportunities should be provided across Camden but this school will largely offers these to students and staff outside of the area, considering the demographics of Camden mentioned above. One can argue that we should be encouraging a more diverse community by drawing families to an institution such as that proposed; however, previous failures in infrastructure and policy can highlight that a reactive approach such as that where we first build a school without sufficient local students to attend is not wise. We should be proactive — build the homes and develop the diverse population first through housing and development that will improve the community through contributions that must be made to the local government and then build a school that is needed once there are adequate resources to support it. If educational facilities need to be built, which they do, then state funding should be provided to a PUBLIC school which does not divide based on socio-economic or religious status but instead caters to all students in the local rate-paying population who can safely travel to the school without negative ramifications to local services and climates. Such a school should not be proposed on a site riddled with safety concerns, insufficient resources, and negative ramifications on local residents and the rural environments. Overall, it is apparent that numerous crucial issues are triggered by the proposed school which have not been addressed by developer. The costs of developing such a school in the proposed location, both for the state government financially and to the livelihood of local residents, should not be triggered. The revised proposal does little to alleviate the corners of local residents or address the numerous implications this development will have on residents and the environment. On the basis of the numerous concerns addressed above, I object to the proposed development. Whether it is a proposal for a total of 980 students (although the Department even did not recommend more than 650 students) or less, the decision to proceed with such a development would demonstrate a glaring case of negligence and hypocrisy from development authorities.

18381

New South Wales 2557

10/02/2026

Object

Website

To whom it may concern, I would like to express my continued opposition to the proposed K-12 Minarah College. The revised proposal does little to address the concerns of the community and minimise the considerable challenges which this project would impose upon the area. As previously outlined, my position as a resident of Catherine Field for 20 years allows a deep understanding of the issues that this proposed school would pose and that continue to be blatantly ignored by their proposal. Before outlining my various concerns I would like to request that my private information (name and address) not be disclosed. This project at any scale (whether it be 980, more or less) is incompatible with the area due to the topic of rurality. There is a reason why you do not see small lot residential subdivision having taken place at the location in question — it is not ready. This decision has not come lightly to anyone — whether it be the local council, developers, or the state government — but it has come after careful consideration of the land and insufficient resources available to accomodate potential residents. In fact, the Department have not identified Catherine Fields as being a priority within the South West Growth Area and deemed that until a point of time that this occurs no significant development should occur in the area. So, if various authorities have deemed the current state of this area inappropriate for further development then why should a development such as Minarah College proceed? If with all the pressure and demand for housing that persists this, this land is still not being developed then why should this development proceed? If the rest of the area is to maintain the objectives of RU4 primary production small lots, why should this development not have to abide by such objectives? The 2021 census states that the population of Catherine Field was 2,609 (I believe Catherine Park slightly contributes to this). Even if we were to assume that the entire figure of 2,609 was residents of Catherine Field, (who, might I add, live on land only recently transitioned from rural to large lot residential) with a school of 980 students and 51 staff you are talking about an almost 40% increase in the number of individuals within the area. Yet there’s still no improved roads, no drainage, there’s a reliance on septic systems, and conveniently the developers for this project will avoid making any contributions that can contribute to improvement of this area’s assets. They will argue that they are not living at this school and the resources expended by the residents is significantly more. Yet, we are talking about a school which will operate from 7am to as late as 9-10pm potentially 7 days a week, as they wish for this development to be at least a 35% commercial enterprise and hire out the hall and field late at night and on weekends. With the average resident of Catherine Field currently not being at home for majority of the week, whether they be at work or school, the attendees of Minarah College will be spending a substantial amount of time in the area despite not holding the responsibilities of typical residents. Yet they get to avoid making a contribution to the local resources, whilst simultaneously degrading them with overuse. It is claimed that the reduction down to max. 980 students, with a staggered increase in the schools operational scale, addresses these concerns of degrading local resources and such. Yet, the negative ramifications of overusing the community resources is evident with similar private schools such as Bellfield College located in Rossmore and Unity Grammar in Austral also inadequately considering the rural environment, especially with such a strong community use of the school similarly occurring at these schools. Both schools have significantly burdened the local services, particularly the roads, and little effort has been made other than what Minarah College similarly proposes now in Catherine Field across over a decade of operating. Considering the similar rural environment of the proposed school in Catherine Field to both Austral and Rossmore, with no proposed improvements to local infrastructure or redevelopment currently scheduled or expected within at least the next five years, the precedent of these nearby schools indicates a negative outlook for the Catherine Field community and poses unnecessary complications for future town planning should the construction of Minarah College proceed. The proposed solutions to address these traffic concerns remain inadequate, with the widening of the road, a bus bay and parking spots proven as inadequate solutions again by the above mentioned schools but also through a knowledge of the local area. The 2021 Census revealed that only 4.8% of the local population identified their religious affiliation as Islam, with not all being school-age individuals that could attend this school of course. Considering the sheer scale of the Camden LGA, this would imply an ever smaller number of students available in the vicinity of the school in Catherine Field, Oran Park, Gregory Hills, etc. The Social Impact Assessment even identifies that “the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the immediate vicinity and the suburb of Catherine Field indicate that the population is generally older”, highlighting the lack of school-age residents to populate the school alongside the smaller population density of the area compared to other locations. The discussion of disadvantage within this assessment also suggests a lack of economic resources for local students to attend a private school, which can amount to thousands of dollars in school fees each year, with recent economic and inflationary pressures likely worsening this greatly. Therefore, the school would place exorbitant pressure on the local roads and environment as students would need to travel greater distances to attend their school. With limited parking spaces and drop-off/pick-up spaces available, especially when taking into consideration the 51 staff members who will likely travel in from outside of the area and occupy the spots, there will likely not be sufficient spaces to accomodate the parents of the many students forcing parking to take place on Catherine Field Road. As has been recognised previously, “High private vehicle ridership has been observed, with a substantially lesser reliance (close to zero) on public transport options for the Green Valley Campus”. Catherine Field is a rural area and thus public transport is limited. The school may offer rather limited bus options but students will likely have to be transported by their parents driving them to school. The proposed staggered start times will also do very little to alleviate traffic concerns, instead ensuring that traffic is generated by the school for more hours throughout the day. This will provide no breaks in the traffic generated for the local residents, business owners and local wildlife. Moreover, any proposed facilities that will be open to the community after school hours or on weekends will only ensure that this traffic persists consistently. The proposed right turn bay will also do little to alleviate traffic concerns, with few cars able to fit in such a turning bay. Unfortunately, the roads are also not safe and there is no suggestion that this will be improved any time soon. In fact, the roads have only worsened since the original application for this development, with the road being riddled with pot holes and being barely more than dirt at times— one must only look to the adjacent Chisholm Road to see the completely inadequate conditions available to local residents. There is an extreme bend in the road on Catherine Field Road near the proposed site of the school which poses a great risk to both drivers and attendants of the school. The proposal indicates that only metres away from this bend on Catherine Field Road will be the main site access point. No proposed school or community facilities with such great numbers of potential occupants should think to make such a location the setting of their facilities if they genuinely prioritise the safety of individuals. Vehicles consistently speed on these roads due to the rural nature of the area, regardless of the speed limit, including trucks and heavy duty vehicles from the multiple businesses located in the area which are forced to use Catherine Field Road due to the decision to make no right turn available from Deepfields Road onto Camden Valley Way. Even if these vehicles did travel the speed limit, which local residents can personally assure that they don’t, the sheer number of vehicles on a road with children proposed to walk the pathless and streetlight-less streets of Catherine Field Road is a severe risk. Section 3.4.1 of The Transport & Accessibility Impact Assessment clearly states “Currently there are no provisions for footpaths along the Catherine Fields road” and that “There is no anticipated footpath works planned for the Catherine Field area”. This does not meet the Environmental Assessment Requirement “identify any infrastructure upgrades required on-site & off-site to facilitate the development & any arrangements to ensure that the upgrades will be implemented on time and be maintained”. There are no pedestrian footpaths or crossings other than those proposed within the kiss and drop area, so the school itself obviously will not take responsibility for this either. Parents who attempt to pick up children outside of school, because there will not be enough parking spaces, will be unsafe walking or parking on the sides of roads, additional to the impact on traffic this will have. Only mere years ago was a driver killed nearby on the end of Springfield Road due to speeding, poor road conditions and a similar road bend as that on Catherine Field Rd. Another consideration is that due to substantial deforestation and development of the Camden area in recent years, the presence of local wildlife within Catherine has greatly increased. Suddenly increasing the car traffic within the area through the development of this car-dependent school would come at a substantial cost to local wildlife, which would not occur should there be local students who can actually walk to their school or utilise public transport to minimise the number of cars on the road. Moreover, the school would require greater efforts to address local wildlife than Minarah College has currently proposed, especially due to rural nature of the location. Catherine Field residents are currently required to utilise fencing on their properties that allow for wild animals to make their way across the land through the fencing. Would the school consider such factors and be equipped to have wild animals such as foxes and snakes, which is commonplace within Catherine Field across the year, roaming through the school grounds? The reduction to 980 students barely reduces the negative impact on directly neighbouring residents. Local residents would still be forced to live next to a school which is processing the sewerage of nearly 1000 individuals through septic tanks next to their properties, with the smell certain to be a considerable nuisance for them and even the students. Locals are able to vouch that the smell of pump-out septic tanks pollutes the air and this is in relation to households with only a few mere individuals, not hundreds of students and staff. Moreover, the telecommunication networks are insufficient as it is in Catherine Field — one can only imagine the negative impact hundreds of students and staff will have on the local internet and telephone supply in a rural area when the existing service is already poor and we have only been connected to the NBN in the last few years. The substantial shift to working-from-home and high prevalence of at-home businesses must be considered when discussing the major impact that this school will have on these services, with the proposal lacking any suggestions to alleviate this and the government providing no future proposal to improve the services. Flooding should also be considered, with the the existence of a natural overland flow towards the Heatherfield Close side of this site raises concerns for neighbours regarding where this water will move once diverted for the sake of the school’s construction. Also, flooding is expected within the carpark at the exit gate where the overland water flows and the flood safety plan provided (which is very likely to be used based on the environmental events of recent years) offers absurd solutions. It would either keep the children on site or asks that they walk the students through flood waters to Catherine Field hall which cannot hold 980 students plus 51 teachers and which will have no footpaths or safe roads to accommodate this journey. Unfortunately, it is abundantly clear that despite promises of a safe and inclusive environment Minarah College will not include the local population in their operations as private religion-based schools do not provide opportunities to those who do not follow their religion. Yes, greater educational services and job opportunities should be provided across Camden but this school will largely offers these to students and staff outside of the area, considering the demographics of Camden mentioned above. One can argue that we should be encouraging a more diverse community by drawing families to an institution such as that proposed; however, previous failures in infrastructure and policy can highlight that a reactive approach such as that where we first build a school without sufficient local students to attend is not wise. We should be proactive — build the homes and develop the diverse population first through housing and development that will improve the community through contributions that must be made to the local government and then build a school that is needed once there are adequate resources to support it. If educational facilities need to be built, which they do, then state funding should be provided to a PUBLIC school which does not divide based on socio-economic or religious status but instead caters to all students in the local rate-paying population who can safely travel to the school without negative ramifications to local services and climates. Such a school should not be proposed on a site riddled with safety concerns, insufficient resources, and negative ramifications on local residents and the rural environments. Overall, it is apparent that numerous crucial issues are triggered by the proposed school which have not been addressed by developer. The costs of developing such a school in the proposed location, both for the state government financially and to the livelihood of local residents, should not be triggered. The revised proposal does little to alleviate the corners of local residents or address the numerous implications this development will have on residents and the environment. On the basis of the numerous concerns addressed above, I object to the proposed development. Whether it is a proposal for a total of 980 students (although the Department even did not recommend more than 650 students) or less, the decision to proceed with such a development would demonstrate a glaring case of negligence and hypocrisy from development authorities.

