Case progress
Carousel items
-
-
Submissions open at 10am
-
Speaker registrations open at 10am
-
-
-
-
-
With DPHI for assessment of amendment
-
DPHI either approves or rejects amendment
-
Submissions reopenView notice (PDF, 157.79 KB)
-
Public hearing
-
Submissions close
-
Case outcome
Overview
Pending department consideration of amendmentMap showing the location
Documents
| Document | Date |
|---|---|
|
Referral letter redacted (PDF, 228.61 KB)
| 18.12.2025 |
|
Assessment report (PDF, 5.77 MB)
| 18.12.2025 |
|
Recommended conditions of consent (PDF, 2.17 MB)
| 18.12.2025 |
|
Ministerial request for a public hearing (PDF, 236.36 KB)
| 18.12.2025 |
| Document | Date |
|---|---|
|
Commission conflict of interest register (PDF, 136.56 KB)
| 12.01.2026 |
| Document | Date |
|---|---|
|
Guidance for communities (PDF, 2.07 MB)
| 12.01.2026 |
| 23.01.2026 | |
|
Notice regarding public submissions (PDF, 157.79 KB)
| 10.02.2026 |
| Document | Date |
|---|---|
| 23.01.2026 |
Meetings
Meeting information
Public Hearing on Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) has been postponed
Meeting documents
There are currently no documents.
Disclaimer
The Commission's Transparency Policy sets out how information related to this meeting will be made publicly available.
Public submissions
| ID | Name | Date | Submission |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25076 | Hasmukh Chand | 20/02/2026 | |
| 24366 | Name Redacted | 18/02/2026 | |
| 24391 | Name Redacted | 18/02/2026 | |
| 25131 | Zoe Wall | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25136 | Lulu Littler | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25141 | Yvonne Butterfield | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25146 | Janet Kossy | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25151 | Margaret Rice | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25156 | Sheila McInnes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25161 | Steve Rogers | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25166 | Trish FitzSimons | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25171 | Jann Dark | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25176 | Pamela French | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24721 | Robyn Godfrey | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24731 | Cathy Gill | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24446 | Murray S | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24451 | Brigid Dowsett | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24456 | Ludo McFerran AM | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24461 | Virginia Handmer | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24466 | Julie-Anne Geddes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24476 | Annee Lawrence | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24481 | Judith Christie | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24486 | Andrew McGlashan | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24491 | Anthony Amis | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24496 | Anne Reeves, OAM | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24501 | Renee Willemsen | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24506 | Anastasia Murray | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24511 | Bronwyn Couch | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24516 | Louise McFadden | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24521 | Alex Oonagh | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24526 | Trevor Jennings | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24531 | Janet Burstall | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24536 | Carole Helman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24541 | Scott Marshall | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24551 | Scott Marshall | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24556 | Donna Patterson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24561 | Diane Willman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24566 | Deborah Kuras | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24571 | Gerhard Kuras | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24576 | Tony Lewis | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24581 | Roslyn Burge | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24586 | Barbara Anderson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24591 | Catherine Millard | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24596 | Patricia Giannotto | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24601 | John Smith | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24606 | Michelle Packett | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24611 | Bryan Purcell | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24616 | Stan Buckman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24621 | Deborah Stevenson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24626 | Jennifer Fitzgerald | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24631 | Andrew Lenart | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22166 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22171 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22176 | Sandra Reed | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22181 | Suzanne Duyster | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22186 | Kate Buchanan | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22191 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22196 | Jim Cassel | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22201 | Lulu Littler | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22216 | Raman Jain | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22221 | Robert McLaughlin | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22226 | Alison farrell | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22231 | AnneMaree McLaughlin | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22236 | Cornelia Harris | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22241 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22246 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22251 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22271 | Michael Webb | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22286 | Valeska Detto | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22316 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22326 | marc kiho | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22376 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22401 | Hunter Williams | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22411 | Ashlee Todd | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22416 | Tom Nicholson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22426 | Paul Schimmel | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22446 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22466 | Louise Archer | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22486 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22491 | Catherine Lane | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22541 | Sylvia Ray | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22551 | Jenny Andrews | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22556 | Raelene Narraway | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22566 | Peter Judge | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22571 | Louise Stokes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22576 | Thomas Ebersoll | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22581 | Sandra Santacruz | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22586 | Shelley McFarlane | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22591 | Julie Hunter | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22596 | Nick King | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22601 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22606 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22611 | Jada Parsons | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22616 | Joanna de Burgh | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22626 | Bob Hill | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22636 | Jim McIlroy | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22641 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22646 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22656 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22661 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22666 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22676 | Jane Crosskill | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22691 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22701 | Bronwen Evans | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22711 | Glenda SHOULDER | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22716 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22721 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22726 | heather mclean | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22731 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22736 | Judy Cole | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22746 | Leigh Naunton | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22751 | Bernadette Hobbs | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22761 | Dave Rowe | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22766 | Sarah Daniel | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22771 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22786 | Cathy Gill | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22791 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22796 | darshil shah | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22801 | Liz Millen | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22806 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22811 | Suzanne Bessell | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22816 | Gemma Pitcher | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22821 | Mani Berghout | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22831 | Michael Smart | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22836 | Adrienne Shilling | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22846 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22866 | Paul Riccard | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22871 | Stephen Kimber | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22876 | Leila Frijat | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22881 | DUPLICATE Stephen Kimber | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22886 | Ellie Robertson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22896 | Chris Jonkers | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22901 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22911 | Gail Mensinga | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22916 | Richard and Maria Maguire | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22921 | Jan Davis | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22926 | Kate Moppett | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22931 | Rodney Scott | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22941 | Keelah Lam | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22946 | Eila Jameson-Avey | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22956 | Tracey Carpenter | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22961 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22966 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22971 | Peter Avey | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22976 | Diane O'Mara | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22986 | Erica Nash | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22996 | Peter Stuart | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23001 | Stephanie Luke | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23006 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23011 | Marysia Derewlany | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23016 | Stephen Nugent | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23021 | Bronwyn Vost | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23026 | Wendy Wales | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23031 | Gordon Kennard | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23036 | Joanne Moylan | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23041 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23046 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23051 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23056 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23066 | Diana Combe | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23071 | Kim Williams | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23076 | Margaret Sewell | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23081 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23086 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23091 | Gregory Ray | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23096 | Virginia Hollister | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23101 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23106 | Jack Simmons | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23111 | Hilary Crawford | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23116 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23121 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23126 | Angela Frimberger | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23131 | Wendy Stokoe | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23141 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23151 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23161 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23166 | Janet Lewis | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23171 | Angela Burrows | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23181 | Peter Winkler | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23186 | Helen Kveldr | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23191 | Chris Lee | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23196 | Michael Cleary | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23201 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23206 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23216 | Sanaa Shah | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23221 | Victor Batorijs | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23226 | Anka Cleary | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23231 | gary barnes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23236 | Ross Liddle | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23241 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23246 | Maddy Yerbury | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23251 | Cynthia Alexander | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23261 | David Christie | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23266 | Kyle Patterson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23271 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23276 | Kylien Hitchman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23281 | Kylien Hitchman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23286 | Thomas Kendall | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23291 | Shreya Ghosh | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23296 | Maureen Kingshott | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23301 | Kerryn HIGGS | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23306 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23311 | Martin Mansfield | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23321 | Martin Mansfield | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23326 | Lynn Benn | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23331 | Sally Neaves | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23336 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23341 | Kerry Walker | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23346 | Alexandra Barratt | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23351 | Anne PENDER | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23356 | Elaine Tan | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23361 | Lynn Benn | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23371 | Olivia Yu | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23376 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23391 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23396 | Suhailah Ali | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23401 | Barry Walsh | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23411 | Peter Whitecross | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23416 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23421 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23436 | Jane Hegarty | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23441 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23446 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23451 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23456 | Wendi Etherington | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23461 | Emmanuel Kneeshaw | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23471 | Jo-ann Holstein | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23476 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23481 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23486 | Grace Amarante | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23496 | Georgia Conechado | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23501 | Stuart Guthrie | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23506 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23516 | Virginia Pidcock | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23521 | Rhonda Daniels | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23526 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23531 | Steven Gott | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23536 | Pam Atkins | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23541 | Annabelle MacClelland | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23546 | Majid Saghafi | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23556 | Geoff Selwood | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23561 | Elizabeth O'Brien | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23566 | Rosemary Stapleton | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23571 | Daryn Poulden | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23581 | Mark Horn | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23586 | Kate Cash | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23596 | Brynn Davis-Hay | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23601 | John Clarke | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23606 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23611 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23616 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23621 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23626 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23631 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23641 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23646 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23651 | Dante Reyes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23656 | Kate Bowman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23661 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23666 | Susan Pilkington | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23671 | Mathilda Bowman | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23676 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23681 | Merinda Voigt | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23686 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23691 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23706 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23711 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23716 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23726 | Cynthia Nadai | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23731 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23736 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23741 | Claire Bettington | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23746 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23751 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23761 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23766 | Helen Kvelde | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23771 | Amelie Adkins | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23776 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23786 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23791 | Geoff Allshorn | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23796 | Katherine Kotarska | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23801 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23806 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23816 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23821 | Hayden Smith | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23826 | Mandy Gyles | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23831 | Catherine Turner | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23836 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23841 | Alannah Dair | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23846 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23851 | Sarah Fordyce | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23856 | Millie Jones | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23861 | Kristin Dawson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23871 | David Allworth | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23876 | Yvonne Ingeme | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23881 | Rhys Tranter | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23896 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23901 | sharon Kinnison | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23906 | Beau Cummins | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23911 | Catherine Ciret | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23916 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23921 | Margaret Sewell | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23926 | Cosmin Luca | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23931 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23936 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23941 | Marisa Koszta | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23946 | Uzma Rayani | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23951 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23956 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23961 | Denise Turner | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23966 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23971 | Monika Maria Doepgen | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23976 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23981 | Leila Mangos | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23986 | Michelle Griffiths | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23991 | Vivian Harris | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23996 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24001 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24006 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24011 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24021 | Adrienne Murphy | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24026 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24031 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24036 | Harry Mangos | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24041 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24046 | Chantelle Leenstra | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24051 | Benjamin Patch | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24056 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24061 | Peter Bennett | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24066 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24071 | Calum Harvey-Scholes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24076 | Helen Hudson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24081 | Jann Dark | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24086 | Hayden McLean | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24091 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24096 | Amy Blain | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24101 | Catherine Errey | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24106 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24111 | Jo Thomas | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24116 | Elizabeth Weiss | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24121 | Leonard Hobbs | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24126 | Alana W | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24131 | Howard McCallum | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24136 | Deborah Stevenson | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24141 | Carmel McCallum | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24146 | Mrs Ritu Jain | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24156 | Pamela Evans | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24161 | Ruby Hardie | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24166 | Lincoln Turner | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24171 | Nadarajah Rajkumar | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24176 | Abigail Humphreys | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24186 | Carole Stanford | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24201 | Isabella Todd | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24206 | Amie Illfield | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24216 | Edie Griffin | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24221 | Christine Tapp | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24226 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24231 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24236 | Ben Cheetham | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24241 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24246 | Reed Mladenovik | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24256 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24261 | Lucia Smith | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24266 | Jack Brady | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24271 | Kim Gambrill | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24276 | Michael Rynn | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24281 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24286 | Yuktee Gupta | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24291 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24296 | Brent Hoare | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24301 | Jamie Harrison | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24306 | Johanna Lynch | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24311 | Janne Seletto | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24316 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24321 | Carina Griffin | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24326 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24331 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24336 | John Wurcker | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24341 | Janice Haviland | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24346 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 25091 | Rex Graham | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25096 | Jepke Goudsmit | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25101 | Gloria Foxley PhD | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25106 | Wayne Lavers | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25111 | S Whare | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25116 | Patrick Li | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25121 | Cath Ireland | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25126 | Isabelle Turpin | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22356 | Louise Taylor | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22361 | Catherine Desjarlais | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22381 | Richard Stuart | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22391 | Dr Nicola Ross | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22406 | Sharon Northage | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22421 | Ruth Ferrington | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22431 | David Hufton | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22436 | Nathalie Paul | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22441 | Seo Hee Choi | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22451 | Megan Quinn | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22456 | David O'Connell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22461 | David Croft | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22471 | Judith Walker | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22476 | Camille Clinton | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22481 | Anne Ammann | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22516 | Lyndal Sullivan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22521 | Dianne Craig | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22536 | M Ryan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20231 | Simon Staines | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20381 | Talia Kinney | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20401 | steve robinson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20461 | Peter West | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20531 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20536 | Mick Daley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20541 | Meg Benson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20566 | Martine Porret | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20571 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20586 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20591 | Andrew Town | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20606 | James Crowley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20611 | Catherine Evangelista | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20616 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20621 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20626 | Tom Hunt | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20631 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20636 | Lorraine Bower | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20641 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20656 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20666 | Mara de Jongh | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20671 | Robert Skappel | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20676 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20681 | Mary Burke | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20686 | Dean Corcoran | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20691 | Wendy Kelton | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20696 | Ute Herzog-Hupfauf | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20701 | Joseph Zagari | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20706 | Nigel Howard | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20711 | Janet Murray | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20716 | Grant Norris | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20721 | Janet Mayer | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20726 | Mindy Carr | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20736 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20741 | TIM BAILEY | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20746 | Claudia Koller | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20756 | Tom Maughan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20761 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20766 | Richard Weatherley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20776 | Peter Cranston | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20781 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20786 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20801 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20811 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20816 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20821 | JOY Nason | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20826 | Damian Buck | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20831 | Brian Richter | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20836 | Rhonda Allen | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20841 | Peter Tilley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20846 | Anne Quinlivan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20851 | Dominic Case | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20856 | Helen Nugent | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20861 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20866 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20871 | Maggie Lawlor | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20876 | Mark and Lynda Bloxsome and Fletcher | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20881 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20886 | Marie Hensley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20896 | Alan Glover | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20901 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20911 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20916 | Kate Miskin | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20921 | Dr Lindsay Sharp | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20926 | Philip vincent | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20936 | Tina Wilkie-Miskin | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20941 | Matthew Washington | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20946 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20951 | Julie Kolges | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20956 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20961 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20966 | Mark & Lynda Bloxsome & Fletcher | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20976 | Yvonne Wells | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20981 | Zoe Butler | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20986 | Alexander Betcher | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20991 | John Philpott | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20996 | Nicola Hensel | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21001 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21011 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21016 | John Turier | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21021 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21026 | Maggie Pressnell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21031 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21041 | Carolyn Barlow | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21051 | Diane Westerhuis | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21056 | Gabrielle Asprey | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21061 | Jennifer Kent | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21076 | Antoinette Farrow | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21086 | Bill Jacobi | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21091 | Carolyn Barlow | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21101 | Stephen & Cheryl Russell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21106 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21111 | Amanda Berlyn | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21116 | Rob Clifton | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21121 | Kati Watson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21126 | Shaun Watson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21131 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21136 | Gillian Leahy | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21146 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21151 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21156 | Ken Sewell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21161 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21166 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21171 | george mercier | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21176 | Thomas Samuel Gledhill | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21186 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21191 | Campbell Goff | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21196 | Terry Howard | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21201 | Gisela Conechado | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21206 | Judith Ohana OAM | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21216 | Francis Breen | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21221 | Kathleen Maze-Neeley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21226 | Paul Hannah | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21231 | Theodore Reimer | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21236 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21251 | Victoria Treole | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21261 | Pascale Osanz | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21266 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21276 | Phillip Bradley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21281 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21286 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21291 | Michael Faulkner | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21296 | Barbara Briggs | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21301 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21316 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21321 | Bernadette Systa | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21326 | Janet Dawson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21331 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21336 | Gerry Nucifora | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21341 | Jennifer Duncan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21346 | Jenny Goldie | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21356 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21361 | Bron Powell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21371 | Linda Delaney | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21376 | Kaama Joy | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21381 | Kaama Joy | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21386 | Maureen Beckett | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21396 | Sammy Nazam | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21411 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21416 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21421 | Rach Mangan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21426 | GREGORY WALKER | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21436 | Rat Brodie | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21441 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21451 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21461 | Greg Beresford | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21466 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21471 | Diala Salim | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21476 | DAVID LACHLAN HUFTON | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21501 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21506 | Kimberley HORNER | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21531 | Dawn HORNER | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21546 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21556 | Penelope Stapleton | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21561 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21571 | Yatha Jain | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21576 | RICHARD M MILLER | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21581 | Elizabeth Milner | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21586 | Nina Fitzgerald | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21591 | Jennifer Abbo | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21596 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21601 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21611 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21621 | Phoebe REPETI | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21631 | Jackson McNulty | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21636 | Wendy Mitchell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21651 | Shae Salmon | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21661 | Aakanksha Wadia | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21666 | SANDRA RYAN | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21671 | Nina Rose | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21681 | Lawrence Murphy | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21686 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21691 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21696 | Lydia Fagan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21706 | Andrew Putnam | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21711 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21716 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21721 | Cynthia Harris | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21726 | Karlene Beahan | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21736 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21746 | Sarah Kensington | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21751 | Alanah Jeffries | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21756 | Rebecca Muir | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21761 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21766 | Alison Winn | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21771 | Elizabeth Day | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21776 | Megan Shooter | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21781 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21786 | Narelle Jarvis | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21791 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21796 | Frida Forsberg | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21806 | Cathy Gill | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21816 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21821 | Elizabeth Fuller | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21826 | Margaret Pickup | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21831 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21836 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21846 | Niko Leka | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21851 | Susan Lammiman | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21856 | Gretta Fuller | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21861 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21871 | Claudia Walters | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21881 | Poh Rodrigues | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21886 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21891 | Elizabeth Fuller | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21896 | Jean Osanz | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21901 | Garth Wimbush | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21906 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21911 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21921 | Peter Metcalfe | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21926 | Suzanne Taylor | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21931 | Judith Bourne | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21936 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21941 | christian Hjelte | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21946 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21951 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21961 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21966 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21971 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21976 | David Hughes | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21981 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21986 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21991 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21996 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22001 | Cate Peterson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22006 | Omid Sadeghpour | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22016 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22021 | Lucy Costas | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22026 | Ishbel Dunsmore | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22031 | Louise Appel | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22041 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22051 | Catherine Dobbie | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22056 | Sue Pridmore | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22061 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22066 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22071 | Lynette Allen | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22076 | Mora Main | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22081 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22086 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22091 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22096 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22101 | Barry Nivison-Smith | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22106 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22111 | Lai Heng Foong | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22116 | Fiona Bennett | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22121 | Melville Fernandez | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22126 | Ilona Renwick | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22131 | Rebecca Blowfield | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22136 | Neelesh Paravastu | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22141 | Maleeka Barat | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22146 | Susan Morley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22151 | John Hill | 16/02/2026 | |
| 25086 | Jacqueline Buswell | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20356 | Julie Favell | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20366 | Barbara Hickson | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20376 | Ms Bodil Conroy | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20406 | Meg Benson | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20006 | Phyllis Setchell | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20011 | Phyllis Setchell | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20016 | David Anderson | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20021 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20026 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20031 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20041 | Ann Nielsen | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20046 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20056 | Karen Payne | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20061 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20066 | Jens Svensson | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20071 | Martin Borri | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20076 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20081 | Colin Imrie | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20086 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20091 | Peter Bryant | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20096 | Elizabeth Maddox | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20101 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20106 | Ann Finegan | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20111 | Jenny Day | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20116 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20121 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20126 | Angeal Bennett | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20131 | Jackie Davis | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20136 | Margaret Vautin | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20146 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20151 | Penny McMullin | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20161 | David Schwartz | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20166 | Astrid van Blerk | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20171 | Monique Koehler | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20176 | Angel Bennett | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20186 | NICOLE LUHRS | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20191 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 25291 | Anne Kelly | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19856 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19876 | Mark Ferrington | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19896 | Angela Michaelis | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19916 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19926 | Emily Edwards | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19946 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19956 | Kay de Ridder | 14/02/2026 | |
| 25081 | Colleen Roche | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20301 | Therese Hanrahan | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20311 | Rosslyn Rix | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20321 | Michelle Cole | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20326 | Stephen Cole | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20331 | Derek Williams | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19571 | Merril Hillis | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19576 | Noni McDevitt | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19581 | Christine Carmichael | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19586 | Shirley Lewis | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19591 | Terry Morgan | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19596 | Merran Maclaren | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19671 | Marian Lorrison | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19686 | Ann-Maree McEwan | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19691 | Margaret Key | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19706 | Sharyn Munro | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19766 | Lyn Bevington | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19796 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19801 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19806 | Derek Williams | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19831 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 20286 | Jeanette Hunter | 12/02/2026 | |
| 20291 | Dr Roy Tasker | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19096 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19261 | Graeme Tychsen | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19266 | Graeme Tychsen | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19286 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19326 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19331 | Anne McKenzie | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19376 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19401 | Billie Ayling | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19411 | Simon Salter | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19416 | Warren Adams | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19421 | Daniel Rooney | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19426 | Jocelyn Williams | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19431 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19436 | Laurie Strathdee | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19441 | Nat Cheney | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19446 | Cath Jackson | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19451 | Judith Finch | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19456 | Mary Waterford | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19466 | Yelena Bide | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19471 | Susan Ambler | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19476 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19481 | Lesley Sammon | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19486 | Patrick Vu | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19491 | Warren Adams | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19526 | Kerry Cooke | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19551 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19176 | Margaret L Hagan | 11/02/2026 | |
| 19191 | Rosalind Vaughan | 11/02/2026 | |
| 19196 | Gay Curtis | 11/02/2026 | |
| 19211 | Mia Floyd | 11/02/2026 | |
| 19231 | Dr Sorcha Cotter | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18766 | Diane Rooney | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18916 | Judy Lambert | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18946 | Linda Apps | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18951 | Stephanie Owen | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18966 | Anthea Nicholls | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18976 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18876 | Carol Kerstholt | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18881 | Regina Schien | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18886 | Councillor Jess Miller | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18891 | Allison Griffiths | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18901 | Jonathan Skinner | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18166 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18246 | Steve Wilson | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18426 | Peter Gyulay | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18436 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18491 | Katherine Allan | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18536 | Derek Bolton | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18696 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18701 | Madeline Hourihan | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18711 | MARK SEEMANPILLAI | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18716 | Tim Luckett | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18721 | Christina Hofmann | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18726 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18821 | Jeneane Wright | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18826 | Sue Tolley | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18831 | Megan Benson | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17641 | Ian McKinlay | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17646 | Karlene Beahan | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17681 | Jean Ellis | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17691 | Luke Mesterovic | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17701 | Peter Duggan | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17731 | Margaret MCDONALD | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17751 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17761 | Rebecca Reynolds | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17921 | Don White | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17986 | JIll Green | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18816 | Justine Cogan | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17451 | Rhonda Green | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17506 | Alan Tarlinton | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17526 | Marie Woolnough | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17556 | David Martin | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17576 | Dorothy Luther | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17246 | Name Redacted | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17341 | Valerie Kost | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17381 | Barry Hadaway | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17401 | Rachel Yerbury | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17426 | Name Redacted | 07/02/2026 | |
| 19166 | Mary Forbes | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16571 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16576 | PIPI QUINLAN | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16776 | Charlotte McCabe | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16826 | Penny Auburn | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16831 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17146 | Megan Hyatt | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17156 | Allan EVANS | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17161 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17171 | Niamh Murray | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17186 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16786 | Stacy Wake | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16796 | Scott Shade | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16801 | Jeanette and John Hammett | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16806 | Mick Boller | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16811 | Peter Coughlan | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16816 | Tony Caine | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16821 | Fiona Lee | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16836 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16841 | Grace Webster | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16096 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16126 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16186 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16216 | Sally Stockbridge | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16286 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16311 | Penny Davies | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16316 | Dr Eric van Beurden | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16326 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16336 | Susie Russell | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16351 | Stephanie Carrick | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16371 | Danny Briggs | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16396 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16401 | Melissa Barrass | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16421 | Kelli Tangney | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16426 | Julie & Desmond Croasdale | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16431 | Susan Dwyer | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16436 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16441 | Mathilda Freiheit | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16446 | Judy Rees | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16456 | Nicolas Sprauel | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16466 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16476 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16481 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16781 | Graeme Batterbury | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14921 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14961 | Louise Archer | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14966 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14971 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14976 | Nerissa Dowling | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14981 | Simon Wright | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14996 | Linda CHAPMAN | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15066 | Thea Ormerod | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15161 | Rupert Macgregor | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15181 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15221 | Virginia Woods | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15231 | John Dyer | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15251 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15336 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15396 | Clare O’Brien | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15666 | Leyla Barry | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15696 | Asuman Barry | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15841 | Aylin Barry | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15851 | Susan Whelan | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15856 | Julie Castles | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14686 | Pauline Dunne | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14691 | Anthony Lonergan | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14716 | rick mcgregor | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14746 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14806 | Rosie White | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14681 | Dr. Anthony Hull | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14266 | Cathy Stuart | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14296 | Kath Leahy | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14346 | Frances Steele, PhD | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14366 | Justine Dodd | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14396 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14451 | Ruth O'Reilly | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14491 | Ian Clarke | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14676 | Dianne Turner | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14121 | Reily Cubb | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14131 | Virginia Congdon | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14181 | Marian Haire | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14186 | Lani Imhof | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14201 | Ingrid Ralph | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14671 | Chris Doyle | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13951 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13956 | Gwenaelle Levasseur | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13996 | Lesley Clarke | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14001 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14011 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14021 | Grace Harrison | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14026 | Robin Murray | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14031 | Josie McElvogue | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14036 | Isadora Poole | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14046 | Justin Lund | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14056 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14061 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14356 | Warren Birkinshaw | 30/01/2026 | |
| 14361 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13626 | Sol Warburton Hughes | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13641 | Graeme Stuart | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13661 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13711 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13796 | Linda Thomas | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13821 | Julia Mitchell | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13861 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13871 | Liz Smith | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13881 | Ross Brown | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13891 | Jennifer Martin | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13896 | Joanne Bell | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13911 | Warren Birkinshaw | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13836 | Tori Bail | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13841 | Brian Stevens | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13846 | george mercier | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13851 | Marilyn Perkins | 29/01/2026 | |
| 12731 | Renee Hall | 29/01/2026 | |
| 12736 | Marion Giles | 29/01/2026 | |
| 12926 | Elizabeth Honey | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13011 | Megan Benson | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13306 | Julia Lee | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13386 | David Rowe | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13406 | Joanna Bowan | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13411 | Mark Marusic | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13486 | Dominique Jacobs | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13516 | Stephanie Luke | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13521 | Name Redacted | 29/01/2026 | |
| 13526 | Name Redacted | 29/01/2026 | |
| 12706 | Elizabeth Newell | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12711 | Donna Ross | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12721 | Angelika Treichler | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12726 | Andrew Zdenkowski | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12091 | Christine Clarke | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12166 | Gail Mensinga | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12321 | Name Redacted | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12366 | Sue Outram | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12401 | Alan Newbery | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12406 | Horst Thiele | 28/01/2026 | |
| 12061 | Anne Welch | 27/01/2026 | |
| 12066 | Philip Hammial | 27/01/2026 | |
| 12081 | Lee Amber | 27/01/2026 | |
| 12671 | Bev Atkinson | 26/01/2026 | |
| 12676 | Roderick John Lee | 26/01/2026 | |
| 12006 | J N Cuthbertson | 26/01/2026 | |
| 12651 | Gregory Peters | 25/01/2026 | |
| 12656 | Matt Moran | 25/01/2026 | |
| 12661 | Jeanette Dib | 25/01/2026 | |
| 12666 | Sharon Powell | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11871 | Warren Lloyd | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11876 | Anne Hodgson | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11881 | Dr Nerida Riley | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11941 | jepke goudsmit | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11946 | Name Redacted | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11956 | Name Redacted | 25/01/2026 | |
| 11406 | Name Redacted | 24/01/2026 | |
| 11591 | Sandra Reed | 24/01/2026 | |
| 11736 | Karen Taylor | 24/01/2026 | |
| 12621 | Sally Wilson | 23/01/2026 | |
| 12626 | Christine Moloney | 23/01/2026 | |
| 12636 | Victoria lewis | 23/01/2026 | |
| 12641 | Tony Edye | 23/01/2026 | |
| 11346 | Susan Barling | 23/01/2026 | |
| 11351 | Anna Mackiewicz | 23/01/2026 | |
| 11371 | Melissa Gray | 23/01/2026 | |
| 11381 | Janet Thompson | 23/01/2026 | |
| 12606 | Joy Nason | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11221 | Sandra Thompson | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11226 | Name Redacted | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11256 | Chris Ross | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11261 | Lindsay Keay | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11266 | Colin Burman | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11271 | Allan Medway | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11281 | Stephen Pfeiffer | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11286 | Jonathan Milford | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11321 | Steve Bruce | 22/01/2026 | |
| 11326 | Jonathon Dykyj | 22/01/2026 | |
| 13831 | Alison Hill | 21/01/2026 | |
| 12601 | Georgette Allen | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11116 | CRAIG SHAW | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11131 | Kirsty Fuller | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11136 | Alex Johnston | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11141 | Name Redacted | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11176 | Melissa Gray | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11186 | Sharon Tinant | 21/01/2026 | |
| 11051 | Name Redacted | 20/01/2026 | |
| 11056 | Jessica Keast | 20/01/2026 | |
| 11081 | Name Redacted | 20/01/2026 | |
| 11101 | Carolyn Martin | 20/01/2026 | |
| 11171 | Richard Smith | 19/01/2026 | |
| 10986 | Maree Holton | 19/01/2026 | |
| 10991 | Naomi Hodgson | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11001 | Name Redacted | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11006 | Name Redacted | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11011 | Jim Geddes | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11026 | Name Redacted | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11031 | Nicole Cooney | 19/01/2026 | |
| 11041 | Ross Brown | 19/01/2026 | |
| 10816 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10831 | Chloe Hyde | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10836 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10841 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10846 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10851 | Rachel Arthur | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10856 | Winston Liu | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10861 | AJ Gough | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10866 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10871 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10876 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10881 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10891 | Avani Bhojwani | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10896 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10901 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10906 | Kate Moffatt | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10911 | Mary Pilkinton | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10916 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10926 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10936 | Cliff Harris | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10941 | Colleen Wysser - Martin | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10946 | Tobias Walsh | 18/01/2026 | |
| 10951 | Name Redacted | 18/01/2026 | |
| 11156 | Roderick Weir Anderson | 17/01/2026 | |
| 11161 | Anna Harpley | 17/01/2026 | |
| 11166 | Anna Lorcan | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10711 | Rick Kilpatrick | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10786 | Sarah Brennan | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10791 | Timothy Carroll | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10796 | Marita Macrae | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10801 | Dan Vickers | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10806 | Name Redacted | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10811 | Jodie Hanson | 17/01/2026 | |
| 13826 | Ruth Bacchus | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10641 | Sophia Platthy | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10646 | Elizabeth Chase | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10651 | Name Redacted | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10656 | Name Redacted | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10666 | Craig Shaw | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10671 | Margaret MCDONALD | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10676 | Name Redacted | 16/01/2026 | |
| 10536 | Jennifer Valentine | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10551 | Name Redacted | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10556 | Fiona Sim | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10561 | Fiona Sim | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10566 | Name Redacted | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10591 | Ros Treloar | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10596 | Pierre Louys | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10601 | Rod Anderson | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10606 | Ben Rumble | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10611 | Kim Zegenhagen | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10616 | Name Redacted | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10621 | Mina Bui Jones | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10626 | Marie Belcredi | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10631 | Tibor Kovats | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10636 | ernest newman | 15/01/2026 | |
| 10321 | Maureen Harper | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10326 | Bradley Bliss | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10331 | Clive Woodworth | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10346 | sally Novak | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10351 | Name Redacted | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10356 | Dianne Thompson | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10386 | Jijo George | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10401 | Michelle Rice | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10406 | Brigid Prain | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10411 | Dorothée Heibel | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10416 | Name Redacted | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10456 | Alan Pursch | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10471 | Martin Scurrah | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10531 | Name Redacted | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10371 | Yvonne Lollback | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10376 | Rob Wildman | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10381 | Jeffrey Hamilton | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10391 | Joanne Stevenson | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10396 | Yvonne Fessler | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10156 | Peter Enge | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10166 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10171 | Craig Ling | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10181 | Martin Smith | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10186 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10191 | Rebecca Reynolds | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10201 | May May | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10211 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10221 | Christina Smith | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10226 | Don White | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10231 | Alex Mateer | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10236 | Quentin Dresser | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10241 | Allen Shrimpton | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10246 | Chris Ross | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10251 | Richard Holz | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10266 | Helen Evans | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10281 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10286 | CD ROBERTSON | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10291 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10301 | Name Redacted | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10361 | Andrena Gorman | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10366 | Chris Hughes | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9946 | Sylvia Cooper | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9951 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9956 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9961 | Felicity Davis | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9966 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9971 | Jane Morgan | 12/01/2026 | |
| 9976 | Kym Kilpatrick | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10011 | Douglas Williamson | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10016 | Rishab Nandagopal | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10021 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10031 | Jorj Lowrey | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10036 | david platt | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10041 | Kathy Sheehan | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10046 | Ruth O'Reilly | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10051 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10061 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10066 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10071 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10081 | Megan James | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10086 | Allan Medway | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10091 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10096 | David Bray | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10101 | Sylvie Constantine | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10106 | Michael Streatfeild | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10111 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 | |
| 10121 | Name Redacted | 12/01/2026 |
Hasmukh Chand
|
ID |
25076 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Action Network Australia |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
20/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear NSW Independent Planning Commission, Please find attached Climate Action Network Australia's late submission to the above inquiry. Please accept our sincerest apologies for the lateness of this submission. We were awaiting internal sign off. This submission can be published online and we would urge this to be considered as the project is of vital importance to the organisation. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. |
|
Attachments |
25076 - Hasmukh Chand.pdf (PDF, 172.9 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Objection to the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project To the Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales, I am writing to formally lodge my objection to the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) coal mine expansion. As a member of the broader New South Wales community, I believe this project is fundamentally inconsistent with the public interest and the state’s legislated environmental, health, and climate obligations. Inconsistency with NSW Climate Legislation The proposed expansion directly undermines the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, which enshrines the state's emissions reduction targets in law. Legislated Targets: This Act mandates a 50% reduction in emissions by 2030 and 70% by 2035. Approving an expansion that locks in 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions (99% of which are Scope 3) places an unfair burden on other sectors of the NSW economy to accelerate their decarbonisation. Federal 2035 NDC: Furthermore, this project contradicts Australia’s 2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), which targets a 62–70% reduction. As open-cut coal mining is a major source of fugitive methane, this project specifically threatens Australia's commitment to the Global Methane Pledge. Duty of Care and Intergenerational Equity I urge the Commission to apply the principle of intergenerational equity as recognised in the landmark July 2025 Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). International Precedent: This ruling, championed by a student-led organisation from the Pacific Islands, confirmed that states have a legal obligation to prevent climate harm to protect the human rights of future generations. Moral Accountability: Approving a coal expansion in 2026, when the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is already set to provide 2,000 new regional jobs, constitutes a failure of our duty of care to the youth of New South Wales. Human Health and Social Impacts Under the EP&A Act 1979, the Commission must consider the social impacts on the community, which includes public health. Air Quality and Particulate Matter: The expansion of open-cut mining increases the cumulative load of PM2.5 and PM10 dust particles in the region. Chronic exposure to coal dust is a documented risk factor for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. The proximity of this mine to local communities raises significant concerns regarding long-term health outcomes. Mental Health and Solastalgia: The ongoing destruction of the local landscape and the loss of cultural heritage sites contribute to 'solastalgia' - the lived experience of negative environmental change. For the Wiradjuri People and local residents, the permanent fracturing of Country represents a significant psychological and social cost that has not been adequately mitigated. Destruction of Critical Biodiversity The proposal to clear 480 hectares of native vegetation is a substantial loss that cannot be recovered. Threatened Species: The destruction of 113 hectares of documented koala breeding habitat and 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat is unacceptable. Biodiversity offsets are an insufficient mitigation strategy for the loss of these established, high-value ecosystems. Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: Mining within 100 metres of the reserve boundary exposes sensitive wildlife to noise, dust, and blasting. A 500-metre buffer zone should be a non-negotiable requirement. Water Security and Groundwater Risks The predicted 2–6 metre groundwater drawdown poses a severe risk to Moolarben Creek, an essential drought refuge. Yancoal’s proposal to defer comprehensive monitoring until after approval is an inadequate safeguard. Under the EP&A Act 1979, the Commission must promote the "proper management and conservation of resources." Allowing potential irreversible damage to groundwater without rigorous baseline data fails this legislative objective. Procedural Integrity and Late Amendments The recent amendments introduced by Yancoal do not reduce the mine's clearing footprint. Proposing 'habitat enhancement' elsewhere is a tactical move that disrupts the transparency of the community consultation process. I request that the Commission reject these amendments and evaluate the project based on its significant direct environmental impacts. Conclusion For the reasons stated above (specifically the irreversible loss of biodiversity, the risks to human health, and the clear conflict with state and federal climate target) I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse this application. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned that if this coal mine is extended, the continued detrimental impact on the environment and local biodiversity demonstrates the NSW Government is not actually committed to transitioning to a renewable energy sector and remains stagnated in the energy sector. To continue mining rather than actively transitioning to renewable technologies signals the NSW Government does not value the renewable sectors as it does the coal industry, that the NSW Government does not value or plan to actually achieve the committed and legislated target to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. There are plentiful evidence and research of the impacts of mining and coal powered electrical generation, why and how, in the face of the evidence is this application deemed appropriate to even consider? How does this expansion fit into the NSW Government's Coal Innovation Program to reduce emissions from the mining and use of coal that was promised in the Net Zero Plan? |
|
Attachments |
net-zero-plan-2020-2030-200057.pdf (PDF, 6.59 MB) |
Zoe Wall
|
ID |
25131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I email as I am gravely concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Climate change has resulted, for example, in more frequent and sudden flooding of the Ourimbah Creek catchment area on the Central Coast (thus damaging/eroding). This in turn damages Platypus habitat for instance. I thus write to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause irreversible Environmental harm, affecting climate and my community, and should not be approved. This unique biodiverse area would best be added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and, actually be protected not exploited. My reasons are :- Threatened species and habitat loss due to clearing of 113+ hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining (blasting etc) proposed in extremely close proximity of 100 metres of the reserve. Water / Groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown risking Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems; these are critical drought fauna refuges. Climate impacts - an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the fact NSW will not meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. No clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining around Mudgee, where renewable energy development is the priority. Overall, our NSW Government cannot afford to approve expanding coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Therefore, I seek the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your consideration. Yours Sincerely, Zoe Wall |
Lulu Littler
|
ID |
25136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
yaama Please see attached my submission and confirm received by receipt. Regards Lulu Littler |
|
Attachments |
Sovereign Objection to Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine expansion on Wiradjuri Country– Country, Law and Cultural Survival.pdf (PDF, 65.45 KB) |
Yvonne Butterfield
|
ID |
25141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern I am an almost-ninety retired high school teacher. I come from a long family line of environmentalists, before there was such a word for their love of the land and all its wonderful fauna and flora. I strongly object to the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal complex oc3. As an environmentalist myself, I am funding replanting of degraded rainforests and wildlife protection initiatives. This project would destroy valuable habitat of threatened species, further pollute the area, and adversely impact the local community. What benefits would this project bring to either the area or the country? Its sole aim is to enrich the associated company at a time when Australia is not meeting its climate targets As a world traveller I have stood on retreating glaciers, breathed polluted air in Beijing, walked in the dust of Africa, and endured colossal dust storms in the Riverina and outback NSW. I have seen first-hand what the burning fossil fuel is doing to our planet. This project will not benefit the warming planet. It will certainly not benefit the next generation which will be facing more extreme weather and life-limiting diseases. Australia must do more to help the planet and its people, starting by refusing to extend thermal coal projects and concentrate on renewable energy. I am a city-dweller, but my heart is in the country which my ancestors have farmed for nearly 200 years. Yvonne Butterfield |
Janet Kossy
|
ID |
25146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners Yancoal has made an unprecedented move to have the Independent Planning Commission hearing postponed and to interrupt the community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion, by making more minor amendments to its proposal. The Department of Planning now needs to decide whether to accept or reject this amendment. In my view the amendment should be rejected and the public hearing should not have been postponed in the first place. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. It’s a farcical attempt at greenwashing a very damaging project and the change at this stage makes a mockery of community consultation processes. The amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. This valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. WE MUST STOP WRECKING THE CLIMATE! Janet Kossy |
Margaret Rice
|
ID |
25151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Margaret Rice. I am a 66 year old resident of North Sydney and I am very concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate impacts that all coal mining imposes, collectively. It is irresponsible in this age and at this time for NSW to approve a new one, especially when we are attempting to lower emissions to reach Net Zero by 2050. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. Thank you, Margaret Rice |
Sheila McInnes
|
ID |
25156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Yancoal’s Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion should not be given approval. My name is Sheila McInnes, retired and very 'senior' at 86 years old. However, I hope you will consider my submission as I have several points I feel are extremely important. 1. We, in NSW and Australia, committed to reducing our carbon footprint in the hope of ameliorating climate change and reducing environmental habitat destruction. Despite assurances from Yancoal, their remedies on this project are totally ineffectual. 2. NSW is already off-track for meeting our commitments. NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. 3. An expanded mine footprint involves clearing habitat that is essential for native species to survive. These habitats can not be 'moved' elsewhere. Off-site 'habitat enhancement' are weasel words - there is no re-habilitation that can be undertaken to renew destroyed areas within a reasonable time-frame. AND no money to complete attempts for rehabilitation. 4. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is adjacent to the proposed expansion - this area should be expanded - not crowded out. 5. The Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is encouraging renewable energy projects which will provide employment for workers losing jobs at the coal-mine. That means there is no public benefit from creating local jobs. Habitat destruction for no advantage. 6. Groundwater draw-down. This is such an important part of my submission. I was a flower-farmer and a reliable source of water was essential. If a neighbour starts using groundwater in an unsustainable way it affects the whole neighbourhood. The world, I understand, is using more water now than the amount that falls as rain. Totally unsustainable. I hope you will please consider the points above and decide against the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion. Yours, Sheila McInnes |
Steve Rogers
|
ID |
25161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find attached my objection to the proposed mine extension. Steve Rogers |
|
Attachments |
25161 - Steve Rogers_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 62.67 KB) |
Trish FitzSimons
|
ID |
25166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I have known the beautiful land around Mudgee for nearly 50 years. I was last there in 2016 and was shocked by how the coal mine then operating between Mudgee and Cassilis was despoiling the landscape. Coal has taken millions of years to be formed in swamps and wetlands. It is a travesty to destroy some of Australia's finest arable land to mine coal for export, when right now what the world needs is to transition away from coal. This is an issue that impacts on the way that I vote Sincerely Trish FitzSimons |
Jann Dark
|
ID |
25171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission re the proposed Yancoal Moolarben Open Cut Coal expansion. Dear Sir/Madam, I am a resident of Northern Sydney and a member of the Lane Cove Bushland and Conservation Society and previously the Lane Cove Coal and Gas Watch. I am very concerned about global warming and despair every time I see a proposal for more thermal coal mines and expansions of coal mines. For this reason I am writing to you to express my opposition to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are all affected by coal mining and the greenhouse gasses emitted by burning coal, no matter where we live. I suffer during heat waves in Sydney, my energy bills grow, my cost of living rises as food becomes more expensive due to the pressure extreme weather events put on farming. My mental health also worsens as I see governments continue to ignore the science and allow coal mining to continue, and I see here and around the world, people suffering from climate related disasters and environments destroyed. Every time a new or expansion of a coal mine is approved we delay transition to safer cleaner renewable energy, both here and overseas. Too many people in Australia and around the world are suffering, and dying, from the impacts of global warming. Estimations are that this expansion will add 64 tons of climate pollution into the atmosphere. NSW and Australia, have no hope of achieving climate targets at this rate. Too much land in the Hunter Valley and surrounds has been destroyed for coal mining. This mine expansion endangers 113 hectares of Koala habitat as well as Regent Honeyeater and the micro bats that live in the area. Indigenous cultural heritage is also at risk, as well as ecosystems and water sources and the beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Mudgee is situated within a growing renewable energy zone that promises to provide around 2,000 jobs. Any jobs claims made by Yancoal cannot be taken seriously. Sales forecasts for coal show falling demand. According to The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, "renewable energy has overtaken coal in global electricity generation for the first time in history …” Future jobs in coal look risky and what is the point of destroying land, habitat and water resources, and polluting the planet for an industry that faces serious downsize risks. For the sake of future generations, and present Australians, who are routinely on the frontline of climate disasters, please do not approve this coal mine extension. Kind regards, Jann Dark |
Pamela French
|
ID |
25176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Commission Secretariat With respect, I am submitting my objection to the extension to the Moolarben Open Cut Mine3 Hearing as a representative of a community group - Transition Towns Maroondah. I understand that Yancoal is currently seeking state and federal approval for a proposed expansion of the mine, Moolarben OC3, which would extract an additional 40 million tonnes of thermal coal until 2034 I submit that the proposed extension Project by Yancoal is but a ploy to interrupt the Independent Planning Commission Hearing. ... Not an uncommon idea from large companies. I submit that the proposed amendments do not address the risks to the - *55 Wiradjui cultural sites, *Waterways, *the BoxGum Woodland, *the 23 threatened wildlife species - especially the habitat of the very special endangered koalas. When species are endangered it behoves the whole society of the time to take all care, take no risks and act responsibly. It would be impossible for the designated area of !00 metres from the critical habitat not to destroy it. This is not a time to play with the unpredictable and changing environment by extracting 40 million tonnes of thermal coal until 2034. Pamela French, [redacted] I understand that Yancoal is currently seeking state and federal approval for a proposed expansion of the mine, Moolarben OC3, which would extract an additional 40 million tonnes of thermal coal until 2034 |
Robyn Godfrey
|
ID |
24721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
SUBMISSION AGAINST THE EXPANSION OF THE.pdf |
|
Attachments |
SUBMISSION AGAINST THE EXPANSION OF THE_0.pdf (PDF, 62.48 KB) |
Cathy Gill
|
ID |
24731 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Sydney Knitting Nannas |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please see attached PDF submission on behalf of the organisation, the Sydney Knitting Nannas. I sent one through the portal on 16.2.26 but I think maybe the document attachment failed as I did not receive a reply. Please add the attached submission, which objects to the approval of Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD33083358. Thanking you, Cathy Gill, on behalf of the Sydney Knitting Nannas |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben submission.pdf (PDF, 79.95 KB) |
Murray S
|
ID |
24446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
See attached |
|
Attachments |
24446 - Murray S.pdf (PDF, 429.81 KB) |
Brigid Dowsett
|
ID |
24451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2111 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To: Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project SSD 33083358 I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s existing Moolarben OC3 thermal coalmine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As there was a late request from Yancoal for further amendments which has disrupted the community consultation process, extra time has been given to submit objections to the proposal. Due to this request, the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) indicated they will wait for an amendment report from Yancoal before they decide whether to accept or reject a revision. The DPHI advised that the Independent Planning Commission postpone the public hearing which was initially scheduled for 10 February while it reviews Yancoal’s requested proposed amendments which, if accepted, would require a revised development application. The Mudgee District Environment Group views this last-minute action by Yancoal as an unprecedented interference with the community consultation process through the IPC. They state that “Yancoal’s proposed changes will not reduce the size or impact of the mine, but merely make promises to ‘enhance’ areas of vegetation outside of the mine footprint - the full 480 hectares of native vegetation planned for clearing will still be cleared”. I would agree that the minimal changes being proposed by Yancoal will in fact do nothing to mitigate the mine’s impacts, assist in protecting the existing biodiversity or prevent the destruction of the extremely critical habitat for native wildlife such as the currently flourishing koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. The planned 480 ha of native vegetation will still be cleared up to 100 metres of the boundary of the highly valued Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area in addition to the critical habitat providing for their survival. The site of the proposed coal expansion must remain intact and be fully protected and integrated into a single conservation landscape combined within the boundaries of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to protect this beautiful valley with its irreplaceable bushland and environmental values. I can see no sense in irreversibly disturbing this significant landscape, thereby placing a precious ecosystem drastically at risk through this proposed unjustifiable project with all its disbenefits. Moorlaben is already the largest producing coal mine in NSW. The expansion would create no new jobs locally as up to 2000 jobs are planned to come from regional renewable energy projects. But going ahead with this detrimental expansion will create even more negative health, social and local community impacts, harm cultural heritage, threaten water and groundwater sources, permanently destroy essential biodiversity and dangerously increase our climate risk. The NSW government’s own Net Zero Commission report confirmed that mine expansions like Moolarben will prevent NSW from reaching our 2030 & 2035 climate targets. The currently permitted extent of mining already potentially provides coal processing for Yancoal’s mine until 2038 - despite the fact that the NSW Government has adopted a policy framework that acknowledges a gradual phase-out of thermal coal mining and is actively planning for the transition of coal-dependent regions. Thus it seems extraordinary that we could be about to approve yet another polluting fossil fuel proposal, whether it be for a new project or an expansion of an existing one. We must respect nature and ensure we conserve our precious biodiversity into the future. Achieving the goals of ecological sustainability must be paramount and the means seen to be clearly embedded into our planning systems to guide decisions on all land use and development. I fully support the community’s request that the Department of Planning rejects Yancoal’s late proposed amendment and continues with the community consultation process that was already underway. I also urge the IPC to recommend that this major expansion to an already damaging coal mining project is refused. Thank you for receiving my submission. I had some issues using the IPC website. Brigid Dowsett |
Ludo McFerran AM
|
ID |
24456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Ludo (Catherine) McFerran AM. I care for one hundred acres on the far south coast of NSW near Bermagui. This country has been badly affected by the impact of European settlement: the river is clogged with sediment from clear-fell logging, the native bush is overgrown with invasive weeds and bushfires have visibly reduced birdlife and other diversity. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I know that you will have received many submissions outlining the harm this project will cause. So I want to add a very personal note of disbelief that a Labor Government is even considering new and expanding coal projects. Every day I work in the Conservation Area on this property to protect native habitat. The NSW Biodiversity Trust assists with a grant to help with bush regeneration. Why with one hand is tax payer money being used to protect habitat while destroying it with another? For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Virginia Handmer
|
ID |
24461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find my submission below. If you have any trouble opening please let me know. Virginia Handmer |
|
Attachments |
24461 - Virginia Handmer.pdf (PDF, 38.63 KB) |
Julie-Anne Geddes
|
ID |
24466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I wish to object to the Moorlarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension, Project Number SSD-33083358. I object because the valley needs to be conserved, not converted into an even larger open-cut coal mine that would encroach very close to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I object because 480 hectares of native vegetation will be cleared. I object because this habitat is needed to keep alive and thriving 23 threatened wildlife species, including Koalas, Large-eared Pied Bats, Eastern Cave Bats and Regent Honeyeaters, and will also clear the endangered Box Gum Woodland. The Bats use the sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and the mine expansion will be 100 metres from their habitat. They will have to contend with noise and light pollution; they are a threatened species. I object because Moorlarben's water drawdown will discharge into the Goulburn River, which will also negatively impact vegetation and the environment. I object because the Aboriginal sites and the cultural heritage in the area will be harmed. I object because coal mine expansions are inconsistent with having a safe climate. Can you guarantee that there will be no harmful emissions into the atmosphere? I have been told that according to the Net Zero Commission, expansions are inconsistent with the NSW law - the NSW Climate Change Act. Is this true? If this is true, why is Moorlarben allowed to expand? The project will produce an estimated 64.6 Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to 58% of NSW's annual emissions from all sources. The Net Zero Commission has stated that such emissions are inconsistent with NSW climate change targets and the Paris temperature goals. I also object because of the contribution that coal mine expansion and their emissions have to the climate crisis the world is experiencing, and because of what this does to the mental health of people. As a psychologist, I see people who are anxious, depressed and feeling powerless about the ignoring of global warming on our planet due to increasing emissions. This project should NOT be approved. Kind Regards, Julie-Anne Julie-Anne Geddes (she/they) |
Annee Lawrence
|
ID |
24476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To: NSW Independent Planning Commission Please see below my objection to the proposal by the Yancoal mining company to expand their existing mine into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve by: 1. clearing 480 hectares of native vegetation 2. mining right up to 100m of the Reserve. Yancoal's mine expansion project should not be approved because: 1. It contravenes the express advice of the NSW Net Zero Commission's Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions in the State are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets for a safe climate. 2. It would destroy critical habitat for koalas and have significant detrimental impacts on biodiversity including on other plant and animal wildlife in the Box Gum Woodland, and in the sandstone cliffs in the vicinity. 3. It would impact water drawdown (by up to 5m) in the Moolarben Creek. 4. It would destroy 55 Indigenous cultural projects. The coalmine is one of three in the area (Yancoal, Ulan and Wilpinjong) that are proposing to expand, despite it being clear that all coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act for NSW to meet its emissions reduction targets, and inconsistent with the Paris Agreement's temperature goals. NSW is already not on track to achieve its 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets; and this expansion, if approved, would produce an estimated 64.4Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions -- equal to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. I understand that Yancoal will argue that the mine's expansion will bring jobs to the region. I find that argument dubious. This expansion is about profits, not jobs, and Mudgee already has more than 2000 jobs in the pipeline over the next decade as part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. What matters most? What matters most is that we do NO HARM to the land, soil, existing habitat, the climate, or precious future populations of koala, and other threatened wildlife and vegetation in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Save the koala habitat. Save the Box Gum Woodland Ecosystem & protect its biodiversity. Stop the increase in climate emissions. Stop the negative impacts on water in and around the Moolarben Creek. Yancoal's proposed Moolarben Coal mine expansion should NOT be approved. Yours sincerely -- Annee Lawrence |
Judith Christie
|
ID |
24481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the extension of the Moolarben coal OC3 project. I knew this country before it was an open cut mine. It was my back road to my family home where I could stop for picnics and birdwatching. No longer. To expand mining to the very boundaries of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is unacceptable. This further harm to threatened species and ecosystems cannot be offset. Biodiversity loss is a loss for everyone. Please do not approve this extension Yours faithfully, Judith Christie |
Andrew McGlashan
|
ID |
24486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3793 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Andrew's my name; I'm a resident of Monbulk, Victoria, and an advocate for our environment. I wish to state my objection to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this expansion would cause irreversible harm to the environment, would contribute to global warming, and would place at risk Wiradjuri cultural heritage and community. For these reasons it ought not be approved. The rich biodiversity of this land should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and protected, whilst Indigenous cultural artefacts and sacred sites must be preserved for all time. Regarding Yancoal's amendments to the proposal; these do not scale back the clearing of native vegetation or the injury to Wiradjuri culture, are too late to be considered, and the proposal overall still risks severe impacts to biodiversity and Indigenous heritage. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Andrew Charles McGlashan |
Anthony Amis
|
ID |
24491 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Land Use Researcher Friends of the Earth Australia |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am writing on behalf of Friends of the Earth Australia. We object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Mining Extension near Mudgee. Project Number SSD-33083358 We object to the expansion due to the high likelihood of severe impacts on koalas in the area. We understand that almost 500 hectares of native vegetation, including endangered Box Gum Woodland. Koala habitat will be destroyed for this mine expansion. Another 23 threatened species have also been recorded at and near the proposed site. Impacts on wildlife include the Large-eared Pied Bat, Regent Honeyeater and Eastern Cave Bat The mine will also contribute to global heating through the mining, transport and burning of coal. It will also impact and destroy Aboriginal heritage sites as well as use vast quantities of water. It is beyond comprehension that the NSW Government would support a 19th century form of resource extraction in the 21st century. Yours sincerely Anthony Amis - Land Use Researcher Friends of the Earth Australia |
Anne Reeves, OAM
|
ID |
24496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL MINE EXPANSION Thank you for receiving submissions: please consider my comments as below:- I am opposed to the Moolarben 0C3 coal mine expansion because: 1 it will result in the release of additional climate changing emissions from currently buried fossil fuel beds; 2 the operation will destroy the integrity of the existing onsite landscape and irreversibly damage nearby lands including important remaining natural habitat in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the wildlife it sustains. UN Secretary General Anthony Gueterres has stated “Climate action is not optional. It's an imperative.” It would be irresponsible to approve further mobilisation of fossil fuels that exacerbate climate warming. Given the increasingly fraught global warming situation and the consequences for life into the future, it is imperative to think globally while acting locally. A Sydney based resident, I have visited the Munghorm Gap area many times, and have previously written to oppose the impact of coal mining activities in the area. I am happy for my submission but not my contact details to be made public. Anne Reeves, OAM. |
Renee Willemsen
|
ID |
24501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/ madam Please find attached my Submission re: Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Protecting native wildlife, particularly our native koalas should be a national and NSW state priority. Kind regards Ms Renee Willemsen |
|
Attachments |
Renee Willemsen - Submission rejecting Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project (SSD-33083358)_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 287.03 KB) |
Anastasia Murray
|
ID |
24506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Kind Regards Anastasia Murray |
|
Attachments |
24506 - Anastasia Murray.pdf (PDF, 26.18 KB) |
Bronwyn Couch
|
ID |
24511 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
For submission to independent Planning Commision My name is Bronwyn Couch, I live on Darug and Gundungurra lands adjacent to the beautiful Wiradjuri land of Moolarben Creek, Goulburn River and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I would like to express my deep concern about the proposed expansion to the Moolarben Coal Mine. It has been pointed out to me that this is already the largest coal mine in NSW. This privileged state should be leading the way in addressing the enormous need to retreat from this emission producing project, rather than adding to it. This is so important for the country and our planet . This expansion extends planned use to continue operation until 2038. That is so preposterous, so wrong for us, so wrong for our children, so wrong for the children of this world. A child born in Wollen today will be 12 years old, just beginning to understand what we have done. How can we look that 12 year old in the eye and say that we had the choice to put more effort and resources into renewable energy ( for which this region is known and lauded, and where more current and future jobs are likely than in coal mining) we had that choice and were negligent and short sighted. We have zero emissions targets in NSW due to mature at this time. This target will be a joke if we admit that this expanded mine will produce 58% of total emissions from all sources in NSW. This is so obviously the site to reduce, not to expand. In the past we have been so reckless with encroachment and destruction of indigenous cultural heritage. We can no longer ignore our First Nations voices when they implore decision makers to protect rather than destroy. That alone should be enough- artefacts, shelters and grinding grooves. Surely we know better and care more. This project should not be approved Bronwyn Couch |
Louise McFadden
|
ID |
24516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the decision makers at the Independent Planning Commission, The koala populations under threat from this project can NOT afford to lose 113 more hectares of their habitat. Have we learned nothing in the last 12 months? We are encroaching more and more into our wildlife’s homes and it’s getting to the point where they have nowhere to go! I’d challenge any of your employees to drive into the outback, into the mountains, into the bush. I see a LOT of roadkill, a LOT of logging, and a LOT of habitat destruction, and it’s truly gut wrenching. Or try listening to a fire service pilot, talking about the thousands of kangaroos and possums and koalas he saw when the Grampians were on fire. They were closed in and trapped with nowhere to go, and there were too many of them because we keep edging in further and further, taking just a little bit more here, a little bit more there. Lend Lease wants to convince us their property developments aren’t impacting koalas because it’s not in their habitat zone, but residents of these monopoly home villages tell otherwise! (I should know, my sister lives in one of them and it’s not just koalas, it’s emus too that they had to enclose into protected habitat zones). The bottom line is, coal is still needed but it’s on the way out. And no matter what it is, blue gum farms or coal mines, money and power should NEVER justify destruction of our native wildlife’s homes and habitats. EVER. People are sick of the bullshit, sick of the excuses, sick of the innocent and vulnerable always paying the price for corporate greed and political influence and lean. Do the right thing! Don’t approve harmful plans! Don’t think progress is something that kills living things and will be abandoned in 50 years time. Coal has an expiry date, a habitat is something that takes DECADES to grow and develop. It’s part of an ECOSYSTEM and the flow on effect is damaging to many other species, not just koalas, as well as the effect on land temps in the region. A coal mine isn’t part of an ecosystem, it’s depleting the land and killing the creatures who live on it. Enough! Sincerely, Louise McFadden |
Alex Oonagh
|
ID |
24521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
TO. THE INDEPENDENT PLANNING COMMISSION I am AlexOonagh Redmond ,an 83 yr old female ,living inner city Sydney,passionate about Australia’s Country side and Bush/ Outback. Having the joy to have travelled and worked around this huge country. It’s important to have an identity and not an ANONYMOUS “ opinion”. Iam unable to write a submission . But I will speak of my anger ,disappointed and concern on what will,happen further To the Evironment and the Threatened Species that require the habit around ,over and under it . I CAN NOT believe that the Mine owners and the Government consider having any mine is ok,let alone an EXPANSION. Ofcourse you are aware of CLIMATE CHANGE. and its effect on so much of our Land and our Peoples and their Homes. But I am aware it suits Big Business and Government to say but jobs are necessary and “Third World Countries “ need Electricity.? But we Australians receive NOTHING .Its a Win/ Win for the Mines and their SHARE HOLDERS, and OUR wonderful landscape and EVERTHING around DISAPPEARS. As well as Polluting the Atmosphere ,that we have to breath in,there is the run off from Mine,polluting the water Basins and the beautiful creek,in this case of the village of WOLLAR ,the MANGARUIN . But these big Foreign Businesses will probably not have travelled or lived outside our Cities . So they will not be familiar how our Country was built around our Bush communities ,and the contribution in each area to the appropriate Farming required to meet our food needs and exports . The various STOCK will also be affected by the pollution To the FEED and water as well as bird and wild life.many of which are facing extinction . So with regard to the Community ofWOLLAR ,it’s has its community possibly halved by folk selling their homes to the Mine ,which Im told are just left to rot. They have to leave due to Health reasons due to the pollution ,the smell, the constant noise of the trucks etc. and seeing their loved environment disappear. The rest who love their homes ,and generations of their families have lived there.They DO NOT WANT TO SELL OUT AND LEAVE. This is THEIR HOME and they love it and the lifestyle they have created . They are proud of the Nature Reserve and its special HONEYEATER and the Iconic Kolola breeding and so much more that is left? This Reserve will LOOSE a part of its land. BUT OFCOURSE, this won’t affect the Bird and wild life??? I ask you ,what would you Feel if this was your HOME and LIFESTYLE .? Thank you AlexOonagh Redmond I believe our Federal Government hand over [redacted]. ( what about Us TAX PAYERS ?) Sent from my iPad |
Trevor Jennings
|
ID |
24526 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Clemton Park Uniting Church |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I am writing in opposition to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine - Project Number SSD-33083358. At a time that the whole earth is increasingly experiencing the effects of climate change, caused mostly by CO2 emissions, it seems ludicrous to me and a great crime against the earth and future generations, that any further coal expansion be allowed in Australia. We do not need to rely on the burning of fossil fuels for our electricity needs in Australia nor should we be supplying cheap fuel to foreign countries where it is burned and produces CO2 emissions. These emissions do not just effect the countries in which they are burned, the effects are felt in every part of the earth. I quote the following from the 'Moolarben OC3 Extension Project State Significant Development Assessment Report (SSD-33083358)' The project would generate approximately 64.6 million tonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions. Most of these emissions (ie around 99%) would be scope 3 emissions associated with the combustion of coal by end users. Yancoal’s attempt to make minor amendments to its proposal on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion is like someone landscaping their back garden while a bush fire is encroaching their property. It may make the garden look prettier but the real threat of damage being done is not being addressed. We do not need to destroy the earth for short term gain, nor for greed, nor even to provide local employment. There are many more jobs in renewables. As a minister of religion, the members of my congregation are very concerned about rising sea levels and storms effecting their homelands. Most of my congregation come from the Pacific Islands. Any expansion is a greater threat to all Islanders and to all Australians. It is heart breaking for them to see the destruction to their islands while at the same time seeing governments in Australia allow the expansion of coal mining and burning. You have the power and the responsibility to stop this expansion not only the sake of local ecology but also for the sake of the earth. Thank you for considering my petition against this proposal. Regards, Rev. Trevor Jennings. Minister - Campsie, Earlwood, Clemton Park Uniting Church |
Janet Burstall
|
ID |
24531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
TO: NSW Independent Planning Commission I wish to register my objection the environmental destruction that will be caused if this project is approved. It is ONLY for the benefit of Yancoal, and not for anyone else, not for jobs, not for koalas, for other local species, not for native habitat, not for water, and not for limiting global warming, which threatens quality of life for all of us. Because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone, there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. So the jobs supposedly on offer are not needed by the community. We know that koalas as a species in NSW are officially endangered. The habitat of the koala population in this area is "critical to the survival of the species”. It is a population that “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully” according to the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group. If the mine proceeds, there will be clearing of habitat for multiple threatened species, along with 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. "Biodiversity offsets” will not avoid the damage in this area, which means that the mine must be stopped in order to avoid further species extinctions. Water flows and quality would be damaged by this mine. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. The cumulative impact of applications for mine expansion in the Mudgee area should also be considered, for Ulan and Wilpinjong, as well as Moolarben. Janet Burstall |
Carole Helman
|
ID |
24536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find my submission below. Carole Helman |
|
Attachments |
24536 - Carole Helman_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.3 KB) |
Scott Marshall
|
ID |
24541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2258 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I email as I am gravely concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW in general due to the recognised effects of carbon dioxide on the climate, as ratified by a recent scientific investigation by OregonState University and collaborators. In addition, the supposed benefits of biodiversity offsets are illusory. Offsetting land that is to be destroyed with biodiverse active land still results in the net loss of land. And of course the ecological characteristics will be lost. I thus write to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause irreversible Environmental harm, affecting climate and my community, and should not be approved. This unique biodiverse area would best be added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and, actually be protected not exploited. My reasons are :- Threatened species and habitat loss due to clearing of 113+ hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining (blasting etc) proposed in extremely close proximity of 100 metres of the reserve. Water / Groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown risking Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems; these are critical drought fauna refuges. Climate impacts - an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the fact NSW will not meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. No clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining around Mudgee, where renewable energy development is the priority. Overall, our NSW Government cannot afford to approve expanding coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Therefore, I seek the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Yours Sincerely, Scott Marshall |
Scott Marshall
|
ID |
24551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I email as I am gravely concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW in general due to the recognised effects of carbon dioxide on the climate, as ratified by a recent scientific investigation by OregonState University and collaborators. In addition, the supposed benefits of biodiversity offsets are illusory. Offsetting land that is to be destroyed with biodiverse active land still results in the net loss of land. And of course the ecological characteristics will be lost. I thus write to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause irreversible Environmental harm, affecting climate and my community, and should not be approved. This unique biodiverse area would best be added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and, actually be protected not exploited. My reasons are :- Threatened species and habitat loss due to clearing of 113+ hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining (blasting etc) proposed in extremely close proximity of 100 metres of the reserve. Water / Groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown risking Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems; these are critical drought fauna refuges. Climate impacts - an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the fact NSW will not meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. No clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining around Mudgee, where renewable energy development is the priority. Overall, our NSW Government cannot afford to approve expanding coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Therefore, I seek the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Yours Sincerely, Scott Marshall [redacted] Kind regards Scott Marshall Professional Multi-Asset Securities Analyst and Fund Manager. |
Donna Patterson
|
ID |
24556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am Donna Patterson, a 64 year old retired speech pathologist from Manly. Particularly as a grandmother, I am appalled at the prospect of the expansion of coal mining in our state for its impact on climate, biodiversity and water. I am objecting to this expansion in the interests of our future and the world we are leaving for our children. Such an expansion would work directly against the goals to mitigate climate change that this state has championed. We cannot continue to ignore the extreme weather events causing deaths from heat, flooding, fire, loss of property. These events correlate directly with increased insurance and food costs for individuals, not to mention the overall cost to our economy of repair and rebuilding. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause further serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Donna Patterson |
Diane Willman
|
ID |
24561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My submission re the above is attached below. Thank you. Diane Willman |
|
Attachments |
24561 - Diane Willman.pdf (PDF, 58.98 KB) |
Deborah Kuras
|
ID |
24566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Deborah Kuras, I am a retired woman from North Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts. My mother was affected by both the “ once in 500 year flood in Taree and the 2019/2020 bushfires. We are all being affected heatwaves, drought and extreme weather events. I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife.• Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Deborah Kuras Cammeray 2062 |
Gerhard Kuras
|
ID |
24571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Gerhard Kuras, I am a retired mam from North Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts. My mother was affected by both the “ once in 500 year flood in Taree and the 2019/2020 bushfires. We are all being affected heatwaves, drought and extreme weather events. I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife.• Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Gethard Kuras |
Tony Lewis
|
ID |
24576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam As an individual member of the community who strongly supports the replacement of fossil fuels such as coal by renewable resources, I wish to voice my objection to this proposed expansion going ahead. Our community continues to recognise the harm to the environment caused by greenhouse gasses and to individuals exposed to the harmful effects of particulates derived from the burning of coal. Expanding a coal mine simply adds to both. Yours sincerely, Dr. Tony Lewis |
Roslyn Burge
|
ID |
24581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Roslyn Burge, I am a retired historian living Inner West Sydney and I frequently visit Ulan and Mudgee and environs and have witnessed the terrible environmental impact of coal mining in this area. I am shocked at the extent of expansionary coal mining in this state and the nation. As a historian I have read, written about and travelled the Goulburn River and surrounding landscapes and object to the environmental damage caused by the activities of Moolarben Coal and Yancoal. I write now to object strongly to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The proposed amendments by the mining company do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. The World Economic Forum publishes an annual Global Risks report and in 2025 that report identified the global risks of biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse - as Moolarben and Yancoal are progressing in the environment in the wider vicinity of Ulan - a retrograde step - as #2 (up from #37 in 2009). WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2025.pdf I am deeply opposed to any expansion by Moolarben Coal ... on a number of grounds **Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks - including The Drip and Goulburn River. I understand the mining company has failed to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and has a poor track record of complying with requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. The Yancoal proposal to conduct 12 months of water monitoring is putting the cart before the horse and is absurd - this should be required before any application by the mining company. **The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage - this nation is long overdue in recognising the First National people, including the Wiradjuri nation. Nearby is one of the most remarkable "industrial" Evidence of Aboriginal presence in the area - During an archaeological survey undertaken between 1965 and 1967 by the Australian Museum in the vicinity at Bobadeen (approx. 2 kms north west of The Drip, beside Queens Creek, near the watershed of the Great Dividing Range); at Sandy Hollow (on the Goulburn River, west of Denman); and at Milbrodale (south of Singleton, on Wollombi Brook, a tributary of the Hunter River), Dr Moore, Curator of Anthropology at the Museum, describes the Bobadeen site as a highly efficient, productive ‘industry’ site, where the predominance of quartz and the “extraordinary quality of the quartz-working ... surprised all those excavating”. Hugely impressed by the finesse of workmanship, Dr Moore continued: “The quartz crystal geometric microliths, many less than a centimeter in length could scarcely be believed to be man-made, until placed under … a microscope to view the secondary work.” Reference below. I had great difficulty downloading the links - apologies I am sending to this email and appreciate this alternative method. Roslyn Burge |
|
Attachments |
WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2025_Full_Report (4).pdf (PDF, 19.69 MB) |
Barbara Anderson
|
ID |
24586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2060 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the plans of mining giant Yancoal to expand the Moolarben coal mine, an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. The mine will clear a major area of native vegetation if it extends right up to the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, an area of incredible importance for biodiversity. The mine will not only destroy habitat but also threaten wildlife including destruction of habitat critical to the survival of the koala. The mine will also cause serious harm to cultural heritage, especially the many Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint. It is tragic to think the mine expansion will significantly clear hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Continued expansions to coal mining in NSW are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and its emissions reduction targets. The proposed Moolarben Coal Mine expansion must be rejected. Barbara Anderson |
Catherine Millard
|
ID |
24591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am deeply concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to biodiversity, water systems, climate stability and Wiradjuri cultural heritage. It should not be approved. I am also concerned about the late amendments submitted by Yancoal in January 2026, which resulted in the postponement of the IPC hearing. These proposed amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or the clearing of native vegetation. They rely on off-site “habitat enhancement” measures that do nothing to lessen the significant impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Introducing amendments at this late stage undermines the integrity of the consultation process and appears to be an attempt to greenwash a damaging proposal. These amendments are far too late to be considered and should be rejected. 1. This landscape should be protected, not mined The proposal would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including a uniquely resilient koala population. This beautiful and biodiverse valley should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected as part of a connected conservation landscape, not converted into an open-cut coal pit. The expansion creates no new mine and no essential public benefit, but would permanently destroy irreplaceable habitat. 2. Serious and irreversible harm to threatened species The expansion would destroy: • 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded • 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, including areas with breeding females • Up to 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland Threatened species including the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and microbats face severe impacts. The NSW Environment Department has warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt the recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. No offset or enhancement proposal can replace habitat that is currently supporting threatened species. 3. A massive climate cost inconsistent with NSW law The OC3 extension is estimated to generate 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. Around 99 percent of these emissions would be downstream emissions from burning the coal overseas. This is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The Department’s assessment fails to properly consider the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires full consideration of downstream emissions and their local climate impacts. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been properly quantified or addressed. 4. No compelling employment or economic justification The Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion. The proposal does not deliver meaningful new employment. Meanwhile, the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is projected to create around 2,000 jobs over the next decade. With thermal coal demand forecast to decline in key export markets such as China and South Korea, the long-term economic case for expansion is weak. The project would impose lasting environmental costs while delivering minimal public benefit. 5. Serious groundwater risks The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of 2 to 6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining. This places Moolarben Creek, an important drought refuge, at significant risk. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems and riparian trees may be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres. Yancoal’s proposed amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring before mining begins is inadequate. Baseline monitoring must occur before approval, not after. 6. Irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage The expansion would destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts and potentially impact many more. All are considered to have high cultural value by Registered Aboriginal Parties. Further fragmentation of this landscape contributes to the cumulative degradation of Wiradjuri Country and undermines cultural connection, heritage protection and intergenerational responsibility. 7. Poor assessment of cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal alongside expansions at Ulan and Wilpinjong mines have not been adequately assessed. Together, these projects threaten connected landscapes, water systems, biodiversity and cultural heritage on a regional scale. ________________________________________ We are facing a climate and biodiversity crisis. Projects that lock in further coal extraction and habitat destruction are inconsistent with the public interest and with NSW’s legislated climate commitments. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and to reject the late amendments that attempt to weaken community scrutiny. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Catherine Millard |
Patricia Giannotto
|
ID |
24596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Patricia and I'm a retired community member living on Sydney's lower north shore. I am writing because I am very concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, due to its impacts on climate and biodiversity. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and our communities, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Patricia Giannotto Kirribilli, NSW |
John Smith
|
ID |
24601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2615 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I write to OBJECT to the expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion Project Number SSD-33083358. Approving this mine expansion when we are in a climate emergency, with heat waves, floods, and fires ravaging the country is madness. The science tells us that we must stop burning fossil fuels if we wish to have any hope of stopping runaway climate heating. I have four grandchildren under 14 and I refuse to see their future destroyed for a fistful of dollars for a mining company to tear up the earth and our biodiversity and pollute the atmosphere with greenhouse gases. There are many reasons to refuse permission for this mine to proceed, some of which I have listed below. If this mine goes ahead, it will: - Clear 113 hectares of endangered koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, and destroy critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Protecting the Regent Honeyeater habitat will also protect the habitat of many other species such as the Eastern Cave Bat, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum vegetation. - Bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, a particularly important nature reserve for its many bird species. Industrial mining so close will adversely impact this reserve and inevitably lead to its decline over time. - Add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. - Lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which runs into the Goulburn River. Water is a scarce resource and the drawdown of water in the landscape contributes to climate warming and the resultant increase in atmospheric instability leading to reduced rainfall frequency and increased rainfall volatility. It dries out the land, reducing evaporative cooling, and stresses vegetation even further into a downward spiral. - Directly impact and cause serious damage to 55 Aboriginal cultural heritage sites. The loss of these sites, especially two shelters, one with grinding grooves, is of great significance to the local First Nations people, the Wiradjuri. - Undermine the transition away from coal mining already underway in the region. The Moolarben coal mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. It is not as if there are no alternative jobs available in the area. Finally, the cumulative impacts of all the various coal mines and coal mine extensions and expansions in the area such as the Ulan and Wilpinjong projects have not been properly assessed or taken into account. It is my firm conviction that this project should not be given approval to proceed. Yours sincerely John Smith |
Michelle Packett
|
ID |
24606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Michelle Packett and I am a resident of Sydney. I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Complex in Mudgee. Given the unprecedented climate change impacts we are experiencing in Australia and our commitment to the Paris Agreement, it is unfathomable to me that we would consider granting an expansion of a coal mine that will result in a targeted loss of critical habitat, impact the water table and damage and contaminate waterways. The UN has stated that we have already gone over 1.2 degrees Celsius in global temperature rise and as a country we have already seen the devastation across Australia caused from flooding, fires, droughts, algae blooms, extreme heat impacts on wildlife, farmland and people. We know for a fact that our lack of commitment to meeting our Paris Agreement targets has put us on track to exceed the 1.5 degree Celsius global warming cap in the next 4-5 years. Whilst no-one can say for sure what the impacts of that will be, based on current evidence we know that our extremes in weather are going to get worse, with economic impacts into the billions of dollars. The Moolarben Coal Complex Expansion would create not just an local environmental impact, but would contribute to an increase in CO2 emissions globally, which is in direct opposition to our Paris Agreement targets. From a local economic impact to Mudgee and the surrounding area, there will be no increase in jobs from this expansion and if anything it will create unhealthy competition for the investment into renewables that is planned for the area, which is estimated to create up to 2000 jobs. Furthermore the impact to threatened species, such as koala’s, honeyeaters and microbats would decrease our biodiversity at a time when conservation is critical given the devastating impacts from fires, floods and heatwaves to these populations throughout Australia. I do not believe that the NSW Government can afford to approve such an economically and environmentally unsound proposal, when the damaging impacts it will cause far out way any good that will come from this expansion. For the sake of our economic prosperity and that of our children, I urge the Independent Planning Commission refuse this proposal. Kind Regards, Michelle |
Bryan Purcell
|
ID |
24611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To: NSW Independent Planning Commission Shown below are my objections to the proposal by the Yancoal mining to expand their existing mine into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve by clearing 480 hectares of native vegetation and mining up to within 100m of the Reserve. I consider the expansion should not be approved as it : A) Contravenes the advice of the NSW Net Zero Commission's Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions in NSW are inconsistent with achieving the states climate targets for a safe climate. B. It would destroy critical habitat for koalas and have significant detrimental impacts on biodiversity including on animal wildlife and flora in the Box Gum Woodland, and also impact the sandstone cliffs in the vicinity. C. It would impact water drawdown by up to 5m in the Moolarben Creek. D. The expansion would also destroy 55 Indigenous cultural projects. The coalmine is one of three in the area (Yancoal, Ulan and Wilpinjong) that are proposing to expand. This is despite all coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act for NSW to meet its emissions reduction targets. The proposal is also inconsistent with the Paris Agreement's temperature goal of 1.5 degree warming. Even without this expansion the chances of meeting our Paris agreement targets are impossible as the States emissions continue to rise. This expansion, if approved, would produce an estimated 64.4Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions -- equal to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. Yancoal may argue the expansion will bring jobs to the region however this should not be at the expense of our children and grandchildren. I consider the expansion is about profits, not jobs. It is my understanding Mudgee has more than 2000 jobs in the pipeline over the next decade as part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and the expansion is incompatible with Net Zero goals. It is critical we prevent any further damage to the land, soil, existing habitat, the climate and protect our precious koala populations and other threatened wildlife and vegetation in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. We must save the koala habitat,the Box Gum Woodland Ecosystem & protect its biodiversity. Additionally we must stop the increase in CO2 emissions and eliminate the risk of Climate Trigger Points which will exacerbate an already warming planet. As the United Nations has declared we are in a Climate Emergency and it is incumbent on us all to act accordingly. Having regard to the above the proposed Moolarben Coal mine expansion should be rejected outright. Yours sincerely, Bryan Purcell |
Stan Buckman
|
ID |
24616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Subject: Objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) I am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. As a concerned member of the public, I believe this project poses unacceptable risks to our environment, climate, and cultural heritage. My primary reasons for objection are: • Climate Impacts: This project would extract an additional 30 million tonnes of coal, producing an estimated 64 to 86 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. Approving this expansion is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. • Biodiversity Loss: The proposal involves clearing over 113 hectares of Koala habitat and 80 hectares of habitat for the Critically Endangered Regent Honeyeater. Recent records confirm breeding activity for both species on-site; habitat offsets cannot replace these vital breeding grounds. • Threat to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: The project proposes mining within just 100 metres of this significant reserve. Noise, dust, and blasting will severely disrupt wildlife and the amenity of this sensitive area, ignoring recommendations for a 500-metre precautionary buffer. • Water Resources: The expansion is predicted to cause groundwater drawdown of up to 6 metres in Moolarben Creek alluvium, threatening vital drought refuges and groundwater-dependent ecosystems for at least 25 years post-mining. • Cultural Heritage: The project would destroy 55 Aboriginal heritage sites and damage sacred Wiradjuri cultural landscapes. This represents an permanent loss of First Nations' connection to Country. • Alarmingly the current US Government has placed a great and destructive stress on the world's remediation efforts, AUSTRALIA must do more to counteract this madness. In light of the ongoing climate and biodiversity crises, the NSW Government cannot afford to approve new coal expansions. I urge the Commission to reject this proposal in its entirety. Sincerely, Stan Buckman |
Deborah Stevenson
|
ID |
24621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Good Evening Please find attached my submission on this State Significant Development Project. Yours sincerely |
|
Attachments |
Submission on the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project D Stevenson Feb 2026.doc (DOC, 34.5 KB) |
Jennifer Fitzgerald
|
ID |
24626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hello to the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Jennifer Fitzgerald, I am urgently writing this submission to express my grave concerns about the Moolarben OC3 Coal EXPANSION. As a Mother and Grandmother, I am deeply concerned for the well being of my family and their immediate future with the effects of climate change increasing in frequency and intensity; with higher temperatures never seen before, with drought and bushfires, flooding caused by global warming. With the Moolarben OC3 Coal Expansion, 64 million tonnes of climate pollution will be added at a time when NSW is failing to meet its legislated climate targets as communities in NSW and across the World are facing climate fuelled disasters. I am also concerned about : Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat would be destroyed with the mine extension. NO BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS CAN REPLACE HABITAT THAT IS ALREADY SUPPORTING THREATENED SPECIES. Impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve from noise, blasting and vibration impacts have not been adequately assessed. Water and drawdown groundwater risks harm to Moolarben Creekand groundwater ecosystems that are crucial drought refuges for wildlife. There is no public benefit , with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons and with the future lives of our children at risk, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Approval of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. PLEASE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION , PRIORITISE RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS. Yours sincerely, Jennifer Fitzgerald / Bushcarer Gunnamatta Park, Cronulla |
Andrew Lenart
|
ID |
24631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, Please accept my submission in relation to SSD-33083358, the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I am an individual, making this submission on my own behalf, not for a group. I don’t live near Wollar, and my legal consent for the project is not required. I object to the proposed project. I agree with the Terms and Conditions published at <https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/form/moolarben-coal-complex-oc3-extension-project>. Andrew Lenart (Redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
While not a resident of NSW, I am deeply concerned about projects Australia-wide that reduce endangered species habitat, destroy biodiversity, and increase carbon emissions. Clearing native vegetation and delays in increasing renewable energy production effect us all. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am a 22 year old law student based in New South Wales. I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine. I am profoundly concerned about the expansion's climate impact -- in 2025, when the science is crystal clear and renewable technologies are available and advancing at plummeting cost, we should be scaling back fossil fuels and investing in a sensible, science-based renewable future. In previous state and federal elections, I preferenced Labor under the impression that the party's stated commitments to progressive environmental policy would in reality produce a managed transition away from fossil fuels. It is horrifying to discover that dirty projects like this one are even being considered for approval. I am also disturbed by the influence on local bat and koala populations near Mudgee. Please consider my submission. |
Sandra Reed
|
ID |
22176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6112 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the independent Planning Commission. I am deeply concerned that despite the scientific FACT that we are in a climate crisis, government and industry are continuing to even propose both new coal mines as well as expansion of existing ones. People have already died, livelihoods wiped out and ecosystems destroyed and we are just at the beginning of the crisis. Destructive weather extremes and record temperatures will continue to increase in intensity and frequency. Wildfires will destroy vs areas and will become more and more ferocious and frequent. All fossil fuels need to be phased out - not expanded. And this area needs to be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected for all time. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. It takes hundreds of years before "rehabilitated areas" become viable - we don't have that time. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW, and indeed much of Australia, is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Suzanne Duyster
|
ID |
22181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2447 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear sirs, madams I am writing this objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal expansion. Why? Firstly: I deserve a long, happy and healthy life! Secondly: if the expansion would be approved, it would clear another 113+ hectares of koala habitat (after so much has been cleared for the existing mine and the species being on the endangered species list (nothing to be proud of)), where breeding has been recorded! It would also destroy the habitat of the Regent Honeyeater and microbat (another two species on the endangered species list of even on the brink of extinction, also absolutely nothing to be proud of)! It will also bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, heightening pollution on all levels! And it would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are continuously facing climate-fuelled disasters! This country is Australia. To the world, Australia thinks it poses itself as a modern and democratic first world country, where people live good lives. Nothing could be further away from the truth than that!! Because the only people in Australia that live good lives, are rich and more than rich Australians. Australians: - Who seem to live on top of hills/mountains, far away from the "commoners", that don't get affected by floods, bushfires and destructive storms. - Who can afford gigantic electricity bills because of the many air-conditioning systems, or who can afford many, many solar panels and batteries to store the solar power. In the case of the latter, many "commoners" would call them hypocrites. - Who can afford thousands of litres of bottled water, if natural and council water systems are polluted or drying up. - Who can even afford to import it from other countries, although so many other countries are facing the same water poverty as Australia is, making prices far from affordable. Water is becoming the next oil!!! - Who can afford gigantic water bills so that they are the only ones who can keep their lawns green and their gardens bright and colourful. - Who can afford to drive in expensive electric cars. - Who simply just don't care about the "commoners", about clean air and the production of rain and oxygen, and who don't care about Australia's unique flora and fauna! Basically, these richer than rich people don't care about other Australians or whomever lives on the land that has been named Australia! All they care for is the amount of money in their bank accounts and therefore their own lavish lifestyles!!!! Oh, but most likely...these richer than rich people don't even live in Australia. They live far away from the damage they are causing, far away from the truth and reality! And I'm not only talking about the owners of the mine!! Lastly: this is Wiradjuri Country. No one else owns it but the Wiradjuri People. It's bad enough the existing coal mine got pushed through, without thinking about the Wiradjuri People, the pollution of their land and people and the destruction of so much habitat for their beloved fauna. It hasn't exactly been developed in the desert now, has it? But: what also has seemed to have been forgotten is people power! And that there are many more voting "commoners" than there are those richer than rich people!! People power exists due to people standing up for themselves, their communities, their unique flora and fauna, and the right to live a happy, healthy life!!! They stand up and say: "Enough is enough, no more new mines or expansion of existing mines". "Previous generations have destroyed so much, doing whatever they wanted and as they pleased. We now only have the small amount that is left, and we will fight for it. Although it is a shame that we have to and can't enjoy it as previous generations have"!!!!!! IF WE ARE ALL AUSTRALIAN, THEN WE ALL DESERVE LONG, HAPPY AND HEALTHY LIVES! Thank you for your time. Sincerely... Suzanne Duyster |
Kate Buchanan
|
ID |
22186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, and the climate impacts being felt across the country. People are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This beautiful valley should be protected, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation, and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a koala population, where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. There is simply no justification for disturbing this significant landscape and ecosystem for a project that creates no new jobs, and is permanently going to destroy biodiversity, all to make profit for a company, majority-owned by the Chinese-based Yankuang Energy Group and primarily serving the Asian market. Problems with the expansion: • inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown, that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Regards, Kate Buchanan |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine on Wudjeri Country. I am a university student from Victoria and I am concerned about the impacts that this mining expansion will have on our environment. In a time where we are experiencing record levels of heat it feels highly inappropriate to entertain this idea, when we know for a fact that CO2 emissions are the primary and unequivocal driver behind global warming. This summer, my energy bills were higher than ever before due to the number of heatwaves we have been experiencing. It is reaching a point of being unaffordable to me and for many other students who are already living on very low budgets. I personally know many students who do not have access to air conditioning at home and rely on public spaces. However, we aren't even the ones bearing the brunt of it. The impacts of the global warming from the 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases produced over the lifetime of this project will have overwhelming effects on the pacific islands and developing nations who have fewer resources to deal with the increasing temperatures of our climate. Furthermore, NSW is already falling behind on energy targets for both 2030 and 2025. How can we possibly achieve net zero if more and more mining expansions are being approved? This proposal does not align with the goals stated in the Paris agreement and other commitments Australia has made to achieving net zero. We are in a climate crisis and rather than working to resolve it we are debating whether or not we should make it worse? As a young person, it has been extremely frustrating and disheartening to see the lack of change in Australia's systems despite there being clear decisions we should be making to reduce our emissions our impact on the environment - decisions which will eventually benefit all of us in the long run. It is long past the time to be thinking about economical value when climate change is putting our survival at risk. I urge you to recommend that this expansion proposal be rejected. |
Jim Cassel
|
ID |
22196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2447 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the approval of the Molarben coal project. Mining companies have proven to be dishonourable to the contracted conditions causing negative effects to communities and the environment. |
Lulu Littler
|
ID |
22201 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Gamilaroi Peoples |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2541 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Monday 16th February 2026 To the Independent Planning Commission, I make this submission as a sovereign Gamilaroi woman, a cultural woman, a writer and a midwife. I do not consent to the proposed Open Cut 3 expansion at the Moolarben coal mine by Yancoal. This mine operates on stolen land. Sovereignty was never ceded. The authority of First Nations law continues, whether recognised by the colonial state or not. Your assessment process does not extinguish our law, our custodianship, or our obligation to protect Country. Country is not a “resource.” Country is a living ancestor. Country holds law. Country holds birth, death, memory and spirit. As a midwife, I know that birth is ceremony. There are birthing trees and women’s places across this landscape. There are healing places where people go to grieve, to sing, to reconnect. When you blast and clear this land, you are not just removing vegetation — you are committing cultural violence. Destroying Country is femicide. It is the destruction of the life-giving body of the earth. It is the desecration of women’s sacred sites. It is the silencing of future generations before they are even born. The proposed amendments do nothing to change this reality. They do not reduce the mine footprint. They do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation. They do not prevent the severe impacts on threatened species. They are far too late in the process and undermine meaningful community consultation. Offsite “habitat enhancement” cannot replace ancient, living ecosystems. You cannot offset sacred ground. The expansion would push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and destroy critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and other threatened beings. These animals are not collateral damage. They are part of our kinship system. They hold totems, stories and responsibilities within First Nations law. When their habitat is destroyed, our law is disrupted. The project would also cause significant greenhouse gas emissions, worsening climate instability that disproportionately harms First Nations communities. Approving further coal expansion in the era of the Paris Agreement is an act of wilful negligence toward future generations. This is a continuation of a long colonial pattern: extract, export, profit — and leave Indigenous people to carry the damage. The majority of this coal will be shipped overseas. The cultural loss will remain here. The poisoned water will remain here. The fractured Country will remain here. If governments insist on continuing to extract natural resources from Indigenous lands without treaty or true consent, then the Federal Government must at minimum dramatically increase taxation and royalties on what is taken. Australia gives away coal at cut-rate returns while First Nations peoples bear the permanent cost. This is economic injustice layered upon dispossession. But taxation does not solve the core issue. Consent does. Under First Nations law, this project does not have free, prior and informed consent. It does not have cultural legitimacy. It does not have moral authority. I call on the Commission to: Reject the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion in its entirety. Refuse to legitimise last-minute amendments that fail to reduce harm. Recognise the ongoing sovereignty of First Nations peoples. Place the protection of Country, culture, water and future generations above corporate extraction. You have a choice: continue the colonial legacy of sacrificing Indigenous lands for profit, or take a stand that honours Country and acknowledges that some places are too sacred to mine. I stand for Gamilaroi lore. I stand for women’s lore. I stand for Country. I do not consent. Sincerely, Lulu Littler Gamilaroi Woman Nowra, 2541 Monday 16th February 2026 |
Raman Jain
|
ID |
22216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2194 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission (IPC), Time is running out to act against climate change, an existential crisis which is impacting us all: unpredictable weather patterns, rising sea levels, impacts to the biodiversity, the air we breathe, the food that we eat and more. With coal projects operating, expanding and being proposed around the world it just means that the responsibility to resist climate change falls on all of us. As a NSW resident, that means resisting the largest coal-producing mine in NSW which is the Moolarben Coal Mine. The mine is on-track for expansion of its OC3 section. NSW’s current coal mine expansions are not aligned with the NSW Climate Change Act and Paris Agreement. If things continue the way they are, NSW won't achieve its 2030 and 2035 climate targets. To put into perspective how much of a detriment the extension of this coal mine will have on CO2 emissions, this extension alone will produce 64 million tonnes of CO2 emissions over the mine’s lifetime (which ends in 2038) which is equivalent to 58% of NSW’s annual CO2 emissions. In addition to the climate impacts, there is extensive biodiversity impact the project has on local habitats. Devastation of 100s of hectares of lands to native wildlife such as koalas, regent honeyeater birds and snakes will be irreversible, and will risk long-term population decline as per the NSW Environmental Department. This is only worsened by the significant groundwater drawdowns which will risk existence of refuges for wildlife during droughts. Poor assessment of the noise and blasting impacts of the mine expansion, inadequate baseline water monitoring and refusal of compliance with recommendations for wildlife and reserve protection are just testament to Yancoal’s total disregard for environmental concerns. When it comes to coal mines, their justification is always pointed to their ability to create jobs. However, despite the Moolarben mine expected to operate till 2038, coal jobs in the region remain vacant for years. Mudgee as a community is diverse and beautiful but is also suffering from a huge cost of living crisis and unemployment crisis. Instead of realising the potential benefits of creating around 2,000 jobs in renewable energy projects, since the Mudgee lies within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, thermal coal from Moolarben is being mined which won’t even be used by Australians. The coal will be exported out to China, South Korea, Thailand and other countries. Furthermore, with demand for thermal coal in China and South Korea forecasted for decline, the economics for this coal mine sound even more non-sensical. It goes to show that coal mine projects like these are rooted in short-sighted profit margins that hinder for not just an environmentally sustainable but economically sustainable future. It should also be pointed out that the Moolarben coal mine has destroyed the Wollar community by buying up land which was previously owned by families and locals which previously brought life and vibrancy to a regional heartland of the NSW. With all these reasons, I urge the IPC to reconsider and recommend the rejection of the OC3 extension of the Moolarben coal mine. Thank you for spending the time to read this. I hope you consider my concerns. Sincerely, Raman Jain (redacted) NSW 2194 |
Robert McLaughlin
|
ID |
22221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Project I write to object to the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for this project on the basis that it is inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development, presents unacceptable environmental and health impacts, threatens regional water security and agricultural productivity, and is contrary to the long-term public interest of New South Wales. ________________________________________ 1. Inconsistency with Climate Policy and the Public Interest The project would enable continued and expanded extraction and export of thermal coal at a time when both Australia and NSW have committed to significant emissions reduction targets. While the proponent may argue that exported emissions are not counted within NSW inventories, the planning system is required to consider downstream (“Scope 3”) emissions when assessing public interest and environmental harm. Combustion of the coal extracted from the OC3 extension will produce very large quantities of greenhouse gases over the life of the project. Approval would therefore: • undermine NSW emissions reduction commitments, • conflict with Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, • and lock in decades of additional global emissions. The NSW Land and Environment Court (Rocky Hill decision, Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning) established that the climate impacts of exported coal are a relevant planning consideration. The OC3 extension clearly fails this test because it expands — rather than phases down — fossil fuel production during a period of urgent decarbonisation. ________________________________________ 2. Unacceptable Air Quality and Health Impacts Coal mining in the Mudgee–Ulan region has already resulted in cumulative particulate pollution from multiple existing mines. The OC3 extension would significantly increase: • PM10 and PM2.5 dust pollution • blasting emissions • diesel exhaust exposure • coal handling and transport particulates Fine particulate matter is linked to: • cardiovascular disease • respiratory illness • asthma exacerbation • premature mortality Rural communities have limited access to specialist health services. The burden of disease therefore falls disproportionately on residents of the region. The project adds to an already high cumulative exposure environment and fails the precautionary principle. Approval would effectively shift private economic benefit onto public health cost. ________________________________________ 3. Water Security and Groundwater Impacts The project presents significant risk to both surface and groundwater systems. The Moolarben mine operates in a region where: • groundwater supports agriculture, • aquifers recharge slowly, • and rainfall is highly variable. Longwall and open-cut mining can cause: • aquifer depressurisation • permanent drawdown • fracturing of geological strata • loss of baseflow to creeks Predicted “make-good” provisions do not restore aquifers. Water systems that take centuries to form cannot be replaced through compensation agreements. Given increasing drought frequency in NSW, approval would represent a short-term industrial use overriding long-term regional water security. ________________________________________ 4. Agricultural and Land Use Conflict The Central West and Upper Hunter regions are strategically important agricultural areas. Mining expansion creates: • land sterilisation • dust deposition on crops and pasture • reduced livestock productivity • loss of soil quality • property devaluation Agriculture provides sustainable, intergenerational employment. Coal mining does not. The project therefore represents a direct land-use conflict in which a finite extractive industry displaces a permanent food-producing landscape. Once mined, agricultural capability cannot be restored to its original state, despite rehabilitation claims. ________________________________________ 5. Biodiversity and Ecological Impacts The project area contains remnant woodland ecosystems and habitat for threatened species. Even where offsetting is proposed, biodiversity offsets do not replace ecological function. Mature ecosystems cannot be recreated within human timeframes. Cumulative biodiversity loss across the Western Coalfields is significant. Approval of the OC3 extension would contribute to incremental ecological degradation and habitat fragmentation across the region. ________________________________________ 6. Economic Considerations and Employment Claims Employment benefits are often overstated in mining assessments. Coal mining is increasingly mechanised and provides relatively limited long-term employment compared with: • agriculture • renewable energy development • regional tourism Furthermore, approval risks creating stranded assets and economic instability as global demand for thermal coal declines. The project therefore exposes the regional economy to future shock rather than supporting economic transition. ________________________________________ 7. Failure of the Precautionary Principle Under ecologically sustainable development principles, where there is scientific uncertainty but potential for serious environmental damage, approval should not proceed. There remains uncertainty regarding: • cumulative dust impacts • groundwater behaviour • rehabilitation success • long-term climate effects Because impacts may be irreversible, the Commission must err on the side of environmental protection. ________________________________________ Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension is not a neutral development decision. It is a long-term commitment to expanded fossil fuel extraction with permanent environmental consequences and limited regional benefit. The project: • increases greenhouse gas emissions, • threatens water resources, • harms community health, • damages agriculture, • degrades biodiversity, • and conflicts with NSW’s long-term public interest. For these reasons, I respectfully request the NSW Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely, Robert McLaughlin [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
RMcL Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 142.14 KB) |
Alison farrell
|
ID |
22226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2011 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is not an environmental option anymore. Please dont expaned a coal mining operation in Mudgee . The enviroment is already under great stress from human activity. |
AnneMaree McLaughlin
|
ID |
22231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Project I write to object to the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for this project on the basis that it is inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development, presents unacceptable environmental and health impacts, threatens regional water security and agricultural productivity, and is contrary to the long-term public interest of New South Wales. ________________________________________ 1. Inconsistency with Climate Policy and the Public Interest The project would enable continued and expanded extraction and export of thermal coal at a time when both Australia and NSW have committed to significant emissions reduction targets. While the proponent may argue that exported emissions are not counted within NSW inventories, the planning system is required to consider downstream (“Scope 3”) emissions when assessing public interest and environmental harm. Combustion of the coal extracted from the OC3 extension will produce very large quantities of greenhouse gases over the life of the project. Approval would therefore: • undermine NSW emissions reduction commitments, • conflict with Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, • and lock in decades of additional global emissions. The NSW Land and Environment Court (Rocky Hill decision, Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning) established that the climate impacts of exported coal are a relevant planning consideration. The OC3 extension clearly fails this test because it expands — rather than phases down — fossil fuel production during a period of urgent decarbonisation. ________________________________________ 2. Unacceptable Air Quality and Health Impacts Coal mining in the Mudgee–Ulan region has already resulted in cumulative particulate pollution from multiple existing mines. The OC3 extension would significantly increase: • PM10 and PM2.5 dust pollution • blasting emissions • diesel exhaust exposure • coal handling and transport particulates Fine particulate matter is linked to: • cardiovascular disease • respiratory illness • asthma exacerbation • premature mortality Rural communities have limited access to specialist health services. The burden of disease therefore falls disproportionately on residents of the region. The project adds to an already high cumulative exposure environment and fails the precautionary principle. Approval would effectively shift private economic benefit onto public health cost. ________________________________________ 3. Water Security and Groundwater Impacts The project presents significant risk to both surface and groundwater systems. The Moolarben mine operates in a region where: • groundwater supports agriculture, • aquifers recharge slowly, • and rainfall is highly variable. Longwall and open-cut mining can cause: • aquifer depressurisation • permanent drawdown • fracturing of geological strata • loss of baseflow to creeks Predicted “make-good” provisions do not restore aquifers. Water systems that take centuries to form cannot be replaced through compensation agreements. Given increasing drought frequency in NSW, approval would represent a short-term industrial use overriding long-term regional water security. ________________________________________ 4. Agricultural and Land Use Conflict The Central West and Upper Hunter regions are strategically important agricultural areas. Mining expansion creates: • land sterilisation • dust deposition on crops and pasture • reduced livestock productivity • loss of soil quality • property devaluation Agriculture provides sustainable, intergenerational employment. Coal mining does not. The project therefore represents a direct land-use conflict in which a finite extractive industry displaces a permanent food-producing landscape. Once mined, agricultural capability cannot be restored to its original state, despite rehabilitation claims. ________________________________________ 5. Economic Considerations and Employment Claims Employment benefits are often overstated in mining assessments. Coal mining is increasingly mechanised and provides relatively limited long-term employment compared with: • agriculture • renewable energy development • regional tourism Furthermore, approval risks creating stranded assets and economic instability as global demand for thermal coal declines. The project therefore exposes the regional economy to future shock rather than supporting economic transition. 6. Biodiversity and Ecological Impacts The project area contains remnant woodland ecosystems and habitat for threatened species. Even where offsetting is proposed, biodiversity offsets do not replace ecological function. Mature ecosystems cannot be recreated within human timeframes. Cumulative biodiversity loss across the Western Coalfields is significant. Approval of the OC3 extension would contribute to incremental ecological degradation and habitat fragmentation across the region. ________________________________________ 7. Failure of the Precautionary Principle Under ecologically sustainable development principles, where there is scientific uncertainty but potential for serious environmental damage, approval should not proceed. There remains uncertainty regarding: • cumulative dust impacts • groundwater behaviour • rehabilitation success • long-term climate effects Because impacts may be irreversible, the Commission must err on the side of environmental protection. ________________________________________ Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension is not a neutral development decision. It is a long-term commitment to expanded fossil fuel extraction with permanent environmental consequences and limited regional benefit. The project: • increases greenhouse gas emissions, • threatens water resources, • harms community health, • damages agriculture, • degrades biodiversity, • and conflicts with NSW’s long-term public interest. For these reasons, I respectfully request the NSW Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely, AnneMaree McLaughlin (redacted) NSW 2800 (redacted) (redacted) |
|
Attachments |
AM McL Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 180.57 KB) |
Cornelia Harris
|
ID |
22236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am owner of a property in (redacted). I am a GP who treated many patients for climate change related conditions. These range from cardiovascular to mental health affects and their number is increasing. Human health should be on top of your lists for opposing the extension of this coal mine. However all other points of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction, impact of water resources and greenhouse gas emissions are also within their own enough reason to object this extension. Regarding particle pollution, please remember the worst particles the very fine ones that enter our lungs deeply and can’t be removed do usually travel happily up to 150 km until they come down and do their great harm. Neighbours should include those within that radius. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2481 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. It proposes clearing around 480 hectares of native vegetation there are at least 23 threatened species recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is no merit in this project it creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. It threatens water supplies, adds to climate change and enriches yet another large corporation paying little to no tax while destroying the environment. At a time when renewable energy is being embraced this is a backwards step. I fear for my grandchildren’s future if this rampant destruction of our natural environment continues. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2550 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been a concerned voter in New South Wales since 1975. During this time, I have watched the development of accurate, scientifically rigorous information about the impacts of burning fossil fuels. Increasingly, it is obvious that voters understand the links to climate change and the wider deleterious effect on our planet. Increasingly, they are demonstrating their objections to decisions which cause damage to our environment. Increasingly, they expect their elected representatives to transmit those objections into action to protect the state’s natural assets. I believe the Independent Planning Commission has the responsibility to implement the intent of the law to protect our natural environment. It is clear that the NSW government is now the organisation responsible for that protection. The fact that the mine continues to operate as a long-term entity is greatly concerning. The concept that the mine may be expanded is not just dangerously short-sighted, it is contrary to the expressed wishes of increasing numbers of voters. The deleterious effect of burning fossil fuels has been evident for a very long time and the impacts are now increasing exponentially. All governments, but in this case specifically the New South Wales government, has the responsibility to diminish the impacts not only of burning fossil fuels but the immediate impacts on the Mudgee region. The mine site itself, the destruction of the local habitat, the impact on the region’s health and it’s community are well-documented. Most alarmingly, any damage to the water systems in the area are highly likely to be irremediable. I object to the proposed expansion of the Yancoal Moolarben Mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed amendments as they do not remove the clearing of native vegetation. The loss of this vegetation will have lasting environmental consequences and reduce habitat for local wildlife and this irreversible damage on biodiversity is unacceptable. |
Michael Webb
|
ID |
22271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2541 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a New South Wales elector who has made study of the environmental impacts of coal mining and burning a careful concern. The proposed Moorlarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension currently under your consideration is a threat to the welfare of New South Wales residents as a whole and in a number of ways. Obviously, and most importantly, the primary object of the applicant is to bring more coal to market. Wherever in the world it is burned, coal threatens the prosperity, health and, if not retired rapidly, the survival of humans and most life forms worldwide. Open cut mining is known to expel methane and thus add multiples of risk over those modes releasing mainly CO2. Continuing the narrative of coal extraction as a viable source of wealth and employment stymies the transition focus that the New South Wales economy urgently needs to accelerate. The local environmental effects have also been carefully documented by the local residents and it seems Yancoal would need to accept responsibility not just for atmosphere global warming effects but also direct damage to Koala habitats and groundwaters [were their application approved]. New South Wales has chosen a path to net zero but this expansion runs entirely counter to that goal. It also appears incongruous with respectful dealings on first nations concerns. The last minute amendments brought by the company are transparently designed as a salve and a disruption to the orderly consideration of the known and threatening impacts of their proposals. It is for these reasons I urge the Independent Planning Commission recommend refusal of this extension project. Sincerely, Michael Webb (redacted) 2541 |
Valeska Detto
|
ID |
22286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to voice my objection regarding the proposed Moorlaban coal mine expansion. I am deeply concerned about the impact to the surrounding community and ecosystems. The area is a known koala habitat and the expansion would destroy 480 hectares of koala habitat, resulting in habitat loss and making it harder for koalas to move, breed and survive. This land clearing would also impact other biodiversity in the area, including birds, insects and flora. I am also deeply concerned about the increased production of greenhouse emissions this would cause, which would severely impact our climate future. Australia should be moving away from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy. Thirdly, the project will be a huge drain on our precious water resources. Again, endangering local wildlife populations, as well as the local community and our countries commitment to sustainable water use. I hope the commissions listens to the community concerns regarding the opposition of this coal mine extension and opposes the planned submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Department of Planning Commission, I am writing to you today to strongly object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project on Wiradjuri Country. This project with have detrimental impacts on Wiradjuri Country by destroying over 55 cultural artefacts, as well as degrading the land. This is unacceptable and cannot be allowed to happen. If approved, this expansion of this mine will have absolutely devastating environmental impacts on wildlife, water systems and the climate - with an estimated 64 million tonnes of green house emissions being produced. The amendments recently made by Yancoal will not reduce the destruction that the coal mine will wreak on the land, waterways and native habitats - this project must not go ahead. With this reasons, I deeply urge the Planning Commission to reject the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension project. Thank you. |
marc kiho
|
ID |
22326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project will cause further incremental and irreversible damage to the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • The ongoing and ever-expanding industrial scale plundering of the landscape by mining and the subsequent ongoing loss of suitable habitat and loss of habitat connectivity for endangered native species. • The Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve, The Drip Gorge and adjoining Goulburn River National Park have lost connectivity for native wildlife by the existing mining operations stretching from Ulan to Wollar in the valley. Further expansion of the mine will only make the current bad situation even worse. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. To think that a 100m buffer is suitable is ridiculous. You only have to look at aerial photos of the industrial mine complex stretching from Ulan to Wollar to see that the current setbacks are totally irresponsible and completely ignorant of the impacts on the adjoining native vegetation areas. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The loss of natural groundwater within this landscape will be devastating for native vegetation, ecosystems and endangered wildlife that are already at critical levels. • At some point you have to say ‘enough is enough’. Moolarbin coal mine has reached that point. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a wildlife carer I OBJECT to the planned submission, and I DO NOT support this planned coal expansion. |
Hunter Williams
|
ID |
22401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3102 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, My name is Hunter Williams, I am an Environmental Science and Environmental Engineering student at (redacted). The proposed Moolarben coal mine is a disastrous proposed development for the local environment and climate as a whole. As we trend further and further into catastrophic warming, we are nearing climate tipping points which will devastate our Australia's precious ecosystems such as the irreversible slowing of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. This tipping point will cause dramatic rises in sea temperatures leading to the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef. It is absolutely necessary that this coal mine is not developed. The threat to groundwater and creeks is a disastrous threat as fresh water becomes ever more precious with the development of large data centres. Thank you for you're time. I hope you see how this decision plays into the well-being of generations to come, and right now, we can decide on a better future for our planet and our grand children. Hunter Williams |
Ashlee Todd
|
ID |
22411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation. 23 threatened wildlife species have been recorded in and around the site, including habitat critical to Koalas. |
Tom Nicholson
|
ID |
22416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2456 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Tom Nicholson. I’m a 51 year old father of 2. I’m a geologist, living and working in northern NSW. I work primarily helping communities recover from natural disasters. My field of expertise is natural disaster recovery, and am formally educated as a geologist. I have a history of working in mining, but now work helping our communities recover from natural disasters. I fix landslides to help people recover from disastrous circumstances. For the last 5 years I have been overwhelmed with work. Natural disasters and extreme weather events have been destroying communities more often. It’s clear that we have changed the climate, both our specific local environment and the wider environment have suffered from our burning of fossil fuels. This is not a question of belief, but simple understanding of facts – the science is simple and evidence based. It’s abundantly clear that burning fossil fuels has led us to this point. In response, given I can’t control what governments do, but I can control what I do, I have converted my families energy system to electric. We power all our needs from the sun. We drive in excess of 100,000 km a year and export 3 times what we use annually – we are a net green power exporter. It’s clearly possible for us to pivot away from coal rapidly and without disrupting our lifestyles and incomes. My family is better off personally, financially and we no longer cause irreversible damage to the wider community from pollution of the atmosphere with CO2. I bring this viewpoint to the Yancold Moolarben coal mine expansion. I fundamentally object to Yancolds proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. The expansion of the coal mine is not needed. We do not need more coal. We do not need to export coal. There is no community good to come from mining more coal. Far from it – the costs to our specific community and the world wide community are clear and detrimental. The expansion of the coal mine clearly contradicts the NSW climate goals. The area for the expansion should be protected and brought into the Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve to provide a buffer from the open pit. Yancold has refused to adopt the 500m buffer zone from the reserve. This will lead to serious affects on the threatened species that inhabit the area. Its clear that this expansion of the mine will lead to unacceptable harm to threatened species and ecosystems. The expansion of the mine is not needed for jobs and prosperity of the community – mining of the expansion is predicted to be completed by 2034. This is a short term employment prospect for workers. Alternate jobs in our new energy future are more urgent and profitable. More coal workers are just more workers who will be out of work as the economic isssues of supply and demand catch up to coal miners. Renewable energy is now clearly cheaper than coal fired energy. All coal workers are in the end going to need to retrain in other roles. Lets upskill our workforce now in new expanding areas of expertise, and not entrench more people in jobs that have a use by date. Lastly, coal mining will cause serious and long lasting damage to groundwater systems. This is unnecessary and not required. In summary I respectfully, but fundamentally, object to Yancolds proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. Regards, Tom Nicholson (redacted) NSW 2456 |
Paul Schimmel
|
ID |
22426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2087 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To The Independent Planning Commission I am a psychoanalyst, now retired and I wish to register my opposition to the proposed Moolarben Coal Mine expansion proposal. In my lifetime I have witnessed the relentless degradation of the world's natural environment, and today we are faced with the reality of rampant climate change which is already beginning to create destruction for the environment and for human beings. Such destruction is largely driven by human greed, and politicians, with their often limited perspectives do not seem to have the motivation to address the problem of climate change effectively, so it is left to individuals and environmental organisations to campaign against such policies as opening new coal mines or expanding existing ones. That the proposed expansion should not go ahead is a 'no brainer' as we say in Australia, but it does rely on people with foresight and the capacity to think, in the true sense of the word, to oppose it. Please do so. Thank you for considering my views. Dr Paul Schimmel |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22446 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
ACF |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2167 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I think this proposed expanson will significantly affect Australia's image for promissed responsibility of reducong immition, while makes no sense to our national benifits. |
Louise Archer
|
ID |
22466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2750 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Just STOP with all your interference of the Natural World! Find another way to make your filthy money Shame on you 😕 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. |
Catherine Lane
|
ID |
22491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2483 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the independent Planning Commission, My name is Catherine and I am an artist and recently retired adult educator. I am writing to voicve my opposition to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. My family came as free settlers to Australia and settled on Wiradjiri country as pastoralists, so although I don't live there now, I have a deep connection with the place. The first nations Wiradjiri people suffered terribly from the effects of colonisation and still deal with that trauma. What is left of their cultural heritage in location, should be protected without question. My dear late friend Jennifer Newman, an academic from UTS and the university of Western Sydney was a Wiradjiri woman so I got to know country intimately through her. It's country that is irreplaceable and I don't understand why millions of years of biodiversity has less value than a dirty substance that has maybe a 30 year life span. It's a no brainer. Please don't do this. Notably: * in this time of dramatic climate change it's astonishing to me that a project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions is being pushed at a time when emission targets are currently not even being met * when we are in the middle of a global extinction crisis and Labor said there would be no more extinctions on their watch, this would be iinexcusable. To clear 480 hectares of native vegetation which is currently habitat for 23 threatened and endangered species including the Regent Honeyeater and the koala is madness. Koalas have been recorded breeding there and every opportunity must be taken to look after these animals who now face unprecedented danger. This beautiful valley should instead, be added to the adjacent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to secure protection in perpetuity for these animals that cannot speak for themselves. It is not empty scrub. * The impacts of increased blasting, noise, vibration from major plant equipment and industrial scale activity within 100m of the Munghorn Nature Reserve have not been adequately assessed and must also be taken seriously. The consequences would be disastrous for wildlife. * There are serious potential water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. The water monitoring and impact studies must be done BEFORE any development application, not after. These are critical drought refuges for desperate wildlife. * From an economic perspective, there is no justification for expansion of a coal mine and the arguments don't stack up. It won't mean more jobs because there is a clear priority being given to renewable energy nationwide and globally. Australia should be leading the way forward with this, not pushing outdated energy models. * further to that last point, Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to anyone else who wants it. Australia must stop ruining it's biodiversity for foreign money - once it's gone, it's gone. Please stop the expansion of the Yancoal mine. Yours sincerely, Catherine Lane |
Sylvia Ray
|
ID |
22541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sylvia, I am a 59 year old grandmother of two small children. I am deeply concerned about the relentless expansion of coal in NSW and the rest of Australia. The impacts on our climate are becoming more extreme. The heatwaves we have faced during this last month have been devastating for communities. And they are predicted to worsen the more emissions that are produced. I object to the Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. It is not justified and will exacerbate the already dire situation we face. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Please consider the devastating impacts this expansion will cause would it be approved. Sincerely Sylvia (redacted), NSW 2289 |
Jenny Andrews
|
ID |
22551 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Friends of Aranda Bushland |
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2614 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We object to any expansion of coal mining in Australia. It is out of date when new, clean ways of achieving what coal used to do are available. That's the general feeling of our group |
Raelene Narraway
|
ID |
22556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hello, My name is Rae Narraway and I have the privilege of owning 30 acres of land at (redacted), near Mudgee. I am writing to voice my objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. As the stewards of undisturbed land in the region I see first hand how critical and delicate the biodiversity of the area is. Natural challenges take a very long time to repair in the environment, and man-made distruption even longer. I am begging you to do all you can as an gatekeeper, to stop the degradation of our unique natural spaces. There is no plan or submission that can adequately repair the damage that large mining does to our region. I thank you sincerely for your time. kind regards, Raelene Narraway |
Peter Judge
|
ID |
22566 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Blayney Eco Hub |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2799 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Blayney Eco Hub Inc are opposed to Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are a community centre at the headwaters of the Belubula River who care about future resilience of our region. We educate community members on how to build a stronger community together by supporting local food growing, water security, and possible threats from disaster induced by climate change. Participants in our education programs come from all over the Central West NSW, including Mudgee and surrounds. We therefore voice our concerns about this mine expansion which would significantly impact ecological communities both in the immediate vicinity near Mudgee, but also around us through its climate impacts. Our key concerns include: • Water impacts: In times of heating and drying, water is more precious than coal. This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for more than 25 years post mining significantly altering stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems and potentially Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This puts Moolarben Creek and Spring Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Cultural significance: Mining expansion would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. • Disturbance to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: As one of the oldest and most diverse reserves in the state, we are concerned that the 675 ha destruction from clearing and mining activities will leave only a 100 m buffer between the mine and the reserve. We join with those calling for a 500m buffer minimum. • Coal extraction and its climate cost: this project will add an extra 30 million tonnes of coal produced over the life of the mine to 2038. An additional 64.6 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced. This impacts us all through increasing extreme weather events and must be phased out. • Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koalas on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. We also note the documented presence of microbats and Broad-headed Snakes, within the 401ha of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland, for which the NSW Environment Department has warned would be in serious decline. Local landcarers have put in many years of work to build up these habitats and we do not have the luxury of going backwards in these efforts. For all of these reasons we call upon the Independent Planning Commission to reject the OC3 expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben mine. Sally Neaves (Secretary) on behalf of Peter Judge (President) Blayney Eco Hub Inc. |
|
Attachments |
22566 - Peter Judge_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 158.07 KB) |
Louise Stokes
|
ID |
22571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
For over 30 years scientists have been warning about the need for fossil fuels to power energy to cease in order to prevent dire climate change. My husband and I, as 4th generation farmers in the Upper Hunter Valley, are already feeling the effects of the climate crisis, having to fork out thousands of dollars to mitigate the damage from unprecedented flooding. Already some days it is too hot to farm, and our livestock, feed and trees are demonstrating signs of heat stress. If Australia is going to have food security in the future, and our sons (who will be 5th generation farmers on a productive farm which has been in the Chapman family since 1913) are going to have a viable farm to nurture, Governments, state and federal must protect farmers, not cause more damage. Protection includes stopping the effects of climate change, which means phasing out economic and energy reliance on fossil fuels. I completely oppose the expansion of this mine. |
Thomas Ebersoll
|
ID |
22576 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Lithgow Environment Group Inc. |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To The Independent Planning Comission Ref.: Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Lithgow, 16 February 2026 Lithgow Environment Group has been advocating environmental issues since 2005 and we welcome the opportunity to contribute to the above inquiry. We are a member of the Central West Environment Council (CWEC) and as such are concerned about environmental issues in the greater Central West. We are opposed to the proposed mine extension for the following reasons: We consider the proposed “off-site habitat enhancement” as ‘Greenwash’ and an afterthought in the application process. It will do nothing to reverse the total destruction of the environment by open cut mining locally and the destruction of our climate from burning the coal globally. The NSW Government has officially committed to reducing emissions with the introduction of the NSW Climate Change Act 2023. This proposal contravenes that act. The expansion comes too close to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which should be protected and enhanced instead of being compromised by an open cut mining operation next to it. The clearing of 480ha of native vegetation is too much a price to justify a few jobs, royalties and profits for the Yancoal corporation. There is no economy without an environment. Water, the most precious resource in our drying continent will be compromised. Both surface and underground water will be affected and vital riparian environments lost. We urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you Thomas Ebersoll Secretary LEG |
|
Attachments |
22576 - Thomas Ebersoll_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 186.13 KB) |
Sandra Santacruz
|
ID |
22581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2259 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
You're threatening the endangered spices in the area. |
Shelley McFarlane
|
ID |
22586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2026 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We ALL have a responsibility to protect our environment, Protect the health of those affected nearby and tourism and that of the surrounding Towns. School children and animals. |
Julie Hunter
|
ID |
22591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I have a long-standing connection to Rylstone and the Central West and operate a business in the region. I am actively involved in environmental and community initiatives focused on protecting local landscapes and waterways. Through my professional work in sustainability and climate strategy, I understand the broader policy, economic and environmental implications of decisions relating to fossil fuel expansion. Decisions about large-scale mining projects directly shape the environmental future and economic direction of this community. I write to formally object to the proposed **Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension. There are several reasons why this proposal should not proceed. I highlight four of them below. 1. The proposal places the ecological integrity of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve at risk. Munghorn Gap is a landscape of recognised environmental value and an important wildlife corridor in the Mudgee region. It supports remnant woodland ecosystems, including Box-Gum Woodland communities, and provides habitat for species such as koalas, powerful owls, gliders, microbats and woodland birds. Extending large-scale open cut mining in close proximity to this reserve risks habitat fragmentation and ongoing disturbance from noise, dust and light. Woodland corridors are critical for wildlife movement and breeding. Once fragmented, their ecological function is significantly weakened and cannot simply be reinstated through rehabilitation. 2. The extension will accelerate the loss of native habitat. OC3 requires further clearing of native vegetation in a region already heavily impacted by mining. Groups including Lock the Gate Alliance and the Mudgee District Environment Society have raised consistent concerns about cumulative biodiversity loss across this mining precinct. Incremental clearing across successive expansions compounds long-term ecological decline. This is not consistent with the protection of remaining habitat or with responsible environmental decision-making. 3. The proposal is inconsistent with the renewable energy transition. Expanding coal extraction during a national and global shift toward renewable energy is fundamentally at odds with stated climate commitments. The scientific evidence is clear that fossil fuel combustion is a primary driver of climate change. Approving new or expanded coal projects locks in decades of additional emissions at a time when Australia is investing heavily in renewable infrastructure. There should be no further extensions to coal mines during an active transition away from fossil fuels. 4. The proposal does not support a sustainable future for the Central West. The Central West is positioned to play a significant role in Australia’s renewable energy future. Continuing to expand coal mining prolongs dependence on an industry that is incompatible with long-term environmental stability. Incremental approvals such as OC3 create substantial and lasting impacts without a full and transparent assessment of the region’s future direction. For these reasons, I request that the Moolarben Open Cut 3 extension be refused. Planning decisions in this region should prioritise ecological protection, climate responsibility and a sustainable economic transition for the Central West. Thank you for considering this submission. |
Nick King
|
ID |
22596 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Environmentall Concerned Citizens of Orange (ECCO) |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The submission from ECCO has been sent as an attachment. It opposes the project on the grounds of unacceptable greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity impacts, impacts on groundwater and those of aboriginal heritage. Further, ECCO submits that there is no economic advantage to the proposal. |
|
Attachments |
22596 - Nick King_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 617.88 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2602 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
No new coal mines are required in Australia, renewable energy is the way to go. The mine will negatively impact biodiversity, ground water, wildlife and add tons of Co2 to the atmosphere and no doubt move profits off shore. Heading for 2030, we had better set an example and stand for Earth Health. Your concerned citizen [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], I am a 25-year old PhD student and research in Sydney and I am writing to express my significant concerns and objections regarding Yancoal’s proposed expansion of Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I deeply object to the proposal on the grounds of the substantial adverse impact this project would have on cultural sovereignty, biodiversity, environmental health, community welfare, and our state’s achievement of climate goals. The land proposed for expansion should rightfully be considered part of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected accordingly. While Yancoal has made proposed amendments following rightful community backlash, I believe this amendments do not adequately reduce the negative impact of the proposal, and moreover have been submitted far too late for meaningful consideration. Cultural Sovereignty The proposed expansion involves the desecration or destruction of numerous irreplaceable Wiradjuri cultural artefacts, as well as the land to which Wiradjuri People have an intrinsic and inextricable cultural connection. The proposal contributes to a long history of cultural destruction that causes irrevocable harm to First Nations Peoples, undermining cultural sovereignty by violating connection to Country. Biodiversity and Environmental Health Environmentally, the project threatens significant species and habitat loss, including the destruction of land on which koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats live and breed. Biodiversity offsets are an insufficient solution in the face of this destruction of threatened species’ land. Ecosystems are also at risk of long-term groundwater drawdown, which could harm the Creek and the surrounding flora and fauna. Additionally, the project would involve additional greenhouse gas emissions, worsening our state’s impact on the ongoing climate crisis and undermining our ability to protect future generations from climate impacts. Community Welfare This project threatens the welfare of the surrounding community, with proposed expansion contributing to noise pollution, vibration impacts, and worsened air quality. This damage is not balanced out with job justification or a clear contribution to public safety and prosperity. Climate Goals Finally, the NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For the above reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
|
Attachments |
22606 - MacKenzie McCowan_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 90.68 KB) |
Jada Parsons
|
ID |
22611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to you from Dubbo to voice my strong opposition to the Moolarben coal mine extension. Decades ago, the Dubbo region supported a healthy population of koalas, so I understand the loss of no longer living alongside these beautiful animals. I have been following the news about this Moolarben project, and I am horrified to learn about the devastating impact it will have on the local koala population. These are not just any koalas. This is a healthy, breeding population that has shown incredible resilience, surviving droughts and bushfires. To destroy 480 hectares of their critical habitat, including a known breeding area, is simply unconscionable. The fact that the mine's own reports acknowledge the 'significant impact' and that the habitat is 'critical to the survival of the species' makes this proposal even more outrageous. We are in the midst of an extinction crisis, and koalas in NSW are on a path to disappearing forever by 2050. Approving this mine extension would be a death sentence for this important koala colony and would make a mockery of any government commitment to protecting this iconic species. We should be protecting places like the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not allowing a coal mine to encroach to within 100 metres of its boundary. Please listen to the experts and the community. Please choose to protect our precious wildlife over the profits of a coal company. Please reject this destructive project. Sincerely, Jada Parsons |
Joanna de Burgh
|
ID |
22616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Tasmania 7004 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
How many floods, fires, droughts record numbers of cyclones, will it take for some people to realise that there are things which exist which can't be bought with money. It is so disappointing that this project has gone as far as it has. We need vegetation. I live in Tasmania and my local bushland and my Mount Field bushland are dying as I watch with the changes in weather patterns. What happens in NSW affects climate locally and globally. Assessors, bring yourselves up to date with the state of our climate. I have grandchildren: think of them too. We can make decisions on emotional grounds other than greed. I openly own and acknowledge my emotion, as well as the evidence. |
Bob Hill
|
ID |
22626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2798 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Commissioners, I have been a resident in Central West NSW for 50 years during which time I have been a member of my local fire brigade, environment groups and have volunteered at my local museum. I oppose the proposed extension to the Moorlaben coal mine for the following reasons. Firstly it seems crazy to clear 480 hectares of endangered boxwood gum habitat for koalas and threatened bats, birds and reptiles when Australia’s record for species extinction is among the worst in the world. We need a strong buffer zone around the Munghorn Gap Reserve, not a coal mine. Secondly, the project makes no sense when the region is building a reputation for sustainable tourism, focussing on food, heritage and nature. The recent developments around the Garden of Stone Conservation area near Lithgow represent a good example of a community transitioning from fossil fuels. But my main objection is the projected64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions from the extension. The predictions of the IPCC, & most of the world’s climate scientists, for droughts, floods, fires, heatwaves and coastal erosion of increasing frequency and intensity have proven correct. The recent fires, heatwaves and droughts in Australia are evidence of this frightening global trend. There is no way at present, or in the foreseeable future, that the emissions from the extension can be captured and stored, The costs of capture and storage attempts to date massively, exceed any income that might come from the extension. The local, national and global consequences from the current expansion of coal mining in NSW will be catastrophic. Massively unprecedented weather changes produce lots of victims. The phase out of coal mining should have started long ago. The Moorlaben extension should not be approved. |
Jim McIlroy
|
ID |
22636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2008 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as a concerned citizen of NSW to express strong opposition to the proposed Moolarben coalmine expansion project. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. The Moolarben coal mine expansion would be a step backwards in ensuring we meet our climate goals. The NSW government needs to act with the climate crisis in mind. The area where Moolarben wants to dig for coal, is also set to become an REZ (renewable energy zone). We need to shift the focus of the government to building up REZ areas, as we cannot simultaneously be expanding new fossil fuel projects. Having visited the area around Mudgee where the mine is situated, I appreciate the beautiful scenery there and want to re-emphasise my opposition to the Moolarben mine expansion project going ahead. Thank you, Jim McIlroy |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project will cause further incremental and irreversible damage to the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • The ongoing and ever-expanding industrial scale plundering of the landscape by mining and the subsequent ongoing loss of suitable habitat and loss of habitat connectivity for endangered native species. • The Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve, The Drip Gorge and adjoining Goulburn River National Park have lost connectivity for native wildlife by the existing mining operations stretching from Ulan to Wollar in the valley. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. You only have to look at aerial photos of the industrial mine complex stretching from Ulan to Wollar to see that the current setbacks are totally irresponsible and completely ignorant of the impacts on the adjoining native vegetation areas. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The loss of natural groundwater within this landscape will be devastating for native vegetation, ecosystems and endangered wildlife that are already at critical levels. • At some point you have to say ‘enough is enough’. Moolarbin coal mine has reached that point. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this development!! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4211 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I would like to bring to your attention my objection and concerns about the Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As a society, we are facing significant impacts due to global rising temperatures. There are actions we can take to minimise damage and in fact we have many opportunities to maintain and create micro-climates. We have a choice of living in deserts or an oasis. I’m not anti coal mines. However, I believe that the priority with every decision must be based on the short and long term impacts on our environment. We can and are moving to energy sources that are more sustainable, and these projects will eventually eliminate the need for coal mines. In the meanwhile, any damage to the environment causes significant harm that in many cases is irreversible. It is arrogant to act in ways that do not allow the rights of other lifeforms to exist in peace. The clearing of approx. 480 hectares of native vegetation for this coal mine expansion is to me unacceptable. All levels of government have a responsibility to act in the interests of the Australian people. That is your function. Acting in the interest of corporations does not mean you are acting in the interests of the people. Energy from coal may bring minor benefits to some people for a very short period of time. The damage done to the flora and fauna is long term and, in the case of a coal mine, usually irreversible. Potential harm and contamination to our water must be avoided at all costs, not avoiding this potential harm is simply irresponsible and definitely not in the interests of Australians. These 480 hectares of native vegetation need to be made a protected nature reserve. This area could join with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I believe that there has been identified at least 23 threatened species in this area. Koalas, an Australian icon and known worldwide, live in this area. Koala populations were devasted in the 2020 fires in NSW and I believe there was a commitment from government to do all they could to protect koalas. This area needs to be protected. As human beings we need biodiversity to survive. Here, you would be destroying it. This destruction would include: • The clearing of approx.113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded • The clearing of approx. 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded • The clearing of approx. 401 hectares of the nationally listed endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem • Loss of habitat for approx. 23 threatened species including the Regent Honey Eater, the Broadheaded snake and microbats • Significant impacts on the adjacent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve • Significant long term impacts on groundwater and creeks in the area • Serious risk of causing drought conditions within the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve – another significant and avoidable impact on these ecosystems • The destruction of 55 First Nation cultural artefacts – which will directly cause harm to the Wiradjuri people's ability to engage in their cultural practices and their connection to Country Australia needs to vastly improve its level of protection of native flora, fauna and habitats. We do not have a good global image in this area and we are experiencing a climate and biodiversity crisis. I believe it is in the best interests of the Australian people that the NSW Government should not approve to expand any existing coal projects or to approve any new ones. Additionally, this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely Concerned Australian |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2087 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To The Independent Planning Commission I wish to register my opposition to the proposed Moolarben Coal Mine expansion proposal. In my lifetime I have seen the aggressive, thoughtless and greedy degradation of the world's natural environment. We are already facing the reality of the effects of scientifically verified climate change which is beginning to create destruction for the environment and for human beings. It is also extremely costly with huge governmental subsidies being required to support farmers and residents who are dealing with the effects of prolonged droughts and other extreme weather events. The destruction is largely driven by human greed and short sightedness. Politicians do not seem to have the motivation and courage to address the problem of climate change effectively, so it is left to individuals and environmental organisations to campaign against such short sighted, destructive policies as opening new coal mines or expanding existing ones given all the evidence we have of their destructive impacts for the environment and human life. Surely vast employment opportunities can be created within green energy projects and the electrification of our beautiful country, so unique in this world. The proposed expansion should not go ahead, but this decision would rely on people with foresight and a true capacity to think and protect. Thank you for considering. [redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted] and I have retired we have 2 Grandchildren and I am deeply concern about the climate impacts of any expansion of any coal mine in NSW. We have seen the impacts of climate change, Victorian flash Floods 10 cars washed in the ocean, Record heat waves this summer, Queensland floods. Over heated oceans coursing Algal Blooms killing wildlife. Loss of species in local areas. I my local park we have seen many birds disappear this summer. I am writing to voice my concerns over the Yancoal’s proposed expansion Moolaeben OC3 Coal mine near Mudgee NSW. Carbon Dioxide and methane are a record high amounts in the Atmosphere. I am concerned over the loss of habitat for Koala, gliders and rare bird habitats. Groundwater will be affect and we are losing water everywhere. We can’t keep exporting coal to be burnt overseas. I am urging the Independent Planning Commission to reject any expansion plans. Thank you for considering my submissions. [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
22666Redacted.pdf (PDF, 431.15 KB) |
Jane Crosskill
|
ID |
22676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. The mine is located near Mudgee and is the largest producing coal mine in NSW with permission to operate until 2038. At the same time Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone which will provide alternative employment opportunities over the next decade. The mine expansion is not needed for jobs and regional prosperity and will cause lasting environmental damage. As a Mudgee resident I do not understand why this project is being considered when it is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris agreement. The proposed expansion would encroach within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Reserve threatening critical ecosystems, water sources and Aboriginal cultural heritage. Not to mention the massive climate cost because it would generate millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. There needs to be a planned transition not additional, destructive and irreversible harm to the beautiful Mudgee region. I urge the IPC to recommend that this project is refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a freelancer who teaches young people and adults, I am deeply concerned about the effects that this development will have on people's wellbeing and the wellbeing of wildlife in NSW. I am particularly concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat.The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. As an artist and theatre maker and historian I am concerned that the development will destroy Aboriginal artefact and items of historical value and importance. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. This development threatens wildlife and protected species. It will cause irreversible damage to the environment and should be stopped ASAP. |
Bronwen Evans
|
ID |
22701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2036 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. As a practicing Veterinarian I am well versed in animal welfare. The stress caused to the animal life, which would be only 100m away in the reserve, due to noise, blasting vibrations, dust and unnatural lighting, especially at night, is unacceptable. This is already well documented by the local community, many of whom have subsequently moved away. The proposed area includes 113 ha of koala habitat which is of great breeding importance for this now endangered iconic species 2. The DPHI has recommended that ground water baselines are measured for 1 year. This will only be possible with the installation bores due to the IEAPM recommendation. That the MCO wants to start mining according their own self determined time line is not an adequate reason to not impose these very important means to accrue scientifically proven data on the impacts of the mine proposal on water. Water is the basis of life and should have top priority. Moolarben Creek is a critical drought refuge for wildlife and must be protected. The project has an expected drawdown of up to 6 which will affect deep rooted trees and riparian life. 3. With regards to habitat enhancement I find it impossible to understand its effectiveness. It is not yet fully understood the complexity of any ecosystem. Therefore any proposed enhancement cannot guarantee it will be the correct balance for any one species let alone the 23 threatened species. The increase of this area from 160ha to 188ha is a mere 28ha, hardly a significant area compared to the area of 480 ha to be cleared by the proposal. Revegetating cleared land to its former ability to provide habitat is a long term project, which can not be fulfilled during the time line proposed, especially as the environment will be so devastatingly changed. Once the 401 ha of the endangered Box Gum forest is cleared it will be gone forever The report itself talks of remnant woodland and remnant riparian vegetation. Any further affects on these remnants is unacceptable. 4. The local First Nations people, the Wiadjuri have noted places of high cultural significant in the area. 5. The high mechanisation of this industry does not provide significant local financial advantage. Renewable energy projects are far more beneficial locally and to the world environment 6. The impact of this mine needs to be assessed in combination of the effects of all the mining in the area Australia has a Net Zero Commission and agreed to the Paris agreement. Allowing this expansion is not in agreement with either of these. |
Glenda SHOULDER
|
ID |
22711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned about the expansion of coal mining in this area of NSW. It will destroy the habitat of many animals which are under threat already from climate changes, including the current drought in NSW,. As a member of the community, I am aware that habitat clearing has destroyed many places for our native creatures that we as humans enjoy as well. This enjoyment can be passive in the sense of enjoying the appearance of the landscape, or in being involved with the natural environment by walking, or sensitively using the area for a commercial end, such as tourist activity, even painting a picture that gives pleasure to people who cannot access the place. From my observations while traveling in regional areas, I consider that Coal mining is not a clean industry. Dust clouds can occur, and water resources can be polluted. Downstream areas can be affected by toxic run off. There are other possible ways to create electricity, and I believe they should be pursued before further environmental damage is inflicted by further mining of coal. When the damage is done it is difficult and sometimes impossible to repair. Future generations will wear the cost of repairs, if possible, the loss of amenity of a valuable resource for recreation and environmental sustainability. Please do not do this coal mine development. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2072 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed development threatens the survival of 23 threatened wildlife species including the regent honeyeater. This is very harmful to the future of our wildlife and biodiversity. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the Open Cut 3 Extension Project. Expanding coal operations will worsen environmental impacts, including air and water pollution, and contribute to climate change. The ongoing expansion of fossil fuel extraction is incompatible with urgent action on climate and the health and safety of local communities. |
heather mclean
|
ID |
22726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed extension of Moolarben Coal Mine OpenCut3 (OC3). This coal complex proposal has no justification to proceed and many reasons to NOT be approved. The pit named OC3 and its impact on the environment has already been approved until 2038 but this proposal to extend it and also dig more pits further in to Moorlarben Valley as a so-called extension of OC3 and destroy a further 475 hectares of native vegetation should not be approved. The State Significant Development Assessment Report (SSD-33083358) provided to the IPC by DPHI records, in the section Strategic Context, that “ The project has been considered in accordance with key relevant Commonwealth, State and regional strategies including Australia’s Long-Term Emissions Reductions Plan, NSW Climate Change Policy Framework, Strategic Statement on Coal Exploration and Mining in NSW and Mid Western Regional Local Strategic Planning Statement”. However, it has obviously failed to consider the findings of the Net Zero Commission. NSW is already not on track to meet our 2030 and 2035 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. The expansion of coal mining is not consistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) 2023 Act and our commitment under the Paris Agreement. Historically, the argument that coal mining is vital for energy production and to provide regional jobs has been the basis for the industry to proceed, despite the cost to the environment and the consequences for future generations. This is no longer the case. The Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone will support many new jobs. The market for coal diminishes as renewable energy production increases. The true cost of the impact of coal mining on the local communities of people, plants, animals, water, air quality and ecosystems becomes ever more apparent. Government decisions to do what we can to limit global heating must be made. There is now legislation in place that the IPC must have regard to. I submit to the IPC that Yancoal should not be permitted to extend their open cut mine to within 100metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Yancoal have provided no basis to not accept the buffer recommendation made by DEECCW. It seems to me that would have been Yancoal’s main reason to fail to adequately assess the noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. In June 2024, the NSW Department of Energy Environment Climate Change and Water wrote to NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure stating : We also recommended a minimum setback of at least 500 metres from the geological features within Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to significantly reduce direct loss of habitat and commensurately reduce blasting vibration impacts. This same report ( link to doc ) to Dept PHI advises that there is likelihood of Serious And Irreversible Impacts on Box Gum Woodland CEEC, and the nationally endangered species Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Eastern Cave Bat and Large-eared Pied Bat . Also, the proponent itself reports that the proposal includes clearing 113 hectares of habitat critical to the survival of the local koala population. The loss of populations leads to the extinction of endangered species. There is drone footage of a koala with a baby koala in vegetation slated to be cleared for an open cut mine pit. It is not in the public interest to continue to fuel climate change and contribute to species extinction. Also at risk is known breeding habitat of Regent Honeyeaters! There is believed to be as few as 300 of these birds remaining in the wild. Successful breeding is vitally important to the Recovery Program. The recent submission by Yancoal of minor amendments has resulted in the indefinite postponement of the planned public hearing on Feb 10 2026 but does little, if anything, to alter the impact of the proposal. The expansion of mining of Moolarben Open Cut Coal Pit 3 only provides profit to the corporation at great cost to the environment and the future. This is not Ecologically Sustainable Development. It is not in the public interest to approve the expansion of coal mining and contribute to further greenhouse gas emissions. I submit that the IPC should recommend that this proposal be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22731 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2135 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a concerned citizen and I do not think there is reasonable grounds for this project to proceed. Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad- headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I am also concerned about the consequences of emissions from the extracted coal. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. For these and many other reasons I object to this proposal. |
Judy Cole
|
ID |
22736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We are racing against time to reduce carbon emmissions and coal is only making it worse. We need to shut down the coal mines and focus on renewable energy together with upgrading the grid. This is harmful to the environment and wasted money that can be used for renewable energy systems instead. |
