Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project

25496

26/02/2026

Object

Email

Please find my Submission attached Yours sincerely, Gill H. Boehringer

25496 Gill Boehringer_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 89.09 KB)

25346

Gloucester Knitting Nannas Against Gas & Greed

New South Wales 2422

26/02/2026

Object

Website

We wish to lodge our objection to this project. There are many reasons why it should not go ahead, the main one being that we are in a climate crisis. The burning of fossil fuels is a major contributory factor to this crisis, and we should not be approving any new mines or mine extensions. We also do not believe that the project is in the public interest, as the cumulative impacts pose a significant risk to the health of local people, particularly related to air quality associated with the mining, the power station, and truck movements, the cumulative effects of which need to be taken into consideration. It also poses an environmental threat, with the concern of subsidence post-approval, and probable water contamination. We ask that this project be rejected.

25351

New South Wales 2111

26/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to this proposal for the following reasons: 1. More carbon emissions mean that NSW emission reduction targets cannot be met 2. The cumulative impacts of this proposal will pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. 3. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources both from the coal mine project and from the power station and Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns. 4. The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. 5. Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. 6. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk. 7. Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. More mining of fossil fuels is not feasible when renewable energy is the only clean form of energy production if governments are serious about drastically reducing carbon emissions and avoiding catastrophic climate change.

25361

New South Wales 2250

26/02/2026

Object

Website

My relevant background is in civil engineering designing NSW power station structures, and in IT. I have a PhD(Eng) in adapting homes for climate change, and have modelled the climate for 2050 (Shiel, 2017), recognising the implications of accelerating temperature increases. As such I was one of the 11,000 scientists who raised the climate emergency in 2019. I object to this Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project with extension of time proposal (CVC) on the grounds that: • More coal burning of the CVC will o jeopardise global climate emergency efforts to - curb the use of fossil fuels at COP30 (Carbon Brief, 2025) - keep to the 2 °C limit to which Australia agreed in the Paris Conference of the Parties (COP21) (ASBEC, 2016, p. 21) o increase the frequency, duration and intensity of wilder extreme events due to climate change o move the planet closer towards exceeding more Tipping Points in the Planetary Boundaries • There is no need to extend the approval of coal mining operations beyond the already approved date of 31 December 2027 since Vales Point Power Station (VPPS) is not needed for energy security • Coal fired power stations have reached their end of life with around only 50% reliability, and firmed renewable sources have less human health and environmental impact • Any coal exports mainly benefit the overseas investment owners, Seven Global Investments (7GI), at the expense of: o the global climate emergency effort to lower emissions for a stable climate, and o the health of the local community where there are increased cancers and serious illnesses due to air pollution and heavy metal exposure • CVC is not required for the local economy. o BZE’s Million Job Plan shows that the renewable power industry has far more clean jobs than all employed in mining and coal-fired electricity industries, and even those unemployed • The owner of Delta Coal, 7GI, has a poor global reputation and this raised doubt about it undertaking all the conditions • The recommendation conditions are not stringent enough - at the very least, no extension of time should be allowed, and best practice air filters need to be installed at VPPS.

2025 Shiel-Chain Valley Colliery Submission v1.0.pdf (PDF, 1.26 MB)

25381

26/02/2026

Object

Email

Independent Planning Commission NSW (IPC) RE: Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project (SSD-17017460) project - Objection Submission INTRODUCTION The proposal being considered by the IPC includes an: * extension of the life of a mine by 2 years; * increase throughput at MC pit top from 2.1 million tonnes per annum to 2.8; * additional secondary coal extraction... The mine is operating under Lake Macquarie and the resultant coal is being utilised by Vales Point Coal Fired Power Station located on the lakes foreshore. On the hearing date for this project there were two significant admissions and a further understanding regarding greenhouse gas emissions. Firstly, there was an admission that the project would contribute to climate change; Secondly, there was an admission that the mine was known to be gassy which is a concern due to the release of methane which may have a shorter lifespan to coal but has a much larger greenhouse gas potency and climatic impact over a shorter lifespan. With this there was an understanding that there would be 'some' plan for scope 1 and 2 emissions but not for scope 3 emissions which accounts for over 80% of additional emissions. This project comes at a time when there is a continued climate crisis, in which the industry itself heavily researched into providing foreseeability towards significant climatic projected outcomes and impacts. This included EXXON and their projected increase in temperature in line with increased atmospheric carbon concentrations from the combustion of their industries product. Their physicist refused to say that this trend would not be catastrophic after 2030 due to time lag effects. Shell also produced a 1991 documentary called 'Climate of Concern' which also outlined concern that changes would occur too fast to adapt without severe dislocation. There are also concerns relating to community health risks that are significantly heightened due to information from the governments own website. Although the projects assessment document states that 'PM10& PM2.5 concentrations within national standards' the governments own website states that 'There is currently no evidence of a threshold below which exposure to particulate matter does not cause any health effects.' Health effects are reported by the government website as follows: SHORT TERM * irritated eyes, nose, and throat * worsening asthma and lung diseases (chronic bronchitis COPD) * heart attack * increased hospital admissions and premature deaths due to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. LONG TERM * reduced lung function * cardiovascular and respiratory diseases * increased rate of disease progression * reduction in life expectancy The departments own report states 'there is convincing evidence from the literature for a link between exposure to particulate matter and adverse health outcomes'. Linking it to lung cancer and cardiopulmonary mortality. PM2.5 is known to travel significant distances. One community report has outlined its path traveling as far as Wollongong. The governments website also notes concerning health impacts from nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Another separate study showed higher rates of cancer surrounding Vales Point Coal Fired Power Station without identifying the location of the station. This does not include issues from resultant waste with the power stations coal ash dam where the governments own submission to another inquiry stated that it 'may threaten human health and the environment'. There are also water quality issues in Lake Macquarie from the coal fired power station operation and waste which have already resulted in Fish Kills and EPA warnings regarding specified crab consumption. There is an understanding that this project needs to consider s.4.15 of the Environmental Protection and Assessment (EP&A) Act. Matters of consideration for the IPC being the consent authority in this matter include: * planning instruments * significant likely impacts * suitability of site * submissions * public interest These considerations will now be discussed. CONTENT PLANNING INSTRUMENTS: The objectives of the EP&A Act include: * Protection of the environment * promotion of resilience to climate change and natural disasters * facilitation of ecological sustainable development (ESD) as defined by 6.2 of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1999 which includes the precautionary, intergenerational equity, and polluter pays principles and understandings. This project does not protect the environment or provide resilience towards anthropogenic climate change and its resultant natural disasters as seen from the introductory information. This project does not facilitate ESD as: * It is precautionary to reject this project on the basis of climate change and health issues. * It is not in the interest of intergenerational equity to contribute to climate change and entrench health issues. * There is no understanding that the proponent will pay for their pollution which includes health assessments and triage. SIGNIFICANT LIKELY IMPACT Air Quality There is already an issue with air quality which will be entrenched with this project. Climate Change There is already an issue with climate change which will be entrenched with this project. SUITABILITY OF SITE The coal extraction, usage, and resultant waste utilises Lake Macquarie and its foreshore. Lake Macquarie has already been impacted on with Fish Kills, warnings relating to specified crab consumption, while people have identified bubbling at its surface. SUBMISSIONS The project saw 180 submissions from 173 individuals and 7 groups detailed as follows: * 133 objections, 45 in support, 2 providing comments. Objections saw the following key issues of concern: * subsidence * air quality * greenhouse gas * noise * water quality PUBLIC INTEREST It is not in the public interest to contribute to climate change impacts during a climate crisis as well as entrench pollution that leads to respiratory and cardiovascular issues as well as cancer. CONCLUSION: On the basis of analysis just on the basis of air quality particularly in relation to PM2.5 and greenhouse gases this project fails in the public interest. Conditions cannot provide mitigation towards this. Any suggested economic benefit, particularly utilising the multiplier effect, should be analysed against a cost benefit analysis of resultant ill health in the community along with necessary risk management from resultant climatic impacts. Such negative externalities should not be continually borne by the community already under pressure with the cost of living placing pressure on the ability to afford private home or health insurance which doesn't cater for specialist consultations. Any analysis should also enshrine the continued contamination impacts from the resultant waste of the coal ash dam leaking into Lake Macquarie. Fish kills have already occurred. Kind loving thoughts... Sonya McKay APPENDIX: Two powerpoints: FUTURE SOONER CITIZENS INQUIRY COP26 GLOBAL DAY OF ACTION

inquiryaddress16.8.24expanded26.8.24b_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 5.69 MB)

ProtectOurFutureFromFossilFuels30.10.21.24.1.25.pdf (PDF, 7.74 MB)

25386

26/02/2026

Object

Email

25386 - Victoria lewis_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 149.56 KB)

25401

New South Wales 2121

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Immediate action is needed to tackle the impacts of climate change. NSW is not on track to meet its 2030 or 2035 emission reduction targets, nor its goal of net zero by 2050. Any further coal project extension is inconsistent with these targets and the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. This proposal has significant impacts on climate change (additional CO2 emissions), the environment (subsidence and water resources), and human health (air and noise pollution). It is unacceptable to grant development consent without addressing crucial decisions such as subsidence risk management and emission mitigation plans.

25406

New South Wales 2444

26/02/2026

Object

Website

In my opinion the proposal is not in the public interest because its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, and would contributing to climate change by producing more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The decision to go ahead with this proposal flies in the face of the Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025. The Commission stated that continued extensions of coal projects are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. I understand that Delta has not provided a breakdown (that is, any differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. Therefore the proponent must be required to provide this level of detail. Nor has the proponent comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. In the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out, it is unacceptable for the proposal to proceed. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. The project has not been adequately justified on energy security grounds. The proposal has ignored the fact that there is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. Nor has the proposal's biodiversity assessment fulfilled the requirements of the environmental impact statement insofar as it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This failure of the Department is particularly unacceptable when the Department itself publicly recognizes that NSW is not on-track to achieve its emission targets. Developing a greenhouse gas emissions plan after approval assumes that the project emissions can be safely managed regardless of NSW's capacity to meet the overall emissions target. The Department’s report considers subsidence-risk as the biggest environmental risk but nevertheless suggests a plan to manage subsidence can be deferred till after development-consent through staged extraction plans. Surely the Department's high-risk rating for subsidence demands that a plan be prepared before consent is given.

25411

New South Wales 2025

26/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to this proposal. I urge refusal of this proposal due to: a) The inevitable increased Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions that it will produce when there is clear urgency to reduce these emissions. NSW is already failing to stay on track to meet its zero emissions target. Clearly, proposals such as this must no longer proceed. b) Its potentially deleterious effects on the local environment and human health, and c) Its inadequate clarity on vital issues that should be perfectly clear prior to approval. Delta has failed to properly assess local climate change impacts, It has failed to provide a breakdown of emissions type, It has failed to address concerns in regard to subsidence risks, It has not adequately addressed the air quality concerns in respect of increased truck movements due to increased mining. It has not adequately responded to community concerns regarding water resource impacts, air quality or climate change. The biodiversity assessment does not meet the requirements of the Environmental Impact Statement. The recognized great environmental risk of subsidence is disregarded with a management plan simply proposed to be developed after consent. Similarly, the development of a GHG emissions mitigation plan is simply proposed to occur AFTER development consent. These issues indicate refusal to allow this proposal to proceed. We are in a rapidly progressing climate crisis with a duty to achieve emissions reductions. The Net Zero Spotlight Commission report on coal, released in December 2025, acknowledged that continued coal mining extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emissions reduction targets. I urge refusal of this proposal due to the increased GHG emissions, due to the inadequate clarity on the vital issues mentioned above and due to its potentially deleterious impacts on the local environment and human wellbeing. Rosie White 26th February 2026

25421

New South Wales 2044

26/02/2026

Object

Website

The cumulative impacts of the proposed mine consolidation would pose significant risks to the environment and human health. The proposed project will also contribute to climate change because it would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. Furthermore, Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. Contrary to the company's claims, it has been found that subsidence impacts were understated in the environmental impact statement and seagrass and species in the lake are in the firing line from the mine. The company has not responded adequately so far to community concerns about the proposed expansion. Particular concerns have been raised about air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources, from both the coal mine project and from Vales Point power station. A biodiversity assessment has been undertaken but it does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement, because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. It does not address potential impacts from the expansion.

25426

New South Wales 2044

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear the commissioner, Portia here, I'm a 26 year old environmental science student and resident of NSW who is writing to request the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused. I decided to study to my degree after the horrifying 2020 bushfires. 6 years on, and far from finally cutting out greenhouse gases, the government is considering extending the life of another coal mine. Our planet is literally on fire! When is enough enough. I understand the issues of energy security, but what use is energy security when the homes you want to power are in ashes or swept away in floods and landslides. Its really really upsetting that the people in charge of our precious future seem to think its okay to be pushed over by wealthy and powerful fossil fuel lobbyists. Extending the chain valley coal mine is exactly the kind of thing that gobsmacks me. Its time to stand up for what is right. You know coal is dirty, you know it pollutes the air we all breathe, especially in Sydney. You know it pollutes waterways and heats up the atmosphere. You know the people who own these corporations pay barely any tax and rake in billions from poisoining our planet. I appreciate the time anyone has taken to read this email, and I hope you consider my point of view, and will refuse the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension.

25431

New South Wales 2259

26/02/2026

Object

Website

My family have lived the southern end of Lake Macquarie since the 1930's well before the mine and power station. We have watched the environmental vandalism of both mining and power generation that hide under government legislation to protect them, the mines and power station have a bad history of neglect to both residents and the environment. As you sit there about to approve this expansion we wait to see the outcome of Delta being convicted of killing approximately 17,000 fish in Wyee Bay. this is by no means the first time a fish kill has occurred in Wyee Bay or pollution spills from this outlet and ash dam spill way , even fly ash that blows over 4 lanes of the Pacific Hwy or asbestos illegally dumped in the ash dam ,another little slap on the wrist for Delta by the pathetic EPA. I believe the commission members had a lovely boat ride recently on Lake Macquarie by the Colliery to show you how pristine the lake is when what you should have done is select the locals to take you out to see the effects of mining in our area , the many many subsidence issues , the failed foreshore protection zones , the destruction of Wyee Creek. And what is the local community going to get out of this consolidation ???? very little if anything , a pathetic VPA with a few cents per tonne into a community grants scheme when we have renewable energy companies out there offering many millions to communities. A potential increase of up to 500 coal trucks a day on Ruttleys Road and we know how well that went last time they hauled coal to Newcastle. Back then up to 150 coal trucks a day , constant damage to Ruttleys Road ,damage to local residents cars from coal that had fallen off trucks , The Chain Valley Colliery mine , truck drivers and trucking companies all fined for over weight vehicles , They all knew they were over weight , even the Port Waratah Coal Services must have known and they all did nothing , it was the local residents who insisted the then RTA investigate and weigh these trucks. We all know this Independent planning commission will approve this and I believe it's already been pre approved ?? How about you actually do something for the local suffering community. Lets start with increasing the VPA to $1 per tonne which it should have been in the first place , again a VPA that was never offered by the mines but insisted on by the local Mannering Park Precinct Committee in a submission nearly 20 years ago when the colliery applied to increase production and road haulage. You know Chain Valley Colliery you could also actually do the wright thing and offer the VPA $1 a tonne , you've taken so much from this area and you give peanuts back. The other offer you can make to this community is to refuse their current approval of coal haulage of up to 500 trucks a day for future use. Feel free to call me and I can tell you many more incidences of Delta's murky history and maybe you would like me to take you on a boat cruise to see what you wouldn't have been shown. Neil Wynn, Mannering Park. Lake Macquarie.

25436

Nature Conservation Council of NSW

New South Wales 2000

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Please see attachment.