18386

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

submission attached

B submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 93.19 KB)

18396

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I grew up in Catherine Field and spent over 30 years of my life there. I still visit relatives at least weekly and cannot fathom that an application of this scale has been even considered. Please see my submission attached

Tsub_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 78.71 KB)

18461

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I am submitting concerns from my family members

RS_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 68.11 KB)

ES_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 281.87 KB)

18471

New South Wales 2557

10/02/2026

Object

Website

The existing capacity of Catherine Fields Road is inadequate to accommodate the proposed Minarah College development. The increase in traffic would cause serious congestion and negatively impact road safety and local amenity.

18476

New South Wales 2154

10/02/2026

Object

Website

Building of Minarah College, would cause significant congestion on an already busy road

18506

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to this proposal please see attached submissions from our household

RPSP submissions_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 151.73 KB)

18511

New South Wales 2557

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I have the property next door to the proposed development and am strongly opposed to the building of a school with 900+ people accessing the proposed development, the issues with effluent currently running through my property that will only be multiplied and disruption and noise levels which will emanate from the school. Traffic and road condition. Catherine Fields Road is currently a busy road which has through traffic from Camden Valley Way from Campbelltown area and Bringelly Road from Liverpool and Penrith areas. It has a 80k speed limit which is not often respected. The traffic includes semi trailers, large trucks, commercial vehicles, cars and bikes. The road is in poor condition, with poor lighting at night and no footpaths, or stormwater to manage water run off. There have been fatalities and serious accidents on this road over the years caused by all the issues mentioned, along with speed. We don't want 900 more people next door to us, we are an elderly couple and enjoy our peace and quiet. I don't want lines of traffic twice a day past my property, with only 30 car spaces for a kiss and drop area. It will be unsafe for us to enter or leave the property during those times. What happens in the case of an emergency how will that be managed with that amount of cars on a semi rural road? Sewerage run off is a major concern. We have made a complaint to council, that currently we get the sewerage run off from the residence next door, which is currently just one family. What will happen when you add 900 plus people to that area, with the sewerage pumped onto the sports field and between buildings in later stages. Especially when it rains. Our property is not flood affected, however we do get water running through our property, to the road, with a pooling of septic run off on our land on the side closest to the road. This is a health issue. Noise and disruption to our living environment. There have been no plans released by council, and this site I understand has not been designated for a school. Camden Council are opposed to this development, and I can understand and support their concerns. We don't want flood lights shining onto our property until 9pm at night, it's bad enough now when the flood lights are on in the shed next door. The disruption to our lifestyle, the health risks, the dangers of adding more traffic to an already busy road are more than a little concerning. Most schools built for greater than 900 children are not on 10 acres of land. This would impact our lives and peace we enjoy on our land, I don't understand why you would even consider this proposal.

18521

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

please redact our personal information from the submissions attached. I also have a video that will be emailed on my behalf to the submissions email address

MS_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 2.37 MB)

ZS_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 39.49 KB)

18631

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I strongly oppose Minarah College and fully support Camden Council and our State Member on their opposing submissions. Please find my submission attached

GIPA road repairs - Redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.38 MB)

Asub.pdf (PDF, 1.23 MB)

18636

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

As an immediate neighbour, my biggest concerns are about traffic, the floodlights on the sport field and level of noise and what hours there will be noise and the management of the natural waterway that runs along my back fence

18646

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

After reviewing the piping under the road to divert floodwaters I strongly object. I have had no communication from the applicant or their representatives This is completely unacceptable

18651

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I oppose Martens report showing where the flood water will end up after increasing the pipe size under the road, i strongly object. This will impact our property extremely & is unacceptable

18656

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I strongly oppose this school due to the increased flood waters that will impact our home!

18661

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I oppose this school and its capacity, the flood waters are proposed to impact our property & i am scared of how we will cope

18666

Redacted

10/02/2026

Object

Website

I completely support Camden council in opposing this application The flood waters are a massive concern given the proposal to install wider pipes under the road dispensing water onto our property

image_0.jpg (JPG, 822.55 KB)

17601

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

Please find my opposing submission attached

NH submission.pdf (PDF, 208.58 KB)

17611

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident of Catherine Field Road, and I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development. This project represents an over-development of a semi-rural area that lacks the infrastructure to support a 980-student facility. Key Grounds for Objection: Oversupply and Lack of Strategic Need: There is no proven necessity for another large-scale independent school in this specific rural pocket. The educational needs of the growing community are already being addressed by several nearby independent schools, including: Amity College, Leppington Campus: Currently under construction on Byron Road, this K-12 school is already expanding to a 1,000-student capacity. Arrahman College (Austral): A recently established independent Islamic school nearby. Leppington Anglican College: A new K-12 campus that opened in 2023. Bellfield College (Rossmore): An existing independent Islamic K-12 school located just minutes away. Infrastructure Deficit: Catherine Field Road is a narrow rural road with no kerbing, guttering, or footpaths. It cannot safely accommodate the heavy traffic and bus movements generated by this proposal, especially with existing construction traffic from other nearby developments. Environmental & Privacy Impacts: The scale of this two-storey development is inconsistent with the rural character of Catherine Field. The proposed operating hours—including weekend use of the hall until 10 pm—will cause unacceptable noise and light pollution for direct neighbors. Flooding & Utilities: The site lacks permanent sewerage and sufficient stormwater management. Relying on on-site wastewater treatment for a facility of this size poses a significant environmental risk to local properties. Given the abundance of existing and approved independent schools in Leppington and Austral, there is no justification for the significant negative impact this development will have on Catherine Field Road residents. I request that the Commission refuse this application

17616

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident of Catherine Field, I’m writing to formally object to Minarah college My concern is that the local roads would not cope with this collage, me and my wife work and rely on family to come and pick up our children to take them to school this would make it impossible to get in and out of the area to get my children to school, and there is no sewer in the area so how would they deal with that. How would our local fire station get to emergencies in our area with this influx of traffic. I strongly oppose this development it would turn our rural area into traffic nightmare

17621

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

Hi, I’ve been active in attending all the locals meetings. And fully support the locals opposing the development, and their reasons behind along with Camden councils owns submission . The area is simply not ready for any development this scale My greatest concern is that my live stock could be affected by the waste management system from the school Example if floods were to happen the sewer could travel in to my land that my stock feed of in turn could kill or make sick at my expense Plus my fruit trees also having the same issue that could turn my stock bad. This is still a rural area ! In addition there was a severe motor vehicle accident on the 4th February. At the intersection of Springfield rd and Catherine fields rd. The intersection is poorly lite, not to mention the potholes. I’m concerned for my family’s safety I hope the commissioners listen to locals concerns Photos attached of incident mentioned with poor lighting

IMG_0478.jpeg (JPEG, 830.68 KB)

IMG_0477.jpeg (JPEG, 518.89 KB)

17696

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am not happy with a school being built This kinda school is not suitable for this area This is a very dangerous lead to build a school here The site is an unsewered rural property located on a rural road with no shoulder, formed kerb and gutter, footpath, lighting or piped underground stormwater system. The location of the school in a rural area and on a rural road with no footpaths or bike paths places immense pressure on the road system to support cars and buses traveling to the school to pick up and drop off students as there are no feasible alternatives to commute to the school (e.g. walking, cycling etc.).

17756

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

1) The current infrastructure is still insufficient for to support the extensive Growth 2) Catherine Field Precinct is not connected to town sewerage; a development of this magnitude will cause major health risk to the school’s Children and the local community due to the accumulation of waste in the event of flooding. The proposed development site is located in a major flooding area. 3) The exacerbated runoff of water runoff will heighten flood risk. 4) The extreme increase of traffic in the area will damage undeveloped roads, imposing a significant ongoing expense to the local council to repair roads to maintain a safety standard. 5) Without the proper infrastructure, Kerb & guttering is a major safety risk to the school children & local residence. 6) Many long-time residents, particularly the elderly, cherish the quiet surroundings of our community 7) Suspicious why the Hall area has remained the same as previous DA. Is the systematically going to increase the student numbers without further approval. A disaster waiting to happen. 8) The approval of this development is basically putting the “Horse before the Cart”. A planned development of the Catherine Field precinct needs to be put in place before a development of this magnitude is approved. 9) Neglects the environmental heritage significance of Camden’s rural land.

17831

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am formally objecting to the proposed school development, as the scale of the project is not suitable for the existing infrastructure or character of the area. The local roads are already in poor condition, with potholes and no kerb and guttering, and are not designed to safely accommodate the significant increase in traffic from a large school. In addition, the lack of connection to reticulated sewer infrastructure and reliance on a septic system raises serious environmental and public health concerns. The development would also negatively impact the quiet residential amenity of the area through increased traffic, noise, and infrastructure strain. For these reasons, I believe the proposed development is inappropriate for this location and should not be approved.

17886

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I oppose the development of Minarah College in catherine field. The existing land and surroundings does not contain the essential services infrastructure needed to accommodate 980 students. There is no kerb and gutter, no adequate stormwater drainage and no sewer for wastewater. I believe that the development of Minarah college will have devastating impacts on local residents unless major state government intervention is applied in the form of major services for roads, water and sewerage to accommodate such a high density project. The current road services poses a dangerous safety risk to pedestrians as there will be a ten fold increase in local traffic. Heavy vehicle traffic frequents this road and will pose a real threat to school students in such a small but densely populated project.