Leigh Naunton
|
ID |
22746 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Move Beyond Coal Kooyong |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached file |
|
Attachments |
22746 - Leigh Naunton_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 434.5 KB) |
Bernadette Hobbs
|
ID |
22751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
In a time of both climate and biodiversity crises it beggars belief that the state’s largest producing coal mine seeks permission to increase NSW TOTAL emissions by almost 60% by clearing 480 hectares of habitat essential for endangered species! That is the opposite of what any responsible government which is committed to meeting its emissions and biodiversity targets should be doing! The Net Zero Commission in December 2025 states that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The NSW Govt is not on track to achieve either it’s 2030 or 2035 emissions reductions target. This alone should spell the end of Yancoal’s proposed new site which would convert a richly biodiverse valley into an open-cut coal mine. But there are so many other reasons for this proposal to be rejected. BIODIVERSITY: The government’s own Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCSG) has highlighted the threat that the project poses to our now endangered Koala: - The habitat present is critical to the survival of the species - This population is one of the few to have survived the recent onslaught of climate challenges - high temperatures, drought and bushfires. We cannot risk this critical population for the sake of offshore profit. In addition to koalas, several other endangered species of animals (regent honeyeater, bats, broad-headed snake, squirrel glider) and plants (the nationally endangerd Box Gum Woodland) are likely to endure serious and irreversible impacts! And the disregard for biodiversity in the proposal is further evidenced by the vastly inadequate 100m buffer from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The BCSG said a minimum buffer of 500m was needed to better protect the at-risk species. WATER: The mine would likely to lead to a water drawdown around Moolarben Creek of up to 5m. This seriously risks our deep-rooted trees which rely on that water. Yancoal has a deservedly bad reputation for water quality monitoring – it simply doesn’t do it. And there’s no proper baseline monitoring of the water in this case. CULTURAL HERITAGE: At least 55 cultural artefacts will be destroyed by this project, including a significant shelter which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of this site but Yancoal refused. Honestly, is nothing more important than their profits??? ECONOMY: Job creation is certainly not an excuse for approving this project. Even without any extension the Moolarben coal complex will continue until 2038. And an additional 2000 future-proofing jobs in the state’s Central West Renewable Energy Zone (which includes Mudgee) are predicted over the next decade. I want to thank all of the people who have provided me with the detailed analysis of this proposal so I can make an informed submission. To my mind, the habitat destruction and massive increase in emissions alone are ample reason to reject this proposal. But from all I’ve read and learned there is so much more at risk. I urge the IPC to reject this proposal. |
Dave Rowe
|
ID |
22761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2477 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached file. |
|
Attachments |
22761 - Dave Rowe.pdf (PDF, 287.96 KB) |
Sarah Daniel
|
ID |
22766 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2778 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. The more we learn about biodiversity the more we see that biodiversity is an ecosystem driver, population depletion has flow on effects to climate, water security and even food security. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. Threats to water in a county with fragile water security and continuing drought as dangerous as it affects livelihoods, the ecosystems capacity to maintain itself, draw down carbon and clean water and air, these are essential ecosystem functions we all benefit from. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. This is unconscionable behaviour that disrespects and disregards the oldest continuous culture in the world. A fact all Australians should be working hard to uphold and protect. We are already experiencing the effect of climate change. In the past 5 years we have lived through catastrophic fires, floods and drought. It takes generations to remove carbon from the atmosphere. It is too little to late already for our children. Sincerely, Sarah Daniel |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to Yancoal’s application for Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358). The plans would mean blasting, dust and noise from open cut mining right up to 100m of Munghorn Nature Reserve. This disregards the high importance and quality of the adjoining Nature Reserve, with which it shares a boundary several kilometres long. For instance, think of 100m from your own house being a noisy, dusty operating coal mine. The effects on koalas, bats, plants and birds would be many. Regarding Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, there are continued worldwide calls and scientific consensus on the great urgency to stop fossil fuel burning because it exacerbates climate change. Our NSW Government is committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. With over 30Mt of coal involved in this application, burning it would release a huge amount of GHG, and allowing this SSD application is directly opposed to reducing GHG emissions. I drive through the Ulan area a couple of times of year, and several times have enjoyed camping and spending time in Munghorn Gap NR. I call for this expansion to be rejected. |
Cathy Gill
|
ID |
22786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission is in attached PDF file |
|
Attachments |
Personal Moolarben submission.pdf (PDF, 85.51 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to strongly object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am deeply concerned about the serious and irreversible harm this project would cause to biodiversity, water systems, cultural heritage, and the climate. This expansion would destroy critical habitat for threatened species, including over 113 hectares of koala habitat, 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, and up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. Mining is proposed within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, putting species and ecosystems at severe risk. Offsite “habitat enhancements” suggested in recent amendments do nothing to reduce the clearing of native vegetation and come far too late in the consultation process, they just cannot replace the habitats that already exist. The climate impact of this project is enormous. The OC3 extension would produce around 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, which is equivalent to more than half of NSW’s annual emissions. Approving this mine expansion contradicts the Net Zero Future Act 2023, the Paris Agreement, and NSW’s climate targets, while locking in destructive emissions for decades. Water risks are also significant. Groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres could last 25 years, threatening Moolarben Creek and the ecosystems it supports, which are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Proposed post-approval monitoring is entirely inadequate, baseline studies need to happen before mining, not after, when the damage has been done. The expansion would also destroy irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural heritage, including 55 significant artifacts, further fracturing the landscape and undermining Wiradjuri connection to Country. Finally, the economic justification is weak. Coal jobs in the region have been chronically unfilled, most production is for export, and the region is better served by renewable energy projects that can provide sustainable local employment. The environmental, social, and cultural costs of this expansion far outweigh any claimed benefits. I urge the IPC to reject Yancoal’s OC3 expansion. This biodiverse valley should be protected and incorporated into Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve as a token of honour to preserve this amazing habitat. Approving this project would be a devastating step backwards for biodiversity, climate action, and cultural heritage. Thank you for considering my submission. |
darshil shah
|
ID |
22796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to object to this coal mine expansion. This expansion will impact sensitive environments around this area that a number of endangered and important native species (Koalas, 20+ other native species) rely on their stability and availability. 480 hectares of native vegetation being removed does not seem like a good deal AT ALL for the expansion of a mine that offers no benefits other than economic greed. I urge discovery of a better site that has does not impact the surrounding biodiversity in such a drastic way by introducing unnecessary strain on an already fickle biodiverse ecosystem. |
Liz Millen
|
ID |
22801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired health worker living in Sydney, and am writing to register my strong objection to Yancoal's proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine, and the irreversible harm it will cause, both to the local environment and through the enormous additional greenhouse gas emissions that will be caused. Not only will this expansion cause clearances that will have a devastating impact on the habitat of local threatened species such as koalas and Regent honey-eaters, it is also estimated to impact adversely on the groundwater that sustains Moolarben Creek and local ecysystems. I am also concerned that the proposed expansion has not been considered in the context of proposals to expand other mines in the area. There is so much well established science showing that we cannot keep up current levels of fossil fuel extraction and usage, let alone continually expanding production, and on such a scale, if there is to be any chance of keeping our planet within the temperatures recommended for a liveable future for our children and the generations to come. We insist that our doctors are trained to follow scientifice evidence, that there is an evidence base and accountability for all spending of public money - how come when it comes to climate and the environment, science appears not to count? NSW is already not on track to meet its own goals on emissions reductions. It is now five years since the IEA (International Energy Agency) warned that there could be no new coal or gas projects if the goal of staying within 1.5 degrees has a chance of succeeding. In a region in which I understand the development of renewable energy and creation of next-generation jobs is a priority, expansion of this mine would be a clear backward step. Any short term economic gain is likely to be eclipsed by future costs of mitigation of climate change impacts, not to mention the destruction of important Aboriginal cultural artefacts and loss of threatened species, which can never be recovered. For all of these reasons, I believe that the Independent Planning Commission should recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining extension Project be refused. Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission Yours sincerely Liz Millen |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am particularly concerned about the impact of the proposal on Koala populations, water tables and impact on aboriginal cultural heritage |
Suzanne Bessell
|
ID |
22811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2090 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to lodge an objection to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mining operation near Mudgee. I am a business woman and mother of two young adults. As a NSW resident, I am already experiencing the impacts of more frequent heatwaves, fires and floods. I am deeply concerned that this development would add to ongoing environmental, climatic and social harm, with consequences that could be lasting and irreversible. For these reasons, I believe the expansion should not be approved. Instead, the highly diverse natural landscape within the proposed expansion footprint should be preserved and incorporated into Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Protecting this area would safeguard important ecosystems rather than sacrificing them for further extraction of fossil fuels that contribute to global warming. My specific concerns include: a) Water resources - There is a risk of significant and prolonged groundwater drawdown that could adversely affect Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that provide vital drought refuge habitat for wildlife. b) Climate consequences - The project is projected to generate approximately 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already struggling to meet its legislated emissions-reduction commitments. c) Biodiversity impacts - The proposal involves clearing more than 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding activity have been recorded, along with habitat for threatened bird and bat species. Habitat currently supporting threatened wildlife cannot realistically be replaced through offsets. The late amendments submitted by Yancoal do not meaningfully reduce vegetation clearing, were introduced too late for proper scrutiny, and do not resolve the serious biodiversity consequences from the expansion. d) Effects on nearby protected land - Mining is proposed within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, yet the assessment of potential noise, blasting and vibration impacts on the reserve appears insufficient. e) Limited public benefit - There is no persuasive employment or economic justification for expanding coal extraction in a region where policy directions prioritise renewable energy development. f) Insufficient consideration of nearby mining operations - The cumulative impacts of this proposal together with planned expansions of neighbouring operations have not been adequately evaluated. The proposed changes at Ulan Coal Mine and Wilpinjong Coal Mine would affect further extensive areas of similar terrain, interconnected water systems, significant biodiversity and cultural heritage values. All of these projects are likely to affect the same suite of threatened species through habitat loss and clearing. Given the current climate and biodiversity crises, it is not appropriate for the NSW Government to approve new or expanded coal developments. This proposal is inconsistent with the State’s climate legislation and with Australia’s international commitments under global climate agreements. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Commission recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Yours sincerely, Suzanne Bessell |
Gemma Pitcher
|
ID |
22816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2017 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Clearly having a coal mine 100 metres (or even multiple kilometres) from an important nature habitat supporting species under threat is a bad idea. Animals, birds and trees have inherent value - their right to exist and thrive is of primary importance and should be considered as paramount when making decisions about human activities such as mining. Humans exist in harmony and inter dependence with nature and protecting natural areas of environmental importance is a duty of human society, particularly of the representatives we have elected to government. Instead of expanding highly damaging, polluting industries such as coal mining, we need to be looking at sources of sustainable employment that provide future-focused, innovative and environmentally beneficial jobs to the local population - jobs and careers that will make us proud to be part of a leading region in green technology and nature conservation. A region where animals, plants and birds - including endangered species - are protected and appreciated for their own sake as well as the benefits they bring to human wellbeing. A region where humans can experience nature and the mental and physical health benefits it brings with it. A region where green jobs are available to current and future workers, securing our community's future for the long term. This is the vision of the region I ask that government considers when making a decision on this proposed expansion. This future is entirely possible and only requires political will to implement. |
Mani Berghout
|
ID |
22821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Geriatrician and General Physician based in the Hunter Valley. Prior to attaining my medical qualifications, I also trained as an Ecologist including completing a PhD in Ecology. I have a deep understanding of the threat to the natural environment of fossil fuel extraction and its role in fuelling climate change. I also recognise the existential threat to human health posed by climate change, and that we urgently need to reduce carbon emissions so as not to make the problem worse. I write to express my opposition to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine for the following reasons: 1. Emissions reductions targets: We urgently need to decarbonise our economy, including transitioning to renewable power generation. Expanding fossil fuel extraction is not compatible with meeting our emissions reduction targets as set by the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris agreement. 2. A just transition: People employed in the coal industry need support to transition to alternative employment as the economy decarbonises. What they do not need is a ramping up of coal extraction, thereby keeping workers trapped in a declining industry and drawing them away from alternative employment pathways such as in renewable energy projects. 3. Biodiversity: The site of the proposed expansion is important habitat to multiple threatened species and ecosystems. This habitat is irreplaceable. Biodiversity cannot be replaced or traded by “enhancing” some habitat elsewhere. The fact remains that the mine expansion will result in a loss of habitat and biodiversity. 4. Riparian vegetation: As our climate warms, rainfall is becoming more erratic and there is increased likelihood of prolonged drought and focal rain deluges. The project will cause significant drawdown of groundwater which will stress riparian vegetation in the catchment. During droughts, riparian vegetation becomes a critical refuge for wildlife. In the event of extremely heavy rainfall, riparian vegetation is critical for preventing soil loss and maintaining bank stability. We cannot risk damage to the integrity of riparian vegetation through groundwater drawdown. 5. Aboriginal cultural heritage: The proposed expansion will damage country that is culturally significant to the Wiradjuri people. It is recognised in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap that maintaining connection to Country is fundamental to improving life outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Degradation of this site and the destruction of irreplaceable cultural artefacts runs counter to the goals of Closing the Gap. For the reasons I have outlined above, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend against the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Michael Smart
|
ID |
22831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2297 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Always was always will be Aboriginal land. Sovereignty was never ceded and you have no right to disrespect anyone or anything on stolen land. |
Adrienne Shilling
|
ID |
22836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal's proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing long-standing and irreplaceable native bushland that CANNOT be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat at a time when so much habitat is vanishing across NSW due to land-clearing as well as mining projects. Other diminishing species (eg birds and gliders) would be similarly threatened. Above all, the proposed OC3 extension would generate huge amounts of greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime - contributing an enormous impact on our already heating climate. How many more times do we ordinary people have to repeat what scientists keep warning: global warming is worsening and is exacerbated mostly by burning of fossil fuels! In any case Yancoal has indicated that some 65% of the coal will be exported - where Scope 3 emissions are not counted as part of Australia's contribution to domestic emissions. Further, this project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of between 2-6 metres potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining has finished. While Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining, this is totally inadequate. Clearly, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur BEFORE such an intrusive project as this is approved. The cumulative impacts of the proposed Moorlarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansion of neighbouring mines have not been fully considered (eg Ulan Coal Mine Mod. 6 & 8, and Wilpinjong Coal Mine Mod. 3 )together will contribute huge damage to connected water sources, biodiversity and cultural heritage values. The proposed Moorlarben Mine expansion therefore cannot be considered in isolation. Moreover, how can this proposed expansion offer PUBLIC benefit? Renewable energy options are currently being prioritised in this region as they need to be. In summary of the above, I urge the IPC to recommend that the Moorlarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose offsite “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process. This is a clear attempt to greenwash a damaging project. Also the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. |
Paul Riccard
|
ID |
22866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
File uploaded below IPC submission PRiccard 17Feb2026.docx |
|
Attachments |
22866 - Paul Riccard.pdf (PDF, 153.01 KB) |
Stephen Kimber
|
ID |
22871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4020 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name isStephen Kimber. I am a 69 year old former teacher and professional writer in Queensland and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our nation, due to the climate impacts being felt across the country. I also fear that unchecked mining drastically affects biodiversity and environmental quality. We may indeed be aland of drought and flooding rains but the extent to which these visit and revisit our nation these days is absurd. And Dorothea didn't really mention the bushfires. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Stephen Kimber Scarborough Qld 4020 |
Leila Frijat
|
ID |
22876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2079 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing as a community member who is deeply concerned about the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project on Wiradjuri Country. I care about the future of our environment, our communities, and the places that make NSW such a unique and beautiful place to live, and I cannot support a project that would cause such permanent harm. As a community member, I strongly oppose the proposal’s plan to clear 480 hectares of native bushland including 113 hectares of vital koala habitat, 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, and large areas of the endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. It is heartbreaking and horrific to think that these local species who are already struggling to survive could lose some of the last intact habitat they have left. And I am also worried about the impact on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, a precious conservation area that should be protected, not exposed to open cut mining just 100 metres away. The refusal to apply the recommended 500 metre buffer feels careless and dismissive of both environmental science and community values. The projected climate impact of this mine is impossible to reconcile with NSW’s climate goals and the urgent need to reduce emissions, not expand them. As someone who wants a safe climate future for my community, this is particularly distressing. I am also concerned about the serious risks to groundwater and local creeks, including long term drawdown of up to 2–6 metres that could last decades and harm Moolarben Creek, an important refuge for wildlife. It makes no sense that proper baseline monitoring would only occur after approval I want to also express my concern that this project would destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, deeply impacting cultural heritage and connection to Country. These places cannot be replaced once they are gone As a community member who wants a healthy, resilient, and thriving regional NSW now and for future generations, I urge the IPC to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. The environmental, cultural, climate, and water impacts are simply too great, and the benefits too small, especially when cleaner industries are already creating new opportunities for the region. Thank you for considering my submission. |
DUPLICATE Stephen Kimber
|
ID |
22881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4020 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name isStephen Kimber. I am a 69 year old former teacher and professional writer in Queensland and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our nation, due to the climate impacts being felt across the country. I also fear that unchecked mining drastically affects biodiversity and environmental quality. We may indeed be aland of drought and flooding rains but the extent to which these visit and revisit our nation these days is absurd. And Dorothea didn't really mention the bushfires. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Stephen Kimber Scarborough Qld 4020 |
Ellie Robertson
|
ID |
22886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2173 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the Independent Planning Commission Re: Yancoal Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Expansion and Late-Stage Amendments My name is Ellie Robertson, and I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion and to strongly oppose the Department of Planning accepting the late “minor amendments” recently submitted by the company. In my view, these amendments should be rejected, and the public hearing scheduled for 10 February should not have been postponed. The changes do not fix the serious problems with the project, they do not reduce environmental harm, and they were submitted far too late in the process to be fairly considered. Late changes undermine community consultation Yancoal submitted these amendments at the last minute, after years of assessment and just as the community was preparing to speak at a public hearing. As a result, the hearing has now been postponed indefinitely, cutting off an important opportunity for people to be heard. This does not feel like genuine consultation. It feels like a deliberate attempt to delay the process and disrupt community participation. Many people, including local residents, Traditional Owners, and community groups, have already spent significant time engaging with this proposal in good faith. Changing the proposal at this late stage undermines that process. Importantly, these amendments do not actually improve the project in any meaningful way. They do not reduce the size of the mine, they do not avoid sensitive areas, and they do not reduce the level of harm. Proposals that arrive this late and offer no real benefit should not be accepted. The amendments do not reduce vegetation clearing or biodiversity loss Despite being presented as “minor improvements”, the proposed amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all. The same large areas of bushland would still be destroyed, including habitat that is currently supporting threatened species. The proposal still involves clearing around 480 hectares of native vegetation. This includes: 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, including breeding females Up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland The suggested off-site “habitat enhancement” does not change the reality that this destruction would still occur. You cannot replace living, functioning ecosystems by promising to improve land somewhere else. Once this habitat is gone, it is gone forever. Even with the amendments, the project would still have severe and irreversible impacts on biodiversity. This area should be protected, not mined I believe this valley should be protected as part of a connected conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open-cut coal mine. Mining would be pushed to within 100 metres of the reserve, placing enormous pressure on wildlife from noise, blasting, vibration, dust and light. The refusal to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer shows a lack of care for the reserve and the species it exists to protect. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including a particularly resilient koala population that has survived fires and drought. Destroying its habitat now would be an irreversible mistake. This project creates no new jobs. It offers no compelling public benefit. What it does offer is permanent environmental damage. Serious and irreversible harm to threatened species The proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. Independent assessments and warnings from the NSW environment authorities acknowledge that the project risks long-term population decline and could affect habitat that is critical to species survival. Species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and several microbat species are already under extreme pressure. Clearing habitat that is currently being used by these animals cannot be justified. The impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve have also been poorly assessed, particularly when it comes to noise and blasting. These impacts are not minor — they affect animal behaviour, breeding and survival. A massive climate impact that cannot be ignored The OC3 expansion would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime. This is an enormous contribution to climate change at a time when NSW is already struggling to meet its emissions reduction targets. Most of these emissions would occur when the coal is burned overseas, but they still contribute to the climate impacts we are already experiencing here — more extreme heat, drought, bushfires and floods. Approving this expansion would lock in decades of additional emissions at exactly the wrong time. No real benefit for jobs or the local community This expansion is not needed to keep the mine operating. The Moolarben mine is already approved to operate until at least 2038 without this expansion. Coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years, while renewable energy development in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is expected to create thousands of jobs over the coming decade. Most of the coal from this expansion would be exported overseas. This means the environmental damage stays here, while the benefits flow elsewhere. That is not a fair or reasonable outcome for the local community or for NSW. Serious risks to water and groundwater The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of between 2 and 6 metres, potentially lasting for up to 25 years after mining ends. This places Moolarben Creek at serious risk as an important drought refuge for wildlife. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems, including deep-rooted trees along the creek, could be severely affected. These risks are made worse by inadequate baseline water monitoring and the proponent’s poor compliance history. The proposal to carry out groundwater monitoring after approval but before mining is not acceptable. Baseline studies should be completed before a decision is made, not after approval has already been granted. Irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage The expansion would destroy at least 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, all assessed as having high cultural value by Registered Aboriginal Parties. This is not just about individual artefacts. It is about the ongoing damage to Country caused by cumulative mining impacts. The destruction of these sites undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain cultural connection and pass knowledge on to future generations. Once these sites are destroyed, they cannot be replaced or restored. Cumulative impacts have not been properly assessed This proposal should not be considered in isolation. Other nearby mine expansions would affect the same landscape, water systems, threatened species and cultural heritage values. Taken together, these projects represent a major escalation of harm that has not been adequately assessed or addressed. Conclusion In my view, the late amendments submitted by Yancoal do not reduce vegetation clearing, do not meaningfully reduce environmental harm, and were submitted far too late to be properly considered. Accepting them would reward delay tactics and undermine public confidence in the planning system. The public hearing should not have been postponed, and the amendments should be rejected. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to biodiversity, water, climate and cultural heritage, while delivering little to no public benefit. In the middle of a climate and biodiversity crisis, this expansion should not proceed. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mine Expansion be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Chris Jonkers
|
ID |
22896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners I am totally opposed to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, and urge the IPCN Commissioners to reject it for the following reasons - 1. Land clearing and biodiversity loss I regard it as absolutely obscene that any NSW Government Department of Agency in this day would even consider approving the direct disturbance of 675 hectares (ha) of land including the destruction of 480 Hectares of native vegetation. And not just any old bit of scrub, but the clearing of 401 Ha of Critically Endangered Box Gum Woodland, 81 Ha of Regent Honeyeater ‘important mapped’ habitat' 113 Ha of Koala and Squirrel Glider habitat, 106 Ha of Swift Parrot habitat, 207 Ha of Pink-tailed Legless Lizard habitat, and 106 Ha of Gang-gang Cockatoo habitat. Surely the term "Critically Endangered' must ring some sort of alarm-bells within the IPCN? Surely clearing native vegetation on this scale cannot in any way be regarded as Ecologically Sustainable Development, Environmentally Acceptable, nor justifiable on any grounds? The Precautionary Principle should apply, and the proposal rejected. 2. Cumulative Impacts A major failing of the NSW Planning process has long been the failure to consider cumulative impacts and cumulative losses over time. Due to the proximity of the above native vegetation clearing to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the project will directly and indirectly impact upon the rich biodiversity, cultural heritage sites, threatened species habitats, and significant sandstone features of the Reserve. Approximately 5 kilometres of the OC4 Pit borders Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, while the Wilpinjong Mine adjoins 15 kilometres of the Reserve. The cumulative effect of Moolarben, Ulan, and Wilpinjong mines has already negatively affected the wider landscape and Goulburn River system. Collectively these mines are licensed to suck 56 million litres per day of groundwater from the landscape, making it drier and more fire-prone. That minewater is regarded as a waste product and dumped into the Goulburn River and its tributaries in the Upper Hunter catchment, significantly altering the natural flow regimes, increasing stream volume and peak flow, changing the hydrochemistry, and increasing downstream salinity by adding salt loads of 10–25 tonnes per day. At the very lease the IPCN must require a Buffer Zone of 300m of uncleared vegetation bordering Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The discharge limit for Salinity in mine water must be reduced to 500 uS/cm from the proposed 900 uS/cm. 3. Impacts of water resources Increasing mine discharge from 10 million litres a day to 20 million litres a day as well as adding the equivalent of 30 tonnes of salt each day into the upper Goulburn River system threatens viability of the entire Hunter River system. And I don't understand how a discharge limit for salinity in minwater can be set at 900 uS/cm, which is contrary to the Hunter Salinity Trading Scheme which limits discharges to 600 uS/cm in the upper catchment? I believe that an Independent Regional Water Survey and cumulative impact study is urgently required before approval to determine the full impacts of all mining on groundwater drawdown in the region and river systems of the Upper Goulburn River catchment. 4. Off-site Habitat Enhancement is a farce I regard Biodiversity Offsetting as an absolute farce, and the proposed Off-site Habitat Enhancement as greenwashing of the worst kind. 5. Emissions Reduction and Climate Change The NSW Government has officially committed to reducing emissions with the introduction of the NSW Climate Change Act 2023. Adding more than 86 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent emissions at a time when NSW is already projected to miss its targets cannot be reconciled with a credible pathway to net zero or a safe climate future. This proposal contravenes the NSW Climate Change Act 2023, and must be rejected. Conclusion I strongly urge the IPCN to reject this proposal in its entirety. Thankyou for this opportunity to provide comment Yours sincerely Chris Jonkers |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It is incredible that this extension plans to clear 600 hectares of koala habitat. Not only that, but the emissions from this project would threaten biodiversity. Australia has committed to net zero by 2050, and to have any chance at keeping global temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius of warming, we cannot afford to open any new coal or gas projects - including extensions. |
Gail Mensinga
|
ID |
22911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2477 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached submission. |
|
Attachments |
22911 - Gail Mensinga.pdf (PDF, 171.45 KB) |
Richard and Maria Maguire
|
ID |
22916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2145 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My submission is attached |
|
Attachments |
Submission on the Moolarben expansion.pdf (PDF, 223.01 KB) Unburnable Energy.pdf (PDF, 1.97 MB) Climate-of-the-Nation-2024-WEB.pdf (PDF, 2.9 MB) |
Jan Davis
|
ID |
22921 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Hunter Environment Lobby Inc |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please advise receipt of attachment |
|
Attachments |
260217 Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 415.79 KB) |
Kate Moppett
|
ID |
22926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2066 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Kate Moppett, an individual citizen greatly concerned about the destruction to precious land, flora, fauna, water and local culture if this mine expansion is allowed. I am writing to register my strong objection to the expansion of this mine for the following reasons: • The 480 hectares of native bushland is proposed to be wilfully destroyed for NO benefit to the local area, NSW or Australia. It only benefits the Chinese state-owned enterprise which owns the majority of Yancoal. All they care about is money, not our country. They have even refused to allow a 500 metre buffer zone between Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the open cut mine. • This 480 hectares of precious native bushland must NOT be Destroyed! It should be added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Because of Yancoal’s refusal to allow a 500 metre buffer zone, the proposed open cut mine pit would adjoin the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve one of the oldest conservation areas in NSW. If allowed to go ahead the disturbance from heavy machinery, air and water pollution, and draining of the water table will destroy the nature reserve’s assets as precious habitat – it will no longer be a haven for nature. • These 480 hectares of native bushland are home to at least 23 threatened species including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. • The greenhouse gas emissions during the life of the mine will add approximately 65 million tons to the atmosphere – making a mockery of the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. NSW is already failing to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. • There is no benefit to the local job market or the prosperity of the local area as they are working in the renewable energy sector which is of far greater benefit than this coal mine expansion. This destruction MUST NOT BE ALLOWED! It is irretrievable and WHEN IT’S GONE IT’S GONE FOREVER. AND, the Chinese owners don’t care about Australia or the land they want to destroy, they only want the coal and the money. Sincerely Kate Moppett Lane Cove North 2066 |
Rodney Scott
|
ID |
22931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
More coal means higher CO2 affecting the whole planet. Destruction of the native habitat contributes to greater global emissions. Given where we are at with global warming and how it is adversely affecting our planet we must stop the madness of the fossil fuel lobby. How ludicrous is it to open ever more mining operations at this time. |
Keelah Lam
|
ID |
22941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2094 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern: I was born in 1943, and grew up totally unaware of the colonial crimes against our indigenous population or massive destruction of so much of our natural heritage. We never had to think about availability of clean air or water. I am strongly opposed to the Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) Extension Project. I visited Wollar near Mudgee recently to see the effects of Yancoal for myself and what is at stake. I met many concerned people, Manjo; from the nearby affected township of Mudgee, Bev Smiles of the Save Wollar group, Australian Youth Coalition and others. I had previously done a train trip through the coal mining district and was horrified to see the kilometres upon kilometres of ugly black denuded coal mines. I recognised the resulting huge amount of environmental damage and loss of rich farming lands which we in the cities depend on for our food, and thought about the loss of native species. The length/size of the coal trains headed to shipping our coal overseas was astounding. . Moolarben Coal Mine This coal mine is the biggest coal mine in NSW and has already bulldozed so much of our precious habitat trees which our threatened and endangered species depend on. Any extension of this mine, let alone the planned 10 year extension will cause irreparable loss. International global emissions added to by Moorlarben will be an unacceptable massive 64.6 million tonnes. . Habitats The new pit is not even planned to have the 500m buffer to protect wildlife. It is within special and important habitats, 113 hectares of koala habitat, 80 hectares of Regent Honey Eater habitat, 401 hectares of Woodland Box Gum habitat to name just a few. The expected loss of these valuable ecosystems in this natural environment is unacceptable. . The Wiradjuri homelands The Wiradjuri traditional owners of this land have been pushed aside and even today not listened to or their local knowledge heeded when they express their concerns for the preservation of their traditional homelands. This is unacceptable. Our indigenous owners of their land must be respected. . Extreme climate stress Climate cost will be even more disastrous. The climate crisis we’ve been warned about since last century is upon us. We observe the rapid changes from year to year. We are now, as you must be aware, all at the same time, experiencing drought, floods, wildfires and extreme heat. We are not even prepared for these disasters by good planning laws. The cost to the climate seems to mean nothing to Yancoal. Their intent seems to be only a money making grab before it becomes a stranded asset, and blow the local community who have already lost so much in economic and social costs. And blow the climate chaos. . Groundwater and creeks. The groundwater which sustains the wildlife in times of drought will suffer a calculated drawdown of 2-6 metres. The local ecosystem’s survival of tall trees and native species is dependent on water being maintained in the creeks and Goulburn River. But no baseline water monitoring has been proposed by Moorlarben before any approval may be given. Not only that, it is important for government agencies to check Moorlarben’s poor track records of environmental damage. . Jobs jobs jobs! My fat aunt! There has been no increase in mining jobs for years whilst on the other hand, the Mudgee area offers 2000 new jobs with the planned Central West Renewable Energy Zone. Moorlarben extension offers scant and limited economic value but will continue to create huge damage to the area and our climate. . Noise The day and night noise of bulldozers and dump trucks has a huge impact on the local population of Wollar residents, farmers and wildlife. Peabody i believe has used, it seems, the tactic of divide and conquer, scaring people off their lands, buying up and demolishing houses leaving the remaining and new community members with the struggle to save their community and its amazingly rich surviving environment. . Cumulative impact. Science informs us that serious irreversible damage caused by clearing threatened species habitat and rapacious mining leads to the increasing speed of extinctions. Australia’s record of extinctions is shameful. Who could have thought 80 years ago that koalas, platypus, greater gliders and so many other iconic Australian species would be heading for extinction? Which government of the day would knowingly put our unique Australian species, admired around the world, at risk of extinction? My submission offers but a few reasons for this 10 year extension, or any extension to go ahead. Please refuse this extension and give hope to our youth that they will inherit a liveable environment which they can work to improve and hand on to future generations. You must in all seriousness refuse the Moorlarben mine extension. With respect Keelah Lam Fairlight |
Eila Jameson-Avey
|
ID |
22946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission formally objects to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. I am a local Mid-Western Council resident, a mother of two and grandmother of five. I am a writer. I live on a 25-acre block which I have kept as native bushland to preserve the wildlife and flora of the area. I have many friends who support the wildlife of the region as rescuers. I strongly oppose this project due to the unacceptable environmental, social, and economic costs it will place on our local wildlife, the climate, and the volunteer community. Government assessments have noted there are numerous threats to the local fauna habitats near Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve due to blasting impacts on rocky features. The loss of these habitats will have a detrimental effect on the fauna, which will affect the ecology negatively, indiscriminately and permanently. The expansion of the mine will contribute to global warming. This exacerbates heatwaves, killing flora and fauna. The recent heatwave (January 2026) caused mass mortality events across Australia. Supporting a coal expansion that fuels these heatwaves is counterintuitive to wildlife survival. As a property owner using bore water, I am aware of the decreasing flow of underground springs, and this will only worsen through the groundwater drawdown of Murdering Creek and Moolarben Creek. These waterways are lifelines for wildlife during droughts. The Department’s assessment leaves the determination of "public interest" to the IPC. I submit that a project which generates 64.6 Mt of CO2, threatens groundwater lifelines, destroys critical habitat for vulnerable species, resulting in ecological trauma, is not in the public interest. For the sake of our wildlife, our waterways, our climate, and the mental well being of the community, I respectfully ask the IPC to reject the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely Eila Jameson-Avey |
Tracey Carpenter
|
ID |
22956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2010 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a long-time resident (and former Councillor and State seat candidate) of the Central West I oppose the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, (Project Number SSD-33083358, and to continue decades of opposition to continued coal mining as a threat to our water, biodiversity and sustainable climate future. In the Central West we have bourne the impacts of mining, and coal mining in particular has had grave consequences through its destruction of our land, water, clean air, communities. The cumulative impact of the devastation of open cut and underground coal mining and transportation is particularly apparent along the Goulburn River. I have watched over the past decade as the mines have destroyed vast swathes of land, ground and surface water and emptied towns of their families and communities. The proposal to extend the climate impacts of reliance of this carbon intensive industry is long past the point of social license and it is urgent that our legal process catch up with the seriousness of the climate impacts of the coal industry both on the local community across the country and internationally. I have visited the region over many decades and most recently joined a study tour with the Knitting Nannas which took in the Wollar Village, Munghorne Gap Nature Reserve and the Drip Gorge, located in the Goulburn River State Conservation Area 50 km north of Mudgee. The Drip Gorge Conservation area has indeed grown in popularity and was thronged by tourists demonstrating its value as a major tourist attraction for the district. There can be no restoration or rehabilitation of the damage done to nature (land, water, biodiversity and human health) but I am grateful that so many of the people of the district are resilient and putting up such strong effort to protect the country and the vulnerable and threatened species that stand on the precipice of extinction due to the rapid expansion of coal mining’s footprint. I strongly oppose Yancoal's expansion plans to make life even more unbearable for the the people living near the Wollar Village and encroaching on one of our oldest and most unique Nature Reserves in a drying and heating environment. To further jeopardise the ground and surface waters that support the sacred Gorge and vital Goulburn Rivers is an act of bastardry. If this were to occur, the disruptions caused by mining could destabilise the Drip area to a point where public access to The Drip would be removed for safety reasons. This would deprive Mudgee of an important tourist attraction. But there are also serious environmental concerns. We understand that final decisions on Yancoal's extraction plan are happening now. We urge you not to support this extension and would refer you to research that says this plan to extend underground mining risks fracturing and draining groundwater (aquifers) that flow into the Goulburn River, removing critical base flows in times of drought. I strongly object to any approval of the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion. The current approval is to 2038 and given the rapidly changing landscape as a consequence of climate change [2], there can be no justification for approvals such as this one, beyond 2038. The proposal’s amendment Yancoal’s proposed amendment, which has delayed community consultation, does not reduce the proposed mine’s footprint or limit its destruction and their offer to manage adjacent areas of its proposed destruction can only be called greenwashing. The proposed mine would be surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Nature reserve and would be a gaping wound in a piece of nature which is a refuge for wildlife and their unique ecosystems. This area needs to be incorporated into the reserve, one of Australia’s oldest reserves, rather than having the reserve subject to 24/7 industrial blasting and dust on three of its borders. An arial view of the map shows clearly how the proposal cuts into the shape of the park and runs adjacent to its long and curved perimeter. No approval of any expansions should happen without an in-depth review of the cumulative impacts of mining developments in this area. The argument to incorporate the valley into the existing reserve rather than creating massive stress to the reserve, takes into consideration the huge loss of nature created by the three major mines in the area (Ulan, Moolarben and Wilpinjong Coal Mines). Their total footprint is 190 square kilometres: 70 km2 above ground, 120km2 below ground.[3] The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. No assessment has been made of the three mines’ cumulative impacts on the natural environment, including: - massive impact on the hydrology of the local area through using megalitres of water and releasing contaminated saline water (4) - huge losses to endangered flora and fauna habitat Habitat destruction cannot be justified or compensated by biodiversity offset This proposal includes clearing 113 hectares of koala habitat (one mother and joey sighted right in the middle of a proposed pit): 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat where breeding pairs have been sighted (only 250-350 breeding pairs in existence); and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. These impacts as well as those on the endangered microbats and the Broadheaded Snake are assessed to be so severe that the NSW Environment Department has recommended a 500metre buffer to protect the reserve. The chance of mine blasting destabilising the bat’s roosting and breeding cliffs in Munghorn is too great. Given the bigger picture of large-scale destruction of habitat and ecosystems of the three mines, the only appropriate action is to refuse this proposal and to instead incorporate the whole proposed mine expansion area as reserve. This flora and fauna are too close to extinction to have some of their last remaining habitat, critical to their survival, destroyed. They may even get the chance to recover if the reserve, as we recommend, is expanded and saved from the proposed blasting, noise, coal dust and massive void. There is no way biodiversity offsets could compensate for loss of such a unique landscape. Climate impacts are inconsistent with Net Zero Commission’s findings and climate change This proposal is in contradiction of NSW Government’s Climate Change Act and therefore must not be approved. The electorate of NSW has been assured that NSW will meet its obligations, yet that will be impossible if business as usual approvals of massive coal mine expansions are allowed. This proposal does not make any reference to the Net Zero Commission’s Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report Finding 4, which states that: “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets, which it has promised its electorate. Consequently, there can be no justification to approve an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. Scope 3 emissions must be considered The failure of the proposal to include the consideration of the Denman case is grounds to reject the proposal. There has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of Scope 3 downstream emissions in Australia and in the local area, even though Scope 3 emissions make up 99% of all emissions from the project. As now a Sydney Knitting Nanna we were in the Court of Appeal to hear the arguments and the unanimous findings of the three justices of the Denman case.[5] The appeal was heard in the same week that five people in the Hunter Region drowned in unprecedented climate-affected flooding. The decision was handed down on the same day that Advisory Opinion on climate change by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was announced in the morning news bulletins.[6] Scope 3 emissions can no longer be ignored. Further damaging impacts There has been inadequate consideration given to the 5metre drawdown in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek which feeds into the Goulburn River. The damage to deep-rooted vegetation and the ecosystems it sustains must be given high priority. Importantly, it should be noted that the mine does not have a good history of its water estimates.[7] There is a huge risk of the blasting destabilising the cliffs. This is a landscape milennia in the making as are the adjacent ecosystems, and if damaged the loss is forever. Harm to the cultural heritage of the Wiradjuri people There are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the footprint of the proposal and there are dozens more which may be indirectly affected. It is unacceptable that further fracturing of the landscape would be allowed without full consideration of the right to practice culture on country. As indicated before, the cumulative degradation of land from open cut and underground mining in the local area must be considered. Even the cumulative loss from just the current and proposed Moolarben mine is unacceptably high. Respecting the rights of the traditional owners should be the first consideration and the proposal must be rejected. The declaration of a renewable energy zone This proposal cannot be justified by the need for employment as Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. There is a shortage of workers for this forward-looking industry, and it is being welcomed by the local community who have endured 24/7 industrial noise, blasting, dust, and air/water/land pollution and the loss of the natural landscape caused by the mines. I strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. [1] https://knittingnannas.org/sydney/ [2]https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/05/flawed-economic-models-mean-climate-crisis-could-crash-global-economy-experts-warn [3]https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/pac/projects/2018/10/bylong-coal-project/presentations-and-comments/cumulative-impacts-goulburn-river-final-nov-2018.pdf [4] (Extract from [3]. The estimated total water intercepted and extracted in the relatively dry year of 2014, as reported in the three mine water balances (Ulan, Moolarben and Wilpinjong Coal Mines) was in excess of 8,500 ML/year (UCML, 2014; MCC, 2014; WilpinjongCoal, 2015a). During 2014 the cumulative mine water usage was around 4,000 ML/year. This equates to about one third of the total annual flow in the Goulburn River as measured at the downstream Coggan stream gauge over the same period (11,951 ML/year at GS210006). [5] https://www.johnsonlegal.au/newsfeed/denman-aberdeen-muswellbrook-scone-healthy-environment-group-v-mach-energy-and-independent-planning-commission [6] https://envirojustice.org.au/what-the-icj-ruling-means-for-australias-environment-laws/ [7] Extract from [3]. In 2015 Moolarben Coal Mine modelling predicted groundwater inflows to their Underground One mine (UG1) to be less than 1ML/day peaking at around 1.5 ML/day (MCC, 2015). When underground mining commenced in 2017, the actual water make in the first 6 months exceeded 5 ML/day10 Groundwater modelling was subsequently amended and recalibrated to capture the significant unpredicted mine inflows which increased to over 6 ML/day in 2018. The adjusted modelling now predicts a maximum peaking at 17.27 ML/day in 2025 (MCC, 2017b). This represents a more than 10 fold increase in the maximum water make than originally predicted and a significant increase in interference to the groundwater system by the Moolarben Coal Mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We should be aiming to reduce the amount of coal mining, I don't believe I need to explain why - there is enough scientific evidence to back this up. Let's think about our earth's future instead of more profits for mining companies. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local resident and oppose the proposed expansion to the open-cut coal mine which would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and extend to within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, threatening a high-biodiversity landscape that should instead be protected and incorporated into the reserve. At least 23 threatened species occur in the area, including a breeding koala population. Yancoal’s expansion would irreversibly damage ecosystems, destroying 113 hectares of koala habitat, 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, and up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. Severe impacts on multiple species, inadequate assessment of noise and blasting, and refusal of a 500-metre buffer highlight unacceptable environmental risks. Moreover, the proposed extension would produce 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions—about 58% of NSW’s annual total—yet the assessment overlooks findings that new coal expansions conflict with climate laws and targets. It ignores legal requirements to consider downstream emissions and fails to address resulting climate, economic, and social costs. This disastrous impact on local biodiversity and huge contribution to GHG emissions will come without the potential for increased employment for locals; promising little economic benefits despite huge environmental costs. I am deeply concerned about coal mining in New South Wales and the cost to the community in negative climate impacts, loss of local biodiversity, and negative cultural and social impacts. There are many other employment opportunities in this region including tourism, agriculture and renewable energy. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Peter Avey
|
ID |
22971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Subject: Formal objection to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project Dear IPC, I am a father of two and a grandfather of one, and I live nearby the proposed mine expansion. As a long-term resident in the region, I am deeply concerned about the OC3 Extension and its potential impacts on my family, our community, and the local environment. I strongly oppose this project due to the unacceptable environmental, social, and economic costs it would impose on our wildlife, climate, and the volunteer community that sustains our region. Government assessments have highlighted multiple threats to local fauna and their habitats near Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve arising from blasting and disruption to rocky features. The loss and degradation of these habitats would have a detrimental, widespread, and lasting impact on wildlife and the broader ecosystem. The expansion of the mine would contribute to global warming, intensifying heatwaves that harm flora and fauna. The recent extreme heat events have already caused significant ecological stress across Australia; supporting coal expansion that worsens these conditions contradicts our responsibility to wildlife and future generations. As a local resident who relies on bore water, I am acutely aware of the declining flow of underground springs. Groundwater drawdown associated with Murdering Creek and Moolarben Creek threatens essential lifelines for wildlife and for our community, especially during droughts. While the Department’s assessment leaves the determination of “public interest” to the IPC, I submit that a project emitting approximately 64.6 Mt of CO2, compromising groundwater lifelines, and destroying critical habitats for vulnerable species constitutes an unacceptable public interest outcome. The risks to climate, water security, and biodiversity are irreversibly harmful. For the sake of our wildlife, our waterways, our climate, and the mental wellbeing of our community—especially families like mine who live in close proximity to the project—I respectfully urge the IPC to reject the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely Peter Avey [Nearby residence, Mid-Western NSW] |
Diane O'Mara
|
ID |
22976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Di O’Mara Submission To: NSW Independent Planning Commission Subject: Formal Submission of Strong Objection – Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) This submission formally objects to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension. The development of four new open-cut pits on the floor of the Moolarben Valley represents an unacceptable risk to both the state’s fiscal stability and its unique biodiversity. The project directly contradicts the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and ignores the transition toward a renewable economy already underway in the Central-West Orana region. 2. Massive Climate Costs vs. NSW Legislated Goals Approving this extension means locking in 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. To put that in perspective: Breaking our Promises: NSW has a legal plan to cut emissions by 50% by 2030, yet as of early 2026, we are officially falling behind. Approving a massive new coal project now is like trying to put out a fire while pouring more petrol on it—it makes our state's goals impossible to reach. A Bad Deal for Taxpayers: The project claims it will bring in about $152 million in royalties. That sounds like a lot until you look at the "bill" climate change is sending us. Disasters like floods and fires are already costing Australia $38 billion every single year. The damage caused by the emissions from this one mine extension would likely cost society more than the mine will ever pay in royalties. It’s a net loss for the public. The Insurance Crisis: As climate disasters get worse and more frequent, insurance companies are hiking their prices. Right now, 1 in 8 households can barely afford to insure their homes. When people can’t afford insurance, the government (and the taxpayer) has to pick up the tab for rebuilding after a disaster. By expanding coal mines, the NSW government is essentially creating a permanent, multi-billion-dollar debt that our kids will have to pay. 3. Threat to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve & Endangered Species The proposed pits bring high-intensity mining within 100–500 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR), one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. Serious and Irreversible Impacts The NSW Department of Climate Change has warned that the extension could significantly contribute to the extinction of four species in NSW. Regent Honeyeater (Critically Endangered): The project will clear 81 hectares of "important mapped habitat." With the global wild population at critically low levels, the destruction of this "stepping stone" habitat between the MGNR and Goulburn River National Park is an unacceptable risk. Koala (Endangered): The valley floor habitat is recognized as "critical to the survival" of a climate-resilient local population. The project will clear 113 hectares of this habitat, creating a hostile industrial barrier to movement. Cave-Dwelling Microbats: Blasting vibration and habitat removal target a regional hotspot for the Large-eared Pied Bat and Eastern Cave Bat. 4. Redundant Economic Argument: Jobs and REZ Integration The proponent’s claim that this extension is necessary for regional security is factually unsupported: The REZ Advantage: Mudgee, Gulgong, and Ulan sit within the Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. This zone is projected to create 2,800+ jobs and attract $25 billion in investment—providing a far more stable and sustainable economic anchor than a 10-year coal extension. Existing Longevity: The Moolarben Complex is already approved to operate until 2038. This extension is not required to save current jobs; it is a push for increased extraction volume at the height of a climate crisis. The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project represents ‘a step too far’ into the southern Moolarben Valley. It offers diminishing economic returns to the local community while imposing massive, long-term climate and biodiversity liabilities on the people of New South Wales. I strongly urge the Commission to reject this application in its entirety. |
Erica Nash
|
ID |
22986 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Cattai Hills Environment Network Inc |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2156 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mrs Erica Nash 17 February 2026 Independent Planning Commission of NSW Department of Planning Housing and Infrastructure Re: Moolarben OC3 Extension Project (SSD – 33083358) Dear Sir/ Madam, I wish to object to the proposed extension of the existing OC3 pit allowing Moolarben Coal Operations Pty Ltd (MCO) to develop four new open cut pits along the Moolarben Valley. My reasons for the objection include: Loss of Biodiversity 1) The proximity of the mine to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, in particular the rocky cliffs and crevices which support several threatened microbat species chiefly the Large eared Pied Bat and the Eastern Cave Bat. Compared with the Grey Headed Flying Fox, these species might be smaller in size, but they are some of the greatest pollinators of native plants and help to keep insect populations in balance. Continual noise from the accumulative effects of blasting and movement of heavy machinery not just at Moolarben but also the nearby mines of Ulan and Wilpinjong may lead to subsidence of the rocky cliffs, crevices and caves where the microbats roost and breed with detrimental effects on their populations. In addition, bright night lighting which is characteristic of mining operations will continue to impact the travelling routes which microbats undertake every night. Whilst the bright lights might be insect attracting, it will also expose the bats to predation, further diminishing their numbers and eventually result in them abandoning their sites with little certainty of return. 2) The critically endangered Regent Honeyeater breeds between Capertee Valley and the Mudgee- Wollar Key Biodiversity Area (KBA). The latter encompassing Goulburn River National Park, Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, west to Gulgong and Mudgee and the woodlands around Mudgee, Ulan and Wollar. KBAs are globally significant sites for conservation which are crucial to the survival of unique species and ecosystems. Recently, the Australian Government provided substantial funding across four years from May 2024- 2028 to the Central Tablelands Local Landcare Service for the “Rescuing Regent Project” and the “Woodland Birds on Farms” Project in the Hunter Valley to help secure important refuge areas and habitats. It is estimated that only 400 birds currently exist in the wild and because the population is small, the birds are unable to find each other through loss of song connections. Captive bred birds are exposed to song recordings in the hope that when released they will be able to find others of the same species. However, the biggest issue at stake for all Biodiversity in relation to mining operations is from land clearing, where it is estimated that 480 Ha along with 113 Ha of known Koala Habitat is slated for removal. This will result in a significant loss of Native vegetation, vital habitat and connectivity, so important for ongoing survival of every species. Impact on the environment 3) Whilst it’s admirable that mining supports the local community by providing employment and skills, the question remains at what cost to the environment? • As pointed out by Nature Conservation Council (NSW), is it “the estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution that would be added at a time when NSW is failing to meet its legislated climate targets”? World-wide, including Australia there are ever increasing climate related disasters observed every day or reported via media outlets. • Or is it the proposal to extract 40 million tonnes of thermal coal for overseas export until 2034? • When will a mining giant such as Yancoal, Glencore or Peabody ever stand up for this beautiful part of the world which is being ravaged to within an inch of its life and say: “We are ceasing all mining activities. Instead, we are going to expand Munghorn Nature Reserve and make it one continuous conservation area.” “However, first, we need to acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Wiradjuri peoples whose cultural heritage will be impacted if mining continues. For too long they have been dispossessed from Country, and only now we see the importance for restoration and healing to begin”. Kind regards Erica Nash Cattai - Hills Environment Network Inc (NSW) |
Peter Stuart
|
ID |
22996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2118 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
At a time when climate change caused by increased CO2 in the atmosphere is already making weather events more severe and temperatures are rising, it seems inconceivable that any responsible government would approve yet another coal mine expansion. Coal is only mined for one reason - to be burnt somewhere in the world. I urge the commission to reject the proposal on deteriorating climate grounds alone. |
Stephanie Luke
|
ID |
23001 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Central West Knitting Nannas |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
On behalf of the Central West Knitting Nannas, I am writing to say that we strongly object to this mine expansion. Our mission statement - we are “a diverse group who want to use the time we have to save land, air and water for everyone! We share info, write to politicians and protest when all else fails. We are particularly concerned about our rivers and the threat from mining.” In this spirit we raise concerns (amongst other things) about the draw down of underground water for the next few decades which will jeopardize the wildlife refuge created in nearby creeks and forests. We are also appalled at the ongoing mining of coal as a viable and sustainable fuel. This is sabotaging our transition to clean energy. The mid west has other opportunities available and weaning us off old dangerous technology needs to start yesterday. We implore you to think beyond the next ten years. Thankyou. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I live in Katoomba, and am grateful for the environmental protections given to the Blue Mountains national parks and world heritage area. I urge the Minns Government to value the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve as equal to other conservation areas. There is unique biodiversity that needs protection from industry. We also cannot afford to expand any fossil fuel projects, let alone the largest producing coal mine in NSW. The NSW Government cannot meet its climate targets, and the Australian Government cannot meet the Paris Agreement - by expanding existing projects or opening new fossil fuel projects. |
Marysia Derewlany
|
ID |
23011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. I am providing this submission because I am deeply concerned that humanity is heading toward irreversible climate change. The mining and use of fossil fuels such as coal is causing devastating impacts today and if unabated will result in a world which will be unliveable for most, if not all of humanity. I am incredulous and intensely frustrated that most people are not concerned about this situation and are not demanding that governments take action to ensure this does not occur. The Moolarben project is contrary to the climate goals the NSW government as signatory to the NSW Climate Change Act and Paris Agreement and does not take into account that NSW is already unlikely to meet its emission reduction targets. Preserving the natural environment is essential to fostering a liveable future. The proposed expansion area will destroy a landscape and ecosystem which should be protected as part of a single conservation area together with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The mine will cause unacceptable and irreversible impacts to threatened species and ecosystem in both areas. In addition, it will result in serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks which are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The expansion will seriously harm Wiradjuri people’ cultural heritage including irreplaceable cultural artefacts and undermine their ability to practice culture and maintain connection to country. First Nations culture must be protected and fostered. There is no justification for expanding coal mining in this region given that coal jobs at the existing mines have not been filled for some time. Also, it is expected that approximately 2,000 new jobs will be created over the coming decade from renewable projects in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone which will provide good job opportunities in the region. The economic case for the expansion is further weakened by the projected decline in the demand by for Australian thermal coal. Yancoal has submitted minor amendments to its proposal. The changes do not reduce clearing of native vegetation and the proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. In view of the significant negative impacts and lack of public benefit from job creation, I believe the Independent Planning Commission should recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Yours sincerely Marysia Derewlany |
Stephen Nugent
|
ID |
23016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Written submission uploaded. |
|
Attachments |
23016 - Stephen Nugent_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 4.22 MB) |
Bronwyn Vost
|
ID |
23021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am a 76-year-old woman who was born and raised in rural NSW. I have lived in this state all my life. I am extremely worried about the effect this mine extension would have on the climate, biodiversity and water resources of NSW. Yancoal proposes to extend the existing OC3 open cut pit and to develop four new open cut pits along the floor of the Moolarben Valley. This proposal must not be permitted. Biodiversity and extinctions The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group within the NSW DCCEEW states in its contribution to this project, “We have identified that the revised project is likely to result in a serious and irreversible impact (SAII) on Box Gum Woodland CEEC, regent honeyeater, broad-headed snake, eastern cave bat and large-eared pied bat.” A Serious and Irreversible Impact (SAII) on a species means extinction. (In official language, the species is “unlikely to respond to management”.) That one project could be allowed to cause the extinction of four species of animal and one community of plants is beyond belief, even given Australia’s shameful record as the top country causing extinctions. Impacts on the state’s Koala species would also be dire. This region is home to a particularly climate-robust population of koalas which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. The Moolarben project would destroy habitat which this population relies on to survive. Given the increases in temperature which have already occurred in Australia and are further predicted, a drought-defying population could be critical to the survival of the species in the country as a whole. Water Open-cut mines lower the water table of a region because water drains to the lowest point. Because of its depth, the Moolarben project would lower the local water table by 5 metres, causing the death of deep-rooted trees, the drying up of previously permanent water attractions such as ‘The Drip’ and the failure of local agricultural bores. Climate change The over-arching problem associated with this project is climate change. Every approval of a large coal mine such as Moolarben increases carbon pollution in the atmosphere. The resultant climate chaos causes NSW to carry a heavy burden of damage. The Department’s economic assessment guidelines for coal mining are more than ten years old and wildly out of date in their accounting of the social costs of carbon pollution. The Strategic Statement on Coal, created by former Deputy Premier John Barilaro in 2020, continues to be cited and relied upon and seriously undermines efforts to pursue fair and effective action on climate change. Commissioners, I urge you not to be tempted to rely on this government policy. The Net Zero Commission has warned the NSW Government that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” In other words, the Government is in breach of its own legislation. Postponement of IPC Hearing Yancoal has succeeded in having the IPC Hearing postponed, disrupting the community consultation process. I believe that the amendments which they propose do not improve Yancoal’s case, however, because they do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all. Intergenerational equity Having lived in NSW all my life, I am distressed that, if large mines such as Moolarben are approved, my 7 grandchildren will not have the same experience that I had of an environment that is able to support them in safety and abundance. Commissioners, I urge you to reject this proposal and thus protect the environment for the younger generations and those to come. Yours sincerely, Bronwyn Vost. |
Wendy Wales
|
ID |
23026 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group INC (DAMS HEG) |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2333 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc is located in the Upper Hunter coalfields. We are dedicated to providing community voice to industry and all levels of government in defense of our natural environment in the interests of human health and wellbeing, and the protection of biodiversity. Objection to: Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Mine Extension Project SSD 33083358. Dear Sir/Madam, We object to extending the Moolarben coal mining complex, overarchingly because of its Climate Change impacts. Climate change is wreaking havoc well beyond the coal lease but simultaneously and uniquely exacerbates local environmental consequences by way of extreme weather events like severe heatwaves, fires, flooding and extended intense drought. Clearing 480 Ha and destroying 113 Ha obviously degrades the environmental and cultural qualities of the area. Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the second oldest reserve in Australia is adjacent to Moolaben project. The industrial scale noise of 24/7 heavy machinery and frequent blasts along with dust impact Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, frays the nerves of human visitors but is a significant stress for many native species. This country is habitat to a wide range of native birds, highly sensitive microbats, koalas etc. The expansion would bring irreversible impacts on groundwater and the Goulburn River. There would be permanent loss of freshwater springs to feed the Goulburn River and intensified control of that river at its head-waters. Around the country, Australian native bird populations are in decline. There are 164 different bird species recorded in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which is protected for environmental and cultural reasons. Among those bird species, the critically endangered nomadic Regent Honey Eater is one known to breed in Munghorn Gap. The Regent Honeyeater was once found from Rockhampton to Adelaide, but is now confined to Victoria and New South Wales, on the western slopes of the Great Dividing Range. Clearing and mining 113 Ha adjacent to Munghorn clearly disrupts connectivity and is a serious incremental annihilation of available habitat and a deterioration in the chain of survivability for all the living things, tens of millions of years in the evolving, associated with the area and beyond. Plants and animals do not simply “go somewhere else”. The “somewhere else places” are already occupied to their capacity. This represents a net loss for populations, including those of the uniquely resilient local population of otherwise endangered koalas. When the costs of the impact of climate change on NSW already (extreme drought, bushfires and flood events plus a myriad of local variations and disruptions to the built and natural environment- eg land slips, sewage backups into homes, road, spillway and bridge washouts, ) is factored in, along with the on going and increasingly difficult challenge for climate refugees, there is clearly no cost benefit to support the expansion of the Moolarben coal project. We draw your attention to last year’s decision in the NSW Court of Appeal, known as The Denman Decision, where the judges unanimously agreed consideration had not been given to the local impacts of Scope 3 emissions for the Mount Pleasant Optimisation Project. Short term profit, royalties and jobs from export coal will be history long before our planet’s climate stabilises. Relevantly the NSW Net Zero Commission’s 2025 Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report identified “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” In 2022, Prof Penny Sackett, former Chief Scientist for Australia 2008-2011 explained “A warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour than a cooler atmosphere; this relationship alone can increase moisture in the atmosphere by 7% for every degree Celsius of global warming, causing likelihood of heavy rainfall events. Increased atmospheric moisture can also provide more energy for some processes that generate extreme rainfall events, which further increases the likelihood of heavy rainfall. In future, NSW can expect more frequent extreme precipitation events like those of February and March 2022.” Sydney has since recorded it wettest 5 years on record, with the 2025 “Taree” flood event having devastating impacts well south in Newcastle (including serious suburban landslip), on rail and the Central Coast Clearly doing away with the legal protections in place will not make climate change go away. We urge that Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Mine Extension Project SSD 33083358 not be approved. Yours sincerely, Wendy Wales For DAMS HEG Inc. |
Gordon Kennard
|
ID |
23031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Ms Janett Milligan, Mr Richard Pearson, Mr Michael Wright, Dear Commissioners, ***************** In relation to the proposal for an extension to the current Moolarben coal mining activities ***************** Please don't sell our children's future. – Humans – and the plants and animals in the surrounding environment – need the enormous amount of ground-water that mines use, uncontaminated with a serious build-up of coal dust. In Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve – twenty metres from current mining operations – koalas and many other 'rare sprcies' (including Regent Honeyeaters and micro-bats – the bats that use echo-location to find their dinner, which they can't do against significant industrial noise) are very likely to reveal important breakthroughs to science/medicine. Also, any extra employment generated could easily be absorbed by longer-term jobs in the nearby Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone – and the coal industry may well collapse, leaving no jobs – just a big environmental mess, (such as we're dealing with here in the Illawarra)! . Thanks, commissioners, for your careful consideration of this and other submissions. – Please don't sell our children's future. And thanks to your staff, Gordon Kennard. |
Joanne Moylan
|
ID |
23036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2084 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my opposition to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Complex Expansion. This Coal mine is already the largest coalmine in NSW. If approved, 113 Hectares of Koala Habitat will be destroyed, also threatening local populations of the threatened Regent Honeyeater and Microbats. 64 million tonnes of climate pollution will be added to our atmosphere. Climate Change is already causing significant flooding and bushfires both here and in many other countries. The national area-averaged mean temperature in Australia in January 2026 was 1.90 °C above the 1961–1990 average, the fourth-warmest January on record since national observations began in 1910. Area-averaged mean temperature for all states and territories except Queensland and Tasmania were in the top ten warmest on record for January for the respective state or territory. We cannot afford to ignore the effect of burning fossil fuels is having on our climate. The proposed amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. The proposed amendments would not reduce the amount of climate pollution added to our atmosphere. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4553 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded (Koala populations Australia-wide are in rapid decline), destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I don’t like to see that the open-cut coal mine is going to encroach so close to Munghorn Gap nature reserve. I’ve been there on about 5 occasions bushwalking and camping. Particularly enjoy the tranquillity of the area and the interesting birdlife. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted]. I am a land use planner in my 50s, and I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I know the Mudgee region well. My family and I have attended the annual Mudgee Bike Muster several times over the years. That weekend event is about cycling but also much more. It’s about what makes the region work: the vineyards, the food producers, the small towns, the landscape itself. People travel there because the Central West still feels like something worth enjoying and protecting. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, economy and community, and should not be approved. This biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected, not turned into an open-cut coal mine. As a land use planner, I look at proposals through the lens of competing uses and long-term value. This expansion fails both tests. On threatened species and habitat loss: The proposal would clear over 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. It would destroy up to 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland. Once cleared, this habitat cannot be replaced. Offsets do not work when you are destroying habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve—one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state—puts the reserve itself at risk from noise, blasting, and vibration impacts that have been poorly assessed. On water and groundwater risks: The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining stops. Moolarben Creek is a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, will be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. Yancoal's proposed amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies *before* they commence mining is inadequate. Baseline groundwater monitoring should occur before a project is approved, not after. Their poor track record of water monitoring compliance elsewhere in the mine complex does not inspire confidence. On climate impacts: This project would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life—equivalent to around 58% of NSW's total annual emissions. The Department's assessment ignores the Net Zero Commission's clear finding that further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. Approving this expansion makes those targets even less achievable. The Commission has a duty to consider whether it is in a position to make judgements that flatly and clearly contradict both State legislation and international agreement. On lack of public benefit: The expansion creates no new jobs. The Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. Meanwhile, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, with the remainder split between South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, and others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand—especially to China and South Korea—the economic argument is even weaker than Yancoal claims. We are now reaching the point at which it is cheaper to build new solar power plants that it is just to buy the coal for existing coal power plants. The idea that there will be a market for coal from Mudgee into the next decade is wholly illusory. On the proposed amendments: The last-minute amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose offsite "habitat enhancement" that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process and appears to be an attempt to greenwash a damaging project. The amendments are far too late to be considered, and the proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. On cumulative impact: There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this expansion combined with neighbouring mine expansions—Ulan Coal Mine Modifications 6 and 8, and Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3. All these proposals impact the same threatened species, connected water sources, and cultural heritage values across a similar landscape. From a land use planning perspective, this proposal represents poor sequencing, poor prioritization, and above all, poor regional strategy. The Mudgee region's future lies in its landscape, its food and wine economy, its tourism value, and the renewable energy zone it sits within. This expansion delivers none of that. It locks in decades of environmental damage for export coal with a declining market, while the region is actively trying to build a post-coal economy. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [redacted] |
Diana Combe
|
ID |
23066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2137 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am very much opposed to Yancoal's proposal to expand its Moolarben coal mine. Although I live in Sydney, I have family in Mudgee and I visit the Central west regularly and enjoy the beautiful countryside and wild areas. I love this area and am concerned about this proposal for many reasons. I am a retired scientist and teacher, with children and grandchildren who enjoy visiting the beauty of nature in this area. This expansion would clear hundreds of hectares of native vegetation including hundreds of acres of endangered Box Gum woodland. This is currently habitat for many precious native animals and birds. This includes areas known to have breeding koalas. It includes areas known to have breeding regent honeyeaters. We can't possibly justify threatening these species. Water is a precious resource for our forests and for us all. This proposal would draw deeply in the Moolarben Creek and would adversely affects the deep rooted trees around the Goulburn River. Finally, we simply don't need and can't afford more coal and gas. This proposal would have huge greenhouse gas emissions. The world cannot afford these gas emissions. Mudgee is fortunate in that there are many job opportunities in the region because it is in the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. The area does not need the mine expansion. Far better renewables, a chance to achieve NSW energy targets, and an opportunity for tourism to see goals and regent honeyeaters. Please reject this proposed expansion. Thank you for receiving and reading my comments. best wishes from Diana |
Kim Williams
|
ID |
23071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. The proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine would extend close to the edge of one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, posing a serious threat to a healthy koala population and their critical habitat. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitats that are critical to the survival of the Koala population and other wildlife in a uniquely resilient population. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, that are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The NSW Government committed to stopping the decline of Koalas in NSW. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat this project poses to the Koala population, noting that: Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species,’ and that this is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. The mining company refused to accept the department agency recommendation for a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species. The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing and impact on native vegetation and the 500m buffer does not take into consideration wildlife movement across the reserve or contamination and management of the waste water and invasive weed species. Biodiversity offsets Biodiversity offsets are used to justify habitat destruction. Impact on native vegetation and local ecosystems must be avoided if we are to avoid further loss of mature habitat sites, species decline and extinctions. Offsets are poorly managed and poorly monitored with little or no public reporting or accountability. Existing wildlife are displaced with no record of population numbers prior to clearing, their ability to adapt to habitat changes the consequences of habitat destruction, forced displacement, and loss of food sources is not monitored. Securing and protecting existing forest ecosystems as an offset to areas to be cleared has also been proven to result in a net loss of vegetation and habitat in the region. Offset replanting programs take decades to establish and create sustainable food sources and wildlife habitat. Over that time the wildlife has either moved on with no knowledge of what might have happened to them or they have died off. Water impacts The wastewater created from the mining activities, and coal mine waste discharges, will increase the physical and chemical changes to Moolarben Creek water quality. Mining discharge downstream below the contamination point can impact the ecosystem of the Moolarben Creek and Goulburn River. This is reflected by marked ecological degradation of stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic macroinvertebrates can also be adversely affected. To minimize impact to the natural environment and water quality from the existing mining operation the NSW EPA should have increased oversite for ongoing monitoring of wastewater discharge, regular monitoring of creek and river water quality, and ongoing monitoring of the impact on existing flora and fauna from current mining and transport activities. The mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek causing changes in the ground water table levels which are difficult to monitor and can extend far beyond the mining area and stream catchment area impacting vegetation that relies on tapping into current water table levels. Climate Change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed as an accumulative impact. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. As stated by the Climate Council 'The collective impact on global warming will severely impact the frequency of bush fires and extreme weather events as we move toward 2.6C. Recent Disaster Costs: Following recent disasters (e.g., Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred), the Federal Government has indicated that total costs for national disaster support are expected to reach at least $13.5 billion, with $1.2 billion provisioned in the contingency reserve for future disaster recovery. Long-Term Projection: Without strong action, climate-related damage is projected to cost the Australian economy $8.7 billion annually by 2050. Adaptation Spending: Since 2022, the Federal Government has committed $3.6 billion to adaptation and resilience measures, including the $1 billion Disaster Ready Fund. A report by the Federal Government states the cost of climate related disaster management is $7.1 Billion dollars. As more properties are being impacted or destroyed, more people are being displaced, and more assets become uninsurable. The return in royalties and taxes from expanding this coal mine or any other coal mine will not cover the consequential cost to the community, State and Federal Governments in funding disaster relief efforts coursed by fossil fuel induced climate change. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. The existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Rather than waiting for mining closures to force restructuring, the existing licensing period to 2038 is a proactive opportunity for Government to work with and support increased local business diversity and sustainability, and if required support retraining of new skills to meet new opportunities. |
Margaret Sewell
|
ID |
23076 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Bathurst Community Climate Action Network |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Bathurst Community Climate Action Network (BCCAN) is a network of organisations and individuals working together to promote action on climate change and sustainable and equitable development. BCCAN has about 45 members and an additional mailing list of about 250. BCCAN is an active participant in public discussions about environmental policy in the Central West of NSW, addressing environmental issues both locally and in the wider area. We are greatly concerned about Yancoal’s planned expansion Moolarben OC3 on many grounds, and call for the application to be refused. It is imperative that we cease coal mining to do our best to maintain a liveable and safe climate. Mining 30 Mt of coal would certainly add a significant amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere, contributing to growth in instabilities in the climate both in the region where it is extracted and worldwide. As flagged by the NSW Net Zero Commission in correspondence to the state planning department in September 2025, it considers scope 3 emissions to be “an important factor in addressing climate change locally and globally, particularly for sectors like coal mining”. We welcome the NSW Land and Environment Court ruling¹ of November 14, 2025 which acknowledged the direct causal link between the extraction of coal in NSW and climate harms suffered by locals. In this ruling, the court cancelled the Ulan Modification 6 approval. Since the court has established that climate change must be a mandatory consideration, and also rejected the Mount Pleasant coal mining application in July, this Modification 8 expansion must also be rejected. Additional grounds for rejection of this application include: 1. Impacts on the neighbour, Munghorn Nature Reserve. Several BCCAN members have visited the reserve and been impressed with their experiences. It was one of the first in the state, established in the 1960s. It is “botanically significant ... forming part of a transitional zone containing a mixture of plants from the south-east, north-west and western parts of the State. Consequently a variety of plant species endemic to the Sydney Sandstone reach their northern and western limits here.” ² It is home for numerous threatened species. The NSW National Parks website notes 164 species of birds have been recorded at Munghorn Gap – an extraordinary number for habitat without open water bodies. Yet, this application would have open cut mining come to just 100m on three sides. Blasting effects will especially threaten several species of bats which roost and have their young in the cliffs alongside the open cut mine. Mining to 100m is extremely close, and reduces liveability of the adjacent habitat for many different species due to edge effects, including vibration, noise, light and dust. We call for at least a 500m buffer. 2. Koalas have been discovered living on and near the proposed mine area. Clearing of 401ha of endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem will also fragment and reduce their habitat and add stress, make movement more difficult and increase risk of vehicle strike. The koala is just one of 23 various threatened wildlife species living on the mine footprint. Impacts of the mine would contribute to the shrinking of regional species’ gene pools. BCCAN members are greatly concerned that impacts to threatened biodiversity continue to be allowed. 3. Water impacts. The mine would cause the groundwater level to drop by up to about 5m, and for at least 25 years. This leaves many deep-rooted trees ‘high and dry’, i.e. very likely killing them. In the landscape all clean water is precious, and its loss will greatly affect the downstream ecosystems especially in what is expected to be hotter and drier climate³ in the future. 4. Cultural heritage. Sadly, mining will destroy 55 cultural artefacts. This includes two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. These may be tens of thousands of years old, yet for the sake of burning coal once, they are not valued and retained. 5. Yancoal included in its application the emissions onsite (e.g. by generators and diesel vehicles), but entirely omitted what was established in the Court of Appeal in the Denman case recently – that a full consideration of the social, economic and environmental impacts is required. So, all emissions - including from the eventual burning of coal (even if overseas) - needs to be included in its application for approval consideration. 6. Eventual land rehabilitation cannot replicate the way water was retained in the landscape; rock strata would have been shattered. Neither can the soil profile be returned, nor the original biodiverse habitat be re-established – i.e. the former fungi, insect, spider, ants, worm and other invertebrate abundance, interrelationships and diversity. 7. It is a huge fault in our planning system that no study of the cumulative effects of the 3 mines located side by side has ever been conducted: no full consideration of the myriad of minerals and salts going into the Goulburn River, the clearing of many types of habitat, the impacts for example on koalas, regent honeyeaters, rare plants, several species of bats and the many various ecological communities, or of the emissions released and the known impacts of those on exacerbating climate change. Yancoal’s very late proposed amendment to include “habitat enhancement” would do nothing to ameliorate any of these impacts or reduce the mine footprint, and is merely greenwashing, serving to derail the IPC process. For all these reasons, BCCAN calls for the Independent Planning Commission to refuse this mining application. References: ¹ Sydney Morning Herald, ‘Courts turn on coal mines over climate impacts,’ November 15, 2025. ² https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/munghorn-gap-nature-reserve ³ How NSW is affected by climate change: NARCliM2.0 climate projections at a glance https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/my-region/nsw |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 21-year-old law student, deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states due to the climate impacts being felt in my area and all over the world. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species, and safe breeding spaces are especially essential if NSW koala populations are to recover. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. How can nature thrive when subject to stress levels like this? • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for reading my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 50 year old Educator from the Blue Mountains. I work for the Botanic Gardens of Sydney and I am concerned about the continuation and expansion of coal mining in our area. In a time where it is clear that burning fossil fuels is the main driver of climate change it is irresponsible of all of us to not speak up where it is possible to prevent the worsening of climate change for our children. I have 2 grown sons and I have been blessed to be able to show them a wonderful planet. I am not sure their children will experience the same. In the Blue Mountains we are experiencing warmer winters, and more frequent extreme weather events including fires and floods caused by climate change fueled by the burning of fossil fuels. Climate Change The data from Australia's Bureau of Meteorology State of the Climate report in 2024 is clear. They report that “Concentrations of all major long-lived greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continue to increase. Global annual mean carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations reached 419.2 parts per million (ppm) in 2023 and the CO2 equivalent (CO2-e) of all greenhouse gases reached 524 ppm. These are the highest levels on Earth in at least 2 million years.” Scientists agree that the main driver of increasing CO2 is the burning of fossil fuels, including coal. The Moorlarben mine extension seeks to mine 40 million T of coal. If we assume 2.5 T of carbon dioxide is emitted for every T of coal, this means the mine extension would add an additional 100m T of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Yancoal has diligently calculated their emissions for their Scope 1 and 2 emissions around their operations and tried to show their commitment to their reduction. However, I question their commitment to environmental sustainability. Their website states that “At Yancoal, sustainability refers to creating long-term stakeholder value by undertaking profitable mining and energy activities while minimising financial, operational, environmental and social risks.” Their first pillar of sustainability is ‘Profit’. The elephant in the room remains that that their core business relies on producing as much coal as they can and selling it to burn. This is how they measure their success. If they dig up more coal and sell it to burn, they make money. They cannot reduce these Scope 3 emissions. Only responsible regulation can. The recent Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 163 Appeal showed that the IPC must consider the effect of Scope 3 emissions (climate change) on the local area. NSW is not immune to the effects of climate change produced by the coal burned as a result of Yancoal’s mining in Mudgee, even if the coal is burned off-shore. Minimal local benefit Yancoal is owned by a Hong Kong company. While it is listed on the ASX, there is minimal financial benefit to Australia. The coal produced by Yancoal will be shipped off-shore. It is not required for local power production as NSW now has significant sources of renewable energy. Mudgee is located in the Orana Renewable Energy Zone where there will be a surplus of energy projects requiring a workforce. It is also a reasonably affluent area with a strong local wine and tourism industry. In this area, there is not a need for extra jobs provided by Yancoal’s mine extension. The mine extension would clear around 480 ha of native vegetation. The negative impact on the ecosystems and species (which include 23 threatened species) next to and in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve will be significant. The plan for token efforts to rehabilitate other areas by Yancoal to offset damage is inadequate. Ecosystems take centuries to develop and cannot simply be replaced by replanting another area. At a time when natural areas are under ever increasing pressure, it is only regulation that can preserve what remains. In essence, the world and Mudgee does not need Yancoal’s coal mining extension. The project has minimal benefit to Australia and the local area, and will cause measurable harmful effects. Thanks for your consideration. With kindest regards, [name redacted] |
Gregory Ray
|
ID |
23091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the proposed expansion is a serious mistake, threatening the habitat of koalas and other native species. It will inevitably damage aquifers and cause lasting damage to water resources in the area. |
Virginia Hollister
|
ID |
23096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Virginia Hollister. I am a 74 year old resident of Mudgee, a retired arts and museum administrator, federal and state government policy officer, artist and author. I oppose the Moolarben Open Cut Extension 3 because I believe coal mining should be phased out entirely as soon as possible, and because I believe the proposed extension will compromise very precious ecological communities in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Do you remember in late October 2019 when we all woke up to the news that lightning strikes in the Wollemi Wilderness had ignited fires? After years of drought, now the wild, untamed sandstone cliffs and gorges, rainforest pockets and pristine streams, the largest refuge for plants and animals in New South Wales, were burning. Over the next weeks and months, I watched in horror as fire consumed 380,826 hectares of this precious bush, 76% of the total Wollemi, the single largest bushfire ever recorded in Australia. Days and days of choking smoke. After it was over we all started counting the monetary and ecological cost – how many millions spent fighting the fires, how many millions in damage to affected communities, how many billions of native animals burnt to death. I was gutted. With bushwalking friends I walked through the forest – white ash, dirt, twisted blackness - and silence. This happened on Mudgee’s doorstep, some 60 kilometres away. The ‘Black Summer’ bushfires collectively wiped out 15% of the koala population, and destroyed habitat that will take 30-50 years to regenerate. Climate crisis writ large, here, now. I am totally opposed to the Moolarben OC3 extension both because the world cannot bear to burn more coal to warm the climate (where is the respect for the earth systems that sustains us?), and because of the incredibly precious pocket of nature in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve – even more precious after the loss in the nearby Wollemi. It is ridiculous to even contemplate mining in a valley surrounded on three sides by the nature reserve. The reserve is located on ridge lines and cliff tops, but the birds and animals use the valley as a food source, protection, nesting sites, and crucially as a source of permanent water in Moolarben Creek and Murdering Creek. Munghorn Gap is one of the oldest nature reserves in NSW, recognised because of its location at the junction of multiple ecological communities, thus supporting flora and fauna from both eastern and western areas. The proposed mine extension would not just destroy adjoining habitat by physically removing it to create a giant hole in the ground, it would impact the nature reserve by the ongoing creation of noise, dust, vibration, explosions, and light – until 2038. What creatures would stick around for that? We truly cannot afford to let such an extension be approved due to: • the escalating economic cost to our communities of ever more intense climate impacts, emergency responses and insurance premiums • the loss of Munghorn Gap’s environmental integrity, diversity, and resilience • the loss of iconic species now on the brink of extinction, including koalas and the Regent Honeyeater • the positive shift to renewable energy production in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone These losses can be mitigated by the simple determination to stop coal mining for good, and, in particular, to stop the proposed Moolarben OC3 extension because of its specific threats to a recognised high value nature reserve. Thank you for considering my views. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [name redacted] and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in New South Wales (and other states), due to the climate impacts being felt by us all across our state and around Australia: extreme heatwaves, more intense weather events including rain, health impacts as higher humidity makes homes increasingly mouldy, energy bills going up. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Jack Simmons
|
ID |
23106 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Tomorrow Movement |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2517 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
February 16, 2026 To: the Independent Planning Commission, NSW. From: Jack Simmons on behalf of the Tomorrow Movement. Re. OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Dear Independent Planning Commissioners, I am writing to you on behalf of the Tomorrow Movement, a youth movement representing thousands of young people across the country fighting to make our communities safe, secure and supported. We are writing this submission to express our objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension. We understand that Yancoal has submitted amendments to this project proposal resulting in the postponement of the public hearing in Mudgee. These amendments come far too late in the process, and do not significantly change the objections our communities hold. Instead they only serve to disrupt the community consultation. Introduction We write this submission today as we have received a multitude of concerns from our community about this proposed extension. Young people are deeply invested in fighting for a future that is climate safe, a society that respects Aboriginal cultural heritage and landscapes that are climate-resilient. This proposed expansion threatens each of these visions. Risk to climate safety It goes without saying that young people have a vested interest in combatting the climate crisis. We have inherited a world where ‘unprecedented’ is normal and millions of people around the world are faced with real and devastating consequences of climate change every day. Climate impacts are unequally felt - the homelands of our neighbours in the Torres Strait and Pacific are being reclaimed by the sea while we decide whether or not to allow further fueling of the crisis. On December 12 2025 the NSW Net Zero Commission published the ‘Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report’. A major finding of this report is that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” (iv, NSW Net Zero Commission Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report). The proposed Moolarben extension flies in the face of this finding. Should the IPC approve this extension it would allow a private company to continue to profit from the export of coal, whose emissions are fuelling the climate crisis. The climate crisis directly fuels disasters which impact our communities in NSW. From January 5-7 this year a severe heatwave impacted most of the state. Analysis from World Weather Attribution found “that similar events are about 5 times more likely to occur now than they would have been in a preindustrial climate without human-caused warming; however, this is likely an underestimate.” (World Weather Attribution: Climate change eclipses La Niña cooling in Australia to drive extreme heatwave and heightened fire risk). We don’t need science to prove to us the impact heatwaves have on our communities - we see it every day. “Over the summer period lots of the community events I’m part of were cancelled due to extreme weather. This has been more and more frequent due to climate change. I’m worried that if projects like Moolarben extension go ahead what spaces we’ll have to gather in the future.” - Luke, Thirroul. Climate change also strongly worsens bushfire risk. Hot dry conditions in late 2025 and early 2026 brought back memories for many in our community of the Black Summer bushfires, another climate change-driven disaster. “I remember in 2020 being on the South Coast of NSW, looking up to the sky and being completely terrified. Drops of rain black with soot fell from a sky roiling in red and orange and the smell of smoke filled my nose. I tried to call my parents to tell them I was OK and in town only to find the phone lines down. Driving the long way back to my house in Wollongong and passing coal mines continuing to fuel disasters like the one I had just experienced was surreal. We can’t keep choosing to let people profit off this crisis - that’s why the Moolarben expansion can’t go ahead.” - Jack, Wollongong. Harm to Wiradjuri heritage Australia is home to the oldest living culture in the world. Extractive industries have damaged countless sites of irreplaceable Aboriginal art, artefacts, history and songlines across the continent. Should it be allowed to proceed this extension will continue this legacy - destroying 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. This is on top of the intangible and ongoing degradation of Wiradjuri Country and fracturing of connection and story. Young people know that respecting Aboriginal cultural heritage is a requirement for any development. The continued destruction of artefacts to allow businesses to profit from our landscapes is unacceptable. Risk to groundwater and creeks In a future where rainfall will become more variable and harder to predict, water will be one of our most precious shared resources. The proposed expansion of the Moolarben mine is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown. This put the fragile Moolarben Creek ecosystem at risk. Furthermore water is a shared resource. Yancoal has failed to characterise groundwater behaviour prior to applying for this extension. The impact upon shared resources must be characterised before a project is approved, not after. To conclude The proposed Moolarben OC3 extension puts at risk the safety of our shared climate, irreplaceable cultural heritage and precious water resources. The NSW Government is still reeling from the effects of climate disasters on our state in the past decade - drought, fires, floods and heat. To grant Yancoal an extension to Moolarben during a climate crisis would go against scientific consensus and risk massive public backlash. For these reasons Tomorrow Movement strongly encourages the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your consideration. Jack, on behalf of the Tomorrow Movement [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
23106 - Jack Simmons_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 139.89 KB) |
Hilary Crawford
|
ID |
23111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTION TO MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL MINING EXTENSION PROJECT SSD-33083358 I have lived in Rylstone for over 20 yeas and have an 80 ha property in the Capertee Valley which I manage to increase the biodiversity of plant and animal life. The Capertee Valley is a breeding site of the Regent Honeyeater, a critically endangered woodland bird, with only 250 to 350 birds remaining in the wild. BirdLife Australia and Taronga Zoo have been planting appropriate trees and shrubs on properties in the valley for more than 30 years to increase the habitat of the Regent Honeyeater and other woodland birds. I have two plantations on the property with another planned for May this year (2026). It is vital that this habitat and other breeding areas be looked after to limit the decline of woodland birds, the Regent Honeyeater in particular. I wish to object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 extension project for the following reasons. 1 IRREVERSIBLE HARM TO THREATENED SPECIES AND ECOSYSTEMS The proposed mine extension is surrounded by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, an area of 5934 ha, known for its sandstone pagodas and diverse and abundant birdlife (164 species of birds recorded). It is a breeding site of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and home to a population of Koalas, a species now listed as endangered in NSW. The proposed extension would destroy 80 ha of habitat of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater, 113 ha of habitat of the endangered Koala and up to 478 ha of the critically endangered ecological community (CEEC) of Box Gum Grassy Woodland. Once destroyed, this ecological community cannot be replaced. Twenty two threatened fauna species will be impacted by this habitat loss including the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater, the endangered (in NSW) Koala, the vulnerable (in NSW) Squirrel Glider, the endangered (in NSW) Large-eared Pied Bat and the vulnerable (in NSW) Eastern Cave Bat. Without urgent intervention (eg saving this habitat), Koalas could become extinct by 2050 (NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into Koalas 2020). 2 CLIMATE COSTS AND IMPACT The OC3 extension project through its greenhouse gas emissions would lead to increased global warming. It is estimated that over its life, the proposed OC3 extension would generate 64.6. million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions which is equivalent to about 58% of NSW's total annual emissions. Further coal mine extensions are inconsistent with the aims of the NSW Climate Change Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement 2015 according to the Net Zero Commission and NSW is unlikely to meet its current targets of 50% reduction on 2005 levels by 2030 and 70% reduction by 2035. Human-emitted greenhouse gases are driving climate change. The result is intense extreme weather events (floods, fires, droughts, heatwaves), rapid ocean warming leading to marine ecosystem collapse (eg Great Barrier Reef), accelerated sea level rises and ice melt, extreme weather intensification (hurricanes and storms) and marine heatwaves leading to losses of marine life. The NSW Government needs to take action to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the State, not give the go-ahead to coal mine expansions which undermine the State's climate goals. 3 RISKS TO GROUNDWATER AND CREEKS It is expected that the proposed OC3 extension project will cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2 to 6 metres that may last up to 25 years after mining has ceased. As a result, Moolarben Creek may no longer be able to provide a critical refuge for wildlife during droughts. At present, springs in the Moolarben Valley provide good-quality potable water that flows to creeks and the Goulburn River. If the project is approved, this supply of quality water could be decreased if not destroyed. The above risks are compounded by the failure of the proponent to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and the proponent's poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements. 4 CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF MINE EXTENSIONS The cumulative impact of the proposed mine extension together with the proposed extensions of the neighbouring mines - Ulan Coal Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 - have been poorly assessed. These extensions together will have an irreversible impact on the climate, the native animal and plant life of the area, including endangered species, on the landscape, the ecosystems and the creeks and groundwater associated with the Goulburn River system. It will also have an irreversible impact on local Wiradjuri cultural heritage. This cumulative impact needs to be thoroughly assessed. 5 IRREVERSIBLE HARM TO WIRADJURI CULTURAL HERITAGE If the project goes ahead, it will do irreparable damage to Wiradjuri cultural heritage. More than 55 irreplaceable cultural artefacts will be destroyed and potentially dozens of others. And the ability of Wiradjuri people to practice their culture and maintain their connection to Country will be eroded by the fracturing of the landscape and its cumulative degradation by ongoing mining. The Wiradjuri cultural heritage should be protected, not destroyed. 6 IMPORTANCE OF NATURE TO MENTAL WELLBEING Connecting with nature is crucial for mental wellbeing. This may involve a walk in the local park, a bushwalk in a national park or reserve or a walk along the beach. Research has shown that exposure to nature significantly improves mental wellbeing. It reduces stress and anxiety, decreases depression, restores mental energy and concentration and improves creativity (The Nature Conservancy Australia; Dr Rona Weerasuriya, Deakin University). Thus it is important to preserve green spaces, including national parks and reserves, not destroy them. 7 PROTECTION OF AREA AND INCORPORATION INTO MUNGHORN GAP NATURE RESERVE The proposed OC3 extension area should be protected and incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. CONCLUSION For the above reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely Hilary Crawford Rylstone NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached Submission Opposing Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 Coal Expansion |
|
Attachments |
23116_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 164.64 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], I am a 53 year old office manager, parent and long term resident of Mudgee. My family has a long association with Mudgee from early European settlement and have been involved in contributing to the community of Mudgee and the Moolarben/Ulan farming districts. I am writing to express my deep concern for the continued expansion of coal mining in our district and to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. In particular, I am concerned that this project would add to the already significant and irreversible damage to the natural environment, climate, community and wildlife. I believe that there needs to be a point at which this expansion should cease before we lose this precious environment forever. This important area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected for the benefit of our flora, fauna and future generations. I am concerned about: The threatened species and habitat loss in this area including clearance of 113 hectares of Koala, Regent Honeyeater and micro-bat habitat and breeding grounds. The impact of noise, blasting and vibration on the existing Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The long-term risks of mining to water and ground water in the Moolarben Creek and surrounding tributaries. Climate impact with the continued reliance on fossil fuels at a time when NSW is not on track to meet it's legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit with no clear jobs justification in an area where renewable energy projects are currently being prioritised. At a time when the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and Paris Agreement are a deadly serious priority, we can ill-afford the approval of new or expanded coal projects. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] (Resident of Mudgee NSW 2850) |
Angela Frimberger
|
ID |
23126 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2446 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We write to register our objection to the proposed project. Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action represents people who have been severely impacted by the physical impacts of climate change. Our members’ losses range from damaged mental and physical health and wellbeing, deep impacts across communities, through to massive tangible and financial losses; and while some of these losses have eventually been recovered through enormous effort and determination, many continue long term. We also know that even in the best case scenario the numbers of climate-impacted people in NSW will only continue to swell due to floods, storms, sea level rise and other impacts. Therefore, we advocate for the strongest, most rapid climate pollution reduction possible. The project being considered here is for export, a profit-taking commercial enterprise, not a public good, and its benefit to the people of NSW is limited. There is no clear jobs benefit, as Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. Conversely, the project would cause substantial local environmental damage which the people of NSW would have to bear. In addition, the emissions from the overseas burning of exported coal are just as harmful to the people, environment and economy of NSW as if the coal were burned here. The NSW Net Zero Future Act legislates emissions reduction targets, and while the domestic electricity sector is making progress in transitioning to renewables, exports continue apace. The proposed project’s additional 64.6 MT of climate pollution would contribute excessively to climate change at a time when all actors urgently need to reduce emissions as strongly as possible. The importance of reducing climate pollution is underscored by the recent National Climate Risk Assessment, which found among many other risks, that sea level rise and increased coastal hazards will significantly impact coastal communities and cities, particularly in New South Wales and northern Queensland; and by 2050, more than 1.5 million Australians will be living in areas that will experience risk from sea level rise. In addition, the Assessment finds that “Dangerous fire weather days are projected to become more frequent in southern and eastern areas with a longer fire season and the potential for more megafires (high confidence)”. This is especially alarming to people like our members, who have already been impacted by bushfires; and also particularly concerning in the context of NSW’s housing crisis. The most recent NSW budget states, “…expenditure on natural disasters has increased more than 1,000 per cent in the six years since the 2019-20 bushfires compared to the six years prior”. The Insurance Council of Australia found that extreme weather events in 2022 cost every Australian household an average of $1,532. And healthcare costs alone from the Black summer bushfires were found to amount to $1.95 billion, while a recent analysis found that extreme fire years like this are 88-152 percent more likely due to climate change. The project’s contribution to these risks and costs - and its competition with the CWOREZ - should be subtracted from its projected financial benefit, before any assessment is made based on monetary contributions to the state. The NSW Net Zero Commission in its 2024 Annual Report found that while NSW has made progress in emissions reductions, achieving its 2030 and 2035 targets is only possible under the most optimistic scenarios; and more effort is needed across all sectors of the economy to have a good chance of reaching them. In particular, the Commission expressed concerns that the resources sector specifically could put the state’s targets in jeopardy by increasing emissions associated with new, extended and expanded coal mining projects, considering the “sizeable pipeline” of projects in the planning system. This puts unfair pressure on other sectors of the NSW economy to reduce emissions even more strongly to compensate for the excess pollution from the resources sector. In its Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight report the Commission found that further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. And importantly, last year’s NSW Court of Appeal in DAMSHEG v MACH Energy Australia requires decision-makers to consider the local impacts of climate change caused by all the emissions - including downstream emissions - in assessing projects. All these clearly point to a conclusion that this project should be refused. In addition to the enormous climate risk posed by the proposed project, the project would also significantly impact groundwater and creeks, and put a high biodiversity area at substantial risk. The project would clear over 400 hectares of native vegetation and bring the mine to within 100 metres of a Nature Reserve. Noise, blasting, vibration and dust would compound these impacts. The area includes critical koala breeding habitat at a time when NSW’s koala population is already under severe pressure, plus habitat for at least 22 other threatened species including the Regent Honeyeater. Clearly, this habitat clearing cannot be offset. The project would also exacerbate the cumulative impact of other local mines already damaging the biodiversity of the area, including Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3. We understand that the proponent has submitted last-minute amendments, regrettably resulting in the delay of the public hearing on this matter. We recommend that these changes be rejected, as they do not reduce the amount of native vegetation proposed to be cleared, nor the footprint of the mine. As the Commission no doubt knows, off-site habitat enhancement cannot replace the clearing of critical breeding habitat for threatened species. BSCA’s members deeply understand the seriousness and urgency of climate change, and our mission is to help keep Australian communities safe from climate change. We urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Yours sincerely, Angela Frimberger, Government Relations Advisor Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action | Birpai Country [redacted] Serena Joyner, CEO Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action | Darug and Gundungurra Country [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
23126_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 166.01 KB) |
Wendy Stokoe
|
ID |
23131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a concerned citizen who opposes the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal complex. My objections and concerns can be summarised as follows: - it is foolhardy to continue our reliance on coal, given the egregious effects of burning coal for power in relation to global warming and climate concerns. - the proposed development lies within an area the Central West Renewable Energy Zone, an apparent contradiction in terms of the goals of transferring a reliance on coal to the use of renewables. - the development would have a deleterious effect on the wildlife and biodiversity of the region. The current mining footprint has already caused significant damage to the landscape and its flora and fauna. - the proposed extension would impact the adjacent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, home to threatened wildlife species. - we have sacrificed many significant and awe-inspiring locales to mining. I have spent time in the Moolarben Valley prior to the mining operations there. It is a unique and beautiful area, now lost to the families who formerly lived there. -there are risks to watercourses and groundwater resources on which wildlife are dependent. - I am passionate about our responsibility to conserve wildlife and ecosystems. Continual expansion and depletion of resources jeopardises the future for all of us. - this development is simply unnecessary. It will not provide lasting benefits for the local community or the broader population. It is not in the interests of protecting our increasingly fragile and abused ecosystems. -the benefits of this proposed development will flow to the mining company. Their interest in further expansion is driven by a commitment to increase profits. - mining companies are depleting resources that belong to all of us here now, and those in future generations. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2443 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
G day one and all. Generally, I m opposed to the rapid expansion of the Moorabin coalfields. There are several local and several global reasons. Firstly though, it should be one of the roles if not duties of government to help redirect the workers to meaningful jobs is alternate energy roles or other construction fields. Lasiness and neglect of responsibilities is not an option. And so the obvious objections are in areas of local and global pollution, local habitat and ecology loss, water accessibility diminishment, and longer term uglification of the landscape. The locals also don t want to breathe such high levels of coal dust. So for these reasons and some others I am opposed to the coal field expansion. Thankyou for listening and understanding the long term cosquences. Have a good day and breathe easy? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2443 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
G day one and all. Generally, I m opposed to the rapid expansion of the Moorabin coalfields. There are several local and several global reasons. Firstly though, it should be one of the roles if not duties of government to help redirect the workers to meaningful jobs is alternate energy roles or other construction fields. Lasiness and neglect of responsibilities is not an option. And so the obvious objections are in areas of local and global pollution, local habitat and ecology loss, water accessibility diminishment, and longer term uglification of the landscape. The locals also don t want to breathe such high levels of coal dust. So for these reasons and some others I am opposed to the coal field expansion. Thankyou for listening and understanding the long term cosquences. Have a good day and breathe easy? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine would extend close to the edge of one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, posing a serious threat to a healthy koala population and their critical habitat. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitats that are critical to the survival of the Koala population and other wildlife in a uniquely resilient population. Yancoal has move to have the Independent Planning Commission hearing postponed and to interrupt the community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion, by making more minor amendments to its proposal. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. This is an attempt at greenwashing a very damaging project and the change at this stage makes a mockery of community consultation processes. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, that are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The NSW Government committed to stopping the decline of Koalas in NSW. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat this project poses to the Koala population, noting that: Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species,’ and that this is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing and impact on native vegetation and the 500m buffer does not take into consideration wildlife movement across the reserve or contamination and management of the waste water and invasive weed species. Biodiversity offsets Offsets are poorly managed and poorly monitored with little or no public reporting or accountability. ‘Habitat Enhancement’ biodiversity offsets are used to justify habitat destruction. Impact on native vegetation and local ecosystems must be avoided if we are to avoid further loss of mature habitat sites, species decline and extinctions. Existing wildlife are displaced with no record of population numbers prior to clearing, their ability to adapt to habitat changes the consequences of habitat destruction, forced displacement, and loss of food sources is not monitored. Offset replanting programs take decades to establish and create sustainable food sources and wildlife habitat. Over that time the wildlife has either moved on with no knowledge of what might have happened to them or they have died off. Securing and protecting existing forest ecosystems as an offset to areas to be cleared has also resulted in a net loss of vegetation and habitat in the region. Water impacts The wastewater created from the mining activities, and coal mine waste discharges, will increase the physical and chemical changes to Moolarben Creek water quality. Mining discharge downstream below the contamination point can impact the ecosystem of the Moolarben Creek and Goulburn River. This is reflected by marked ecological degradation of stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic macroinvertebrates can also be adversely affected. The mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek causing changes in the ground water table levels which are difficult to monitor and can extend far beyond the mining area and stream catchment area impacting vegetation that relies on tapping into current water table levels. To minimize impact of the natural environment and water quality from the existing mining operation the NSW EPA should have increased oversite for ongoing monitoring of wastewater discharge, regular monitoring of creek and river water quality, and ongoing monitoring of the impact on existing flora and fauna from current mining and transport activities. Climate Change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed as an accumulative impact. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. As stated by the Climate Council 'The collective impact on global warming will severely impact the frequency of bush fires and extreme weather events as we move toward 2.6C. Recent Disaster Costs: Following recent disasters (e.g., Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred), the Federal Government has indicated that total costs for national disaster support are expected to reach at least $13.5 billion, with $1.2 billion provisioned in the contingency reserve for future disaster recovery. Long-Term Projection: Without strong action, climate-related damage is projected to cost the Australian economy $8.7 billion annually by 2050. Adaptation Spending: Since 2022, the Federal Government has committed $3.6 billion to adaptation and resilience measures, including the $1 billion Disaster Ready Fund. A report by the Federal Government states the cost of climate related disaster management is $7.1 Billion dollars. As more properties are being impacted or destroyed, more people are being displaced, and more assets become uninsurable. The return in royalties and taxes from expanding this coal mine or any other coal mine will not cover the consequential cost to the community, State and Federal Governments in funding disaster relief efforts coursed by fossil fuel induced climate change. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Regional impacts and jobs The existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. |
Janet Lewis
|
ID |
23166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Written submission has been attached, below. |
|
Attachments |
23166- Janet Lewis.pdf (PDF, 50.19 KB) |
Angela Burrows
|
ID |
23171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2081 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to this mine extension for many reasons. As a mother, and grandmother of ten grandchildren and it is my highest priority to I do everything I can to leave them and all future generations with a safe and healthy ecosystems, environment and planet. 1. It is now universally recognised that fossil fuels are responsible for drastically increasing carbon pollution of the earth's atmosphere and causing deleterious climate change. It is therefore totally irresponsible to approve any further coal mining. Further mining contravenes the NSW Government Climate Change Act, and is fails to uphold Australia’s Paris agreement responsibilities. 2. The current approval for the Moolarbin mine extends to 2038. It is unreasonable to be seeking or considering granting extensions at this time. 3. Over the years of visiting the area I have seen this once beautiful, rural and biodiverse region, especially around the village of Wollar, destroyed and turned into an unhealthy moon landscape, with farms and communities destroyed. 4. I urge the commission and planners to focus now on the future providing sustainable renewable energy jobs and environmentally sustaining jobs whilst rehabilitating and restoring land and ecosystems after the coal mining damage. 5. Further development of this mine would require more clearing of native vegetation causing destruction of ecosystems including documented critical koala habitat and threatening many other endangered animals, birds, plants and communities. Now is the time to be building and restoring native habitat and undertaking species conservation so important to sustain life.. 6. The beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature reserve, one of NSW oldest reserves and a tourist attraction, depends on the surrounding native vegetation to protect its native ecosystems. This mine extension would bring the moon landscape to surround the reserve on three sides. 7. Rather than destroying this native vegetation it would be so much better to include it in the Munghorn Nature reserve to mitigate the huge losses already caused by mining in this valley. It would add to the tourist attraction and jobs in our world where spending time in nature is now recognised as essential to human wellbeing. 8. Many Aboriginal cultural heritage sites will be affected and so much has already been lost due to the extensive mining locally. Aboriginal community should be given much greater respect. 9. Water is critical for life and especially precious in rural areas. Mining damages local watercourses and draws down the water table. Mining uses large quantities of water to quell dust - so distressing for local communities in times of drought. It would be lifegiving for rural communities and tourism if water conservation is given priority over mining water wasting. For all these reasons I strongly object to the mine extension and look forward to hearing that this proposal has been declined. Thank you Angela Burrows |
Peter Winkler
|
ID |
23181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the extension of the Moolarben Coal mine. The proposed expansion of this coal mine in the New South Wales Central West would displace and reduce the size of a critical koala population. In the context of the global climate crisis extension of coal mining makes the climate crisis worse and jeopardises the future of biodiversity. Australia must transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy as quickly as possible. |
Helen Kveldr
|
ID |
23186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am shocked this is even being considered we are in climate emergency and the 6th great extinction. Why would we even consider a new coal mine? I am concerned about future generations and about all the living creatures which will die if this goes ahead. We cannot afford to keep plundering our planet. There are already better alternatives than coal and these alternatives - solar, wind, wave, etc would all provide energy and jobs. It’s time to stop propping up an industry which is going to end and start looking to a real and positive future for us and all other life in this planet. |
Chris Lee
|
ID |
23191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a nation we have challenging emissions reductions goals committed to by international treaty. We are investing a lot of tax money to support our transition and are making good but still inadequate progress. Our Minister for Climate Change and Energy will be working hard this year to get international commitments to a faster reduction in global emissions at COP31. Expanding or opening coal mines undermines his authority and ability to build global action. We don't need this coal, and the expansion of the mine is contrary to our national climate goals. |
Michael Cleary
|
ID |
23196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Project I write to object to the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for this project on the basis that it is inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development, presents unacceptable environmental and health impacts, threatens regional water security and agricultural productivity, and is contrary to the long-term public interest of New South Wales. ________________________________________ 1. Inconsistency with Climate Policy and the Public Interest The project would enable continued and expanded extraction and export of thermal coal at a time when both Australia and NSW have committed to significant emissions reduction targets. While the proponent may argue that exported emissions are not counted within NSW inventories, the planning system is required to consider downstream (“Scope 3”) emissions when assessing public interest and environmental harm. Combustion of the coal extracted from the OC3 extension will produce very large quantities of greenhouse gases over the life of the project. Approval would therefore: • undermine NSW emissions reduction commitments, • conflict with Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, • and lock in decades of additional global emissions. The NSW Land and Environment Court (Rocky Hill decision, Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning) established that the climate impacts of exported coal are a relevant planning consideration. The OC3 extension clearly fails this test because it expands — rather than phases down — fossil fuel production during a period of urgent decarbonisation. ________________________________________ 2. Unacceptable Air Quality and Health Impacts Coal mining in the Mudgee–Ulan region has already resulted in cumulative particulate pollution from multiple existing mines. The OC3 extension would significantly increase: • PM10 and PM2.5 dust pollution • blasting emissions • diesel exhaust exposure • coal handling and transport particulates Fine particulate matter is linked to: • cardiovascular disease • respiratory illness • asthma exacerbation • premature mortality Rural communities have limited access to specialist health services. The burden of disease therefore falls disproportionately on residents of the region. The project adds to an already high cumulative exposure environment and fails the precautionary principle. Approval would effectively shift private economic benefit onto public health cost. ________________________________________ 3. Water Security and Groundwater Impacts The project presents significant risk to both surface and groundwater systems. The Moolarben mine operates in a region where: • groundwater supports agriculture, • aquifers recharge slowly, • and rainfall is highly variable. Longwall and open-cut mining can cause: • aquifer depressurisation • permanent drawdown • fracturing of geological strata • loss of baseflow to creeks Predicted “make-good” provisions do not restore aquifers. Water systems that take centuries to form cannot be replaced through compensation agreements. Given increasing drought frequency in NSW, approval would represent a short-term industrial use overriding long-term regional water security. ________________________________________ 4. Agricultural and Land Use Conflict The Central West and Upper Hunter regions are strategically important agricultural areas. Mining expansion creates: • land sterilisation • dust deposition on crops and pasture • reduced livestock productivity • loss of soil quality • property devaluation Agriculture provides sustainable, intergenerational employment. Coal mining does not. The project therefore represents a direct land-use conflict in which a finite extractive industry displaces a permanent food-producing landscape. Once mined, agricultural capability cannot be restored to its original state, despite rehabilitation claims. ________________________________________ 5. Economic Considerations and Employment Claims Employment benefits are often overstated in mining assessments. Coal mining is increasingly mechanised and provides relatively limited long-term employment compared with: • agriculture • renewable energy development • regional tourism Furthermore, approval risks creating stranded assets and economic instability as global demand for thermal coal declines. The project therefore exposes the regional economy to future shock rather than supporting economic transition. 6. Biodiversity and Ecological Impacts The project area contains remnant woodland ecosystems and habitat for threatened species. Even where offsetting is proposed, biodiversity offsets do not replace ecological function. Mature ecosystems cannot be recreated within human timeframes. Cumulative biodiversity loss across the Western Coalfields is significant. Approval of the OC3 extension would contribute to incremental ecological degradation and habitat fragmentation across the region. ________________________________________ 7. Failure of the Precautionary Principle Under ecologically sustainable development principles, where there is scientific uncertainty but potential for serious environmental damage, approval should not proceed. There remains uncertainty regarding: • cumulative dust impacts • groundwater behaviour • rehabilitation success • long-term climate effects Because impacts may be irreversible, the Commission must err on the side of environmental protection. ________________________________________ Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension is not a neutral development decision. It is a long-term commitment to expanded fossil fuel extraction with permanent environmental consequences and limited regional benefit. The project: • increases greenhouse gas emissions, • threatens water resources, • harms community health, • damages agriculture, • degrades biodiversity, • and conflicts with NSW’s long-term public interest. For these reasons, I respectfully request the NSW Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely, Michael Cleary [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
23196_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 141.03 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2516 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the expansion. I am a young person with a science degree and I work for the protection of the environment. I can see that this expansion goes against common sense. We can't afford to approve any more expansions or approvals of new projects if we meet our NSW climate targets or Aus Paris Agreement. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this project for the following reasons: The proposal would clear about 450 hectares of native vegetation and extend to within 100 metres of the Munghorn gap nature Reserve. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area including a uniquely resilient koala population. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, making its climate impact enormous. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2-6 metres placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. |
Sanaa Shah
|
ID |
23216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 22155 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object the Moolarben OC3 Expansion- it will have negative ramifications for biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, water resources, and intergenerational equity. As NSW continues to progress it Net Zero objectives, it is bizarre that this mine is being expanded, despite longstanding discontent voiced by the local community and environmentalists. |
Victor Batorijs
|
ID |
23221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2090 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully appreciate that this extension will create jobs for the local community but there is simply no justification for supporting fossil fuel based industries, particularly where we have abundant renewable energy resources and this is in the Renewable Energy Zone which will create long term jobs based on clean energy. |
Anka Cleary
|
ID |
23226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Project I write as a resident of the Mudgee area to object to the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for this project on the basis that it is inconsistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development, presents unacceptable environmental and health impacts, threatens regional water security and agricultural productivity, and is contrary to the long-term public interest of New South Wales. ________________________________________ 1. Inconsistency with Climate Policy and the Public Interest The project would enable continued and expanded extraction and export of thermal coal at a time when both Australia and NSW have committed to significant emissions reduction targets. While the proponent may argue that exported emissions are not counted within NSW inventories, the planning system is required to consider downstream (“Scope 3”) emissions when assessing public interest and environmental harm. Combustion of the coal extracted from the OC3 extension will produce very large quantities of greenhouse gases over the life of the project. Approval would therefore: • undermine NSW emissions reduction commitments, • conflict with Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement, • and lock in decades of additional global emissions. The NSW Land and Environment Court (Rocky Hill decision, Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning) established that the climate impacts of exported coal are a relevant planning consideration. The OC3 extension clearly fails this test because it expands — rather than phases down — fossil fuel production during a period of urgent decarbonisation. ________________________________________ 2. Unacceptable Air Quality and Health Impacts Coal mining in the Mudgee–Ulan region has already resulted in cumulative particulate pollution from multiple existing mines. The OC3 extension would significantly increase: • PM10 and PM2.5 dust pollution • blasting emissions • diesel exhaust exposure • coal handling and transport particulates Fine particulate matter is linked to: • cardiovascular disease • respiratory illness • asthma exacerbation • premature mortality Rural communities have limited access to specialist health services. The burden of disease therefore falls disproportionately on residents of the region. The project adds to an already high cumulative exposure environment and fails the precautionary principle. Approval would effectively shift private economic benefit onto public health cost. ________________________________________ 3. Water Security and Groundwater Impacts The project presents significant risk to both surface and groundwater systems. The Moolarben mine operates in a region where: • groundwater supports agriculture, • aquifers recharge slowly, • and rainfall is highly variable. Longwall and open-cut mining can cause: • aquifer depressurisation • permanent drawdown • fracturing of geological strata • loss of baseflow to creeks Predicted “make-good” provisions do not restore aquifers. Water systems that take centuries to form cannot be replaced through compensation agreements. Given increasing drought frequency in NSW, approval would represent a short-term industrial use overriding long-term regional water security. ________________________________________ 4. Agricultural and Land Use Conflict The Central West and Upper Hunter regions are strategically important agricultural areas. Mining expansion creates: • land sterilisation • dust deposition on crops and pasture • reduced livestock productivity • loss of soil quality • property devaluation Agriculture provides sustainable, intergenerational employment. Coal mining does not. The project therefore represents a direct land-use conflict in which a finite extractive industry displaces a permanent food-producing landscape. Once mined, agricultural capability cannot be restored to its original state, despite rehabilitation claims. ________________________________________ 5. Economic Considerations and Employment Claims Employment benefits are often overstated in mining assessments. Coal mining is increasingly mechanised and provides relatively limited long-term employment compared with: • agriculture • renewable energy development • regional tourism Furthermore, approval risks creating stranded assets and economic instability as global demand for thermal coal declines. The project therefore exposes the regional economy to future shock rather than supporting economic transition. 6. Biodiversity and Ecological Impacts The project area contains remnant woodland ecosystems and habitat for threatened species. Even where offsetting is proposed, biodiversity offsets do not replace ecological function. Mature ecosystems cannot be recreated within human timeframes. Cumulative biodiversity loss across the Western Coalfields is significant. Approval of the OC3 extension would contribute to incremental ecological degradation and habitat fragmentation across the region. ________________________________________ 7. Failure of the Precautionary Principle Under ecologically sustainable development principles, where there is scientific uncertainty but potential for serious environmental damage, approval should not proceed. There remains uncertainty regarding: • cumulative dust impacts • groundwater behaviour • rehabilitation success • long-term climate effects Because impacts may be irreversible, the Commission must err on the side of environmental protection. ________________________________________ Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension is not a neutral development decision. It is a long-term commitment to expanded fossil fuel extraction with permanent environmental consequences and limited regional benefit. The project: • increases greenhouse gas emissions, • threatens water resources, • harms community health, • damages agriculture, • degrades biodiversity, • and conflicts with NSW’s long-term public interest. For these reasons, I respectfully request the NSW Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely, Anka Cleary [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
23226 - Anka Cleary_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 141.03 KB) |
gary barnes
|
ID |
23231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe this will do irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. the climate cost is incompatible with NSW climate goals |
Ross Liddle
|
ID |
23236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2206 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
[name redacted]] Tues Feb 17, 2026 To the Independent Planning Commission My name is Ross Liddle. I'm a 68 year old father of three who lives in Earlwood Sydney operates a local handyman business and am deeply disturbed by the continued approval of new coal expansions. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In a time when it is so clear that our climate is rapidly heating and we’ve already hit climate tipping points we need to stop approving new coal expansions and instead make every effort to transition to net zero energy solutions. In particular, I am concerned about: Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting andvibration impacts. Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion To: The Independent Planning Commission NSW Re: Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) Dear Commissioners, I object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Complex (OC3). This project is fundamentally inconsistent with Australia’s rapid transition toward renewable energy. We are moving toward very high levels of renewable electricity within the next decade. Expanding coal extraction now risks locking in unnecessary environmental damage for an industry that may not be needed in 10 years. The mine is located within the Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, an area designated to support renewable energy development. Approving a coal expansion in a Renewable Energy Zone directly contradicts the strategic intent for the region. The expansion would destroy native habitat near the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and cause irreversible environmental harm. Once this land is cleared, it cannot be restored to its natural state. Local residents are currently being reminded by council to be mindful of water usage, while mining operations use large volumes in a drought-prone region. The surrounding environment and communities cannot sustainably support further strain. Finally, this expansion primarily benefits a corporation and a limited number of jobs, while the environmental and climate impacts are borne by wildlife, local communities, future generations, and people globally. For these reasons, I urge the Commission to reject this proposal and ensure planning decisions align with a sustainable, renewable future. Yours sincerely, |
Maddy Yerbury
|
ID |
23246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2502 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Maddy and I am a local resident of Wollongong. I studied biology at university because I care deeply about the environment, and now work in community and environmental organisations. Last year I travelled to Mudgee to visit the town of Wollar and hear from local residents who have been devastated by coal mining development and expansion. Growing up in a coal mining town, I know the significant contributions that industries like coal mining have brought to our workers and communities. I also know that coal mining is destroying our environment, our ecosystems and water that we depend on, and Aboriginal heritage. As a young person, I see these impacts and am terrified by the catastrophic effects that mining and burning coal have on the climate. I am therefore writing to object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. On my visit to Mudgee last year, I visited the beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which is only 100 m away from the proposed mine expansion. We walked through the reserve, and learnt about the ecosystems and species that the reserve provides habitats for. I am highly concerned that 480 hectares of native vegetation, including 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been sighted, is proposed to be cleared for the expansion. I was also horrified to learn that the proposed expansion is predicted to have serious and irreversible impacts on several threatened species and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland. I am particularly concerned about the damage that the proposed mining would have on Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including 55 Aboriginal heritage sites directly impacted. I note that the Cultural Heritage Management Plan recommended protection of these sites, which has been ignored by the proponent. Additionally I am highly concerned about the climate pollution that would be emitted due to this proposed expansion. I understand that an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases emissions would be produced over the life of the OC3 mine extension if this expansion is to go ahead. This is an unjustifiable cost to the climate, and inconsistent with the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement, especially since NSW is not on track to meet it’s greenhouse gas emission targets for both 2030 and 2035. As a young person, I have experienced a lifetime of extreme weather from severe drought in the early 2000s, to the black summer bushfires in 2019-2020 and the preceding floods. I have witnessed climate fueled disasters like these across the state, the country and the world, and more frequently over the past few years. I am terrified of what the world will look like if we continue to mine and burn coal. I want to see good meaningful jobs that benefit the local communities of Mudgee and surrounding areas, not those that will take their future away from them. The NSW Government cannot afford to allow the approval of new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. For the reasons outlined above I therefore urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. I thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Maddy Yerbury Wollongong NSW |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben submission.pdf (PDF, 33.57 KB) |
Cynthia Alexander
|
ID |
23251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2221 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Cynthia. I am an Australian citizen. I love this thrilling land of rich beauty, and its people of moral fibre and common sense. I am therefore very surprised and concerned by the proposed further expansion of coal mining in our states and particularly the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. These are some of my concerns: 1) The expansion of this mine will benefit no one but the mining company, as jobs and commerce in this area are already abundant. I assume that there will be little if any income to NSW or Australia, like so many other mining projects that send profits off shore. 2) There has been inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. 3) The local environment would be further degraded causing: • irreversible threatened animal and plant species habitat loss, • water and ground water contamination and depletion threats, • impacts to neighboring Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, • mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve The world is in a climate crisis spiral and weather extremes break records with fearful regularity. This expansion project is estimated to produce 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions, yet NSW is NOT on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Where is the common sense in approving this mining project? I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the Local environment, climate and community, as well as the wider environment, climate and community. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country should be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Cynthia Alexander |
David Christie
|
ID |
23261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2779 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is David Christie and I live in the Blue Mountains. I have lived here since 2001, and during that time I have experienced several bush fires. In 2001, bushfires were close to my home in Lawson. In 2002, a fire front roared past my parent’s home in Winmalee while I was manning hoses, in 2013 fires destroyed neighbours on both sides of parent’s home in Winmalee. We evacuated to my sister’s home during fires in 2019. While there is a history of bush fires in the Blue Mountains, these fires are more extreme due to the effects of Climate Change, and the burning of fossil fuels and the subsequent pollution is one of the principle causes of the warming of the planet and the changes to climate. I also have relatives who live in Mudgee and Cooks Gap and the area around the Moolarben Mine. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am opposed to the mine expansion: • This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine. This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. My wife grew up surrounded by this beautiful bushland. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. • Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. This vegetation is habitat for 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including the Koala, Regent Honeyeater, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Broad-headed Snake. The NSW Environment Department has warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • The vegetation to be cleared includes 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits, and 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, • A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals. The proposal would produce an estimated 64.6 Metric tonnes of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. This is inconsistent with the NSW Net Zero Commission conclusion in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets and the Paris Agreement temperature goals • Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks. It would lead to water drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. • The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. It would cause serious harm to cultural heritage – at least 55 Aboriginal heritage sites would be directly impacted. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, David Christie [name redacted] |
|
Attachments |
23261 - David Christie_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 67.48 KB) |
Kyle Patterson
|
ID |
23266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Kyle Patterson and I am mad as hell about Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This is insanity. Future generations will judge this to be the case. Imagine when your great-grandchildren one day in the future discover those responsible for allowing this to happen. Of course, they won’t. You’ll stop it! This project poses serious, irreversible risks to the environment, the climate, and the community. Instead of being carved up, this biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected — not treated like a spare patch of dirt waiting for excavation. My key concerns include: • Threatened species and habitat loss. Over 113 hectares of koala habitat — where koalas actually live and breed — would be cleared, along with habitat for the Regent Honeyeater and microbats. Biodiversity offsets cannot magically recreate functioning ecosystems, no matter how optimistic the paperwork may be. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Mining within 100 metres of the reserve, paired with inadequate assessment of noise, blasting, and vibration, is not what anyone would call a “precautionary approach.” It’s more of a “hope for the best” strategy. • Water and groundwater risks. Long term groundwater drawdown threatens Moolarben Creek and groundwater dependent ecosystems that serve as critical drought refuges. Once these systems are damaged, they don’t bounce back with a glass of water and a pep talk. • Climate impacts. An additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already struggling to meet its legislated reduction targets is the opposite of climate leadership. It’s like announcing a diet and celebrating with a family sized cake. • Lack of public benefit. There is no compelling jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region that is actively transitioning toward renewable energy. The future is arriving whether we approve new coal projects or not. The NSW Government cannot credibly approve new or expanded coal projects in the midst of a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusing the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. Kyle Patterson [redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia should be leading the world in the transition to Renewable Energy, not the extension of fossil fuel (FF) resources. Australia gets more sunshine than any other country in the world, so we should be fostering the solar industry, not supporting an industry whose days are numbered. Whilst apologists for FFs say that there's great demandfor fossil fuels, that demonstrates complete abrogation of any moral responsibility. There's demand for prostitution, for gambling, for illicit drugs. Should we seek to expand these industries? There was very good demand for slaves and opium, many fortunes were made but history does not remember them kindly and I would respectfully suggest that we are at a similar transition point. Please factor the above into responses to the excuse that "if we don't sell it, then someone else will". The damage that global warming is doing is manifest most particularly in increased insurance premiums. our business insurance has gone from $56,000 to $186,000. That increase, spread across our staff, would allow a wage increase of $7-10,000 PER STAFF MEMBER, a very handy extra in this cost of living crisis, but all of that is lost to our communities in a dead weight cost....and that sort of weight, a significant productivity loss, is a burden not just on our business but hundreds of thousands of businesses and millions of households across NSW. Electricity derived from coal delivers only 35% of the energy that comes out of the ground to the point of use; that is, 65% is wasted as a fuel source but contributes to global warming. As a tax payer and a rate payer and an employer in NSW, I urge the NSW Government to reject the proposal to extend the mine. Best Regards + Thanks, |
Kylien Hitchman
|
ID |
23276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2094 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a citizen of NSW concerned that the Moolarben Opencut Coal mine is under consideration to be expanded. I am very concerned about its impact on the surrounding biodiversity and its contribution to the climate change crisis. It is unacceptable that the IPC Hearing has been indefinitely postponed when the surrounding residents and concerned citizens need to be heard through ongoing community consultation. I call for the Department of Planning to reject the proposed amendments from Yancoal as they do not reduce the mine footprint and so impact on local biodiversity through vegetation clearing, which can not be remedied/offset with "off-site habitat enhancement". Yours sincerely, Kylien Hitchman |
Kylien Hitchman
|
ID |
23281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2094 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a citizen of NSW concerned that the Moolarben Opencut Coal mine is under consideration to be expanded. I am very concerned about its impact on the surrounding biodiversity and its contribution to the climate change crisis. It is unacceptable that the IPC Hearing has been indefinitely postponed when the surrounding residents and concerned citizens need to be heard through ongoing community consultation. I call for the Department of Planning to reject the proposed amendments from Yancoal as they do not reduce the mine footprint and so impact on local biodiversity through vegetation clearing, which can not be remedied/offset with "off-site habitat enhancement". Yours sincerely, Kylien Hitchman |
Thomas Kendall
|
ID |
23286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2287 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached document |
|
Attachments |
23286 - Thomas Kendall.pdf (PDF, 121.73 KB) |
Shreya Ghosh
|
ID |
23291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 700089 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The expansion will threaten the means of livelihood of local communities and the biodiversity in the area. It also places a delicate ecosystem at further risk. It will not generate enough employment to justify it happening since coal jobs remain unfilled. Renewable energy sources can however help in creating new jobs. The pollution caused by the extension is life threatening and unwelcome. I object the development. |
Maureen Kingshott
|
ID |
23296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2454 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I live in the mid North coast region of NSW which is constantly under threat of wildlife habitat destruction by the NSW Forestry Corporation. In my view the state of our natural environment in NSW generally is far too precarious to permit new or expanded fossil fuel projects. I am therefore writing to object to Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben OC3 coalmine near Mudgee. My main concerns are that the expansion would cause irreparable damage to the local environment, the many plant and animal species which inhabit that environment, and it would result in even more greenhouse gas emissions than now. I ask you not to approve Yancoal’s proposal for the following reasons: 1. I understand that by clearing 480 hectares of bushland the proposed expansion would result in irreversible damage that cannot be offset. It would impact severely on threatened species including microbats, regent honeyeaters and broadheaded snakes. It would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat, affecting breeding koalas; 80 hectares of regent honeyeater habitat; and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered box gum woodland ecosystem. Any offsets proposed will not be of any use to these important NSW flora and fauna. The ‘habitat enhancement’ offsets proposed by Yancoal appear to be mere greenwashing. 2. The proposed mine expansion will also have impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve as mining is proposed to take place within 100 metres of the Reserve. The effects on the environment of blasting and mining activities would not be conducive to the resident wildlife in the Reserve or to visitors hoping to enjoy a peaceful experience birdwatching or walking in the Reserve. In my view the area concerned should be part of the Reserve, not part of an open cut coal mine. 3. Moolarben Creek and local ecosystems would be under threat as a result of the long-term drawdown of groundwater required for the expanded mine. 4. There is no apparent public benefit for the expansion, with no new jobs or economic gain likely for surrounding townspeople, with the existing mine proposed to operate until 2038, and renewable energy projects in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone expected to create many more jobs than the mine. 5. The additional greenhouse gas emissions projected from the proposed expansion (estimated at 64 million tonnes) would not be consistent with the emission reduction targets set out in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. 6. Neighbouring coal mines, Ulan and Wilpinjong, are also proposing expansions which would affect native plants and animal habitat, similarly to the Moolarben proposal. The cumulative effects of all these proposals should be considered together, not separately. I ask you to reject the Yancoal proposal. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely Maureen Kingshott |
Kerryn HIGGS
|
ID |
23301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2446 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Kerryn Higgs. I am a 79 year old retired academic and author, living near Wauchope in mid-north NSW. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in my state of NSW. This is due to many reasons, but especially the climate impacts of continued coal and gas extraction. I have lived in the same place for well over 50 years and it is clear that our temperatures are a good deal higher than they were when I moved here. Every decade brings more intense heatwaves and some years bring us torrential rainfall of the kind we never saw before in my lifetime or that of others who can remember back 60 or 70 years ago. The road to the mountains which I have taken every year since 1970, was washed away (totally washed out in one place) and covered in landslides (three cases) in the past 5 years, We had rainy seasons regularly, but nothing of this severity had ever happened before. Global warming means the atmosphere holds more moisture, about 10% more at present, and always rising as the temperatures rise, so that the storms are much more destructive. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, so therefore should not be approved. Rather than being cleared and destroyed for a coal mine, this biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected, Here are the main issues I am worried about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas -- and breeding -- have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. And NSW must protect what is left of Koala habitat. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Coal mines use a lot of water. • Climate impacts -- the project will produce an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. *** The NSW Government should not approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Kerryn Higgs |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The environment has been of great concern to me for many decades. So, on this basis, I oppose Yancoal’s proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. I am informed that Yancoal has sought to delay the IPC hearing and disrupt community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion by submitting last-minute minor amendments to its proposal. The amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose offsite “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process. In short, the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. The proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional emissions from coal mining. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population and clear irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Unbelievably, Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions, including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions), and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal, and the proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining. This is inadequate; baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. I will not go into the potential destruction of Aboriginal heritage, which would be of great concern to the Wiradjuri people, and to anyone who values Australian indigenous culture. The main concerns I have raised are directly related to the environment, and the fauna relying on it. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Martin Mansfield
|
ID |
23311 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Cumberland Bird Observers Club |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Martin Mansfield. I am writing on behalf of Cumberland Bird Observers Club (CBOC) NSW, which has over 450 members. I am the club’s Conservation Officer and this submission has been approved by the CBOC Executive Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. CBOC urges that Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben coal mine be rejected. In particular, we are worried about the impact that the proposal would have on the Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) which is classified as Critically Endangered under the Federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. The Regent Honeyeater has suffered a drastic population decline and there are only 250-350 left in the wild. The mine expansion would involve the clearing of 80 hectares of the habitat used by this special bird. Breeding females have been recorded on site. CBOC has a particular concern for the protection and survival of the Regent Honeyeater. Members have participated in plantings of thousands of suitable trees in the Capertee Valley for many years in an effort to increase the number of Regent Honeyeaters and prevent the species’ extinction. The vegetation used by Regent Honeyeaters is also used by other species of woodland birds many of which are also declining in numbers, some of them declining significantly. In addition, Yancoal’s proposed coal mine expansion would produce an estimated 64.6 metric tonnes of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. This would contribute further to climate change which is the greatest threat to the wellbeing and survival of birds in Australia. We are deeply frustrated that we have to repeatedly take action to try to protect birds and their habitat. It seems that every time birds are in the way of a money-making venture, it’s the birds that have to make way. It’s therefore not surprising that the numbers of many species of birds are in decline, sometimes precipitously, and that more species keep being added to the list of threatened species. Enough is enough! The expansion of Yancoal’s mine poses an unacceptable threat to birds both in the local area and further afield. Cumberland Bird Observers Club therefore urges that it be rejected. |
Martin Mansfield
|
ID |
23321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Martin Mansfield. I am passionate about ensuring that my 2-year-old granddaughter, and all other people of her generation and future generations have a liveable planet in which to grow up and prosper. I therefore believe that much stronger action needs to be taken to combat climate change and protect nature. I am writing to express my strong opposition to Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben coal mine. The scientific evidence is clear that climate change is primarily caused by the burning of fossil fuels and that we need to reduce, at the very least stop adding to, the amount of greenhouse gases that we are producing. Instead Yancoal’s proposal would produce an estimated 64.6 metric tonnes of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions which is equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. The proposal contradicts the NSW Net Zero Commission conclusion in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets and the Paris Agreement temperature goals. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets and Yancoal’s proposal would make the situation worse. The Premier said recently that it would be irresponsible to close down the NSW coal industry ‘overnight’. This comment was disingenuous because no-one is suggesting that. I’m certainly not. What I’m saying is that we need to stop approving new, expanded or extended coal mines. I do not want my granddaughter to grow up in a world which is experiencing more bushfires, floods, droughts and extreme heat, and in which there is likely to be environmental collapse and social dislocation, all of which are inevitable if climate change continues to worsen. I also want my granddaughter to grow up in an Australia where all our unique species of flora and fauna not just survive but positively thrive. Yancoal’s proposals and many other fossil fuel projects being proposed around Australia are a significant threat to this. The Moolarben mine expansion would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation including up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosytem, 113 hectares of koala habitat, and 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat. Regent Honeyeaters are classified as Critically Endangered under the Federal Environment Conservation and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act and breeding females have been recorded on the proposed mine site. Koalas are classified as Endangered and breeding females have been recorded including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. How can the NSW Government possibly achieve its aim of ensuring the survival of the koala in NSW if we keep destroying their habitat? Project proponents often claim that they will use offsets to compensate for the damage they do to habitat but most offsets are virtually useless as a means to protect species. In some cases, they are little better than a joke. One project recently approved in Queensland said that it will ’secure’ land to ‘offset’ the vegetation they will destroy. How does buying land with existing vegetation possibly offset destroyed habitat! Yancoal’s proposal would destroy habitat used by 21 other threatened wildlife species that have been recorded in and around the site, including the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Broad-headed Snake. I note that Yancoal has recently made some minor amendments to its proposal but they do not reduce the amount of vegetation to be cleared. The Moolarben coal mine expansion would also lead to water drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which runs into the Goulburn River. This represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses this water. In addition, and very importantly, the mine expansion would cause serious harm to Indigenous cultural heritage. At least 55 Aboriginal heritage sites would be destroyed, all of which are considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. It is sometimes claimed that coal mines are necessary to ensure the maintenance of jobs and regional prosperity but in most cases this is false. It certainly is in this case. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade. Furthermore, the existing Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038. By this time, the demand for coal in the countries to which the mine currently exports its product is highly likely to have significantly declined, eg South Korea has announced that all its coal-fired power stations will be closed by 2040. Therefore the mine expansion proposed by Yancoal is unnecessary. The mine will inevitably close and many of the workers will face long-term unemployment. They will have missed out on the opportunity to transition to good replacement jobs. This is unjust. For the above reasons, I strongly urge that Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben coal mine be rejected. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Lynn Benn
|
ID |
23326 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Knitting Nannas Hunter Loop |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We object to the project. Please see attached document. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben To the Planning Commission.docx (DOCX, 16.18 KB) |
Sally Neaves
|
ID |
23331 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Catholic Diocese of Bathurst Laudato Si' Group |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2799 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Catholic Diocese of Bathurst’s Laudato Si’ Group are opposed to Yancoal’s proposal to expand its Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are a group of 12 representatives from different parishes across the Central West of New South Wales. With the support of the Bishop of Bathurst, we take time to learn about critical environmental issues impacting our communities as core to our faith and mission. We believe we have a responsibility to protect creation for both the spiritual and ecological nourishment we stand to lose. Indeed, too much has already been lost from the cumulative impacts of mining, land clearing and industrialisation of the landscape at a time when the world is reaching a breaking point. We therefore voice our concerns about this mine expansion which would significantly impact our ecological communities as well as people in our school and parish communities. Our key concerns include: • Water impacts: In times of heating and drying, water is more precious than coal. This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for more than 25 years post mining significantly altering stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems and potentially Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This puts Moolarben Creek and Spring Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Cultural significance: Mining expansion would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. We lament that too many places of cultural significance in the Mudgee area have already been lost. • Disturbance to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: As one of the oldest and most diverse reserves in the state, we are concerned that the 675 ha destruction from clearing and mining activities will leave only a 100 m buffer between the mine and the reserve. We call for restraint and common sense in determining an appropriate buffer of at least 500m to protect this significant reserve. • Coal extraction and its climate cost: this project will add an extra 30 million tonnes of coal produced over the life of the mine to 2038. An additional 64.6 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced. This is on top of the expansion of two other mines in the Mudgee area. Our moral responsibility to our Pacific neighbours already impacted, as well the obvious impacts we are already seeing from climate change in Australia, impels us to responsible action now. • Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koalas on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. We also note the documented presence of microbats and Broad-headed Snakes, within the 401ha of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland, for which the NSW Environment Department has warned would be in serious decline. We know the hard work put in by various local environmental groups and government agencies to protect and increase habitat for these species. Another way forward must be found to prevent any more destruction. For all of these reasons we call upon the Independent Planning Commission to reject the OC3 expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben mine. Jenny Allen – Bathurst NSW 2795 Helen Croke – Orange NSW 2800 Leanne Bovington – Bathurst NSW 2795 Peter Judge – Newbridge NSW Bernadette Mullaney – Bathurst NSW 2795 Sally Neaves – Bathurst NSW 2795 Ann-Maree O’Beirne RSM – Bathurst 2795 Patricia Powell RSM OAM – Bathurst NSW 2795 Therese Welsh – Eugowra NSW 2806 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object the Moolarbaen Coal Complex OC3 Expansion Project for the following reasons. 1. It needs land and forest clearances which will threaten endangered wildlife and plants in the region such as koalas. 2. Fossil energy such as coal should be stopped as we observe the effect of the global warming such as fires, floods and sever weather events. 3. A coal project expansion means a water consumption expansion. We can't afford this. 4. This project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts and please take this matter seriously. 5. Moolarben is in the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and its renewable energy project will be a big job opportunity for people in the region. 4. |
Kerry Walker
|
ID |
23341 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Hunter Wildlife Rescue |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2293 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, and those described in our submission in relation to the protection of native wildlife within the Project Area and surrounds, Hunter Wildlife Rescue urges the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
|
Attachments |
Kerry Walker - HWR Submission - Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project _Redacted.pdf (PDF, 788.96 KB) |
Alexandra Barratt
|
ID |
23346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension (project number SSD-33083358) proposal on the grounds that it will increase greenhouse gas emissions and increase biodiversity loss it if proceeds. Evidence and reasons supporting my objections: Global greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, causing climate degradation. Emissions caused by this proposal may be released overseas (Moolarben scope 3 emissions), but the atmosphere does not have borders and climate systems are global. NSW is particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts particularly extreme heat, floods and fires. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has pointed out the duties and obligations on nation states to prevent climate degradation to protect human populations. The NSW Net Zero Commission has previously warned that NSW is not on track to meet legislated carbon emission reduction targets. In its Spotlight report (2025), the Commission noted that “NSW consent authorities need to meaningfully consider greenhouse gas emissions and their impacts in all planning decisions, including those for additional coal mining.” The Commission continues “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” As an agent of my government I expect you to act to ensure emissions reduction targets are met, and to protect the people of NSW from additional climate change impacts i.e. extreme heat, floods and fires that will result if this proposal is approved. Approving this proposal would be completely at odds with your responsibilities to us and under law. Furthermore the ICJ has noted that nation states may be liable to pay financial compensation to populations harmed by governments that do not act responsibly with respect to greenhouse gas emissions. If you approve this proposal you also expose the people of NSW to financial risk if damages have to be paid to other nations for damage and loss due to Moolarben scope 3 emissions. I also object on the grounds of the biodiversity loss that will occur if the proposal goes ahead. The world is already suffering effects of biodiversity loss including crop failures, intensified natural disasters and emerging infectious diseases, according to the UK Government National Security Assessment of global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security. Critical ecosystems are at risk of collapse as early as 2030. Halting and reversing biodiversity loss through forest protection is essential and urgent to ensure Australia’s national wellbeing and security. References NSW Net Zero Commission Spotlight Report December 2025 https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-12/NZC_Coal_Spotlight_Report_2025.pdf International Court of Justice advisory opinion 23 July 2025 https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/187/187-20250723-pre-01-00-en.pdf HM Government National Security Assessment Global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security. Summary released 20 January 2026 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nature-security-assessment-on-global-biodiversity-loss-ecosystem-collapse-and-national-security Alexandra Barratt MBBS MPH PhD Emeritus Professor School of Public Health University of Sydney |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Objection Feb 2026.docx (DOCX, 16.33 KB) |
Anne PENDER
|
ID |
23351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2090 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a concerned citizen of NSW - concerned at the way in which this government is allowing both extensions to existing coal mines and additional mines to proceed without due regard to the enduring, apocalyptic consequences for our world. The 10year expansion at Moorlaben will: - devastate 624 hectares of endangered woodland, - threaten vital koala habitat, - put 4 natives animal species at risk of extinction and jeopardise Australia's climate targets. And this all for no good or necessary purpose. The Head of the UN has told the world repeatedly that there is no need for any additional coal mines - yet the NSW government continues to approve new mines - both historically over the course of its time in power and a further 23 proposals currently in the pipeline. Enough is enough. This government must be brought to awareness of their abject failure to consider the damage they do to the whole world in terms of destruction of critically important environment, increasing heating of the atmosphere with its attendant catastrophic climate events and massive social impacts for people everywhere. We live in an interdependent world and we ignore that at our personal, national and global levels. Please exercise your responsibility by rejecting the proposed 10year expansion of Moorlaben mine, already the largest mine in NSW where coal is being dug up on an industrial scale which could have massive impacts on water availability locally. |
Elaine Tan
|
ID |
23356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2114 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am part of a research group collecting long-term biodiversity data in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, principally through bird banding, and I am highly concerned about the impacts of development to native biodiversity and water resources. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider, and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The biodiversity research I am involved in has recorded Rockwarblers in the area, the only bird species endemic to mainland New South Wales. We have also recorded Black-chinned Honeyeaters, a critically endangered bird dependent on the endangered Box Gum Woodland habitat. These populations are threatened by the proposed development in the area. Researchers have also noted several frog species in the area, and native marsupials such as sugar gliders. As part of this biodiversity research, I have been privileged to be able to camp in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve for a few days once every three months, with the Honeyeater Flats site maintained by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. At night, I and my fellow researchers are often disturbed by mine activities nearby the site, which will get worse if the mine is allowed to clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. I know of several property owners in the area whose water supply may be threatened as well. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. |
Lynn Benn
|
ID |
23361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this project. We are facing runaway climate change and we have a critical few years, not to avoid it, but to limit the worst of it. Our Paris agreement targets are not strong enough. NSW is failing to even meet those. We are a wealthy country with plenty of resources. We are also one of the largest per capita exporters of fossil fuels. We have the capacity to lead the world in a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. There are many strong and valid reasons for this project not to go ahead but the deadly exacerbating effect of the emissions that will result is by far the most consequential. The NSW Net Zero commision and the court of appeal finding over the Denman mine have given you the tools. I urge you to rise to the urgency of the situation and find against proceeding with this project. |
Olivia Yu
|
ID |
23371 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Team Zali |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to prioritise the environment over all else. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2230 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to alert the Independent Planning Commission of the serious damage to critical groundwater and creeks risked by this proposal. The amendment to this proposal by the company that they will conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies is neither sufficient for the scale of damage risked, nor is it appropriate to occur alongside the project proposal (especially with the lack of baseline water monitoring and the company's poor track record of compliance). It is wildly inappropriate to be risking any further irreversible damage to groundwater flow regimes before we even understand the extent of damage already caused (both Nation-wide and with respect to this project). |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
If not now, when? The matter of urgency Scientists have been advocating strongly for at least 30 years. The ‘ticking clock’, that metaphor for limited time symbolising the relentless passage of time, urgency or a looming deadline, highlights an urgent need to act before a deadline or to signify that opportunities are passing. ‘Seconds to midnight’ refers to the current setting of the Doomsday Clock. That is a symbolic timepiece but one maintained by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, that is, a scientific reality-based representation of how close humanity is to a global catastrophe. Climate endangerment, habitat loss, species protection and the Moolarben proposal As of January 2026, the clock is set at 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to a metaphorical apocalypse since its inception in 1947. Midnight on the Doomsday Clock represents zero hour of a human led global annihilation, typically through nuclear war or environmental collapse. Climate endangerment and slippery targets. It has been estimated that an additional 64 million tonnes of climate pollution will be added by the Moolarben mine. Notably , this is occurring when NSW is already in deficit to its own legislated climate targets. Species endangerment. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hecares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded. The Regent honeyeater and microbat habitat are also at risk. Slippery targets and their explanation Motivation I can understand that the Chinese operators and beneficiaries of Yankuang Energy Group are not lying awake worrying about a koala or two or 12. But Australians should be concerned - and are very concerned judging by the last election results on an environment platform. It is not uncommon for people of my age (many of these allegedly indulgent Baby Boomers who have fought for the environment for 50 or more years) to confess they are sometimes glad they won’t be around in 20 years time. Young people are very scared, the leaders of tomorrow (if their protest movement speaker representatives are anything to go by) carrying unfairly a heavy mantle. But motivation does not seem to cover it. Why are Australians seemingly so indifferent to the high costs for little reward of our mineral reserves going offshore? Cognition; Joining the dots NSW is one of three prime culprit states when it comes to koala endangerment, that is, where populations have declined significantly. The koala to our shame is now listed as an endangered species under Australia’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. They were previously listed as vulnerable, specifically linked to habitat loss (alongside disease and bushfires); as of 2026, they are officially listed as endangered. Some estimates suggest a high risk of extinction by 2050 without intervention. Pandas interestingly have gone from endangered to vulnerable since 2016, so the last 10 years has seen Australia going in the opposite direction from that of China, towards further extinctions; the panda it seems is likely to outlive the koala. The data are also officially in about who are the financial beneficiaries of such ‘growth’ measures involving minerals extraction: mostly not local and mostly enlarging the gap between rich and poor. Splitting. But it is hard to think about a looming catastrophe affecting us all. If motivation and cognition don’t seem to lead to rational self protective solutions (which are available if retreating) how are we to explain why for example the NSW government, already in deficit to its own legislated climate targets, might approve an expansion of a culprit coal mine? Splitting is one of the mechanisms interfering in rational thinking. It has its normal origins in early development of infants (all good vs all bad dichotomy that preserves a ‘good’ experience from a perceived threat); the black and white concretism of middle childhood; the regressions of ‘all or nothing’ idealisations and devaluations of adolescent thinking; the not connecting the dots of adulthood. Splitting allows us avoid holding conflicting emotions or thoughts about a person or situation, a reality that is too painful or frightening. While these are normal mechanisms of growth and defence they can become dysfunctional in adulthood. They can also be augmented by politicians or organisations through exploiting social divisions, fears, wishful emotions, phantasy [eg American case study example of the current President]. Is the juxtaposition of a proposal to add millions of tonnes of climate pollution alongside admirable greens initiatives a striking example of adults not connecting the dots? Conclusion: One important – hopeful - thing about splitting is we do know, somewhere, ‘in our hearts’, what is what, ie we don’t just recognise the one perspective, a bit of us understands the other and the underlying dynamic of fear or wish or whatever. Our current situation is the legacy of all of us, for which we are all responsible. Our only hope for solutions being enacted is through acknowledging that, and doing so in every single step we take on these questions, together. We cannot pretend we are doing good by ‘green’ initiatives with one hand while behind the back we are promoting enterprises that work in direct opposition to those. This is one planet, one enterprise, not us and them. We are all currently witness to what not joining the dots looks like in the American case. It is very frightening when the adults have ‘left the room’. A mind in bits. But it does take courage and I feel for administrators, like young people, when left the burden dropped by leaders. |
Suhailah Ali
|
ID |
23396 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Jubilee Australia Research Centre |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2206 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making this submission on behalf of Jubilee Australia Research Centre to object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project. Jubilee Australia conducts research-based advocacy, in partnership with other organisations and communities across Australia and the Asia-Pacific, to defend the rights of people and the planet over profit, and hold corporations and governments accountable. Our vision is a fairer future where a healthy planet, empowered communities and just economies go hand in hand. Concerns around biodiversity and water resources have been clearly outlined by the combined response of the Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group of the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service provided here: https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=PAE-68741737%2120240625T233829.479%20GMT. In terms of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, the International Energy Agency has stated that no new or expanded coal mines are needed in the global pathway to net zero emissions by 2050, in line with limiting the average global temperature increase to 1.5°C, the Paris Agreement’s temperature goal (https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/deebef5d-0c34-4539-9d0c-10b13d840027/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR.pdf). The Net Zero Commission’s ‘Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report’ states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to” (https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report). The Assessment Report states that “MCO anticipates product coal will predominantly be directed to Asian markets in the short to medium term. Key receiving countries include China (65%), South Korea (10%), Taiwan (10%), Thailand (5%) and Japan (5%)”. China has recently seen coal power generation drop for the first time in 52 years (https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-coal-power-drops-in-china-and-india-for-first-time-in-52-years-after-clean-energy-records/), adding a record amount of new clean-power generation last year which was more than sufficient to meet rising demand. Korea has recently joined the Powering Past Coal Alliance, affirming its commitment to phasing out coal power plants (https://poweringpastcoal.org/news/republic-of-korea-and-bahrain-join-the-powering-past-coal-alliance-at-cop30/). Coal is clearly on its way out in key markets in Asia, making the continued production of coal from this mine incompatible with the energy transition that is well underway. Campaigners and communities across Asia are actively resisting coal power, pointing to its array of harms, from air pollution and resulting health impacts, to displacement and disrupted livelihoods; “Shutting down coal plants in Asia and replacing them with renewable energy is both urgently needed and increasingly feasible (…) The benefits of potentially saving tens of thousands of lives, reducing illness and improving ecosystem health are clear”. (https://apmdd.org/asias-coal-reckoning-can-it-shut-down-the-past-to-power-the-future/). It is vital to consider both the local and exported harms of this project. |
Barry Walsh
|
ID |
23401 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
BirdLife Southern NSW |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2148 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See our PDF attachment. |
|
Attachments |
23401 - Barry Walsh_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 569.42 KB) |
Peter Whitecross
|
ID |
23411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I have worked 35 years for NSW Health as a public health professional, now living in Orange. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. Given the impacts resulting from the way the current mining operation has been managed, it is clear that this project will exacerbate the current serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, community, and economy. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected rather than being permanently destroyed. In particular, I am concerned that: • The trend away from fossil fuel extraction is now well established and continues on economic grounds alone. The estimates by proponents of similar coal projects (Adani/Carmichael) have been shown to be overly optimistic and out of step with current trends, resulting in the granting of exemptions from paying royalties. Further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already failing to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. • Yancoal identifies the intended destination of the coal exports but fails to factor in the costs of extreme weather such as increased insurance premiums, loss of real estate value and the destruction of public infrastructure that governments have to replace. Extreme weather while it is distributed globally, is not distributed evenly. Some countries are more vulnerable and much of Australia falls into this category. • At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone declared by the NSW Government. It is expected that renewable energy projects will create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Given that the NSW Government has recognised the necessity for, and opportunities in renewal energy in this area it would be an ‘own goal’ to approve such an extension of coal mining. Some of the other obvious problems with this proposal include - • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact many more. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2166 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned about the proposed Moolarbon expansion. The area has experienced water depletion from the growth of mining, in addition to the destruction of the landscape. We know from the experience of other mining communities that the land cannot be restored after substantial mining and we will be left with the scars of a soon to be legacy power source. Weather events and catastrophic sea level changes all over the world are causing destruction to the only planet we have. If this mine expansion continues, and fossil fuels continue to be burnt, it will be too late to turn down the temperature and Mars will look quite charming. I trust you will consider the future of our children and the future of the Pacific Islands in your considerations. Thankyou. |
Jane Hegarty
|
ID |
23436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2329 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a resident of the local area that this expansion will impact. I object to the expansion of the Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 on the grounds that in a world that is undergoing rapid climate change it seems incomprehensible that our government would allow mining to increase its land area when we should be decreasing the land that is being consumed by coal mining. This expansion would also generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life which is an unnecessary burden for this region to carry when the State government is already clearing land in the Central West Orana Renewal Energy Zone (CWOREZ)to construct new power lines, energy hubs and has approved a number of renewable energy wind and solar farms. Why is this region being asked to shoulder all this damage to our natural environment for the reduction of emissions when corporations like Yancoal can still expand their mining activities. Lets have some common sense here. The expansion of this mine would impact 113 hectares of native vegetation in an area that is currently undergoing rapid construction and development for renewable energy projects in the Central West Orana REZ. To clear more land that will only result in the emission of more carbon dioxide when the current Australian government is trying to reduce Australia's carbon dioxide output seems to be ludicrous. The loose of native habitat for fauna that is critically endangered like koalas, while trying to protect them elsewhere in our state is also madness. To allow such an expansion seems to contradict the current state government Climate Change Act and the Federal Government commitment to the Paris Agreement. It also will make it harder to meet our 2030 and 2035 climate targets and will undermine the work that is already being done in the local community around renewable energy development. I also have grave fears for the long-term impacts on our ground water and creeks. Water is a valuable resource in Australia because of its scarcity and to allow an international company with no vested interests in protecting Australia's ground water supply to expand a mining development for their own personal financial gain at the expense of local community's access to ground water seems unethical. Australia already has a poor record in its management of waterways and water sources so surely, we should at all times protect this resource for our own citizens and the local fauna and flora. If the government looked at the total loss of biodiversity, the impacts on the environment, air quality and water resources of all the development occurring in the CWOREZ at the moment it must in all honesty reject this expansion proposal because of the cost to our local area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal burning produces toxic greenhouse gases. The planet in general and the Central West Community specifically are victims of global warming spurred on by greenhouse gases emissions. The water table around Mudgee nourishes world class vineyards. These and the economic benefit derived from wine production are imperilled by this proposed expansion. I also note the continued obfuscation of the approval/ objection process such as the constant delay in community public hearings. It is difficult for an opposition lobby to form when the fair play platform is not in place. The department has a duty of care and moral obligation to provide this. Contrast the mining lobby with unlimited funds and endless spin. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, and community, and therefore should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected in perpetuity. In particular, I am concerned about: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This coal mine extention is in an area of high biodiversity and it will further impact wildlife extinctions in NSW. The area is quite similar to where I live and I know that this kind of natural landscape supports a wonderful array of native plants and animals. Please consider instead adding this area to the nearby national park. I really hope you will save and protect this land and it can be conserved for future generations to see. Coal mines are causing terrible environmental damage and I fear for the future. Please consider my submission. Thank you |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the International Planning Commission, My name is (Redacted) and I’m a 21 year old student at the University of Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I oppose the expansion of fossil fuel projects, having visited Moolarben’s grounds recently. I oppose expanding fossil fuel projects in New South Wales and elsewhere. The fossil fuel expansions will devastate local water ecosystems, threaten local wildlife and human residents and also encroach on significant Indigenous land. I feel as if the expansion of this coal mine goes against the current government’s aims to cut down on fossil fuel projects and reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Additionally, the government claims that it is enshrining biodiversity and protecting endangered species, yet the proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project will encroach into irreplaceable koala, honeyeater and microbat habitats. Even when the coal mining ceases, the land which is damaged will take many years to return to its original state. I am concerned about adding to the greenhouse effect. The reach of this expansion will go further than just the site itself and will contribute to the worsening climate crisis in Australia and elsewhere. Beyond this, against the backdrop of so many climate tipping points being reached recently, and with major ecological impacts now inevitable, allowing for the extraction of and combusting of fossil fuels is incredibly reckless and I oppose this expansion on the advice of climate scientists around the world. For the reasons above I strongly suggest the Independent Planning Commission refuse the proposal for the expansion of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Wendi Etherington
|
ID |
23456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission My name is Wendi and I am a retired public servant . I love bush walking, being in nature and especially sharing these things with my two grandchildren. Like many young people they are fascinated by Australia's wildlife and are very concerned about their future survival with the challenges of climate change and deforestation. I am writing on all our behalf to object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee.The project has already severely affected the environment and habitat of local species and the expansion would only excacerbate this destruction. There are several threatened species in the area, including koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. Clearing this habitat can not be undone and no amount of replanting or biodiversity offsets will replace this crucial environment for these precious creatures. The threat to groundwater in the area is very concerning as the nearby Munghorn Nature Reserve and Moolarben Creek will almost certainly be affected with widespread impact again on the local environment and its wildlife. In my lifetime, the impact of climate change has become more and more obvious and most governments, including the NSW Government, are now claiming that they have a plan to net zero and are in agreement with the goals of the Paris Agreement. How then can an expansion of this nature be justified when it will create many more tonnes of additional greenhouse emissions and further impede any progress towards net zero?? I urge those on the Independent Planning Commission to consider these serious issues and refuse the proposed extension project. Thankyou for your work and for considering these issues with the gravity they deserve. Sincerely Wendi Etherington Lewisham NSW 2049. |
Emmanuel Kneeshaw
|
ID |
23461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a university student studying Earth Science and Politics at Monash University. I learn every day about the cost-benefit analysis of projects and the methods that undermine this process. Environmental Offsets are one such method. They are rarely monitored appropriately and as reported by the Australian Conservation Foundation not legally protected in 70% of cases included in the study. This is why Yancoal's Moolarben expansion should not be approved based on the poor substitute of 'habitat enhancement'. Bushland takes hundreds of years to mature and old growth and developed bushland is becoming scarce in Australia where there is already a 50% deforestation rate. We cannot replicate the 480 hectares of valuable bushland, home to at least 23 threatened species, in our life time, and any claims to 'offset' this damage is false and damaging. Local environmental damage is just one impact which the proposed expansion will have, not only on the local community, but on all Australian's and populations worldwide. Firstly, investing in coal is detrimental to NSW, Federal Government, and global climate goals. We CANNOT afford extending the lifetimes of these mines in any sense- environmentally, socially and economically. Australian's will see little benefit from the profits of this mine which will be mainly sent overseas. Additionally, a faster move away from the coal industry towards renewables will only benefit Australian's who live on the continient with the most potential for renewable power in the world, especially those living in a region where renewables are being prioritised. Every degree of global warming has an additional impact, the severity of which can be viewed in the National Climate Risk Assessment. It doesn't matter where this additional coal is burnt- it will negatively affect Australians. Local environmental impacts to threatened species breeding grounds and groundwater sources is clear, as well as the track record of Yancoal, who have failed compliance checks and groundwater monitoring on the same site they wish to expand. There is no justification for the approval of this expansion that could possibly override the impacts it will have on the local comminity, environment and global population. I urge the independant planning commission to evaluate these impacts with the correct weight and refuse the mine expansion. Thank you for reading my submission, Sincerely, with hope, Emmanuel Kneeshaw |
Jo-ann Holstein
|
ID |
23471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a financial economist, academic and mother of a young adult. I am deeply concerned about the continued expansion of coal mining in our state. Decisions made today will shape the world our children inherit and expanding fossil fuel projects increases the risks they will face. Our children should be able to live in a safe climate with clean air, secure water and thriving natural environments, not one burdened by escalating climate impacts driven by short-term decisions. I write to object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine, operated by Yancoal, near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country in the Mid-Western region of NSW. While the mine is already a major thermal coal exporter and the largest coal producer in the state, this further expansion would intensify environmental destruction, cultural harm and climate impacts at a time when NSW should be urgently transitioning away from fossil fuels. The proposal to extend mining operations deeper into this ecologically and culturally significant landscape is unjustified and contrary to the public interest. 1. This landscape should be protected, not mined The valley adjoining the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve forms part of a highly intact and biodiverse landscape that warrants protection, not excavation. This ecologically rich valley should be added to the reserve, not carved into for coal extraction. The expansion would remove approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation and bring mining activities to within 100 metres of the reserve boundary. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the locality, including a uniquely resilient koala population. Clearing habitat at this scale, immediately adjacent to one of NSW’s oldest conservation reserves, places extraordinary ecological values at risk. There is no compelling public benefit to justify sacrificing such a significant natural landscape, particularly when the project results in permanent biodiversity loss. The proposed expansion would permanently destroy critical habitat that cannot be meaningfully replaced or offset. This includes: • 113 hectares of recorded koala habitat, including breeding sites located within proposed mine pits; • 80 hectares of habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater, with breeding females documented on site; • Up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecological community. The NSW Environment Department has acknowledged the risk of serious and irreversible impacts, including long-term population decline and loss of habitat essential to species survival. Despite these risks, noise and blasting impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve have been inadequately assessed. The proponent has also declined to implement a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife, instead proposing mining as close as 100 metres from its boundary. 2. A Major Climate Impact Inconsistent with NSW Law and Policy The OC3 extension is estimated to generate approximately 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its operational life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This is an enormous climate burden. The assessment process has failed to properly consider the findings of the Net Zero Commission, which clearly state that further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the objectives of the NSW Climate Change Act 2022 and Australia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. NSW is not currently on a credible pathway to achieve its 2030 and 2035 emissions reduction commitments. Furthermore, the assessment does not properly apply the Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2025] decision, which requires decision-makers to consider downstream (Scope 3) emissions and the local climate consequences they generate. These impacts have not been meaningfully quantified in economic or social terms. The climate costs, environmental, social, and economic, remain unaddressed. 3. Limited Economic Benefit The expansion cannot credibly be defended on employment or regional prosperity grounds. The Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of whether this expansion proceeds. The proposal does not deliver significant new employment, and coal mining roles in the region have remained difficult to fill for years. At the same time, Mudgee lies within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy developments are expected to create approximately 2,000 jobs over the coming decade. These projects offer long-term, future-focused employment pathways aligned with NSW’s clean energy transition. Additionally, a significant proportion of Moolarben’s coal is destined for export markets, including China, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan. Forecast declines in demand for Australian thermal coal, particularly from China and South Korea, further weaken the economic case for expansion. 4. Water and Cultural Heritage Risks The project is predicted to cause groundwater drawdown of between 2 and 6 metres, with impacts potentially lasting up to 25 years beyond the life of mining. This poses a serious threat to Moolarben Creek, a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent hydrogeological experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian vegetation, may suffer significant harm from drawdown of up to 5 metres in alluvial systems. These concerns are compounded by inadequate baseline water monitoring and the proponent’s compliance history elsewhere in the mine complex. The proposal to conduct only 12 months of groundwater monitoring prior to mining commencement is insufficient. Robust baseline studies should be completed before approval, not deferred until after consent is granted. The expansion would destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts of high cultural value, with dozens more potentially affected. Registered Aboriginal Parties have identified these sites as significant. Continued expansion of mining operations fragments and degrades Country, compounding cumulative harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage. This undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain connection to Country, practise culture, and protect sacred sites of profound and irreplaceable importance. Conclusion The cumulative effects of this proposal, combined with expansions at neighbouring mines, have not been adequately assessed. Modifications to the Ulan Coal Mine and Wilpinjong Coal Mine would result in further clearing of similar connected landscapes, water systems, biodiversity corridors, and cultural heritage areas. All of these projects affect many of the same threatened species identified as at risk of serious and irreversible impacts. Evaluating each proposal in isolation fails to account for the broader and compounding ecological damage across the region. The proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine would result in permanent biodiversity loss, substantial climate harm, long-term water impacts, and irreversible damage to Wiradjuri cultural heritage, without delivering meaningful new economic benefits. At a time of escalating climate crisis and biodiversity decline, this project represents a step backwards. This valley should be protected and incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve as part of a coherent conservation landscape. For these reasons, I strongly urge the refusal of this expansion. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