25436 Jacqueline Mills_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 220.19 KB)

25441

New South Wales 2257

26/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to Delta Energy’s proposal to extend the Chain Valley Colliery operations for a further two years. The justification provided for this extension appears to rely heavily on a “business as usual” approach — maintaining current operations and delaying critical emissions abatement actions. The proponents of Delta Energy's consolidation project whom spoke at the Final Public Hearing 19th February 2026, did nothing to convince me that the proposal is anything other than blatant disregard of the public common interest and scientific advice regarding its detrimental cumulative impacts on human health, and environmental risks. In my view, the proponents of the application are failing to recognise the urgency of the climate crisis and our collective responsibility to act decisively and immediately. Continuing coal extraction, even temporarily, contributes to further emissions , increased current and potential health costs, and delays the transition to sustainable energy and employment alternatives. The impacts of climate change are escalating and demand immediate disruption of “business as usual.” Every extension of fossil fuel activity represents a lost opportunity to invest in long-term, sustainable solutions that protect both the environment and future community wellbeing. I appreciate that transitions bring challenges, including for local workers and Delta Energy as an entity. However, the difficulties of change should be embraced now — equitably shared across community, industry, and government — rather than deferred. Deferring action only deepens the challenges, that myself, my younger family & future generations will face. Deferring action is a short-term, ineffective management decision and should be rejected. I believe that approving this extension would be a step backward at a time when forward action is essential. The community, Delta Energy, and all sectors must recognise the need to face transformation now rather than postpone the inevitable. Further, relying on historical approvals for the stated minimal extension time is not acceptable. Obsolete environmental surveys should not be able to be used to support this project using the apparent argument that the timeframe is minimal and insignificant in comparison to the past time of the operations. Every day of operations is contributing to future costs and not future benefits as proponents are attempting to argue. Delta has not adequately responded to expressed community concerns, preferring to dismiss them, and nor has it addressed environmental impacts to the standards expected given the latest scientific data available. The project is not justified on energy security grounds, and if the IPC is unable to assess the project against the Climate Change Act favourably, due to Delta's lack of detailed evidence, then the project should not proceed, or seek any further amended approval paths. The time to extend colliery operations has passed, and the weight of objections to Delta Energy's proposal heard by the IPC, is evidence of this.

25446

New South Wales 2257

26/02/2026

Object

Website

The IPC can reject this proposal surely on the basis of NSW Government duty of care to protect health of public citizens alone. In this day and age, hauling coal through public spaces, exposing the public repeatedly and frequently to coal dust is abhorrent. Increasing citizens exposure to and involvement in further coal extraction processes, and coal burning processes will adversely affect the health of citizens, and the health care support available, both now and in the future. This is well documented and evidenced. We have public memorials to countless deceased and invalids from coal industrial activities including coal dust. Is this to be yet another activity that Delta is going to have to face up to in the coming years? or maybe the IPC will build the memorial plaques? It is simply illogical, but also likely able to be proven to be legally negligent, that the problem of coal dust and air quality, in the pursuit of coal haulage, for a "minor extension of operations" is not solved to a higher standard. It is bluntly, laziness, to avoid addressing the increment in coal dust issue , especially for a " minor time extension". My reference here is that I read that the DPHI’s suggested conditions of consent include in certain circumstances, permission to haul coal between the colliery and the power station by public road, which will create additional public exposure to coal dust. Please refuse the proposal. Public health and physical wellbeing will be adversely affected by extending coal operations.

25451

New South Wales 2259

26/02/2026

Object

Website

I’m a local resident and I strongly object to the chain valley colliery consolidation project.. Delta makes no mention of the combined impacts of both mines will have on climate change. The lake area where delta discharges waste is a toxic swamp of who knows what. All the locals with boats know you don’t fish there. Especially with the thousands marine life were killed., not just fish but rays and other marine creatures. They get a slap on the wrist and are good until the next time. Delta has ash dams that are uncovered. The doctors for the environment have proven over and over that people are being affected, asthma and respiratory illness are rampant. But everyone turns a blind eye. Chemicals are also leaching into lake Munmorah at the far end but no one wants to test for that either. The world is transitioning to renewables and mining need to be phased out and serious thought given to retraining miners. Thanks for your time and I hope commonsense wins and the merger is not approved.

25461

New South Wales 2085

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Independent Planning Commission This submission is made in respect of the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project (the Project), proposed by Great Southern Energy Pty Ltd (trading as Delta Coal). I strongly OBJECT to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years. The Project seeks to combine the existing consents of Chain Valley Colliery (CVC) and Mannering Colliery (MC), extend the life of the mines by a further two years until 2029 and enable secondary extraction in the mining areas, which are located underneath Lake Macquarie. The mines supply coal to Vales Point Power Station (VPPS). The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project is inadequate and fails to provide the information lawfully required by the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). Notably, the EIS is deficient in respect of the following matters- -Air Quality- The EIS and AQIA do not include an assessment of the optimal control strategies to control future levels of air pollutants and assessment of potential future climate conditions and their possible influence on the attainment of air quality objectives. -Water- The Groundwater Impact Assessment does not adequately characterise the quality of groundwater extracted from the mining operations, which will impact surface water quality. -Biodiversity-There is no detailed assessment of the potential impacts of the Project on the ecology of Swindles Creek. -Subsidence-The subsidence assessment does not meet with requirements of the SEARs because it does not include a detailed qualitative assessment of the potential subsidence effects and impacts of the development. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The GHGEA fails to assess the likely impacts of GHG emissions from the Project in contributing to climate change. -Health-The EIS does not properly assess the likely health impacts of the Project because it fails to take into consideration the air pollution caused by burning the coal extracted from the mines at VPPS. Recommendations -Air Quality-the Department require that the EIS addresses the likely impacts of the Project in the EIS, which includes the off-site impacts on air quality caused by operations at VPPS. -Water Quality- the Surface Water Impact Assessment should include a detailed analysis of the quality of the mine water that makes up most of the surface water discharges, and its potential impacts on Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie. An assessment of cumulative impacts to surface water in general has not been completed, which was a specific requirement of the SEARs. The EIS is therefore deficient on this basis. Likely impacts of the Project on both groundwater and surface water are not adequately addressed in the EIS. Suggestions are to properly characterise the potential impacts of discharging mine water to Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie. Include a detailed assessment of the potential impacts of heavy metals in water caused by the Project. -Biodiversity-Department require a more thorough biodiversity assessment including one that extends to the ecology of Swindles Creek and the potential impacts to Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie as a result of water discharges from the CVC and MC sites. -Subsidence- Department requires that the EIS undertake a more thorough and detailed subsidence assessment that extends beyond an assessment based on past predictions and monitoring and includes a detailed temporal assessment of the subsidence monitoring data. -Contamination Impacts-The Department require that the EIS contain specific information on the Groundwater Impact Assessment that will be undertaken as part of mine closure. The Department should seek that this assessment be undertaken now while CVC and MC are operational and that any mitigating measures identified by the assessment be implemented. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project must be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project would instead increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to assess the likely impacts of GHG emission from the Project in contributing to climate change. It is open to the Minister to determine that the absence of conditions to minimise Scope 3 GHG emissions is a factor against approval of an application. But this should be a cautious decision. -Health Impacts-There are notable health impacts from climate change. The Department require that Delta Coal addresses the likely impacts of the Project in the EIS, which includes the off-site impacts on health caused by operations at VPPS. Conclusion- I strongly object to the project due to the cumulative environment and health impacts of the Project, including the impacts that the Project will cause by contributing to climate change. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. The Net Zero Commission warned that extending the life of coal mines will blow NSW's legislated greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. The Independent Planning Commission will decide on whether to allow an extension of Chain Valley coal mine. This is NSW third most emitting coal mine, and it cannot keep operating until 2029. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process now. I am appalled that Delta Energy doesn’t seem to want to even play by the rules regarding the assessment process. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project’s approval process. Delta Energy's attitude is totally disrespectful of climate science. They describe the extra emissions as “negligible” and argue that the state’s emission targets are not relevant because they take effect in 2030 and their mine will operate until 2029, one year short. They haven’t even bothered to measure emissions properly and have dismissed expert recommendations on emission abatement actions without conducting a cost-benefit analysis. They obviously do not care about people’s health and how their climate bomb is affecting people’s lives with their emission contributions increasing climate change and causing more frequent natural disasters that negatively impact nature and communities. They are vague in their statements and vocabulary trying to deflect any responsibility away from themselves. They should be made accountable to the Independent Planning Commission to provide all the correct information and data requested with no excuses regarding the proper measurement of emissions. Because of their disrespect to the whole process including input in their EIS they should not presume and assume that approval will be granted. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans. I do not agree that leniency should be shown, as the proponent will not be compelled to complete this documentation. All documents requested by IPC and documents to complete the EIS must be provided before approval is given. Some documents are outdated and not even relevant. Recent documentation and data first to be provided before a decision is made to even approve Delta. I advocate that approval be denied to Delta now because the documentation has not been provided. I strongly encourage and urge that IPC also OBJECT to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine. No extension of time should be given to Delta to extend their operations whatsoever even if it is 2 more years. They have done enough damage to our climate, air, water, biodiversity and our health. Janice Haviland

25466

Redacted

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Independent Planning Commission This submission is made in respect of the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project (the Project), proposed by Great Southern Energy Pty Ltd (trading as Delta Coal). I strongly object to the Project on the basis that the cumulative impacts of the Project pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including that the Project will contribute to climate change. On the Central Coast, Chain Valley is NSW’s third most emitting coal mine. Delta Energy wants to consolidate Chain Valley operations with neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years, going deeper under Lake Macquarie and pumping an extra 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions into our atmosphere. This request MUST be rejected. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project is inadequate and fails to provide the information lawfully required by the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). Notably, the EIS is deficient in respect of the following matters- -Air Quality- The EIS and AQIA do not include an assessment of the optimal control strategies to control future levels of air pollutants and an assessment of potential future climate conditions and their possible influence on the attainment of air quality objectives. -Water- The Groundwater Impact Assessment does not consider the potential long-term impacts that could be caused by increasing the permeability of the formations underlying Lake Macquarie as a result of mining. -Biodiversity- The biodiversity assessment does not extend to the potential for impacts to aquatic, benthic and riparian communities that could result from the large-scale pumping of groundwater from the mine and the release of that groundwater, and other industrial water, into Swindles Creek and subsequently into Lake Macquarie. -Subsidence-The subsidence assessment does not meet with requirements of the SEARs because it does not include a detailed qualitative assessment of the potential subsidence effects and impacts of the development. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The EIS fails to propose conditions or measures to minimise the Scope 3 GHG emissions assessed in the GHGEA. -Health-The EIS does not consider the health impacts caused by climate change as a result of Scope 3 GHG emissions. Recommendations -Air Quality- the Department requires that the EIS and AQIA include an assessment of the optimal control strategies to control future levels of pollutants (such as PM2.5) and an assessment of potential future climate conditions and their possible influence on the attainment of air quality objectives. -Water Quality- the Surface Water Impact Assessment should include a detailed analysis of the quality of the mine water that makes up most of the surface water discharges, and its potential impacts on Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie. Include a detailed analysis of the quality of the groundwater pumped from the mines. Address the SEARs by including a thorough assessment of any likely flooding impacts. -Biodiversity-Department must require a more thorough biodiversity assessment including one that extends to the ecology of Swindles Creek and the potential impacts to Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie as a result of water discharges from the CVC and MC sites. -Subsidence- Department must require that the EIS undertake a more thorough and detailed subsidence assessment that extends beyond an assessment based on past predictions and monitoring and includes consideration of the potential impacts to ecological receptors, including Lake Macquarie, and land occupants above the mines, in the event that subsidence exceeds predicted levels. -Contamination Impacts-The Department require that the EIS contain specific information on the Groundwater Impact Assessment that will be undertaken as part of mine closure. The Department should seek that this assessment be undertaken now while CVC and MC are operational and that any mitigating measures identified by the assessment be implemented. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project will increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to assess the feasibility of capturing and burning the fugitive methane emissions caused by mine depressurisation. -Health Impacts-There are notable health impacts from climate change. The Department must require that Delta Coal addresses the likely health impacts of climate change resulting from the contribution of the Project’s GHG emissions to climate change. Conclusion- I strongly object to the Project as the EIS is deficient with respect to the Project’s likely impacts on air quality, water, biodiversity, subsidence, rehabilitation, GHG emissions, health, society and transport such that it does not provide information lawfully required by the SEARs. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta Energy also argues that harmful mining further under Lake Macquarie is needed to supply nearby Vales Point coal fired power station. Yet Vales Point is not due to close until 2033 so there’s a four-year gap anyway beyond this proposed project extension, where coal would need to be sourced from elsewhere. The proposal is therefore not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process now. The proponent appears to be dictating the rules of the approval process when they should be complying. Their project request must be rejected as it is missing vital relevant and recent documentation that already has been requested. Thank you

25476

New South Wales 2086

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Independent Planning Commission This submission is made in respect of the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project (the Project), proposed by Great Southern Energy Pty Ltd (trading as Delta Coal). I OBJECT to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project is inadequate and fails to provide the information lawfully required by the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). Notably, the EIS is deficient in respect of the following matters- - Air quality-The EIS and AQIA do not include an assessment of the optimal control strategies to control future levels of air pollutants and an assessment of potential future climate conditions and their possible influence on the attainment of air quality objectives. -Water- The Surface Water Impact Assessment does not meet the requirements of the SEARs because it does not include an assessment of any likely flooding impacts on the Project. -Biodiversity- The biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the SEARs because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. -Subsidence-The subsidence assessment does not evaluate the adequacy and results of past monitoring or the potential impacts to ecological receptors above the mines, such as Lake Macquarie, in the event that subsidence exceeds predicted levels. -Rehabilitation-The EIS does not detail a program for ongoing monitoring of potential future subsidence, nor mitigations should the level of subsidence in the future exceed predictions. -Social-The EIS does not adequately address health and wellbeing as part of the social impact assessment of the Project as it does not extend to all the ‘likely impacts’ of the Project, namely: health impacts and the social impacts of climate change. In this sense, the social impact assessment is not responsive and proportionate to the scale and nature of the cumulative impacts of the Project and therefore has not been conducted in accordance with the SEARs, which require a detailed assessment of how the Project might affect people’s way of life, community, health and wellbeing, among other things. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project must be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project would instead increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to assess the likely impacts of GHG emission from the Project in contributing to climate change. Recommendations -Air Quality- the Department require that the EIS includes a quantitative assessment of the combustion emissions of the Project. -Water Impacts-Department must require further information from Delta Coal to assess the subsidence impacts of the Project. If the Department considers there to be a threat of serious or irreversible environmental damage and that there is scientific uncertainty as to the environmental damage, then the Department must apply precautionary principle to these impacts. It is therefore incumbent on Delta Coal to show that this threat does not in fact exist or is negligible via a more detailed EIS. Include a detailed analysis of the quality of the groundwater pumped from the mines. Address the SEARs by including a thorough assessment of any likely flooding impacts. -Biodiversity-Department requires a more thorough biodiversity assessment including one that extends to the ecology of Swindles Creek and the potential impacts to Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie as a result of water discharges from the CVC and MC sites. -Subsidence- Department requires that the EIS undertake a more thorough and detailed subsidence assessment that extends beyond an assessment based on past predictions and monitoring and includes further information on the programs for monitoring subsidence and biota during the closure and rehabilitation phase of the Project. -Contamination Impacts-The Department requires that the EIS details a rigorous subsidence monitoring program that will apply to the Project site beyond mine closure. The Department should seek that this program includes viable mitigation measures should subsidence exceed current predictions. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project must be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project would instead increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to quantify gases liberated by mine depressurisation systems that are not captured by the mine ventilation systems. -Health Impacts-There are notable health impacts from climate change. The Department require that Delta Coal consult with NSW Health, including with respect to the Health Impact Assessment. Conclusion- I object to the Project as a result of the paucity of information in the EIS, the Department cannot properly consider, weigh and balance the likely environmental, social and economic impacts of the Project – including considerations of the principles of ESD. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. The biodiversity assessment also does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. This information is lacking and the proponent’s project requests must be rejected until that information is provided to the IPC in a timely manner and before the project is approved for its modifications. Thank you