17896

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. Although I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road, my brother does, and I visit him regularly, particularly during school pick-up and drop-off times. Because of this, I experience firsthand the current road conditions, the daily traffic movements, and the way this small rural area functions at peak times. I am also a member of the local community and I feel a strong connection to Catherine Field and the families who have chosen to live here for its rural lifestyle and peaceful environment. This proposal is completely inconsistent with the existing rural zoning and character of Catherine Field. Catherine Fields Road is not an urban corridor or a high-density area. It is a semi-rural environment where residents have deliberately chosen to live for space, privacy, and a quieter way of life. A large-scale school development does not fit within the current landscape or the purpose of the zoning. It would dramatically change the identity of the area and permanently destroy the rural amenity that local residents value. It is also clear that this area is not ready for rezoning or development of this intensity. The existing infrastructure is simply not in place to support a school of this scale. In particular, it is extremely concerning that the proposed site does not have an adequate sewer system in place, and there are significant unanswered questions about stormwater management. Catherine Field already experiences flooding and drainage issues, and it is unreasonable to assume that a development of this magnitude can proceed safely without proper supporting services and infrastructure being established first. This is not a minor development. A school of this size will generate major daily impacts, including increased traffic congestion, safety risks, noise, and pressure on local roads. Catherine Fields Road is already difficult and unsafe during peak times, and I have personally witnessed the traffic issues that occur even under current conditions. Adding the constant daily movement of hundreds of students, staff, buses, and parent vehicles will create an unacceptable safety risk for residents, local families, and road users. Additionally, I am deeply concerned by the lack of genuine consultation with the local community. Despite claims made during the public hearing, there has been no meaningful engagement with residents who actually live on Catherine Fields Road. My brother has lived on the street, and neither he nor his neighbours have been consulted or approached directly. It is very difficult to accept that community feedback has been properly considered when the people most directly impacted have not even been spoken to. This gives the impression that the development is being pushed forward regardless of local concerns. It is upsetting to see such a major proposal being pursued in an area that is clearly unsuitable, without proper infrastructure, and without genuine consultation. This community deserves transparency, respect, and planning decisions that reflect the reality of the area — not decisions that appear to prioritise convenience or cost over suitability and community impact. Catherine Field is a rural community, and it should be protected as such. Approving this development would set a dangerous precedent and would permanently alter the character of the area. Once the rural lifestyle is lost, it cannot be restored. For these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for considering my submission.

17901

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally express my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. While I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road, my brother-in-law does, and I visit his home regularly. I am there often during school drop-off and pick-up times, which means I see firsthand how this road functions day-to-day. Catherine Fields Road is not built to cope with heavy traffic or intense development. It is a rural road in a semi-rural community, and it is deeply concerning to think that such a large school could be placed here. Catherine Field has always been a quiet rural area. People live here because it offers space, peace, and a lifestyle that feels removed from the congestion and pressure of suburban development. This proposal would completely destroy that. A massive school complex does not belong in this setting and does not align with the existing zoning or character of the area. Approving it would permanently change the identity of Catherine Field and remove the very qualities that make it such a special place to live and raise a family. What concerns me even more is that this area is clearly not ready to be rezoned or developed at this scale. The infrastructure is simply not in place. It is alarming that there is no proper sewer system servicing the site and that there are major unanswered questions surrounding stormwater management. These are not minor issues — they are essential services. It is difficult to understand how such a large development could even be considered when the basic infrastructure required to support it does not exist. The stormwater concerns are particularly worrying. This area already experiences flooding and drainage problems, and the addition of large buildings, hard surfaces, and increased runoff has the potential to make these issues far worse. It feels reckless to push ahead with a development of this size when the long-term impacts on flooding and stormwater have not been properly addressed. The traffic and safety impacts will also be overwhelming. I have personally witnessed the congestion and risk that already exists along Catherine Fields Road, especially during peak school hours. The road is narrow, rural in nature, and not designed for the daily movement of hundreds of vehicles, buses, staff, and students. Introducing a school of this scale will inevitably lead to constant traffic disruption, increased accident risk, and serious safety concerns for residents, families, and anyone travelling through the area. It is also incredibly disappointing and upsetting that the local community has not been genuinely consulted. At the public hearing it was suggested that community consultation had taken place, however this does not reflect reality. My brother-in-law lives on Catherine Fields Road and has not been approached or spoken to, and to our knowledge neither have many other residents who will be most directly affected. It is hard to accept that community views have been properly considered when the people living on the street have not even been contacted. This feels disrespectful and dismissive of the very community that will carry the burden of this development. This proposal gives the impression that Catherine Field has been selected simply because it is a cheap and convenient site, rather than because it is appropriate. Residents should not be forced to sacrifice their safety, lifestyle and rural environment to accommodate a development that does not fit the area and is not supported by the infrastructure required. Catherine Field is not an urban centre. It is a rural community, and it should be protected. If this development is approved, the damage will be permanent. The rural character of this area will be lost forever, and the quality of life for residents will be significantly impacted for years to come. For all of these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for considering my submission.

17906

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. Although I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road, my uncle does, and I visit him regularly. I am there often during school drop-off and pick-up times, and I spend enough time in this area to truly understand the environment, the road conditions, and the lifestyle that people here value. Catherine Field is not just somewhere I pass through — it is a place I feel connected to through my family and through the community that exists here. Every time I visit my uncle, the first thing I notice is the peace and calm. The area has a rural atmosphere that feels rare now. There is space, quiet, and a sense that life moves slower. It feels safe, open, and natural. It is the kind of place where people live because they want to escape congestion, noise, and overdevelopment. My uncle and many others chose this street because it offers a semi-rural lifestyle that is increasingly difficult to find. This is why the proposed development is so upsetting. A school of this size does not belong on Catherine Fields Road. It is completely inconsistent with the rural zoning and character of the area. A large institutional development would not only change the appearance of the landscape, but would permanently change the entire feeling of the community. Instead of visiting a quiet rural street, it would become an area dominated by daily noise, traffic, congestion, and pressure. The thought of Catherine Fields Road becoming a constant drop-off and pick-up zone is extremely concerning. What is currently a peaceful road would turn into a busy corridor filled with cars, buses, noise, horns, impatient drivers, and constant movement. It would completely change what it feels like to visit my uncle. Instead of being able to pull into the driveway safely and enjoy time with family, visits would be surrounded by stress, traffic build-up, and disruption. It would take away the calm environment that makes this area feel like home. The traffic and safety impacts alone should be enough to refuse this proposal. Catherine Fields Road is not designed for this level of development. It is a rural road and it already becomes difficult at peak times. I have personally experienced how busy it can get during school drop-off and pick-up hours, even without a major school being built there. Adding a development of this size will create dangerous conditions, with an overwhelming increase in cars, staff vehicles, buses and visitors. It is hard to understand how this can be considered safe for residents, families, children, pedestrians, or even emergency access. It is also extremely concerning that this area is not ready for rezoning or development at this scale. The infrastructure simply does not exist to support a school of this magnitude. In particular, the proposed site has no proper sewer system in place, and stormwater infrastructure appears inadequate. These are essential services and should not be treated as secondary issues. Catherine Field is not an established suburban area with the systems needed to support high-density development. Stormwater is a serious issue that cannot be ignored. This area is already known for drainage and flooding problems, and adding large buildings, hard surfaces and increased runoff will only make these problems worse. Approving a major development without proper stormwater systems in place risks long-term damage to surrounding land and nearby properties, including those of local residents like my uncle. Another major concern is the lack of genuine community consultation. During the public hearing it was stated that the community had been consulted, however this has not been the experience of those most affected. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road, and neither he nor other residents along the street have been directly approached, spoken to, or meaningfully consulted. It is difficult to accept that community concerns have been properly considered when the people who will carry the daily burden of this development have effectively been ignored. It feels as though this development is being pushed through regardless of local impact, and that this rural community has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper and more convenient location for a large school. That is not fair. Residents should not lose their lifestyle, safety, and rural surroundings simply because the land is available and affordable for a major development. Catherine Field is a rural community. It is not suited to a large-scale institutional development like this. Approving Minarah College on Catherine Fields Road would permanently change the character of the area, increase traffic and safety risks, place pressure on inadequate infrastructure, and destroy the peaceful environment that local residents have built their lives around. Most importantly, it would change what it means for families like mine to spend time here. The calm, quiet visits to my uncle’s home would be replaced with constant disruption, congestion and stress. That is not what this community deserves. For all of these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for considering my submission.

17916

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. I travel through Catherine Field every day for work and have done so for a long time. Because of this, I have a genuine understanding of the local area, its road conditions, and the rural character that makes Catherine Field such a unique and valued community. I am also a member of the local community and feel strongly connected to this area and the people who live here. Catherine Field is a semi-rural location with open space, quiet roads, and a peaceful lifestyle. It is not an urbanised suburb and it is not suited to a development of this size. A large school complex is completely inconsistent with the existing aesthetics and character of the area. The proposed development would permanently change the rural landscape and replace it with an intensive institutional build that does not belong in this setting. Each day when I drive through Catherine Field, it is obvious that the area still operates like a rural community. The roads are narrow, traffic is already increasing, and the overall environment is not designed for high-density infrastructure. Introducing a massive school with hundreds of students, staff, buses and parent vehicles would dramatically increase congestion, noise, and disruption. This would not only affect local residents, but also everyone who relies on these roads daily for work and daily travel. It is also clear that Catherine Field is not ready for rezoning or development at this intensity. The supporting infrastructure required for a large-scale school is simply not in place. Approving such a significant development before the area is properly prepared will place major pressure on the community and create long-term issues that will be difficult to reverse. What is particularly disappointing is the impression that this site has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper option for the school to build on. It feels as though Catherine Field has been targeted as a convenient location to place a large development, without proper regard for the existing rural environment or the concerns of the local residents who will be most affected. The people living in this area should not be forced to sacrifice their safety, lifestyle, and community character to accommodate a development that does not fit the area. Residents have chosen to live in Catherine Field because it offers a rural lifestyle and a quieter way of life. Approving a development of this scale would be a major and permanent change to the community and would undermine the purpose of the zoning that currently protects the semi-rural nature of the area. For these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road. Thank you for considering my submission.

17926

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road, and I visit him regularly, often during school drop-off and pick-up times. These visits are an important part of my routine and my connection to this community. When I am there, what stands out most is the calmness of the area — the open space, the quiet roads, and the sense that this is still a rural place where people can slow down and feel safe. It is one of the reasons my uncle chose to live there, and why families have invested their lives in this area. The idea that a massive school could be built on this road is deeply upsetting. Everything that makes visiting my uncle enjoyable and peaceful would change. Instead of quiet conversations, safe access to his driveway, and a relaxed rural environment, there would be constant traffic, noise, congestion, and stress. School drop-off and pick-up times would no longer be manageable — they would become chaotic and unsafe. What is currently a simple, calm visit would turn into something rushed, frustrating, and concerning. Catherine Field is a rural and semi-rural area, and the proposed development does not fit the zoning or character of the location. This is not an area designed for high-density development. A large school complex is completely out of place in this setting and would permanently alter the look, feel, and identity of the community. Once this rural character is lost, it can never be restored. It is also clear that this area is not ready for rezoning or development of this scale. The basic infrastructure required to support a school of this size is simply not in place. The site does not have a proper sewer system, and there are serious concerns regarding stormwater management. This area already experiences drainage and flooding issues, and adding large buildings, car parks, and hard surfaces will only make these problems worse. Proceeding with a development without addressing these fundamental issues is irresponsible and places residents at risk. Traffic and road safety are another major concern. Catherine Fields Road is a rural road, not built to handle the daily movement of hundreds of vehicles, buses, staff, and students. I have personally experienced how limited and constrained the road already is. Adding a school of this size will create ongoing congestion, increased accident risk, and serious safety issues for residents, visitors, and families who use the road daily. What is particularly disappointing is the lack of genuine consultation with the local community. Despite claims made at the public hearing, residents who live on Catherine Fields Road — including my uncle — have not been spoken to or consulted. The people who will be most directly impacted by this development have effectively been ignored. This makes it very difficult to trust that community concerns have been properly understood or considered. This proposal feels like an attempt to place a large development in a rural area simply because the land is available and affordable, rather than because it is appropriate. Local residents should not be forced to give up their safety, lifestyle, and environment to accommodate a development that clearly does not belong in this location. Catherine Field is not an urban centre. It is a rural community that people cherish. Approving this proposal would forever change what it feels like to live in, visit, and enjoy this area. For my uncle and many others, it would mean the loss of peace, safety, and the lifestyle they deliberately chose.