4To the Independent Planning Commission, I'm a student currently living in the Blue Mountains and I'm writing to you about Yancoals proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal mine expansion, near Mudgee, Wiradjuri Country. While the whole project is cause for concern, there are a few key points I'd like to focus on. Habitat loss, particularly habitat for Endangered species, such as the Koala breeding population, the Reagent Honeyeater breeding population and the Micro-bats living and thriving in the area. The impact on the nearby Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with limited assessment of the impact of noise, vibration effects, etc. Cultural impact, with the proposed expansion to destroy 55 irreplaceable cultural artefacts, and harm dozens of others. Climate Impact, with the project to bring a devastating estimated 64 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions. Lack of Benefit, with the expansion to bring no new jobs and no new energy supplies for NSW. Conversely, green energy projects in the area are forecast to bring almost 2,000 jobs in the coming years. I hope you will take into due consideration the above points and I thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2205 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am a grandmother who wants, not only a sustainable planet for future generations but beautiful places for them to visit and rejuvenate. I am writing to urge you to reject Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. This a beautiful part of Australia and instead of expanding damaging, polluting industries such as coal mining, we need to preserve it for the restorative benefits, the tourist industry and the green jobs that it provides. We can also look at future employment in this area that is environmentally sustainable, innovative and future-focused. You will be aware of the risks to the plants, animals and birds - many of them endangered - in this area, and also the risks to the groundwater and creeks. We should acknowledge that humans exist in harmony and interdependence with nature. Therefore, it is important for our mental and physical health that such regions should be preserved intact. I encourage you to consider the great benefits to humans, animals, plants and birds when making the decision on this expansion. Please reject it. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Grace Amarante
|
ID |
23486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern at the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Grace and I’m an undergraduate student who is very concerned about the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine and I object to it. The intolerable blazing heat is becoming more apparent to me and I am anxious about how the worsening climate crisis will impact living across the world. With the estimated emissions coming from Moolarben if this project is approved being 64 million more tonnes of greenhouse gases, this is not a small contribution to the global greenhouse effect around the world. At a time at which many different climate scientists have suggested that global warming is now reaching invariably bad outcomes, approving this project seems irreconcilable with New South Wales’ climate targets. Having experienced the devastating impacts of the bushfires in 2020, including the warnings about health risks, pollution and changes to lifestyle, I empathise with the locals of the local communities surrounding the coal mine. If the proposed changes happen, there will be devastating losses to both local ecosystems and the residents of that area in the way of damaged water systems, pollution and other ecological issues. Thank you for considering my objection. |
Georgia Conechado
|
ID |
23496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached PDF. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Submission - GC.pdf (PDF, 44.43 KB) |
Stuart Guthrie
|
ID |
23501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2096 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am opposed to further coal mining as it's fundamentally toxic, terrible for our childrens future and likely to be a stranded asset with no money to repair the terrible damage it will do to the region when the mining company goes bust. India and China have reached peak coal (read the Guardian about it) and we do NOT need more coal mines. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2173 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission attached |
|
Attachments |
23506 - Shirisha Nampalli_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 76.27 KB) |
Virginia Pidcock
|
ID |
23516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Virginia. I am a recent retiree, having worked for 48 years in the health and community sectors. I am deeply concerned about the impacts of climate change and I see the future of humanity on earth being threatened by these impacts. I have grandchildren who will be dealing with the consequences of our generation’s inactions at this critical time. I believe it is incumbent on all levels of society to take strong steps to reduce the impacts of climate change and to look to securing a sustainable future. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal would have severe impacts on biodiversity. It is important that the valley be part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and not be made into an open cut mine pit. This will allow the continued protection of biodiversity and the habitat of a koala population. I am concerned that the mine expansion: • will create irreparable damage to ecosystems and severely impact threatened species, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department. • will create noise and blasting impacts. These have been poorly assessed with no buffer zone agreed to. • will put water and groundwater at risk. This includes long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before the project is approved. • will generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. The true climate, economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Virginia (Redacted) |
Rhonda Daniels
|
ID |
23521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2232 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am a Life Member of the Australian Plants Society NSW and Sutherland Shire Environmental Citizen of the Year 2025. I am well aware of the importance of our natural environment for human health and wellbeing, and actively work to protect our environment. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community. It should not be approved. I ask for this rich biodiverse area to be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, • I object to the threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • I object to the impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • I object to the water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • I object to the climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • I object due to the lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusing the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. The last minute proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. Yours sincerely, Rhonda Daniels |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned about this development, due to the risk it poses to the biodiversity of the area through habitat destruction and possible pollution. I am also concerned about the fact that this will support greenhouse gas production and thus contribute to the greater climate crisis. |
Steven Gott
|
ID |
23531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Re www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/cases/moolarben-coal-complex-oc3-extensionproject I am writing to express my concern with the proposed moolarben coal complex OC3 extension project. I was listening to a farmer speaking on the radio this morning as I travelled to work – she spoke about the extreme drought that they are having to work with and how this is creating mental and financial stress on their lives, she said that the drought was “unprecedented”. Unprecedented is said so frequently in NSW with respect to floods, fires, hail and wind events that it loses its impact – this means that these weather events have never been known before! These unprecedented events are due to climate change as a result of mines like this one being responsible for spewing 64.6 million tonnes of green house gas emissions into our atmosphere – why do we even think of allowing this project to go ahead, clearly the project developers will never be convinced that climate change is real and that coal mining is a major contributor. I also watch the weather forecast on TV and see the graphs that peak in 2025/26 for the number of days in NSW that are above 30 and 40° Celsius – what are the proponents thinking when they see these simple graphs showing climate change. I am hopeful that by making this submission that an independent group of people can see sense and stop these ridiculous projects from going ahead. There is no doubt that this is a project that will cause untold damage to NSW, Australia and the whole planet earth for the following six reasons. 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine due to the number of threatened species that have been recorded in the project area. 2. The unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystem that cannot be rectified through any offset scheme. 3. The project would create a massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals, the OC3 extension project would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. 4. The economic argument does not stack up, given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially, the future for this area of NSW lies in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. The expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks, these risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. 6. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. 7. The cumulative impact of this project expansion with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines being the Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification. Australia is not the greatest country to live in whilst we continue to approve massive climate changing coal projects and allow companies like the proponent to export coal to other countries at the current rate. I look forward to hearing that this project is not approved to proceed. Yours Faithfully Steven Gott Lawson NSW 2783 |
Pam Atkins
|
ID |
23536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3350 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We do not need more coal. We have other cleaner and less expensive ways to generate electricity. This will not benefit the local community, the rest of Australia, or the rest of the world. It will harm our children's future. Look at the bigger picture and do the right thing - stop helping only fossil fuel industry with short term gains when it damages the health and well-being of everyone else. We are approaching tipping points that will make the planet uninhabitable. Don't go down in history as enablers of our destruction. |
Annabelle MacClelland
|
ID |
23541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2256 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Annabelle, I am a student in Sydney and the Central Coast and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. People are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Annabelle MacClelland Patonga NSW 2256 |
Majid Saghafi
|
ID |
23546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2067 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to approval of this development |
Geoff Selwood
|
ID |
23556 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Orange Field Naturalist and Conservation Society |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Orange Field Naturalist and Conservation Society's reasons for objecting to this proposal are in the attached file. |
|
Attachments |
Geoff Selwood - Moolarben OC3 OFNCS submission_Redacted_0.pdf (PDF, 1.15 MB) |
Elizabeth O'Brien
|
ID |
23561 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
The LEAD Group Inc charity |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I discovered during my attendance at 3 hearings of the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry into the Impacts of Gold, Silver, Lead & Zinc Mining that the IPC is not a fit instrument for protecting the environment, biodiversity, cultural heritage or preventing a climate crisis, as its only criteria seem to be whether a mining project will increase government mining royalties or employment taxes. This proposal doesn't even increase employment so hopefully even the IPC will listen to all the objectors and the likes of David Attenborough and Greta Thunberg and set a precedent by NOT approving more coal mining. What particularly concerns me about this coal mine expansion proposal is the proposed increase in coal exports at a time when all future-oriented national and state governments are decreasing coal use and increasing renewable energy use, which is quite compatible with agriculture and will not increase either local or overseas toxic particulates or carbon emissions from coal mining and burning. I have already advised the NSW Environment Minister that it is not adequate to only require mine proponents to assess fauna and flora - like the 23 threatened species in the vicinity of this proposed mine expansion - and this proposal is just another example of the possible loss of vital-to-life fungal species before they are even described and understood as to their benefits, such as "eating rock, making soil, digesting pollutants, nourishing plants, surviving in space, producing food, making medicines, manipulating animal behaviour and influencing the composition of the Earth's atmosphere." [Ref: "Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds, and Shape Our Futures" by Merlin Sheldrake (2020)] It is just so incredibly short-sighted in 2026 to seek to mine more coal to be burnt on this planet, when every single thing we can do to avert a climate crisis, our grandchildren will be asking why didn't we do it? This proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion MUST NOT BE APPROVED. Reducing coal exports MUST happen before we can all tell our grandchildren we did everything we could to avert a climate crisis and hand on a healthy biodiverse environment in NSW. Please restore my faith that IPC decision-makers are pro the future of the planet and not just pro-short-term profits. |
Rosemary Stapleton
|
ID |
23566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see my reasons for objecting to this coal mine expansion in the attached file |
|
Attachments |
Rosemary Stapleton - 2026-02-17 Moolarben OC3 R Stapleton Submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 112.52 KB) |
Daryn Poulden
|
ID |
23571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2424 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposal by Moolarben Coal Operation Pty Ltd for the expansion of the existing mining complex. Over the years Mudgee and surrounds has grown as a key tourist area in NSW - people visit from all over NSW and Australia and Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is a popular tourist destination. The mine has already had a negative impact on the Reserve and any attempt to increase the size of the mine will further the damage and could have a negative impact on tourism. Who wants to come to a beautiful part of the world to see rich biodiversity, cultural heritage sites, special fauna and habitats and be exposed to ugly open cut mines and hectares of land clearing. I am very concerned about the impact an extension of the mine will have on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which is known for its rich biodiversity, cultural heritage sites, threatened species habitat and significant sandstone feautures. The mines promises "habitat enhancement" but this is hardly a remedy for the ongoing large scale clearing of native vegetation (480 hectares); the impact on critical habitats and threatened species; the impact on the Goulburn River system; the impact on Aboriginal heritage sites. How does this request fit in with the various environment acts and laws and the Biodiversity Conservation Act? How can this project be managed in accordance with the NSW net zero emissions police objective? Research is advising that the use of fossils fuels must end. There has been a huge move to renewables. How can the ongoing extension of mines be allowed? Given the increased temperatures, periods of drought, floods, fires - the increase in serious climate events being experienced across the state and across Australia important decisions about how to manage the environment must be made. Requests for new mines and request for the extension of existing mines must be stopped. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new mines of or expand present mines - there is a climate and biodiversity crisis happening. I am 74 years old I am very concerned what the world will be like for future generations if hard decisions are not made now. I urge the Planning Commission to refuse the request for the extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine. |
Mark Horn
|
ID |
23581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2066 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this DA, on several grounds. 1. The valley where development is proposed is effectively adjacent to a Nature Reserve (Munghorn Gap) and will destroy the ecological context (e.g. migration of species) of that Reserve and its visual setting as part of a wider landscape. 2. The proposed development will have a severe impact on many species of native plants and animals, especially koalas. 3. The proposal to extend coal mining is contrary to national policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The distinction between “types” of emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3) is immaterial in this context, since the coal would be mined in order to be burnt, and its burning would entail massive amounts of CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere. 4. Any jobs created by the proposed mining operation would be temporary; that is, any boost to employment would be ephemeral. 5. The proposed development would cause long-term damage to groundwater systems, with consequent impacts on the ecological roles played by Moolarben Creek as a refuges for wildlife during times of drought. |
Kate Cash
|
ID |
23586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I am writing to express my OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine would extend close to the edge of one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, posing a serious threat to a healthy koala population and their critical habitat. Yancoal has move to have the Independent Planning Commission hearing postponed and to interrupt the community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion, by making more minor amendments to its proposal. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitats that are critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The NSW Government committed to stopping the decline of Koalas in NSW. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat this project poses to the Koala population, noting that: Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species,’ and that this is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, that are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek causing changes in the ground water table levels which are difficult to monitor and can extend far beyond the mining area and stream catchment area impacting vegetation that relies on tapping into current water table levels. The wastewater created from the mining activities, and coal mine waste discharges, will increase the physical and chemical changes to Moolarben Creek water quality. Mining discharge downstream below the contamination point can impact the ecosystem of the Moolarben Creek and Goulburn River. To minimize impact of the natural environment and water quality from the existing mining operation the NSW EPA should have increased oversite for ongoing monitoring of wastewater discharge, regular monitoring of creek and river water quality, and ongoing monitoring of the impact on existing flora and fauna from current mining and transport activities. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. Biodiversity offsets are poorly managed and poorly monitored with little or no public reporting or accountability. ‘Habitat Enhancement’ biodiversity offsets are green washing and used to justify habitat destruction. Existing wildlife are displaced with no record of population numbers prior to clearing, their ability to adapt to habitat changes the consequences of habitat destruction, forced displacement, and loss of food sources is not monitored. Offset replanting programs take decades to establish and create sustainable food sources and wildlife habitat. Over that time the wildlife has either moved on with no knowledge of what might have happened to them or they have died off. Impact on native vegetation and local ecosystems must be avoided if we are to avoid further loss of mature habitat sites, species decline and extinctions. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed as an accumulative impact. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. The existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. This expansion project should not be approved. |
Brynn Davis-Hay
|
ID |
23596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3004 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Our land is our birthright. As a young person I recognise the theft that is taking place of our natural resources. This is an attack on the right to peaceful enjoyment of our lives. Myself and other young women I know have made the decision to not have children, we do not trust they will enjoy the same quality of life that we were afforded. The decisions being made by this government do not reflect the mandate given to them by their constituents. It is well recognised by experts and scientists we are on the brink of a climate catastrophe. The idea of opening new coal mines right now is an abomination and a disrespect. The labor government acts as if it is so inclusive of indigenous communities and issues but these actions show you have zero respect for the land or country. I am disappointed in this government. |
John Clarke
|
ID |
23601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making this submission to voice my objection to the proposed OC3 development from Yancoals Moolarben Coal mine. I live in the Mid Western Region and have been a resident for 16 years now. During this time I have seen the development and expansion of three very large thermal coal mines in the region where I live. Taking a short car drive past the mine's open cut workings the scale of the vegetation clearing and despoiling of the natural landscape becomes evident. This expansion proposed by Moolarben will further impact our natural environment. I have had visitors from other areas convey their concerns to me as to the size of these open cut mining operations. They were unaware of the scale of the workings they saw as they passed by. If this proposal is approved then the NSW Gov. will fall behind in its 2030 emissions targets as these sort of developments are very large emitters of methane, a very potent GHG. Also my concerns are for the towns of Mudgee and Gulgong where the presence of high income earning mine employees is causing localised inflation. Also becoming obvious is the lack of tradespeople in the towns I mentioned as they are being offered work at either of these three operating coal mines. As a local person I again voice my objection to this proposal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2066 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is (Redacted), I am a 17 year student in Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Considering the fact that Australia is trying to meet an emissions target and also develop our renewable energy network, it seems counterintuitive to be increasing the capacity of a coal mine. Biodiversity will absolutely be affected by the extension of the coal mine and the very late amendments made on behalf of the coalmine developers will do nothing to prevent the destruction of environment and protection of this biodiversity. Any development such as is proposed for this coalmine extension is bound to upset natural water resources in the area. Our water is our life blood. Mess it up and we are failing everyone in the local area as well as in Australia . |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission A development application has been received from Yancoal to extend open cut mining operations at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The application proposes to extend the existing OC3 open cut pit as well as develop four new open cut pits along the floor of the Moolarben Valley. Further scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions data has been requested from Yancoal, and that “rigorous environmental standards” and “public accountability” will be upheld by the government in their assessment. Knowing the number of greenhouse gas emissions that are cumulative from all operating fossil fuel projects in NSW must be considered as cumulative negative impacts to the environment, climate and people. When the Department referred the Moolarben OC3 project to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC), they gave no recommendation on whether it should be approved or rejected. This is the first time a coal mine has been referred to the IPC with NO recommendation of approval by the government and that indicates that the NSW Government is also concerned. The danger of expansion of this coal complex to biodiversity, climate and the local community is real. These factors MUST be seriously considered in the IPC’s assessment. Based on the following issues I strongly reject the Moorarbeen Coal Complex OC3 extension project. 1. Cumulative Damage The current Moolarben coal operation is already NSW’s biggest producing coal mine. The project is now before the NSW Independent Planning Commission, the body that will decide whether NSW’s biggest producing coal mine even now is allowed to expand even further. Strong public opposition already exists right now in the region and local government area of this coal mine. Stubbornly Yancoal – the proponent has not listened to the ongoing concerns of the local community. The community have already been vocal over many years concerning the irreparable damage this current project has already caused in their local area. Wollar and the Mudgee region locals have spent over two decades resisting the devastating impacts of coal mining. The fight for climate justice is intergenerational and is at both local and global considerations. Three coal mines exist near Mudgee and Wollar already, and with a focus on the Moolarben coal mine – NSW's largest producing coal mine and the seriousness of their proposed expansion this will put further strain on nature, add to climate emissions and affect the local community even more. Even a NSW petition garnered over 2000 signatures in October 2024 strongly objecting to further coal expansion in the Mudgee Region of NSW. Cumulative damage MUST be considered. The three Mudgee Region coal mines are Yancoal/Moolarben, Glencore/Ulan and Peabody/Wilpinjong and they were the largest producing coal mines in NSW in 2023 and still are. The combined production of 36.7 million tonnes (MT) of coal in 2023 is equivalent to 89 MT CO2e. The overall CO2e could be as great as 1.7 billion tonnes with current approvals and proposed expansions. The proposed OC3 extension alone would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. These negative impacts are cumulative across NSW. Nature is being challenged to the highest level in order to survive, and with ongoing native forest logging and deforestation clearing still continuing and increased natural disasters that not only affect people but also nature in that their habitats are burnt or flooded, we must factor in these cumulative challenges for nature, climate and people. The Moolarben OC3 is already NSW’s biggest producing coal mine in its present state and despite this still wants to expand and destroy our climate and nature even more! 2. Concerns- Negative Impacts • Nature We must protect and save species and their habitat and protect Wiradjuri cultural heritage. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding koalas have been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater (critically endangered) and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (second oldest reserve in the state). Birds Australia has identified this area as extremely important for bird life, as it is in very good condition and can support the Regent Honeyeater who has a state recovery plan. The NSW Government has recognised the peril of this bird in terms of their survival and has actively supported breeding these birds that are released into the wild to help in their recovery. Why would the NSW government approve Yancoal’s expansion as it WILL jeopardise the survival of the Regent Honeyeater (less than 250 in the wild) and all their conservation efforts to date to increase its chances of survival in the wild? Untouched habitat MUST remain untouched to support our wildlife. On this basis alone this coalmine MUST be rejected. As this is a 10 year expansion project, it will gut all species habitat. It will also threaten VITAL koala habitat also an endangered species. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem that they depend on to survive. Four species will be adversely affected by this expansion. The Regent Honeyeater, Koala, Broad- headed Snake and microbats are at a greater risk of extinction. Even a further drop in their numbers will affect the health of vital ecosystems in the area. That will be the cost to nature and it will never recover! In total at least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area. Yancoal proposes as last-minute changes off site “habitat enhancement” that will supposedly not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. As to Yancoal’s process, ecologists are meant to check for wildlife with proper reporting, and limited if any data has been provided. Minimal if any government compliance will not ensure that Yancoal will follow correct procedures to relocate wildlife. Protocols around bulldozing trees with no clear reporting, no stringent conditions is lacking. Who follows up that Yancoal is meeting these conditions? The proposed late amendments on ‘habitat enhancement’ do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, and are far too late to be considered. The expansion will go between the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the Goulburn River National Park. These important conservation areas are set aside to support critically endangered species like the Regent Honeyeater and endangered species like the Koala, identified through thermal drone surveys that has revealed a Koala breeding colony. Why should this coal mine expansion be approved to accommodate Yancoal at a cost to losing these conservation areas that were established in the first place to protect threatened species? The Biodiversity Assessment Report has also identified that this is a highly successful significant area for biodiversity with species such as the Pink- Tailed Legless Lizard, Large-Eared Pied Bat, Mased Owl, Powerful Owl, Squirrel Glider, and the Broad Headed Snake. All species are worth protecting. • Emissions The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. The current damage Yancoal’s coal mining has already done to nature, climate and the town of Wollar, must be recognised. A coal expansion that involves four new open cut pits will risk even more major damage to nature and climate. Yancoal seems to be forgetting that they have operated for decades since 2004 and already have caused immense damage to habitat and native wildlife and cumulatively added to climate emissions. Yancoal has negatively impacted people’s lives in the local community. This added 64+ million tonnes of climate pollution is at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. This appears to be a selfish action on the part of Yancoal to cause even more environmental damage and wreck people’s lives further. The three mines in the Mudgee area - Yancoal/Moolarben, Glencore/Ulan and Peabody/Wilpinjong- have approval to produce a combined 58 million tonnes of coal per year, the largest producer, Yancoal/Moolarben was approved until 2038. In 2023 their combined production was 36.7 million tonnes (MT) of coal. That’s an increase of 21.3 million tonnes (MT) of coal if expansions are approved. All three mines propose to expand their area of impact, increase production rates and extend the period of mining activity. This is strongly opposed. Current economic, social and environmental impact of extreme weather events in NSW is a warning that additional release of carbon into the earth’s atmosphere is unsustainable. Climate science and the International Energy Agency have declared that to ensure a safe climate future no more new coal can be mined. Yancoal is proposing to mine new coal. This must be rejected. These mines are within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where competition for skilled workforce, accommodation and services is very high. There is no justification to expand coal mining in a region with fast-tracked renewable energy generation. Coal is an industry from the past. We cannot and must not approve this expansion proposal by Yancoal. • Air Pollution and Water Pollution Constant coal dust effects the health of nature and communities. Those with upper respiratory diseases will be affected. Most people are not financially in the position to leave their homes and relocate. Koalas and other native wildlife reside in their current habitat because it supports their existence. They cannot leave to find another habitat. The local community and nature were there before Yancoal. This proposal cannot have priority over people’s and native animal’s lives and their health. Dust, smells, vibration and noise and lighting at night time will be ongoing . Large trucks will operate at night time. Farming families already who used to live close by to the coal mine have already been driven out of their homes because of noise pollution, air pollution and night lighting. They were there before Yancoal but they had to go to preserve the quality of their lives. Families experienced trauma. Yancoal did not care. I plead with the IPC to show compassion in their decision. Yancoal’s proposed expansion will further affect the remaining local community. Their quality of life will be negatively impacted. Governments when making important decisions on projects must consider the cumulative effects over time to people’s lives and that this project expansion will magnify those impacts that they already have had to live with. Please show compassion for local communities and their rights and not just consider the rights of big companies to expand. This expansion will also be a huge disrupter for native animals who just want to be left in peace and undisturbed. Air pollution, habitat destruction, increased carbon emissions, and pollution of their waterways that sustain them will be the result of this expansion. Yancoal will need water and will take from local water supplies and river systems that will result in further degradation of the environment that will further affect animals and their ability to survive. Native animals will be worse off, and most will not survive. Constant blasting in itself can be frightening for these animals. Ongoing transport vehicles and large trucks moving through the adjacent area will affect species habitat that will become excessively noisy. The tranquility and peace of their natural environment will disappear. Their once pristine protected habitat will erode away and with it these animals. This is NOT acceptable. These animals are being edged out and are losing their habitat to big companies who exploit our natural resources to sell to overseas countries. Whilst not a multi- national company Yancoal exports its coal to China, Japan and South Korea and is majority owned by a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Yancoal’s presence to date has negatively impacted native wildlife and local communities. Please DO NOT approve this expansion as it will cause more damage. Protect the wildlife and their habitat and the local communities’ homes. They existed before Yancoal and have a right to now have some protection from this greedy company. • Social Impacts Yancoal is a big company that has come in and bought up many properties in the adjoining area. These properties and the infrastructure on them has been left to rust and rot and erode away. Yancoal came in, bought up and neglected this whole area with the purpose and intent to destroy to satisfy their own agenda. Yancoal has negatively impacted this regional community. Their past actions are indicative of a company that did not care for the environment and nature but also the local community. The village area of Wollar and its original ambience and tranquillity has been disturbed. Save Wollar Action group has been organised because people- the local community- care about what has happened to their community and town because of Yancoal’s actions. We should all care and so should our NSW Government. People have a right to feel safe in their regional towns and villages. They are NSW residents and should not be pushed out of their homes with a huge buy out of properties by this company. Renewables are taking a place in the area as well as it lies within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone that is focused on expanding renewables. This presents a decided conflict of focus by the government when they are supposed to be supporting climate targets and renewables not a dirty coal expansion. 3. Conclusion If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat and destroy Regent Honeyeater (critically endangered) and microbat habitat and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve- a conservation area. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets. We do not need another huge coal expansion in NSW that further erodes environmental values and supercharges climate change and worsening natural disasters. Please protect nature, people and our climate. I strongly oppose Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Reject this coal expansion. Thank you |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Grandmother and member of the Mudgee community. I regularly reflect on my Grandchildren’s futures and what legacy I, and my generation will leave for them. Current scientific research and major climate institutions make it clear that approving and expanding coal mines runs directly counter to established environmental science and global climate goals. Expanding coal mining is incompatible with achieving international and national climate commitments, worsens environmental degradation, and intensifies climate-related harms that will affect future generations unless the global energy system transitions rapidly away from fossil fuels. While the economic benefits may be presented as short-term gains, the long-term costs—health impacts, environmental clean-up, and the loss of natural beauty—will far outweigh them. I cannot support a project that prioritizes temporary profit over the well-being of our children and grandchildren. We have a responsibility to leave them clean air to breathe, safe water to drink, and a healthy environment in which they can thrive and enjoy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben project is not only endangering our native wildlife but also us. The coal mine would not only clear 480 hectares of native bushland, critical to many species survival, but also 113 hectares of koala habitat, an already endangered species in Queensland, New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, where koalas have been recorded to be breeding. This project would not only take away native wildlife’s habitat and food source, but their water source, putting the Moolarben creek at serious risk. A water source for fauna but also the flora ecosystems along the creek are warned to be at critical risk of collapse. The expansion of the coal mine could also put human health and lives at risk. Coal mines are proven to increase respiratory illnesses as well as cardiovascular and carcinogenic diseases. This particularly hits home for many in New South Wales, especially in the Hunter region as there are recorded cases of the coal mines particularly around Singleton and Muswellbrook causing an increase in rates of asthma, heart disease, and respiratory illness to local residents as the mines have expanded. The people, the wildlife, and the environment of Moolarben do not need nor want the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. #StopMoolarben |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I do not support the expansion of Moolarben OC3 coal expansion. Adding more pollution to the expanding climate change is a negative outcome. Economic outcomes do not justify the selling off of our natural heritage, causing irreversible loss of wildlife habitat and the destruction of ground water. These are our most precious commodities. As a volunteer for the environment for the past 21 years, I strongly disagree with any damage/loss to the unique natural environment left in Australia. I cannot balance out any gains made by this expansion. Mining has a poor environmental record worldwide. Yours sincerely |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Approval of the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine would be wrong in so many ways. Pumping more carbon into our atmosphere - the only atmosphere we have - is reprehensible. The science is settled and unequivocal. The negative effects on surface and sub-surface water will be profound. Biodiversity will suffer. Labour and resources will be diverted away from solar and wind energy projects which are much less damaging to the environment. How can we teach our children and grandchildren to be better stewards of the planet if we were to give them such a poor example as extending the mine and other dirty fossil fuel projects? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I live in the Hunter Valley on a property which has been in my husband's family for over 100 years. The farm was almost entirely undermined for coal in 1990 - 2003. I am very aware of the damage to the environment from mining. The proposed development would destroy the biodiversity of the region. 480 hectares is a significant area to clear and many species would lose habitat. NSW is experiencing drastic climate change, with another drought looming in the area. The emissions would exacerbate this situation. Mining destroys groundwater and creeks. This cannot be repaired. Once water is lost it does not come back. I live with this issue daily with the destruction of a permanent creek on our property. I urge the NSW Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. It is time for the Government to take some responsibility to protect our environment. |
Dante Reyes
|
ID |
23651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Pollution bad |
Kate Bowman
|
ID |
23656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this under the basis that this expansion would cause irrepearable damage to the local area (an area I am most fond of) and contribute to increasing green house emissions. It makes no sense to approve such expansions in todays world with renewable options available. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2008 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object the project on grounds of - greenhouse gas emissions - reduction of biodiversity - water usage |
Susan Pilkington
|
ID |
23666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the extension of coal mining in this area as fossil fuel excavation denies our children and grandchildren a future. We must urgently uncouple our dependence on mining for our wealth and livelihood. It is disrespectful to the traditional owners of the land and adversly affects the flora and fauna in such a beautiful area. |
Mathilda Bowman
|
ID |
23671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am thirteen years old and have been learning about coal and the effects of both mining and burning at school for many years. I have attended protests, and advocated during school assemblies for No Coal from a young age. I am deeply worried about the future of our planet and the lack of care by people in power to this issue. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2008 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This crazy nonsense needs to stop! We're in the middle of a worsening climate crisis and are talking about new mines that'll make it worse? |
Merinda Voigt
|
ID |
23681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, My name is Merinda Voigt and together with millions of Australians I am extremely concerned and disappointed about the continuing operation of coal mining in Australia. The proposed expansion of NSW’s biggest producing coal mine Moolaben is an act of both environmental and cultural vandalism with disastrous consequences. The projected temperature increases, increased bushfire threat and loss of life due to human induced climate change from sources such as burning coal produced from this mine demands immediate action across every policy level well beyond the tokenistic and poor responce from the government that we have had so far. The onus is on the entire global community and calls for an urgent global response not just passing the buck.Your legacy will be written on how this government rises to this challenge. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2233 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Extension of this open cut mining operation directly negatively impacts the quality of life and economic viability of all people due to a warming planet and environmental degradation. Climate change is currently impacting all world communities and wildlife, it is imperative we significantly plan and act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions now! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission. I have been a resident and Medical Doctor in Mudgee for the last 13 years. I am concerned about the expansion of coal mining in the Mudgee region for a number of reasons. I am concerned about the climate impacts of ongoing mining. It is widely acknowledged through robust science that use of fossil fuels is contributing to climate change and that climate change is having a significant impact on the health of people around the globe. Australia will struggle to meet the healthcare needs of our population in the years to come. This will be made harder if we are not able to reduce our emissions in line with has had previously been agreed upon in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I agree that we need ongoing employment and growth for Mudgee but feel that this should be in new industry not in extending extraction of coal past what has already been approved. From a local environment point of view , loss of 480 hectares of native vegetation with the support it provided for native animals and birds can not be replaced. The project it expected to require significant groundwater, in a time of increasing droughts and fragile ecosystems I struggle to see how we can risk this precious resource. For these reasons I urge that the Independent Planning commission recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project will cause further incremental and irreversible damage to the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • The ongoing loss of suitable habitat and loss of habitat connectivity for endangered native species. • The Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve, The Drip Gorge and adjoining Goulburn River National Park have lost connectivity for native wildlife by the existing mining operations stretching from Ulan to Wollar in the valley. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. You only have to look at aerial photos of the industrial mine complex stretching from Ulan to Wollar to see that the current setbacks are totally irresponsible and completely ignorant of the impacts on the adjoining native vegetation areas. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The loss of natural groundwater within this landscape will be devastating for native vegetation, ecosystems and endangered wildlife that are already at critical levels. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a student in Sydney and I am very concerned about the expansion of coal mining, as we can feel the impacts of climate change already. We feel the extreme heat, with our energy bills rising from the added cost of air conditioning, and the sudden weather shifts impacting plans. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. The area is rich in biodiversity and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve for protection. This expansion risks threatened species and additional habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Any proposed biodiversity offset could never replace the already established habitat that supports these and more species. The proposed project also impacts the protected Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Additional environmental consequences are posed given the water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Not to mention the vast climate impact this project would have, with its estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. There is a lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project will cause further incremental and irreversible damage to the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • The ongoing loss of suitable habitat and loss of habitat connectivity for endangered native species. • The Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve, The Drip Gorge and adjoining Goulburn River National Park have lost connectivity for native wildlife by the existing mining operations stretching from Ulan to Wollar in the valley. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. You only have to look at aerial photos of the industrial mine complex stretching from Ulan to Wollar to see that the current setbacks are totally irresponsible and completely ignorant of the impacts on the adjoining native vegetation areas. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The loss of natural groundwater within this landscape will be devastating for native vegetation, ecosystems and endangered wildlife that are already at critical levels. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Cynthia Nadai
|
ID |
23726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Cynthia. I have visited the area from Sydney and was struck by its extraordinary beauty. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW. My particular concern is the climate impact of this proposed project. I am fighting our local Council who are advocating for converting 2 natural grass fields into synthetic grass. We MUST do all we can to combat climate change. Expanding the Moolarben mine is completely WRONG. We should be investing in renewables not depending on coal as a dirty energy source. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23731 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a mother of two young children in Sydney who values nature and clean air. I’m concerned with repeated allocation of natural habitats to industry that burns fossil fuels and/or damages ground water resources. The amendment here does not reduce clearing of native vegetation and is far too late to be considered. It also doesn’t preserve or create jobs, so has no clear value to the community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2132 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners I am a deeply concerned NSW citizen who strongly opposes the proposed development. As a well educated middle class professional I understand the economic and financial arguments the expansion of the coal mine present. I also understand the continued need for energy to sustain Australia's economic growth. However, the proposed development is a backward to step in the fight against climate change. As is now almost universally agreed, climate change is real. While the coal that would be mined by this expansion, would mostly likely to exported to other countries, the sale of this coal is just as morally bankrupt as the user of it. A similar argument is that of the tobacco giants that we just sell cigarettes we don't make people smoke them. Clearly some countries are tempted to use coal as it is a relatively cheap resource. As in the tobacco case, mining companies have a responsibility to transition to cleaner renewal energy. If this proposal is passed, it sends a clear signal to big polluters and mining companies that Australian governments don't really care about climate change or meeting net zero omission targets. Such a decision goes against the tide of history and future generations will look at such decisions with incredulity that governments and mining companies were so short sighted and only interested in the immediate return on investment. While a transition to renewal energy is understandable and necessary to ensure communities who rely on mining are not unduly impacted, the granting of this proposed development does not do those communities any favors as is delaying the inevitable. Fossil fuel mining cannot continue unabated without further catastrophic impact on the climate. Please consider carefully a decision which will impact many generations to come |
Claire Bettington
|
ID |
23741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2035 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
see attached file |
|
Attachments |
SUBMISSION C. Bettington, Moolarben OC3 proposal, 17-2-2026.docx (DOCX, 21.5 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23746 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a long-term Mudgee resident I am against Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project for many reasons: Professionally as a paediatric physiotherapist the extension would have negative impact on both physical and mental health of community by polluting the air and waterways and robbing the local population and visiting tourists of the pristine Munghorn Nature Reserve we have enjoyed countless times over the last four decades for family outings and picnics. The extension would severely impact Mudgee tourism opportunities by removing such a stunning nature reserve from visitors no longer keen to visit this site which would be only 100m from the mine expansion site. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2011 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project # SSD-33083358 https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/projects/moolarben-oc3-extension-project When I first moved to NSW for work several decades ago, I fell in love with the abundance and diversity of NSW’s natural environment and it is a major reason I have lived in NSW since. Back then, you could expect to see koalas in the Blue Mountains and regent honeyeaters in bushland closer to Sydney. To me, these large and interesting birds came to seem emblematic of the wealth of NSW’s natural environment. Decades on, we have a much better understanding of the contribution of healthy, diverse and accessible local ecosystems to the wealth, health (physical and mental) and resilience of NSW’s communities but I am immensely saddened by how much NSW’s natural heritage has been depleted and devalued, in large part due to regulations that permitted a short term, piecemeal lens on land clearing and development. Much of the area proposed for clearing around the Munghorn Gap Reserve, one of NSW’s oldest nature reserves, is a case in point. The NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW) estimates as few as 200 regent honeyeaters remain in the wild, with only 3 contemporary breeding sites (Capertee Valley, Upper Hunter Valley (Goulburn River) and Lower Hunter Valley (Cessnock).(1) Incredibly, hopes are now pinned on interventions like captive breeding programs to save them from extinction. In the face of the desperate need to address the wave of threatened extinctions resulting from past policies and practices, it seems like the height of irrationality to contemplate approving the destruction of a place where breeding females have been recorded, with the risk that fragmented habitats, noise, dust, lights and traffic from 24 hour operations will inevitably disrupt and endanger all the species that live in and around the valley, not to mention precious potable water resources, all on the basis of a proposal that contains notable gaps and inadequacies and promises insufficient public benefit. Indigenous rights and concerns must also be taken seriously and upheld. I object to the proposal on the following grounds: 1. Inadequate assessment of environmental impact » Yancoal's proposal extends open cut mining operations immediately south of the approved and operational open cut pit 3 (OC3), as well as development of four new open cut pits to the east and south-east of the approved OC3(2), so that the cumulative impacts of all of these proposals are of concern. I note that the submissions of both the Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining (IEAPM or (’the Panel’) and DCCEEW as well as the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI)’s December 2025 Assessment Report agree on the need for more comprehensive and transparent data from the proponent, especially regarding downstream emissions, biodiversity, and water impacts. Specifically: » The IEAPM’s submission supports concerns that in conjunction with existing mines, significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 m could occur, placing groundwater-dependent ecosystems and deep-rooted riparian trees along Moolarben Creek at serious risk - substantial enough to warrant careful consideration and additional mitigation measures. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to provide adequate information to enable decision-makers to accurately assess groundwater impacts. The OC3 Expansion assessment relies heavily on the proponent’s own groundwater model, which the Panel, the Independent Expert Scientific Committee (IESC), and NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) have all considered inadequate for local-scale prediction. Major issues include poor hydrogeological characterisation, inadequate monitoring and baseline data, unexplained discrepancies between measured and modelled data and insufficient quantification of drawdown in alluvium and impacts on baseflow. Together with Yancoal’s poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements in the existing mine complex(3) decision-makers cannot be satisfied with Yancoal’s concern for the impacts of its operations on groundwater. Other submissions from Water for Rivers(4) and residents in the region have noted damage from coal-washing water released from the existing mines and other risks to local waterways, as well as a lack of information in the proposal. » The DHPI Assessment Report notes some gaps remain in the data provided regarding emissions, specifically cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and downstream emissions. It recognises Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions of 64.6 Mt CO2-e would represent ~0.012% of global emissions and contribute to local climate impacts in the locality. It also recognises “specific features of the locality that render it vulnerable to the effects of climate change”. (5) » The proximity of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve demands thorough environmental impact assessments and protection, yet Yancoal has refused to adopt even a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife from noise and blasting impacts.(6) Further deficiencies are enumerated at https://mdeg.org.au/yancoals-moolarben-oc3-expansion/. » The Commission should be aware that legal challenges may arise if climate and environmental impacts are not adequately addressed, and specifically its duty to consider the impacts of all emissions associated with a project on the local environment and community, including ‘Scope 3’ (exported) emissions confirmed in NSW Court of Appeal's 24 July 2025 'Denham’ decision. » Given the proposal before it does not enable adequate consideration of the cumulative impacts of multiple mining projects in the region, including downstream environmental effects, the proposal should be rejected on those grounds alone. 2. The costs outweigh the public benefit » As I understand it, the currently proposed OC3 extension project amounts to a plan to destroy: • 113 hectares of koala breeding habitat - including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pit, critical to the survival of the species. Yancoal itself acknowledges the project would displace a “critical” koala population • 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater breeding habitat • up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem critical to the survival of several threatened and endangered species including large-eared pied bat, eastern cave bat, broad-headed snake, regent honeyeater, pin-tailed legless lizard, koala, swift parrot, squirrel glider.(7) » In exchange for its proposed destruction of our natural heritage, Yancoal's 2022 EIS claims a project NPV A$1,857M (assessable revenue net of allowable deductions,(8) equivalent to ~ A$200M over the life of the project (to 2038) at the current ad valorem royalty rate of 10.8%, or perhaps up to $300M allowing for inflation. This is a drop in the bucket in comparison to the economic cost of more severe and frequent storms, floods, and other natural disasters which is already estimated to be in the billions, and increasing – with the steepness and scale of the increase dependent on the success of CO2 reduction measures.(9) » Despite NSW being one of the largest exporters of coal globally, coal royalties contributed just 2.8%-3% of total state revenue in the most recent budget year. This share is expected to decrease gradually in the coming years as both the NSW economy diversifies, and global demand for coal reduces.(10) With no mechanism to enable repatriation of any portion of production or profits from Australian energy resources exported by majority foreign-owned resource companies (including windfall profits such as those seen in 2022-23 as a result of international supply disruptions), any benefits posited from increased resource security / price suppression, and the vast majority of profits from the expansion, will flow offshore rather than benefiting NSW or Australian residents. » A key rationale expressed by many proponents of the project that the expansion should be supported to create regional employment opportunities during the transition to a lower carbon economy. While I fully support a ‘just transition’ and support for workers in industries and regions affected by the clean energy transition, this claim seems contested. Coal jobs in the region have reportedly remained unfilled for extended periods. The DHPI Assessment Report acknowledges that no new jobs will be created, rather, the benefit seems to be limited to maintaining the current employment ‘trajectory’ (i.e., status quo) with supposed ‘flow on social and economic benefits, particularly for local employees and suppliers’. (11) In contrast, renewable energy projects within the broader region around the existing mines occupy are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the same period.(12)Given this, the claim that the expansion is justified because it will maintain mining employment necessary for the local economy is irrational. The proposal also fails to consider how the proposal could impact existing labour and accommodation shortages within the region. » The NSW government’s Net Zero Commission report confirmed that any coal mine expansion endangers NSW's ability to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets and is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. It is obviously counterproductive for the NSW Government to continue approving increased coal extraction while pushing forward on establishing large-scale renewable energy projects, climate adaptation and resilience programs to meet its legal and other obligations. » Decision-makers weighing the net public benefit against the risk of lasting environmental damage, significant and long-term health and safety risks and direct economic cost of climate change-fuelled natural disasters, must find that the latter outweighs any relatively minor and short-term economic benefit. 3. Disrupted planning process and outcomes » The recent amendments proposed by Yancoal seem to demonstrate an egregious lack of respect for the community and the planning process itself and risk community trust that the planning process for coal mines is fair and consistent. I am particularly concerned by a report on Yancoal’s website that it is preparing a second set of amendments ‘including additional environmental management commitments’ (13) – while the community consultation phase is ongoing. » Yancoal has demonstrably not met previous undertakings regarding water use and impacts and despite ample opportunity for Yancoal to improve biodiversity outcomes by acting on agency advice provided to them since planning commenced in 2022, it appears no agreements have been reached between Yancoal and the government agencies which have made numerous suggested improvements for biodiversity outcomes. » The DHPI Assessment Report notes that ‘a number of residual concerns remain’ i.e., proposed amendments appear inadequate to address concerns raised about the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, in particular the areas of critical koala and regent honeyeater habitat proposed for clearing, given the significant concerns raised about increased mortality from fragmentation of endangered species habitat arising from the use of ‘offsets’ and concerns about the effectiveness of proposed mitigations loss of existing contiguous habitat; inadequate buffers to mitigate impacts from blasting, and so on (the report outlines, in some detail, the differing views of the Conservation Programs, Heritage and Regulation (CPHR) unit and the (Mining) Panel whether unmitigated impacts on the regent honey eater and Box Gum Woodland ecosystem are serious and irreversible enough to cause extinction or not) (14). Why take the risk?! It’s not as though we can use coal royalties to buy new regent honeyeaters. » The recent proposed amendment to conduct, post-approval, baseline groundwater monitoring studies permitting assessment of potential cumulative impacts of mining operations across and immediately adjacent to the OC3 extension area for 12 months, signals an apparent disregard for both decision-makers and for community concerns and should be rejected. » How can we have confidence in a community consultation process or a decision process based on partial information? Decision-makers must be provided all relevant data before a project is approved, not after. I urge the Commission in the strongest possible terms to reject the proposal (including any subsequent amendments) to expand the existing mining operation into the proposed OC3 site, in recognition of the significant unmitigated risks it embodies. Instead of another coal mine, I urge relevant Departments to recognise that the high environmental values of the area documented through this process deserve full and ongoing recognition and protection by incorporation into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, accompanied by revegetation of degraded grasslands and full restoration of the existing MCO sites when mining operations cease. Yours sincerely (Name withheld) References (1) https://www.nsw.gov.au/departments-and-agencies/local-land-services/projects/nht-regent-honeyeater-conservation (2) ‘MCC’ and ‘MCO’ refer to Moolarben Coal Complex/Operation, i.e., the broader mining entity and operations related to the Moolarben site, including the proposed OC3 Expansion (3) https://mdeg.org.au/yancoals-moolarben-water-failure/ (4) https://www.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/projects/moolarben-oc3-extension-project#:~:text=Object-,Water%20for%20Rivers,-Object (5) DHPI Assessment Report December 2025 https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=SSD-33083358%2120251218T071610.639%20GMT p. 94 par 375-6 (6) Recommendation of the NSW Biodiversity Conservation and Science (BCS) Group, cited in https://mdeg.org.au/yancoals-moolarben-oc3-expansion/ (7) DHPI assessment Report, Table 8, pp 30-31 (8) majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au APPENDIX K - Economic Assessment for Moolarben OC3 Extension, NSW Planning Portal page 12 (9) NSW Treasury. An indicative assessment of four key areas of climate risk for the 2021 NSW Intergenerational Report. April 2021. p. 25 (10) https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/P1696-Coal-Royalties-in-NSW-Web.pdf (11) ibid., p.109, par 417 (12) https://mdeg.org.au/yancoals-moolarben-oc3-expansion/ (13) https://www.yancoal.com.au/our-sites/moolarben/ (14) ibid, pp. 38-53 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Every year Australia adds new species to State and Federal lists of endangered species. The big drivers of this unconscionable situation are habitat loss and climate change. This extension proposal if approved will not only destroy important habitat but will also add more carbon into our atmosphere continuing to drive climate induced extinctions. At what point of this critical climate situation do we say enough we must change direction and protect our planet our home? I object to the proposal. |
Helen Kvelde
|
ID |
23766 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Midcoast knitting nannas |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Midcoast knitting nannas are extremely concerned about this proposed development for many reasons. Firstly we object to any new coal mines in this time of rising temperatures. Here in the midcoast we have already suffered greatly from climate change with drought fires and two floods in the last 7 years. People have lost their homes animals livelihoods and some have lost their lives. Governments promises help but it seems that not much actually arrives. And nannas personally know people who were rendered homeless in fire and flood who are still homeless. If we do not stop rising temperatures the numbers of people affected will increase. Secondly midcoast nannas believe it is our duty to protect other species not drive them to extinction by destroying their habitat. This development threatens several endangered species that we know of such as koalas and greater gliders. Also nannas are very concerned about the effect on water. After air water is the most importantly thing all living creatures need to survive. It seems crazy to do anything to damage our sources of clean water. We know there are other ways to source the power we need. It’s time to stop relying on coal and use renewables. Give workers a just transition by training them in renewable energy which is also cheaper snd surely that’s a win win for everyone except the coal mine owners. And they don’t seem to pay tax anyway. Sincerely Helen Kvelde On behalf of Midcoast Nannas |
Amelie Adkins
|
ID |
23771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3749 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am strongly opposed and disgusted by the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. It appears the Earth is almost on fire, and the government looks like they could care less. The entire proposal is a colossal (Redacted) to our country’s environment, people and future. In a approving this expansion plan our government is helping hammer in the final nail of our future – it’s bloody revolting. It is critical that the IPC help reinforce how terrible this expansion is for humanity at the largest. I beg. I implore. Please. Please officially recommend that the destruction that Moolarben Coal Mine expansion will cause does not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is (Redacted), I am a 34 year old community leader working in Bathurst NSW and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our region, due to the climate, water and long term biodiversity impacts. I live on a property on the outskirts of the village of Peel and have seen the devastating heatwaves, singe hilltop and paddock trees in our area; especially around the Turon and Sofala area. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am distressed that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I realise that many of these submissions and objections may sound similar, so I will write something a little different, imagining if the mine expansion was sadly approved: Silence, as a lone koala searches for its mate, 113ha cleared in ever shrinking islands of vegetation loss, like death by a thousand cuts. No more, do the microbats fly, hunt insects at night and no more does the Regent honey eater sing in the morn; they have been crushed or have moved on, they are refugees for the remaining allowed land preserved to protect threatened species. Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, was once bigger…animals don’t acknowledge the arbitrary lines and tenures we make until we explode them out of the landscape creating tunnels within 100 metres of the reserve, vibrations that crack rock and drain soil moisture – ah but not just any moisture, as the years pass Moolarben Creek and groundwater disappears, community mentions it, the bores are tainted and low, a farmer remarks ‘it sure has been getting hot these days’. The world holds its breath as around 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas enters the atmosphere, the world asks why are we still doing this can’t we see what we are doing? We had the vision we were in a renewable energy zone, jobs on the horizon. The alure of delusional greed was our downfall as we now live in a dying landscape, public benefit lost, only private company gain and riches sent overseas, the jobs they promised don’t seem worth the heat and super storms that strip the soil clean only to evaporate quickly after like our children’s futures. How much longer do we burry our heads in the coal dust in a climate emergency and biodiversity crisis? Will we ever meet our net zero and Paris agreement targets? I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) Peel NSW 2795 – Wiradyuri Country |
|
Attachments |
Jack Fry - submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 120.56 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please reconsider this expansion. It provides a real threat to local wildlife and to ground water. What is more Australia has set targets to combat climate change and global warming, and this goes against these. We need renewables not more coal. |
Geoff Allshorn
|
ID |
23791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission attached |
|
Attachments |
Geoff Allshorn - Submission 17 February 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 133.29 KB) |
Katherine Kotarska
|
ID |
23796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Kate Kotarska and l live in Caerleon, on the outskirts of Mudgee. I write to oppose the expansion of Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. I base my opposition on a number of factors: 1. Climate Change impacts As a qualified environmental scientist and someone who has worked in climate and energy policy over the last 20 years, I find it almost inconceivable that at this stage in the climate crisis we are still fighting the creation of new coal mines and the expansion of existing ones. Australia is a signatory to the Paris agreement which is a legally binding international treaty adopted in 2015 aimed at limiting global temperature rise to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.5°C, above pre-industrial levels. Under the Paris Agreement, Australia has committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and has set a 2030 target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 43% below 2005 levels. In September 2025, Australia submitted an updated nationally determined contribution with a 2035 target of a 62-70% reduction in net national greenhouse gas emissions below 2005 emissions levels, covering all sectors of the economy and all greenhouse gases. This will be implemented as an emission budget over 2031–35. This target aligns with Australia’s Net Zero Plan, which charts out Australia’s path to achieving our commitment to reach net zero by 2050. The Australian Government and State Government’s including the NSW Government are taking ambitious action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by encouraging the roll out of renewable energy infrastructure to decarbonise the energy sector. Here in the Central West we have the roll-out of the first NSW Renewable Energy Zone. It hardly bears thinking about that while one part of the NSW Government is working to decarbonise our electricity supply, proposals like this are still being given serious consideration by the IPC. The proposed Moolarben extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. This is equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. The Net Zero Commission’s December 2025 ‘Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report’ found that “continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The Net Zero Commission’s 2024 Annual Report found that: • NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets for 2030 and 2035 • any increased emissions from the sizeable pipeline of proposed coal project expansions and extensions would require other sectors to make greater reductions for the state to meet its targets. In Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 163, the NSW Court of Appeal overturned the approval for the Mount Pleasant coal mine expansion. The court ruled the IPC failed to properly consider the local climate impacts of Scope 3 emissions. The decision clarifies that simply acknowledging greenhouse gas emissions will have global effects is insufficient; decision-makers must assess how those emissions impact the local area, even for Scope 3 emissions (coal burned overseas). The economic and social costs of these Scope 3 emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. The Mudgee region, and indeed the whole State, have recently endured several week-long heat waves, where temperatures regularly climbed above 40 degrees. This has impacts on local agriculture, water use, fire risk, and native animal deaths due to extreme heat. This is a sign of things to come if climate change risks are not taken seriously. 2. Biodiversity Impacts I have also studied ecology at a tertiary level and am dismayed at the coal mine expansion’s impacts on biodiversity. DPHI’s Moolarben OC3 Extension Project State Significant Development Assessment Report found that Yancoal’s initial proposal would “directly disturb approximately 675 hectares (ha) of land, including 480 ha of native vegetation. Key biodiversity impacts include disturbance of 401 ha of Box Gum Woodland Critically Endangered Ecological Community (CEEC) and 81 ha of Regent Honeyeater ‘important mapped’ habitat, which are candidate species for serious and irreversible impacts (SAII). The project would also impact habitat for the Koala and Squirrel Glider (113 ha), Swift Parrot (106 ha), Pink-tailed Legless Lizard (207 ha), and Gang-gang Cockatoo (106 ha). Due to the proximity to rocky features in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the project has potential to indirectly impact threatened microbat habitat as a result of blasting.” Following Yancoal’s amendments, the Conservation Programs, Heritage and Regulation Division of the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, The Environment and Water (NSW DCCEEW) stated that the project would still result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on Box-Gum Woodland CEEC and the Regent Honeyeater. The report notes that “the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) has raised various concerns regarding the close proximity of the project to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (the reserve) and recommended a 500 m setback between the project and the edge of the reserve to adequately manage potential environmental impacts. Concerns raised include: • blasting and potential vibration impacts on geological features and rocky habitat; • risks to public safety; • light and noise impacts on biodiversity values; and • groundwater drawdown beneath the reserve and associated impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems (GDEs).” Setback from the reserve was increased under the amended application from 50m to 100m, not the 500m recommended by the NPWS. This biodiversity rich valley should be preserved and considered for incorporation into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 3. Impacts on ground water, creeks, and riparian zones As a result of open cut mining, impacts on groundwater and surface water resources would be significant. This includes groundwater drawdown in the shallow alluvium of up to 5 metres (m) and potential impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems. These impacts could last for many years after mining has ceased. Moolarben Creek is a critical drought refuge for wildlife. The Mining Panel has advised that there is a moderate risk to deep-rooted groundwater dependent vegetation and recommended conditions to manage this risk, including the expansion of the groundwater monitoring network. Inadequate baseline groundwater monitoring studies have occurred to date. 4. Workers urgently needed for the REZ and unnecessary for further coal expansion The Mudgee area is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone (REZ). The REZ is forecast to support an annual average of about 1,850 direct jobs in the local area during construction, and about 930 ongoing operational jobs from 2034. There are clear alternative employment opportunities within the REZ. The existing Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038. Coal from Moolarben is shipped overseas to China, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Japan. Australian thermal coal exports face a significant, structural decline due to accelerating energy transitions in South Korea and China, with projected falls in demand threatening to reduce export values by up to 50% over the next five years. South Korea aims to phase out coal by 2040, while China is boosting domestic production and renewables. The expansion may well deliver little economic benefit while causing irreversible environmental damage, making its costs significantly greater than any proposed public benefit. 5. The expansion will harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project State Significant Development Assessment Report found that a total of 138 Aboriginal heritage sites were identified in the study area, with 55 located wholly or partially within the surface disturbance footprint. A further 12 sites could be indirectly impacted from blasting. These sites have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s cultural and spiritual connection to the land. 6. Cumulative impacts This proposed expansion should be considered in the context of the cumulative impacts of this expansion along with the proposed expansions of neighbouring Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3. All of these expanded mines will impact threatened species, water resources, and cultural heritage values. Thank you for considering this submission. Sincerely, Kate Kotarska. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Opposing the Moolarben Coal Mine Expansion (OC3) I strongly oppose the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. The project would cause serious and irreversible environmental, cultural and climate harm, while delivering little public benefit. The valley should instead be protected as part of a conservation landscape with Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 1. Destruction of Critical Koala Habitat The proposal would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, including areas where breeding koalas have been recorded. The NSW Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group has identified this habitat as critical to the survival of the species and described the local population as climate-resilient, having survived drought, bushfire and rising temperatures. Destroying habitat for a climate-robust koala population is unacceptable, particularly during a biodiversity crisis. These impacts cannot be adequately offset. 2. Serious and Irreversible Biodiversity Impacts The project would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, including up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Offsets cannot replace the losses . At least 23 threatened species are at risk, including the Regent Honeyeater, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Broad-headed Snake and Squirrel Glider. Vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve provide key bat habitat. Blasting and noise threaten these species. The recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve was refused. Biodiversity offsets cannot justify permanent destruction of irreplaceable habitat. 3. Significant Groundwater Risks The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, including up to 5 metres in the alluvium along Moolarben Creek. This threatens groundwater-dependent ecosystems and deep-rooted riparian trees, and puts a key drought refuge at risk. Baseline groundwater monitoring has been inadequate, and monitoring is proposed after approval rather than before. Given the proponent’s poor water compliance history, these risks are deeply concerning. Other mines have continued to pollute long after closing, there is no reason to risk further pollution by expanding or extending operations. 4. Massive Climate Impacts Inconsistent with NSW Law The expansion would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions which is equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act 2021 and Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement. The Net Zero Commission has clearly stated that further coal mine expansions are not compatible with NSW’s emissions reduction targets. The assessment also fails to properly consider downstream emissions (which make up 99% of the project’s emissions) and the local environmental, social and economic costs of climate change. 5. Irreversible Harm to Aboriginal Cultural Heritage The proposal would destroy at least 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, including two shelters despite recommendations for protection. These sites are of high cultural value and form part of Wiradjuri Country. Their destruction would contribute to the cumulative degradation of culturally significant landscapes. A significant number of sites were destroyed during earlier mining establishment. 6. Cumulative Impacts Ignored The cumulative impacts of this expansion alongside proposed expansions at: Ulan Coal Mine Wilpinjong Coal Mine have not been properly assessed. Together, these projects would compound damage to biodiversity, water systems, cultural heritage and the climate. 7. No Clear Economic Justification The existing Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion. The project does not create meaningful new employment. Meanwhile, the Central West Renewable Energy Zone is projected to create a significant number of jobs over the next decade, during construction and ongoing, offering sustainable alternative employment pathways. Conclusion The Moolarben expansion would permanently destroy critical koala habitat, endangered ecosystems and Aboriginal heritage, create major climate harm inconsistent with NSW law, and put groundwater systems at risk without delivering significant public benefit. The recent amendments proposed by Yancoal, do not improve the outlook and clearing of native vegetation, and the flow on devastation to fauna and biodiversity. For these reasons, I urge the IPC to refuse approval of this project and protect this landscape as part of a broader conservation area linked to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to urge the Commision to reject the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project on the following grounds: - as Australia meets a benchmark of less than 50percent of our energy production being from fossil fuels, the future of coal production is moving in the right direction to save our planet for future generations. Expanding coal production now is a backward step and threatens our ability to meet our climate objectives - the proposed expansion threatens endangered species native to the proposed area, including regent honeyeaters and koalas - the cultural heritage of the indigenous people will be threatened by the proposed expansion. As a mother and grandmother, after a career in primary and tertiary teaching , I ask that the welfare of future generations be considered and valued above the profits of a mining corporation and this proposal be rejected. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly oppose this development. My main reason is preservation of natural habitat, as well as issues of climate and water pollution. As a resident of Canberra/ACT, I can appreciate the benefits of effective environmental protection policies and strategies that ensure the safety of biodiversity. This development would threaten koala habitat as well as multiple other endangered species, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. |
Hayden Smith
|
ID |
23821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2233 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I find it absolutely ludicrous that an extension and expansion of this coal complex would even be considered, when the effects of fossils fuels is not only scientifically proven to be detrimental to the environment but also financially unviable without enormous government subsidies. If this extension goes ahead I feel it’s hugely disrespectful to young people as it directly signals policy makers do not care about the detriment they will and are causing to the quality of life Younger people will experience in the future. |
Mandy Gyles
|
ID |
23826 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Australian Conservation Foundation - Hunter community |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission. I am writing on behalf of the Australian Conservation Foundation's Hunter community to express our alarm at the proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 Mine near Mudgee. This expansion should not go ahead because of the devastating impact it would have on biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, water in the landscape, and local Aboriginal culture. The proposed expansion and clearing poses unacceptable and irreversible threats to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve where at least 23 threatened species have been recorded. For example, it would critically impact the habitat of a uniquely resilient koala population, the Regent Honeyeater, Broad- headed Snake and microbats. The proposed extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. The project would also cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. In addition, there has been poor assessment of the cumulative and irreversible impact of this proposed mine expansion combined with that of the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines which threaten similar species due to clearing and loss of habitat. For these reasons, I urge you to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering our submission. Sincerely, Mandy Gyles Australian Conservation Foundation, Hunter Community Newcastle NSW 2291 |
Catherine Turner
|
ID |
23831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2090 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the mine extension. Tree clearing required will have a negative effect on wildlife. The project poses irreversible threats to groundwater and creeks. The ares should be added to the adjacent nature reserve. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2122 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission My name is (Redacted). I have a Masters in Global Studies, and I'm a mother of a child facing a lifetime in a warmer, more dangerous climate future, one where droughts, storms, fires, and famines will be more extreme and more commonplace. Habitable zones are shrinking forcing whole societies to relocate. Political friction, war, and extremism will rise. We have a moral obligation to mitigate this to the extent we have the power. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I gather there are multiple coal mine expansion applications all impacting the breeding grounds and homes of the same group of 23 threatened species - including koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, microbats, Box Gum ecosystems,and broadheaded snakes - and the cumulative effect of the separate extensions has not been taken into account in assessments. What might be deemed acceptable risk from each expansion individually may have a far greater impact on species survival when combined. Furthermore, ground water drawdown of up to 5 metres threatens the whole ecosystem at Moolarben Creek, including trees, and remove a refuge for native fauna during drought. While Yancoal have offered to conduct testing, the expectation is that this testing will be done after the mine expansion is approved, which is nonsensical and leaves the government without any way to regain control. The Registered Aboriginal Parties to the consultation have noted 55 significant cultural sites that would be destroyed if the mine expansion proceeds. That this is being contemplated is a disgrace. How can the government claim to value Aboriginal people and their concerns while permitting destruction of sites of cultural significance en masse? Finally, the NetZero Commission has found that coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and our commitments under the Paris Agreement, while the Denman Court of Appeal decision requires decision makers to consider all emissions, including downstream emissions from burning after export. I exhort you therefore to abide by this legal precedent and to rule out the Moolarben OC3 coal expansion. The argument that the mine is needed for revenue and jobs is not aligned with reality. The expansion will create negligible employment, as even current vacancies in the industry cannot be filled. Meanwhile the growing renewables in the area is driving job growth. Rather than turning this area containing so many threatened species and cultural sites into a mining pit, the area ought to be made an added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Australia has some of the richest biodiversity in the world, which is something we should treasure. Sadly, we also have the highest rate of extinctions. With climate change forcing many many species into stress, strong biodiversity is vital for the survival of whole ecosystems. I thank you for taking the time to consider this submission. (Redacted) Eastwood NSW 2122 |
Alannah Dair
|
ID |
23841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Alannah, I am a 29 year old art installer living and working across Dharug and Gadigal land in Sydney. I am concerned about the expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine, due to the current impacts of climate change being felt across all states of this country. Since I moved from Brisbane 6 years ago, I have witnessed an increase in extreme weather here in NSW such as bushfires, 40+ degree days, torrential rain and flash flooding. I am concerned that this project, this expansion of mining, would cause even further irreversible harm to the climate, the surrounding environment and community. This rich biodiverse area slated for the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am concerned about threatened species and habitat loss within this area, including the clearing of koala, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. I am further concerned about the impacts of noise, and the operation of machinery on the surrounding Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and don't believe there has been adequate assessment as to the impacts of conducting further operations within 100 metres of the reserve. I am further concerned about the groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets it is of no benefit and only hinders us to create further carbon emissions. Finally, I personally, don't see the justification from a job related standpoint for this expansion. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Alannah Dair |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. Although I am not a local resident, I am concerned that this project would have a much wider impact than just on the local community. I believe it would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, the climate and the broad community. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats. It would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and Aboriginal cultural heritage. The plan to mine within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve will put an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including, as mentioned above, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. This area provides a critical habitat for the local koala population. This rich biodiverse valley should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposed coal mine expansion would be a major risk to water and groundwater resources. This includes long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The climate impacts are enormous, with the proposed OC3 extension estimated to generate 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This is at a time when NSW is falling behind in meeting its legislated emissions reduction targets. There is no clear justification in terms of employment for this for expanding coal mining in this region, where renewable energy development is being prioritised. Renewable energy projects are expected to create clear alternative employment pathways. I am aware that Yancoal has submitted last-minute minor amendments to its proposal, thus delaying the IPC hearing. The proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, and the proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Sarah Fordyce
|
ID |
23851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2614 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly oppose this development. My main reason is preservation of natural habitat, as well as issues of climate and water pollution. This development would threaten koala habitat as well as multiple other endangered species, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project will also cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. I live in Canberra and value living somewhere that protects native habitat and waterways, and wish this also for the community of Mudgee and surrounds. |
Millie Jones
|
ID |
23856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2080 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi there. My name is millie and i grew up among the gorgeous nature and wildlife of the mudgee region. Mudgee's art and nature made me the person i am today and visiting puttabucca wetlands, and the drip, and hands-on rock inspired me to have a keen interest in nature and the the natural world into my adult life. I wouldn't trade my outback floral countryside upbringing for anything - it's made me a more well rounded person than my city-born peers. Growing up i knew a lot of my friends had parents that worked in the mines and i understood that it was companies like yancoal that let those families eat, but this expansion is going to starve those families faster. It has become clear to me as i watch this expansion drag on and unfold you, reading this, know that it will ruin mudgee too. I want the Moolarben OC3 Expansion to be rejected because it will kill the wildlife that make my outback australian unique and important. I want the Moolarben OC3 Expansion to be rejected because it will prevent the creation of hundreds of high-paying jobs in sustainable energy in the midwestern region. I want the Moolarben OC3 Expansion to be rejected because it will destroy a literal nature reserve in the mudgee region that i got to explore as a kid, and stop future generations from experiencing the magic of australian nature that shaped me as a person. I want the Moolarben OC3 Expansion to be rejected because it will further poison the groundwater used to grow crops and protect even more important flora and fauna in the midwestern region. I'm appalled at this expansion proposal and it makes me embarrassed to share the earth of the wiradjuri with people who want to drain it of its life, beauty and ecosystems. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. I stand with the Nature Conservation Council, Manjot Kaur and the future of the midwestern region. Thank you for considering my submission. Thank you so much, Millie(Milla) Jones, Formerly of Mudgee 2850, Currently Mt Kuring-Gai 2080 |
Kristin Dawson
|
ID |
23861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2530 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this expansion because of its impact on our native fauna - it would mean clearing 113 hectares of koala habitation and further destruction of the life chances of this endangered animal; it also contains habitat for the Regent Honeyeater and microbats. It also will come very close to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Most of all in a world and particularly our own nation there is increasing natural disasters due to climate change fuelled by industries such as this one. This extension will release an estimated 64 million tonnes of pollution into our atmosphere- and with this extension of mining NSW will fail in reaching its legislated reduction of emissions targets I object to this extension for the above reasons. We are here now and morally responsible for the planet we leave for our children’s future. Science has demonstrated the harmful impact of fossil fuel extraction and burning. |
David Allworth
|
ID |
23871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attachment. |
|
Attachments |
23871 - David Allworth_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 51.22 KB) |
Yvonne Ingeme
|
ID |
23876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, RE: Objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee Hi my name is Yvonne and I am an ecologist, and have seen first hand how continued habitat lost impacts threatened species and communities. I am very concerned about the potential expansion of this and other coal mines in Australia, due to the resulting climate impacts that I also experience in my area. Extreme heat waves are causing not only increased deaths in our community but also a massive increase in deaths of native animals, many dying during heatwaves unobserved by people but some species give a clear indication of the impacts of heatwaves on native animals such as ringtail possums and flying foxes which simply drop out of trees dead from the extreme heat events. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. This area plays a critical role in supporting the habitat and threatened species populations within the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and its removal will lead to decreased resilience of that reserve. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem and remove microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Removal of this habitat will undermine the resilience of the habitat within the reserve. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours Sincerely, Yvonne |
Rhys Tranter
|
ID |
23881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2298 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the NSW Independent Planning Commission, My name is Rhys Tranter, and I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This proposal would significantly extend one of NSW’s largest thermal coal operations at a time when we are facing a worsening climate and biodiversity crisis. It would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and cause unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species, water systems, and cultural heritage. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the project area. The proposal would destroy more than 100 hectares of koala habitat, including areas where breeding koalas have been recorded, as well as habitat for the Regent Honeyeater, microbats and endangered Box Gum Woodland. These ecosystems cannot simply be “offset” elsewhere. Once they are gone, they are gone. I am also deeply concerned about groundwater impacts. Significant drawdown is predicted, with risks to Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that serve as critical drought refuges. The proponent’s proposed amendment to undertake groundwater monitoring after approval is inadequate. Baseline data should be established before approval, not after. The climate impacts are substantial. The project is estimated to generate 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. This is inconsistent with the intent of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement. Approving new or expanded thermal coal projects undermines NSW’s legislated emissions reduction targets and ignores the broader economic and social costs of climate pollution. The proposed late-stage amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or vegetation clearing. They appear to be an attempt to minimise scrutiny rather than meaningfully reduce impacts. These changes are too late in the process and do not address the serious and irreversible environmental harm identified. As a social worker who has experience with rural Australians, I am deeply concerned that this will not create sustainable and ethical employment opportunities or afford the local community long-term prosperity as suggested by Yancoal. This will reinforce a divide between people who work for the mind and those who do not, and leaves communities highly vulnerable to market volatility, without providing training or support around climate resilience. Finally, this project cannot be justified on employment grounds. The mine will continue operating for years without this expansion, and the region is already transitioning toward renewable energy development. The environmental and cultural costs of this proposal far outweigh any claimed public benefit. For these reasons, I urge the Commission to refuse approval for the Moolarben OC3 extension. This biodiverse valley on Wiradjuri Country should be protected, not permanently scarred by expanded open-cut mining. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Rhys Tranter Waratah, NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a community member, that strongly object to Moolarben expansion project. I am concerned about the environmental issues that this expansion will cause. Fauna, flora and the wild animals that rely on this land and have been for years being destroyed and extinct is not a future I would like to see. Once you disturb it, it will never be the same. The cultural areas of the wiradjuri people being destroyed and disturb, those you will never get back. Water table being disturb or destroyed, especially when the area is in drought and what water is there, is for the animals and the environment. For these reasons and many more, I OBJECT to Moolarben expansion |
sharon Kinnison
|
ID |
23901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2105 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am 78 years old and especially concerned about the preservation of functioning ecosystems, biodiversity and water for future generations. This project should not go ahead. It will heavily impact and threaten all of the above. I am also concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts. I am coastal but everywhere storms and other extreme weather events including fire are more frequent and more extreme. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Off site biodiversity offsets can not replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that arecritical drought refuges for wildlife. 100 metres would not flow to the creek or underground water • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Sincerely, Sharon Kinnison Scotland Island NSW 2145 |
Beau Cummins
|
ID |
23906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As you read these words, at a time before this proposed development is either approved or rejected, there are hundreds of thousands of creatures that call this place home. Life requires us to make countless decisions using our ethical compass. There is no scenario in which an individual with sound ethics would approve this development. An approval can only mean that we value profit over life. We're better than that. I believe that you, the person reading this is better than that. Don't overcomplicate the matter. It is not complex. There is only one just response to this proposal. Pause. Consider the life that is at stake. |
Catherine Ciret
|
ID |
23911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The proposed expansion would cause unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems by clearing critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats. In addition, the proposed OC3 extension would generate an enormous amount of greenhouse emissions (estimated 64.6 million tonnes over its life) which contradict the NSW commitment to mitigate climate change (NSW Climate Change Act 2023). I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Submission My name is [name redacted], I have a background in public health, and am a parent to two young people aged 16 and 20. I’m writing this submission to oppose the Moolarben Coal Expansion as I’m extremely concerned about the climate disasters which will be fuelled by this coal expansion, and how it will impact communities near Mudgee, already impacted by extreme weather events, and how it will impact my two children and other young people. The IPCC has already warned that in order to keep warming at 1.5 degrees, and prevent catastrophic global warming, there should be no new fossil fuel projects bought online, that means in Australia, we should stop expanding existing coal mines. In addition, last October the world reach the first global tipping point, with 160 scientific experts warning that warming at 1.2 degrees was irreversibly destroying coral reefs. And as coral reefs are an essential part of the marine ecosystem, including in supplying the world with fish, this would be catastrophic for our marine environment, and decimate millions of people’s livelihoods. The report from scientists and conservationists warns the world is also “on the brink” of reaching other tipping points, including the dieback of the Amazon, the collapse of major ocean currents and the loss of ice sheets. The Global Tipping Points report, led by the University of Exeter and financed by the fund of the Amazon owner, Jeff Bezos, includes contributions from 160 scientists from 87 institutions in 23 countries. The Global Tipping Points report warns the world is also “on the brink” of reaching other tipping points, including the dieback of the Amazon, the collapse of major ocean currents and the loss of ice sheets. And as you are aware, reaching one tipping point can then speed up other tipping points. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. • There is no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The government should focus on creating more renewable jobs, and ensuring that people in coal mining regions are supported with free TAFE and other training supports to retrain and become technicians for renewable energy projects, especially as it sits within an area designated for renewable energy projects. pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. • The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thanks for considering my submission, [name redacted] Randwick, 2031, NSW. |
Margaret Sewell
|
ID |
23921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Opposition to Moolarben Coal Complex Extension Project I am writing to express my strong objection to the Yancoal proposal to extend Moolarben OC3. NSW, Australia and the world do not need more coal extraction and burning, with its deleterious effects on the climate here and worldwide, and on local biodiversity, with potential extinctions of koalas and regent honey-eater populations. I am a resident of Bathurst, so for me, Mudgee is local, and for many people it is a key tourist centre. This is partly due to the beautiful surrounding areas, now being systematically destroyed by mining. Increases in coal mining will reduce the value of tourism in the area, and also reduce jobs available in hospitality as fewer tourists visit Mudgee. Jobs in mining will not make up for this. Conversely, employment in renewable energy is increasing. Australia and the world need to be reliant on renewable sources of power, rather than continuing to dig up and destroy the habitat of endangered species. Coal power is complicit in increasing global warming, or global weirding, as climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe terms it. This increases extreme weather events such as raging bushfires, with their concomitant health effects, cyclones, hurricanes and floods. The proposed mine extension is in fact close to an existing REZ, with wind farm approvals. This needs to be the future for Australia, and we are already heading towards significant amounts of renewable power being available to replace coal. Yancoal’s proposed amendment which has halted the IPC hearing offers small extensions of Habitat Enhancement Areas which do not in fact reduce the destruction that open-cut mining brings to the area and would only inadequately remediate it. In addition to koalas and regent honey-eaters, micro-bats and small insects are threatened by this proposal, and biodiversity will be lost. A meaningful amendment could have addressed reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and the importance of Net Zero. Yancoal’s attempts at greenwashing will also not rehabilitate water losses, as the destroyed ground cannot be reconstructed. Water flows will be disrupted, and much of this precious resource will be lost. As baseline monitoring has not been undertaken, this is difficult to quantify. Destruction of large numbers of Wiradjuri Indigenous artefacts brings Juukan Gorge to mind. The spiritual significance of this destruction cannot be overstated, and it is easily avoidable. As I now have a young grandchild of my own, Tim Winton’s novel Juice really hit home. The protagonist found that his many times great-grandparents were the generation that refused to restrict their comfortable lifestyles by limiting their use of fuels that they dug up and burned, leading to catastrophic climate effects with huge impacts on future generations. His generation was forced to live underground for many months of the year, as being above ground was impossible. In the remaining months of “winter”, people could only be above ground in the early morning, and late afternoon, heavily covered, to grow what was necessary to enable their subsistence lifestyle and support them through the underground months. This is the foreseeable future for our descendants if we continue down this path. I do not want to be part of that older generation that ignores the effects on our young people. I do what I can to reduce reliance on coal-fired power, with solar panels and an EV, and so do many others, but decisions to completely stop coal mining and burning need to be made now. For these reasons, and the many other reasons that other submissions will have highlighted, I call on the IPC to reject this extension proposal. |
Cosmin Luca
|
ID |
23926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Re: Objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Expansion My name is Cosmin Luca. I am a student of Econometrics and Data Science at the University of Sydney. I am writing to strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 expansion. I endorse the submissions made by other objecting organisations. In particular, I support the Nature Conservation Council’s detailed assessment of the water degradation and ecological risks associated with this expansion. On all economic, social, and environmental grounds this proposal threatens the future of sustainability and prosperity in New South Wales. 1. Economic Transfer Pricing & Resource Depletion Yancoal is majority-owned (over 60%) by the Shandong Energy Group. The economic structure of this project appears designed for vertical integration, allowing Australian coal to be exported at or near cost production price to the parent company. This effectively offshores the profits while Australia retains the resource depletion and environmental liabilities. It is a poor return on investment for the state. 2. Environmental & Water Security Risks The environmental costs are extraordinary. I object to the scale of land clearing and the irreversible impact on local wildlife habitat. Furthermore, the risk of water quality degradation and drought pressure places an unacceptable burden on the Mudgee community and downstream agricultural assets. 3. Climate Policy Contradiction This expansion is completely at odds with our climate obligations. It contradicts the NSW Net Zero Commission’s objectives, undermines the Federal Government’s legislated emissions reduction goals, and weakens our 2025 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) ahead of the COP31 Presidency Australia will preside over. We cannot claim to be aiming for Net Zero domestically or internationally while approving new thermal coal capacity. 4. Labour Hysteresis By expanding thermal coal capacity while the global economy transitions to clean energy, we are entrenching the local workforce in a dying industry. This increases the risk of labour hysteresis—trapping the community in a sector that cannot offer long-term security, rather than transitioning workers toward sustainable, future-proof employment. This project fails to serve the public interest and should be rejected. Sincerely, Cosmin Luca Student, Econometrics and Data Science University of Sydney |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to formally express my concerns regarding the real and potential impacts of the proposed Open Cut 3 (OC3) expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine, particularly in relation to its proximity to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and surrounding natural areas. As a long-term and frequent visitor to this region, I have spent many years exploring and enjoying the Mugnhorn Gap Nature Reserve, the Goulburn River National Park, the Drip Gorge, Ferntree Gully, and Ganguddy (Dunns Swamp). Through these experiences, I have developed a deep appreciation for the biodiversity and unique environmental values of this area. As an avid birdwatcher, I am especially concerned about the ecological integrity of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which is home to more than 150 bird species. The Reserve and surrounding national parks are places of immense environmental, recreational, and personal significance to many visitors, including myself. When reviewing the map of the proposed OC3 extension, it is clear that habitat loss, noise, dust, light pollution, and potential groundwater degradation will have serious implications for the birds, wildlife, and plant communities of the Nature Reserve. OC3 does not exist in isolation. The existing Wilpinjong mine already abuts substantial sections of the northern and eastern boundaries of the Reserve and has itself submitted a proposal for expansion. Both the OC3 and Wilpinjong mines would effectively operate with minimal buffer between open-cut excavation and this sensitive environmental area. In the case of OC3, a buffer of only 100 metres is proposed. This is wholly inadequate. A buffer of at least 500 metres should be required to provide any meaningful protection. It is difficult to understand how it can reasonably be asserted that there will be little or no negative impact on the birds, animals, vegetation, and groundwater systems of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve under such conditions. In addition to these environmental concerns, I wish to raise the following issues: Light and noise pollution: Residents of Kains Flat and surrounding areas are already experiencing significant light and noise pollution from the Wilpinjong mine. The addition of OC3, located even closer to Kains Flat, will undoubtedly exacerbate these impacts. Greenhouse gas emissions: The excavation and burning of an additional 30 million tonnes of coal from OC3 is estimated to generate approximately 65 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. This is inconsistent with both national and international efforts to reduce emissions and address climate change. Economic transition and regional planning: The continuation of coal extraction at this site until at least 2038 risks undermining investment in the newly established Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. If Regional NSW is to transition toward a more sustainable and resilient economic future, government decisions and those of its statutory bodies must align with forward-looking economic and environmental priorities. Cumulative impacts: The cumulative effect of continued mining in the region is deeply concerning. In addition to the Moolarben, Wilpinjong, and Ulan coal mines, Bowdens has received approval to develop a lead, silver, and zinc mine at Lue and holds exploration licences across substantial areas of Bara, Botobolar, and Kains Flat. The combined impact of these developments must be properly assessed. National interest: It is also worth noting that coal is not listed by the Australian Government as a critical mineral. Given this, it is reasonable to question what long-term benefit this expansion provides to the Australian public. In my view, the benefit appears negligible at best when weighed against the environmental and social costs. Before the Commission makes its determination, I respectfully request that the community be provided with a guarantee of a genuinely independent, transparent, and scientifically rigorous assessment of the potential impacts of this proposal on biodiversity and groundwater systems in and around the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Opposing Expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine, New South Wales To whom it may concern, I write as a medical practitioner in New South Wales to formally oppose the approval of the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. My concerns are grounded in both the direct health impacts of coal mining and the broader public health consequences of climate change. From a clinical perspective, coal mining poses well-established risks to respiratory and cardiovascular health. Mining operations generate particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides, and other pollutants associated with increased rates of asthma exacerbations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular events, and premature mortality. Communities living near coal extraction and transport corridors bear a disproportionate exposure burden. As a doctor, I routinely see the impact that poor air quality has on vulnerable populations — particularly children, older adults, and those with pre-existing medical conditions. I have had vulnerable patients die because of the impact of pollution on their lung disease. Beyond local pollution, the most significant concern is the contribution of new coal projects to climate change. The health consequences of climate change are no longer theoretical — they are presenting daily in clinical practice. Increasing temperatures are associated with higher rates of heat stress, dehydration, renal impairment, and cardiovascular strain. In addition, there is robust evidence that mental health presentations increase during periods of extreme heat. From a psychiatric perspective, hotter days are associated with: - Increased emergency department presentations for acute mental illness - Exacerbation of mood disorders and psychosis - Increased anxiety and distress - Higher rates of substance use relapse - Elevated suicide risk during heatwaves As a psychiatrist working within the NSW health system, I am acutely aware that our services already operate under strain. We simply do not have the resources to cope with extra mental health presentations and crises from rising temperatures. Climate-related stressors — including prolonged heat, bushfire smoke exposure, and disaster events — are increasing the psychological burden on individuals and communities. Approving new fossil fuel developments that lock in future emissions directly contributes to these escalating pressures. The approval of further coal extraction is inconsistent with the obligation to protect public health, particularly when safer energy alternatives exist. Health is not an abstract externality; it is the core responsibility of public policy. Decisions made now will shape the environmental conditions that determine the physical and mental wellbeing of current and future generations. I feel as a doctor that it is my responsibility to advocate against dangers to public health, such as the proposed extension to the Moolarben Coal Complex. For these reasons, I strongly urge the decision-making authority to reject the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. Protecting public health requires decisive action to reduce fossil fuel dependence, not expand it. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] |
Marisa Koszta
|
ID |
23941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Chair, I’m a woman in regional NSW, a mother and grandmother. I work full time and travel every day and watch the evidence of disappearing landscape, less habitats, less protection with excess roadkill and costly insurance. We plough through with little respect for the consequences. It is with sadness that I write to you. I do hope my letter will resonate with you and your understanding of an environment like numerous that should not be lost to further mining. There seems to be again the short sighted application for this expansion of the Moolarben mine. One would imagine that the company would invest in the rehabilitation and moving to renewable energy, rather than destroying a integral ecosystem~ a critical and important habitat to future proof. Isn’t there a case more than ever needed, now, that the chair consciencely make a decision to not approve the expansion, you have the power. “The Drip” could carry on into the future because of wise decisions, to protect and future proof for my grandchildren and theirs plus cultural investments that may carry on through time. The refuge for flora, fauna, microscopic life forms the education for all in the future and a place to rest and embrace nature at its best. Science has provided us with the evidence of the irreversible purge of greenhouse gases generated and therefore responsible for extremities of whether events. It would be a game changer to see Moolarben embrace a green energy option, show the world what can be achieved when taking a positive business change - inject money into employment to decommission a coal mine that has expired and spend the money building renewables. Thank you for your time. Yours Sincerly Marisa Koszta |
Uzma Rayani
|
ID |
23946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2009 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Uzma, I am a 42 year old Professional in Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states due to the climate impacts being felt in Australia, and globally. I see the increased rates of wild fires, flooding and other natural disasters that are causing loss of lives and livelihoods in South Asia, the America's, and here in Australia. We are seeing biodiversity reduced across the globe and it deeply saddens me that my country, Australia, is directly and indirectly responsible for these atrocities. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: - Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Please do not permanently destroy our biodiversity. - Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. - Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. - Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. Additionally, the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Uzma Rayani |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am greatly upset that this is being pushed ahead inspite of damage to the environment and the local community. Please do not go ahead with this. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my deep concern and formal objection to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 extension. Beyond the technical data, I am heartbroken by the proposed destruction of our shared natural heritage. I urge the Commission to consider the following: *A Sanctuary Under Threat: The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is a rare pocket of silence and wilderneThe Moolarben complex already has enough coal to last until 2038. There is no moral or environmental justification for this extension. I ask the Commission to choose the survival of our ecosystems over the expansion of a dying industryss. Allowing a massive open-cut pit within 100 metres of its border is an act of environmental negligence that will scar this landscape for centuries. *Silence of the Bush: We are in a biodiversity crisis. To knowingly clear 113 hectares of Koala habitat and the homes of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater is to accept the permanent silencing of our native birds and wildlife for short-term profit. *Water is Life: In an increasingly dry continent, our groundwater and creeks (like Moolarben Creek) are sacred. We cannot risk the lifeblood of this land for coal that we no longer need to power our future. *Generational Responsibility: As a citizen, I feel a profound responsibility to protect what remains. Adding 64 million tonnes of CO2 into our atmosphere is a step backward at a time when we should be healing the planet for our children, not further wounding it. *The Moolarben complex already has enough coal to last until 2038. There is no moral or environmental justification for this extension. I ask the Commission to choose the survival of our ecosystems over the expansion of a dying industry. |
Denise Turner
|
ID |
23961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2578 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarben OC3 expansion for the following reasons: This expansion would clear 113 hectares of native bushland which is known habitat for Koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and micro bats. Biodiversity and species survival should be prioritised over short term coal mining expansion. Preservation of this habitat is especially significant because it is within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Species survival is dependent upon area size and linkage of habitats. Scientists are warning of the catastrophic impacts of Climate Change. We are already experiencing climate warming and unless carbon emissions are reduced the impacts will worsen. This expansion would increase carbon pollution by around 64 million tonnes. We cannot allow this expansion to proceed. The time has come for us to prioritise the future of our children over short term economic gain. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted], I am from Sydney I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. My objection is based on the climate impacts for future generations . We can already feel the impact of climate change from increasing hot summers and drought and need to address these issues by moving away from fossil fuels to more sustainable energy sources such as wind and solar I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Monika Maria Doepgen
|
ID |
23971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6640 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a concerned citizen and very worried about the increase of greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal and deforestation, which accelerates climate change. Which causes more severe weather events like extreme heatwaves, flooding and droughts. I am objecting to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country because of the potential harm to the environment. Biodiversity - Threatened wildlife and vegetation The project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. The coal mine extension would be deforesting huge areas of vital habitat for endangered koalas, critically endangered Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and over 400 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the Large-eared Pied Bat and Eastern Cave Bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those threatened bat species. Greenhouse gas emissions - contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. Water resources - Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. The proponent has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Other - Irreversible harm to Wiradjuri Cultural Heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. Other - Offsets Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. This incredibly biodiverse rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Other - Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Other - Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. For the reasons outlined above, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Our future generations deserve to enjoy all our unique and beautiful wildlife as we have been fortunate enough to do so. The last minute minor amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the mine footprint or the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to OBJECT to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Project Number SSD-33083358. Please see the attached submission document which details my objection. |
|
Attachments |
23976_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 65.95 KB) |
Leila Mangos
|
ID |
23981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2117 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Leila Mangos, I grew up in regional NSW and now live in Sydney's Western suburbs, and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the the irreversible damage climate change and non-renewable mining will have on our precious ecosystems, our coasts, First Nation's sovereignty and culture, and future generation's quality of life. All of my friends and family at home on the Central Coast NSW and my community in Sydney are aware of the direct link between coal mining and an unsustainable economic and environmental future, with many already experiencing the health impacts of heatwaves, have had homes damaged by frequent dangerous weather, and have bushfire anxieties, namely friends on the Central Coast whose homes were immensely at risk by the recent Koolewong fires. I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Leila Mangos Dundas Valley NSW 2117 |
Michelle Griffiths
|
ID |
23986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to you, to oppose Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion, near Mudgee, NSW. It may have economic benefits but I am deeply concerned about the environmental and ecological impacts such an expansion would have on the region. Yancoal proposes to clear 480 to over 600 hectares of woodland. This includes between 113 to 480 hectares which is critical habitat for koalas, 80 hectares which is critical habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and 106 hectares which is critical habitat for the endangered Gang-gang Cockatoo. The Broad-headed Snake is another endangered species found in the proposed area to be mined along with large-eared Pied Bats and Eastern Cave bats. At least 23 species have been recorded in the area, many of which are endangered. We should do everything in our power to protect the environment rather than expand a coal mine which would operate for ten years at the risk of losing species that are already endangered. Australia has one of the worst extinction rates in the world, so it's time we chart a new course, one in which our natural world is not disregarded or taken for granted but given priority. Once the habitat is cleared, there's no getting it back. It's gone and so too, the endangered wildlife. In Yancoal's Rehabilitation Management Plan, they stipulate on page 19 with regards to water quality the following:- • Water retained on site is fit for the intended land use (s) for the post-mining domain(s). • The potential ecological, hydrological and geomorphic impacts from post-mining water discharges on receiving creeks are assessed and appropriate mitigation measures are effectively implemented as part of the closure plan. These points are vague with regards to water quality which is essential for the health and well- being of nature and human life. Mine rehabilitation often fails to prevent long-term water contamination because, while surface landscapes may be restored ( although never to how they were), underground voids or waste piles continue to generate contaminant such as acid mine drainage (AMD) that leach into groundwater and surface water for decades or centuries after closure. The expansion could further risk water contamination which is vital for nature and human health alike and therefore, should be avoided despite Yancoal's mitigation measures which are not guaranteed. The Berrima Colliery, Medway, NSW, closed in 2013 and it is still discharging polluted water into the Wingecarribee River which is completely unacceptable. The expanded coal mine is estimated to increase greenhouse gas emissions by 64 Million tonnes despite Yancoal believing their efficient mining practices will minimise emissions. This is not ideal for our environment or our climate and the additional emissions would be inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. As an Australian who cares for our natural world, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to unequivocally take a stand for our natural world and its vulnerability, which is priceless and irreplaceable and henceforce recommend the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be denied. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours Sincerely, Michelle Griffiths |
Vivian Harris
|
ID |
23991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2112 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing to strongly object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. From what I’ve read, the impacts on the environment, local water systems, cultural heritage and the surrounding community would be both significant and irreversible. One of my biggest concerns is the plan to clear more than 113 hectares of koala habitat—an area where koalas are actually living and breeding. It’s not just koalas at risk either; this extension would also destroy habitat for Regent Honeyeaters, microbats, the Broad headed Snake, and other threatened species. These ecosystems are already under huge pressure and once this habitat is gone, it is gone forever. Offsetting is in no way a replacement for a functioning, living ecosystem. I’m also very concerned about how close the mine would come to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, apparently only 100 metres distance in some places. That reserve is one of the most important refuges for wildlife in the region. In addition, the noise, blasting and vibration impacts have not been properly assessed. It is simply irresponsible and risky to push industrial activity so close to such a sensitive area. On top of that, the project is expected to add around 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already behind on its own climate targets. Approving a new coal expansion really is totally out of step with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act and the national commitments we have made under the Paris Agreement. There are also real risks to local water. This includes long term groundwater drawdown, potential impacts on Moolarben Creek and threats to groundwater dependent ecosystems that wildlife rely on, particularly during times of drought. These concerns don’t appear to have been addressed in a meaningful way in the proposed development plans. Given the state of our climate, the ongoing biodiversity crisis as well as the lack of any clear public benefit from this proposal, this project is detrimental to the people, land, flora and fauna of NSW. For all these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Thankyou for your consideration. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I object to the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate impacts being felt in local rural areas. Climate change has resulted, for example, in more frequent and sudden flooding of a friend's place in the Ourimbah Creek catchment area on the Central Coast (thus damaging/eroding). This in turn has damaged habitat for critically endangered species such as the Platypus, koala, spotted quoll and many other species in the local area. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause irreversible Environmental harm, affecting climate and rural community, and should not be approved. This unique biodiverse area would best be added to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and, actually be protected not exploited. My reasons are :- Threatened species and habitat loss due to clearing of 113+ hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining (blasting etc) proposed in extremely close proximity of 100 metres of the reserve. Water / Groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown risking Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems; these are critical drought fauna refuges. Climate impacts - an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions exacerbating the fact NSW will not meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. No clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining around Mudgee, where renewable energy development is the priority. Overall, our NSW Government cannot afford to approve expanding coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Therefore, I seek the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your consideration. Yours Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, As someone who grew up in Sydney's Western suburbs, and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, due to the the irreversible damage climate change and non-renewable mining will have on our precious ecosystems, our coasts, First Nation's sovereignty and culture, and future generation's quality of life. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I grew up in Wagga Wagga and now live on the regional Central Coast of NSW, and all my life, bush, waterways and biodiverse environments have enriched my quality of life and my community. We have the immense responsibility to protect ecosystems at risk. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, due to the the irreversible damage climate change and non-renewable mining will have on our precious ecosystems, our coasts, First Nation's access to sacred sights, and future generation's quality of life. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission Re: Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension- under consideration I am a parent, and social worker/counsellor in private practice, serving the Mudgee region. I have lived in Mudgee now for twenty years, and have raised four children here- three of whom were born in Mudgee, the youngest is in upper primary school. I am concerned about this proposal and argue that it should not be approved. The negative impacts on our climate, and on our local environment are significant. I’m concerned about the impact of the coal to be mined on global heating, and the impacts on inland Australia, including the Mudgee region, of these impacts. It’s often argued by industry locally that these local proposals have trivial impact. This is not the case. The amount of coal mined in the Mudgee and surrounding regions shipped out of Newcastle is very significant and measurably worsens CO2 emissions. The argument that as the coal is for export, Australians and our governing bodies are not responsible for the resultant emissions, is a ridiculous argument. The only purpose of mining coal is to burn it. CO2 emissions are the inevitable result. The bushland which would be impacted is crucial habitat for many species, especially a breeding population of koalas, the threatened Regent Honeyeater, as well as microbat species which are important for the ecosystem. There has been pressure in Mudgee and surrounds to suppress, rather than research, report on, and protect, information about the koala breeding population in the proposed site and nearby (including on land under threat from other companies’ mine proposals). The proposal to mine up to 100m from the border of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is very concerning as it is clear that the reserve will be impacted. Water requirements and the risk of groundwater contamination are also of concern to me. Whilst the company applying doubtless has a financial interest in this ‘extension’, or new section of mining, being approved, the disadvantages for the community are too great. It is not an appropriate juncture to be expanding coal mining- particularly in an area of such ecological significance where the environmental harms to critical species are so great. Additionally I argue against the acceptance of the amendments to the proposal. The request to amend the proposal while the engagement and consultation process is underway is disruptive to the process. The proposal should be considered in its originally submitted form, or alternatively withdrawn, and re-submitted in its new form following the appropriate process. The amendments do not address the significant impacts on threatened species and the effect of seeking to include this information at such a late stage is to undermine effective community consultation on the proposal. I therefore argue that both the inclusion of the amendment, and the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my concerns Sincerely [redacted] |
Adrienne Murphy
|
ID |
24021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mining Extension Project near Mudgee for the reasons outline below. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Further, the amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2281 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Expansion of this coal mine is an act of environmental vandalism on many fronts. Destroying habitat fair Koalas and endangered birds like the regent honeyeaters. This expansion is contrary to Labours own stated laws to protect biodiversity and limit greenhouse gas emissions. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Without the ability to share in a public hearing, I am writing in response to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension project by Yancoal on Wiradjuri Country. My name is [name redacted], an Australian who enjoys spending time outdoors, and am passionate about protecting the natural environment. I am a strong believer in doing good for people and the planet, including Australia’s native biodiversity. I often volunteer in conservation efforts such as beach and park clean ups and tree plantings. I am deeply concerned about expanding and continuing coal mining in NSW and across Australia. Climate change is real, its impacts already expansive and worsening, and this proposal goes in the direct opposite direction of a safer, cleaner future for all. I object the proposal and am disappointed the public hearing became postponed indefinitely. This project would cause irreversible harm onto our environment, climate, and community. I urge you to not approve Yancoal’s project. This rich biodiverse area should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. My concerns include: 1. Demolition of natural ecosystems and risks onto waterways, There’s no sensible justification for clearing native vegetation and biodiversity. Such actions result in further worsened conditions for threatened species such as koalas, regent honeyeaters, and microbats who currently live there . No offset actions can replace the habitat of these already threatened species. The area is the home and breeding location for these beautiful innocent creatures and permanently destroying it would cause irreversible damage. No amount of commitments by Yancoal to replant trees and flora would recreate what we have currently – 113ha of koala habitat, 80ha of regent honeyeater habitat, and 401ha of the nationally endangered box gum woodland ecosystem. The risks are known and recognised by the NSW Environment Department, and destroying Australia’s biodiversity will be in direct contradiction of protection and conservation. To approve this project without adequate groundwater monitoring studies reveals how communities are not a focus for Yancoal. Further, such studies’ completion should occur well prior to a project’s approval, not after. 2. Lack of public benefit, Australia is seeking to move away from coal mining, instead focusing on renewal energy projects. At the same time, Asian economies have been predicted to move away from relying on Australia’s exports of thermal coal. Surely, this project, with lasting environmental damage, little economic benefit, and costs significantly outweighing any claimed public benefit must not be approved. 3. Harm onto Wiradjuri cultural heritage, Yancoal’s project will destroy over 50 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, with potential to damage many more. According to the Registered Aboriginal Parties, all have high cultural value, and ignoring and openly going against their advice, knowledge, and perspectives will be detrimental. Already, the natural landscape is fracturing, undermining the Wiradjuri community’s ability to connect, practice culture, and maintain connection to Country. Protecting and preserving sacred sites should be the minimal action done. The Independent Planning Commission must not approve the proposal. Any approval risks a destruction of sacred sites – something happening far too often. We know and see the consequences forever felt in Western Australia on Puutu Kunti Kurrama Pinikura Country when the Juukan Gorge was destroyed. From loss of Country with deep cultural and spiritual significance, as well as sacred artefacts, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to not allow the same to occur here in NSW. 4. A complete disregard for the estimated >64.6m tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. An absence in acknowledging or applying any consideration onto the NSW Climate Change Act, Paris Agreement, the Denman Court of Appeal decision, to me, heightens the lack of care in the ecological, social, and economic costs of greenhouse gas emissions Yancoal would produce. Continued approvals of mining projects contradicts NSW climate goals. The estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions is enormous and unwanted, in fact, unwanted globally. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your time reviewing my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Harry Mangos
|
ID |
24036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2250 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, due to the the irreversible damage climate change and non-renewable mining will have on our precious ecosystems, our coasts, First Nation's Peoples access to sacred sites, and future generation's quality of life. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Harry |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2217 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear IPC NSW, I have considered the Assessment Report prepared by the Department along with the recommended conditions of consent for the Moolarben coal complex extension project ( "the mine extension application"). The recommended conditions of consent are grossly inadequate. They fail in a meaningful way to deal with the highly detrimental impacts upon threatened species and biodiversity, the expected considerable greenhouse gas emissions, and significant groundwater draw down, proposed by the mine extension application. The recommended conditions of consent effectively have nothing to say about the impact of scope 1 to scope 3 GHG emissions locally, and generally upon NSW residents. That the scope 3 GHG emissions will be burnt internationally doesn't minimize their significant, negative impact upon me and other NSW residents, as it is trite to say we all share the same atmosphere (and the same planet). The mine extension application proposes substantial, irreversible and detrimental impacts upon the Box Gum critically endangered community, critically endangered Regents honey-eater, critically endangered Swift parrot, endangered Gang Gang parrot, the koala (which is at risk of being extinct in the wild in NSW by 2050), squirrel glider, pink-tailed legless lizard and broad headed snake, among other species from the clearing of these communities and habitats. The primary response of the recommended conditions of consent to the losses of these individual species and ecological communities, some critically endangered, is the retiring of biodiversity offset credits and payments. The NSW Audit Office, and other bodies at a state and federal level, have established that biodiversity offset credits fail to protect NSW species and biodiversity. Respectfully, the proposed harm and damage to the affected species and ecological communities is unacceptable, irreversible and can't be "off set" in the manner envisaged in the recommended conditions of consent. It follows that I object to the mine extension application. I respectfully request that the Commission reject the mine extension application, including on the following grounds: 1. Its serious, irreversible impact upon endangered and threatened species and ecological communities, and upon local biodiversity generally, particularly the box gum woodland, regent honey eater, koala, swift parrot, broad headed snake and micro-bat species. 2. The 64.6 million of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions that it will generate over its life that will have an enormous, clearly negative impact. NSW is already failing to meet its GHG emissions targets. Approval of the mine extension application will be inconsistent with NSW's GHG emission targets, and with meeting the Paris Agreement targets, as the Net Zero Commission recently found. It will also be inconsistent with the short term to long term interests of the people of NSW. Respectfully, it is difficult to understand how the mine extension application can be recommended, or approved, on this ground alone in light of the current, dangerous impacts of climate change upon the state of NSW and its residents. 3. The expected groundwater draw down of up to 5 metres, its detrimental impact upon Moorlaben Creek, and its negative impacts upon ground water dependent ecosystems. It is inadequate that the applicant proposes an amendment to undertake 12 months of ground water monitoring studies before the commencement of mining. The Department assessment report and the evidence also does not support that approval of the mine extension application is necessary for jobs in the local community and the region, let alone that there is an overall benefit in the approval of the project for the region or NSW. |
Chantelle Leenstra
|
ID |
24046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia has a Net Zero Commision and agreed to the Paris Agreement. Allowing this expansion is not in agreement with either of these and so must be denied. |
Benjamin Patch
|
ID |
24051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia's pristine environment and unique wildlife is under threat of further irreparable damage due to the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine being operated by Yancoal. As somebody who has spent much time in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and met with Wiradjuri people to whom this area is significant, the thought that the beautiful honey eater birds there may be pushed closer to extinction makes me think: will the externalities of this mine expansion will be held to the level of priority they deserve? Nothing can replace the Creating four new open cut pits when Australia has just committed to 62-70% emission reductions by 2035 is a clear contradiction. Actions would not be aligned with promises. The false dichotomy of "renewable energy vs. economic prosperity" is exactly that: a false dichotomy created by large mining companies and those with whom their interests align, to try to convince us that devastating projects like this expansion are necessary. Let us not allow Australia to regress further behind the next generation of energy production. Let us protect the wildlife and the culturally significant land. Let us pivot our economy to one that is more beneficial to all. Let us cancel this coal mine expansion. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], I am a musician living in Southern Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW. The impacts we are already feeling from the climate crisis should be obvious enough reason to say no to more coal. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] |
Peter Bennett
|
ID |
24061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired doctor and I believe the scientific evidence that says that we must move away from reliance on fossil fuels for energy. I believe that expansion of coal mines in NSW is a betrayal of our children's and grandchildren's futures, both because of the destruction of the natural environment and because of the cumulative effect on our climate. In addition this proposal will permanently destroy sites of cultural heritage significance. The time has come to try to preserve what we still have and not to continue clearing native bush for financial profit. I ask that this proposal, the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project, be refused |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired medical practitioner and I live in NSW. I write to express my alarm at the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine by Yancoal. Apart from the unsightly destruction of the environment and the associated risks to wildlife and their habitat, coal mining will inevitably result in increased particulate matter/coal dust in the air from fugitive emissions. There is a known association between the chronic inhalation of small particles and lung and heart disease, as well as other health problems. Lung and heart disease are already common in a number of rural areas in NSW. Increased exposure to coal dust can be expected to worsen the problem. A recent visit that I made to Newcastle revealed that coal dust exposure was also a problem there, because of fugitive emissions from the coal loading facilities. Of additional concern to me is climate change and the potentially devastating effects that this will have on our world – already, changed weather patterns (including worsening heat waves, drought and cyclones), bushfires and flooding are having major effects in Australia and elsewhere in the world. Adverse impacts on our health and our health systems will increase, and health services will be unable to respond adequately without significant investment to increase their resilience in the face of this threat. The burning of fossil fuels such as coal is a major contributor to climate change – extracting coal, gas and oil from the ground and burning them has to be reduced and stopped as soon as possible for our children and grandchildren to have any chance of a safe and healthy future on this planet. To me, it makes no sense for Australia to keep on strongly supporting industries that we know cause harm. As stated in the ‘Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report’ published in December 2025 by the NSW Government Net Zero Commission: ’Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.’ The transition to clean energy sources must be much quicker. The coal mining industry employees only a small proportion of the Australian working population – far fewer than, say, health. As coal mining and other fossil fuel extraction hopefully winds down and stops, as it must, it is important that all those who work in these industries and their families are supported and given every opportunity to find suitable alternative skilled employment with similar financial benefits. Renewable energy projects could have a key role in providing employment. Finally, as is the case with many Australian fossil fuel miners, Yancoal has overseas owners. Whilst coal mines have local employees and associated supporting businesses, the large majority of coal mining profits from Australian mining are sent overseas and do not benefit Australia. |
|
Attachments |
NZC_Coal_Spotlight_Report_2025.pdf (PDF, 7.56 MB) |
Calum Harvey-Scholes
|
ID |
24071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2517 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached. |
|
Attachments |
24071 - Calum Harvey-Scholes_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 67.83 KB) |
Helen Hudson
|
ID |
24076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Submission from Dr Helen Hudson, age 76, retired Science teacher and concerned grandparent. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This should not be approved. The expansion of coal mining in NSW is outrageous for the following reasons 1.Climate change We are already dealing with serious impacts of climate change and the situation can only get worse unless serious efforts are made to reduce the burning of fossil fuels. My concern is that once we reach the tipping point, it will be impossible to prevent the effects of climate change and the damage done. 2 . Ecosystem destruction. It is important that we preserve habitat for native species. . This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. 3. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. 4. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. 5. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. In Summary The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Helen Hudson |
|
Attachments |
24076 - Helen Hudson.pdf (PDF, 56.52 KB) |
Jann Dark
|
ID |
24081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2065 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a resident of Northern Sydney and a member of the Lane Cove Bushland and Conservation Society and previously the Lane Cove Coal and Gas Watch. I am very concerned about global warming and despair every time I see a proposal for more thermal coal mines and expansions of coal mines. For this reason I am writing to you to express my opposition to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are all affected by coal mining and the greenhouse gasses emitted by burning coal, no matter where we live. I suffer during heat waves in Sydney, my energy bills grow, my cost of living rises as food becomes more expensive due to the pressure extreme weather events put on farming. My mental health also worsens as I see governments continue to ignore the science and allow coal mining to continue, and I see here and around the world, people suffering from climate related disasters and environments destroyed. Every time a new or expansion of a coal mine is approved we delay transition to safer cleaner renewable energy, both here and overseas. Too many people in Australia and around the world are suffering, and dying, from the impacts of global warming. Estimations are that this expansion will add 64 tons of climate pollution into the atmosphere. NSW and Australia, have no hope of achieving climate targets at this rate. Too much land in the Hunter Valley and surrounds has been destroyed for coal mining. This mine expansion endangers 113 hectares of Koala habitat as well as Regent Honeyeater and the micro bats that live in the area. Indigenous cultural heritage is also at risk, as well as ecosystems and water sources and the beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Mudgee is situated within a growing renewable energy zone that promises to provide around 2,000 jobs. Any jobs claims made by Yancoal cannot be taken seriously. Sales forecasts for coal show falling demand. According to The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, "renewable energy has overtaken coal in global electricity generation for the first time in history …” Future jobs in coal look risky and what is the point of destroying land, habitat and water resources, and polluting the planet for an industry that faces serious downsize risks. For the sake of future generations, and present Australians, who are routinely on the frontline of climate disasters, please do not approve this coal mine extension. |
Hayden McLean
|
ID |
24086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I object to the ongoing development of the Moolarben Coal Complex given its proposed impacts on biodiversity and fresh ground water dependency within the area, with specific focus on the destruction of Indigenous sacred sites within the Mudgee region. Not only is the proposed development against the established Labor government policy (Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023) and the commitments made by the Federal Government at the Paris Climate Summit it reduces confidence in the ability of State and Federal Governments to enact real, lasting and substantive environmental protection action. The brunt of this failure will be borne by the local fauna and flora of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to which the proposed site will have devastating impact upon. The site of development includes 113 hectares of native breeding habitat of koala populations who are already facing dwindling numbers nationwide due to the effects of ongoing climate liquidation. Several other species of charismatic mammals and unique reptilia are also at imminent risk of collapse if the proposed increase to the MCC were to be approved. It is our duty to protect these animals whose uniqueness will not be seen again if their populations drop below recoverable numbers. The deforestation of natural habitats is not the only factor in the risks to these species as the proposed groundwater drawdown of a possible 6 metres has a continued environmental impact for additional 25 years after the closure of operations. This puts the local ecosystems at a critical risk of drought the importance of which is made further dire given the increasing temperatures made possible by increased Co2 emissions. The devastation on Indigenous cultural heritage alone should be enough to halt the development of the proposal as it will destroy 55 unique Aboriginal cultural artifacts further severing communities of the Wiradjuri people from their rightful and crucial connection to Country. These sacred sites are of importance not just to the people whose living legacy continues to this day but to the nation as a whole and must be preserved. Their uniqueness and cultural importance cannot be overstated. The proposed expansion to the MCC is not worth the destruction of our environment, of our animal species or of Wiradjuri history. It will not provide economic benefit to the community, not that there is a number of jobs that could possible be enacted that would justify such unjust and wanton destruction. It is therefore imperative that the IPC deny Yancoal's proposal unreservedly. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [redacted], and I'm a 25-year-old working in the healthcare sector. I volunteer for a health non-profit called Sweltering Cities, where for the past 2 years, I've encountered hundreds of stories of everyday Australians being housebound, getting extremely sick, and struggling to stay cool because of extreme heat caused by climate change. And these stories are increasingly becoming the norm. I'm writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 Mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I really worry that if we don't significantly restrict carbon emissions and protect our environment from unjustified mining activity, we will see irreversible damage to our homes and the community's well-being from the effects of burning more fossil fuels. Approval of this extension means destroying up to hundreds of hectares of habitats for important and threatened flora and fauna like the Regent Honey-eater, and the White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum. In which this biodiversity simply can't be offset. It means harming the cultural landscapes surrounding the Goulburn River and the Drip Gorge. Risking the potential destruction of 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts. It means producing another 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gases over the extension's lifetime. That's 58% of NSW's total annual emissions, on top of the fact that we are extremely behind on the NSW Climate Change Act and Paris Agreement targets. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Because to do so otherwise would be actively accelerating the devastating effects of climate change and threatening our home and communities. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards, [redacted] |
Amy Blain
|
ID |
24096 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Peoples Climate Assembly |
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2602 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Peoples Climate Assembly strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Expansion. The Net Zero Commission's December 2025 Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report found that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. There is a specific finding that: "Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. It is morally unethical to approve a coal expansion of this scale given the climate emergency. This coal mine would clear 113 hectares of habitat ‘critical to the survival of the koala in NSW’ of a climate resilient population. This area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve for its biodiversity values and protection; 23 threatened wildlife species have been recorded in and around the site. The mine proposed expansion would destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. There are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water. The Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, the cumulative impacts of expanding these three existing coal mines must be considered given their enormous impacts on climate, biodiversity, cultural heritage and water. |
Catherine Errey
|
ID |
24101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for this opportunity to make a submission. I am a past resident of the small community which lives on the banks of the Goulburn River surrounded by Goulburn River National Park at the end of Mogo Road. I realise that my strongest objection to the expansion of “Moorlarben Coal Complex” is the loss of cultural heritage. I realise the area may have cultural significance for Indigenous people but I am not able to speak to that. My family, however has a tradition of respect and appreciation of the flora , fauna and geology of Australia spanning at least 3 generations and likely five. When I am in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve I know that I am safe, I am loved, I am fully accepted. This is the gift of Spirit. I feel it more in some places than others and the country around Wollar is particularly special place for me. In this world of increasing complexity and conflict this ability to feel grounded, very alive and very present are real gifts which nourish us and promote good health. To protect the buffer between the current mine and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is to protect a place of cultural significance because of its inherent beauty and peacefulness in its current form. In my family there is a history of positive experience in the Munghorn Gap Scientific Research Station with students at High School and Tertiary level learning research skills at that venue. I believe this warrants maintaining for the students of the future. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is not a very large area so it is dependent of the nearby healthy bush land to maintain its current integrity. NSW has suffered persistent and ongoing loss of habitat since the arrival of the English colonisers. Each area has it’s unique array of plants and animals. The area that would be affected by the proposed mine expansion has great biodiversity including some threatened species. It is worth remembering that there is much yet to be discovered about the life that lives in such places. We have more to learn about invertebrates, bacteria and fungi for example. It is not unusual for new plants such as orchids to be discovered as such plants are not visible continuously but flourish with specific weather conditions that occur occasionally, or only after fires of certain temperatures. I do hope this land is protected from mine expansion and that we go on learning and being inspired by this diversity of life. I am very concerned about Climate Change and the consequences that future generations will face. Already it seems clear that our weather has become less predictable and more extreme. To reduce this escalating danger, scaling back the mining and use of foil fuels makes good sense. Australians are creative and resourceful people who will find solutions to these challenges if they are articulated and understood. We look to our Governments for leadership in this area at this time. Today I drove along Wollar Rd and learnt that the current Moorlarben mine is so close to the road that traffic movement is stopped when blasting goes ahead in certain parts of the mine site. This shows a lack of forethought in either planning or regulation and not enough buffer left to safely use the road while mining proceeds. I hope that such invasions into the use of our publicly owned facilities can be prevented in the future. Having lived beside the Goulburn River and learning of its beauty and restorative properties I am keen to see it protected now and into the distant future. I hope to be able to share my joy in this life giving water and its surrounds with my grandchildren and they with their children and grandchildren. I know that I am not alone in this and it is the hope of all people with a connection to land and waters that it can be protected to stay healthy for it’s own sake and for and descendants. Plants and animals need safe places to exist. While travelling from Mudgee to Wollar and the Goulburn River in the last 30 hours I encountered ducks, cockatoos, pigeons, an emu, coot, lyrebird, Willy wagtail, wrens, goannas and multiple lizards and kangaroos. Then there are the ants and dragonfly. The bush land currently in the area of the proposed mine expansion is likely also to be home to these and many more. I hope that the Government body which decides whether to allow the Moorlarben mine expansion or not, can appreciate the high cultural and health value of allowing this land to continue as it is. Thank you your consideration of my submission. The attached photo was taken in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2774 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission re Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 extension project – Feb 2026 To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a retired librarian, and occasional volunteer teacher in the Blue Mountains, and I am deeply concerned about the environment, and especially any expansion of coal mining, and climate impacts being felt in my area, and across NSW. I see school students already sitting through extreme heatwaves, energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing similar struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. Yancoal’s last-minute amendments to the proposal, do not reduce the mine footprint, or reduce any vegetation clearing. They propose offsite “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage has the affect of undermining the consultation process, and is a clear attempt to greenwash a damaging project. I am deeply concerned that this project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and believe it should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected for future generations. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine. In particular, I am concerned about: 1. Threatened species and habitat loss. This includes the clearing of 480 hectares of native vegetation where at least 23 threatened species have been recorded, and including over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. It would also clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which has warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. Biodiversity offsets cannot replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Re-growth take decades, old growth cannot ever be replaced. A tree cut down cannot be stuck back up. Nature doesn’t work like that. I implore you not to cut any trees down. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm and impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Mining is proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and there has not been an adequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Despite the NSW Environment Department acknowledging the severe impacts on threatened species, Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. Yancoal is not a good steward of the environment. Transparency about the serious impacts, and adequate assessments, must occur. The Commission and the Community must be told the truth. The impacts cannot be undone, or ‘offset’ out of mind. 3. A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. How could anyone contemplate a massive increase of emissions at such a time? 4. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by Yancoal’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is totally inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies must occur before a project is approved, not after. I expect that you will have experienced droughts and already know the devastating effects? This mine expansion is a disaster-in-waiting. 5. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 6. Lack of public benefit as the expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. It simply does not make economic sense to expand this mine. 7. The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. In summary, the proposed coal mine expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. This project will produce an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. There is also no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during the current climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For all the reasons noted above, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Jo Thomas
|
ID |
24111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My family has owned property at Kain's Flat for over forty years, and I wish to voice my objection to the proposed mine extension. My family's property is already affected by light and noise pollution from the existing mine operations in the area, and the proposed expansion would no doubt worsen those effects. We have long enjoyed visits to the nature reserves in the area, including Munghorn Gap, and have witnessed the threatened biodiversity in those reserves and on the family property as species, including now endangered Koalas, are forced to move further afield to find suitable habitat. When reading the hundreds of pages of documents relevant to this, I came to the not new, not revelatory, conclusion that the reams of data and information were not an attempt to justify this "minor" extension. Instead, it represents a concerted effort to "flood the zone", to distract, confuse, bore, exhaust and ultimately stifle any dissent to the project. I wonder at the time and effort put into justifying an extension, when the project can and should be rejected simply on principle. Coal is dying quickly as the transition to renewable and sustainable sources of energy proceeds much faster than was ever predicted when this mine commenced 15 years ago. The sooner Australia gets out of the coal industry entirely, the better for all Australians and for the planet. If the revenue it contributes is so necessary, perhaps governments could consider winding back the subsidies and concessions it currently grants to the various fossil fuel industries. * The supposed benefits of this project - like not leaving a hole at the existing OC3 site, or efficiently extracting coal with less fugitive emissions than some other mines - are not benefits to the local community, to NSW, to Australia, or to the planet. They are principally beneficial to the largely overseas owned mining company. The financial benefits are likely overstated and front loaded as the coal market internationally continues to die as demand and prices decline. The Department of Industry forecasts that export income from thermal coal is expected to fall in the next two years, despite increasing export volumes. (ref: https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/resources-and-energy-quarterly-december-2025). * The proposed OC3 project will denude, degrade and industrialise the land deep between two arms of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with only 100 metres from the edge of the cut to the reserve - not from the edge of industrialisation, just from the actual cut, contrary to the NSW NPWS recommendation of at least 500 metres. The ongoing industrial activity disturbance will continue 24/7. The idea that this will not substantially affect wildlife wanting to stay in, or move around, the reserve is fanciful to say the least, even if remnants of critical habitat are preserved, and could only be suggested by someone who has not lived within 100 metres of the lip of an open cut coal mine. Also, I note that the 81ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat discussed on P41 of the IPCN assessment of the revised project is incorrect. It is clear from Table 8, P31 of that report that 103ha is proposed to be "disturbed", with the 81ha being the reduction from the earlier proposal of 184ha of destruction. * Having the Yancoal's "independent" expert opine that this further incremental destruction of the environment will not "contribute significantly" (significantly: in a sufficiently great or important way as to be worthy of attention) to extinction (6.1.6.2/119, P39 of the IPCN assessment), while CPHR believes the opposite (6.1.6.2/118, P38), is hardly surprising and not convincing. When even the DPHI admits the impacts on biodiversity would be "substantial" (substantial: of considerable importance, size or worth) (6.1.7/219, P 63), this is clearly a game of semantics, not an objective assessment. In every instance the concerns of the miners trump the concerns of the community. * It is acknowledged that the project will contribute to climate change, but this also appears to be considered unimportant (Assessment Para 438, P112) * Yancoal's contention that the 100m buffer they propose is reasonable because that is what other local miners do is an ingenuous race to the bottom of environmental management. And finally, and especially, I object not only to this project, but to the way the mining companies drip feed their "amendments" - this is the 17th for this project - so that each bite of the cherry can be independently assessed as "insignificant" under rules that refuse to see the project in its overall context, until the tiny amount remaining itself becomes the justification for taking it just to finish the job - just as the OC3 extension is proposed to fill in the hole currently left by the OC3 to date. Just say no. |
Elizabeth Weiss
|
ID |
24116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the extension of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine on the following grounds: - Yancoal's amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or its clearing of native vegetation. These offsite so-called 'habitat enhancement' does not adequately mitigate the very significant negative impact its mine extension would have on biodiversity. The mine extension covers habitat of multiple threatened species in a landscape which should be treated as a nature reserve, rather than destroyed for a mine. - Yancoal's very late amendments are suggestive of a token effort to give the nod to the planning process rather than genuine intention to minimise environmental impact. - The so-called 'habitat enhancement' elsewhere would in no way offset the very substantial extra emissions generated by this mine expansion that would compromise NSW efforts to meet its carbon emission targets. |
Leonard Hobbs
|
ID |
24121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2147 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am objecting to the Moolarben coal mine. The area belongs in a protected nature reserve, there are 23 threatened species including koalas and the damage would be irreversible, with serious and long lasting risks to local water sources, and destroy and damage irreplaceable Aboriginal artefacts. In addition the expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity. I urge the IPC to refuse the proposed extension. Len Hobbs Seven Hills 2147 |
Alana W
|
ID |
24126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is (Redacted) ,and I am writing this letter as a concerned NSW resident in solidarity with the Mudgee community. As you are well aware , Yancoal is seeking approval to expand its’ Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations, causing not only extensive pollution but serious harm to threatened species, waterways and cultural heritage. The proposed expansion of the mine would extract an additional 40 million tonnes of thermal coal until 2034 and clear over 113 hectares of endangered koala habitat. It also extends close to the edge of one of the OLDEST conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The NSW government Environment and Heritage Group states that it is not koala habitats that would be threatened in the event of the expansion , but so too would four other animal species be at risk of extinction. For the sake of ecology, heritage, conservation and community impact , I heavily implore you to use refrain from the OC3 extension. Sincerely, (Redacted) |
Howard McCallum
|
ID |
24131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTION TO THE MOOLARBEN OC3 EXPANSION. To The Independent Planning Commission, I, Howard Leigh McCallum, am an Australian citizen, 71 years old, retired naval officer with 48 years’ service, father of four and grand-father to five children and still in very good health. I reside with my wife Carmel near Nowra, in the beautiful Shoalhaven area of NSW. Carmel is a retired pharmacist and five-time federal election candidate for The Greens. We both share the same concerns for the future of humanity on this planet, especially with respect to the environment which supports and sustains us all. Therefore, I object to the plan to expand the Moolarben Open Cut 3 coal mine. The clearing of approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation for a company’s profit-making mining activity is, on its own, a travesty against the natural environment. Doing this to expand an existing coal mine is insane in the known climate-change circumstances. The IPCC declaration requires that no more coal mines be opened or expanded, among other harmful fossil fuel projects. It may be pertinent to note that Yancoal’s parent company, Yanzhou, is the fourth largest coal mining state-owned enterprise in the People's Republic of China. The loss of a large area of koala habitat is of major concern, as well as several other species’ habitat, some of which are endangered. Offset areas do not compensate the affected animals’ habitat loss – they cannot all be migrated to other areas – their ecosystems are always unique. The offset areas already have their own animals and biodiversity which may well be incompatible with those of the area to be cleared for Moolarben OC3. The country is moving towards the essential goal of zero greenhouse gas emissions. The Moolarben OC3 extension alone would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions to the Earth’s atmosphere. Building new coal and gas mines and extending current coal mines is going in the wrong direction. Such increase of coal and gas mining is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement, to which Australia has committed. As UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres said: Countries must progressively phase out fossil fuels, “moving to leave oil, coal and gas in the ground, where they belong.” For all the reasons I have listed above, and for all the reasons other anti-extension submissions have provided, I implore the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Sincerely, Howard McCallum Cambewarra, NSW, 2540 |
|
Attachments |
OBJECTION TO THE MOOLARBEN OC3 EXPANSION.docx (DOCX, 15.14 KB) |
Deborah Stevenson
|
ID |
24136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2537 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have attached my submission. |
|
Attachments |
Submission on the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project D Stevenson Feb 2026.doc (DOC, 31.5 KB) |
Carmel McCallum
|
ID |
24141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to Independent Planning Commission re Moolarben Open Cut 3 Mine Expansion Application 17th February, 2026 To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Carmel McCallum, and I am an Australian citizen, born in Darlinghurst, Sydney in 1955. I am married to Howard, who served for forty-eight years in the Royal Australian Navy, initially as a helicopter pilot, then in administrative roles. In the 1980s, we were posted to California, USA, for two and a half years, where we travelled considerably on the western coast and to Canada, seeing beautiful national parks which had been isolated from development and mining, because of their beauty and value to the whole world, not just for Americans. We now have five very young grandchildren and five older step-grandchildren. We want to see them grow up to have more faith in governments to protect the environment, and make policy which has more positive long-term benefits for their future. I had a career as a pharmacist, working in many regions in NSW, in many pharmacies and owning my own pharmacy for ten years, in the beautiful Shoalhaven on the South Coast of NSW. I mothered four children who all appreciate the unique and fragile nature of the Australian landscape and its flora and fauna. I have run for The Greens for federal elections, five times, twice in Macquarie - in the Blue Mountains, Hawkesbury, and out to Bathurst and Oberon - and three times for Gilmore - encompassing the area from Minnamurra to Tuross Head. We live with a magnificent view of a rock face and temperate rainforest which changes continually over the day and over the year. It is truly a privilege to be able to live in such a place. There are two main reasons I put my hand up to run for parliament to become a local representative. The first is to protect our environment from the ravages of climate change, caused by our overuse of fossil fuels, and secondly, because there seems to be almost no political will to act in good faith by governments to make big cuts in our greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), because of the influence by lobbyists from fossil fuel companies, mining companies, and large finance companies, seeking high but relatively short-term profits from our domestic use, and our exports, of Australian-owned resources. I want to object to the approval of extending the Moolarben Coal Mine by Yancoal. I also want to object to the postponement of the IPC hearing, as the consultation process already conducted will be undermined, and the proposed amendments appear to be a Greenwash attempt to convince the IPC that there will be minimal damage to the native vegetation which is frankly, impossible. The area, which would come to within 100 metres of a conservation area including the Munghorn Nature Gap Reserve, proposed for extension is currently a beautiful valley, protecting the critical habitat of koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats, threatening the ecosystems, including 23 threatened species, water resources and cultural heritage of Wiradjuri Country. This area should continue to be left in its natural state, instead of being destroyed for short term gain for a few, and robbed from future generations. With the automation of mining, the expansion will not contribute to employment or benefit the local communities, unlike the renewable energy projects proposed in the Mudgee area, which will be providing around 2,000 jobs. Most of the advanced countries which Yancoal claims will be receiving the exports will be well on the way to reducing their own emissions and will be unlikely to be in demand for thermal coal for energy production not too long into the future. It would be an even greater tragedy if the project becomes a white elephant while causing destruction which could never be rehabilitated, let alone the potential damage to groundwater and creeks in the area. We would also lose Wiradjuri culture and heritage, which is still inestimable; a lesson we should have learned from the unbelievable negligence by Rio Tinto in Western Australia at the Juukan Gorge caves. It is just NOT justifiable for a single mine to contribute 58% of NSW greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the mine, when it goes against the NSW government’s commitment to GHGE reductions and our commitment to the Paris Agreement. We do not need to be exporting, or burning domestically, coal, with the knowledge of the absolutely proven science of impending climate change. No taxes by our government, or royalties payable to our government, justifies the destruction of a beautiful diverse area by a company which has ties with a parent company, Yanzhou Coal, registered as a state-owned enterprise in China, a foreign communist dictatorship. There is already enough ‘long-term damage for short-term gain ‘ mining and mining expansion happening in the same area. The same species of flora and fauna, many threatened, underground water and creeks, and Wiradjuri her image and culture, have already been damaged and lost by mining. Why do we need to take all the coal and leave nothing for the future, when, owing to unpredictable events, future generations may have a desperate need to return to archaic and out-mode methods of energy production. I would be very upset if a huge ‘foreign’ mining company was to apply for approval in our area on the beautiful South Coast, or indeed, in the wonderful Blue Mountains, for both of which, I have a very fond love and affection. Production of energy using coal to propel a ‘Steam Engine’ first took place in 1700. It’s time we left this antique method behind. The NSW Government must not approve this expansion application by Yancoal for many reasons, including climate change and its threat to biodiversity, but also because of the hypocrisy regarding the regulations set out in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and our national signatory to the Paris Agreement. Please consider all the long-term aspects of destruction if this mine expansion is approved, and so I urge the IPC to reject the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Mine Expansion. Thank you for reading my submission and taking my arguments into consideration. Faithfully, Carmel McCallum (Redacted) |
Mrs Ritu Jain
|
ID |
24146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2194 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Independent Planning Commission, I'm against the OC3 expansion of the Moolarben Coalmine and my key points include: - The project threatens existing wildlife habbitat and risks the decline of animal population - The project is not alignedwith the 2030 and 2035 climate targets - The expansion is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement - There will be longlasting negative impacts to the exsting groundwater and the creek. I request that the OC3 expansion be stop immediately. Sincerely, Ritu Jain Campsie NSW 2194 |
Pamela Evans
|
ID |
24156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2036 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Water is the basis of life. The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project wants to go ahead without sufficient scientifically researched data on its effect on the water table. This is completely unacceptable. The DPHI has recommended data collection for a minimum of one year. The IEAPM has recommended installing bores to collect this information. To neglect collecting and utilising this vital information regarding the mines impact on water by the MCO shows how little importance it is given to sustainable water protection. The disregard for the impact on the local ecosystem is extremely poor. The area to be cleared has habitat for many species but importantly 23 endangered species. This includes a precious breeding habitat of our now endangered iconic Koalas. Australia's own research and advice calls for no new fossil fuel projects, this includes expansions of existing mines. Otherwise why has Australia a Net Zero Commission and signed the Paris Agreement? |
Ruby Hardie
|
ID |
24161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2086 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am very concerned that the Moolarben OC3 expansion project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. I therefore strongly oppose this project. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and successful breeding have been recorded. Clearing of 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat also with breeding females recorded on site. Clearing of microbat habitat also. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting species like the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater with less than 250 in the wild and the Koala that is already endangered. • Negative Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. This could mean that groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2 metre to 6metres every year for up to 25 years post mining. This will have a severe detrimental effect on the survival long term of all wildlife in the area. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to even meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. This is the largest operating coalmine in NSW who wants to expand even further to produce more greenhouse gas emissions. This is unacceptable. • Cultural Significance-Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. • Economics does not stack up in this proposal- There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been ongoing vacancies already at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, the Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Expanding the already biggest coalmine in NSW contradicts the push to renewable energy. The coal will be 100% exported. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially, the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. This would be a bad decision economically. • Social Impacts- Yancoal has negatively impacted this regional community as the largest coal mine in NSW. Their past actions are indicative of a company that do not care for the environment and nature and also the local community. The village area of Wollar near Mudgee and its original ambience and tranquility has been disturbed. Farms have been bought out, and people and native wildlife will be further affected if this proposal is approved with increased mine blasting, dust, smells, vibration and noise and night- time lighting will be ongoing. Large trucks will operate at night also. Farming families already who used to live close by to the coal mine have already been driven out of their homes because of noise pollution, air pollution and night lighting. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused entirely. Please protect threatened species, climate and communities. Thank you for considering my submission. Your sincerely Ruby Hardie |
Lincoln Turner
|
ID |
24166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3002 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, Re: Moolarben coal complex OC3 extension project I am a scientist, university lecturer and father of three children aged 13, 10 and 4. I am profoundly concerned that Australian governments continue to allow the expansion of fossil fuel production, in the face of the deepening climate emergency. The damage done to the Earth’s climate system, primarily by the extraction and combustion of fossil fuels, is already causing escalating natural disasters affecting people in NSW, and in Victoria where I live, and of course everywhere else. This summer intense fires in central Victoria incinerated the town of Harcourt, a few minutes drive from my father-in-law’s house. Friends of ours camping near Wye River were fortunate not to be swept away in flash floods a few days later. My sister and her family narrowly avoided flooding while holidaying near Eden. It is now beyond doubt that these ‘natural’ disasters are anything but, their intensity and frequency amplified greatly by the rapidly-heating atmosphere and oceans. Most Australians have either personally experienced climate disasters, or have friends or family who have. Consequently, I am writing to object to the proposal by Yancoal to expand (Open Cut 3) the Moolarben coal mine, located near Mudgee on the lands of the Wiradjuri people. Should this project be approved, it would cause major and irrevocable damage to the global environment through methane emissions from the mine, and scope-3 emissions from combustion of thermal coal; to the local environment through habitat loss, groundwater drawdown, noise, blasting and vibration; to local cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country; and without significant benefit to the local community where the development of renewable energy is now the priority. The global environmental impact of the project is immense. Approving it will cause an additional 65 million tonnes of carbon dioxide to enter the atmosphere. It matters not at all to the climate system whether the site of injection is an Australian coal-fired power station or one in Japan, the global warming effect is the same. The connection between thermal coal mined in Mudgee, and the incineration of small towns in Victora – or for that matter the flooding of Lismore – is now clear. The International Energy Agency stated in 2021, and confirmed in 2023/24, that no new fossil fuel developments can be made if the world is to maintain temperatures below the +1.5C Paris Agreement goal. Additional emissions from expanded coal mines are inconsistent with Australia’s commitments under UNFCCC Agreements, and are inconsistent with the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. The Denman Court of Appeal decision obliges decision makers to consider emissions, including scope-3 emissions, when considering proposals such as this one. The local environmental impact of the proposal is unacceptable. The expansion would clear the habitat of koalas, regent honeyeaters, and microbats amongst more than 20 other threatened species of fauna, and destroy 480 ha of native vegetation. In a climate emergency, retaining all possible native vegetation for biodiversity and carbon sequestration is imperative. The NSW Environment Department has warned that this project is likely to lead to long-term population declines in threatened species. The project is proximal to the historic Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with dust, blasting, noise and vibration impacts expected to reduce the amenity of the reserve. Groundwater drawdown threatens Moolarben Creek, a key refuge for wildlife during drought. The project would further fracture the landscape, destroying irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and further severing the Wiradjuri people from culture, Country and sacred sites. The climate impacts already baked in from historic fossil fuel production and combustion will lead to my children living harder, and likely shorter, lives than I expect mine will be. As a scientist, a citizen and a parent, I am aghast at this reckless proposal to expand thermal coal production in the face of the climate emergency that threatens us all. I urge the Independent Planning Commission , in the strongest possible terms, to recommend the Moolarben OC3 extension project be refused. Yours sincerely, Dr Lincoln Turner East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 |
Nadarajah Rajkumar
|
ID |
24171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2121 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am Strongly objecting to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this Expansion project would cause would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage in Mudgee (Wiradjuri Country). Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. - This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. - Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad- headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve was poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. - A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. - The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. - Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. - The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. - The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat.The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected Outright. Thank you for considering my submission. N Rajkumar Epping, NSW 2121 |
Abigail Humphreys
|
ID |
24176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2148 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed extension to this coal mine. Australia needs to stop coal and gas now to be able to fulfill its international obligations to meet net zero by 2050. We will not be able to meet the atmospheric carbon emissions reduced to safe levels if your government continues to approve coal extensions. I reach the 2050 target we have to stop burning fossil fuels. |
Carole Stanford
|
ID |
24186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4883 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see the attachment, MoolarbenOC3_submission_CStanford.pdf |
|
Attachments |
Carole Standford - MoolarbenOC3_submission_CStanford_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 99.28 KB) |
Isabella Todd
|
ID |
24201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2517 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent planning commission My name is Isabella Todd and I am a young person living in Wollongong, and I am deeply concerned about this proposed project and the impact on biodiversity and the climate. I am the daughter of a 6th generation coal miner who now works in renewable energy, I grew up on the coal coast in Wollongong, and I’ve already seen the impact of the climate crisis in my lifetime. Impacts that will only get worse as we continue to burn fossil fuels. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed OC3 expansion to the Moolarben Coal Mine on unceded Wiradjuri country on the basis it can and will cause serious, irreversible harm to the natural environment, the climate and the community. Of particular concern to me are: - The clearing of 113 hectares of native koala habitat. Koalas are endangered in NSW and this habitat is critical to their survival in the area, especially as breeding has been recorded there - The area being cleared is also critical habitat for the endangered Regent honey eater and micro bats; this habitat cannot be replaced through so called “offsets” - The proposed mining could occur within 100m of the Munghorn Gap reserve an there has not been adequate consideration of the impact of noise, vibrations and blasting on this special area - there is a risk of groundwater draw down that could put Moolarben creek at risk and impact drought refuges for wildlife that are critical for ecosystems - NSW is already behind on its emission reduction targets and this project would release 64 million tones of greenhouse gas emission jntot rh atmosphere that our climate (and our communities on the frontlines of climate change) cannot afford - Furthermore it is not evident that this project would create sufficient community benefit; the fossil fuel industry is dying, there are fewer jobs as processes are increasingly mechanised and automated. There is no job justification for this project, especially when renewable energy projects are on the rise. The NSW government, the people of Wollar and Mudgee, the people of NSW, of Australia, of the world - none of us can afford this risky project. For all these reasons I urge the independent planning commission to reject this proposal. Sincerely Isabella Todd Russell Vale NSW |
Amie Illfield
|
ID |
24206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing in opposition to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine that is operated by Yancoal. I am from the Hunter and have numerous familial connections with the coal industry both presently and historically. While I’m proud of my family’s efforts to work for an industry that provides what has been an essential service, I also recognise the need for society to take heed of the prescient science which indicates a causal relationship between the burning of fossil fuels and global warming. In fact, given my family’s involvement and benefitting from this industry, I am pressed ever more with a responsibility to be a part of transitioning from our dependency on an energy source that undermines fundamental elements that sustain life on earth as we’ve known it in recent eons. Concurrently with my concerns in regards to our need to stop all new coal and gas projects due to their otherwise unacceptable contribution to climate change, is my very impassioned concern for the impact on the integrity of the Munghorn Gap reserve and other sites of significance (for example ‘the drip’) that this expansion poses. With the legacy of such extreme landclearing as has occurred in NSW in only the last 200 years, we cannot afford to degrade any of the remaining habitat. Rather, with climate change upon us, we need to strengthen them. Nature reserves aren’t effective just because of what is inside of the perimeter of the boundary. Water flows, critters scurry, and birds fly. The ecology’s robustness is dependent on the surrounds as much as what is within. And, in the other direction, artificial noise, light and pollutants also travel across boundaries and create impacts. I have been to the mine site, I have been to the nature reserve, I have been to ‘the drip’. I can see what will be lost on the expansion site - that is forever, and what is at very real risk of being lost in the surrounds. We need to establish regional economies that are not bound to such devastating destruction which is in line with Ecological Sustainable Development (ESD). The region of the Moolarben mine is fortunate to be within the Central West Orana REZ which is expected to contribute significantly to the economic security of the region in a way that is aligned with ESD principles, unlike this proposed expansion. Importantly, the mine is situated on Wiradjuri Country. My understanding is that the impact on Wiradjuri cultural heritage, including ‘the drip’, is of paramount concern for Wiradjuri. The principles of free, prior, and informed consent should be applied to all developments of this nature on Indigenous land. This has blatantly not occurred. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Sincerely, Amie Illfield |
Edie Griffin
|
ID |
24216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Registered Nurse and a community member deeply concerned about the proposed expansion to the Yancoal mine at Moolarben near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As a healthcare professional, I understand that human health is completely dependent on climate health, ecosystem health and planetary health. I believe that preventative healthcare must include climate action. The proposed Moolarben mine expansion will do great harm to the local ecosystems and will be additive to a dangerous trajectory of global heating. Scientists are almost unanimously indicating that this decade is crucial for us to minimise fossil fuel emissions if we are to limit the degrees of warming under 1.5-2 degrees. The mine expansion is inconsistent with Australia’s ability to play our part in reducing emissions to limit atmospheric warming, and is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement, the NSW Climate Change Act, and and Net Zero targets, which NSW is not on track to meet. The expansion will directly destroy habitat of koalas and the critically endangered regent honeyeater of which breeding pairs have been found living at the proposed expansion site, as well as endangered box gum ecosystems. The mine is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown and is likely to endanger the health of the local water tables which would place further stress onto an already vulnerable ecosystem. Important Wiradjuri cultural heritage exists at this site which will be placed at risk if the expansion were to go ahead. Degradation of Country and the inability for the Wiradjuri to access Country for cultural purposes is a continuation of colonisation. There is no clear benefit for community jobs proposed by this mine expansion, with major export countries like China and South Korea on a decarbonisation trajectory that will see them relying less on buying Australian coal in the coming decades. Moreover, as someone who grew up with farming family in regional NSW whom I watched suffer the devastating impacts of long droughts during my childhood, I have witnessed the risk that regional communities face due to climate change. Climate change is an urgent healthcare crisis, which is why as a Registered Nurse I feel compelled to write to the Independent Planning Commission and ask that they recommend this mine expansion is not approved. All extensions and expansions to coal and gas projects will hasten our global trajectory towards a level of global heating that tips tipping points and sets us on a pathway to a hothouse earth. Rising seas and extreme weather events will cause displacements, climate refugee communities, food and water scarcity, and the risk of widespread illness and death caused by heat, fires and floods, to which activity at this mine will contribute. The science is clear and demands that we act responsibly, and quickly, to secure the future of our future generations. Thank you for your time in considering my submission. Edie Griffin Registered Nurse, Marrickville NSW |
Christine Tapp
|
ID |
24221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2018 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a mother and a grandmother and have a vested interest in the future of the environment. At its most basic this means taking care of accessible water. The MBO is obviously not interested in this, so much so, that they want to start the project before there is reliable data on the impact it will make on the water table. The IEAPM has advised to install bores and the DPHI has asked for at least 1 year of baseline ground water data. I also know that the world will be a diminished place every time there is a species extinction. Hence I am concerned not only that the clearing of the land will impact 23 endangered species but destroy 401 ha of the endangered Box Gum forest, and more. There is a breeding koala population in the area to be cleared. This is totally unacceptable. Australia has signed the Paris Agreement and has the results of a Net Zero Commission. These show that there should be no new fossil fuel projects nor expansions. This assessment needs to have and follow a moral conviction toward improving the world and it's future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please find attached submission |
|
Attachments |
Elli Trav MoolarbenOC3Submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 35.85 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension of the Moolarben coal mining complex OC3 will see the destruction of native habitat impacting on biodiversity. We must see a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and save our planet before it is too late. Please conduct the public hearings that had been planed to find a way forward without expanding coal mining activities into the future. . |
Ben Cheetham
|
ID |
24236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I grew up on a farm on Wollar Road and seeing the damage that mining has done to the landscape in the space of 20 years is wild. I personally find it hard to believe that there is any way that meaningful rehabilitation is possible. I recently spoke to a mining engineer involved in the original mine plan for the neighbouring Wilpinjong coal mine, who told me that in his opinion the impacts of these coal mines on water ways and aquifers cannot mitigated - in particular he was worried about rising salinity and the unavoidable consequences for users downstream who rely on that water. These are impacts that will be felt for years and I am not convinced that there is any benefit that these foreign corporations could bring to the local community that would be worth it in the long term. While it is distressing to see the impact that burning fossil fuels has already had on our environment, I think it's wrong that locals are being asked to shoulder the burden of changing climate by sacrificing farm profits and productivity so that greedy foreign companies can wring the final drops from a collapsing coal export market. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to t to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are in a critical climate emergency where we need to desperately reduce greenhouse gas emissions to avoid runaway climate change and it is inconceivable for coal extraction to be increased in the face of this fact. I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards (Redacted) |
Reed Mladenovik
|
ID |
24246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3163 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the independent planning commission, My name is Reed, I am a 21 year old student at Monash University in Victoria. I am one of a student who attended a screening of a documentary about the Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion and I was shocked by the formation of the plan despite the harmful and irreversible impacts that it would bring. I’m quite concerned about the environmental impacts namely the destruction of the ecosystem, threatened species, risks to groundwater and creeks, and irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage. In addition to this, the costs of the mines contradict the NSW climate cost goals while being an unnecessary expansion for the local economy. It must also be said that the proposed amendment to the expansion only seeks to greenwash this harmful project rather than doing any meaningful work or prevention of the many long term risks at hand. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Reed Mladenovik Carnegie VIC 3163 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24256 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 37-year-old project officer at the University of Sydney in Sydney. This year I have experienced the heat stress and anxiety of two record-breaking 40-degree days in January and February. This is the now-expected ‘unnatural’ climate-induced phenomena that I am experiencing in my lifetime. The first time I was aware of this was during the 2019 mega-fires when for the first time, as a city-dweller, I inhaled bushfire smoke and experienced unhealthy levels of air pollution as a result. While the climate crisis worsens by the year, I am shocked that Australia continues to expand coal mines and that Yancoal is proposing such an expansion within NSW at the site of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine. I am writing to oppose the expansion of this mine. The science is clear that the emissions from the burning of coal from this mine will further contribute towards severe climate impacts for us all, globally. Even domestically, the Net Zero Commission’s own findings show that Australia is not on target to meet its own emissions reductions targets by 2030. Australia is not fulfilling its responsibilities towards the Paris Agreement. Closer to home, I have read about the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which I heard about because of the presence of the rare and beautiful Regent Honeyeater bird. Having heard about the rich biodiversity and ecosystems when friends visited the town of Wollar in 2025, I am concerned that the destruction of the habitat will mean that this threatened species -and the rich ecosystem that supports it- will be lost. An open cut coal mine position so close to a nature reserve creates cascading ecological impacts that cannot be reversed. Groundwater drawdown could dry out ecosystems, and noise and blasting could impact species that are not only within the vicininity of the proposed site. When destroying one ecosystem, in fact you are also impacting the surrounding areas. Please do not let Yancoal expand this mine without proper due diligence and assessment of environmental impact on this Nature Reserve. In considering the emissions of the mine, and of the coal exported from it, and in considering the unique ecosystem of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, I ask the Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension. Thank you for considering my submission. [name redacted] |
Lucia Smith
|
ID |
24261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, A development application has been received from Yancoal to extend open cut mining operations at the Moolarben Coal Complex in NSW near Mudgee. The application proposes to extend the existing OC3 open cut pit as well as develop four new open cut pits along the floor of the Moolarben Valley. I am greatly concerned about the biodiversity and climate crisis in NSW and the further negative impact a coal project of this size will have on an already struggling environment and carbon emissions that keep increasing when they should be decreasing to meet our climate targets. When the Department referred the Moolarben OC3 project to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC), they gave no recommendation on whether it should be approved or rejected. This is the first time a coal mine has been referred to the IPC with NO recommendation of approval by the government and that indicates that the NSW Government is also concerned. I am strongly opposed to the Moorarbeen Coal Complex OC3 extension project. My reasons are- 1. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in that specific area. This is totally unacceptable and irresponsible. A threatened species with a dwindling habitat already at risk of losing more habitat to the biggest coal project in NSW so that they can expand their operations even more. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (a loss of 493.12 Hectares). 3. There are three mines in the Mudgee area already - Yancoal/Moolarben (the biggest in NSW), Glencore/Ulan and Peabody/Wilpinjong- all have approval to produce a combined 58 million tonnes of coal per year, the largest producer, Yancoal/Moolarben was approved until 2038. 4. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. These impacts will affect the peace of nature that will be interrupted with ongoing loud noise. 5. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. This will include long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. 6. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. The Climate Risk Group in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. 7. The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by contributing to climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day livability. Please oppose this project. Thank you Lucia Smith |
Jack Brady
|
ID |
24266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3016 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Jack, and I'm a 24-year-old university student in Melbourne, and I'm concerned about the impact fossil fuel emissions will have on my generation's future and on my local community. Over the past several years, I've witnessed devastating floods, endured summer heatwaves, and had friends and family who have been directly threatened by bushfires. I am writing to express my objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The proposed OC3 extension would produce 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Any further coal expansions are inconsistent with already existing climate targets and a safe, liveable future for communities across Australia. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. Additionally, the coalmine expansion poses a significant threat to Wiradjuri cultural heritage, including 55 cultural artefacts considered to be of high cultural value by the relevant Registered Aboriginal Parties. The expansion would almost certainly lead to further damage to Country and these significant cultural artefacts, impacting Wiradjuri people's ability to practice their culture and protect and preserve the local ecosystem. For the above reasons, I am writing to ask that the Independent Planning Commission rejects the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission Jack |
Kim Gambrill
|
ID |
24271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am very concerned that the Moolarben OC3 expansion project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. I therefore strongly oppose this project. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and successful breeding have been recorded. Clearing of 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat also with breeding females recorded on site. Clearing of microbat habitat also. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting species like the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater with less than 250 in the wild and the Koala that is already endangered. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. This could mean that groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2 metre to 6metres every year for up to 25 years post mining. This will have a severe detrimental effect on the survival long term of all wildlife in the area. • Negative Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Social Impacts- Yancoal has negatively impacted this regional community as the largest coal mine in NSW. Their past actions are indicative of a company that do not care for the environment and nature and also the local community. The village area of Wollar near Mudgee and its original ambience and tranquility has been disturbed. Farms have been bought out, and people and native wildlife will be further affected if this proposal is approved with increased mine blasting, dust, smells, vibration and noise and night- time lighting will be ongoing. Large trucks will operate at night also. Farming families already who used to live close by to the coal mine have already been driven out of their homes because of noise pollution, air pollution and night lighting. • Cultural Significance-Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to even meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. This is the largest operating coalmine in NSW who wants to expand even further to produce more greenhouse gas emissions. This is unacceptable. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. • Economics does not stack up in this proposal- There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been ongoing vacancies already at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, the Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Expanding the already biggest coalmine in NSW contradicts the push to renewable energy. The coal will be 100% exported. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially, the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. This would be a bad decision economically. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused entirely. Please protect threatened species, climate and communities. Your sincerely Kim Gambrill |
Michael Rynn
|
ID |
24276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2161 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See my attached uploaded PDF document which was titled "Moolaben-OC3-Coal-mining-parasitism.pdf" for presentation of arguments in detail. Coal mining acts as diesel consuming parasite on the Australian economy, as global diesel supply declines. Given the structural energy support of diesel fuel for most of Australian transport, trade, the increasing consumption by mining is parasitic. Our global biosphere temperature rise and climate is ever more unstable, as GHG emissions continue to rise, and ditto for Australian coal exports. The government needs to widen the impact protected areas of all nature reserves and ecosystems. |
|
Attachments |
Moolaben-OC3-Coal-mining-parasitism.pdf (PDF, 379.74 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2010 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am [name redacted]. I care about the dying environment in the area within which this expansion is meant to take place. Biodiversity is at threat and I would not stand another expansion of this coal mine which does not even generate a huge revenue to the NSW government to go ahead. This is my step to contribute towards saving by this planet from climate change. The species in this area need to be protected. |
Yuktee Gupta
|
ID |
24286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2050 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Based on public knowledge, it seems pretty clear that the actual economic benefit the expansion could provide is massively overblown. Moreover, the area has a rich ecosystem that would be destroyed, and the local population might not be completely aware of the long-term impacts this might have on the town. In a time period where several countries are transitioning to a net-zero emissions goal, and rapidly increasing the use of renewables (easily available and implementable in Australia), encouraging an expansion of a mine seems backward and counterproductive. We don't want to support an industry that is archaic, actively harmful, and in fact, not even efficient! Coal generators are not, in fact, the best way we can produce electricity. See https://youtu.be/IfvBx4D0Cms?si=ZkbsY_vYaDcXXM7G for a very excellent and understandable explanation of the same. Also, I think taking submissions from people actively hired by the mining company seems like it might have very glaring conflicts of interest, which I hope the IPC considers. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the further extension of the Moolarben Coal Complex site, the amendments that have been submitted at the last minute will not lessen the mine's footprint or any clearing of vegetation on the proposed site. This proposal will still have severe impact on biodiversity. The extension of MCC would destroy around 480 hectares of native vegetation and pushing the mine within 100 meters of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the close proximity of the mine to the Reserve would put the high diversity of the area at risk. There is already (23) threatened species that have been recorded in the area, this includes a resilient koala population. The project would destroy: - 113 hectares of the koala's habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, one area being right in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. - 80 hectares of the Reagent Honeyeater breeding habitat, a species that is on the brink of extinction. - 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum woodland ecosystem. - Also threatened species such as the Broadheaded Snake and Microbats. All of this having a severe impact which has been acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, leading to decline in longterm populations and affect habitats critical to the survival of these species. The noise and blasting that will impact the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed and Yancoal has refused to go with the recommended 500 meter buffer to protect the Reserve and wildlife. This beautiful valley should never be mined and should be included in the Munghorn Nature Reserve. There would also be an estimated 6.46 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, around 55% of NSW's total emissions, which would have an enormous impact on climate change. This is all ignoring the findings of the Net Zero Commission for further mine expansions. The impact on the residents in the area has been enormous over the last decade and has severely, causing many to leave the area and health problems. For these reasons and more I implore the IPC to reject Yancoal's proposal. |
Brent Hoare
|
ID |
24296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2779 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission: Opposition to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mine Expansion (OC3) From: Cr. Brent Hoare, Greens Councillor, Blue Mountains City Council Date: February 17, 2026 Regarding: Yancoal's proposal to expand the Moolarben Coal Mine (Open Cut 3) near Mudgee, NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. To the Independent Planning Commission, I submit my strongest objection to Yancoal's proposed expansion of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) coal mine. While the Blue Mountains is geographically distinct from the Mudgee region, we are ecologically and climatically connected. As a Councillor representing a community that borders the World Heritage Blue Mountains National Park, I am acutely aware of the responsibility we hold to protect our natural environment and the global imperative to transition away from fossil fuels. This expansion—proposed for the largest producing coal mine in NSW—would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, destroy critical habitat for threatened species, generate massive lifecycle emissions equivalent to 58% of NSW's annual total, and permanently damage Wiradjuri cultural heritage. It is incompatible with a safe climate, NSW's legislated emissions targets, the protection of threatened species, and the long-term interests of the people of NSW. --- 1. This Valley Belongs in a Protected Nature Reserve, Not an Open-Cut Coal Mine The beautiful valley targeted for this expansion should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve—one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. Instead, Yancoal proposes to push mining to within just 100 metres of the reserve boundary, putting an area of exceptionally high biodiversity at immediate risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in this area. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem. This project creates no new jobs—Moolarben will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless—and all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. This incredibly rich valley should never have been slated for mining and should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. --- 2. Unacceptable and Irreversible Harm to Threatened Species and Ecosystems Yancoal's proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. Among the most devastating impacts: · Koalas: The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. This area is home to a genetically diverse and climate-resilient koala population that has survived drought and bushfires—precisely the population we should be protecting, not destroying. · Regent Honeyeaters: With only 250-350 individuals left in the wild, the clearing of 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat—where breeding females have been recorded on site—would be an act of active participation in their extinction. · Box Gum Woodland: Up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Grassy Woodland ecosystem would be cleared. · Other threatened species: Impacts on the Broad-headed Snake, microbats, and numerous other species are expected to be severe. The NSW Environment Department has warned that the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. --- 3. A Massive Climate Cost That Contradicts NSW Climate Goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. To put that in perspective, this is equivalent to around 58% of NSW's total annual emissions. Approximately 99% of these emissions are downstream emissions from the burning of exported coal—yet the Department of Planning's assessment ignores the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider all emissions and the local climate impacts they cause. The assessment also ignores the clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. It fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The economic and social costs of these emissions remain unquantified and unaddressed by Yancoal. My community in the Blue Mountains knows the devastating reality of the climate crisis firsthand. We lived through the 2019-2020 Black Summer bushfires, which brought destruction to our doorsteps. As a serving RFS Advanced Firefighter since 2013, and an SES Field Operator since 1999 I work on the front lines of increasingly frequent and severe fires floods and storms. Approving new coal mines while our communities are still recovering from climate-fuelled disasters is the height of negligence. We cannot afford to lock in decades more climate pollution. --- 4. The Expansion Is Not Needed for Jobs or Regional Prosperity The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community. The Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. Yancoal's own job figures are unreliable, having recently sacked 225 workers at other Hunter mines. Meanwhile, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) , where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade—offering clear alternative employment pathways. The region already boasts a diversified economy based on wine, tourism, and agriculture, all of which are threatened by coal dust, noise, and the region's association with fossil fuels. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to others. Given the forecasts of a decline in Australian thermal coal demand, particularly to China and South Korea, the economic argument is even weaker than Yancoal outlined in its May 2025 Resource Assessment. The expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. --- 5. Serious and Long-Lasting Risks to Groundwater and Creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ceases. This places Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by Yancoal's failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal is proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies after approval, before commencing mining. This is inadequate: baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. The recent, unpredicted highwall collapse at Open Cut 1—which threatened a public road—demonstrates that geotechnical and hydrological risks are being underestimated, jeopardizing public safety and environmental integrity. --- 6. The Expansion Will Irreversibly Harm Wiradjuri Cultural Heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, with the potential to impact dozens more. All are considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape and the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people's ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. The expansion also threatens the iconic sandstone gorge known as "The Drip"—a site of immense cultural significance to the Wiradjuri people and a popular tourist destination. Underground mining proposed within 200 metres of the riverbed threatens not only groundwater but the structural integrity of these culturally significant cliffs. --- 7. The Cumulative Impact Has Been Poorly Assessed There has been a grossly inadequate assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines, including the Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3. All these proposed expansions impact a similar set of threatened species, with Serious and Irreversible Impacts expected due to clearing and loss of habitat across a connected landscape. Together, these projects will impact an even larger area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity, and cultural heritage values. The cumulative loss of habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and other threatened species—combined with cumulative groundwater drawdown and cumulative emissions—has not been properly considered. This piecemeal assessment allows destruction to proceed incrementally while ignoring the broader collapse of ecosystem integrity across the region. --- Conclusion This project fails the test of climate credibility, ecological protection, cultural heritage respect, and common sense. It would: · Destroy critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and countless other threatened species · Generate emissions equivalent to 58% of NSW's annual total · Push mining within 100 metres of a protected nature reserve · Cause groundwater drawdown lasting decades · Destroy irreplaceable Wiradjuri cultural heritage · Deliver minimal economic benefit while locking in long-term environmental damage The IPC must recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 expansion. We must draw a line in the sand: no new coal mines on Wiradjuri Country, no new coal mines anywhere in NSW, and a genuine commitment to a just transition toward the renewable energy future that already awaits in the Central West Orana REZ. Thank you for your consideration. Cr. Brent Hoare Blue Mountains City Council |