25481

New South Wales 2085

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Independent Planning Commission This submission is made in respect of the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project (the Project), proposed by Great Southern Energy Pty Ltd (trading as Delta Coal). I firmly object to the Project on the basis that the cumulative impacts of the Project pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including that the Project will contribute to climate change. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project is inadequate and fails to provide the information lawfully required by the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs). Notably, the EIS is deficient in respect of the following matters- - Air quality- All coal that is currently extracted at CVC and MC is burned at VPPS, which releases air emissions that contribute to health impacts for the community. The EIS and Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) does not extend to the air quality impacts caused by burning coal at VPPS, despite these impacts being ‘likely impacts’ of the Project. As likely impacts of the Project, they must be included in the EIS and considered and assessed by the Department. The EIS is inadequate until it properly considers these secondary impacts arising from the Project. -Water- The EIS does not satisfy the SEARs because a detailed assessment of the cumulative impacts on water has not been completed. -Biodiversity- The biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the SEARs because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. Somehow, Delta has managed to get around requirements to prepare a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report even though experts found that subsidence impacts were understated in the environmental impact statement and seagrass and species in the lake are in the firing line from the mine and the power station. The Biodiversity Development Assessment Report is a mandatory requirement to the process of approval for this Project. This Project must not be approved until a current in -date Biodiversity Development Assessment Report is provided to IPC first BEFORE determination of this project proceeds. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project must be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project would instead increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to assess the likely impacts of GHG emission from the Project in contributing to climate change. -Subsidence-The subsidence assessment does not evaluate the adequacy and results of past monitoring or the potential impacts to ecological receptors above the mines, such as Lake Macquarie, in the event that subsidence exceeds predicted levels. -Rehabilitation-The EIS does not appear to properly address the SEARs regarding rehabilitation, which requires the EIS to address the measures which would be put in place for the long-term protection and/or management of the site and any biodiversity offset areas postmining. -Traffic- The Traffic Assessment is out of date and does not provide a detailed route for transportation of coal by truck to the Port of Newcastle, particularly with respect to roads near residential areas or schools. It is therefore not possible on the information before the Department to properly consider the likely impacts of the Project on the capacity, condition, safety and efficiency of the local and regional road network and what, if any, conditions of consent should apply to the Project having regard to potential truck movements. Recommendations -Air Quality- if the Minister approves the Project, that he requires as a condition of consent that an air quality station that continuously monitors TSP, PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in real-time be installed in close vicinity to CVC and MC and that data from the monitoring station is made publicly available in real time. -Water Impacts- subsequent collapse of bedrock above mine cavities will increase the permeability of the bedrock overlying the mine cavities, which will result in increased flows of seawater from Lake Macquarie into the brackish aquifers underlying Lake Macquarie. Include a detailed analysis of the quality of the groundwater pumped from the mines. Address the SEARs by including a thorough assessment of any likely flooding impacts. -Biodiversity-Department requires a more thorough biodiversity assessment including one that extends to the ecology of Swindles Creek and the potential impacts to Swindles Creek and Lake Macquarie as a result of water discharges from the CVC and MC sites. -Subsidence- Department requires that the EIS undertake a more thorough and detailed subsidence assessment that extends beyond an assessment based on past predictions and monitoring and includes further information on the programs for monitoring subsidence and biota during the closure and rehabilitation phase of the Project. -Contamination Impacts-The Department require that the EIS details a rigorous subsidence monitoring program that will apply to the Project site beyond mine closure. The Department should seek that this program includes viable mitigation measures should subsidence exceed current predictions. -Greenhouse Gas Emissions-The Project must be refused on the basis that Australia’s GHG emissions must be urgently reduced by 74% by 2030. The Project would instead increase Australia’s emissions by 25 million tonnes over the next 7 years. Delta Coal must be required to explain the technical bases for the calculations of the fugitive GHG emissions. -Health Impacts-There are notable health impacts from climate change. The Department require that Delta Coal consult with NSW Health, including with respect to the Health Impact Assessment. Conclusion- I object to the Project as a result of the paucity of information in the EIS, the Department cannot properly consider, weigh and balance the likely environmental, social and economic impacts of the Project – including considerations of the principles of ESD. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change, negative impacts to biodiversity and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. That is disrespectful to community concerns. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is NOT acceptable. This is despite the Department recognising that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. Greenhouse gas emissions affect people’s health, the climate and nature, therefore this plan must be presented before consent is given. This must be a mandatory requirement. Thank you

25486

New South Wales 2774

26/02/2026

Object

Website

Submission objecting to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years. Chain Valley is NSW’s third most emitting coal mine. Delta Energy wants to extend operations for 2 more years, going deeper under Lake Macquarie and pumping an extra 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions into our atmosphere. Delta Energy is very arrogant in attempting to argue that the state’s emission targets are not relevant and their huge increase in emissions is ‘negligible’. This project is not about ‘keeping the lights on’. Delta Energy argues that harmful mining further under Lake Macquarie is needed to supply nearby Vales Point coal fired power station. Yet, Vales Point is not due to close until 2033 so there’s a four-year gap anyway beyond this proposed project extension, where coal would need to be sourced from elsewhere. Why hasn’t Delta been required to prepare a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report when experts have found that subsidence impacts were understated in the environmental impact statement and seagrass and species in the lake are in the firing line from the mine and the power station. Other reasons for objecting to this proposal include: The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfil the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

25371

25/02/2026

Object

Email

Dear Commissioners > Thanks for your time and consideration at the VALES IPC. Please read this in conjunction with the data in the latter part of the Untold Stories Submission to NSW Parliament ( March 2025). This data had been provided to the EPA & PHU since April-August 2022, but they have ignored it. Even Dr Kat Taylor’s presentation to the CAHCAC committee based on the Cancer Atlas statistics have supported our data. Basically the Central Coast has higher health risk factors and only one major polluting industry. Vales Point Power Station remains unfiltered. This needs urgent change! > There’s many recent articles pointing out that PM2.5 particles increase maternal hypertension ( & preeclampsia); lower infant birth weights; increase congenital heart valve and septal defect; and other abnormalities. > > We should focus on harm prevention; not just expensive repairs to infants abnormalities once they have occurred!! > > Kind wishes > Merlene Thrift > MBBS FACNEM > https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12220139/ > > Sent from my iPhone

25376

Illawarra Knitting Nannas Against Greed

25/02/2026

Object

Email

Please find attached a submission from the Illawarra Knitting Nannas Against Greed. Kind regards, Anne Kelly

25376 - Anne Kelly_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 94.4 KB)

25321

New South Wales 2050

25/02/2026

Object

Website

No new projects that harm our beautiful country should ever be allowed to proceed. Let’s be smarter about this

25326

New South Wales 2024

25/02/2026

Object

Website

Please see attached PDF submission

Chain valley submission- Cathy Gill.pdf (PDF, 56.61 KB)

25336

Knitting Nannas Hunter Loop

New South Wales 2323

25/02/2026

Object

Website

This submission objecting to the Chain Valley Bay extension project is on behalf of the Hunter Knitting Nannas. Knitting Nannas are a group of women dedicated to ensuring a liveable environment for this and future generations. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that any coal mine extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. The DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman) ruling in the Court of Appeal states that local effects of climate change due to mine emissions must be considered. This has not been addressed by the proponent. Submissions from the community voiced strong concern about air quality, climate change consequences and impacts on water resources. These have not been adequately addressed by Delta energy. The emission abatement actions suggested by the expert advisory panel appear to have been summarily dismissed without even a cursory cost benefit analysis. Subsidence risk is a real concern with potentially serious consequences for the lake and surrounds. The suggestion that this can be managed by a plan for staged extraction written after consent has been given is a recipe for disaster. Delta’s history with fish kills does not inspire confidence in their stewardship of the environment without adequate external constraints in place. The biodiversity assessment is inadequate and does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement. The energy security argument for the mine extension is weak but if it does go ahead there is no justification for also allowing this mine to enter the export market. The resultant truck movements alone should mitigate against this. On all these grounds this project should be found not in the public interest and rejected. Lynn Benn On behalf of Hunter Knitting Nannas.

25366

24/02/2026

Object

Email

Please find attached my Objection submission to the Chain Valley Colliery expansion, Application SSD-1701746n. While my address is Glebe I am involved in work on the Central Coast and Hunter and have business associates and friends who also live there. I care deeply for that community. My submission is independent of any organisation. I would appreciate it only my name is published. If you could acknowledge receipt of this email that would be appreciated. Many thanks

25366 - De Brierley Newton_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 1.52 MB)

25246

New South Wales 2262

24/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Coal mining, transportation and combustion for electricity generation each cause significant harm and cannot be considered in the public interest. Beyond its contribution to climate change, coal mining damages ecosystems and undermines the health and safety of surrounding communities. Delta proposes to extract an additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. This expansion would generate up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO₂ emissions and release thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere. There is no evidence that Delta intends to invest in meaningful emissions reduction technology. The company has already been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence, resulting in two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie. Sentencing is scheduled in the Land & Environment Court on 6 February 2026. Given this record, the Independent Planning Commission must determine that Delta is not a fit and proper entity to continue operating its colliery or power station beyond the scheduled closure date, and should require closure at the earliest possible time. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety Health Impacts and Environmental Harm In Australia, the health burden associated with coal-fired power generation is estimated to cost taxpayers approximately $2.4 billion each year, driven by increased rates of childhood asthma, cardiovascular disease and other pollution-related illnesses. The combustion of coal generates vast quantities of solid waste, including fly ash and bottom ash, which contain toxic heavy metals. These wastes can become airborne or leach into soil and groundwater, posing ongoing risks to human health and the environment. Coal burning also releases methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Although emitted in smaller quantities than carbon dioxide, both are highly potent greenhouse gases that significantly contribute to climate change. In addition, the combustion process releases toxic heavy metals such as mercury, lead, arsenic and cadmium into the atmosphere. For context, burning just one million tonnes of coal can release more than 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic. This volume of coal combustion also produces substantial localised air pollutants, including: Sulfur dioxide (SO₂), which contributes to acid rain and respiratory disease. Nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), a key component of smog and ground-level ozone. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), fine and coarse particles that penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, increasing the risk of asthma, lung disease and heart conditions. Communities surrounding the Chain Valley Colliery and Vales Point Power Station experience elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease and several cancers, according to government data. Recently conducted “ghost wipe” testing of homes in the area identified extremely high levels of toxic substances recognised as human carcinogens associated with coal combustion. Approving additional coal extraction from Delta’s Chain Valley operations would further intensify the existing health risks borne by the local community. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC The primary concern raised by stakeholders during the 2022 public exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this project was air pollution. Despite this clear and repeated feedback, neither Delta nor the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) has introduced additional measures to meaningfully address those concerns. While further analysis has been undertaken in relation to issues such as subsidence and noise, the widespread community concern regarding air pollution has effectively been dismissed. Both Delta and DPHI have concluded that the mitigation measures outlined in the original EIS are adequate, despite substantial opposition and health concerns raised by residents. It therefore falls to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) to reject this proposal. To approve the project in its current form would represent a failure of the NSW Government’s duty of care to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the community. Furthermore, the DPHI’s proposed conditions of consent would, in certain circumstances, permit the transportation of coal between the colliery and the power station via public roads. This would increase community exposure to coal dust and associated pollutants, compounding existing public health risks. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health There is a documented housing estate in the local area where cancer mortality rates are reported to be as high as 27%. This figure is deeply alarming and cannot be ignored in the assessment of cumulative industrial impacts on the community. Within my own family, we have experienced significant health challenges that are consistent with the known effects of prolonged exposure to coal-related pollution. These include asthma, chronic respiratory illness and various forms of cancer. While it can be difficult to attribute individual diagnoses to a single source, the clustering of these illnesses in a community situated near a coal mine and coal-fired power station raises serious concerns. Beyond my immediate family, many local residents report persistent respiratory issues, increased reliance on asthma medication, chronic coughing, cardiovascular conditions, and diagnoses of multiple cancers. Families speak of children growing up with inhalers, older residents developing heart and lung disease, and homes regularly coated in fine dust. Recently conducted environmental testing in residential properties has identified elevated levels of toxic substances recognised as carcinogens associated with coal combustion. The cumulative impact of living in close proximity to the Chain Valley Colliery and Vales Point Power Station appears to be taking a measurable toll on community health. Approving additional coal extraction would prolong and potentially intensify these risks for current and future generations. In conclusion Delta’s history of environmental non-compliance demonstrates that it cannot be relied upon to meet its Environmental Protection Licence obligations or conditions of consent in the future. Its track record raises serious concerns about ongoing oversight, accountability and risk to the community. In responding to the original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application, Delta failed to meaningfully address the substantial concerns raised by local residents. Key issues — particularly those relating to air quality and human health — remain unresolved. Delta has also not demonstrated any genuine commitment to investing in technologies that would materially reduce emissions or improve outcomes for public and environmental health. The absence of proactive mitigation measures further undermines confidence in its proposal. The health impacts associated with coal mining, transport and combustion are well documented and widely recognised. Approving this application would be inconsistent with the NSW Government’s stated environmental and public health commitments, and would represent a failure to uphold its duty of care to protect the community’s fundamental right to clean air and a safe environment.

25261

Climate Change Balmain-Rozelle

New South Wales 2041

24/02/2026

Object

Website

- Climate and the economy The climate impact of the proposal should be viewed in the wider context of all further extraction of thermal coal in NSW. We calculate that the climate damage from approving all currently proposed NSW new coal mines and extensions would eventually cost Australia between $4,000,000 and $12,000,000 in lost productivity annually, and for long after production has ceased. - Direct health harm There is quantifiable health harm from both the mining of the coal and its combustion. For details see attached file.

Derek Bolton submission Redacted_0.pdf (PDF, 325.44 KB)

25276

KEEP LAKE MACQUARIE CLEAN

New South Wales 2267

24/02/2026

Object

Website

Please refer to the uploaded file below - CHAIN VALLEY submissionF1.PDF

CHAIN VALLEY submissionF1_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.53 MB)

25071

New South Wales 2064

23/02/2026

Object

Website

The Chain Valley proposal is not in the public interest. Its cumulative impacts pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. When emissions from coal burnt at the Vales Point Power Station are included, the project would generate more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO₂-e. The NSW Net Zero Commission’s December 2025 coal spotlight report makes clear that continued mine extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW’s legislated emissions reduction targets. There are also serious assessment gaps. Delta has failed to provide a breakdown of emissions by type, limiting the Independent Planning Commission’s ability to properly assess the project under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, and has not comprehensively assessed local climate impacts in line with the Denman (DAMSHEG v MACH Energy) ruling. Emissions abatement measures have been dismissed without cost-benefit analysis, and community concerns, particularly regarding air quality, climate change and water impacts from both the mine and associated power station, have not been adequately addressed.

25181

Redacted

23/02/2026

Object

Website

To whom it may concern, My name is Catherine and I am writing to express my opposition to the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. I am deeply concerned for the impact of this project on the surrounding region - I am an avid camper in the Central Coast region and feel strongly about protecting it from further damage. As someone who lives in metropolitan Sydney, I am also acutely aware of the impact that coal has on our community at large. The pollution associated with coal combustion affects all of us, and I implore that you consider the impact on citizen health, not to mention the effect on the local biodiversity. It concerns me especially seeing as Delta Energy has a track record of environmental negligence that they are yet to properly address, and I question whether they are committed to safeguarding the environment if this extension is approved. I feel that approval of this project would go directly against our country's commitment to global climate agreements like the Paris Agreement. I believe that as a country, we should be moving away from greenhouse gas emitting projects - the flooding, bushfires, extreme heat events and air pollution affects all of us. I ask that the IPC take the opinion of community stakeholders seriously and reject the proposed development. Thank you

24956

New South Wales 2206

22/02/2026

Object

Website

Hello, I would like to thank you for allowing submissions from the community. I strongly oppose this extension of the coal mines as this goes against the NSW Government’s Climate Change Act, and against the Paris Agreement. We should be phasing out fossil fuels, not extending coal mines. Approving this extension will increase emissions and affect not only air pollution and health of people in the local area, but also air pollution within Sydney. I am asking for the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused, as this will have major biodiversity impacts. Many thanks for your time and efforts.