17931

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road, and I visit him regularly, often during school drop-off and pick-up times. These visits are not occasional — they are part of my normal routine and part of my family life. Catherine Field is a place I know well, not just because I drive through it, but because I spend real time there and experience what it is like to be on that road and in that community. When I visit my uncle, the first thing I notice is how different it feels compared to built-up areas. The drive into Catherine Field feels calmer. The road is quieter. You can actually hear birds, see open land, and feel that you are entering a rural area where life moves at a slower pace. When I pull up outside my uncle’s home, it is peaceful. Cars aren’t constantly speeding past. You don’t have to fight for a parking space. You can step out of the car and feel safe. You can have a conversation without being drowned out by noise. That is what makes Catherine Fields Road what it is — and that is exactly what would be destroyed if this development is approved. If a large school is built on Catherine Fields Road, the simple act of visiting my uncle would completely change. Instead of arriving calmly, it would mean sitting in traffic, trying to squeeze past long lines of cars, buses, and frustrated parents. It would mean constant congestion and stress. It would mean worrying about whether it is even safe to turn into his driveway. The peaceful rural atmosphere would be replaced with noise, horns, heavy vehicle movements, and daily chaos. The lifestyle that residents have chosen would be taken away from them. Catherine Fields Road is not designed to cope with this level of activity. It is a rural road, not an urban commuter route. Even now, when I am there around school pick-up and drop-off times, I can already see how quickly traffic builds up in the area. The road is narrow, and there is limited capacity to handle extra vehicles safely. Adding a major school development will create daily traffic congestion and significantly increase the risk of accidents. This is not a minor inconvenience — it is a serious safety concern for residents, visitors, children, and road users. This proposed development also does not fit the zoning or character of the area. Catherine Field is rural and semi-rural. It is not an area that should be absorbing large-scale infrastructure and high-density development. A school of this size does not belong on a road like this. It will permanently change the appearance of the landscape and completely alter the identity of Catherine Field. Once this rural character is lost, it cannot be restored. It is also extremely concerning that this area is not ready for rezoning or development at this scale. The basic infrastructure needed to support a school of this size is not in place. There is no adequate sewer system servicing the site, and stormwater infrastructure is clearly lacking. These are not small issues that can be brushed aside. They are essential services. Building a massive school without proper sewer and stormwater systems in place raises serious questions about long-term safety, environmental impacts, and the future burden placed on local infrastructure. Stormwater management is a particularly alarming issue. The area already experiences flooding and drainage problems. The introduction of large buildings, extensive hard surfaces, and major car parks will only increase runoff and put further pressure on an already vulnerable environment. Residents should not be forced to live with worsening flooding and drainage issues because a large development has been pushed into an area without the appropriate infrastructure. What makes this situation even more disappointing is the lack of genuine consultation with the people who will be most affected. At the public hearing, it was claimed that consultation had occurred, however this has not been reflected in reality. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road and has not been approached, spoken to, or consulted in any meaningful way. To our knowledge, many residents along the street have not been consulted either. It is extremely difficult to accept that the concerns of the local community have been taken seriously when the people living on the street have effectively been ignored. This proposal gives the impression that Catherine Field has been chosen simply because it is a convenient or affordable location to build, rather than because it is appropriate or supported. Residents should not be expected to sacrifice their safety, peace, and rural lifestyle to accommodate a development that does not suit the area and does not align with the existing zoning. Catherine Fields Road is not just a site for development — it is where people live. It is where families have built their homes and their routines around a quieter rural lifestyle. When I visit my uncle, I am reminded of why people choose to live there: the space, the calmness, and the feeling that you are away from constant traffic and noise. Approving a school of this size would take that away forever. For all of these reasons, I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development and urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for considering my submission.

17936

New South Wales 2571

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I lived in Catherine Field for 32 years until 2 years ago when I decided to move from the area and retire. I saw a great deal of development surrounding Catherine Field in that time, managed reasonably well by the Council. When the surrounding development commenced, Camden Council assured the residents that the infrastructure would be in place to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the residents and those passing through Catherine Field. Up until now I have few concerns, however this proposed area has not had any planning completed or released by council, so they have been unable to provide that infrastructure. Catherine Field have a number of issues that need to be addressed prior to any development application being considered. 1. Road Quality and Safety. Catherine Fields Road is currently a 80k zone at the roadway near the proposed site, with many trucks and trades using the road to connect with Bringelly Road, Northern Road and Camden Valley Way. It has not been upgraded to support the current traffic, let along adding potentially #900 additional cars/buses at peak school times carrying children to and from school as most students would come from outside the immediate area. How many lives are you willing to risk by adding this level of traffic to a roadway that is not capable of supporting it, that's the question you need to ask yourselves! Now I say that this road is used by many trucks, cars and trade vehicles outside the community as well, except when it floods. 2. Flooding. There are regular road closures and flash flooding that has occurred at times of heavy rain. The properties opposite the proposed site back onto South Creek which is where I lived in 285 Catherine Fields Road. There is at times rising flood water from the creek but by far the most dangerous is the water running down the incline from the east side of Catherine Fields Road, across the road to the westerly side, down through the properties and into the creek which does not flow freely. As there is no stormwater drainage, there are 2 drains underneath the road, which fill quickly and cannot manage heavy rainfall to successfully stop the road from flooding. With the flood water comes effluent, as there is no sewerage in the area. With an area of 10 acres (which is only twice the size of the surrounding residential properties and families) and more than 900 students and adults, a sewerage system that acts as a transpiration bed on the sports field and goes down between buildings, I can see by the proposed flows that stormwater will increase for the properties across the road, and my guess is, it will bring more sewerage with it. Not only a health hazard for the school but the residents. So how do the children get out of the area in a flood, not by the footpaths, there are none, so they would be dodging between flood water, trucks, cars, busses etc. Once again how many lives do you think is a reasonable tradeoff for adding a school which has not had the opportunity to be supported by council or surrounding infrastructure. Emergency evacuation? Nowhere to go other than a local hall 1km away that is potentially to be used by the residents. There have been multiple fatalities on Catherine Fields Road, and those roads running off attributed to speed, poor road conditions, lack of lighting, and flooding. These risks are not new, but they will be exacerbated when you add over 900 children and adults to the mix on a daily basis, not to mention noise and disruption to the residents during construction. There will be no comfort in us telling you, I told you that, but you wouldn't listen. My question is why won't you listen to the objections, not just by the residents who have lived in the area for decades, but by local council who have also opposed this submission and work to deliver on their promise to their rate payers and residents. This proposed submission is not progress, you would only think that if you didn't consider the potential cost to lives and the wellbeing of children and residents. Note: the photos I have included occured on 7th March 2022, after around 3 hours of steady rain

Catherine Fields Road 2.pdf (PDF, 1.2 MB)

17941

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. Although I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road, my uncle does, and I visit him regularly. I am there often during school drop-off and pick-up times, and I spend enough time in this area to truly understand the environment, the road conditions, and the lifestyle that people here value. Catherine Field is not just somewhere I pass through — it is a place I feel connected to through my family and through the community that exists here. Every time I visit my uncle, the first thing I notice is the peace and calm. The area has a rural atmosphere that feels rare now. There is space, quiet, and a sense that life moves slower. It feels safe, open, and natural. It is the kind of place where people live because they want to escape congestion, noise, and overdevelopment. My uncle and many others chose this street because it offers a semi-rural lifestyle that is increasingly difficult to find. This is why the proposed development is so upsetting. A school of this size does not belong on Catherine Fields Road. It is completely inconsistent with the rural zoning and character of the area. A large institutional development would not only change the appearance of the landscape, but would permanently change the entire feeling of the community. Instead of visiting a quiet rural street, it would become an area dominated by daily noise, traffic, congestion, and pressure. The thought of Catherine Fields Road becoming a constant drop-off and pick-up zone is extremely concerning. What is currently a peaceful road would turn into a busy corridor filled with cars, buses, noise, horns, impatient drivers, and constant movement. It would completely change what it feels like to visit my uncle. Instead of being able to pull into the driveway safely and enjoy time with family, visits would be surrounded by stress, traffic build-up, and disruption. It would take away the calm environment that makes this area feel like home. The traffic and safety impacts alone should be enough to refuse this proposal. Catherine Fields Road is not designed for this level of development. It is a rural road and it already becomes difficult at peak times. I have personally experienced how busy it can get during school drop-off and pick-up hours, even without a major school being built there. Adding a development of this size will create dangerous conditions, with an overwhelming increase in cars, staff vehicles, buses and visitors. It is hard to understand how this can be considered safe for residents, families, children, pedestrians, or even emergency access. It is also extremely concerning that this area is not ready for rezoning or development at this scale. The infrastructure simply does not exist to support a school of this magnitude. In particular, the proposed site has no proper sewer system in place, and stormwater infrastructure appears inadequate. These are essential services and should not be treated as secondary issues. Catherine Field is not an established suburban area with the systems needed to support high-density development. Stormwater is a serious issue that cannot be ignored. This area is already known for drainage and flooding problems, and adding large buildings, hard surfaces and increased runoff will only make these problems worse. Approving a major development without proper stormwater systems in place risks long-term damage to surrounding land and nearby properties, including those of local residents like my uncle. Another major concern is the lack of genuine community consultation. During the public hearing it was stated that the community had been consulted, however this has not been the experience of those most affected. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road, and neither he nor other residents along the street have been directly approached, spoken to, or meaningfully consulted. It is difficult to accept that community concerns have been properly considered when the people who will carry the daily burden of this development have effectively been ignored. It feels as though this development is being pushed through regardless of local impact, and that this rural community has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper and more convenient location for a large school. That is not fair. Residents should not lose their lifestyle, safety, and rural surroundings simply because the land is available and affordable for a major development. Catherine Field is a rural community. It is not suited to a large-scale institutional development like this. Approving Minarah College on Catherine Fields Road would permanently change the character of the area, increase traffic and safety risks, place pressure on inadequate infrastructure, and destroy the peaceful environment that local residents have built their lives around. Most importantly, it would change what it means for families like mine to spend time here. The calm, quiet visits to my uncle’s home would be replaced with constant disruption, congestion and stress. That is not what this community deserves.