Jamie Harrison
|
ID |
24301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an electrical engineering student, writing to oppose the Moolarben Coal Complex’s extension, and the opening of new open cut pits in the Moolarben Valley. The proposed expansion would cause permanent harm to the local environment. The harm to the ecosystem of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve would be irreversible. Coal demand is forecasted to decline. NSW has committed to reducing emissions, among many other countries which are moving away from coal. The residents of Western NSW will be saddled with a forever-changed natural landscape long after the state and the world moves on from coal. The damage done by clearing a rich ecosystem and destroying sites culturally significant to the Wiradjuri people cannot be undone. The loss of a long-standing and complex ecosystem cannot be “compensated” by adding more green space elsewhere. The short-term benefit impoverishes future generations in Western NSW: we should be investing in and building a future for all families in this region rather destroying its history and borrowing against the next generation. |
Johanna Lynch
|
ID |
24306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a lifelong resident of Newcastle, an environmentalist and a young adult with serious concerns about the future of the Hunter if we fail to seize opportunities to economically diversify our region, support its skilled workforce to transition into the renewable and other alternative sectors, and halt new and expanded mining projects. I object to the Moolarben expansion proposal on the grounds of intergenerational equity, environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation and regional economic justice for the Hunter region and beyond. The expansion proposal if approved would have adverse and destructive impacts on the climate, biodiversity, water and air quality, Indigenous cultural heritage and the local community of Mudgee. Even if this or other individual expansions are approved, it won't necessarily secure the future work of those currently employed in the mining sector in the Hunter, and it will come at great cost the region; destroying precious and irreplaceable biodiversity and unique ecosystems including vegetation, waterways and terrain which support critically endangered species, and Indigenous cultural heritage. The expansion, if approved would further pollute the climate and exacerbate the trends of more extreme disasters, at a time when people in the Hunter, Newcastle and across Australia are subjected to the rising costs of insurance and essential goods due to more frequent disasters, and facing more extreme and damaging flooding, storms and heatwaves themselves too. Hunter workers need support now from industry and government to plan so we can make a collective decision to transition away from fossil fuels and ensure the climate, economy and environment we inhabit now, and that which we leave our children and future generations, is functional. |
Janne Seletto
|
ID |
24311 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am strongly opposed to the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee. We are already experiencing the effect of climate change. It is bad enough with the carbon fuel mines that we have, please do not open any new ones. Coal mines are incredibly destructive to the environment and threaten animal and plant species and water sources. Mudgee is a beautiful area with vineyards, quaint towns and beautiful countryside. It has huge additional tourist potential. A transition away from coal mining work should be provided for the Mudgee community and here we have the tourist industry as well as alternative energy sources – clean energy - that could absorb potential coal mine workers if there was a purposeful government approach. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (Reference: SSD-33083358) on Waradjuri Country. This is on the grounds of its irreversible devastating impact on the Environment, Community, Culture and Climate Change. Critically, Yancoal’s proposed amendments not only disrupt the community consultation process, but do not reduce clearing of native vegetation and still have dire consequences on biodiversity. Notably the proposed off-site “habitat enhancement” is an unconvincing and unacceptable green-wash for a project and site of this scale. The amendments will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems in that specific valley. If Yancoal, NSW’s largest mining conglomerate really wants to ‘off-set’ its plans and operations, it needs to be an undeniable leader in ethical innovations that do not further cost Australia its biodiversity and local communities and economies. My focus here on the guaranteed loss of critical habitat for already threatened species, but that does not diminish my utmost concerns for the surrounding communities, significance for Aboriginal culture, risks to water, Co2 emissions and climate change. I note that 23 species including a unique Koala population, with confirmed breeding sites are threatened by the proposal to: • Clear 480 hectares of native vegetation, including: o 113 hectares of Koala habitat – our nationally celebrated marsupials thrive in unique populations reliant on that unique area gum habitats and food sources. They are unlikely to survive even if relocated. o 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. o 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. • Mine within 100m of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with inadequate assessment of impact on that area by mining operations Conclusion For these reasons, I urge decision-makers to reject the proposed expansion and instead: • invest in sustainable industries • incorporate the area under consideration into the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve so that it is not further considered for mining. We must protect Australia’s world-renowned and unique fauna and flora and overall environment, ensure thriving local communities, and align with climate goals, so generations to come can enjoy and advance Australia fair, ethically and sustainably. Care for Country, do not deprive it. The world is looking in. Yours faithfully, |
Carina Griffin
|
ID |
24321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in attached file. |
|
Attachments |
Carina Griffin Submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 21.43 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached pdf |
|
Attachments |
MoolarbenOpenCut3Explansion.pdf (PDF, 108.12 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, I object to the OC3 Extension Project for Moolarben Coal Complex due to the unacceptable destruction of Koala and Regent Honeyeater breeding and feeding habitat, the green house gases the mine will produce during operation, the use of water by the mine and negative impact this will have on water availability in Moolarben Creek especially being an essential drought refuge for native wildlife and the destruction of Wiradjuri landscapes and sacred sites, along with the poor economical viability of continuing the mine. Yours sincerely, (Redacted) |
John Wurcker
|
ID |
24336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2605 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I was born and grew up on a farm near Merriwa - not far from the proposed development and still have strong links to the area. Australia has sufficient coal from current mines to supply all its domestic needs and to satisfy our overseas customers - especially if they reduce their emissions as fast as needed to stave off a climate emergency. We don't need this additional coal production - in fact Australia should be showing the lead globally and not approve any more new or expanded coal protects. In relation to this particular proposed development, it should also not go ahead based on the damage it would cause to native habitat, water resources and First Nation cultural sites. |
Janice Haviland
|
ID |
24341 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The current Moolarben coal operation is already NSW’s biggest producing coal mine. The project is now before the NSW Independent Planning Commission, the body that will decide whether NSW’s biggest producing coal mine is allowed to expand even further. I live in Sydney and I am aware of the coal- based ventures that the state government has approved since 2023- most are existing coal mines that want approval to expand. I call on the Independent Planning Commission the decision maker on this expansion to reject the Moolarben OC3 expansion. This destructive coal expansion must not go ahead. Even the NSW Government for the first time has not approved this project. I am strongly opposed to the Moolarben OC3 expansion. I have multiple reasons based on the negative impacts to nature, water and air pollution, increased carbon emissions that make climate change worse and natural disasters and the impacts to the local communities. • Nature The direct and immediate impact if this proposal is approved would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where successful breeding of koalas on site has been recorded. Additionally it would destroy as well 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site also. Microbat habitat would also be impacted. Mining itself would occur only within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, an important conservation area that must be protected. The proponent Yancoal has not considered the ramifications for nature properly instead minimising it, and its mitigation measures are insufficient to effectively save species decline. This coal mine expansion would also destroy habitat of the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Birds Australia has identified this area as extremely important for bird life, as it is in very good condition and can support the Regent Honeyeater. With less than 250 in the wild and all the conservation efforts to date to increase its chances of survival in the wild, destroying this bird’s habitat of endangered Box Gum Woodland would be the wrong choice. 624 hectares of endangered woodland Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would have a total disturbance area of 675 ha at risk from clearing and mining activities. This is huge! This mining expansion will be between the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the Goulburn River National Park. These conservation areas are set aside to support critically endangered species like the Regent Honeyeater and endangered species like the Koala. A Biodiversity Assessment Report has also identified that this is a highly successful significant area for biodiversity with species such as the Pink- Tailed Legless Lizard, Large-Eared Pied Bat, Mased Owl, Powerful Owl, Squirrel Glider, and the Broad Headed Snake. I strongly urge IPC to prioritise nature and protect these conservation areas that support threatened species already struggling to survive. They have a dwindling habitat already and approving this coal expansion to destroy even more habitat will accelerate their path to extinction. Communities and the broader public have serious ongoing concerns regarding the resilience of nature that is being constantly tested to accommodate destructive projects at a cost to their survival. This is causing a decided rift between the government and the people. With carbon emissions increasing causing more natural disasters that affect wildlife with more and severe flooding and bushfires, as well as ongoing native forest logging and deforestation clearing still continuing, native animals in NSW and indeed Australia are doing it tough. As the Moolarben OC3 is already NSW’s biggest producing coal mine and despite this still wants to expand further, more of species precious irreplaceable habitat WILL be destroyed and native wildlife in NSW will decline further. I strongly urge the IPC to prioritise nature over this coal expansion that has already negatively impacted our climate, species habitat and their survival ability and local communities’ lives. • Carbon Emissions Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64.6 million tonnes of climate pollution will be produced at a time when NSW is already is failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. This would represent the wrong decision by the NSW Government who should be protecting people, our climate and our environment. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. The Climate Risk Group in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. • Local Community Strong public opposition already exists right now in the region and the local government area of this coal mine. Stubbornly Yancoal has not listened to the ongoing concerns of the local community. They have already been vocal over many years concerning the irreparable damage this current project has already caused their local area. Wollar and the Mudgee region, locals have spent over two decades resisting the devastating impacts of coal mining. Three coal mines exist near Mudgee and Wollar, with a focus on the Moolarben coal mine – NSW's largest producing coal mine – and the serious threat posed by its proposed expansion. • Climate Change I am greatly concerned about the biodiversity and climate crisis in NSW. All these coal projects cumulatively contribute to increased carbon emissions that make a mockery out of NSW’s emissions climate targets. As of May 2025 the NSW Minns Government had already approved six coal mine expansion projects since coming to power in March 2023. These approved projects when combined would be responsible for an estimated 340 million tonnes of climate pollution (lifetime), more than THREE times TOTAL annual emissions from ALL sources. With all these expansions, cumulatively vast tracts of habitat is being cleared and destroyed, breaking up wildlife corridors and adding additional stress onto species survival. The mining of coal is supercharging the climate crisis and worsening catastrophic weather events like the flooding in recent years that has devastated communities in northern NSW as well as bushfires. This coal that is dug up in this area by Yancol has international ramifications. Moolarben is the largest producing coal mine in NSW and is also responsible for almost 10% of saleable coal in NSW. Coal is the single most contributor to the climate crisis. This is our best opportunity in NSW to stop climate change because our state has been heavily invested in coal and coal expansion over the last few years. Climate change MUST be addressed to save our planet from severe national natural disasters. As of August 2025 there were 18 new coal projects or expansions in NSW. When does this carnage to our environment, to our climate stop? When do we stop investing in fossil fuel? We all have a stake in the fight for climate justice because if we lose this fight the consequences will affect us all into the future! The mining of coal is supercharging the climate crisis and worsening catastrophic weather events like the flooding that has devastated communities. The sixth coal-mine expansion in 2025 (Tahmoor) was approved by the Minns Labor government despite the Net Zero Commission warning that NSW is not on track to meet any of its legislated climate targets and that coal expansions are a key reason why. So we cannot just look at one project and consider separately its negative impact on climate and nature. These negative impacts are cumulative across NSW. • Air Pollution and Water Pollution Constant coal dust affects health of nature and communities. Those with upper respiratory diseases will be affected. It cannot be allowed to go ahead. Dust, smells, vibration and noise and lighting at night time. These large trucks operate at night time. Farming families that used to live close by to the coal mine have been driven out of their homes because of noise pollution. Families experienced trauma. This expansion will affect detrimentally species habitat for the worse. Constant blasting in itself can be frightening for these animals. Constant transport vehicles and large trucks moving through the adjacent area will affect species habitat. The tranquillity and peace of a natural environment will disappear. Their once pristine protected environment will disappear and with it these animals. This is NOT acceptable. These animals are being edged out and are losing their habitat to big companies who exploit our natural resources to sell to overseas countries. This has negatively impacted native wildlife and people. Please DO NOT approve this expansion. Protect the wildlife and their habitat and the communities’ homes. Yancol will need water and will take from local water supplies and river systems that will result in further degradation of the environment that will further affect animals. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. This could mean that groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2 metre to 6metres every year for up to 25 years post mining. This will have a severe detrimental effect on the survival long term of all wildlife in the area. • Social Impacts Yancoal‘s past actions are indicative of a company that does not care for the environment and nature but also the local community that has negatively impacted the village area of Wollar. Save Wollar Action group has been organised because people- the local community- care about what has happened to their community/town because of Yancoal’s actions. We should all care and so should our decision- makers. The village area of Wollar near Mudgee and its original ambience and tranquillity has been disturbed. Farms have been bought out and people and native wildlife will be further affected if this proposal is approved with increased mine blasting, dust, smells, vibration and noise and night time lighting will be ongoing. Large trucks will operate at night time also Conclusion If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. Social impacts, water and groundwater risks are all important considerations. I strongly oppose this project for the above reasons Thankyou Janice Haviland |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is (Redacted) and I have lived within the Mid Western Regional Council area Central Tablelands/Central West NSW since 2012 and have been a permanent resident of Gulgong since 2018. The unnecessary extension of MOC 3 will permanently destroy 113 hectares of existing breeding koala habitat and cause distress and displacement of koalas within that habitat. This expansion will also see the destruction of habitat for the endangered Regent Honeyeater and Microbats. I strongly oppose the proposed encroachment on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve sought by Yancoal for MOC3. No mine should be permitted to expand nor encroach/operate within 100 m of a pristine significant Nature Reserve. This mine already has a guaranteed operating life expectancy to 2038 therefore does not need this unnecessary expansion to further destroy critical wildlife habitat and leave ugly long lasting scars on our fragile environment. This submission is a voice for our beautiful unique wildlife and the fragile but beautiful environment they choose to call home. We must fight for their survival. |
Rex Graham
|
ID |
25091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear IPC, The International Energy Agency has said that there must be no new coal, gas and oil mining given the terrible suffering that is currently happening across the world due to carbon emission fuelling global warming. The highly damaging bushfires in January in Victoria is one of the most recent cases. For the NSW government to be giving the OK for coal expansion projects like Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee, at the same time as saying it is looking to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 is so dumb and irrational as to be laughable. Unfortunately, it is not a laughing matter but rather a deadly serious issue of the future of human and other life on the planet, as it heats to unbearable levels. A group of 6-year-olds, if they were told that bushfires burn down houses and kill livestock and ruin forests and crops, could readily understand why we have fire brigades to combat bushfires. If the 6 year olds were then told that as well as sending out fire trucks to put the fires out, adults also think it a good idea that other trucks be sent out with flame throwers to start more fires, the youngsters would be incredulous and likely highly distressed, and agitated, at such irrational and perverse behaviour by adults. I call upon the IPC hearing to disallow the utterly dumb and perverse action on the part of Yancoal in its plans to expand its coal production at Moolarben. In this way the NSW government will be acting consistently with its many other commendable measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Regards, Rex Graham |
Jepke Goudsmit
|
ID |
25096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in all of our states, due to the climate impacts being felt across the regions. We are seeing extreme heatwaves, floods, storms, and changes in weather patterns, all related to the onset of climate change. Communities across NSW are facing diree struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I fear that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. My fears particularly relate to: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Jepke Goudsmit |
Gloria Foxley PhD
|
ID |
25101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country for two reasons: (1) Scientific evidence is strong that coal mining and burning are major sources of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter which contribute to smog and adverse health outcomes (2) The negative impacts of a coal mine on the local environment can be significant. Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion is in close proximity to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. There is no guarantee of zero impact to wildlife habitats in this reserve from acoustic disturbance and corridor fragmentation, with consequences on breeding and survival of countless species here. The proposed buffer zones are a far cry from anything that will preserve biodiversity in this area as its stands today. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the proposal for Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Cheers. Gloria |
Wayne Lavers
|
ID |
25106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Wayne Lavers and I’m 70 years of age. I live in the Weddin Shire on a 300 acre property that has been managed with environmental sustainability as my main concern for the last 25 years and is to be under ongoing environmental protection in perpetuity. I first read about human induced climate change in the early 1980s and realised immediately that it was already happening at that time. Scientists were already realising the impact of releasing stored and secure carbon in the form of coal emissions into the earths atmosphere and what the impact will be in the future. We are now living that future in the form of more volatile weather events. These events are impacting, not only on human lifestyles but natural environments, native species, biodiverse communities and therefore all living species around the planet. Australia is already successfully made the transition to sustainable energy, which has now overtaken fossil fuels as the cheapest form of energy. Humanity doesn’t need more coal and opening more coal mines is nothing more than a last minute cash grab to line the pockets of greedy company shareholders. It is humanity and therefore all levels of government, local, state and federal who have their hands on the controls that will seal the fate of all future generations of all future species. Do we want our grandchildren and great grandchildren to see the world that we have known? Or are we content to burn their future for our short term gratification? The Moolarben expansion does not need to proceed. Sincerely Wayne Lavers |
S Whare
|
ID |
25111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Sirs, I strongly object to this proposal for the following reasons, Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site; they are now considered endangered in NSW and therefore all koala habitat is essential to their survival The mine will also clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species ( large eared pied bay, eastern cave bag, regent honeyeater, broad headed snake, squirrel glider) as well as 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused this suggestion. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid Further, DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. A further objection considers the destruction of 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. I therefore strongly urge you to refuse this proposal, Yours faithfully, Mrs S Whare Sent from my iPad |
Patrick Li
|
ID |
25116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear IPCN NSW It has been reported that the Yancoal coal project has bypassed your consultation procedure in an effort to ramp up the Moolarben coal project. This would unleash more climate pollution and biodiversity loss at the same time, rendering the planet uninhabitable sooner. It would drain lots of drinking water, making the water more expensive than necessary. It also ruins first nations culture, particularly the ancient arts that have been untouched for tens of thousands of years. The Aboriginal culture must stand the test of our modern settlements in order to build climate justice. This means executing the responsibility of sharing the land with the people thoughtfully and not steal and exploit resources far beyond what is already necessary. Unfortunately however, the planet has already breached its 1.5*C climate limit according to climate scientists, making it more than urgent to aggressively cut carbon emissions. For these reasons, the Moolarben coal project MUSTN'T go ahead REGARDLESS of excuse. The good news from the climate council is that renewable energy now supplies over 50% of the total energy demand, particularly in South Australia when the state nears its 100% renewable energy declaration. It doesn't have to be dirty elsewhere. In fact, coal must be phased out as soon as possible if we want to increase our chances of climate survival in the future. Moreover, the Voices of the Valley have very rich stories featuring a short film documentary of Wollar in the Mudgee region directed by Jess Nipperess and Manjot who was one of the activist leader of School Strike 4 Climate, a movement which raises concerns about the high temperature of our planet coupled with extreme weather and atmospheric and environmental pollution threatening the balance of our ecosystem. Because the truth is, they depend on us as much as we depend on them for equal survival. Our Earth doesn't have to be as hot as a boiling kettle. With rapid cuts to carbon emissions, investment in renewable energy and resisting tempting projects such as the Moolarben coal mine would greatly do both your future generations and the planet a big favour. Sincerely |
Cath Ireland
|
ID |
25121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am a 69 year old who is retired, working at a community nursery after working for 34 years for the National Parks and Wildlife Service. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts. As a 9 year old, I learnt that the hottest place in Australia was 50 degrees, at Marble Bar, WA. Imagine my dismay in 2019 when Macksville in NSW registered 49 degrees! There are more and more climate emergencies, with ever increasing insurance costs. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee . This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected due to the following: : • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife This is already a very large coal mine, and this expansion would add.some 64 million tonnes of CO2 to our atmosphere. This expansion is not needed for work as mine jobs remain unfilled for long periods already. Why ruin this special area to simply add to climate stress? Thank you for the opportunity to comment Cath Ireland OAM |
Isabelle Turpin
|
ID |
25126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, My name is Isabelle Turpin, a very passionate environmentalist who cares deeply about the future of our planet. I am writing to you today to object the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension project, Project number SSD- 33083358. If you have been to areas proposed to get deforested, you would know how precious and sacred the land is there. Not only culturally significant, but also ecologically significant. There are threatened wildlife living in the habitat proposed to get cleared, including Koalas, the Regent Honey eater, eastern Cave Bat, Large-eared Pied Bat, Squirrel Glider and more. There are significant sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats along the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve that serve as crucial environments, particularly for various bat species. Blasting activities and excessive noise pose serious threats to these sensitive populations. The department advised that a minimum buffer of 500 meters be maintained between the mining operations and the reserve to ensure better protection of these species. However, the mining company declined to adopt this recommendation. Biodiversity offsets are fundamentally flawed, as they often serve to legitimize habitat destruction. True conservation requires avoiding impacts on native vegetation altogether if we are to prevent further species extinction. Please, myself and so many other devasted citizens desperately urge you to object this expansion. Our precious bush here in Australia is irreplaceable and invaluable. We cannot afford to lose any more of it. If more mines all around Australia keep getting approved for expansions, we will have no bush left. No national parks, no thriving ecosystems and habitat for our native fauna. This next step from your end is crucial, and we are relying on your compassion to object the destruction that this expansion will bring. Thank you you, Isabelle Turpin |
Louise Taylor
|
ID |
22356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2449 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission members, Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission regarding the above-mentioned proposed expansion. Have you noticed how hot summers are these days? Extreme heat for more days in Australia and around the world coupled with fires, floods, landslides, even more damaging hurricanes and typhoons. Climate change is well underway with more persons, communities and other species suffering from its impacts. I avoid going out on the hot days because of the heat and the strong UV rays. I observe the trees and other plants wilting, with some dying and others barely surviving. I worry about fire risk all the time. My heart goes out to all the communities in Victoria where this summer hundreds of homes and other structures were burnt to the ground. There has been limited reporting on wildlife and livestock killed and injured but the numbers must be very substantial given the huge area burnt and the speed with which the fires moved. I strongly oppose Yancoal's proposed expansion and urge you to reject this project. In addition to the proposed expansion exacerbating climate change, it would mean yet more clearcutting of native vegetation, which is home to koalas, gliders, Regent Honeyeaters, micro bats, etc. 23 threatened species could lose their habitat with the clearcutting of 480 hectares for the proposed expansion. The NSW Environment Department warns that the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the nearby Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Water is life, especially on the driest continent on earth. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, which could last for up to 25 years after mining. This places Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. Yancoal has failed to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and has a poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in its existing mine operations. It is unacceptable for Yancoal to propose an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining: baseline groundwater monitoring studies should conducted as part of the assessment process. It is equally unacceptable that this proposed expansion would result in the destruction of 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts as well as others which have not yet been uncovered. It is beyond time that Australia respect and protect this priceless culture. In 2026 as climate change and biodiversity loss become ever more acute, it is incumbent on the IPC to reject this submission, which is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Thank you for rejecting this proposed expansion. Greetings, Louise Taylor |
Catherine Desjarlais
|
ID |
22361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hi! Please stop Moolarben from happening because of the impact’! Sent from my iPhone |
Richard Stuart
|
ID |
22381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2430 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed extension to the Moolarben Coal mine. I am not going to bore you with lots of words. My resason for objecting is quite simple..... IN THIS TIME WHERE THE WORLD IS (IN GENERAL) TRYING TO REDUCE RELIANCE ON COAL, WE DO NOT NEED ANY NEW OR EXTENDED COAL MINES. regards Richard Stuart |
Dr Nicola Ross
|
ID |
22391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am happy to have my name and details published on your website. My name is Dr Nicola Ross. I am a retired 66 year old Honorary Associate Professor of Law from Hamilton in Newcastle. I am deeply concerned about the environment including the threats caused by expansion of coal mining in our states, which are contributing to climate impacts being felt in my area. Our home in Hamilton now regularly experiences flooding. More frequent and hotter heatwaves are increasingly hard on the health of myself and my 70 year old husband. We are very concerned about the world we are leaving behind for our sons and future grandchildren. Our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend thatthe Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. The minor amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered and do not prevent the proposed expansion having severe impacts on biodiversity. Thank you for considering my submission. Please acknowledge this objection has been received as I have not been able to submit successfully to your portal. Dr Nicola Ross |
Sharon Northage
|
ID |
22406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it concerns, Dear sir/madam, I'm writing to express my profound opposition to the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. We continue to tear up precious country at an alarming rate, contaminating air and water and ensuring the continuation of the accelerating climate catastrophe. Australia is becoming an international laughing stock for its double standards- going on about working towards net zero while continuing to approve more coal mining and gas exploration. It's a moot point making a plea for the wildlife that will be impacted, because who cares? No one, it seems. If jobs are the only consideration - find jobs elsewhere! Retrain! Please don't go ahead with this monstrous idea. Sincerely, Sharon Northage |
Ruth Ferrington
|
ID |
22421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find attached my submission objecting to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project (SSD-33083358). Thank you |
|
Attachments |
Moorlarben submission Feb 2026.pdf (PDF, 66.42 KB) |
David Hufton
|
ID |
22431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My submission is attached Thankyou David Hufton |
|
Attachments |
To the Independent Planning Commission Mollarben Mine Submission David Hufton 16 Feb 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 125.4 KB) |
Nathalie Paul
|
ID |
22436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Make it clear that you are making a submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Nathalie Paul Sent from my iPhone |
Seo Hee Choi
|
ID |
22441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
From Seo Hee Choi Health Care Worker. |
|
Attachments |
22441 - Seo Hee Choi_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 136.24 KB) |
Megan Quinn
|
ID |
22451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2016 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to make clear my objection to the above project. I have visited the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and surrounds and found it to be a fascinating, rare and valuable remnant of bushland which I intend to take my granddaughter to visit when she is a bit older. Given the species it supports and its role as wildlife sanctuary in times of drought and bushfire, the area should be protected in its entirety. I understand there are also many ancient cultural sites that would be destroyed by further expansion of the Yancoal mine. Australia's ancient history of human habitation holds a significance for humanity which this country is yet to appreciate. That doesn't mean we can't start valuing it in the same way that sites such as Chauvet, Altamira and El Castillo are valued. I wonder what would be the response if Yancoal proposed to mine those sites. It would be great to see some consistency in the effort to maintain what's left of our koala population. You have the chance to do that here. You also have the chance to preserve some of the dwindling habitat for gang gang, Regent honeyeaters and threatened bats. This is a no-brainer. Please tell Yancoal to get lost, they are not wanted here. Yours sincerely, Megan Quinn |
David O'Connell
|
ID |
22456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
thank you |
|
Attachments |
Submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 97.05 KB) |
David Croft
|
ID |
22461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is David Croft. I am a veterinarian from (redacted), and I am writing to strongly object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As a veterinarian, I see firsthand the impact habitat destruction, climate change and environmental degradation have on animals and ecosystems. I care deeply about protecting biodiversity and preventing further irreversible harm to Australia’s wildlife. The Moolarben expansion represents exactly the kind of damage we should be preventing — not approving. The proposal would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including breeding koalas and Regent Honeyeaters. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat and up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. These losses cannot be meaningfully offset. The expansion would also generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, undermining NSW’s obligations under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. Approving new coal infrastructure during a climate crisis is inconsistent with both science and public interest. Serious risks to groundwater, Moolarben Creek and Wiradjuri cultural heritage have not been adequately addressed. Baseline water monitoring should occur before approval, not after. The destruction of Aboriginal cultural artefacts and continued fragmentation of Country is unacceptable. Importantly, this expansion is not necessary for jobs or regional prosperity. The mine will continue operating regardless, while renewable energy developments in the region offer far more sustainable employment pathways. This extraordinary landscape should be protected and incorporated into a broader conservation corridor with Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve — not sacrificed for short-term export coal profits. For the sake of wildlife, climate stability, water security and cultural heritage, I respectfully urge the Commission to refuse this proposal. David Croft BVSc |
Judith Walker
|
ID |
22471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Members The Independent Planning Commission, My name is Judith Walker. I live in a suburb of (redacted) next to the Royal National Park. I appreciate the importance of our natural environment for physical and mental health, as do the many visitors to this area. I am writing to object to the Moolarben Coal Complex oc3, open cut pit extension and the development of four new open cut pits in the Moolarben Valley. The environmental impacts of these projects are not acceptable. The clearing of bush required will clear Koala habitat where healthy koalas are breeding. Local extinctions have occurred due to clearing and fragmentation of eucalypt woodlands and forests. The Koala was declared endangered in NSW in 2022. A NSW Legislative Council Committee stated that without urgent government intervention, koalas would become extinct in NSW before 2050. The Great Koala National Park was an election promise in 2023. Yet here we are in 2026 and the NSW government has not yet developed the management plan for the Great Koala National Park promised to deal with the crisis. More needs to be done if we are to save our koalas from the dangers of the disease chlamydiosis. We stand far more chance if we have separated populations. It would be a crime to allow this healthy population of koalas to be destroyed by allowing this project to go ahead. The Moolarben Open Cut oc3 Extension will clear land where there are breeding Regent Honeyeaters. Birdlife Australia reports that there is estimated to be between 250 to 300 of these birds in the wild. This is a critically endangered species. Birdlife Australia’s Recovery Team with the help of citizen scientists are thrilled to report in 2024 that their efforts are having positive effects. The Regent Honeyeater is found in eucalypt forests and woodlands. They are badly affected by land-clearing, with the clearance of nectar-producing trees and the poor health of many remnants, as well as competition for nectar from other honeyeaters. Therefore vague statements by Yancoal about offsets are totally unsatisfactory. The Moolarben Coal Mine is a thermal coal mine. This is the easiest coal to replace with renewable energy. Increased greenhouse gas emissions will result from the coal mined if the Moolarben extensions are approved. These emissions drive climate change throughout the world, which means extreme weather conditions. Australia’s coal burnt in China, Japan or India contributes to the climate change that affects our weather conditions in Australia. Extreme weather conditions lead to heatwaves, bushfires, floods. These have economic consequences for Australia, as well as for the rest of the world. NSW must meet its legislated climate targets. Refusing this application is one important step along the way. The existing mine will operate until 2038. There is no argument for serious effects on local employment. Renewable energy projects can fill the gap in employment by this time. I see it as vital that the Independent Planning Committee does not support the approval of the Moolarben oc3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Sincerely, Judith Walker (redacted). NSW 2230 |
Camille Clinton
|
ID |
22476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I would like to voice my concern and disapproval of the extension of this mine. Many of my concerns have already been raised but I will add my name to these in the hope that common sense will prevail and this mine will be closed. To name a few: 1. The critical survival of our native Koalas. At risk due to habitat destruction and the knock on affect of this. 2. The pollution and emissions that this mine has and will continue to have will have on the environment 3. The close vicinity that this mine has on the Munghorn Gap nature Reserve and the imminent impact it will have on the Reserve. The survival of one of Australia's most iconic , and endangered species must be paramount, not only for now but for the environmental future of Australia and the world. Please consider the long term ramifications of this mine if i is allowed to be extended. With Regards Camille Clinton |
Anne Ammann
|
ID |
22481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2786 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Re: Objection to Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Anne Ammann and I am writing to object to the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 coal mine extension on Wiradjuri Country in the Mid-Western region of New South Wales. 1. Nature, Recreation and Tourism Values The bushland landscapes surrounding the Moolarben mine, including areas near Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the broader western ranges of New South Wales, hold significant environmental, recreational and social value. I, together with family, friends and organised bushwalking groups from Sydney and surrounding regions, regularly visit this area for bushwalking, birdwatching, wildlife observation and exploration of native plant communities. Many outdoor and conservation groups use the region in similar ways. These activities support local economies through accommodation, hospitality and tourism services in surrounding towns, providing ongoing economic value that depends on the preservation of natural landscapes. Access to intact natural environments is also increasingly recognised as contributing to mental health, physical wellbeing and community resilience. In my own experience, involvement in bushwalking groups and living in bushland earlier in life played an important role in supporting my mental wellbeing. Now in retirement, bushwalking remains central to my health and quality of life. This reflects a broader community reliance on accessible natural environments for wellbeing and social connection. The permanent industrialisation or fragmentation of these landscapes would diminish not only biodiversity but also their long-term recreational, tourism and social value. The principle of intergenerational equity requires that future generations retain access to healthy, functioning natural environments. Expansion of coal mining in this location would reduce those opportunities. 2. Environmental and Biodiversity Impacts The proposed extension would involve substantial clearing of native vegetation, including habitat supporting threatened species such as koalas and Regent Honeyeaters. Habitat loss and fragmentation adjacent to protected areas, including Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, risk long-term ecological decline and reduced landscape connectivity. Biodiversity offsets cannot fully replace mature woodland ecosystems or the ecological complexity developed over long timeframes. Once disturbed by open-cut mining, these environments cannot be restored to their original condition within meaningful ecological timescales. In the context of Australia’s ongoing biodiversity decline, further habitat loss in this region is inconsistent with responsible environmental management. 3. Water and Groundwater Risks The project presents risks of groundwater drawdown and impacts on surface water systems and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. In a drying and warming climate, water security is increasingly critical for ecosystems, agriculture and regional communities. Approving expansion where uncertainty remains regarding long-term hydrological impacts creates unacceptable risk. Changes to groundwater systems may persist long after mining operations cease, with consequences extending beyond the life of the project. 4. Climate Impacts and NSW Climate Obligations The proposed extension would result in substantial additional greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the project, including operational emissions and emissions arising from the eventual combustion of the coal. These emissions form part of the project’s overall environmental impact and should be considered accordingly. New South Wales has established statutory and policy commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including the objectives of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, which recognises the need to reduce emissions and address climate risks in government decision-making. Approving new or expanded coal extraction projects that enable additional long-term emissions is inconsistent with the intent of these commitments. The NSW planning framework also requires consideration of ecologically sustainable development, including the precautionary principle and intergenerational equity. Scientific evidence demonstrates the urgent need for emissions reduction to limit climate impacts. Expanding coal production at this time increases cumulative climate risk and places a disproportionate burden on future generations. Climate impacts are already being experienced across NSW through worsening bushfires, drought and extreme heat events. Approval of projects that extend fossil fuel dependence contributes cumulatively to these impacts and undermines efforts to build climate resilience. For these reasons, approval of this proposal would not be consistent with NSW’s emissions reduction trajectory or long-term climate objectives. 5. Health and Community Impacts Open-cut coal mining contributes to dust, noise, blasting and air quality impacts affecting nearby communities and workers. Continued expansion prolongs exposure to these risks and delays economic transition toward industries that provide safer and more sustainable long-term employment outcomes. 6. Cumulative and Long-Term Public Interest Considerations The Moolarben extension contributes to cumulative environmental pressures in a region already affected by multiple mining operations. Incremental approvals compound impacts on biodiversity, water systems, landscape character and community wellbeing. The long-term public interest requires balancing economic activity with environmental protection, climate responsibility and social wellbeing. In this case, the environmental, climate, water and social costs outweigh the short-term benefits of continued coal extraction. Conclusion I acknowledge that mining has played an important role in supporting regional employment and communities in New South Wales, and that workers and their families deserve certainty and respect during economic transition. My objection is not directed at mine workers or local communities, but at the continued expansion of coal extraction at a time when environmental, climate and social risks are increasingly clear. Long-term regional prosperity will depend on investment in sustainable industries that protect environmental assets, community health and future economic opportunities. For the reasons outlined above including environmental degradation, water risk, biodiversity loss, climate impacts, loss of tourism and recreational value, and inconsistency with NSW climate obligations and the principles of ecologically sustainable development. I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse approval of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 extension. Sincerely, Anne Ammann |
Lyndal Sullivan
|
ID |
22516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
to the Independent planning Commission Please find my submission attached regards Lyndal |
|
Attachments |
To the Independent Planning Commission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 124.03 KB) |
Dianne Craig
|
ID |
22521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I write to you to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 mine expansion near Mudgee. As a nation, we are trying to save our environment and planet from climate change. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimate of 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. The Mine Expansion would bring serious and long lasting risks to groundwater and creeks. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjura cultural heritage. Please do not allow this expansion to be passed. Please think of your families and their families. We have a duty to the next generation to preserve our lands, our culture and our wildlife. Please. Yours sincerely Dianne Craig |
M Ryan
|
ID |
22536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Having just travelled around Australia and observed the increase in water temperature!!!!!!!! Seen fire destruction of bushland and houses by fire!!!!!!!! Seen whole areas flooded. It is Obvious we are doing ourselves in. Can you greedy people please learn the worlds history of previous empires collapsing?????????? And you will die too and as can be seen YOU CANT TAKE IT WITH YOU!!!! How about some decency. NO EXPANSION OF CLIMATE WRECKING MINES> Yours M RYAN |
Simon Staines
|
ID |
20231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben mine expansion poses a question as to whether we take seriously the continuing threat to the survival of koalas and other threatened species like the Regent Honeyeater in our region. The Regent Honeyeater is a critically endangered bird with only a few hundred remaking individuals left in the wild. As someone who has been intimately involved in the ongoing development of tourism in the Mudgee Region, a founding member of the Farmers Market local movement, small business owner and region tourism board member I submit that the time has surely come to say NO to this proposal. With climate change a real and ongoing threat to us all we ought to have the strength to say enough is enough. Regards. |
Talia Kinney
|
ID |
20381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Kinney, I am an activist for Rising Tide and the Greens party and a BA graduate of Western Sydney University. I am writing to express my dissent for Yancoal’s expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. The future of our export industries cannot survive in the fossil fuels sector. Most of our trade partners are transitioning to renewable energy, rendering our current international trade infrastructure unsustainable in the coming decades. The IPCC has found that nations like Australia who mine and export fossil fuels are liable for international prosecution, for contributing to the global climate change crisis and the devastation it has already begun to cause to global communities and habitats. The greatest threat to our native wildlife is habitat destruction. No mitigation strategy proposed by Yancoal could counter-balance the impact of expanding Australia’s most productive coal mine into the surrounding habitat. The commonwealth does not get enough revenue tax on fossil fuels to justify the nation’s continued reliance on mining and exports. Jobs in coal mining are not secure in the long term, due to the inevitable global transition to renewables, and so it is unjust to perpetuate regional economies and job markets’ reliance on the fossil fuels sector. The public consensus is that Australia must transition away from the fossil fuels sector for our export revenues, and make polluters like Yancoal pay the tax they are due for exploiting our precious non-renewable resources; not to approve expansions or new projects. As long as lobbyists and billion-dollar corporations have the upper hand on the approval of new fossil fuel projects and expansions, and local communities’ protests and demands are ignored, we cannot honestly call the political structure of this nation democratic. Remaining one of the world’s largest fossil fuels exporters undermines our domestic clean energy transition efforts. The entire globe shares one atmosphere; it is self-defeating to contribute to other nations’ carbon output. Please consider the welfare of future generations of Australians and global citizens, and deny Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension project. Yours sincerely, Mx. Kinney (Legally Miss Talia Kinney) (redacted) NSW 2780 I certify that this submission was not written by an LLM; that I am the sole author and all views expressed are my own. |
steve robinson
|
ID |
20401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to NSW Independent Planning Commission Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Application No SSD 33083358 I object to this proposal for an extension of mining My reasons for writing this submission I live about 100km from Moolarben Coal Mine. Why should I bother to write this submission? I am an 82 year old retired psychiatrist and I have lived for the last 14 years of my professional life, since 1993, in (redacted) NSW. (Probably the only psychiatrist in Australia living and working in and hearing the problems of a coal mining community). Like the community around Moolarben, (redacted) is a farming community with a National Park nearby. It has had a very large mining company descend upon the town which for a brief period provided riches for a few at the expense of local and global environmental pollution. This is a divisive combination. The various Hunter rural coal mining communities banded together for support and I came to know people from Wollar who have helped (redacted) and so believe I have a contribution to make in describing the situation to the IPC with the multiple adverse impacts and a few benefits that a coal mine brings to a community. Despite the high wages for a lucky few and a few inflated land purchases we remain financially disadvantaged local communities divided by the inequalities that temporary outside money and power bring about. I had moved to a rural area to plant trees to counter the worrying effects of climate change from rising greenhouse gases. The science was unequivocal 35 years ago. I have been a member of the local environment group and we are alarmed at the habitat destruction that invariably accompanies coal mining and the emerging mass extinction of species that appears to be associated with climate change and accentuated by habitat loss. Climate change is the biggest threat to our planet. As a medical practitioner and a psychiatrist I became interested in the mental and physical health effects of coal mining and of climate change on individuals, the local community and the wider world. One of the most uncaring aspects of mining I saw was that mine employees had a medical examination prior to employment and regular reassessments whilst employed. These recorded details such as their lung function and blood pressure so that there was a baseline from which to fight any subsequent workers compensation case if they believed their health had been adversely affected by their employment. The surrounding community residents however were never advised of the likely health impacts and so did not have relevant baseline health measurements. Consequently very few people have been able to succeed in later attempts to get compensation for the health impacts of coal mining. In my opinion all mining developments should be required to document the health status of the local residents. In the past very little importance has been placed on the adverse impacts of mining on local communities nor has any responsibility been taken for exacerbating climate change harms world wide by the burning of coal in countries to which our coal has been exported. I have recently become aware of the July 2025 NSW Court of Appeal, Denman Court Ruling, regarding Mount Pleasant Coal Mine. It is my understanding that the ruling made clear the likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments and social and economic impacts in the locality must be considered. The ruling stated community views on local climate harms are important, as is the suitability of the site for development. Additionally it is not enough to acknowledge climate is a global problem. Australia will be liable for climate harms, caused by our fossil fuel production, to other nations.. The Net Zero Commission, a NSW Government body of independent experts, in their Annual Report it states “Continued extensions and expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with emissions targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals”. Watching the TV news we are now daily made painfully aware of the escalating human and environmental disasters such as bushfires and flooding. We know these deaths and destruction of land and buildings are fueled by global warming and that this in turn is in large part due to burning fossil fuels. Yet we have allowed it to continue for decades since acquiring this knowledge. Medical bodies such as Doctors for the Environment of Australia have detailed the increase in infectious diseases and heat stress from global warming with many premature deaths. We need to spell out far more clearly the extent of the harms that are inevitable from allowing developments such as the Moolarben Coal Mine extension proposal. The harm consequences of approving Moolarben OC3 Extension Project Yancoal state they will extract 25 million tons of coal over the life of the project. The coal is thermal coal to be used for producing electricity. Solar power or wind power could produce electricity for a very competitive amount of money without significantly increasing global warming. Scientific consensus is that premature deaths from global warming currently result at an average rate of one death for every 1,000 tons of coal burned. This equates to 25,000 unnecessary premature deaths over the life of the project. These deaths from global warming will be spread all over the world. Proportionately Australia should expect about 100 of these deaths. Locally, particularly for residents within 5km of Moolarben mine, air pollution from coal mining coats every surface every day. It exacerbates asthma and also bronchitis. The very fine air particulates increase the rates of heart attacks and strokes. Water pollution for those on tank water arises because sulphur in the coal makes the rain water acidic and releases heavy metals including lead from any roof that was originally painted with lead paint and from brass plumbing fittings. This pollution is especially harmful for the brains of children. The NSW Dept of Health has told me they can’t be responsible for water quality in privately owned water tanks. A financial burden is caused by acid rain water rapidly rusting tin roofs, gutters and water tanks. Low frequency noise from mining machinery and coal trains interferes with sleep and brain functioning whilst awake. Blasting shakes the structure of housing and frightens young and old. I have seen a child terrified their house was going to collapse on her during blasting. All of this greatly decreases the quality of life for the local community. Farming land close to coal mines becomes degraded by toxic dust on pasture and disturbance of the groundwater drainage. Stock are also liable to similar health risks. There are fears heavy metal contamination from pollution will enter the food chain. Extreme heat resulting from global warming has resulted in temperature records being broken year after year in the past decade. 50 degree Centigrade temperatures are only a year or two away. Humans are not adapted for living in such heat. Extreme heat significantly impacts mental health increasing stress, anxiety, irritability and risk of psychiatric emergencies. It disrupts sleep, impairs cognition and decreases social interactions. Vulnerable groups include the very young, the elderly and those with pre-existing mental illness. Older homes and those in socially disadvantaged areas, such as close to coal mines, usually have less house insulation and no air conditioning. High temperatures interfere with the body’s ability to process medication and prolonged heat causes inflammation within the brain. There is a direct correlation between extreme heat and suicide rates. Heat related deaths increased by approximately 85% for the four year periods from 2001-2004 compared with 2017-2021. Between 2030 and 2050 climate change is expected to cause 250,000 additional deaths annually from heat stroke, undernutrition, diarrhoea, malaria etc. Every ton of coal left in the ground will literally save lives. Suitability of the site for development Four new pits are being proposed along Moolarben Valley. This is on undisturbed land very close to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which is host to an estimated 23 threatened species. Locally Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is an important natural asset and tourist destination. The clearing of several hundred acres would cause pressure on the Nature Reserve fauna and flora and be an eyesore that is bad for tourism. Cleared land dries the surrounding vegetation accelerating bush fires. At a global level it is estimated we are currently losing species at between 100 and 1000 times the background rate as a result of various human activities such as land clearing and burning fossil fuels. This species loss is so significant it has attracted the label of the sixth mass extinction of this planet or the Anthropocene extinction and the human species may or may not become part of it. I can’t think of any less suitable development for the site. I strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Dr Steve Robinson (Fellow of the Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatry, Member of Doctors for the Environment of Australia, Past President of Gloucester Environment Group, Grandfather) Contacts:- (redacted) |
Peter West
|
ID |
20461 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Hastings Birdwatchers |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2443 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Mine Expansion To the Independent Planning Commission: My name is Peter West, I am Conservation Officer for Hastings Birdwatchers. We are an affiliate of BirdLife Australia, the preeminent national avian research and conservation organization. We are deeply concerned about this proposal to clear nearly 500 hectares of native habitat for threatened species. This includes around 400 hectares of box gum woodlands. The clearing will bring the coal mine to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. We have visited this reserve as a club and it is a haven for threatened wildlife, including many threatened birds, as well as the koala. The impact on the reserve will be immense, with the noise and all the mining operations proceeding right next door. The clearing for the mine includes clearing 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat. The Regent Honeyeater is classified as Critically Endangered under the EPBC Act. There used to be thousands of these birds and habitat clearing has reduced their population to around 400 birds at the most. If we keep approving habitat clearance that contains threatened species, they will become extinct. The proposal is also asking permission to clear over 100 hectares of Koala habitat. The Koala is now classified as endangered in NSW. No offsets can make up for this loss. There will still be less habitat and more species sliding towards extinction. The coal for export will also result in more carbon emissions and more extreme weather. The climate has been steadily warming this century. Every decade since 1950 has been warmer than the previous one. This summer we have observed some of the hottest temperatures ever recorded in parts of Australia. Please do not approve the expansion of this mine and hence the clearing of habitat, which will not only lead to more extinctions but also to the worsening of climate change. Thank you for considering my submission Sincerely Peter West Conservation Officer, Hastings Birdwatchers. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the proposed expansion of the Yancoal mine through the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Extension near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I strongly oppose this proposal because it would cause serious and irreversible harm to biodiversity, water systems, cultural heritage, and the climate, while delivering little meaningful public benefit. This landscape should be protected and incorporated into the adjoining Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not further industrialised through open-cut mining. I am also deeply concerned about the late amendments submitted by the proponent. These amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation, do not reduce the mine footprint, and rely on off-site “habitat enhancement” that cannot meaningfully address the project’s impacts. These changes have been introduced far too late in the assessment process and undermine genuine community consultation. They should not be accepted, and they do not reduce the severe biodiversity impacts of the proposal. My key concerns are outlined below. - Irreversible destruction of threatened species habitat and ecosystems. The proposal would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, including critical habitat supporting threatened species. This includes extensive clearing of koala habitat, habitat for the Regent Honeyeater, and large areas of the endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. These ecosystems are already supporting wildlife and cannot be recreated through offsets or so-called enhancement measures. Mining within 100 metres of a long-standing conservation reserve places a highly biodiverse landscape at unacceptable risk. - Inadequate protection of the surrounding conservation landscape. The valley forms part of a connected ecological system that should be managed as a single conservation landscape with Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Noise, blasting, and vibration impacts on the reserve and its wildlife have been poorly assessed, and the recommended 500-metre buffer has not been adopted. This is an unacceptable risk to an area of recognised ecological significance. - Severe climate impacts inconsistent with NSW commitments. The expansion would generate tens of millions of tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime, at a time when NSW is already struggling to meet legislated emissions reduction targets. Findings of the Net Zero Commission make clear that new or expanded coal projects are inconsistent with climate commitments, yet these concerns have not been adequately addressed. The assessment also fails to properly account for downstream emissions and their economic and social costs. - Groundwater and surface water risks. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown lasting decades, placing important drought refuges such as Moolarben Creek at risk. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems and riparian vegetation may be permanently affected. Proposed groundwater monitoring after approval is inadequate. Baseline monitoring must occur before any approval is granted, not after. - Damage to Aboriginal cultural heritage. The proposal would destroy numerous Aboriginal cultural artefacts of high cultural significance and further fragment Country. Continued cumulative disturbance undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain cultural practices, connection to Country, and protection of sacred sites. - Lack of clear public benefit or employment justification. The mine is already approved to operate for many years without this expansion, and the project does not meaningfully increase employment. At the same time, the region sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy development is expected to generate substantial long-term employment opportunities. The expansion would primarily serve export markets while leaving NSW communities with environmental and climate costs. - Cumulative impacts across the region. This proposal cannot be considered in isolation. It adds to the impacts of neighbouring mine expansions, including the Ulan Coal Mine and Wilpinjong Coal Mine, which affect the same interconnected landscapes, water systems, and threatened species. The cumulative effect is escalating and unacceptable ecological degradation. Conclusion This proposal would cause permanent environmental damage, increase climate harm, threaten water resources, and destroy irreplaceable cultural heritage, while providing minimal public benefit. The late amendments do not reduce these impacts and should not be accepted. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Mick Daley
|
ID |
20536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission My name is Mick, I am a 59 year schoolteacher in the (redacted) of NSW and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students at my school are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Mick Daley (redacted) NSW 2480 |
Meg Benson
|
ID |
20541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Meg Benson. I have lived in (redacted) since 2022 before that I was in the Blue Mountains World Heritage National Park for 30 years. The wild location continues to bring much tourism, economic impact and opportunity for healthy lifestyles in the BM. I have worked in two industries; The helping professions, as a Psychotherapist/ Adolescent and Family Therapist where I have provided therapy for cases where youth and families have sometimes expressed terror and anxiety about their futures on this fragile planet in regards to scientific facts and evidence. The 2nd industry I have worked in for 15 yrs is the music industry; as a live music event producer and promoter focussing on community wellbeing via high quality destination events creating access to the medicine of live story telling via song and original music while at the same time offering an antidote to isolation and depression via in person connection and distraction from struggles through imaginative experiences and spectacular visual presentations. I care about stopping Moolarben OC3 expansion because: 1/. Using up the existing mine is enough for now to carry on with while we also swiftly prepare for more responsible transitions to renewable sources. No immediate jobs lost, but no excuse to expand an industry that has devastating impact on local and global climate systems and natural disasters. 2/. The proposed expansion infringes directly on environmental reserves featuring endangered species and the key habitat that enables their continuity. 3/. It is already one of the largest mines in NSW, let’s not make it larger. I am 54, and when I was 14 I was following the science in my geography class about the impact of non/renewable resources. It is ridiculous and irresponsible that 40 years on that such a proposal is even made. 4/.Mental illness, anxiety and suicide are ever on the rise, almost in sync with rising sea levels as a direct impact from the blind stubborn repetitive indulgence in the short term gains from the fossil fuel industry- uncertainty erodes mental heath, and climate refugees disturbs essential community and cultural lives. 5/. Further expansion demonstrates zero responsibility toward trends of habitat loss for flora and fauna and in addition no consideration of the decimation of any communities unfortunate to be living in the dark shadow of a proposed mine, and god forbid an existing mine wreaking havoc on critical wildlife. 6/. I don’t think stopping the existing mine use is suddenly necessary- though I DEFINITELY OPPOSE ANY FURTHER EXPANSION. 7/. The greater Mudgee area is a tourism destination, nothing inspiring to see at a black hole wasteland. We should be focussing on destination tourism events to help strengthen local businesses, and opportunities for young people, their families and those who pay to stay for all the wonderful reasons seen listed on Mudgee tourism and for those initiatives better still yet to come, if our reputation snd award winning allure is not trashed. You are confusing our proud reputation as leaders in renewable energy farms. Stop any expansion to Moolarben OC3 . Do the right thing for your children/ grandchildren, your community, your state, your country and your planet. Also please act swiftly with alternative jobs in renewables for the hard working coal miners. Cheers |
Martine Porret
|
ID |
20566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2106 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Martine I am a 70 year retired in the (redacted) and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. We are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Martine Porret (redacted) NSW 2106 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this proposed development firstly because coal mine expansion directly contradicts the urgent reductions required to save our climate, native species and society. Secondly I object to the destruction of prime koala habitat. Development like this will continue to ouch koalas toward extinction. Third, the mine will create ecological destruction and pollution at the site, as well as when it is burned. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We should be doing ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING WE CAN TO COMPREHENSIVELY ADDRESS THE CLIMATE CRISIS. This project is should NOT go ahead if we want a sustainable future for our children - the project costs should instead be invested in renewable energy projects. |
Andrew Town
|
ID |
20591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2132 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply troubled by the proposed expansion of the coalmine which would involve the destruction of 113 hectares of active breeding koala habitat. As i understand it, this expansion would also destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Koala communities are under immense stress and need protecting. The clearing of the habitat also reduces carbon sequestration and the increased coal production would see an additional 64 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent pollution. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in July, 2025 that nations have binding legal obligations under international law to combat climate change. They are obliged to co-operate internationally, upholding fundamental rights and avoid significant environmental harm. This decision impacts the health of the local flora and fauna but also the local and international community due to adding to the negative impacts of climate change. The IPC is obliged to act in the long term interests of the community and the environment and only a rejection of the proposed development will meet this obligation. |
James Crowley
|
ID |
20606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the Moolarben OC3 Extension. The DPHI’s Assessment Report overlooks critical legal shifts and specific local risks that make this project a poor outcome for the state. 1. Inadequate assessment of scope 3 and local climate impacts The Assessment Report admits that the Central West Orana region faces rising temperatures and increased fire risks. However, it fails to explain how adding another 64 million tonnes of scope 3 emissions will not worsen these exact local threats. Under the Mount Pleasant Court of Appeal ruling (Denman Aberdeen v MACH Energy [2024] NSWCA 163), the Commission is now legally required to address the "causal connection" between these emissions and the specific impacts on our local environment. Citing that the receiving countries are party to the Paris agreement is not legally sufficient; the Commission must consider the specific regional climate damage this project will cause beyond the existing projections. 2. Incompatible with NSW Net Zero laws This extension is impossible to reconcile with the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. The Net Zero Commission’s 2025 Spotlight Report is very clear on this: “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act”. Approving this extension while NSW is already “not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets for 2030 and 2035” is counterproductive. It effectively forces other industries and communities to make deeper, more expensive cuts to compensate for this project's emissions. 3. Irreversible biodiversity loss, regardless of offsets The project will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation, including 401 hectares of Box Gum Woodland, which is a Critically Endangered Ecological Community and a candidate species for Serious and Irreversible Impacts (SAII). Relying on the Biodiversity Offsets Scheme to fix this is unreliable. The NSW Audit Office (2022) found that the Department 'has not effectively designed core elements of the Scheme' and that there is a 'significant risk' that the gains made will 'not be sufficient to offset losses'. While efforts have been made to address these issues (Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Offsets Scheme) Act 2024), for a community as rare as Box Gum Woodland, there is a “substantial shortfall in the current supply of relevant credits”, meaning the habitat destroyed here likely cannot be replaced elsewhere. We cannot rely on speculative restoration or mine rehabilitation to bring back a community that is already at high risk of extinction. 4. Water risks and threats to ecological refuges The Independent Expert Advisory Panel for Mining has raised serious doubts about the “accuracy of local-scale predictions” in the proponent’s water modeling. The project is predicted to cause a 5-metre groundwater drawdown along Moolarben Creek. The panel concluded this poses a “moderate risk to deep-rooted groundwater dependent vegetation”. These areas serve as vital refuges for endangered species like the Regent Honeyeater and Koala; depleting their water source during a period of increasing climate stress is an unacceptable risk. Conclusion This project is not in the public interest. It relies on a flawed offset system, ignores the warnings of the Net Zero Commission, and fails to meet the legal standards for assessing local climate damage set by the Court of Appeal. I request that the Commission refuse consent for the OC3 Extension. |
Catherine Evangelista
|
ID |
20611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2550 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Do not expand this coal mine. Seek out alternatives to coal mining. There are plenty to choose from. Phase out fossil fuels in favour of more sustainable and cleaner energy resources. It's that simple. Just do it. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is (redacted), I am a 31 year old logistician in the (redacted) and I hold grave concerns about expanding coal mining in NSW, due to the increasing severity and frequency of climate change fuelled impacts across the continent. I saw my hometown burn during black summer bushfires in 2019/2020. I am a volunteer emergency responder and I know the effects that climate change will have on our communities. The consensus from both the IPCC and scientific community is that we need to rapidly transition away from coal, oil, and gas, and new fossil fuel projects are throwing fuel on the fire. This mine creates and represents a terrifying prospect for future generations and lives and livelihoods across Australia, and indeed the world. Older people in my community are at risk of heat exhaustion, and we are one severe storm away from homes being lost to another significant flooding event. I am sending this submission to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project could also cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and to approve it would be highly irresponsible. The project risks threatened species with habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. And we are heading into an era where our greatest resource, water, is under increasing risk across the continent. We have seen coal mines shirk responsibility when it comes to water protection for generations, you just need to look as far as the Bravus Carmichael Coal mine in central QLD for examples of promises made and broken, and there we are now seeing devastating consequences on the Doongmabulla Springs. Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion risks long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. For the above reasons, I strongly the Independent Planning Commission to consider refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. I am not the only one, and these objections need to be heard and actioned. Thank you for the consideration my submission. Yours, (redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This develpoment is moraly and enviormentaly wrong. Because this is koala habitat and Koalas are endangered. I am not against mining ect, I am against nedless destruction of wild habitat and endangering wildlifes habitat, especialy endangered wild life. If you aproe of this preposal, you have no moral consious and I fail how you caoud sleep at night. Please do not aprove this unnesecary and enviormentaly wrong preposal. There are other sources and non wild areas to mine on. |
Tom Hunt
|
ID |
20626 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Citizens Climate Lobby Australia |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2529 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Take a look at the CO2 in our atmosphere. CSIRO tests of the cleanest air in the world coming from the southern ocean show that our global society is now adding CO2 and Methane to the air at twice the rate it was back in the 90's when the UN called us to action. https://capegrim.csiro.au. The world is now twice as far away from net-zero and still moving in the wrong direction. Australia's coal production has more than doubled in that time, and we now contribute more than 4.5% of the worlds carbon pollution from our mines, while we are only 0.3% of the world's population. Approving the expansion of any coal mines will only work to worsen our planets fast heating climate and would be completely neglecting our children's future. We are well on the way to 3 degrees of warming which will make large areas of Australia unliveable. Is that really worth the short term profits from more mining? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, further contribute to climate change impacts and negatively impact the community. The proposal should be rejected. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am concerned about about the destruction of essential habitat for threatened species and other biodiversity, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as habitat for Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project will destroy 401ha of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat for these threatened species or ecosystems. Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve will be particularly at risk, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The proposed project will further contribute to dangerous climate change, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. There is a clear lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The long term benefits to the community of a healthy and biodiverse local environment will outweigh any short term benefits and contribute to a more sustainable economy. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Sincerely, (redacted) |
Lorraine Bower
|
ID |
20636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2038 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2151 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should instead, be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Isn't it about time we stopped killing the natural environment and dumping CO2 and methane into the atmosphere? |
Mara de Jongh
|
ID |
20666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2575 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Mara, a retired teacher, and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, especially the clearing of significant vegetation, especially its impact on koalas and Regent Honyeaters. • Impact of mining operations, such as dust, noise, and vibrations, on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with its diverse ecosytems and wildlife. • the long-term water and groundwater risks to Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Mara de Jongh (redacted) |
Robert Skappel
|
ID |
20671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2032 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
In my opinion there is more value in leaving the proposed land as a nature reserve, for all the biodiversity to flourish, rather than being destroyed for more coal that we don't need at this time ! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly oppose, (redacted) owned Yancoal Moolarben OC3 expansion which if approved would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is lalready failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. The elected government cannot continue to support and approve mining expansion such as the expansion being proposed at Moolarben. I urge the government to stop the expansion at Moolarben. |
Mary Burke
|
ID |
20681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3020 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a concerned citizen, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am worried that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. Instead of developing an open cut mine, this rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. My concerns focus on the following issues: The loss of habitat for threatened species, especially for koals and Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Mary Burke |
Dean Corcoran
|
ID |
20686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2079 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. My concerns relate to the project’s environmental impacts, its contribution to climate change, and the long‑term risks it poses to water resources, biodiversity, and surrounding communities. I am also increasingly concerned about the erosion of public trust when major decisions appear to prioritise short‑term industry interests over the wellbeing of citizens. 1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Risk Approving a new coal extension in 2026 is fundamentally incompatible with the emissions‑reduction goals set by the NSW and Australian governments, as well as international climate commitments. The Assessment Report acknowledges that the project will generate significant Scope 1, 2, and especially Scope 3 emissions. These emissions will contribute to worsening climate impacts—heatwaves, bushfires, droughts, and extreme weather—that already affect NSW communities. When governments endorse projects that run counter to their own climate policies, it undermines public confidence that long‑term community safety is being prioritised. 2. Impacts on Water Resources The project area sits within a landscape already under pressure from cumulative mining activity. Key concerns include: Groundwater drawdown Reduced surface water availability Contamination risks from mine runoff Long‑term impacts on water‑dependent ecosystems and agricultural users Water security is one of the most critical issues facing NSW. When approvals are granted despite clear risks to this finite resource, it contributes to a sense that community needs are secondary to industry demands. 3. Biodiversity Loss and Habitat Fragmentation The extension will clear additional native vegetation and disturb habitat used by threatened species. The region has already experienced extensive ecological fragmentation from existing mining operations. Further clearing will: Reduce habitat connectivity Increase pressure on threatened flora and fauna Undermine regional conservation objectives Offsets cannot replicate mature ecosystems or the ecological functions they provide. When irreplaceable habitats are repeatedly traded away, it weakens public trust that environmental protections are being meaningfully upheld. 4. Cumulative Impacts This project cannot be assessed in isolation. The Moolarben complex is part of a cluster of mines in the region, and the cumulative impacts—noise, dust, water extraction, habitat loss, and emissions—are substantial. Communities in the area have already borne decades of mining‑related impacts. Extending the life and footprint of this mine prolongs these burdens. When cumulative impacts are acknowledged but still accepted, it reinforces the perception that community wellbeing is not being placed at the centre of decision‑making. 5. Social and Economic Considerations While the project may provide short‑term employment, the long‑term economic future of NSW lies in clean energy, not expanded coal extraction. Approving new coal projects delays the transition, increases future remediation liabilities, and exposes workers and communities to economic instability as global demand for coal declines. Communities need confidence that governments are planning for a stable, sustainable future—not locking regions into industries that the world is moving away from. Conclusion For reasons relating to climate change, water security, biodiversity protection, cumulative community impacts, and the need to restore public trust in decisions that genuinely prioritise citizens, I strongly object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Wendy Kelton
|
ID |
20691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6280 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Wendy, I am a 86 year old retired tour guide from Busselton in Western Australia and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt everywhere in Australia at the moment. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission |
Ute Herzog-Hupfauf
|
ID |
20696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Ute, and I am a 73 year old clinical psychologist, mother and grandmother. I hold grave concerns about the expansion of coal mining in Australia, as distressing information about the impact of climate change in our country and across the globe reaches me in new almost on a daily basis. This is not just about extreme weather that kills people and animals, but also about such changes leading to food insecurity and water shortages. One of the factors that can mitigate these factors is the preservation of native flora and fauna and the expansion of wind and solar farms. Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country represents the exact opposite: destruction of natural vegetation, loss of habitat, danger to survival of species, and more coal to add to emissions. This is not just contrary to the promises made by the current government, it is contrary to reason and rational policy. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Joseph Zagari
|
ID |
20701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2068 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. |
Nigel Howard
|
ID |
20706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2100 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Regarding the Proposed Moorlaben Open Pit Coal Mine Extension Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Moolarben project extension. My name is Nigel Howard and I have been very concerned about the impacts of climate change for over 50 years throughout my career in UK, US and Australia and now into retirement to continuing climate research and activism. I am a Chemist (FRSC) and have worked in senior roles, public and private sector, in UK, US and Australia where I founded the environmental consultancy “Edge Environment” which now employs over 80 People in Australia and internationally. I was the founder of the Northern Beaches Climate Action Network. My research for the last 4 years (together with Prof Peter Newman from Curtin University has been into the lives likely to be lost due to climate change – our scientific paper is submitted to a peer reviewed journal and when published will be highly controversial for that large numbers of deaths likely caused per megatonne of CO2-e emitted (at least 660 per megatonne of CO2-e even if we by some miracle curtail all emissions globally by 2050). The deaths per megatonne go up for every year that we fail to hit out Paris commitment deadlines. Our paper will reveal the culpability of Government Ministers, governments and other institutions including IPC that have approved new or extensions to fossil fuel projects. For example, Murray Watt’s approval of the NW Gas Shelf project alone is likely to cause at least 2.6-3.9m Deaths globally, mostly through the 2050’s (i.e. to our own children and grandchildren’s generations). This surely amounts to intergenerational genocide. The Moolarben project extension is slated to produce 16Mt of coal per annum from 2025 to 2034. When burnt, this will emit about 58Mt of CO2-e per year for 9 years – so 528Mt of CO2-e likely killing at least 35,000 people. Do you want this on your conscience, or will you assume that this can just be fobbed off? In due course those responsible are likely to be challenged in courts globally by our youth. I also support the submissions from the Nature Conservation Council and their supporters. I am making this submission to ensure that you cannot say that you didn’t know! Thank you for considering this submission, kind regards, Nigel Howard FRSC |
Janet Murray
|
ID |
20711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Pls see attached file. |
|
Attachments |
objection_to_moolarben_extension_proposal.pdf (PDF, 235.18 KB) |
Grant Norris
|
ID |
20716 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Australian Fauna Society Inc. |
|
Location |
Victoria 3228 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Grant, I am a wildlife shelter operator in Victoria, and the president of the Australian Fauna Society Inc. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the continual loss of established old growth habitats, and the direct impacts that it is having on our native wildlife. Many critically endangered species have been documented at this location, and further expansion of this mine will put these animals at further risk of extinction. Australia has the world's worst record for mammal extinctions since colonisation. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas have been recorded, as well as colonies of breeding Regent Honeyeater and the loss of microbat habitat. Proposed biodiversity offsets cannot replace established old growth habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve will directly impact the wildlife with further loss of habitat and the effects of this habitat destruction and resultant noise polution • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown will harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater that are necessary to a balanced ecosystem. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets would be irresponsible. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Given all of these points of discussion, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Grant Norris President, Australian Fauna Society Inc (redacted), Vic., 3228 |
Janet Mayer
|
ID |
20721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2534 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. |
Mindy Carr
|
ID |
20726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2250 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the proposed expansion of the mine would be clearing critical habitat for many native species. It threatens critical ecosystems, and water sources. The NSW government has committed to reducing emissions and i believe this would do the complete opposite. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is (redacted), I am a Lawyer in (redacted) and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states. Renewable energy should be the primary focus, and instead extensions to coal projects are being approved. From an economic perspective, Australia is going to be left behind by the rest of the world if we continue to expand coal projects. We need to shift the focus away and towards renewables, starting yesterday. The world has already reached the first critical climate tipping point, being the recent late 2025 mass coral bleaching event. Scientists warn that this is one of the few critical tipping points that once crossed, we cannot go back. The damage to our environment, our ecosystem, our livelihoods, and the fabric of our society will be in threat. This first tipping point has ALREADY been crossed. This is why I am objecting to the extension of the Moolarben coal project. Not only do coal projects create extreme climate ramifications, but if this extension is approved, the cultural damage to the landscape will be severe. This disproportionately impacts First Nations people, damaging Country for generations. I am also concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (redacted) |
TIM BAILEY
|
ID |
20741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2576 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a resident in the Wingecarribee area, which lies south of the proposed development in NSW. I am 67 years old and still in full-time employment as a rural doctor who practices in Emergency Medicine. I have taken a strong and involved interest in Community developments throughout the Nation for many decades. Over that time I have seen too many promises broken in the pursuit unnecessary development. In my opinion, this is one of those developments, as it does not provide any further employment in the region, as opposed to the alternate pursuit in funding renewable energy developments, which are predicted to provide up to 2000 additional jobs by 2030. Further than being unnecessary, it will actively promote global warming, an act which runs completely contrary to the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, to which our nation is a signatory. In addition to the unarguable increase to global CO2 emissions, this project will: - decrease biodiversity in the surrounding area, in particular due to the 23 identified threatened species which live in the land to be cleared - impact the existing breeding population of koalas which has been identified ion the land to be cleared and the surrounding bushland - cause another reduction in extent of the Box Gum woodlands, which themselves are a threatened community, to be cleared under the planned mining tenements - diminish the current height and extent of groundwater in the surrounding area, thus further impacting the drought resistance of the region - whilst simultaneously increasing the likelihood of extreme drought through climate change Finally, the proposed mining will permanently destroy at least 32 identified waridjuri sacred sites and artefacts which are found in the area to be destroyed by clearing. In shorts when there are so many legal, moral and environmental reasons NOT to mine, and so FEW reasons to continue approve the mine development, I respectfully request that this extension to the current mine plan be refused, permanently |
Claudia Koller
|
ID |
20746 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2294 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need to consider the survival of life on this planet before everything else. Jobs, profits, convenience etc. that may be positive outcomes of the development are temporary, degradation of the environment and nature that we depend on for our survival is not. We need to do everything in our power to preserve the environmental conditions that make our planet such a beautiful and life-supporting place to give our children (and ourselves) a future. This is not optional. Jobs and profits are. |
Tom Maughan
|
ID |
20756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2484 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Climate Scientist have called for the phase out of fossil fuels for decades. It’s time we start prioritising the future of our planet over the profit of a few individuals. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2786 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing as a resident of the Blue Mountains where we have been subject to fires that destroy houses and burned 5 millions hectares of land in NSW alone. I would like to formally object to Yancoal’s plan to expand the Moolarben OC3 coal mine. I am deeply concerned about the serious and irreversible harm this project would cause to our environment, climate, and community. The area in question is a rich, biodiverse landscape that should be protected as part of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not opened to further mining. The suggested amendments fail to lessen the clearing of native vegetation, arrive far too late to be meaningfully evaluated, and would nevertheless cause serious biodiversity impacts. My main concerns are: 1. Threatened species and habitat loss – The proposal would clear more than 113 hectares of known koala habitat, as well as habitat for the Regent Honeyeater and several micro‑bat species. Offsets cannot replace habitat that already supports threatened animals. 2. Impact on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve – Mining is planned within 100 metres of the reserve, yet there has been little assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts on the reserve’s ecosystems. 3. Water and groundwater risks – The expansion could cause long‑term groundwater drawdown, threatening Moolarben Creek and groundwater‑dependent ecosystems that act as vital drought refuges for wildlife. 4. Climate impacts – The project would generate roughly 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse‑gas emissions, at a time when NSW is not on track to meet the targets set out in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 or the Paris Agreement. 5. Lack of public benefit – There is no clear justification for jobs or economic benefit, especially when the region is being encouraged to develop renewable‑energy projects. These issues are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the goals of the Paris Agreement, and the broader need to protect our state’s biodiversity and climate. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Independent Planning Commission: * Reject the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. * Incorporate the land slated for mining into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to ensure its protection. * Continue to prioritize renewable‑energy development and sustainable employment for our community. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely |
Richard Weatherley
|
ID |
20766 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2035 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See upload |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 expansion 20260216.pdf (PDF, 30.16 KB) |
Peter Cranston
|
ID |
20776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2602 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired environmental scientist - much of my career involved assessment of the relationship between fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions, and global warming - and the impact a warmer world is having on biodiversity on land and in the waters, inland and oceanic. This is accepted fact, not a belief: use of coal (and gas) causes much of the global warming already with us. It is obvious that there must be reduction of our emissions. And here we have a proposal to emit unabated million tonnes of greenhouse gas over its life, equivalent to more than 50% of NSW’s total annual emissions. No 'ifs' and 'buts' - the enormous climate impact is simply unacceptable. For us and our children and grandchildren for sure, but we also have a moral and ethical obligation to conserve biodiversity. Please reject the proposal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2778 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Clio, I am a 40 year old mum of two young boys in the Blue Mountains and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Australia due to the well known, well understood climate impacts of burning fossil fuels and the irreversible damage to biodiversity and water resources of the mines themselves. Therefore, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Clio Collar |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a retired state public servant (NSW) having served the State for 41 years. I have deep concerns relating to the expansion of coal mining in our stat across a broad range of issues. I write in objeciont to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and most likely irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. This area has rich biodiversity and supports many Australia only species including some seriously threatened birds and animals and rather than being mined and destroyed, the area shoudl be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve where it can be protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss. The mine expansion proposal includes the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. These threatened species need protection and no biodiversity offsets can be trusted to effectively replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. 100 metres provides a totally insufficient buffer zone against mining activities. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that would harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, alone is sufficient reason to stop this expansion. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal mining is an old answer to our ongoing need for energy. Continuing it via expansions such as that proposed is a direct contradiction to NSW climate goals. Experts and the community know that solar and renewables are the environmentally and therefore morally responsible ways forward to meet our energy needs. Approving the Mooarbin OC3 expansion would reward short term greed at the expense of future generations right to live in a habitable world. During the decision process I support the call that the Yancoal amendments should be rejected, as should the proposed expansion. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3020 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [name redacted], I am a 52 year Environmental Health Officer in Western Melbourne and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. The natural environment needs to be protected at all costs. Coal a fossil fuel has shown the impacts of climate change and green house gas emissions. Thank you Regards [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Given what the world now knows and accepts about the impact of carbon emissions on the climate (and thereby the future of the world), it is irredeemably irresponsible and totally unacceptable to increase carbon emissions. Alternatives are now available. To knowingly increase carbon emissions is nothing less that criminal given what it will do to our children and to other species with which we share this extraordinary planet. Please ponder hard the future you leave for our (including your) children and other species on which their future survival and enjoyment depends. |
JOY Nason
|
ID |
20821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2103 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Just at a critical time in our planet’s history with climate change threatening our very existence, we are told there is a proposal by Moolarben to expand a mine that would clear over 100 hectares of koala habitat and bring mining very close to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I believe this expansion would be irresponsible to say the least and anyone with a conscience would not consider putting profits before saving our fragile natural resources. Please do the right thing and do not approve this expansion. Thank you. |
Damian Buck
|
ID |
20826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2620 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I cannot accept: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Damian |
Brian Richter
|
ID |
20831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
South Australia 5112 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This planet is already in decline and we as a civilisation must reverse these harmful effects . We must say no to this project so the future generations and our home [ mother earth ] has a chance to recover . Please do what is required to save this planet . |
Rhonda Allen
|
ID |
20836 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Toowoomba Knitting Nannas Against Coal and Gas |
|
Location |
Queensland 4350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal is 78% Chinese owned only 2% of the coal stays here in Australia. This coal mine will damage vital koala habitat, ecosystems, water and land beyond repair. It will never be rehabilitated to what it was. When the world including China is moving away fast from this filthy toxic industry why would we be expanding this mine? We need to be protecting our land for future generations not digging it up!!! Australians who want to preserve our unique land for farming, enjoying nature and living in wild places are being pushed further and further out. This mine expansion must not go ahead. |
Peter Tilley
|
ID |
20841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2294 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Climate change needs to be acknowledged and addressed. Fossil fuels need to be fazed out |
Anne Quinlivan
|
ID |
20846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2518 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Good morning, that we're even having to make submissions about the mine extension going ahead is completely flying in the face of the URGENT ADVICE from innumerable climate scientists re how critically important it is that we take diligent steps to LOWER OUR EMISSIONS NOW. This isn't some drill you know. Climate action isn't an option. It's imperative to OUR CHILDREN & GRANDCHILDREN that we stop being so damned cavalier about their future, & that the government WE ELECTED, yes, we elected, in that WE PUT YOU IN THE JOB remember, stops extending coal & gas licences & starts standing up to the bullies in the fossil fuel industry. Not forgetting that the escalating impacts of climate change are going to cost BILLIONS, do isn't it time you told the fossil fuel companies where to go? I'm so tired of this. I'm tired of fighting my elected representatives in order to try & salvage some form of LIVEABLE FUTURE for coming generations of Australians. The SHAME & ANGER I feel when trying to explain to my grandkids what climate change means & WHY this country is not doing enough is appalling. And let's face it, GREED & SELF INTEREST is ultimately the reason we're not doing enough to lower our emissions. So too, protecting our forests is paramount to combatting climate disruption & safeguarding the aquifers this country & our agricultural resilience depends on. Forests are a KNOWN STABILISER of weather systems, & given the MEASURABLE INCREASE IN EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS across Australia & the globe, protecting & regenerating forests should be high on the agenda. Forests also protect topsoil & supply essential water to the aforementioned groundwater reserves upon which much of the inland agricultural sector depends. Meanwhile, Australia has the HIGHEST MAMMAL EXTINCTION RATE ON EARTH. Do you think that's something to be proud of? Does it matter that this abhorrent statistic continues to climb under your watch? YES, YOUR WATCH. It certainly does. You must NOT ALLOW THIS EXTENSION TO GO THROUGH. We cannot continue to blithely ignore the extreme impacts that atmospheric warming is already having on this country & the planet or refuse to account for & take responsibility for the greenhouse emissions we also export. I've voted Labor for the last 40 odd years. I voted for you again last year for the EXPRESS REASON THAT YOU SAID YOU'D TAKE STRONG & CONCERTED ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Yet here we are, with more coal extensions in the works & the UTTER INSANITY of Fracking & Coal Seam Gas being let loose in this country & depleting & contaminating our precious groundwater. What gives? We live in fraught times, & the times demand people of courage & integrity to stand up & be counted. To not succumb to the demands of the fossil fuel industry, & to clearly communicate to the Australian electorate the concerns & the science behind your decisions. Regards, Anne Quinlivan |
Dominic Case
|
ID |
20851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I have been an active member of a local climate action group in inner Sydney for nearly 20 years. I am aware of the threats to a range of native species in the area, as well as the risk of contaminating ground water. Protecting local flora and fauna is not a matter of saving cute' animals, but of preserving the entire balance of nature that has supported human life for millions of years. Upsetting this balance has repercussions throughout our environment. But this is not the primary reason for my objection. My over-riding concern is for the stability of the world's climate. This project would result in massive destructive emissions from coal mining. The Net Zero Commission has reported that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. It has never been justifiable to base an argument purely on the local ('scope 1') emissions from coal mining, ignoring 'Scope 3' emissions, purely because they occur elsewhere (wherever the coal is exported to and burnt). The' Scope 1, 2, and 3' system is purely an accounting procedure to avoid emissions being counted twice. Greenhouse gas emissions add to the total in the atmosphere world-wide, wherever they are produced. The so-called '(redacted) defence' - that if I don't supply a product somebody else will - is no longer a valid argument. There is not an unlimited supply of coal mines, and as the process of gaining approval becomes more complex - and therefore expensive and time-consuming - proposals become less and less attractive, resulting in fewer going ahead, therefore reduced emissions. Finally, despite an overwhelming number of scientists looking into not just the increase in GHG emissions and the steadily accelerating rise in global temperatures, but predicting - with alarming accuracy - the increase in wildly variable climates in various areas, and the increase in extreme and destructive weather events, the world is struggling to reduce emissions even slightly, as demand for energy increases. It is not unreasonable to foresee massive crop failures and famine, mass migration (and the political and military implications) following on from some populated areas becoming uninhabitable, by the end of this century unless changes are made now We must surely take every possible opportunity to reduce emissions wherever they occur, and however they are generated. Disallowing the expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben mine would be well supported by some other recent precedent rulings, and a step in the right direction. |
Helen Nugent
|
ID |
20856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2541 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. We are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community. It should not be approved. This richly biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species! • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. The proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a keen scuba diver and snorkeller from (redacted), NSW. I am deeply concerned by the climate impacts of coal mining having witnessed myself the degradation of marine habitats in the area. The increased marine water temperatures, which are the direct result of the burning of fossil fuels harms ocean habitats in two ways. Firstly by changing the marine environment radically and rapidly, and secondly by creating larger storms, with large amounts of runoff that damages further these fragile areas. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including downstream effects on marine environments. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Reducing part of a public reserve to an industrial waste area is effectively a giveaway of a public good to a private enterprise. • Water and groundwater risks, including to the Hunter and Goulburn Rivers. Moolarben Creek is a tributary to both rivers and here in Newcastle, the degradation of the water in the Hunter River has impact on our local marine environment as well as further out to sea. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. The projected increase to the acidification of the oceans, and the further loss of marine environments that comes with the increased emissions risks being catastrophic. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. Notably, in 2020-2021 Yancoal Australia paid no income tax, and has a poor track record in this regard. The NSW Government should not approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Respectfully, (redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2108 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to provide a submission with regard to this matter. However, as someone in his early 80's, I am appalled that it is necessary for me to continue to, again, add my voice, or my raised had, to stop yet another appalling misuse of our land and our waters from the predations which are outlined in the Moolarben proposal. I could not more vehemently oppose such madness a this is. Thank you again for the opportunity to express my heartfelt opinion. |
Maggie Lawlor
|
ID |
20871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the expansion of any coal mine on the basis of the greenhouse gas emissions from coal. We do not need coal in Australia, and we are simply shifting the global problem out of our backyard and into another, whilst ignoring the fact that emissions are GLOBAL and will still affect the climate of Australia. This double-faced policy must end as it is meaningless, and in fact short-sighted and makes us complicit if we reduce our emissions whilst contributing to the emissions of another area. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. In addition, the proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. |
Mark and Lynda Bloxsome and Fletcher
|
ID |
20876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2518 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Document Attached |
|
Attachments |
Lynda Fletcher and Mark Bloxsome-IPC Submission-16 February 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 153.62 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am strongly against coal mining in the Ulan, moolarben wilpinjong area. The impacts to the environment are not less than minor and are going to be long term. The drawdown in the overlying units and the alluvium will negatively impact the environment long term. Additionally, the coal will go on to contribute to human induced climate change that will lead to the irreversible change to our planet within our lifetimes. Lastly, the impacts to groundwater levels and quality and base flow contributions will be impacted. The impacts to our water resource are already unacceptable. |
Marie Hensley
|
ID |
20886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To: NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure Subject: Submission of Strong Objection – Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project ________________________________________ Summary This submission formally objects to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The proposal to extend the existing OC3 open cut pit and develop four new open cut pits along the Moolarben Valley floor is fundamentally incompatible with the current economic and environmental reality of New South Wales and our local Mid-Western Region. This submission provides clear evidence that the approval of further coal extraction represents a direct threat to the Mid-Western Region’s and NSW state fiscal stability and the well-being of its people, environment, social and economic stability due to the growing cost of Climate impacts as a direct result of increased emissions from Coal and its extraction. Please find my attached submission containing the information to support this claim and the reason for the objection. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project_Submission.pdf (PDF, 646.2 KB) |
Alan Glover
|
ID |
20896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a volunteer firefighter with 46 years experience in the Hunter Valley and around NSW. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate crisis affecting all of us. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that will harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Alan Glover (redacted) NSW 2325 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is (redacted), I am a 42 year old mother and sustainability student living in (redacted) and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our area due to the resulting climate, biodiversity and environmental impacts. This current summer has been the hottest I have experienced since living in the region with extreme heatwaves, increasing energy bill costs as a result of a higher dependence on air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2267 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This coalmine expansion will negatively impact the local ecosystems on which many local threatened species rely on for continued survival. It also contradicts the NSW climate goals that our state government has encouraged. The decreasing demand for coal in the international market provides an insight into the global direction away from fossil fuel use, and towards a more sustainable way of living for the global community. |
Kate Miskin
|
ID |
20916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Clearing these areas will have significant and devastating impacts on koala habitat. |
Dr Lindsay Sharp
|
ID |
20921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2534 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Dr Lindsay Sharp and I have watched horrified as this diabolical and destructive mine proposal has proceeded: 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not as an open-cut coal mine This valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not trashed as a coal mine, clearing around 480 hectares of native vegetation and mining within 100 metres of the reserve, risking an area of high biodiversity. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded locally, with critical habitat for threatened yet resilient koalas. There is no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem; a project creating no new jobs but permanently destroying biodiversity. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems Yancoal’s expansion would cause irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset; it would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat with breeding koalas, including in the middle of a proposed mine pit; clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females, and up to 401 hectares of the endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad headed Snake and microbats will likely be severe, as acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the mine could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species' survival. Despite this, noise/blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and wildlife. This rich valley should never be mined and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 3. A massive climate cost contradicting NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension will generate approx. 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions total, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, failing to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030/2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, requiring decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts caused, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. 4. The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity The expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects will create around 2,000 new jobs by 2036, offering good alternative employment. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. The expansion will deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts warn that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, will be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium, risks compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. 6. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others, all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 7. The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. It must be stopped. Failure to do so will affect my vote at the next election. Goodbye Labor hello Greens, despite our personal support, admiration and deep friendship with Katelin McInerny. Truly a tragic outcome on every count. Dr Lindsay Sharp. |
Philip vincent
|
ID |
20926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4306 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Moolarben Coal Complex – Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension To: NSW Independent Planning Commission Project: Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Location: Near Mudgee, Mid-Western NSW (Wiradjuri Country) Introduction I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension. This submission is made in response to the Commission’s public exhibition process and in the public interest. The proposed expansion would result in serious and irreversible environmental, climate, water, and cultural heritage impacts, while delivering little demonstrable public benefit. I respectfully submit that the proposal should not be approved. Late Amendments and Procedural Concerns I am particularly concerned that Yancoal has submitted last-minute amendments to its proposal after the close of meaningful community consultation. These amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or vegetation clearing and instead rely on off-site “habitat enhancement” measures that fail to address the severe on-site impacts. Allowing such amendments at this stage undermines procedural fairness and the integrity of the assessment process. They should not be accepted or relied upon by the Commission. Unacceptable Impacts on Biodiversity and Threatened Species The proposed OC3 extension would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, including habitat for at least 23 threatened species. This includes: Around 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding koalas have been recorded Approximately 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, including breeding females Up to 401 hectares of the critically endangered Box Gum Woodland ecological community Mining is proposed within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. Noise, blasting, and vibration impacts on the reserve have been poorly assessed, and the proponent has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect wildlife and ecological values. These impacts have been identified by the NSW Environment Department as likely to cause long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Such impacts are clearly serious and irreversible. Climate Impacts Inconsistent with NSW Law and Policy The OC3 extension is estimated to generate approximately 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life — equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This is fundamentally inconsistent with: The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act Advice from the Net Zero Commission Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement The Department’s assessment fails to properly account for downstream emissions, which represent approximately 99% of the project’s total emissions, contrary to established legal principles requiring their consideration. The climate, economic, and social costs of these emissions have not been adequately addressed. Groundwater, Surface Water, and Long-Term Environmental Risk The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of between 2 and 6 metres, with impacts potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ceases. This places Moolarben Creek at significant risk, including its function as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems, including riparian vegetation, are likely to be harmed. The proponent’s proposal to conduct groundwater monitoring only after approval is inadequate — baseline monitoring should occur prior to any approval decision, not after. Irreversible Harm to Wiradjuri Cultural Heritage The proposed expansion would destroy at least 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, all assessed by Registered Aboriginal Parties as having high cultural value. The cumulative impact of ongoing mining in the area continues to fracture Country and undermine the Wiradjuri people’s ability to maintain cultural practices, protect sacred sites, and sustain connection to Country. These impacts are permanent and cannot be meaningfully mitigated or offset. Lack of Public Benefit and Cumulative Impacts The expansion is not required to maintain employment, as the mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of the OC3 extension. Coal jobs in the region remain unfilled, while the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is expected to generate thousands of new jobs over the coming decade. In addition, the cumulative impacts of this proposal in combination with nearby mine expansions — including Ulan and Wilpinjong — have not been adequately assessed, despite overlapping impacts on threatened species, water systems, and cultural heritage. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I respectfully urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project be refused. This proposal would cause unacceptable and irreversible harm, is inconsistent with NSW climate and environmental objectives, and fails to deliver a clear public benefit. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Philip Vincent (redacted), Qld, 4306 |
Tina Wilkie-Miskin
|
ID |
20936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to coal mine expansion due to the effects of coal mining and coal use on climate change, native plant and animal habitats, and water quality |
Matthew Washington
|
ID |
20941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Matthew, I am a 73 year retiree. I have property in the (redacted) area which I know and love. Hence I know about the detrimental impacts of coal mining and that most mining in general can bring. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our State, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. I believe it is a growing fact that many people, in the NSW regions and in our cities, now understand the threats and damage caused by climate and environmental damage. Not only do we have extreme heatwaves and floods, we see our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning. Hence I know many communities across NSW are facing the same struggles and have genuine fears for our future for farming and just for our ordinary urban life. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am also aware that as a genuine issue for our future that, we must protect important areas, their habitat and threatened species, so that can be enjoyed and protected while being an ongoing source of wonder and pride in our unique natural heritage. We in Australia are lucky to have these habitats and remarkable species. But if we destroy and disrespect these areas we destroy that uniqueness which we can no longer share with future generations. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. These creatures are widely known and loved so how can we imperil their habitat. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. It is clear that rather then endangering this nature reserve it should be added to by protecting and expanding it to include this threatened area where mining expansion is proposed. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Ground water disruption can have very bad long term effects so that this proposed mine expansion should be viewed as highly likely to create irreparable damage. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. As this proposal is in a Labor held state one wonders how the electorate will view such blatant disregard for the climate and the environment as elections come around. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours Sincerely, Matthew Washington |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2135 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We are in a climate emergency. The International Energy Agency reported back in 2021 that if the world is to meet the target of net zero emissions by 2050, and stay within 2˚C of warming, that the approval of new or expanded fossil fuel projects must end. That was nearly 5 years ago, so how can we be considering opening or expanding any coal or gas projects now ?? It is insane and must stop. History will judge those continuing this madness, in the face of all the evidence of a heating world and climate breakdown. It doesn't matter where the coal is burnt - the CO2 goes into the same atmosphere. And even the process of extracting it will release thousands of tonnes of methane pollution. Your children and grandchildren will ask what did you do to prevent this. What will you tell them ? |
Julie Kolges
|
ID |
20951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal expansion. The environment and wildlife cannot afford the clearing of 113 hectares of koala habitat, it would be criminal. Plus it would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of pollution, at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities across NSW and Australia and also across the world are facing climate fuelled disasters. Haven't we already lost too much to bushfires and floods? Enough is enough, start protecting our unique wildlife and flora, because once its gone its gone there is no Planet B, this is it and we need to protect it with our lives, because the human race are the only ones that can do it. STOP the destruction and STOP the greedy fossil fuel corporations from destroying our planet. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife etc. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2118 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I live in Sydney and I am extremely worried about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate issues in NSW and Australia. NSW and Australia have had extreme heatwaves and floods, our energy bills are expensive, and many folks across NSW & Australia, in regional areas and the cities are facing these struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and our communities, this should not be approved. These rich biodiverse areas should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. Our koalas and wildlife continue to suffer habitat and forest loss, the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. We are in a climate and environment crisis, the NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused, and not be allowed to go ahead. Please consider my submission. Kind regards (redacted) (redacted) 2118 NSW |
Mark & Lynda Bloxsome & Fletcher
|
ID |
20966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2518 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission attached. |
|
Attachments |
Lynda Fletcher and Mark Bloxsome-IPC Submission-16 February 2026.docx (DOCX, 19.88 KB) |
Yvonne Wells
|
ID |
20976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3515 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I ask the question - why - we share this planet with all types of species - please keep the status quo - we need to start thinking how this impacts different species rather than taking and taking. NO, no, no it should not go ahead. |
Zoe Butler
|
ID |
20981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2778 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see my attached file. |
|
Attachments |
20981 - Zoe Butler.pdf (PDF, 35.92 KB) |
Alexander Betcher
|
ID |
20986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2140 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a taxpayer, I don't want to be on the hook for a white elephant when coal becomes unprofitable in the next decade (china and India both reduced their coal generated power last year), which let's be honest, is exactly what we know is going to happen. Plus, the destruction of the environment and damage to water resources and biodiversity in the area, plus impact on air quality for residents, plus just general climate change considerations. It's madness to consider. |
John Philpott
|
ID |
20991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2034 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Stop Moolarben The amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation and proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. |
Nicola Hensel
|
ID |
20996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion of the Moolarben open cut coal mine. I think it is vital for Australia to move away from it's dependence on fossil fuels and that we do everything we can to address the devastating effects of climate change. I am extremely concerned this project would cause irreversible damage to the environment. I am very concerned about the loss of habitat for the threatened species in the area, particularly the Regent Honeyeater, as well as the impact the expansion would have on the nearby nature reserve, the groundwater, and the 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gases that would result from the project going ahead. I urge you to recommend that the Moolarben Coal Extension Project be refused and that the area concerned be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely Nicola Hensel Adamstown NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This government should be closing coal mines in his State not opening new ones or allowing expansion of existing mines. The community is repeatedly suffering loss and damage to homes, farmland and National parks due to major climate events as a result of climate change contributed to by the burning of fossil fuels. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2034 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Beyond the obvious and well documented greenhouse effects of coal, the extension of this mine will damage further and , probably irreparably, the delicate ecosystem of Mudgee. we ask you to protect the remaining ecosystem form further damage for future generations. thank you |
John Turier
|
ID |
21016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am extremely concerned about the proposed extension to the Moolarben opencut coalmine. I believe the project would have dire effects on the habitat of the Regent Honeyeater, as well as the groundwater, and poses risks to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I urge you to refuse this proposal and recommend that the land involved be incorporated into that Reserve. Thank you John Turier |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a retired engineer living outside (redacted) just south of Mudgee, NSW I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved as this rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, as no biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Having visited and hiked through the beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, a mine operation proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts makes no sense at all. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. • And the fact that this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I am urging the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (redacted) |
Maggie Pressnell
|
ID |
21026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
16 February 2026 Personal Submission to the NSW Independent Planning Commission Regarding the Proposed Expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Mine (Open Cut 3 – OC3) My name is Maggie Pressnell, and I spend considerable time at Kains Flat, NSW 2850. I appreciate the opportunity to express my concerns about the real and potential impacts of the proposed OC3 expansion of the Moolarben coal mine on this property and the surrounding environment. I regularly spend time exploring the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the Goulburn River National Park, the Drip Gorge, Ferntree Gully, and Ganguddy (Dunns Swamp). We have developed a deep appreciation for the remarkable biodiversity of the region. As an avid birdwatcher, I am particularly drawn to the rich variety of birdlife—Munghorn Gap alone hosts more than 150 bird species. Both the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the Goulburn River National Park hold significant personal and environmental value for my family and community. When examining the proposed OC3 extension map, it is evident that the project would have substantial impacts on habitat integrity, noise levels, dust, light pollution, and groundwater quality—affecting the plants, animals, and birdlife within the nature reserve. Importantly, OC3 is not the only threat: the existing Wilpinjong mine already borders a large section of the reserve’s northern and eastern edges and is also seeking expansion. Both the OC3 and Wilpinjong projects provide virtually no meaningful buffer between their open-cut operations and the nature reserve. For OC3, a buffer of only 100 metres is proposed, which is entirely insufficient; a minimum buffer of 500 metres should be required. It is difficult to accept the argument that such limited separation would result in little or no negative environmental impact. In addition to the concerns above, I would like to highlight the following issues: Light and noise pollution currently affecting residents of Kains Flat from the Wilpinjong mine will inevitably worsen with OC3 due to its closer proximity. Greenhouse gas emissions totalling an estimated 65 million tonnes will result from excavating and burning the additional 30 million tonnes of coal proposed for OC3. Coal extraction until at least 2038 risks hindering investment and confidence in the newly established Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. For regional NSW to transition toward a sustainable and resilient economy, government decisions must align with forward-looking economic and environmental priorities. Cumulative mining impacts from Moolarben, Wilpinjong, and Ulan mines, combined with the newly approved Bowdens lead, silver, and zinc mine at Lue, and Bowdens’ exploration licences over Barra, Botobolar, and Kains Flat, pose significant long-term environmental pressures. Coal is not listed as a critical mineral by the Australian Government, raising questions about the long-term strategic value of further expansion. Public benefit remains unclear; it is difficult to see how this expansion delivers any substantial long-term advantage to the Australian community. Before the IPC makes its decision, I respectfully request that the Commission provide the community with a commitment to a truly independent scientific assessment of the potential impacts on biodiversity and groundwater within and surrounding the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Thank you for considering my submission. Regards, Maggie Pressnell |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2021 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We do not need an extension of this coal mine. We have more than enough coal already. This extension completely ignores the interests of the community and will only serve the avaricious needs of the mining company. There is absolutely no ecologic purpose to this application. |
Carolyn Barlow
|
ID |
21041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a grandmother of seven (two under 5 years of age, living in Mudgee) and am retired from a life long career in education. Having lived in the Mudgee region for over 50 years, I have witnessed the growth of Mudgee since the coal mines came but I have also witnessed massive destruction of natural habitats, small communities, schools and waterways. This has been caused by the presence of the three coal mines in the Mudgee region. I have friends in Wollar who have fought for decades against mine damage and were thinking in the last couple of years that finally, there was light on the horizon. They would not have to bear the impacts of the mines for much longer and that there would be no further modifications to present coal mines. Imagine their dismay, when Yancoal once again applied for an expansion to the Mooarben Mine, when they were already able to mine until 2038 without it. Moolarben OC3 Expansion must not be approved because: • It will be surrounded on three sides by the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve making it impossible for wildlife to travel from one side of the reserve to the other. The mining operation will only have a 100m buffer between it and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • It will add 64.6 million tonnes of Green House Gas emissions over the life of the mine. • It will destroy 113Ha breeding koala habitat 80Ha breeding Regent Honeyeater habitat. • It will impact severely both groundwater and above ground creeks, all of which are vital for wildlife in and around the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • It will damage Wiradjuri sacred sites and landscapes. • It will further destroy the struggling Wollar community. I find it difficult to believe that the NSW Government would seriously consider granting permission for this expansion The moral repercussions alone are obvious. Add to that climate risks, adverse social impacts and risks to threatened species and you have a disaster in the making. Mudgee is bigger now and has more money. However, its is a considerably poorer community than it was 50 years ago, when it was economically sustainable and residents cared for one another more than they do now. Now it has nothing going for it, apart from money. |
Diane Westerhuis
|
ID |
21051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2443 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Proposed amendments by Yancoal are an attempt to greenwash the project, they do not reduce vegetation clearing and there is no clear economic justification for the expansion. Existing coal jobs remain unfilled, and renewable energy projects in the region promise more sustainable employment opportunities |
Gabrielle Asprey
|
ID |
21056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion due to its serious environmental and community risks. There is clear evidence that this project threatens vital koala habitat and other endangered species, risks damage to the nearby Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and poses significant water and groundwater dangers. It would also add around 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, undermining NSW’s climate goals. There is little public benefit, especially as the region moves toward renewable energy. Furthermore, to ignore the damage caused by coal to the environment now and into the future, is morally unacceptable and ethically wrong. Given these concerns and the urgent climate and biodiversity crises, I urge the Commission to refuse this expansion. |
Jennifer Kent
|
ID |
21061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Dr Jenny Kent, I work in the area of Sustainability in Local Government and have a PhD related to climate change and local community responses. I am deeply concerned about the continuing expansion of coal mining in NSW as I understand the impact on the health and well being of the local community and environment. In addition there are scientifically validated contributions to climate change, impacts of extreme weather events, biodiversity and cultural impacts of great concern to me should this proposal proceed. I am therefore writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Dr Jenny Kent, Marrickville NSW 2204. |
Antoinette Farrow
|
ID |
21076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This proposed expansion is a serious threat to koala and other vulnerable species' habitat. It will increase Australia's carbon emissions when we are supposed to be reducing them. There is no suitable biodiversity offset that could possibly reduce the impact of this proposal. I believe this is merely greenwashing. Furthermore, it requires an unsustainable amount of groundwater, further degrading the surrounding areas. There is no public benefit to this project. We need to create more renewable energy jobs, which are planned for this area. we do not need more mining jobs. This is a hugely damaging project and the development application should be rejected. |
Bill Jacobi
|
ID |
21086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2484 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben coal mine expansion. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. |
Carolyn Barlow
|
ID |
21091 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Rylstone District Environment Society |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Members of Rylstone District Environment Society object to Yancoal’s application for Moolarben OC3 because: • It will be surrounded on three sides by the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, making it impossible for wildlife to travel from one side of the reserve to the other. The mining operation will only have a 100m buffer between it and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • It will add 64.6 million tonnes of Green House Gas emissions over the life of the mine. • It will destroy 113Ha breeding koala habitat 80Ha breeding Regent Honeyeater habitat. • It will further impact severely both groundwater and above ground creeks, all of which are vital for wildlife in and around the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • It will damage Wiradjuri sacred sites and landscapes. • It will further destroy the struggling Wollar community. Yancoal has paid zero tax in Australia in the past five years and it will not be payng tax in the forseeable future. In addition, it receives millions of tax-payer dollars in government subsidies each year. Surely the moral, economic and environmental repercussions of approving the expansion outweigh the few votes from coal mining families. The Moolarben OC3 Expansion must not be approved. |
Stephen & Cheryl Russell
|
ID |
21101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Opposing the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine |
|
Attachments |
21101 - Stephen & Cheryl Russell_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.08 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2117 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This proposal would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations: • The proposed expansion has enormous impacts on biodiversity, water sources, cultural heritage, and locking in more climate pollution. • The extension will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. • Produce 64 million tonnes of climate pollution at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets. • Coal dug up has consequences internationally; Australian contributes 4.5% of global impact. worsening the impacts faced by vulnerable nations including Pacific Island states. • Climate pollution from burning coal, oil and gas is driving more explosive fire conditions and threatening our homes, suburbs, cities and regional centres. Unless Australia and the rest of the world rapidly and deeply cut climate pollution, catastrophic fires will become even more frequent. Australia is ranked 56 on the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) in 2026 due to insufficient NDC targets, high energy usage, and continued fossil fuel reliance. We need to commit to phasing out coal fired power stations, stop subsidies for fossil fuels by 2030 or announce it will not approve any new gas or coal projects in line with the commitment it made at COP28 in 2023 to transition away from fossil fuels. The NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets and are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act of the Paris Agreement. I am a grandmother and deeply concerned for my children and grandchildren about the wide-ranging impacts of climate change, resulting in more bushfires and droughts, extreme weather events like flood and cyclones affecting crop production and food supply and prices, including on the cost of living and on our health. We are also currently paying a lot more for insurance premiums. I no longer have any trust in what the government is saying or doing; they are putting the interest of short-term economic growth above sustainability and the wellbeing of the people and the planet. The UN says 5-year-old will experience seven times more heatwaves. How many more ‘unseasonable’ weather events, ‘unprecedented’ storms, food shortages, algae blooms, animal losses, rising global tensions, illnesses, ‘historical’ floods and droughts do we have to see before we start realising the future is actually now? WE HAVE INHERITED A GARDEN DON’T LEAVE A DESERT FOR OUR CHILDREN. |
Amanda Berlyn
|
ID |
21111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2070 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. Where cumulative impact is concerned there has been poor assessment of the this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. I am a 54 year old Carer of a 93 year old parent & we live in Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt already in my area. We already have extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. I attach a few pictures too from the ‘Voices of the Valley’ documentary to highlight the plight of the voiceless within the area under proposal for this destructive bill. Sincerely, Amanda Berlyn Lindfield NSW 2070 |
|
Attachments |
IMG_6352.jpeg (JPEG, 188.56 KB) IMG_6353.jpeg (JPEG, 174.1 KB) IMG_6350.jpeg (JPEG, 114.38 KB) |
Rob Clifton
|
ID |
21116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6230 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Just STOP! I'd really like for my kids to have a livable future, expansion should not even be on the table for consideration, are we still really this stupid? |
Kati Watson
|
ID |
21121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine. The recent amendments do not change any of the reasons for why I object to this expansion. I object to the loss of biodiversity that this expansion will bring. No amount of remediatation can replace naturally evolved ecosystems that are perfectly compatible with their proper location. This mine is too close to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The proposed mine area should if anything be made a nature reserve too. This area of the mine is home to a Koala community and Regent Honeyeaters. These populations are valuable components of the area’s biodiversity as is the ecosystem in which they live. The current climate situation with its unpredictable weather patterns and concomitant loss of biodiversity makes such issues more urgent. The mine itself will lock in further carbon emissions at a time when we should be reversing not increasing these! Thus the problems are compounded. My family and friends have a great love of this particular part of the world. When we first began visiting this area there were broad paddocks with emus running through them on occasion. Now it looks like an industrial waste land. My heart breaks for our descendants and all the living creatures whose world will be so irreversibly altered by these profit wringing expeditions. Real value is in nature, beauty, a healthy environment and healthy creatures both human and non human. |
Shaun Watson
|
ID |
21126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a neurologist who is deeply concerned about the environment and greenhouse emissions. In addition, I have been a regular visitor to the Goulburn River National Park and The Drip over the past 30 years. I have witnessed the growing impact of coal mining on the general enviroment and the Goulburn River in particular, over this period of time. Without a doubt, this extension will impact the country and the river that I have come to love. Even more importantly, we are in the midst of a climate health emergency, as stated by the World Health Organisation, Australian Medical Association, Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Doctors for the Environment Australia and numerous other health organisations. Our planet and our health cannot afford any new coal projects and this includes this Moolarben Extension. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I'm a biologist who taught at universities for more than three decades and, since retirement, I spend a lot of my time on a bush property in NSW. I am alarmed that expansion of coal mines is even being considered in Australia in 2026. I am sending this submission to object to Yancoal's proposed extension to the Moolarben Coal Complex near Mudgee. The proposed area for the expansion of the coal mine has highly significant nature values and should be protected by incorporation into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I have the following serious concerns: • Yancoal's proposed expansion would cause the loss of irreplaceable native bushland that cannot be offset effectively and would destroy the habitat for koalas and the critically endangered Regent's Honeyeater. • The groundwater drawdown resulting from such a project is likely to imperil the vital habitat of Moolarben Creek. Loss of this water resource would impact wildlife, especially during drought, and probably lead to loss of native vegetation, including trees along drainage lines. • There would be impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve due to the proximity of the proposed mining operations. Noise, pollution and other disturbances would have negative effects on the plants and animals of the nature reserve. • There would be a massive climate cost due to the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from this project. Any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 emission reduction targets. • In addition, there is a lack of public benefit, with no clear justification in terms of employment or other community benefits for expanding coal mining. Renewable energy projects will create many more jobs and cause far less environmental and climate damage. Mudgee is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone and this is where the future lies. The NSW Government should not be approving new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. For the above reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben Coal Mining Complex OC3 Extension Project be refused. Regards, Penny 16 February 2026 |
Gillian Leahy
|
ID |
21136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Gillian and I am a retired University lecturer. I am 75. I have recently been suffering with shortness of breath on the very hot unusual days we have been having. Even with aircon on full blast on a recent 42 degree day I was getting close to ringing the ambulance. So I am concerned about the climate impacts of this mine expansion. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. The fact that this expansion will threaten biodiversity also worries me. I have seen Regent Honey Eaters, microcbats snd koalas. I hate the idea of these species being further threatened. I am alarmed about seeing ever more land clearing. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. All the best, Gillian Leahy Lilyfield . 2040 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to formally object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex expansion. This project represents a continuation of short-term economic gain at the expense of long-term environmental stability, community wellbeing, and intergenerational equity. The expansion raises serious concerns about habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, water contamination, air pollution, and the displacement of both wildlife and local communities. How many animals and people must be displaced from their homes before this pursuit of profit is reconsidered? How many more climate-related disasters, intensified by fossil fuel expansion, must communities endure before we acknowledge the cumulative consequences of these decisions? At what point will leadership shift from extraction to stewardship? Governments have a responsibility to safeguard natural systems so that future generations inherit clean water, clean air, and resilient biodiversity capable of sustaining food systems and human health. Approving further coal expansion moves us in the opposite direction. I urge you to reject this proposal and to prioritise policies that protect ecosystems, support affected communities, and transition our economy toward sustainable energy solutions. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3133 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Violet, I am a 30 year schoolteacher in Western Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students at my school are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Ken Sewell
|
ID |
21156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2048 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Ken Sewell, I am a 69-year-old retired Mathematics schoolteacher from the inner west of Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due principally to their climate impact on the natural environment. I am also a grandfather of two little girls, and I am writing as much as on their behalf as my own. This submission is written to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am convinced that should this project be given approval it would cause serious and irreversible degradation, not only to the land directly impacted but also on the adjoining land in particular the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the people who currently enjoy that reserve and the animals that depend on it. The proposed mining extension area with its currently rich biodiverse characteristics should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected, not turned into a open air mining pit from which CO2 will continue to escape in perpetuity. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat. Can this be allowed to happen in the current context of scientists warning of the extinction of this iconic animal, within this state, in the coming decades. Add to this the nationally important Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitats, how can such destruction be contemplated? No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and totally inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts on this fragile ecosystem which is already threatened by the effects of climate change. • Water and groundwater risks, which threaten Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is failing to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. As I understand it this mine is already the biggest in NSW. We must begin the process of winding back these operations not expanding them. I would argue that the NSW Government cannot allow new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity emergency. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and Australia’s international commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Thank you for your consideration of my submission. Yours sincerely, Ken Sewell Stanmore NSW 2048 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object strongly to these open cut coal mines. The disruption to the habitat of local flora and fauna is unacceptable and will cause irreparable damage to an already compromised and fragile area. In addition the risks to the water tables and contamination is unacceptable and too high a risk . |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 39 year Registered Nurse on the (redacted), and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my community. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Sincerely, (redacted) (redacted) NSW 2257 |
george mercier
|
ID |
21171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2423 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i am opposed to the expansion of the coal mine. this expansion will threaten and damage koala habitat and this is unacceptable. the coal mining expansion will damage the forest and the ecosystem. it will also pollute the groundwater. the few jobs that will be created are not worth the damage caused. coal when it is burned is a toxic pollutant that causes a great deal of damage to the environment and people's health. the extraction process of coal mining is not only damaging and dangerous to the environment but it generates a great deal of pollution and emissions from the dust that is created and from the huge amount of diesel fuel that is used. i also have friends who live near the coal mine and i fear for their health. i also live in a home that is 100% off-grid so i know firsthand that there is alternatives to the burning of coal. even steel production has progressed to the point where coal is not needed for the production of steel. the world is moving away from burning stuff and wrecking our environment and climate so this expansion is completely unnecessary and reckless and must be rejected. |
Thomas Samuel Gledhill
|
ID |
21176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4750 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal has sought to delay the IPC hearing and disrupt community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion by submitting last-minute minor amendments to its proposal. The Department of Planning must now decide whether to accept these changes. We believe they should be rejected and the hearing should not have been postponed. The amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose offsite “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process. This is a clear attempt to greenwash a damaging project. To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Tom, I am a 30 year social worker in Queensland and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our country, due to the climate impacts being felt. Australians are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across Australia are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It is a well- established fact that Climate Change is occurring due to the amount of carbon humans have released into the environment. It is accepted that Climate Change due to Global Warming is a major threat to life on Earth. All around the World, people and the environment are already experiencing the negative effects of more frequent extreme weather events. The only way to mitigate these effects is to reduce the amount of carbon being released, with aims of getting to net zero as soon as possible. Coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, gives off large amounts of carbon, when burnt. We signed international treaties saying we would play our part in reducing carbon emissions. We can’t, in good faith, keep expanding our production and export of coal, pretending that it doesn’t matter, just because it isn’t burnt here, and doesn’t count as ‘ our’ emissions. Coal mines are a blight upon the landscape; the land will never recover to its previous state of health and diversity, no matter how much money is spent on remediation. That land is removed from production permanently. While operating, they use massive amounts of water. That we risk our precious water, when 70% of Australia is arid or semi- arid, seems particularly short- sighted. Humans can live without coal, but we can’t live without water. |
Campbell Goff
|
ID |
21191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Campbell, I am a 24-year-old, bushfire ecologist from the (redacted) and I am immensely concerned and somewhat dumbfounded by the proposed expansion of the biggest coal mine in NSW. The current Labor government have made pledges to meet the legislated emissions targets and make every effort to meet the recovery plans laid out for the thousands of species that have made it on to the threatened species list. Therefore, this proposed expansion would set a highly dangerous precedence and open the gateway for future proposals across the state that directly contradicts and remain inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the goals of the Paris Agreement and the recovery plans for Threatened Species. Australia is leading globally in extinction rates and continues to make decisions that directly harm the ability for struggling fauna populations to persist. Therefore, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, the areas destroyed and mined by Yancoals operations outside of Mudgee were predominantly box-woodland. These ecological communities consist of Yellow Box (Eucalyptus Melliodora) and White Box (Eucalyptus Albens), both of which are well known favoured feed tree species for the Koala. Due to historic mass clearing from mining and other land use pressures, these remaining fragments of box-woodland are utterly essential for the continued persistence of Koalas in the area. This area around the Goulburn River NP and Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve are both part of the only core Koala habitat identified as highly suitable for Koalas in the entire Mid-Western Region of NSW. Koalas have been recorded breeding in these areas immediately adjacent to the proposed expansion area and further disturbance, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of Koala habitat would be nothing short of detrimental and entirely inappropriate for the future of these regional populations. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species and previous attempts to move Koala populations have ended in severe losses (up to 90% of individuals) due to the specific and highly complex diet and behaviour of this species. Furthermore, the Regent Honeyeater – one of the most critically endangered species in Australia and globally for that matter, is another species at immense risk of extinction from an expansion of Moolarben. With less than 250 individuals left these nomadic species rely on a continuous corridor of flowering eucalypts for their nectar resources to survive and continue migrating. The extensive research around this bird demonstrates that much like the Koala the specific diet of the Regent Honeyeater (RGH) relies on key tree species including the same Yellow and White Box as the Koala but also the Mugga IronBark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon) as 3 of their 4 key feed trees. All of which are dominant species found in the Munghorn gap nature reserve and the grassy woodlands of the proposed expansion site. Essentially, this area is the perfect highly specialised habitat relied upon by the RGH. To clear, disturb or even degrade this habitat or near this habitat is taking unnecessary and avoidable risk that will be irreversible for the future of native wildlife. • Impacts of pollution on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. This will be incredibly degrading for nearby wildlife and essential refuges for hundreds of species through the noise and air pollution via continued 24/7 operations will bring right up to the periphery of a nature reserve. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. As well as drought refuges, this area was one of few forests in the region that did not burn during the 2019/20 fires and thus provides critical habitat for the fauna that were impacted from the mass destruction of their previous habitat in surrounding areas. Ensuring the protection and health of this area remains as best as possible is highly important. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Campbell Goff (redacted) 2500 |
Terry Howard
|
ID |
21196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2028 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
IT IS A DISASTER FOR SPECIES AND BIODIVERSITY: The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. Key Points 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. |
Gisela Conechado
|
ID |
21201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2452 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am against the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. This project will not create new jobs. The coal export industry is projected to diminish as international markets continue to transition to renewable energy. My daughter who works in the renewable energy industry as an engineer explains that the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone (CWO REZ) provides opportunities for workers to switch industries and upskill in a rapidly growing industry, and will provide flow on economic benefits to the local community, reducing reliance on coal mining companies. Additionally, there is a social mandate for pragmatic, immediate action on climate change, not only due to the environmental and biodiversity impacts identified in the Assessment Report, but also considering the financial consequences of increased natural disasters on the Australian public. The coal produced by the Moolarben coal mine does not contribute to domestic energy production but is exported to declining international markets. Modelling by the Treasury [Australia’s Net Zero Transformation] states that fossil fuel exports are projected to decline as trading partner countries implement net zero targets, decreasing the value of these exports. The decreasing demand of Australia’s thermal coal has been explored in detail by energy economists such as the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis [https://ieefa.org/resources/australia-pursues-adding-18-billion-tonnes-thermal-coal-despite-declining-market]. One example is the recent announcement by South Korea, one of the top importers of Australian thermal coal, that aims to phase out unabated thermal coal use by 2040. In addition, countries like China will increasingly rely on their domestic coal production for the remainder of the coal use while they transition. This risk impacts the royalties obtained from coal production, and emphasises the need for a proactive transition plan for workers in the coal mining industry. The renewable energy transition including nearby projects such as the CWO REZ will provide employment, local community and wider societal benefits that will outlast the Moolarben OC3 expansion. As stated in the Assessment Report, the expansion does not create any new jobs. The employment opportunities created by the CWO REZ include 1,850 direct jobs in the local area during construction, and about 930 ongoing jobs [https://www.energyco.nsw.gov.au/our-projects/central-west-orana-renewable-energy-zone]. We understand that this is not immediately applicable to all current coal mining industry employees. However, as renewable energy continues to replace coal generation globally, at some point it will become necessary for workers to transition as the industry does. We feel that the proximity of this REZ provides one such opportunity, while also contributing to state and national energy targets. EnergyCo has also established a Community and Employment Benefit Program [https://www.energyco.nsw.gov.au/our-projects/central-west-orana-rez/community-benefits] and there will be additional flow on impacts to the local economy. Any remaining benefits do not justify the extensive and irreversible environmental damage caused by the coal from this expansion. As listed in the Assessment Report, there are negative impacts considering greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, Aboriginal heritage sites and ground water resources. I agree that an approval of this expansion would not support the strong social mandate for progress on climate change in this country. These impacts extend beyond environmental concerns as increased climate disasters are exacerbating cost of living and housing issues. The impact on home insurance costs due to increasing frequency of extreme weather events illustrates this. We don’t believe offsets are a sufficient mechanism to avoid the biodiversity impacts that would be caused by this expansion. Recognising the importance of the threatened species that reside in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. As a mother and a human that cares about a healthy future, I feel strongly about this issue. Thank you for considering my concerns. Gisela Conechado |
Judith Ohana OAM
|
ID |
21206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Independent Planning Commission I am writing to you as a 77 year-old grandmother who has been blessed with 5 young and healthy grandchildren. While I live a relatively quiet life in a retirement village in Sydney, I am very aware of the problems affecting our country, and indeed the problems threatening the world. One of the most serious is climate change, which is already bringing us increased temperatures and worsening extreme weather events such as floods and bushfires. Having flown over some of the coalmines in the Hunter Valley in years past, I also still retain the shocking images of the landscape devastated by coalmining there. In view of the above, I am very concerned about the NSW Government’s continued approval of coalmine expansions. Last year I went to the trouble of meeting with my local State MP Dr Marjorie O’Neill to express my grave concern over this issue. Today I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion near Mudgee. I believe that this project, like many other similar ones, would result in serious and irreversible harm to the environment and climate, and should not be approved. In particular I am concerned that it: 1. would result in large volumes of additional greenhouse gases being released into our atmosphere, and make it even more difficult for our governments to meet their net zero targets; 2. would endanger the environment of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which I understand is only 100 metres from the site. I do not believe the impacts of the noise, blasting and vibrations have been adequately assessed; 3. could entail risks to local waterways such as the Moolarben Creek, and long-term groundwater degradation; 4. would bring little or no sustainable benefit to the local economy, which should be prioritising renewal energy projects. For these reasons I am writing to urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Project be refused. I thank you for your attention. Yours sincerely Judith Ohana OAM Randwick NSW 2031 |
Francis Breen
|
ID |
21216 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Ryde Hunters Hill Flora & Fauna Preservation Society Inc |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To: Independent Planning Commission We are a local environment group established over 60 years ago. The aims and objectives of the Society include- • Respect for the land and its flora and fauna and original custodians: • The education of the membership and the community, particularly in the local area, in nature conservation and protection of the environment. • The promotion of ecologically sustainable land use and development at the local, state, national and international levels. • Advocating measures at the local, state, national and international level necessary to safeguard the environment from all forms of pollution to ensure, clean air, clean water and a healthy environment and address climate change. The Society has been actively campaigning over many years on the mitigation of climate change, ceasing further exploitation of fossil fuels, supporting renewable energy, protecting native forests and wildlife, opposing destructive land clearing and preserving our precious biodiversity. The Society is writing to object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s existing Moolarben OC3 thermal coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. Please refer to the attached documnent for details of our objection. Francis Breen President |
|
Attachments |
21216 - Francis Breen_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 922.26 KB) |
Kathleen Maze-Neeley
|
ID |
21221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please don’t allow the Moolarben OC3 expansion. It’s so disheartening to cheer when Labor wins elections assuming they will prioritise safeguarding the natural environment and endemic species (what’s left) and attempting to mitigate the disastrous fossil fuel policies driving climate change only to realise it wouldn’t matter who you voted for. I want to be able to believe that elections matter and that voting for those that say they will deliver on policies that address these issues actually mean it. Thank you. |
Paul Hannah
|
ID |
21226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am retired and live in the Blue Mountains. While I do not have any children I am deeply concerned about the state of the world, and the impacts of climate disruption in particular, being left to future generations. In the ten years I've lived in the Blue Mountains I've experienced devastating bush fires and torrential rainfalls and flooding. In recent years the day-to-day fluctuations in weather and temperatures have become more extreme. For these and other reasons I am writing to object to any expansion of fossil fuel extraction – in particular Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee, an area of NSW I have visited frequently. This project will only add to the serious and irreverible harms to the local community, to the local environment and the global climate and should not be allowed to proceed. The harm to threatened species such as the microbats, the critically endangered Regent Honey eater, the Broadheaded Snake, and their habitats will be irreversible and are unacceptable on top of the already considerable and accelerating damage to critical habitats and species extinctions. Even the NSW Environment Department has acknowledged the risks this project poses such as long-term population declines and loss off critical habitat crucial to species survival. The Department of Planning's assessment ignores the findings of the Net Zero Commission that ANY further expansion of coal extraction are inconsistent with both the Paris Agreement and the NSW Climate Change Act. The 2025 Denman Court of Appeal decision requires decision makers to consider downstream emissions and the local climate impacts which the Department of Planning has failed to address in their assessments of the project. We are already in the midst of a climate and biodiversity crisis. The NSW Government must not approve new or expanded coal extraction projects, to do so will impose intolerable crises on future generations. It is for these reasons that I implore the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the this Moolarben Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Yours Sincerely Paul Hannah Katoomba NSW 2780 |
Theodore Reimer
|
ID |
21231 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Rising Tide |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
see uploaded file "submission.pdf" |
|
Attachments |
Submission.pdf (PDF, 31.78 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the proposed expansion of the Moorlaben Coal Mine. As an artist who draws deep inspiration from the landscapes of this region, I feel compelled to speak not only as a concerned citizen who visits this area regularly but as someone whose creative practice is intrinsically tied to the character, ecology, and atmosphere of this place. The land here is not an abstract resource — it is a living environment that shapes identity, culture, and artistic expression. The proposed expansion of the Moorlaben Coal Mine threatens significant environmental degradation, including impacts on water systems, biodiversity, air quality, and the long-term health of surrounding communities. Open-cut coal mining permanently alters topography, fragments habitat, and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions at a time when urgent climate action is globally recognised as necessary. This region has a long and meaningful artistic history. Artists have been drawn to its unique light, terrain, and atmosphere for generations. The legacy of Australian art in regional landscapes is profound. Brett Whiteley was known to paint in this very area. The Hunter region and surrounding areas are not merely industrial zones; they are places of heritage, agriculture, community, and creativity. The cumulative impact of continued coal expansion risks reducing this landscape to a site of extraction rather than preservation and renewal. Beyond artistic concerns, there are clear long-term economic questions. Sustainable industries — including tourism, agriculture, and the arts — depend on environmental integrity. Protecting the natural character of the region safeguards diversified economic futures rather than deepening reliance on industries facing global decline. As an artist, I experience this landscape not as scenery but as subject, collaborator, and teacher. Its ridgelines, river systems, native flora, and shifting skies inform my work and the work of many others. The expansion of the Moorlaben Coal Mine risks eroding not only ecological systems but also the cultural and creative fabric of this community. I urge decision-makers to consider the irreversible consequences of this development and to prioritise environmental protection, cultural heritage, and sustainable futures over short-term extraction. Thank you for considering this submission |
Victoria Treole
|
ID |
21251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I must confess to being very confused about the NSW Labor government’s attitude towards all elements of environmental protection, habitat protection and meeting our greenhouse gas reduction targets. It seems that the government is hostage to both the resource industries and the unions although the proposed expansion seems to deliver only damage to the environment, government credibility on environmental issues, endangered species in the area of the proposed expansion, surrounding communities and the water and atmosphere of the entire area. Employment from the expansion of the mine will not increase. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. I live on the far south coast of NSW and over the last 40 years have seen the impact of logging across this region. Most of the logged forests were turned into wood chips. Despite promises to the contrary many areas were clear-felled having devastating impacts on rivers, wildlife and communities. The benefits such as they were went to the logging companies. Employment from this industry was tiny and there has been no upside for communities. In fact with a changing climate the removal of so much forest has fuelled fire risk and intensified water shortages and drought. The coal industry has much in common with the timber industry. Ignore the regulations attached to the permission to mine and maximise profits. Taking care to protect birds, animals, indigenous art sites, the waterways and the air all just slows down the process and reduces profits. I’ve lived on this planet for over 70 years and have been lucky enough to enjoy the extraordinary beauty and diversity of Australia. I am concerned that the Yancoal expansion, like many resource developments, appears to primarily benefit Yancoal rather than serving the interests of other stakeholders. There is only damage and devastation to the country, to the wildlife, to the communities and to Australia as a country. In terms of environmental regulation, it’s hard not to see the manoeuvring of the Yancoal board with its tiny proposed changes coming so late in the IPC process of consideration as just a deliberate attempt to derail a possible negative finding against the expansion. In terms of the Labor Government, state and federal, it’s another encouragement for me to abandon previous allegiance and vote progressive independent as it’s impossible to find a shred of evidence that these governments have any intention of protecting our country from greedy exploitation by any business big enough to challenge any inconvenient environmental protection. |
Pascale Osanz
|
ID |
21261 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Environment grouo |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
No to mining |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2065 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an 80 year mother grand mother farming family. Fed up with the refusal to see the damage coal is doing world wide … deplorable lack of action on pollution, green house gases greedy few ripping off the next generation ….. shame ! |
Phillip Bradley
|
ID |
21276 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Parramatta Climate Action Network- ParraCAN |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion proposal mostly as we’re seriously concerned that the expansion of coal mining is causing worsening climate change and has brought us to the brink of calamitous tipping points. This is because there is clear scientific evidence that burning coal is the main source of greenhouse gas emissions which are heating our atmosphere, worsening extreme weather damage, and increasing the cost of living, such as much higher insurance premiums, increased cost of energy, food, health etc. People are rapidly joining the dots between fossil fuel accelerated climate change, detrimental health impacts and increased cost of living! It should be noted that: **One of the world’s leading conservative climate change economists Sir Nicholas Stern estimated that the annual cost of action on climate change to be around 1-2% of GDP by 2050. This compares to inaction which is projected to cost 5-20% of GDP by 2050.** (Stern Review – www.hm-treasury.gov.uk). Approving this Moolarben coal mine expansion would be even worse than inaction! Also we note that the respected International Monetary Fund (IMF) reported that Australian governments subsidised the fossil fuel industry $65 Billion in 2022 alone, (https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-fossil-fuel-subsidies-costing-taxpayers-65-billion-a-year-imf-20230824-p5dz0l.html), rather than subsidising climate mitigation and families against rocketing climate fuelled costs from more extreme weather, including droughts, floods, record heat waves, and cyclones. We implore you to reflect on the fact that Australia has only about 0.3% of the world’s population yet is responsible for internal greenhouse gas emissions of about 1.0% and in addition exports approximately 3.5% of the world’s emissions. Australia cannot reasonably ignore its role in the burning of fossil fuels outside of Australia, as combined with Internal emissions, we can be blamed for about 15 times our reasonable population share of the world’s emissions. This is irresponsible, as when we need to be reducing emissions, it is no longer plausible for Australia to defend our export fossil fuel industry by using the heroin dealer’s defence that if we don’t do it, someone else will. By withdrawing our cheap fossil fuels from the overseas market, we would put greater pressure on other countries to otherwise transition into the use of more cheap renewable energy rather than paying higher prices for good quality coal or suffering the serious environmental and health impacts of burning lower quality coal for energy. The project is estimated to produce 64 million tonnes more greenhouse gas emissions when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 (including 50% CO2eq emissions reduction by 2030) and the goals of the Paris COP Climate Agreement. This is totally unacceptable, especially compared to the Climate Council’s advice that a 75% emissions reduction by 2030 is necessary! We are also genuinely concerned that if approved, this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the natural environment and communities. The proposal is located in a biodiversity rich area, which should be protected and incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. We also particularly concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of at least 110 hectares of habitat where critically endangered Regent Honeyeater, koalas and microbats have been recorded. Any suggestion that biodiversity offsets can compensate for loss of this habitat is misguided. • Noise, blasting, vibration and trucking impacts of mining operations on the nearby Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve are excessive and the mining clearance from the reserve is inadequate. • The absence of adequate justification of the number of jobs alleged to be created by the proposal, without comparison to the better alternative of renewable energy project jobs nearby. • Surface water and ground water risks, including long-term ground water table drawdown, which would deprive Moolarben Creek and ground water dependent ecosystems that are critical for the survival of flora and fauna. For all the above reasons, we urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend rejection of this damaging Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Phil Bradley and Zyntaurus Donna-aroon Co-convenors Parramatta Climate Action Network ParraCAN |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the proposed OC3 expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. This proposal represents an unjustified escalation of environmental harm in a landscape that should be conserved, not excavated. I am also concerned about the climate impacts further mining will have for the future of my two children who already have to adapt to a changing environment and whose lives will be heavily impacted by climate change. Now is not the time to pour more fire into an already hot oven. A conservation landscape, not a mine pit The valley targeted for this expansion forms part of a broader ecological system that connects directly with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Rather than being carved into an open cut void, this area should be incorporated into a unified conservation corridor that strengthens and buffers the existing reserve. The proposal would remove approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation and bring mining operations to within 100 metres of the reserve boundary. This proximity places a recognised biodiversity stronghold at unacceptable risk. Surveys have recorded at least 23 threatened species in the project area, including a highly resilient koala population that relies on this landscape as core habitat. There is no compelling public interest case for converting a functioning ecosystem of this significance into another coal pit. Irreplaceable ecological damage The ecological consequences of the proposal are extensive and irreversible. The clearing footprint includes: • 113 hectares of koala habitat, including areas where breeding has been documented • 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, with breeding females recorded • Up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecological community These are not degraded lands that can be easily rehabilitated or offset. They are established, functioning ecosystems that support species already under severe pressure. The destruction of breeding habitat for koalas and Regent Honeyeaters is particularly concerning, as it undermines recovery efforts for species already facing long term decline. The NSW Environment Department has acknowledged the risk of serious and irreversible impacts, including potential long term population reductions for threatened fauna such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and various microbat species. Despite these warnings, the assessment of noise and blasting impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is inadequate, and the proponent has declined to adopt a 500 metre buffer recommended to reduce harm to wildlife within the reserve. This valley is ecologically rich and strategically located. It should be added to the protected estate, not fragmented and degraded. A project incompatible with climate obligations The climate implications of the OC3 expansion are enormous. Over its lifetime, the project is expected to generate approximately 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. This equates to more than half of NSW’s current annual emissions. Such an outcome is fundamentally inconsistent with the objectives of the NSW Climate Change Act and Australia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. The Net Zero Commission has made clear that further coal expansions undermine the state’s emissions trajectory. NSW is already struggling to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. Furthermore, the assessment does not properly apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires consideration of downstream emissions and the local climate impacts they cause. Approximately 99 percent of the project’s emissions would occur through combustion overseas, yet these consequences have not been meaningfully incorporated into the decision making framework. The economic and social costs of these emissions remain unquantified. No convincing employment case The expansion is not necessary to sustain employment at Moolarben. The mine is approved to operate until at least 2038 regardless of this proposal. Coal vacancies in the region have reportedly remained unfilled for extended periods, suggesting labour supply constraints rather than unmet demand. At the same time, the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is forecast to create around 2,000 jobs over the coming decade. These roles provide a forward looking pathway for regional employment that aligns with state climate policy and global market trends. A substantial proportion of Moolarben coal is destined for export markets including China, South Korea and Taiwan. Forecasts indicate declining demand for Australian thermal coal in several of these markets. The claimed economic benefits of the expansion are therefore uncertain, while the environmental costs are definite and permanent. Groundwater and surface water risks The proposal carries significant risks to groundwater systems and to Moolarben Creek, a critical refuge during drought conditions. Predicted groundwater drawdown of between 2 and 6 metres may persist for decades after mining ceases. Independent experts have indicated that groundwater dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep rooted riparian vegetation, could be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. The proponent’s baseline water data is inadequate. Conducting only 12 months of groundwater monitoring prior to commencement is insufficient to establish robust long term baselines, particularly in a highly variable climate. Baseline studies must inform approval decisions, not follow them. Given past compliance concerns within the broader mine complex, the precautionary principle should apply. Impacts on Wiradjuri cultural heritage The expansion would result in the destruction of 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts and potentially affect many more. Registered Aboriginal Parties have identified these sites as being of high cultural significance. The cumulative loss of cultural heritage across the region contributes to the progressive fragmentation of Country. It erodes the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain cultural practices, protect sacred places, and sustain intergenerational connection to land. These impacts cannot be mitigated through documentation or salvage. Once destroyed, they are gone permanently. Cumulative impacts across the region This proposal does not exist in isolation. Nearby mine expansions, including those at Ulan and Wilpinjong, are proposed or underway within connected landscapes and water systems. Each project affects similar threatened species, ecological communities and cultural values. The combined effect of multiple expansions across this region has not been adequately assessed. Habitat loss, groundwater drawdown and landscape fragmentation accumulate over time, increasing extinction risk and degrading ecosystem resilience beyond what any single project assessment reveals. Conclusion The OC3 expansion would permanently damage a biologically rich landscape adjoining an established nature reserve. It would destroy threatened species habitat, increase greenhouse emissions at odds with state law, expose water systems to long term risk, and further erode Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The public interest lies in conservation, climate stability and sustainable regional development, not in extending thermal coal extraction into areas of high ecological and cultural value. For these reasons, this proposal should be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
[redacted] Coal. Climate change is killing all of us and all of our children. We absolutely don't need any more of it. This expansion should not go ahead. |
Michael Faulkner
|
ID |
21291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2450 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Michael Faulkner, I am a 75 year old retired person living in Coffs Harbour NSW. I am deeply concerned about the deleterious effects of the expansion of coal mining in our states. This mining will create both local impacts but also global impacts to the climate. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and micro-bat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely, Michael Faulkner Coffs Harbour NSW |
Barbara Briggs
|
ID |
21296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2090 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I write to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment and climate and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. As a botanist I have visited Munghorn gap for botanical studies and am aware of many plant species found in the region and nowhere else. I am also concerned about the expansion of coal mining because of the climate impacts being felt throughout New South Wales and more widely. These are already seen in record hot temperatures and more extreme weather events. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. There would be impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts as well as water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. [redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2460 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Commissioners, NSW Independent Planning Commission. I am writing to object to the extension of the Yancoal Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee. Where I live, near the northern NSW town of Grafton, we have already experienced very high temperatures in 2024 and 2025. Just a few years, back in 2019-2020, we experienced catastrophic fires that burned down a number of the houses in our village. Climate change due to rising emissions is a key factor in driving hotter, more unpredictable weather and droughts. Mining coal creates vast emissions in addition to burning it, and I understand the project will generate an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. This is a huge amount that NSW and the world cannot afford. It is just such projects that will push us over the brink because even small changes in overall temperature have enormous impacts – the like of which we have already started to experience. These impacts will be huge in money terms, especially for our children: higher insurance costs, the replacement of lost infrastructure due to increased bushfires and floods and the costs of additional adaption. Lost farm production will also result, as well as health and social impacts that will add up to billions. Losses will also be due to biodiversity and habitat loss with this mine extension. NSW must forge ahead with renewable energy, and this is where present day jobs, investment and future benefits actually lie. The benefits of the mine extension, even to local jobs will be minimal. For these reasons I urge you to reject the application for an extension of the Moolarben coal mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2602 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. The area includes many threatened species and Box Gum Grassy Woodland which is an endangered ecosystem. Koala and Regent Honeyeater habitat would be destroyed; offsets cannot replace mature woodland habitat which supports threatened species. Although I do not live close to this mine site, I am familiar with box gum grassy woodland and appreciate that its area should not be further reduced. Mine expansion would also have long term effects on ground water resources in the area affecting the local creek systems on which wildlife rely. Adding more coal emissions to the atmosphere of Earth is against the Paris agreement and inconsistent with NSW targets. Earth has one atmosphere and all emissions wherever produced should be counted. The mine expansion does not provide long-term job opportunities for the local communities which would benefit from transition to jobs in the renewable energy sector and should be supported to make this transition. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Bernadette Systa
|
ID |
21321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4164 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Bernadette Systa and I am a deeply concerned parent of five children. I am writing about Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben expansion, which will make this mine the largest producing coal mine in NSW. Climate experts have agreed that the phase out of fossil fuels is not happening fast enough, and transition to renewable energy needs to be fast tracked if we are to limit the impact of climate change. Communities across the nation are already experiencing the devastating impacts of climate change including ferocious bushfires, destructive flooding and extreme heatwaves. Our children are suffering and our energy and insurance bills are increasing. I am deeply concerned that this latest proposal from Yancoal will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. This area is rich in biodiversity and should be protected. I am particularly concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss - including the clearing of over 113 hectares of critical koala habitat as well as regent honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • The impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve – with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. I am aware that the NSW Environment Department has acknowledged the risk and has warned the project could lead to long term population declines and affect habitat critical specials survival. • Water and groundwater risks – including long term groundwater drawdown that could ham Moolarben Creek and groundwater dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. I believe the project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2-6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining. • Climate impacts – this expansion will produce an estimated 64million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislate emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit – there doesn’t appear to be any clear benefits to the public and only destruction for the environment. The amendments recently proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation and will not reduce the negative impact this project will have on our biodiversity. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Violet Smith Westmead NSW 2145 |
Janet Dawson
|
ID |
21326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2444 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Further dependence on fossil fuels makes the existing energy crisis worse. Greater funding and work on renewable energy is needed. I object for the sake of my grandchildren. Water is essential for all life, and this probject threatens water supplies. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. As a bird watcher and nature appreciator, I am concerned about: • Regent honeyeater and box gum woodland loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded. Biodiversity offsets can not replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a REZ (region where renewable energy development is supposed to be prioritised). The NSW Government should not approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Gerry Nucifora
|
ID |
21336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal mine expansion would create even greater greenhouse gas emissions .. also threatening ecosystems. Climate change is a real issue .. we need to be transitioning off coal power and getting into sustainable energy |
Jennifer Duncan
|
ID |
21341 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Mine is the largest producing coal mine in the state of NSW. Given the increasingly urgent situations regarding climate change, biodiversity loss, and water resources, and considering the specifics of this particular proposed expansion, it is clear that the proposal to expand Moolarben Coal Mine is deeply ill-advised. I was born in NSW and have lived most of my sixty-six years in this state. I believe I have both the right and the responsibility to object to the Moolarben expansion proposal in the most strenuous terms. The profit-seeking of the few must be regulated in the public interest. The Moolarben Coal Mining Extension Proposal must be refused. |
Jenny Goldie
|
ID |
21346 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Action Monaro Inc. |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2630 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Climate Action Monaro Inc. is a community-based organisation whose primary aim is to educate the public and decision-makers about the science of climate change. We believe that climate change is an existential threat that must be addressed as a matter of urgency. The most important need is to move economies away from fossil fuels to renewables. This means there must be no new coal mines or extensions, and existing coal mines must be phased out as quickly as possible. While we are concerned about the biodiversity, water and cultural aspects of this proposal, our main fear is that the proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. The Net Zero Commission has noted that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. NSW is already unlikely to meet its 2030 and 2035 emission reduction targets. In addition, the Denman Court of Appeal decision requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause. To stress the urgency of the need to move our economies away from fossil fuels, we submit a paper ('The risk of a hothouse Earth trajectory' Ripple, William J. et al. One Earth, Volume 0, Issue 0, 101565 <https://www.cell.com/one-earth/fulltext/S2590-3322(25)00391-4>) published this month by some of the world's leading climate scientists, including William Ripple, Johan Rockström and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who warned that we are close to crossing critical temperature thresholds that will make global warming even worse. They said precaution was essential. Crossing these temperature thresholds could commit the planet to "a hothouse trajectory with long-lasting and potentially irreversible consequences". And here is another from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. 'Parasol Lost: Recovery plan needed' <https://actuaries.org.uk/news-and-media-releases/news-articles/2026/jan/14-jan-26-parasol-lost-recovery-plan-needed/>. The Parasol Lost report warns that global temperatures are accelerating faster than predicted, driven by a loss of ‘aerosol cooling’, a hidden sunshade effect created by air pollution which has offset around 0.5°C of warming. This hidden sunshade is now receding as pollution is being cut down, particularly by shipping regulations. Sandy Trust, lead author and Sustainability Board Member, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, said: "“Planetary Solvency is threatened, and we urgently need a recovery plan. An actuarial review of key climate change assumptions shows we may have seriously underestimated the rate of warming as well as the related economic impacts. Unless we rapidly change course, climate damages will start to impact growth and future prosperity. The parallels between the risk management failure of the Global Financial Crisis and inaction on the major systemic risk posed by climate change are clear. Both feature an over reliance on benign risk model results and a failure to understand systemic risk.” In other words, climate change is a threat to our economies as well as to the environment and to humanity itself. If we continue on the path we are on, opening up ever more coal mines and their extensions, then we are headed for a dire future. It is imperative that this proposed coal mine extension not proceed. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I submit herewith my strong opposition against an expansion of the coal mine. Reduci g fossil fuel use is a must to prevent climate change. Climate change is a health disaster for our planet we rely to live on. The Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion will cause additional and specific harm by destroying remnant vegetation, precious habitat Australia cannot afford to lose in tbe face of ourbiodiversity extinction crisis. |
Bron Powell
|
ID |
21361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a resident of Dubbo, and visit the Mudgee area frequently. Over the 19 years of living in Dubbo, I have seen the loss of more and more habitat in Central West NSW. The area around Moolarben is one of the best vegetated areas left in the Central West. The loss of more, high ecological value habitat (including koala habitat), for a climate-changing coal mine, is nonsensical. I run eco tours in the Macquarie Marshes (north west NSW) and Dubbo. Nature-based tourism values our natural assets, and is the way of the future – not the destruction of our natural environment. My objections to the proposed expansion are: - Destroying 113 hectares of koala habitat, and 80 hectares of regent honeyeater (a critically endangered species) habitat. “Offsets” do not replace habitat currently supporting threatened species. - The lack of buffer zone to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve - The contribution of coal mining to the climate crisis - The destruction of at least 55 high cultural value Wiradjuri artifacts (deemed high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal) - The impact of drawing down groundwater on the surrounding environment - The “creating jobs” argument is null and void, given the jobs being created in the Orana Renewable Energy Zone, and the growing tourism industry in the region. Thank you for your consideration of my submission. Bron Powell, Dubbo, NSW. |
Linda Delaney
|
ID |
21371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion of the open cut mine because the environmental destruction involved is irresponsible and ignores the impact of greenhouse gasses generated when stabilising environmental assets are destroyed. The wild landscape in question is a valuable resource in its original state with dividends yet to come for future generations. Stop giving it all away. As an Australian I say it belongs to everyone, except the handful of shareholders profiting from its commercial exploitation. Leave us something to value and enjoy. Leave it well alone. |
Kaama Joy
|
ID |
21376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
SUBMISSION OBJECTING TO MOOLARBEN OC3 EXTENSION To: Independent Planning Commission RE: Objection to Moolarben OC3 Extension Project I object to the Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 Extension. I am writing from Wiradjuri Country, near the villages of Rylstone and Kandos, NSW. As a farmer, Permaculture Designer with 45 years of experience, Deep Ecologist, rural firefighter, elder and grandmother, I am deeply opposed to this expansion. Climate Crisis and Fire Emergency We are in a climate emergency. Approving an additional 40 million tonnes of coal production, which would generate 86.59 Mt CO2-e of greenhouse gas emissions, is unconscionable. As a rural firefighter, I have witnessed firsthand the devastating impacts of climate change. We are now dealing with droughts, extreme weather events, and extreme fire conditions that no previous generation has faced. Approving more coal mining while our communities battle these intensifying disasters is a betrayal of our safety and future. Destruction of First Nations Cultural Heritage I am horrified and deeply embarrassed that in 2026, we are still contemplating the destruction of Indigenous cultural places. A total of 130 First Nations cultural heritage sites have been identified within or overlapping the project area, including shelters with artefacts (one with a possible burial) and an axe grinding groove site. Are we so uncultured, so disconnected from the oldest continuous culture on Earth, that we would destroy these irreplaceable places for coal? Has the world not learned enough about such things yet? These are not merely "sites" - they are sacred places, evidence of tens of thousands of years of continuous connection to Country, and irreplaceable heritage belonging to the Wiradjuri people on whose land I live. The destruction of 130 cultural heritage sites on Wiradjuri Country is unconscionable and shameful. We must do better. Community and Children's Health I have grown-up children who suffered from heavy metal poisoning in childhood. It was deeply traumatic and has impacted their health for a lifetime. This personal experience makes me acutely aware of the health dangers mining poses to communities. My grandchildren and all our community's children deserve never to suffer the health impacts of mining. The health effects of continued coal mining - air quality degradation, water contamination, and the cumulative stress of living near expanding industrial operations - affect us all, particularly our most vulnerable: children and elders. Critical Biodiversity Loss This expansion threatens: • 113 hectares of critical koala habitat, risking local extinction of a resilient koala population • Regent Honeyeaters (only 250-350 individuals left in the wild) • Gang-gang Cockatoos and other threatened species • Encroachment to within 100m of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve • 480 hectares of habitat critical to koala survival Water Security The permanent loss of high-quality groundwater from springs, the predicted loss of 180-225 million litres/year of baseflow to the Goulburn River (600 million in wet years), and impacts on downstream water users and river health are unacceptable in an already water-stressed region. As a farmer and Permaculture Designer, I understand how critical healthy water systems are to our survival and food security. I have direct experience of the impact of losing water to washing coal during the drought years of 2018-19, where river systems and much biodiversity were lost forever, including the death of many local platypus. Regional Heritage and Ecological Integrity The intrusion into the upper Moolarben Valley, bounded by the outstanding Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, destroys an area of irreplaceable natural and cultural value. After 45 years of working with ecological design principles, I know that such damage cannot be offset or rehabilitated; it is a permanent loss. As an elder living on Wiradjuri Country, a farmer, Deep Ecologist, and rural firefighter, I am horrified that we continue to approve expansions that threaten the basic necessities of life - clean water, breathable air, stable climate, and the irreplaceable cultural heritage of the traditional custodians of this land - for short-term economic gain. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject this application. |
Kaama Joy
|
ID |
21381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
SUBMISSION OBJECTING TO MOOLARBEN OC3 EXTENSION To: Independent Planning Commission RE: Objection to Moolarben OC3 Extension Project I object to the Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 Extension. I am writing from Wiradjuri Country, near the villages of Rylstone and Kandos, NSW. As a farmer, Permaculture Designer with 45 years of experience, Deep Ecologist, rural firefighter, elder and grandmother, I am deeply opposed to this expansion. Climate Crisis and Fire Emergency We are in a climate emergency. Approving an additional 40 million tonnes of coal production, which would generate 86.59 Mt CO2-e of greenhouse gas emissions, is unconscionable. As a rural firefighter, I have witnessed firsthand the devastating impacts of climate change. We are now dealing with droughts, extreme weather events, and extreme fire conditions that no previous generation has faced. Approving more coal mining while our communities battle these intensifying disasters is a betrayal of our safety and future. Destruction of First Nations Cultural Heritage I am horrified and deeply embarrassed that in 2026, we are still contemplating the destruction of Indigenous cultural places. A total of 130 First Nations cultural heritage sites have been identified within or overlapping the project area, including shelters with artefacts (one with a possible burial) and an axe grinding groove site. Are we so uncultured, so disconnected from the oldest continuous culture on Earth, that we would destroy these irreplaceable places for coal? Has the world not learned enough about such things yet? These are not merely "sites" - they are sacred places, evidence of tens of thousands of years of continuous connection to Country, and irreplaceable heritage belonging to the Wiradjuri people on whose land I live. The destruction of 130 cultural heritage sites on Wiradjuri Country is unconscionable and shameful. We must do better. Community and Children's Health I have grown-up children who suffered from heavy metal poisoning in childhood. It was deeply traumatic and has impacted their health for a lifetime. This personal experience makes me acutely aware of the health dangers mining poses to communities. My grandchildren and all our community's children deserve never to suffer the health impacts of mining. The health effects of continued coal mining - air quality degradation, water contamination, and the cumulative stress of living near expanding industrial operations - affect us all, particularly our most vulnerable: children and elders. Critical Biodiversity Loss This expansion threatens: • 113 hectares of critical koala habitat, risking local extinction of a resilient koala population • Regent Honeyeaters (only 250-350 individuals left in the wild) • Gang-gang Cockatoos and other threatened species • Encroachment to within 100m of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve • 480 hectares of habitat critical to koala survival Water Security The permanent loss of high-quality groundwater from springs, the predicted loss of 180-225 million litres/year of baseflow to the Goulburn River (600 million in wet years), and impacts on downstream water users and river health are unacceptable in an already water-stressed region. As a farmer and Permaculture Designer, I understand how critical healthy water systems are to our survival and food security. I have direct experience of the impact of losing water to washing coal during the drought years of 2018-19, where river systems and much biodiversity were lost forever, including the death of many local platypus. Regional Heritage and Ecological Integrity The intrusion into the upper Moolarben Valley, bounded by the outstanding Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, destroys an area of irreplaceable natural and cultural value. After 45 years of working with ecological design principles, I know that such damage cannot be offset or rehabilitated; it is a permanent loss. As an elder living on Wiradjuri Country, a farmer, Deep Ecologist, and rural firefighter, I am horrified that we continue to approve expansions that threaten the basic necessities of life - clean water, breathable air, stable climate, and the irreplaceable cultural heritage of the traditional custodians of this land - for short-term economic gain. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject this application. |
Maureen Beckett
|
ID |
21386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2298 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I find it hard to believe that the expansion of this mine is even on the table given the latest IPCC reports. Hundreds of reputable scientists have issued the warning that unless we decrease emissions immediately, we will affect the climate irreversibly, condemning future generations to unprecedented hardship. Australia should be decreasing coal exports in line with the Paris agreement and yet the federal government continues to expand existing mines and allowing new fossil fuel projects. And yet, Yancoal intends to extract an additional 30 million tonnes of thermal coal by the year 2034, creating a projected 64 million tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to 58% of total emissions from all NSW sources. This in itself should be reason enough to reject the expansion of Moolarben but there are also well documented serious repercussions locally that will result from the increased footprint of the mine. These include destruction of natural habitat for koalas, bats and particularly the regent honeyeater which is under threat. The koala population which the government has declared resilient due to its abililty to survive previous threats would be further threatened by the mine expansion. Even Yancoal admits the project poses a threat to habitat “critical to the survival” of a local koala population. The project poses risks of increased mortality and physiological stress for koalas due to habitat fragmentation, stress, and vehicle strikes and the resulting interruptions to breeding activities. Similarly, the critically endangered regent honeyeater and endangered gang gang cockatoo will be negatively impacted by the proposed expansion, which will border one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. For these reasons and more, I strongly oppose this expansion. |
Sammy Nazam
|
ID |
21396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2008 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTION: Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sammy, I am an American expat and architect currently living and working in Sydney. I am writing this submission to put forward my objection to Yancoal’s OC3 proposal to expand the Moolarben Coal Mine near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country. In November of 2025 I was given the opportunity to participate in a visit to Wiradjuri Country. This tour was hosted by the Nature Conservation Council as part of a project to provide participants with a unique opportunity to witness a trio of coal mines in mid-west NSW, Wilpinjong, Ulan, and Moolarben. The tour also involved meeting with the local community of Wollar and a local indigenous leader, giving us the opportunity to hear directly from those who have been directly impacted. Additionally, we toured the areas within the boundaries of Yancoal’s proposed expansion, which includes lush bushland. Rather than understanding conceptually the destructive force of coal mines to ecosystems, local communities, and as contributors to climate crisis, the tour provided us with a first-hand encounter of these realities. The tour of Wiradjuri Country has given me firsthand experience of the coal mine in question and it’s impacts on it’s surroundings. It has set the emotional and experiential foundation of this submission. Building off this foundation, the below lays out the primary points of opposition to the proposal 1 ) The Destruction of Wildlife Habitat, Impacts to Biodiversity, and Endangered Species The proposed area of expansion contains critical habitat and breeding grounds for Koalas ( 113 hectares ) and Regent Honeyeaters ( 80 hectares ) located within Box Gum Woodland Habitat. All of this would be destroyed if the expansion is approved. The NSW Environment Department has acknowledged that the impacts on threatened species including the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, and micro bats will be severe and has warned if the expansion is to go ahead it could lead to long-term population declines due to habitat loss which is vital for these species survival. Additionally, the expansion zone extends into an area surrounded by the bushland of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest nature conservation sites in the state. Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500 m buffer from the boundary with Munghorn Gap as a bare-minimum request for protecting the wildlife in the reserve. Noise and blasting impacts continue to negatively affect the reserve. The area proposed for expansion should not be converted into a mine but instead should be incorporated into Munghorn Gap Reserve thus protecting the wildlife habitats, endangered species, and overall ecosystem. Lastly, the expansion would cause significant reduction to groundwater levels in the area, estimated at 2-6 meters below the current level. This would severely affect Moolarben Creek and the species that rely on it and the ecosystem it sustains as a critical drought refuge. 2 ) Destruction of Aboriginal Cultural Sites There are 55 Aboriginal Cultural Artefacts and Sites within the proposed expansion zone that would be destroyed if the expansion is approved and potentially impact dozens of others. We had the honor of visiting, one of these cultural sites, named the Drip. The NSW government has announced numerous times, in different contexts, it’s commitment to (re)conciliation. However it has approved the construction and expansions of numerous coal mines across the state which have resulted in the destruction of Aboriginal Sacred Artefacts and Sites, such as for the Wilpinjong, Ulan, Whitehaven, mines and the Metropolitan Colliery; actively compromising their stated commitments to protecting First Nations Culture & Country. 3 ) Climate Impacts If approved, the OC3 expansion would contribute heavily to greenhouse gas emissions over the course of it’s operations, an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of emission. This is an enormous amount. Furthermore, the expansions and it’s expected emissions are in opposition to the stated goals of the NSW Climate Change Act of 2023, including the 2030 goal to reduce emissions to 50%. The NSW Government has an obligation, set by it’s own legislation, to thoughtfully re-consider the approval of any expansions to fossil fuel extraction projects. 4 ) Little to no local and economic benefit Finally, none of these destructive impacts can even be justified from an economic point of view, as it will not provide an economic benefit to the area because all of the coal is planned for export. Additionally, mining jobs in the area have been unfilled for years. By contrast this area is part of central west Orana Renewable Energy Zone where renewable energy jobs are expected to create an estimated 2,000 new jobs within the next decade. The mine would provide essentially no economic benefit to the area and by contrast cause irreversible environmental damage. The above describes the categorically significant evidence against accepting Yancoal’s expansion proposal. I hope the Independent Planning Commission will take the time to consider the grave consequences if the proposal is to be approved. It is now as crucial as ever for people within every industry and from every walk of life to take a stand against the extractive industries perpetuating the climate crises. This holds true especially for the individuals and groups within government institutions who hold influence, like yourselves at the Independent Planning Commission. You can make the difficult decisions to protect our biosphere and contribute towards a livable future for all life on this planet. Thank you for your consideration, Sammy |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted] I am a 51 year teacher in Newcastle and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students at my school are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Regard [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate crisis affecting all of us. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that will harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Rach Mangan
|
ID |
21421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need to be transitioning away from coal at this point in time not expanding a dying industry. |
GREGORY WALKER
|
ID |
21426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project: SSD-33083358 I oppose this Extension Proposal. The reasons for rejecting this proposal are well documented by other parties who oppose it. I wish to add my support to those objections. Economic Benefits The claims made by Yancoal on the expansions economic benefits are spurious. The mine still has over 10 years of operating life under its existing permits. The principal export market targets of China and Korea are already under retreat. This extension risks becoming a stranded asset prior to reaching its proposed end of life. Other thermal coal mines exist in the area. It is expected that they also will seek extensions. The current State Government approval mechanism of assessing proposals on an individual rather than a collective basis is flawed. It increases the probability of hastened collective failure at a time when demand for global coal is in decline. In a rush to the competitive bottom individual mines will experience declining coal prices, declining employment and negative regional economic decline if not managed properly. By contrast, a policy of restricted approvals of thermal coal mine proposals will keep export prices higher for the existing approved timelines thus actually providing economic security for existing employees at least for the short term. Higher prices will also encourage faster uptake of renewable energy substitutes in the targeted export markets as is already being witnessed. The same mechanism will apply the local Australian regional economy. Focus will shift to new economic opportunities with a clearer timeline as to when the closure of Mooralben will occur. That shift will also be towards renewable energy projects – strengthened by the fact that the area is within a State designated Renewable Energy Zone. It might also discourage the funding of opposition campaigns to IPC approvals of such renewable energy projects. Environmental Impacts The economic benefits of rejection of this expansion proposal will also prevent the negative environmental and biodiversity damage expected. The same individual assessment procedure for mining proposals that has economic negative impacts also contributes to acceleration of environmental and biodiversity impacts. Continued removal of natural habitat from individual approvals has a magnified cumulative impact on the environmental and biodiversity. Policies that approve expansion of fossil fuel projects also impact negatively on our environment and biodiversity by continuing to support climate change. Climate Change The time has come to seriously address Australia’s conflicting policies of fossil fuel project approvals and climate change emissions reduction. It is time to place time limits on the endless expansion of such projects. This will send a message to the Australian and Global community that Australia is serious about addressing climate change. I declare that I do not live in the area of the proposed expansion but I am familiar with it having travelled there multiple times and having witnessed the massive expansion of coal mining over several decades. Dr Gregory Walker Retired Academic |