24961

New South Wales 2043

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I'm a 30-year-old expat who has been living in Sydney for the past 3 years, and has developed a deep tie to Australia and it's beautiful nature - so much so that I am seeking permanent residency. Last year, I quit my job in consulting to commit to a career that makes a more positive impact on the world, and spend some time doing a part-time 'climate learning for action' fellowship which helped me deepen my understanding of climate issues and solutions. I am deeply concerned by the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension which will burn 5.6 MT of additional coal, and emit 16m tonnes of CO2. This toxicity will be drastic on the health of our local communities - it is estimated that coal-fired power stations on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie cause 650+ childhood asthma cases per year and likely to be associated with higher rates of cancer. Australians will need to pay $2.4b per year in health damages from air pollution. Why should us, as Australians, be paying both physically and financially for the actions of Delta, who continue to lack accountability for their past actions? In late 2025 the Land and Environment court found Delta guilty of a “significant environmental breach” after a faulty valve at Vales Point discharged sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and caused tens of thousands of fish to die. Their past negligence must be taken into account - would they really uphold their commitment to proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts if the extended operation of the mine is to go ahead? I object to this proposed development to go ahead, and ask that the Independent Planning Commission refuses the extension and merger. I look forward to hearing your response. Kind regards, Abbie

24966

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

To the Independent Planning Commission - I grew up and lived in Sydney ever since I migrated to Australia as a child. As a member of Generation Z, the climate crisis is something that will personally affect me and my peers' standard of living in the present and into the near future. As such, the proposed Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger is something that concerns me, especially as someone who was affected by asthma and has family who is affected by conditions like asthma. I am concerned about the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger's implications on people's health and the NSW Budget. Air pollution from coal-fired power stations are estimated to have created issues related to childhood asthma and higher cancer rates in areas like the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie; I am also concerned as weather conditions lead to pollution being pushed into the Sydney basin. Air pollution from coal-fired power stations are also estimated to cost taxpayers about $2.4b per year in health damages. Additionally, I am concerned about this project because expansions and extensions in coal mining within NSW would be inconsistent with the emissions targets outlined in the Paris Agreement and the Climate Change Act. I am also concerned regarding Delta Energy's found negligence when it comes to environmental management and protection measures (e.g. the 2025 Land and Environment Court finding regarding fish kills and a faulty valve in Vales Point). I request that the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused.

24971

New South Wales 2015

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I am writing to ask for the IPC to refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. First of all, approving the project would exacerbate greenhouse gas emission, which is against the commitments and targets set by all levels of government. The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 commits the state to deep cuts in emissions, and the NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act.” Moreover, the toxic emissions from coal causes air pollution and other significant environmental, health, and biodiversity consequences such as acid rain and smog. When our environment and our community wellbeing is harmed, it consequently takes a toll on our economy. Importantly, Delta did not have a track record of accountability for the community. As Delta is being assessed for their coal mine extension, their past negligence must be taken into account in considering whether they would uphold their commitment the proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts of the extended operation of the mine. When we consider the benefits of coal and mining projects for the economy, negative externalities should be taken into account, as well as the state’s effort to transition into our net zero future with clean, affordable and reliable energy. With all factors considered, there shouldn’t be a reason for the reason to go ahead.

24976

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I oppose to the merge and extension of Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery as it is not aligned to expectations and commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As one of the countries most affected by the effects of climate change, it is important for me and other members of the public to see tangible action to reduce these effects. We are already seeing how sustained increases in temperatures are causing more extreme weather patterns which affects the citizens, local communities and companies with how Climate Transition Plans are required. I have seen that the extension of these coal mines would result in approximately 16 million tCO2-e, which is a significant addition to Australia's emissions profile. The health issues caused by coal mines, and this extension, should also not be minimised with links to higher rates in childhood asthma and long-term cancer risks. As a community member, I strongly oppose this extension of these coal-fired power stations and hope you take this public opposition into consideration.

24981

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

Key Ask: I am asking for the IPC to refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. Impacts: 1. Extra greenhouse gases. - Burning 5.6 Mt of additional coal would emit roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2. - These emissions would exacerbate climate change (more heatwaves, storms and droughts locally) and directly conflict with NSW’s climate laws. - The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 commits the state to deep cuts in emissions, and the [NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement”.] - Approving this project would lock in large new emissions at a time when all levels of government are supposed to be reducing coal dependence. 2. Toxic emissions from coal. - Coal combustion releases a cocktail of pollutants – sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and heavy metals (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium). - SO₂ and NOₓ cause acid rain and smog; fine particles and heavy metals penetrate lungs and bloodstream, causing asthma, chronic lung disease, heart attacks and cancer. - In Australia, air pollution from coal-fired power is estimated to cost taxpayers about [$2.4 billion per year in health damages](https://envirojustice.org.au/press-release/australians-pay-a-deadly-2-4-billion-health-bill-for-coal-fired-power/) (higher asthma and cardiovascular disease). Even burning 1 million tonnes of coal can emit on the order of 40 tonnes of lead and tonnes of arsenic into the air. - The extension of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension would continue exacerbate the already existing burden on the health of the community from coal pollution. - It is estimated that coal-fired power stations on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie cause over [650 cases of childhood asthma a year](https://cen.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/21032025-Final-Report-Citizens-Inquiry.pdf#:~:text=The%20burning%20of%20fossil%20fuels,to%20areas%20without%20power%20stations) and that they appear to be associated with higher rates of cancers well above areas where coal fired power stations do not exist. - They also appear to be associated with higher rates of cancer compared to areas without power stations 3. Lack of Accountability for Past Actions. - In late 2025 the [Land and Environment court found Delta guilty of a “significant environmental breach”](https://thepoint.net.au/planning-commission-may-approve-deltas-coal-mine-extension-despite-fish-kill-judgement/) after a faulty valve at Vales Point discharged sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and caused tens of thousands of fish to die. Sentencing is set for early 2026. - Also, Delta has been granted a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) waiver for this development application on account of the project being ‘not likely to have any significant impact on biodiversity values.’ - As Delta is being assessed for their coal mine extension, their past negligence must be taken into account in considering whether they would uphold their commitment the proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts of the extended operation of the mine. A proper BDAR has not been conducted for the extension application and will continue to have negative consequences on the biodiversity of the area.

24986

New South Wales 2042

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I'm writing to submit an opposition to the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger, and request the IPCC to refuse the application. Failing to do so would lead to millions more tonnes of coal to be produced, leading to millions of tonnes of carbon emissions, among other pollutants to enter the atmosphere. I'm based in Sydney, and have an interest in this issue. This extension would directly contradict the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 (https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2023-048). A government led commission in 2024 (https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/NZC_Coal_Spotlight_Report_2025.pdf) found that “NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emission reduction targets for 2030 and 2035”, and explicitly mentions that “any increased emissions from the sizeable pipeline of proposed coal project expansions and extensions would require other sectors to make greater reductions for the state to meet its targets” - a make-up which is exceedingly unlikely to occur, given already lagging results. It's not only carbon dioxide as an emission, other particulates are emitted via coal. These emissions (such as lead and arsenic) affect not just the immediate and local surroundings, but also nearby cities, such as Sydney (where I am based). However, carbon emissions have a global impact.

24991

New South Wales 2071

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a NSW resident living and Sydney but often travel to the Central Coast to visit friends and their young families. The proposed Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger concerns me for two main reason: the GHG emissions will have negative consequences that extends far beyond the colliery surrounds, and the lack of accountability that has been taken by Delta for past negligence sets a bad precedent. The burning 5.6Mt of additional coal would emit roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2. Not only can this potentially exacerbate climate change impacts, but directly contradicts the NSW Government's own commitment to cut emissions. The NSW Climate Change Act (2023) specifically warns against extension and expansion to coal mining. The pollution committed can also contribute to the worsening air pollution which is even seen in the rising costs of treating asthma. Thinking that my friends and my young children may be exposed to this is disheartening. The approval of this project also demonstrates a lack of accountability for companies that violate public trust. In 2025 the Land and Environment court found Delta guilty of a significant environmental breach which resulted in the deaths of 10,000s of fish. How can we look past this when Delta has been granted a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) waiver for this development application on account of the project being ‘not likely to have any significant impact on biodiversity values.’ Beyond the potential harm that may come from the emissions of this project, the past negligence must be taken into account when considering whether they would uphold their commitment the proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts of the extended operation of the mine.

24996

New South Wales 2050

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a resident of Sydney's inner west, in the basin where the toxic pollution of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger would settle. I have been a climate advocate for many years, working with high school students. This is where I have witnessed firsthand the catastrophic decline in youth mental health directly due to climate change impacts occurring right now and anticipated in the future. The inaction of the government and the permissive approval of fossil fuel expansions such as the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger are the exact actions, indicative of a lack of courage and care for communities, which I see destroying the wellbeing of young people around the country. The Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger is in direct contradiction to The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, which commits the state to deep cuts in emissions, and the NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement. Passing legislation that greenwashes the actions of the government, while acting in direct contradiction to it, is the exact hypocrisy which the young people I teach cite as their reason for losing faith in democracy and choosing not to vote for this government. I know that in late 2025 the Land and Environment court found Delta guilty of a “significant environmental breach” (https://thepoint.net.au/planning-commission-may-approve-deltas-coal-mine-extension-despite-fish-kill-judgement/) after a faulty valve at Vales Point discharged sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and caused tens of thousands of fish to die. As Delta is being assessed for their coal mine extension, their past negligence must be taken into account in considering whether they would uphold their commitment the proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts of the extended operation of the mine. A proper BDAR has not been conducted for the extension application and will continue to have negative consequences on the biodiversity of the area. Approving this extension and merger would signal a complete lack of conviction in the penalties the government claims to stand by and weakens faith in legislation. I am asking that the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused on behalf of myself and my community. I can see no excuse for its approval in the context of the ecological and health devastation already caused, and which will surely continue if approved. Please stand up for the young people who are looking to you for their health, wellbeing and future.

25001

New South Wales 2220

22/02/2026

Object

Website

To the IPC - please refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger - Burning 5.6 Mt of additional coal would emit roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2. - These emissions would exacerbate climate change (more heatwaves, storms and droughts locally) and directly conflict with NSW’s climate laws specifically The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. Which commits the state to deep cuts in emissions. [https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report#:~:text=,goals it gives effect to](https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report#:~:text=,goals%20it%20gives%20effect%20to) - Approving this project would lock in large new emissions at a time when all levels of government are supposed to be reducing coal dependence. Toxic emissions from coal: - Coal combustion releases a cocktail of pollutants – sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and heavy metals (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium). - SO₂ and NOₓ cause acid rain and smog; fine particles and heavy metals penetrate lungs and bloodstream, causing asthma, chronic lung disease, heart attacks and cancer. - In Australia, air pollution from coal-fired power is estimated to cost taxpayers about $2.4 billion per year in health damages https://envirojustice.org.au/press-release/australians-pay-a-deadly-2-4-billion-health-bill-for-coal-fired-power/ (higher asthma and cardiovascular disease). Even burning 1 million tonnes of coal can emit on the order of 40 tonnes of lead and tonnes of arsenic into the air. - *The extension of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension would continue exacerbate the already existing burden on the health of the community from coal pollution.* - It is estimated that coal-fired power stations on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie cause over 650 cases of childhood asthma a year and that they appear to be associated with higher rates of cancers well above areas where coal fired power stations do not exist. - They also appear to be associated with higher rates of cancer compared to areas without power stations 1. Lack of Accountability for Past Actions. - In late 2025 the Land and Environment court found Delta guilty of a “significant environmental breach” after a faulty valve at Vales Point discharged sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and caused tens of thousands of fish to die. Sentencing is set for early 2026. - https://thepoint.net.au/planning-commission-may-approve-deltas-coal-mine-extension-despite-fish-kill-judgement/ - Also, Delta has been granted a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) waiver for this development application on account of the project being ‘not likely to have any significant impact on biodiversity values.’ As Delta is being assessed for their coal mine extension, their past negligence must be taken into account in considering whether they would uphold their commitment the proper maintenance and mitigation of impacts of the extended operation of the mine. A proper BDAR has not been conducted for the extension application and will continue to have negative consequences on the biodiversity of the area. There is more than enough evidence of ecological and long term economic damage to righfully refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. Thank you for your attention.

25006

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to this application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger and ask For the IPC to refuse the application on the basis that the action is illegal based on NSW law. Just calling it 'extending' a coal plant rather than opening a new one is a blatant flouting of the law that will no doubt be used as a defence for this. But the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 commits the state to deep cuts in emissions, and the NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement. Approving this project would lock in large new emissions at a time when all levels of government are supposed to be reducing coal dependence. Further, this extension would continue to exacerbate the already existing burden on the health of the community from coal pollution. Its 2026 why are we still having to deal with an outdated and clearly unhealthy practise when we are all trying to move forward here? Did Labor not commit to renewables? What are we doing here? For these reasons and more I would ask for the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused.

25016

New South Wales 2024

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I am Ash from Sydney. However, I have lived in 5 different countries before moving to Australia and have visibility on lots of environmental policies and how it's shifted over the decade in the many countries I have lived in and others that I have visited. As a part of the planning commission, I hope to reach to you to make consideration on the approval of the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. Burning of more coal is not what this country needs. Any additions from this extension would add roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2. This is in direct contradiction to the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 which is a direct commitment to better environmental policies. While wanting to support energy growth might be a priority, it cannot be expanded at the expense of the world we live in, especially given the wide access to the renewable energy tech we now have. Second to this is the fact that your commission has already found Delta group in environmental breach leading to fish kills. Clearly this is not an organisation to be trusted further with careful planning and demonstration of ethical energy expansion. It's also come to light that Delta has been granted a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) waiver for this development application on account of the project being ‘not likely to have any significant impact on biodiversity values' which is unfortunate and negligent. As an independent council, I urge that better and stricter stances be taken on expansion projects of this nature. It would be at minimum to have Delta not be granted the BDAR waiver but in best interest for environmental impact to sack this project. I strongly oppose it. I hope this is taken into consideration for the decision you make. Kind regards, Ash

25021

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

To the Commissioners, I write to oppose the proposed extension of the Chain Valley Colliery and its consolidation with the neighbouring Mannering Mine. The project should be refused on three clear grounds: increased greenhouse gas emissions, worsening air pollution and public health impacts, and a lack of justification on energy security or public interest grounds. 1. Increased greenhouse gas emissions Delta proposes to mine an additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. Burning this coal would generate up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO₂ emissions, along with methane and nitrous oxide — both potent greenhouse gases. This proposal is inconsistent with New South Wales’ legislated obligations under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and Australia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. NSW has committed to deep emissions reductions this decade and net zero by 2050. Approving new coal extraction that locks in millions of tonnes of additional emissions moves the State in the opposite direction. Climate change is not abstract to me. I have travelled in the Torres Strait and seen firsthand how vulnerable low-lying island communities are to sea level rise and extreme weather. In those communities, climate change is not a future risk — it is a lived reality affecting homes, cultural sites and ways of life. Approving additional fossil fuel extraction in 2026, knowing the consequences, is incompatible with the responsibility we owe to those communities and to future generations. 2. Air pollution and public health Burning coal releases sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), and toxic heavy metals including mercury, arsenic and lead. These pollutants contribute to asthma, cardiovascular disease, lung cancer and other serious health conditions. Coal-fired power in Australia is estimated to impose approximately $2.4 billion annually in public health costs due to increased rates of respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Residents living around the Chain Valley Colliery and Vales Point Power Station already experience elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. Independent testing of household dust in the area has identified high levels of coal-combustion related toxins, including known carcinogens. The most significant issue raised by stakeholders during the 2022 exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement was air pollution. Despite this, no meaningful additional mitigation measures have been proposed. The Department has concluded that existing controls are sufficient, despite clear community concern and the cumulative burden already faced by residents. Further, the proposed conditions of consent would permit coal to be transported by public road in certain circumstances, increasing community exposure to coal dust and fine particulates. Delta’s environmental compliance history also raises serious concerns. The company has been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence in relation to two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie, with sentencing pending in the Land and Environment Court in February 2026. In light of this record, it is difficult to conclude that Delta is a fit and proper entity to continue operating and expanding fossil fuel infrastructure. Approving this project would increase pollution in a community already carrying a disproportionate health burden. 3. No justification on energy security grounds The project has been framed as necessary to align mine life with the continued operation of the Vales Point Power Station. However, even under the proposal, a supply gap would remain before the power station’s scheduled closure. There is no demonstrated long-term plan for energy security beyond the short extension period. NSW is already undergoing a planned transition toward renewable energy and storage. Renewable generation is now cheaper and more scalable than new fossil fuel supply. Extending coal extraction for a further two years does not strengthen long-term energy security; it merely prolongs dependence on ageing coal infrastructure and delays investment certainty in clean alternatives. The economic and employment benefits are limited and short-term. In contrast, the climate, health and environmental costs are significant and enduring. Conclusion The Independent Planning Commission has a responsibility to assess this proposal in the public interest. Approving the extension would: - Lock in up to 16 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. - Increase air pollution and associated health impacts in an already affected community. - Undermine NSW’s climate commitments. - Extend operations by a company with recent serious environmental compliance failures. - Provide no credible long-term energy security benefit. In the context of legislated climate targets, escalating health impacts and a clear transition underway in the energy sector, this project is neither necessary nor justified. I respectfully request that the Commission refuse the proposed extension and consolidation.