17946

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. Although I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road, my uncle does, and I visit him regularly. I am there often during school drop-off and pick-up times, and I spend enough time in this area to truly understand the environment, the road conditions, and the lifestyle that people here value. Catherine Field is not just somewhere I pass through — it is a place I feel connected to through my family and through the community that exists here. Every time I visit my uncle, the first thing I notice is the peace and calm. The area has a rural atmosphere that feels rare now. There is space, quiet, and a sense that life moves slower. It feels safe, open, and natural. It is the kind of place where people live because they want to escape congestion, noise, and overdevelopment. My uncle and many others chose this street because it offers a semi-rural lifestyle that is increasingly difficult to find. This is why the proposed development is so upsetting. A school of this size does not belong on Catherine Fields Road. It is completely inconsistent with the rural zoning and character of the area. A large institutional development would not only change the appearance of the landscape, but would permanently change the entire feeling of the community. Instead of visiting a quiet rural street, it would become an area dominated by daily noise, traffic, congestion, and pressure. The thought of Catherine Fields Road becoming a constant drop-off and pick-up zone is extremely concerning. What is currently a peaceful road would turn into a busy corridor filled with cars, buses, noise, horns, impatient drivers, and constant movement. It would completely change what it feels like to visit my uncle. Instead of being able to pull into the driveway safely and enjoy time with family, visits would be surrounded by stress, traffic build-up, and disruption. It would take away the calm environment that makes this area feel like home. The traffic and safety impacts alone should be enough to refuse this proposal. Catherine Fields Road is not designed for this level of development. It is a rural road and it already becomes difficult at peak times. I have personally experienced how busy it can get during school drop-off and pick-up hours, even without a major school being built there. Adding a development of this size will create dangerous conditions, with an overwhelming increase in cars, staff vehicles, buses and visitors. It is hard to understand how this can be considered safe for residents, families, children, pedestrians, or even emergency access. It is also extremely concerning that this area is not ready for rezoning or development at this scale. The infrastructure simply does not exist to support a school of this magnitude. In particular, the proposed site has no proper sewer system in place, and stormwater infrastructure appears inadequate. These are essential services and should not be treated as secondary issues. Catherine Field is not an established suburban area with the systems needed to support high-density development. Stormwater is a serious issue that cannot be ignored. This area is already known for drainage and flooding problems, and adding large buildings, hard surfaces and increased runoff will only make these problems worse. Approving a major development without proper stormwater systems in place risks long-term damage to surrounding land and nearby properties, including those of local residents like my uncle. Another major concern is the lack of genuine community consultation. During the public hearing it was stated that the community had been consulted, however this has not been the experience of those most affected. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road, and neither he nor other residents along the street have been directly approached, spoken to, or meaningfully consulted. It is difficult to accept that community concerns have been properly considered when the people who will carry the daily burden of this development have effectively been ignored. It feels as though this development is being pushed through regardless of local impact, and that this rural community has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper and more convenient location for a large school. That is not fair. Residents should not lose their lifestyle, safety, and rural surroundings simply because the land is available and affordable for a major development. Catherine Field is a rural community. It is not suited to a large-scale institutional development like this. Approving Minarah College on Catherine Fields Road would permanently change the character of the area, increase traffic and safety risks, place pressure on inadequate infrastructure, and destroy the peaceful environment that local residents have built their lives around. Most importantly, it would change what it means for families like mine to spend time here. The calm, quiet visits to my uncle’s home would be replaced with constant disruption, congestion and stress. That is not what this community deserves.

17951

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. My brother-in-law lives on this street, and I visit his home regularly. Through these frequent visits I have come to know the area well and have developed a strong connection to the local community. It is my firm belief that this proposal is not suitable for Catherine Field and that it represents an inappropriate form of development for a semi-rural location that is not designed to accommodate a large-scale educational facility. A school of this size and intensity does not fit within the existing character of Catherine Field. This area has long maintained a quiet rural and semi-rural identity, with open land, limited services, and a low-density lifestyle that residents value. A major school campus would dramatically alter the local environment and permanently change the nature of the area. I am also concerned that Catherine Field is simply not ready for this level of development. The locality is not appropriately prepared for rezoning or increased urban-scale land use, and the supporting infrastructure required for a major school is not currently in place. Road capacity, traffic safety, access arrangements, and supporting services are already limited. Introducing a large school would place further strain on an area that is not equipped to handle significant daily vehicle movements, staff traffic, student drop-offs, and ongoing congestion. Of further concern is that the proposed site is both flood affected and bushfire affected. These are serious environmental constraints, particularly for a development involving children and high daily occupancy. It is difficult to understand how a major school could safely operate on land subject to flooding risk and bushfire exposure, especially considering the need for safe access and evacuation routes during emergencies. In my view, a development of this scale would be far better suited to a properly planned growth area where infrastructure, roads, stormwater systems and emergency access have been designed to support large facilities. Catherine Field is not that type of area, and approving a major school here would be an example of poor planning that would create long-term safety and amenity issues for local residents.

17961

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to lodge a formal objection to the proposed Minarah College development at Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. My uncle resides on this street, and I am a regular visitor to his home. As a result, I am very familiar with the existing conditions of the area, including its rural character, limited infrastructure capacity, and environmental constraints. It is my view that the proposed development is not appropriate for this location and is inconsistent with orderly and proper planning principles. The scale and intensity of a large educational facility is incompatible with the established semi-rural nature of Catherine Field and would result in significant and ongoing impacts to the local community, road network, and surrounding environment. Incompatibility with Local Character and Premature Rezoning Catherine Field remains a predominantly rural and semi-rural locality. The proposed development represents an urban-scale land use that does not align with the existing character of Catherine Fields Road or the surrounding area. The bulk, built form, and intensity of the proposed school would permanently alter the rural landscape and undermine the established low-density lifestyle of local residents. Furthermore, this area is not currently suited to rezoning or major intensification. The supporting infrastructure required for a development of this nature has not been delivered, and approval of such a large facility at this stage would be premature and inconsistent with proper strategic planning. Flood and Bushfire Constraints It is also of significant concern that the proposed site is both flood affected and bushfire affected. These constraints raise serious issues regarding the long-term suitability of the site for a school accommodating a large number of students and staff. The presence of flooding and bushfire risk introduces unacceptable safety concerns, including the potential for restricted access, evacuation difficulties, and increased risk to occupants during emergency events. Such constraints should be considered a major limitation to the appropriateness of this location for a large-scale educational facility. Traffic, Access and Lack of Public Transport Catherine Fields Road and the surrounding road network are not designed to accommodate the substantial daily traffic volumes that would be generated by a major school. There is no adequate public transport servicing this area. As a result, it is highly likely that the majority of students and staff would be travelling from outside the local area and would be dependent on private vehicle drop-offs and pick-ups. This would significantly increase congestion, worsen road safety risks, and create daily traffic impacts for local residents, particularly during peak school times. The increased vehicle movements would also place pressure on intersections, access points, and local roads that are already limited in capacity and unsuitable for high-volume commuter traffic. Environmental Impacts and Pollution The lack of public transport options means that the development would be heavily reliant on private car travel. This would lead to increased vehicle emissions, air pollution, and noise impacts. The resulting environmental impacts are inconsistent with sustainable development objectives and would contribute to a decline in local amenity and environmental quality. A development of this scale should be located in a designated growth area where infrastructure, public transport networks, and road capacity have been planned to support increased density and high daily occupancy. Catherine Field is not currently such an area, and forcing this development into a rural setting will result in avoidable environmental and community impacts. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I strongly submit that the proposed Minarah College development is not suitable for Catherine Fields Road. It is inconsistent with the rural character of the locality, is located on land constrained by flooding and bushfire risk, and will generate significant traffic, safety, and environmental impacts due to the absence of public transport and reliance on private vehicles.

17966

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed development of Minarah College on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. My uncle lives on Catherine Fields Road and I visit him regularly, including during weekday peak periods. Through these visits I have become very familiar with the local road conditions, environmental constraints, and the existing rural character of this area. In my view, the proposed development is not an appropriate land use for this location and will result in unacceptable impacts to the surrounding community, local infrastructure, and the natural environment. Traffic Impacts and Absence of Public Transport One of the most significant concerns is the lack of public transport servicing Catherine Field. There is currently no adequate transport network to support a major educational facility, meaning the school would be heavily reliant on private vehicle travel. It is highly likely that the majority of students and staff would be travelling from outside the local area, resulting in large-scale daily drop-off and pick-up movements. This would significantly increase traffic volumes along Catherine Fields Road and surrounding routes, leading to congestion, reduced safety for residents, and increased pressure on an already limited rural road network. The existing roads were not designed to handle this type of high-frequency commuter traffic associated with a large school. Environmental and Pollution Concerns Due to the absence of public transport and the expected reliance on private vehicles, the development will also contribute to increased air pollution, vehicle emissions, and noise. This is inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development and would have a negative impact on the local environment and overall amenity of the area. A large school in a rural setting will inevitably generate ongoing noise and pollution impacts that are not compatible with the quiet semi-rural lifestyle that currently exists in Catherine Field. Flooding and Bushfire Risk Constraints It is also highly concerning that the proposed site is identified as being both flood affected and bushfire affected. These are serious constraints that should weigh heavily against the suitability of this site for a large educational facility. A school development accommodating a large number of children and staff must be located on land that is safe, accessible, and capable of supporting emergency response and evacuation requirements. The combination of flood risk and bushfire exposure raises significant doubts regarding the long-term safety and viability of the proposal. Incompatibility with Rural Character and Strategic Planning Catherine Field remains a semi-rural area and is not currently equipped to support a development of this scale. The bulk, intensity, and urban nature of a large school campus is inconsistent with the existing character of Catherine Fields Road and the surrounding locality. It is also evident that the area is not ready for rezoning or major intensification, as the infrastructure required to support a development of this magnitude has not been delivered. Approving a school of this size in an area without the necessary planning framework and supporting services would be premature and inconsistent with orderly and proper planning. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I strongly submit that the proposed Minarah College development is unsuitable for Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. The proposal would result in significant traffic and environmental impacts due to the absence of public transport, and it raises serious safety concerns given the flood and bushfire constraints affecting the site. This development would be more appropriately located within a designated growth area where infrastructure, transport capacity, and emergency access arrangements are already planned to support large-scale development.