Rat Brodie
|
ID |
21436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2843 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, My family have been visiting Wollar, Ulan, Noname and many of the beautiful villages that are placed in Wiradjuri country, surrounding the Goulburn River ecosystem, for decades. Every summer we would visit the river and fish for eels. We would tread lightly, aware of its significance and in awe at its specialness, as we visited the Drip on the way home from seeing freinds and buying groceries in Mudgee. Over my lifetime I have watched the lights from the coal mines grow and spread further than we ever thought. We live on a farm over 100km from Ulan and can still see the lights. To think now, 20 years later that the mines are still expanding, still seeking growth and extraction is a disgusting show of greed and profit. This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for more than 25yrs post mining significantly altering stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems (and potentially Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve). This puts Moolarben Creek and Spring Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. Rivers are webs of interconnected life and ecological signficance. From our fishing in this area year after year, we've seen water levels go down and back up overnight as a result of being controlled by the mines. We've seen creek beds dredged and a boggy channel cut through, disturbing the waterflow and allowing more opportunity for introduced species. This mine expansion would take Moolarben up to 2038 to keep digging out coal. We don't need to keep digging up coal and ruining landscapes, damaging culture up to 2038 to keep the energy on. Renewable energy is set to overtake coal and if given proper infrastructural support it could overtake coal faster. Promising Mudgee's community that there will be jobs at Moolarben til 2038 is negligent and irresponsible. I am submitting this letter on behalf of my family, we have lived in Coolah NSW for 25 years and will always be supporters of freeing Wollar from coal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted], and as an educator in Western Sydney, I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state due to the ongoing climate impacts being experienced by our communities. Across NSW, many communities, especially our schools, are already facing extreme heatwaves and rising energy costs linked to increased air conditioning use. The school I work at in particular, is located on an energy grid that is unable to handle the power required to install air conditioners, and thus last term I had students expected to learn in near 40 degree heat. These challenges highlight the urgent need to reconsider projects that contribute significantly to climate change, and make communities struggle even more so. I am writing to formally object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. My concerns include the serious and irreversible harm this project would cause to the environment, climate, and local communities, and I believe this expansion should not be approved. The area’s rich biodiversity should instead be protected, ideally incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Specifically, I am concerned about: The loss of habitat critical to threatened species, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding has been recorded, as well as habitats for the Regent Honeyeater and microbats. Biodiversity offsets are no substitute for existing habitats supporting threatened species. Potential impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, including mining operations proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and insufficient assessment of noise, blasting, and vibration effects. Risks to water and groundwater systems, including long-term groundwater depletion that could damage Moolarben Creek and critical drought refuges for wildlife dependent on groundwater. The significant climate impact, with an estimated additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions from this project at a time when NSW is not currently on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. The lack of clear public benefit, as there is no strong justification for expanding coal mining in a region increasingly prioritising renewable energy development. In the context of the current climate and biodiversity crises, the NSW Government must not approve new or expanded coal projects. This proposal conflicts with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2026 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Submission Regarding Yancoal’s Proposed Moolarben OC3 Mine Expansion (near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country) My name is [name redacted] , and I am a 56-year-old counsellor living in Eastern Sydney, New South Wales. I wish to express my strong objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion. As a concerned member of the community, I am deeply troubled by the ongoing expansion of coal mining in New South Wales and Australia, given the severe and escalating impacts of climate change already being experienced across the state and the nation. We are increasingly affected by extreme heatwaves and catastrophic bushfires, rising energy bills due to greater reliance on air conditioning, and growing levels of climate distress within our communities. These issues are both immediate and long-term public health and environmental concerns. I am concerned that the proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, the climate, and local communities. This biodiverse area deserves permanent protection and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve rather than subjected to industrial development. Specifically, I have the following concerns: Threatened species and habitat loss: Clearing of approximately 113 acres of koala habitat, known to support breeding populations. Impacts on other threatened species, including the Regent Honeyeater and the Microwave (possible mishearing — please confirm intended species name). Biodiversity offsets cannot replace existing habitat that already sustains threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: Mining operations are proposed within 100 metres of the reserve boundary. Inadequate assessment of noise, blasting, and vibration impacts on the reserve and surrounding biodiversity. Water and groundwater risks: Potential for significant and long-term groundwater drawdown, which could damage creeks and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. These ecosystems serve as critical drought refuges for local wildlife. Climate impacts: The project is estimated to generate an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, which would directly undermine New South Wales’ legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit: No clear or credible employment justification has been provided for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The New South Wales Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with: The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, and The goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion proposal. Thank you sincerely for considering my submission. Yours faithfully, |
Greg Beresford
|
ID |
21461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We must not further expand coal exploration due to the resulting greenhouse gas emissions which this will produce when the coal is subsequently burnt - either here or overseas. Such emissions may be small relative to global emissions but it sends the wrong signal to nations who will be mostly affected by this. Australia will then have a moral obligation to bear the cost of dealing with the consequences. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2158 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I write to formally object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension and to express strong concern regarding the recent amendments submitted shortly before the scheduled hearing. The timing of these amendments is deeply problematic. Introducing changes at such a late stage undermines the integrity of the consultation process and limits the community’s ability to properly review and respond. Meaningful public participation requires transparency and adequate time for assessment. These amendments are far too late to be considered within a fair and robust planning process. Importantly, the proposed amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation. The footprint of ecological disturbance remains significant, and the proposal continues to pose severe impacts on biodiversity. Native vegetation in this region supports threatened species and complex ecosystems that cannot simply be offset or replaced through so-called “habitat enhancement” measures. Once cleared, these ecological communities are not recoverable within meaningful timeframes. The project, even as amended, would still result in substantial habitat loss, fragmentation, and long-term degradation of biodiversity values. In the context of accelerating species decline and climate pressures, further clearing of native vegetation is inconsistent with responsible environmental stewardship and intergenerational equity. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Commission reject the proposed amendments and give serious consideration to refusing the extension in its entirety. At a minimum, the amendments should not be accepted, given their late submission and the ongoing, severe ecological consequences of the project. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] |
Diala Salim
|
ID |
21471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2160 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Diala Salim. I am a law student, a disability support worker, and a concerned member of the public. I write to unequivocally oppose the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex expansion. This proposal represents a continuation of fossil fuel expansion at a time when climate science and public health evidence demand action to prevent further carnage. Approving this project would not be a neutral act — it would be an active choice to deepen environmental harm, entrench climate instability, and impose further burdens on vulnerable communities. As a law student, I am acutely aware that planning decisions must be made in the public interest and informed by principles such as sustainable developments. These are not abstract concepts; they are intended to be safeguards to prevent further long-term and irreversible harm. Approving new coal extraction in 2026 is fundamentally inconsistent with those principles. Climate science is unequivocal that fossil fuel production must decline rapidly to limit catastrophic warming. Extending the life of the Moolarben Coal Complex locks in decades of additional greenhouse gas emissions and undermines Australia’s climate commitments. Each incremental approval contributes to cumulative harm — more extreme heat, bushfires, floods, and public health crises. These consequences are no longer theoretical; they are lived realities across New South Wales. Land clearing, habitat fragmentation, and ecological degradation cannot be justified during a biodiversity crisis. Ecosystems, once destroyed, cannot simply be restored to their original complexity and function. Rehabilitation efforts rarely replicate what is lost. protection where there is risk of serious or irreversible harm. In this case, that risk is clear. Water security presents another significant concern. In a drought-prone country facing intensifying climate pressures, jeopardising water resources for the sake of extending coal extraction is short-sighted and irresponsible. Water sustains communities, agriculture, and ecosystems. It is a shared and finite resource that must be protected for present and future generations. In my work as a disability support worker, I see firsthand how environmental stressors disproportionately affect people with disabilities, chronic illnesses, and limited resources. Increased pollution, noise, and industrial activity have tangible health consequences. Environmental harm is never distributed equally. Expanding coal mining compounds these inequities and raises serious environmental justice concerns. A planning system that claims to act in the public interest must dutifully account for these realities. For these reasons, I firmly urge you to reject the expansion. The decisions made now will shape the environmental, social, and economic conditions inherited by future generation, just as the decisions made historically have impacted this generation. I ask that the Commission place the health of our communities, ecosystems, and climate at the forefront of its determination. Sincerely, Diala Salim Merrylands, NSW. |
|
Attachments |
21471 - Diala Salim_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 50.93 KB) |
DAVID LACHLAN HUFTON
|
ID |
21476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission attached file |
|
Attachments |
21476 -Redacted.pdf (PDF, 130.9 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am a counsellor and psychotherapist living in the Illawarra region of NSW. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts that all global citizens are experiencing. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. I also note that the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Kimberley HORNER
|
ID |
21506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2820 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed expansion of the Moolarben mine in Mudgee could have catastrophic impacts on the local water table, impacting some of the most amazing natural and cultural beauty in the region. We are meant to be moving AWAY from coal and gas dependency, not expanding our mines. The project threatens to destroy 113–153 hectares of critical habitat for the endangered Koala and 80 hectares for the Regent Honeyeater, with concerns that this will lead to a long-term decrease in these populations. Over 470 hectares of critically endangered Box Gum Woodland are also at risk. |
Dawn HORNER
|
ID |
21531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2820 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been to the Drip and it is one of the most beautiful places I have ever seen, it is the equal to the Three Sisters in the Blue Mountains, but in our region! Any new mine expansion has NOT been studied for environmental impact by unbiased people. Collapsed longwall tunnels have caused far field movements of the earth surface up to 2 kms, and the expansion goes too close to that. It will destroy amazing habitat and cultural sites. I oppose it wholeheartedly. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need to put a moratorium on all CO’s and gas projects, new or existing or expanding. Renewables do work and many countries now lead on this by example. |
Penelope Stapleton
|
ID |
21556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please reject the Moolarben coal expansion. The impact on our environment and our water is to horrendous to allow this proposal to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2548 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We must stop approving more coal if we want to have a livable environment |
Yatha Jain
|
ID |
21571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Yatha. In my spare time I love to spend time outdoors - whether that's hiking, camping, snorkelling. I love it all. This area being discussed should be protected, not turned into an extractive, harmful coal mine pit. over 20 threatened species have been recorded in the area, and it would be a shame to destroy this beautiful area forever. This project will also cause long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks, according to experts. Yancoal's proposed to amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies is inadequate. This study should occur before the project is approved. I want to live in a country which prioritises our environment, our people and our communities. This coal mine expansion is not in the best interests of our community, and it would be an awful shame for it to go ahead. Yatha |
RICHARD M MILLER
|
ID |
21576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2287 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Thank you for taking the time to read my short submission, re: Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. My name is Richard Miller; I live in the Hunter with my family, including two young daughters. It's primarily for my children's sake that I'm writing to you today. They are too young to understand the devastating impacts of this proposal to the environment and climate, but you and I know that this proposal will be destructive. Not only for the native plants and animals in the immediate area, as well as the surrounding waterways, but for all of us. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. This is an undeniably huge impact, coming at a time when we must be transitioning as fast as possible to a net-zero economy. DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. I and many thousands of other locals are fearful of what this proposal means for the immediate impact today and the looking-term impacts on our children's future. The scale of land clearing happening in NSW is deeply troubling and this proposal would accelerate the destruction, clearing 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded. We simply can't afford this destruction. Please, it's time to take a common sense approach to this decision and realise that the negatives for our animals, plants, waterways, and atmosphere vastly outweigh any proposed benefit. I am just an everyday person and these decisions are out of my hands. But my children will pay a price if this proposal is passed. So I'm doing the only thing I can do: writing to ask that nature and future generations be acknowledged as you weigh up this important decision. Thank you for reading my submission. Yours sincerely, Richard Miller |
Elizabeth Milner
|
ID |
21581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission formally objects to the proposed Open Cut 3 (OC3) expansion of the Moolarben Coal Complex. After consideration of the environmental, social, cultural and economic consequences, it is my position that the cumulative and potentially irreversible impacts of this project are unacceptable and outweigh any short-term economic benefits. The proposed expansion would extend open-cut mining operations within the existing tenement area and prolong coal extraction activities for several additional years. The proposal represents a continuation of large-scale coal extraction at a time when biodiversity loss, water insecurity and climate change demand stronger environmental protection and forward-looking economic planning. For the reasons outlined below, this project should not be approved. 1. Biodiversity Impacts The proposed expansion would result in the clearing of significant areas of native vegetation, including critically endangered Box-Gum Woodland ecological communities. This vegetation provides essential habitat for threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Large-eared Pied Bat, koalas and other woodland-dependent fauna. The proximity of mining activities to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve raises additional concern. Industrial operations near protected conservation areas will introduce noise, vibration, dust and light pollution that disturb sensitive wildlife populations. Habitat destruction and fragmentation are widely recognised as leading causes of species decline. These issues reduce species’ ability to move, feed and reproduce. In landscapes already under pressure from agriculture, drought and climate change, further clearing increases the risk of biodiversity decline and local extinction. Further habitat loss is ecologically irresponsible. Once complex woodland ecosystems are cleared and species populations decline these ecosystems cannot be fully restored to their original ecological complexity. Approval of this expansion would directly contribute to biodiversity decline. 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The OC3 expansion would generate tens of millions of tonnes of CO₂-equivalent emissions over its lifetime, including downstream emissions from the burning of exported coal. At a time when global and national efforts are focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, approving new coal extraction capacity undermines meaningful climate action. Additional emissions will contribute to climate change impacts already being experienced across New South Wales, including more frequent and more severe bushfires, prolonged droughts, extreme heat and flooding events. Approving this project would contribute to cumulative global emissions and increase long-term climate risks. The economic costs associated with climate change — disaster recovery, infrastructure damage, agricultural losses, health impacts and insurance pressures — far exceed the temporary economic benefits generated by continued coal extraction. It is inconsistent with responsible planning to approve additional fossil fuel developments that exacerbate a global crisis with well-documented long-term harm. 3. Water Resources The expansion is predicted to cause groundwater drawdown of several metres in surrounding aquifers. Such impacts may reduce flows to Moolarben Creek and connected waterways, particularly during drought conditions. Water resources in this region are already vulnerable. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems rely on stable water tables, and reductions in baseflow threaten aquatic life, riparian vegetation and overall ecosystem health. Hydrological changes can persist long after mining ceases, and full restoration of groundwater systems is highly uncertain. In an era of increasing water scarcity due to climate change, further compromising water security is not in the public interest. The precautionary principle should apply where long-term water system integrity is at risk. 4. Cultural Heritage The project area lies within Wiradjuri Country and contains numerous Aboriginal cultural heritage sites, including artefact scatters and rock shelters of significant cultural value. Disturbance or destruction of these sites would represent permanent and irreversible cultural loss. Cultural heritage places embody spiritual, historical and social significance for First Nations communities and are integral to maintaining connection to Country. These sites cannot be replicated or replaced through offsets or mitigation measures. The protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage is a matter of justice, respect and intergenerational responsibility. Impacts extend beyond physical loss and may affect cultural continuity, identity and intergenerational knowledge transfer. Development that results in irreversible cultural damage should not proceed. 5. Social and Community Impacts The expansion would perpetuate dust, noise, blasting vibration and increased heavy vehicle traffic in surrounding communities. Exposure to fine particulate matter is associated with respiratory and cardiovascular illness. Industrial encroachment into rural landscapes reduces amenity, alters community character and may contribute to community stress and social division, particularly in regions that have experienced long-term cumulative mining impacts. Communities that have already experienced cumulative mining impacts should not be subjected to further environmental and social stress. Sustainable regional development should prioritise long-term health and resilience rather than continued dependence on extractive industries. 6. Economic Considerations and Long-Term Risk While employment and royalties are cited as benefits, these are short- to medium-term gains within a global coal market facing structural decline. Continued investment in coal extraction may delay economic diversification and the transition to renewable energy industries. Economic benefits tied to resource extraction are finite. In contrast, environmental damage, water system alteration and biodiversity loss will impose enduring costs on the community and future generations. Additionally these liabilities and climate-related damages represent substantial long-term economic costs. These costs are most often borne by the public and future generations. True economic sustainability requires investment in industries aligned with long-term environmental stability, not expansion of activities that compound ecological and climate risk. My Conclusion: The cumulative impacts of the Moolarben OC3 expansion — including irreversible biodiversity loss, significant greenhouse gas emissions, groundwater and surface water impacts, destruction of Aboriginal cultural heritage and ongoing community health and amenity disruption — are substantial and, in many cases, irreversible. Given the scale and permanence of these impacts, and the availability of alternative economic pathways for regional development, this project is not in the public interest. For these reasons, I respectfully submit that the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion should not be approved. |
Nina Fitzgerald
|
ID |
21586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2483 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Speciest, ecocidal, psychopathic governance ends now. |
Jennifer Abbo
|
ID |
21591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
For the sake of present and future life on our planet, i implore you to stop the greed based plunder and exploitation of the planet. Just give it a rest for a couple of years for a chance to recover. Please. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am a 22-year-old Australian who takes the duties of a citizen seriously. I believe that both for society and our country’s wellbeing and sustainability, the expansion of Moolarben is hugely detrimental. The environmental, impacts of this project cannot be ignored. This project would result in irreversible harm to koala, Regent Honeyeater, and microbat habitats. Furthermore, it presents a significant climate cost, generating an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. It would be a grave error to overlook these issues during a climate and biodiversity crisis. I therefore urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension be refused. Thank you for your consideration. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2046 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am a retired citizen of Australia who grew up in Newcastle with a deep love of the environment in the Hunter/ Mudgee area. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate impacts it will cause and are being felt all over the world. Our energy bills are going up due to the increased amount of electricity needed to heat and cool our home. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I believe that this project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment and climate and should not be approved. If you visit the Mudgee area today you can see the wasteland already created by the existing Ulan mines. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. The clearing of 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum woodland ecosystem With the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets! The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to NOT approve this plan. The proposed amendments to this proposal do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, and are far too late to be considered For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write as a long-term agri-tourism operator in the Mudgee region. For over 30 years, my family has built and operated a business grounded in the environmental integrity, agricultural productivity and natural beauty of this region. Our livelihood depends directly on the health of the landscape, clean water, biodiversity, and the reputation of Mudgee as a premium regional destination. The proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben Mine presents unacceptable environmental, economic and reputational risks to our region. 1. This Landscape Belongs in a Conservation Corridor, Not an Open-Cut Pit The proposed clearing of approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, including habitat adjacent to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, is fundamentally incompatible with the character and ecological value of this valley. Mining to within 100 metres of one of the state’s oldest conservation reserves places: 23 recorded threatened species at risk Critical koala breeding habitat Endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystems Regent Honeyeater habitat Microbat populations From a tourism perspective, the natural landscape is not peripheral — it is the product. Visitors come for intact ecosystems, wildlife, and scenic integrity. Industrial expansion directly undermines this asset. This area should be incorporated into a single conservation landscape linked to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not fragmented by open-cut mining. 2. Irreversible Biodiversity Loss Impacts the Visitor Economy The clearing of: 113 hectares of koala habitat 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland is not offsettable in any meaningful ecological or reputational sense. The Mudgee region markets itself on environmental quality. Wildlife loss and habitat destruction weaken the authenticity of that brand. Tourism is perception-sensitive. The reputational damage associated with biodiversity destruction — especially in proximity to a Nature Reserve — cannot be separated from economic consequence. 3. Climate Cost and Economic Risk The projected 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions associated with this expansion contradict NSW climate commitments and global transition trends. As an agri-tourism operator, climate instability directly affects: Agricultural productivity Drought frequency and intensity Visitor patterns Insurance costs Long-term regional resilience The failure to fully assess downstream emissions (99% of total emissions) and their economic cost represents an incomplete evaluation of public interest. 4. The Economic Argument Is Weak The expansion: Creates no new jobs Extends an existing operation Primarily serves export markets (65% to China) Enters a declining global thermal coal demand environment By contrast, the region’s visitor economy: Provides diverse employment Supports small businesses Attracts inward investment Drives relocation of skilled professionals Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, offering clear alternative employment pathways consistent with future economic direction. Short-term extraction should not undermine long-term regional prosperity. 5. Groundwater and Water Security Risks Proposed groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting decades, poses serious risks to: Moolarben Creek Groundwater-dependent ecosystems Riparian vegetation Agricultural water security As an agricultural operator, water reliability is fundamental. The proposal to undertake baseline groundwater monitoring only after approval is inadequate and contrary to precautionary planning principles. Water risk is not theoretical — it directly affects food production, land value, and visitor confidence. 6. Cultural Heritage Impact The destruction of 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts of high cultural value, and further potential impacts, compounds the cumulative degradation of Wiradjuri Country. Cultural heritage is increasingly recognised as integral to place-based tourism and community identity. Respect for Country is not optional — it underpins social licence and regional integrity. 7. Cumulative Impact Ignored This expansion must not be assessed in isolation. Combined with proposed expansions at: Ulan Coal Mine Wilpinjong Coal Mine there is a clear cumulative threat to: Biodiversity Water systems Cultural heritage Regional brand and economic stability Fragmented assessment obscures total risk. Conclusion As an agri-tourism operator, my business depends on: Clean water Biodiverse landscapes Climate stability Cultural integrity Regional reputation The proposed Moolarben expansion places all of these at risk while offering limited long-term benefit to the local community. The economic foundation of this region is diversifying toward tourism, agriculture, renewables, and creative industries. Decisions that entrench legacy extraction at the expense of these emerging sectors are not aligned with sustainable regional development. I respectfully urge the Commission to reject this expansion in the public interest. |
Phoebe REPETI
|
ID |
21621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2048 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi, My name is Phoebe and I work in the public sector. I am an active person in my community in the Sydney region. I am seriously concerned about the expansion of Moolarben mine for many reasons. The ecological impact of this is terrifying considering our rapidly changing landscape. This expansion will have detrimental impact on sacred Flora and fauna in the local area. It will have terrible and irreversible negative consequences on the local water sources, local honey eaters, micro bats, just to name a few. We are seeing ecological collapse at seriously alarming rates and this will further in entrench this change. We do not need more coal. We need more innovative technology to build a sustainable future for our children. I would rather see this investment be put towards something that we can truly rely on. Not something that has such a short life cycle but long term impacts on the environment. It also has a massive impact on Traditional sacred lands of the Wiradjuri People, not being able to practice ceremony on their own lands. They will also dig up sacred sites and reduce access for First Nations people. Please, please don't allow this to go forward. It would break my heart. We are constantly making these terrible environmental decisions that only benefit the few people in the short term. The environmental impact is too dangerous, too damaging. Nature needs a very long term to replenish itself and we won't see that in our lifetime if this goes forward. Please consider the environmental impacts of this at this time. It is extremely negligent to let something like this go through. We need to protect our environment, not pillage it for short term profit. Again, please don't let this go ahead. Get an independent environmental inquiry before going ahead. Think of other sustainable alternatives. There are so many other things we can do! DONT LET THIS GO THROUGH! We can work on a better future together. |
Jackson McNulty
|
ID |
21631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2205 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Jackson, and I am a concerned member of the community, who is frightened by the continued growth of coal mining at a time when we are heading towards irreversible tipping points within the climate system. I am in my mid-20s, and through my teenage years and to the current day I have seen governments take actions that contradict their words about facing up to climate change. Within this environment, I have experienced the impact of climate change firsthand, fearing for loved ones on the Central Coast when fires were going through their communities, and experiencing flooding outside of my home that will make it inaccessible in years to come. Expanding fossil fuels beds, us to a continuation of catastrophic floods, fires and heatwaves, which alters Australia as we know and enjoy it today. We have an obligation to Australians of the future, and to the natural environment to not continue down a path that is no longer economically viable, with the sole desire being to squeeze as much money as possible from an industry that is on its last legs. We have an obligation to the workers within the fossil fuel industry in NSW. Expanding mines creates an impression that this is an industry that is continuing to grow and puts a false sense of security in the minds of workers. At the end of the day, we can expand these mines, but with 100% of the coal from this expansion going overseas, if these countries stop buying, as they will do, with demand from South Korea and China dropping and South Korea vowing to close all coal-fired plants by 2040, these workers will be left high and dry. We need to be supporting these workers into the renewable industry, so that they can have jobs into the future, instead of bedding them into a dying industry. These workers could be supported into jobs within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, which is expected to create around 2000 new jobs over the next decade. I implore you to look for alternative uses for this land that are more in the interests of the Australian public. This expansion will not support new jobs, with coal jobs in this region remaining unfilled for years, adding no benefit to the community. Instead, the area could and should be included in a protected nature reserve, allowing the community to experience the natural beauty of the region now and into the future. There is such beauty in this area, I spent many summers growing up in the region, and I would be an incredible, further loss for this region. With 23 threatened species recorded in the proposed expansion area, the focus should be on protecting and cultivating Australia’s natural gifts. I am urging you to recommend that the Moolarben expansion be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Kindly, Jackson |
Wendy Mitchell
|
ID |
21636 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Wires Central West Branch Committee |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2787 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The WIRES Central West Branch Committee formally objects to the proposed extension of the Moorlaben Open Cut Mine. As a volunteer-led wildlife rescue and rehabilitation organisation operating across the Central West region of NSW, we directly respond to the ecological consequences of habitat loss, road trauma, fragmentation, and industrial expansion. Our members attend roadside rescues, care for displaced wildlife, rehabilitate injured animals, and absorb the emotional and financial burden of environmental degradation. This submission focuses on wildlife and environmental impacts and is grounded in NSW legislative obligations requiring biodiversity protection, precautionary decision-making, and ecologically sustainable development. The proposed extension of the Moorlaben Open Cut Mine is inconsistent with: The Ecologically Sustainable Development principles embedded in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 The conservation objectives of the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Sustainable water protection under the Water Management Act 2000 Wildlife cannot absorb further cumulative impact without irreversible consequence. For these reasons, WIRES Central West Branch Committee formally objects and respectfully requests refusal of the proposal. Regards Wires CW Branch Committee Wendy Mitchell Branch Secretary |
|
Attachments |
Formal Objection – Wildlife and Environmental Impacts%0AMoorlaben Open Cut Mine Extension Proposal%0A.pdf (PDF, 75.57 KB) |
Shae Salmon
|
ID |
21651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a citizen of Australia and the planet I am deeply concerned about any coal mine expansions. We must be ending coal and fossil fuel production everywhere all together This area in particular faces irreversible damage to threatened species and the natural environment/ecosystems if this expansion goes ahead. It is not needed! Renewable energy production will provide far more job opportunities without the devastating environmental impact from this proposed expansion. We must move away from coal not towards more. Our climate cannot cope with the extra ommissions caused by more coal burnt. The creeks and waterways - especially Moolarben Creek plus all the creatures that depend on clean water are at great risk- including humans! There are so many important reasons not to allow this expansion. Please take great notice - don't destroy more of Moolarben's beautiful natural environment. |
Aakanksha Wadia
|
ID |
21661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2050 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the planning commission, My name is Aakanksha and I'm a 40 year old marketing professional and I'm very concerned about the expansion of coal mining projects and continuous reliance on fossil fuels exploitation, the impact they have on the climate as well as biodiversity, and our incessant focus on the short term while not bearing enough responsibility for the long term and the future of our communities and planet. I'm writing to you to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project near Mudgee in Wiradjuri Country. I'm concerned this project will cause harm to the environment, climate and community where we should instead be preserving and protecting what has already been exploited for a long time. In particular, I'm concerned about - Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. - Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. - Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. - Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. - Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal miningin a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission, Sincerely, Aakanksha, InnerWest 2050 |
|
Attachments |
StopMoolarben.pdf (PDF, 31.1 KB) |
SANDRA RYAN
|
ID |
21666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2327 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine - we are dangerously close to complete climate collapse, and all steps must be taken now to ensure that we don't make things significantly worse. |
Nina Rose
|
ID |
21671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6082 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Nina Rose and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, cultural heritage and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected in perpetuity. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Irreversible impacts on the Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people's ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense irreplaceable significance. • The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. • Lack of genuine public consultation and lasting benefits, There is no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. It is time the NSW Government shifted its focus onto positively geared renewables that do not harm our unique and precious environment, our ancient indigenous culture, our climate or the people of this great land we call home. This proposed expansion would prove to have lasting detrimental, irreversible and catastrophic impacts on our already fragmented environment, the Wiradjuri people and their ancient culture that should be preserved in perpetuity not destroyed for short term greed and profiteering. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely - Nina Rose |
Lawrence Murphy
|
ID |
21681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2113 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Lawrence, I am a 74 year old Pensioner in Macquarie Park and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Residents are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Lawrence Murphy, Macquarie Park. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2390 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 52 years old. I have a degree in Geosciences and a Master's degree in Integrated Water Resources Management and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Australia, due to the climate impacts being felt across Australia by farmers, wildlife and ordinary people trying to live their lives. The impact on doesnt stop there, what do the children of today have to look forward to? More devastating droughts, bigger heatwaves, compounding floods, loss of inconic species, higher costs and a reduced standard of living. Quite simply Australia does not need to mine any more coal, let alone clear trees and the natural habitat of unique and threatened for the purposes of mining this coal that we dont need. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. This proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit (which we all know is simply fossil fuel industry propaganda). I come from Narrabri, so I know the impact that coal mines have on water resources that are needed for communities, nature and farmers. This project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. Whats more is that coal mining companies have broken the rules applied to them many times, you will be well aware of the number and types of fines that coal mine operators have been charged with over the years, including at Moolarbin. In addition, there has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. Finally, Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Yours sincerely |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As a human being, dependant on our planet earth and its thin layer of atmosphere to stay alive, I oppose the continuing erosion of the natural environment proposed by this project. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I strongly ask the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for listening. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] Mollymook NSW 2539 |
Lydia Fagan
|
ID |
21696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Lydia Fagan. I’m a teacher and a PhD student at the University of Sydney and I grew up in Canowindra in Central West NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. I know firsthand how beautiful the lands in this region are and how vital it is to keep our preserved native lands protected. Yancoal’s expansion proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation, which is increasingly scarce. It will also push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, endangering a highly biodiverse area, with at least 23 threatened species. This reserve was created to recognise the importance of protecting our native ecosystems and placing an open cut coal mine so close to it will be a major disturbance. This should be protected land, not a coal mine that delivers no new jobs to the region. Yancoal’s proposed expansion relies on the idea that the irreversible damage to nature can be offset, but this would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. With so much koala habitat already destroyed by bushfires, this land needs to be protected, not demolished and offset. It would also clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. Given their unwillingness in the past to follow their requirements for caring for the land, we must be sceptical of their proposal. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. NSW and Australia have climate goals which this expansion will directly set us against. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions which are 99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. The proposed expansion will not contribute to employment nor benefits for the local community, given that the current mine will operate until 2038 without this expansion and coal jobs have remained unfilled for years in the region. Not only does the region not need the coal jobs this expansion would provide, Mudgee is in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. This is the perfect place to stop further coal mining in line with our climate goals, because those impact by its closure (in over a decade) will have abundant alternative employment options. There is little economic justification for the destruction of these vital habitats. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. Beyond the many environmental impacts, Yancoal’s proposal will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. The Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal have indicated that these all have high cultural value and deserve to be protected for future generations, as they have been for hundreds of past generations. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. We must not allow our vital cultural heritage and fragile ecosystems to be further destroyed in the name of an industry with limited local or national benefits that will continue to leave our climate goals impossibilities. This expansion will cause irreparable damage that can never be offset. The land should be protected for all of our futures, including those working at the coal mine, who are well positioned to transition to renewable energy instead of remaining dependent on a dying industry. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarban Expansion Submission.pdf (PDF, 39.82 KB) |
Andrew Putnam
|
ID |
21706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To The Independent Planning Commission I am firmly opposed to the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine. It will create unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. It would be developed at a massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity. The cumulative impact of this expansion and other coal projects in the area will be felt within a broader ecosystem than simply that near the Moolarben coal mine. I urge you to consider our future. You have the power to make it a cleaner, safer place. Sincerely Yours Andrew Putnam |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 60 year old mother of 2. I object to the Moolarben Coal extension. There are several reasons - we must stop destroying our environment for the benefit of multi national companies. It is our communities that pay the price through floods, fires, increased storm events, etc. These cost our economies significantly, not the fossil fuel companies directly. These projects also destroy First Nations heritage and land. We must protect our oldest culture , not destroy it. The devastating impacts on our native flora and fauna is becoming critical. With the destruction of habitat due to fires and floods, the remaining habitat must be preserved, not destroyed for the profit of foreign multinationals. Governments have developed policies such as net zero. It is time they enforced it. Regards, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and the local community if it is allowed to proceed. The clearing of 113 hectares of koala, Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat cannot be made up for casually with “biodiversity offsets” in other areas. The unique biodiversity of Australian regions must be protected before it is lost. Furthermore the negative climate impacts of this proposal being approved are significant, with an estimated addition 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas being added when NSW is already not on track to meet legislated goals of decreased emissions. There is not even a clear public benefit to use as an excuse to justify this proposal, as there is no clear job justification for this expansion in an area where renewable energy is being prioritized. The climate crisis is one of the foremost issues of our lifetime and we must make a difference where we can so that our future generations still have a planet to inhabit. This proposal runs completely counter to the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, and it is for these reasons I strongly object to the Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion being approved. Thank you for considering my submission. Regards |
Cynthia Harris
|
ID |
21721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a school teacher still, in my late seventies, and as one of the caretakers for a beautiful small farm where nature flourishes, I am totally opposed to the expansion of ANY coal mine in Australia. With decades of very clear scientific reports available, and the evidence of our own eyes, it cannot be denied that our world is heading towards disaster if we continue to destroy natural environments and put more fossil fuel emissions into our atmosphere. The use of alternative power supplies such as solar and wind continues to rise, and I believe it will eventually wipe out any remaining coal mines - but the damage will by then be done and unable to be repaired. There are so many reasons for not allowing the Moolarben mine to expand: the impact on the Wiradjuri people whose ancestral land is being destroyed; the impact on all people in the local community (how many owners of coal mines dare live anywhere near the polluted and sterile mess they create?); the pollution of groundwater, and the destruction of habitat for endangered creatures such as koalas, microbats and Regent Honeyeaters (a "promise" to offset such destruction seems to totally forget the fact that koalas can't live on air while they wait for new trees to grow, nor does it take into account the stress caused by proximity to mining operations). Imagine explosions and excavation taking place a hundred metres from a nature reservation! The only people to benefit will be those already rich - not locals, nor anyone devoted to protecting our precious environment instead of seeing it as simply more dollars. I am ashamed that the NSW Government appears to have bowed down before those who have no thought for the future of our planet, for Australia will certainly not achieve its promised goals if matters continue like this. I therefore feel very strongly that the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 extension project be totally banned. |
Karlene Beahan
|
ID |
21726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
99% of the Worlds leading Scientists agree we are in a climate crisis we cannot afford to burn any more coal , there are alternatives . I also believe we need to retrain all in the mining sector especially in the renewable energy boom that is here and growing . |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2039 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Independent Planning Commission 135 King Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Re Moolarben Coal Complex 0C3 Extension Project SSD- 33083358 Dear Commissioners, I write this submission against the proposed expansion as a concerned resident of the State of NSW and as a grandparent concerned about the future of not just my grand- daughter but all future generations as they will be greatly affected by climate breakdown caused by the burning of fossil fuels. There is also the loss of wildlife and destruction of bush habitat that will be caused by the proposed expansion of the project. The proposed extension project, which involves the partial expansion of the existing open cut operations, as well as four new open-cut pits along the floor of the Moolarben Valley, should be deemed unacceptable by the commission as its next hearing on the matter for the following reasons: Yancoal has refused to implement a recommend 500-buffer around the proposed extension to help protect wildlife and the neighbouring Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The proposal also threatens Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The amendments being proposed come too late to be considered by the Planning Commission given the hearings should not have been postponed. The amendments do not reduce the footprint of the mine, which is already very large, and do not reduce their effect on the many threatened species in the area in terms of loss of native habitat. The Moolarben Coal Mine is already the largest producing coal mine in NSW, and the proposed expansion threatens koala habitat, microbats and regent honey eaters. It will also come within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest proscribed conservation areas in the state. In addition, at least 48 threatened species have been recorded in the 480 hectares of native vegetation to be cleared under the terms of the proposal. There would also be around 400 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodlands cleared if the extension were to go ahead. As a bushwalker and life-long conservationist, I would rather see the area under consideration by the Commission kept in its natural state and not become an open cut mine as the biodiversity loss cannot be offset. There is also the critical issue of water contamination at the headwaters of several major river systems. The Commission should also note that the proposed extension does not take into consideration the findings of the Net Zero Commission, which found that any further expansion of coal mining is not consistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. As well, the Denman Court of Appeal Decision should be considered and acted upon, where it was found that decision making involving the approvals of coal mining should take into account their emissions in downstream usage and their effect on local climate, which could otherwise not fully take into account the true costs of such proposed extraction of coal. The proposal involves net zero creation of jobs and comes at a time when the International Energy Agency, only this week, called out that coal production globally had peaked, leaving a question mark over how coal mining regions will manage the transition away from fossil fuels. See Renew Economy – IEA calls peak coal even as “Age of Electricity” takes hold to boost global power demand - https://reneweconomy.com.au/iea-calls-peak-coal-even-as-age-of-electricity-takes-hold-to-boost-global-power-demand/ For the above reasons, I would urge the Commission to refuse the application for the proposed extension. Thank you for considering my submission. [name redacted] Rozelle NSW 2039 |
|
Attachments |
21736_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 53.79 KB) |
Sarah Kensington
|
ID |
21746 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To The Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, cultural heritage and significance, and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species.chrome-extension://aeehekhncjhhmchjolinnihgdpapmljk/assets/img/cat6_move.gif • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • The destruction of Aboriginal Cultural Artefacts and places of cultural meaning. As I have completed a master of Museum and Heritage Studies I am very aware and concerned about the overall consultation process and disregard of the significance of these sites in opposition . These sites are deemed to have high cultural significance as per consultation with Registered Aboriginal Parties and Outlined in Niche Environment and Heritages Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment. Over 55 sites of importance have been identified and will be impacted either directly or indirectly by the expansion. Importantly, additional sites of cultural heritage were identified in the 2022 Assessment compared to the 2017 Assessment also by Niche Environment and Heritage. As per the report "Of these known Aboriginal heritage sites, seventy-nine (79) are located wholly or partially in or within 10m of the surface disturbance footprint extent of the Subject Area and would be directly impacted by the Project'. The Assessment denotes that total loss of value is a consequence at sites and the acceptance of this outcome further demonstrates Yancoal's disregard for the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your consideration of my submission. Kind regards, Sarah Kensington |
Alanah Jeffries
|
ID |
21751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2127 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an 81 year old retired doctor who is concerned about Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine extension. I am concerned about the damage to the beautiful valley including the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Extending the mine will cause irreversible harm to threatened eco-systems and species. There will be serious damage to groundwater. The proposed extension will not improve the employment of local people and the environmental and social costs will be great There will be damage to Wiraduri cultural heritage. |
Rebecca Muir
|
ID |
21756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
If politicians dont respect nature reserves and the environment, along with all of the wildlife that rely on this environment, who the hell will? Australia is one of the worst in the world, at caring for its environment. Please start doing better...here and now. No more mines, when it takes away from our most important asset. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarben expansion. Australia is already so far behind in its emission targets and it is our responsibility not just as citizens but as lawmakers and the biggest island in Oceana to protect biodiversity and limit emissions of greenhouse gases. |
Alison Winn
|
ID |
21766 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still will have severe impacts on biodiversity. |
Elizabeth Day
|
ID |
21771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2026 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have recently bought a block of land in Kandos. I was planning to move into the region to join creative and ecologically minded people who are part of the developing community there. It is devastating to find that there is a relentless encroachment of mining companies in the area. I regret that I haven’t had time to more extensively make a counter claim to the proposal but anything but coal in my view would be better. My basic objection to the development of ever more coal mines is that our planet is already past the tipping point according to 99% of worlds scientists. Many European countries now manage without coal… especially solar energy is the most long term solution. It’s my deep regret that the Labor party is so pro coal despite promising better. |
Megan Shooter
|
ID |
21776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2142 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an environmental scientist I wholeheartedly object to the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358). I object to the proposed extension due to its cumulative environmental impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and regional water resources. The Project would significantly increase carbon emissions at a time of escalating climate risk, contributing to more frequent and severe extreme weather events. No sound economic justification exists, as the long-term costs associated with climate-related disasters are likely to outweigh any projected benefits. Recent extreme flooding events globally have demonstrated the high financial and social costs of intensified climate change. Climate and Greenhouse Gas Impacts The Project is expected to generate approximately 64–86.59 Mt CO₂-e over its lifetime, a volume comparable to the total projected annual greenhouse gas emissions of NSW in 2030 (78.9–87.6 Mt CO₂-e). Between 2025 and 2034, it would contribute roughly 600,000 t CO₂-e in Scope 1 emissions and 190,000 t CO₂-e in Scope 2 emissions. At the existing Moolarben Mine, both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions have increased annually over the past four years, while emissions intensity per tonne of coal mined has risen over the past three years. Diesel combustion is the primary source of Scope 1 emissions, with no evidence of meaningful mitigation, and Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity remain unabated. These emissions exacerbate climate risks, including more extreme heat, droughts, and flooding, which threaten ecological systems, human communities, and regional economies. The additional emissions also conflict with NSW’s legislated emission reduction targets under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Biodiversity Impacts The Project would clear 624.18 hectares of native bushland, including 477.75 ha of Box-Gum Woodland and 15.37 ha of Eucalypt Forest and Woodland, both Critically Endangered Ecological Communities. This habitat supports numerous threatened species, including: • Regent Honeyeater (Critically Endangered) • Koala (Endangered) • Squirrel Glider • Pink-tailed Legless Lizard • Broad-headed Snake • Large-eared Pied Bat • Eastern Cave Bat • Rare plant species such as Cotoneaster Pomaderris, Commersonia procumbens, and Large-leafed Monotaxis The Project is located in the last intact valley in the region not yet affected by mining, directly adjacent to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, a critical wildlife corridor. Habitat fragmentation, dust, noise, light, and invasive species associated with mining would degrade habitat quality, disturb fauna, and reduce reproductive success. Displaced wildlife may not find suitable alternative habitat, increasing the risk of local population decline and long-term biodiversity loss. Proposed mitigation measures are insufficient to prevent these cumulative impacts. Water Impacts The valley contains significant natural springs at the head of the catchment, which are permanent water sources supporting both groundwater-dependent ecosystems and threatened species. These springs function as drought refugia and are integral to the broader groundwater system. Mining is expected to reduce baseflows to local creeks and the Goulburn River, with estimated reductions of 180–225 million litres per year under normal conditions, and up to 600 million litres in wetter years. Such reductions threaten river health, aquatic and riparian species, downstream water users, and the ecological values of the Goulburn River National Park. The proposed 200 m buffer zones along Moolarben and Murdering Creeks are unlikely to protect waterways from mining impacts. Infrastructure, including haul roads, sediment ponds, and other facilities, is expected to damage riparian vegetation, which is vital for bank stabilization, shade, and habitat quality. Groundwater drawdown could further compromise ecosystem resilience and connectivity. Given these unresolved and potentially severe water-related impacts, the Project’s assessment is inadequate, and approval is not supported. Economic and Policy Considerations The economic assessment of the Project understates environmental costs, particularly those associated with climate change, biodiversity loss, disaster recovery, and ecosystem degradation. These costs are likely to outweigh any short-term financial benefits. Expanding coal mining in a region increasingly prioritizing renewable energy offers limited public benefit and weak employment justification. Approval of the Project is therefore inconsistent with NSW’s climate and biodiversity policy objectives. Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project would: • Lock in decades of additional greenhouse gas emissions, undermining NSW and global climate targets. • Cause severe and irreversible biodiversity impacts, including the loss of threatened species and fragmentation of key wildlife corridors. • Significantly impact water resources, including springs, baseflows, aquifers, and riparian ecosystems. • Provide limited public or economic benefit, while imposing long-term environmental and social costs. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358). Megan Shooter |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the extension of this coal mine. The increased risk of global warming does not warrant this extension. We are currently not meeting our emissions targets and this coal mine will put this further at risk. The draw down of ground water adds a further risk to the local environment by reducing the drought resilience of local forests. All in all this proposal runs a great risk to our environment and is simply not worth jeopardizing our children's futures. |
Narelle Jarvis
|
ID |
21786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Narelle Jarvis, a recently retired Library Assistant and I live in Northern New South Wales. I am very concerned about the proposed expansion of coal mines in New South Wales, indeed the whole of Australia. Mudgee is a beautiful area but the coal mining is destroying the habitat and environs. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. In recent times the term “social cohesion” has been bandied about by politicians. Coal mining is disruptive to our communities and the flora and fauna of our native forests. The environment has already been destroyed by coal mining, causing irreversible harm to the health of our people, air quality and climate. No expansion should be approved. Endangered species of birds and animals are being pushed to the brink of extinction because of mining and the decimation of the land. Alarming too is the potential destruction of irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts. These artefacts have high cultural value. The proposed expansion will undermine the Wiradjuri people’s right to practice their culture and maintain connection to Country. The expansion holds no respect for First Nations people. The mine is already a blight on the landscape. The proposed expansion is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. The Independent Planning Commission must refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thankyou for reading and considering my submission. Regards, Narelle Jarvis |
|
Attachments |
21786 - Narelle Jarvis.pdf (PDF, 23.62 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a NSW resident. The fact that a coal mine in this day and age is considered to be extended is disturbing. We know how extracting and burning coal is damageable to whole planet. We know how damaging coal is for our health, which is directly linked to the health of our environment. In the immediate vicinity of the mine, the Moorlarben coal mine expansion means more land clearing, loss of habitat for wildlife, more disruption of the nearby nature reserve, more pollution of waterways and aquifers. When viewed through a systems thinking lens, such a project can only be approved through a myopic short term gain mindset, without regards for the legacy for the future generation, and ecosystems of which we, humankind, are integral part of. Here is an opportunity to stop and hear the many voices who are in love with their environment and Life, voices simply asking to get on a path to writing a better story which will be proudly told by future generations enjoying good health in harmony with their environment. With gratitude for your consideration |
Frida Forsberg
|
ID |
21796 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Toowoomba Knitting Nannas |
|
Location |
Queensland 4350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Frida Forsberg and I am a member of the Toowoombs Knitting Nannas in Queensland. I have been involved in campaigns to stop the expansion of coal and coal seam gas projects in both Queensland and New South Wales for many years through Lock the Gate. I have also stood as a candidate for the Queensland Greens 3 times in south-east Queensland. I am very concerned about the ongoing expansion of fossil fuels when we are facing climate breakdown and ecological collapse due to anthropogenic climate change. My reason for writing is I am concerned about a public hearing on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 coal mine in Mudgee, NSW, that has been postponed indefinitely by the IPC. Yancoal has made the unprecedented move to interrupt community consultation, only to make minor amendments that will not reduce the clearing of vegetation or reduce the footprint of the mine. Some 480 hectares of native vegetation near the Munghorn Gap Reserve are set to be cleared - important habitat for many native aminals, including the endangered regent honeyeater and koala. Yancoal's amendments have been introduced far too late in the process and they do not even reduce the mine's impacts. These amendments are little more than greenwashing and make a joke of the community consultation process. I am writing to ask that these last minute amendments be rejected and the community consultation process be allowed to continue as planned. Kind regards |
Cathy Gill
|
ID |
21806 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
The Sydney Knitting Nannas |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission is in the attached PDF document. |
|
Attachments |
21806 - Cathy Gill.pdf (PDF, 101.76 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My reasons for objecting to the Moolarben expansion are as follows: Increased greenhouse emissions will result. Habitat will be lost due to vegetation clearing. Biodiversity will be reduced. Water resources will be put under stress. |
Elizabeth Fuller
|
ID |
21821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2074 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a retired secondary school teacher living in NSW. Before my retirement, and even more so since, I have dedicated my leisure time to volunteering in biodiversity conservation, indigenous plant propagation, and habitat restoration in Victoria and New South Wales. In 2025 I attended a screening of Voices for the Valley and learnt about the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am deeply concerned by the proposal and wish to raise my voice in support of the local community who will be affected, and in support of our unique and irreplaceable environment. As you will be aware, the Moolarben Valley is part of a vital conservation landscape connected to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Yancoal’s proposed expansion would bring mining to within 100 metres of the reserve. At least 23 threatened species live here, including a resilient koala population. There is absolutely no justification for destroying this unique ecosystem, and the expansion would create no new jobs, only permanent biodiversity loss. The proposed expansion would: • Destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat, including breeding sites. • Clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, with breeding females present. • Remove up to 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland. Threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, and microbats would face severe impacts. Despite NSW Environment Department warnings, Yancoal refuses to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. In addition, the project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting 25 years, threatening Moolarben Creek, a key drought refuge for wildlife. It defies reason that baseline groundwater monitoring is being treated as an optional afterthought, to be done after mining starts, rather than a mandatory requirement before approval. This valley’s ecosystems are too precious to risk. This proposal would also cause profound and irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The destruction of cultural artefacts undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain connection to Country, practise culture, and protect sacred places of deep significance. A culture that has sustained and respected this land for over 65,000 years demonstrates what true stewardship looks like. We have a responsibility to care for this Country with the same respect and foresight. Approving further mining in this valley would fail that responsibility. The world is facing a climate emergency and yet the coal mining industry appears in this case intent on a ‘business as usual’ approach. The expansion offers minimal economic benefit at the cost of lasting environmental damage. The NSW Government cannot justify approving new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. The environmental, social, and cultural costs of this project far outweigh any claimed economic benefits. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely, E. Fuller |
Margaret Pickup
|
ID |
21826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2478 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Meg; I am a 75-year-old retiree from Ballina NSW. I am greatly concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Australia. While there are no coal mines in my area the Northern Rivers has been adversely affected by extreme climate impacts in recent years, most notably the 2022 floods in February and March and Cyclone Alfred, February 2025. In the February 2022 flood Ballina was adversely impacted: a first. My property on Ballina Island was surrounded by floodwater with water entering my garage. Other properties were more seriously impacted than my property, some of which have yet to be made habitable. More powerful storms with some combination of heavy rain, large hail and strong winds occur more frequently. In addition, people still experience anxiety when heavy rain falls locally or in the catchment areas. Other parts of NSW are experiencing serious flooding, extreme heat and other challenges, also linked to climate change. This summer the impact of extreme heat has been particularly apparent. Because of my concerns I am writing to express my objection to Yancoal’s proposed mine expansion of their Moolarben Complex OC3 Extension Project near Mudgee in Wiradjuri Country. This project should not be approved because it will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, and local communities in the Central West, an important agricultural region in NSW. It will add to climate pressures. The area has a rich biodiverse that should be protected by being incorporated as part of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Of particular concern is the impact on: • Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. If the proposed expansion is approved mining will occur within 100 metres of the reserve. Inadequate assessment has been undertaken to determine the impacts of noise, blasting and vibrations on wildlife. • Threatened species and the habitat. Over 113 hectares of habitat where koalas live and where breeding has been recorded will be cleared. Endangered Regent Honeyeaters and microbat also call this habitat home. Biodiversity offsets cannot replace habitat already supporting threatened species. • Water and groundwater. Risks include long-term groundwater drawdown with the potential to harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, the project will produce an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • The local community. The proposed expansion lacks any public benefit for the local community. There is no clear job justification to expand coal mining in this area. The application is counter to the region being prioritised for renewable energy development. It is inappropriate for the NSW Government to approve new or expanded coal projects given the current climate and biodiversity crisis. This application to expand Yancoal’s proposed mine expansion of their Moolarben Complex OC3 Extension Project is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I implore the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [redacted]. I am in year 6 and I have lived in Mudgee all my life. I find it very important that my concerns about the Moolarben Coal expansion are heard. Firstly, it would be devastating for all the animals living in the nature reserve, as there are many endangered species there. Secondly, the mining will disturb the waterways. One of my favourite places is ‘the drip’. I would be deeply concerned if this amazing area was lost. Thirdly, we already have enough coal. If we need more energy we should be focusing on renewables. Lastly, the climate is already in deep enough trouble. We have had droughts and floods. Burning coal is a major factor contributing to global warming. I am very worried about the climate of the future. If we keep expanding coal mines, the climate will only get worse. Please do not allow this devastating expansion to go ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. The last minute submitted amendments do not reduce the mine footprint nor do they reduce the clearing of native vegetation. This proposal, if approved, will see mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state; this is not acceptable. The proposal would still have severe impacts on biodiversity. The proposed off-site habitat enhancement will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. It is time to reduce our emission footprint, not increase it. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Niko Leka
|
ID |
21846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Objection: Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project A development application to extend open cut mining operations at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The application proposes to extend the existing OC3 open cut pit as well as develop four new open cut pits along the floor of the Moolarben Valley. I am amazed and utterly appalled at such an irresponsible application at the worst possible time in human history. We all know that climate chaos- and the word chaos means just about every systems collapsing- is anthropogenic. We know there is an imperative to phase out fossil fuel as quickly as possible. We also know that renewables are booming- in may places renewables have replaced fossil fuels with better outcomes for climate, health and for people concerned about profit: at far less cost. So why such a proposal? Greed. The proposal offers few new jobs to the affected communities. By the time the existing Moolarben reaches the end of its life, renewables will have created over 2,000 new jobs. There is little doubt that there will be a collapse in global demand for thermal coal. So who would benefit? A little additional benefit for those who would seek to profit from the proposal. At what cost? The cost is more than 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, over 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. 58% of NSW's current total annual emissions is not neglible. And what of the Scope 3 emissions- what would be the impact of increasing emssions to that extent? Do we know? Let me make it clear, I'm not talking about the amount of emissions, I am talking about the effect of the emissions. Right now, as we all are on the precipice of disaster. It will wipe out massive areas of wildlife habitat, destroy Moorladen creek, ruin the water table, destroy sacred sites. It sits right in the pattern of continuing approvals of fossil fuel projects that will destroy earth's holocene climate. It reveals that the government has been captured by fossil fuel interests. It is an arrogant, dumb proposal that should be rejected utterly. I am Dr Niko Leka- my qualifications are in health social science. The impact of the reckless approvals over the past few years is something that will take decades to recover from- if that is at all possible. For the sake of life on this planet, throw out this project that only benefits a few, at the expense of everyone and everything else. |
Susan Lammiman
|
ID |
21851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposal to expand the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine. I have many concerns that this project will cause serious harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. There are many issues and I am making my submission based on the following points. The beautiful Wiradjuri valley should be managed as part of a whole conservation area. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation impacting on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. THere are 23 threatened wildlife species in the vicinity of this site and impacting on the vegetation critical to the survival of the koala population. Water supply will be impacted with huge risks to the deep rooted vegetation that uses the water. The mine will cause irreparable harm to over 50 sites of cultural significance. There are huge implications for the NSW Net Zero Commission statement which states that any further coal mining expansion is inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets. I am concerned that the company has not undergone water monitoring and this lack of scrutiny will put at risk habitats. Other mines at Ulan and Wilpinjong are also due for expansion and these three mines will present enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our cimate |
Gretta Fuller
|
ID |
21856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am 90 years old and have devoted my adult life to protecting Australia’s natural heritage as a conservationist. Although I do not live in New South Wales, I feel morally compelled to add my voice to this submission to strengthen the call to protect this extraordinary and irreplaceable landscape. I pride myself on keeping abreast of the news and public affairs, and despite my age I remain deeply engaged with the environmental challenges facing our country. It is with great concern that I have followed the proposal to expand the Moolarben OC3 coal mine. As a founding member of a community-based, not-for-profit indigenous plant nursery, now in its 31st year, which supplies hundreds of thousands of native tube stock for bush regeneration and educated thousands of people about the value of native ecosystems, I am profoundly distressed by this proposal. This expansion would destroy critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and microbats, damage sacred Aboriginal cultural sites, and push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would also generate millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when we are already facing a climate crisis. After a lifetime spent restoring landscapes and protecting biodiversity, I cannot accept the deliberate destruction of a valley so rich in ecological and cultural significance. We should be expanding nature reserves, not coal pits. I urge the Commission in the strongest possible terms to refuse approval for this project. Protecting our land, wildlife and cultural heritage is a responsibility that transcends borders and generations. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, [name redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I'm objecting to the proposal because of clearing to native vegetation and huge levels of carbon emissions that will be produced by the expansion actions and from burning the coal extracted from the mine. The mine expansion would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation including up to 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland.. This vegetation is habitat for 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including the Koala, Regent Honeyeater, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Broad-headed Snake. The vegetation to be cleared includes 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits, and 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, The proposal would produce an estimated 64.6 Metric tonnes of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. This is inconsistent with the NSW Net Zero Commission conclusion in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets and the Paris Agreement temperature goals It would lead to water drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. It would cause serious harm to cultural heritage – at least 55 Aboriginal heritage sites would be directly impacted. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. Yancoal has recently made some minor amendments to its proposal but they do not reduce the amount of vegetation to be cleared. |
Claudia Walters
|
ID |
21871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I do not support the Moorlarben expansion on the basis the we are not moving fast enough on reducing green house gas and this proposal will add an estimated 64 million tonnes of pollution into the system. |
Poh Rodrigues
|
ID |
21881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2768 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object in basis of environmental issues. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission Commissioners, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine, near Mudgee in Wiradjuri country. I have had a long personal connection with Mudgee since childhood, with close friends and family still living and working in the region today. Because of this, I care deeply about the future of the landscape, community, and ecosystems around Mudgee. This is why I am deeply concerned about Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion. I submit this objection on the basis that the proposal would cause permanent environmental, cultural, and climate harm that is not justified by limited economic benefits. Climate impacts The Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, has legislated emission reduction targets for 2030 and 2035. As it currently stands, the NSW government has admitted that it will fall short of both of these reduction goals. This will also impact the national obligation Australia has made to reduce emissions under the Paris Agreement. In my lifetime alone the impacts of climate change are becoming more apparent and alarming. Australia has seen a dramatic increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events and bush fires. These events which have been linked to climate change have an especially devastating impact on regional communities and businesses particularly agriculture. I believe that the emissions from an OC3 extension would contribute to pushing NSW further from its emission reduction targets. Aside from targets and numbers set for NSW alone, any coal mined in Australia, regardless if it is burnt domestically or overseas, will contribute to the overall worsening of the current global climate crisis. Biodiversity impacts To my understanding, the proposal would result in the loss of 113 hectares of Koala habitat. Any clearing of this size will not just negatively impact one species; it will have immense and irreversible impacts on the ecosystem in the area by removing refuges for wildlife. I have great concern for any proposed plans to mitigate or offset biodiversity impacts and the accountability that will be taken to ensure the efficacy of these measures. For the reasons above, I believe the proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension Project should be refused. I urge the IPC to recommend that the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project not be approved. Thank you for your time, |
Elizabeth Fuller
|
ID |
21891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2074 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a retired secondary school teacher living in NSW. Before my retirement, and even more so since, I have dedicated my leisure time to volunteering in biodiversity conservation, indigenous plant propagation, and habitat restoration in Victoria and New South Wales. In 2025 I attended a screening of Voices for the Valley and learnt about the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am deeply concerned by the proposal and wish to raise my voice in support of the local community who will be affected, and in support of our unique and irreplaceable environment. As you will be aware, the Moolarben Valley is part of a vital conservation landscape connected to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Yancoal’s proposed expansion would bring mining to within 100 metres of the reserve. At least 23 threatened species live here, including a resilient koala population. There is absolutely no justification for destroying this unique ecosystem, and the expansion would create no new jobs, only permanent biodiversity loss. The proposed expansion would: • Destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat, including breeding sites. • Clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, with breeding females present. • Remove up to 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland. Threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, and microbats would face severe impacts. Despite NSW Environment Department warnings, Yancoal refuses to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. In addition, the project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting 25 years, threatening Moolarben Creek, a key drought refuge for wildlife. It defies reason that baseline groundwater monitoring is being treated as an optional afterthought, to be done after mining starts, rather than a mandatory requirement before approval. This valley’s ecosystems are too precious to risk. This proposal would also cause profound and irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The destruction of cultural artefacts undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to maintain connection to Country, practise culture, and protect sacred places of deep significance. A culture that has sustained and respected this land for over 65,000 years demonstrates what true stewardship looks like. We have a responsibility to care for this Country with the same respect and foresight. Approving further mining in this valley would fail that responsibility. The world is facing a climate emergency and yet the coal mining industry appears in this case intent on a ‘business as usual’ approach. The expansion offers minimal economic benefit at the cost of lasting environmental damage. The NSW Government cannot justify approving new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. The environmental, social, and cultural costs of this project far outweigh any claimed economic benefits. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely, E. Fuller |
Jean Osanz
|
ID |
21896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, My name is Jean (John) Osanz, I am a retired electrical engineer. I live in Rylstone, not far from the Moolarben mine. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Regards, Jean Osanz |
Garth Wimbush
|
ID |
21901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Garth Wimbush. I am a 60-year-old retiree living in Jervis Bay, and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW due to the worsening climate impacts already being felt in my community and across the state. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and local community, and should not be approved. This highly biodiverse area should instead be protected and incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. My key concerns are: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of more than 113 hectares of recorded koala habitat, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Biodiversity offsets cannot replace habitat already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term drawdown that may damage Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that provide critical drought refuge for wildlife. Climate impacts, with an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions, despite NSW not being on track to meet its legislated emissions targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot justify approving new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the objectives of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Garth Wimbush Jervis Bay NSW 2540 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The world is in a state of crisis. It is imperative that we take action now to protect the important biodiversity habitat areas that remain. It is time we invest in better safer alternatives. Time is running out and we need to act responsibly and with a view to a longer term goal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2785 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion due to The clearing of land causing irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems . This land is critical Habitat to koalas, breeding regent honeyeaters, microbats, and the nationally endangered boxgum woodland ecosystem. I can’t understand why we would allow expansion of a coal mine when are trying to reduce greenhouse gases and emissions . This is 2026 , there are more bushfires and floods than ever before. The climate is changing and we should I be doing everything we can to protect our environment , not continue to destroy it . |
Peter Metcalfe
|
ID |
21921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The following statement is based on my personal knowledge of the Munghorn Gap area and my 50 year experience of the changed ecology of the New England region The Munghorn Gap area is an important transition zone between east and west flora and fauna. There are unique examples of coexistence of species that are normally separated by rainfall/soil/topography. This uniqueness of Munghorn Gap has been long recognised and studied. It is an important study area to monitor the impact of climate change on plants and animals. The area is a recognised koala habitat that is worth conserving. Therefore there is a threat to the immediate environment by the proposed mining activities. The fossil fuel used to mine and transport coal to Newcastle and overseas is an immediate contribution to global warming. The ultimate burning of the coal is the final stimulus to global warming. Australia is already suffering from weather extremes and sea level rise that are directly attributable to rising CO2 and NH4 levels in the atmosphere and all new coal mining and burning will accelerate global warming to the further detriment of Australia and our Pacific neighbours. Coal and gas must never be curtailed and not expanded for the sake of the world. |
Suzanne Taylor
|
ID |
21926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country for the following reasons: 1. The proposed expansion will require the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala, regent honey eater and microbat habitat . This is outrageous at a time when our country is witnessing mass extinction of native animals due to habitat loss. The creation of koala sanctuaries flies in opposition to the loss of more habitat. 2. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve will be impacted by this expansion. What is the use of creating nature reserves when mining operations are permitted within 100 metres of a reserve and will obviously impact the reserve. 3. There is a risk of harm to Moolarben Creek and ground water dependent eco systems if this expansion is approved. These are critical drought refuges for wildlife and hence must be protected and not placed at risk. 4. My personal major concern is that if this project is approved it is estimated that 64 million tonnes of additional green house gas emissions will be produced. This is occurring at a time when the impact of green house gases on our climate is being felt all around us. The scientists are warning us we are beyond the point of being able to reverse the impacts of climate change and what we need to do now is reduce the impacts as much as we can. Increasing the output of green house gas emissions goes against all of the current scientific evidence that will enable my grandchildren to have a comfortable existence on this planet. We have reached a crisis point and we cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commision to recommend that the Moolarben C3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused |
Judith Bourne
|
ID |
21931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Judith Bourne and I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am a Veterinarian with a house on the NSW South coast and have recently learned of this proposal. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. I understand this proposed expansion would involve clearing critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats. Clearing would cause irreversible damage to nature that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe. This impact is acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department. This departmental assessment warned the project could lead to long-term population declines due to destruction of critical habitat. I understand the project includes plans lans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. Noise and blasting impacts on the Reserve were poorly assessed.At the very least, Yancoal should allow a 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife, as recommended. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. While living at the coast, I am increasingly alarmed at the effects of our worsening climate on people and coastal systems. Science tells us these climate effects are caused mainly by emissions from the burning of coal and other fossil fuels. NSW’s complicity in worsening this carbon pollution by allowing the digging and export of coal is deeply concerning to me. I have children and grandchildren and dread the quality of their future, with higher temperatures and more extreme weather due to climate change. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Dr JA Bourne [redacted] |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose this expansion - as the proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation and there would still be severe impacts on biodiversity. |
christian Hjelte
|
ID |
21941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee on environmental, social, and climate grounds. Environmental and Biodiversity Impacts The expansion would result in the clearing of hundreds of hectares of native vegetation and critical wildlife habitat, including areas used by threatened species such as koalas, Regent Honeyeaters and other vulnerable fauna. Studies show that the project would likely displace koalas and lead to significant long-term declines in local populations by destroying habitat that is currently in good condition and supports breeding.  Climate Change Incompatibility Approving a major expansion of a thermal coal mine directly undermines Australia’s and NSW’s climate commitments. Additional coal extraction locks in decades of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when science clearly shows rapid reductions are needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Independent research has highlighted that the climate damage attributable to coal extraction often outweighs any economic benefits.  Water and Health Concerns Large-scale mining poses real risks to groundwater and surface water systems through drawdown, contamination, and changes to hydrological flows. In an already climate-stressed region, protecting water resources is essential for wildlife, agriculture, and local communities. Cultural and Community Values The mine footprint overlaps with culturally significant lands on Wiradjuri Country. The loss of Aboriginal heritage sites and landscapes of importance to First Nations people adds further moral and legal reasons to refuse approval. Conclusion Given the irreversible environmental damage, the threat to threatened species, the conflict with climate goals, and the lack of compelling justification for this expansion, I urge the Commission to reject the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am horrified and object because of the massive climate cost and absolute contradiction this proposal has in relation to NSWs climate goals. This extension would belch out 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas and place Australia well behind in global emissions goals. How will you look your children in the eye knowing you all care more about lining the pockets of the rich, than the planet? I’m sickened by this proposal and its supporters. Sincerely, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2034 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project contradicts Nsw government climate goals. It will cause significant groundwater drawdown. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners I am writing, as a NSW resident to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I have grave concerns that, if approved, this project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, Wiradjuri cultural heritage, climate and local community, and should not be approved. I worry about the proposed expansion of coal mining, due to the increasingly severe impacts of climate change here in NSW, and more broadly, across Australia and around the world. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. I urge you to consider the Net Zero Commission’s findings that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. I understand NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. I draw to your attention the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. Noting the urgency of the climate crisis, this project will lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. It is important to me, as a descendant of white “settlers” and convicts, who have already taken so much from Aboriginal people, including their lands, children and often their languages, that no more is taken from the Wiradjuri people. I note with concern in the Department’s own report that, “Key concerns raised by Aboriginal stakeholders related to cumulative and ongoing impacts on Aboriginal cultural heritage due to mining, including impacts on the cultural and spiritual connection to the land and proximity of the disturbance area to sites of significance. It was also emphasised that despite the assigned scientific significance ratings for the identified sites, all Aboriginal objects are considered deeply important and are of high cultural significance”. I understand the project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practise their precious culture, maintain their connection to Country since time immemorial, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. I implore you not to allow this extension to go ahead. Please safeguard Wiradjuri cultural heritage and don’t allow its ongoing degradation and disturbance. I am proud of our unique Australian fauna, including koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats. I understand this expansion would clear critical habitat for these precious creatures, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. This rich biodiverse area should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem. Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I understand the project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds nor benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. The expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat.The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. In summary, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss. • Adverse impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Water and groundwater risks to critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification during a climate and biodiversity crisis. Please do not allow Yancoal to threaten critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Their last minute proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are too late to be considered, and mean their proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. For the reasons outlined above, I urge you to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2160 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
IPC Submission.Moolarben OC3.D Newland.16.2.26. Date.pdf |
|
Attachments |
21966 - Redacted.pdf (PDF, 93.85 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This expansion contradicts Government policy to reduce Green House Gases. Koala protection will be reduced and the nearby Moolarben |
David Hughes
|
ID |
21976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2350 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposal to open Moolarben, or any new site, or expand any existing mine, be it coal, oil or gas, only further exacerbates the current environmental issues that are well researched, defined and documented. These environmentally damaging activities, such as removing native forests, destroying native animal habits and killing their inhabitants such as koalas (even if indirectly due to air/dust and toxic fume dispersion) and all other wildlife: birds, reptiles, mammals, marsupials, insects and polluting ground waters etc are guaranteed to occur. Further, the revenue collected from the mine in the form of taxes etc, and the kickback to the community through royalties, donations and so forth will be comparatively negligible and could easily be matched by the government (by either, or both, state and federal) if some reports I have written were followed (and I would be happy to email these to any person or party who requests them) which outline how we can better address the issues of climate change, and afford to do so, and even assist those who need the energy that the coal could provide, but in a clean, renewable form. Renewable energy is also part of this issue, even if it has also been ignored. Fossil fuels are NOT renewable. They will be exhausted and they will pollute the environment for the whole time they are mined, transported, shipped, stored and burned (roads and railway lines are always black with coal lumps and particles). At this point we will have no choice but to whole-heartedly embrace the various forms of renewable energy available and so it is far more sensible to further this approach now whilst we can still do so with relative ease, and this includes assisting any overseas clients of the projected coal supplies from Moolarben. Further to this is the false argument of financial benefit from the new mine (or any fossil fuel mine) because regardless of the 'pocket money' some companies, parties and people make, their children, your children and our children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and descendants will suffer the consequences of these polluting activities regardless of any flow-on effect of some families financial gain. This displayed greed by some will not outweigh the cost experienced by us all. Ignoring all these issues WILL NOT negate them, regardless of how often supporters believe, and argue, that it will. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I appose the development plan. Mainly for the environment impact long term. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It's obvious from the established climate research. And my own life experience of over seventy years is in keeping with the scientific findings. We should be making deep cuts to our greenhouse gas emissions as a matter of urgency, not paving the way for increasing our emissions. We have no right to foul our nest, nor to impose the impacts of global warming on generations to come. The proposed development should not be approved. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Stop the extension |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2009 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a person who has always had a strong connection with nature but things changed for me when I witnessed the devastation of the Black Summer fires of 2019/20. The extreme fire conditions were driven by climate change and took their toll on billions of native animals. We will never know the true extent of our loss. I now understand how important it is for the survival of our natural world as suitable habitat for all species, including humans, that we take immediate action. Any approval to extend the Moolarben Coal Mine is completely at odds with protection of our natural environment in the following ways: 1. It would destroy habitat of countless species of animals and plants, including the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. 2. It would emit dangerous greenhouse gasses at a time when we need to bring emissions down by shifting to renewable energy sources, not allow them to rise. NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 emissions target and this would massively worsen the situation. 3. It would seriously deplete the groundwater supply, placing animal and plant species at great risk in times of drought. The recent amendments tendered by the proponent do nothing to ameliorate the damage this mine extension would cause. The proposal needs to be rejected by the IPC. Thank you for considering this submission. |
Cate Peterson
|
ID |
22001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the Independent Planning Commission – Objection to Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion My name is Cate and I write to you as Strategic Relationship Manager of SoulAdvisor, a global platform dedicated to trusted wellbeing and integrative health. I write to emphasise the unquestionable relationship between personal and planetary wellness and to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. From a professional standpoint working within the wellness sector, and from a human standpoint as a custodian of this land for future generations, I hold deep concern that this proposal represents not future-proofing for our state, but quite the opposite: the continued destruction of natural resources which we, as humans, have been granted in perpetuity to care for. Our natural heritage — particularly groundwater — is the lifeblood of the land. Its protection is fundamental to the wellbeing of ecosystems, communities and future generations alike. Groundwater: The Lifeblood of the Land The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of between 2 and 6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ceases. Such long-term depletion places Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. In an era of intensifying climate variability, these refuges are essential to ecological resilience and biodiversity survival. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along Moolarben Creek — including deep-rooted riparian trees and associated habitats — are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These systems are not easily restored once damaged. Their loss represents not only environmental degradation but a weakening of the living networks that sustain soil health, wildlife corridors, agricultural stability and community wellbeing. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and by a documented poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere within the mine complex. Yancoal’s proposal to conduct only 12 months of groundwater monitoring prior to commencing mining is manifestly inadequate. Baseline groundwater monitoring must occur before a project is approved, not retrospectively once extraction has begun. Without comprehensive pre-approval data, the true scale of risk cannot be responsibly assessed, and irreversible harm may occur before any mitigation is possible. To knowingly proceed under such uncertainty is to accept the potential permanent depletion of shared water systems — resources that sustain life far beyond the lifespan of any single project. Cultural Heritage – Irretrievable Loss Equally concerning is the potential for cultural heritage loss across Wiradjuri Country. Cultural landscapes, water systems and ecological knowledge are inseparable. Once damaged or destroyed, these living cultural connections cannot be replaced or offset. Such losses are irretrievable. From a wellness perspective, cultural continuity and connection to Country are foundational determinants of individual and collective health. The erosion of these connections contributes to a growing sense of dislocation and ecological grief being experienced across many communities. Protecting cultural heritage is therefore not only a matter of respect and justice but of sustaining holistic wellbeing for present and future generations. A Widening Gap Between Human and Planetary Wellness Through my work in the wellbeing sector, I observe an increasing awareness that human health cannot be separated from the health of our natural systems. Clean water, intact ecosystems, biodiversity and cultural continuity form the foundation of true and lasting wellness. Yet projects such as this move us further away from a state of connected wellness and toward deeper fragmentation between human activity and planetary limits. The proposed expansion would generate an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when New South Wales is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Communities across the state are already experiencing the impacts of climate instability through extreme heat, drought and rising living costs. Approving further fossil fuel expansion during a climate and biodiversity crisis undermines both public trust and the long-term wellbeing of our communities. Furthermore, the project offers limited enduring public benefit while placing irreplaceable environmental and cultural resources at risk. True economic and community resilience lies in protecting natural systems and supporting regenerative industries that sustain both people and place. A Call for Responsible Stewardship We stand at a point in history where future-proofing must mean safeguarding the ecological foundations of life. Groundwater systems, creeks, biodiversity and cultural heritage are not expendable assets; they are living inheritances entrusted to our care. To approve this project would be to sanction the long-term depletion of shared natural resources and to move further away from a future grounded in resilience, connection and genuine prosperity. To refuse it would signal a commitment to responsible stewardship and to the understanding that personal and planetary wellness are inseparable. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project and to prioritise the long-term protection of this biodiverse and culturally significant landscape. Thank you for considering this submission. Sincerely, Cate Strategic Relationship Manager, SoulAdvisor |
Omid Sadeghpour
|
ID |
22006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2217 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the extension of coal mine in Mudgee |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an active and concerned member of a Koala Conservation Project and concerned about damage o habitat for our threatened species of flora and fauna. I believe the risks posed by the proposed Yancoal expansion is an area of concern which people from all states of Australia have a responsibility to oppose. This level of potential destruction is a national environmental issue. The proposed amendments from Yancoal do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and the proposal still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. I am extremely concerned about the impact on biodiversity of this significant area of koala habitat in this protected nature reserve near Mudgee should the mine extension proceed and which could involve the clearing of approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine. In particular, I am concerned about threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. There is overwhelming scientific evidence of the impact the fossil fuel industry has on climate change. We must embrace alternative energy options and refuse to support expansion of the coal industry and its destructive emissions and destructive impact on our fragile habitats. Please oppose the expansion of Yancoal! Thankyou for considering my submission. |
Lucy Costas
|
ID |
22021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2620 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal's Moolarben OC3 expansion needs to be stopped. The reasons are: clearing of this particular region will damage the habitat of koalas and Regent honey eaters and damage biodiversity, the resultant coal extraction will result in huge additional carbon emissions which the Earth cannot afford, the expansion will result in damage to Wiradjuri cultural lansdscapes including sacred sites. For these reasons I strongly oppose this development. |
Ishbel Dunsmore
|
ID |
22026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. People in this region are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. The changes now proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called 'habitat enhancement. This amendment won't make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Louise Appel
|
ID |
22031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion. Nobody with even a cursory knowledge of the damage done to the planet by the millions of tonnes of climate pollution which will be produced by this expansion can possibly support it. We are the caretakers of this world for future generations and those currently here – all of us. There is empirical proof in abundance of what ignoring the threat of continuing to mine and use fossil fuels will cost us, and is already costing us. The suggested last minute amendments are nothing more than lipstick on a pig, they are an insult to my children and the children of the communities that will be compromised by the expansion. The habitats and ecosystems that will be destroyed will be destroyed forever, it is simply not good enough to say that there will be “off-site habitat enhancement” and the mine footprint will be reduced. The mine should at this stage be being scaled down and real effort and money applied to transition away from fossil fuels. They are NOT part of our future, and the faster we leave them in the past the better. The folly of promoting this expansion is a weight that will be carried for generations to come, in this country we have so many alternatives, and we cannot stand by any longer and let the wealthy multinationals get more wealthy with money we could have invested into clean energy solutions for the future. Our native wildlife depends on it, we depend on it. Clean and green are not just slogans. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this proposal on the grounds that the long term effects on the biosphere outweigh the short term economic benefits. |
Catherine Dobbie
|
ID |
22051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a teacher, a grandmother, and someone who cares deeply about the impact of carbon to all of our futures, and the impact of land clearing on the amenity and future in the vicinity of this proposal. The two little boys who I adore, the students I work hard to educate, my friends and family deserve to be protected from the disastrous impact of MORE coal mining. Coal's time is up! The clearing of d 480 hectares of native vegetation and the moving of mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. We know the threats and the real impact this mine will have - it is not in dispute. Koala populations are in direct danger and Regent Honeyeaters, Broadheaded Snakes and microbats are expected to be severely impacted, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. The Net Zero Commission makes it expectations clear and the OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making this project in direct opposition to the Net Zero Commission and the Paris Agreement. It ignores the urgency of the climate emergency for a State that should be forefronting transition energy and job projects. Water is also under direct threat, with independent experts warning that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. I cannot believe that in this day and age and the growth in our understanding of the bedrock of importance of Aboriginal cultural respect and protection, that a project that will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others, would be considered. The high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal needs to be heard and acted upon. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Our planet, our State, the Mudgee community needs this decision to be refused! Kind Regards Catherine Dobbie Lawson, NSW |
Sue Pridmore
|
ID |
22056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My husband and I object to the proposed extensions proposed, Moorlarben Coal Comolex OC3. Our property is not far away, and shares the same sort of flora and fauna as the land in question. We are a wildlife sanctuary. Any new extension to any existing mining activities is, in this now very fragile world, is a travesty. Scientists all over the world are publicising the effects of mining, on the health and well being of this planet. Their information is being ignored. Companies like yours are ruling the world, ignoring uncomfortable truths that we are already in a climatic chaos. Our native flora and fauna, Nature, are giving us evidence that life is not that easy.We personally have experienced severe flooding, severe drought, and as seed collectors, there has been a dearth of seeds setting for collection for either propagation, or reliable honey source for bees. Chaotic weather conditions affect all of us, in one-way or another. We have koalas around our house. Also powerful owls...and they need a huge range for their feeding ground. We live to protect all these beautiful creatures. Take away our vegetation, take away our water sources like springs and healthy creeks, is dealing a death blow on all living things, including you and us. We humans are basically dissatisfied creatures, I believe. We keep wanting more and more. It is great that our health and medical care is so good, as are other aspects of modern life. But we hear nothing about restraining what are truly indulgent wishes, habits, desires. Is all this mining going towards vital, good causes that make our world happier in the tru-est sense? No! We live in societies where we want big cars, big houses, TV and Games in each child's bedroom, and how many $$$ went into Our Sydney Fireworks night. We don't like War, but strangely, we are in a serious war as we dig up more and more of our earth . We are really digging our own graves. We are certainly digging a dagger into our best ally, Nature. We cannot live without our flora and fauna. We cannot replace what we take away, no matter what we tell ourselves. We ask you, please try to understand the affect this extension project will have.It would be the saddest happening, on everything living in our countryside, a real travesty. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission. I am a resident in the Mudgee region and am deeply concerned about the ongoing destruction in this region of native vegetation with the accompanying negative impacts on biodiversity and water. The importance of biodiversity and its continuing decline is well documented. Why is the information not informing the planning process? What most irks me about the planning process is that there is absolutely no consideration of cumulative impacts over a range of issues: loss of critical habitat and negative impact on groundwater, both of which cause unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. There are three major coalmines in this region - Ulan Wilpinjong and Moolarben - but each expansion of each coal mine is always considered on its own though it is the cumulative impact that is most significant – the sum of the whole is greater than the parts! Furthermore the project comes with a massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community. Coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. In addition Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. The recent amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife, water and ecosystems. It completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway, making a mockery of that process.It is a farcical attempt at greenwashing a damaging project. This open cut coal mine will destroy a beautiful valley and create a pit that would effectively bisect an important nature reserve. Instead the valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This project should not go ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2085 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I object to the expansion of Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project on the grounds that it is both an environmentally and economically a bad outcome for Australian and the whole world. The world has seen unprecedented weather events made worse by the effects of climate change. The year 2024 was the hottest on record. Australia, as a well respected developed country, should be leading by example and winding back coal extraction to minimise greenhouse gas emissions. The year 2025 or thereabouts is regarded as peak coal. Coal use in the world is expected to gradually decrease from now. Economically, it makes no sense to invest in a product that is in structural decline especially when it is environmentally contentious. This does not even take into account the biodiversity loss or ground water issues that this project will likely affect. I do not currently have grandchildren or great-grandchildren but if I do, I want to be able to tell them that I tried to stop global warming in a peaceful democratic way. Hopefully, this letter helps that cause. On this basis, I think it would be reckless to let this project proceed given the future high risk potential of the project. Kindest regards. |
Lynette Allen
|
ID |
22071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2340 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired general practitioner and am writing this submission to object to the extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, the second oldest reserve in NSW is adjacent to the extension and it is proposed to mine within 100 metres of it. The vibration, dust, noise and lighting will put many species at risk including the 23 threatened ones found in the reserve. The Goulburn River currently has 3 coalmines which draw down a lot of water. It is the headwaters for the Hunter River. There are significant springs at the edge of the valley that also provide a drought and fire refuge which will be destroyed. The area should be added to the Nature Reserve not an open cut coalmine. Most of the coal will go overseas- 65% to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan and 15%to others such as Japan and Thailand .It will deliver little economic benefit to Australia but massive environmental damage and draw down the groundwater 2-6 metres which will impact the river , vegetation and animals with also a huge subsidence risk. The proposal is NOT in the public interest. |
Mora Main
|
ID |
22076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: It is well understood that climate warming is causing weather extremes. And fossil fuel burning is supercharging these hugely damaging string of events. Please listen to indigenous wisdom gained from thousands of years of living on their home country, acknowledge their learned position and do not allow mining of this land for the short term benefit of the few. When you are aware of serious damage, it is incumbent on sensible decision makers be guided by common sense and science. Please do not allow this mine expansion ot go ahead. 2 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The expansion of the mine will have a detrimental impact on the local environment by clearing bushland, increasing pollution and impacting koalas habitat. Australia needs to stand by the commitments for no more new coal and gas so that we do not continue contribute towards irreversible climate impacts. The world is moving away from coal, our country needs to be putting all new efforts toward new renewable and clean energy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension of this coal mine is unnecessary due to its coal being exported. We can produce so many other types of more sustainable energy in this country and don’t need to destroy our environment to help another country to warm our atmosphere! This extension will potentially be devastating to koala and other populations of native animals in the proposed areas to be cleared. It’s heading in totally the wrong direction. Please reconsider |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2015 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this project because of the harm it would do, if approved, to the climate, water resources, Aboriginal Heritage sites, the Munghorn Gap Reserve and agricultural land, and also because it would push many endangered native species further towards extinction. Climate change and extreme weather events and relevant legislation The Department of Planning’s assessment report fails to properly address the Net Zero Commission’s recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report. The Net Zero Commission found and reported clearly to the government and to the public that: “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The government is yet to publish its response to this important report. I submit that no new coal projects in NSW, including this one, should be approved without due consideration of the report’s warnings that any further coal extensions and expansions risk breaches of the laws of the state and a binding international agreement. The Department of Planning seems to have also failed the panel by not including in their assessment an analysis of the environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change on the local area. This would be in line with the court of appeal judgement in relation to the Mt Pleasant/Denman case. This assessment must include the impacts of scope 3 emissions. Most of the massive emissions from the project would be scope 3. I submit that this work must be undertaken before further consideration is given to this project. The enormous costs of extreme weather events, including loss of human lives and wellbeing of communities as well as the economic costs to communities, industries and the state should be documented as closely as possible. The social and economic costs of persisting with a dying industry instead of investing in new industries and jobs should be included in this assessment. It is well documented that the international market for thermal coal is declining rapidly. Surely it is the duty of the state to promote industries with a future in NSW regions in whatever way they can while working to rapidly phase down coal because of its shocking impacts on the climate and the environment. This project should not be given approval to stand in the way of renewable energy projects and other beneficial and more sustainable industries. As someone who enjoys visiting tourist sites in the Mudgee region I submit that local communities deserve government support for further development of its tourism, wine and agricultural industries rather than support for further expansions and extensions of Moolarben and other coal mines. Aboriginal cultural heritage A significant loss to Aboriginal heritage and to the state would be the destruction of cultural artefacts, which the proponent has refused to protect. Endangered Native Species The government’s own Environment and Heritage Group have pointed out that this coal project would destroy koala habitat that is critical to the survival of the species. They have also warned that the project would significantly contribute to four other animal species and one critically endangered ecological community becoming extinct in NSW. The extraordinary list of species that would be impacted includes: the koala, the large-eared pied bat, eastern cave bat, broad-headed snake, regent honeyeater, pin-tailed legless lizard, swift parrot and squirrel glider. The threats to nature acknowledged by the government’s own experts are enough on their own to reject this project. I ask that you reject this proposal outright in the public interest of the people of NSW and the human rights of people everywhere to be protected as much as possible from the climate harms caused by the mining and burning of coal. Thank you for the opportunity to object to this proposal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the independent planning commission. My name is a [name redacted], a 30 year old support worker from greater Sydney. I am very stressed about the expansion of coal mining because of its untold environmental impacts. The coal mining industry plays a pivotal role in the progression of climate change, much of which is currently being felt by our community. We have been ravaged by heat waves, floods and fires over the past few years, with this projected to worsen with the development of these sites. I am writing to object to this project because this area belongs to a protected nature reserve with at least 23 threatened species recorded in the area. The continuation of this will result in at best, devastating and irreversible harm to threatened species and at worst, extinction. The proposed extension will produce 65 million tonnes of greenhouse gases, which is equivalent to 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, which will cause serious and long lasting damage to ground water and creeks, especially Moolarben Creek, a critical water source for threatened species. Ultimately this project will cause a climate cost that contradicts NSW Climate goals. The dphi assessment clearly ignores the findings the net zero commission which states that further coal mine expansions are not consistent with the NSW climate change act and the Paris agreement. Additionally, this fails acknowledge how NSW off target meeting its 2030 and 2035 targets. Moreover, the assent doesn’t apply the Denman court of appeal decision, which requires decision makers to take into account emissions as well as the local climate impacts they generate leaving the true climate and economic cost of the project unaddressed and unquantified. I strongly object to this coal mine expansions. |
Barry Nivison-Smith
|
ID |
22101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2040 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Barry, I am a parent and keen appreciator of the Australian countryside and the flora and fauna which make it so unique. I am very concerned about the continued expansion of coal mining in this country, and the proposed extension of the Yancoal operation at Moolarben is one that I believe should not be approved. This is because: 1. Coal mining is unsustainable It is fundamental that coal mining is unsustainable, it cannot go on forever. While it continues the climate and environment will suffer damage, making life difficult for all inhabitants of this planet .As a parent I care about the future for my own children but this also extends to all future populations of this planet. We need to stop extraction of fossil fuels and convert to a sustainable energy economy as soon as possible, let's start this process now. 2. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This is an opportunity to incorporate this valley with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, an area where at least 23 threatened species have been recorded. This includes critical koala habitat. 3. A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension is estimated togenerate 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. 4. The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. This is environmental vandalism, and presents a bleak future for the flora and fauna of the area and surroundings. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. Yancoal has sought to delay the IPC hearing and disrupt community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion by submitting last-minute minor amendments to its proposal. The Department of Planning needs to decide whether to accept these changes. I believe they should be rejected and the hearing should not have been postponed. The amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose off site “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process. This is a clear attempt to greenwash a damaging project. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Barry Nivison-Smith Lilyfield NSW 2040 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. Loss of habitat for critically endangered species. There are 23 endangered species in this area 2. Contamination of air and quater quality . Past history of suboptimal monitoring in the past in this complex ecosystem . 3. Increases green house gas emissions fueling the climate change and extreme weather 4. Impacts on the health of the local population from air and water contamination . The direct and indirect impacts of climate change on the health of the population . Heatwaves that are increasing in intensity are already increasing the impacts on the mental and physical health of our community. Leading to an increased hospitalisation. |
Lai Heng Foong
|
ID |
22111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission for expansion of Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country My name is Associate Professor Lai Heng Foong and I am an Emergency Specialist working in NSW. I have worked in Mudgee Hospital as an Emergency registrar. I have personally experienced the beauty of Mudgee and area around it. I have served the community living around Mudgee. These are reasons why I am writing this submission, because the impact to health, wellbeing and community are going to be substantial and potentially life transforming. I am concerned that with the expansion of the mine will endanger the environment in significant ways. There will be serious long lasting risks to ground water and creeks. Water is essential for life and once destroyed will have negative impacts on health. As an Emergency physician with expertise in Disaster management and prevention, we have witnessed the warmest 10 years in this decade. Extreme heat and heatwaves are now the deadliest climate-related hazard in Australia, causing more deaths than floods, bushfires, and cyclones combined. As climate change accelerates, heatwaves are becoming hotter, longer, and more frequent. It is also an accepted fact that fossil fuels are contributing to this warming, and if health of the community is to be preserved, it does not make sense to expand coal mines. Extreme heat can lead to the following: • Heat related illness such as heat exhaustion and heat stroke, the latter of which is a medical emergency that can lead to multi organ failure and death • Cardiovascular conditions such as myocardial infarction (heart attack) and cardiac failure • Kidney problems and kidney stones Dehydration reduces urine output, increasing the risk of kidney stones and, in severe cases, acute kidney failure. • Pregnancy and birth complications Exposure to extreme heat during pregnancy is associated with higher risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth. • Infectious diseases Hot weather increases the risk of foodborne and waterborne illnesses, such as gastroenteritis. Warmer temperatures also affect mosquito populations, increasing the risk of diseases such as dengue fever and Ross River virus in some regions. • Mental health impacts and violence Heatwaves are linked to increased anxiety, irritability, sleep disturbance, and worsening of existing mental health conditions. Research also shows that rates of domestic and community violence increase during extreme heat. • Toxic algae and water safety risks Hot weather promotes the growth of toxic cyanobacteria and algae in rivers, lakes, and coastal waters, which can harm skin, liver, and neurological health. The Algae bloom in SA is a good example of how hot weather and warmer sea temperature were harmful to our seafood and environment. Cultural legacies important to the Wiradjuri people will be destroyed. First nations people have been custodians of the land for over 60,000 years and have intimate knowledge of country and how to live harmoniously with the land, and they have objected to the expansion of this coal mine. The health and community impacts of this expansion are significant and the government has a duty of care to protect the residents in the Mudgee area. The expansion of the coal mine is deleterious to the community’s health and future and should not go ahead. |
Fiona Bennett
|
ID |
22116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2088 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I live in Sydney and I have become increasingly concerned about extreme climate events caused by burning of fossil fuels. In particular heatwaves and intense rainfall events which I have had personal experience of. It is unacceptable for fossil fuel projects to be given approval at this point in time when the evidence of the consequences is well known. I am concerned that future generations will have to deal with considerably more frequent weather events than have been experienced thus far. The loss of habitat is also of great concern given the loss of species and the increasing number that are becoming threatened. For these reasons I urge you to reject the Moolarbeen Coal Complex OC3 extension project. Thanks for considering my submission, Fiona Bennett |
Melville Fernandez
|
ID |
22121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2767 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Melville Fernandez, I am a semi-retired humanitarian and development practitioner in Western Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. The communities are experiencing extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know students in educational institutions across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Melville Fernandez |
Ilona Renwick
|
ID |
22126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am against this mine expansion. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. Sufficient reasons not to approve this mine expansion. The time to stop bushland destruction is now |
Rebecca Blowfield
|
ID |
22131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3138 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am appalled that in this time and age that expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine be considered! In Victoria we are experiencing record high temperatures, more intense bush fires and more intense storms due to the effects of carbon induced Climate Change. Coal (and all other fossil fuels) needs to be kept in the ground to have any chance of achieving a liveable planet for years to come. I am a mother of two children and I want to know that we did everything we could to mitigate the effects of climate change and I would hope that would be a desire for you, too. Australia has signed up for the Paris Agreement for a good reason – we see a responsibility to curb our emissions for a safe climate. Just because another country is burning the coal does not mean Australia will avoid the consequences – the burning of fossil fuels contributes to climate change regardless of where it is burnt. Furthermore, expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben coal mine will have dire consequences for the indigenous animals currently living there. Animals such as koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, Broadheaded Snake and microbats have all been reported as living on the site proposed for the expansion. Australia’s biodiversity loss is already an embarrassingly high rate at the moment. The expansion of the mine is not necessary and will only cause irreversible damage to the habitats and animal populations currently under threat. I am also concerned about the effects the expansion of the mine will have on the groundwater levels. Reductions in groundwater will impact the local trees. I am not satisfied that Yancoal’s amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. And the loss of 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts is disrespectful to the First Nations who cared for this land for so many years. They understood the meaning of only taking what you need, not expanding destruction when better alternatives are available. For all of the reasons outlined above, I therefore request that the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Kindest regards, Rebecca Blowfield Mooroolbark, Vic |
Neelesh Paravastu
|
ID |
22136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2066 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Neelesh, I am a research assistant at the University of Sydney and as someone that works in research, I am deeply disturbed by the poor quality environmental investigation that this that has been conducted before approving this open cut mine expansion. Evidence indicates that this expansion will require the clearing of 113 hectares of breeding koala habitat, 80 hectares of regent honeyeater habitat, and 401 hectares of the endangered Box Gum ecosystem, in addition to harming 20 other endangered species. These habitats and ecosystems should be protected as a nature reserve, and not further destroyed for the purposes of mineral exploitation. Furthermore, given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea, there is little economic or financial incentive to continue this expansion, especially considering that the Moolarben mine will continue operating until 2038. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. It is especially ironic to consider that Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Additionally, it is important to consider the long-term impacts this expansion will have, such as significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. The project will also destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. In conclusion, the NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Neelesh Paravastu |
Maleeka Barat
|
ID |
22141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2114 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Maleeka, I am from Northwest Sydney and I am appalled by the expansion of coal mines in so-called Australia. The impacts of anthropological climate change are extremely well researched and almost unanimously regarded as a serious and avoidable issue. Every single person on this planet has a duty to reduce our contribution to rising temperatures, emissions and destructive land practices. Not only are coal mines contributing to a bleak future for both humanity and non-human environments, but they are one of the leading causes of the global ecological collapse. This submission is in complete objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would certainly cause damage beyond repair to the ecosystem and the community of Traditional Owners of the land, and therefore should not be approved. This ecologically important area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. There are many elements to be concerned about, namely the project estimated to produce 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions (while we are not projected to meet our emission targets), long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife, and the clearing of over 113 hectares of habitat where koala breeding has been recorded and other threatened species such as Regent Honeyeater and microbat. Any suggested offsets cannot replace this currently existing environment. Further issues to be raised are the poorly assessed consequences of noise, blasting and vibrations just 100 metres from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. To really top it all off, there is simply no public benefit from this expansion as renewable energy is leading the priority of the local area. We are in a critical time for climate and biodiversity breakdown. This proposal does not align with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Maleeka Barat West Ryde NSW 2114 |
Susan Morley
|
ID |
22146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to OBJECT to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension SSD-33083358. The natural values of the landscape proposed to be destroyed by this project are irreplaceable, and should be managed for conservation as part of the important Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. It is unacceptable that the mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area is of vital importance for biodiversity with 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. I am also very concerned about the level of water drawdown (up to 5m) in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. There is no valid case for this project’s approval - and so many important reasons why this project should not be approved. |
John Hill
|
ID |
22151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3115 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please consider LATENT HEAT and take whatever steps you can to stop our World from burning fossils. Details provided in the attached document. |
|
Attachments |
22151 - John Hill_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 533.33 KB) |
Jacqueline Buswell
|
ID |
25086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
dear administrators of the NSW Independent Planning Commission, Please consider the attached submission concerning a matter of grave importance for the future well being of citizens in these times of climate change. Please please so kind as to confirm receipt of this email. regards Jacqueline Buswell https://www.rivertonpress.com/peace-in-the-pacific/ |
|
Attachments |
25086 - Jacqueline Buswell_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 73.25 KB) |
Julie Favell
|
ID |
20356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submissions and the reasons I object and equally oppose this current extension. The reasons being as follows: Greenhouse Gas Emissions • The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals; • We have already reached the tipping point of extreme climate impacts, reaching 1.5degrees; Water impacts • The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck; • We are one of the driest nations in the world. Water security is critical for communities and the environment survive and to preserve into the future; Nationally Endangered Communities 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ; Endangered Fauna • Endangered listed under EPBC Act12/2/22 • Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site; • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species; • The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland Other reasons for objecting • a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. It clearly shows the company has no respect or empathy for communities or the environment; • Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Your truly Julie Favell |
Barbara Hickson
|
ID |
20366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Submission. Re coal • I am a Mudgee wildlife volunteer, and a heritage adviser. • I object to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project, which will lead to do much more loss of environment and wildlife habitation. I have had birds in care from the Moolarben area and it is devastating to be out there and see the area as it is now ! With climate change leading to more temp rise and in the future reduce tree numbers it is a terrible thing to still be allowing this to • Water, groundwater & our creeks like Moolarben Creek are declining - they are life blood for birds and all wildlife. Barbara Hickson 5 February 2026 |
Ms Bodil Conroy
|
ID |
20376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Northern Territory 833 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Ms Bodil Conroy |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 coal expansion (AutoRecovered).pdf (PDF, 1.38 MB) |
Meg Benson
|
ID |
20406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Meg Benson. I have lived in (redacted) since 2022 before that I was in the Blue Mountains World Heritage National Park for 30 years. The wild location continues to bring much tourism, economic impact and opportunity for healthy lifestyles in the BM. I have worked in two industries; The helping professions, as a Psychotherapist/ Adolescent and Family Therapist where I have provided therapy for cases where youth and families have sometimes expressed terror and anxiety about their futures on this fragile planet in regards to scientific facts and evidence. The 2nd industry I have worked in for 15 yrs is the music industry; as a live music event producer and promoter focussing on community wellbeing via high quality destination events creating access to the medicine of live story telling via song and original music while at the same time offering an antidote to isolation and depression via in person connection and distraction from struggles through imaginative experiences and spectacular visual presentations. I care about stopping Moolarben OC3 expansion because: 1/. Using up the existing mine is enough for now to carry on with while we also swiftly prepare for more responsible transitions to renewable sources. No immediate jobs lost, but no excuse to expand an industry that has devastating impact on local and global climate systems and natural disasters. 2/. The proposed expansion infringes directly on environmental reserves featuring endangered species and the key habitat that enables their continuity. 3/. It is already one of the largest mines in NSW, let’s not make it larger. I am 54, and when I was 14 I was following the science in my geography class about the impact of non/renewable resources. It is ridiculous and irresponsible that 40 years on that such a proposal is even made. 4/.Mental illness, anxiety and suicide are ever on the rise, almost in sync with rising sea levels as a direct impact from the blind stubborn repetitive indulgence in the short term gains from the fossil fuel industry- uncertainty erodes mental heath, and climate refugees disturbs essential community and cultural lives. 5/. Further expansion demonstrates zero responsibility toward trends of habitat loss for flora and fauna and in addition no consideration of the decimation of any communities unfortunate to be living in the dark shadow of a proposed mine, and god forbid an existing mine wreaking havoc on critical wildlife. 6/. I don’t think stopping the existing mine use is suddenly necessary- though I DEFINITELY OPPOSE ANY FURTHER EXPANSION. 7/. The greater Mudgee area is a tourism destination, nothing inspiring to see at a black hole wasteland. We should be focussing on destination tourism events to help strengthen local businesses, and opportunities for young people, their families and those who pay to stay for all the wonderful reasons seen listed on Mudgee tourism and for those initiatives better still yet to come, if our reputation snd award winning allure is not trashed. You are confusing our proud reputation as leaders in renewable energy farms. Stop any expansion to Moolarben OC3 . Do the right thing for your children, your community, your state, your country and your planet. Cheers Meg |
Phyllis Setchell
|
ID |
20006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this project SSD 33083358 MOORLARBEN COAL MINE EXPANSION. It should not go ahead as it will clear 430 hectares of native vegetation. This is an important biodiversity are home to 23 threatened wildlife species. The valley is surrounded on three sides by the Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve. The mine expansion will come to within 100m of the reserves boundry. Much too close! Noise,lights and dust impacting on the native wildlife. My family use this reserve for recreational purposes. We will also be adversely impacted and lose the quality of life much needed in this busy world. I am also concerned about the increased water drawdown and the impacts on the Goulburn River. Futhermore the expansion of the extraction of coal will contribute to increase in Climate Change. This damaging expansion should not go ahead. Phyllis Setchell |
Phyllis Setchell
|
ID |
20011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this project SSD 33083358 MOORLARBEN COAL MINE EXPANSION. It should not go ahead as it will clear 430 hectares of native vegetation. This is an important biodiversity are home to 23 threatened wildlife species. The valley is surrounded on three sides by the Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve. The mine expansion will come to within 100m of the reserves boundry. Much too close! Noise,lights and dust impacting on the native wildlife. My family use this reserve for recreational purposes. We will also be adversely impacted and lose the quality of life much needed in this busy world. I am also concerned about the increased water drawdown and the impacts on the Goulburn River. Futhermore the expansion of the extraction of coal will contribute to increase in Climate Change. This damaging expansion should not go ahead. Phyllis Setchell |
David Anderson
|
ID |
20016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached file |
|
Attachments |
20016_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 897.32 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am 24 years old and live in Inner Sydney. I am writing to object the proposed Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. As a young person I am terrified of the effects climate change will have on my future, the future of everyone around NSW and the world. I am concerned about the severely damaging effects the Moolarben coal mine expansion will have on the local enviroment, community and climate. My particular concerns are: - The threat to biodiversity - the mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation. - At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. - The NSW Environment Department acknowledges that there is a severe risk of impacting particular threatened species such as the regent honeyeater, broad-headed snake and microbats. - How the expansion cannot be justified job or economic prosperity as renewabe energy jobs are expected to rise in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone and foreign demand for Australian thermal coal is forecasted to decline. - The effect on Wiradjuri cultural heritage, as the mine expansion will destroy 55 irreplacable cultural artefacts. The proposed amendments to the proposal will still severely impact biodiversity, clear too much native vegetation, and are far too late to be considered. This expansion will contribute to the climate crisis and and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. It is incompatible with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I’m writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion, near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I’m a PhD Candidate studying environmental action and believe this project to have dire, cultural and environmental impacts. The impacts of climate change are being felt throughout communities in NSW (and indeed, globally) and the expansion of this mine will only further contribute to these processes. The project is forecasted to produce 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions and NSW is not currently on track to meet legislated emission reduction targets. Further, the local impacts of this project cannot be understated. The expansion of this mine threatens native habitat and biodiversity, with offsets being a mere accounting process allowing for the justification of local destruction. The habitats of koalas and Regent Honeyeaters are threatened by this project. Finally, the project is set to destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts. An act which would be deeply disrespectful the Wiradjuri people, and would continue the legacy of disregard for First Nations culture and connection to Country. Given the severity of the climate crisis, expansion of these coal mine would be deeply irresponsible. Irresponsible to both current and future generations set to live through the catastrophic impacts of environmental mismanagement. There is no sufficient justification for irreversibly harming the future of our planet in the interests of business. As such, I wholeheartedly object to the expansion of this mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – Open Cut 3 Extension Project (SSD‑33083358) 1) Introduction & who I am I am a local Mudgee wildlife volunteer, the coordinator of community mange wombat program across the Central West, mother of a teenager and a part-time TAFE teacher. I strongly object to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project, which would extend open‑cut mining at the Moolarben Coal Complex by expanding the current OC3 pit and developing four new open‑cut pits along the Moolarben Valley floor. I oppose the project because of the environmental, social and economic costs it will place on the wildlife, myself, my family and the community. 2) Lived experience 2.1 Treating wombats with mange in the Munghorn Valley I coordinate the region’s wombat‑mange volunteer network and have personally treated wombats in the Munghorn Valley. During 2025, for 6 months, I travelled weekly from Mudgee to Munghorn to refill wombat mange burrow flaps, review camera footage, and adjust treatment plans. This route took me along Ulan Road and Wollar Road, where I almost always had to remove dead or injured wildlife including wombats, kangaroos, wallabies, birds, victims of habitat fragmentation from the mines and vehicle collisions. 2.2 Only active, trained, experienced bat rescuer in the region I am the only active, trained, and experienced bat rescuer able to attend microbat emergencies across the Mid-Western Regional Council area, including Ulan and Wollar. In 2025, I had to drive from Mudgee to Wollar, (a distance of 40 kms) repeatedly to retrieve injured or dying microbats from a disturbed roost. Microbats carry out nightly insect control for free, eating around 40 percent of their body weight of pest species and disease carrying mosquitoes. Microbat services benefit agricultural production by reducing the need for chemical pesticides. According to Bat Conservation and Rescue Queensland, microbats significantly increase crop yields by praying on herbivore insects and thus reducing chemical pesticides costs for farmers. Government assessments also recognise risks to threatened microbat habitat near Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, due to proximity and potential blasting impacts on rocky features that provide bat roosts. Any loss of microbat roosts would have cascading negative impacts on biodiversity, agriculture and farmers. 2.3 Rising temperatures, extreme weather & mass flying‑fox deaths The Government assessment of this OC3 extension project notes rising temperatures, increased fire risk, and more frequent extreme weather events for our region. I am one of only two vaccinated, trained and experienced fruitbat rescuers in the mid-western regional area. As a consequence, I am sometimes called out, while working, to fruit bats that are called in by members of the public. The two endemic species to the central west are the little red flying fox (Pteropus scapulatus) and the grey-headed flying fox (GHFF, Pteropus poliocephalus). The GHFF is a ‘keystone species’ essential to the long-term health of plants and hardwood forests. The GHFF is protected under state and federal legislation and currently listed as vulnerable. The GHFF and little red flying foxes’ survival is already precarious battling man-made challenges such as barbed wire, fruit tree netting, swimming pools, homes, electric power lines, discarded fishing line and other unnatural, human induced situations. The OC3’s destruction of box-gum, which is a food source for the flying foxes, would put further pressure on the populations and most likely lead to more encroachment on human, residential areas. This will increase the likelihood that I will be called out to more rescues of this undervalued and misunderstood species. The OC3 project would generate more than ~64.6 Mt CO₂‑e over its operation time. Rising CO2 emissions is causing a warmer planet and this brings disastrous consequences for wildlife and humans. We are seeing it year on year with more frequent, severe weather events. Such climatic disasters have been recently experienced by volunteer bat carers in South Australia who worked tirelessly to try and ease the suffering of Australia’s native, key stone pollinators and prevent them dying on mass in the most horrific way. Please refer to the Guardian Australia’s report “Heatwave kills thousands of flying foxes.” (12th January , 2026). Throughout the heatwave, that affected most of Australia, there is a high likelihood of a mass bat mortality event impacting our Mudgee and Gulgong GHFF and little red flying fox colonies. This causes me great anxiety because I know we are inadequately prepared and under-resourced to respond. There is just me and most of the time I am trying to do my day job teaching and being a mum. These heatwave events leave me feeling hopeless for the future survival of wildlife. It also makes me question the value of rehabilitating bats when we continue to cause the environment and climate to become increasingly inhospitable. Heatwaves affect me and my family. It is a health hazard to be outside during the hours of 11am and 5pm. This restricts our daily activities such as walking our dog, walking, swimming, cycling and house maintenance during the summer months. Lack of exercise causes low mood and the frequency of these heatwaves causes us all anxiety about the climate crisis happening now in our lifetime. I have to oppose the Moorlaben Open Cut coal mine extension because to support it would be doing nothing to alter the dangerous trajectory that our climate and planet are on. 3) Biodiversity impacts: severe and irreversible on threatened species The Department’s assessment identifies direct disturbance of more than 675 ha, including 480 ha of native vegetation. It records impacts to Box‑Gum Woodland (CEEC) ~401 ha and Regent Honeyeater ‘important mapped’ habitat ~81 ha, with Koala habitat ~113 ha also affected. It further notes proximity‑based risks to threatened microbat habitat in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (e.g., from blasting). Once cleared, these habitats cannot be replaced by offsets in any meaningful time frame for the species already surviving there. 4) Water, groundwater & our creeks: lifelines for wildlife (Murdering & Moolarben) I am particularly worried about negative impacts on groundwater sources that sustain Murdering Creek and Moolarben Creek. For wildlife, these creeks are year‑round lifelines, especially through drought. Even small declines in baseflow mean dehydration, starvation, heat stress, increased road crossings (and roadkill), and more wildlife arriving at properties searching for water. Wildlife rescue callouts will escalate and be more than our tiny volunteer base can cope with. 5) Social, mental, and economic burdens shifted onto volunteers and families I am on call 24/7, fielding texts, emails, calls, and Facebook tags from distressed residents. As the Central West mange‑wombat coordinator, I support and mentor other volunteers while also trying to carry out my day job of teaching. As the only active bat rescuer, every microbat and flying‑fox emergency defaults to me. I absorb fuel, equipment, treatment, and travel costs personally. My family lives with ongoing disrupted routines, and my emotional exhaustion from constant exposure to animal trauma. Approving the OC3 Extension knowingly increases this burden. 6) Public interest The Department’s assessment provides an evaluation rather than a recommendation, acknowledging benefits claimed by the proponent while also detailing material environmental risks, greenhouse emissions, and residual impacts on groundwater and biodiversity, ultimately leaving the IPC to determine whether the project is in the public interest. The documented risks to water, climate, biodiversity and the socio-economic costs onto unpaid volunteers demonstrate it is not. 7) Conclusion & request The Moolarben OC3 Extension will intensify habitat loss, water stress to Murdering Creek and Moolarben Creek, heat‑driven mortality, and wildlife road trauma. This would cause further overwhelm for me and the few wildlife volunteers in the central west. The OC3 extension will add new CO2 emissions and is therefore fundamentally inconsistent with protecting community wellbeing and wildlife health. For the sake of our wildlife, waterways, climate, community wellbeing, and basic fairness to volunteers, I respectfully ask the IPC to reject the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. References • Bat Conservation & Rescue QLD. (n.d.). Why bats are important. Retrieved from https://www.bats.org.au/about/why-bats-are-important/ • NSW Department of Planning, Housing & Infrastructure (DPHI) – Moolarben OC3 Extension Project Assessment Report, Dec 2025 (biodiversity disturbance areas; GHG ~64.6 Mt; groundwater drawdown up to ~5 m; proximity risks to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve; climate projections). • Independent Expert Scientific Committee (IESC) – Advice 2023‑140 on Moolarben OC3 (groundwater drawdown up to ~6 m in Moolarben Creek alluvium; risks to groundwater‑dependent ecosystems; baseflow/groundwater‑fed pools; catchment reduction up to ~16%; monitoring and trigger‑action needs). • Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Case Page – Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (project overview; case status; submissions timetable; submissions close 17 Feb 2026, 11:59 pm). • Stock, P. (2026, January 12). Flying foxes die in their thousands in worst mass mortality event since Australia’s black summer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/12/flying-foxes-die-in-their-thousands-in-worst-mass-mortality-event-since-australias-black-summer [theguardian.com] |
Ann Nielsen
|
ID |
20041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on the Moolarben OC3 Mine Proposed Extension My name is Ann Nielsen. I am a retired science teacher and live in (redacted) in the (redacted) area of Western Sydney. We in Westen Sydney have watched the maximum and minimum temperatures rise, especially in the last few years. Some nights the minimum temperature is 10 degrees above average and the maximums are similar or greater. I have been involved in a local climate group for 20 years because I have been very concerned about the amount of coal and gas Australia is exporting and burning locally. The government might think it doesn’t matter how much we export as long as we get our own emissions down but we all live on the same planet and our Scope 3 emissions do count. Also coal mines do add to our Scope 1 emissions as coal mines release methane both during their active life and after they have closed, unless the owner goes to great lengths to prevent these emissions and their main aim is to make money, not protect the environment, including the atmosphere. We cannot allow Yancoal to clear the precious bushland that is in the path of the area of the proposed expansion. The area is habitat for breeding koalas, a resting place for critically endangered Regent Honeyeaters as well as habitat for Broad-headed Snake and various microbats. Rather than clearing this land for a mine extension this close to 500 hectares of land should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve that is adjoining this land. As well as destroying native bushland, including the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland that is part of the planned destruction site, the proposed extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to about 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This clearly isn’t acceptable if NSW is going to stick to its current Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement that Australia signed. As well the countries we export this thermal coal to will themselves be reducing their emissions so it is inconceivable that they will need more coal and the current mine site is expected to have enough coal to last until 2038, which in itself won’t enable NSW to reach its 2030 and 2038 targets of the Net Zero Commission. The proposed extension will not create any new jobs with the Mudgee area being part of the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, with expected new jobs to be over 1,000 over a 10 year period. The last point is the extension could seriously drawdown the groundwater in the area and lower the level of the Moolarben Creek. In times of drought this is an unacceptable consequence. For the above reasons I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Ann Nielsen |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the expansion of coal projects because if the impact of emissions and the impact on native habitats for threatened species. |
Karen Payne
|
ID |
20056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Karen Payne and I have lived and worked in the central west for most of my 60 years. During this period I have spent many hours enjoying the biodiversity of the central west region including the Goulburn River National Park and surrounding area. I am very concerned about ongoing mining projects due to the impacts of climate change driven by greenhouse gas emissions causing rapid global warming. I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned about the irreversible harm being caused to the environment at this location and adjacent to the mine. In particular, I am concerned about threatened species and habitat loss and water and groundwater risks. The ongoing expansion of mining projects when we are in a climate crisis is nonsensical. Expanding this mine is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. It also makes no sense when we in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely Karen Payne (redacted) NSW 2830 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Moolarben coal mine expansion in the Mudgee area. I am concerned that the proposed expansion would result in unacceptable levels of land clearing and air pollution with serious impacts on the local community, water resources, and habitat for threatened species. This would further exacerbate the impacts of climate change, and destroy important refuge that native species require during natural disasters. As the local threatened species rely on large old hollow bearing trees for their survival, any offsets would not adequately compensate for loss of habitat in this area. In accordance with the principles of ecologically sustainable development, I believe that the environmental and social impacts of this expansion outweigh any economic benefits for the local community. In particular, there are already job vacancies at the existing coal mines, and the proposed project is in a renewable energy zone. Accordingly, I believe that the expansion should not be approved for the reasons outlined below. NSW climate targets Recently the NSW Court of Appeal found that it is important to consider the impact of all the mine’s greenhouse gas emissions (Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 163). This includes impacts in the local area such as increased temperatures, prolonged droughts, floods and increased bushfires. These factors were found to be a mandatory consideration required by 4.15(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). These principles were recently applied in the NSW Land and Environment Court where the approval of Glencore’s Ulan coal mine near Mudgee was found to be invalid. Any further exploration for coal in the Mudgee area would be incompatible with the government’s emission reduction targets and Australia’s international obligations under the Paris Agreement. If all nations are to reach the Paris target than by 2040 global demand for coal will dramatically decline (International Energy Agency (2019), World Energy Outlook 2019 – Report Extract Coal). The local area of Mudgee already has a number of large existing coal mines that produce considerable greenhouse emissions. As noted by the NSW Department of Planning Assessment report, climate projections for the Central West Orana region “indicate rising temperatures, increased fire risk, and more frequent extreme weather events” (p iv-v). This reveals that the existing coal mines in the area are already having a cumulative impact on the climate in the local area. Serious and Irreversible Impacts on threatened species I believe that the proposed expansion is likely to have serious and irreversible impacts on threatened species in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve as it is likely to contribute significantly to their risk of extinction (Clause 6.7 Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017 (NSW)). This includes important habitat for the regent honey eater, koala, squirrel glider, swift parrot, gang-gang cockatoo, pink tailed legless lizard, and the critically endangered box gum ecological community. Yancoal has already cleared a lot of bushland in the surrounding area for the existing coal mine. Threatened species rely on the remaining hollow bearing trees which have taken hundreds of years to form. Any proposal to revegetate a nearby area would not compensate for these large hollow bearing trees which also provide important shade, shelter and food for the local threatened species. Impacts on the local community The local community is concerned that the proposed expansion would have a detrimental impact on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the Drip Gorge which is a popular and iconic local tourist attraction. This includes bushwalking tracks, the Moolarben Picnic Area and a camping area. There have been concerns raised by the local community that underground mining near the Drip Gorge would risk destabilising the fragile sandstone landscape and create a safety risk for people who visit this area. Expansion of the Moolarben coal mine would also increase the air pollution, noise and vibrations in this picnic area. This would discourage tourism in the area which would have an impact on the local economy. Any further exploration is likely to have detrimental social and economic impacts on the local community. New exploration sites for coal would be going against the transition to jobs in renewable energy (NSW Parliamentary Research Service (2021), Transitioning communities dependent on coal mining in NSW; Mudgee Guardian (2021), “Will we be heard?: Concern as community asked to comment on two new coal exploration sites near Rylstone’). Expanding the local mining industry will also lead to rising costs of living for the local community. An increase in mine workers from outside the area would lead to greater housing and other costs. The rising number of transient out of area workers may also affect the local sense of community, and create pressure on local services and infrastructure (Power Consulting (2019) ‘The Social Costs of Mining on Rural Communities’). Impacts on Aboriginal Cultural Heritage National Parks NSW has advised that Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve has been inhabited by Aboriginal people for over 12,000 years and continues to be a significant place for the local Wiradjuri people (Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve | Learn more | NSW National Parks). As noted by the NSW Department of Planning Assessment report, the proposed expansion would include direct disturbance to 55 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage sites, and potentially impact 12 Aboriginal heritage rock shelters (at p v). If the project is approved, I believe there need to be conditions to prevent all impacts to Aboriginal cultural heritage. Impacts on water resources The Mudgee District Environment Group has raised concerns that the project could cause significant groundwater drawdown and alter stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems. This could have an impact on Moorarben and Spring Creeks which are an important drought refuge for wildlife. The report by the Department of Planning found that the project would “result in changes to baseflow in Moolarben Creek, groundwater recharge rates and water quality as a result of backfilling the proposed pits and catchment size during mining” (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure, “Moolarben OC3 Extension Project State Significant Development Assessment Report (SSD-33083358),” December 2025 at p 64). The Department of Planning also noted that “stream flow in the Goulburn River is heavily influenced by release from Moolarben dam and licenced discharges from the complex and the Ulan Coal Mine” (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure, “Moolarben OC3 Extension Project State Significant Development Assessment Report (SSD-33083358),” December 2025 at p 77). If the project is approved then there need to be robust conditions to protect the quantity and quality of water, maintain river health, and protect water dependent species and ecosystems. Cumulative Impacts of all coal mines in the Mudgee area As there are a number of other coal mines in the Mudgee region, the project needs to be assessed in accordance with the Cumulative Impact Assessment Guidelines for State Significant Projects (NSW Department of Planning, Cumulative Impact Assessment Guidelines for State Significant Projects, October 2022). NSW Courts have found that it is important to consider the cumulative impact a project is likely to have on climate change, local air quality, the health of the local community, habitat for threatened species and water resources (Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 163 (24 July 2025); Gloucester Resources Limited v Minister for Planning [2019] NSWLEC 7 (8 February 2019); Friends of Tumblebee Incorporated v ATB Morton Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] NSWLEC 16 (11 March 2016); Ironstone Community Action Group Inc v NSW Minister for Planning and Duralie Coal Pty Ltd [2011] NSWLEC 195 (10 November 2011); BT Goldsmith Planning Services Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 210 (1 July 2005)). Based on available evidence it appears that the existing coal mines have already had a significant impact on local air quality, community recreation areas, water resources and habitat for threatened species. Any further expansion of this coal mine would exacerbate these cumulative impacts which have been widely observed in the region. Conclusion I oppose the proposed mine expansion due to the detrimental impact this would have on the environment and the local community. Furthermore, any further mine exploration in the area would be inconsistent with the government’s climate targets. Thanks again for the opportunity to provide this submission and I would be happy to provide any further detail if required. Kind regards, (redacted) |
Jens Svensson
|
ID |
20066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2606 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
CO2 levels are already too high, any expansion of coal mining will increase this to civilisation threatening levels. Please do not approve this expansion. |
Martin Borri
|
ID |
20071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2113 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am a resident of NSW who is very concerned about the impact of climate change on the environment. I am also a high school Geography teacher and one of the topics that I teach is about the role of water in the world. I believe that the expansion of coal mining in our state will result in negative impacts on the State’s water resources and biodiversity. The NSW Government Development Assessment Report on the project stated that “The project would impact groundwater and surface water resources as a result of open cut mining activities. Key impacts include groundwater drawdown in the shallow alluvium of up to 5 metres (m) and potential impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems.” My understanding is that the drawdown could last for more than 25 years after mining had ceased. This would be devastating since this groundwater feeds springs and Moolarben Creek. This water is crucial for ecosystems that are critical refuges for wildlife, some of which are endangered, especially during periods of drought. It is particularly concerning that various expert groups’ comments about the development have expressed low confidence in the groundwater modelling that has been done so far. These comments relate to a perceived lack of groundwater monitoring, a lack of information on the impact on water quality, and unexplained discrepancies between measured and modelled data I submit that more research needs to be carried out in relation to the impact of this development on water resources in the area, before approval is granted. My other main concern is that this project is likely to cause all this environmental damage, while there is no clear increase in the output of the mine and the number of jobs produced, For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Martin Borri (redacted) 2113 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2134 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I'm a data analyst at the Ministry of Health. My uncle has a farm in Mudgee that I have fond memories of as a child. Every harvest my uncle gives olive oil from the family farm to the whole extended family. I'm writing because I'm concerned about the Woolarben coal expansion. The proposed expansion will not be a net benefit to Australia or NSW. The mine expansion will cause permanent environmental damage for a marginal and transient economic gain to shareholders in Yancoal. The environmental damage includes the loss of habitat for endangered species and direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions. While environmental costs should not just be evaluated in economic terms, the economic costs of the proposed expansion are considerable. Biodiversity is one of Australia's most valuable assets in both economic and non-economic measures. According to the IPCC 6 report, climate change is endangering the possiblity of organised human life. In accordance with this fact, NSW has legislated climate goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030 and net zero by 2050. Setting aside the downstream emissions from burning the mined coal, the direct emissions from methane escaping from coal mines already poses a risk of NSW not meeting its climate goals. Under these conditions, proposals to expand existing coal mines defies belief. |
Colin Imrie
|
ID |
20081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see full submission attached - brief summary here The Moolarben mine has approval to operate until 2038 regardless of this expansion. It will not bring new jobs or regional prosperity, but hinder the development of the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, and will hinder the essential transition to renewable energy, permanently destroy biodiversity, degrade irreplaceable water resources, a drought refuge and accelerate climate change impacts. Rather than more coal mine expansions we urgently need a binding and effective mine closure plan. |
|
Attachments |
CImrie_IPC Feb 2026_MCOSubmission OC3.pdf (PDF, 120.3 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission because I am deeply concerned about the negative environmental impacts of the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine on this ecologically sensitive location, the surrounding area, and the entire planet. I am a TAFE teacher and father of 3 dependant children and although we live in faraway Sydney, this proposal will adversely affect my family, the people of Australia and the citizens of the world, and must not be approved. If this expansion goes ahead, the greenhouse gas emissions released will increase global heating and exacerbate the climate crisis which is already threatening the prospect of a liveable planet. Unprecedented heatwaves in the past decade are evidence of this in Sydney. By mining and burning more fossil fuels, we are borrowing from future generations, burdening them with undeserved financial, environmental and health debts. In addition, energy experts argue that it is unnecessary to expand coal production for export, as our market countries are presently reducing reliance on coal to meet their Paris Net Zero targets. Current mines will supply all expected domestic and international demand as the world undergoes the transition to renewable energy. Thus, this mine expansion will actually waste financial resources which would be better spent on growing the renewable energy sector. Lastly, this proposed extension will destroy an area of unique ecological value. We are caretakers of the land and have the responsibility to preserve threatened ecosystems and species for generations to come. Our descendants have the right to see and interact with these magnificent environments. Please take these points into consideration when making your decision. |
Peter Bryant
|
ID |
20091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This is to express my objection to Moolarben Coal’s proposed (OC3) expansion. I am a resident of (redacted), having lived here for 21 years. My wife and I have brought up our four children in (redacted). This expansion will extend into bushland in the Mughorn Gap area. I often drive from Mudgee to Newcastle through this area and can state that this area is strikingly beautiful. This area should remain bushland and not be lost to open cut mining. This area is important for many native and vulnerable species. This proposed expansion will destroy the habitat that these species need. Tourism is an important industry for the area and preserving the nearby bushland and the natural beauty of our area is essential for tourism. Looking towards the future, I would hope that tourism will remain important for the area well after the mining of coal has ceased in this area. There is strong opposition to the expansion of local coal mines in the area. Living in a town where many people are employed in mining and related industry, I am very aware that it can be difficult for local people to speak up to express concerns about local coal mines. Yet in talking with local people there is awareness that the future for our area does not lie in the mining of coal. The people of Mudgee know that we cannot continue to mine coal forever. Our community needs to move away from relying on the coal industry, and towards industries that are sustainable into the future such as tourism, agriculture and renewable energy, and the sooner this change happens, the better it is for our area. With regards to our local economy, what the people of Mudgee want most is support to develop new industries and support for existing industries that have a sustainable future. I am aware from my own conversations, that even among those who are employed by Moolarben Coal and associated entities, there are reservations about the proposed expansion. There are people in our town who work in the local coal mines because it is the only source of employment that they can find, or the only way they can earn enough to cover the cost of renting in Mudgee. Some of these people are ashamed that they work in the coal industry, and many who work at the mines would love to have work in other industries if they were available. All these discussions take place in a global setting, where the climate of our planet is clearly changing. We are all aware that the burning of fossil fuels is the major contributor to global heating. In this setting it is perplexing that proposals are even being made and considered to expand the mining of coal. The impacts of climate change are felt by vulnerable people around the world far from the township of Mudgee. The people of this town are aware of the global climate situation, and aware that the longer we take to move away from mining coal, the more our community contributes to the impacts of climate change that are being felt around the world. I have children ranging in age from (redacted). I am so aware that my children are going to feel the impact of climate change in their lifetimes more than I will in mine. This coal mine expansion is not positive for the future of our town, nor is it good for the future of our children who will inhabit this planet into the future. Proponents of this expansion will argue that the expansion will bring great economic benefit to the local community, and having lived in this town for two decades I am very aware of how the mines prop up our local economy. However, I wish to argue, that in the light of the destruction that this mine expansion will bring to the nearby bushland and the impact it will have on the local community and the global climate, that any short-term economic benefit that this proposal brings to the local community is simply not worth it. No doubt the commission will receive submissions from those wanting to reap the economic benefits of mining coal for the area while it is still possible. Such a views are short-sighted, selfish and not in the best interest of our local community. The best thing for the community of Mudgee and surrounds is for this proposal to be refused, so that we can move forward into a future built on industries that are sustainable. |
Elizabeth Maddox
|
ID |
20096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Elizabeth Maddox, I am a 60 year old schoolteacher in Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, due to the climate impacts resulting from the associated carbon emissions. This year again Australia has experienced an ever increasing number of days of extreme heat, longer and more intense bush fire seasons and more devastating floods (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-28/australia-heatwave-smashes-temperature-records/106275472). As one local consequence, our home insurance premiums keep rising exponentially and in many cases have become unaffordable or insurers no longer insure properties at all. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Elizabeth Maddox (redacted) NSW 2193 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project because of the following. The NSW Net Zero Commission stated in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. This expansion will impact - Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve - 480 hectares of native vegetation - habitat for 23 threatened wildlife species - precious water resources - Aboriginal cultural heritage Australia’s international reputation, especially with our near neighbours will be further tarnished. The NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. Alternative job opportunities are available in the Mudgee region because it is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. The area also offers work in the tourism, wine and food producing industry. Is the tidal wave of coal expansions a delaying tactic for remediation? Three other coal mines in the area have applied for expansions and still there is no assessment for cumulative impacts. Shame – how can coal projects be assessed properly when our laws are so inadequate around emissions and cumulative impacts? |
Ann Finegan
|
ID |
20106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Objection to Moolarben Coal Company 0C3 Extension Project Dear Department of Planning and Environment, I am a homeowner in the Kandos community, and hence of the wider community of Mid-Western Council, and, over the past fifteen years, have been privy to the seemingly endless extensions of coal mining projects, and, more so, of their collective negative impacts on the environment, specifically in respect of the drawdown of water and damages to the water table. This proposed extension is of major concern, further compounding earlier environmental damages, with coal production (and its burning) a key contributor to worsening climate change. The proposed area for this expansion is too close to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve putting breeding koala populations at risk, and also removing Regent Honeyeater habitat. In times of drought the drawdown of water in the underlying groundwater systems will seriously adversely affect the entire ecosystem. The Mudgee region has suffered the effects of coalmine expansion for far too long, with the Goulburn River suffering many negative incidents. EPA provisions have failed to protect it. Then there are the social and cultural impacts. The village of Wollar for example has slowly and painfully disappeared under the numerous expansions of Peabody’s Wilpinjong. And, given the numerous sites of importance to local Wiradjuri people, the ongoing fragmentation of Wiradjuri lands needs to be halted. As a nation we are losing far too much of our First Peoples cultural heritage and knowledge. In respect of the risk to local employment I suggest that the introduction of more renewable energy enterprises into the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone will provide alternative employment. Given the urgent need to mitigate the risks of climate change such a shift from coal mining to renewable energy will be of immense benefit and should be supported. In summary, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the extension of Moolarben 0C3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns. Yours Sincerely, Ann Finegan |
Jenny Day
|
ID |
20111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coalmine Submission.pdf |
|
Attachments |
20111 - Jenny Day.pdf (PDF, 17.42 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed development going ahead. I oppose the expansion as it is counterintuitive and counterproductive to Australia’s current environmental policies and commitments. It goes against the protection and advancement of our beautiful country and feels redundant. While not from the local area, I acknowledge that the biodiversity and health of the environment is deeply interlinked. I live near centennial parklands which are known for their rich and dense number of bats. I have grown to love and learn more about their vital contributions to the parkland, and all of the amazing ecosystem services that they provide. Hearing about the implications of the projects on the lives of desecration of threatened fauna and ecological communities, including the Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, and Microbats is truly disheartening to me. These animals are essential to the health of our ecosystems and the expansion of this project threatens a voiceless species. No care or regard has been given to the relocation of this species. This is a clear example of a transgression of Australia's environmental and biodiversity protection laws and appears to be causing harm for harm's sake. I am sick and tired of watching the environment become a silent and voiceless stakeholder. The richness and charm of Australia comes from the diverse and abundant biodiversity and natural environment. I am an avid hiker and I love being immersed in nature and seeing beautiful grasslands, hearing birdcalls, smelling rich eucalyptus. However, I feel like this is often a foresight and afterthought in policy and decision-making, despite it contributing to our brilliant country. I have seen gorgeous and hundred year old trees being burnt in fires, our national treasure, koalas, crawling through desecrated landscapes, homeless and devoid within destroyed homes. We need greater action for the protection of our biodiversity and the expansion of this project is exactly what we don't need! Likewise, the expansion of this project is counter to Australia’s climate commitments. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. The expansion of this project would worsen climate impacts already being felt. Thank you for reading my submission. I implore you to reject approval for the OC3 Extension Project. You play a vital role in the protection of Australia and help ensure that Australia is on track to achieving its climate targets and protecting the beauty in our world. Kind regards, Scarlet |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted]. I am 71 years old. I am retired and live on the North Shore of Sydney. I follow some of the news regarding forest destruction and the impact this has on native animals and plants. In particular I am concerned about the destruction caused by our Australian coal mines and their ongoing contribution to the adverse effects of climate change. There is a constant news cycle of fires and floods across our continent with climate change often blamed for the extreme destruction. Obviously, should the expansion go ahead it will cause additional harm to native animals and plants and additional harm to the planet from the increased greenhouse gases. Because of this it should not be approved. Please accept this written correspondence as my objection to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. Please reject Yancoals request. Yours sincerely [redacted] |
Angeal Bennett
|
ID |
20126 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Gloucester Knitting Nannas Against Gas & Greed |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We wish to make a submission opposing the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. There are many reasons why this project should not be permitted to proceed, including but not limited to : Threatened Wildlife and Vegetation Australia has one of the highest incidents of species extinction, both flora and fauna, which we do not believe is a record we should be proud of as a nation. As Knitting Nannas we are committed to doing all in our power to ensure that future generations are able to enjoy as much of nature as we are currently privileged to. The area that Yancoal propose to clear is habitat for some 23 threatened wildlife species, and will cause major impact on Koalas, Large-eared Pied Bats, Eastern Cave Bats, Regent Honeyeaters, Broad-headed Snakes, and Squirrel Gliders, as well as clearing some 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. With regard to the koalas in particular, the Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW have gone on record to say that the local koala population is ‘critical to the survival of the species’, and that this project poses a serious threat to this population, which has successfully survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires. The sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. Yancoal has made no effort to avoid or minimise impacts on biodiversity. This proposal will expand the mine into a valley that is surrounded on 3 sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and will be a mere 100m from the boundary, despite recommendations, which they have refused to accept, that there should be a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect threatened species. If we are to avoid further species extinctions, impacts on native vegetation must be considered and avoided, rather than invoking biodiversity offsets, which are deeply flawed and tend to justify habitat destruction. Cultural Heritage Some 55 cultural artefacts could be destroyed by the project. This includes two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. Yancoal have refused to protect this site, despite the CHCP's recommendation. Water The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Creek, and deep-rooted trees that use that water will be placed at risk. We believe the Company has failed to carry out proper baseline monitoring of water. It has a poor record elsewhere in the existing mine complex, where they have failed to do the required ongoing water monitoring. Climate Change Others far more qualified than us have addressed the climate change issues in detail. Suffice to say that one of the key findings of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that was released in December was that any additional coal mine expansions was inconsisent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The decision by the Court of Appeal in the Denman case means that the full econonmic costs of downstream emissions, both to NSW and the locality, must be taken into consideration. Cumulative Impacts We do not believe that the cumulative impacts with other proposed and exisiting coals mines have been taken into consideration. Regional Impacts and Jobs It is our belief that the rejection of this application will not impact on job opportunities. The current Moolarben coal complex with continue to operate until 2038. Additionally, Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone,, with some 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next 10 years. In view of all the above, we would urge you to reject this proposed extension. |
Jackie Davis
|
ID |
20131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in strong opposition to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of their Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. I was part of a group of people who visited the Wollar area last year, to gain an understanding of the impact on residents, the natural landscape and the native wildlife from Yancoal’s huge mining projects there. We saw the beauty of the local area, particularly The Drip and the Munghorn Nature Reserve just adjacent to the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 mine expansion area. We also noted the irreparable damage to the natural landscape caused by the voids from huge open cut mines. I outline below my main points of concern, but one of my key concerns in this time of ever expanding heat waves, fires and floods, is that this mine will directly contribute to climate change. (The NSW Net Zero Commission stated clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate.) Here is a summary of my other key concerns: • The project assessment has also not adhered to the now LEGALLY REQUIRED ECONOMIC COSTS OF DOWNSTREAM GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine). • The proposed expansion would CLEAR 480 HECTARES OF NATIVE VEGETATION AND PUSH THE MINE OUT INTO A BEAUTIFUL VALLEY SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY MUNGHORN GAP NATURE RESERVE, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. • TWENTY-THREE THREATENED WILDLIFE SPECIES HAVE BEEN RECORDED IN AND AROUND THE MINE SITE, including habitat that is critical to the survival of a uniquely resilient population of koala. • In addition, the mine will CLEAR ENDANGERED BOX GUM WOODLAND and destroy habitat of threatened wildlife such as the LARGE-EARED PIED BAT, EASTERN CAVE BAT AND REGENT HONEYEATER. • Critically important is the fact that the mine will DRAW DOWN UP TO 5 METRES OF WATER IN THE ALLUVIUM OF MOOLARBEN CREEK, WHICH RUNS INTO THE GOULBURN RIVER. This is a serious risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED. KOALAS Koalas have recently been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, and the Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, noting that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. THREATENED WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species as well as clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of wildlife species including not only the Koala but the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats particularly for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be AT LEAST A 500M BUFFER FROM MUNGHORN GAP NATURE RESERVE TO BETTER PROTECT THOSE SPECIES, but the mining company refused to accept that and has instead proposed a 100 m buffer. BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS ARE DEEPLY FLAWED AND SIMPLY JUSTIFY HABITAT DESTRUCTION WHEN IN FACT, IMPACTS ON NATIVE VEGETATION MUST BE AVOIDED IF WE ARE TO AVOID FURTHER SPECIES EXTINCTIONS. WATER IMPACTS The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Creek, and will release saline water, putting at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. [1] The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, failing to do the ongoing water monitoring required. [2] CLIMATE CHANGE The NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) in their assessment report of this mine expansion has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission (NZC) in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that: “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though the downstream emissions make up 99% of all emissions from the project. CULTURAL HERITAGE The project will destroy 55 First Nations cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The Cultural Heritage Contingency Plan recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. REGIONAL IMPACTS AND JOBS There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL MINE EXTENSION PROJECT, PROJECT NUMBER SSD-33083358. Approval of this project is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act as well as the Paris Agreement. Jackie Davis [redacted] [1]https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/pac/projects/2018/10/bylong-coal-project/presentations-and-comments/cumulative-impacts-goulburn-river-final-nov-2018.pdf [2] Extract from [1]. In 2015 Moolarben Coal Mine modelling predicted groundwater inflows to their Underground One mine (UG1) to be less than 1ML/day peaking at around 1.5 ML/day (MCC, 2015). When underground mining commenced in 2017, the actual water make in the first 6 months exceeded 5 ML/day10 Groundwater modelling was subsequently amended and recalibrated to capture the significant unpredicted mine inflows which increased to over 6 ML/day in 2018. The adjusted modelling now predicts a maximum peaking at 17.27 ML/day in 2025 (MCC, 2017b). This represents a more than 10 fold increase in the maximum water make than originally predicted and a significant increase in interference to the groundwater system by the Moolarben Coal Mine. |
Margaret Vautin
|
ID |
20136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2151 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retired dentist concerned about the future of our country. I care deeply about our biodiversity and climate, both of which are threatened by the constant expansion of coal mining. Our beautiful country is threatened, and our future generations. Coal mining destroys habitat and its burning results in carbon emissions which are damaging our climate. This project will cause serious and irreversible harm to our native species and future generations of our people. Already scientists are warning us of increasing numbers of threatened species and we see for ourselves the effects of increasing heat on our people. Yancoal's proposed expansion of what is already the largest productive coal mine in NSW cannot be allowed to proceed. It wants to clear yet more critical habitat for Regent Honeyeaters, micro bats and koalas and extend the mine to within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It threatens water sources and Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The NSW Environment Dept has already warned that this project, by destroying even more habitat, will lead to long-term decline of native species populations. And the proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas over its life, making its climate impact enormous. In my opinion it would be madness to allow it to proceed. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the extension of the open cut mining operations at the Moolarben coal complex. The extension will come within 100m of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which together with surrounding areas, provides habitat for critically endangered Regent Honeyeaters and other woodland species including Koalas. Mining activities are disruptive and will impact the resident species and indeed human visitors to the Reserve. Even 500m distance would not be acceptable. There is a loss of 480 hectares of native vegetation, including 401 hectares of critically endangered Box Gum woodland and the species that depend upon it. Future revegetation is no solution, as it is slow and has been shown to be ineffective on disused mining sites. By the time revegetation is implemented, some species such as the Regent Honeyeater may well have become locally, or perhaps totally, extinct. The mine will generate 64.6 million tonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions. These emissions will contribute to global climate change which is already impacting the area with increased temperatures and extreme weather events, which have negative economic and social effects both regionally and nationally. Open cut mining activities would impact groundwater and surface water resources. The risk to groundwater dependent ecosystems appears too great to rely on supposed risk management. While there are claimed economic benefits through “continuing employment, royalties and flow-on effects”, I would submit that these are conjectural and minor compared to the inevitable loss of irreplaceable biodiversity. Conditional approval and mitigations are no substitute for preventing loss in the first place. Please find the courage to reject the proposed extension. |
Penny McMullin
|
ID |
20151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am making this submission to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I cherish being able to live in Australia with all of its unique and wonderful wildlife, however I'm extremely concerned that future generations will not be able to share this same enjoyment. I am deeply concerned about the serious and lasting environmental, climate, water and community impacts of this proposal. After reviewing the available information, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that this expansion not be approved. 1. Unacceptable climate impacts The Moolarben OC3 proposal would significantly extend one of New South Wales’ largest thermal coal operations, locking in decades of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when urgent climate action is required. Approving this expansion would be inconsistent with the NSW Government’s legislated climate targets and Australia’s international climate commitments. New coal expansions fundamentally undermine efforts to reduce emissions and limit worsening climate impacts that are already affecting regional communities, agriculture and ecosystems across NSW. 2. Severe and irreversible impacts on threatened species and biodiversity The proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecological communities, including clearing of critical habitat for species already under significant pressure. This includes impacts on: - Threatened woodland and forest ecosystems - Koala habitat - Critically endangered species such as the Regent Honeyeater Once destroyed, these habitats cannot be genuinely offset or replaced, and biodiversity losses of this scale are permanent. 3. Impacts on water resources and the Moolarben Valley The expansion would pose significant risks to surface water and groundwater systems in the Moolarben Valley, an area that supports farming, ecosystems and local communities. Mining‑related drawdown, contamination and long‑term hydrological changes threaten water security in a region already vulnerable to drought and climate variability. 4. Harm to cultural heritage and community values The proposed expansion would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes and heritage, adding to the cumulative impacts already experienced by local communities after decades of mining in the region. Local residents have lived with the impacts of coal mining for over twenty years. Further expansion would intensify dust, noise, blasting and landscape degradation, eroding community wellbeing and the liveability of the region. 5. Lack of genuine public benefit There is no compelling public interest justification for approving this expansion. Thermal coal demand is declining, and continued investment in new coal infrastructure delays the transition to more sustainable regional economies. The long‑term costs — environmental degradation, climate damage, water impacts and loss of natural and cultural heritage — far outweigh any short‑term private benefit. For these reasons, I respectfully submit that the Moolarben OC3 expansion should not proceed. The proposal presents unacceptable environmental and climate risks, threatens threatened species and water resources, and undermines the long‑term interests of the Mudgee region and the people of New South Wales. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of this project. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Penny McMullin Caringbah South, NSW 2229 |
David Schwartz
|
ID |
20161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2150 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is David and I am a resident of Parramatta. I’m writing to oppose the proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine extension. This landscape is part of a living Country that has been cared for by Wiradjuri people since time immemorial. It should be protected and restored, not bulldozed into another open‑cut void. The valley forms an ecological continuum with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and should be consolidated into a single conservation landscape. Instead, this proposal would clear roughly 480 hectares of native bush and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve’s boundary. This is one of the most biodiverse valleys in the region, home to at least 23 threatened species and a uniquely resilient koala population. No project that destroys habitat currently supporting breeding populations of threatened species can be justified—certainly not one that creates no new jobs and leaves permanent environmental damage. The environmental impacts are severe and irreversible. Yancoal proposes to destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat, including sites where breeding has been directly recorded. It would clear 80 hectares of habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater—again, in areas where breeding females have been observed. Up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box‑Gum Woodland ecosystem would be lost. The NSW Environment Department has already warned that this project risks population decline for species including the Regent Honeyeater, Broad‑headed Snake and microbat species. Despite this, Yancoal has refused to adopt even a 500‑metre buffer to reduce harm to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This valley should never be mined—it should be added to the reserve and protected for future generations. The climate implications are stark. The extension would generate roughly 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse pollution—equivalent to more than half of NSW’s annual emissions. NSW is already falling behind its climate targets, yet the assessment ignores the clear findings of the Net Zero Commission and the requirements of the Denman Court of Appeal ruling. Ninety‑nine percent of the project’s emissions are downstream emissions, and they cannot be waved away. Approving more coal at this point in history is incompatible with the NSW Climate Change Act, the Paris Agreement, and any responsible climate policy. The project delivers no meaningful economic benefit. The mine will continue operating for more than a decade with no expansion. Coal jobs in the region remain unfilled, and the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is set to create around 2,000 new jobs that align with the state’s future economy. Most of the coal from this expansion is destined for export markets where thermal coal demand is declining. This extension is simply not needed—for jobs, for local industry, or for the state’s economic future. The water risks are substantial. Groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting 25 years, threatens Moolarben Creek—a vital drought refuge and one of the last reliable water sources for wildlife in dry seasons. Groundwater‑dependent ecosystems, including deep‑rooted riparian vegetation, are likely to be damaged by drawdown of up to 5 metres. Yancoal has an inadequate monitoring record elsewhere and is proposing only 12 months of groundwater monitoring after approval. Baseline studies must occur before any decision, not after damage is set in motion. The cultural heritage impacts are unacceptable. The project would destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts of high significance, with many more potentially at risk. This is not “manageable impact”—it is ongoing cultural erasure. The cumulative fragmentation of Country from multiple mine expansions further undermines the ability of Wiradjuri people to practise culture, maintain connection to land and water, and protect sacred sites. Finally, the cumulative impact assessment is wholly inadequate. This expansion cannot be considered in isolation when neighbouring expansions at Ulan and Wilpinjong would collectively clear large areas of similar habitat, impact the same threatened species, and degrade connected water systems. Ignoring cumulative impact is not responsible planning—it’s negligence. For all these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project and protect this critical landscape in partnership with Traditional Custodians. |
Astrid van Blerk
|
ID |
20166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2066 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission - Urgent Submission Against Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Mine Expansion My name is Astrid, I am a 60 year old retired nurse living in Sydney and I am writing to strongly object to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine for so many relevant reasons that it is impossible to mention them all! The expansion poses a significant threat to critical habitats for our precious wildlife—including Koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats—and encroaches dangerously close to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, within just 100 meters. This is not merely an environmental issue; it threatens entire ecosystems, local water sources, and the cultural heritage of Wiradjuri Country. In light of the ongoing climate crisis and New South Wales’ commitment to reducing emissions, the approval of this project would be an outright failure. It would lock in additional, unnecessary, and devastating emissions from coal mining, directly opposing our efforts to mitigate climate change. Also, from what I learned this remarkable valley clearly deserves protection as part of a cohesive conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. We cannot convert it into an open-cut coal mine that destroys what cannot be replaced! And evidently doesn't even bring benefits for the wider local community, such as the creation of sustainable new jobs. The Moolarben mine can remain operational until at least 2038, regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have gone unfilled for years. Meanwhile, Mudgee is strategically located within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, expected to generate around 2,000 new renewable energy jobs over the next decade, providing meaningful, sustainable employment opportunities for the community. To me, it is especially unacceptable that if approved, the mine's expansion would result in the clearing of 113 hectares of koala habitat, including areas where breeding koalas are present. Additionally, 80 hectares of habitat for the endangered Regent Honeyeater—with breeding females already recorded on site—would be lost, along with up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, and microbats are projected to be severe and irreversible. Furthermore, the environmental assessments of noise and blasting impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve have been egregiously inadequate. Yancoal has even blatently disregarded recommendations for a 500-meter buffer to protect the reserve and its sensitive wildlife. The ramifications of this project on our climate cannot be overstated, and Yancoal has failed to address the economic and social costs associated with these emissions. Importantly, the proposed expansion cannot be justified on the grounds of job creation or any other meaningful benefits to the local community! In conclusion, the proposed expansion would yield minimal economic benefit while imposing irreparable environmental damage. The risks to groundwater and local creeks are also significant, with projected drawdown levels of 2–6 meters lasting up to 25 years post-mining. This jeopardizes Moolarben Creek, a vital refuge for biodiversity during droughts. Again - I urge the relevant authorities to reject this expansion unequivocally, safeguarding both the precious biodiversity and natural beauty of the area, and the quality of life and cultural integrity of the potentially affected communities. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Astrid van Blerk, Riverview NSW 2066 |
Monique Koehler
|
ID |
20171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2151 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please don’t do this. The impact on our environment and people will not be something we can recover from. My family lives in this area and I bring my children here to not only visit them, but to show them the beauty of this part of the country. I saw my first and only Regent Honeyeater here and I’m worried my children will never see them. I fear that the water available will not be able to support the bush and the mines in times of drought, and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and other surrounding bush will suffer as a result. My family say that the community has been negatively affected by the mine and worry that the smells and noise and dust will continue to drive people and animals away. Not only that, the general emissions from mining and burning coal will continue to damage our earth. To continue on this path is an injustice to our future generations. This is a disastrous and destructive proposal. Please, please stop this expansion. |
Angel Bennett
|
ID |
20176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to lodge my opposition to the above project. We are in a climate crisis. The NSW Government has acknowledged this with the passing of the NSW Climate Change Act, and the introduction of reduced emission targets set for 2030 and 2035. According to the Net Zero Commission's Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December 2025, if we are to have any chance of reaching these goals, any future coal mine expansions should not be approved. Australia already has the dubious honour of being among the countries having the highest incidence of species extinctions. The area covered by this proposed expansion is home to many threatened species, both flora and fauna. Among them is the koala. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has said that this site is ‘critical to the survival of the species’. The koala is Australia's iconic animal - surely we should be doing everything possible to protect its habitat to that it does not become extinct? Water is our most precious commodity, and should be protected at all costs. Yancoal do not have a good record for conducting the required monitoring, and have failed to carry out baseline monitoring in the proposed area. There are some 55 cultural artifacts that risk destruction if this extension goes ahead. Yancoal have already indicated their refusal to protect one site in particular, despite recommendation from the CHCP that this should happen. This proposal should not be considered in isolation, and the cumulative impact of this and other current proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region must be assessed, and I believe will render it unacceptable. I do not believe that local jobs would be lost if this proposal is rejected, as the existing Moolarben coal complex is scheduled to continue operation until 2038. I beseech you, please reject this application. |
NICOLE LUHRS
|
ID |
20186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2776 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I totally object to this expansion. We are in a climate emergency and we cannot be extending or opening coal mine projects. This extension will fuel climate change adding millions of carbon emissions. We are already seeing the impacts of climate change in the latest extreme bushfires in Victoria I worked in disaster recovery for 3 years , I have first hand experience of what climate driven disasters do to the economy, mental health and social fabric I strongly object to this proposed expansion due to the impacts on biodiversity- already the nature reserve very close to the area proposed has masked owls, koalas and other threatened species We lost 3 billion animals in the black summer fires we should not be digging up more land for coal Also, I am very concerned as coal mining uses huge amounts of water. This region is prone to drought and bushfires. Coal mines extract water and this will dry up the river and impact on adjoining communities as well as water for habitat |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached submission. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben mine extension submission.pdf (PDF, 76.44 KB) |
Anne Kelly
|
ID |
25291 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Illawarra Knitting Nannas Against Greed |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
See attachment. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Submission Feb 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 77.05 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2450 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This community, or what is left of it due to mining, has suffered enough. Just leave that once beautiful part of NSW alone. I lived there for many years and retuning there is so sad. Please do not extend the lease. Regards |
Mark Ferrington
|
ID |
19876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am OBJECTING to the Moolarben Coal extension proposal. My name is Mark Ferrington. I am 73 years old and I live in inner Sydney, but I have visited the Mudgee area more than once, and walked in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. I have seen the open cut coal mining in the area north of Mudgee and other areas, and found this devastating moonscape very distressing. I am a qualified horticulturalist. Throughout my working life, I have advised people about the planting of native trees and shrubs, and have seen how people want to help support our natural spaces for their own pleasure, but also to encourage wildlife into their gardens and surrounding areas. Since COVID in particular, we now understand our need for connection with nature is important to our wellbeing. For this reason I believe that any loss of natural areas is no longer acceptable for short term gain by a mining company. We have done enough damage since colonisation began. People's individual attempts to preserve nature are only undermined by destruction in other places like this. I lived in Western Sydney for 25 years and experienced the extremes of heat and cold in the area from Blacktown to Richmond, and I am very concerned about future climate change. I would like to draw attention to the environmental impacts of this project, as well as its impact, through its greenhouse gas emissions, on the climate. Environmental examples include loss of habitat for the Koala, the impact on the nearby nature reserve and the changing of watercourses and water flow. As for the future warming of NSW, we must protect areas like Box Gum Woodland which absorb carbon. The NSW Government already has policy to work towards reducing our climate emissions with targets for 2030, 2035 and 2050. But coal mining and burning contributes significantly to our greenhouse gas emissions in this state. So increasing the quantity of coal produced , as well as reducing the vegetation of natural areas on the proposed mine site, is crazy. This will only put more pressure on every aspect of life and business in this state to meet our emissions reduction targets. For these reasons I urge the Commission to refuse the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine. |
Angela Michaelis
|
ID |
19896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
In the attached submission, I express a number of concerns about: biodiversity, especially on the endangered Box Gum Woodland; endangered Koalas and other threatened species; Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (especially how it will be affected by "edge effects" if the project goes ahead; water in Moolarben Creek and underground water; and the increased greenhouse gas emissions from coal extraction which will contribute to climate change with both local and global impacts. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 sub to IPC AM 13-2-2026.pdf (PDF, 3.54 MB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2159 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to this mine expansion. It means that almost 500 hectares of native vegetation will be removed including endangered Box Gum Woodland which is habitat for over 23 threatened fauna species including many bats which are essential pollinators. The species to be impacted includes Koala's which breed at this site. As a volunteer wildlife rehabilitator we see how habitat loss is the biggest cause of concern for many of our unique Australian species and we must protect them by protecting the places they can still survive and thrive. What is highly concerning is the water that would be used to operate this coal facility and poses a real and significant risk to the Goulburn River. I believe that this expansion is unnecessary and that better energy production methods are available that would not impact the environment so detrimentally and that our Government needs to start prioritising such methods. Australia must stop wanton and unnecessary destruction of endangered and threatened habitats and species, and move towards a more sustainable approach towards energy that protects our future. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. |
Emily Edwards
|
ID |
19926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2024 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Emily Edwards. I write to register my strongest objection to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 coal mine on Wiradjuri Country, near Mudgee. I make this submission on behalf of my children and those unborn who deserve planning decisions that preserve our ecological and cultural heritage for generations to come. The people of Australia, and farmers in particular, want an end to the dig-it-up-chop-it-down stupidity masquerading as policy that has plagued planning decisions for so long. I am the sixth generation of a farming family in Merriwa, NSW, a descendant of the (William) Lawsons and the Bettingtons. My ancestors helped to build the food bowl of Australia. I cannot understand why politicians and planning authorities still have not learned that we can't eat coal. Coal mining robs Australia of the nation's best farmland and the vital water supply needed to produce the food we all need to survive. My extended family and old friends in the Moolarben area are already dealing with the impacts of coal mining. They are being outcompeted for water rights by a foreign company that is irreparably damaging our environment and atmosphere, instead of putting food on the table for all Australians and our valuable export markets. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad- headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 3. A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. 4. The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeksThe project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. 6. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 7. The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat.The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. Sincerely, Emily Edwards Waverley NSW 2024 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2121 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the extension of the Moolarben coal mine because the use of fossil fuels is not sustainable given the already disastrous effects of climate change on the environment. Firstly the coal mine impacts on the upper Goulbourn river with saline discharges and sediment runoff. Furthermore the mine draws ground water from the underground which means reduced water flow of the Goulburn river. This impacts the river already and an extension will exacerbate this. Secondly an open cut mine will involve removing more topsoil, cutting down more trees and leaving a bigger scar in the landscape. Even when a coal mine is not operated any more, water sources for the surrounding area continue to be polluted. Thirdly and most importantly Australia should not continue to mine coal and to export it to other countries because we need to stop producing greenhouse gas emissions. Australia has vast amounts of sunlight as well as the necessary technology to use this clean and renewable resource to gain electricity. The Australian Institute reported that in 2021-22 despite high amounts of profit the gas and coal industry received huge government subsidies. Why is this money not invested in solar power programs? I refer to the link pasted in below. https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hs=pmJp&sca_esv=ec04cb20b49346cc&hl=en-au&q=Australia+institute+coal+%26+gas+profits+2022&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0-IavzsuSAxXF1zgGHZCdAEsQ1QJ6BAg2EAE&biw=792&bih=795&dpr=2&safe=active&ssui=on The Climate Council’s report (see link below) lays out detailed information provided by researchers about the current climate crisis. We are already seeing catastrophic changes in weather patterns leading to heat waves, bushfires and flooding which destroys the environment and leads to loss of plant and animal diversity and to loss of human lives and livelihoods. Australia needs to stick with the net zero by 2035 target and do everything possible to reach this target. If temperatures rise higher than 2 degrees celsius, the climate council warns that it will cause “....abrupt, irreversible changes or tipping points that supercharge global warming and cause widespread system collapse, like: The loss of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, leading to multi-metre sea level rise. Frozen soils in the Arctic melt, releasing vast quantities of heat-trapping gases. The Amazon rainforest experiences massive dieback – where plants die off en masse – releasing huge volumes of heat-trapping gases.” https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/why-australia-needs-to-set-a-strong-climate-target-this-year/ I urge you to not allow the coal mine extension in Moolarben to go ahead. We will not reach net zero by 2035 if we continue to burn fossil fuels at the rate at which we are now and we can definitely not afford to increase our greenhouse gas emissions by extending coal mines. We will leave our children and grandchildren an environment in which it will be hard to survive, hard to grow food etc. |