25026

New South Wales 2134

22/02/2026

Object

Website

Good afternoon, hope you are well. I am a member of this community who cares deeply about the health, safety, and future of the place we call home. Like many people in our region, I have experienced the growing impacts of climate change – from prolonged heatwaves and bushfire smoke to flooding and extreme weather. These events are not abstract policy debates to me: they affect my wellbeing, my community's resilience, and the future we are leaving for younger generations. I am writing to strongly oppose the Chain Valley coal mine extension. Approving this project would lock in decades of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when Australia must be rapidly reducing emissions to meet climate commitments and avoid worsening climate impacts. Expanding coal extraction directly contradicts the urgent need to transition to clean energy and undermines efforts to limit global heating. Beyond climate impacts, continued coal mining poses serious local risks. Increased air pollution, including fine particulate matter and coal dust, can affect respiratory health and reduce quality of life for nearby residents. There are also significant concerns about biodiversity loss, groundwater impacts, and damage to surrounding ecosystems. Our region's natural environment including waterways, bushland, and wildlife habitat, is already under pressure from climate change. Extending coal operations will only compound this harm. The merger would prolong dependence on an industry that is in structural decline globally, rather than supporting investment in sustainable industries that provide long-term, secure jobs without compromising environmental and public health. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the independent planning commission prioritise the long-term wellbeing of our community and environment. I urge to recommend that the Chain Valley coal mine extension to be refused. Approving new or expanded coal projects is inconsistent with the science on climate change, inconsistent with Australia's emissions reduction goals, and inconsistent with the responsibility to protect current and future generations. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Member of the community

25031

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I oppose the merging of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery approvals and the extension of mining by two years, because of the climate impacts. When burnt, the additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal mined during the extended period would emit roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2, which would exacerbate climate change. The extension conflicts with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 commitment to make significant emissions cuts, which should mean no extensions of existing coal projects. The NSW Net Zero Commission warned in its Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report (https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report#:~:text=,goals%20it%20gives%20effect%20to) that "continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement". It's appalling that the Government would consider extending the life of this project at a time when all levels of Government should be reducing coal dependence. Air pollution from coal-fired power in Australia is estimated to cost taxpayers $2.4 billion a year (according to an Environmental Justice Australia 2020 report - https://envirojustice.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EJA-Costs-of-Negative-Health-Outcomes-Arising-from-Air-Pollution-from-Coal-Fired-Power-Stations-final.pdf). The extension of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension would also continue to exacerbate the already existing burden on the health of the community from coal pollution, evident in the increased cases of childhood asthma on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie (https://cen.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/21032025-Final-Report-Citizens-Inquiry.pdf#:~:text=The%20burning%20of%20fossil%20fuels,to%20areas%20without%20power%20stations) and higher rates of cancer in the areas around power stations. When it was found guilty of a "significant environmental breach" last year (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-23/delta-electricity-guilty-for-fish-kill-near-power-station/106173120), Delta demonstrated that it cannot be trusted to uphold its commitment to mitigating the environmental effects of the mine extension.

25036

New South Wales 2190

22/02/2026

Object

Website

Hello, My name is (Redacted) and I am a Sydney citizen concerned about the merger between the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery. I am a prior employee at an EV company and I have interacted with dozens of customers a day over months who feel incentivised and uplifted by the government's Net Zero Plan in the process of their purchase. To approve this merger would be to discount the positive impact of other climate strategies like the NSW Electric Vehicle Strategy. These positive strategies are in direct contention with the NSW Climate Change Act 2023 which aims for a Net Zero Future as this development would produce 16 million tonnes of CO2, equivalent to 3-5% of Australia's entire emissions. This is too significant to be ignored or to counter with other positive strategies which is why it cannot go ahead. The emissions from coal have a significant health impact that is not limited to the area of the site's surroundings and will have an effect in the greater Sydney area too. I have travelled to more polluted cities in SE Asia and I distinctly remember the pain in my throat just from breathing the air outside for a few minutes. I say this as a perfectly healthy individual and I know that those less privileged than myself will suffer much worse should these toxic emissions be allowed to be emitted. Fine particles and heavy metals will irritate those with asthma, chronic lung disease and can cause heart attacks and cancer. When I think of the Newcastle area as a Sydneysider, I imagine a haven of beaches. To remove the freedom for visitors and residents alike to be out in nature - a key part of our Australian culture - would take away our lifestyles and autonomy. Furthermore, in December 2025, Delta was found guilty of 'a significant environmental breach' when a faulty valve discharged bleach into the water and led to the death of thousands of fish. Our biodiversity has directly been threatened by Delta and they are still not being held accountable for this past offence. I believe this should be a strong point of contention for their approval as they have proven to neglect proper maintenance of their site with detrimental impacts. This should warrant an immediate rejection, not an approval of this merger. Once more, I request that the IPC refuse the extension and merger between the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery for the sake of our future, freedom and biodiversity.

25041

Redacted

22/02/2026

Object

Website

Dear Independent Planning Commission My name is (Redacted), I’m an air quality and health expert living in (Redacted). Today, I am writing to you to ask that the IPC refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger. I am concerned about the toxic emissions from coal and the impact it has on our individual and public health, particularly among vulnerable and marginalised communities such as children, the elderly, Awabakal people, low-income households and those with pre-existing health conditions. I have outlined below the key pollutants released, and the toxic impact of coal on our health and economy: Pollutants * Coal combustion releases a cocktail of pollutants – sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and heavy metals (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium). Health Impacts * SO₂ and NOₓ cause acid rain and smog; fine particles and heavy metals penetrate lungs and bloodstream, causing asthma, chronic lung disease, heart attacks and cancer. Economic Impacts * In Australia, air pollution from coal-fired power is estimated to cost taxpayers about $2.4 billion per year in health damages (higher asthma and cardiovascular disease). Even burning 1 million tonnes of coal can emit on the order of 40 tonnes of lead and tonnes of arsenic into the air. The extension of the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension would continue exacerbate the already existing burden on the health of the community from coal pollution. * It is estimated that coal-fired power stations on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie cause over 650 cases of childhood asthma a year and that they appear to be associated with higher rates of cancers well above areas where coal fired power stations do not exist. * They also appear to be associated with higher rates of cancer and neurological conditions compared to areas without power stations Looking forward to hearing from you. Warm Regards, (Redacted)

25046

New South Wales 2074

22/02/2026

Object

Website

As a mechanical engineer, sustainable business owner, and resident deeply invested in Australia’s energy transition, I am writing to formally lodge my opposition to the proposed consolidation and extension of the Chain Valley and Mannering Collieries. My professional background in energy efficiency and infrastructure systems compels me to highlight that this project is a technical and environmental step backward. My name is Dilhan, and I have spent my career focused on the mechanics of energy efficiency. Having founded a business centered on urban resilience, utilizing hydroponics to grow food with 90% less water, I understand the necessity of optimizing resources and transitioning away from high-impact, legacy systems. My opposition is based on the following critical points regarding the project's impact: - Emission Targets vs. Reality: The project seeks to extract millions of additional tonnes of coal, resulting in significant CO2-equivalent emissions. While the current federal target is a 43% reduction by 2030, scientific consensus maintains that a 65% reduction is required to prevent the most catastrophic outcomes. Adding 22 million tonnes of emissions via this project makes the 65% target mathematically impossible to reach. - Infrastructure Risks under Lake Macquarie: The proposal to mine directly under the lake bed poses unacceptable risks of subsidence and permanent damage to local biodiversity. From an engineering standpoint, risking the structural integrity of a major natural asset for a short-term fossil fuel gain is poor long-term planning. Economic Opportunity Costs: Continuing to support fossil fuel companies with taxpayer-funded infrastructure and approvals, estimated at over $10 billion annually stifles the growth of the renewable energy sector where my professional expertise lies. Conclusion and Urgent Request The 2019/2020 bushfires and subsequent floods have shown that "once-in-a-lifetime" disasters are becoming the baseline. We must shift from debating whether action is needed to the rapid implementation of widespread change. I urge the Commission to reject this consolidation. We must stop the extension of projects that harm our livelihoods through the emission of hundreds of millions of tonnes of CO2. Our children deserve a healthy and safe existence, which can only be achieved by prioritizing science-based climate action over legacy coal interests. Thank you for considering this technical and community-focused submission.

25051

New South Wales 2258

22/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a designer and artist who has recently moved to the Central Coast after living in Sydney. I was drawn to the central coast for its nature, for the healthy environment for raising children, and loved becoming a part of the community here. I swim weekly with a local group of women, we love to see all the variety of fish - we see every week how fragile the ecosystem is, and I hear from the women who have been living in the community for more than 20 years how much the underwater life has changed. Often lately with increase heat and rain we’ve had to cancel our swims because of fears of the water pollution and contamination from run off. I was extremely concerned to learn of Delta Energy proposing to merge the existing Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery approvals and extend mining by 2 years (to the end of 2029). This would mean an extra 5.6 million tonnes of coal, roughly 16 million tonnes of CO2, and these emissions would exacerbate climate change that has we have already been feeling the effects of like more heatwaves, storms and droughts locally. This merge would also directly conflict with NSW’s climate laws, that commit to deep cuts in emissions. The NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement”. Approving this project would lock in large new emissions at a time when all levels of government are supposed to be reducing coal dependence. In addition to my concerns for the environmental health, the effects of the coal combustion would release many harmful pollutants harmful to our own health. As a 33 year old in a committed relationship, maintaining a healthy environment for potential future children is also very important to me. It is estimated that coal-fired power stations on the Central Coast and Lake Macquarie cause over 650 cases of childhood asthma a year and that they appear to be associated with higher rates of cancers well above areas where coal fired power stations do not exist. Please recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused. Air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise and vibration, subsidence Subsidence is the downward sinking or settling of the ground surface, often causing severe structural damage to buildings, roads, and infrastructure.  I’m writing to ask for the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger be refused.

25056

New South Wales 2204

22/02/2026

Object

Website

In this time of climate crisis it is truly absurd to be approving more projects that will increase our emissions as well as add a toxic cocktail of pollutants (sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), methane (CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O) and heavy metals (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) to our atmosphere. SO₂ and NOₓ cause acid rain and smog; fine particles and heavy metals penetrate lungs and bloodstream, causing asthma, chronic lung disease, heart attacks and cancer. Approving this project would go against the governments own NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 with the NSW Net Zero Commission specifically warns that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement”. As a concerned citizen I ask the IPC to refuse the application for the Chain Valley and Mannering Colliery extension and merger.

25251

New South Wales 2259

21/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Coal mining, transportation and burning coal to generate power, all cause harm and as such, is not in the public interest. Coal mining not only causes environmental harm but damages the health and safety of the community • Delta intends to mine a total of 5.6 million addition tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. This will produce up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO2 emissions and release thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere. • There is no evidence that Delta intends to invest in technology to reduce its emissions . Delta has been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence that caused two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie. Sentencing is set in the Land & Environment Court for 6 February 2026. On that basis the Independent Planning Commission must conclude that Delta is not a fit and proper entity to continue to operate its colliery or power station beyond the scheduled closure date, preferably before. • Add your own words here if you wish or delete this line 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety Health Costs: In Australia alone, the health impacts from coal-fired power stations cost taxpayers roughly $2.4 billion annually due to increased rates of childhood asthma and cardiovascular diseases. • Fly ash and bottom ash: burning coal produces massive quantities of solid waste containing heavy metals which can be blown on the wind and leach into groundwater. • Methane (CH₄) & Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): While smaller in volume, these potent greenhouse gases are also released during the combustion process. • Toxic Heavy Metals: Burning coal releases mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium into the atmosphere. For context, burning even 1 million tons of coal can release over 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic. • Burning this volume of coal also releases significant amounts of localized pollutants that impact human health and the environment: o Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂): Contributes to acid rain and respiratory illnesses. Nitrogen Oxides (NOₓ): A major component of smog and ground-level ozone. Particulate Matter (PM): Includes fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10) particles that can lead to lung disease, asthma, and heart problems. • The residents living around the Chain Valley Colliery and the Vales Point Power Station have elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease and multiple cancers according to government statistics. Recently conducted ghost wipes of homes found extremely high levels of toxins that were known human carcinogens directly linked to the combustion of coal. • Adding more coal from Delta’s Chain Valley mines will increase the health hazards already facing the community. • Add your own words here or delete this line 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC Deltas’s response does not resolve any of the issues I raised in my original submission. They have made no changes to the proposal - we have been ignored. In particular regarding AIR POLLUTION - Delta and the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) have taken no additional measures to address those concerns. • Additional research has been undertaken on other important issues, such as subsidence and noise but Delta and DPHI have both ignored the overwhelming community concerns over air pollution, concluding that existing measures set out in the EIS are sufficient. • It is up to the IPC to reject this proposal on the basis that it would be an abrogation of the NSW Government’s duty of care to protect the health of its citizens to permit the project to go ahead. • The DPHI’s suggested conditions of consent including in certain circumstances, permission to haul coal between the colliery and the power station by public road, will create additional public exposure to coal dust. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health There is always black coal dust in the air and on surfaces in my home. I hate to think what it is doing to my lungs! Why should I have to put up with this just so Delta can make money? In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment

25256

New South Wales 2259

21/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest As long term resident of Chain Valley Bay, I have experienced the damage and destruction caused by coal mining first hand. Coal mining is a dying industry which causes huge amounts of harm and needs to stop. It causes environmental harm and damages the health and safety of our lakeside community. • The additional coal Delta wants to mine will produce up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO2 emissions and release thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere. • There is no evidence that Delta intends to invest in technology to reduce its emissions . Delta has been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence that caused two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie. Sentencing is set in the Land & Environment Court for 6 February 2026. On that basis the Independent Planning Commission must conclude that Delta is not a fit and proper entity to continue to operate its colliery or power station now, much less beyond the scheduled closure date. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety This proposal is madness, both from financial and from a health perspective. Health impacts from coal-fired power stations cost Australian taxpayers $2.4 billion every year, and causes increased rates of illness including childhood asthma and cardiovascular diseases. • The toxic ash dam near our house needs to go. Fly ash and bottom ash: burning coal produces massive quantities of solid waste containing heavy metals which can be blown on the wind and leach into groundwater. • Methane (CH₄) & Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): potent greenhouse gases are also released during the combustion process. • Toxic Heavy Metals: Burning coal releases mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium into the atmosphere. For context, burning even 1 million tons of coal can release over 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic. • Burning this volume of coal also releases significant amounts of localized pollutants that impact human health and the environment: o Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂): Contributes to acid rain and respiratory illnesses. Nitrogen Oxides (NOₓ): A major component of smog and ground-level ozone. Particulate Matter (PM): Includes fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10) particles that can lead to lung disease, asthma, and heart problems. • As residents living around the Chain Valley Colliery and the Vales Point Power Station we have elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease and multiple cancers according to government statistics. Recently conducted ghost wipes of homes found extremely high levels of toxins that were known human carcinogens directly linked to the combustion of coal. Our houses, clothes and gardens are covered in coal dust - it’s disgusting ! • Adding more coal from Delta’s Chain Valley mines will increase the health hazards already facing our community. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC Like many other concerned local residents, I made a submission in 2022 expressing a range of well-founded concerns. These concerns have been completely ignored. Delta’s arrogance and lack of any kind of consideration for local residents prove they are not fit to operate the mine any longer. The most significant issue raised by stakeholders in the 2022 public exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project was AIR POLLUTION and yet Delta and the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) have taken no additional measures to address those concerns. • Additional research has been undertaken on other important issues, such as subsidence and noise but Delta and DPHI have both ignored the overwhelming community concerns over air pollution, concluding that existing measures set out in the EIS are sufficient. • It is up to the IPC to reject this proposal on the basis that it would be an abrogation of the NSW Government’s duty of care to protect the health of its citizens to permit the project to go ahead. • The DPHI’s suggested conditions of consent including in certain circumstances, permission to haul coal between the colliery and the power station by public road, will create additional public exposure to coal dust. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health As long term resident of Chain Valley Bay, I have experienced the damage and destruction caused by coal mining first hand. My home is covered in coal dust. I breathe it in every day. Subsidence has caused enormous damage in the neighbourhood. The toxic ash dam is just a few kilometres away. Smoke and dust fill the air. This must stop!!! In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment

24816

New South Wales 2550

20/02/2026

Object

Website

Key points for your submission to the IPC on Chain Valley: • The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. • The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. • The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. • The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

24841

Future Sooner

20/02/2026

Object

Email

See attachment.