17976

New South Wales 2179

09/02/2026

Object

Website

MINARAH COLLEGE SUBMISSION 4 I object to the current proposed development of the State Significant Development Application – Proposed Minarah College – 268-278 Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field (SSD 30759158) on the following grounds: 1/ I have read Camden Council’s submission and am pleased that they have made a detailed and considered response to the School project and are representing the majority of the residents views. 2/ Considering the councils submission I have found it ridiculous that an State Significant Development (SSD) can bypass Council almost completely. It is wrong that this or any project that is SSD doesn’t have to pay contributions where all other developments must. How can this development not contribute toward all the ammenities that must be provided by council to the school now and into the future. The infrastructure that must be provided by council is considerable and it’s us ratepayers that provide the funds to make this possible. Most residents judging by the submissions already made object to the proposed school. We the residents are then forced into funding a project that we object to on serious grounds. 3/ I would like draw attention to Austral land release and development. As with all developments electricity must be supplied as well as gas, water and sewerage infrastructure. With the Austral land release it is obvious that small site developments are completely haphazard and without the proper infrastructure in place. It is disjointed. Timelines for infrastructure provision for example sewerage and stormwater have blown out many times. Sydney Water states that funds are scarce and not allocated. The already sold lots of residential land are not serviced sufficiently by town sewerage. The new and proposed schools in the area are not either. 4/ Traffic and queueing analysis in the development proposal suggests that there will be a massive rise in traffic on Catherine Fields and Spring Fields roads. With respect to Catherine Fields road there is an unaccounted for 20% of outbound traffic from the school. I suggest that this will be for traffic that will use Chisholm Road. Local roads around the proposed school are not constructed of sufficient durability to cater to the massive increase in traffic of cars and buses once the school is operational and will make the roads already in bad shape worse. Chisholm road is only one lane with no dividing markings and cars are frequently going onto the shoulders to pass each other. This situation is dangerous and causing damage to vehicles. The whole road needs upgrading making a proper divided road if a school is to be considered at the proposed site address. Catherine Field road, Deepfields road, Springfield road, Anthony road and now Alma roads will become feeder roads for the school and are in poor condition. To allow the proposed development when the Catherine Field North part of the SWG Centers area is not released will make the necessary road and traffic upgrades haphazard and disjointed. So even if the road frontage of the development is upgraded (including curbing, guttering, footpaths and street lighting currently not available) the rest of the road will become even more damaged. The council will have to fund the upgrades that will definitely be required and insisted upon by RESIDENTS!. The developers won’t have to pay towards its upkeep because its an SSD, when it’s the developers that are are the cause of the increase in subsequent road damage for a school that we residents do not want. It’s Camden council that will have to fund the upkeep using our rates monies that are already too high and will likely increase above I-Part recommendations. 5/ From the diagrams of the site provided by the developer and traffic and queueing analysis, it shows that there is not enough kiss and drop parking spaces on the proposed school proposal. The overflow of kiss and drops will be onto Catherine Field road in the southerly direction in the mornings. The developer has only provided for one lane only and if the time taken for kiss and drop is long the overflow of cars waiting will completely block the southerly direction of the road. For through traffic there is no way to avoid this traffic snarl as there is an island in the middle of the road (for the northern incoming traffic) that will stop cars from overtaking. The cars waiting for their kiss and drop parking spot cannot even pull to the left on Catherine Field road enough to allow cars bypassing the school to pass safely. I suggest there will be extensive road rage and the temptation to overtake with no zebra crossing will make it extremely unsafe for the drivers and pedestrians. There is no modelling for risk and safety analysis of kiss and drop times exceeding 1.25 mins. The bus stand on Catherine Field road on the corner with Chisholm road has no crosswalk to the school side of the road. This again is not safe for the students using public bus transport. There are no bicycle lanes proposed for Catherine field road either. Once the school is built the students, teachers and parents will then complain about the too many heavy vehicles and cars that use the road. Council will then have to install speed humps to stop any trucks from using Catherine Field road as a matter of new risk modelling that will be initiated by the School. Will council then ban the parking of trucks now in our properties now allowable to minimise risk? 6/ Traffic, student and building noise is another concern. The fact that children playground noise as modelled in the proposal is higher than that allowed for residential areas makes the site unsuitable for a school. The use of acoustic panelling on the site will not reduce the noise enough for nearby residents and the aesthetic’s is not in keeping with the rural nature of our area. Also the proposed Color bond fencing is not currently allowed by council. It only allows post and rail construction, and that is not suitable for schools. The developers propose the use of neutral and site appropriate colors for the Color bond fence is ill defined. The 2m high fence perimeter will increase the segregation of the school community from the community at large and again is not in keeping with the aesthetics of our area. The proposed closing time of 10 pm means that the traffic and therefore noise will continue until very late. This is not fair on the current and future residents mental and physical health. 7/ The use of on site waste water treatment will mean children will be playing on sports grounds that are at possible risk of failure. The fact that removal of excess sewage is pump out, there is a possibility that with flooding the raw sewage could be released untreated. The council have detailed in depth in their submission the requirements of current law and council guidelines that are not adhered to using the developers intended treatment of on site sewage in the proposal. I will refer you to that analysis. 8/ Because there is no proper stormwater piping and drainage the flooding will get worse on Catherine Field road. This will exacerbate the already flooding of properties down stream of the school and make the current flood modelling of the area and at the school obsolete. The roads that are now already subject to flooding and with no footpaths or street lighting or curb and guttering will make it risky for kiss and drop and pickup along those roads during inclement weather. 9/ The school will need extra sporting fields to use for major sporting events days etc. From what I can ascertain the school will use the park adjacent to the RFS station. How can this be allowed when the developer has paid no contributions to council in its upkeep. It’s we the residents through our rates that maintain it. 10/ I note that the developer propose the removal of 230 trees. Very easy for a developer to destroy trees. Not so a resident. Hypocrisy and double standards in the extreme. In Summary the site is zoned RU4 Primary Production Small Lots and the school is to be located on rural land that would not be in keeping with the current rural nature of our community. The site will have dilapidated rural roads with no shoulder, formed kerb and gutter, footpath, lighting or piped underground stormwater system necessary for the school. The proposal does not have town sewer and as such can cause environmental contamination and hazards to humans with and without the possibility of flooding as detailed in Camden Councils detailed submission. The proposed development will largely not be beneficial to us residents. It is currently required under the councils building code. We the majority of residents will enjoy no benefits from the school. The fact that the development is prior to SWGA precinct planning and rural land release means that it is inappropriate in our community and will hinder the future proper coordinated infrastructure and ammenities construction. There is no infrastructural benefit to us residents and will hinder and disrupt our way of life and cause as I’ve outlined above more harm to the majority of the residents of my community than any perceived good for the few proponents who reside outside our community. Finally the people who wrote submissions supporting the school mostly live completely outside our community. They do not have our RURAL way of life at heart and do not care if they destroy it. They have nothing to loose in their way of life so how can they be allowed to make a submission that potentially affects us! I have read the Yes submissions. They are largely short of few words and without thought. They are therefore written quickly almost as if it’s of a printing press, without the due consideration that should be given to me and my neighbours. It takes a lot of time and research and thought to make a submission. Most of the residents oppose the development as does our council so please show us the due respect we deserve and deny this development. Kind regards

17991

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

I Wish to formely object to the proposed school development of Minarah College (SSD-30759158 } in catherine field on the following planning and safety grounds. 1 - INAPPROPRIATE ZONING R4 RURAL LAND which is intended to preserve the rural character and limit intensive urban style development . A school of approximately 1000 students plus teachers is inconsistant with the objectives of zoning and represents overdevelopment of rural land 2 - LACK OF ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE . The proposal relies on no connection to reticulated sewerage , raisng serious concerns about wastewater management , public health and environmental impacts - No street lighting -No kerb and guttering , This infrastructure defecit is unaceptable for a development of this size and use particularly involving children. 3 FLOODING AND EMERGENCY ACCESS The site is located within a flood-prone area and surruonding roads are also subjet to flooding. this presents a serious risk to student and staff safety , emergency vehicle access and evacuation during flood events, Approving a large schhol in a known fllod zone contradicts basic risk management and disaster planning princicples 4 UNSAFE ROAD CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC IMPACTS The existing road network is not suitable for the traffic generated by a 1000 student school. The road surface is in poor condition with poyholes and loose material . There are no sealed footpaths and no formal pedestrian infrastructure. The main access road provides only one entry and one exit for the entire school This creates an unacceptable traffic and safety risk during peak drop-off and pick-up times particularly for pedestrians , cyclists and local residents 5 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY -There are no footpaths - Poor lighting - Unsealed footpaths expecting children and parents to safely walk or cycle in these conditions is unrealistic and dangerous 6 CUMULATIVE SAFETY AND AMENITY When considered together - rural zoning , fllod risk , lack of sewerage and limited access - the proposal represents a significant and unreasonable risk to the public safety and local amenity For the reasons outlined above , the proposal development is inappropriate for the site and should be refused thanking you

18091

Redacted

09/02/2026

Object

Website

To- The independaent Planning Commison Project - Minarah College (SSD-30759158) Position - Strong opposition I am writing to formally object to the proposed Minarah College development at 268-278 Catherine fields rd . This proposal is incompatable with the existing semi rural character of catherine fields and possess signifacant risks to the local communtyMy objections are based on the following 1 UNSUITABLE RURAL ZONING AND FLOOD RISK The proposed site is loacated on rural land that is known to be flood-prone .introducing a schol of significant size into an area subject to flooding rasises major safety concerns for students , staff and emergency services and surrounding residents .Flooding risks could compromise access during emergencies and place lives at risk ,ALlso of note is Anthony rd wich is an access rd for catherine fields rd on the northern end . THis road is notorius for flooding so uch that council have installed fix floodgates with warning sensors to alert them as the water rises rapidly on this road with any site of rain- There has been a fatalaty on this particular road with a vehicle being swept away when the road was under water 2 INADEQUATE ROAD ACCESS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY Catherine fields rd provides only a single access route to the site . The road already experinces heavy veicle traffic , including trucks and semitrailers accessing rural properties . These vehicles frequently reverse into and out of driveways creating hazardous conditions a few examples is they take both sides of the road when reversing , Cars travelling behind thsem or coming in the opposite direction in general do not give enough room for these large trucks and semitrailers . Also there a high number of heavy trucks and semitrailers using catherine fields as they A - Live on rural properites in catherine fields as they need acerage to run their business B Use catherine fields rd as a route when coming from the south to acess bringelly road at the northern end The additions of school traffic with parents and staff vehickes woulkd dramatically increase congestion and signifantly elevate the risk of accidents on a road thats not desined for this volume or tyep of use especially with the ackonwledgement of the Deoartments own report that states Paragrah 159 Confirms an extraordinary reliance on the use of private vehicles 90% of syudents and 97% of staff 3 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC PRSSSURES Traffic conditions on catherine fields rd are already deteriorating due to rapid residential growth in neighbouring suburbs, This pressure will worsen substaintially with the expexcted increase in traffic associated with the new Western Sydney Airpot . The cumaltive imapct of these developments has not been adequeatley addresses and adding a major school to this environment is unsafe and irresponsable 4 LACK OF ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE The site currently laxcks fundamental infrastructure required for a schhol of this scale incudling - No connection to sewage - No kerb and guttering - No stree lighting - Poor road conditions , includng potholes and degraded surfaces These defeciences pose afety risks for children and the broader community 5 eEMERGENCY ACCESS CONCERNS With only one access emergency vehicles during peak traffic periods would bre sererly compromised , This is unacceptable for a facilty resonsible for the care of a large number of children 6 OTHER MAJOR POINTS OF NOTE The acknowledgement of the Deprtments own report PARAGRAH 117 States the site is an unsewered rural property on a road with no footpayhs , no lighting , no kerb and gutter and no piped stormwater drainage PARAGRAH 127 Notes the absence of pedestrian infrastructure and states that pedestrian movement is expected to be minmul , with no expectation of future footpath provision This is deeply troubling , Schools should be places that children can safely walk or cycle where it isnt dependant on almost entirely on car travel The proposed school has stated in will be operational 7am to 9pm 7 days a week ( yes including weekends) for sports activities hall use and early children centre . The community and residents who purchasedand have been living here for many years will have to suffer taffic , traffic pollution , noise pollution from increase in traffic as well as noise from everyday schoolstudents and pa systems As well as the sports feild with proposed foodlighting oon 12,5 mtr poles . This will totally destroy the communtiy and residents lifestyle , the reasons we all purchased here originally was for the open space and tranquilaty cCatherine fields is not currently identified for precinct planning and is recognised as being 10- 15 years away from that process. yet we are being asked to apporve a significant peice of social infrastucture in isolation before the communtiy os known Once the school is approved its location becomes fixed ,Roads , traffic movements land uses and servicing decisions foloow it. this reduces future options ,limits how centres and community fscilites can be intergrated and ultimately shifts the burdan of poor sequencing onto future residents . That is not strategic planning it is reacting rather than planning In conclusion given the risk factor inadequate infrastructure unsafe road condition and significant existing and future traffic pressures . Catherine fields road is an inapropriate location for a school development of this scale . Approcal would place undue risk on students staff residents and road users I ask thatbthe commison to refuse this application in its entirety * I have attached 3 photos max as allowed but and have many more if required