Kay de Ridder
|
ID |
19956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a woman who is passionate about nature and justice. I am a member of the Australian Conservation Foundation (Greater Western Sydney) in order to fight for a fair and just future for nature, animals and also my family. I am scared that the world has reached a tipping point with climate change and none of the big companies and governments are taking matters seriously enough. This summer in Australia has been extraordinarily hot. This is not only uncomfortable, but it is dangerous. My granddaughter has been kept inside the classroom at lunchtime on many occasions as it is too hot to play outside. This did not happen when I was a child - and I grew up in Darwin! I fear for our future and you at Yancoal are able to do something to change the future for the better. I wish to object to Yancoal's proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. In this time of climate crisis, I think the move to expand the mine is reckless and inconsiderate of our planet's future. The last three years have been the hottest on earth since records began. It is becoming untenable for people to be outside on ultra hot days - this affects people working, children at school, the elderly and other people just going about their day to day life. The main driver of our climate crisis is COAL and GAS mining. The proposal to extend the Moolarben coal mine would mean clearing around 480 hectares of native vegetation, including native Box Gum Woodland which is endangered. This native vegetation is home to many wildlife species who would die due to the lack of anywhere to live. This includes koalas and the Regent Honeyeater - both on the endangered species list. The proposal to extend the mine would produce greenhouse gas emissions, estimated at 64.6 metric tonnes!!! This is not consistent with achieving climate targets and adhering to the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Other problems that would be caused by the proposed expansion are the drain on the water in Goulburn River - which in turn has an impact on the vegetation along the river; and the impact on at least 55 Aboriginal heritage sites. I implore you to consider the climate impacts of this proposal, and cancel the proposal for expansion immediately. Our world is at a tipping point and every action that helps prevent further climate impacts is needed - NOW. |
Colleen Roche
|
ID |
25081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hello, I am Colleen Roche writing to you from the beautiful World Heritage Blue Mountains. I strongly oppose the expansion of the mining site at Moorlaben because of it's effects on ecosystems and habitat. The valley waters would be destroyed, groundwater and underground aquifers, especially during drought. Birds, like the Regent Honeyeater could be brought to extinction, along with other birds, reptiles, fish and mammals, like the chlamydia - free koalas. Deforestation, seismic blasting, noise, light and polluted air would force community away from the picnic area, and cause immeasurable harm to humans, wildlife and nature. Young people, elderly, and all people including indigenous people need to be respected. Around 55 irreplaceable Wiradjuri cultural heritage items would be destroyed, we need to respect First Nations people as being the stewards of this beautiful land, for aeons.There is no point approving this increase, as no more jobs or increased production is planned. There's already solid renewable energy production going ahead. Please support us in opposing this horrific expansion. Colleen Roche |
Therese Hanrahan
|
ID |
20301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Therese Hanrahan and since the mid-1970s I've been fighting against the environmental destruction occurring in Australia caused by the unlimited greed of the non-renewable energy sector. Although I often feel my struggle is in vain, I believe that the very real climate crisis we are experiencing locally and globally will inspire more and more people to stand up and voice their concerns. With particular reference to the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion, now that Yancoal has disrupted community consultation by submitting last-minute minor amendments to its proposal, I am compelled to make the following submission: The Department of Planning must oppose Yancoal's delay tactics and reject the suggested amendments which do not reduce the mine footprint or any native vegetation clearing. They propose off-site “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. There will be severe impacts on biodiversity if the mine expansion proceeds. Making changes at this stage undermines the consultation process. This is a clear attempt to greenwash a damaging project. The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. Furthermore, the expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. In addition, serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks will occur. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. First Nations justice and environmental justice are inseparable. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage, destroying 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impacting dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Therese Hanrahan, Katoomba |
Rosslyn Rix
|
ID |
20311 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Rosslyn Rix. I am a concerned resident of the Blue Mountains. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mines in our State due to climate impacts caused by fossil fuels. My objections to Yancoal’s proposed extension to the Moolarben mine are as follows: Threatened species and habitat loss, including of over 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve. I have enjoyed walking in this wonderful natural environment and can’t envisage it being damaged in any way for the short-term benefit of coal mining. Water and groundwater risks are also at stake. Climate impacts, 64 million tonnes of climate pollution for example, are unacceptable. We can’t destroy our environment for short-term so called gain. We must protect what we have left. Thank you for considering my submission. Rosslyn Rix |
Michelle Cole
|
ID |
20321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
My name is Michelle Cole. I am writing to voice my strong objection to the proposed coal mine extension SSD-33083358, which I have only become aware of today. I am outraged at the proposal to place in harms way the irreversable impacts on the flaura and fauna and significant Aboriginal heritage sites. I am aware that there are vulnerable and threatened wildlife species which relay on native habitat suh as the Large eared Pie Bat, the Eastern Cave bat, the Regent honey eater. The mine expansion will either lead to the elimination of these species or reduc them to such low numbers that they will be basically an unviable natural popluation. The Government will then try to seek at some point in the future the public accoladdes should they decide to poor public money into groups who seek to prevent them from total anhialation. This area is also critical to the survival of the koala in this uniquely positioned population. Futhermore, there are numerous Aboriginal sites of significance that will be directly and indirectly impacted by a widening footprint. The Wiradjuri people have been traumatised enough by the impacts of colonisation, I can hardly believe that there is actually a proposal that has advanced this far, knowing that those significant cultural sites are there and the devbastation that would be caused by this project going ahead. There are so many more waysthat this project is of permenent disadvantage to all Austtralians now and into the future and for forever. Just stop it. Enough. This small notes does not go far enough. However I wanted to ensure that this is heard. Michelle Cole Blue Mountains resident Voter Mother Grandmother |
Stephen Cole
|
ID |
20326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I write to formally object to the proposed Moolarben OC# Coal Mine Extension (SSD-33083358). The expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine represents a significant escalation of coal extraction in a region already heavily affected by cumulative mining impacts. While I acknowledge the economic role mining has historically played in New South Wales, this proposal raises serious and substantive concerns that, in my view, weigh decisively against approval. First, the project would facilitate the continued extraction and combustion of thermal coal at a time when state, national, and international policy settings recognise the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Approving a substantial extension risks locking in emissions for decades and undermines broader climate mitigation efforts. In planning terms, this raises questions about intergenerational equity and the consistency of the project with long-term public interest outcomes. Second, the environmental impacts warrant careful scrutiny. The extension is likely to intensify: • Greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1, 2, and downstream scope 3) • Impacts on groundwater systems and surface water resources in an already water-stressed region • Loss of native vegetation and habitat fragmentation • Dust generation and associated air quality impacts • Noise and cumulative health burdens on nearby communities Given the scale and duration of the proposal, these are not minor or short-term effects. They represent enduring changes to landscape, ecology, and community amenity. Of particular concern are the cumulative impacts when considered alongside existing and approved mining operations in the region. Incremental expansion across multiple projects can collectively result in significant environmental degradation, even where individual projects are assessed in isolation. Third, there are legitimate concerns regarding the long-term economic rationale of expanding thermal coal production amid accelerating global energy transition. There is a material risk that such projects may become stranded assets, leaving environmental legacies and rehabilitation liabilities that persist long after economic returns diminish. The Commission’s role is to determine whether this project is in the public interest. In weighing short- to medium-term economic benefits against long-term environmental risk, climate impact, water security, and community wellbeing, I respectfully submit that the balance does not favour approval. For these reasons, I request that the Independent Planning Commission refuse consent for Project SSD-33083358. Thank you for considering this submission. Yours faithfully, Stephen Cole |
Derek Williams
|
ID |
20331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
IPCN I am writing to express my OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Expansion of this Yancoal’s Moolarben open cut coal mine will impact the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. One of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population and considered an umbrella species. Koalas The NSW Government committed to stopping the decline of Koalas in NSW. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species,’ and that this is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, that are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The mining company refused to accept the department agency recommendation for a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species. The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing and impact on native vegetation and the 500m buffer does not take into consideration wildlife movement across the reserve or contamination and management of invasive weed species into the reserve. Biodiversity offsets Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed, poorly sited as they are seldom next to impacted sites, poorly managed, poorly monitored, and are used to justify habitat destruction. Impact on native vegetation and local ecosystems must be avoided if we are to avoid further loss of mature habitat sites and species extinctions. It is well documented Eucalypt trees need to be semi mature > 12 years of age before they can be considered suitable feed trees for Koalas. Offset replanting programs take decades to establish and create sustainable food sources, wildlife homes. Tree hollow dependent Wildlife: Small hollows can take 80 -150 years to form. Medium hollows can take 150 to over 200 years to form. Large/deep hollows are only found in old and overmature trees (deteriorating, dying or dead). Water impacts The wastewater created from the mining activities, and coal mine waste discharges, will increase the physical and chemical changes to Moolarben Creek water quality, including increased salinity, metals, pH and modification of ionic composition, and introduction of potentially toxic levels of zinc and nickel associated with the cumulative effect of the multiple changes to Moolarben Creek. Mining discharge downstream below the contamination point can impact the ecosystem of the Moolarben Creek and Goulburn River. This is reflected by marked ecological degradation of stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic macroinvertebrates can also be adversely affected. The mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek. The creek runs into the Goulburn River and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that relies on tapping into current water table levels. Changes in the ground water table levels are difficult to monitor and can extend far beyond the mining area and stream catchment area. The impact on vegetation communities includes increased water stress, and reduced resilience to extreme weather events caused by climate change. Water stressed trees can also experience increased insect and pathogen attack leading to further tree stress and tree death. Declining tree health and mass tree deaths have been recorded across Australia following changes in water availability, extreme weather events. Tree health symptoms can be missed before tree decline and death begins to occur. By then it can be too late to act. The result is largely irreversible decline with canopy loss, and related environmental impacts including increased storm runoff, increased soil erosion due to a lack of canopy cover, reduced water infiltration into the soil further impacting soil moisture reserves and reducing water table replenishment. Climate Change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. As stated by the Climate Council 'The collective impact on global warming will severely impact the frequency of bush fires and extreme weather events as we move toward 2.6C. Recent Disaster Costs: Following recent disasters (e.g., Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred), the Federal Government has indicated that total costs for national disaster support are expected to reach at least $13.5 billion, with $1.2 billion provisioned in the contingency reserve for future disaster recovery. Long-Term Projection: Without strong action, climate-related damage is projected to cost the Australian economy $8.7 billion annually by 2050. Adaptation Spending: Since 2022, the Federal Government has committed $3.6 billion to adaptation and resilience measures, including the $1 billion Disaster Ready Fund. A report by the Federal Government states the cost of climate related disaster management is $7.1 Billion dollars. As more properties are being impacted or destroyed, more people are being displaced, and more assets become uninsurable. The return in royalties and taxes from expanding this coal mine or any other coal mine will not cover the consequential cost to the community, State and Federal Governments in funding disaster relief efforts coursed by fossil fuel induced climate change. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Regional impacts and jobs To minimize impact to the natural environment and water quality from the existing mining operation the NSW EPA should have increased oversite for ongoing monitoring of wastewater discharge, regular monitoring of creek and river water quality, and ongoing monitoring of the impact on existing flora and fauna from current mining and transport activities. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. The existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Rather than waiting for mining closures to force restructuring, the existing licensing period to 2038 is a proactive opportunity for Government to work with and support increased local business diversity and sustainability, and if required support retraining of new skills to meet new opportunities. |
Merril Hillis
|
ID |
19571 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Campaign |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached file for submission |
|
Attachments |
19571 - Merril Hillis objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 10.18 MB) |
Noni McDevitt
|
ID |
19576 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Campaign |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Objection submission attached as file |
|
Attachments |
19576 - Noni McDevitt objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 9.72 MB) |
Christine Carmichael
|
ID |
19581 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
campaign |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached objection submission |
|
Attachments |
19581 - Christine Carmichael objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 10.07 MB) |
Shirley Lewis
|
ID |
19586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached submission |
|
Attachments |
Shirley Lewis objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 1.29 MB) |
Terry Morgan
|
ID |
19591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2785 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached objection submission |
|
Attachments |
Terry Morgan objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 2.72 MB) |
Merran Maclaren
|
ID |
19596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached objection submission |
|
Attachments |
Merran Maclaren objection Moolarben OC3_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 2.63 MB) |
Marian Lorrison
|
ID |
19671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2063 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country.I am a 65-year-old retired teacher and university tutor who cares passionately about the environment. As such, I am deeply concerned about the effects of global warming on our plant and animal species, not to mention upon humankind. As a grandmother, I hold grave fears for my grandchildren’s future, and the future of our planet. Scientific evidence continually confirms the role of greenhouse gases on rising temperatures, and planet activists urge governments and businesses to limit their production of such. And yet, I have discovered that Yancoal is planning to develop a huge open cut coal mine, which has left me stunned and afraid. Such a development would threaten 23 wildlife species and further endanger an already fragile and beleaguered ecosystem. The planned project: • Poses significant effect on threatened species and habitat destruction, including the clearing of more than 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding activity have been documented, along with habitat used by the Regent Honeyeater and microbats. Biodiversity offsets cannot substitute for habitat that is already sustaining threatened wildlife. • Carries obvious adverse effects to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining planned within 100 metres of the reserve and insufficient assessment of potential noise, blasting, and vibration impacts. • Poses risks to surface water and groundwater, including prolonged groundwater drawdown that could damage Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that serve as vital drought refuges for wildlife. • Will have major climate consequences, with the project expected to generate approximately 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is failing to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Offers limited public benefit, with no clear employment rationale for expanding coal mining in a region prioritising renewable energy development. Given the climate and biodiversity crises, the NSW Government should not approve new or expanded coal developments. The proposal conflicts with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the objectives of the Paris Agreement. I am dismayed that such a project would even be considered today, with everything we know about climate change and the need to put our efforts into renewable energies rather than fossil fuels. I urge the Department of Planning to reconsider and place the interests of the environment and our future above the interests of business. Please reject this proposal. Regards, Marian Lorrison |
Ann-Maree McEwan
|
ID |
19686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project I wish to ask the Independent Planning Commission to reject the Moolareben coal mine OC3 extension. I strongly object to the expansion of this coal mine for the following reasons: The Moolarben mine will operate until at least 2038 without this expansion. Continued extensions to coal mines in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction’s targets under NSW legislation or the Paris Agreement. For this coal mining community this will require a just and equitable transition away from coal mining. The current proposed 675-hectare expansion will clear 480 hectares of habitat of at least 23 threatened species including endangered koalas, regent honeyeaters, micro bats and countless invertebrates that rely on soil and vegetation for survival. Koalas are listed as Endangered under the NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 since may 2022 and the Commonwealth EPBC Act since Feb 2022. Some of koala major threats are land clearing and climate change. The existing koala population is a breeding population and also, I understand chlamydia free so is an important sustainable population. The NSW Koala Strategy (2021-2026) is the NSW government’s primary framework to prevent the extinction of koalas and is relevant in this submission. Pillar 1 is koala habitat conservation with funding of $107.1 million to protect, restore and improve habitat. This key NSW government koala conservation strategy surely outweighs the financial gain to Yancoal Australia Limited of exporting more thermal coal. Mining would come within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This is clearly unworkable environmentally. Coal mining generates significant greenhouse gas emissions which unequivocally cause global warming. The overwhelming driver of these emissions is the combustion of fossil fuels, of which coal is the most emissions intensive. The Open Cut 3 proposed expansion to Moolarben coal mine could produce 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions which is 58% of NSW annual total. One of the key findings of the Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report - Net Zero Commission. 12 December 2025) states: “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” It is judicious to say no to this proposed open cut expansion now rather than approve it and try to manage/ monitor/ reduce greenhouses gas emissions and fugitive emissions, including methane, from the mine in the future. Taking a broader view of the proposed Moolarben mine expansion the Net Zero Commission’s 2024 Annual Report found that: • NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets for 2030 and 2035 • Any increased emissions from the sizeable pipeline of proposed coal project expansions and extensions would require other sectors to make greater reductions for the state to meet its targets. (page ii, Coal Mining Emissions Spotlight Report - Net Zero Commission. 12 December 2025) Thank you, Commissioners, for considering this submission. |
Margaret Key
|
ID |
19691 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Country Women's Association of NSW- Umina Beach |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see the attached submission. |
|
Attachments |
SUB 02 15 2026 SSD-33083358 Moolarben Coal Mine Extension Umina CWA NSW.pdf (PDF, 248.03 KB) |
Sharyn Munro
|
ID |
19706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2444 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Expansion OC3objection I am a 78-year old grandmother and writer, who has been associated with the Mudgee district for decades. I have relatives (the O'Briens) and many good friends there, and have visited often. Having lived in the mountains 90 minutes drive from Singleton, first from the late 1970s for several years and then from 1994 until 2014, I had watched with disbelief and horror what rampant coal mining was allowed to do to the Hunter Valley between Singleton and Muswellbrook, to its communities, rural landuse, environment and water. That experience began my research into the supposed 'rules' around such an overwhelming takeover and destruction of a region for and by one industry, and the contrast between these and the experiences of those in its path. I had naively thought that government was there for the people as well as for developers, and would never have considered myself anti-mining… until I saw the first huge opencut mine at Mt Thorley near Singleton. I began to understand that coalmining was not like it had been in my miner grandfather's day, that giant machinery had now made it possible to make giant holes in the landscape and have giant impacts… and that our governments would allow it. Cumulative impacts were not considered, and 'assessment' became synonymous with 'approval'. This part of the Hunter became a source of boasting by the industry that the 50kms between Singleton and Muswellbrook were all opencut mines; in fact, the scale of this devastation was visible from space. My first book, 'The Woman on the Mountain' (2007, Exisle) was mainly about my self-sufficient solar lifestyle on my mountain Wildlife Refuge, but I had to include my anger and sorrow at the pollution I saw when I came down from the mountain. When I spoke about that book at Mudgee Library in 2009, I said: 'Sadly, I see your future in the Hunter's present. This is not just an environmental issue, but a community one.' I was writing articles for The Owner Builder Magazine (now-defunct), and was seeing and hearing the mounting destruction north of Mudgee, where for a long time only the Ulan mine had been operating. I had written a story on Julia and Colin Imrie's stone cottages by the Goulburn River in 2005, and in the following years several times farm sat for them, once for almost a month, realising first hand what their neighbouring Moolarben mine was like, even at a distance. I had written one on Rob and Lisa Carrol's self-sufficient handbuilt home in 2008, as the Wilpinjong mine impacted them. After the voluble Rob had been driven to sell, and that beautiful home demolished, in the early days of Moolarben's impact, someone wrote on side of the road, 'Rob was right'. My publishers asked me to write a book on what coal was doing elsewhere in Australia, so for two years I travelled to see this for myself. 'Rich Land, Wasteland' (2012, Pan Macmillan/Exisle) was the result. I knew and interviewed Lance and Kate Batey near Wollar, who also suffered health impacts and lost their dream home and land as Wilpinjong expanded. I interviewed Susan Symons and Grayson Tuckwell as the 'new' Moolarben mine got going, noisily and dustily, right next to them. I interviewed residents of the Cumbo Valley, now emptied by Wilpinjong; like the Kattaus, still suffering health damage, and Cathy Pattullo, whose family broke under the strain. I know Bev Smiles at Wollar, who had done so much for the area's regeneration and was then watching it all be destroyed, along with her village and community. I have since met 'coal refugees' from these areas: so many lives and futures ruined by coal. There is no need for this to be continued; serious damage has already been done to the area, but this is no reason to approve more. It must stop. My chapter 5 on the area was called 'Clearing out the country', and that was in 2012 (pp. 123-154, 'Rich Land, Wasteland'.) Yes, Bylong Valley was rescued at last from Kepco's proposed mine, but it was after too long a fight with too much damage. Tarwyn Park there, home of Peter Andrew's Natural Sequence Farming, became the 'Rich Land' for the cover of my book. As Gerry Harvey said, 'The place should be a bloody shrine, not a hole in the ground.' A national treasure now gone… and for what? The Moolarben mine and its expansion plans cannot be considered in isolation, especially in such a cumulatively coal-impacted area, and just because coal exists under an area does not mean it must be mined. It is often quoted that a mine or proposed expansion is needed for the jobs or benefits to the local community, but as the Moolarben mine as it is would continue operating until at least 2038; no jobs are threatened. Plus Mudgee is in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade. Yancoal (a Chinese company) has said that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. It is expected that the demand for Australian thermal coal to China and South Korea especially will decline, so the economic argument does not stand up; any expansion would deliver little economic benefit but impose lasting environmental damage, as I will state. I was proudly shown Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of NSW's oldest conservation reserves, by my Mudgee relatives some years ago. The valley where the proposed expansion would occur should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Reserve! The proposal would clear around 480 ha. of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 m. of the reserve, which is not nearly enough of a buffer. Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer. And yet there has been inadequate assessment of the impacts of noise, blasting, dust and vibration on wildlife. When Moolarben first started, folk living nearby noted the exodus of wildlife onto their property and then the territorial conflicts, resulting in less wildlife. They all need habitat.… we remove that and where do they go? As a nature writer and former owner of a Refuge and Conservation property, I cherish our wildlife. Our flora and fauna are under enough threats already from climate change and I (an ex-RFS member) have seen what bushfires can do to an area, especially now so many small RFS brigades have been removed locally here as communities are wiped out by coal. I am appalled that Yancoal’s proposed expansion might be allowed, as it would cause irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bushland… and we need not consider any offset plans as anything other than a sick joke on nature, which always suffers a net loss. The project would destroy 113 ha of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. Why endanger them, when their numbers, especially in NSW, are so low? The clearing would occur of 80 ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 ha of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The latter has been reduced every time a coal proposal has been approved in this area! The NSW Environment Department has warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival; it would have severe impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broadheaded Snake and microbats. We are in an extinction crisis: there is no justification here for adding to it. Of course, as a grandmother, I am deeply concerned that we must not add to the global warming that has already impacted negatively on my grandchildren's lives and futures.… and on everyone's. Over its life the climate impact of this proposed OC3 extension would be enormous, generating an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, which equals around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. The Net Zero Commission has said that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, yet DPHI’s assessment ignores these and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. Nor does the assessment apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision in the DAMSHEG case, which meant that decision-makers should consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause. Having stayed beside the Goulburn River and walked along it, I am already distressed at the impacts of mining on the once-pristine waterways of this region. A river or a creek is not a drain, and water as a resource must not be underestimated. It is even more precious as the impacts of climate change are felt… far more precious than coal and the private profits from it. A significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, maybe lasting up to 25 years after mining, is expected from this project, placing Moolarben Creek at grave risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. This is a low rainfall area already; the problem is real. I have read that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdowns of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. Yancoal has failed to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and it has a poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements, so the risks are made even greater. Baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after, so Yancoal's proposed 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining is not only inadequate, but it is too late. I began my 'Rich Land, Wasteland' chapter on this region thus: 'Clearing out the country is nothing new in Australia. Although the weapons aren't muskets this time, I see some similarities with the poisoned flour and waterholes.' It must feel like death by a thousand cuts as the First People watch more of their landscapes being destroyed. It hurts us; what must it do to them? If approved, the project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others, all deemed to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 'Irreplaceable' should be understood to mean just that, and respected. It cannot be recreated or rehabilitated. So we should preserve, not destroy, such sites. As I keep saying, there has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines, of Ulan and Wilpinjong. It is one region. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species due to clearing and loss of habitat, and will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. Too much. Unnecessary. Yancoal's proposed amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation, are far too late to be considered, and would still would have severe impacts on biodiversity. I object to the disruption their amendments have caused the public /IPC process. Yancoal could have made these amendments long ago. It reminds me of the 2022 QLD Land Court case I was involved in for The Bimblebox Alliance, where, in the midst of proceedings, Clive Palmer's Waratah Coal suddenly changed their mine plan; all our objections had been based on the original, but the basic premise remained. The judge rejected that mine on the grounds of biodiversity, climate change and human rights. As must happen here. I urge the rejection of this Moolarben OC3 proposal. It has no justification for approval but plenty for rejection. Thank you. |
Lyn Bevington
|
ID |
19766 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Blue Mountains People for Reconciliation |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project No: SSD-33083358 I am writing on behalf of Blue Mountains People for Reconciliation to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben UC3 coal mine expansion SSD-33083358 near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. We are concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to cultural heritage, the environment and the climate. We believe that this project should not be approved. We believe that · The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted - this is not acceptable. · This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of the whole conservation landscape with Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It should NOT be an open cut coal mine. · The area is very important for biodiversity and includes 23 threatened wildlife species, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the koala in a uniquely resilient population. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the koala population. · The proposed mine will destroy habitat for threatened wildlife including Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. · The mine will clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. · DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. This project should not be approved. Yours sincerely Lyn Bevington Convenor BM People for Reconciliation |
|
Attachments |
19766 - Lyn Bevington_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 127.27 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached file for full submission |
|
Attachments |
19796_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 450.11 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached document for full submission |
|
Attachments |
19801 - Dawn Hart.pdf (PDF, 441.58 KB) |
Derek Williams
|
ID |
19806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my OBJECTION to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Expansion of this Yancoal’s Moolarben open cut coal mine will impact the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. One of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population and considered an umbrella species. Koalas The NSW Government committed to stopping the decline of Koalas in NSW. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species,’ and that this is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider, and clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, that are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The mining company refused to accept the department agency recommendation for a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species. The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing and impact on native vegetation and the 500m buffer does not take into consideration wildlife movement across the reserve or contamination and management of invasive weed species into the reserve. Biodiversity offsets Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed, poorly sited as they are seldom next to impacted sites, poorly managed, poorly monitored, and are used to justify habitat destruction. Impact on native vegetation and local ecosystems must be avoided if we are to avoid further loss of mature habitat sites and species extinctions. It is well documented Eucalypt trees need to be semi mature > 12 years of age before they can be considered suitable feed trees for Koalas. Offset replanting programs take decades to establish and create sustainable food sources, wildlife homes. Tree hollow dependent Wildlife: Small hollows can take 80 -150 years to form. Medium hollows can take 150 to over 200 years to form. Large/deep hollows are only found in old and overmature trees (deteriorating, dying or dead). Water impacts The wastewater created from the mining activities, and coal mine waste discharges, will increase the physical and chemical changes to Moolarben Creek water quality, including increased salinity, metals, pH and modification of ionic composition, and introduction of potentially toxic levels of zinc and nickel associated with the cumulative effect of the multiple changes to Moolarben Creek. Mining discharge downstream below the contamination point can impact the ecosystem of the Moolarben Creek and Goulburn River. This is reflected by marked ecological degradation of stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic macroinvertebrates can also be adversely affected. The mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek. The creek runs into the Goulburn River and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that relies on tapping into current water table levels. Changes in the ground water table levels are difficult to monitor and can extend far beyond the mining area and stream catchment area. The impact on vegetation communities includes increased water stress, and reduced resilience to extreme weather events caused by climate change. Water stressed trees can also experience increased insect and pathogen attack leading to further tree stress and tree death. Declining tree health and mass tree deaths have been recorded across Australia following changes in water availability, extreme weather events. Tree health symptoms can be missed before tree decline and death begins to occur. By then it can be too late to act. The result is largely irreversible decline with canopy loss, and related environmental impacts including increased storm runoff, increased soil erosion due to a lack of canopy cover, reduced water infiltration into the soil further impacting soil moisture reserves and reducing water table replenishment. Climate Change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. As stated by the Climate Council 'The collective impact on global warming will severely impact the frequency of bush fires and extreme weather events as we move toward 2.6C. Recent Disaster Costs: Following recent disasters (e.g., Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred), the Federal Government has indicated that total costs for national disaster support are expected to reach at least $13.5 billion, with $1.2 billion provisioned in the contingency reserve for future disaster recovery. Long-Term Projection: Without strong action, climate-related damage is projected to cost the Australian economy $8.7 billion annually by 2050. Adaptation Spending: Since 2022, the Federal Government has committed $3.6 billion to adaptation and resilience measures, including the $1 billion Disaster Ready Fund. A report by the Federal Government states the cost of climate related disaster management is $7.1 Billion dollars. As more properties are being impacted or destroyed, more people are being displaced, and more assets become uninsurable. The return in royalties and taxes from expanding this coal mine or any other coal mine will not cover the consequential cost to the community, State and Federal Governments in funding disaster relief efforts coursed by fossil fuel induced climate change. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Regional impacts and jobs To minimize impact to the natural environment and water quality from the existing mining operation the NSW EPA should have increased oversite for ongoing monitoring of wastewater discharge, regular monitoring of creek and river water quality, and ongoing monitoring of the impact on existing flora and fauna from current mining and transport activities. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. The existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Rather than waiting for mining closures to force restructuring, the existing licensing period to 2038 is a proactive opportunity for Government to work with and support increased local business diversity and sustainability, and if required support retraining of new skills to meet new opportunities. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community. • 113 hectares of koala habitat would be cleared, including areas where breeding has been recorded. • Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat would be destroyed. • Mining proposed within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts on the nature reserve. • Long-term groundwater drawdown risks harming Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that act as critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions. • NSW is already not on track to meet legislated emissions reduction targets. • No clear public benefit or strong jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region prioritising renewable energy. • Inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. • Proposed changes do not reduce the mine’s footprint — they only reclassify vegetation areas for “habitat enhancement”. • The amendment does not reduce direct or indirect impacts on threatened wildlife and ecosystems. • Disrupts the community consultation process already underway. • Call for the Independent Planning Commission to refuse approval of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. |
Jeanette Hunter
|
ID |
20286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I, Jeanette Hunter of (redacted) NSW 2299 am making a submission objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project Number SSD - 33083358. It should not go ahead because of environmental, climate, community and cultural reasons. In the short and long term the impact on threatened species, habitat, water, emissions are deeply concerning and potentially irreversible. The project will also destroy 55 cultural artefacts including 2 shelters. The expansion would also threaten the health and wellbeing of local communities. All up, just an appalling idea at a time when we are facing an existential threat from climate change." Contact: (redacted) Sent from my iPhone |
Dr Roy Tasker
|
ID |
20291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find attached my submission against the Moolarben Coal Mine extension. Please submit it where it will have most impact. Sincerely Roy |
|
Attachments |
Submission on the Moolarben Coal Mine v2.pdf (PDF, 91.1 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the Independent Planning Commission re the Moolarben OC3 Coalmine expansion I call upon the NSW Independent Planning Commission to reject this proposed expansion for the following reasons: 1. The proposed expansion would clear habitat that is critical for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. At a recent presentation on the Regent Honeyeater, I learned that the area in which this beautiful bird breeds has shrunk dangerously over the last few years, and it is not fully understood why this shrinkage has occurred. Given this, I think it becomes more important than ever to protect any areas in which it does still breed. Conservation efforts cannot succeed if critical habitat is destroyed. No biodiversity offset can replace this critical habitat. The impact on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, koalas and microbats has been acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. I suspect that this proposed expansion would be likely to lead to the complete extinction of the Regent Honeyeater as there are only an estimated 250 to 300 birds remaining in the wild. Yancoal has reportedly refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This reaction shows a complete disregard for our precious wildlife and critical habitat in the name of short term economic gain, and strongly supports an equal and opposite position being taken by the Independent Planning Commission. 2. DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. With recent reports of China and India fast tracking renewables because they are cheaper, and with our own renewables now for the first time being able to supply over 50% of household energy over lengthy periods, the writing is on the wall for coal. It would be positively criminal to approve this expansion, wreak havoc on the natural and social environment of the area, only to find that there is no market for coal beyond the current approval limit of 2038. That would amount to short sighted vandalism of a most extreme variety. 3. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. In contrast, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 4. The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdowns. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining. This is inadequate - baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. Please do not be taken in by Yancoal’s attempt to thwart due process with its cynical, last minute minor amendments that constitute nothing more than a transparent greenwashing manoeuvre. I believe that the Department of Planning should reject these amendments because they do not reduce the mine footprint, lessen vegetation clearing, or protect threatened species, cultural heritage or our performance on emissions. The hearing should not have been postponed and the minor amendments should not be taken seriously. 5. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. There can be no reconciliation while mining interests are allowed to destroy Aboriginal cultural heritage. If this expansion is approved I would suggest that we have learned nothing from the 2020 destruction of 46,000-year-old Juukan Gorge rock shelters by Rio Tinto in Western Australia. There continue to be systemic failures in protecting Aboriginal cultural heritage. I implore you to consider Wiradjuri cultural heritage and firmly reject this proposed expansion. 6. There is a grave danger in considering each expansion proposal in isolation. There has not been an adequate assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. Combined, these proposed expansions threaten critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, totally unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. For the reasons listed above, I believe that this area belongs in a protected nature reserve, and must not be destroyed by the expansion of an open-cut coal mine. This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, so that the koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats have a safe place to live and breed, our precious water resources are protected, and Wiradjuri cultural heritage is preserved. Coal mining is a dying industry and this fact should be recognised by rejecting this and other similar expansionist projects which simply fuel climate change. We as a society will live to regret the wanton destruction of our environmental heritage if we do not recognise this in time. Elaine West Greens Councillor Bathurst Regional Council Bathurst NSW 2795 The views expressed above are my personal views and do not necessarily represent the position of Bathurst Regional Council. Bathurst Regional Council notes that this matter is outside its council area and has not been discussed by Council. |
Graeme Tychsen
|
ID |
19261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2283 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Decisionmaker, The atmosphere in terms of heat holding greenhouse gases, is now bursting at the seams, 50 per cent above the level when industrial powering by fossils began. miniscule amount so potent that without their then 280ppm, now over 420, Earth would be minus 18, rather than the 15, when the industrial use began. The International Energy Agency, a real heavyweight, warned more than five years ago warnings are not optional - there was no room for expansion in any shape or form, whatsoever. Emissions are still rising, confounded by the terrible clearing of vegetation., not least Australia and the Amazon. Worse still all fossil activity from exploration drilling to end use leaks massive methane, up to 80 times more potent than CO2, from burning. These are incontrovertible, far more than chilling, facts. To see, since 2000, the fabled temperate climate and mild summers of coastal south east Australia, the otherwise most arid inhabited continent, is a powerful canary of looming and powerful upheaval. The growing chronic dryness of this region - the term wildfires is not apt- rather worsening blast furnaces. Actions making it worse, and not getting it right, for so long, show we do not know what we are doing. Humankind's say in the matter, though the cause, per the best science advice, has really dwindled. |
Graeme Tychsen
|
ID |
19266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2283 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Decisionmaker, The atmosphere in terms of heat holding greenhouse gases, is now bursting at the seams, 50 per cent above the level when industrial powering by fossils began. miniscule amount so potent that without their then 280ppm, now over 420, Earth would be minus 18, rather than the 15, when the industrial use began. The International Energy Agency, a real heavyweight, warned more than five years ago warnings are not optional - there was no room for expansion in any shape or form, whatsoever. Emissions are still rising, confounded by the terrible clearing of vegetation., not least Australia and the Amazon. Worse still all fossil activity from exploration drilling to end use leaks massive methane, up to 80 times more potent than CO2, from burning. These are incontrovertible, far more than chilling, facts. To see, since 2000, the fabled temperate climate and mild summers of coastal south east Australia, the otherwise most arid inhabited continent, is a powerful canary of looming and powerful upheaval. The growing chronic dryness of this region - the term wildfires is not apt- rather worsening blast furnaces. Actions making it worse, and not getting it right, for so long, show we do not know what we are doing. Humankind's say in the matter, though the cause, per the best science advice, has really dwindled. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project, located near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project should not be approved because the environmental, climate, water, biodiversity, cultural and community harms it would cause are unacceptable, irreversible or fundamentally inconsistent with the public interest. 1. Environmental and Biodiversity Impacts: Threatened Species and Habitat Loss The expansion will result in the clearing of 480 hectares of native vegetation, including habitat that has been identified as critical to the survival of a resilient local koala population where koalas and breeding activity have been recorded within the mine footprint. Koalas in this area have been described by the NSW Government’s biodiversity agency as a climate-robust population that has survived recent temperature increases, drought and bushfires, and yet this expansion would destroy habitat that is vital for their survival. Clearance is also likely to significantly degrade habitat for multiple other threatened species, including: - Regent Honeyeater (critically endangered) - Large-eared Pied Bat - Eastern Cave Bat - Broad-headed Snake - Squirrel Glider - Box-Gum Woodland (nationally endangered ecological community) The Department of Planning’s own agency acknowledged the risk to these species and their habitats, but the assessment has not adequately avoided, minimised or mitigated these impacts. Biodiversity offsets cannot replace habitat that is already supporting threatened wildlife, and such destruction fundamentally undermines NSW’s obligations under its own biodiversity strategy and conservation laws. 2. Threat to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve This proposal would extend open cut operations to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. Mining activity this close to the reserve’s boundary introduces serious risks: - noise, vibration and blasting impacts on sensitive wildlife - fragmentation of connected habitat networks - undermining the integrity of a conservation landscape that should be protected rather than encroached upon - loss of opportunities to manage this entire valley as part of a unified conservation area 3. Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Moolarben OC3 extension will contribute an estimated 64+ million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its lifecycle — equivalent to roughly 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions from all sources. Approving new or extended coal mining projects at a time when: - NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the Paris Agreement temperature goals require a rapid phase-down of coal, independent assessments (e.g. the NSW Net Zero Commission) have confirmed that further coal expansions are not consistent with a safe climate, would seriously undermine climate policy, state planning principles and global commitments. Importantly, the economic impacts of downstream greenhouse emissions, including from exported coal that is burned overseas, have not been properly quantified in the project assessment despite clear legal precedent requiring such analysis. 4. Water, Groundwater and Ecosystem Health The OC3 extension is likely to cause significant impacts on water and groundwater resources, including: - drawdown of alluvial groundwater levels by up to ~5 metres for many years, threatening ecosystems dependent on baseflows; - adverse effects on Moolarben Creek and the Goulburn River system, which provide critical water for wildlife - esp during drought periods; - insufficient baseline water monitoring by the proponent and ongoing failures elsewhere to monitor water impacts to required standards. Water is foundational to the health of the broader environment, agricultural communities and regional economies. Projects that risk long-term depletion or degradation of water systems should not proceed without robust science, transparent monitoring and an enforceable protection framework, none of which have been demonstrated here. 5. Cultural Heritage and Wiradjuri Country The project footprint overlaps with sites of cultural heritage significance. According to documentation on the project, there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites directly impacted and a further 12 potentially indirectly affected. This expansion will damage cultural landscapes and artefacts of importance to the Wiradjuri people. The protection of First Nations heritage and cultural landscapes is a matter of both legal and moral obligation in the planning system. 6. Community and Social Impacts Communities in and around Mudgee, Wollar and the broader region have endured decades of cumulative mining impacts, including noise, dust, water stress and disruptions to rural life. Submitting this project for approval without adequately weighing these lived impacts risks further social harm. The claimed economic benefits (particularly job creation) have not been reliably demonstrated, and the region is poised for renewable energy investment and job opportunities through the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, which is projected to generate thousands of clean jobs over the next decade. 7. Cumulative Impacts and Planning Integrity The OC3 extension must not be considered in isolation. Other coal mines in the Mudgee region (e.g., Ulan, Wilpinjong) have proposed expansions with significant environmental footprints. An assessment that ignores cumulative impacts on biodiversity, water systems, cultural heritage, and climate fails to meet the rigorous standards required for major projects. Conclusion For all of the reasons outlined above, and supported by scientific, legal and planning evidence, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Approving this project would lock in decades of additional emissions, destroy critical habitat for threatened species, degrade water systems, undermine cultural heritage and contradict state and national climate commitments. Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission. Yours sincerely, Concerned Earth Citizen |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object strongly to the extension of the Moolarben coal mine, for a number of reasons: *Coal and greenhouse gas emissions The amount of coal-fired generation electricity continues to fall nationwide, so investing any money or resources into this technology is a complete waste. It will simply end up costing our country in the race to become a worldwide renewable energy 'centre of excellence'. The Clean Energy Council's 2025 report noted that the amount of coal-fired generation in Australia’s electricity system fell 52 per cent - more than halved! - in 2024, down from 52.7 per cent in 2023. This compares to growth in both wind and solar electricity generation, so why approve a project that will do damage in the long term. The NSW Net Zero Commission stated in their December 2025 Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. I am also concerned at the approval process, where each request is considered in isolation. The impacts of this proposal needs to be considered along with other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region, such as the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines, which also have major expansions proposed. These alone are enough to not approve the mine extension. *Water resources The project will also lead to a water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which runs into the Goulburn River. Consequently this represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that use that water. Yancoal has a very poor history within the mine complex, and has failed badly in conducting the required ongoing water monitoring. The baseline to be set for monitoring of water needs to be scrutinised thoroughly. *Biodiversity The mine site is within the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem, and clearing over 400 hectares will cause serious harm to a number of flora including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, and Squirrel Glider. |
Anne McKenzie
|
ID |
19331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this mine extension on the following grounds: Our CO2 budget is empty - we need to stop our CO2 emissions and stop exporting them overseas (wherever they are emitted the whole planet is affected). Quality of life for communities need to be considered - lights and noise 24/7 - I don't think so. Community cohesion - small communities (such as Woolah) have been decimated - schools and shops closed, Clearing land of ever diminishing habitat and vital corridors will result in more stress on already depleted biodiversity of the area Water is gold in Australia and unfortunately mining uses far more than their share and they also return it to our drinking catchments high in heavy metals and contaminants. The world is shifting away from fossil fuels as an energy source. Profit of the few should never override the health of this one planet that we have. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2285 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am a grandmother, environmental educator, and avid bushwalker. I am deeply concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, biodiversity, climate and local community, and should not be approved. This highly biodiverse area should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and afforded permanent protection. While Yancoal has proposed amendments to the project, these amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation, do not meaningfully address the project’s impacts on biodiversity, and have been submitted far too late in the assessment process to be properly considered. Even with these changes, the proposal would still result in severe and unacceptable impacts on threatened species and ecological communities. In particular, I am concerned about the following: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of more than 113 hectares of confirmed koala habitat where koalas and breeding activity have been recorded, as well as habitat for the Regent Honeyeater and microbats. The proposed amendments do not reduce this clearing. No biodiversity offset can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve boundary. The assessment of noise, blasting, vibration and edge effects remains inadequate, and poses serious risks to the ecological integrity of the reserve. • Water and groundwater impacts, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could damage Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that act as critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project estimated to produce an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when New South Wales is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear or compelling jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development and sustainable industries are being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the objectives of the Biodiversity Conservation Act, and Australia’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Billie Ayling
|
ID |
19401 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Action Burwood Canada Bay |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2132 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I and my family, though city based, love this area of NSW and visit sometimes on holidays. We are familiar with the birdlife and the range of marsupial animals that live there. The vegetation is botanically interesting and beautiful. For me, the adjacent nature reserve is not just a holiday destination, but a peaceful place and an ancient place of renewal. Any further destruction of the site that is proposed for the open cut mine is an anathema to us. The site may produce coal and be viable for 20 years or so, but the site will never be returned to its natural state. Yet the demand for Australian coal is already declining internationally and indeed, South Korea (where the company headquarters are based) has committed to phase out its coal fired power stations by 2040. Why destroy such important and ancient habitat for a short term financial gain? I am concerned about the level of damage (lowering of the water table and pollutants) to the local creek and ultimately to the Goulburn river that will occur. The state of our inland rivers, as you would know too hell, is appalling and very sad. This is another place in NSW that has been used for the millenia by Aboriginal people. Today when we hear of the failures in the Close the Gap targets, I wonder why we don't protect places like this, where urban Aboriginal people can go, to recuperate and connect to their cultural past. Surely this would help in some way to reach those targets. The final point of concern is the Greenhouse Gas Emissions associated with this expansion. Of course most of these emissions will be Scope 3 - and it is argued that these aren't our concern, but what requirements would there be for the company to use only renewable energy to abate its Scope 1 and 2 emissions? None I suspect. The company may buy some offsets for use in land the company owns and the eventual sale price of that land when they sell, will be higher as a result, but that land will not be permanently protected. The NSW Net Zero Commission has advised that coal mine expansion is not consistent with NSW Climate Targets. Why then should this mine expansion be approved? Thank you. |
Simon Salter
|
ID |
19411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My Name is Simon from Katooomba. I am constantly taken aback by the inconsistency in the NSW Labor governments’ words on their commitment to reducing green house gas emissions which affect climate change, and their words on protecting biodiversity, and their actions. If the governments’ words meany anything this, and future coal mine expansions, should not be approved. Furthermore, Yancoals’ profits should be taxed at 78% , like Norway does, and the tax revenue invested in the community of Mudgee and surrounds to enable the community to transition away from the coal industry towards renewable energy jobs. My key points are: 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems Yancoal’s proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, including in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad- headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This incredibly rich valley should never be up for mining and should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 3. A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, making its climate impact enormous. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement, and fails to acknowledge that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. 4. The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the forecasted decline in Australian thermal coal demand to China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Clearly, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its costs far greater than any claimed public benefit. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. 6. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, and potentially impact dozens of others. They are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This expansion contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, undermining the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice culture, maintain connection to Country, and preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 7. The cumulative impact There has been poor assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat.The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values |
Warren Adams
|
ID |
19416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2779 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I an concerned that Australia is not meeting its objectives in relation to greenhouse gas emissions. Granting further expansion of coal mines and the destruction of native fauna and fauna and the destruction of aboriginal sites should not go ahead. We need to leave a legacy of protection ean air and first nations culture into the future. As such I oppose the expansion of the coal mining. |
Daniel Rooney
|
ID |
19421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m deeply troubled by the proposed expansion of The Moolarben Coal Mine. My primary concern is the impact on the biodiversity of the local region. The impact on endangered species such as the Regent Honey Eater (whose numbers are well below 300 remaining in the wild) would be irreversible and potentially catastrophic. The local koala population, a deeply symbolically important species for the people of this country, whose habitat and numbers have already been massively reduced by human activity, would be displaced with little prospect for successful rehabilitation elsewhere. I was born in this state, I live only a couple of hours away. I cannot allow this expansion to go ahead without raising my voice in abject opposition. |
Jocelyn Williams
|
ID |
19426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2785 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to lodge an objection to the proposed extension. I used to live in Mudgee and am well aware of the biodiversity of the area that will be impacted by any extension/expansion of the coalmine. The extension will clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Reserve (the 2nd oldest reserve in Australia). Munghorn Gap has at least 23 threatened species and includes critical habitation for the koala population. The population in Munghorn Gap is one of the chlamydia-free populations and therefore needs to be protected. The reserve will not only be impacted by loss of habitat, but also by the constant noise from the mine. The mine will also impact on the Goulburn River and local creeks which are so important for the local biodiversity. Once an area is impacted by a mine, it is gone forever. We need to look at renewables as our future, not the damage that coalmining does. We are a smart country, so let's show how things can be done differently, more humanely and in a way that impacts on our people, native animals and nature less. I am fervently opposed to this extension. Mudgee is a beautiful flourishing town. Wollar is a beautiful small village. There is so much opposition in the local area and further afield. I am not someone who usually attends protests, but I certainly would to stop this mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I love in th [redacted], work as a professional in the Sustainability space, an economist and understand and am.deeoly concerned about the impacts of expanding this mine. The impacts of this money on the local and distant environment are very large and irriversable. Eg the loss habitat and threatened species, the impact on river, creeks and groundwater and the associated ghg emissions. Amy proper economic analysis would include these costs and there and demonstrate thos expansion should not go ahead. The proposed mitigation is woefully inadequate and tokenistic. Thank you for considering my submission |
Laurie Strathdee
|
ID |
19436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2783 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the extension of the Moolarben Coal mine. The area where the extension is planned has great biodiversity, with koalas, regent honeyeaters and many other special animals. It deserves to be included in the Nature Reserve not to become a big pit. The extension will also adversely affect the water resources in the area. Likely to cause more pollution of streams and absorb most of the areas water during a drought. Climate Change is happening now. The UN has said that we cannot open or extend any coal mines or gas fields. The Paris Agreement committed countries to reduce their carbon emissions to keep warming below 1.5 degrees. Australia is working to reduce our own emissions. But by continuing to export coal we are pushing more carbon into the atmosphere and reducing the likelihood of keeping warming below the target. Stopping this extension will reduce the availability of Australian coal and increase the cost of coal worldwide. This will hasten the transition to renewables in other countries while increasing the value of the reduced amount of coal exported. Please do not extend this mine. The local community, the local biodiversity and the whole world will be damaged by it. Laurie Strathdee |
Nat Cheney
|
ID |
19441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project creates a direct conflict with our legislated emission goals. We must align our actions with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 to ensure a consistent path toward our targets. True economic progress lies in shifting our focus to the industries of the future. By redirecting our resources into emerging sectors, we secure long-term stability and create sustainable employment opportunities that will thrive for decades. Preserving our established ecosystems is a vital priority. These complex environments represent a unique heritage that remains fundamentally irreplaceable. Choosing to protect these habitats ensures the survival of threatened species and maintains the integrity of our natural landscapes for future generations. Rejecting this extension is a proactive step toward a restoration-based economy. It represents the most effective investment in our state's environmental health and long-term financial prosperity. Please refuse this project. |
Cath Jackson
|
ID |
19446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion of the Moolarben mine for the following reasons: - coal is being phased out worldwide - why do we plough on oblivious to this trend - coal is the single largest contributing factor in climate change and Moolarben contributes 10% of Australia's exports. It is not something to be proud of. - mines disrupt cohesive communities - workers in mines must be retrained with new skills suitable for a world that is moving away from fossil fuels - ie in renewable energies - the expansion of this mine will destroy pristine healthy reserves teeming with wildlife including endangered species such as the regent honeyeater - the expansion of this mine will destroy 55 indigenous sites - the expansion of this mine will drain the Goulburn river in an area that is prone to drought and bushfires - the mine already causes much damage to the local environment & animals with the trucks, dust, blasting and night lights. An expansion will only exacerbate this situation. |
Judith Finch
|
ID |
19451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned about this mine progressing to a further stage for a number of reasons. I think the application should be rejected. There will be a significant negative impact locally on the environment – on threatened species such as koalas, bats, birdlife such as honeyeaters as well as degradation to land within the site and in the near environs. It is clear that water from the Goulburn River is depleting the water and that in times of water shortage, the needs of the mine will take precedence over the animal population that depends on water for survival and river’s own health. I hear that already the water downstream is already impacted and an extension to the mine can only exacerbate a situation that there has been a failure to address. We know that the existing mine with the purchase of land that was previously the home to farmers, creating community and connection has created massive disruptions to community and livelihood in the local area. Further expansion can only exacerbate the disconnection that has occurred in the neighbouring community. There is a broader issue here that needs attention. In order to meet climate targets, we need to be moving away from coal as a source of energy. It seems contrary to logic and policy to be approving extensions to mining at this important juncture in addressing climate change. This particular extension should not be approved for its own sake and also for the vitally important message that a rejection will give to mining ventures in Australia. Australia sells its coal and it then creates climate disasters in other countries. We need to act as global citizens where we actively take better care of climate change and disastrous climate events across the globe. |
Mary Waterford
|
ID |
19456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2782 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write this submission against the proposal to extend the Moolarben Coal Mine. I am very concerned about the expansion of coal mining when evidence is so strong that the impact of coal mining is having devastating impacts across the world. The statistics are easily available and compelling. Coal contributes hugely to climate change and environmental destruction in Australia. Additionally, the impact of climate change is felt significantly more in those countries who are not contributing to it. Populations are being devastated by fires, floods & extreme heat across our planet. We cannot afford to ignore it. It makes no sense economically, socially, environmentally or in planning for our future. It is irresponsible that leaders of today are ignoring the scientific evidence that demonstrates clearly that we must reduce emissions. It is irresponsible that future generations should be left with the mess of greed of business & political opportunism. It is unethical that business should ignore the impact of on water, animals and plant life. We must have a maturity in decision making, acting a global citizens . |
Yelena Bide
|
ID |
19466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the IPC, I'm Yelena, a Blue Mountains local who is deeply concerned about the continuous expansion of coal in NSW. We're at a stage where the effects of the climate crisis are obvious to see and it's unbelievable the state government is not taking more serious action to stop the crisis, but is prioritising profit over people and planet. I'm writing to strongly object to the proposed coal mine expansion. It's unbelievable that in this current climate crisis, an expansion of this massive coal mine is even being considered and that communities have to spend so much time and energy organising to oppose something that it should be abundantly clear to all involved makes no sense for climate, people, animals, or aboriginal justice -- for anyone expect for the massive coal corporations who've already ruined so mich fo this country's land. . Firstly, NSW Net Zero Commission stated in the recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. That in of itself should be enough for this project to be opposed immediately. When we then consider that it borders a nature reserve and is an area with deep importance for biodiversity, Aboriginal Cultural Heritage, and affecting water resources, the facts are abundantly clear! It is not possible, in good consciousness, to approve this expansion. Please reject it! In terms of biodiversity, this project would threaten already endangered wildlife like the precious and rare Regent Honeyeater and bats like the Large-eared Pied Bat and the Eastern Cave Bat. It will also clear 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. In terms of cultural heritage, 55 cultural artefacts, will be affected. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. How can profit be prioritized over cultural heritage? It was also an absolute miscarriage of justice that the hearing was postponed indefinitely. How did this happen? It's clear the proposed changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine but plan to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. We've seen that approach fail time and again. This is a mockery of the community consultation process. Consider the facts, consider your conscience, consider the future generations and please reject this submission! Thank you for your consideration. Yelena Katoomba, NSW, 2780 |
Susan Ambler
|
ID |
19471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to strenuously object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. There are many reasons for my objection listed below. I live nearby in the Blue Mountains and have visited the Mudgee area and Goulburn River National Park many times. I have seen the damage that is being done to the rivers near this mine. Any expansion of this mine will cause greater use of and damage to local water sources. This has a detrimental effect on the production of food for our country, and on the protection of biodiversity for our future and future generations. We are already seeing the effects of climate change in our area, wild fires and even floods that cause fatal and damaging landslides. Allowing an expansion of this mine will increase climate change producing gases in both the extraction and the use of the coal both here and overseas. These effects must be taken into account. This expansion takes in areas where an incredibly resilient community of koalas make their home. It is not possible to protect these koalas by moving them even if this were to actually be undertaken. There are also communities of extremely endangered Regent Honeyeaters and other endangered species. I have been involved in planting trees to attempt to save these birds and I understand how fragile their survival chances are. This expansion will also abut Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and cause light and sound pollution which devastates animal and insect communities. This is not appropriate development. The community of Wollar, and surrounding areas, have been devastated by this mine already, they do not need further destruction and damage to air, water and liveability. This expansion will also destroy at least 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts and potentially impact many more. It is not needed by the community for jobs or income, in fact the local communities will gain nothing and lose untold resources. This expansion should not go ahead due to the massive environmental, social, cultural and future climate change impacts that it will cause. Please refuse this mine expansion project. Thank you, Susan Ambler |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion of this coal mine on the basis of its local impacts on threatened species habitat both on site and adjacent, its impact on water quality and quantity and its ongoing impacts on the local community through dust and noise. Further expansion of col mines, particularly for export directly contradict or state and national commitments to reduce emissions. The focus for development and investment locally should be on renewable energy that reduces our biodiversity and climate impacts, |
Lesley Sammon
|
ID |
19481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed mine expansion on these grounds We are in a climate emergency and this will contribute to more CO2 emissions. This contradicts NSW climate goals. 23 threatened species including koalas will be terribly impacted by this expansion - habitat can never be fully rehabilitated after clearing. Regent honeyeaters are critically rare and more of their habitat will be destroyed. Munghorn Gap nature reserve will be adversely impacted. Ground water is being extracted and polluted already and this expansion will exacerbate this problem badly impacting the environments downstream and drinking water will be further contaminated with heavy metals. Goulburn river and Moolarben creek will be at serious risk of of drought threatening habitat and wildlife. Community members will be badly impacted by 24/7 lights, noise and their community will be decimated. This expansion will particularly adversely impact the community of Woolah. Wiradjuri cultural heritage will be destroyed - This is not acceptable. Please refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission Sincerely Lesley Sammon |
Patrick Vu
|
ID |
19486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Patrick Vu and I'm a 35 year-old living in the Blue Mountains, NSW. I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed development to extend the Moorlarben coal mine. This extension will cause inevitable and irreversible damage to land, threaten local species (including endangered species), and cause further harm the surrounding community. The profits of multinational corporations should not be prioritised over land and community. The area should be a protected nature reserve. It should not destroyed beyond recognition by open-cut coal mining. Moreover, approving an extension to NSW's largest existing theramal coal mine is in direct contradiction to NSW climate goals. Doing so would provide the people of NSW with evidence that state government is not serious about meeting its stated climate goals, and undermine trust in the political process. Lastly, I would like to express my dismay at Yancoal's strategic disruption of community consultation with last-minute amendments. It reflects bad faith on their part. The amendments do not reduce clearing of native vegetation and the proposal will still have severe impact on biodiversity. I urge the ICP to recommend that the Moorlarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Sincerly, Patrick Vu Katoomba NSW 2780 |
Warren Adams
|
ID |
19491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2779 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I an concerned that Australia is not meeting its objectives in relation to greenhouse gas emissions. Granting further expansion of coal mines and the destruction of native fauna and fauna and the destruction of aboriginal sites should not go ahead. We need to leave a legacy of protection ean air and first nations culture into the future. As such I oppose the expansion of the coal mining. |
Kerry Cooke
|
ID |
19526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Kerry Cooke. I am a 76-year-old retiree residing in the Blue Mountains, New South Wales. I write to formally object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 open cut coal mine expansion by Yancoal Australia Ltd, located near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This proposal presents unacceptable and irreversible risks to threatened species, groundwater systems, a protected nature reserve, and the global climate. I urge the Commission to refuse consent to this development. 1. Loss of Threatened Species Habitat The proposed development would require clearing approximately 113 hectares of koala habitat. This is not simply a loss of vegetation — it is the destruction of habitat that is actively and currently supporting threatened species populations. I am deeply concerned that the Environmental Impact Statement appears to treat biodiversity offsets as an adequate response to this loss. They are not. Offsets cannot replicate the ecological function, species composition, or resilience of habitat that has developed over decades or centuries. Where threatened species are present and dependent on specific habitat, destruction of that habitat causes direct, irreversible harm that cannot be “offset” elsewhere. The koala is listed as Endangered under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (NSW) and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). Approving the clearance of 113 hectares of occupied habitat would be inconsistent with the obligations imposed under both pieces of legislation. 2. Unacceptable Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve The proposed mining footprint extends to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This proximity raises serious concerns about the ongoing viability of the Reserve as a protected area. Mining operations generate persistent noise, blasting, and ground vibration. At such close proximity, these impacts would: • Disrupt the behaviour, breeding, and movement of wildlife within the Reserve; • Degrade the ecological integrity of a formally protected area; and • Undermine the purpose for which the Reserve was created and is managed. Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve supports regionally significant biodiversity and was gazetted specifically to provide long-term habitat protection. Permitting a major industrial operation to operate at its boundary fundamentally contradicts that purpose. I submit that this proximity alone should weigh heavily against consent. 3. Risks to Water Resources and Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems The proposal carries significant risks to surface water and groundwater systems in the region. Of particular concern is the predicted long-term drawdown of groundwater levels, which threatens to: • Reduce base flows in Moolarben Creek and connected waterways; • Damage groundwater-dependent ecosystems, including vegetation communities and springs that rely on stable groundwater access; and • Destroy critical drought refuges for native wildlife during dry periods. In the context of a changing climate — where droughts in south-east Australia are projected to become more frequent, longer, and more severe — drought refuges are not peripheral ecological features. They are the sites from which wildlife populations recover and from which landscape-scale recovery becomes possible. Their loss would have cascading and long-term consequences for biodiversity across a wide area. Groundwater drawdown caused by open cut mining can persist for decades after operations cease. The decision-maker must therefore assess not only the impacts during the mine’s operational life, but the long-term legacy impacts on water resources well beyond mine closure. 4. Climate Change and Carbon Emissions Approving new or expanded coal extraction in 2026 is incompatible with Australia’s obligations under the Paris Agreement and its commitments to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Every additional tonne of coal extracted and combusted contributes to cumulative global greenhouse gas emissions that drive the climate change already causing irreversible harm to ecosystems, communities, and economies in Australia and internationally. The consent authority is required to consider the public interest, including the broader environmental and social costs of approving this development. The ongoing expansion of thermal coal mining is contrary to the public interest at both a domestic and global level. I submit that the climate impacts of this proposal constitute an independent and sufficient ground for refusal. Conclusion Taken together, the impacts of the proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion are cumulative, irreversible, and disproportionate to any economic benefit. The harm to threatened species, a protected nature reserve, groundwater systems, and the global climate cannot be adequately mitigated or offset. I respectfully urge the Commission to refuse this development application. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2319 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed mine expansion on the grounds of the irreversible damage it will cause to the local environment. Many endangered animals and plants rely on the box gum woodland to survive, for some it is the only place they can live. It is a critical part of the regent honeyeater's already diminished migration route, and its loss will impact sites across the eastern side of Australia. Koalas are picky about their habitats and cannot survive far from where they live if they are rehomed due to changes in the tree species available for them to graze. Koalas have been found on the site of the proposed expansion, and as a critically endangered species, it is the role of the state to protect it abd its habitat. If biodiversity and the preservation of diminishing natural resources is important to the planning commission at all, the proposed Moolarben mine expansion will not be allowed to continue. |
Margaret L Hagan
|
ID |
19176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 22622 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Attached is my response to the extension Project number SSD- 33083358 at Moolarben. I would appreciate it to be included in submissions in relation to this application. Thank you Margaret Hagan |
|
Attachments |
19176 - Margaret L Hagan_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 71.49 KB) |
Rosalind Vaughan
|
ID |
19191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2037 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I object to the mine because of the following reasons 1 The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 2.The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and a round the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. 3.The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. 4 The mine will lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. 5.The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. 6. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. 7.The assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. |
Gay Curtis
|
ID |
19196 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Shire Climate Action Network (ShireCAN) Coordinator |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern Attached is Shire Climate Action Network’s submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. |
|
Attachments |
19196 - Gay Curtis_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 177.38 KB) |
Mia Floyd
|
ID |
19211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2075 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Reader, I hope you are having a lovely day. Recently, I have been enlightened about the atrocious plans regarding the Coal Mine Extension at Moolarben and am horrified. Encroaching on and simply put, completely destroying, the habitat of one of Australia’s endangered and native animals is shameful. I am writing to object to this expansion. This expansion will destroy 480 hectares of koala habitat that is critical to their survival. Yancoal plans to extract an additional 30 million tonnes of thermal coal until 2034. Coal is a fossil fuel !! This releases so much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere causing the greenhouse effect ultimately contributing to climate change. 64 million tonnes of climate pollution is projected to be generated by this expansion. That is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions across all sources in NSW. Climate change is a leading threat to koalas. Be on the right side of history. Don’t let this expansion happen. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Mia Floyd |
Dr Sorcha Cotter
|
ID |
19231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hello, I would likle to make a submission against Moolarben coal mine expansion. As you are aware, it is an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand the mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved for the following reasons: Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. I would strongly urge you to consider these points and deny the request to expand the coal mine. Warm regards, Dr Sorcha Cotter. |
Diane Rooney
|
ID |
18766 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2284 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Diane Rooney I am a 71 year old retired nurse. I have become increasingly concerned about our environment, climate change and the effect this will have on future generations. I first became aware of increasing carbon in the atmosphere over 30 years ago. I understood the science and the risk of overheating our planet. I believed the climate changes predicted would occur well after my end of life but of course we are all living with the reality already. I am terrified thinking about the challenges we face due to continuing use of fossil fuels. I am objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Expansion My primary concern is that Moolarben is already the largest producing mine in NSW. Expansion will produce an extra 64.6 million tonne of greenhouse gas emissions over its life. The climate impact will be enormous. Another huge concern for me relates to the environment that will be destroyed forever. The proposed Moolarben extension will destroy over 480 hectares of native vegetation within the valley and threaten the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Destruction of the 480 hectares will destroy habitat for koalas and regent honey eaters, both threatened species. This environment cannot be offset not rehabilitated once destroyed. The third issue that deeply troubles me is the projected effects on groundwater. The project predicts significant drawdown of groundwater which will be Lo lasting. The will place groundwater dependent ecosystems at risk and Moolarben creek acts as a drought refuge for wildlife. This proposal is not consistent with a net zero future and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project Sincerely Diane Rooney Booragul NSW |
Judy Lambert
|
ID |
18916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2094 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in response to proposed amendment to Moolarben coal complex -OC3-extension 11 February 2026 This submission is made in a personal capacity, based on a lifetime of experience encompassing tertiary degrees in science to PhD level, as a research scientist, Canberra-based national environmental advocate, and fulltime consultant to a former Federal Environment Minister, followed by more than 20 years as a principal of a successful environment & sustainability consultancy. That work included numerous threatened species and ecological community projects, submissions in response to ‘offsetting’ and consideration of the implications of climate change on the natural environment. It is against this background that I am somewhat heartened by the NSW Government commitment to “upholding rigorous environmental standards” and “ensuring that all projects are assessed with due diligence and public accountability” (C Ritchie, Dept of Planning, Dec 2025). The opportunity to respond to a last-minute bid by proponents Yancoal, to delay hearings by the Independent Planning Panel is welcomed, even though the delays are a significant disruption to public input that is an essential part of community consultation in important environmental matters. I retain serious concerns about the project which are not addressed by the amendments which are minor in avoiding or mitigating environmental effects. It is my strongly held view that, for the reasons discussed briefly below, the Yancoal Moolarben OC3 extension should be refused. *Reliance on off-site ‘habitat enhancement’ Reliant on off-site changes to the proposed project, the proposed modifications do not change the direct footprint of the proposed mine and will do nothing to avoid direct impacts on habitat in the area that will disappear with the 480ha of native vegetation proposed for clearing. Much of this vegetation is nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland, which includes habitat of more than 20 threatened species recorded in the area. Some 113ha of this are shown to be important Koala habitat, together with 80ha of known Regent Honeyeater breeding habitat. As has long been recognised, ‘habitat enhancement’ can only contribute positively to threatened species and ecological community conservation if there are appropriate alternative sites of similar ecology within reasonable proximity to the affected ecological communities and their dependent species. *Failure to avoid serious & irreversible harm Recognising that the Koala is Endangered and the Regent Honeyeater is Critically Endangered in NSW and nationally, taking out key habitat and diminishing connectivity across that habitat cannot be compensated by ‘enhancement’ of other sites beyond the surrounding Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The proposed modifications are thus not “avoiding serious and irreversible harm”. As is widely recognised, the use of offsite habitat enhancement (or ‘offsets’) is only valid when residual significant impacts cannot be fully avoided or mitigated, a requirement recognised at Commonwealth level. The changes to the Moolarban OC3 extension as proposed by Yancoal fall far short of this necessity. Even the current EPBC Act requires that 90% of offsets are direct offsets, which are not what is proposed by Yancoal. *Failure to address additional greenhouse gas emissions, and thus climate change Nothing in the proposed amendments does anything to address the 64.6Mt of additional greenhouse emissions that would result from the proposed Open Cut expansion during its operating life. As addressed in my earlier submission, these emissions over the life of the proposed mine will ensure that NSW fails to meet its obligations under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the international Paris Agreement. At a time when the impacts of climate change are increasingly apparent in the frequency of both devastating bushfires and floods this is unacceptable. In assessing the proposed expansion, full account should be taken of the determination by the Denman Court of Appeal decision, that decision-makers (in this case DPHI and/or the Independent Planning Commission) should consider all emissions (including downstream emissions) and the local impacts the project will cause. Yancoal fails to address both economic and social impacts of these. *Failure to demonstrate public benefit, including either employment or protection of Wiradjuri cultural heritage While the proposed Moolarben OC3 mine expansion will clearly have significant negative impacts, the ‘public benefit’ to be gained by the local community from such an expansion is difficult to identify. As Mudgee lies within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, with its associated increase in renewable energy jobs, jobs in coal mining in the area remain unfilled and will be unlikely to benefit further from continued operation of the mine until at least 2038, regardless of the proposed expansion. Perhaps more difficult to quantify, but nonetheless an essential consideration, are the impacts of the proposed mine (with or without the recent amendments proposed by Yancoal) on Aboriginal cultural artefacts and values. The proposed expansion will undoubtedly impact adversely the Wiradjuri people’s connection to Country and their maintenance of cultural practices. In view of the above substantial deficiencies of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 proposal, the Independent Planning Panel should reject the proposal whether in its initial form or after taking account of the proposed modifications and community input in response to them. Thank you for considering these concerns. |
Linda Apps
|
ID |
18946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2203 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As I sit here sweltering in 35 degree heat I cannot understand why we continue to expand coal mines and burn fossil fuels. We seem to be suffering from head in the sand syndrome, hoping if we ignore climate change it will just go away. Last year was the 4th warmest year in Australia since records began to be kept. The extent and number of natural climate disasters are increasing. We have to wean ourselves off this senseless addiction to coal. Renewables are surging ahead and we need to back these alternatives instead. |
Stephanie Owen
|
ID |
18951 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Hunter Bird Observers Club |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2322 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See Attached Document |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben IPC SSD-33083358 submission HBOC 20260202 v2.pdf (PDF, 258.72 KB) |
Anthea Nicholls
|
ID |
18966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a resident of Mudgee, who works as a vet locally. I have seen the effects on the wildlife with the loss of habitat & increased traffic associated with coal mines. I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee on Wiradjuri country. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and microbats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. It threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. Anthea Nicholls Mudgee 2850 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18976 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Doctors for the Environment Australia |
|
Location |
Victoria 3053 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We oppose the Moolarben OC3 coal mine extension project known as SSD 33083358 on the grounds of: - protecting human health - limiting Australia’s direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions - limiting further dangerous global heating. Further information is provided in the attached submission, |
|
Attachments |
DEA submission Moolarben NSW Coal OC3 Extension SSD-083358 Feb 2026.pdf (PDF, 197.06 KB) |
Carol Kerstholt
|
ID |
18876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners I write to formally lodge my objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project Number SSD-33083358. Mining giant Yancoal Australia, the proponent ot the Moolarben Mine Extension Project is currently set to continue operating the existing coal complex until 2038, regardless of the extension project proceeding or not. The Independent Planning Commission's original hearing was postponed at Yancoal's request in order to make minor amendments to the proposal. Current Situation of the Moolarben Mine and related Legislation Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine is an existing thermal coal mine located near Mudgee in mid-western NSW. The proposed expansion of Moolarben coal mine would extend close to the edge of one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, creating a serious threat to a healthy koala population and their critical habitat. The proposed amended changes do not reduce the impact of the mine in any way but only propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the existing mine area for supposed "habitat enhancement". The direct and indirect impacts on the threatened wildlife and ecosystems remain the same under the proposed amendments. The project continues to be damaging to the ecosystems and wildlife. Yancoal is not reducing the clearing of native vegetation at all. What Yancoal has achieved is the unnecessary disruption to the Independent Planning Commission by postponing the public hearing indefinitely. The mine would clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine up to 100 metres from the boundary of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Water drawdown of up to 5 metres would occur in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek that runs into the Goulburn River and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation using the water. Expansion of the mine is projeccted to generate 64 million tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to 58 percent of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW, significantly contributing to climate change which is one of the greatest threats to koalas. The mine would contribute to accelerated climate change harm in NSW. The NSW Net Zero Commission stated clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with achieving a safe climate. Also, the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure assessment report ignores a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The assessment report fails to mention the NSW Government is not on track to meet either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The Moolarben coal mine extension economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions have not been quantified. This is now a legal requirement after the Court of Appeal decision on the Mount Pleasant coal mine. The proponent of the Moolarben mine extension has failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which determined that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It is not possible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, as no attempt has been made to quantify the full economic costs of the downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99 percent of all emissions from the project. Impacts if Moolarben Mine Expansion Proceeds The high-value conservation area of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is of exceptional importance for biodiversity where 23 threatened wildlife species have been recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the healthy koala population. Koalas have been recorded in the Moolaroben Coal Mine as well as in the centre of one proposed pit. Just over a year ago a mother koala and joey were recorded in the area via a thermal drone. The local koala population was highlighted by the NSW Government Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group at the NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water as being resilient to the effects of climate change having "survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. The present koala habitat is critical to the survival of the climate-robust species". Yancoal admits the expansion project would be a threat to habitat "critical to the survival" of a local koala population. The proposed expansion project threatens increased risks of mortality and physiological stress for koalas caused by habitat fragmentation, stress and vehicle strikes. The 2020 NSW Legislative Council inquiry into NSW koala populations and habitat concluded that, without action, koalas in NSW would be extinct by 2050. The NSW Koala Strategy outlines the government's long-term goal of doubling koala numbers in NSW by 2050. If the NSW government is sincere in this endeavour then the Minns government should deny expansion of mines in habitat critical to the survival of koalas. The impact of clearing habitat critical to koalas would (a) fragment the landscape, making it more challenging for koalas to move and access food sources (b) increase the likelihood of vehicle strikes (c) disrupt breeding activities further threatening the viability of the koala population in the area. Nationwide koalas are facing a perilous situation from dual threats of habitat destruction from land clearing and climate change. Similarly, the proposed expansion of the Moolarben mine has not minimised impacts on biodiversity, is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts on the critical habitat not just for the koala, the squirrel glider and the broadheaded snake but also for the threatened wildlife such as the large-eared pied bat, Eastern cave bat, the critically endangered regent honeyeater, the endangered gang-gang cockatoo, and would also clear 401 hectares of the nationally current endangered boxgum woodland. On the edge of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, rocky habitat and vital sandstone cliffs are key habitats for the bat species. Blasting and noise are a major threat to those species. The department agency stated at least a 500 metre buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve should be in place to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Implementing biodiversity offsets is a deeply flawed process and merely justifies habitat destruction. Rather, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided in the first place to pre-empt further species extinctions. The cultural heritage of the area would be impacted by the Moolarben mine expansion where 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves, would be destroyed. At the request of cultural heritage interests the mining company was approached to protect the area but the company refused. Cumulative impacts of the expansion proposal in relation to other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee area have not been assessed. Both Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines have also proposed major expansions. Collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have huge impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate but have not been assessed. Impacts on regional jobs may be obviated by numerous alternative employment opportunities available in the area through Mudgee being a part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. Renewable projects provide a wide source of employment with 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Conclusion The NSW Net Zero Commission stated clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets and any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The NSW government is already not on track to meet either the 2030 or 2035 emissions targets. The high-value conservation landscape of the valley and the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve should be managed jointly and not turned into and open cut mine. The NSW Koala Strategy states the government's long-term goal is to double koala numbers by 2050. If the Minns government is sincere about the Koala Strategy the expansion of coal mines needs to cease and to preserve the habitat critical to the survival of koalas. The threats posed by this project are too great for the already endangered species and their critical habitat. This damaging expansion project should not be approved. Ms Carol Kerstholt |
Regina Schien
|
ID |
18881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I write to strongly object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. This area has incredible importance for biodiversity - 23 threatened wildlife species have been recorded in and around the site. The project will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100 metres from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. As a result, critical koala habitat would be destroyed. This habitat clearing may also cause serious and irreversible impact to species such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. The mine will also cause serious harm to cultural heritage - 55 Aboriginal heritage sites exist within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. There is absolutely no doubt that this mine will contribute massively to runaway climate change as well, even though the NSW Net Zero Commission stated clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required, following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. Further, the amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. In conclusion, this project should not be approved. Yours faithfully, Regina Schien |
Councillor Jess Miller
|
ID |
18886 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
City of Sydney |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am writing to voice my concern about the Yancoal mine expansion And the impact it will have on local Koala habitat wildlife and threatened ecosystems. I am outraged that the Independent planning commission are considering postponing the hearing which will interrupt the community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut coal mine. For a government that positions itself as supporting the transition to net zero this expansion threatens to not only undermine those aspirations but also directly contravenes the principles of community input into major state significant infrastructure. I urge the department planning to reject the amendment to the proposal and proceed with the public hearing as soon as possible the amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all. Sincerely, Councillor Jess Miller, City of Sydney |
Allison Griffiths
|
ID |
18891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Sir or Madam, I am objecting to the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine in Mudgee. This is appalling when we know how bad Coal is to our environment. I am devastated that so many koalas will be killed by the growing development of this mine. Please stop. Just stop. Thank you for listening. Allison Griffiths |
Jonathan Skinner
|
ID |
18901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2038 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
This extension application is obscene. The proposal goes against the advice of the governments own advisors, will lower the water table, endangering tree life in the region, endanger the koala population and other animals barely 100m away in one of Australia’s oldest national parks, and threaten biodiversity. I object in the strongest terms. It is bad for the region, bad for NSW and bad for the planet. We just don’t want or need it. The focus must be on renewable, clean energy sources and protecting our indigenous precious wildlife, and our water. Jonathan Skinner |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. |
Steve Wilson
|
ID |
18246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This eyesore will scar a beautiful landscape, kill all the living things it displaces, pump millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere and ruin important surrounding natural reserves. For these reasons it should not go ahead. |
Peter Gyulay
|
ID |
18426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2194 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My main concern is that by approving the coal mine, we are further falling short of our ethical obligations to reduce C02 emissions. To say that "if we don't export this coal, then it will just be purchased somewhere else," is to take part in the degradation of the world's living standards and the loss of human life. We need to take an ethical stand or else every country will keep waiting for "everyone else" to give up coal first. I am also concerned about the loss of biodiversity in the area of the mine and the loss of aboriginal cultural heritage, both of which are invaluable and irreplaceable. If we are missing out on an economic opportunity, so be it. Ethics need to underline all business activities, especially ones like this with such high stakes. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission, in relation to the project there is grave concerns related to the koala population and the habitat, Koalas are referred internationally apart of our tourism and unique to our country but we continually place them at risk of extinction. This area has been proven as koala location and therefore no mining or any development must not be permitted, every Australia should have the right to see a koala in their lifetime, now and the future. Is the EPBC mapping on this area up to date, number projects in hunter were using outdated mapping system. In relation to greenhouse gases, the impacts are effecting climate and costs on insurances are increasing continually, in which many families are struggling to meet the cost, all over our country. Water is so important for life, any impact has a flow on effect. Greenhouse gases How can you judge other area or nations if we have no respect for our own national |
Katherine Allan
|
ID |
18491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
At a time of increasing natural disasters in Australia, floods, fires, drought and lack of water for farms towns and cities it is completely irresponsible for the state government to approve the extension of this coal mine. This coal mine is already contributing enormous amounts of co2 into the atmosphere and this extension will create 64 million tonnes more pollution into our already damaged atmosphere. How can we meet our climate targets if we allow this extension to go ahead. How will future generations judge the decisions that are being made today? How will we produce enough food to feed our population? Enough is enough. No more coal mines. Embrace renewable energy and try to mitigate the damage that decades of coal pollution has already caused our suffering planet. |
Derek Bolton
|
ID |
18536 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Change Balmain-Rozelle Inc |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We calculate that the climate damage from approving all currently proposed NSW new coal mines and extensions will eventually cost NSW alone between $4,000,000 and $12,000,000 in lost productivity annually. On this basis, no new thermal coal extraction should be approved, no matter how modest. Our full analysis is in the attached file. |
|
Attachments |
20260225 Submission on Moolarben OC3 Extension.pdf (PDF, 295.1 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am deeply concerned to hear about the likely impact of the proposed Moolarben mine expansion on wildlife in the area. There is significant evidence of the presence of koalas and other threatened native animals. I cannot imagine how any project which increases harm to our precious environment can be approved. This also adds to our inability to meet targets to reduce emissions. Investment should be in renewables not more coal mines. An Australia without koalas is unthinkable but sadly every project like this, if it is approved, is contributing to this potential outcome. Please do not approve this project! |
Madeline Hourihan
|
ID |
18701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
While the following is a form submission, I thoroughly support all points outlined and oppose the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine and will not be voting Labor if the mine expansion is approved. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. |
MARK SEEMANPILLAI
|
ID |
18711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2067 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the members of the Commission. I object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. There are strong objections within the community to more mines in the region - these voices deserve to be represented over the interests of the mining industry. Sincerely, Mark Seemanpillai Chatswood, NSW |
Tim Luckett
|
ID |
18716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned about negative impacts on habitat for a number of threatened species including the regent honeyeater, large eared and eastern cave bats, and koalas. This is a genetically important community of koalas for safeguarding the wider population in the event of disease outbreaks. As well as directly impacting habitat during construction the mine will lower the water table leaving tree roots without access. NSW’s own climate change authority has warned that more coal projects are incompatible with our climate targets. The moolarbenarea is close to the renewable energy hub set to contribute to the local employment and economy. |
Christina Hofmann
|
ID |
18721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2067 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a dedicated bushcarer, I am writing to formally object to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion. My work involves the hands-on restoration of our native landscapes—spending countless hours weeding, planting, and nurturing the local ecosystem to ensure its survival for future generations. I take my personal responsibility to the environment seriously and have made significant changes to my own lifestyle to reduce my carbon footprint. It is disheartening and, frankly, offensive to see the NSW government consider a project that undermines these individual efforts. If citizens are expected to do their part for the climate and biodiversity, the State must do the same by rejecting projects that are fundamentally incompatible with a liveable future. 1. Rejection of Last-Minute Amendments & Process Disruption I strongly urge the Department to reject Yancoal’s recent minor amendments and refuse the postponement of the public hearing. • Tactical Delay: These amendments appear to be a strategic move to interrupt community consultation and the IPC hearing process. • Inadequate Measures: The proposal to manage vegetation outside the mine area ("habitat enhancement") does nothing to reduce the actual physical footprint of the mine. • Greenwashing: You cannot "enhance" your way out of destroying 480 hectares of native vegetation. This is a clear attempt at greenwashing that makes a mockery of the public’s right to a transparent and timely planning process. 2. Critical Biodiversity Loss The scale of ecological destruction proposed is unacceptable, particularly given the site’s proximity to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Irreversible Impact: The clearing of 401 hectares of Box Gum Woodland—a nationally endangered ecosystem—cannot be "offset." • Threatened Species: The area is home to 23 threatened species. Specifically, the presence of a climate-robust Koala population (including recently sighted mothers and joeys) makes this habitat "critical to the survival of the species" according to the DCCEEW. • Habitat Fragmentation: Mining within 100m of the Nature Reserve boundary ignores the recommended 500m buffer. This will devastate the sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats essential for the Large-eared Pied Bat and Eastern Cave Bat through noise and blasting. 3. Incompatibility with Climate Goals This project represents a direct contradiction to NSW’s legislated climate targets. • Net Zero Commission Findings: The Commission’s Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report (December 2025) explicitly states that further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the Climate Change Act. • Massive Emissions: The project’s lifecycle emissions (64.6Mt) represent roughly 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. Approving this would effectively sabotage the state's 2030 and 2035 reduction targets. • Legal & Economic Failure: The proponent has failed to quantify the full economic costs of downstream (Scope 3) greenhouse gas emissions, ignoring the precedent set by the Court of Appeal regarding the Mt Pleasant mine. 4. Water, Heritage, and Cumulative Impacts • Water Scarcity: A 5-meter drawdown in the Moolarben Creek alluvium threatens the deep-rooted vegetation I work so hard to protect. Yancoal’s poor history of water monitoring does not inspire confidence. • Cultural Destruction: The destruction of 55 Aboriginal heritage sites, including grinding grooves and shelters, is a loss of irreplaceable cultural history on Wiradjuri Country. • Cumulative Stress: When combined with the Ulan and Wilpinjong expansions, the Mudgee region is being pushed beyond its ecological breaking point. Conclusion The Moolarben complex already has approval to operate until 2038. There is no economic necessity for this expansion that outweighs the permanent loss of biodiversity and the acceleration of climate change. With 2,000 renewable energy jobs coming to the Central West REZ, the region’s future is in green energy, not more open-cut pits. I request that the Independent Planning Commission reject this application in its entirety. Sincerely, Christina Hofmann |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the extension of the coal mine. It will threaten local biodiversity and lower the water table, threatening local plant and animal life. Time to a stop to this madness. |
Jeneane Wright
|
ID |
18821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4121 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Submission: Objection to Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion, Project Number SSD-33083358 To whom it may concern, I am writing to lodge a formal objection to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. I strongly oppose the project on environmental, climate, water security, health, and community impact grounds. This proposal is not in the public interest and should not be approved. 1. Climate impacts are unacceptable Approving an expansion of a major thermal coal mine is incompatible with Australia’s climate commitments and the scientific reality of climate change. Expanding coal extraction locks in decades of additional greenhouse gas emissions, worsening extreme weather, drought, bushfires, and heatwaves already affecting communities across NSW and Australia. The climate impact of this proposal extends far beyond the mine site. The emissions produced when this coal is burned overseas are real and should be considered as part of the project’s true environmental footprint. Approving this expansion undermines NSW’s ability to meet emissions reduction targets and shifts the burden of climate harm onto future generations. 2. Damage to biodiversity and threatened species The expansion would increase land clearing, habitat fragmentation, and disturbance to native wildlife. The cumulative impacts of mining across the region have already placed significant pressure on ecosystems, and further expansion will worsen biodiversity decline. Rehabilitation claims are routinely overstated. Restoring complex woodland ecosystems takes decades—if it can be achieved at all. Once habitat is cleared and soil systems are disrupted, the environmental damage is often permanent. 3. Water impacts and contamination risks The Moolarben mine expansion raises serious concerns regarding: • groundwater drawdown • contamination of waterways • long-term impacts on aquifers and catchments • risks to local water users and agriculture Mining activities such as blasting, dewatering, spoil dumping, and coal handling can permanently alter groundwater systems. In a climate where water security is increasingly uncertain, it is irresponsible to approve a project that threatens water resources for local communities, farms, and ecosystems. 4. Air pollution, dust and human health Coal mining generates dust and particulate pollution that can travel well beyond the mine boundary, impacting nearby residents and communities. Increased extraction and transport will likely increase: • fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) • diesel emissions • noise pollution • light pollution • blasting impacts These factors pose well-established risks to respiratory and cardiovascular health, especially for children, older residents, and people with existing conditions such as asthma. 5. Community impacts and loss of amenity The expansion will worsen the industrialisation of the region and place additional strain on local communities through increased heavy vehicle traffic, noise, vibration, and visual impacts. Communities should not be forced to accept ongoing degradation of their quality of life for a project that benefits a private company while leaving the public with long-term environmental liabilities. 6. Cumulative impacts have not been adequately addressed The assessment of this project must not occur in isolation. The region is already heavily impacted by coal extraction, and cumulative impacts on: • air quality • water systems • biodiversity • climate emissions • community wellbeing must be treated as central to the decision-making process. Too often, expansions are approved incrementally, allowing serious long-term harm to occur without a realistic accounting of the overall cost. 7. Economic claims do not outweigh long-term harm While the proponent may argue that the project provides jobs and economic benefits, this must be weighed against: • long-term rehabilitation costs • environmental damage • impacts on agriculture and tourism • public health costs • climate-related disaster costs Mining expansions frequently leave communities with degraded land, polluted water systems, and unresolved rehabilitation burdens once profits have been extracted. The long-term costs fall on the public. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. 8. The project is inconsistent with a responsible energy transition The world is shifting away from coal. Continuing to approve new coal expansions increases the risk of stranded assets, economic instability, and future job losses when coal demand declines. NSW should be investing in sustainable industries and clean energy, not extending dependence on a declining and harmful industry. ________________________________________ Conclusion For the reasons above, I urge the Department to refuse approval for the Moolarben Coal Mine expansion. The environmental and climate consequences are significant and long-lasting, and the project is inconsistent with the public interest, ecological sustainability, and responsible planning. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Jeneane Wright |
Sue Tolley
|
ID |
18826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sue, I am a 75 year retired woman living on the South Coast and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state of NSW and others. Extreme heatwaves, The top climate scientists, such Dr Watkins at Monash University and former head of the long range forecasts for the bureau and others argue that global heating caused mostly by burning fossil fuels was now the so strong that it was simply taking over year to year variability in terms of air temperature. Extreme heatwaves and record warming is predicted to likely occur this year and next. We will reach unlivable temperatures in the 2030 for the old, frail and young. Air conditioners, for those can afford them running constantly won't fix the problem when we leave or houses. We are no longer talking about mid century we are talking about now. Coal emissions are the cause and they are increasing, not even static. I am writing to specifically object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that Moolarben OC3 would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Megan Benson
|
ID |
18831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commission, As per your instructions via email 9.2.2026, attached is my submission of objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Thanking you, Megan Benson |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Objection Final.pdf (PDF, 243.11 KB) |
Ian McKinlay
|
ID |
17641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My wife & I have been regular visitors to the Mudgee region since the early 1980s. The surrounding National Parks & countryside, with the Bird-Watching wildlife viewing, bushwalking & clean air opportunities, have always been a major part of the area's attractions. In the 2020s, with Coal demand in decline, it appears to verge on criminal stupidity to allow/encourage further expansion of the foreign-owned Coal Industry in the region. Any such expansion will surely become a "Stranded Asset" over the next decade or so, then the foreign owners will abandon these sites & the beautiful Mudgee Region will be left with ravaged earth, eyesores and a long term environmental hangover. Consider the Upper Hunter for example. The Commission must look beyond strict legalities and make determinations that are responsible to the future and our whole society. |
Karlene Beahan
|
ID |
17646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
After reading that 99% of the world's leading Scientists agree we are in a climate crisis , I am appalled this extension is even being considered , please think of future generations . |
Jean Ellis
|
ID |
17681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 The amendment should be rejected and the public hearing should not have been postponed in the first place. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. There is so much damage done already, which cannot be repaired or ‘enhanced’ and the proposal will lead to even more damage which will not be prevented or managed in any way at all. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process, which we all know is only happening because it is a legal requirement, not because it’s going to be taken any notice of. Manjot Kaur, Coal Mining and Methane Campaigner, Nature Conservation Council of NSW said: “The NSW government’s own Net Zero Commission report confirmed that mine expansions like Moolarben will prevent NSW from reaching our climate targets.” I used to live at Wilpinjong before Peabody came on the scene, while Moolarben was still farmland, and over the years have witnessed the degradation and virtual destruction of the whole area in the pursuit of the almighty dollar, not to mention the climate distortion we are suffering as a result of this, and other, similar developments. We don’t need to be so destructive, other sources of power are open to us and we should use that advantage instead of doubling down on the irreversible damage we have already done. |
Luke Mesterovic
|
ID |
17691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2137 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Luke. I am 23 and living on unceded Wangal Land. I am very concerned about Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion and am writing to voice my objection. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards, Luke Mesterovic |
Peter Duggan
|
ID |
17701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben open cut coal mine. A number of objections I outline below are as follows: - The open cut coal mine expansion poses a number of serious risks to groundwater and to the Goulburn River. Independent experts have warned that groundwater dependent ecostystems will be affected by the increased drawdown on groundwater. - The mine expansion will add 64 million tonnes of extra greenhouse gases. The world is entering a dangerous age of climate breakdown and cannot afford to continue to contribute to the problem. Future generations and life on earth will continue to be put in harms way if we continue burning fossil fuels. The mining and use of coal to generate energy must stop. - The mine expansion will cause irreversible damage to nature by clearing the native habitat of endangered species. The valley of the proposed mine expansion needs instead to be included in the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Once again I strongly oppose the proposed coal mine expansion and would request consideration be given to the points given above. Thank you, Peter Duggan |
Margaret MCDONALD
|
ID |
17731 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Dubbo Environment Group Inc, |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The members of Dubbo Environment Group Inc. do not support the expansion of any new coal mines or, for that matter, the continuation of any fossil fuel extraction. We should not need to continually repeat that we need to reduce our carbon and methane emissions as expert Climate Science has been advising for the last 20 years, for us to avoid the devastating consequences of a 2 -degree C. rise in world average temperatures. Already we are experiencing the unprecedented extreme weather events which were predicted by these experts. In 2024, NSW's average temperature was 1.71 degrees C. above the average for 1961 -1990 according to the BOM. Global temperatures in 2024 were 1.28 degrees C. above 1951-1980 records and the Earths' average surface temperature was the warmest on record according to NASA. Our emissions, meanwhile, continue to climb. We are in a Global Climate Emergency! The time is overdue to leave fossil fuels in the ground. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Violet, I am a 30 year schoolteacher in Western Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students at my school are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (redacted) |
|
Attachments |
To the Independent Planning Commission.pdf (PDF, 49.53 KB) |
Rebecca Reynolds
|
ID |
17761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the coal mine expansion and any projects that harm our precious native flora and fauna |
Don White
|
ID |
17921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
see attachment |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project .pdf (PDF, 139.32 KB) |
JIll Green
|
ID |
17986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2074 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Re: Moolarben Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I am writing to object to the proposal from Yancoal to expand the Moolarben coal mine. I am seriously concerned about the risks that climate change from burning fossil fuels poses to our planet. There is no need to open or expand any new coal mines. There are already enough mines in Australia to meet the needs of power generation in a situation where the world is transitioning to renewable electricity sources. Making more coal available will prolong the transitioning process to the detriment of future generations. I am a regular visitor to the Central West NSW region and admire the landscape and biodiversity of the area, particularly the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and its pagoda landscapes. There is strong cultural heritage with 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the proposed new mine footprint. The landscape should not be destroyed forever by a mine that is unnecessary. The land can never be restored to its original beauty and ecosystem value. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation including 400 ha of critically endangered Box Gum Woodland. It is not possible to obtain effective offsets for this vegetation community. Critically endangered means that the land area that remains is barely able to support a viable area of forest. The mine will clear land right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Blasting will disturb the wildlife in the Reserve, in particular the bats living in the sandstone cliff faces. The additional clearing will further threaten the survival of several endangered species through loss of habitat. The koala is particularly vulnerable as the population needs this area in order to retain resilience in the face of bushfire risks and loss of forest through climate change. The clearing is also likely to cause serious and irreversible impact (SAII) to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. The Central West area has been declared a renewable energy zone meaning that many new employment areas will be created in the near future. The Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines are proposing expansion on top of the existing significant employment demand. The Moolarben expansion cannot be justified on the grounds that the extra employment opportunities are needed. Thank you for reading my submission Jill Green NSW 2074 |
Justine Cogan
|
ID |
18816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2297 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am voicing my opposition to Yancoal's expasion of the Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company have refused to accept that. This is not acceptable. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. The amendments recently proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. I understand the company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Please note my opposition to the Moolarben Coal Mine extension. Justine Cogan |
Rhonda Green
|
ID |
17451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2459 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to Yancoal seeking approval for expanding Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3). This coal mine is already contributing significantly to climate pollution, causing displacement, injuries and death to threatened species, they are struggling to survive now, expansion of this dirty coal mine will ensure they become extinct. Threatened species are extremely important for keeping the environment healthy, humans are dependent on a healthy environment for their health. Water sources are contaminated by this mine which affects humans and threatened species. It is wrong to destroy this cultural heritage site further by expanding this coal mine. Monetary profits are the only consideration for this coal mining company. Once the damage is done, they walk away, erratic weather patterns will rise, we are seeing this now in Australia because of mining. There are minimal jobs created with mining, compared to jobs created protecting the environment, wildlife, water and tourism which in turn leads to a healthy economy well into the future. Say No to this destructive expansion. Closing this existing coal mining operation altogether would be a sensible alternative. |
Alan Tarlinton
|
ID |
17506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2441 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to have my say on this proposal. This project would have a seriously deleterious effect on Aboriginal heritage, as there are 55 cultural sites in the area. Their destruction is unconscionable. What benefits humans benefits all life. Biodiversity is essential for human health. We have a responsibility to protect Nature on which all life depends, for our own future and for the future of Country. Expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine runs counter to this. The project would clear 480 hectares of precious native vegetation, 400 ha of critically endangered Box Gum Woodland, 113 hectares of critical Koala habitat, habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. Destruction of such richly biodiverse land is totally unacceptable. The Large-Eared Pied Bat and the Eastern Cave Bat roost in the cliffs in Munghorn Reserve, cliffs that may be destabilised by blasting. The noise and vibration would be harmful to the bats and other wildlife. The project would only leave a 100m buffer zone to the Reserve, flaunting the Environment Department's 500m recommendation. The Net Zero Report has been ignored by the Department of Planning. The expansion would draw down on alluvium, damaging groundwater and the Moolarben Creek, which flows into the Goulburn River. Not only is this project environmentally destructive, it will contribute to climate change. It is time to phase out fossil fuel mining. Jobs in renewable energy will expand in the near future and this will be a true benefit to the community. I am strongly opposed to such an expansion of a destructive industry at a time of extinction and climate crisis. |
Marie Woolnough
|
ID |
17526 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Nature Conservation of NSW |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2115 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Independent Planning Commission I am objecting to Yancourt's propose Moolarben 0C3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This area belongs to a protected nature reserve , not an open coal mine when the wind blows ,coal dust blows everywhere and may infect the lungs of the miners and those nearby and make a mess of the houses nearby. Miners just leave a big landscape mess behind. I am concerned about 1 Threatened species and habitat loss, where koalas and breeding have been recorded as well as Regent Honeyeaters and Microbat habitat.No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. 2 Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve within mining proposed, within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts 3 Water and groundwater risks , including long term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek - dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. 4 Climate impacts , with the project producing and estimate of 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse emissions at a time NSW is not on the track to meet its legislation emission reduction for the Paris accord. 5 Lack of public benefit, with no clear justification for expanding coal in a region where renewable energy is being prioritised 6 The NSW cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate biodiversity crisis . This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate change Act 2023 and the goals on the Paris Agreement. 7 I urge the Independent Planning Committee to recommend that the Moorarbon 0C3 coam mining extension project to be refused. Thank you for allowing me to make a submission. Kind regards, Marie Woolnough |
David Martin
|
ID |
17556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2077 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission. My name is David Martin and I am a member of the NSW Bird Atlassers Inc (NSWBA) and also the Hornsby Conservation Society. I have been an avid bird watcher for over 40 yrs and have contributed records and sightings of birds extensively throughout large areas on NSW to the large NSWBA data base. We have observed the declining numbers of native bird species mainly due to habitat loss and climate change, excessive heat and extensive fire. I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 near Mudgee. I am deeply concerned that this project will cause serious deterioration and irreversible harm to the environment and community and contribute to damaging climate change and should not be approved. Due to its rich biodiversity this area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The following points of particular concern are as follows: Threatened species and habitat disturbance loss (675 ha) which include the clearing of woodlands of White Box, Yellow Box- Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland amounting to total loss of 493 hectares ( a NSW Critically Endangered Ecological Community). The loss of over 113 hectares of koala breeding and feeding habitat, Regent Honeyeater habitat (80 ha) which is a critically endangered bird endemic to South Eastern Australia, the micro bat including other native species. A very important point is that no biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. The mining expansion proposal is within 100 mtrs of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. There will be damaging impacts to this reserve due to operational noise, vibration and blasting. It is is evident that an inadequate noise impact assessment has been made. Long-term ground water drawdown risks could harm Moolarben Creek and ecosystems dependent on groundwater systems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The expansion will also impact on local water sources. This project is estimated to produce approximately 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. There is a real possibility of a slow decline in demand for Australia's thermal coal, the economic argument could be even weaker than YANCOAL outlined in the MAY 2025 Resource Assessment. Significant damage done by the mining to the Wiradjury cultural landscapes including sacred sights. There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional employment as there have been vacancies at 3 Mudgee regional coal mines for many years. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission regarding this project. Yours sincerely David Martin Hornsby NSW 2077. |
Dorothy Luther
|
ID |
17576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal expansion assessment fails to identify the cumulative impacts of mining on bird populations in the district. Our research, explained in detail in the attached report, [Report_Mudgee_Birds_LLA_Juliane.pdf] shows a significant decline in woodland bird populations since mining began. This report presents a 20-year analysis (2005–2024) of temporal reporting trends for non-migratory bird species in the Mudgee–Wollar KBA, using complete checklists from eBird and Birdata. The dataset has 62,529 complete checklist records, for 206 species. Of the 206 species: • 67 species (32.5%) showed significant decline (mainly forest birds) • 44 species (21.4%) showed significant increase (mainly water birds) • 95 species (46.1%) were statistically stable The steepest negative trend was found for Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua), Other species with strong negative trends included: • Gang-gang Cockatoo (Callocephalon fimbriatum) • Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) • Glossy Black-Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami) • Southern Boobook (Ninox boobook) • Australian Owlet-nightjar (Aegotheles cristatus) Many of these species are already recognised as threatened or declining at state or national level and are strongly associated with woodland or mature forest. Several small passerines with negative trends, such as Silvereye (Zosterops lateralis), House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) and Diamond Firetail (Stagonopleura guttata), fit within a broader pattern of declining small insectivores and seed eaters in modified woodland landscapes. The families with the most negative trends were: • Strigidae (hawk owls) • Meliphagidae (honeyeaters and chats) • Acanthizidae (thornbills and gerygones) These families include many woodland dependent species with known declines across south eastern Australia. Honeyeaters and small insectivorous passerines are repeatedly highlighted as vulnerable to habitat fragmentation, loss of understorey and changes in flowering or insect availability. The patterns detected point to broad changes in the Mudgee–Wollar bird community that are not fully explained by variation in observer effort. Declines are concentrated in woodland and nocturnal species, including honeyeaters, thornbills, robins, cuckoos and owl species. These groups depend on structurally complex woodland, mature canopy trees and consistent resource availability, all of which are affected by ongoing mining activity within and around the KBA. |
|
Attachments |
Dorothy Luther Redacted.pdf (PDF, 774.79 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Against this. It should not happen |
Valerie Kost
|
ID |
17341 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This area is a protected nature reserve, I don’t know how or why it is even being considered. There are threatened species at stake here. I don’t understand how anyone can be happy with that on their conscience. The project contradicts climate goals. It is not needed for human sustainability. Major risk to the water reserves and creeks which are likely to over time create desert conditions. This project is neglectful and should not be on the drawing board. It cannot be underestimated the effect these projects have on ‘ordinary’ people’s mental health. We are suffering with worry and depression. Support your planet you expect it to support you. ValK |
Barry Hadaway
|
ID |
17381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarban OC3 Extension Project, for the reasons detailed in my written submission which has been uploaded to the IPC website. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Expansion Submission B Hadaway_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 766.76 KB) |
Rachel Yerbury
|
ID |
17401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2526 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Moolarben Expansion review board, I am writing to oppose the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. My name is Dr Rachel Yerbury and I am a psychologist with a particular research and practice focus on how nature connection affects psychological wellbeing. The literature shows that psychological wellbeing declines as biodiversity and natural spaces decline. In a time of immense habitat and species loss and degradation, we need to think carefully about the remaining areas and how we exploit them. As a person who lived as a child in the Riverina area, I feel a strong connection to Wiradjuru lands and waters and I oppose the expansion for the following reasons: * The expansion, if approved, would clear native vegetation and reduce the buffer zone between the mine and the Munghorn Gap Nature reserve. The proposed expansion area contains 23 documented threatened species and Box Gum woodland habitats and cause significant and irreversible damage to species including Microbats, koalas, regent honeyeater, broad-headed snake to mention a few. This is not good enough. * Expanding coal mines goes against Australia's climate goals and commitments. The Moolarben expansion would create over 60 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions (estimated over its life). This is not good enough, * Effect on people. As mentioned, I have a keen interest in researching and practicing in a psychological space that recognises how important intact and clean nature is for human wellbeing. The Denman court of appeal decision needs to be applied in this case to acknowledge and quantify the local climate impacts the expansion will cause. Further, the coal mine expansion would enable little economic benefit, but a lasting environmental damage that will cost the community and the state dearly in the future. This is not good enough. * Wiradjuri cultural heritage will be impacted. If approved, the expansion will destroy 55 catalogued Aboriginal artefacts. Further, the expansion contributes to the effects of ongoing colonisation which have fractured the culture, Country and Wiradjuri communites. This is not good enough. * The expansion will affect creeks and underground water, causing disruptions to natural flows and water quality. This area is particularly vulnerable to drought if the water is impacted and species of animals and plants that rely on this water will undoubtedly be impacted. This is not good enough. I ask you to think carefully about the above mentioned issues and take into account the wide reaching effects that this expansion will have; on the local community, the Wiradjuri people, the plants, animals and ecosystems. Please do not approve this proposed expansion Yours sincerely, Rachel Yerbury (PhD, psychologist) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4350 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
7th February 2026 To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s mine expansion of Moolarben OC3 near Mudgee NSW. I live in Toowoomba Qld, and I am horrified by the State and Federal governments continually allowing the destruction of Australia’s beautiful landscape, displacing (killing) our iconic wildlife and flora for greed. In the previous two years I have noticed the changes to the weather, as summers are becoming hotter. Trees, plants and grasses are essential to protect the land from the ravages of the sun, to decrease air pollution, to reduce moisture evaporation, and to provide homes for the varied animals, birds, insects and fungi that are essential for a healthy ecosystem and healthier humans. Our country also needs these diverse habitats to remain intact for the future of our children, and grandchildren. Expansion of mines, housing estates for a growing population cannot continue without dire consequences. Australia was a land of droughts and flooding rains which were all natural and nature’s way of maintenance. The landscape and weather patterns have changed due to the introduction of invasive plants, animals that denude our grasses, and human population growth that the land cannot sustain. Mining is one of the most detrimental factors contributing to the destruction of all life, continually demanding more and more, whilst providing less and less and failing every time to repair the damage caused. The destruction of trees which are the homes and shelter of the myriad of species is incomprehensible as these animals, birds, insects and reptiles have nowhere to go. The barren land left by mining must be changing the flow and quality of water, causing erosion, evaporation, and greater atmospheric temperatures. Looking back through history how many species have become extinct due to environmental changes and human meddling. Our animals should not be in zoo, nor should humans have to live in multi-story high rises with fewer and fewer trees to filter the toxins created by the building process, emissions from vehicles, manufacturing, and large-scale animal (cattle, sheep, pigs, poultry and fish) production. I personally am glad I do not have children who would have to live in a world devoid of natural beauty due to the continual destruction of our landscape. I will no longer vote for a political party who is not interested in repairing the destruction made to this beautiful country of Australia. In writing this rant I am hoping that the Independent Planning Commission give a great deal of thought to the long-term benefits of keeping this land unaltered. Toowoomba Qld 4350 |
Mary Forbes
|
ID |
19166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2441 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I firmly object to the expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine on Wiradjuri Country. This expansion would be very harmful to wildlife, flora and fauna, water resources, the community and would increase greenhouse gas emissions. Nature is our life support system. Once destroyed, the complexity of the natural world and all that it offers us can never be replaced. Every tiny creature, plant or element in the marvellous web of life plays an important role. Pull one thread of that web and the whole is endangered. Water, soil and biodiversity must not be threatened or compromised. At a time of climate crisis, we have a grave responsibility to urgently phase out fossil fuels. This proposal is to cover land that is richly biodiverse and already home to threatened species and therefore should not be disturbed. Rather, that land should be included in an expansion of the beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which I have had the privilege of visiting many times. The project would clear 480 hectares of precious native vegetation, including 113 hectares of Koala habitat which is crucial for the survival of a resilient population that lives and breeds there. 400 ha of critically endangered Box Gum Woodland would be cleared if this expansion were approved. It is also an important habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. There are only 250 to 350 left in the wild but the species has been previously recorded breeding nearby. The Large-Eared Pied Bat and the Eastern Cave Bat are known to roost in the cliffs in Munghorn. There is a definite risk that blasting from the mine will destabilise the cliffs and the noise and vibration will disturb the bat and other wildlife. Yancoal refused to accept the Department of Environment's 500m buffer zone from Munghorn Reserve and will be expanding to 100m from the Reserve. This is not a good sign of their willingness to consider wildlife and the environment. The recent update from Yancoal is meaningless as it does not reduce the footprint or the amount of coal to be mined; it only commits to managing the area outside - whatever that means. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. These precious creatures cannot be transplanted! There would be damage to groundwater and waterways. Up to five metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which flows into the Goulburn River, will be drawn down, posing an unacceptable risk to ecosystems that rely on that water, especially in times of drought. The mine would do serious harm to indigenous cultural heritage. There are 55 heritage sites within the proposed footprint of the expansion, with a further twelve being indirectly affected. I am concerned about climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. The Department of Planning does not even mention the most important finding of the Net Zero Commision, Number 4: "Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to." This alone should be a red light. It is very concerning that no cumulative impact assessment of the three large mines in Mudgee has ever been undertaken. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. In fact, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energyprojects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering clear alternative employment pathways. It is clear that this project would offer no substantial benefit to the community but instead would cause irreparable damage to the environment, to biodiversity and to climate. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Regards, Mary Forbes |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2113 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia currently is the worst continent on the planet for the loss of biodiversity and habitat degradation. Australia’s biodiversity is some of the most rich and diverse of anywhere else on earth. The loss of more biodiversity will not only impact the environment, but communities throughout the country. |
PIPI QUINLAN
|
ID |
16576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Re: Moolarben Coal Complex – Open Cut 3 Extension To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 Extension, located near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This proposal represents a serious and irreversible harm to Country, Aboriginal cultural heritage, and the living cultural practices of the Wiradjuri people. It should not be approved. The land impacted by this proposal is not empty or expendable. It is Country; a living, interconnected system of land, water, biodiversity, and story that holds profound cultural, spiritual, and historical significance for Wiradjuri people. The project would directly destroy at least 55 Aboriginal cultural artefacts, all of which have been assessed by Registered Aboriginal Parties as having high cultural value. The loss of these artefacts is permanent. They cannot be relocated, recreated, or meaningfully “offset.” Cultural heritage does not exist in isolation from landscape; once Country is fractured, the cultural meaning embedded within it is fractured as well, and this spreads into the community. Beyond the artefacts themselves, the proposed expansion contributes to the cumulative degradation of Country from decades of mining in the region. This ongoing industrialisation undermines Wiradjuri peoples’ ability to: maintain connection to Country practice cultural traditions pass knowledge, story, and responsibility to future generations Failure to respect Aboriginal consultation and decision-making The late-stage “minor amendments” proposed by Yancoal, which do not reduce vegetation clearing or cultural impacts, further undermine meaningful consultation. Altering a proposal after community consultation, particularly where Aboriginal cultural heritage is concerned, demonstrates a lack of respect for both country and community. Cultural heritage assessments should not be treated as procedural hurdles. They are meant to protect Country, not facilitate its destruction. The proposed OC3 extension threatens groundwater systems, Moolarben Creek, and surrounding ecosystems that are deeply connected to Wiradjuri cultural values. Waterways are central to Country, spiritually, ecologically, and practically (not to mention to effect Predicted groundwater drawdown lasting decades risks further degrading Country and damaging water-dependent ecosystems that hold cultural significance and act as drought refuges. Approving such harm contradicts principles of custodianship and intergenerational responsibility. Inconsistency with climate responsibility and cultural futures The project would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, further increasing climate change impacts that disproportionately affect poorer and/or farming communities. Approving new coal expansion during a climate crisis, particularly on Aboriginal land, contradicts NSW’s stated commitments to emissions reduction and reconciliation. It places short-term corporate profit above cultural survival, and environmental responsibility. Conclusion Country is not a resource to be consumed until nothing remains. The proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension would cause irreversible damage to Wiradjuri cultural heritage, living Country, and cultural continuity, while delivering little public benefit. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse approval of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Extension and to prioritise the protection of Wiradjuri Country, cultural heritage, and ecological integrity. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, PIPI QUINLAN NORTH WOLLONGONG, NSW. |
Charlotte McCabe
|
ID |
16776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2297 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Charlotte McCabe, I’m currently in my second term as an elected Councillor for Newcastle City Council and I’m the Deputy Lord Mayor until the 8th of October this year. I’ve been a resident of Newcastle for the last fourteen years and have had direct experience with the poor planning decisions for the Hunter Region that have relied on the coal industry for economic development, at the expense of all other industries. I am strongly opposed to the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 extension for the following reasons: Climate impacts The OC3 extension would generate over half of the state’s current emissions over the lifetime of the site. Approving an additional 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions when global CO2 has already reached 429 ppm is unconscionable. The Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group v MACH Energy (2025) and Gloucester Resources v Minister for Planning (2019 - "Rocky Hill Case") both found that Scope 3 emissions should be considered as part of project assessments and in this case should be a key consideration for the rejection of this application for OC3. The Moolarben extension adds no additional jobs for the local community but will contribute to local climate impacts that are already having significant impacts through foods, droughts, fires, the cost of insurance and supply chain uncertainty. The Net Zero Commission has found that any further coal mine expansions would be in direct contravention of the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement and the IPC should be making determinations in line with these commitments. Biodiversity impacts The Munghorn Gap Conservation Reserve is one of the oldest in the state and should be expanded to protect the habitat for the 23 identified threatened species. The presence of a resilient koala population and Regent Honeyeaters alone should be enough to rule out this expansion under our recently updated EPBC laws. 113 hectares of koala habitat, 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat and 401 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland are threatened by this extension. Biodiversity credits should not be permitted for this project. Neither should increased buffers be treated as a genuine mitigation for these biodiversity impacts. This habitat is irreplaceable and the species in question have already lost too much habitat across the state. There’s no justification for further clearing of habitat, particularly for a coal mine expansion. The Moolarben Creek is a critical water source for the fauna that lives in this valley which will be threatened by the project’s drawdown on ground water of 2-6 metres which is estimated to last for up to 25 years after the mining concludes. Wiradjuri Cultural Heritage This project will destroy 55 Wiradjuri artifacts and potentially impact dozens of others with high cultural value as identified by Registered Aboriginal Parties. Cumulative Impacts The cumulative impacts from the intensity of coal mining in the region must be taken into consideration. Impacts from the Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 are already causing significant damage to surrounding water, air quality, biodiversity and cultural sites. This mine extension should be rejected and the land should instead be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Conservation Reserve in order to protect its ecologically significant flora and fauna populations. Thank you for considering my submission. Charlotte McCabe Newcastle, NSW, 2297 |
Penny Auburn
|
ID |
16826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
The Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has great importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site. It includes habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. This population of koalas has proved itself to be climate-robust, and “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to other wildlife such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. Australia is the driest inhabited continent, getting drier all the time. The water drawdown from this project also poses a significant risk of depletion of flows further downstream in the Goulburn River, further exacerbating water shortages for our farmers. The mine should not be approved because the NSW Net Zero Commission says clearly in its recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. The project needs to be halted until an assessment has successfully quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions. This is legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. This project should not be approved. Yours sincerely, Penny Auburn |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Expansion of the Moolarben thermal coal mine will encroach too close to protected environmental areas, putting more than 20 species of vulnerable flora (i. e., Box Gum woodland) and fauna (including microbats, Regency Honeyeaters and endangered koalas) will be at risk from noise, water contamination and chemical pollutants, in additional to critical and irrevocable habitat loss (the proposed amendments from Yancoal are insufficient to address the threats to the current animals and plants); furthermore, Yancoal cannot accurately determine the exact time that their Moolarben mining operations will be concluded.) 2. The NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act and Paris Agreement targets will not be met if this proposal is approved. Furthermore, the proposed expansion is diametrically opposed to current NSW energy policy: the establishment of green energy, rather than coal-based, alternatives. 3. The Denman Court of Appeal decision (i.e., the negative impacts of mine emissions on the environment) have not been taken into account. 4. Putting our priceless environment and its precious inhabitants at risk for coal that will be exported overseas, at a time when so many animals and plants in that area are endangered, is akin to unconscionable conduct. |
Megan Hyatt
|
ID |
17146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2576 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission in opposition to the Project Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I would like to introduce myself, my name is Megan and I live in Bowral in the Southern Highlands of NSW. In November 2012 Wingecarribee Shire Council declared itself a Coal Seam Gas (CSG) and Longwall Mining Free Shire, installing signage at entry points to the region. Incidentally in the late 1970s I worked for Sydney College of the Arts which was located at White Bay, everything was covered in fine black coal dust and the EPA came to do regular monitoring each month I think it was it was quite frequent. I am extremely concerned about any expansion to coal mining in Australia. The climate impacts being felt everywhere. Ten years ago my pond would freeze over for months at a time but no longer does that occur the climate is warming it is obvious just in my garden how the temperatures are rising. We used to get snow in winter it has been eleven years since we had a snowfall in Bowral. We used to get snow each winter even if it was just a flurry that melted when it hit the ground this no longer occurs. We are extremely fortunate to live in a temperate area and even if we have days with temperatures in the mid thirties the temperatures normally fall at night. This makes it more comfortable we are so very fortunate. Not all communities enjoy this respite. I used to live in the Hawkesbury Shire and it was very hot and dry in summer, the Highlands are heading in the same direction. I cannot imagine how hard it is for people in the western suburbs of Sydney or the western parts of NSW. Australia is suffering through extreme heatwaves, and energy bills are going up due to the added cost of cooling our homes. In opposing this project I am very concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. My concerns include: * Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. All of the bush that will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. * The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). * Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. The impacts of noise and blasting on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. * Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. The UNSW Centre for Ecosystem Science conducted a study on three of five Thirlmere Lakes. They investigated water levels within Thirlmere Lakes, which are primarily filled by rainfall but interact with the shallow groundwater. They study showed, “Groundwater levels in the shallow aquifer declined by up to 40m after mining commenced in 1982, also coinciding with an exponential increase in the number of groundwater bores (1940-2011). Although there were no publicly available data on how much groundwater was extracted each year, the serious decline in water levels coincided with increased groundwater development and longwall mining (29 longwall panels (2010)). These serious declines in water levels in the three Thirlmere Lakes were not climate related and are best explained by anthropogenic impacts. There are two potential explanations for the draining of Thirlmere Lakes, which may have acted synergistically: either there was considerable pumping of groundwater or longwall coal mining disrupted the groundwater aquifers, causing diversion of groundwater resources. The implications are significant for the ecological character of the Thirlmere Lakes. There are many affected obligate aquatic species or species reliant on wet habitats, including five species of waterbirds (Australasian bittern Botaurus poiciloptilus, Australian painted snipe Rostratula australis, great egret Ardea alba, cattle egret Ardea ibis, and Latham’s or Japanese Snipe Gallinago hardwickii) one fish species (Macquarie perch Macquaria australasica), two frog species (giant burrowing frog Heleioporus australiacus, Littlejohn’s tree frog Litoria littlejohni) and two plant species (smooth bush pea Pultenaea glabra, Kangaloon sun orchid Thelymitra Kangaloon) that are listed as threatened.” We need to ensure this will not happen again. * Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. * Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Allan EVANS
|
ID |
17156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the project p[roposal. Please refer to attached document for detaiols. |
|
Attachments |
Independent Planning Commission Submission Moolarben_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 86.34 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
State and Federal Governments have been elected to represent those that voted for them and act in the best interests of those people. Approving any new mine or coal powered anything is not working in the best interests of the majority of the population. We now have sources of power that cause less damage to the world and other people around us. Stop representing mining lobbyists. Your children will also be affected by the climate change you are exaccerbated. If you wont do it for the people who elected you, do it for them. |
Niamh Murray
|
ID |
17171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2089 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Niamh, I'm 31 years old and I'm deeply concerned about the state of the environment here at home. It concerns me that Australia is not taking the action that is so evidently needed - like transitioning from coal - and that is why I am writing to you today. I wholeheartedly reject to expansion of this coal mine for the following reasons: - The coal mine will clear 113 hectares of koala habitat and impact already threatened species like the Regent Honeyeater, Broad headed snake and microbats. - The proposed expansion is bordering too close Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, causing signficant disruption to precious biodiversity. - The project will cause irrversible harm to Wiradjuri Cultural Herittage sites and it's high time to respect our First Nations peoples. We must listen to their wisdom and their desperate calls for us to respect the land. The land is not an ornament, it's living and breathing, and it's the life support system upon which we depend. - The significant risks to water and groundwater are including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek. - The enormous climate impact, including 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. - There is no benefit to the community as coal mining jobs in the area have remained unfilled for years, and nearby Mudgee will soon see renewable energy projects which will likely create 2,000 new jobs, offering clear employment alternatives. - The coal dug up at this mine will primarily be exported overseas, and given the decline in Australian thermal coal demand, the economic argument for an expansion is weak at best. To reiterate, I firmly reject the expansion of this coalmine on the basis that there is no benefit to people, nature or the economy. To approve the expansion amidst a climate a biodiversity crisis would be unconscionable. If the land, water and wildlife are destroyed, we die. We cannot eat a good economy, and clearly this expansion isn't going to actually provide much benefit anyway. Please, we can't waste time any longer. It's time to lay down the sword and for us to create a new future, based on a new economy, together. Thank you for hearing me, Niamh Murray |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2329 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a 65 year old retired council worker living in the Upper Hunter and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in my region, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. 30 years ago a normal hot summer’s day reached 33degC. Now 37degC is the norm and lasts much longer than before, up to a week with only a couple of days reprieve before it starts all over again. This is scientifically recognised as anthropogenic climate change and our current government was voted into power on the promise of reversing climate change. Expanding coal mine enterprises is just an utter kick in the face to all those who voted for change and reveals how weak our governments are when it comes to corporate fossil-fuel lobbyists. We all know that coal is going to be phased out eventually but the government’s greed for taxes (no matter where they come from) along with corporate political donations, shows what a travesty it has made of acting in the public interest! I too am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. I too am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to utilise it’s so called “independence” and recognise that no one other than the vested interests (including the greedy NSW Govt.) want this Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project to expand. It makes you wonder doesn’t it, so close to Mount Penny and here they go again, trying to destroy our environment for another sly buck! Sincerely, (Redacted) Merriwa NSW 2329 |
Stacy Wake
|
ID |
16786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Submission in Objection to the Moolarben OC3 Expansion I make this submission to object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion. Having reviewed the application and the proponent’s recent amendments, I submit that the proposal remains inappropriate and should not be approved. The amendments do not materially alter the scale, impacts, or risks of the project, and therefore do not address the fundamental concerns outlined below. 1. Biodiversity and Habitat Impacts The proposal would result in the clearing of significant areas of native vegetation, including documented koala habitat where breeding has been recorded. The area also provides habitat for threatened species, including the Regent Honeyeater and microbat species. The loss and fragmentation of this habitat would be irreversible and inconsistent with state and national biodiversity conservation objectives. Proposed offset and mitigation measures do not adequately compensate for the loss of mature, connected habitat or the long-term ecological function of the area. 2. Proximity to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve The expansion would bring mining activities to within approximately 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This proximity poses an unacceptable risk to the reserve’s ecological integrity through noise, dust, vibration, altered hydrology, and edge effects. Buffers of this scale are insufficient to protect sensitive conservation areas, particularly those supporting threatened species. 3. Water Resources and Catchment Impacts The project presents ongoing risks to surface water and groundwater systems, including altered flows, contamination, and cumulative impacts on the surrounding catchment. Uncertainty remains regarding the long-term impacts of mining on water availability and quality, particularly in the context of increasing climate variability. These risks have not been satisfactorily addressed in the application or the recent amendments. 4. Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The expansion would contribute an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions over its lifetime. This is inconsistent with New South Wales’ legislated climate targets and broader commitments to emissions reduction. Approving a large new source of emissions at a time when climate-related disasters are increasing presents a clear conflict with the public interest. 5. Cumulative Impacts The application does not adequately address the cumulative environmental, social, and climate impacts of continued and expanded mining in the region. When considered alongside existing and approved operations, the additional impacts of OC3 would exacerbate pressures on ecosystems, water resources, and local communities. 6. Public Interest Considerations The long-term environmental and climate costs of the proposal outweigh the claimed economic benefits. Once ecological values are lost, they cannot be restored. Decisions of this nature should prioritise intergenerational equity, environmental protection, and alignment with climate policy. Conclusion The proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion, including the proponent’s recent amendments, remains fundamentally flawed. It would cause unacceptable and irreversible harm to biodiversity, water resources, and climate outcomes, and poses undue risks to nearby protected areas. For these reasons, I respectfully submit that the application should be refused. |
Scott Shade
|
ID |
16796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear IPC Panel, I wish to lodge my objection to this project in the strongest terms. This proposal is abhorrent and to approve it would be a crime against the local critical ecosystems, endangered species, local towns and everything that has been proven beyond doubt about CO2 emissions from burning coal and the dangers of coal dust. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. It will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the local Koala population, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. I sincerely hope you will arrive at the right decision for the environment, the local towns, the indigenous history and the local waterways and aquifers by rejecting this proposal. Kind regards, Scott Shade |
Jeanette and John Hammett
|
ID |
16801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioner, This matter requires your urgent attention! The Yancoal Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee is already a considerable size on the landscape. It extracts 22 million tonnes of coal per year and has a life span until 2038. It is one of the largest producing millions of tonnes for domestic power and export. This coal mining giant has disrupted the community consultation process with a last-minute attempt to greenwash its proposal. Hundreds of hectares of native vegetation including critical Koala and Regent Honeyeater habitat would be cleared and climate-wrecking emissions remain unchanged, should the extension be approved. 675 hectares of native vegetation at risk from clearing and mining activities with only a 100m buffer retained between operations at Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This project would significantly extend one of NSW's biggest thermal coal operations locking in more climate pollution, adding an extra 30 million tonnes of coal produced over the life of the mine. The cost to our climate will be an additional 64.6 million to 86.59 million tonnes of emissions, a massive blow for| Australia's responsibility to climate change and the future of the planet. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113 hectares of Koala habitat with breeding Koala's on site, as well as 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females on site. This proposal is expected to impact several threatened bat species, particularly due to habitat disturbance from subsidence and blasting effects. They are the Large-eared Pied Bat, the Eastern Cave Bat and the Greater Long-eared Bat. All are racing towards extinction because of reckless development and the bad decisions made by governments on both sides. This project could cause groundwater drawn down up to and exceeding 2-6 metres for more than 25 years post mining. This would significantly alter the stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems and the potentially Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This puts Moolarben Creek and Spring Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. Should the expansion go ahead, damage would be done to Wiradjuri cultural landscapes including sacred sites. Australia's weather has been significantly hotter over summer with above average temperatures! Flooding in the north of the country and recurring heatwaves throughout the south. There is record-high sea surface temperature surrounding the continent. Current global warming is not yet at 2.5 degrees, but reports indicate that the world is on track for 2.3 to 2.9 degrees temperature increase above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century. Australia is a global leader in renewable energy adoption, particularly in rooftop solar with over 4 million installations. This will only increase over time with more and more households being able to afford battery technology. Australia's commitment to the Paris Agreement reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. The nation aims for a net zero emissions by 2050, so extensions to the life of power stations and open cut mines must be refused! Kind regards, Jeanette and John |
Mick Boller
|
ID |
16806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to OBJECT to the proposed Moolarben expansion. I write my objection from Wiradjuri land at Lue. This proposed expansion will have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water and sites of significance for First Nations people. There are at least 57 significant cultural sites in this area. The destruction of such sites is unforgivable. The impacts on Moolarben Creek and vegetation along its banks and therefore important habitat from drawdown of local aquifers will be very significant. Thirdly, the impact on critically endangered species such as Koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, Eastern Cave Bats and Large Eared Pied Bats cannot be allowed. This expansion, surrounded on three sides by the Munghorn Reserve, will involve the clearing of 480 hectares of Box woodland. Koalas are an iconic Australian species whose greatest threat is habitat loss and fragmentation. A cumulative impact assessment for the coal mining projects in this area has never been undertaken. Each new expansion or modification is treated as a small and inconsequential effect on water and species. There has been no quantification of the full economic costs or a full consideration of emissions associated with these projects, including when coal is burnt overseas. Considering climate change implications, more extreme weather events and the local impacts on cultural heritage, water and biodiversity, I urge you to disallow this proposed expansion. Mick Boller |
Peter Coughlan
|
ID |
16811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please note my objection to the above project. There are multiple reasons for this objection. As headline points this project must be considered in the light of a cumulative impact assessment. It is inconceivable to look at projects on a standalone basis. Furthermore and in the light of recent NSW court cases the project must be considered bearing in mind the full emissions from the project - scope 1, 2 and 3. There is absolutely no justification for taking a head in the sand approach and not considering these emissions. Not only that, the decision, and the deliberations of the IPC, must be consistent with the Climate Change Act and Australian commitments to the Paris Agreement. On more local fronts: - the proposed footprint of the mine is a death sentence for 540 ha of native vegetation, including 113 ha of proven koala habitat. -The land is also known vital habitat for the critically endangered regent honeyeater - the land clearing plus noise and dust from blasting etc will have huge negative impacts on the Large eared pied bat and the Eastern Cave bat - there must be proper protection for all the 55 identified aboriginal sites within the footprint and the 12 adjoining which will be impacted. - climate change is already heavily impacted on our rainfall patterns and water flows. This mine, if it was to be permitted, will dramatically exacerbate those impacts for nature and farmers in the immediate region and downstream. At the very least there must be a 500 metre buffer on all sides to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It is laughable to contenance a deep and wide scar on the earth, with all its negative consequences, to be allowed with a token 100 metre buffer I call on the IPC to consider all these points, plus the clear evidence from all the environmental experts in their respective fields who have clearly demonstrated that this extension application should be refused Yours Peter Coughlan |
Tony Caine
|
ID |
16816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I would like to object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 Firstly to achieve nett zero emissions required to slow coal and co2 driven climate change we need to stop expanding the coal mining in nsw. The full downstream effects of nsw coal mining needs to be considered. These include local costs from climate change including to our economy but also the costs and effects globally of NSW exporting toxic coal. Secondly, the effects of Moolarben coal mine are completely at odds with the NSW koala protection strategy. How can more coal mines be approved at all. It has been determined that the mine expansion will destroy over 100 ha of known koala habitat as well as an additional 300ha of old forest that is habitat to endanged birds, bats and other precious animals and trees. How can it be approved. Moolarben window dressing by prosing some other habitat management is no where close to preserving known koala habitat – DO NOT APPROVE THIS PROJECT Tony Caine |
Fiona Lee
|
ID |
16821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I write to formally lodge my objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. First I would like to acknowledge Yancoal's shameful attempt at greenwashing by asking DPHI for permission to do a minor amendment, at this late stage, that does nothing to address the significant impacts on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. Yancoal's request to do an amendment at this very late stage should be rejected by DPHI. The valley where Yancoal wants to push into should be protected and managed as part of a connected conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and not sacrificed to an open-cut coal mine. This would fragment a highly significant ecological area at a time when intact landscapes are critical for climate resilience and biodiversity survival. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in and around the site, including habitat essential to a uniquely resilient koala population. The mine would destroy and degrade habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible harm to threatened species such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, as well as clearing endangered Box Gum Woodland. The mine would cause significant harm to cultural heritage, with 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint directly impacted and a further 12 potentially affected indirectly. Beyond the local damage, this project would worsen climate change. The NSW Net Zero Commission has clearly stated in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW’s climate targets or maintaining a safe climate. Despite this, the assessment of the project has failed to properly quantify the economic costs of downstream greenhouse gas emissions, something that is now required following the NSW Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. In the context of the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and cultural heritage protection, this project should not be approved. Sincerely, Fiona Lee Artist and community organiser |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I write to formally lodge my objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I object to this project on the following grounds: Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. We are transitioning away from coal. Coal expansions have no place in our landscape, especially given their impact on the environment, the climate, and community. Best regards (Redacted) Please redact my personal details prior to publishing on the website. |
Grace Webster
|
ID |
16841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern at the Department of Planning, We are writing to express our objections to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine extension, Project Number SSD-33083358. We have serious concerns around the extremely detrimental and irreversible impacts this proposed expansion will have on the already endangered local native wildlife, local flora and heritage sites, as well as climate change, which will have far reaching impacts locally and globally. The site is currently supporting healthy populations of threatened wildlife, including a healthy and breeding Koala population, Regent Honeyeaters (which has a dramatically low population), and the Large Eared Pied bat and Eastern Cave bat. These animals are all extremely important to our Australian eco-systems, and losing these beautiful animals for short term economic gain is simply not acceptable. In addition, the proposed extension will have an irreversible impact on the local flora and waterways. 4000 hectares of Box Gum woodlands would disappear, and the drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium, which runs into the Goulburn river, would severely impact this essential waterway, creating a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water and aquatic animals living in the system. The proposed extension would also impact 55 First Nations heritage sites, destroying 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. We find this oversight inexcusable, considering how it will contribute to erasing an already threatened 60 000+ year old culture. The impact in the region and more broadly on climate change is essential to consider. In their assessment report the DPHI has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. We sincerely hope you review the proposal in the context of this objection and other submissions made by the community who care about sustainability in the region for flora, fauna, key heritage sites and humans alike. We are at a tipping point for climate change and biodiversity protection, and the proposed extension of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine would create a calamitous and irreversible impact for future generations. Robyn Webster Grace Webster (age 16) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My main objection is that given that climate change is occurring, and that one of the largest causes is carbon-dioxide and methane being released into the atmosphere by the mining and later burning of coal, there should be no more new or expanded coal projects granted. There is already enough coal being hauled out of the ground to supply the world through to the renewable energy transition completion. We don't need more. Other objections are land degradation, habitat loss of endangered species, air/noise pollution for local communities, possible water table pollution, plus the pollution from all the spoil. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
IPCN Submission: Moolarben Coal Mine, proposed expansion. To whom it may concern, My name is (Redacted), and I am writing to you ask you to put a stop to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine. Coal, as a fuel is a dying resource and your proposal to give life support to this, or any new coal projects is simply delaying the inevitable. The world is moving on from coal, but Australia it seems, is not moving with them. As a proud Wailwan/Wongaibon man from the Wiradjuri Nation, I ask that you deny the application on the following grounds: 1. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage. This proposed expansion will have an irreversible negative impact on Wiradjuri Country, destroying at least 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts, (and possibly many more), all with high cultural value to all Australians. If we are ever to truly walk together in this country, our history needs to be as important as yours. Wiradjuri people need to be able to practice our culture, maintain our connection to Country, and look after our sacred sites. This mine will interfere with all of this. 2. Environmental concerns must be addressed. The barren footprint of almost 500 hectares cleared of native vegetation and the wildlife it supports, would only add pressure to the 23 threatened species that call this site home. Koalas would again suffer the stress of having even more of their declining habitat removed. 3. Employment and the local economy. The existing site will continue to export coal until at least 2038; this is more than enough time for the REZ to absorb the employees from mining and transition them to renewable jobs without impacting the local economy. Renewables are rapidly overtaking mining as a career choice going into the future. 4. EPA impacts. It is estimated that the proposed expansion will spew almost 65 million tonnes of extra Greenhouse Gases into the atmosphere before it is finally closed, making a mockery of our “Net Zero” target. The water impacts are of great concern as well, the impacts on ground water are at this stage unknown, as no data exists that can accurately predict what damage the proposed extraction will have on the existing and surrounding water table. Summary: If you grant a license to expand Moolarben, you will be ignoring the best advice that you have received, even from other government departments, and will contribute to our ongoing inability to meet our emissions reductions targets into the future. Most importantly for me, you will destroy my history and severely limit my ability to teach our story to the next generation. Warm regards, (Redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to object to the extension application of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 mine. Our climate is in crisis, evidenced by more frequent & severe heatwaves, fires & floods. Fossil fuels have been linked to these changes. Mine expansions will therefore further impact the climate, along with other negative consequences including habitat destruction & water impacts. Therefore this application should not be approved. |
Sally Stockbridge
|
ID |
16216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2232 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on Moolarben I work for one of the wineries in the Mudgee region and also use the area for tourism. My home is fully run by solar energy. Renewables are the future. The coal industry is dying. I object to the Moolarben OC3 Expansion because; It destroys the local environment. It negatively affects the local wildlife by destroying habitat. It negatively affects local tourism because of this and by adding pollution. The coal industry is dying. It is no longer needed and should not destroy the environment any further. The Yancoal amendment should be rejected and public hearings should be held. Community consultation processes should not be disrupted. The Community IS NSW. The community voices need to heard, not sidelined. The proposed amendment should be rejected and consultations continued. Please note that NSW’s Net Zero Commission report confirmed that “mine expansions like Moolarben will prevent NSW from reaching our climate targets.” |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to strongly oppose the Moolarben 0C3 coal expansion plan near Mudgee, New South Wales I. These lands are sacred ancient bushlands in Wiradjuri Country at Moolarben. I live in another area of the vast majestic Wiradjuri Country area in Albury. My concerns of the Moolarben coal expansion stem from extreme weather events we are already experiencing in a changing climate which is worsened by deforestation and pollution from carbon emissions which affect us now and forever. Natural landscapes are homes for significant biodiverse flora and fauna and have been appreciated by Indigenous people for thousands of years. Coal mine expansions and land clearing are wrecking balls on humanity and their ecosystems which support all life. I and many others will not accept or live with this sort of destruction of this amazing planet which needs nurturing now and well into the future. This proposed expansion site is at an irreplaceable remaining reserve of Box woodland on 113 Hectares of resilient koala habitat. There is 80 Hectares of Regent Honeyeaters habitat. These birds have been recorded on the site. This is an area of natural ecological significance in habitat that supports at least 23 endangered species. There are springs, creeks and waterholes adjacent to the site that are at threat in an already warming climate. Moolarben Creek is a vital refuge for wildlife and is at risk with the mine’s proposal, particularly when there are droughts. The groundwater of this area helps riparian trees and vegetation grow which ecosystems would be impacted permanently. Climate change poses more issues when this groundwater is used wrongly. Compromising and damaging this area permanently for the sake of no new jobs, and minimal, if any economical benefit in a declining industry would create more emissions and potentially further coal exports. And that is nonsensical. Not a single bit of groundwater data had been previously taken in at the coal mine. This sort of inadequate water monitoring and poor compliance history is a serious concern. We have seen areas elsewhere, in the USA for example where in recent history of the last few hundred years or so, bores have been sunk for agriculture and used excessively. And then the ground has sunk completely and is ruined forever. There are as many as 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal artefacts which would be destroyed, and several more at risk. All artefacts are of high cultural value. Removing natural landscapes of the environment is permanent damage on this Wiradjuri People’s Country. Clearing 480 hectares, or any amount of this bushland reserve for a coal mine expansion in 2026 is an atrocity and a contradiction to New South Wales climate goals. This proposal is an attack on biodiversity. And we are now in 2026 following a Net Zero Commission in 2025 and basic climate science has been known for several years. The Paris Climate agreement which was signed in 2016 recognises that our precious planet earth is vulnerable to catastrophic temperature increases by as much as 2 or 3 degrees. We certainly do not need to embrace this harsh increase in average temperature, Please see sense and do not allow the expansion of this coal project and any other projects which would detrimentally affect the environment and everyone. The biodiversity of New South Wales and all states beyond is at risk when environmentally destructive projects are approved against the will of environmentally conscious rightly concerned citizens who want to be in a livable planet where nature and life are abundant. With sincere hope for the natural environment and all of its inhabitants, (Redacted) |
Penny Davies
|
ID |
16311 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
There is critical koala habitat in the location under threat by the expansion of the mine. Nothing is worth endangering these animals, whose numbers are declining around the country. Please do not allow this to go ahead. |
Dr Eric van Beurden
|
ID |
16316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Crucially, Yancoal’s proposed changes make no meaningful difference to the application. The mine footprint, habitat destruction, water impacts and climate pollution all remain. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2137 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please refer to uploaded document |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Expansion submission.pdf (PDF, 72.44 KB) |
Susie Russell
|
ID |
16336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
There are already more than enough new and extended coal mines approved. The Hunter Valley and the world doesn't need another one. Nor do we need to see hundreds of hectares of precious native vegetation bulldozed and replaced with a massive hole in the ground. The idea that these voids are rehabilitated is a sick joke. Global temperatures are rising as a result of continued and rising greenhouse gas emissions, much of it resulting from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal. The increased temperatures are causing serious disruption to global weather patterns. This looks like to tip planet Earth from a 'goldilocks' climate, which is just right for human society, to climates that are either way too hot, too cold or threatened by wild winds or rising sea waters. This is an existential crises for humanity. On the current exponential trend line, children born today are likely to be living in a hostile environment by the time they reach 20 years old. Added to the loss of biodiversity and the greenhouse gas emissions from this development is the disruption to water resources. Mining, particularly open cut coal mines often leads to significant drawdown of groundwater. Something that we, as inhabitants of the driest continent on Earth, cannot afford. I urge you to refuse this development application. |
Stephanie Carrick
|
ID |
16351 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Sydney Basin Koala Network |
|
Location |
New South Wales 1240 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Our objections to the extension and it's direct impact on an established Koala population are attached. |
|
Attachments |
Stephanie Carrick - Objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 679.25 KB) |
Danny Briggs
|
ID |
16371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Major habitat impact from 480Ha Clearing including to koalas, regent honeyeaters , cave bats and critically endangered box gum. among others Ongoing mining operations especially noise, blasting and light will impact Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve Have not taken account of the impacts of all emissions including scope 3 as per the Denman decision in the Court of Appeal Completely ignores the Net Zero Emission coal report that says mine expansions should stop. What is the point of creating this commission and ignoring its findings. Water impact on Moolarben Creek, At least 55 aboriginal heritage/cultural sites affected |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I object the Moorlaben coal mine extension. I will keep my submission short as I am aware that several environment and community groups are making lengthy submissions. For well over 20 years from the early 1980s I spent more than half of my life living on a, then, remote freehold property within the Goulbourne River National Park. During that time I walked throughout the area extensively. I also walked with camels to Wollar. I walked throughout the Wollar Valley and from Wollar to Mudgee via Munghorn Gap. Many of the areas where I walked are now massive lifeless voids. The people of Wollar adopted me as their own. I felt completely safe and welcomed in Wollar. Sadly many of the old timers who new the bush of yester-years are gone now. Men and women who loved their village, considered it to be a paradise made tangible contributions to community and the lives of people like me. I know many people buried in Wollar's tiny historic cemetery. I also know a lot about wildlife, rare and endangered birds, animals, fish and plants found in these lower parts of The Great Divide. I am well aware of the division the arrival of the mines caused in community and even in families - it was and continues to be a tragedy. Up to 4 genetations of families displaced. Their quiet, modest homes subject now to industrial noise, coal dust and an apparent loss of wildlife that frequented their properties. The social and familial costs of this mine and others in the vicinity - can never and will never be compencated for. The loss is devestating and heartbreaking. This mine expansion will continue the destruction of vital corridoors between Goulbourn River National Park and Munghorn Gap NR. Some of the questions you need to ask yourselves as commissioners include: ● How much more destruction can the remaining members of the Wollar community take? ● How much more societal and community damage is acceptable? ● How much more damage to the greater Goulbourn River catchment is acceptable. This perenial river is already damaged, subject to mine run off and pollution. ● Is the long term permanent damage to biodiversity, community, indigenous heritage, our global climate and our living world - worth the short term gains for a USA company that is in the top ten profiteers in Australia that pays ZERO tax? Please call a halt! Please give the people of the Wollar Valley the opportunity to re-build their lives and community before the last of the, now older people die and are buried in the little Wollar Cemetery - surrounded by mines. I object |
Melissa Barrass
|
ID |
16401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2294 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, my name is Melissa Barrass, and I am concerned that this project contributes to a global effort of placing short-term profit and greed over fact-based reason and acknowledgement and agreed national goals of the Paris Agreement to keep our climate below 1.5 degrees of change. I am tired of writing letters like this. It's a global shame inflicted on people of my generation to BEG for reason and science to be considered over the corporate interests of those who wish to rape and pillage the land, depriving it of water - a life source, and polluting the surrounding communities. I would usually spend more time to professionalise my message, but I am tired. I should be out and enjoying life instead of penning words that will likely be overlooked in favour of a quick buck. We know that coal communities are severely disadvantaged, have higher than average health issues like cancer, depression, asthma and many more (source: https://thephn.com.au/2024-local-government-area-health-profiles). I strongly object to the expansion of this coal mine. Why do we keep destroying and scarifiying the land like a big scab on our skin? We keep picking at it and reopening the wound, depriving the healing and nourishment it deserves. The greatest investment we can make is preserving the land and water resources for abundant communities that will thrive for generations to come. |
Kelli Tangney
|
ID |
16421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2046 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project will cause more serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritized. * I am also very concerned for local farmers, primary producers, small business operators, tourism operators etc who will all have there businesses adversely impacted by this development. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Further this decision by the NSW Government represents a serious breach of there electoral commitments made during the last election. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Kelli |
Julie & Desmond Croasdale
|
ID |
16426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am concerned about this NEW mine giving of over 50% of the annual NSW emission currently. This is not good for our planet, the natural habitat that lives there or our environment. The devastation it could cause in the long term with drawing water usage that has not been assessed with this application. Or the effects of the adjoining nature reserves. Each year it gets hotter, we get more bushfires and our native species are being wiped out. How can you do an assessment on the future consequences to our biodiversity This mine is about EXPORTING coal and its life is now greater than the existing mines in the area. Australia should be leading the world in new renewables, that our future generations will need, not coal or gas that is exported overseas. This is not justice for our next Genz or of Australia as a whole. We must say NO to more coal, and YES to preserving endanger REGENT HONEYEATER, and protecting our breeding koalas who keep getting wiped out from fires, roadways and more fossil fuel development. |
Susan Dwyer
|
ID |
16431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3056 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am a retired schoolteacher in Melbourne and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our country. The emissions from coal mining and burning are contributing to a hotter Australia with increasingly extreme heat waves affecting people all over the country. The hotter conditions are increasing the frequency and intensity of bushfires and are unfavourable for our unique and biodiverse wildlife and flora species. I am therefore writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. The mine expansion will also negatively impact ground water which will further endanger native species. In particular, I am aware of and concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Susan Dwyer Brunswick, Victoria 3056 (phone number redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4069 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Wendy, and as a mother and a grandmother I am becoming increasingly concerned about the impacts of coalmining on climate change and our natural world. I am particularly concerned for my children and my grandchildren and I'm worried about the degradation that is being caused by the approval of coal mining projects. In Australia, we've had a hot summer and the heat will only get worse if coal mines continue to be expanded. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. This rich biodiverse area should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protected. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government and Australia cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) |
Mathilda Freiheit
|
ID |
16441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3052 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission My name is Mathilda, I’m a young Australian living and I am devastated and concerned about the proposed Moolarben coal expansion in Western NSW, due to the climate impacts and biodiversity loss that will occur. As a young Australian the cost of living crisis has impacted me deeply. Increased energy bills going up due to the added cost of air condition because of the recent heatwaves. I’m sure that communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I love hiking, going on walks with my family and spending time in nature with the people I love. Because of these reasons I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment. In particular, I am concerned about: * Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. * Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. * Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. * Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. * Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government would be at a significant disadvantage if it were to continue to approve new or expanded coal projects. Especially as this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for your time for reading and considering this submission. Sincerely, Mathilda Freiheit Parkville, VIC 3052 |
Judy Rees
|
ID |
16446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
South Australia 5052 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an Australian who loves nature, wildlife and can see the impact, suffering we have on their homes, I cannot accept any more new mining, extraction or expansions of coal, oil or gas. I am already impacted by Climate Change and my children and grandchildren should not have to suffer even more. The Moolarben coal mine is already the largest producing coal mine in NSW. To be considering an expansion of any thermal coal mines is not in keeping with reducing emissions and transitioning from fossil fuels. This important valley must be protected for the high biodiversity that exists there. It is part of the critical habitat for koala, Regent Honeyeaters and micro bats. To clear a further 480 hectares of important native bush, pushing up against the existing reserve. The expansion by Yancoal would clear habitat, breeding grounds for koalas and Regent Honeyeaters. 401 hectares of the endangered Box Gum , the Woodland species and the broad-headed snake, all would be severely impacted. The NSW Department of Environment has acknowledged the effects could be long term decline of populations. Noise and blasting effects have not been adequately assessed. The amount of emissions approximately 64.6 tonnes is around 58% of NSW annual emissions. The clear findings of the Net Zero Change Act and Paris Agreement. How can NSW meet their 2030 and 2035 targets? The Denman Court of Appeal means the amount of emissions must be considered, which it has not. Mudgee is within the Central West Orana Renewable Enregy Zone which could provide 2,000 new jobs. Subsequently it is not feasable to say that this expansion is needed for new jobs. The old mine still exists, some jobs there are still not filled. The serious risk to groundwater drawdown of between 2-6 metres , which will be longlasting. The Moolarben Creek cannot recover most probably and neither will the riparian tress who have deep roots that cannot reach down so far. The Wiradjuri people must be heard. Yancoal will destroy 55 cultural artefacts and perhaps inpact dozens of others. Considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted. There has been little assessment of the cumulative of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion which will seriously impact threatened species with loss of habitat. It will impact on cultural heritage, water sources and the landscape. No expansions of any fossil fuel project should be entertained in 2026 due to the effects of Climate Change. |
Nicolas Sprauel
|
ID |
16456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2015 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Nicolas, and I live in Sydney. I am writing to you today because I am deeply concerned about the continued expansion of fossil fuel projects in NSW, particularly given the increasing frequency of droughts and extreme weather events that threaten local economies and the Australian way of life. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This proposal represents an unacceptable risk to our environment and climate. Rather than allowing an open-cut pit to encroach on our natural heritage, this significant valley should be protected and incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to create a single, continuous conservation landscape. In particular, I am concerned about the following points: Irreversible Harm to Biodiversity and Threatened Species: The project would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation, including 113 hectares of habitat for a uniquely resilient breeding koala population. Furthermore, it threatens 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat and 401 hectares of the endangered Box Gum Woodland. The NSW Environment Department has already warned of potential long-term population declines for species like the Broad-headed Snake and various microbats. Massive Climate Cost: This expansion would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. This is equivalent to roughly 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. Approving this project contradicts the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and ignores the reality that NSW is already off track to meet its 2030 and 2035 targets. Groundwater and Riparian Risks: Independent experts have identified a significant risk of groundwater drawdown between 2 and 6 metres, which could persist for 25 years. This threatens Moolarben Creek, a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Yancoal’s plan to conduct monitoring only after approval is insufficient; baseline studies must be completed beforehand. Lack of Economic and Employment Justification: The Moolarben mine is already approved to operate until 2038; this expansion is not required to maintain current jobs. With Mudgee located in a Renewable Energy Zone expected to create 2,000 new jobs, our region’s future lies in sustainable industry, not in a project where 65% of the product is destined for a declining Chinese thermal coal market. Impacts on Wiradjuri Cultural Heritage: The expansion will result in the destruction of 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts of high value. This project further fractures the landscape and undermines the ability of the Wiradjuri people to maintain their sacred connection to Country. Cumulative Environmental Impact: This proposal cannot be viewed in isolation. When combined with the expansions of the neighbouring Ulan and Wilpinjong mines, the cumulative loss of habitat and pressure on shared water sources reaches a breaking point for the region's biodiversity. The NSW Government must stop prioritising short-term corporate profits over the long-term survival of our ecosystems and the stability of our climate. This proposal is inconsistent with our legislated targets and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For the reasons outlined above, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for your time and for considering my submission. Sincerely, Nicolas Sprauel, NSW 2015 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to the Independent Planning Commision re the extension of the Moolarben Coal Extension Project Dear colleagues and commissioners, I am writing to object to the Yancoal proposal to expand mining of the Moolarben coal mine. Moolarben coal mine is an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. Moolarben is surrounded by the Munghorn Gap reserve an important habitat for koalas and many other species. This is an opportunity to keep this beautiful Munghorn Gap Nature reserve for current and future generations. Turning this area into additional open cut coal mines is not insightful or forward thinking. The proposed extension will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It is recommended by environmental experts that a buffer of at least 500 metres be kept around the reserve. Koalas have been found in this area recently and have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate using a thermal drone just over a year ago. Koalas are and endangered species that are threatened by habitat loss, road strikes and feral predators such as cats and foxes. In addition this is also habitat for the regent honey eater a critically endangered bird. There are also bat species that use the cliffs and area for nesting and food sources. Both the loss of habitat and the noise from blasting will reduce this bat population. The vegetation in this area is unique and includes the native box gum. The Yancoal mine expansion will clear 400 hectares of these gums for open cut mining. Vegetation regrowth rarely returns the site to its previous old growth diversity and the timeframe means that valuable time is lost while the trees grow. At a time when carbon capture is so important this is both reckless and short sighted. The cumulative impact of this clearing is impossible to predict and the risks too high at this time. When Koalas are threatened with extinction by 2050 all attempts to keep habitat and populations are imperative. They are an iconic Australian animal that cannot be replaced once extinct. Any proposed Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction, when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. The Independent Planning Commission needs to consider the impact of this mine in the context of our rapidly changing climate, which is primarily driven by human activity. The full impact of emissions not only during mining but also when the coal is burnt needs to be included in calculations. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. Expansion of this mine is inconsistent with emissions reduction and our climate change targets. It is also inconsistent with the Paris targets that our government has agreed to. A key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December was that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. The NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets based on this report. In addition to habitation reduction – the mine extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. Water is a precious commodity that needs to be kept uncontaminated and at this time is critical to maintaining environmental integrity. Mine expansion is often justified on the grounds of job creation. However there are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. There are other avenues of employment also in agriculture, tourism, health industries, viticulture and education. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Finally I would urge you to oppose this expansion. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I'm a doctor living and working in nearby regional NSW, and passionately and vehemently object to the expansion of the OC3, on environmental and human health grounds. As I'm sure has been explained in more eloquent and scientific terms than I have the subject-specific scientific expertise to convey, there are a wide range of environmental catastrophes that would ensue if the expansion were to proceed, and plenty of evidence to back this. This is including but not limited to the devastating loss of biodiversity and risk of animal extinction through destroying/ fracturing/ altering natural environments, alongside the serious damage to water supplies and creek beds, which together will butterfly to loss of natural habitat and culturally significant land with long-lasting consequences. Beyond this, I personally have an interest and experience in the intricate and deep interconnection between human health and the environment. On a local scale, the difference that having space and natural reserves/ national parks has on human mental and physical health is immense - it allows for not only space to breathe and relax, but a landscape with which to do physical activity eg hiking, and a way in which we find grounding and connection. There are countless studies and evidence put forward to back the argument that loss of natural environment has significant local health impacts and contributes to pre-existing health crises which already put strain on a failing system. But on a bigger and grander scale, the carbon emissions which would be significantly increased by the expansion of the coal mine would contribute to global warming, which of course has devastating affects on human health both in Australia and internationally. The World Health Organisation considers the climate crisis to be the single biggest threat to human life and health in the present day. It is everyone's responsibility to minimise our contributions to such an issue, and therefore absolutely unacceptable to consider expanding what is already a damaging industry such as the coal mine in Moolarben. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a doctor in the Illawarra, with ties to rural communities in NSW and their functional interests, and so can offer brief commentary within that context to the proposed development, that may not otherwise receive too much voice from other submissions. Providing an evidence base to the impact of environmental works on the health of a community is a difficult subject to research considering how many variables obscure that reality; though there exists no doubt the importance of local environmental conservation and intergenerational custodianship in our NSW communities. It acts in a modern sense as a vitality to common interest in rural townships, Wollar certainly notwithstanding in my experience. There will be no possibility to provide quality research through this lens before a decision could be made on this proposal, or in fact any of the current mining expansion proposals across the state. This expansion as I understand it, using evidence base, places 55 high cultural value Aboriginal artefacts in risk of destruction per the RAP, further extends the habitat loss and co-existing environmental stressors onto at least 4 threatened NSW native species, threatens irreparable damage to groundwater systems at least in Moolarben Creek, and would invariably put significant mental and functional strain on the residents of Wollar in a way consistent with their prior concerns raised to local council. It is unclear to my eyes how there is appropriate compensation provided for potential permanent destruction of artefacts, species, land, or community; other than some hope from developers that compensation would not need to be provided once all the voices representing those pillars were destroyed with them. Our strongest NSW communities would not allow that to happen, no doctor advocating for the people they represent would stand for it, I certainly never would, and it should be the state-wide standard. |
Graeme Batterbury
|
ID |
16781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I wish to lodge an objection to the Moolarben coal mine expansion. This proposal will push coal mining operations into critical koala habitat surrounded on all three sides by the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, and goes against the advice of the NSW Net Zero Commission who have said coal mine expansions are not consistent with climate laws. I support the research and submission detail from Lock The Gate as per the following: Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Please refuse to allow the Moolarben expansion to proceed. Warmest regards, Graeme Batterbury Lillian Rock NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Once again, one is compelled to oppose the environmental damage that will follow any approval of this proposal. What fresh madness would it be to allow this to go ahead? |
Louise Archer
|
ID |
14961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2750 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Why can't you just leave the environment alone.!!! Don't you under the impact it will have now or in the future or do you just not care ??? Shame.on you if you go ahead with it $. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission is to object to the expansion of an existing coal mine which moves into an existing nature reserve where Koalas and other threatened species live. Koalas are supposed to be a protected species and face constant threats of reduced habitat and climate change. Coal creates carbon emissions so whether it is being used in Australia or exported it still contributes to climate change. We have the scientific evidence and know we, as a nation, should be reducing coal extraction regardless of where in the world it is burned. It makes no sense at all to be expanding a coal mine into Koala habitat, expanding the extraction of coal and risking polution of local waterways. Please do not approve this development |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2469 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This country was an environmentally balanced land mass. Increasingly, this balance is being broken by the mining industry's destruction of what keeps us alive. It is a very short-sighted view to just dig up what the rich mining companies can make a buck on, leaving a mess behind, poisoned water, forests and the life forms they support wiped out. Remediation is a farce --- you can NEVER put back a forest, a clean river, the wildlife that has suffered and nearing extinction. Planting a few trees in NOT rehabilitation. This is one more project that is taking life away from our planet. The effects of continued mining are now being felt, as nature tries to re-balance:- an impossible task as the people in government, driven by the rich mining companies, continue to wipe out the country. The rise in fires, floods, extreme heat events, etc, is our country saying 'STOP, YOU'VE TAKEN ENOUGH! NO MORE!!! Thank you |
Nerissa Dowling
|
ID |
14976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2229 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia benefits VERY LITTLE from such mines.. these huge companies are not paying tariffs of much tax... they are destroying native habitat... we have almost reached the point of no return for a mass extinction across the planet. Survival for humans is more important than supporting mines. Please do. not let it go ahead. Let's save as much wildlife as possible for our children and their children |
Simon Wright
|
ID |
14981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The recent record breaking temperatures across Australia remind us YET AGAIN of the folly of continuing to burn fossil fuels. On this matter the science is unambiguous. Consequently, this planned extension will only exacerbate an already dire situation and must not be allowed to proceed on the grounds of the scale of the mine's footprint; habitat destruction; water impacts; and climate pollution. It is stupidity in the extreme to permit this.Thank you for your consideration. |