Future Sooner Suplimentary to the IPC 2026.pdf (PDF, 53.95 KB)

24866

New South Wales 2790

20/02/2026

Object

Email

See attachment.

Geoff Miell additional submission.pdf (PDF, 10.25 MB)

24886

New South Wales 2536

20/02/2026

Object

Website

• Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposal. I have been advocating for 2 decades to leave all remaining fossil fuels in the ground in order to avoid runaway climate change. Six years ago my home and workshop and gardens were completely burnt to the ground in the wildfires on the NSW South Coast. So my primary objection to all coal mining proposals is around the Scope 1,2 AND 3 emissions. Nevertheless I submit the additional points for your consideration: The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. • The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans. The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. • The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. I submit also some photos of my home destroyed by the climate fueled fires of 2019/20 to reinforce my objection to the proposal.

24886 Nick HOPKINS combined imaes.pdf (PDF, 1.39 MB)

24891

Sydney Knitting Nannas and Friends

New South Wales 2044

20/02/2026

Object

Website

Sydney Knitting Nannas and Friends are an environmental action group primarily made up of older Australians, concerned for the wellbeing of our country and our people. Extending coal mine operations for any period of time is counterproductive to protecting our country and our people. We strongly object to the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project as it will extend operations of these mines for two more years. It will significantly contribute to the failure to meet the NSW greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. It extends deeper under Lake Macquarie, increasing the effect on ground water systems. In the proposal, no sustainable energy options have been considered to ensure a sustainable climate friendly future. This consolidation, and any extension of coal mines, has deleterious effects on the environment and the people around it. This project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions. Delta offers no amount of effective emissions abatement measure that helps reach the NSW Government’s Net Zero by 2050 plan. We need to be thinking about these targets now – mostly to make sure they’re not coming too little too late. Instead the NSW government needs to provide alternatives for our energy needs and related employment requirements to make sure we actually make it to Net Zero! “Energy security” for the area is not ensured, even if this project is approved – the NSW government needs to work on green energy sources to address Vales Point Power Station’s energy supply gap. The EIS from Delta Coal does not seem to assess or mention the following issues: - Offsite air quality impacts from burning coal or the emissions from the trucks transporting the coal to Newcastle (up to 270 trucks per day!) - The likely impacts of greenhouse gas emissions - Subsidence impacts and impacts on the groundwater systems - Downstream pollution This Chain Valley Project proposes approval first, then post-development consent for the above issues. This procedure does not ensure environmental protection. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure suggests Delta develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan and subsidence plans after development consent is given! Delta’s Chain valley Colliery Consolidation proposal should show its competency and its responsibility to prevent such possibilities before approval is given, especially as NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. Serious concerns about air quality, water resources and climate change have been raised by the local community. Lake Macquarie is an important resource for these people. Their concerns have not been taken seriously or addressed appropriately in the consolidated Chain Valley Colliery proposal. This proposal has an inadequate biodiversity assessment. It simply reviews past surveys, instead of actually assessing the current impact on wildlife and biodiversity. Also their traffic assessment is out of date. Consolidation of the Chain Valley mines means Delta can cover two mines with one set of requests, one EIS, one assessment, one set of monitoring requirements, one report. This leads to aggregating and averaging effects of the mining and thus less accountability to us, the public and the NSW government. We must prioritise the health of our environment, of Australians, and the health of the global population, for now and for the future above Delta Coal’s profit. Profit which will only last a few more years. The effects are too great for climate change to continue at it’s current pace – a pace that is seemingly not slowing down. We do not want this extension to go ahead; we want to move beyond coal. The Sydney Knitting Nannas strongly object to this proposal.

24926

New South Wales 2474

20/02/2026

Object

Website

When such a self-interested and powerful global group as the IEA stated a while ago that NO new or expanded fossil fuel projects could be approved if the world was to avoid dangerous levels of climate change, I took them seriously. Therefore it is beyond outrageous that the IPC even has to consider this insane proposal at Chain Valley (or for anywhere else in NSW). This proposed coal mine expansion must be refused completely and utterly. Then the NSW government and all its departments and authorities need to get with the program (as the IEA laid out) by banning all new and expanded fossil fuel projects, starting immediately!

25391

FutureSooner

19/02/2026

Object

Email

Dr Merlene Thrift speaker notes.pdf (PDF, 11.35 MB)

25396

FutureSooner

19/02/2026

Object

Email

Gary Blasche OAM speaker notes.pdf (PDF, 2.66 MB)

24711

New South Wales 2259

19/02/2026

Object

Website

I am very concerned that two more years of Delta’s proposed expansion of mining under and around Lake Macquarie will have immediate effects on air quality with more greenhouse emissions, and the risk of damage to the lake bed, particularly by way of subsidence. I live very close to Mannering Park in a retirement community whose residents would be impacted by changes in air quality. I leave it to experts to comment in more detail, but my submission is nonetheless sincere. Thank you!

24746

New South Wales 2090

19/02/2026

Object

Website

Hi, I am writing to voice my vehement opposition to the project. I am aghast that this proposal, which is not in the community interest, is being considered. The proposal would result in an additional 25 million tonnes of CO2 emissions which is incompatible with NSW emission reduction targets. Similarly, there has not been a breakdown of emissions type, meaning we cannot adequately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. Considering this, it is unacceptable that these concerns have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining, with the proponent not adequately responding to community concerns about air quality. Meanwhile, the proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. Furthermore, the proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. Moreover, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines and does not consider broader ecological impacts. All this considered, the project surely needs to be rejected.

24766

Redacted

19/02/2026

Object

Website

I strongly object to expanded mining practices going ahead. Any expansion affects our fragile environment and the fauna and flora that currently exist. For our own health and survival, we need to not add to commercial practises that exaccerbate or add to climate change.

24796

Redacted

19/02/2026

Object

Website

To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years. I am a young person who is terrified of the effects on climate change, not only in NSW but around the world. This proposal goes against the public interest and the NSW emissions reduction targets because this coal mine will contribute to climate change by producing 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions. Not to mention the negative effects it will have on air quality and water resources. Thank you for considering my submission.

24406

Australian Capital Territory 2617

18/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would contribute to climate change at a time when we are at risk of massively overstepping the set temperature rise of 1.5 degrees C. This is because the proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2 emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions to coal production and burning are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • The biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to analyse Delta’s claims. The department's suggestion that the IPC allow Delta to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent is inadequate and will further undermine NSW's ability to achieve emission targets.

24546

New South Wales 2120

18/02/2026

Object

Website

Regarding the Chain Valley Colliery consolidation Project As a member of the community impacted by pollution, degradation of natural areas and ground water and impacted by climate change driven extreme weather, I write to oppose this project. There is no adequate plan for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation. This needs to be clarified prior to approval. The environmental impact statement is also based on very limited information and area of impact. ( Sea grass and life in the surface layer of the water reservoir ) The impact on ground species, the effect of warming climate, destruction of corridors for native animals and light pollution have not been considered. Please ensure a through environmental impact assessment is completed and mitigation and site rehabilitation are included in the proposal prior to approval. Thank you Kim It appears that many of the community and IEAPM's concerns have not been addressed in the Deltas' submission in regard to air quality, impacts on water and climate change. This applies to the coal mine and power station proposals.

24636

New South Wales 2126

18/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. • The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. • The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. • The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

23061

Narara EcoVillage

New South Wales 2250

17/02/2026

Object

Website

Narara Ecovillage is a multi-generational community of about 250 people located between Tuggerah Lake and Brisbane Water. On northerly winds, we breathe the emissions from the Lake Macquarie coal-fired power stations. We invest a lot of community resources into being champions, first-movers and examples of sustainable living. For example, 100% of our homes have solar panels and our community battery powers us during the night and on cloudy days. It is clear that Australia has the technology to phase-out coal-fired power over the next few years and to reduce its impacts on human health and climate change. We can only presume that any decision to prolong the life of a coal mine or power station is a political decision, presumably informed by vested interests. We humbly request that the quality of life of our community and the whole Central Coast is prioritised over the profits and political donations of the coal lobby. Please follow the science and unbiased economics, and reject the proposal to extend and increase the extraction from the Chain Valley Colliery and Mannering coal mine.

22501

New South Wales 2259

16/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Statement of Opposition: Impact on Family, Health, and Environment The continued operation of the Vales Point colliery and power station is no longer just a policy debate; for my family, it is a daily burden on our health and our quality of life. We believe it is fundamentally against the public interest to extend these operations when the costs are being paid by local residents. 1. Direct Impact on Our Home and Health The physical presence of this industry follows us into our home. We are constantly dealing with: Coal Dust: We find layers of black coal dust on our furniture and our clothes hanging on the line. Knowing we are breathing in what we are scrubbing off our surfaces is a constant source of anxiety for my family’s respiratory health. Noise and Vibrations: The peace of our home is frequently shattered by the relentless noise and physical vibrations from mining activities, disrupting our sleep and wellbeing. The Ash Dam: The looming presence of the ash dam is a constant reminder of the heavy metals and pollutants staged right in our backyard, threatening our groundwater and safety. 2. Loss of Nature and Local Wildlife Our family has been deeply saddened and disappointed by the management of our local environment. The "unprecedented" fish kills in Lake Macquarie were a heartbreaking turning point for us. To see our local waters—once a place of life—turned into a site of mass die-offs due to license breaches is unacceptable. The damage to nature and the displacement of wildlife aren't just statistics; they represent the degradation of the place we call home. 3. A Question of Fitness and Responsibility Delta’s plan to mine an additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal will result in 16 million tonnes of CO_2 and thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants. No Innovation: There is no evidence of a sincere move toward emission-reduction technology. Legal Standing: With Delta facing sentencing in the Land & Environment Court on 6 February 2026, their track record proves they are not a "fit and proper" entity to manage these assets. For the sake of our children’s health and the restoration of Lake Macquarie, the Independent Planning Commission must reject the extension. We deserve a future free from coal dust, noise, and environmental negligence. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety From Our Front Porch: A Plea for Our Children’s Future We aren't just names on a petition or "residents" in a statistical zone. We are a family raising young children in the shadow of Vales Point, and every day we feel the weight of that choice. We are writing this because we can no longer stay silent while our children’s health is treated as an "acceptable cost" of doing business. The Dust in Their Lungs, Not Just on Our Windows For a family with young kids, "particulate matter" isn't a scientific term—it’s the black grime we wipe off the chairs and the soot we find on our children’s clothes after they play outside. * The Invisible Threat: It breaks our hearts to know that while we scrub the dust off our windows, we can’t scrub it out of our children’s developing lungs. * The Cost of a Breath: Australia-wide, this industry costs taxpayers $2.4 billion in health expenses. A Poisoned Playground We moved here to be near the beauty of Lake Macquarie, but that dream has been tarnished. * The Fish Kills: How do we explain to our children why the fish are dying in the lake where they should be swimming? The "unprecedented" fish kills caused by Delta’s negligence weren't just an environmental breach—they were a betrayal of our community's trust. * The "Ghost Wipes": Learning that independent tests found known carcinogens inside local homes—the very places our children crawl and play—is terrifying. No parent should have to wonder if their carpet or curtains are carrying heavy metals like lead, arsenic, and mercury. A few years ago, my husband had extremely toxic levels od murcury. The doctora had even questioned, how close we were to the power station and if it could be a possible link. More Coal Means More Risk Delta wants to mine 5.6 million more tonnes of coal. To them, that’s a profit margin. To us, it represents: * Thousasnds of tonnes of arsenic and 40 tonnes of lead potentially entering our air and water. * More sleepless nights from the rumbling vibrations and noise of the colliery. * The continued growth of the ash dam, a toxic legacy we are leaving for our children to deal with long after the power station closes. Enough is Enough We are disappointed, we are tired, and we are deeply worried. Delta has been found guilty of failing our environment, and their lack of investment in cleaner technology shows they have no intention of changing. Our children deserve to grow up in a place where the air is clear, the lake is alive, and their home is a sanctuary—not a health hazard. The Independent Planning Commission must put the lives of our little ones ahead of the interests of a company that has already proven it cannot be trusted with our future. Please, don't let our children be the ones to pay the ultimate price for two more years of coal. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC A Failure of Care: Why "Business as Usual" is Failing Our Children As both a mother raising my children in this community and a teacher who looks into the faces of our future every day, I am appalled by the lack of action regarding our air quality. We have spoken up, we have voiced our fears, and yet it feels as though our concerns have been pushed aside in favor of corporate convenience. 1. Our Loudest Concern has Been Met with Silence In 2022, when the community was asked for feedback, the message was loud and clear: Air Pollution is our primary fear. It is the invisible thief stealing our children’s health. * The Disconnect: While Delta and the Department (DPHI) have spent time researching ground subsidence and noise, they have completely ignored the overwhelming outcry regarding the air we breathe. * The "Sufficient" Fallacy: To conclude that existing measures are "sufficient" is a slap in the face to every parent who has to wipe black soot off a high chair or every teacher who has to keep students inside on high-pollution days because they can’t stop coughing. 2. The Classroom Reality: More Than Just Statistics In my classroom, I see the "health costs" firsthand. I see the high number of "Asthma Action Plans" in my file folders. * The Duty of Care: As a teacher, I have a duty of care to protect my students. The NSW Government has that same duty to its citizens. To allow this project to proceed without new, stringent air quality protections is a total abrogation of that responsibility. You cannot claim to care about education and the future while simultaneously poisoning the lungs of the students sitting in our desks. 3. Coal on Our Roads: An Unacceptable Risk The DPHI’s suggestion to allow coal hauling by public road is, quite frankly, terrifying. * Direct Exposure: Our public roads are where our school buses travel; they are the routes we take to the park and the shops. * A New Threat: Allowing trucks to carry coal through our public spaces will create a "dust corridor," directly exposing our families to even more airborne toxins. It is a backwards step that prioritively treats our community streets as industrial zones. My Final Thought as a Mother and Educator I am tired of explaining to my children—and my students—why the "grown-ups" in charge aren't doing more to protect the lake and the sky. The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) has a choice: stand with the families and the children who have to live with these consequences, or stand with a company that refuses to listen. I implore the IPC to reject this proposal. Our children’s health is not a negotiable line item on a balance sheet. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health As mentioned above an educator, I am witnessing an increased amount of staff, parents, children and wider community members, with increased health issues. Athma, a range of types of cancer, respiratory disease. The facts have been demonstrated that, one local housing estate is known to have a 27% cancer mortality rate. In conclusion In conclusion, Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment. I believe we have a right to a safe, clean home and emvironment. Name Allyse Cresta