Bruno Costa image.pdf (PDF, 118.02 KB)

18111

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

My concerns are about planning,infrastructure, public health and environmental safety in a rural residential area still awaiting comprehensive structural planning. The area currently lacks kerb and guttering has limited street lighting, narrow roads and critically no connection to sewerage infrastructure. Council has stated the the proposed development does not meet required performance standards to operate sewerage management, specifically the system must ensure The prevention of the spread of disease The prevention of foul odours The prevention of contamination of surface and groundwater The discouragement of insect and vermin That people do not come in contact with untreated sewage And minimisation of adverse impact on neighbouring properties and surrounding land. The councils own submission states that the development will not be able achieve these performance standards. In a rural setting, failure in waste water management doesn’t just stay on one property. They impact ground water,neighbouring land, local waterways and public health. Contamination is extremely difficult and costly to reverse. In addition, increased traffic associated with nearly 1000 students and staff will place further strain on narrow rural roads that were never designed for this level of use, raising safety concerns for residents, pedestrians, and emergency services. Good planning is not about stopping development. It is about putting the right development in the right place, at the right time, with the right infrastructure in place. If this sight can not meet sewerage performance standards, cannot safely manage waste water, and cannot support the scale of the proposal with the existing infrastructure, then the responsible decision is not to approve it in its current form. I respectfully urge the commission to give significant weight to the technical assessments, the identified not compliance, and the long-term risk to public health and the environment. This is about ensuring that any development-regardless of who it serves-meets planning standards, protects the community, and does not create problems that future generations will be left to fix.

18121

New South Wales 2557

09/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Sir/Madam My name is [name redacted] and I am opposed to the new school that is proposed for Catherine Field Road, Catherine Field. I do not believe the area is suitable to have a school of any size due to zoning, infrastructure and Flooding. The following concerns also need to be addressed and resolved before any school is built in the area. 1) Infrastructure - Roads. The proposed location Catherine Field Road is a major Thorofare for traffic and is used by many vehicles including heavy vehicles that reside in the area. Catherine Field Road, Barry Ave, Allenby Ave, Deepfield road, Springfield Road and Chisholm Road are all in poor state of repair and any increase in traffic will see these roads deteriorate. Who is responsible to maintain these roads? Will the increase in traffic related to the school contribute to the road maintenance or upgrade. As Catherine Field Road will now have a 40 k/h speed limit many vehicles will begin using other roads namely Chisholm rd. / Deepfield rd, as a rat-run. Also, there are NO footpaths or bike lanes along any roads in this area so any Parents/Children walking or bike riding will be at high risk. 2) Parking. Will enough parking be provided for all Teachers / pupils & visitors including special events such as Christmas / Easter / End of year events that may occur as any vehicles parking on the streets will be placed in a dangerous situation as little room exists on many of these roads and any rains will result in further danger as vehicles possibly getting bogged / people slipping again due to poor road width. 3) Drop-off, Pick-up Has enough been provided here to as the real world has shown there needs to be minimum 2 lanes as parents come to pick up their children some will take longer than others, and these pick-ups, drop-off lanes will be clogged very quickly resulting in traffic overflowing onto Catherine Field Road. 3) Sewer. Another concern is sewer. Since every property in the area has their own septic system due to no town system how will a system for a school be consider hygienic since the location is part flood zone and no doubt the septic will be located in the lowest part of the property. 4) Hour of operation We were informed the school will operate 7 days a week up to 10pm. Any people living within close proximity who moved into the area moved into a Rural location, NOT an urban location. No other businesses operate these hours in this area. Allowing these business hours threatens the lifestyle of those who moved into the area. This includes excess noise, extra traffic and general disruption to the area. I feel it is total inappropriate to have ANY school or business in this area and total object. I have never made any political donations to any political party, ever. Signed, [name redacted]

18466

Redacted

08/02/2026

Object

Email

Hello, I would like you to please attach these videos and photos that I took on 20/01/26 out front of the site for Minara College proposed school and just further along towards Catherine Fields Road that i spoke about at the public hearing. This was after only a small amount of rain to show you how much water pools in this area and also again highlighing the danger for students and parents to be wondering along the sides of the road during morning and afternoon pick up with only a small amount of rain. Thankyou (redacted) Video; https://youtube.com/shorts/S1kyDpODApo?feature=share

Small amount of rain 20126 out front of site.pdf (PDF, 5.47 MB)

17466

Redacted

08/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed development of Minarah College on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field NSW. While I do not live directly on Catherine Fields Road myself, my son does, and I visit him regularly throughout the week. As a result, I am very familiar with the area, its road conditions, and the quiet semi-rural lifestyle that local families have built their lives around. I am also an active member of the local community and feel a strong connection to Catherine Field and the people who live there. This proposal is completely out of place for the character and aesthetics of the surrounding area. Catherine Field is a rural and semi-rural environment, known for its open space, low-density living, and peaceful atmosphere. A development of this scale is not consistent with the existing landscape or lifestyle. A large school complex would permanently alter the appearance and identity of this community, replacing a rural setting with an intense urban-style development. It is deeply concerning that this proposal appears to be driven by convenience and cost rather than appropriate planning. It feels as though this location has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper option to build a massive school, regardless of whether the site is suitable or whether the local community supports it. The concerns of residents and surrounding families should not be ignored in favour of what appears to be an opportunistic development decision. This area is clearly not ready for rezoning or development of this intensity. The infrastructure is already under strain and is not designed to support the additional traffic, noise, congestion, and daily disruption that would come with a large school population. Catherine Fields Road is not built to handle the scale of vehicle movements that would occur during drop-off and pick-up times, and the resulting safety risks for residents and road users would be unacceptable. Most importantly, this proposal would have a direct and ongoing impact on my son and other residents who live along the street. The increase in traffic, parking issues, noise, and loss of rural amenity would significantly reduce the quality of life for the people who currently call this area home. The residents of Catherine Field chose this area for its quiet, rural character. Approving a development of this size would represent a major and irreversible change to the local environment and lifestyle. Once the rural nature of this community is lost, it cannot be restored. For these reasons, I strongly object to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road and urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for considering my submission.

17471

New South Wales 2570

08/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This proposal is deeply upsetting to me, not only as a member of the local community, but as a parent whose son lives directly on this street. I visit him regularly and spend a great deal of time in this area. Catherine Field is not just a location on a map — it is a peaceful rural community where families have chosen to live for the quiet lifestyle, open space, and natural environment. The thought of this area being permanently changed by a massive school development is extremely concerning. Catherine Field has always been a semi-rural area with a unique character. It is known for its open landscape, low-density living, and calm atmosphere. A development of this size and intensity does not belong here. It would destroy the rural aesthetic and replace it with an urban-style complex that is completely out of place. If this is approved, the community will lose the very qualities that make Catherine Field special. It is also difficult not to feel that this location has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper option for the school to build on. The scale of this proposal suggests the school is looking for an affordable site to construct a large development, regardless of whether the area is suitable or whether local residents support it. The people who already live here, raise their families here, and rely on these roads every day should not be ignored in favour of a project that clearly does not fit the local setting. This area is not ready for rezoning or development of this magnitude. The existing infrastructure and road network are already strained, and Catherine Fields Road is not designed to safely handle the daily traffic chaos that will come with hundreds of students, staff, buses and parent vehicles. The increase in congestion and the pressure on local roads will create ongoing safety risks for residents, visitors, and families who travel through the area daily. Most importantly, this proposal will have a direct impact on my son and the many other residents who live along Catherine Fields Road. It is heartbreaking to think that their peaceful lifestyle will be replaced by constant noise, traffic, parking issues, and disruption. Residents should not be forced to accept a development of this scale in an area that was never designed to accommodate it. Catherine Field is a rural community, not an urban centre. Approving this proposal would change the area forever. Once the rural character is destroyed, it cannot be restored, and the damage to the lifestyle and environment of this community will be permanent. For all of these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission.

17476

New South Wales 2570

08/02/2026

Object

Website

To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed Minarah College development on Catherine Fields Road, Catherine Field. This proposal is deeply upsetting to me, not only as a member of the local community, but as a parent whose son lives directly on this street. I visit him regularly and spend a great deal of time in this area. Catherine Field is not just a location on a map — it is a peaceful rural community where families have chosen to live for the quiet lifestyle, open space, and natural environment. The thought of this area being permanently changed by a massive school development is extremely concerning. Catherine Field has always been a semi-rural area with a unique character. It is known for its open landscape, low-density living, and calm atmosphere. A development of this size and intensity does not belong here. It would destroy the rural aesthetic and replace it with an urban-style complex that is completely out of place. If this is approved, the community will lose the very qualities that make Catherine Field special. It is also difficult not to feel that this location has been chosen simply because it is a cheaper option for the school to build on. The scale of this proposal suggests the school is looking for an affordable site to construct a large development, regardless of whether the area is suitable or whether local residents support it. The people who already live here, raise their families here, and rely on these roads every day should not be ignored in favour of a project that clearly does not fit the local setting. This area is not ready for rezoning or development of this magnitude. The existing infrastructure and road network are already strained, and Catherine Fields Road is not designed to safely handle the daily traffic chaos that will come with hundreds of students, staff, buses and parent vehicles. The increase in congestion and the pressure on local roads will create ongoing safety risks for residents, visitors, and families who travel through the area daily. Most importantly, this proposal will have a direct impact on my son and the many other residents who live along Catherine Fields Road. It is heartbreaking to think that their peaceful lifestyle will be replaced by constant noise, traffic, parking issues, and disruption. Residents should not be forced to accept a development of this scale in an area that was never designed to accommodate it. Catherine Field is a rural community, not an urban centre. Approving this proposal would change the area forever. Once the rural character is destroyed, it cannot be restored, and the damage to the lifestyle and environment of this community will be permanent. For all of these reasons, I strongly urge the consent authority to refuse this application. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission.