Linda CHAPMAN
|
ID |
14996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2480 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission on behalf of a dying planet. Every life form on this planet has a part to play in maintaining life on Earth. The burning of fossil fuels has had a major impact on life forms to whom air quality is of the highest importance. The death and removal of any existing life will mean a future where the Earth cannot maintain life on a planet that works like a machine, which has evolved over millions of years. As with a car engine, it will not work without a battery or intact connections! Allowing more fossil fuels to be burnt, releasing toxic carbons into the atmosphere, is basically allowing and actually taking part in the certain death of life as we know it. The continuance of our planet as we know it, where we can breathe freely and live without fear of massive weather changes, such as increased occurrences of floods and intense bushfires. This will mean the end of the human race because WE are causing it, and the Earth will not give up her creation of life in all its amazing beauty and absolute fragility without a fight. Please DO NOT ALLOW THE MOOLARBEN COAL COMPLEX OC3 EXTENSION PROJECT TO PROCEED. |
Thea Ormerod
|
ID |
15066 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
ARRCC, Incorporated |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2000 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
ARRCC’s Submission to the Independent Planning Commission Re: Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion on Wiradjuri Country I write on behalf of the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change (ARRCC), a multi-faith Charity dedicated to acting to protect the earth’s climate. Our organisational members include the Federation of Australian Buddhist Councils, Brahma Kumaris Australia, Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, Quakers Australia, World Christian Meditation Community Australia, Islamic Sciences and Research Academy, Angligreen, Catholic Religious Orders and dozens of local congregations. We are hereby presenting our reasons why the Moolarben OC3 opencut thermal coal mine expansion should not be allowed to proceed. As well as being enriched by the beauty and wonder of nature, we in ARRCC hold that all things are interconnected and held in balance. We want all of life to flourish, now and into the future. As people of faith, we believe that humanity has a special responsibility to protect nature’s balance. This balance includes respect for the rights of First Nations people of the land on which the expansion is proposed. The majority of ARRCC’s constituency are of an older generation. We have children and grandchildren who, because of the failures of our own generation, are facing a future which no longer includes the beauty and biodiversity that we ourselves grew up with. Indeed, the same disregard for the ecosystems on which we all depend is leading to the threat of climate breakdown. ARRCC’s grounds for opposing the expansion Climate change is at an emergency level Not a week goes by without news of mega-fires, record-breaking heat waves, super-storms, increasingly frequent floods and landslides, and unprecedented droughts. Humanity has begun to live through the ‘age of consequences’. We are teetering on 1.5°C global average temperatures, the agreed guardrail for humanity beyond which there is an unacceptably increased likelihood of precipitating self-reinforcing systems of global heating. The last three years have been the warmest on record and we collectively face a real threat of runaway, irreversible climate change. Australia is predicted to be one of the countries that is most vulnerable to mega-fires, heatwaves, droughts and floods. State or Federal, a government’s highest duty is to keep their citizens safe. Our generation of leaders, in particular, has a duty of care particularly to the children and young people of today who will have to deal with the chaotic world which we are collectively creating for them. Climate-related disasters are paid for in the loss of lives, homelands and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of everyday people while profits are made by the relatively few, who have unfortunately captured public debate and government decision making. This is a gross injustice. Limiting atmospheric heating will require, among other things, a halt to the unconscionable approvals of new fossil fuel mining projects and expansions of existing projects. Every delay in adequately addressing climate change will cost lives and livelihoods, especially for those already in poverty - both here and globally. As Pope Francis wrote in his famous encyclical, Lauadato Si’: ‘Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony and disdain. We may well be leaving to coming generations debris, desolation and filth. The pace of consumption, waste and environmental change has so stretched the planet’s capacity that our contemporary lifestyle, unsustainable as it is, can only precipitate catastrophes, such as those which even now periodically occur in different areas of the world. The effects of the present imbalance can only be reduced by our decisive action, here and now. We need to reflect on our accountability before those who will have to endure the dire consequences.’ (161) ‘We know that technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels – especially coal, but also oil and, to a lesser degree, gas - has to be progressively replaced without delay….’ (165) A liveable planet means walking back from coal mining If the earth’s atmosphere is to support human life as we know it, humanity must stop extracting coal, oil and gas and burning it, and instead find more sustainable ways to produce and use energy. Climate scientists say that there should be no new coal or gas mines opened if we are collectively aiming for Net Zero by 2050. For example, an International Energy Agency Report states that ‘No new long-lead time upstream oil and gas projects are needed in the NZE Scenario, …’ Proponents of the status quo frequently argue that this ‘cannot be done overnight’. They have been saying this for 30 years. ARRCC and other climate advocates know the process of extracting societies from the grip of fossil fuels will take time but, as humanity experiences the impacts of too many years of business-as-usual, we must act as quickly as possible. Added risk to climate has led to approvals overturned Twice in 2025 NSW courts overturned decisions by State and Federal Governments to approve expansions of coal mining. The court rulings were on the grounds that planning authorities had failed to adequately consider the local climate change impacts of the projects' downstream greenhouse gas emissions, particularly Scope 3 (exported) emissions. Such decisions set a precedent for future court rulings. In July 2025, the NSW Court of Appeal overturned the Independent Planning Commission's 2022 approval for Mach Energy's expansion of the Mount Pleasant mine in the Hunter Valley. In November 2025, the NSW Land and Environment Court invalidated the state government's approval for an extension of Glencore's Ulan thermal coal mine near Mudgee. Since these two decisions were made, the Net Zero Commission released its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report, stating that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. Quoting Finding 4, ‘Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.’ The Moolarben OC3 expansion would be open to such arguments and legal challenges if it is approved. The government can not keep shutting its eyes to the growing pressure to move away from new coal. This proposal should not be approved. ARRCC advocates winding back coal exports We are given to understand that the coal from the proposed expansion is basically for export. Yancoal plans to export 65% of coal to China, with smaller amounts to South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan. Australian Governments are ethically inconsistent in their pursuit of domestic emissions reductions while, at the same time, allowing the continued export of our nation’s coal and gas overseas. These exports will most assuredly contribute to the very same climate change that we are attempting to mitigate at home. There is only one atmosphere that the world shares. Tragically, Australia bears the shame of being one of the world’s largest exporters of fossil fuels. First Nations opposition to the project The Wiradjuri Aboriginal Land Council and many among the Wiradjuri in the Mudgee area want to protect their country from any kind of coal mining and expansions of existing mines. With our nation’s conscience awakening to the injustices perpetrated on First Nations people since settlement began, from an ethical perspective this should rank as a highly important consideration. ARRCC is committed to justice for our nation’s First Nations peoples who have suffered land theft and many forms of oppression. Approvals of mining projects are usually a form of continued colonisation in which the wishes of First Nations Traditional Custodians are given, at best, token acknowledgement. Australia’s Native Title Legislation fails to properly incorporate principles of Free, Prior and Informed Consent. There are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. From past experience, we have witnessed the kind of heart-break suffered by First Nations people as their sacred sites, one by one, are desecrated by mining companies. Biodiversity impacts We in ARRCC believe that the earth and its biodiversity are sacred gifts that should be cared for by each generation and handed on more-or-less intact to subsequent generations. Given our special place in nature, we humans have a responsibility to steward the gifts in our care. Short-term economic benefits for the few do not outweigh in value what can be inherited by many generations (hopefully) yet to come in terms of land, its waters, flora and fauna, its beauty and spiritual riches. Australia has the shameful reputation of ranking second (to Indonesia) for ongoing biodiversity loss. Our national Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Protection Act has only recently been modestly improved in late 2025 but it will take well-funded, determined efforts on the part of State and Federal Governments to reverse the tragic biodiversity decline we see across the country. The system of biodiversity offsetting is deeply flawed and, in effect, papers over habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. When habitats are destroyed, species dependent on them cannot survive. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the neighbouring Goulburn River National Park are part of an important protected park system in NSW that provides essential wildlife corridors. Expanding conservation efforts into the valley would help connect these, which is critical for the long-term viability of native fauna, as the reserve itself is relatively small, isolated. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which are habitats for a number of bat species. There have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The area has a uniquely resilient Koala population. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW noted that the area’s Koala habitat is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that it is a climate-robust population which ‘has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully.’ Blasting and noise represent a major threat to the above-mentioned species. The NSW DCCEEW recommended that there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company has not acted on that recommendation. Coal mining is water-intensive, which is particularly problematic in a dry continent like Australia. Water is essential for life to flourish. Therefore our precious, limited water resources should be protected for supporting life – ours and those of other species. It should not be wasted on washing coal. The proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history of water monitoring elsewhere in the mine complex. Positive potential for alternative industries The environment around Mudgee is already burdened by multiple dirty coal mines and the threat of more. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines have further major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous potential impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. All this when the world simply must move away from fossil fuels and transition to sustainable ways to generate energy and generative, sustainable forms of employment. As part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone, there are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region around Mudgee. There is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Given the beauty of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and the Goulburn River National Park, the area could be viewed through the alternative lens of its potential for local and overseas tourism. As a nation with high average levels of education, surely there are better ways to organise local economies like Mudgee’s than digging up dirty coal so it can be burned somewhere and make our home – our one and only home - less habitable. Outcome sought: The Moolarben OC3 opencut thermal coal mine expansion should not be allowed to proceed. With gratitude to the NSW Nature Conservation Council for its guidance regarding problems with the proposed Moolarben OC3 expansion, I offer the above submission. Thea Ormerod she/her President, ARRCC (Australian Religious Response to Climate Change) E: (Redacted) M: (Redacted) W: www.arrcc.org.au |
|
Attachments |
ARRCC submission Moolarben OC3 expansion_2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 181.89 KB) |
Rupert Macgregor
|
ID |
15161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2600 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTION TO EXPANSION PROPOSED BY YANCOAL OF MOOLARBEN 0C3 MINE LOCATED NEAR MUDGEE IN NEW SOUTH WALES To the Independent Planning Commission, I have long been opposed to the original establishment and operation of this mine site in terms of its damaging consequences for country, environment and climate as well as detrimental impacts the local community – in an area of NSW which I know from both my time of residency in the State and subsequent return visits to the region. These concerns have been exacerbated by subsequent indications of Yancoal’s projected intensions for massive expansion of the original site, on a scale that threatened to wreak far-reaching and irreversible harm on ecologically important but highly vulnerable surrounding ecosystems; further exacerbation of accelerating global heating and the intensifying destructions of climate change - to the further detriment of local communities and far beyond. At a time when we are under the ever increasing challenges of conjoint crises of climate change and ecological collapse – driven even harder by out-of-control land clearing and native forest logging, it appears self-evident that any expansion of the mine must be stopped, and that, in preference, the this richly biodiverse area should be protected by its addition to the Munghorn Gap Nature Park. In this regard, I draw attention to the determination of the United Nations Organisation and the International Energy Agency in recent time, that if we are to have any remnant chance of holding global heating within the agreed liveable safety limit of 1.5 degrees, there can be No further fossil fuel exploitation sites established, NOR any significant expansion of existing sites. [Note: I am now aware that Yancoal has submitted minor changes to the project documentation, which are also before the Commission: but in my view cannot resolve or mitigate the factors that I raise in support of my opposition to the proposal) Context in Brief Yancoal’s presently existing Moolarben coal mine – a thermal coal mine producing for export – is located near Mudgee; and is currently the largest producing coal mine in the state of NSW. The proposed expansion would clear critical habitat for koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bats, with plans to mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. Implementation of the proposed expansion threatens critical ecosystems, water sources, and cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. Despite the climate crisis and NSW’s commitment to reducing emissions, this project would lock in additional, unnecessary and destructive emissions from coal mining. The Opposing Concerns Considered 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems. This proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible damage to nature, clearing irreplaceable native bush that cannot be offset. The project would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded - including right in the middle of one of the proposed mine pits. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. Impacts on threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, a risk acknowledged by the NSW Environment Department, which warned the project could lead to long-term population declines and affect habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the reserve and its wildlife. This environmentally rich valley should never be devastated by mining; rather, because of its ecological importance, should be incorporated into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. 3, An Unacceptable Climate Cost Which Starkly Fails NSW Climate Pollution Reduction Targets The proposed OC3 extension would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over its life, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions, a hugely adverse climate impact. Yet DPHI’s assessment ignores clear findings of the Net Zero Commission that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement; and most egregiously fails to acknowledge that NSW is already falling far short of the progress necessary to achieve its 2030 and 2035 targets. The assessment also does not apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires decision-makers to consider emissions (including downstream emissions (99% of its emissions) and the local climate impacts they cause, leaving the true climate and economic costs of the project unquantified and unaddressed. The economic and social costs of these emissions have not been addressed by Yancoal. 3. The expansion is unnecessary for jobs or regional prosperity. The proposed expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds or benefits to the local community, as the Moolarben mine as it currently stands will continue operating until at least 2038 without this expansion. Coal job vacancies in the region have remained unfilled for years. It is in no way a “key employer” At the same time, Mudgee sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where renewable energy projects are expected to create around 2,000 new jobs over the next decade, offering firm and attractive alternative employment pathways. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. But given the forecast decline in Australian thermal coal demand in China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Unquestionably then, the expansion would deliver little economic benefit while imposing lasting environmental damage, making its certain short, medium and longer term costs far greater than any speculatively asserted public benefit. 4. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause significant groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts have warned that groundwater-dependent ecosystems along the creek, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be affected by drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium. These risks are compounded by the proponent’s failure to undertake adequate baseline water monitoring and its poor track record of complying with water monitoring requirements elsewhere in the mine complex. Yancoal are proposing an amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring studies before they commence mining - this is inadequate, baseline groundwater monitoring studies should occur before a project is approved, not after. 5. The expansion will irreversibly harm Wiradjuri cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts and potentially impact dozens of others. These are all considered to have high cultural value by the Registered Aboriginal Parties consulted on the proposal. This proposed expansion massively contributes to the fracturing of the landscape, and to the cumulative degradation of Country from ongoing mining, unacceptably destroying the Wiradjuri people’s ability to practice their culture; to maintain connection to Country; and to preserve sacred sites of immense and irreplaceable significance. 6. The cumulative impact There has been notably poor and inadequate assessment of the cumulative impact of this proposed Moolarben Mine expansion combined with the proposed expansions of neighbouring mines. All proposed expansions have impacts on a similar set of threatened species listed as likely to have Serious and Irreversible Impacts due to clearing and loss of habitat. The Ulan Coal Mine Modification 6 and 8 and the Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3 will impact an additional large area of similar landscape, connected water sources, rich biodiversity and cultural heritage values. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Rupert Macgregor The Australian Capital Territory 2600 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2226 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
After decades of mining we understand what a negative influence this is to climate change and many associated systems. I am extremely concerned over the pretence surrounding the proposed coalmine expansions and their cumulative and irreversible impacts to fauna, flora and water. When you have to fight a large company, whose sole goal is to maximize profits and greed, there are so many reasons to stop it - Climate change is recognized and accepted by everyone with a working objective brain, so when it totally contradicts our State’s climate goals and pollution ideals, you have to wonder who are the beneficiaries of the contradiction - This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. 480 hectares of native bushland to be destroyed, together with 23+ threatened animal species that call this ‘home’ – where is Yancoal suggesting they relocate to? With the demise of the koala, what resort will these remaining koalas be sent to? - This leads on to the environmental destruction, which in turn will cause both unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems – this area is already in a protected nature reserve for a reason. Is making money and destroying the area the reason to overturn its existence – I certainly hope not. - Not even to create minimal job opportunities. There are other ways of doing this, apart from putting a massive hole in the ground and destroying 480 hectares of the environment. For so little economic benefit, there is no offset to justify the massive environmental damage predicted. - Our MOST PRECIOUS resourse, WATER is under massive threats - the project is expected to cause significant groundwater draw downs of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining – (what a miserable legacy issue considering the climate change issue which is only becoming worse). Yancoal hasn’t even thought of doing preliminary baseline monitoring of these groundwater areas, so anything they ‘suck out of their thumbs’, will be sheer rhetoric and/or lies Hopefully you are very well aware of all the above and will agree there is no reason at all to allow the proposed OC3 extension. |
Virginia Woods
|
ID |
15221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this proposed development because both science and ethics so clearly indicate that we need to discontinue rather than expand the extraction of fossil fuels. |
John Dyer
|
ID |
15231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2453 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear IPC Members, My name is John Dyer and I am writing to you as a concerned person, concerned about the state of our world. I am also writing to you to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am particularly concerned about: - 1. The nearby nature reserve, Munghorn Gap, that is proposed to be as close as 100 meters away. 2. Mining of underwater streams and surface water effects. Also pumping from streams and underground water supplies will deplete ecosystems. 3. Effects on koala habitat and other species like microbat and Regent Honeyeater. 4. The use of coal mining can be offset by solar and wind power grids. Coal is not required today for power production, if we put as much effort into providing it as coal companies do to justify coal production. 5. Production of massive CO2 and greenhouse gases from more coal production. Remember when China had to stop all systems that produced CO2 before the last Olympic Games to try to show the world China is clean. China now produces as much emissions as the rest of the world combined, and we supply their coal. 6. There is no real proven benefit from coal production for the Australian community, as most profits go elsewhere. So in summary, I would be most grateful for the world, if you declined this expansion. Thank you. John Dyer |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2256 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 Project – Objections to Amendments I am calling on the Department of Planning to reject this proposed amendment and continue with the community consultation process that was already underway. My objections to these amendments are : • The amendments do not reduce the size of the mine area or the impacts of the mine. The whole area of 675 hectares is at risk of clearing and mining with a meagre 100 metre buffer retained between the mining operations and the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Hence hundreds of hectares of native vegetation, that includes essential habitat for the koalas and the Regent Honeyeater would be cleared and as well greenhouse gas emissions would be abundant. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of koala habitat with breeding koala’s on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. • This project would add an extra 30 million tonnes of coal extracted over the life of the mine to 2038. • Throughout the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions will be produced. • From a water perspective, this project could cause groundwater draw down up to and exceeding 2–6m for more than 25years post mining significantly altering stream, spring and groundwater dependent ecosystems (and potentially the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve). This puts Moolarben Creek and Spring Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a resident of New South Wales, and am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Expansion. It concerns me that I need to be creating this letter at all. At the time of writing this, here in New South Wales, the sky is filled with smoke from severe bushfires in Victoria that have already destroyed more than 100 buildings, along with a town. Unprecedented weather events will become more frequent and severe because of our society’s unproductive crawl towards a post fossil fuel civilisation. I have been to the town of Wollar, which has suffered immensely from the bullying of Yancoal. I have listened to the stories of residents being harassed and families being pitted against one another. I have listened to the research conducted by brave and dedicated people who are speaking up for the critical natural environments that will be desecrated and defiled by Yancoal’s proposed expansion. All that I know about this mine expansion has already been offered to you by the ever-growing alliance that objects to it. They stand on mountains of research, experience, and knowledge about the land and its resident, human and non-human. I will reiterate what that research says, but from me I will say this: It would be utterly indefensible, immoral, and unjust to wield the power and research that you, the Independent Planning Commission, have presented to you, and to then approve the expansion of the Moolarben coal mine, or any other project that intends to unearth with more fossil fuel for that matter. With that said, I object to the Moolarben OC3 Expansion for the following reasons: 1. This area belongs in a protected nature reserve, not an open-cut coal mine This valley should be protected as part of a single, connected conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not allowed to be used as an open-cut mine pit. The proposal would clear approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including a uniquely resilient koala population. This project creates no new jobs and delivers no genuine public benefit—its sole outcome is the permanent destruction of an irreplaceable ecosystem. 2. Unacceptable and irreversible harm to threatened species and ecosystems The proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible environmental harm that cannot be offset. It would destroy 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding has been recorded, including within the footprint of a proposed mine pit. It would clear 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, with breeding females recorded on site, and up to 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The NSW Environment Department has acknowledged that impacts to threatened species such as the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and microbats are expected to be severe, potentially leading to long-term population declines and affecting habitat critical to species survival. Despite this, noise, blasting and vibration impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed, and Yancoal has refused to adopt a recommended 500-metre buffer. This landscape should never have been considered for mining and should instead be incorporated into the reserve. 3. A massive climate cost that contradicts NSW climate goals The OC3 expansion would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to around 58% of NSW’s total annual emissions. This is completely inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. DPHI’s assessment fails to apply the Denman Court of Appeal decision, which requires consideration of downstream emissions—approximately 99% of this project’s emissions—and the local climate impacts they cause. It also ignores findings of the Net Zero Commission that further coal mine expansions are incompatible with legislated climate targets. The true climate, economic and social costs of this project remain unquantified and unaddressed. 4. The expansion is not needed for jobs or regional prosperity This expansion cannot be justified on employment grounds. The Moolarben mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this proposal, and coal jobs in the region have remained unfilled for years. Meanwhile, the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone is expected to create around 2,000 jobs over the next decade, providing clear alternative employment pathways. Most of the coal from this expansion would be exported—65% to China, with the remainder largely to other overseas markets facing declining thermal coal demand. The economic case for this project is weak and deteriorating, while the environmental damage would be permanent. 5. Serious and long-lasting risks to groundwater and creeks The project is expected to cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining, placing Moolarben Creek at serious risk as a critical drought refuge for wildlife. Independent experts warn that groundwater-dependent ecosystems, including deep-rooted riparian trees, are likely to be harmed. Yancoal’s proposed amendment to conduct 12 months of groundwater monitoring after approval is wholly inadequate. Baseline studies must occur before approval, not after. This proposal compounds concerns given the company’s poor compliance history with water monitoring elsewhere in the mine complex. 6. Irreversible harm to Wiradjuri cultural heritage The expansion would destroy 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts and potentially impact dozens more, all assessed as having high cultural value by Registered Aboriginal Parties. Continued mining fractures Country, degrades cultural landscapes, and undermines the Wiradjuri people’s ability to maintain connection to Country, practice culture, and protect sacred sites of immense significance. 7. Failure to assess cumulative impacts There has been inadequate assessment of the cumulative impacts of this proposal alongside neighbouring mine expansions, including Ulan Coal Mine Modifications 6 and 8 and Wilpinjong Coal Mine Modification 3. Together, these projects would compound habitat loss, water impacts, biodiversity decline, and cultural heritage destruction across a connected landscape already under extreme pressure. Conclusion The proposed amendments do not reduce vegetation clearing, do not meaningfully reduce impacts, and have been introduced far too late in the process. The Moolarben OC3 Expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to biodiversity, climate stability, water systems and cultural heritage, while delivering minimal public benefit. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the proposed amendments and recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion be refused. Thank you for reading my submission. We all will be waiting for your response. |
|
Attachments |
Objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project - from a concerned human.pdf (PDF, 35.23 KB) |
Clare O’Brien
|
ID |
15396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This proposed extension is utter madness. With the climate warming so quickly an extension of this mine will ultimately imperil all living creatures on this planet. The proposed extension is shameful and will ultimately create havoc for future generations, who will undoubtedly look back in bewilderment as to how such a dangerous proposal was allowed to proceed. |
Leyla Barry
|
ID |
15666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2034 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Leyla, I am a 24 year-old Science/Arts graduate and local nanny in the Coogee community and I am unbelievably concerned about this Moolarben Coal Mine Expansion. The rising temperatures, alterations to weather due to climate change, loss of animal life, loss of sites of cultural importance to the Wiradjuri people and the culmative impact of mines themselves already, all terrify me and should terrify you too. I am writing to strongly object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine exapnsion on Wiradjury country. I am grossly dissapointed in the desire for Yancoal's expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. Why? Where do I begin. Maybe with the fact that we are in the midst of a climate emergency. In no way, is expanding or applying to begin a new open cut mine, going to help Australia reach it's climate targets in time before irreversible damage takes it's toll. Expanding the Moolarben coal mine during this time is a violation and should not be allowed to continue. The proposed OC3 extension would generate ~64.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas, equivalent to just less than 60% of NSW's total annual emissions. This is an insane climate impact with unacceptable and irreversible harm to endangered animals and their ecosystems. Yancoal has refused to adopt the recommended 500-metre buffer to protect the Box Gum Woodland ecosystem and the endangered Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, microbats and koalas. Importantly, this land belongs to the Wiradjuri people (whether or not legally proven, Always was and always will be Aboriginal land) and this particular land of interest to Yancoal belongs to a protected nature reserve. How dare you allow this to happen? Listen to the facts, think about the environment. For these reasons, I urde the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 COal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you very much for considering my submission. Sincerely, Leyla Barry |
Asuman Barry
|
ID |
15696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I vehemently object to Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine expansion as it will detrimentally harm the wonderful existing biodiversity. It will result in many animal extinctions, not to mention the pollution - noise, and traffic pollution to local communities. This goes against the supposed promise of the NSW governments commitment to reducing carbon emissions. Clearing much needed Koala, Regent Honeyeaters, and micro bat habitat is absolutely disgraceful, animals need our protection, not us destroying where they existed first. To mine within 100m of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state, is incredibly unconscionable. This unnecessary coal expansion will threaten critical ecosystems, water sources, and damage cultural heritage on Wiradjuri Country. The land belongs to our indigenous communities not Yancoal. |
Aylin Barry
|
ID |
15841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Aylin and I am 20 years old, trying to figure out my place in this world and the role I can play to benefit society and the environment during this harsh and hostile climate crisis. I am only 20, and I know that this proposal is not necessary or benefitial. This proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine is disgraceful and inhumane. It is no supurise why myself and THOUSANDS of others oppose this request. I firstly just want to address the lack of humanity and empathy for the beautiful creatures which live in the Mudgee region and the gorgeous Wiradjuri land which this greedy company wants to exploit for their selfish benefits. Although we have wrongfully been given rights to destroy this land which is not ours and disrupt the habitats and ecosystems which reside here, does NOT mean that we should. The local community, the families, the children, they care so deeply about their home, so how is it fair that Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine are allowed to destory more of this beautiful land? This proposal will have devastating effects such as long-lasting risks to the water systems which directly strips water that the plants and wildlife need to survive as well as impacting many Aboriginal cultural artefacts and the Wiradjuri people's ability to practice their rich culture and preserve beloved sacred sites, so really what is the need? Will it help the biodiversity? Will it help protect the 23 threatened species recorded in the area? Will it help protect the 55 irreplaceable Aboriginal cultural artefacts? Will the company be able to regrow the native bush to what it once was if they undergo this development? The answer to these questions is no. No it will not further protect this sacred, living ecosystem nor will it reverse the already threatened groundwater systems which have already been impacted by our worsening climate crisis. Please, consider not just what you're affecting if you undergo this proposal, but who. Sincerely, Aylin Barry |
Susan Whelan
|
ID |
15851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3127 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have few words, as it’s quite simple. For the sake of this planet, and its inhabitants, including us humans, this Moolarben Coal Complex OC Extension Project proposal should be rejected . Can you please listen to the science, and have the courage to be brave enough to make the right decision and reject this proposal in the interests of the common good. Yours Sincerely Susan Whelan |
Julie Castles
|
ID |
15856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an aged pensioner, and a grandmother. I am alarmed by the expansions of coal mining in Australia and its impacts on the environment. This project will require the clearing of 480 hectares of land which provides habitat for endangered and vulnerable species. Biodiversity offsets cannot replace this habitat. There is already extensive planned land clearing of mines in the area (Wilpingong Coal Mine - Mod 3 and Ulan Coal Mine - Mod 6). The cumulative impact of habitat destruction should be considered alongside the project's specific requirements. I believe it should be refused due to its unacceptable impact on the local environment. This project is projected to add an estimated 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases to our atmosphere. The effects of burning fossil fuels are now being felt by us all in more extreme weather events. The argument once posed that our emissions from burning our coal in other countries should not be considered is no longer tenable. I fear for the future of my gandchildren and for their children. It is critical that we stop adding to the climate crisis through the burning of fossil fuels. The project is completely at odds with the NSW Government's stated net zero targets, and the need to fast track renewable energy projects. Because the international demand for thermal coal is declining, jobs in the mining sector are insecure. The Mudgee region is a fast growing area and young people in this region will need jobs that provide for their future. Those jobs are likely to be provided in the renewable sector, not through coal mining. This project cannot demonstrate a lasting benefit to the community. For these reasons I urge you to refuse this project. Thankyou for considering my submission. Yours sincerely Juie Castles. |
Pauline Dunne
|
ID |
14686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2283 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, OBJECTION TO MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL MINE EXTENSION PROJECT N0. SSD-33083358 My name is Pauline, I am a 68 year-old former Primary and Adult Educator / Community Engagement Officer working most recently in the renewable energy sector and biodiversity and environment field in the Upper Hunter and Central West regions. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW and across the country. Why? I and most of Australia’s leading scientists, climate researchers and peoples recognise the increasing climate impacts experienced by local Mudgee residents and other communities across NSW and the nation. Extreme heatwaves, rising energy bills due, and more frequent and intense weather events such as bushfire, drought, storms and flooding are becoming the new norm. These impacts of climate change are also linked to the cost-of- living crisis, including the steady increase in insurance premiums. Consequently, I am writing to the Independent Planning Commission TO OBJECT to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This mine expansion is a significant project that will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and therefore should not be approved. My concerns are: • Climate impacts: Expanding on my comments above, this proposed mine expansion is projected to output an additional 30 million tonnes of coal and add an estimated 60 to 70 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Threatened species habitat loss, including the clearing of # 113 hectares of koala habitat an Australian iconic marsupial listed as vulnerable to extinction. Yancoal itself admits the project poses a threat to habitat ‘critical to the survival’ of the local koala population. A population recognised by the NSW Government as being resilient to the effects of climate change. # 80 hectares of critically endangered Regent Honeyeater habitat and endangered gang- gang cockatoo This habitat is vital for the survival of these and other species. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve: Mining is proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and there has been inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Munghorn Gap is one of the oldest nature reserves in Australia. It is an area of high cultural heritage value for Wiradjuru people and the expansion risks damaging Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. The area is also used by educators, environmentalists, and naturalists for environmental learning experiences. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. These refuges will be increasingly important as the climate impacts mentioned above are expected to escalate. • Lack of public benefit: There is no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised and promoted. Climate change is here and getting worse, causing increasingly damaging disasters with communities bearing the costs of the direct impacts of climate risks. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during this climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project BE REFUSED. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours Sincerely, Pauline Dunne |
|
Attachments |
Pauline Dunne Submission to the Independent Planning Commission January 2025 _Redacted.pdf (PDF, 57.81 KB) |
Anthony Lonergan
|
ID |
14691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2333 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Any coal mining extensions will add to the dire situation facing the Hunter, NSW, Australia and indeed the entire planet. This needs no further explanation. What is particular to this proposal is the scale of the impact on biodiversity. Not only will 113 hectares of habitat be destroyed, but the proximity to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (look on a map) should alone rule this project out. I have visited this site many times, including with school groups for field ecology studies. Lights, blasting, noise in general, dust will have serious implications for the plants, animals (including koalas) and birds of the Nature Reserve. This reserve is home to an enormous number of bird species. |
rick mcgregor
|
ID |
14716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
480 hectares of native vegetation which provides critical habitat to koala and the regent honey eater.The company has not done a proper baseline monitoring of water from the Moorlaben Creek endangering deep rooted trees |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14746 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2095 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am seriously concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts and need to move away from coal to green energy. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I understand Yancoal has sought to delay the IPC hearing and disrupt community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion by submitting last-minute minor amendments to its proposal. But the amendments do not reduce the mine footprint or any vegetation clearing. They propose off- site “habitat enhancement” that will not lessen the serious impacts on threatened species and ecosystems. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. I am particularly concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Please incorporate this rich biodiverse area into the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and protect its natural and cultural values into the future, as places like this are rapidly disappearing. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) Manly NSW 2095 |
Rosie White
|
ID |
14806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see uploaded document |
|
Attachments |
IPC Submission. Moolarben OC3 extension Project..docx (DOCX, 9.24 KB) |
Dr. Anthony Hull
|
ID |
14681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
The risks of expanding the Moolarben Coal Mine are too great to allow it to be approved, and they far outweigh the benefits. The risks relate to greenhouse gas emissions - direct and indirect, and direct health impacts to those who live (and work) within the vicinity of Moolarben coal mine. These effects are caused by exposure to PM2.5 particulate pollution, heavy metal exposure, coal dust (black lung - which has seen a resurgence). Gulgong, Mudgee and Merriwa for example are likely to be affected by pollutants depending on the prevailing weather conditions. Health impacts include respiratory and cardiovascular disease, and increased mortality, and few people in the exposure areas are aware of these risks for themselves and their children. Moreover, children, and many adults aren't able to leave the area to avoid the risks even if they are aware. (https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/factsheets/Pages/mine-dust-and-you.aspx). https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2025/223/10/public-health-impacts-mining-australia Also there are direct impacts of exposure to the combustion products of coal fired power stations that are fed by such coal - though the majority of this may be in overseas jurisdictions that burn the coal from this mine. GHG emissions from CO2 and Methane from this mine are problematic, and will significantly worsen secondary to an extension. When the CO2 emissions from burning the coal (scope 3) are considered, these impacts are even worse; In 2019 Australian domestic emissions were 1.4% of total global emissions while exported fossil fuels generated a further 3.6% of global emissions There will be increased methane leakage from coal seems related to the proposed expansion, this has proven to be a major source of GHG emissions from coal mines. In 2024 The NSW NetZero Commission stated it was "concerned about the risks to the state's (emissions reduction) targets from increased emissions in the resources sector...associated with new coal mining projects (extensions and expansions of existing mines)...Any emissions increases associated with extended or expanded projects would require all other sectors to make greater emissions reductions if the state is to meet its emissions reduction targets. The emissions increases pose a major challenge for the state's regulatory arrangements..and are not consistent with the Paris temperature goals” This project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. The increased emissions have a direct and increasingly quantifiable impact on global temperatures. Global warming is a clear and direct cause of death and disease and affects Australians with increasing frequency and severity. Such impacts include deaths during heatwaves, floods and fires, and less obvious health effects due to droughts, expanding tropical diseases and disruption due to rising sea levels and coastal storm surge and flooding. Mitigating climate change is a prime example of preventative health care. In just the last 12 months we have seen unprecedented climate related disasters in the form of floods, fires and heatwaves. Thousands of Australians have had their mental and physical health, and their safety and security directly impacted. This includes significant economic imposts such as loss of home and business, and rising insurance premiums. Approving Moolarben coal mine expansion in this context is an abuse of responsibility and governance. I note the economic costs related to downstream GHG emissions have not been quantified for this proposal - please note the Court of Appeal decision regarding this requirement as regards The Mt. Pleasant case. . In addition, The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem.. The NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, noting that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. The project will impact water, causing drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has a poor history of baseline and ongoing water resources. The Yancoal proposal to expand this mine should NOT be approved. Kind Regards, Dr. Anthony Hull FANZCA NSW Health (Deputy Chair Doctors for The Environment Australia) |
Cathy Stuart
|
ID |
14266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Fossil fuel mining expansion MUST cease. We are on a very dangerous course to uncontrolled climate change, water insecurity and biodiversity loss. This mine expansion MUST not be allowed to proceed. |
Kath Leahy
|
ID |
14296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2300 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Panel, I am the grandmother of two young children and am watching in despair as grown adults in Australia follow Trump’s ‘Drill, drill, drill’ policy in attacks on our fragile, floundering planet. It is insane to keep expanding fossil fuel projects when we are flooding or burning from coast to coast while our agricultural return diminishes in the wake of extreme weather events. Algae blooms, barrier reef bleaching and a host of other problems beset our vital marine environments while glaciers melt and permafrost releases greenhouse gases. Beyond our shores the gas and coal we export hastens the demise of vast regions and the ecological collapse we are already witnessing worsens. This Yancoal plan directly threatens koala habitat and has the potential to produce millions of tonnes of climate pollution. We have no need of fossil fuel projects as we must quickly transition to renewable power technologies that are already capable of giving us all the power we need. South Australia is on track to be fully renewable within the next couple of years. NSW needs to get over the past and urgently facilitate the Great Energy Transmission as we no longer have the time for a slow and easy move between the old forms of generation and the new. It is unconscionable to persist in the destruction of our planet when we are knowingly doing harm. The science is irrefutable and some climate scientists fear the cost for our children and theirs could well be more destructive than the modelling suggests, partly because the funding of the research is being reduced because powerful vested interests manipulate weak governments and their complicit institutions and bureaucracies. I beg you to deny this company its profit-driven extension in order to protect ourselves and those we leave behind, Dr Kath Leahy |
Frances Steele, PhD
|
ID |
14346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. It has been brought to my attention that Yancoal wish to expand a mine near the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. There are two possible justifications for this new mine. One is that it will not significantly increase carbon emissions. Alternatively, coal is being produced for the market, and will be burned by an end user, therefore increasing overall carbon emissions. Presumably for their economic gain and ours. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. To say the mine will not significantly increase overall carbon emissions requires showing that all of this greenhouse gas production will be offset by a carbon sink. There is no evidence that this is part of the proposed development, even if it were possible. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that the mine will add to overall carbon emissions. What justification can there be for this when the science has repeatedly shown the effects of increased carbon the atmosphere to be global warming, damage to all human and animal habitats and the huge economic cost of extreme weather events. The CSIRO Report on Global warming: Highlights the urgent need for a coal phase-out to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The report emphasizes that existing fossil fuel infrastructure alone could exceed the 1.5 °C warming threshold, necessitating the cessation of new coal developments and early retirement of existing projects… The report underscores the importance of understanding and planning for the transition from coal to renewable energy sources to meet Paris Agreement goals and manage economic risks during the global energy transition. www.csiro.au No serious argument can be found for an expansion to coal mining at Moolarben or anywhere. Kind regards, Frances Steele, PhD |
Justine Dodd
|
ID |
14366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2453 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully” The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. This expansion should NOT go ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I have worked at the Moolarben Coal Complex for approximately 10 years and during this time have gained a strong understanding of how the operation functions, how it is managed, and how it interacts with employees, the local community, and the surrounding environment. Throughout my employment, Moolarben has operated in a responsible and professional manner. There is a clear focus on safety, compliance, and meeting regulatory requirements. Standards are communicated clearly to the workforce, and there is an expectation that work is carried out correctly and safely. Based on my experience, the operation has demonstrated that it can manage its activities effectively while maintaining accountability to workers, regulators, and the community. The OC3 Extension is important for providing certainty and continuity of employment for the workforce. Moolarben supports a large number of direct employees and contractors, many of whom live locally and contribute to the regional economy. Extending OC3 will help secure the future of these jobs and ensure that skilled workers can continue to live and work in the area, rather than being forced to seek employment elsewhere. Moolarben has shown ongoing support for the local community, including sporting clubs and community organisations. This support plays an important role in keeping local clubs viable and maintaining social connections within the community. Over the past 10 years, this involvement has been consistent and has contributed positively to community wellbeing and participation. In my time at Moolarben, rehabilitation and environmental management have been treated as important parts of the operation, not afterthoughts. Rehabilitation works have been undertaken progressively and to a good standard, demonstrating a commitment to meeting environmental obligations. This history provides confidence that rehabilitation associated with the OC3 Extension will continue to be managed appropriately. Based on my experience working at Moolarben for the past 10 years, I believe the operation has proven itself to be responsible, well managed, and committed to both its workforce and the local community. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Ruth O'Reilly
|
ID |
14451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Ruth, I am a 72 year retiree previously worked as a schoolteacher and Research Assistant in Sydney. I am a mother of four adult children and a grandmother of two. I am a nature lover and am very proud of Australia’s natural environment and it’s unique animals. I am very concerned about keeping Australia’s natural heritage protected. This is why I am extremely concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states in particular, Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I strongly object to this proposal. Please refer to the attached document for details outlining my submission. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Mining Submission.docx (DOCX, 12.95 KB) |
Ian Clarke
|
ID |
14491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2153 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission within attached file. |
|
Attachments |
Submission concerning proposed expansion of Moolarben OC3 coal mine.pdf (PDF, 73.84 KB) |
Dianne Turner
|
ID |
14676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4650 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I wish to lodge my objection to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I lived around mining communities as a child in NSW and I am well aware of the ecological destruction that happens as a result of mining operations. I am also aware that mining companies do not prioritize minimising the impacts on the environment and nor do they clean up appropriately after the mines close. I find it distressing that the habitat of critically endangered wildlife is going to be put in more extreme danger. With all that mining fossil fuels that has caused this world, which is very much apparent with the extreme weather changes we are currently experiencing, the long standing heatwaves, flooding and ever increasing severe and very dangerous storms I cannot believe any government would even consider extending mining leases let alone expansions. I am aware that Moolarben coal mine is an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand the mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully” *. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Yours sincerely Dianne Turner |
Reily Cubb
|
ID |
14121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It’s a bad idea |
Virginia Congdon
|
ID |
14131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thankyou for the opportunity to present in brief my reasons for objecting to the Yancoal-Moolarben coal mine expansion as follows: • This mine will be operational until 2038 even without the proposed expansion. And therefore, should be considered unnecessary with the expansion of renewable energy projects as an alternative energy source coming on board making it a less desirable and more expensive form of energy. • The project will be competing for regional job opportunities and detract from the retraining of skills required for renewable energy. • The collective impacts that are currently being created by other coal mines in the area should be considered for their cumulative impacts. All of which will be intensified by their own future individual proposed expansions. • Cultural heritage deserves to be protected yet the mining company has refused recommendations for protection proposed by the Cultural Heritage Council Planning. • The DPHI has failed to recognise in their assessment report that further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. And that indeed the NSW Government is already not on tract to reach their 2030 or 2035 reduction targets. • The environment will be denied water resources necessary for deep rooted trees. And there has been no baseline monitoring of water by the company that already has a poor reputation for the responsible monitoring of water in their mining operations. • Key habitat concerns for Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. Noise and blasting, habitat destruction, deeply flawed Biodiversity offsets and the mining company’s refusal to create at least a 500m buffer zone between the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve will all contribute to the further decline of these threatened wildlife species and vegetation they are dependent on. • By refusing key recommendations re heritage and environmental protections concerns it demonstrates the lack of exercising a social license by the coal company. THE END |
Marian Haire
|
ID |
14181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See uploaded file |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Expansion Jan 2026.pdf (PDF, 140.34 KB) |
Lani Imhof
|
ID |
14186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the independent planning commission I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am very concerned that this project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. Our climate is under extreme pressure and is changing right before our eyes. We cannot keep on polluting and digging up coal. Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced. The temperatures in the last week should be an indicator that we must do something about climate change. Humans are unable to endure temperatures reaching 50 degrees Celsius, and while we can use air conditioning, native plants and animals lack such means to survive in these extreme conditions. Our animals are under stress like never before and losing habitat at a fast rate. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat. This is totally unacceptable. Koalas are under threat in NSW and largely due to loss of habitat. There have been breeding koalas recorded on the site. 80 hectares of the endangered Regent Honeyeater habitat will also be destroyed. Moolaraben Creek is a vital refuge for wildlife in drought. This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2-6m for up to 25 years post mining. This poses a great risk to the local wildlife. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box, Yellow Box, Blakely’s Red Gum, Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). On top of all this, there will be damage done to Wiradjuri cultural landscapes and sacred sites. And there is no justification for this type of expansion. No job is worth destroying our land and water resources and driving up climate change. There have been job openings at three Mudgee regional coal mines for years. So why would the Government even consider this proposal? It makes no sense at all, not economical, not environmental and not social. Even if the land is offset with biodiversity offsets, you cannot replace the existing environment. It must stay intact for the flora and fauna, for the health of the planet and the health of all of us. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. The project is projected to produce 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions, at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emission reduction targets. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. Just because NSW is already not on track to meet GHG targets, it shouldn’t mean we abandon any attempt to reduce emissions. It means we need to work harder to reduce emissions and thus should not approve any coal mining expansions or new coal. This project must be rejected. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Lani Imhof Vincentia NSW 2540 |
Ingrid Ralph
|
ID |
14201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2074 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attached |
|
Attachments |
MOOLARBEN OC3 EXPANSION.docx (DOCX, 7.95 KB) |
Chris Doyle
|
ID |
14671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am opposed to the expansion of Moorlaben proposed by Yancoal. Just look around the country - more extreme fire events, unseasonal floods, yet this profit oriented, foreign owned company is seeking to make this human induced problem in Australia much worse. If approved, the Moolarben mine expansion will: • Clear 113 hectares of koala habitat and destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. • Bring mining to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. • Produce 64 million tonnes of CO2e, at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets and when communities across the state and the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. • Lead to water drawdown of up to 5 metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which runs into the Goulburn River. • Directly impact and cause serious damage to 55 Aboriginal heritage sites. • Undermine the transition away from coal that is already underway in the region. The Moolarben coal mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where the transition to clean energy is well advanced. Please use your independent status to make a wise decision for our country and our world. Ban the expansion of Moorlaben. Yours sincerely, Chris Doyle |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2281 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The gorgeous and important valley should be protected and included in the Mughorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. As outlined in the recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report, further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. I am objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. The approval of new coal projects directly opposes Australia's goals of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. Instead it contributes to dangerous climate change, destroys habitat for key species and pollutes the region. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation, including much of the last remaining, endanger Box Gum Woodland. This landscape is home to over 23 threatened wildlife species and will cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted that the Koala habitat present is 'critical to the survival of the species' and is home to some of the last remaining healthy koalas. The expansion will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek which runs into the Goulburn River, threatening local communities and risking deep rooted vegetation. Additionally there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted, causing irreversible damage to communities and cultural history. Yancoal has made an unprecedented move to have the Independent Planning Commission hearing postpones, interrupting community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Expansion, making minor amendments to its proposal. These amendments do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation and disrupt the democratic process of community consultation. It is an attempt at greenwashing a very damaging project and the change at this stage makes a mockery of the community consultation process. The Department of Planning needs to reject this amendment and cancel the proposed expansion. It is too damaging to community, culture, environment and climate. |
Gwenaelle Levasseur
|
ID |
13956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2285 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As the existing mine will keep going until 2038 there is no work issue in the matter. The main issues are : > the destruction of native biodiversity that is essential to wildlife like koalas, almost threatened to be in extinction, and all the plants and other living species who NEED this biodiversity. > destruction of culture and art spaces which are centuries old and should definitely be respected. > alterations or damage water ways > development of a real damage on the planet making the climate change worse and therefore impacts on the whole community, country and international impact aswell. Please respect the government engagement to reduce it’s emissions and do go any further. Thank you |
Lesley Clarke
|
ID |
13996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. This proposal should be rejected. the amendments just proposed by Yancoal don"t reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. This valley should be put out of the reach of any mining, much less coal, and preserved for its beauty. The mine's expansion to within a100m of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is an outrage.Vital habitat will be detroyed, with likely irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. There are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. Furthermore, we just don't want further coalmine expansion! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2223 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to the Moolarben Coal Mine extension as it proposes to clear large areas of Critically Endangered Regent Honeyeater habitat and other endangered species habitat in NSW’s Central West. This proposal is immediately adjacent to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and a mere 45km from the Capertee Valley, a critical breeding area for the Regent Honeyeater on Wiradjuri Country. This proposal would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations, locking in more climate pollution and causing serious harm to threatened species, water sources and cultural heritage. The proposal plans to clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat and bring mining within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would also add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution. NSW government should not be approving any expansions to coal mines or new coal mines in NSW. It threatens our community through dangerous climate change and our unique biodiversity through loss of habitat. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached. |
|
Attachments |
Submission to NSW Independent Planning Commission- Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project-2026.pdf (PDF, 62.7 KB) |
Grace Harrison
|
ID |
14021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2205 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe strongly in climate action. I do not believe this expansion is in the best interests of the broader community due to it's inevitable contributions to climate change. Time and resources should be focused towards renewable energy and slowing climate change. |
Robin Murray
|
ID |
14026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be protected as part of a single conservation landscape with the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not made into an open cut coal mine pit. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining to within 100 metres of the reserve, putting an area of high biodiversity at risk. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in the area, including critical habitat for a uniquely resilient koala population. There is simply no justification to disturb this significant landscape and ecosystem - this project creates no new jobs, all it does is permanently destroy biodiversity. |
Josie McElvogue
|
ID |
14031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am extremely concerned that the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project will have disastrous impacts on biodiversity, waterways and the local community. I call on the NSW Government to reject this proposal, and to take a definitive stance against further greenwashing from Yancoal and other mining providers in Australia. While the proposed expansion has been decreased in size, there is no justification to produce a further 30 million tonnes of coal within the life of the approved mine to 2038. The bushland contains critically endangered species and provides food sources for Koala, Regent Honeyeater and other native animals threatened with extinction. The so-called amendments do not reduce the size of the mine footprint or the impacts of the mine. Hundreds of hectares of native vegetation, including critical Koala and Regent Honeyeater habitat, would still be cleared, and climate-wrecking emissions remain unchanged. Finally, claims that this expansion is needed for jobs do not stand up to scrutiny. Coal mines in the Mudgee region have carried vacancies for years, and Moolarben sits within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where government investment is focused on accelerating clean energy and long-term employment. Expanding coal mining in this region runs directly counter to that transition. |
Isadora Poole
|
ID |
14036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Isadora, I am a 27 year youth NGO worker in Inner Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in NSW, due to the climate impacts affecting communities and landscapes. Communities across the state are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, flooding and other unprecedented weather events, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning and failure to transition to renewable energy rapidly. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Isadora Poole Newtown NSW 2042 |
Justin Lund
|
ID |
14046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2203 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3. My concerns are both deeply personal and grounded in the broader environmental and community impacts that this project would worsen. 1. Concerns for My Family’s Future My wife is currently pregnant, and we are preparing to welcome our daughter into the world. This should be a time filled with hope, but instead I find myself increasingly anxious about the future she will inherit if we continue expanding coal mining in Australia. Every new or extended coal project locks in decades of additional emissions. These decisions shape the world my daughter will grow up in — a world that is already showing clear signs of strain. I worry about the kind of climate, environment, and stability she will face if we continue down this path. 2. Climate Change Impacts Are Already Here This summer has been brutally hot. We have experienced extreme heat, fires, and floods — sometimes all within the same season. These events are no longer rare or unpredictable; they are becoming the new normal. Approving further coal extraction directly contributes to the worsening of these climate impacts. The OC3 extension would add millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when science is unequivocal: emissions must rapidly decline, not increase. Continuing to expand fossil fuel projects undermines Australia’s commitments and exposes communities to escalating climate risks. 3. Loss of Biodiversity and Habitat The proposed extension would clear significant areas of habitat, including land known to support threatened species such as the Koala and the Regent Honeyeater. These species are already under immense pressure from habitat loss, climate stress, and fragmentation. Once these ecosystems are destroyed, they cannot simply be replaced. The cumulative loss of biodiversity weakens the resilience of the entire landscape — something future generations will pay the price for. 4. Water Impacts and Long-Term Risks I am also deeply concerned about the project’s potential impacts on water resources. Mining operations of this scale can alter groundwater systems, reduce water availability, and degrade water quality. In a drying climate, water security is becoming one of the most critical issues facing regional communities. We cannot afford to compromise water resources that local people, farms, and ecosystems rely on. 5. A Decision That Will Echo for Generations This is not just a technical planning decision. It is a moral one. Approving the OC3 extension would send a message that short‑term extraction is being prioritised over long‑term community wellbeing, environmental protection, and the safety of future generations. As a soon‑to‑be parent, I am asking decision‑makers to consider the world our children will inherit. We have an obligation to act responsibly, to protect what remains of our natural environment, and to shift toward cleaner, safer, and more sustainable industries. For these reasons, I strongly oppose the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension and urge you to reject the proposal. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2300 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I disagree with the expansion because it will destroy 480 hectares of habitat that's critical to the survival of a resilient koala population near Mudgee and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The expansion is projected to generate 64 million tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to 58%!!! of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW, significantly contributing to climate change—one of the greatest threats to koalas. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. 25th Jan 2026 - Charlestown NSW Dear IPC I want you to reject the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. My concerns circulate around the threat to the habitat of the Regent Honey Eater, and the Koalas. Also, NSW as a rich part of the global society, we have an obligation to reduce thence eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, the principal cause our present dangerous global heating. I personally love and respect coal, the basis of our prosperous society. However, we now have the physics driven imperative to transition to non fossil renewable energy. The Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 will push the timeline of the inevitable transition further into future decades, and with this delay the deeper the ecological and climate damage. We are a rich society, and we need to stop exploiting fossil fuels, and in so doing act as a role model for other societies. So, our example of stopping this project for environmental reasons can and will have an outsized global impact well in excess of the scopes 1,2, and 3 emissions from the mine project, and the resultant coal. This disproportionately positive effect will be the example NSW sets for other communities around the world. Now is much better than later. Do it now. Refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 |
Warren Birkinshaw
|
ID |
14356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I hereby lodge my objections to the expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 near Mudgee. Apart from objecting to the expansion or approval of any new coal mines or other fossil fuel projects, this particular project may well lead to the killing of what may be our largest population of koalas. Clearing is the complete destruction of habitat for not only these koalas, but all other wildlife who live there. The clearing adds to the impacts of climate change directly by removing living breathing vegetation, exposing the soil to drying, reducing water penetration and many other impacts. Extracting coal leads directly to air pollution, and the transport and burning of the coal contributes to the already existential impacts of ever increasing climate change due to emission of greenhouse gases Please do not approve this Regards Warren Birkinshaw |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14361 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Byles Creek Valley Union Inc |
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
OBJECTING SUBMISSION REGARDING MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL MINE EXTENSION Project Number SSD-33083358. BCVU Inc. request refusal of the proposed extension to the Moolarben coal mine. The proposed site should instead be conserved and managed as part of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Our concerns include but are not limited to: the clearing of 480 hectares of native vegetation to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve the impact upon the known and documented threatened species the impact upon the habitat and future potential survival of the existing Koala population whereby it has been documented that the "Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species" by the Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW the serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. the impact upon Moolarben Creek and subsequently the flow on impacts upon the Goulburn River, and the associated riparian areas the impact upon numerous Aboriginal heritage sites the resultant addition to Climate Change impacts. This has been noted by the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. the lack of assessment of the project regarding the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, (as was legally required by the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant Coal Mine) This project should not be approved. Regards Byles Creek Valley Union Inc President: (Redacted) Vice President: Ana Warnecke Secretary: Robyn Smith |
Sol Warburton Hughes
|
ID |
13626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2298 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. This is based on the impacts on climate change (the burning of fossil fuels exponentially exacerbates climate change), koalas (it would cause the destruction of habitat that's critical to the survival of the species), impacts to local water (drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Creek without proper baseline testing) and cultural heritage (it will destroy 55 cultural artefacts). |
Graeme Stuart
|
ID |
13641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mining Extension Project. This objection is based on serious concerns regarding environmental harm, climate impacts, cumulative effects, community wellbeing, and the inconsistency of the project with long-term public interest and climate commitments. 1. Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions The extension of Open Cut 3 would enable further coal extraction at a time when urgent and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are required. Approving additional coal mining directly undermines Australia’s climate commitments and contributes to worsening climate impacts, including extreme heat, bushfires, droughts, and floods. The project represents a lock-in of high-emissions infrastructure that is incompatible with a just and timely transition to a low-carbon economy. 2. Cumulative environmental impacts The Moolarben coal complex already imposes significant environmental pressures. The proposed extension would add to cumulative impacts on air quality, water resources, noise levels, biodiversity, and landscape integrity. Incremental approvals risk masking the true scale of harm when assessed collectively, particularly in a region already heavily burdened by mining activity. 3. Water resources and hydrological impacts The project poses unacceptable risks to surface and groundwater systems, including drawdown, contamination, and long-term disruption of local hydrology. In a drying climate, water resources must be protected for ecosystems, agriculture, and communities. Further mining threatens these shared and finite assets. 4. Biodiversity loss and ecological damage Open cut mining results in extensive land clearing, habitat destruction, and fragmentation. Any proposed offsets cannot adequately compensate for the loss of mature ecosystems, threatened species habitat, and ecological connectivity. Once destroyed, these values cannot be fully restored. 5. Community health, wellbeing, and social impacts Mining expansions bring increased dust, noise, blasting, traffic, and visual impacts that diminish quality of life for nearby residents. There are also well-documented mental health and social impacts associated with prolonged exposure to large-scale industrial activity. These burdens fall disproportionately on local communities while benefits are largely externalised. 6. Economic risk and lack of long-term benefit Coal markets are increasingly volatile, and global demand is declining as countries transition to renewable energy. Approving new or extended coal projects exposes workers, communities, and governments to stranded asset risks, while diverting attention and investment away from sustainable economic alternatives. 7. Public interest and intergenerational equity The project prioritises short-term private profit over long-term public good. Decisions made now will shape environmental and social outcomes for future generations, who will bear the costs of climate change, environmental degradation, and rehabilitation liabilities. Conclusion For these reasons, I urge the consent authority to refuse approval of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Australia has the opportunity and responsibility to move away from further coal expansion and toward solutions that protect communities, ecosystems, and future generations. Thank you for considering this submission. Yours sincerely, Graeme Stuart |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2421 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal has made an unprecedented move to have the Independent Planning Commission hearing postponed and to interrupt the community consultation on the Moolarben Open Cut 3 expansion, by making more minor amendments to its proposal. The Department of Planning now needs to decide whether to accept or reject this amendment. In our view the amendment should be rejected and the public hearing should not have been postponed in the first place. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. It’s a farcical attempt at greenwashing a very damaging project and the change at this stage makes a mockery of community consultation processes. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2300 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. We are in a climate crisis and any expansion of a coal mine, and indeed the continued burning of fossil fuels in general, causes harm and vastly increased risk for every living thing on the planet. Unnatural disasters caused by global warming make our homes uninsurable, makes our growing seasons unreliable, significantly reduces potable water supply, and puts lives at risk through the increasing frequency of ferocity of fire, flood, and drought. When a fire is out of control, the last thing you do is pour extra fuel on it. That's unconscionable. |
Linda Thomas
|
ID |
13796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2294 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project No: SSD-33083358 as i believe that the area proposed for mining should be managed as part of a whole conservation landscape with the adjacent Munghorn Gap Nature reserve. Conservation of the bushland which would be affected by the mine extension footprint is important to protect the habitats of the 23 threatened species recorded in & around the site, especially the critical habitat for the resident koala population. The mine extension will also seriously harm important cultural heritage values of the 55 Aboriginal sites within the mine area, and impact local water quality. The climate change impacts are also unacceptable as any new coal mine projects are in breach of IPCC guidelines to limit fossil fuel emissions. I understand that the assessment does not include quantification of downstream greenhouse gas emissions which will result from this project. I strongly object to this extension on these grounds. Regards, Linda Thomas |
Julia Mitchell
|
ID |
13821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Pls see attached document. |
|
Attachments |
Jullia Mitchell - Moolarben Mine_Redacted_0.pdf (PDF, 35.6 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13861 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Canterbury Bankstown Climate Action Network |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2206 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Dear Sir/Madam On behalf of the Canterbury Bankstown Climate Action Network (CBCAN), I would like to make a submission objecting to the extension of the Moolarben coal mine. CBCAN is a group of over 500 residents of the Canterbury Bankstown LGA, who all levels of government to take the threat of climate change more seriously. Our prime concern is that this expansion would emit significant greenhouse gases, both during the extraction and burning the coal. This project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. This is completely unacceptable, and is in direct conflict with the NSW Government's emissions reduction targets. As well as climate change, this proposal would have serious impacts on water, habitats and biodiversity in the area. The area's threatened koalas rely on intact vegetation and connectedness across the landscape. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully” From an economic point of view, it makes more sense for the regional to focus on the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and boosting tourism to this beautiful area, rather than supporting destructive, ugly proposals like this one. Regards (Convenor, CBCAN) |
Liz Smith
|
ID |
13871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the mine as it will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. |
Ross Brown
|
ID |
13881 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Dark side masks |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2292 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please don't expand this coal mine. We must think of the impacts on the environment around the mine but also the impacts of burning coal on the climate and future generations. |
Jennifer Martin
|
ID |
13891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Thank for the opportunity to comment on the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal Complex,OC3. For many years I have participated in and financially supported many community programs which aim to retain and protect our Australian landscapes, unique flora and fauna, protect crucial water supplies and our cultural heritage. I am a grandmother and care deeply about the legacy our generation will leave for future generations. We have destroyed enough of our unique Australian natural assets and the Moolarben mine expansion project is yet another project which guarantees further destruction of irreplaceable landscapes with biodiversity, threatened species, crucial water resources and Aboriginal cultural heritage sites to be destroyed. The predicted climate impacts of emissions from this mine proposal are also unacceptable in 2026 when NSW has legislated emission reduction targets and communities are already feeling the impacts of extreme weather events both in Australia and worldwide. Yancoal are clear that this project involves the destruction of 480 hectares of native vegetation, highly valued as in tact habitat of breeding koalas and also of the endangered and beautiful Regent Honeyeater. They are clear about the 675 hectares of habitat being at risk from mining activities. They have been clear that they are not prepared to increase the buffer zone along the edge of the highly valued Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve from their 100 metres to the recommended 500 metres and their EIS has given little thought to the impacts of dust, noise and blasting vibrations on nearby bat colonies and other species. The company has also been clear that they expect to destroy 55 Aboriginal cultural sites and have been unwilling to reconsider these impacts. It is also clear that impacts to groundwater will be significant with expected drawdown of 2 to 6 metres and for this impact to extend out in time for at least 25 years after mining finishes in 2038....ie until 2063! This puts Moolarben Creek and watercourses downstream such as the Goulburn River at serious risk with the fact that these watercourses are vital refuges for wildlife enabling survival during heat waves and droughts, events which will continue to worsen with climate change. All of these impacts are out of step with both science and community expectations. There is little to justify the approval of this mine extension particularly when considered with the cumulative impacts of other large mining projects in this area such as at Ulan and Wilpinjong. Provision of jobs for this region cannot be considered a justification as the present Moolarbon mine will continue until 2038 and this area, being within the Central West Renewable energy Zone should be prioritising training and jobs in future renewable industries. It must also be noted that all coal produced will be exported. Biodiversity offsets which Yancoal intend to use may sound "nice" but it must be understood by most people that these cannot replace what this Yancoal project will destroy. It is also clear that the company has been prepared to disrupt the community consultation process with the postponement of the public hearing scheduled for the 10th February, stating that it wanted to make amendments to its proposal. However, these appear to be minor and the keys facts about this proposal remain unchanged. With all of the above considerations in mind I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject this project as not being in the public (in Australia and the world) interest. |
Joanne Bell
|
ID |
13896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3707 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission uploaded as per instructions below. |
|
Attachments |
Joanne Bell_Moolarben Coal Mine submission.pdf (PDF, 4.85 KB) |
Warren Birkinshaw
|
ID |
13911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2159 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I hereby lodge my objections to the expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 near Mudgee. Apart from objecting to the expansion or approval of any new coal mines or other fossil fuel projects, this particular project may well lead to the killing of what may be our largest population of koalas. Clearing is the complete destruction of habitat for not only these koalas, but all other wildlife who live there. The clearing adds to the impacts of climate change directly by removing living breathing vegetation, exposing the soil to drying, reducing water penetration and many other impacts. Extracting coal leads directly to air pollution, and the transport and burning of the coal contributes to the already existential impacts of ever increasing climate change due to emission of greenhouse gases Please do not approve this Regards Warren Birkinshaw |
Tori Bail
|
ID |
13836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, Glad to hear that the IPC has postponed cusultation in light of minor amendments to the original proposal. The Department of Planning now needs to decide whether to accept or reject this amendment. The changes do not reduce the footprint of the mine at all but merely propose to manage more areas of vegetation outside the mine area for so-called ‘habitat enhancement’. This amendment won’t make any difference to the direct and indirect impact on threatened wildlife and ecosystems, and it completely disrupts the community consultation process that is underway. It’s a farcical attempt at greenwashing a very damaging project and the change at this stage makes a mockery of community consultation processes. The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. Yancoal's push out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. We don't have much time left, climate change is kicking in and as Anthony Albanese said on Sunday 25th January, Insiders programme, " maybe climate change is real, given the temperatures experienced in the heat waves. Maybe there is something in it." Tori Bail |
Brian Stevens
|
ID |
13841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2777 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please see my submission attached. Brian Stevens (Redacted) |
|
Attachments |
Brian Steven - Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 141.97 KB) |
george mercier
|
ID |
13846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
to the government: This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. mr george mercier (Redacted) Sent from my iPhone |
Marilyn Perkins
|
ID |
13851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find submission on the Moolarben Coal Mine C3 Extension Project. Thankyou, Marilyn Perkins. |
|
Attachments |
Marilyn Perkins - Moolarben Mine Project_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 143.28 KB) |
Renee Hall
|
ID |
12731 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Submissions close 17 February I am writing to object to Yancoal's Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project! (Project Number SSD-33083358.) I object to the project expansion and request the urgent consideration of Mudgee's Koala's. Include this link with drone footage of a mother and baby from the colony from the organisation Lock the gate! https://www.lockthegate.org.au/new_drone_footage_captures_mum_and_bub_koala_in_path_of_yancoal_s_bulldozers These proposal amendments will postpone a scheduled hearing with the Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales (IPCN).....insert date here.....and interrupt plans in the current community consultation process. The Department of Planning is responsible for deciding whether to accept or reject proposal amendments. insert legislation here I request that you reject the addition proposal amendments, and I also request that you reject the postponement of the public community hearing due to occur on the 10th of February. It should also be noted that the proposal amendments do not reduce the footprint of the mine, as claimed.. https://www.lockthegate.org.au/new_drone_footage_captures_mum_and_bub_koala_in_path_of_yancoal_s_bulldozers Insert reference here The amendments propose offset areas of vegetation outside the mine area for ‘habitat enhancement’. The proposal amendment will not increase either the direct or indirect impact on already threatened wildlife and ecosystems. insert reference here Interference with community consultation processes by corporations can create community distrust of the government. https://www.apsc.gov.au/publication/report-trust-australian-regional-public-services/understanding-and-exploring-trust-public-service-delivery Insert another reference here The public hearing proposed for 10th February has now been postponed indefinitely. Background Moolarben coal mine is an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western NSW, on Wiradjuri Country. Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand the mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/munghorn-gap-nature-reserve Summary This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open-cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity, and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear the endangered Box Gum Woodland. The mining project will also lead to a water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck. This creek runs into the Goulburn River and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine plans will cause serious harm to the cultural heritage of the area - 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint will be directly impacted, plus an additional 12 sites. The mine development will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets, or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. insert case here This project should not be approved. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, noting that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’, and that • The habit is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to several entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species, especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when, in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause a drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, risking the deep-rooted trees that require the water for growth and maintenance during drought periods. Baseline monitoring of water studies is incomplete. The company has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, having failed badly to do the ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change The Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DPHI) Assessment report (https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-06/ieapm-moolarben-coal-complex-20250417.pdf) does not include recent findings from the Net Zero Commission's Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December, that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 No 48 https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2023-048https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report There is no reference to Finding 4, stating that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act, or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in New South Wales. As the Net Zero Commission (NZC) states, any such emissions are inconsistent with Australia's climate change targets and the Paris temperature goals.(https://unfccc.int/most-requested/key-aspects-of-the-paris-agreement) The New South Wales Government's current emissions status is not documented on the proposal, with neither the 2030 nor the 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the 24/07/2025 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal) (Ward P; Adamson JA; Price AJA) decision in MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd v. Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group & Anor Case No. S174/2025 [2025] NSWCA 163 (https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/cases/current/case-no-s1742025) which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, must be applied and considered. The removal of these references omits the accurate impacts of the Moolarben expansion. Without these omissions neglect the quantification and complete economic costs of predicted downstream emissions are neglected. These emissions make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended the protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region have not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines with their proposed expansions will also impact biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs Alternative job opportunities are available as part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone. 1,850 direct jobs during construction, with a further 930 planned permanent full-time jobs from 2034 to manage operations. https://www.energyco.nsw.gov.au/our-projects/central-west-orana-renewable-energy-zone The employment boom in renewable project development is predicted to employ over 2,000 people during the next decade. The Moolarben coal complex is currently expected to operate until 2038, increasing global emissions impacts. Key Links Independent Planning Commission web page Department of Planning Assessment Report EIS and NSW Government agency responses *https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=PAE-68741737%2120240625T233829.479%20GMT The amendments proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation. This proposal should not be considered at this late stage. Renee Hall (Redacted) Your contact is important to me. "A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. "Albert Einstein R.Salome HallThey said we couldn't save the world you know. I said just because it hasn't been done before...just watch me! |
Marion Giles
|
ID |
12736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
2303 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To Whom it May Concern, I am writing to express my objection to the proposed extension to Moolarben Coal Mine. This expansion is projected to generate 64 million tonnes of climate pollution and such will significantly contribute to climate change. It will destroy 480 hectares of habitat critical to the survival several critically endangered species. Yancoal has admitted that the project poses a threat to habitat "critical to the survival" of a local koala population. This koala population has been recognised by the NSW Government for their resilience to the effects of climate change thus far, however the stress on this population posed by the further clearing of their habitat would cause untold damage. Their landscape would be fragmented , their food sources diminished and breeding activities disrupted. Casualties from increased vehicle access is also inevitable. Other species such as the critically endangered Regent honeyeater and the endangered gang-gang cockatoo thrive in the area set for destruction should this proposal be allowed to proceed. It is our Government's duty to ensure that our Green House Target is met and to responsibly work to protect our unique species that are realistically facing extinction. This extension of Moolarben Coal Mine flies in the face of these aims. I strongly urge you to do all in your power to stop this extension of Moolarben Coal Mine from going ahead. Thankyou, Marion Giles |
Elizabeth Honey
|
ID |
12926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2299 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation, this area is incredibly import for biodiversity, there are 23 threatened species in this area including koalas. The destruction of this habitat will cause irreversible damage to wildlife such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. It would also destroy endangered Box Gum woodland. The mine would also contribute to runaway climate change, a report from the NSW Net Zero Commission stated that any further coal mine expansions would be inconsistent with achieving climate targets or with a safe climate. The current situation in Victoria is a case in point. This project should not be approved. |
Megan Benson
|
ID |
13011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please refer to attached document |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Objection Final.pdf (PDF, 243.11 KB) |
Julia Lee
|
ID |
13306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2430 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m opposed to the Moolarben coal mine expansion. It’s unfathomable to me how anyone in this day and age anyone would think it acceptable to clear such a large area and have no environmental impacts. The area is a not only a known koala habitat, the endangered regent honey eaters live there along with many other creatures. The mine will go with 100 meters of them Munghorn Gap Nature reserve. Bats live on sandstone cliffs nearby and they are not supposed to be impacted? In such a dry country water is our most precious treasure. Yancoal plans on using massive amounts which will drawn down water to a level which will affect the vegetation. Yancoal hasn’t done any baseline studies and is well known for their poor quality of water monitoring Climate change is an accepted fact and the extension of Moolarben coal mine is totally out of step with achieving our Paris targets. The mine is planed to run until 2038 under current agreements. The world is transitioning to cheap renewable energy at a rapid pace and coal is becoming a more and more expensive form of energy. Plus the demand is declining as cheaper forms of energy are available. Morally and ethnically it doesn’t make sense to destroy a beautiful environment for short term gain. In 30 years koalas and swift parrots could be breeding and living in safe environment or they could be gone forever. Please refused the mine expansion our environmental is too precious to lose. Thank you. |
David Rowe
|
ID |
13386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2477 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
See attachment. |
|
Attachments |
2026 Independent planning commission submission^.docx (DOCX, 17.32 KB) |
Joanna Bowan
|
ID |
13406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2603 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed expansion of the Moolarben mine should not be allowed. The mine's expansion would have a terrible impact on the beautiful and ecologically important country around the proposed expanded mine. This area has special biodiversity features which mean that it deserves to be cared for as part of a unified conservation landscape alongside the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve — not sacrificed to open-cut coal mining. If allowed to proceed, the proposal would strip away 480 hectares of native vegetation and push mining activities to within just 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve boundary. This area is critically important for biodiversity, providing habitat for 23 threatened wildlife species recorded on and around the site. It includes key refuges essential for the survival of the Koala, which here supports an especially resilient population. The mining operation would destroy vital ecosystems and pose severe, irreversible risks to vulnerable species such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, and Regent Honeyeater. It would also obliterate remnants of endangered Box Gum Woodland. Significant hydrological impacts are expected as well, with predictions of water table drawdown up to 5 metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek — a tributary of the Goulburn River — endangering deep-rooted vegetation that depends on this groundwater. Cultural heritage would also suffer irreparable damage. Within the planned mine area lie 55 Aboriginal heritage sites that would be directly destroyed, and another 12 potentially subjected to indirect impacts. The mine would further exacerbate climate change. According to the NSW Net Zero Commission’s Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report, any new or expanded coal mining is incompatible with achieving the state’s climate goals and maintaining a stable climate. Moreover, the project’s assessment has failed to account for the economic costs of downstream greenhouse gas emissions — a requirement established by the NSW Court of Appeal in the Mt Pleasant coal mine decision. For these reasons, this project should be rejected. Sincerely, Joanna Bowan |
Mark Marusic
|
ID |
13411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2042 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not transfigured into an open cut coal mine. The mine would clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area is of enormous importance for biodiversity. There have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat critical to the survival of the Koala in a resilient population, which is all too rare. The mine would also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious, irreversible impact to threatened wildlife lsuch as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and would also cut down endangered Box Gum Woodland. A further impact would be water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and so would be a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. Serious harm would be caused to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that would be directly impacted, plus 12 that may be indirectly impacted. Harm would also be brought to NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are not in harmony with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, project assessment has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum W The project has not avoided or reduced the impacts on biodiversity and is likely to bring about serious and irreversible impacts to a number of species, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve - these are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise constitute a major threat to those species. The department agency stated that there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are greatly flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided in order to avoid further species extinctions. The project would cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and endanger deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing required water monitoring They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project would destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused The cumulative impacts of this proposal regarding other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Re employment creation, there are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex willl continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Finally, the amendments just proposed by Yancoal do not reduce the clearing of native vegetation at all and are far too late in the process for consideration now. This project definitely should not be approved. |
Dominique Jacobs
|
ID |
13486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to add my voice in objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project. No matter where the coal mining operation takes place, regional communities across NSW will be impacted through the loss of our natural environment, pollution and depletion of our waterways and the production of greenhouse gas emissions. We live in a climate emergency and regional communities are at the front line of climate change. No new coal mining projects should be approved. The Mudgee region is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone where new employment opportunities are planned. Yancoal should be working proactively to retrain their workforce into new, sustainable industries. The writing is on the wall for the coal industry. To encourage expansion of a dying industry is foolhardy and irresponsible. There is simply no good reason to approve the Moolarben Extension and the project should be refused. |
Stephanie Luke
|
ID |
13516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thankyou for giving me the opportunity to express my absolute objection to this mine expansion. I moved to Bathurst fifteen years ago because the heatwaves in Adelaide were setting new records and the Murray River was in dire critical need. This year has seen those records broken again. The daily news over summer, with algal blooms and failing oceans, bushfires, floods and hot drying winds has terrified me. There is also a growing rage that government policies are not addressing these concerns in a meaningful way, and that targets we have set will not actually be met within the time-frames that were promised. My biggest concern is that this Yancoal mine expansion will directly impact vulnerable water supplies in regional NSW in a time of heating climate. How to convey the catastrophe that this would bring? I am surprised to learn that the cumulative impacts of this huge expansion, along with those of nearby Ulan and Wilpinjong mines, have not been collectively assessed and wonder what kind of criteria our state planning is using. The fact that the very greenhouse gasses released by these three expanding mines will contribute to that very heating climate and create ongoing environmental disasters as the emissions equal half of all NSW’s annual emissions. I despair at the future we have on offer when we export this coal, and wonder at the economic minds doing the sums. Being “open for business” (according to Chris Minns) surely does not mean scraping out the last remaining coal deposits. We understood him to be talking about a transition — a sensible move based on pragmatic modelling. If we go ahead with new and expanded coal mines, we are creating stranded assets with maximum damage to ourselves. Economically it makes no sense to expand at this time. China is seeking to wind down its use of fossil fuels while renewables surge. [1] South Korea, [2] the third-biggest importer of Australian coal, plans to shift away from the “dirtiest fossil fuel”. The Australian Office of the Chief Economist has forecast a near 15 per cent decline in global thermal coal demand in the three years to 2027… The Climate Energy Finance director Tim Buckley said those major exporters would be “terminally challenged” over coming decades as countries shifted to renewable energy to meet commitments under the 2015 Paris agreement.” [3] “[South Korea's] commitment to phasing out coal power sends a powerful signal to Australian decision makers and investors," said James Bowen, a director at energy and climate consultancy ReMap Research. "For Australia to continue to rely on fossil fuel exports in the medium to long-term is a risky strategy." Mr Bowen from ReMap Research said, in the first instance, exporters like Australia and Indonesia faced a rude shock. "The Australian Treasury's latest modelling predicts Australian coal and gas exports will fall by about 50 per cent in value over the next five years — a decline of more than $60 billion by 2030 — regardless of Australia's own emissions targets," he said. [4] What’s more, the mining jobs being created through Yancoal’s expansion won’t match those from surrounding renewable energy projects. We are behaving like a desperate whore, scratching at the last remaining profits, eager for some kind of fossil fuel fix, knowing that this is killing us slowly and surely. The rehabilitation will come with embracing renewable energy as soon as possible, ceasing to be a rogue state and contributing to the international community as a responsible global citizen. I am begging you to think about the outcome for Australia and the world and urge you to say NO to this outdated form of energy and all it’s noxious side effects. Thankyou References 1. https://energyandcleanair.org/publication/china-puts-coal-on-back-burner-as-renewables-soar/#:~:text=With%20new%20renewable%20energy%20installations,GW%20commissioned%20in%20H1%202024. 2. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/korea-coal-phaseout-could-trigger-170000124.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGrrnUdTNm5CudAGVcn3vvBkGof-pXbzA-MFeJn1vISddB7KyN8EPZuFdXhCWN9dHYsUkCNBtQIyUZshB3szquBgYR3qvaj2Owz2nW3QgXfVRbfct8A7jsH0mMzFIUkBF4nEP0bZEOCqWlR_QuebciMgfi64g9J04I8uDuy69uSY 3. https://www.9news.com.au/national/south-korea-phasing-out-of-thermal-coal-to-impact-australian-exporters/ddcba754-8501-4d8c-ba66-ec92595d3c29 4. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-18/south-korea-coal-plant-closure-warning-on-australian-exports/106021660 |
|
Attachments |
Yancoal expansion 2026.pdf (PDF, 35.13 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose the expansion of the coal mine. The temporary extraction of coal for the short term future is not worth the permanent potential extinction of some local wildlife species. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
29/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Continued expansion of fossil fuel mines threatens all living things, this particular expansion threatens Koalas, bats, honeyeaters, snakes, gliders and native flora and the water table in the immediate area. This expansion will also destroy cultural heritage vital to understanding the true history of the area prior to colonisation. Coal mine expansions are not consistent with NSW Climate Change Act emission reduction targets. |
Elizabeth Newell
|
ID |
12706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, Please find below my objection to the Moorlarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project (number SSD 33083358). Yancoal’s minor amendment proposals, to take on 'habitat enhancement ‘ refers to land NOT even inside the proposed expansion area. The amendment it would seem, was put forward to disrupt and insult the community consultation process and make no difference to impacts of the expansion which are serious and lack forward thinking SO required at this time in our country. We need to move away from coal and concentrate on a just transition for communities in coal employment areas. This expansion keeps the mine going, it does not reduce the footprint of the mine. How can this expansion support the findings stated in the NSW Climate Change Act? This project will emit about 58% of all greenhouse gases in NSW. Heartbreakingly, these expansions continue to move in and destroy yet another significant conservation landscape in NSW. The Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, is completely threatened with the expansion coming up to 100 metres from it's already compromised borders; a valley of a fragile water table, a greenway and refuge for 48 threatened species. Since the 2020 fires many already threatened koalas of this region took refuge here.This group of koalas are known to be robust and disease free. Because of Munghorn Gap their population is now increasing because there is somewhere for them to live. Do not allow Yancoal to clear 480 hectares of NATIVE vegetation and worse still only a 100 metres from this Reserve. In addition the science of damage to the water table from the mine is well documented. It is time to look forward and take a stand for all of our futures. Elizabeth Newell |
Donna Ross
|
ID |
12711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission I am writing to object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project. Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand the existing Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee. I recently made a visit to this region to see for myself the impact this proposed extension would on the the environment and the local communities. This extension will impact Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It will affect biodiversity of the region, a region where there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. A healthy Koala population has been recorded in and around the site.The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets proposed by mining companies, in general, are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. The proposed extension will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. These are precious and essential water systems that sustain the vegetation and wildlife of the region. With the ongoing impact of climate change, particularly in the dry western regions, we need to ensure the vital protection of these water sources. DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act, “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. We are seeing unprecedented fires, floods, and other weather events no only in Australia but world wide. We need to responsibly commit to a cleaner, greener future for coming generations by ending this continued support to the fossil fuel industry. The Federal and State Government need to keep investing in alternative job opportunities available in the region as Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Kind Regards Donna Ross |
Angelika Treichler
|
ID |
12721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Objection to Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project: To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Angelika Treichler, I am a 83 year old Pensioner who is deeply concerned about our Natural Environment with its native forests, native animals. I also fear for lives of our future generations with Climate catastrophes becoming more frequent. I live in the Blue Mountains where the impact of Climate Change has already shown catastrophic results. An extension of the open cut Moolarben coal mine near Mudgee would be devastatingly damaging in three ways: Loss of Wildlife, Impact on Wiradjuri Country and Climate Pollution I urge the Panel to reject this project! My points of concern: >Loss of habitat for threatened species like Koalas, regent honey eater and others if 113 ha of native forest is cleared. (The proposed ‚habitat enhancement‘ contained in the amendment would be outside proven Koala habitat and would not reduce the project‘s footprint!) > Construction Impact of noise and blast vibrations too close to the existing nature reserve. > Risk to water sources, the creek and groundwater which would Impact wildlife and people, especially in draught periods. > No benefits for the local community with no clear job prospects. > Climate pollution through the Production of 64 million tons of Greenhouse gas emissions. This would be reason enough to reject this project at a time when heatwaves, fires and floods are tormenting our country! For these reasons, I implore the Independent Planning Commission to reject this project outright! Thank you for the opportunity to speak up. Sincerely, Angelika Treichler |
Andrew Zdenkowski
|
ID |
12726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear commissioners of the IPC, I wish to make a submission to object to the above Project SSD-33083358 on the following grounds 1 It will have serious negative impact on biodiversity(23 threatened species) especially critical koala habitat and the regent honeyeaters. 2 It will negatively impact cultural heritage sites(55 recorded) 3 It will dramatically affect climate change and in particular is inconsistent with net zero aspirations and the Paris agreement. On a personal note it will almost certainly have a negative impact on my grandchildren(6 at last count). It is inconceivable and in fact hideous that they may suffer in the future for bad cpdecisions made today. 4 the economic costs downstream due to gas emissions have not been considered. 5 Impact on local water resources have not been adequately considered . Especially significant in view of water use and poor monitoring of the current mine. I would expect all the above to be taken into account and each item requires a response and explanation in any decision made. Yours with great concern, Andrew Zdenkowski (Redacted) Sent from my iPad |
Christine Clarke
|
ID |
12091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2541 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I grew up in a time when environment was apparently not an issue. Landclearing everywhere, mining, urban expansion the norm. But as we better understood the impact of these actions we came to understand the impacts they were having on our lives and the future. Take the current situation of flooding up north, drought becoming the norm, fires down south. Mining is a big driver of climate change. Even if the environment is not cared about, I really object to taxpayers supporting these industries and not paying tax. Despite supposedly having to rehabilitate lands destroyed, the companies do not, and government allows this e.g. Mt Morgan in Qld.. It could be said that the various government bodies are in thrall to the big multinationals and thus not serious about protecting our fragile continent - short term gain for long term pain as is said. Have the courage to stand up to these companies and refuse to allow new mining, along with the expansion of existing. |
Gail Mensinga
|
ID |
12166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2477 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am a local conservationist and wish to make a brief submission to object to the proposed expansion as above. In particular in the context of our existential climate crisis we are experiencing at the moment I will focus on Climate Change and our threatened wildlife species which I understand are recognised as matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) 1.Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. In particular they do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to.” The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. 2. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The planned expansion will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species, matters of National environmental significance, (MNES) and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, (micro bats) Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland, which would add to our extinction crisis as well as our climate crisis. I sincerely hope the independent planning commission will consider these matters in my objection to prevent hastening our existential climate crisis and extinction crisis as verified by the National Climate Risk Assessment report 2025. Thank you for this opportunity Yours sincerely Gail Mensinga Alstonville NSW 2477 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
12321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the Moolarben OC3 Coal MineExtension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358 My concern relates firstly to the loss of habitat for so many species of fauna, including species that are already listed as threatened. I am familiar with the coal-mining district north of Mudgee. For more than 10 years I have participated in a registered bird-banding project at Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve on the Wollar Road. This bird-banding site has been operating for more than 60 years and is an extremely valuable and an almost unrivalled longitudinal study of bird populations. Munghorn Gap has a permanent water source and serves as a very significant refuge for wildlife in times of drought. Threatened species, including Regent Honeyeaters and Koalas, have been sighted during my visits. Threatened mammals are recorded in the area and each night microbats forage over our campsite at Munghorn Gap. The Nature Reserve supports breeding populations of at least 100 bird species, including iconic species such as Emus and Superb Lyrebirds. At Munghorn Gap NR, an in-depth study of colour-banded Rock Warblers (Origmas) is being undertaken. This is the only bird species endemic to NSW and it is confined to sandstone formations and nearby limestone formations on and around the Great Dividing Range; this habitat is particularly well-represented at Munghorn Gap . Munghorn Gap NR is now almost surrounded by mining leases; we have seen the leases encroach right up to the boundary of the Nature Reserve and every night at our campsite, we can hear the sounds and see the light pollution generated by coal-mining operations. This nocturnal disturbance cannot help but impact the birds and mammals living nearby. All species of native fauna are negatively impacted by the destruction of their environment and the inevitable disturbance from noise, traffic and dust. They are being squeezed into smaller and smaller remnant patches of bush where their very existence becomes unsustainable during to isolation and lack of genetic diversity. All species of birds and animals are made up of individuals, just like us humans. It is these individuals we need to protect for the future of the species as a whole. One cannot protect a species but protect the natural environment in which it thrives The mine extension would result in the disturbance of more than 2,200 ha of current bushland and farmland. This includes Box Gum Woodland, a critically endangered ecological community on whose resources many birds and mammals rely. Regards |
Sue Outram
|
ID |
12366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to any expansion of the Moolarben Coal mine. My reasons below: 1. Biodiversity. This is an important area for the future survival of Woodland creatures - bats, birds and koalas particularly. It is well established that the Regent Honeyeater is on the verge of extinction. The clearing of habitat in this area over the past decade has contributed to this. Approving a mine (noise, lights, dust) just 100 metres from an established Nature reserve can only be seen as environmental vandalism. Munghorn Gap is an important part of the ecosystem and the mine would encompass the reserve on 3 sides. Koalas. This koala population has been recognised by the NSW Government as being resilient to the effects of climate change having “survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully.” Yancoal admits the project poses a threat to habitat “critical to the survival” of a local koala population. The project poses risks of increased mortality and physiological stress for koalas due to habitat fragmentation, stress, and vehicle strikes. Clearing critical koala habitat would: fragment the landscape, making it more challenging for koalas to move and access food sources, increase the likelihood of vehicle strikes and disrupt breeding activities, further threatening the viability of the koala population in the area. 2. Water. The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. 3. Climate Change. As parts of Australia are suffering heatwaves that are dangerous to human health and the recent bushfires and flooding are still very much present in our memories, it is unbelievable that ANY expansion or ANY new mines would be approved. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. 4. Indigenous artifacts have been found in the mine footprint and should be protected. The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. In summary, for the future of our state, this stunning country of ours, our Pacific neighbours and other precious peoples of th eworld, I urge you to reject the extension of the mine. |
Alan Newbery
|
ID |
12401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2295 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed development because of the irreparable harm it will inevitably cause to human health, wildlife, water supplies and the climate. |
Horst Thiele
|
ID |
12406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
28/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Koalas: Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. Threatened wildlife and vegetation: The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts: The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change: DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage: The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts: The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs: There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. |
Anne Welch
|
ID |
12061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2778 |
|
Date |
27/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see my submission in the attached file below |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Expansion submission .docx (DOCX, 15 KB) |
Philip Hammial
|
ID |
12066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2778 |
|
Date |
27/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached file below |
|
Attachments |
PH Moolarben OC3 Expansion submission .docx (DOCX, 14.98 KB) |
Lee Amber
|
ID |
12081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2097 |
|
Date |
27/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Lee Amber and I am completely opposed to the opening of The Moolarben coal complex OC3 extension project. I am a Nana to two beautiful grandchildren Jackson 4 years old and Mia 17 months. I am absolutely devastated that this coal mine could even possibly go ahead with the knowledge/ facts and science we have today supporting the destruction of the environment by fossil fuels. I want and demand that my grandchild have the same opportunities that I had as a child of living in a world that is even livable. Catastrophic wether events that are already to common and unless we act now and stop adding to the global heating of this planet it will become uninhabitable. The continued destruction of biodiversity will leave nothing for my grandchildren to enjoy. I implore you to stop this coal from opening. PLEASE. |
Bev Atkinson
|
ID |
12671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
26/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Attachments |
Bev Atkinson - Moolarben OC3 Expansion Project 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 24.07 KB) |
Roderick John Lee
|
ID |
12676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2753 |
|
Date |
26/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, As a former landowner from Mogo Road, Wollar, NSW, and current resident of the Blue Mountains, I strongly object to the proposed expansion of the Moolarben open cut coal mine, a project of no benefit to the people of NSW or Australia, as the coal is exported by this chinese company. Major reasons for refusal of this proposal, include the fact that the land is critical Koala habit and home to many other native species of flora and fauna. Coal mining also utilises massive amounts of water, which will affect the water table and the flow of the Goulburn river, as well as the necessary access to water for the millions of trees, plants and other wildlife that depend on it in the region, not just within the 400 hectares of the proposed blast site. The Munghorn Gap nature reserve is also a unique site, very rich in a diverse range of life, and serves as an oasis for endangered species from the surrounding farmland. Farmland and homesteads will also be impacted by the imense air pollution from the frequent mining blasts, which creates huge clouds of toxic dust, much of which I witnessed firsthand, while driving through the Hunter region yesterday during the 40C+ weather (which is also a biproduct of coal mining and burning in the form of global warming). The Mudgee region is a growing tourist area of natural beauty and our short-term for profit destruction of the landscape and creation of massive ugly scars which will never be rehabilitated will not be forgiven by our children and grandchildren, who will see no benefit from the Moolarben Corporation. Please say no to this insane Proposal. Best Regards, Roderick John Lee (Redacted) |
J N Cuthbertson
|
ID |
12006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2107 |
|
Date |
26/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to this proposal. It would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations, increasing climate pollution and causing serious harm to threatened species, water sources and cultural heritage. If approved, Yancoal will clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat and bring mining within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would also add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution. |
Gregory Peters
|
ID |
12651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I understand that it is possible to make submissions to the Independent Planning Commission by email. I therefore attach a submission relating to the proposed Moolarben coal mine extension. This is a personal submission I make as a member of the community with a view about the proposed development but also as an academic in a relevant domain. Please confirm receipt of this submission. Sincerely, Gregory Peters Professor of Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division of Environmental Systems Analysis Chalmers University of Technology |
|
Attachments |
Yancoal.pdf (PDF, 55.21 KB) |
Matt Moran
|
ID |
12656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Good morning, I am increasingly concerned that we the public are having to repeatedly object to environmentally catastrophic and increasingly irresponsible decisions by our representatives in office. As you are well aware, the mine expansion will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. This expansion mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. Please reject any further expansions that threaten our precious water reserves, remaining critical habitat so we have something to be proud of rather than perpetually ashamed of the unnecessary and irresponsible damage we are doing! Kind regards, Matt Moran |
Jeanette Dib
|
ID |
12661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I firmly oppose any expansion of any coal mine anywhere. The world is in a climate crisis, and this act will only put fuel on the fire and cause further damage. Be responsible for future generations Thank you Jeanette Dib Get Outlook for Android |
Sharon Powell
|
ID |
12666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear sir/madam, I'm writing to express my horror at the idea that this beautiful valley will be torn up and destroyed by a filthy, polluting coal mine. Surely the climate change writing is on the wall? And yet another mine is being considered? When we KNOW what a major contributing factor it will be? I can hardly believe it! Some things are more important than money! Like, precious wildlife, clean air, beautiful forest. Please don't go ahead with this abomination. Thank you, Sincerely, Sharon Powell |
Warren Lloyd
|
ID |
11871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a retiree with a degree in Biological Sciences, I have had a lifelong interest in nature, and in particular, I care greatly about the conservation of wildlife. I am Secretary of the Boundary Road Reserve Landcare group in Bathurst, and I have 3 sons and 6 grandchildren. My main objections to this proposal are as follows: Firstly, the evidence for climate change is now irrefutable, and one of the greatest factors contributing to it is the mining and burning of fossil fuels. Both Federal and State governments have said they want to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, yet by approving a mine such as this would fly in the face of what they claim they wish to achieve. My children, and especially my grandchildren, will be faced with a very different and frightening future if we continue to act irresponsibly and allow coal mining to continue. With renewable energy now achieving over 50% of our total energy usage, the only ones to benefit from the expansion of this mine will be the multinational owners who contribute virtually nothing to our country and lifestyle. My second main concern is the impact the mine will likely have on nearby wildlife, in particular the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. As someone who has contributed both time and money to projects which are helping to save this beautiful bird, I would be disgusted to see habitat needlessly destroyed for the financial benefit of the few, while yet another Australian species faces extinction. I strongly believe that the approval of the proposed expansion would have widespread and irreversible impacts which simply cannot be justified. |
Anne Hodgson
|
ID |
11876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Climate science is confirmed and scientists are telling us to STOP new fossil fuel projects. We must not expand this mine for the sake of future generations. We need a safe climate future. |
Dr Nerida Riley
|
ID |
11881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2251 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a retired health professional (doctor) I am completely opposed to any development which will increase global greenhouse gas emissions. The risk of health impacts on the surrounding communities is also unacceptable. |
jepke goudsmit
|
ID |
11941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2034 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I submit to you that this beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. It will be an environmental disaster that the mine is set to clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. Environmental and climate change experts have outlined time and again that expansion of existing coal mines should not be given approval and must be stopped before irreversible damage is done. Their reasoning in the case of this project is the following: The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. Furthermore, the mine will also destroy habitat of and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Incredibly, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that the Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that it is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts: The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change: DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage: The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts: The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs: There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Furthermore, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. In conclusion: Based on the reasons outlined above, I am objecting to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2044 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen who cares deeply about environmental impacts. My particular focus is threatened species – the idea of humans causing animals and flora communities to become extinct frankly appals me. I have discovered that Yancoal is seeking approval from the IPC to expand its Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee, which would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations. It would consequently lock in more climate pollution as well as causing serious harm to threatened species, water sources and Indigenous cultural heritage. I am requesting you, the IPC, to recommend that this destructive coal expansion does not go ahead. The mine operation itself would add to climate pollution, as would transporting the coal. Then there is the on-cost for climate change of the burning of that coal. On top of all that is the impact on the local environment. The NSW government has promised to protect koala habitat but this mine extension would involve clearing of their habitat, where there is even evidence of them breeding there. The same argument applies to the already threatened regent honeyeaters that are also nesting there. All mines require the use of water for various processes. In this case, the project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. In summary, I find the nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion to be unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including regent honeyeater, broad-headed snake, microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White box-yellow box-Blakely’s red gum grassy box woodland and Derived native grassland. I hope the Commission will see its way to rejecting the whole proposal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
25/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am a veterinarian working in wildlife health. I am writing to strongly object to the proposed expansion of Yancoal’s Moolarben OC3 coal mine on Wiradjuri Country near Mudgee. I am deeply concerned about the extreme environmental and climate impacts due to the expansion of coal mining in Australia, along the potential damage to First Nations cultural heritage. From a climate perspective, an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the mine extension is catastrophic. The impact on biodiversity is unconscionable, with clearing of critical habitat for our native wildlife including the Critically Endangered regent honeyeater, koalas and microbats. The expansion brings the mine too close to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The impact on water is also concerning, putting Moolarben creek at risk, with significant impacts on native wildlife and the local ecosystem. The mine expansion will also risk damage to Wiradjuri cultural heritage, including sacred sites. I am horrified that the NSW Government would approve new and expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. I therefore call on the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of Moolarben Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
24/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 Extension Project. Climate change is an urgent and growing threat, and projects like this, which are estimated to produce an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over their lifespan, will worsen its impacts for communities across New South Wales. Approving this expansion would further undermine efforts to meet legislated climate targets under the NSW Climate Change Net Zero Future Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. As a resident of Western Sydney, I am particularly concerned about the impacts of climate change on vulnerable communities already facing housing, energy, and financial stress. One in three households in Western Sydney experience energy stress, and rising temperatures and extreme heatwaves disproportionately affect multicultural families, older adults, and essential workers who cannot work from home. Approving further coal expansion risks widening existing social inequalities by contributing to health risks, rising energy costs, and reduced liveability for families who are already struggling to make ends meet. The proposed expansion will also cause serious and irreversible environmental harm. Approximately 480 hectares of native vegetation will be cleared, including habitat for threatened species such as koalas, regent honeyeaters, microbats, and Broad-headed snakes. Groundwater drawdown of 2 to 6 metres is expected, which could last up to 25 years after mining ends, threatening local waterways and critical ecosystems. In addition, the mining activities will damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites, reducing the opportunity for future generations to connect with this heritage. Communities in New South Wales are already feeling the consequences of climate change, from record heatwaves to bushfires, drought, and flooding. Expanding coal operations at Moolarben is inconsistent with the urgent action required to protect people, particularly those in low-income and multicultural communities who are most affected by climate impacts. Globally and locally, the trend is clear: the transition to clean energy creates sustainable jobs, improves public health, and strengthens communities, while continued investment in coal locks us into harmful emissions. For these reasons, I strongly urge decision-makers to refuse approval for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Protecting biodiversity, cultural heritage, groundwater, and the health and equity of communities must take priority over further coal expansion. Our collective future depends on bold action to reduce emissions, promote sustainable energy, and ensure that all Australians, particularly those in Western Sydney, can live in safe, healthy, and resilient communities. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Sandra Reed
|
ID |
11591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6112 |
|
Date |
24/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly object to this proposal going ahead. We have already damaged the Earth's environment to the point where we are in a climate crisis. ANY new fossil fuel developments will accelerate this. This science is indisputable. People have already died, livelihoods lost, ecosystems decimated. Personally I believe we've passed the tipping point as each disaster leaves us with less of a chance of survival and these disasters, fuelled by climate change, are becoming increasingly prevalent as well as violent with devastating and lasting consequences. We have run out of time to recover. Specific to this project it will impact 993.2 hectares of land, including 9.5 ha of Critically Endangered White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Woodland. Endangered species that will be negatively impacted by habitat destruction include the Regent Honeyeater, Swift Parrot, Koala, and Long-eared Pied Bat. The proposal affects the Goulburn River ("The Drip") which includes 48 sites with First Nations cultural values. It is predicted that groundwater drawdown will affect the Goulburn and Talbragar rivers for up to 3,000 years. No company or government has the right to destroy our future this way. This proposal MUST be rejected as must ALL future fossil fuels proposals. There are so many feasible alternatives to the continued use of fossil fuels that support a sustainable future. It is imperative for our survival that these be developed. |
Karen Taylor
|
ID |
11736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2784 |
|
Date |
24/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission on the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion. My name is Karen. As a 69 year old Age Pensioner with multiple health problems, I am already suffering the consequences of climate change. I am a resident of NSW living in the fire prone Blue Mountains. Hence, I am very aware of the escalating risks to my home and life by climate change as well as the risks to the homes and lives of our unique fauna and flora. I regularly visit Wiradjuri country and have a personal commitment to this beautiful and culturally important area. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours faithfully, Karen Taylor Bullaburra, NSW, 2784 |
Sally Wilson
|
ID |
12621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project Number SSD-333083358 My Objection to this extension. Please see my submission attached. Sally Wilson (Redacted) NSW 2257 |
|
Attachments |
Sally Submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 34.46 KB) |
Christine Moloney
|
ID |
12626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find attached my Submission to the NSW Government Independent Planning Commission OBJECTING to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project |
|
Attachments |
Submission to the NSW Govt IPC Moolarben OC3 Extension.docx (DOCX, 17.33 KB) |
Victoria lewis
|
ID |
12636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please accept attached submission. Thankyou for the opportunity to participate in our democratic country. Victoria lewis |
|
Attachments |
Re Moolarben OC3 extension Project_0.docx (DOCX, 25.9 KB) |
Tony Edye
|
ID |
12641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
2256 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear IPCN, Thank you for the opportunity to submit an objection to the Moolarben coal mine expansion, please refer to the attached submission document. Regards, Tony Edye (Redacted) NSW 2257 Darkinjung Country |
|
Attachments |
Tony Edye - Objection to proposed extension of Yancoal_Redacted_0.pdf (PDF, 389.12 KB) |
Susan Barling
|
ID |
11346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion project… The amended proposal fails to fully assess the impacts and focusses on a very narrow update of new information. Subsidence from underground mining, as well as clearing for infrastructure development (roads, pipelines, bores, ventilator shafts) has a significant impact on the landscape. The proposal will impact on threatened species habitat particularly Large-eared Pied Bat Eastern Cave Bat, Powerful Owl, Barking Owl, Southern Myotis. Subsidence or land collapse caused by underground mining damages groundwater systems that store water in the landscape. Groundwater provides base flows to rivers and creeks. This mine expansion when combined with Mod 8 will cause a significant additional loss of flow to Talbragar River |
Anna Mackiewicz
|
ID |
11351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2049 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to express my concern and strong opposition to the proposed expansion of Moolarben coal mine, and the potential impact this will have on local biodiversity, including in Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This expansion proposes to clear 480 hectares native vegetation, including 401 hectares of endangered Box Gum Woodland. 23 threatened species will also be impacted by habitat loss, including the local population of koalas, endangered in NSW, the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater. NSW DCCEEW has itself noted that this koala habitat is "critical to the survival of the species". Additionally, the impact on local waterways presents a risk to vegetation, farming and communities, which have expressed strong opposition to the project. Cultural heritage is also at risk with an astonishing 55 Aboriginal heritage sites located within the proposed footprint. The destruction of this precious corner of biodiversity and cultural heritage for corporate profit is against the interests of native wildlife, local communities, and everyone in NSW. The project is also expected to produce 65.6Mt of greenhouse gas emissions over its lifecycle - equivalent to a staggering 58% of total annual emissions in NSW. There is no good reason to expand coal mining in NSW and contribute to further carbon emissions and biodiversity loss at a time when our planet is on the brink of climate collapse. The NSW Net Zero Commission has clearly stated that any further expansion or extensions of coal mining are inconsistent with NSW climate targets and with a safe climate. Instead, we should be swiftly and purposefully ending all fossil fuel projects, ceasing fossil fuel exports, and meeting our own energy demand with clean renewable energy. This is fully within the realm of what is possible, and the NSW government must immediately commit to no further coal or gas mining in NSW. The proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine extension project will have disastrous impacts on local communities and nature, and must not go ahead. |
Melissa Gray
|
ID |
11371 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Healthy Rivers Dubbo |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
see attached |
|
Attachments |
260131_HRD_SUB_Moorlarben.pdf (PDF, 258.58 KB) |
Janet Thompson
|
ID |
11381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am objecting to this extension of the largest coal mine in NSW. This extension Would add 46 Million Tonnes to our Greenhouse Gas emissions, by the burning of the 25 million tonnes of coal, until 2038, Faking a mockery of our Net Zero future Act 2023, and the aims of the Paris Agreement. The mine would destroy almost 700 hectares of land due to the clearing and mining process over the life of the mine, which includes habitat of endangered Regent Honeyeaters, and habitat of breeding koalas. After the mine was inflicted on us, the ground water would drop over 2-6 meters for up to 25 years, & the Moolarben Creek would be adversely impacted. Fiftyfive sacred sites of the Wiradjuri people would have been trashed. The noise and pollution of the blasting would have impacted he nearby Munghorn Nature Reserve. Please do not inflict more harm on our communities, we are already facing extreme weather events now, and more disastrous things to come, such as water shortages worldwide. Thanks for this opportunity to be heard. Janet Thompson |
Joy Nason
|
ID |
12606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am objecting to the mining giant Yancoal proposed expansion of the mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. Please note the following reasons: This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. Further details: Koalas Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. I hope you will take notice of my submission. Thank you. Joy Nason |
Sandra Thompson
|
ID |
11221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2250 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an Australian Citizen, NSW resident and grandmother. The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world with devastating consequences to communities and economies. In Australia we are experiencing extreme bushfires resulting from increased temperatures and winds alternating with increased flooding resulting from extreme rainfall events. This is because " ... a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture, about 7 per cent more for each additional degree of temperature ..." Joelle Gergis, Australian climate scientist. Any expansion of coal mine approvals will increase the effects of climate change when that coal is burnt, regardless of where in the world it is burnt. It will not be someone else's problem because it is exported, it will directly impact the lives of Australians and communities around the world who are vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Please do the responsible thing and refuse this coal mine expansion. Coal companies pay very little tax, and we can create jobs in other industries. Australia does not need coal mining to have a strong economy, we can support jobs in renewable energy, manufacturing and tourism. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
You know the destruction this will cause to flora and fauna. Thousands have informed you of this. So I won't waste time telling you what you know but I will add, to approve this you certainly must devoid of humanity. Without possessing humanity you are nothing more than a humanoid doing the work of the devil and striving for nothing more than the satisfy the greed of the wicked. Should humanoids be making decisions that affect anothers planet? Absolutely not! Go back to where you came from, in Jesus name, Amen! Do better! |
Chris Ross
|
ID |
11256 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”*. Threatened wildlife and vegetation The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of animals, plants and habitats, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. In summary, this project should be rejected outright. |
Lindsay Keay
|
ID |
11261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2440 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioner(s), Very few people have the time to write submissions to processes like this. Their time is limited and the window for making an informed submission is extremely tight. I only raise this aspect as it should focus your mind(s) to how many other similar submissions might have been made under better circumstances for the general population. Having said that allow me to be succinct. Ideally Australia should stop mining and exporting coal today (21 January 2026). The science is clear. To meet global emmissions targets Australia alone can do nothing more impactful than force other nations to effectively pay more for their energy but taking our fossil derived products off the market. Openning new coal mines is ridiculous. By the time this one starts producing the circumstances will be measurably worse and the case for ending coal exports will only be getting stronger. It could be argued that by preventing this development you are protecting the companies investors from making a financial misstep. It will effect a huge area of our nation because the coal will have to be transported by rail (via diesel locomotives) to an export port. This also places financial stress on the mines viability moving forward as these transport costs are also only likely to increase. In short it is a bad idea being proposed in a bad location for dubious and possibly unrealisable gains. There is no rational aguement that can be mounted in it's favour. Thank You for your time. |
Colin Burman
|
ID |
11266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2068 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I do not believe that Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 Mine Extension should be approved. My overarching objection relates to the medium term and long term climate impacts of such a project. It is well accepted that the extraction of coal and its subsequent use as a fuel (whether in Australia or in export markets) are significant contributors to increased greenhouse gas levels and the resulting global adverse climate impacts. Closer to home is that the project is inconsistent with the desired goal of the NSW State Government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Achievement of legislated targets for 2030 and 2035 depend on a coherent approach across all sectors. Approval of the Moolarben project would be against the public interest, namely to bring about the desired targets put in place by our State legislature. My immediate concerns are the negative environmental and wildlife impacts which would be felt in the short term if the proposed work were to proceed. Loss of habitat for wildlife will decrease the biodiversity upon which the life cycles of all creatures depend. Particular note has been made of the large area of koala habitat which will be destroyed. Approval of a project which requires the certain destruction of such habitat is unacceptable. Likewise there exist significant and irreversible adverse effects on water and groundwater if this project were to be approved. Large volumes of groundwater drawdown are required for an operation of this sort, yet the mapping of groundwater and the effect on ecosystems that depend on it, can never be understood or carried out with any accuracy. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to consider all my points above and to recommend that the proposed OC3 Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely. |
Allan Medway
|
ID |
11271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2021 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We have no need for more coal. The only reason for the extension of this mine is to enrich the owners. No public purpose is achieved. The application must therefore be rejected since it is not in any public interest. |
Stephen Pfeiffer
|
ID |
11281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as a resident of New South Wales who cares deeply about the future of this state, its people, and its natural world, to strongly and unequivocally oppose the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mining Extension Project near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country. My concern is not abstract or ideological. For much of my adult life, my work and personal commitments have been centred on responding to the climate crisis and supporting communities and organisations working to protect nature, reduce emissions and build a safer future. I live on Gadigal Country in Sydney and feel a deep connection to this land and its waters. Like many Australians, I draw renewal and meaning from healthy landscapes and intact ecosystems, and I feel a growing sense of responsibility to ensure they endure. I am not opposed to this project because of who proposes it, but because of what it represents. At a time when the climate crisis is accelerating, when biodiversity loss is reaching irreversible thresholds, and when governments have committed in law to emissions reduction targets, approving a new coal mine expansion is profoundly out of step with both the science and the values many people in NSW hold. The valley proposed for destruction is a beautiful and ecologically rich landscape, surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in NSW. This area should be managed as a connected conservation landscape, not sacrificed for short-term coal extraction. Allowing open cut mining to push to within 100 metres of a protected reserve is reckless and undermines the very purpose of conservation areas. The biodiversity impacts alone should be reason enough to reject this project. At least 23 threatened species have been recorded in and around the site. Of particular concern is the Koala. Koalas have been confirmed in the project area, including a recorded sighting of a mother and joey just over a year ago. Government biodiversity experts have stated clearly that the Koala habitat here is critical to the survival of the species and that this population is unusually climate-resilient, having survived drought, bushfires and rising temperatures. Destroying habitat that has proven resilient in a changing climate is not just short-sighted, it is indefensible. The proposal would clear around 480 hectares of native vegetation, including more than 400 hectares of nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland. It threatens serious and irreversible harm to species such as the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake and Squirrel Glider. The sandstone cliffs and rocky habitats along the boundary of Munghorn Gap are essential to bat species in particular. Blasting, vibration and noise so close to these habitats pose obvious and unacceptable risks. I am alarmed that expert advice recommending a 500 metre buffer was ignored by the proponent. The reliance on biodiversity offsets in this proposal is deeply troubling. Offsets do not replace ancient ecosystems or restore lost species. They function primarily to justify destruction that should never occur in the first place. At a time when Australia is experiencing accelerating extinctions, approving further avoidable habitat loss sends exactly the wrong message. Water impacts are another serious concern. The predicted drawdown of up to five metres in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek risks deep-rooted vegetation and downstream ecosystems connected to the Goulburn River. The lack of adequate baseline monitoring and the proponent’s poor compliance history elsewhere in the mine complex undermine any confidence in the modelling presented. Water systems in this region are already under stress and should not be treated as expendable. The cultural heritage impacts are devastating. Fifty-five Aboriginal heritage sites will be directly destroyed, with further sites potentially indirectly impacted. This includes shelters and grinding grooves that should be protected, not obliterated. The fact that protection was recommended and then rejected by the mining company is deeply disrespectful to Wiradjuri culture and Country. Once destroyed, these places cannot be recovered. From a climate perspective, this project should be plainly unacceptable. Independent state authorities have made it clear that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with NSW climate targets and with a safe climate. This project alone would generate an estimated 64.6 million tonnes of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to more than half of NSW’s total annual emissions. At a time when we are already off track to meet our legislated targets, approving an expansion of this scale would make a mockery of the Climate Change Act. My opposition to this expansion also comes from years of seeing the human cost of inaction on climate change. I work as a grants manager in the environmental philanthropy space and work closely with people and organisations on the frontlines of climate impacts, from extreme heat and drought to ecological collapse and community stress. I see the emotional toll, the burnout, and the growing fear about what kind of future lies ahead. Approving projects that knowingly worsen these risks sends a devastating signal that short-term profit still outweighs long-term wellbeing. I am also deeply concerned that the assessment has failed to properly consider or quantify the economic and social costs of downstream emissions, despite clear legal guidance requiring this. It is impossible for decision-makers to weigh the true public interest when the overwhelming majority of emissions and their costs are effectively ignored. The cumulative impacts of coal mining in the Mudgee region have not been adequately assessed. With major expansions proposed at multiple mines, the combined effects on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and climate are enormous. These impacts do not occur in isolation and should not be assessed as though they do. Finally, claims that this project is necessary for regional jobs do not stand up to scrutiny. The existing mine will continue operating until at least 2038 regardless of this expansion. At the same time, the Central West Renewable Energy Zone is creating significant new employment opportunities, with thousands of jobs expected in clean energy over the coming decade. There is a real and positive alternative future for the region that does not involve sacrificing irreplaceable landscapes. This project represents an outdated way of thinking that no longer aligns with the laws, responsibilities or long-term interests of New South Wales. It would lock in further climate harm, accelerate biodiversity loss, damage irreplaceable cultural heritage and undermine public trust in decision-making. For all of these reasons, grounded both in evidence and in lived commitment, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to reject the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Our responsibility is not just to the present, but to future generations who will live with the consequences of the decisions made today. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Jonathan Milford
|
ID |
11286 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Action Sydney Eastern Suburbs (CASES) |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Although I am concerned about the direct impacts on the local MNES, I am more concerned about the indirect impacts from global heating and even more on the impacts to the rest of NSW, Australia, the oceans and the world. My objections are in the form of comments on relevant paragraphs in the State Significant Development Assessment Report (SSD-33083358) (first attachment). Two of these comments refer to letters on this subject sent by me to State and Commonwealth environment ministers in the past, one on changes required to the NSW BC Act and Commonwealth EPBC Act and the other on the Safeguard Mechanism. Thankyou for your consideration. |
|
Attachments |
Jonathan Milford combined.pdf (PDF, 325.09 KB) |
Steve Bruce
|
ID |
11321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2567 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners Thank you for giving me the opportunity to object to this proposal. My reasons are simple. The worlds oceans and atmosphere simply cannot absorb greenhouse gas emissions for decades to come. Tipping points are already at risk or might have been reached. Our expert scientists, the UN, IPCC, every national respected meterological department, universities, oil and gas companies own scientists, government researchers and just about any reputable scientific institution in the world have been telling us and governments for decades now that new mines must not be opened. Why then is this and similar projects even being considered? There is no rational argument for them. Relentless lobbying by powerful vested interests must be resisted by governments whose primary obligation is to their citizens health and that of the environment we are all part of. To say we need the coal is not a reason when the damage it will cause is impossible to calculate, but will be significant. Coal, oil and gas must be substituted with alternatives. Many are already available and necessity will ensure more will be developed. I implore you to refuse this application. I live in hope but fear despair. Kind regards Steve Bruce |
Jonathon Dykyj
|
ID |
11326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2278 |
|
Date |
22/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It’s absolute madness to be mining new coal in this day and age with what we know about climate. And it will destroy precious koala habitat. |
Alison Hill
|
ID |
13831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
2041 |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing a very quickly worded email in OBJECTION to the proposed Open Cut 3, which is the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mining site ( Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. I am so sick and tired of having to send emails like this, to giant, greedy corporations. The surrounding bush land isn’t for your use. The beautiful Munghorn Nature Reserve needs to be protected at all costs. Not only are the areas surrounding the Coal Mine vital for the Koalas that live in this region, they play a vital part within that ecosystem as a whole. Please do NOT go ahead with the expansion, and leave the Bushland alone. Sincerely, Alison Hill (Redacted) |
Georgette Allen
|
ID |
12601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Wednesday 21 January 2026 To: the NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) Dear Sir / Madam, I am aware that Yancoal is seeking approval to expand its Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee, on Wiradjuri Country. I hold grave concerns that this proposal, if approved by your Commission, would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations. My understanding is that such an expansion would lock in more climate pollution and cause serious harm to a range of threatened species and their habitat, as well as degradation of associated water sources. Wiradjuri cultural heritage in the proposed area would also come under threat. In relation to possible impacts on threatened species, I am advised that, if approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded. Other impacts on fauna include the destruction of habitats of Regent Honeyeater and microbats. The proposed expansion would bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The ‘Nature Reserve’ nomenclature alone should be sufficient to support the Commission’s refusal of this proposal. One hundred metres is a ludicrously small buffer between industrial mining and such Nature Reserve zoning. This proposal would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution; this, at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. I sincerely ask you, with your power as decision-maker regarding this current coal expansion proposal, to give consideration to all the communities facing climate- change calamities. I ask you to re-visit your government’s commitments, pre-election, to address climate change challenges as fast as possible. This proposal to expand coal mining is not inkeeping with the reason I voted Labor. Please do not disappoint, when making your decision. I call upon the IPC to recommend that this destructive coal expansion does NOT go ahead. Yours sincerely, Georgette Allen M.App.Sci (Social Ecology) |
CRAIG SHAW
|
ID |
11116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2048 |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I WISH TO WITHDRAW MY EARLIER SUBMISSION AND REPLACE IT WITH THE ATTACHED I discovered the version of my submission I uploaded previously contained errors with respect to the citing of some elements of legislation. I have also expanded and clarified some points. Please replace my earlier submission with the one attached. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Expansion (SSD) - Submission - Revised.pdf (PDF, 225.24 KB) |
Kirsty Fuller
|
ID |
11131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am an office worker in the [redacted] and deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Australia. Each year we experience more extreme weather driven by climate change, more weather related disasters on a growing scale and are now some of the least insurable communities in the world. This proposal would significantly extend one of NSW’s biggest thermal coal operations, locking in more climate pollution and causing serious harm to threatened species, water sources and cultural heritage. If approved, Yancoal plans to clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat and bring mining within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would also add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution. I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion (Mudgee/Wiradjuri Country). This project stands to cause serious harm to the community and irreversible harm to environment and climate such as but not limited to: . Species and habitat loss including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. . Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. . Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refugees for wildlife. . climate impacts with an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. . Lack of public benefit with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. On a larger scale coal mine expansion increases physical climate risk to governments, corporates and the finance sector around the world and physical risk to individual property owners. The NSW Government needs to act in the best interests of us and our children, economy and environment. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons I urge the IPC to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Sincerely, Kirsty Fuller [redacted] |
Alex Johnston
|
ID |
11136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6156 |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to Moolarben’s coal expansion and protect Mudgee's precious koalas. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the expansion of the Moorlaben coal mine,Extension Project Number SSD-33083358 *Because it has 3 National Parks on its borders that will be harmed. *The world, including Australia is transitioning away from fossil fuels. *Climate change is caused by fossil fuels and its costing too much in lives and homes lost. *Loss of habitat is causing the extinction crisis in Australia. *Australians want National Parks protected. |
Melissa Gray
|
ID |
11176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Melissa Gray Dubbo NSW 21 January 2026 Submission to the Independent Planning Commission Re: Objection to Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing as a resident of Dubbo to express my strong opposition to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. My objection is grounded in a fundamental contradiction that I believe the Commission must address: the NSW Government cannot credibly pursue a renewable energy transition whilst simultaneously approving the expansion of coal mining in the very region designated for renewable energy development. A Strategic Contradiction The Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone (REZ), centred on Dubbo and Dunedoo, represents the NSW Government's flagship commitment to clean energy. This 20,000 square kilometre zone is designed to unlock 4.5 gigawatts of new network capacity by 2028, connecting 7.7 gigawatts of wind and solar projects, enough to power over 2 million homes annually [1]. The REZ is expected to attract up to $25 billion in private investment and create approximately 1,850 direct jobs during construction, with 930 ongoing operational jobs from 2034 [1]. Yet the Moolarben coal mine expansion sits squarely within this same region, proposed to extract an additional 30 million tonnes of coal over the life of the mine, generating approximately 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. This is not merely a coexistence of two industries; it is a fundamental contradiction in policy. The NSW Government cannot claim to be serious about renewable energy transition whilst approving new coal extraction in the designated renewable energy zone. The Message This Sends Approving the Moolarben extension would send a deeply troubling message to investors, communities, and the renewable energy sector: that NSW is not genuinely committed to the energy transition. Renewable energy companies are investing billions in the Central-West Orana REZ based on the Government's stated commitment to clean energy development. Simultaneously approving a major coal expansion undermines that commitment and raises questions about the Government's long-term vision for the region. From a business perspective, this is counterintuitive. Why would the NSW Government invest in renewable energy infrastructure and transmission upgrades whilst simultaneously supporting new coal mining that directly contradicts the stated objectives of those investments? The renewable energy transition is not a distant future scenario it is happening now, with construction of the Central-West Orana transmission project already underway. Economic Opportunity Cost The jobs argument for coal expansion is particularly weak in this context. The Central-West Orana REZ is projected to create 1,850 direct jobs during construction and 930 ongoing jobs—far exceeding the employment that would be generated by coal mining expansion [1]. Moreover, the renewable energy sector offers long-term, sustainable employment that will not be rendered obsolete by global energy market shifts, unlike thermal coal which faces declining international demand. There have been long-standing vacancies at the three existing coal mines in the Mudgee region, suggesting that employment is not the genuine constraint. The real opportunity for the region lies in renewable energy development, not in doubling down on a declining fossil fuel industry. Climate Imperatives The NSW Government has legislated climate targets under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, committing to 50% emissions reductions by 2030 and 70% by 2035. Yet the Government is currently not on track to meet these targets, with projections showing only 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. Approving an expansion that will generate 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions is directly inconsistent with these legislated commitments and Australia's obligations under the Paris Agreement. Conclusion The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project represents a policy contradiction that the Independent Planning Commission should not endorse. The NSW Government has invested heavily in the Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone as the centrepiece of its clean energy strategy. Approving a major coal expansion within that same zone would undermine that strategy, confuse investors, and signal that the Government is not genuinely committed to the energy transition. The region's future lies in renewable energy, not coal. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and to send a clear signal that NSW is serious about its renewable energy transition. Yours sincerely, Melissa Gray Dubbo NSW References [1] EnergyCo. Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. https://www.energyco.nsw.gov.au/our-projects/central-west-orana-renewable-energy-zone |
Sharon Tinant
|
ID |
11186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2028 |
|
Date |
21/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commission I am a passionate defender of the natural environment and it appalls me that expansion is being considered for the Moolarben Coal Complex. With a further 675 ha of natural habitat at risk from clearing and mining activities: • Coal extraction: this project will add approximately 30Mt ROM (run-ofmine) coal, resulting in around 25Mt product coal produced over the life of the mine to 31 December 2038. • Climate cost: Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. • Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koala’s on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. • Water impacts: This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Cultural significance: Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. • Economics: There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. When will we call a halt to such madness? Please say ‘no’ to allowing this expansion to proceed. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2096 |
|
Date |
20/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [redacted], I am a 59 year old retiree from the Northern Beaches, Sydney. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the destruction of forest leading to species extinction. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [redacted] Queenscliff NSW 2096 |
Jessica Keast
|
ID |
11056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2487 |
|
Date |
20/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission Opposing the Moolarben OC3 Coal Expansion To the NSW Independent Planning Commission, I live in regional New South Wales and have a background in environmental science, which I studied as part of my biotechnology degree. I remain deeply engaged with environmental issues because I have seen the impacts of climate change unfold in real time across the communities I know and love. What troubles me most is that, despite the mounting evidence, very few political leaders appear willing to confront the scale of the crisis or act with the urgency required. I have spent more than twenty years in the Northern Rivers, returning annually and living here and witnessing dramatic changes that were once unimaginable. Floods that never used to occur now inundate the area regularly. The Tweed River has reached its highest levels on record. Murwillumbah’s levees are being raised. Tumbulgum went 2.5 to 3 metres underwater during the last major floods. Every time there's heavy rain, there are flash flood and flood warnings along the Tweed River. These are not abstract climate projections. I have worked directly with older residents in flood affected caravan parks, helping them apply for government assistance and repair their homes. I have seen the exhaustion, the financial strain, and the emotional toll on people who have already endured more than enough. And against this backdrop, Australia was the hottest country in the world last week (first week of January 2026). So I have to ask — what on earth do you think you’re doing by even considering another coal expansion. You know the evidence. You know this will worsen already accelerating climate change. You know that countries around the world are transitioning to renewables because they generate far more jobs than coal ever will. Yet here we are, trashing the environment for a short-term gain that doesn’t even make economic sense. This expansion would damage fertile agricultural land and threaten water aquifers at a time when food security is becoming more precarious due to the warming climate. It risks destroying 60,000 years of cultural history for something that will make our lives harder, not easier. And for what benefit. Does the money even flow back into NSW coffers in any meaningful way. I genuinely do not understand how the Hunter, NSW, or Australia stands to gain from this expansion. The Tweed Shire Council’s flood mapping to 2100 makes the future even clearer: without decisive action, large parts of Murwillumbah, Tweed Heads, Banora Point and Kingscliff will be permanently inundated. Continuing to approve new coal expansions affects the whole of Australia and in this context is not only environmentally reckless — it is economically irrational when NSW could instead be accelerating the transition to renewable energy and the jobs that come with it. 1. Unacceptable destruction of critical habitat The proposal would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, including areas where breeding has been recorded. Koalas in NSW are already listed as endangered, and continued habitat loss is one of the primary drivers of their decline. Approving a project that knowingly destroys core habitat contradicts NSW’s own conservation strategies. The expansion would also destroy habitat for the Regent Honeyeater, one of Australia’s most critically endangered birds, as well as important microbat habitat. These species cannot withstand further fragmentation or disturbance. Bringing mining operations to within 100 metres of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve — a protected area valued for its biodiversity and cultural significance — is an unacceptable risk to the integrity of the reserve. 2. Significant climate impacts at a time of escalating risk The project is expected to add 64 million tonnes of climate pollution. NSW is already failing to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, and approving new or expanded coal projects directly undermines the state’s ability to meet those obligations. Communities across NSW are living with the consequences of climate change: catastrophic bushfires, extreme heat, flooding, and prolonged drought. Approving a project that worsens these risks is not in the public interest. 3. Social and community impacts Local communities, including those in Wollar and the broader Mudgee region, have already endured decades of cumulative mining impacts — noise, dust, water stress, and the erosion of rural community life. Many residents have spoken clearly and consistently about the toll this has taken. The public engagement over the past year — from packed town halls to community screenings and listening tours — demonstrates widespread concern and opposition. The IPC has a responsibility to weigh this community voice seriously. 4. Inconsistency with NSW planning principles The expansion fails key public interest tests: • It does not protect biodiversity. • It does not safeguard climate stability. • It does not minimise cumulative impacts on regional communities. • It does not align with NSW’s transition toward cleaner, more resilient energy systems. Approving this project would lock in decades of additional emissions and environmental harm at a time when NSW should be accelerating the shift away from coal. Conclusion For the sake of endangered species, climate stability, community wellbeing, and the integrity of NSW’s planning framework, I urge the Commission to reject the Moolarben OC3 expansion. NSW deserves a future built on sustainable industries, thriving ecosystems, and resilient communities — not further expansion of the state’s largest coal mine. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
20/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed development of the OC3 Extension Project. I am gravely concerned about the impacts to our climate, particularly the surrounding areas around the mining operations. I have visited the Mudgee region recently and the serious environmental harm of the proposed extension including serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities need to be given the proper weight and consideration. Despite the proposed reliance on biodiversity offsets, such a proposal will not be able to sufficiently replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. I am also concerned about the project's broader impacts including producing an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this project further undermines climate commitments made under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. There is also a limited argument in relation to an economic justification. The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where government investment is focused on clean energy jobs. Approving this project goes against this governmental scheme. Further, with vacancies remaining open at Mudgee regional coal mines and declining global demand for thermal coal, there is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. Overall, I object to this project based on the varying negative impacts it will have on biodiversity and to the community. |
Carolyn Martin
|
ID |
11101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2075 |
|
Date |
20/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to offer my objection to the above proposal to expand the Moolarben Coal Mine. I am familiar with the Mudgee area and an active and long-term wildlife rescuer and carer and a person who cares about the impact that people and companies are having on our environment. There are many reasons why this should not go ahead which include impacts on the local groundwater, on the koala populations and the regent honeyeaters that are already an endangered species and struggling to find breeding and feeding sites. The continuation of coal extraction and the use of coal to produce energy for Australia’s growing populations is well documented as damaging to our environment and atmosphere. The damage to the Wiradjuri land and cultural sites is disrespectful to the local First People. It is time that Yancoal listened to the local community who want an end to this expansion. Carolyn Martin [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
Carolyn Martin submission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 81.29 KB) |
Richard Smith
|
ID |
11171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find my letter of objection to the approval of the proposed Moolarben Mine expansion attached. Regards, Richard Smith OAKWOOD (REDACTED) |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben objection _Redacted.pdf (PDF, 103.48 KB) |
Maree Holton
|
ID |
10986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2753 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission My name is Maree, I’m 64 and a retired Registered Nurse in the Hawkesbury. I am extremely concerned about the ongoing coal mining projects in our states due to climate change impacts such as flood and heatwaves that are occurring more frequently. Electricity and Insurance costs are increasing due to events being caused by climate change. I object to Yancoals proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. More coal production means more serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community. No approval should be given as this coal expansion project will cause threatened species and habitat loss due to clearing of large amounts of land where koalas live and are breeding as well as the Regent Honey eater and micro at habitat. There will also be impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature reserve due to noise, blast and vibration impacts. Groundwater will be affected due to pollution and this is critical drought refuges for wildlife. Further coal mining projects will contribute to more greenhouse gases in the environment which NSW is trying to decrease as renewable energy is now being prioritised not coal and this proposal is inconsistent with NSW climate change policy and goals of the Paris Agreement. We want a Net Zero future and for these reasons the Moolarben OC3 Coal mining project is to be refused and I urge the Independent planning commission NOT to support this project. |
Naomi Hodgson
|
ID |
10991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Storms, floods, droughts and fires are escalating beyond Australia's ability to adapt. We cannot take any more, yet further coal and gas expansion is fuelling these climate change-driven unnatural disasters. Similarly our water resources and our biodiversity provide ecosystem services to our communities, our society and economy that we cannot survie without. We are on the brink. Fossil fuel expansion in 2026 is madness and suicidal. We need investment in the industries of the future, we need sustainable jobs. We need to fiercely protect our natural world because we all suffer and burn if we don't. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Extensions to coal projects are incompatible with the action we need to see to avoid the worst consequences of the climate crisis. Objecting to this development is consistent with the broad scientific consensus on climate change, and recent statements of the governments own Net Zero Commission. The mine extension will impact native koala habitat and burden local water resources, both of which are already projected to suffer serious adverse impacts due to the climate crisis. Extending this mine will condemn our future generations to untold suffering, in return for propping up corporate profits of an industry forecast to collapse within a generation. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We can't afford more new coal projects in Australia. The globe is getting too hot and is becoming too dangerous for life |
Jim Geddes
|
ID |
11011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I can not understand how any extention could be considered considering the Climate Crisis we are in. Surely the recent events of bush fires, heat waves floods and flash floods all over the nation tells you to reject this expansion proposal. What will you tell your grandchildren in the future when they have no viable planet? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
11026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This expansion will be devastating for local biodiversity and waterway health, along with contributing to global heating. |
Nicole Cooney
|
ID |
11031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We have enough intelligence to understand that more mining, more coal is damaging our planet and all the species here, including humans. Why not use wind or solar? I object to any extensions to mining in Australia, especially when they involve direct damage to flora and fauna |
Ross Brown
|
ID |
11041 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Dark side masks |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2292 |
|
Date |
19/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It's time to stop digging coal. The science is clear. The earth's atmosphere has too much carbon in it and burning fossil fuels, especially coal, has to be stopped . Now. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2477 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Ms Jannett Milligan, Mr Richard Pearson and Mr Michael Wright, By way of introduction, I am a postgraduate at the University of Sydney, with Honours in both Economics and Law. I attended high school in regional NSW and maintain a strong connection to my hometown. As such, the holistic well-being of regional NSW communities is very important to me. I write to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. In essence, I am concerned that the proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to cultural heritage, climate, biodiversity, the economy, and the broader public interest, and that it should therefore be refused. I acknowledge the significant time and resources that have been invested in the Assessment Report prepared by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. Given the scope of this submission, I am unable to address all the aspects of that report that are concerning to me. Instead, I wish to summarise and highlight key issues with the proposed extension. CULTURAL HERITAGE My understanding is that the OC3 extension would damage Wiradjuri sites, including those of cultural and spiritual significance. Considering the historical relationship between First Nations Peoples in Australia and mining ventures, it is clearly within the public interest that the sites of the Wiradjuri people be protected at all costs. The effects of destroying cultural heritage on the community surrounding Mudgee would be severe, and so the issue of cultural heritage should be taken very seriously by the IPC. CLIMATE IMPACTS AND LEGISLATIVE TARGETS I also understand that the OC3 extension would generate significant greenhouse gas emissions. Over recent decades, both NSW and Australia have suffered from extreme and unpredictable weather events linked to climate change. These events have caused irreparable damage to regional NSW communities. The IPC should take the impact of additional greenhouse gas emissions created by the OC3 extension into consideration. Further, the IPC should consider that NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. The NSW Government has acknowledged that, on current trajectories, NSW will fall well short of both the 2030 and 2035 targets. The failure to meet targets outlined in legislation is a serious concern. In addition, Australia has obligations under the Paris Agreement to reduce emissions. In my opinion, it is not wise to approve the OC3 extension in this context. BIODIVERSITY The project would result in the clearing of 113 hectares of koala habitat, with koalas and the breeding activity of other species recorded on site. Ultimately, this clearing would cause unacceptable and irreversible impacts to other threatened species and ecological communities. This is in addition to the risk of removing drought refuges for wildlife due to groundwater drawdown. I acknowledge the possibility of using biodiversity offsets to mitigate these types of damage; however, I have concerns about the efficacy of these offsets and the authenticity of the intention behind their implementation. ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION As a young Australian with graduate qualifications in economics, I am critical of the economic justifications for this project. These concerns include coal mining vacancies that have existed in the Mudgee region for many years. The project also sits within the Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where government policy is focused on accelerating renewable energy development and employment. A significant proportion of the coal is intended for export to markets with declining thermal coal demand, further weakening the economic case. While I appreciate that interested parties believe the expansion will generate profit for their business, the IPC must critically analyse these profits in the context of the broader economic landscape, as well as the negative externalities generated by the project that I have outlined above. I understand that business profits generate national economic growth which can benefit all Australians, but in my opinion, this project will have an overall detrimental effect on the community. More sustainable and economically resilient pathways for growth are available. CONCLUSION For the reasons set out above, I believe the proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension Project is not in the public interest and should be refused. I respectfully urge the IPC to recommend that the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project not be approved. I appreciate the IPC’s role and respect its time and dedication to this decision-making process. I look forward to reading its detailed analysis of this matter. Thank you for your time. |
Chloe Hyde
|
ID |
10831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2087 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear IPC, My name is Chloe, writing to you from Greenwich, a beautiful leafy part of North Sydney. I work for Willoughby City Council as Resource Recovery Officer, where my day to day is focused mainly on improving the recycling infrastructure, systems and knowledge for residents in the area. I’m also passionate about maintaining natural assets in my area, across NSW and Australia. The proposed expansion of Yancoal's Moolarben Coal Mine presents significant concerns. Specifically, there's a risk of collapsed longwall tunnels causing far-field movements. These movements can lead to sinking earth material and fractures in sandstone structures up to 2 km away, potentially destabilising them. Furthermore, the mining activity could inflict permanent damage on culturally significant sites, such as The Drip, a sacred Wiradjuri place. I’d like express my concern and disapproval of Yancoal’s Moolarben underground mine and ask for: • A 2 km buffer zone to be implemented between the mine and the river gorges • Shorten the longwalls to prevent further harm to the area. A 2 km buffer zone needs to be implemented between the mine and the river gorges and shorten the longwalls of the Moolarben Coal Mine to prevent further harm to this sensitive and significant area. Thank you for taking the time to read and action my submission. Kindly, Chloe Hyde |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2112 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an environmental advisor in Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in my State, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students in my area are already sitting through 40+ degree days, our energy bills are going up due to the amount of fossil fuels still in our electricity system, and I know communities across NSW (especially those in rural communities) are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible impacts to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. Yancoal will likely pay for their offsets directly into the Biodiversity Conservation Fund which cannot replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. The NSW Land and Environment Court has already dismissed coal projects on the basis of climate impacts so I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2043 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an Australian citizen concerned with the decision to extend the Moolarben Coal Complex. The expansion will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, including clearing Koala habitat and impacting other threatened ecological communities. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace this existing environment. There is also no economic justification for the extension improving job opportunities for the surrounding communities. The expansion will increase emissions and is not aligned with Australia’s Paris agreement goals. For these reasons I urge the independent planning commission to recommend the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project be refused. Thank you for taking into account my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi, My name is (Redacted) and I’m based in Gadigal country. I visited Mudgee as a kid and was amazed at all the wildlife, fauna, and landscape it holds, rich in First Nations land. This alarms me to hear about the Moolarben Coal Mine expansion, which will disrupt ~675 ha of land, 480 ha of native vegetation and 30Mt ROM of run-off coal. I share this concern on Sunday afternoon, because it had to be said. There is no justification economically either, because regional jobs are already at the three Mudgee region coal mines. I don’t know much aside from these facts, but it’s obvious it’s a negative impact on climate, including biodiversity with koala habitat and Wiradjuri culture and sacred sites. I write this in light of Invasion Day coming up, and with protests already attempting to silence First Nations voices, I implore you to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension project. We don’t need more thermal coal I hope someone on your team remembers significance of the land. |
Rachel Arthur
|
ID |
10851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2022 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commission of Planning, I am concerned about the Moolarben Coal Mine. I am a young person growing up in a climate crisis - I worry about inequality from climate change causing insecurity and extremism and how threats to community stability can be avoided by supporting the environment. Economically I would prefer for job creation to be supported in less polluting industries. There have been already vacancies in nearby mines for several years and this indicates that rural job creation is not as much of a necessity to require this drastic choice of support for fossil fuels. Biodiversity is in complete decline and any impact on threatened species puts them at a higher vulnerability irrespective if biodiversity (through offsets) is supported in other areas. Additionally, if the projects water and emissions impact on the environment is not mitigated biodiversity will continue to be at threat. Groundwater drawdown in the area will disrupt local wildlife and emissions will further impact the systems that barely support the ecosystems we rely on. I completely reject support for this project - particularly as the methods and decision-making processes (the EPBC Act) for approval of projects such as this do not accurately give direction on how to weigh economic and social benefits against environmental outcomes. Kindly, Rachel Arthur |
Winston Liu
|
ID |
10856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2220 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Winston Liu, and I am a 25 year old living most of my life in Hurstville Sydney 2220. Last October, my close friends road tripped to the Goulburn river area, and visited the Drip. They experienced the rich cultural significance of these landmarks, and saw regent Honey eaters, Microbats (super cute!), and many other flora and fauna in the ecological community. Unfortunately - the Government’s approval of Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Mine is devastating on the Climate, terrible for the community, and (non hyperbole) destroying Australia’s economy. Yancoal is seeking approval from state authorities to expand the existing mine’s operations (known as the OC3 Extension Project). The proposal would increase the footprint of the mine and lock in additional coal production, extending extraction within the lifespan of the current approvals. The expansion will directly disturb approximately 675 hectares (ha) of land, including 480 ha of native vegetation and add approximately 30Mt ROM (run-offmine) coal, resulting in around 25Mt product coal produced over the life of the mine to 31 December 2038. As a citizen who wants to one day visit these sites, please do not approve the coal mine. These devastating impacts include Climate: Over the life of the extension, the project is estimated to produce an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. The ‘[Spotlight on Coal](https://www.netzerocommission.nsw.gov.au/publications/coal-mining-emissions-spotlight-report)’ report, recently released by the NSW Net Zero Commission acknowledges that coal mine expansions in NSW are not consistent with a safe climate or the NSW Climate Change Act, stating that: *“[c]ontinued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to*”. The expansion would worsen climate impacts already being felt locally, including more intense heatwaves, longer droughts, and increased extreme weather events. These changes affect community health, water availability, agriculture, and liveability across the region. Biodiversity The expansion would cause serious and irreversible environmental harm, including Clearing 113 hectares of koala habitat, where koalas and active breeding have been recorded Serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Yancoal has indicated it will rely on biodiversity offsets to help compensate for habitat destruction. However, no biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Water: The project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ends. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk - a critical drought refuge for wildlife and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Cultural significance: Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. Economics: There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, the Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where government investment is focused on clean energy jobs. Additionally, Yancoal plans to export 65% of coal to China, with smaller amounts to South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan. With declining global demand for thermal coal, the economic case is weakening. I’m no expert in Mining policy, but I’m sure you to bring this up in government to protect the land we live on. Hope to hear from you. Best regards, Winston |
AJ Gough
|
ID |
10861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hello, my name is AJ Gough, a resident of Ashfield, NSW and I’m writing in opposition of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project based on unacceptable projected increase in carbon emissions. The project locks in a decade of largely unmitigable fossil fuel emissions, inconsistent with climate commitments. The OC3 Extension will add nearly 500,000 tonnes of CO₂-e & rely overwhelmingly on diesel combustion. The vast majority of the GHG emissions will come from the increased use of diesel machinery (72%) for which there isn’t current viable alternative. Further, the project offers no credible mitigation pathway, operates under an outdated GHG minimisation plan and locks in emissions until 2034. This week it was 43°C in Ashfield. The last seven years have been the warmest on record, with 2024 confirmed as the hottest year globally. In 2025, the three-year average global temperature breached the 1.5C threshold set in the 2015 Paris Agreement for the first time. I studied Environmental Science at university, and I’m terrified by the implications of this. I do not want to sit back and find out what 2026 will bring. I’m concerned, not only for me personally, but for the whole community I live in and love. I am 27 and want to start a family but I don’t know if it’s ethical to bring children into a world under such an imminent threat. I want to secure a future for myself and my family. We need to make an urgent transition away from fossil fuels – not committing to their expansion. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], and I'm a citizen based in Sydney. I have written in the past in objection of Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee, and I am once again objecting to the most recent proposal. As a resident of Western Sydney, I've seen firsthand the impact climate change has had in my community. It is completely irresponsible to support an expansion such as the Yancol proposal. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change Act. The expansion would cause irreversible damage to the Mudgee and Mid Western region, and impact our flora and fauna. For example, the expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where koalas and active breeding have been recorded. It would impact endangered species, including the Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake and Microbats such as the eastern cave and large-eared pied bats. Furthermore, the project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ends. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk - a critical drought refuge for wildlife and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. It also has no benefit to our public, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is currently being prioritised. In a time when our communities and ecosystems are affected by climate change, it would be competely irresponsible for the NSW government to approve new expansion projects for mining. Again, this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend the Moolarben OC3 coal mine to be refused. Thank you |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to state my objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I do not think we have the scientific or social license to be able to extend coal operations into the next decade in the interest of our future under climate change. I grew in the Upper Hunter Valley and have personal experience with the benefits and detractions of coal mine operations and how they affect a community. I visited the Mudgee and Wollar region last year and have witnessed both the beautiful nature in the area and the staggering expanse of mines. I understand the importance of industry but this must be balanced in the best interests of the community and our environment. As such, I strongly object to this project. Recently NSW has experienced extreme weather - of heatwaves and flood in January, while Victoria burns in bushfires. We know that this extreme weather is attributed to climate change, and I object to this project that is estimated to produce an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. NSW is not on track to meet our legislated climate targets, and approving this expansion would undermine our commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) 2013 Act and the Paris Agreement. The NSW Net Zero commission has recently acknowledged that coal mine expansions are not consistent with a safe climate or the NSW Climate Act as part of the ‘Spotlight on Coal’ report. I do not believe there is a sound economic demand for this project, given that the exports for thermal coal have been declining globally. I am in particular concerned for the biodiversity and the serious and irreversible impact that this expansion would produce. The Critically Endangered Ecological Communities in the area - including Box Gum Woodland. This CEEC is groundwater dependent, and historically, there has been poor water management and modelling of groundwater use for coal mines in this region, with the Wilpinjong Mine requiring more water than predicted. The NSW government website specifically mentions that box gum woodland is under threat from fragmentation and habitat loss, which would occur further under this project. I am also concerned about the risks to our fauna species - not least the endangered microbats and their critical breeding habitats, the regent honeyeater and koalas in the region. Additionally I am greatly concerned of the impacts this project would have to the cultural significance of the area for the Wiradjuri people, landscapes and sacred sites. I believe this project would cause permanent and irreversible damage to the surrounding community. The Wollar community is working hard to rebuilt their town, and I praise them for their welcoming attitude to the Renewable Energy Zone in NSW. I have met many members of the community and am inspired by how they have committed to the transition to clean energy in NSW. Overall, I object to this project based on the impact to biodiversity and groundwater, Indigenous cultural heritage and local community. The risks outweigh any benefits. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, as I have serious concerns about the negative impacts of this proposal. Increasing the mine’s footprint and committing to further coal production seems to me to go against the government’s current renewable energy and emissions reductions targets, and also seems likely to cause harm to local communities. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. Having visited the town of Wollar to learn more about the impacts of coal mines on local communities, I have seen firsthand the way that communities shrink as coal mines expand. Locals expressed to me how their population had shrunk to due noise, air, and light pollution, and how none of the promised economic boons had eventuated. I also have seen the recent Rising Tide protests regarding NSW’s coal exports, and from that have learned more about how these companies damage the Australian countryside only to export goods overseas, often at low prices and without significant taxes, and the Australian people suffer the consequences of this. The expansion would worsen climate impacts already being felt locally, including more intense heatwaves, longer droughts, and increased extreme weather events. These changes affect community health, water availability, agriculture, and liveability across the region. Whilst near the Wollar/Mudgee area, I saw an incredible diversity of flora and fauna, typical for the region outside mine-impacted areas. This proposed expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where koalas and active breeding have been recorded. It would also irreversibly impact threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum. In a time when the countries we export this resource to (e.g. China) are rapidly transitioning to renewables, there seems to be little point in further destroying our landscape when soon there’ll be no buyers for this product. I’ve also seen how mining can poison groundwater, which has long-lasting and wide-reaching impacts. The project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ends. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk - a critical drought refuge for wildlife and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. As climate change increases the chances of severe droughts, this waterway is vital. Biodiversity and climate offsets are not going to change this outcome if the mine is built, and the local area has a low chance of recovery should this happen. Overall, I object to this proposal on economic, community, biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, water resources, and policy grounds. Any potential positive impact of this project is insignificant when weighed against its overall consequences. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [name redacted] and I'm a proud NSW resident who grew up in this beautiful state. Climate change has been a big part of my life growing up, from volunteering in local environmental groups in my suburb to now championing decarbonisation in the transport sector. I strongly oppose to this coal mine development due to the adverse impacts on biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, water resources and the local community. This coal mine development will be detrimental to the natural ecosystem, especially the impacts on the natural habitats of the Regent Honey-eater (a highly endangered species). In this era, it's vital that we do not build any new coal mines as this would worsen climate impacts already felt by our communities across Australia. This project would also put Moolarben Creek at risk due to the groundwater drawdown, impacting drought refuge for wildlife. Overall, please terminate this project and consider our environment first. Our future generations are depending on us to do the right thing. |
Avani Bhojwani
|
ID |
10891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am a 28 year old living in Sydney, NSW and studying in Queensland. In recent years I have witnessed the impacts of climate change on friends and family, whether it is due to cyclones in Queensland, or the heatwaves in NSW. For these reasons, the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project concerns me, as it has the potential to exacerbate issues related to climate, biodiversity, and water resources. The assessment report by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure has made this clear by outlining impacts such as 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, irreversible impacts on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater and koalas, and a groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ends. The climate impact of greenhouse gas emissions will not only be felt locally, but throughout Australia in the form of more extreme weather events. For these reasons, I would like to ask the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2140 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is (REDACTED), I'm a young person living in the west of Sydney. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal in NSW. I grew up in regional Queensland, and lived through incredibly severe weather events and floods directly amplified by fossil fuel extraction. Now in NSW I am worried for a future where these weather events become increasingly common. I am writing to express that the Moolarben coal mine expansion should not proceed. In particular I hold concerns that: Any expansion of coal mines in the state will lock in additional fossil fuel extraction into the longterm, long past the timeline we need to transition to a net-zero economy. The clearing of 480ha of native habitat poses risks to multiple iconic threatened species. Notably, Yancoal's own report notes 113ha of koala habitat that is "The habitat within the Development Footprint was determined to potentially constitute habitat critical to the survival of the species.” Over 100ha of habitat to be cleared is identified as important to the endangered Gang-gang Cockatoo and critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. If this expansion is to proceed it threatens to undermine the NSW Government’s climate commitments at a time where the State is already not on track to meet its emissions targets. As a result, expansion is clearly incompatible with the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. Continued export of coal will worsen climate impacts felt locally as well as accelerate climate change globally. NSW is already experiencing severe heatwaves and floods and it's imperative we work towards adaptation and making things safer for communities rather than double down on the causes. As the mine site is contained within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, there is a missed opportunity to instead prioritise a just transition to renewable industries instead of expanding coal. The site will lead to damage to indigenous cultural landscapes and sacred sites and it is not clear how these impacts will be minimised by the proponent. Offsets should be used as a last resort. Reliance of offsets as indicated by the proponent to mitigate environmental harm is reckless and should not be continued in the wake of the numerous failings of the broken State Biodiversity Offset Scheme that results in a 'pay to destroy' system where there is more money paid into the pool than projects to fund. The expansion should not be approved when readily available, accessible, affordable solutions exist that do not cause environmental harm that can still provide for regional workers |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2015 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], I am a 28 year old Sydney resident. I live far from the Moolarben Coal mine but have had the opportunity to get to know people from the community that have been affected and would potentially be further impacted if the expansion is approved. Not just for the wellbeing of the local community, I am also deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts and loss of biodiversity and natural habitats. Everyone of us have experienced or witnessed firsthand the impact of the changing climate and extreme weather events. Climate change is a challenge faced globally, and beyond the scope 1 emission the expansion project would add locally, scope 2 and 3 emission would play a big role as the produced coal being shipped overseas (not to mention that the local communities are not getting much monetary compensations relative to the profit the coal companies are making). I am writing to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. All of the 113ha of woodland Yancoal is proposing to clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. As the independent expert advisory panel has pointed out, the expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAIl) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland. The NSW government simply cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government's Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, and NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets. With abatement "as currently tracking", the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament's Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Kate Moffatt
|
ID |
10906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2008 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom it May Concern at the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to you today as a citizen concerned about the environmental impacts of the proposed expansion of the Moolarben Mine. My personal concern comes from my love of the Australian environment. I am privileged enough to have explored much of the continent and I hope that I will continue to be able to do so, as well as share those experiences with my future children. Over the life of the extension, the project is estimated to produce an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. The ‘Spotlight on Coal’ report, recently released by the NSW Net Zero Commission acknowledges that coal mine expansions in NSW are not consistent with a safe climate or the NSW Climate Change Act, stating that: “[c]ontinued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The expansion would worsen climate impacts already being felt locally, including more intense heatwaves, longer droughts, and increased extreme weather events. These changes affect community health, water availability, agriculture, and liveability across the region. The expansion would cause serious and irreversible environmental harm to the area’s biodiversity, as it would clear koala, wombat, regent honey-eater, broad-headed snake, micro bat, pin-tailed legless lizard, swift parrot and squirrel glider habitat, making the inhabitants face even further threat of intinction. The expansion would put nearby waterways at risk, such as the Moolarben Creek, a critical drought refuge for wildlife and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. The project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres, potentially lasting up to 25 years after mining ends. Economically, there is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, the Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where government investment is focused on clean energy jobs. Additionally, Yancoal plans to export 65% of coal to China, with smaller amounts to South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan. With declining global demand for thermal coal, the economic case is weakening. I am asking for you to please recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. King Regards, Kate Moffatt |
Mary Pilkinton
|
ID |
10911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2205 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Mary, I am a young woman from South Sydney. I am a keen birdwatcher, and I am deeply concerned about the impact of this project on my favourite bird - the regent honeyeater. I have been very fortunate to see a regent honeyeater in the wild, something very few Australians can say, despite the fact they once flocked in the thousands in NSW. The prospect of further reducing the scarce habitat of the regent honeyeater through the approval of this project is very distressing. Additionally, I believe it is essential that Australia rapidly phases out fossil fuels. We have a duty not only to our native wildlife and ecosystems, but also future generations and those currently suffering under climate impacts to ensure access to a safe environment. I look forward to enthusiastically supporting renewable power opportunities in NSW. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission – Objection to Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to formally object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I oppose this proposal because it would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate, water resources, cultural heritage and local community, while delivering no clear or credible public benefit. 1. Unacceptable loss of threatened species and habitat The proposed expansion puts a total disturbance area of 675 hectares at risk from clearing and mining activities. This includes the proposed clearing of 113 hectares of koala habitat, with koalas recorded on site and breeding occurring in the area. The proposal also includes clearing 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, with breeding females recorded on site. These impacts are not theoretical. They involve the destruction of habitat that is already supporting threatened species. No biodiversity offsets can replace functioning habitat that is already present, connected and occupied. The submission guide also identifies likely serious and irreversible impacts on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, microbats, and threatened woodland communities. 2. Poor assessment of impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. This is a major gap. If impacts are not properly modelled, they cannot be properly avoided, minimised or conditioned. 3. Long-term and unacceptable water and groundwater impacts The project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6 metres for up to 25 years post mining, putting Moolarben Creek at risk as a vital drought refuge for wildlife. 4. Climate impacts inconsistent with NSW obligations and public interest The OC3 extension would result in an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the extension. NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, with projections falling short of the 2030 and 2035 targets set under the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is also identified as being in the top 5% of states globally most at risk from climate change impacts. 5. No credible jobs or economic justification There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. Vacancies have existed at coal mines in the Mudgee region for many years. The mine is located within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where the NSW Government is prioritising renewable energy development and associated employment. 6. Cultural harm Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. Conclusion For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2007 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making a submission in opposition to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. I may not live near the mine, but I am already impacted by the climate change that this extension would worsen. During heat waves, I am prone to medical cardiac events, as my disability involves heat intolerance. Hot days are becoming hotter and more frequent. On these days, it is unsafe for me to leave my apartment. This leaves me isolated, sitting on my cold bathroom floor tiles, and taking extra medication to cope with my symptoms. Considering the extreme weather caused by fossil fuel emissions, I hope that coal mining shrinks instead of expands. This extension project specifically has definitive local harms. Serious and irreversible environmental harm would come to threatened animals, and mining procedures would disrupt the nearby Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The local and global environmental harms of this extension outweigh the minimal economic benefits. Yancoal plans to export most of the coal, and other coal mines in the area have vacant jobs. Renewable energy should be prioritised, especially in the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone. I hope the Independent Planning Commission refuses this extension, for my sake and for the people and animals living locally. |
Cliff Harris
|
ID |
10936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6071 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission I am writing this submission to express my opposition to the proposed extension to the Moolarben OC3 coal mine, my reasons being: * The resulting drawdown of the water table will result in reduced water availability to the Moolarben Creek. This in turn will result in the demise of a valuable drought refuge currently available to the animals in the region as well as increased stress on the local flora. * Clearing of the land to be mined will severely reduce valuable habitat for many animals, koalas, regent honeyeaters to mention just two. Any destruction of habitat will only add to the major losses experienced in wide tracts of Australian land, loss of koala nesting and feeding sites being particularly worrisome given the current plight of the koala on the East Coast. * Removal of vegetation, in particular trees, will only increase the likelyhood of further heatwave conditions, ground water loss and increased greenhouse gas emmissions. * To those who claim that without the mine extension communities will suffer lost employment opportunities, it must be pointed out that the current and future development in the area of alternative energy projects will more than compensate. * On the question of broader economics, the fact that the demand for Australian coal by overseas countries is decreasing, as is the demand for coal on the domestic front since coal fired power stations are being decommissioned. Why mine coal if no-one wants it ? * Of course the major reason for objection is the question of climate change. Australia has committed to net zero emmissions by 2050 (Paris Agreement). This mine extension would result in the burning of additional coal giving rise to the release of an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases . Aren't we irresposible if we continue to promote or assist further mining and burning of coal? In conclusion, I believe that if expansion of the Moolaben mine is approved , irreversible harm will be caused not only to the Australian but to the global environment. So, with respect I ask that you do not approve it. Sincerely Cliff Harris |
Colleen Wysser - Martin
|
ID |