20221

Redacted

16/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

20426

New South Wales 2259

16/02/2026

Object

Email

Name Daniel Johnson Address [redacted] Email [redacted] Date 10/25/1988 1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Coal mining, along with the transportation and burning of coal for energy, causes significant harm and therefore does not serve the public’s best interest. Beyond environmental damage, coal mining also poses risks to the health and safety of local communities. Delta plans to extract an additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. This activity is expected to generate up to 16 million tonnes of extra CO2 emissions and release thousands of tonnes of harmful air pollutants into the atmosphere. There is no indication that Delta is committed to investing in technologies to reduce these emissions. Furthermore, Delta has been found guilty of violating its Environmental Protection Licence, which led to two major fish die-offs in Lake Macquarie. The sentencing for this case is scheduled for 6 February 2026 in the Land & Environment Court. Given these facts, the Independent Planning Commission should determine that Delta is not a responsible or suitable operator to continue running its coal mine or power station beyond the planned closure date—and ideally, should cease operations even sooner. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety Health Costs: In Australia, the health effects caused by coal-fired power plants cost taxpayers about $2.4 billion each year. This is largely due to higher rates of childhood asthma and heart diseases. Fly ash and bottom ash: Burning coal generates large amounts of solid waste that contains harmful heavy metals. These can be carried by the wind or seep into the groundwater, posing environmental risks. Methane (CH₄) and Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): Although released in smaller quantities, these powerful greenhouse gases are emitted during coal combustion and contribute significantly to climate change. Toxic heavy metals: Coal burning releases dangerous substances such as mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium into the air. To put it into perspective, burning just one million tons of coal can emit over 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic. Local pollutants: The process also releases pollutants that directly affect human health and the environment, including: Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂): Causes acid rain and respiratory problems. Nitrogen Oxides (NOₓ): Key contributors to smog and harmful ground-level ozone. Particulate Matter (PM): Fine and coarse particles that can lead to lung diseases, asthma, and heart issues. People living near the Chain Valley Colliery and Vales Point Power Station experience higher rates of asthma, heart disease, and various cancers, according to government data. Recent tests in homes revealed extremely high levels of toxins known to cause cancer, directly linked to coal burning. Increasing coal mining at Delta’s Chain Valley site will only worsen the health risks already faced by the community. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC During the 2022 public exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project, the most prominent concern raised by the community was air pollution. Despite this, both Delta and the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) have not introduced any further measures to address these worries. While additional studies have been conducted on other important matters like subsidence and noise, the significant concerns from the community regarding air pollution have largely been overlooked. Delta and DPHI maintain that the existing measures outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement are adequate. It is now the responsibility of the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) to consider rejecting this proposal, as allowing it to proceed could be seen as a failure by the NSW Government to fulfill its duty of care in protecting public health. Furthermore, the conditions suggested by DPHI, which include permitting coal to be transported by public road between the colliery and power station under certain circumstances, may increase the public’s exposure to coal dust. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health One local housing estate is known to have a 27% cancer mortality rate. A family members have suffered from the following – asthma, respiratory disease, types of cancer. In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment. Name Daniel Johnson

20476

New South Wales 2251

16/02/2026

Object

Website

I was planning to move into the area but the damage to the land & baese of lake is predictably a hazard ti fauna

20971

New South Wales 2795

16/02/2026

Object

Website

I strongly object to this proposed project. Australians are aware that our government is not going to meet its climate targets and that by investing heavily in projects like this proposed nightmare, it is likely to cause economic loss through stranded assets. Therefore it will not be in the public interest to have the cumulative environmental, legal, health and economic impacts. The 25 million tonnes of additional CO2 emissions which include coal burnt at Vales Point power station is allowing State approved criminal negligence at a time when escalating climate catastrophes are occurring on a daily basis. I have been in Victoria for the last two months during a burning stinking hot summer. Frankly I find this wilful blindness terrifying. In December last year, the Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. It is only a matter of time before the Australian public will be able to sue our governments for this kind of cumulative damages. By failing to provide a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, which means the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act, Delta is not acting in good faith. The proponent must comprehensively assess local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. I'm also concerned that the communities on-going concerns over air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources have not been adequately addressed by Delta. These are fundamental concerns going forward and avoiding dealing with them isn't a reasonable course of action. I'm also surprised that the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission didn't look more closely at Delta’s claims. Developing a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent is roguish behaviour, as if the fox building a safe chicken coop is not a comical concept. The Department also seeks to allow another slight of hand suggesting a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans, despite their report acknowledging that subsidence risk is the biggest environmental risk. We need to do better than this. It is shoddy and dangerous.

21391

New South Wales 2303

16/02/2026

Object

Website

I want to strongly object to the proposal to extend the operations of Chain Valley coal mine. The Net Zero Commission has warned that extending the life of coal mines will make the NSW legislated greenhouse gas emission reduction targets unobtainable. It is not in the interests of the community or the environment to extend the operations of these mines for two more years. Extraction operations will extend further under Lake Macquarie causing further instability in an area where subsidence is already a problem. Twenty five million more tonnes of CO@e emmissions will be pumped into our atmosphere by an extended mining project. Delta Energy has already a blemished history of polluting waterways and fishkills for which it has been charged. The Community does not trust that the best interests of our precious environment will be a major concern of Delta Energy. This has been highlighted by their failure to adequately measure emmissions properly and have dismissed expert recommendations on emmissions abatement actions without conducting a cost-benefit analysis. Delta has also avoided requirements to prepare a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report. It is clear that Delta does not intend to be accountable to the Community or to the Environment. At this time , when water purity and species are suffering the irreversible effects of industry we cannot justifyably extend coal mining operations. Thankyou.

21511

Redacted

16/02/2026

Object

Website

OBJECT to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for 2 more years. I consider that the proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal.

20386

New South Wales 2259

15/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Coal is not just a resource pulled from the ground — it is a chain of harm that begins with mining, continues through transportation, and ends with combustion. At every stage, it leaves a mark on our air, our water, our climate, and our health. That is why expanding coal production cannot be said to serve the public interest. The costs are borne not by the company, but by the community — by families who breathe the pollution, by ecosystems that cannot defend themselves, and by future generations who will inherit the damage. Delta proposes to extract an additional 5.6 million tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. That decision alone would result in up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO₂ emissions — a staggering contribution to a climate crisis that is already intensifying fires, floods, and extreme heat. Beyond carbon emissions, thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants would be released into the atmosphere, further degrading air quality and placing surrounding communities at risk of respiratory illness, cardiovascular disease, and other serious health impacts. These are not abstract figures; they represent real and lasting harm. Equally troubling is the absence of any clear commitment by Delta to meaningfully reduce its emissions or invest in cleaner technology. Instead of demonstrating leadership or accountability, Delta has been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence — breaches that led to two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie. The scale of that environmental damage shocked the community and caused irreversible harm to a treasured local ecosystem. With sentencing set in the Land & Environment Court for 6 February 2026, there can be no doubt that these were serious failures. In light of this record, it is difficult to see how Delta can be regarded as a fit and proper entity to continue operating its colliery or power station beyond the scheduled closure date — and certainly not beyond. The Independent Planning Commission has a responsibility to protect the public interest. Approving further mining would reward non-compliance, prolong environmental damage, and deepen the burden placed on the community. This is not simply a planning decision. It is a moral one. It is about whether we prioritise short-term extraction over long-term wellbeing. It is about whether we accept ongoing harm as inevitable, or whether we choose a safer, cleaner future for our region. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety The true cost of coal is not reflected on an electricity bill — it is carried in hospital admissions, chronic illness, and the quiet suffering of families. Across Australia, the health burden linked to coal-fired power generation is estimated to cost taxpayers around $2.4 billion every year. That figure represents children struggling with asthma, adults developing cardiovascular disease, and communities paying the price for pollution they did not choose. Burning coal does not simply produce electricity; it produces enormous volumes of toxic waste. Fly ash and bottom ash — the solid by-products of combustion — contain dangerous heavy metals. These particles can become airborne, settling over homes and playgrounds, or leach into soil and groundwater, contaminating the very resources communities rely upon. Coal combustion also releases powerful greenhouse gases. While carbon dioxide is the most discussed, methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) are also emitted. Though smaller in volume, they are far more potent in trapping heat in the atmosphere, accelerating climate change and intensifying its impacts. The toxic burden does not stop there. Burning coal releases mercury, lead, arsenic and cadmium into the air. Even the combustion of one million tonnes of coal can emit more than 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic — substances known to damage neurological development, harm vital organs, and increase cancer risk. These pollutants do not simply disappear; they settle into communities, water systems, and food chains. In addition, coal burning generates significant levels of sulphur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). Sulphur dioxide contributes to acid rain and respiratory distress. Nitrogen oxides are key ingredients in smog and ground-level ozone. Fine particulate matter penetrates deep into the lungs and bloodstream, increasing the risk of asthma, chronic lung disease, heart attack, stroke, and premature death. These are well-documented health consequences, not speculative risks. For residents living near the Chain Valley Colliery and the Vales Point Power Station, these impacts are not theoretical. Government statistics show elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease, and multiple cancers in surrounding communities. Recent “ghost wipe” testing of homes has reportedly revealed extremely high levels of toxic substances — including known human carcinogens — directly linked to coal combustion. Families are literally finding the evidence of pollution on their own walls and windowsills. Approving additional coal extraction from Delta’s Chain Valley operations would only compound these harms. It would increase emissions, increase toxic waste, and increase the health burden on a community that is already carrying more than its fair share. Expanding mining in this context is not just an environmental decision — it is a decision about whether we accept preventable illness and contamination as an acceptable cost of doing business. The community deserves clean air, safe water, and the peace of mind that their children can grow up healthy. Adding more coal to an already polluted environment moves us further away from that basic standard of care. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC During the 2022 public exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement, one concern rose above all others: air pollution. Community members spoke clearly and consistently about their fears for their health, their children, and the air they breathe. Yet despite the strength and volume of those submissions, neither Delta nor the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) has introduced any meaningful new measures to address those concerns. While further studies have been commissioned on matters such as subsidence and noise, the central issue identified by stakeholders — air quality — has effectively been sidelined. Delta and DPHI have maintained that the mitigation measures already outlined in the EIS are adequate, despite overwhelming community opposition and mounting evidence of existing health impacts. Simply restating previous controls does not amount to genuinely responding to public concern, particularly when those concerns relate to well-documented health risks. In these circumstances, the responsibility now rests with the Independent Planning Commission. To approve this project without stronger protections would amount to a failure to uphold the NSW Government’s fundamental duty of care to safeguard the health and wellbeing of its citizens. When credible risks to public health are identified — and when communities have repeatedly voiced their fears — decision-makers are obliged to act cautiously and protectively, not defer to the proponent’s assurances. Further, the conditions of consent proposed by DPHI would, in some circumstances, allow coal to be hauled by public road between the colliery and the power station. This would expose the broader community to additional coal dust through transport emissions, spillage, and wind dispersal along public routes. Residents who may not live immediately adjacent to the site could nonetheless be subjected to increased airborne pollution simply by virtue of living near these transport corridors. The message from the community has been clear: air pollution is not a peripheral issue — it is the defining concern. To proceed without strengthening safeguards would disregard that message and place public health at continued risk. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health When we moved here in 2021, we did so with the understanding that the power station would be closing within the decade. Instead, what we have experienced is extension after extension, with no meaningful change — only ongoing uncertainty and growing stress for our family and neighbours. My daughter suffers from chronic asthma and coughs throughout the morning. It is heartbreaking to watch and deeply distressing to feel powerless to protect her from the air she breathes in her own home. Our neighbours are so fearful of similar health impacts that they rarely open their windows, worried their children may develop asthma or other respiratory conditions. No family should have to live like that. We have also seen an alarming increase in cases of head and mouth cancers within our street. While we are not medical experts, the pattern is frightening and impossible to ignore. It weighs heavily on our community. Daily life is affected in ways that may seem small individually but are overwhelming in total. We cannot freely open our windows because of the constant noise, dust, and persistent odour. Drying washing outdoors is nearly impossible. Balconies are regularly coated in soot or coal dust. Plantation shutters, window frames, and surfaces inside and outside the house accumulate a fine dark residue. Our car has been covered in fly ash on multiple occasions. This is not an isolated incident — it is a recurring reality. It is difficult to comprehend that in this day and age, in one of the most beautiful regions of New South Wales, families are living beside infrastructure that poses such clear and ongoing risks to health and quality of life. We should not have to choose between the place we call home and the wellbeing of our children. In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment Name Emma Garrett

20391

New South Wales 2259

15/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest Coal isn’t just something we dig up and burn like we pick up a lump of dirt from the ground — it causes harm at every single Oh stage. Mining absolutely damages land and water, transporting it spreads dust, and burning it releases huge amounts of pollution. Delta wants to mine another 5.6 million tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029, which could create up to 16 million tonnes of extra CO₂. At a time when fires, floods and extreme heat are getting worse, adding more pollution doesn’t make sense. The company profits, but the community carries the health and environmental costs every single time. 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety Burning coal releases toxic chemicals that include mercury, lead and arsenic, as well as tiny dust particles that get deep into our lungs. These are linked to asthma, heart disease, cancer and other serious illnesses. Coal plants also create massive amounts of waste like fly ash, which can settle on cars, people, pets, homes or contaminate soil and water. Across Australia, the health costs linked to coal-fired power add up to billions of dollars each year. These aren’t just statistics — they represent real people getting sick. 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC When the Environmental Impact Statement was put on public exhibition in 2022, the biggest concern raised by the community was air pollution. People clearly said they were worried about their health and their children’s future. Despite this, no strong new protections have been introduced. Instead, we’re being told the current measures are “enough.” And now they want to extend??? There’s even the possibility of coal being transported by public roads, which could spread more dust. It feels like community concerns have been pushed aside. 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health My family moved here in 2021 thinking the power station would close within the decade, but instead it keeps getting extended. I don’t open our windows because of the dust and smell. Our balcony and windowsills collect black residue, and our car has been covered in fly ash. There have also been several cases of head and mouth cancers on our street, which is frightening to see. Imagine living on a waterfront property on beautiful Lake Macquarie and not being able to open your windows? Read that again. Imagine not letting the air in or being able to feel the breeze in your home on a sunny day. Living like this is disgusting, dirty and stressful and quite frankly upsetting. We shouldn’t have to choose between staying in our home and protecting our health. For two years in a row the coal and mining operation has been responsible for killing all the fish along before shore in front of our house it is so sad to see dead stingrays beautiful dead birds and fish. How do they keep getting away with it? How do they keep hurting the environment and the people who live here and the government allow it? Why do they allow it? Is there something going on under the table? I am sure if the Prime Minister lived here they would shut the coal via power station down immediately because he would be absolutely embarrassed and disgusted with the pollution dust dirt and stink. In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment Name Elise Heddou