17541

New South Wales 2557

08/02/2026

Object

Website

As a resident of Catherine Field for more than 25 years, I object to the proposed Minarah College at 268-278 Catherine Field Rd, Catherine Field. I have reviewed and acknowledged the amended plans and documents concerning this development and so want to address my reasons for my decision. *The proposed development is not in keeping with the existing character of the local area. The area is a rural/semi- rural part of Catherine Field. *The land use zoning for this site is RU4 Primary Production so how is a school considered 'primary production'. How can the zoning be changed for one proposal and not others in the Catherine Field area. Without a change of the area to residential zoning (nothing is predicted for the near future) why is there a need for a school in Catherine Field. *Recent Flood Mapping shows the proposed site is not suitable for development unless major storm water and sewer works are completed. The Flood Mapping report states .."The flood risk at the site consists of overland flow at the site and the potential of isolation in relatively frequent events, even after the proposed drainage works, as areas to the east and west are subject to flooding from South Creek and Rileys Creek". *The road access in Catherine Field is really only 3 local roads that have for as long as I have lived in the area been in sub-standard condition and constantly needing temporary patch up repairs by Camden Council. The roads are extremely narrow, poorly line marked, if at all, have no shoulder, no kerb and gutter, no footpaths, no cycleways, dangerous sharp bends with no barrier protection for resident's homes and in times of heavy rain most of the roads are flooded and inaccessible. Especially the section of Catherine Field Road at the site of the proposed development. This is one of the most commonly floooded roads. *The entire area has little or no street lighting making visibility at night dangerous particularly during times of heavy rain and fog. *Traffic flow has increased substantially since the re-opening of the 'temporary road' on to Springfield Road from Oran Park. Morning and afternoon peaks are increasingly noisy and busy with many vehicles using this as a short cut to Bringelly Road and Leppington station. Increased numbers of cars, buses, large trucks and semi-trailers, many travelling above the speed limit, use Catherine Field local roads especially Catherine Field and Springfield Rd. Many vehicles still travel at high speed regardless of the new 60km/hr signage so walking, cycling or even parking on the roads is dangerous. *In the last 2 years there have been 3 major accidents on Springfield Road alone that I am aware of. All of them due to high speed. One of them being a fatality in front of my property. The next week on 2 separate occasions I witnessed vehicles losing control at speed and skidding in to neighbour's properties. This has also ocurred many times in front of my own property. Since I have been living in Catherine Field I know of other accidents on Catherine Field Road including a fatality. There was a major traffic accident at the intersection of Catherine Field and Springfield Roads only 3 days ago. *Most residents of Catherine Field don't walk, cycle or even park cars on the nature strip outside their own homes out of concern for their own safety. *Extra traffic generated by such a large development would be a major concern to all Catherine Field residents. *Vehicles queueing to pick up and drop off students would cause traffic congestion on Catherine Field Road. This road is too narrow and unfit for increased traffic. *Traffic congestion trying to access the proposed site would mean vehicles idling, whilst waiting to pick up and drop off students, emitting exhaust fumes that are detrimental to the surrounding neighbours. *General school noise is an issue for the local area including regular school bells and announcements over the outside PA systems. Especially affecting neighbours adjoining the proposed development. *Neighbouring properties will lose their privacy and peace. *Properties located opposite the proposed site would definitely incur flooding by storm water and septic overflow onto their land. It is unfair to allow that to happen to residents who have built and resided opposite the site unaware their homes would be compromised. Septic runoff and storm water overflow is already a major problem for most residents of Catherine Field. *What happens in times of heavy rain when the septic system of such a large development will be affected by water ingress and overflow into the natural water course ie. South Creek causing cross contamination? *In times of heavy rain there are flooded roads. Especially bad is the section of road in front of the proposed school. Eventually the flooding of South Creek occurs, which borders the rear of my property and many others opposite the proposed site. With such a large development having multiple roof tops and large concreted areas the excess rainwater has no way of being absorbed by the land. This has to compound the water run off problem. *The removal of trees is an issue that is of concern being that some of this vegetation is considered 'protected' environmentally. No trees in a 'green belt area' have previously been able to be removed for any reason. For these reasons I believe the proposed development of Minarah College is unsuitable for Catherine Field and will have a substantial negative impact on the daily lives of our local Catherine Field community. Therefore I strongly oppose this development.

17546

Redacted

08/02/2026

Object

Website

I Object to the Minarah College (ssd-3079158) proposal. The traffic increase oncatherine fields road as well as cominf from eastwood rd onto anthony road will not cope wiht hte massive increase in traffic . these roads being rural roads , single lane each way aswell as the fact alot off sectionsand road edges worn away due to no storm water catchment and no kerb and gutter will be completlt destroyed . i can forsee many accidents and vehicles damaged with the increase of hundreds of vehicles using this constantly There is no street lighting on catherine field rfd and surrounding roads making these very dangerous in extreme weather conditons in heavy rain,overcast as well as early foogy winter mornings roads The submission states only 1 bus will operate until full capacity . Firstly what is full capacity as this is a private school where they are more inclined to keep growing as well as the unbeleivable statement of only 1 bus meaning all ut a hanful of students and teachers will be travilling in their own cars an absurd amont in normal circumstance let alone a single lane each way on a rural road kept in a very ppor state with a numbe rof potholes large crackes and worn out road edges with loose stone and gravel. this school will be in a fllod zone and to evacute children in a flood where will they take them as the are no footpaths the roads will be under water or a least covered in running water putiing the children in more danger the schhol has stated it will have lighting for sports fields in use utill 9pm everynight . this will be a mojor disturbance to the neighbouring properties as well as major devaluation in their properties There are no sealed footpaths infact in many areas its impassable as water runoff has washed away the footpaths leaving deep watercoarse as well as large trees are standing on the footpath The proposed school is in aflood zone with only one acceess road, no kerb and gutter, no stormwater and no sewerage with absolutely no benefit to the residents of catherine fields and no benefit to the communty, if this were to go ahead it will have a major detrimental flow on effect for catherine fields and surrounding area I ask that the commision to take all of these aspects into account and refuse the application I ask the

17561

New South Wales 2557

08/02/2026

Object

Website

Local roads will be inundated with excess traffic. Please refer to the attached information for details. Issues you will find in the document: - traffic for cars waiting on Catherine Fields road will block the road - alternative routes avoiding Camden Valley way is the likley traffic flow, referred to in the public hearings as a "rat run". - multiple bottlenecks exist when using alternative routes to avoid Camden Valley Way - our roads have fatalities and have been the subject of Blackspot safety programs People will die on these roads as a result of this development. Its not about if, but when. How do we know...because it happens now, and the proposed development does nothing to ensure the post development roads and traffic are better than they are currently. So things will only get worse. The development should not go ahead until rezoning and a proper town plan is designed, with consideration for schools and other infrastructure in the area.

Local knowledge of Catherine Field rural roads and traffic.pdf (PDF, 2.16 MB)

17566

New South Wales 2557

08/02/2026

Object

Website

Thank for the opportunity to present during the recent (3rd February 2026) Zoom review meeting as held by the IPCN Panel. Further, I appreciate the opportunity to attach a copy of the written detailed notes as presented (find this presentation within file attachment 1 Section 2 – Presentation Notes) outlining my concerns and reasons for objecting to the Minarah College proposed development. In support of that initial document as presented, In support of the attached File marked as “Attachment 1” it includes: 1. An Executive Summary which outlines my understanding of why such a development should OR should not be considered as appropriate for the nominated location based on “needs, value, suitability and sustainability” while observing a “duty of care” to the most immediate community. a. This document also includes an updated summarised overview of the prior known and new Key Factors providing further context to my objection and that made clear in my mind why this development proposal should not be approved to go ahead in the proposed current Form or Location. b. An embedded copy of My initial objection notes as presented during the IPCN Panel Zoom meeting. 2. File “Attachment 2” which shows a Map (Marked as MAP 1) of the central area of Catherine Field showing those roads used for current traffic, together with: a. Traffic flow in and out of the limited road entry points to the Catherine Field Central area and: i. Comments specific to significantly increased traffic within this location and that coming from the greater area and why these roads, as I put it, have become a daily part of the “The “Rat Run” for all. ii. Notation will also include current type vehicle mix (car, work Ute / SUV and light commercial, light and heavy trucks) b. Major and minor intersections that will be exacerbated should the development go ahead c. Specific to this area: i. The current known major road flood points. Roads are then closed ii. Secondary points where there is known and often “proceed with caution” is required due to higher water level and flow occurs across those points. Again, thank you for the opportunity to submit my updated summary of concerns. I trust all issues as specifically raised in my executive summary and the prior an subsequent key factors for my objection to the proposed development document, together with the attached Map will be considered and reviewed in detail. Further, I look forward to and welcome further consultation as deemed necessary to discuss those details in my documents. Regardless of said consultation being required or not, at the appropriate time I look forward to the IPCN providing it’s written findings and conclusions addressing all concerns raised by the community.

Attachemnt 1_Exec Summary & Detailed Obj Notes_IPCN Panel__Feb 2026.pdf (PDF, 157.31 KB)

Attachment 2_Deatiled MAPS 1-4_Feb 2026.pdf (PDF, 463.45 KB)

17571

New South Wales 2557

08/02/2026

Object

Website

There is something wrong with the public engagement for this project. I recently reviewed an article for a proposed redevelopment of the Port Kembla steelworks into a reszoned development and land transformation precinct. The development will provide 20,000 jobs and will take place over 20-30 years. As controversial as this project is, it received 200 supporting submissions and 4 objecting submissions. The number of submissions being made for Minarah college development seems to be a very large number of submissions opposing the project, attempting to be outcompeted by the existing Minarah college community trying to "outnumber" the submissions on the supporting side, with intent to create an over all "majority" of submissions that support the project. There is still a large number of opposing submissions. Please refer the article attached below, to understand the context of why a proper, rezoned, yet controversial development in Port Kembla, can result in good public support, yet the Minarah college seems to have motivated huge numbers of submissions presumably to try to suppress or inundate the amount of local opposition for the project. This development should not go ahead until the area is rezoned. https://www.realcommercial.com.au/news/one-of-the-worlds-largest-wollongong-set-for-major-transformation/?campaignType=external&campaignChannel=syndication&campaignName=ncacont&campaignContent=&campaignSource=daily_telegraph_newslocal&campaignPlacement=socrefis&fbclid=IwY2xjawOn-KNleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETF0ZlRCeldxdnVZeXBYamxhc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHi-TV7jrudkH5Jdd6AbOQCHRtzUx7O4_j2m5r-ejw4hQJe57Sn95JVZIsXvX_aem_8rXK2YNkRSbjjJWecyHHjA