20411

New South Wales 2259

15/02/2026

Object

Email

1. SSD 17017460 the Chain Valley Colliery Consolidation Project should not be approved as it is not in the public interest [REWRITE THE FOLLOWING POINTS IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND/OR ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS:] Coal mining, transportation and burning coal to generate power, all cause harm and as such, is not in the public interest. Coal mining not only causes environmental harm but damages the health and safety of the community • Delta intends to mine a total of 5.6 million addition tonnes of coal between 2027 and 2029. This will produce up to 16 million tonnes of additional CO2 emissions and release thousands of tonnes of hazardous air pollutants into the atmosphere. • There is no evidence that Delta intends to invest in technology to reduce its emissions . Delta has been found guilty of breaching its Environmental Protection Licence that caused two unprecedented fish kills in Lake Macquarie. Sentencing is set in the Land & Environment Court for 6 February 2026. On that basis the Independent Planning Commission must conclude that Delta is not a fit and proper entity to continue to operate its colliery or power station beyond the scheduled closure date, preferably before. • Add your own words here if you wish or delete this line The sooner the better!!! 2. The approval of SSD 17017460 by the IPC will cause direct harm to human health and safety [REWRITE THE FOLLOWING POINTS IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND/OR ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS]: Health Costs: In Australia alone, the health impacts from coal-fired power stations cost taxpayers roughly $2.4 billion annually due to increased rates of childhood asthma and cardiovascular diseases. • Fly ash and bottom ash: burning coal produces massive quantities of solid waste containing heavy metals which can be blown on the wind and leach into groundwater. • Methane (CH₄) & Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): While smaller in volume, these potent greenhouse gases are also released during the combustion process. • Toxic Heavy Metals: Burning coal releases mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium into the atmosphere. For context, burning even 1 million tons of coal can release over 40 tonnes of lead and thousands of tonnes of arsenic. • Burning this volume of coal also releases significant amounts of localized pollutants that impact human health and the environment: o Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂): Contributes to acid rain and respiratory illnesses. Nitrogen Oxides (NOₓ): A major component of smog and ground-level ozone. Particulate Matter (PM): Includes fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10) particles that can lead to lung disease, asthma, and heart problems. • The residents living around the Chain Valley Colliery and the Vales Point Power Station have elevated rates of asthma, cardiovascular disease and multiple cancers according to government statistics. Recently conducted ghost wipes of homes found extremely high levels of toxins that were known human carcinogens directly linked to the combustion of coal. • Adding more coal from Delta’s Chain Valley mines will increase the health hazards already facing the community. • Add your own words here or delete this line You killed my wife with your exhaust fumes what more do you want from my family 3. Delta has failed to address the community’s concerns about air pollution and, as such, its proposal must be rejected by the IPC [REWRITE THE FOLLOWING POINTS IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND/OR ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS:] The most significant issue raised by stakeholders in the 2022 public exhibition of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project was AIR POLLUTION and yet Delta and the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) have taken no additional measures to address those concerns. • Additional research has been undertaken on other important issues, such as subsidence and noise but Delta and DPHI have both ignored the overwhelming community concerns over air pollution, concluding that existing measures set out in the EIS are sufficient. • It is up to the IPC to reject this proposal on the basis that it would be an abrogation of the NSW Government’s duty of care to protect the health of its citizens to permit the project to go ahead. • The DPHI’s suggested conditions of consent including in certain circumstances, permission to haul coal between the colliery and the power station by public road, will create additional public exposure to coal dust. You do not pay proportionate road tax so you should not have rights to use the road 4. As a local resident I have witnessed the negative impacts of coal mining and burning coal on public health [REWRITE THE FOLLOWING POINTS IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND/OR ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS:] One local housing estate is known to have a 27% cancer mortality rate. • My family members have suffered from the following – asthma, respiratory disease, types of cancer • Please add any negative health experiences that you believe are the result of the colliery and Vales Point Power Station Pulmonary fibrosis both my wife and I In conclusion • Delta’s track record on environmental pollution clearly means it cannot be trusted not to commit further breaches of its Environmental Protection Licences and conditions of consent • Delta has failed to address the significant concerns expressed by the community when it responded to Delta’s original 2022 Chain Valley Colliery expansion application. • Delta has failed to invest in technologies that would lower its emissions and improve public and environmental health and safety • The human health impacts from coal mining, transportation and burning coal are clear and well-established. Approval of Delta’s application would be a significant breach of the many commitments that have been made by the NSW Government, but particularly of its duty of care to provide citizens with their basic human right to clean air and a safe environment Out lives matter Name Phil Kenny

20001

Blue Mountains Permaculture Institute

Redacted

15/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to any expansion of the mine. Apart from the problem that coal is a stranded asset. I utterly reject any more damage to the natural environment and pollution of air and misuse of water to mine coal. Destruction for coal must stop. Energy must be sourced renewably. I also support the local community. Ive seen what will be lost immediately and to future generations and it is simply terrible. It is a type of vandalism. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Delta is unreliable in doing due diligence and its reports are inadequate. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning. the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project. against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. Refuse this extension for the sake of the land, the people and future generations.

20036

New South Wales 2294

15/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to the project principally on the grounds that the increased CO2 emissions from the burning of the coal will add to climate change impacts. I believe this extension is not in the public interest as there has been inadequate environmental impact assessment & it will pose an unacceptable risk to the the local environment and to the planet’s atmosphere

20141

Nature NSW

New South Wales 2264

15/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to Delta extending Chain Valley coal mine until 2029 and mining deeper under Lake Macquarie. We personally experienced the impact of mine subsidence in the 1990’s at Chain Valley Bay & this together with the knowledge we now have of the environmental impacts of continuing to burn fossil fuels as our main source of energy, have convinced me we need to limit & phase out, not continue, coal mine operations .

19836

Sydney smurf musem

New South Wales 2770

14/02/2026

Object

Website

Good morning would like to make it clear that sydney smurf museum object to this development . Distruction of biodiversity in n.s.w is at record levels. We were living in one of the most biodiverse places on the planet but the minns n albanease government have no regard for the natural environment. Record numbers of critically endangered plants n animals added to list each year. Its no joke the planet is dying. This development achives nothing other then building China n making a select few rich. If we whant to continue to breath air and drink water development needs to stop and the land handed back to first nation people so it can be repaired n cared for properly.

19881

New South Wales 2296

14/02/2026

Object

Website

Please do not expose us to an extra 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions. CO2 emissions are directly linked to climate change and poor air quality / health. Please take into consideration the current residents and future generations who will be harmed by these decisions. We have a duty of care to think about our future generations.

19911

New South Wales 2289

14/02/2026

Object

Website

As a resident of Lake Macquarie, I am making a submission to object to Delta Energy’s proposal to consolidate Chain Valley Colliery operations with the neighbouring Mannering coal mine and extend operations for two more years. I believe that the proposal is not in the public interest because its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources are the biggest concerns that have been raised, both concerning the coal mine project and the power station. It is not sufficient for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as being irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station are accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. The Independent Planning Commission will not be able to accurately assess the project against the criteria contained in the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act because the proponent has not comprehensively assessed the local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. Furthermore, it is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. Finally, the proponent has not adequately addressed the air quality concerns associated with extended mining operations and from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to the Port of Newcastle.

19931

Australian Capital Territory 2602

14/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal to extend the mine will result in a significant increase in the production of greenhouse gases. We must limit increasing greenhouse gases because of their impact on rising sea levels and the likelihood of bushfires and rising temperatures. Annaliese Baker

19961

Redacted

14/02/2026

Object

Website

• The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. • The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. • The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. • The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process . • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

20346

Illawarra Knitting Nannas Against Greed

13/02/2026

Object

Email

Please find attached a submission objecting to the proposed Moolarben expansion from the Illawarra Knitting Nannas Against Greed. Kind regards, Anne Kelly

Anne Kelly submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 91.41 KB)

19566

Redacted

13/02/2026

Object

Website

Submission to the Independent Planning Commission Re: Objection to the Proposed Extension of Chain Valley Coal Mine I am writing to formally object to Delta Energy’s proposal to extend operations at the Chain Valley coal mine. Although I am an immigrant and an international student, I consider Australia my second home. I will be here for a few more years, and even when I return to my home country, Australia will always remain a place I care deeply about. The connections we build and the responsibility we share for this land do not end when visas expire. Climate change affects everyone who lives here now and in the future. This proposal would result in an additional 25 million tonnes of CO2-e emissions at a time when NSW must be accelerating its transition away from fossil fuels. Approving further emissions undermines the intent and credibility of the state’s legislated greenhouse gas reduction targets and contradicts urgent climate science. Extending the mine’s life for two more years may seem short-term, but its climate impacts are long-lasting. Every additional tonne of greenhouse gas contributes to worsening climate risks, including extreme weather, ecological damage, and public health impacts. Emissions cannot be dismissed as “negligible” when their cumulative effect is significant. I am also concerned about potential impacts on Lake Macquarie, including subsidence risks and harm to seagrass and aquatic ecosystems. The environmental assessment appears to understate these risks, and the absence of a Biodiversity Development Assessment Report raises serious concerns about environmental protection and accountability. The argument that this extension is necessary to “keep the lights on” is not convincing. With Vales Point power station operating until 2033 and this proposal extending only to 2029, coal would still need to be sourced elsewhere. This suggests the project is not essential for energy security. NSW must move beyond coal and invest in sustainable energy solutions that protect people, biodiversity, and the climate. Approving this extension would send the wrong signal at a critical moment for climate action. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed extension of the Chain Valley coal mine.

19606

Redacted

13/02/2026

Object

Website

I am opposed to Cgain valley mine proposal- we must act now to stop extending coal mining if we are ever going to halt climate change. The region has had enough pollution from coal mining and Chain valley bay environment must not be damaged further. Asthma and other respiratory conditions abound in the Hunter region , definitely exacerbated by emissions from fossil fuels including burning of coal. Do not support this development. Have the long vision- clean air, healthy people and environment

19621

New South Wales 2290

13/02/2026

Object

Website

Please do not approve an expansion of this mine in Lake Macquarie. We need to transition to renewables asap not continue to approve coal mine expansions. The impacts of greenhouse gas emissions are clearly responsible for the rapid increase in inreasing the frequency and intensity of both loval and global bushfires, unimaginable temperature increases this summer in Australia, flooding, sea level rise, poor air wuality and serious human health conditions. It is absolutely foolish and totally irresponsible for the goverment to give approval to this and any future coal mine expansions - do any of you decision makers have children or grandchildren? How will they cope in the future and remember you and the legacy you have left them. Your sincerely Trevor Cameron - resident of Lake Macquarie LGA

19636

New South Wales 2350

13/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. • The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. • Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. • It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. • Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station. It is not good enough for them to dismiss concerns relating to the power station as somehow irrelevant to consideration of the coal mine proposal. • The project is not justified on energy security grounds. No alternative coal supply options were considered. There is a gap in coal supply for a four-year period from 2029 to 2033 even if this project was approved. • The proponent suggests that it would respond to Independent Expert Advisory Panel on Mining (IEAPM) concerns relating subsidence post-approval as part of the Extraction Plan submission. This fails to address the IEAPM’s concern around subsidence risks to inform the project approval process. • The proponent has not adequately addressed air quality concerns from extended mining operations and air quality impacts from up to 270 trucks per day travelling to Newcastle Port as part of the consent to export coal. • Similarly, the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines. • The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report to the Independent Planning Commission fails to interrogate Delta’s claims and suggests that the IPC allow it to develop a greenhouse gas emissions mitigation plan after development consent. This is despite the Department recognizing that NSW is not on track to achieve emission targets. The Department’s report considers subsidence risk as the biggest environmental risk but also suggests a proper plan to manage subsidence can be written after development consent through staged extraction plans.

19646

Redacted

13/02/2026

Object

Website

When 99% of the World leading Scientists agree we are in a climate crisis this proposal seems ludicrous . There are alternatives to coal , there are no alternatives for clean air , water or soil .

19676

New South Wales 2261

13/02/2026

Object

Website

Please do not continue with this development, for the sake of our environment and future generations.

19711

Nature Conservation Council of NSW

New South Wales 2000

13/02/2026

Object

Website

Please see attachment.

NCC Submission Chain Valley Consolidation Project IPC_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.34 MB)

19776

New South Wales 2285

13/02/2026

Object

Website

We can’t afford any further coal development, we need to look at renewables. We are running out of time the planet is dying

19781

Redacted

13/02/2026

Object

Website

I am a community member concerned about the pollution impacts of coal mining, particularly climate pollution. It’s well beyond established by now that we must not extract any more fossil fuels to avoid the current predictions of global warming of around 3 or more degrees, which would be catastrophic for NSW and the world for reasons that I’m sure you don’t need me to recount. I support the points made by nature advocates like the Nature Conservation Council. Please reject the application to extract any more coal. Thanks for your time and consideration.

19826

New South Wales 2048

13/02/2026

Object

Website

I am distressed and perturbed that Delta Energy's proposal to extend coal mining operations for a further two years is receiving any serious consideration at all. Delta's proposal is made in the context that it is currently the third most emitting coal mine in NSW and that as a state it is projected that NSW will fail to meet it's legislated emissions targets. What is more Delta Energy see these targets as irrelevant to them and their submission because the targets are for the year following their proposed mining extention. This suggests that we can just continue to spew emmissions and then somehow magically bring the targets to fruition over night....instead of the methodical winding back of emmisions over the time that we have. In addition, the sheer scale of the emissions envisaged (25 Million Tons of additional CO2) deserves prejudicial and skeptical treatment not the flippant, indeed arrogant attitude adopted by Delta Energy, which has failed to provide a differentiation of emissions by type or attempt to assess even localised climate change inpacts. Further their submission dismisses emisions abatement actions as unnecessary, without even a cost/benefit assessment being carried out. The delay in assessing the IEAPM's subsidence concerns is further indication that environmental issues are being treated with contempt. 'We will dig it out first and worry about consequences later' seems to be indicative of Delta Energy's bid. The degradation of the air quality, roads and transport infrastructure caused by up to 270 trucks transporting the coal to Newcastle harbour daily is yet another impost that is to be borne by the local and rate paying community and the tax payers of NSW. Either climate change and the mechanisms put in place to require companies to seriously consider the impact of their plans on the environment is taken seriously or we are all just playing word games. I urge the Indepentent Planning Commission to reject Delta Energy's Chain Valley Colliery consolidation project and in doing so support and protect the legitimacy of proper reporting frameworks designed to defend the climate the environment and the people.

19011

New South Wales 2286

12/02/2026

Object

Website

I object to this application going ahead for the following reasons: 1.It is unacceptable that the government continues to add fuel to the fire in the face of the existential threat posed by climate change. We should be looking to decrease carbon dioxide emissions wherever possible and as soon as possible. The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. 2.• The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. 3. Delta has not provided a breakdown (differentiation) of emissions by type, meaning the Independent Planning Commission is unable to accurately assess the project against the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act. The proponent has not comprehensively assessed local climate change impacts associated with the project’s estimated emissions in line with the DAMSHEG v MACH Energy (Denman ruling) in the Court of Appeal. 4. It is unacceptable that emissions abatement actions have been dismissed by the proponent in the face of expert advice from the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining without a cost-benefit assessment having been carried out. 5. Delta has not adequately responded to community concerns expressed in submissions. Air quality, climate change and impacts to water resources were the biggest concerns raised – both from the coal mine project and from the power station.

19021

New South Wales 2251

12/02/2026

Object

Website

The proposal is not in the public interest, and its cumulative impacts would pose significant risks to the environment and human health, including contributing to climate change. The proposed project would produce more than 25 million tonnes of additional CO2-e emissions when emissions from coal burnt at Vales Point power station is accounted for. The Net Zero Commission Spotlight report on coal released in December 2025 found that continued extensions are incompatible with achieving NSW emission reduction targets. Also the biodiversity assessment does not fulfill the requirements of the environmental impact statement because it only extends to a review of past benthic and seagrass surveys undertaken in relation to the mines.

19026

New South Wales 2251

12/02/2026

Object

Website

State Environmental Planning Policy 2007 Clause 12 REQUIRES compatibility of proposed Extension with other land uses PRIOR to approval. No Compatibility = No Approval

19031