10941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2333 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Madam/Sir, I hereby lodge my submission to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I OPPOSE the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Moolarben coal mine is an existing thermal coal mine near Mudgee in mid-western New South Wales, on Wiradjuri Country. Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand the mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. My Summary: * This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. * The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. * The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. * The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. * It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Creek, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. * The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage. There are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. * The mine will also harm New South Wales by contributing to runaway climate change, with the New South Wales Net Zero Commission (NZC) stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving New South Wales climate targets or with a safe climate. * Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. A detailed analyse of the impacts of this mine extension follows: Koalas: Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, noting that: 1. The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’. 2. It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully”. Threatened wildlife and vegetation: The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept the buffer. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts: The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Creek, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change: DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in it’s Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the New South Wales Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in New South Wales are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in New South Wales. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with New South Wales climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the New South Wales Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It is impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to New South Wales and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage: The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts: The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs: There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. The summer of 2025/26 has thus far given us 42°C and violent storms in Sydney, destructive bushfires in Victoria and flooding in northern Queensland. With these ever-increasing effects of climate change on the country the Minns Government must actively denounce the implementation of this project. Green energy generation and infrastructure must take precedence. The extraction and use of fossil fuels must be curtailed immediately. To divert from this necessary path forward would be irresponsible. I thank you for this opportunity to express my opinions on this matter. For the only planet we have. |
Tobias Walsh
|
ID |
10946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2050 |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi, my name is Tobias Walsh and I’m part of the Climate Writers community in Sydney. I started writing to politicians and objecting to projects like this because I want to see our planet thrive and in this current climate emergency that is happening, it seems as though there is a severe lack of care for the environment. At a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this expansion would further undermine climate commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. As a nation, we should set the standard and not accept any new fossil fuel projects that will directly harm us |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 Extension Project. I have an educational background in the global economy and currently work in the environmental consulting space. Through this lens, I am deeply concerned about both the weak economic case for expanding thermal coal production and the significant impacts this project would have on local communities and biodiversity. The proposed expansion would extend coal extraction to 2038, disturb large areas of native vegetation, and result in an estimated additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. At a time when NSW is already struggling to meet its legislated climate targets, approving this project would further undermine commitments under the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. The NSW Net Zero Commission has clearly stated that coal mine expansions are not consistent with a safe climate. I am particularly concerned about the serious and irreversible impacts on biodiversity, including the clearing of koala habitat and damage to threatened species and ecological communities. Long-term groundwater drawdown also poses risks to Moolarben Creek, an important refuge for wildlife, while the project would cause harm to Wiradjuri cultural landscapes and sacred sites that cannot be adequately offset. Given declining global demand for thermal coal and the Central West’s growing role in renewable energy and clean job creation, I do not believe this project represents a responsible or forward-looking development. For these reasons, I respectfully ask the Independent Planning Commission to recommend refusal of the Moolarben Coal Mine OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Roderick Weir Anderson
|
ID |
11156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Objection to Ulan Coal Mine Mod 6 I am a retired GP with a career-long interest in the environmental threats to human health, and threats to the biosphere. Climate change is by far the greatest of these. I OBJECT TO THIS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL; IT SHOULD NOT PROCEED Key points of my objection: 1. Must be assessed together with the Ulan Mod 8 proposal as a new project to provide robust cumulative impact information. 2. The amendment report still fails to fully identify the impacts of the increased greenhouse gas emissions on the local environment, community and economy, as required under NSW planning law. 3. The proposal will produce an additional 18.8 million tonnes of coal and when combined with Mod 8 (additional 43 MT) there will be over a 45% increase in total emissions above current approved operations at Ulan Mine. 4. There is no assessment of cumulative impacts from existing mine approvals or expansion proposals across the three Mudgee Mines: Ulan, Moolarben, Wilpinjong 5. The cumulative loss of threatened species habitat, significant Aboriginal cultural heritage values, water from the landscape and flows to creeks and rivers, and threats to amenity and livelihoods of neighbours has not been assessed 6. The proposal is within the CWOREZ and is competing for regional workforce urgently needed for new industries in the Central West 7. The proposal will place further pressure on already stressed surface and ground water sources within the Murray Darling Basin My contact details are: Roderick Weir Anderson, (REDACTED) |
Anna Harpley
|
ID |
11161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I abhor the destruction and pollution generated under the auspices of Net Zero and support fossil fuel extraction and MORE EFFICIENT fossil fuel burning technologies however, Mining giant Yancoal is proposing to expand a mine, pushing it out into a beautiful valley surrounded on three sides by Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, one of the oldest conservation reserves in the state. This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. Sincerely, Anna Harpley. Coolac. 2727 |
Anna Lorcan
|
ID |
11166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am making a submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. Anna Lorcan |
Rick Kilpatrick
|
ID |
10711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2846 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a small farmer from the district. I am strongly against the approval of this expansion for the reasons listed below: Many threatened species, including koala, depend on this habitat. 675 hectares will be disturbed which has an impact on many native animals that use this area as a home. This may force more extinctions. Ground water is impacted and this effect will last at least 25 years after the mining ceases. All of this coal will be exported overseas which has no benefit to Australia, although the coal company stands to make $250,000 million. However our local community will be affected by the greenhouse gas emissions and the climate pollution. NSW is one of the highest impacted areas in the world from this. |
Sarah Brennan
|
ID |
10786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3121 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sarah and I am a writing in objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I am a young person who is concerned about the impact coal has on the climate and our environment and have seen the impact climate fuelled disasters such as bushfires have had. Therefore, I am concerned about the impact this proposed extension would have on the environment, climate and nearby communities. My concerns include: ⦁ The clearing of vital woodland (113ha) of which koalas have been recorded to be on site and breeding is occuring. The clearing will also impact threatened fauna including the Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed snake, and Eastern Cave and Large-eared Pied microbats. Flora impacted included White Box, Yellow Box, Blakely's Red Gum, Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland. Offsets cannot replace the existing environment. ⦁ The impacts on water and groundwater could harm Moolarben Creek which is a vital refuge during drought for wildlife. ⦁ Impacts on the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve such as noise and blasting have been poorly assessed and not included in modelling reports. With mining proposed to occur within 100 metres of the reserve, these impacts should be considered. ⦁ The greenhouse gas emissions from the prposal amount to 64 million tonnes which is unacceptable when NSW is lagging behind meeting its emissions reduction targets and further exacerbates climate impacts. Local communities already feel the impacts of drought, heatwaves and extreme weather events. ⦁ In a time where the NSW government is focusing on fast tracking renewable energy zones, relevant being the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, there's no justification to expand coal when renewable energy is being prioritised to create jobs and benefit communities instead. For these reasons I call on the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben 0C3 Coal Mining Extension Project be rejected. Regards, Sarah Brennan Hawthorn VIC 3122 |
Timothy Carroll
|
ID |
10791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2193 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Tim Carroll I believe that the NSW government should reject this expansion for many reasons. It is time to stop expanding climate damaging fossil fuel projects and focus on renewable energy. My Key Points are: 1. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. 6. The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by contributing to climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day liveability. |
Marita Macrae
|
ID |
10796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2107 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission attached. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project.pdf (PDF, 106.2 KB) |
Dan Vickers
|
ID |
10801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2072 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally object to the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine. This submission is made on the grounds that the proposal would result in unacceptable environmental, social, and climate impacts, and is inconsistent with contemporary planning principles and the public interest. 1. Unacceptable Environmental Impacts The proposed extension would further entrench long-term environmental degradation in the Moolarben region. The mine has already resulted in extensive land clearing, habitat fragmentation, groundwater disruption, and cumulative impacts on surrounding ecosystems. Extending the mine would exacerbate these impacts, particularly on: • Native vegetation and biodiversity, including threatened species and ecological communities that rely on intact woodland and riparian habitats. • Surface water and groundwater systems, with ongoing risks of drawdown, contamination, and altered hydrological regimes that extend beyond the mine footprint. • Soil integrity and landscape function, through additional open-cut mining, spoil emplacement, and long-term rehabilitation uncertainty. Given the cumulative impacts of existing and approved mining in the region, further expansion cannot be considered environmentally sustainable. 2. Inadequate Consideration of Cumulative Impacts The proposal fails to adequately address the cumulative impacts of multiple coal mines operating within the same catchment and bioregion. Incremental approvals have progressively eroded environmental values, yet each modification is assessed in relative isolation. This approach understates the true scale of impact on ecosystems, water resources, and regional amenity. A precautionary approach is required, particularly where environmental thresholds may already have been exceeded. 3. Climate Change and Inconsistency with Emissions Reduction Goals Approving an extension to a thermal coal mine is fundamentally inconsistent with Australia’s emissions reduction commitments and the global imperative to rapidly reduce fossil fuel extraction. The downstream combustion of coal from the proposed extension would generate significant greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change and its well-documented impacts on communities, biodiversity, water security, and public health. Planning decisions must take into account not only direct operational emissions, but also the broader climate consequences of facilitating continued coal production. 4. Social and Community Impacts The continuation and expansion of mining operations prolongs adverse impacts on nearby communities, including: • Noise, dust, and vibration • Visual impacts and loss of rural character • Increased heavy vehicle traffic and associated safety risks • Ongoing uncertainty about land use, rehabilitation outcomes, and post-mining futures These impacts disproportionately affect local residents while delivering diminishing long-term benefits to the wider community. 5. Rehabilitation and Post-Mining Land Use Uncertainty Despite decades of mining in NSW, there remains no strong evidence that large open-cut coal mines can be rehabilitated to a condition that genuinely restores ecological function or supports equivalent land uses. Approving further disturbance in the absence of demonstrated rehabilitation success places an unacceptable burden on future generations. 6. Public Interest Test When assessed against the principles of ecologically sustainable development, intergenerational equity, and the public interest, the proposed extension does not justify approval. Short-term economic considerations should not outweigh long-term environmental harm, climate risk, and community impacts. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I strongly oppose the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine and urge the consent authority to refuse the application. Instead, planning and investment should be directed toward environmental protection, genuine rehabilitation, and a transition to sustainable industries that provide long-term benefits for communities and the environment. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3282 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making a submission OBJECTING to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. It has been shown that the land in question for the project is crucial habitat for koalas, wombats and other Australian wildlife. Please reconsider the project and withdraw application for proposed plan. Let’s all do better, smarted and more sustainable for not only ourselves but the other creatures we share this country with. |
Jodie Hanson
|
ID |
10811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the extension coal project. Protecting biodiversity should be the number one priority in Australia today. Keeping filthy coal in the ground should be our second. For future generations I implore you to reject this extension. |
Ruth Bacchus
|
ID |
13826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
2795 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear IPC, I wish to register my objection to the expansion of the Moolarben mine near Mudgee, on environmental, social and economic grounds. In every sense the expansion would be damaging and unnecessary. Kind regards , Ruth Bacchus, Peel NSW 2795 |
Sophia Platthy
|
ID |
10641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2223 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing as a parent and a concerned NSW resident, with close family living in regional New South Wales, to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project on Wiradjuri Country near Mudgee. As a parent, I am deeply concerned about the kind of future we are leaving for our children. As someone with family in regional NSW, I am equally concerned about the real and immediate impacts this project would have on local communities, water sources, wildlife and cultural landscapes that cannot be replaced once they are damaged or destroyed. I am concerned that this proposed expansion would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment and climate, with no clear public benefit, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about the following: Irreplaceable biodiversity loss Yancoal is proposing to clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where koalas and breeding have been recorded, including within the footprint of proposed pits. The project would also destroy critically endangered species, Regent Honeyeater, habitat and impact other threatened species such as microbats and the Broad-headed Snake. No amount of biodiversity offsetting can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species and ecological communities. Unacceptable impacts on protected areas The proposal includes mining activities within close proximity to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, yet noise, blasting and vibration impacts on the reserve were poorly assessed and not adequately included in modelling. This raises serious concerns about the protection of a significant conservation area. Water and groundwater risks The project risks long-term groundwater drawdown of 2–6 metres for up to 25 years post-mining, placing Moolarben Creek at risk. This creek is a vital drought refuge for wildlife and an important water source in a region already experiencing increasing climate stress. The impact on the water table and the biodiversity is likely to be extensive, particularly given the likelihood of increased heatwaves. Climate impacts that undermine our children’s future The OC3 extension would result in an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions over the life of the mine. This is occurring at a time when the NSW Government has acknowledged it is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets for 2030 and 2035, and when NSW is recognised as being among the most climate-vulnerable regions globally. Australia was the hottest place on earth, with recent heatwaves. Climate impacts are increasing and making some areas unliveable. Approving new or expanded coal projects in this context is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement, and is not in the public interest. What future are we giving generations to come? It looks bleak, unless we achieve Net Zero soon. Opening and expanding mining operations is in conflict with Net Zero. Lack of genuine public or regional benefit There is no compelling jobs justification for this expansion. Long-standing vacancies already exist across coal mines in the Mudgee region, while the project sits within the Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where the NSW Government is actively prioritising clean energy investment and job creation. Continuing to expand coal mining undermines this transition and locks regional communities into further climate and economic risk. Harm to regional communities Communities in the Mid-Western Region are already experiencing more intense heatwaves, prolonged drought, and extreme weather events. Projects like the Moolarben OC3 expansion will worsen these impacts, affecting community health, water security, agricultural livelihoods and overall liveability for families now and into the future. How many families have had to truck in water during drought periods? How many families have suffered heat stress? How much land has been cleared already - and led to loss of biodiversity in NSW? Given that NSW is not on track to meet its climate targets, that regional communities are highly vulnerable to climate impacts, and that this project would cause irreversible environmental and cultural harm with no clear public benefit, I believe approval of the Moolarben OC3 expansion is not in the public interest. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sophia |
Elizabeth Chase
|
ID |
10646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2774 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Lizzie Chase. I am a school teacher in Western Sydney, living in the Blue Mountains, and I strongly object to the expansion of coal mining in NSW. I object to the proposal for n extension of this mine and the establishment of 4 new open cut mines in the valley. Firstly, I object due to the severe climate impacts of coal mining already being experienced in Western Sydney and the Blue Mountains. We have recently had a heat wave and on one of the days, Penrith was recorded as being the hottest place on earth. Students at my school are already experiencing extreme heat conditions in which outside play is cancelled during summer, on our hottest days. We need to back renewable energy sources - our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know many areas in NSW are in the same position. I am writing to oppose Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. This expansion will cause irreversible harm to the environment and should be categorically rejected - what planet do we want to leave for our children and grandchildren. Please place people and the environment before profits. There is no Planet B. My specific worries are: • KOALAS, REGENT HONEY EATERS, MICROBATS: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is ALREADY home to threatened species. • NATURE RESERVE: Mining proposed within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The reserve will be impacted by noise, blasting and vibration. • WATER ECOSYSTEMS: Mining activities cause severe damage to water, including long-term groundwater draw down that may harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems which are very important drought refuges for wildlife in these heat wave times. • GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: An estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions will be produced in the context of NSW not being on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. PLEASE consider this major issue. • NO CLEAR JOBS JUSTIFICATION: Why are we considering expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised? Surely, it's time to focus on sustainable energy? Time to save our earth and not continue to destroy it with resources that are running out anyway? • INSUMMARY, NSW has a climate and biodiversity CRISIS: This proposal is totally inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these significant reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. The world is in free fall at the moment, can we please have a win for goodness and the environment? Can people who care about the legacy we are leaving our children please have a voice? I teach about conservation and protecting our environment and it is my strong hope that we can back these priorities with actions. Lizzie Chase, Teacher |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3073 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6107 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The latest Moolarben Coal Complex (MCC) expansion proposal is equivalent in scale to a new coal mine development. How can this be justified when the Federal government is saying that coal mines must start closing? Also the NSW Government’s emissions targets are already projected to fall well short of what is required to combat climate change. NSW communities, such as Mudgee, are already feeling the impacts of climate change with increased floods and fires. Yancoal’s plans are to expand the mine right up to the border of one of NSW’s oldest conservation reserves, the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This is an important local tourist spot important to Mudgee. No one will want to visit a regional park and see a giant hole in the ground. The mine expansion would also pose a serious threat to the survival of koalas and other threatened species like the Regent Honeyeater, a critically endangered bird species –– of which there are only 250-350 individuals left in the wild. The project would also impact 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater habitat, a bird that zoos in Victoria and NSW have invested hundreds of hours bringing back from the verge of extinction. There are no more than 300 individuals in the wild today, with numbers possibly already dropping as low as 50. The NSW Environment Department has said the project could threaten the survival of the local population –– potentially causing regional extinction. Authorities have already warned that koalas will not survive in the wild for more then 25 years if the current rates of habitat loss continue. Although Yancoal is promising to rehouse koalas from the area, there are many other animals that are found in the area such as broad-headed snakes, pin-tailed legless lizards, and squirrel gliders. Unlike koalas, these species are very difficult to relocate, and it remains unclear what their fate will be if the project is approved. We can’t afford any new coal mines and expansions –– not just for the sake of our endangered wildlife, but for people and communities already being hit with climate-fuelled disasters. Although Yancoal employs more than 6,000 Australians and is one of the country's largest coal exporters, according to Market Forces, Yancoal paid no taxes for the financial year 2020/21. It is a public company listed on the ASX and in Hong Kong, and is majority-owned by Yankuang Energy Group, a state-controlled Chinese corporation. Why are we allowing foreign-owned companies to devastate Australia? Yancoal itself admits the project poses a threat to habitat that is “critical to the survival” of the local koala population.This project poses risks of increased mortality and physiological stress for koalas due to habitat fragmentation, stress, and vehicle strikes. I believe that clearing critical koala habitat would: o fragment the landscape, making it more challenging for koalas to move and access food sources, o increase the likelihood of vehicle strikes, and o disrupt breeding activities, further threatening the viability of the koala population in the area. Our koalas are facing a perilous situation nationwide due to dual threats of habitat destruction from land clearing and devastating bushfires. This mine expansion is beyond the pale and cannot be allowed. |
Craig Shaw
|
ID |
10666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission on this project. The full text of my submission is attached. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben OC3 Expansion (SSD) - Submission.pdf (PDF, 269.48 KB) |
Margaret MCDONALD
|
ID |
10671 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Dubbo Environment Group Inc, |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The members of Dubbo Environment Group Inc. do not support the expansion of any new coal mines or, for that matter, the continuation of any fossil fuel extraction. We should not need to continually repeat that we need to reduce our carbon and methane emissions as expert Climate Science has been advising for the last 20 years, for us to avoid the devastating consequences of a 2 -degree C. rise in world average temperatures. Already we are experiencing the unprecedented extreme weather events which were predicted by these experts. Currently Victoria is experiencing bushfires which are worse than the previous devastating Black Fires and a flood along the Great Ocean Road while Queensland has lost some 15000 livestock and countless homes to floods. Climate Change is to blame! In 2024, NSW's average temperature was 1.71 degrees C. above the average for 1961 -1990 according to the BOM. Global temperatures in 2024 were 1.28 degrees C. above 1951-1980 records and the Earths' average surface temperature was the warmest on record according to NASA. Dubbo Environment Group Inc. supports the urgent progression of all energy providers to renewable power sources. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10676 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Climate Resource |
|
Location |
Victoria 3065 |
|
Date |
16/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
By online submission at https://www.ipcn.nsw.gov.au 16 January 2026 Submission to the Independent Planning Commission — Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project I write to provide climate-relevant context for the Commission’s assessment of the Moolarben OC3 Extension project. We recently conducted analysis of Australia’s coal outlook in a warming world - Insights from integrated assessment models (report attached to this submission). Key points from this analysis: ● Global and export coal demand is in structural decline under climate pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C or 1.8 °C, which is in line with projected warming if countries meet their current targets. Integrated assessment model projections show that thermal coal exports from Australia could fall by ~64 % or more by 2035 under these scenarios. This decline reflects accelerating policy commitments and technological transitions worldwide. ● Additional coal production risks locking in carbon emissions inconsistent with climate goals. The Moolarben OC3 Extension would extract tens of millions of tonnes of coal that, when combusted, contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions. Ongoing expansions of coal mining increasingly stand in contrast to pathways envisaged to meet Paris-aligned warming limits, posing reputational and policy risk. ● Australia’s economic exposure to declining coal markets warrants caution. With major import markets projected to sharply reduce coal consumption over the next decade, approving further coal mine expansions may expose communities and investors to future economic risk as global energy systems decarbonise. Conclusion Given the trajectory for global coal demand and the imperative to align infrastructure decisions with climate commitments, the Commission should consider whether extending coal mining projects is consistent with credible long-term climate and economic scenarios. Our report underscores the urgency of aligning planning decisions with climate and market realities. With best regards, [name redacted], Decarbonisation Lead, Climate Resource Pty Ltd |
|
Attachments |
Climate Resource Submission to Moolarben coal extension project_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 141.46 KB) 2025-12-11_Australias_coal_outlook_in_a_warming_world.pdf (PDF, 3.27 MB) 2025-12-11_Australias_coal_outlook_briefing.pdf (PDF, 276.88 KB) |
Jennifer Valentine
|
ID |
10536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4701 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Violet, I am a 30 year schoolteacher in Western Sydney and I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Students at my school are already sitting through extreme heatwaves, our energy bills are going up due to the added cost of air conditioning, and I know communities across NSW are facing the same struggles. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is [name redacted], and I am a middle-aged teacher residing in the Blue Mountains. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our state, especially due to its potential climate impacts, threats to biodiversity, risks to groundwater, and the lack of tangible public benefits. I am writing to formally object to Yancoal’s proposed expansion of the Moolarben OC3 coal mine near Mudgee, located on Wiradjuri Country. I have justifiable concerns that this project will result in irreversible damage to the environment, climate, and local communities, and should not be approved. I am concerned about the following issues: The destruction of over 113 hectares of critical koala habitat, where koalas have been recorded breeding, as well as the impact on habitat for Regent Honeyeaters and microbats. Biodiversity offsets do not replace habitats that support endangered species. The potential harm to the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining operations planned just 100 meters from the reserve, and the inadequate assessment of impacts from noise, blasting, and vibrations. Risks to water and groundwater, particularly long-term groundwater depletion that could adversely affect Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that serve as vital drought refuges for wildlife. The climate impact, as this project is projected to generate an additional 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is already off-track to meet its legally mandated emissions reduction targets. The absence of clear public benefit, as the proposed expansion does not offer a strong case for local job creation in a region that is shifting towards renewable energy development. Given the ongoing climate and biodiversity crises, the NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects. This proposal is at odds with the objectives outlined in the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend the rejection of the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. Thank you for your consideration of my submission. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
Fiona Sim
|
ID |
10556 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Running Stream Water Users Association |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached document: RSWUA_Submission_Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project_15/01/26 |
|
Attachments |
RSWUA_Submission_Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project_15:01:26.pdf (PDF, 193.9 KB) |
Fiona Sim
|
ID |
10561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
15 January 2026 Submission to the NSW Government Independent Planning Commission objecting to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion on Wiradjuri Country near Mudgee. I am a resident of Running Stream, around 70 kilometres from the Moolarben mine. I am deeply concerned about the climate impacts of the expansion of coal mining in New South Wales and I believe that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts: This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when New South Wales is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The Moolarben mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone, where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Fiona Sim Running Stream, NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2785 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a remote critical infrastructure professional with experience in groundwater monitoring, water quality and associated development-related monitoring. I do not believe the proposed development provides sufficient resource extraction related gains to offset the risk to groundwater resources in the area which I understand are as yet not fully understood. Proposing to build a better understanding of groundwater impacts during development does not mitigate risk, as negative impacts resulting from development may only be understood after the fact. For an extension that does not extend the life of the mine, and would not provide any additional local long-term local economic benefit this is not acceptable. |
Ros Treloar
|
ID |
10591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2281 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hi, Re: Objection to Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project Number SSD-33083358 I'm registering my objection to the extension because it threatens endangered wildlife and vegetation. It puts at risk deep rooted trees in the Moolarben Creek. Furthermore coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Act. Long term, beauty and diversity are more valuable than an open cut coal mine as we transition to a sustainable future. Thank you, Ros Treloar |
Pierre Louys
|
ID |
10596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commissioners Dear Madam, Sir It is understood that by making this submission, I agree to take responsibility for its entire content, including statements and opinions. Please find attached my submission. Regards Pierre Louys |
|
Attachments |
Pierre Louys attachment_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 123.04 KB) |
Rod Anderson
|
ID |
10601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
I am a retired GP and have had a career long interest in the environmental threats to the biosphere and environmental determinants of health. By far the greatest of these is climate change. I OBJECT TO THIS PROJECT. IT SHOULD NOT PROCEED. Here's why: Koalas: The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: the Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that it is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully. Threatened wildlife and vegetation: The mine will clear habitat for multiple threatened wildlife species and also clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. Water impacts: The project will cause drawdown of the alluvium by up to 5m along Moolarben Ck, and put at risk deep-rooted trees that use that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. Climate change: DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. Cultural heritage: The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. Cumulative impacts: The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. Both the Ulan and Wilpinjong coal mines also have major expansions proposed, and collectively the three existing coal mines and all their proposed expansions have enormous impacts on biodiversity, water, cultural heritage and our climate. Regional impacts and jobs: There are numerous alternative job opportunities available in the region because Mudgee is part of the Central West Renewable Energy Zone and there is a boom in jobs available in renewable projects, with close to 2,000 new jobs predicted over the next decade. Further, the existing Moolarben coal complex will continue to operate until 2038 regardless of whether this expansion goes ahead or not. Yours sincerely, [redacted] |
Ben Rumble
|
ID |
10606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, My name is Ben Rumble and I live in Bowral NSW. I am writing this submission to express my objections to the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Expansion Project, Project Number SSD-33083358. My principal objections to the above cited project are listed below: 1. DESTRUCTION OF KOALA HABITAT The existing Koala population recorded on and near the proposed mine site has been deemed by the Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW to be a robust and thriving population which has successfully "...survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires." Furthermore, this Koala habitat has been identified as being "critical to the survival of the species." Destroying it for the sake of prolonging the life of what is widely deemed to be a moribund coal extraction industry would be an exercise in futility on every conceivable level. 2. THREAT TO EXISTING WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION The Moolarben Expansion Project is projected to clear 401 hectares of the nationally endangered Box Gum Woodland ecosystem and critically endanger many threatened species in addition to Koalas, including the Squirrel Glider, the Broad-Headed Snake, the Regent Honeyeater, the Eastern Cave Bat and the Large-Eared Pie Bat. The noise created by the mine poses a direct threat to key bat habitats along the edge of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve which, along with the destruction of native vegetation caused by the proposed mine expansion, could result in the permanent extinction of these already endangered species. 3. THREAT TO WATER AND CLIMATE Yancoal has failed to conduct effective baseline monitoring of existing water resources associated with this proposed expansion project. This is unfortunately consistent with the company's glaring failure to carry out effective water monitoring procedures in the already operating sections of its Moolarben mine. The projected expansion also represents a disaster in the making for the climate of Eastern Australia, with an estimated 64.6 megatonnes of total lifecycle greenhouse gases being pumped into the atmosphere if it is approved. This is totally inconsistent with the findings of the Net Zero Commission and the targets established by the NSW Climate Change Act. This oversight is highly significant, given that the NSW Government is currently far short of meeting its 2030 and 2035 emissions reductions targets and that the current Moolarben coal complex will continue to produce unacceptable quanities of CO2 and other toxic greenhouse gases even without the proposed expansion taking place until its scheduled closure in 2038. 4. OTHER MINE EXPANSION PROJECTS New expansion projects have also been tabled for the Ulan and Wilpinjong mines, likewise located in the Mudgee region. The cumulative effects of expanding all three mines have not been properly assessed, leaving the impacts they will have on biodiversity, climate, water and indigenous cultural heritage basically unknown. In closing, I ask the Independent Planning Commission to apply common sense when considering the Moolarben mine expansion project and to reject it out of hand. Neither NSW or Australia as a whole can continue to depend on fossil fuels to supply them with reliable sources of energy. Yancoal must not be permitted to put its profits before the future of the environment and the continuing existence of human and animal life on our planet. Thank you for allowing me to share my concerns with you. Yours sincerely, Ben Rumble |
Kim Zegenhagen
|
ID |
10611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2576 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. 675 hectares are at risk of clearing and mining activities. 2. 30Mt of coal will be mined, resulting in 25Mt of product coal., which will add an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions. 3. The project will result in 13 ha of Koala habitat and 80 ha of Regent honeyeater habitat being cleared. 4. The project could cause groundwater drawdown of 2-6 metres for up to 25 years post mining. The risks Moolarben Creek, which is a vital drought refuge for wildlife. 5. It will damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes and sacred sites. 6. There is no economic justification fo rthis project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3078 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Reasons for my objection: 1. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. 6. The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by contributing to climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day liveability. 7. There has been next to ZERO community engagement undertaken by Yancoal. 8. There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. Please refer to this document for EVIDENCE of Australia's coal outlook. Climate Resource analysis of coal demand in Australia’s key markets indicates that by 2035, thermal coal exports could fall by 64% or more, and metallurgical coal exports could drop by 28% or more in these scenarios. Australia’s own 2035 thermal coal use is projected to be 86 to 93% lower in these scenarios. We should be 100% focussed national and international decarbonisation. https://www.climate-resource.com/reports/decarb-futures/2025-12-11_Australias_coal_outlook_briefing.pdf The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Mina Bui Jones
|
ID |
10621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2281 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am a 52-year-old mother of two, working as a Volunteer Engagement Officer and Coordinator for a national conservation organisation. I live on Awabakal Country in Lake Macquarie LGA, on a coastline already greatly affected by climate-change induced storms and increasingly heavy and unpredictable rainfall. I grew up visiting my cousins who live on Wiradjuri Country near Ilford, where they raised four children, on beautiful, healthy bushland. In the Mudgee district, we used to visit friends living on productive farms and in rich, biodiverse bushland before the many open-cut coal mines arrived, destroying habitats, dividing communities, and shifting the local economy away from deep territorial connection and regeneration (agriculture and nature-based tourism) to high-turnover, short-sighted, extraction (coal mining). This shift has put lie to the myth that new fossil fuel projects are designed to create jobs and strengthen communities. Since the emergence and expansion of mines in the region, my cousins now travel to Bathurst instead of Mudgee for shopping and recreation. They choose to drive up to one hour further to access cultural, medical and social services because they feel that Mudgee’s rural community and natural beauty have been destroyed by the mines and the fly-in, fly-out nature of the mining-related work they have brought. Through my relatives, and in my own home, I have witnessed the impacts of coal mining expansion in NSW over the last three decades – leading up to this, the “Decade of Climate Action” that we are halfway through, with greenhouse gas emissions skyrocketing. In 2026, permitting expansion of any fossil fuel projects in NSW is not a responsible option in regard to the climate, to native species’ chances of survival of the current extinction crisis, or to the character and finest qualities of rural and regional economies and communities. In short: - Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. - The proposed project would have an “un-off-settable” impact on several native species, including the Regent Honeyeater. - The proposed project is bereft of public benefit, in a region where sustainable agriculture and renewable energy industries are growing and are genuinely desired and supported by the community. For these reasons I ask you, as Commissioners tasked with the fair, honest, and responsible assessment of the project proposal, to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely, Mina BUI JONES |
Marie Belcredi
|
ID |
10626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2121 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My submission is contained in the attached files. |
|
Attachments |
Submission Moorlaben Coal Complex Extension_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 86.48 KB) |
Tibor Kovats
|
ID |
10631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a resident of NSW at Gloucester. Whilst I am generally opposed to any expansion of coal mining in NSW due to the need to address Greenhouse Gas Emissions globally, I am also informed of the following impacts that the Moolarben OC3 coal expansion will have: 1. Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. 2. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. 3. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. 4.Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. 5. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. |
ernest newman
|
ID |
10636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2774 |
|
Date |
15/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I oppose this expansion of mining because of environmental reasons, especially greenhouse gas. |
Maureen Harper
|
ID |
10321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My primary objection to the increase of coal extraction at the Yancoal Moolarben Mine is the end result, an increase in the production of Carbon Dioxide resulting in greater Climate Change. Approving any increase to coal mining capacity, in lieu of the urgently needed reduction of the same, makes a complete farce of the NSW Government’s (EnergyCo NSW) statement that the Mid-Western region of NSW is a renewable energy zone. The Land and Environment Court has already refused previous modifications requested by coal producers in this area. This standard needs to be upheld to ensure that the NSW Government is forced to move into renewable power generation a lot faster than it is currently doing and take combating the effects of Climate Change more seriously. My second objection is the clearing of Koala and Regent Honeyeater habitat. Being familiar with some of the local area to the Moolarben mine I am aware of under documented koala populations and undocumented black cockatoo habitat. The proximity of the current mine to sensitive environmentally significant locations is unacceptable making the proposed extension even more so. I insist that you respect the fact that global warming is currently harming the natural systems that keep not only humans alive but also those same supportive natural systems that we rely on. Climate change is effecting greater and more intense weather system changes which alone are negatively affecting those same natural systems. I ask that you DO NOT APPROVE THIS MODIFICATION! |
Bradley Bliss
|
ID |
10326 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2820 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation members have put forward an objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project as we have significant concerns around the koala population and their locally dwindling habitat. If this expansion is approved it will signal the end of this population and will give other mining companies and renewable energy projects precedence for destroying koala habitat with intact animal populations. Koalas are nationally listed as an endangered species and must be protected. They also have significant cultural connection to our Apical Clan descendants from this area around Ulan and Moolarben as they are totems. Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation members have put forward as very strong and resolute objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project being approved as in the OC3 area, Registered Aboriginal Parties located and identified the only known local where source of Blue and White Banded Cert where it was identified as a quarry area for our Aboriginal Ancestors. This material has been found as fragments and cultural artefacts including 1 highly significant cultural male ceremonial tool in the surrounding district and nowhere else. This Cultural Quarry which is the origin of this material cannot be allowed to be destroyed as it is highly significant to our people, especially those who Apical connection to this project area and continue their connection to the surrounding area to this day. Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation members have put forward an objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project as Registered Aboriginal Parties located and identified a large boulder shelter with significant cultural artefacts and cultural material in and around it where there was also a good soil deposit containing artefacts. This is one of very few boulder shelters within the Moolarben, Ulan and Wilpinjong Coal complexes and must not be impacted. Wellington Valley Wiradjuri Aboriginal Corporation members have put forward as very strong and very load objection to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project as Registered Aboriginal Parties located and identified a potential burial site, this was reported to Booral Maliyan a Wiradjuri Knowledge Holder and on hearing the description identified it as a potential burial site as it is very similar to another site near Ulan and Moolarben where ancestral Aboriginal Clan remains have been sealed up in chambers of a sandstone outcrop. This site under no circumstances can be impacted in any way. With the Intergenerational Cumulative Loss of cultural sites, impacted songlines from the mass of renewable energy projects, Moolarben Coal's own previous 100% clearance of the OC4 area and the CWO-REZ 500Kva Powerline, our people's heritage is being systematically wiped from the landscape. Those of us involved in Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Field Assessments and the archaeological salvage, we are the last to see these sites in the cultural landscape and in the context of where it is located and for us it is the physical link to our past and helps us understand what our ancestors were doing in that place up to several thousand years ago right up to when they were pushed of the lands they knew to Wellington or also in the case of Mudgee region hunted and killed. Our future generations if these three locations and the koala population and their habitat are destroyed will see only a pdf documents with archaeologist views on it from a scientific point of view, those reports are also significantly lacking in photographic records of these sites and need to be significantly enhanced to the satisfaction of Aboriginal community as onsite cultural heritage field assessments, field officers are not allowed mobile phones and are not allowed to take photos of anything and must request images from the archaeologist and through Moolarben Environmental team, in doing so the requests as to date have not been fulfilled. |
Clive Woodworth
|
ID |
10331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2785 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The world and specifically Australia does not require any more coal or in fact any more fossil fuel . Australia needs to lead on this matter not be an "also run country" that allows coal mining to continue throughout the 21st century when there is more that enough clean green energy available . Extending the excavation of more fossil fuels is sheer madness. Our grand children will one day ask of us, " what did we do to stop more fossil fuel being emitted " I hope we can respond positively . |
sally Novak
|
ID |
10346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sally Novak. I am employed as a Primary school teacher and grew up in the Mudgee district and have watched as the mining industry expands, destroying habitat, communities and changing the water ways. I am extremely concerned about the impacts of the mines in their current operation and the thought of expansion terrifies me. I am aware of the impacts that climate change is already having and that the changing climate is caused by the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and it is absolutely irresponsible for anyone to be supporting and increase in extraction. The governing bodies should instead be encouraging a decrease and a move to renewables and less consumption of energy overall. I have been visiting ‘The Drip’ and the ‘Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve’ since I was a child and value and appreciate the beauty and diversity of these places. Recently I had to drive at night from Wollar past the Munghorn Gap area and had to drive at 10kms per hour because of the incredible amount of wildlife. I saw wombats and wallabies and other small night mammals. The current global extinction rates are the highest they’ve been since the Yucatan meteorite collision 65 million years ago. We need to protect the biodiversity pockets we have. Giving Yancoal permission to clear 113ha of woodland where we know endangered koalas are living is outrageous and completely unacceptable. The NSW government cannot afford new or expanded coal projects in the face of a climate and biodiversity crisis. I implore you to protect what we have to ensure that there is something for future generations and that there are places for plants and animals to thrive. I am pleading for the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thanks for considering my submission, Sincerely, Sally Novak Newcastle |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2617 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Commonwealth public servant based in Canberra. I am deeply concerned that Australia is not taking effective action to mitigate climate change. While our contribution to greenhouse gasses is small on the global stage, our natural abundance of sunlight, wind and innovative entrepreneurship provides us with the resources to lead the world in making the essential energy transition before it is too late to save the environment we depend upon for our survival. In addition, if we counted emissions from fossil fuels which we mine and export, out total contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is much more significant. This is why I object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. The science is clear that biodiversity offsets cannot replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. The whole notion of offsets is deeply flawed. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Dianne Thompson
|
ID |
10356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. State of Significance Status is both grossly overused, and used as a Government tool to enable large scale destruction of NSW country and natural areas. 2. Such proposals are gifted to big business and presented to the Minister for Planning to tick off. 3. My past very recent experience with Snowy Special Activity Precinct, Snowy 2.0 and related Transgrid overhead lines provide for the destruction and desecration of large tracks of valuable, rare and iconic Kosciuszko National Park. The KNP catchments are being further damaged, despite their contributing to 30% of the Murray Darling Basin inflows. 4. This Moolarben OC3 extension, will also deplete, damage and destroy the catchments of the Goulburn River. You well know the damage, so I don't need to spell it out, including the riverine areas and overall water resource, for the surrounding natural areas, towns and the rural sector. 5. All for 10 years extension of a mine, and a mine owned by an overseas company (Yancoal) and overseas country. 6. Data from 2021 states: Chinese-owned Yancoal paid no tax on $18 million of profit and more than $5 billion in revenue. 7. Just to give my submission further credibility, given that the project will be approved, I suggest you allow, at a minimum, the buffer zones to the various creeks and waterways; protect the box-gum woodlands; koala and regent honey habitats (they are endangered species); recognise that these area are full of springs, in fact the catchment to the Goulburn River is one large spring; and take some cognisance of the importance of the whole area to the Aboriginal people. 8. I have been visiting the area for 40+ years, and stayed in Munghorn Gap NR and the Goulburn River NP, plus many of the regional towns. I have a daughter and family living in the Hunter area, a major urban and industrial growth area, and am aware that the Goulburn River is a major tributary of the Hunter catchment. I also know quite a lot about the paucity of Box Gum woodlands in NSW, as the ACT where I live has the largest remaining Box Gum woodlands in Australia, and the ACT is a tiny landlocked blip within the NSW boundaries. None of this is anything to be proud of. 9. I am sick to death of the swathe of accompanying reports, ie the 45 reports associated with the 'hollow' EIS and other formalised documents to this proposal. 10. Finally I do hope my submission goes towards triggering an action thru the EPBC Act, will allow the Federal Government to disallow this extension proposal. |
Jijo George
|
ID |
10386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2762 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission for Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project (SSD-33083358) To: The Independent Planning Commission (IPC) of NSW From: [Your Name] Location: Schofields, NSW Status: Object Subject: Objection to the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project I am writing to formally object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. As a resident of Sydney with a young daughter, I am deeply concerned about the long-term environmental and climate legacy we are leaving for the next generation. My profession involves assessing the long-term viability and risks of complex systems; looking at this proposal through that lens, the "technical debt" we are accruing by approving further coal expansion is unsustainable. My objection is based on the following key points: 1. Critical Habitat Destruction (Koalas and Regent Honeyeaters) The proposal involves clearing over 113 hectares of endangered Koala habitat and 80 hectares of habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. In the real world, the "villain" is often the incremental destruction of our own backyard. With only 250-350 Regent Honeyeaters left in the wild, we cannot justify "upgrading" a mine at the cost of a species' extinction. 2. Proximity to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve The expansion pushes right up to the boundary of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. This is one of NSW’s oldest conservation areas. Blasting and dust from the open-cut pits will inevitably impact the biodiversity of the reserve. I recognize that ecosystems are delicate; you cannot remove a core component (the buffer zone) without the whole system suffering. 3. Climate Change and Intergenerational Equity This project is expected to generate approximately 64 to 72 million tonnes of lifecycle GHG emissions. As a parent to a three-year-old, I am climate-conscious and committed to Democratic Socialist values that prioritize the common good over short-term corporate profit. Every megatonne of CO2 added to the atmosphere now is a direct threat to my daughter’s future quality of life in Australia. We should be investing in the renewable transition, not extending the life of thermal coal assets. 4. Water and Groundwater Risks The Independent Expert Scientific Committee (IESC) has raised concerns about groundwater drawdown of up to 5-6 metres. This threatens the health of Moolarben Creek and the Goulburn River system. In Australia, water is our most precious resource; risking a 3,000-year impact on base flows for a 10-year coal extension is a catastrophic "return on investment." Conclusion The "Patch Notes" for our planet shouldn't include "removed biodiversity" and "increased global warming." I urge the Commission to reject this extension. We must pivot toward a sustainable economy that respects First Nations heritage and protects our unique Australian wildlife. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Michelle Rice
|
ID |
10401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Hello, The Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. Remember the Black Summer? 2/3 of koala's died. Enough. Australia needs solar, not coal, not more fossil fuels, and not more trees cut down ! Sincerely, Michelle Rice Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not. ~ Theodor Seuss Geisel |
Brigid Prain
|
ID |
10406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Dear concerned parties in the NSW and Australian Government, DPHI, EPA, Minister for Regional NSW, Minister for Resources, and NSW Resources Regulator, I am writing to object to the proposed Moolarben OC3 Coal Mine Extension Project. It is my wish that this beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The project has not avoided or minimised impacts on biodiversity and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impacts to a number of entities, including the Koala, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, Regent Honeyeater, Broad-headed Snake, Squirrel Glider and Box Gum Woodland. There are vital sandstone cliffs and rocky habitat right along the edge of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which are key habitats for the bat species especially. Blasting and noise represent a major threat to those species. The department agency said there should be at least a 500m buffer from Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve to better protect those species, but the mining company refused to accept that. Biodiversity offsets are deeply flawed and simply justify habitat destruction when in fact, impacts on native vegetation must be avoided if we are to avoid further species extinctions. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The company has not done proper baseline monitoring of water, and it has a very poor history elsewhere in the mine complex, by failing badly to do ongoing water monitoring required. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. The project will destroy 55 cultural artefacts, including two shelters, one of which contains grinding grooves. The CHCP recommended protection of that site, but the mining company refused. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change, with the NSW Net Zero Commission stating clearly in their recent Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. This project should not be approved. DPHI in their assessment report has ignored a key finding of the Net Zero Commission in its Coal Mine Emissions Spotlight Report released in December - that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change Act. They do not make any reference to Finding 4, which states that “Continued extensions or expansions to coal mining in NSW are not consistent with the emissions reduction targets in the Climate Change Act or the Paris Agreement temperature goals it gives effect to”. The project will produce an estimated 64.6Mt of total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions - which is equivalent to 58% of total annual emissions from all sources in NSW. As the NZC has stated, any such emissions are not consistent with NSW climate change targets or the Paris temperature goals. The assessment report also fails to mention that the NSW Government is not on track to achieve either the 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. The proponent has also failed to apply the Court of Appeal decision in the Denman case, which found that the local environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change, including downstream greenhouse gas emissions, need to be considered by decision makers. It’s impossible for the decision maker to consider those matters for the Moolarben expansion, because there has been no attempt to quantify the full economic costs of downstream emissions to NSW and the locality, even though they make up 99% of all emissions from the project. The cumulative impacts of this proposal in terms of other current and proposed coal mines in the Mudgee region has not been assessed. This project should not be approved. Yours sincerely, Brigid Prain Kia Ora For our Earth, Brigid Mary Prain [redacted] |
Dorothée Heibel
|
ID |
10411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern I am of the opinion that it would be against all logic and terribly wrong to turn an incredibly important area for biodiversity and one of NSW’s very few remaining Koala habitats, a beautiful valley that should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, into an open cut coal mine. I therefore wholeheartedly recommend you to turn that particular project down. Sincerely yours, Dorothée Heibel |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10416 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Nature Conservation Council |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1 Total disturbance area: 673 ha at risk of clearing and mining activities .2 Coal extraction : this project will add approximately 30 Mt Rom ( run of mine) coal resulting in around 25 Mt product coal produced over the mine to Dec.2030 .3 Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113 ha of koala habitat with breeding koalas on site as well as 8 ha Regent Honeyeater habitat with breeding females recorded on site .4 Water impacts: This project could cause drawn water up to exceeding 2-6 m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought for wildlife . 6 .Economics: There is no justification for the expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the 3 Mudgee coal region for many years. Additionally the Moolarben mine is within the Central Coast West. 7 Cultural significance. Mining would damage Wirudjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites |
Alan Pursch
|
ID |
10456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2430 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Alan Pursch. I am a 72 year old retired TAFE teacher, and also worked in early childhood education education for many years, as well as in agriculture. I wish to strongly oppose Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri country, for these reasons: 1. In a climate and extinction crisis, we need to be focussed on renewables, not fossil fuels, and particularly not coal. This project is estimated to release 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases, which is totally incompatible with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, and the Paris Agreement on climate change. We have legal obligations to both of these, and currently are not on track to meet those obligations. 2. Habitat loss that will put even more pressure on threatened species, including koalas, regent honeyeaters and microbats. Biodiversity offsets cannot realistically compensate for loss of habitat that is already supporting threatened species. 3. Groundwater drawdown that will inevitably downgrade Moolarben Creek and ecosystems that depend on it, including as drought refuges. 4. Lack of public benefit and social licence in an area where renewable energy is being prioritised. For these reasons, I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Project be refused. Kind regards, Alan Pursch [redacted] |
Martin Scurrah
|
ID |
10471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Martin and I am a resident of Lake Macquarie in the Hunter Valley. My partner and I moved here three years ago from Peru where we witnessed the impact of mining operations on local communities, and it has been distressing to see similar impacts on local communities and the environment in New South Wales. In the case of Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country, I am particularly concerned about the water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown, that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife and impact the lives and livelihoods of local residents. Furthermore, mining will damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. I am also concerned about the climate impacts generated by the estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Finally, I fail to see any public benefit when there is no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. At a moment in time when we see the devastating impacts of fire in part generated by long term climate change, it seems to be illogical that he NSW Government is approving new or expanded coal projects. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge that the Independent Planning Commission recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Yours sincerely, Martin Scurrah |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2470 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Stop pushing coal ,Stop lining your pockets. Think! Don't destroy our wildlife and wilderness. For a few dollars once destroyed it will never come back.You don't have a good track record. You egotistical maniacs. |
Yvonne Lollback
|
ID |
10371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please don't let Yancoal expand their Moolarben mine. The locals don't want it and Australia doesn't need it as we should be focusing on renewables, not coal. Coal is bad in so many ways which you know. I want my grandchildren to inherit a world without coal and other destructive climate wrecking things. Thanking you in anticipation Yvonne Lollback Springwood NSW |
Rob Wildman
|
ID |
10376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2130 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Please find submission attached. -- Rob Wildman [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
Rob Wildman attachment_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 114 KB) |
Jeffrey Hamilton
|
ID |
10381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
This beautiful valley should be managed jointly as part of a whole conservation landscape with the magnificent Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, not turned into an open cut coal mine. The mine will clear 480 hectares of native vegetation and mine right up to 100m from the boundary of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. The area has significant importance for biodiversity with 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat critical to the survival of the Koala in a uniquely resilient population. The mine will destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife like the Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater, clearing endangered Box Gum Woodland. It will also lead to water drawdown of up to 5m in the alluvium of Moolarben Ck, which runs into the Goulburn River, and represents a risk to deep-rooted vegetation that uses that water. The mine will cause serious harm to cultural heritage - there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted and a further 12 that may be indirectly impacted. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site, including a record of a mother and her joey recorded by Lock the Gate with a thermal drone just over a year ago. The Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group (BCS) at NSW DCCEEW has highlighted the threat the project poses to the Koala, nothing that: • The Koala habitat present is ‘critical to the survival of the species’ and that • It is a climate-robust population which “has survived recent and historical temperature increases, drought and bushfires successfully” Further, the assessment of the project has not quantified the economic costs of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions, even though it is now effectively legally required following the Court of Appeal decision on the Mt Pleasant coal mine. It is my strong opinion that this project should not be approved. Jeffrey Hamilton [redacted] |
Joanne Stevenson
|
ID |
10391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Coal mine extension Stop this in its tracks. SAY NO Thanks Joanne Joanne Stevenson |
Yvonne Fessler
|
ID |
10396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4556 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern I would like to submit my OBJECTION to this mine extension for the following reasons. This area has incredible importance for biodiversity and there have been 23 threatened wildlife species recorded in and around the site, including habitat that is critical to the survival of the koala in a uniquely resilient population. Koalas have been recorded in and around the proposed mine site. This mine will also destroy habitat and is likely to cause serious and irreversible impact to threatened wildlife such as the Large eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat and Regent Honeyeater red Box and will also clear endangered Box Gum Woodland. This mine will also cause serious harm to cultural heritage as there are 55 Aboriginal heritage sites within the mine footprint that will be directly impacted. The mine will also harm NSW by contributing to runaway climate change. The recent Coal Mine Emmisions Spotlight Report states that any further coal mine expansions are inconsistent with achieving NSW climate targets or with a safe climate. It is apparent that before there is any extension approval of this mine that All the above factors should be taken into serious consideration. I voted for the Labor Party on the understanding that coal mine expansions Would be rejected on the grounds that climate change would be taken seriously. If this is the case, then this expansion should be rejected. Thank you for taking my comments into serious consideration and do the right thing by rejecting this expansion and preserving our wildlife for future generations and not for coal. As you will see, I currently reside in Queensland. However, I am originally from NSW and this proposed expansion is of great concern to me. Kind regards, Yvonne Fessler |
Peter Enge
|
ID |
10156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2905 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I Oppose the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Introduction I write to you as a 79-year-old resident of the ACT at this critical juncture in the climate change debate in Australia to express my comprehensive opposition to the Open Cut 3 Extension proposal at the Moolarben Coal Complex. Key Environmental Concerns and Inherent Risks Associated with the Moolarben Proposal 1. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment, given Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All the bush to be cleared is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits, and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Significant noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have serious impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally as per the warning issued by The Climate Risk Group in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry. 6.The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by worsening climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions, and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods, and day-to-day liveability. 7.The negative impact of a further expansion of the Yancoal Moolarben Mine will further exacerbate the negative consequences of the existing Mine. The impacts of the current approved mine on biodiversity, water and the community are already enormous. While the proposed expansion has been decreased in size, there is no justification to produce a further 30 million tonnes of coal within the life of the approved mine to 2038. Expanding into the southern end of the Moolarben Valley is a step too far. As mentioned already, the bushland contains critically endangered species and provides food sources for Koala, Regent Honeyeater and other native animals threatened with extinction. 8. This expansion will do nothing to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. It is a contradiction to be simultaneously expanding coal mining in the area. 9. The real costs of the Moolarben OC3 project will vastly exceed its benefits. The economic assessment of the Moolarben OC3 project heavily understates the environmental costs of the project. The costs of the project are certain to outweigh its benefits. This is no surprise, using emissions-intensive equipment to unearth millions of tonnes of carbon coupled with the even worse impact of greenhouse gas emissions caused by the combustion of the coal mined at Moolarben is the essential reason for rejecting this project. It is the last thing the world’s climate needs, and the essential reason this project should be refused. This last point is incredibly important, given the 18 coal expansions proposed in NSW and the two that have already been approved in the last year, and goes completely counter to the need to urgently curtail all coal and gas producing projects in Australia. Conclusion NSW and Australia more generally must put a complete moratorium on all new fossil fuel projects including the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, and urgently begin making a just transition to sustainable energy and the associated explosion of new jobs, technologies, and industries such a transition will bring. Already it is looking unlikely that the world will reach the 1.5-degree warming targets set by the Paris Agreement. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent planning commission I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I hold serious concerns that this project will cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. I hold grave concerns for: All the threatened species for example Koala’s and the Regent Honeyeaters plus all the other biodiversity that calls that area home for example: Native bees, Butterfly’s, beetles, Echidna’s, Emu’s, possums, Christmas beetles, snakes, Superb Lyrebirds, a wide variety of spiders, Australian jumping Ants, a large variety of birds, different varieties of Fungi, redeye cicada, Australian Cicada-killer wasps then you have to consider all the native vegetation that’s out through there like white flannel flowers being one of them, this is just a very brief list and just touches the surface to what could / is going to be impacted by this extension. The habitat loss that will be impacted by this extension is quite concerning because all the above cannot exist without habitat let alone loss of water for survival. I also hold concerns on the impact it will have on the Munghorn gap reserve which I frequently visit especially with the proposed mine coming within 100 meters of the reserve, with noise levels, blasting and vibration impact and I’m going to throw in dust levels there especially during blasting, as yes I have been held up once from blasting and witnessed first hand the dust levels, noise and vibration impact of it even when we were requested to park further up the road from the firing zone. I wanted to touch base on to then the lighting impact the mine will have on the biodiversity in that area especially during at night when they are working those areas, this disrupts the physiology, behaviour and reproduction of varies species, particularly those that are nocturnal. This new or expanding coal projects really cannot afford to be approved while we are in a climate and biodiversity crisis. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension project be refused. Thanks for reading and considering my submission Sincerely A Concerned local resident Mudgee, Wiradjuri country 2850 |
|
Attachments |
IMG_7953.pdf (PDF, 461.19 KB) |
Craig Ling
|
ID |
10171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Tasmania 7009 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Craig Ling, I am 65 years old, and I live in Hobart. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Australia, due to Global Heating and environmental degradation, including loss of biodiversity. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. I have serious concerns about: Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritized, as it should be. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Craig Ling West Moonah TAS 7009 |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) expansion submission.pdf (PDF, 57.2 KB) |
Martin Smith
|
ID |
10181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2630 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
refer attached document |
|
Attachments |
SubmitMoolarben Coal.pdf (PDF, 135.97 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2021 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
An extension of this mine serves no public purpose. Its only purpose is to enrich the mine owners and produce more coal. This coal will exacerbate climate change and we have more than enough problems with that already. |
Rebecca Reynolds
|
ID |
10191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2041 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am against the proposal on the basis of the damage it will do to our precious native flora and fauna. It will b of no benefit to the local community and will instead have a negative impact. Please do not allow the destructive proposal to go ahead |
May May
|
ID |
10201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, My name is May and I’m writing in regards to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. As a young person I am terrified for my future, the continuing rising temperatures and the ongoing extraction of our earth until nothing is left. We are already witnessing the mass die-offs of many species that make this country we are on so special - the proposed additional clearing of the woodland will only accelerate these processes further. Wildlife in Australia is a rich tapestry of many species codependent on one another - if we lose one species in an area it will mean the deaths of all others connected to it. Traditional cultures on this land understood this, honoured it, and as a result were able to live sustainably on this land for many thousands of years before the landing of the first fleet. The continual disrespect of these beliefs, beliefs which have only been further reinforced by modern science, is despicable - and continues to perpetuate the idea that native country/voice is “less-than” it’s settler counterpart. It continues to contribute to broader narratives of entitlement that have destroyed this earth, social cohesion and everything they touch. Only those who already sit atop piles of wealth continue to benefit from this continued destruction - those who also fund it. Approving new coal and gas mines is a step backward in time. To mentalities that perpetuate genocide, the ideas that only suffering come from. Approval of new coal and gas mines is a symptom of broader problems, but one that is able to be stopped. Think about the future of the land, those who live off it, and everyone connected to these ecosystems. Only those who want the earth to suffer will benefit from the approval of a new mine. Reflect on those you love and how you’d wish a future for them - why is it not the same for those who have lived on this land for centuries. I hope you take this into consideration. We are in a crisis - this will only lead us further to annihilation. Kind regards, May |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Submission.pdf (PDF, 42.47 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2096 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am not going to write a fancy submission, just say it how it is. WHAT ARE YOU DOING? Destroying vital and irreplaceable natural habitat and adding yet more carbon to the atmosphere for what? - 10 more years for a coal mine to go on producing an outdated, highly polluting fuel source. Short-term gain for the few; long-term negative consequences for Australia and the world. Currently, NSW is sandwiched between Victoria, which is on fire, and Queensland, which is drowning. Extreme weather events are the norm and not the exception now, and this will only get worse if you keep supporting coal. Reject this proposal and give us some faith in our Governments. |
Christina Smith
|
ID |
10221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Christina and I am a retired social worker in Sydney who is deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in our country and the impacts this will have both locally and globally. I am writing this submission to object to Yancoal's proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country due to my concern about the ramifications of this extension project. I am a parent and grandparent and am very concerned abut climate change and the effect of coal mines on global temperatures. I do not want our progeny to have to manage temperature rises when if we took this matter seriously and moved away from fossil fuels they would have areal opportunity of lowering the temperature. I find it hard to understand how this issue is ignored when the temperature has increased each year. The other pressing issue with the extension of the project is the disturbance of the area due to land clearing and mining activities. The clearing of land included many hectares of Koala habitat and their breeding areas and I understand that it is also part of a Regent Honeyeater habitat and breading area. It seems extraordinary that the Government would allow the destruction of such an important area for our iconic species. It is also a microbat habitatat and it should be noted that no biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is alread supporting threatened species. Over the life of the mine extension I understand that an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced. This project would also use ground water which could have and effect on the Moolarben Creek for many years. This creek is absolutely crucial for our native species during drought. There is a lack of public benefit as I can see no justification for the expansion of this mine to provide regional jobs as their are other mines in the area which have vacancies for workers. The Government is also focusing on renewables in this area and this would provide employment opportunities for people in the local area. The project is inconsisitent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government's Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. I believe also that NSW is in top 5% of States most at risk from Climate Change globally. It will also contribute to climate impacts which will be felt locally. For these reasons I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moorlarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely Christina Smith |
Don White
|
ID |
10226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Tuesday, 13 January 2026 I am Don White, living in Yengo National Park on the southern edge of the Hunter region. I have a strong and lifelong concern about the effects of Coal mining in the Hunter and across Australia. These effects include the impact of climate change when coal is burnt… wherever that may occur. I am also concerned about the effect of coal mining on the biodiversity in the area cleared, the failure to properly remediate, the effect on water tables and the social disruption coal mines cause in communities, notwithstanding the short-term benefits to a few workers in mining towns I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife • Climate impacts, with the project estimated to produce 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Prof Don White Laguna. NSW. 2325 Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Key Facts • Total disturbance area: 675 ha at risk from clearing and mining activities. • Coal extraction: this project will add approximately 30Mt ROM (run-ofmine) coal, resulting in around 25Mt product coal produced over the life of the mine to 31 December 2038. • Climate cost: Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced.1 • Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koala’s on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. • Water impacts: This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Cultural significance: Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. • Economics: There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West 1Moolarben OC3 Air Quality and GHG Addendum Report - https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=S SD- 33083358%2120240315T015232.056%20GMT Total Scope 1 = 0.49 Total Scope 2 = 0.05 Total Scope 3 = 64.06 Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. ο Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment.2 Key Points 1. No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. 2 https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef% 3DRFI- 82275709%252120250526T072111.190%2520GMT&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1765755184764608&usg= AOvVaw0eEkBlGDcHHrfzD5wCZ5fo Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. 6. The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by contributing to climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day liveability. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project .pdf (PDF, 139.32 KB) |
Alex Mateer
|
ID |
10231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2846 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for the opportunity to express my views on this proposed project. I am a resident of the area and have lived here for over 50 years. I have seen the impact of mining and how it has disrupted many of the small farming communities in the district - many of the close knit villages have been destroyed and small schools have closed down. The benefits to our community are negligible and the threats in terms of climate change are significant. Weather has become more extreme and unpredictable, and bush fires are more intense and difficult to control. The NSW government should not be approving any new coal projects or expansions. We are not on track to meet our commitment to the Paris Agreement already. Renewable energy projects are more appropriate for this area. |
Quentin Dresser
|
ID |
10236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2093 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. This goes against the advice of science which says that there should be no new coal or gas if we are to keep emissions to the agreed 1.5 degrees above the baseline. At this time, there are fires causes huge damage and suffering to people and animals especially in Victoria, because we, as a human race, have not shown the responsible attitude of taking climate change seriously. Animals in nature are being terribly impacted because we have been unwilling to follow the advice of science on the matter of climate change. We owe it to these vulnerable animals to DO BETTER. 2. This is an area of koala habitat. They must take priority over the digging up of thermal coal. 3. My final point is as mentioned above, that we owe it to the animals to prevent the terrible suffering that they are going through due to the impacts of climate change, whether fire or flood or tree felling by extreme winds. Thank you. |
Allen Shrimpton
|
ID |
10241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2420 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Fellow Earthlings, Where I live we have seen a dramatic decline in Koala numbers. 20 years ago I would see a Koala nearly every day. Now I can go a year without seeing one. Please don't destroy any Koala habitat in the proposed mining area. I am a Land Manager of the Dungog Common Recreation Reserve. The State government gave us $200,000 to encourage an increase in Koala numbers, but with the extremes in weather that the increase in greenhouse gases is causing, is making it harder for our programs to have a positive effect. We are so fortunate to live on planet that is the right distance from the Sun for liquid water to exist. Also, Jupiter protects us from most major comets and meteors. Look at the 400+° on the surface of Venus. (Please see attached file). I am 78 years old. My main concern is for my grandchildren to have a healthy planet to live on. As philosopher Albert Camus said, " Why not choose the be the most Loving and Happy person that you can be." Indigenous people have prioritised the health of country. We seem fixated on prioritising greed above all else. Please don't approve the Moolarben OC3 expansion. Prioritise the health of the planet and it's inhabitants. Regards Allen Shrimpton |
|
Attachments |
Screenshot_20251220_160651_Quora.pdf (PDF, 305.69 KB) |
Chris Ross
|
ID |
10246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2508 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is Chris Ross and I have the following concerns about this proposal: No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Given: a) that NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets; b) that NSW ishighly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; c) that approval of Moolarben is not in the public interest and not aligned with Paris Agreement goals or the principles of the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023, the project should be rejected. 6. The expansion will harm the local community in the Mid-Western region by contributing to climate impacts felt locally. The Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day liveability. In addition, there is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. It makes no sense to destroy the environment and impact local peoples for a proposal which is likely to struggle to be profitable within a few years and likely will come cap in hand for subsidies to keep what jobs are still there. |
Richard Holz
|
ID |
10251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Richard and I am a retiree living in the Central Tablelands of NSW. I am very concerned about the continued expansion of coal mining in our state that is contributing to climate impacts such as extreme weather. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Richard Holz Wiagdon NSW 2795 13 January 2026 |
Helen Evans
|
ID |
10266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2350 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The area proposed includes 113 hectares of critical habitat for koala. Koalas are already impacted by climate change droughts and fires and by land cleared for agriculture and housing. Mining must be reduced not expanded, because renewable energy is cheaper and less harmful to the environment. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The NSW Government is not on track to meet its 2030 or 2035 emissions reduction targets. I'm deeply concerned that this coal extension will further damage our climate and environment, contributing to feedback loops and biodiversity loss. |
CD ROBERTSON
|
ID |
10286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2115 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I speak as an individual resident of NSW. I wish express my objection to the proposed extension to the Moolarben Coal Complex. Whilst I question the necessity of expanding a fossil fuel product in a country that is already experiencing dramatic changes in weather, my immediate concern is the impact, of said expansion, in the strongest terms. Biodiversity is a popular word, these days, but that should not lessen the importance of the issue. Biodiversity is our best means by which to gauge the health of our environment. The loss of Koala habit is the most obvious negative, and one to which Australians would have the strongest response. Certainly, it is the most recognisable on the world stage. However, it is only one of many of our unique fauna that is at risk. The Broad-headed Snake, Large-eared Pied Bat, Eastern Cave Bat, and Swift Parrot are all indigenous to the Blue Gum Woodland that would be destroyed in the planned Mine Extension. Biodiversity is more than cute animals and tall trees. They provide an inter-related eco-system that also impact the broader areas of NSW. PLEASE, find the expansion proposal unacceptable in all regards. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please do bot deatroy last place where healthy koala and wombats pipulations survived |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is [name redacted], I am a 23 year old healthcare student on the NSW south coast with close family in Western Sydney and I am writing to express my concerns about the expansion of coal mining in our states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area. Extreme heatwaves and erratic weather events continue to threaten the wellbeing of my family and destruction of Wiradjuri cultural sites is deeply upsetting and inappropriate. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, [redacted] |
Andrena Gorman
|
ID |
10361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Submission To whom it may concern Please consider my opposition to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension. 1.No amount of biodiversity offsets can replace the existing environment. Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of woodland. All of the bush they will clear is koala habitat and koalas are recorded on site, including in the middle of one of the proposed pits and breeding is occurring in the area. 2. The nature and biodiversity impacts of the proposed expansion are unacceptable. The expansion is likely to result in serious and irreversible impacts (SAII) on threatened fauna and ecological communities, including Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, Microbats (eastern cave and large-eared pied bats), and White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland (loss of 493.12 Ha). 3. Noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (MGNR) were poorly assessed and not included in the modelling report. 4. The expansion will have impacts on local water sources, and groundwater. 5. The NSW government cannot afford to approve any new coal mines and expansions. This project is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets. NSW in top 5% of states most at risk from climate change globally: The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. Regards Andrena Gorman |
Chris Hughes
|
ID |
10366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
|
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
|
|
Submission |
To: The Independent Planning Committee As one of the many hard working and conscientious family members who have served the governments and businesses of this country, plus monitored and assisted in the maintenance and protection of our biodiversity and wildlife, I am deeply concerned regarding some decisions being made about our future. Considering the suffering and destruction caused by climate havoc and pollution, I must object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coalmine expansion being approved. Like many around me, I am aware that an approval would mean: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares where koala breeding, Regent Honeyeater and microbat locales have already been recorded. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat where threatened species have already been recorded and these areas are non-negotiable. • Unacceptable climate impacts with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of greenhouse gases at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets and our population and biodiversity is at risk. • Lack of public benefit with no clear jobs justification in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised to ultimately relieve financial and lifestyle stress. For such reasons, and for the good of our future generations over short term goals, I ask that this extension project be refused. Thank you for your consideration. Yours sincerely, Chris Hughes |
Sylvia Cooper
|
ID |
9946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4152 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the coal mine expansion because burning coal contributes to the pollution and heating up of our planet which is already causing climate disasters all around the world. Solar energy is cheaper, cleaner and healthier for the planet. This is where long term investment should go. Why is the government even considering digging up more fossil fuel when it has promised to stop doing so? |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
9951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I object to the proposed development and my reasons are stated in the attached documents. Sincerely, [name redacted] |
|
Attachments |
Stop Moolarben_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 155.7 KB) JB says Stop Moolarben_Redacted_0.pdf (PDF, 32.75 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
9956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2454 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to you to strongly object to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. This expansion would have grave and irreversible impacts on the climate, biodiversity, water systems, cultural heritage and local communities. It should not be approved. 1. Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The expansion will lock in the production of tens of millions of tonnes of additional coal, with lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide. This is directly at odds with Australia’s obligations and global climate goals to reduce emissions and limit warming. Continuing to expand coal extraction while the climate crisis intensifies is inconsistent with both national and international commitments to mitigate climate change. Allowing this expansion would send the wrong signal at a time when the world must phase out fossil fuels, not entrench further dependence on them. 2. Threats to Water Resources and River Health The Moolarben Coal Complex extension will have significant impacts on groundwater and surface water systems that feed the Goulburn River and its tributaries. Independent assessments indicate: Groundwater drawdown and altered hydrology could significantly reduce baseflows to creeks and rivers, threatening water availability and ecosystem health. Water dependencies for mining operations reduce flows critical for riverine ecosystems and downstream users. Licenced water discharges and increased salt loads into waterways will degrade water quality and contribute to ecological stress. The cumulative loss of water quantity and quality will undermine the natural functioning of these river systems, potentially for decades. 3. Loss of Biodiversity and Threatened Species Habitat The proposed extension will clear large areas of native vegetation, including habitat essential to critically endangered ecological communities such as Box-Gum Woodland. It threatens numerous threatened species including koalas, Regent Honeyeaters, bats and other native fauna. Independent environmental groups have warned that these habitats are irreplaceable and that offsets cannot adequately compensate for their loss. Furthermore, the mine’s proximity to Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, a crucial refuge for native wildlife, greatly increases the risk of significant habitat fragmentation, noise disturbance, and species displacement. 4. Cultural Heritage and First Nations Impacts The project area overlaps with a significant number of identified First Nations cultural heritage sites, including shelters, artefacts and culturally important landscapes. Once destroyed, these sites and their cultural values cannot be replaced or compensated. The extension thus represents a permanent and unjustifiable loss of heritage for the Traditional Owners and broader community. 5. Agricultural and Community Impacts The expansion will reduce productive agricultural land, particularly prime farmland that could otherwise contribute to local food security and sustainable land use. Additionally, there is no convincing evidence that the expansion will yield long-term regional benefits or sustainable employment given broader energy transitions underway. 6. Lack of Robust and Independent Assessment Concerns remain about the adequacy of baseline data, particularly regarding groundwater and long-term ecological impacts. Without rigorous independent review and robust modelling, the true environmental and social costs cannot be fully understood and mitigated. Conclusion For all the reasons outlined above; climate impacts, water resource degradation, loss of habitat and biodiversity, destruction of irreplaceable cultural heritage, and the negative social and economic consequences, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse approval for the Moolarben OC3 extension. We cannot justify expanding coal mining in the midst of a climate emergency and at the expense of ecological, cultural and community values that underpin regional and national wellbeing. |
Felicity Davis
|
ID |
9961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2104 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Good Day, I am totally amazed that any body in this day and age is still trying to open a COAL MINE! We know that this is an absolute bad thing to do. We know that from the Scientists that we must not be burning Fossil Fuels. This forms a coating of CO2 around the earth of which allows the heat from the sun to penetrate through to Earth, but it does not let the heat back out into the stratosphere. So the Earth is getting hotter and hotter. This is why it is called a "Greenhouse" effect. Green houses, in case you do not know, are made of glass which has the same effect, thus causing the Green house to heat up, which is what gardeners want. WE DO NOT WANT TO HEAT UP THE EARTH AS IT WILL CAUSE AND, IS CAUSING, WHAT WE CALL "CLIMATE CHANGE" OR "CLIMATE CHAOS". WE ARE EXPERINCING THIS NOW. This is why we are getting hotter and hotter. This causes the trees on earth to burn and changes the way our weather behaves. We get huge floods and huge high temperature's which cause devastating fires which kill people. We know this and yet you still want to open more coal mines! This is knowingly killing people. This is criminal behavior. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
9966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi I don't want this to go ahead because of what will be destroyed animals native trees can not be replaced enough is enough, have lived with the same thing for years and they never stop greedy coal, people need a place to live and a healthy place to live not just for greed |
Jane Morgan
|
ID |
9971 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Doctors for the Environment Australia |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission of objection to the Moorlaben Coal complex extension as a GP and long standing member of Doctors for the Environment, Australia but also as a parent of three adult children. The health risks of climate change are indisputable.Fossils fuels -coal,oil and gas- are a health hazard and there is very clear and abundant evidence for this statement. The issues caused by fossil fuel use are vast and increasingly urgent. Firstly are the ongoing effects of fossil fuel extraction and burning increasing atmospheric CO2 causing worsening climate change and all that that entails. Increasingly frequent and devastating climate events are the most obvious at present in Australia with 300 homes lost in Victoria this last week from bushfires and south-west Qld inundated with water, hundreds of homes damaged or contents lost and 300,000 head of livestock drowned as well as uncounted wildlife loss further hastening the loss of global biodiversity that humans rely on for survival. Climate events and global heat are causing increasing food and water insecurity and issues related to supply chains for delivery of services. Further and more local effects of fossil fuel consumption are smoke pollution,spread of infectious diseases ,exacerbation of mental illness and exacerbation of chronic diseases from pollution and heat including cardiovascular disease,asthma,diabetes and chronic respiratory illnesses. Bushfire smoke and coal fired pollution impacts on the unborn causing an increased rate of premature delivery and smaller birthweight. The personal and financial costs are immeasurable plus the impact on insurance rates adding to cost of living pressures. Australia and the rest of the world have no capacity for any extension of fossil fuel projects .To allow these to go ahead is nothing short of negligence on behalf of our decision makers . |
|
Attachments |
Fossil_Fuels_Health_-2_compressed.pdf (PDF, 5.16 MB) |
Kym Kilpatrick
|
ID |
9976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2430 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to express my absolute opposition to the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I am one of the many Australians who care deeply about the natural environment and Australia's unique biodiversity. I am also a volunteer fire-fighter of 10 years experience. This project, which if given permission to go ahead, will take critically important ground water from Moolarben Creek, which is a vitally important drought and bushfire refuge for wildlife, including koala, Regent Honeyeater and several other species. It has the potential to clear 113 hectares of koala habitat and 80 hectares of Regent Honeyeater. The proposed mine also comes within close proximity of the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, which will inevitably be impacted by noise pollution, and blasting vibrations. The impact on biodiversity, including threatened and endangered species is unacceptable. It will add, over its proposed lifetime, 64 million tonnes of Green House Gas emissions. As we watch Victoria burn with all the tragic toll, and Queensland flood, both events exacerbated by Climate Change, this is a criminal cost. At a time when our governments are rightfully focussing on renewable energy, the approval of this mine extension is a clear hypocrisy and an obvious conflict with our commitments under the Paris Agreement, which is of more importance than ever. |
Douglas Williamson
|
ID |
10011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a professional Environmental Scientist, specialising in Biodiversity and Climate Change. As a frequent surveyor of biodiversity based out of Gulgong, I object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Proposal for the following reasons: • Climate cost: Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced.1 This is clearly inconsistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement and NSW Government’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. NSW is not on track to meet GHG targets: on 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatements as currently tracking; NSW Government projects that NSW will only achieve a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 LEGISLATED targets. • Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koala’s on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. • Water impacts: This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. • Cultural significance: Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. Ref: 1 Moolarben OC3 Air Quality and GHG Addendum Report - https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=S SD-33083358%2120240315T015232.056%20GMT |
Rishab Nandagopal
|
ID |
10016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2125 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Rishab and I'm writing from Dharug Country to express my strong objection to the Moolarben OC3 Expansion proposal. As an assistant manager at a local cat shelter, I'm passionate about protecting animals and their habitats. My work with the shelter has given me a deeper understanding of the importance of preserving biodiversity and ecosystems, and I'm compelled to speak out against projects that threaten the very fabric of our natural world. The potential harm to native wildlife, particularly the koala population, is unacceptable. The proposed clearing of 113 ha of woodland, which is known koala habitat, is a significant concern. Koalas are not just a threatened species, but they're also a symbol of Australia's unique biodiversity. The expansion's impact goes beyond just koalas. It's likely to cause serious and irreversible harm to other threatened fauna, including the Regent Honey-eater, Broad-headed Snake, and Microbats. The loss of 493.12 Ha of White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Box Woodland and Derived Native Grassland is equally alarming. What's more, the project's assessment of noise and blasting impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve is inadequate. The potential disruption to this ecosystem could have long-lasting effects. The expansion also poses risks to local water sources and groundwater, which could affect not just the environment but also the local community. In light of these concerns, I urge the Commission to reject the Moolarben OC3 Expansion proposal. It's crucial that we prioritize the protection of our native wildlife and ecosystems. Some key points to consider: - No biodiversity offset can replace the existing environment. - The project is inconsistent with NSW's climate change goals and targets. - The local community will bear the brunt of the climate impacts. I hope you'll consider my objection and the concerns raised by others. It's time to put the environment and our unique wildlife first. Sincerely, Rishab Nandagopal |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 66-year-old retiree, mother of two adult sons, a keen bushwalker and a regular visitor to rural and regional NSW National Parks and reserves. Last year I visited the village of Wollar, near Mudgee, with a group of around 70 people, including local farmers and their families, the Mudgee District Environment Group and people from the Hunter and Sydney regions. I wanted to see the impact the expansion of coal mining has had on Mudgee, its surrounding villages, and the local natural bushland such as the Drip Gorge, located in the Goulburn River State Conservation Area 50 km north of Mudgee. I was shocked and dismayed by what I saw in Wollar with the takeover and decimation of the village by Peabody Energy. Enormous mines lined the roads for kilometres nearby, clearly, no amount of water will ever be enough to dampen the resulting dust or to keep the air safe for residents. The blasts and land clearing a threat to rare wildlife species and their habitat. Hard enough for locals who live there but a lot of city dwellers would be horrified to know that the NSW government is proposing to allow mine expansions such as that of Moolarben in a climate and biodiversity crisis, especially as this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in Mudgee area, and strongly object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 near Mudgee. This project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: 1. The impact on our climate. As I write, we are experiencing severe fires and floods in two Australian states. The scientific consensus is that the burning of coal is contributing to more frequent and extreme climate disasters. I want a safe climate for my sons, and future generations and expansions such as this put their futures at risk. For example this expansion would cause 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. 2. Impacts on the Munghorn Nature Reserve which is only 100 metres away from the proposed expansion. 3. The clearing of 113 hectares of Koala habitat. As well clearing of Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. 4. Water and groundwater risks that could harm Moorlaben Creek and groundwater dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. Thank you for considering my submission [name redacted] Sydney. |
Jorj Lowrey
|
ID |
10031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, There are many reasons I object to this proposal but I guess the overarching one is Climate Change. If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. Our South Coast village of Manyana narrowly made it through the Black Summer. My brother in Victoria lost everything in the Black Saturday bushfires. And right now, I am with my parents in NE Victoria where we have been surrounded in the last few days by bushfires. Close friends have been directly affected. The science has been in for years. We need to listen to it and leave fossil fuels in the ground. Please deny this proposal. Sincerely, Jorj Lowrey Manyana |
david platt
|
ID |
10036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As I stated in previous submission re extensions to coal mines in the Mudgee, Ulan and Wollar areas of NSW. Enough is enough. I object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I was under the understanding, that on a national and global level, we are transitioning away from coal for environmental reasons. If we keep on approving extensions to coal mines, there will be no incentive to research and implement renewable forms of power to replace thermal and coking coal. I recently returned home from a trip to Hill End via Mudgee , Ulan, and the Hunter Valley. Once North of Mudgee heading toward Ulan, there was a brown/black haze on the horizon. I can't help that think that this haze was dust pollution from the coal mines in this area. These areas are part of our food bowl. Coal dust pollution falling on crops, into our water supplies, being ingested by livestock, is not what produces healthy food. 'If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters.' (ref Nature Conservation Council) The State and Federal governments need to stop relying on coal for income. And not be fearful of taxing the big end of town appropriately. These multinational companies are making a fortune from Australia's finite recourses. Exporting coal is only shifting the pollution elsewhere. But it is still contributing to Global warming which affects us all. We need to shift away from coal. Not only for Australia's sake, but for the rest of the world. If we continue down the coal road, we will be all burnt to a crisp before the coal runs out. Regards ,David Platt. |
Kathy Sheehan
|
ID |
10041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2450 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear NSW Independent Planning Commission, My name is Kathy Sheehan. I am writing to urge you to reject the application by Yancoal to expand the Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3) near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. It is possible that I am a descendant of the Wiradjuri people, and regardless of my ancestry, I hold deep respect for the cultural heritage and connection to Country that this proposed expansion threatens. Extending the Moolarben mine would lock in decades of additional climate pollution and cause serious harm to threatened species, local water sources, and cultural heritage. At a time when the impacts of climate change are already being felt across Australia through worsening droughts, floods, and extreme heat, approving a major expansion of a thermal coal mine is inconsistent with the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Coal contains carbon that has been stored underground for millions of years. Extracting and burning it releases large quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, further destabilising the climate system. This expansion would therefore contribute to worsening climate change, with long-term consequences for ecosystems, communities, and future generations. It is time for companies seeking to make profits to do so in ways that respect people, nature, and the limits of the natural environment. Rather than expanding coal extraction, Yancoal could invest in genuinely sustainable energy solutions that support both employment and environmental responsibility. As a concerned Australian citizen, I respectfully ask the Commission to say “No” to the Moolarben OC3 expansion. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Kathy SHEEHAN |
|
Attachments |
Yancoal Objection 12th January 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 37.54 KB) |
Ruth O'Reilly
|
ID |
10046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
When considering the assessment report please note that if approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares of koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would also add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution. Koala populations are already in decline and destruction of their habitat would only exacerbate their recovery. The future of our energy production is heading towards renewable energy, thus making coal based electricity obsolete in the long term, while long term devastation of our unique natural environment and native species is at risk. Please protect our environment with its unique species. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2540 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country. I am retired and now a keen bushwalker and birdwatcher with real concerns for the future of our planet and humanity. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2068 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a town planner with many years previously working for NPWS reviewing applications like this mine expansion. As I understand it, “If approved, the Moolarben OC3 expansion would clear 113 hectares” of threatened species habitat including “koala habitat, where breeding has been recorded, destroy Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat, and bring mining within 100 metres of Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve. It would add an estimated 64 million tonnes of climate pollution — at a time when NSW is already failing to meet its legislated climate targets, and communities here in NSW and across the world are facing climate-fuelled disasters. “ (NCCNSW) I oppose the proposal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2611 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Uploaded file objecting to expansion |
|
Attachments |
Mine expansion_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 63.43 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
NSW Independent Planning Commission OBJECTION TO MOOLARBEN OC3 COAL EXTENSION PROJECT Hello, my name is [name redacted]. I am a 76 year old retiree and I am writing to say how much this proposed coal expansion distresses me. In a time when horrendous bushfires are happening across our country and wildlife is being decimated in the millions, the thought that you are willing to destroy hundreds of hectares of koala and wildlife breeding/survival habitat for the sake of one company’s profits is totally beyond belief. The fact that this expansion will pollute and destroy habitats immediately affected by it and that pollution will travel down affected waterways or that the projected drawdown of the water table will leave wildlife without a source of water is also unthinkable. The application to expand should be refused because it is environmentally damaging, polluting and destroying of valuable wildlife habitat All of that in itself should be enough to refuse this application. Also, the fact that most of the coal extracted will end up overseas without any clear benefit for Australia or Australians - only a profit benefit for the company involved - should ring alarm bells for this proposal. China in the years to come is more than likely to use our resources against us, either in the form of a direct invasion as it seeks to expand it’s territory and political aspirations or in a monetary take-over. Either way, this is not in Australia’s best interests and on those grounds alone, warrants refusal. For these reasons I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS PROPOSAL TO PROCEED |
Megan James
|
ID |
10081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I object to the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project on the following grounds: - Area of disturbance: 675 ha at risk from clearing and mining activities - Coal extraction: this project will add approximately 30Mt ROM (run-of-mine) coal, resulting in around 25Mt product coal produced over the life of the mine to 31 December 2038. - Climate cost: Over the life of the OC3 mine extension an additional 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced - Native species impact: Yancoal is proposing to clear 113ha of Koala habitat with breeding Koala’s on site, as well as 80ha of Regent Honeyeater habitat, also with breeding females recorded on site. - Water impacts: This project could cause groundwater drawdown up to and exceeding 2–6m for up to 25 years post mining. This puts Moolarben Creek at risk, a vital drought refuge for wildlife. - Cultural significance: Mining would damage Wiradjuri cultural landscapes, including sacred sites. - Economics: There is no justification for this expansion to provide regional jobs. There have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Additionally, The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially - the economic argument could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in the May 2025 Resource Assessment. I call on the NSW Independent Planning Commission to disallow any further expansion to the Moolarben coal mine. Yours in hope, Megan James |
Allan Medway
|
ID |
10086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2021 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is yesterday’s energy. This mine has no reason to extend since the extension will only produce more coal which we don’t need. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Independent Planning Commission, I am a 20 year old student living on Garigal Land in so-called ‘Sydney’. I am strongly opposed to expanding coal mining in Moolarben due to the far-reaching effects that it has on various aspects of our world. It has been calculated that 64 million tonnes of GHG emissions will be produced if the extension goes ahead, which would have a significant impact on the climate. The stability of the koala population will be threatened by Yancoal's proposal to 113ha of koala habitat, considering there are breeding koalas in the area. This would diminish koala numbers significantly. The extension also threatens the longevity of the regent honeyeater which also has breeding females in the area, with 80ha of their habitat at risk of being cleared and displacing them. Moolarben Creek is also being put into risk by the extension as a refuge for wildlife crucial during droughts. The extension would have levels of groundwater drawdown approximately at or above 2-6m for up to 25 years after mining begins. Furthermore, the economic rationale is invalid for the expansion providing regional jobs. Regional jobs would be able to be fulfilled at the three Mudgee coal mines, which have had vacancies for many years. Additionally, the Moolarben coal mine is within the catchment of the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone which has been dedicated to rolling out renewable energy and providing jobs in the industry. The expansion would further harm the local climate change effects in the Mid-Western Region. Finally, it is not in line with the NSW Government's climate goals to approve any new coal mines or expansions. The Climate Risk Group states that NSW is in the top 5% of states most vulnerable to climate change in the world. Expansions or new coal mines are directly contrary to the Paris Agreement and the Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023. Thus, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to please reject the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine as it has no value to our community and the environment and will have devastating consequences to all parts of our society. |
David Bray
|
ID |
10096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where breeding koalas have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting threatened species. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions at a time when NSW is not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis. This proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. For these reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, David Bray Bulga Forest, NSW, 2429 |
Sylvie Constantine
|
ID |
10101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Victoria 3201 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, My name is Sylvie, I am a homeowner working full-time in service delivery for decades on an average wage. I put solar panels on my roof 15 years ago; swapped my old gas water heater for an energy-efficient air-to-heat pump (electric-boosted) last year; and just had a solar battery installed last month. I am now planning to swap my 2006 car for an EV in the next few months. I am embracing the transition to renewable energy because I care about the environment. As such, I am deeply concerned about the expansion of coal mining in all Australian states, due to the climate impacts being felt in my area and around our whole country: frequent heatwaves, catastrophic bushfires, cyclones & floods. I am writing to object to Yancoal’s proposed Moolarben OC3 coal mine expansion near Mudgee on Wiradjuri Country in NSW. I am concerned that this project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the environment, climate and community, and should not be approved. In particular, I am concerned about: • Threatened species and habitat loss, including the clearing of over 113 hectares of koala habitat where koalas and breeding have been recorded, as well as Regent Honeyeater and microbat habitat. No biodiversity offsets can replace habitat that is already supporting these species at risk of extinction. • Impacts on Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve, with mining proposed within 100 metres of the reserve and inadequate assessment of noise, blasting and vibration impacts. • Water and groundwater risks, including long-term groundwater drawdown that could harm Moolarben Creek and groundwater-dependent ecosystems that are critical drought refuges for wildlife. • Climate impacts, with the project producing an estimated 64 million tonnes of additional greenhouse gas emissions, at a time when NSW is already not on track to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets. (On 23 April 2024, the NSW Minister for Climate Change advised that NSW is not on track to meet legislated climate targets for 2030 and 2035. With abatement “as currently tracking”, the NSW government projects that NSW will achieve only a 44% reduction by 2030 and 65% by 2035. This is well short of both the 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035 legislated targets.) In addition, NSW is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The Climate Risk Group - in their submission to the NSW Parliament’s Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Bill 2023 inquiry - warned that NSW is in the top 5% of states most at risk from extreme weather and climate change globally. And the Moolarben OC3 expansion would worsen climate change impacts already being experienced by the local community. In the Mid-Western Region, climate change is intensifying heatwaves, prolonging drought conditions and increasing the risk of extreme weather events, all of which affect community health, water availability, agricultural livelihoods and day-to-day liveability. • Lack of public benefit, with no clear jobs justification for expanding coal mining when there have been vacancies at the three Mudgee region coal mines for many years. Also, Yancoal has indicated that 65% of coal from Moolarben will go to China, 10% to South Korea, 10% to Taiwan, 5% to Thailand, 5% to Japan, and 5% to Others. Yet, given the slow forecasted decline of Australian thermal coal demand from China and South Korea especially, the revenue could be even weaker than Yancoal has outlined in their May 2025 Resource Assessment. Therefore, this project's economic forecast is not likely to stack up. The NSW Government cannot afford to approve new or expanded coal projects during a climate and biodiversity crisis; especially in a region where renewable energy development is being prioritised. The Moolarben Mine is within the Central West Orana Renewable Energy Zone where the NSW Government is focusing on fast-tracking renewable energy and providing jobs in this industry. Finally, this proposal is inconsistent with the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 and the goals of the Paris Agreement. Accordingly, for all of the above reasons, I urge the Independent Planning Commission to recommend that the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project be refused. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, Sylvie Constantine |
Michael Streatfeild
|
ID |
10106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2171 |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 68 year old retired NSW Police office, father of four and grandfather of four. I am concerned at the accelerating impact of climate change on our country and planet for my family. We appear to be sleep walking into a future where extreme weather events are occurring every week in some part of Australia, let alone the rest of the world. Last Saturday 11 January, 2026 we experienced a 42 degree heat wave in Sydney! Bushfires across Victoria and flooding rains in northern Queensland. I am witnessing the massive costs to protect people from disasters, mitigate the impacts, reconstruct homes, reconstruct infrastructure and agriculture as well as the impact on people's health and quality of life. The science is clear, the most cost effective, direct and quickest way to slow climate change is to stop the expansion of mining and burning fossil fuels. I cannot believe that in the light of these disasters the NSW Government is considering approving the expansion of the Moolarben thermal Coal Mine near Mudgee. Not only is this a threat to the well being and future of NSW residents but the human race across the globe as no matter where it is burnt it is released into the same atmosphere. Our government's are elected to serve and protect the people of NSW, not to line the pockets of mining corporations, their shareholders or the Labor Party donors. In addition, there is the threat to our local environment, water sources, cultural heritage, plant and animal diversity. These natural resources are a source of wealth for our state from tourism, food production and the health benefits to our population that is always overlooked by the mining lobby. I vehemently oppose the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to oppose the expansion of Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3). I am a 24 year old sales assistant located in Western Sydney, having just faced a particularly nasty heatwave that was worsened by industries like coal mining. These weather events are only going to continue to worsen due to the insistence on expanding projects that everyone and their mothers know is terrible for the land, ecosystems, and our quality of life. I firmly believe that this project will cause needless damage to neighbouring communities and endangered wildlife, and the effects will travel to the bigger cities as well. I fail to see how there are any benefits to this expansion that would justify the irreparable harm it would cause. “Expanding job opportunities” is not a viable benefit when the local area is already focussing on renewable energy anyway. What use is a coal mine expansion in an era where we are meant to push for net zero carbon emissions? New South Wales is already falling behind in meeting emission reduction targets; approving this expansion will set us back further and make us the laughing stock of Australia - quite possibly the world as we would fail to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. This proposal would be a violation of the NSW Climate Change (Net Zero Future) Act 2023 due to: - the risk it poses to neighbouring nature reserves with thoughtless assessments of noise pollution and vibrational disruptions - millions upon millions of tonnes of greenhouse gasses being emitted in the midst of record breaking climate and weather events - the destruction of refuges for endangered wildlife during times of drought. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to refuse the Moolarben OC3 Coal Mining Extension Project. This plan is backwards, needlessly harmful, and has no benefit other than lining the pockets of already rich folks at the expense of the rest of us. Thank you for your time and consideration. From a concerned citizen in Western Sydney. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Object |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am [redacted], a 17 year old high school student from Western Sydney and I am worried by the growth of coal mining. As I'm sure you're aware, we have experienced worsening climate conditions, the most recent being the heat wave that passed through NSW as I am sat here writing this. I am writing to object to the Moorlarben OC3 expansion. The project will harm the environment, climate, and the people, not only in Mudgee, but in the wider world. The expansion will destroy 675 hectares of native animal habitat including 113 hectares of koala habitat. The project would impact groundwater for up to 25 years post mining in an ongoing global water crisis, this would also impact Moorlarben Creek which is vital for wildlife. The mine would destroy Wiradjuri cultural landscapes and sacred sites, continuing the violence towards First Nations people that has been happening since colonisation. The expansion of the mine will not boost jobs as there are multiple vacancies in mining and energy industries in the Mudgee region. The expansion directly opposes the goals set in the Paris Agreement and the Climate Change Act of 2023. This would severely impact NSW, which is in the top 5% of states most at risk from climate change in the world. Because of this I encourage the Independent Planning Commission to recommend the refusal of the Moorlarben OC3 expansion project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
| ID | Name | Date | Submission |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24351 | Name Redacted | 18/02/2026 | |
| 24356 | Name Redacted | 18/02/2026 | |
| 24361 | Rylan Kennedy | 18/02/2026 | |
| 24376 | Kieren Norris | 18/02/2026 | |
| 24381 | Name Redacted | 18/02/2026 | |
| 22161 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22256 | Craig Morris | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22266 | Jesse Ryba | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22276 | William Forster | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22281 | Scarlett Rhodes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22301 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22311 | Max Rhodes | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22321 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22336 | Daniel Alexander | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22351 | Brad Noble | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22506 | Pascal Savary | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22526 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22531 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22546 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22621 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22631 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22651 | maria lepessiots | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22681 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22686 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22696 | Dale Meuret | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22706 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22776 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22781 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22851 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22856 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22891 | Matthew Hibberd | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22936 | Lucy Stuart | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22981 | Blake Hjorth | 17/02/2026 | |
| 22991 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23136 | Ian Lewis | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23256 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23316 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23366 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23386 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23406 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23426 | Stephen Galilee | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23466 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23491 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23551 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23576 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23591 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23636 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23696 | Scott Taylor | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23701 | Lisa Cottee | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23721 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23756 | Jamie Taylor | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23781 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23811 | Phillip Morley | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23866 | Abbivathana Deva | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23886 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 23891 | Katie Goldthorpe | 17/02/2026 | |
| 24016 | Name Redacted | 17/02/2026 | |
| 20226 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20251 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20296 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20341 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20361 | Matthew Gerber | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20371 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20416 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20436 | Beau Lea | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20486 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20496 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20501 | Dayne Fialkowski | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20506 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20511 | TODD THURKETTLE | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20516 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20521 | Mark K | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20526 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20546 | Annie Reding | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20556 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20561 | Noah Thurkettle | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20576 | zara Thurkettle | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20601 | Kylie Aarons | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20731 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20751 | Peter Wolfgang | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20771 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20891 | Aaron Murrell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 20906 | Cameron Skewes | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21006 | Tod Morley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21081 | Robbie MacLean | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21181 | Ben Lewis | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21246 | Brendan Tobin | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21271 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21311 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21351 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21406 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21446 | Kelton McDonnell | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21481 | Martin Burns | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21486 | Pat Hudson | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21491 | Scott Redfern | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21496 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21541 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21551 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21606 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21616 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21626 | Annette Everingham | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21641 | Justin Punales | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21646 | Dale Lomas | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21656 | Joelene Tabone | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21676 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21701 | George Ling | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21741 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21801 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21811 | Kandice Edmunds | 16/02/2026 | |
| 21866 | Rowen Lindley | 16/02/2026 | |
| 22036 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 19976 | Sam Bullock | 15/02/2026 | |
| 19981 | Kurt Nightingale | 15/02/2026 | |
| 19986 | Oleksandr Taylor | 15/02/2026 | |
| 19991 | douglas stephenson | 15/02/2026 | |
| 19996 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20051 | Shannon Sunderland | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20156 | Glenn Kurtz | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20181 | Ian Sanford | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20196 | Nick Bligh | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20201 | Name Redacted | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20206 | Nathan Brown | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20211 | Philip Searle | 15/02/2026 | |
| 20216 | Amanda Searle | 15/02/2026 | |
| 19841 | Brent Giarratano | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19846 | Lilly Lonsdale | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19851 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19861 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19866 | Paul Willis | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19871 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19886 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19891 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19901 | Gregory Brown | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19906 | Bruce Birchall | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19921 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19936 | Name Redacted | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19941 | James Field | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19951 | Steven Dollisson | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19966 | Cyrus Bakes | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19971 | Scott Redfern | 14/02/2026 | |
| 19556 | April Smith | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19561 | Graeme Draper | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19601 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19611 | Nathan Bowerman | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19616 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19626 | Wes Pirie | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19631 | Nicholas Belton | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19641 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19651 | Tony Hayes | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19666 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19681 | Michael Anthony | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19696 | Sam Turnbull | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19701 | elliot baume | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19716 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19721 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19736 | Deborah O'Brien | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19741 | Christopher Smith | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19746 | Deborah O'Brien | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19751 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19756 | Timothy Oliphant | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19761 | Anthony Banton | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19771 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19786 | Jonathan Marchant | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19791 | Adam Croake | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19811 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19816 | Glen O’Brien | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19821 | Name Redacted | 13/02/2026 | |
| 19006 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19016 | Nick Peninton | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19111 | Bruce Coulter | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19121 | Gerald Tinney | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19126 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19141 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19151 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19156 | Stacey Chen | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19181 | Lee Adam | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19236 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19246 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19251 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19291 | Name Redacted | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19296 | Seb Hewitt | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19301 | George WARE | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19311 | Jake Watson | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19321 | Ronald Minchin | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19336 | Andrew Forbes | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19361 | Luke McKinley | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19386 | Amanda Chetcuti | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19396 | Chris McDonnell | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19506 | Ashley Leonard | 12/02/2026 | |
| 19511 | Elizabeth Hamilton | 12/02/2026 | |
| 18756 | Sean Fitzsimmons | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18761 | Darrin Smith | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18771 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18776 | Grace Mawby Loebel | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18786 | Michael Butt | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18791 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18801 | Adam Perini | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18806 | Chris Brazel | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18866 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18926 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18931 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18936 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18956 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18961 | Nicole Gjessing | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18971 | Justin Turner | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18981 | Andrew Boydell | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18991 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 19001 | Name Redacted | 11/02/2026 | |
| 18161 | Andrew Fotheringham | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18176 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18181 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18186 | Molly Boyd | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18191 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18196 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18201 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18206 | Brooke Thompson | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18211 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18216 | Joshua Harriman | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18221 | James Young | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18226 | Andrew Mcguirk | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18241 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18261 | Gregory Auckett | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18271 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18276 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18281 | Blake Brouff | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18286 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18291 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18301 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18306 | Sam Varcoe | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18311 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18316 | Andrew Dunn | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18326 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18331 | Phillip Morley | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18351 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18356 | Will Cannon | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18361 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18406 | cheyne hanson | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18411 | Daniel Jerabek | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18416 | Jake Peake | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18421 | Hamish Bryant | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18431 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18446 | Luke Tudman | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18456 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18486 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18496 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18501 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18516 | Samara Scholberg | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18526 | Andrew Goodlet | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18531 | Brad Hickey | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18541 | Rusty Russell | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18546 | Amanda Stephens | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18551 | Elizabeth Davis | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18556 | Wayne Taylor | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18561 | Shayne Ryan | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18566 | Paul Mallett | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18571 | Brett Tristram | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18576 | james thompson | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18586 | Shane Pettitt | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18591 | Johannes Greeff | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18596 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18606 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18611 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18616 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18626 | Geoff Shapland | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18641 | Tegan Harrison | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18671 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18676 | Edward George | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18681 | Julie-Anne Marchant | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18686 | Name Redacted | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18691 | Frank Roberts | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18706 | Craig Tilney | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18741 | Bowie Bowie | 10/02/2026 | |
| 18746 | Jim Porter | 10/02/2026 | |
| 17596 | matthew Annis brown | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17606 | Alex Warren | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17626 | Glenn Gricks | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17631 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17636 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17656 | Debbie Fletcher | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17661 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17666 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17671 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17676 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17686 | JOYCE PURTLE | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17726 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17736 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17746 | Kevin Nelson | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17766 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17771 | Caleb McGarry | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17776 | David Jackson-Wills | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17781 | Darren Price | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17786 | Robynn Cook | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17791 | Barry McKay | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17806 | Ben Smit | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17811 | Allen Soxsmith | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17816 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17826 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17836 | Lesley Harding | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17841 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17846 | Michael Lynch-Gardner | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17851 | edwin landicho | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17856 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17861 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17866 | Lutzia Scherrer | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17871 | Hamish Russell | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17876 | Sanjeev Unni | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17891 | andrew lanser | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17911 | Grant Lockrey | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17981 | Ken Doig | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18066 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18071 | David Byrnes | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18076 | Peter Paterson | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18086 | Jennifer Lewis | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18096 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18106 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 18116 | Name Redacted | 09/02/2026 | |
| 17431 | Sandra Cook | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17436 | Will Bateman | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17441 | Sam Muller | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17446 | Name Redacted | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17461 | Name Redacted | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17481 | Adam Ledger | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17486 | Tim Pace | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17491 | Daniel Freeman | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17501 | Name Redacted | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17511 | Maureen Playdon | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17516 | Name Redacted | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17521 | Alexander Campbell | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17581 | Mathew Skofic | 08/02/2026 | |
| 17241 | TROY RYAN | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17256 | Jason Steinbeck | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17261 | Trent McDonnell | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17266 | Name Redacted | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17271 | Scott Parramore | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17276 | Beauy Fernance | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17281 | Rebecca Willis | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17286 | Paul Posetti | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17311 | Lyn Hicks | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17326 | Jacob Woods | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17336 | Damian Walsh | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17346 | Matt Swords | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17351 | Courtney Szloch | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17366 | mitchell blewitt | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17391 | Gina Forster | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17406 | Name Redacted | 07/02/2026 | |
| 17421 | Name Redacted | 07/02/2026 | |
| 16506 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16516 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16521 | Margaret Davis | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16526 | Lewis Wolthers | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16531 | Jordan Wolthers | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16536 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16541 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16546 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16551 | Andy Davison | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16556 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16561 | Bibek Shah | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16586 | Trent Wehr | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16591 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16596 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16601 | Steven Chandler | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16611 | Mikee Alarcon | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16631 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16636 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16686 | Warwick Smyth | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16696 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 16751 | PAUL RODGERS | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17091 | Craig Tanzer | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17096 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17101 | Vince Carrabs | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17106 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17111 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17116 | Ross Tito | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17126 | Tristan Botha | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17131 | Trish Elsegood | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17136 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17151 | Adam Nolan | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17176 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17181 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17191 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17196 | Garreth Bridgland | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17201 | Lincon Costello | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17206 | Name Redacted | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17211 | Darren Upton | 06/02/2026 | |
| 17236 | william browne | 06/02/2026 | |
| 15866 | ty marshall | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15871 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15876 | Daniel Steel | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15881 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15891 | Jason Bell | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15896 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15901 | Mitchell Armstrong | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15911 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15916 | Samuel Ervin | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15921 | Micheal Lindstrom | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15926 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15931 | Annette Rhodes | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15936 | Troy Taylor | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15941 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15946 | Geoff Henning | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15951 | Katie Seckold | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15956 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15961 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15966 | MITCH STAIT | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15971 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15976 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15981 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15986 | Matthew Clarke | 05/02/2026 | |
| 15996 | Peter Heinrichson | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16001 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16006 | Ryan Powers | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16011 | Kiera Lawrence | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16021 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16026 | Lewis Howells | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16031 | Paul Williamson | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16036 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16041 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16046 | Tait Mack | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16056 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16066 | iain winton | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16071 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16081 | edmund brailey | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16091 | William Moncrieff | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16101 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16111 | Lesley Harding | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16146 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16156 | Simon Bestmann | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16161 | Ian Flood | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16166 | Julie Flood | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16171 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16181 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16191 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16196 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16221 | Nola Griffiths | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16226 | Matthew Wall | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16231 | Linda Rogers | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16236 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16241 | Mathew Murphy | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16246 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16256 | Rachel Murphy | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16271 | Stephen Groen | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16281 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16291 | Todd Jeffs | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16296 | Dan Thorn | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16306 | David Freeman | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16331 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16341 | Peter Cunningham | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16356 | Troy Morrison | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16361 | Tegan Donoghoe | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16376 | Penelope Todman | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16381 | Todd Munn | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16411 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16461 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16471 | Paul Moodie | 05/02/2026 | |
| 16486 | Name Redacted | 05/02/2026 | |
| 14871 | Timothy Cusack | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14876 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14881 | James McGeachie | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14886 | Nelsha du Preez | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14891 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14896 | Simon Campbell | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14901 | Brentan Partridge | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14906 | Corey Dunk | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14911 | Bethany Nicholson | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14931 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14936 | Owen Kearns | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14941 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14946 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14951 | Mark Meurer | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14956 | Bronwyn McCall | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14986 | James McRae | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14991 | Kathryn Hands | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15001 | Rebecca Shanks | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15006 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15011 | Clancy Power | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15021 | Jason Edwards | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15026 | Clarine Fourie | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15031 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15041 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15046 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15056 | Luke mayberry | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15061 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15071 | Tammy Caswell | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15076 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15096 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15101 | Teke Vernon | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15106 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15111 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15116 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15121 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15126 | Andy Barrow | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15131 | Pauline Ahern | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15136 | Luke Croudace | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15141 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15146 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15151 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15156 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15166 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15176 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15186 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15191 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15196 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15201 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15206 | Brendan Fitzpatrick | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15211 | Gary Schweizer | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15226 | Paul DELboux | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15236 | Eugene Sysoev | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15246 | Julian Ferris | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15256 | Br4ian Boitano | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15261 | Melissa Chaplin | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15271 | Christopher Ray | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15301 | Leigh Shoemark | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15316 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15326 | Kristen Andresen | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15341 | Harrison Livingston | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15346 | Damon Hooker | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15351 | Craig Tilney | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15356 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15361 | Lachlan Skelly | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15366 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15371 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15376 | David Molesworth | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15381 | David livingston | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15386 | Richard Bennetts | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15391 | Marianne Melnikas | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15401 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15406 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15411 | robert styles | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15416 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15421 | Chris Papallo | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15426 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15431 | joy gough | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15436 | Anthony Ford | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15441 | Leanne Crumpton | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15446 | Luke Nelson | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15451 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15456 | peter aplin | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15461 | Robert Nelson | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15466 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15476 | steven McNaughton | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15481 | Yvonne Coutis | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15486 | Lealey Wood | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15491 | Paul White | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15496 | Rebecca Vass | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15501 | Hugh Doherty | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15506 | Raymond Wadeley | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15511 | Geoff Henning | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15516 | ROBERT ALDER | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15526 | Craig Nosworthy | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15531 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15536 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15541 | Harley Henning | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15546 | 🍍Jayden Williams | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15566 | simon MERRICK | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15576 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15586 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15591 | Peter Fyfe | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15596 | Martinus Hendriksz | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15621 | Allan Searant | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15636 | Paige Henning | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15661 | David Edwards | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15671 | Matthew Downes | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15676 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15681 | Bryson Bryson Gilbert | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15686 | Bryson Bryson Gilbert | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15701 | Arna Gillott | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15706 | Liz Fritz | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15716 | Vince Sunter | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15721 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15726 | harry stefanou | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15736 | David Barnes | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15756 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15776 | Michael Dodd | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15781 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15786 | Geoff Cheetham | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15806 | Matthew Clarke | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15816 | Mitchell Amos | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15821 | Matthew Clarke | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15826 | Matthew Clarke | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15836 | Shane Howe | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15846 | Name Redacted | 04/02/2026 | |
| 15861 | Michelle dobson | 04/02/2026 | |
| 14581 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14586 | Michael Kirkpatrick | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14591 | Justin Griffiths | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14596 | Benjamin Jacobs | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14601 | Colm Foran | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14606 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14611 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14616 | Matthew Court | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14621 | Peter Sinnett | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14631 | Sean Constable | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14636 | Jack Tolhurst | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14641 | William Byrnes | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14646 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14656 | matthew staff | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14666 | Damien Ryba | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14701 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14706 | Dylan Clarkson | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14711 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14721 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14726 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14736 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14741 | Craig Clare | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14756 | Cody McIntosh | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14761 | Marlenn Guihot | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14771 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14776 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14781 | Tracey Brown | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14791 | Simon Rock | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14796 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14801 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14811 | Name Redacted | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14826 | Mitchell Brown | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14831 | Wesley Peters | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14846 | Heath Montgomery | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14856 | Kym Leyson | 03/02/2026 | |
| 14231 | Nicholas Roxby | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14241 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14251 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14261 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14271 | Adam Williams | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14276 | Nicholas Wright | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14281 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14286 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14371 | David Riley | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14376 | Dylan McDonald | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14381 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14386 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14391 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14401 | GRAHAM WHITE | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14406 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14411 | Phil Maslen | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14416 | Wayne Kirkhope | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14421 | Hannah McDonald | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14426 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14431 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14436 | Steven Gale | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14446 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14461 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14466 | David Bennett | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14471 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14486 | Tim Slater | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14516 | Alex Sevil | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14541 | Patrick Elsegood | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14546 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14551 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14556 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14561 | Name Redacted | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14566 | Alex Byrnes | 02/02/2026 | |
| 14106 | Damian Oshea | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14146 | Chris Kinsela | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14151 | Name Redacted | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14156 | Name Redacted | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14161 | Aaron Nolan | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14171 | Name Redacted | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14196 | Name Redacted | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14206 | Chris Deer | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14211 | Name Redacted | 01/02/2026 | |
| 14221 | Michael Connor | 01/02/2026 | |
| 13921 | Jyi Crowley | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13931 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13936 | Vincent Lugg | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13941 | matthew eccleston | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14071 | John Sewell | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14076 | Michael Bethune | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14081 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14091 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14096 | Name Redacted | 31/01/2026 | |
| 14101 | Matthew Holt | 31/01/2026 | |
| 13546 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13551 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13556 | Simon Bell | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13561 | Chad Chandler | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13566 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13576 | Thomas Hudson | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13581 | Nicholas Kuhne | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13586 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13596 | Haydn West | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13601 | Lee Stewart | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13606 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13611 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13616 | william browne | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13631 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13636 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13646 | scott Turner | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13651 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13656 | Robbie Knowles | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13666 | Daniel Delahunty | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13671 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13676 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13681 | Thomas Budd | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13691 | Tyron Reynolds | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13696 | Graeme Tourle | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13701 | Andrew Penfold | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13706 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13721 | Jonathan Chapman | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13726 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13886 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13901 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 13916 | Name Redacted | 30/01/2026 | |
| 12056 | James McGeachie | 27/01/2026 | |
| 11396 | Hayden Cosgrove | 23/01/2026 | |
| 10706 | Name Redacted | 17/01/2026 | |
| 10306 | Name Redacted | 14/01/2026 | |
| 10256 | Christine Shearman | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10261 | David Shearman | 13/01/2026 | |
| 10276 | Paul Norris | 13/01/2026 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4505 |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of this proposed development. I have family members working at the sites in Mudgee whose livelihoods depend on the project proceeding, and many of them also own property in the area. Having recently visited Mudgee, and as a corporate strategic planning professional, I am concerned that if these developments do not continue, there will be significant economic repercussions for the local community. Without the mining industry contributing to population growth, increased spending in local businesses, and improved access to the region, tourism, property values, and the continued growth of the township would likely be negatively affected. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of this development. I have family who work at the sites in Mudgee, and their jobs depend on this project going ahead. A lot of them also own property there. I was there recently, and it made me realise that if these developments stop, it could have a pretty big negative impact on the local community and economy. The mining industry brings more people into town and helps local businesses because people are spending money. It also helps the area grow and attract visitors. Without it, tourism, property prices, and the overall growth of the town would probably suffer. |
Rylan Kennedy
|
ID |
24361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4505 |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of this development. I have family members who work at the sites in Mudgee, and their jobs rely on this project continuing. A lot of them also have houses there. I went to Mudgee recently, and it made me realise that if these developments don’t go ahead, it could really hurt the local community. Mining brings more people to the town and helps local businesses because more money gets spent. It also helps the town grow and brings in tourists. Without it, tourism, house prices, and the future growth of Mudgee would probably be affected in a bad way. |
Kieren Norris
|
ID |
24376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of Moolarben we need mining and its cerate employment |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
18/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This should continue to proced to keep the local community going. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To help with jobs, keep young people local, and support to the surrounding communities |
Craig Morris
|
ID |
22256 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
WesTrac |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2322 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal is supported through our Mudgee, Tomago and Mt Thorley facilities where we provide onsite support, field service, workshops, parts, and administrative activities. Over the past several years, we have had a substantial investment in capital equipment to enhance our technical support for Moolarben Coal and other clients. Continued operations at Moolarben Coal ensures the certainty needed for these investments and support skilled employment in regional NSW. Moolarben Coal is vital for the Mid-Western region and the NSW economy. This project will secure employment for the existing local employees, as well as WesTrac’s local staff residing in the community. |
|
Attachments |
Moolaben OC3 Extension Project_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 145.32 KB) |
Jesse Ryba
|
ID |
22266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to support the proposed Moolarben OC3 extension project due to the ongoing employment opportunities and economic benefits that are provided by Moolarben. My company specialises in land management of mine rehabilitation and biodiversity offset areas. We carry out a wide range of land management (particularly weed management) for Yancoal across various sites, assisting with land stewardship, enhancing biodiversity and providing employment to at least six people in our business. Yancoal is an important employer to the Central West and NSW region, as well as providing much needed royalties for the state of NSW. |
William Forster
|
ID |
22276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support this extension, as it plays a vital role in protecting the job security of many local families and strengthening our local economy. Failing to proceed would likely have a significant negative impact on the community, potentially forcing many families to relocate in search of employment elsewhere. Maintaining stability for local workers and businesses should remain a priority. |
Scarlett Rhodes
|
ID |
22281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This extension will create a range of new jobs and opportunities for the Mudgee region as I already know it has. I personally as well as my family have been provided jobs and amazing opportunities due to the mines. This development will not only add to the communities economy but also provide so many families in the area to do better for themselves, especially in the cost of living crisis. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Extension Project as a proud employee of Yancoal. During my time with the company, I have seen first-hand the opportunities it provides for employees and their families. Yancoal has supported me to grow in my career, build stability, and provide a secure future for my family. It is a company that genuinely values its people and the communities it operates in. Beyond the workplace, Yancoal makes a strong contribution to regional communities through local employment, business support and community investment. The positive impact is felt not only by employees, but by families, local businesses and the broader region. The Moolarben Extension Project will help ensure these opportunities and benefits can continue into the future. For these reasons, I strongly support its approval. |
Max Rhodes
|
ID |
22311 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe this mine extension will be amazing for the Mudgee region in creating more job opportunities and majorly adding to our economy. Yes I understand mining has an impact to the environment, however so do solar panels and wind turbines. I have personally seen first hand how much solar panels affect the land. As I was working with a crew to put them in. Unlike the mines there is no plan for restoring the land back to its normal state. In fact they will probably leave the land 10 times worse than before. As they must be buried as they can not be recycled. Overall I am in support of the mine extension and hope it goes ahead. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mine provides stable employment, supports local businesses, and plays an important role in sustaining the local economy. My family live in Mudgee. I visit often. I know the mine has operated responsibly and I have not experienced negative impacts on my family property or lifestyle I believe the extension will continue to deliver benefits to the community the housing crisis we are facing while maintaining appropriate environmental and operational standards. |
Daniel Alexander
|
ID |
22336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4209 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Go for it boys. |
Brad Noble
|
ID |
22351 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Noble Engineering Services |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2322 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Our business provides services to the coal mining industry and has been committed to the Mudgee region since 2013. The Mudgee community has welcomed our workers as they moved their families to the town, engaged with local schools, churches, sporting and other social groups. Many of those friendships created also existed through a common engagement at one of the local coal mine employers. As our business grew we sought to employ young Mudgee trainees and helped them to develop work skills and social competencies that come through engagement with high end machinery and commercially driven projects such as the Moolarben OC. When our local team could not carry the required workload we supplement with skilled workers out of Newcastle. These workers would stay for a number of days and utilise the local accommodation and public eateries, most often mid-week. We understand this balanced well with the tourists who generally come to town for weekend ventures. Large operations such as Moolarben OC underpin the fabric of Mudgee and I believe the proposed extension would be a very positive outcome for the region. By contrast, failure to approve the extension will bring a significant downturn to the local communities, as well as the businesses and employees of companies that currently supply the industry. These employees have skillsets that are respected worldwide, and are desirable skillsets for our country to continue to build in our population if we expect to be successful into the future. |
Pascal Savary
|
ID |
22506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2620 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We NEED coal to power this country, renewables are not a primary source of power and are not any better for the environment due to increased manufacturing required. Please keep coal going in Australia! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write in strong support of Moolarben Coal’s proposal to extend mining at the Open Cut 3 (OC3) Pit. This extension represents an important opportunity to secure ongoing jobs, investment and economic stability for the Mudgee region, while operating within the existing, approved Moolarben Coal Complex. Importantly, the Project will be integrated into the current operation, which is approved to mine until 2038, and will take place within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. The proposal delivers significant economic benefits to the State and provides continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of work for the existing open cut workforce. At a time when regional employment stability is critical, maintaining these skilled jobs and supporting local families and businesses is a substantial benefit. Notably, the extension does not seek to increase the approved mine life or production rates. It maximises the use of existing infrastructure, avoiding the need for major new disturbance or duplication of facilities. The Project also delivers clear environmental outcomes. It proposes a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley, includes setbacks from creek lines and the nearby nature reserve, and will result in no final voids — reducing the number of voids in the Valley from one to zero. These commitments demonstrate a responsible and considered approach to land management and rehabilitation. Amenity impacts to nearby residences are expected to be minimal, with the extension area visually isolated from surrounding private properties by intervening topography. Overall, the OC3 Extension Project strikes a balanced and responsible approach — supporting regional jobs and economic contribution while strengthening environmental outcomes and operating within the existing approved mining framework. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am submitting a submission to the proposal of extension of moolarben mine. This extension of mining activities is very important to the community as it relies on the mining industry for survival a lot of businesses and also they support a lot of community projects with their yearly grant funding for numerous projects throughout the communities. Mining can have a positive impact on the environment as long as it is conducted through the correct procedures and practices |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Australian Capital Territory 2600 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please consider the longevity and health of rural communities. Mining jobs support local workers, who in turn support local families, who support local businesses and school. I advocate for the extension of the project to ensure the continued prosperity of the local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The OC3 extension will create extra jobs on site as well as within the community. Larger population creates more money for local community, provides extra opportunities for local jobs in retail, food industry and housing in both rental and sales, this then creates a stronger community for all, everyone within the community will benignity through this extension. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this extension project. Wages, jobs and donations from this mine site help to improve and build the mid western region. Without mining this country and region will not be able to prosper. Without the mining in the region, families will be forced leave the area, businesses will close and the region will be effected. |
maria lepessiots
|
ID |
22651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2046 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To make community better. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It is to my understanding that the Open Cut Extension is going to not only support existing employment but also will create new jobs. To consider that the 180 Million plus per annum that will be invested into the local/state economy is imperative for the economic future for all in the region. Moolarben Coal Complex has in place Eco sensitive strategies that comply and exceed State/Federal regulations. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22686 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Skillset Limited |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Skillset Limited appreciates the opportunity to provide a submission to the Independent Planning Commission regarding the Moolarben Coal Operations Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. As the largest employer of apprentices and trainees in Western NSW and a longstanding Group Training Organisation servicing regional industries, Skillset has partnered with Moolarben Coal Operations (MCO) since 2019. Through this partnership, Skillset has gained extensive insight into MCO’s operational integrity, workforce development culture, and community contributions. Based on this experience, we offer the following submission in support of the OC3 Extension Project. Economic and Regional Development Benefits The OC3 Extension Project is of substantial economic significance to the Mid‑Western Region. The project will support continuity of employment for approximately 700 workers and maintain an annual investment of around $180 million into the NSW economy. This economic stability is particularly critical for regional communities such as Mudgee and its surrounding townships, where MCO is one of the largest employers and a key driver of local business activity. The flow‑on effects of this continued operation extend to local suppliers and contractors, many of whom rely on the predictable and ongoing presence of MCO. For Skillset specifically, the continuation of MCO’s operations ensures ongoing opportunities for apprenticeships, traineeships, workforce development programs, and regional training pathways. Without the OC3 extension, we understand the region could face a contraction in skilled job opportunities, an outflow of talent, and a reduction in long‑term career options for young people and adults seeking vocational training. Approving the extension therefore supports an important economic and workforce ecosystem that underpins the region’s social and economic resilience. Training Excellence and Workforce Capability Moolarben Coal Operations is recognised as a training‑centred organisation with a strong culture of capability building. Through its partnership with Skillset, MCO has supported the commencement of over 313 apprentices and trainees since 2009. MCO invests heavily in upskilling its workforce, which directly enhances operational performance, safety outcomes, and long‑term workforce capability within the mining sector and the broader regional labour market. The training programs delivered at MCO, in partnership with Skillset and Registered Training Organisations, are characterised by structured planning, rigorous competency development, and best‑practice integration of on‑the‑job and off‑the‑job learning. Apprentices and trainees benefit from practical training, including heavy‑vehicle simulators, drone‑assisted competency monitoring, sandpit circuits for surface extraction, and comprehensive underground training programs. These programs not only meet national training standards but exceed them in their innovation, safety orientation, and alignment with local workforce needs. Continuation of the OC3 Extension Project will enable MCO to maintain these programs and continue offering critical career pathways for the region. For many individuals—particularly young people, career entrants, Indigenous participants, and candidates from disadvantaged backgrounds—the opportunities provided through MCO are life‑changing and essential to building sustainable employment futures. Community, Social and Inclusion Benefits MCO delivers significant social and community benefits beyond direct employment. Through its partnership with Skillset, MCO demonstrates a strong commitment to local engagement, youth opportunity, Indigenous participation, and inclusive workforce practices. MCO works collaboratively with local schools to support young people through work experience, mock interviews, and career‑awareness activities, and partners with Skillset and various local schools to deliver the annual Try-a-Trade Day in Mudgee, encouraging students across the region to consider apprenticeships and traineeships as viable career pathways. Furthermore, MCO’s partnerships with organisations such as the Clontarf Foundation reflect a commitment to improving employment outcomes for Indigenous people. Structured mentoring, site tours, simulator access, and tailored job‑seeking training have supported Indigenous job seekers to build confidence, gain exposure to industry opportunities, and transition into meaningful career pathways. This commitment to Indigenous participation has also extended to training initiatives with environmental and cultural elements. In 2020, Skillset partnered with MCO and NEWCO to deliver a First Nations Environmental Traineeship Program, through which Skillset employed trainees and MCO hosted them while they undertook a Certificate III in Conservation and Land Management. Under joint supervision, trainees completed conservation and land‑management activities in the Mudgee–Ulan region, supported environmental works with organisations including NSW Forestry and NEWCO’s native nursery at Wollar, and contributed to culturally focused projects such as the construction of yarning circles at local schools. Through this collaborative training initiative, MCO has supported environmental and cultural stewardship alongside workforce development outcomes. The mine has also delivered programs supporting people with disability, demonstrating inclusive employment practices. Through initiatives developed in partnership with Skillset, individuals with disability have been provided with structured workplace experiences and tailored duties that allow them to participate meaningfully in the workforce. Together, these community‑focused efforts reflect MCO’s broader contribution to the social fabric of the region. The OC3 Extension Project will support the continuation of these valued programs and provide stability for future community partnerships, outreach activities, and training initiatives, including opportunities for culturally and environmentally focused workforce programs where appropriate. |
Dale Meuret
|
ID |
22696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have lived in mining towns most of my life and have seen what happens to towns when mining declines. Families have to relocate, shops suffer and close. The towns loses its appeal and eventually the people that live there and some of these people have lived in these towns their whole life's now have to relocate. Mining still continues in other towns, so these people just relocate to another mining areas. I believe people who live in the Mudgee region should have most say, not people from areas where when the town declines, it does not impact them. I live in Mudgee and think it's one of the best mining towns I have lived in and would hate to uproot myself and family because people outside of this area get a say on what happens in Mudgee. I would hate to see Mudgee which has grown so much in the last 10 years on the back of mining, go backwards because mining can not continue |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2280 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the OC3 expansion. I have worked with Moolarben Coal Operations from the start of the Moolarben Coal Project. Moolarben Coal support the local community and provide work for locals, local business's and contractors. Moolarben provides significant ecomomic benefits to the local community, NSW and Australia. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. The proposed extension is vital to maintaining continuity of operations at Moolarben and ensuring ongoing economic stability for the Mid-Western Regional community. The project will safeguard hundreds of direct and indirect jobs, providing certainty for workers, families, and local businesses that depend on the mine’s continued operation. Beyond employment, Moolarben makes significant contributions through local procurement, training opportunities, and investment in community initiatives that strengthen the region’s long-term resilience. Importantly, the extension builds on existing infrastructure and established environmental management systems, allowing operations to continue within a regulated and monitored framework. This approach supports responsible resource development while balancing environmental, social, and economic considerations. Approving the OC3 Extension will help secure regional prosperity and maintain the mine’s positive contribution to New South Wales. I strongly support the project’s approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to formally express my support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. The extension represents a practical and responsible continuation of an established operation that plays a significant role in the Mid-Western Regional economy. Moolarben has consistently provided stable employment, apprenticeships, and career pathways for local residents. The OC3 Extension will help preserve these opportunities while maintaining strong partnerships with local suppliers and service providers. Continued operations will also ensure ongoing royalty payments and community investment that support schools, infrastructure, and essential services. Importantly, the project builds upon existing approvals, infrastructure, and environmental management systems, ensuring that impacts are managed under strict regulatory oversight. This measured expansion supports energy reliability and economic strength while maintaining accountability to the community and the environment. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension and its continued contribution to the region and the state. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22851 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
AUTOMATIC HEATING GLOBAL PTY LTD |
|
Location |
Victoria 3076 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We support the conditional approval of this project as it will secure employment for current employees and contribute to the state's economy. There will be environmental and rehabilitation improvements such as filling voids to improve landform, landscape continuity and enhanced ecological values across the broader region. The region will be strengthened and therefore prosper. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22856 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal Moolarben |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed OC3 extension at Yancoal Moolarben, as the project plays a critical role in supporting local jobs and businesses. The mine contributes a significant amount of money back into the local community, and many businesses rely heavily on its continued operation. Without this extension, a large number of local livilyhood would be put at risk. I have worked at Moolarben Coal for the past four years and have seen firsthand the pride the company takes in supporting the community and providing ongoing job opportunities. The commitment to local employment and business engagement is genuine and ongoing. Moolarben Coal is also extremely careful when it comes to environmental management. The company operates within strict boundaries and prioritises responsible practices at all times. The rehabilitation projects aimed at returning the land to its original condition are highly impressive and demonstrate a strong commitment to environmental responsibility. I am proud to work for Moolarben Coal and to be part of a company that values its workers, the local community, and the environment |
Matthew Hibberd
|
ID |
22891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a resident of the local community I hear by support the extension of the mine as it gives the community support in so many levels with direct employment and all the support businesses that benefit from the mine.with the right conditions and restrictions the mine will be able to operate in a manner which will allow them to extract the coal from the suitable area with the least amount of disturbance to the local flora and fauna as for the rehabilitation of the area the moolarben mine is second to none with all local seeds collected prior to mining and being replanted in the rehabilitation process. At the end of mine life I feel the community and country will have benefited from the many positives that are created from projects like this. |
Lucy Stuart
|
ID |
22936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben OCE Extension Project. The Moolarben operation has been an important contributor to the local and regional economy for many years, providing stable employment, supporting local businesses, and investing in community initiatives. The continuation and extension of operations will help maintain these economic benefits, particularly in a region where mining plays a significant role in sustaining jobs and services. The extension will provide continuity for workers and families who rely on this industry and help support the long-term economic resilience of the region. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben OCE Extension Project. |
Blake Hjorth
|
ID |
22981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the OC3 Extension Project for the following reasons: - The project will continue existing operations which in turn will provide economic and social certainty not only for employees at the mine, but for the many supporting businesses, local shops and tourist businesses within our region. - Moolarben contribute heavily to local organisations, education providers and events. Without this type of support, these events/organisations cease to exist. Importantly, they have contributed heavily to the Doctors 4 Mudgee program (with the other coal mines) to directly source and bring doctors to our region. The local medical centres either had no doctor at all, or have closed their books to new patients. The program has brought 6 doctors to our region so far. If that's not positive social benefits, I don't know what is. - Moolarben have shown that they invest in local youth and older job seekers through their traineeships and apprenticeships as well as graduate programs. Besides the obvious benefit of training and employment, this often allows for families in the district to stay together rather than either a child or parent having to move away to find work. The social benefits of this are huge. - The project has clearly demonstrated that it has amended it's application over time to strengthen biodiversity outcomes while balancing the opportunities to extract a known, economic and mineable reserve. - The NSW Government still relies on the benefits of coal to our economy and electricity grid. While renewables are coming, we are not there yet and to deny the residents of NSW the benefits of allowing an existing coal mine that has demonstrated compliance over many years to keep operating, does not make sense. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Extension Project. I have been fortunate to call Mudgee and its community home for the past year, during which I commenced working at Moolarben Coal Operations. In this time, I have seen firsthand the positive impact that mining has across the region, providing economic stability, generating employment and supporting local businesses and community events. The year I have spent working for Yancoal has shown me the company's steadfast commitment to responsible operations and genuine community engagement. Projects like this are vital to ensuring that people can build long-term futures in regional towns. For those early in their careers, such as myself, they also provide confidence, continuity and opportunities for growth. For these reasons, I am in support of the Moolarben Extension Project and the continued social and economic benefits it will deliver to the region. |
Ian Lewis
|
ID |
23136 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Shearwater Projects Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2446 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My consulting company, Shearwater Projects pty ltd has provided engineering and project management services to Moolarben Coal, either directly, or indirectly (as a consultant / subcontractor) for over ten years. During that time, Moolarben Coal has consistently demonstrated a high level of care for the environment and community in which it operates. I have had direct involvement in delivering projects that conform to Moolarben Coal’s comprehensive environmental and community requirements and can attest to the both vigorous and rigorous approach the Moolarben Coal team takes to meeting its commitments and ensuring that all service providers do the same. I am confident that Moolarben Coal will apply similarly high standards to driving successful delivery of the OC3 Extension Project and genuinely believe that the commitment and passion of the Moolarben Coal team will ensure positive outcomes for all project stakeholders. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23256 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, Independent Planning Commission of NSW Re: Letter of Support – Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) supports Yancoal’s Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project and welcomes the opportunity to outline why this proposal is important to our business, the coal industry, and the New South Wales economy. As a key exporter within the Port of Newcastle, NCIG relies on the continuation of well-planned, efficient and responsible coal mining operations across NSW. Projects such as the OC3 Extension play an important role in maintaining production continuity, workforce stability and supply chain reliability, all of which underpin confidence and long-term investment across the coal export sector. NCIG supports the OC3 Extension because it provides employment certainty for around 700 workers and supports approximately $180 million in annual economic activity, while maximising the use of existing infrastructure and avoiding unnecessary disturbance to the environment and nearby residences. These outcomes are critical to sustaining the competitiveness of the NSW coal industry and the businesses that support it. We also acknowledge the improvements made to the project in response to community and government feedback. The reduced disturbance footprint, enhanced rehabilitation outcomes and strengthened environmental protections demonstrate a commitment to balancing economic benefits with responsible land use and environmental management. This type of continual improvement is important for maintaining community confidence and the long-term social licence of the industry. Yancoal is a valued participant in the coal supply chain, and the continued operation of the Moolarben Coal Complex supports jobs, investment and export activity that delivers significant flow-on benefits to regional communities and the broader NSW economy. For NCIG, the OC3 Extension contributes to the resilience of the export task that our business exists to serve. For these reasons, NCIG supports approval of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Extension Project. Regards, |
|
Attachments |
23256 - Redacted.pdf (PDF, 143.99 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mining is important for our country and communities. Mining also provides jobs and livelihoods for thousands of people. The majority of the media produce misinformation about mining and its tremendous advantages to our country’s wealth. Common sense must prevail!!!!! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I make this submission in strong support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Moolarben Coal has been operating in a safe and environmentally sustainable manner since 2009. During that time it has provided over $2M in support to local community groups benefitting education, sports, health and arts projects. With approximately 700 local employees and contractors working at the mine there is a strong reliance from the local community on its continued operation and the project will provide significant economic benefit to the state and the Australian economies. The project will also enhance the area by converting over 500ha of land previously used for agriculture to woodland in the Moolarben Valley through rehabilitation processes all whilst being one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. Please approve the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I moved to Gulgong in 2016 as I had gained employment with Moolarben Coal. Over the last 10 years, I have enjoyed the community spirit of both working for Yancoal and living in Gulgong. Moolarben supports with many festivals and sports teams in the region, and I believe that all the mining companies have made great improvements to the quality of life for the Mid Western region residents. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I agree with the extension to provide ongoing employment in the Mudgee area due to high costs of living in the Mudgee region |
Stephen Galilee
|
ID |
23426 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
NSW Minerals Council |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2000 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached submission. |
|
Attachments |
NSWMC IPC Submission_Moolarben.pdf (PDF, 541.49 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension Project proposes to extend mining south of the existing open cut mine area, on land that has historically been cleared. The extension Project will be integrated with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, which has approval to mine until 2038. It will operate within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. There would be: • significant economic benefits to the state • continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce • no changes to the approved mine life or production rates • a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley • setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve • maximising use of existing infrastructure • minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography • no final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 extension application following feedback from the community and Government. These improvements will result in: • a reduced disturbance footprint • reduced coal extraction • increased setbacks to protect environmental assets • reduced disturbance of wildlife habitat • increased land rehabilitation. The project will ensure ongoing jobs for around 700 people and annual investment of around $180 million into the economy, from one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the approval of the OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. As a contractor working on site, I see how important the mine is for jobs and the local community. The extension will help keep people employed and provide steady work for contractors, operators, and local businesses that rely on the mine. I have seen strong safety practices on site and ongoing efforts to manage dust, protect the environment, and rehabilitate land. The operation is well managed and continues to improve its environmental performance. Keeping the project going will support local shops, accommodation providers, and service businesses in nearby towns. Without continued work, many families and businesses would be affected. For these reasons, I support the OC3 Extension Project and the benefits it provides to workers, the community, and the regional economy. Sincerely, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local of 52 years and been working in the mining sector since the mid 1990's, my wife and other family members are also locals of their whole life, I have been very fortunate to see our local community thrive because of mining in our area,the generosity of yancoal to our town through sporting sponsorships, community support and other avenues has helped to make our community the best it can be. I am proud to work at moolarbin and to be there or many years yet.I am excited to see the approval of this extension soo i can continue to support my lifestyle,enjoy our local community and be proud to be an employee of a very community supportive professional organization. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This will be a great economic boost for our community, benefiting many different people and businesses. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
our local and national community are very dependent on the continuation of mining. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thus will enable a lot of employment enabling significant funds into the community and substantial employment in the area. |
Scott Taylor
|
ID |
23696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am fully supportive of the MCO OC3 extension project. As a Mudgee local I have personally seen the Mudgee region grow and develop on the back of our local mining developments. Over my life there has been numerous groups, schools, sporting clubs and families that have seen benefits which may be unachievable without the mining sector on our doorstep. As a local I am very proud to work in the mining industry and still be fortunate enough to call Mudgee home. Hopefully with future approvals my children and many others in our great community will benefit as the town further develops. |
Lisa Cottee
|
ID |
23701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in support of the OC3 extension at Moolarben Coal. I have been a resident of the area for over 30 years and have raised my family here in Mudgee . I have been employed at Moolarben Coal as an operator for 8 years now and hope to continue my employment through to retirement. Moolarben Coal provides me with a safe working environment and due to having experience with compliance within my role I firsthand see how well Moolarben Coal acknowledge community concerns by minimising our environmental impact as much as possible with real time dust and noise control monitoring, groundwater protection, and are maintaining progressive rehabilitation. The economic benefits to the area are positive a due to a large percentage of our workforce living locally. Many of my colleagues also contribute to the community through volunteering whether it be SES, RFS, Fire Brigade, sporting programmes, raising funds for charities etc. Ongoing responsible mining activity is important to the Mid-Western area to maintain economic stability where there can be limited opportunities for employment in a country area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coal, currently employs over 700 jobs in the local area, not to mention the ongoing support throughout the community such as local small businesses. That will have a massive impact on the economy and local community. Moolarben coal completes all Rehabilitation work in co ordinance with all rules and regulations ensuring all fauna and flora thrive throughout and after works… |
Jamie Taylor
|
ID |
23756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a Mudgee local and a small business owner I fully support the growth and future developments of responsible mining in our area. We rely not only on the tourism of our beautiful region which can be seasonal but the steady and consistency of the flow on effect that mining provides. Families looking to settle and make Mudgee home support local business on the back of the mining in our region. The extension project will ensure that small business will have the opportunity to develop and grow further. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the OC3 Extension for Moolarben Coal Complex should go ahead. The Mudgee region needs a reliable industry for its residents. I also believe the State and Country need a reliable source of coal for use in power generation as well as an export commodity. I have no issues with mining coal, as it is an essential resource. |
Phillip Morley
|
ID |
23811 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben Lodge MEU |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please attached Letter of support |
|
Attachments |
23811 - Phillip Morley.pdf (PDF, 38.94 KB) |
Abbivathana Deva
|
ID |
23866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2131 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I show my support in resisting the devastating impacts of coal mining and hold a serious concern to the climate pollution and serious harm this will cause to species, water sources and cultural heritage. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
23886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. As a member of the Mudgee / Mid-Western Regional community, I recognise the significant positive contribution that Moolarben Coal has made to our region since operations began. Mining plays a critical role in sustaining local employment, supporting small businesses, and strengthening the economic stability of our community. The proposed extension represents continuity rather than expansion beyond existing approvals. It will operate within the approved mining tenements and does not increase overall mine life or production rates. Instead, it allows for continued employment and investment in the region while improving environmental safeguards. The economic contribution of Moolarben Coal to the Mid-Western Regional Council area is substantial. The company directly contributes hundreds of millions of dollars to the local and state economy, supports over 100 local suppliers, and provides employment for hundreds of workers — many of whom live locally. These jobs sustain families, mortgages, local schools, sporting clubs, and small businesses throughout Mudgee and surrounding towns. In addition to employment, Moolarben Coal has contributed significant funding to local community initiatives, grants and sponsorships across education, sport, health and the arts. These contributions strengthen the social fabric of our region and improve opportunities for local families. Importantly, the revised proposal includes environmental improvements, including increased setbacks, rehabilitation of native woodland vegetation, habitat enhancement areas, and a reduced disturbance footprint. These commitments demonstrate responsiveness to community feedback and a willingness to improve outcomes. The continuation of mining through this extension provides certainty for workers and local businesses at a time when regional economic stability is vital. Without projects such as this, the Mid-Western region risks job losses, reduced local spending, and broader economic decline. For these reasons, I respectfully support approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Katie Goldthorpe
|
ID |
23891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Coal Operation is a vital asset to the Mudgee community and Mid- Western Region supporting the community with $357 million contributed to the Mid Western Regional Council area since 2010, providing 895 full time employees with 684 residing in the local area. Approval of the extension project will secure these jobs and the continued growth of the Mid- Western regional community, local economy and housing market. The operation engages 123 local suppliers with over $56 million in revenue generated for those businesses as well as the jobs created within those businesses. The local community is a thriving hub of activity with schools in healthy numbers; some at full capacity and local businesses well supported. Moolarben Coal has given over $2 million of grants and sponsorships for various local organisations including the local schools, sporting associations, arts and health initiatives. Moolarben Coal Complex is the lowest emissions intensity coal mine in Australia, committed to reducing its carbon footprint and minimising emissions with a rehabilitation program that is second to none. The extension project poses zero risk to existing creek lines and nature reserves, approval of this project would in fact see a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation for the Moolarben Valley. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography, and the complex as a whole has minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. I truly hope the Federal Government considers the vitality of the Moolarben Complex to the Mid Western Region and the country as a whole, and the devastating consequences for the local community and economy should the project not be approved. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
24016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the proposed extension. This extension would benefit the region by providing ongoing employment to thousands of people across the region. Bringing in ongoing monetary support to Mudgee and its wider surrounding towns and communities. Without this extension approval, thousands of direct jobs will be lost. The flow on effect from the jobs lots would have a detrimental impact on the town and its surrounding communities. Job losses equal people leaving the region. Shops, businesses and schools (who rely upon the money that the mines bring into the town) will close. This will have a negative impact on the region’s future moving forward. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project I am a local resident of the Mudgee region and a worker who relies on ongoing employment in the local mining industry. I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The Moolarben Coal Complex is an important employer in our region. The OC3 Extension will help provide job security for workers like myself and many others in the local community. These jobs support families, local businesses, and essential services, and they allow people to continue living and working in the area rather than having to leave to find employment elsewhere. As someone who lives locally, I understand the importance of balancing employment with environmental responsibility. I am supportive of the OC3 Extension because it proposes mining within an existing operation, This limits additional disturbance to local properties. I also support the environmental measures included in the proposal, particularly the increased setbacks from sensitive areas, habitat enhancement along Moolarben and Murdering Creeks, and the rehabilitation of land back to native woodland vegetation. The reduction in the disturbance footprint and increased rehabilitation commitments demonstrate that community and government feedback has been taken seriously. The Moolarben Coal Complex’s low emissions intensity compared to other coal mines in Australia, and its commitment to further reducing emissions through operational efficiencies, provides reassurance that environmental impacts are being actively managed. For local workers and residents like myself, the OC3 Extension represents stability, continued employment, and a future for our community. I believe the project strikes an appropriate balance between economic benefits and environmental protection, and I support its approval. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Kind regards, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project will bring jobs. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support Moolarben in their application for an extension |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20341 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Doctors 4 Mudgee Region Inc |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Doctors 4 Mudgee Region Inc. (D4MR) is a grassroots, community-led initiative established to address the critical shortage of General Practitioners across the Mudgee region. Moolarben has contributed more than $2 million to local community initiatives, including health, sport, arts and education. Importantly, Moolarben has been a key funding partner of our D4MR program. Their support has directly enabled us to attract and support GPs relocating to the region and help strengthen long-term healthcare access for our community. Programs like D4MR require stable, ongoing funding to remain effective. Without the economic support of local industry partners such as Moolarben, grassroots initiatives addressing critical service shortages would be significantly harder to sustain. D4MR recognises that continued economic stability is important in underpinning community-led healthcare solutions like this in our region, and Moolarben mine has played a significant role in this space. |
Matthew Gerber
|
ID |
20361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2204 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The coal and resources industries are the drivers of the Australian economy and underpin our prosperity. The mining industry is the most regulated sector in the Australian economy and has strict environmental standards to meet. Mining and other industries (such as agriculture) have co-existed for generations and this needs to continue. An extension to an existing mining operation to benefit the local community (mining contributes more than any other industry to the Mudgee region) makes complete sense. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support — (redacted) Resident To whom it may concern, My name is (redacted), I am 30 years old and live in (redacted), northwest of (redacted), approximately a three-hour drive from (redacted). I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. While I am not a permanent resident of the local area, I visit frequently because (redacted) lives there and works at the Moolarben Coal Complex. Through these regular visits over three years, I have had the opportunity to closely observe the tangible impact that stable regional employment can have on individuals, families, and communities. From a personal perspective, (redacted) role at the mine has had a profoundly positive effect on his quality of life. Consistent employment, supportive management, and a structured work environment have contributed not only to financial stability but also to his overall wellbeing, confidence, and sense of purpose. In my view, this highlights an often-overlooked aspect of regional industry — its capacity to support mental health and personal dignity through meaningful work. From a broader standpoint, the Moolarben Coal Complex is widely recognised as a significant economic contributor to the Mid-Western Regional area, supporting direct employment, contractors, and local businesses. The proposed OC3 Extension appears to be a logical continuation of existing operations within established approvals and infrastructure, rather than an expansion that fundamentally alters the nature or duration of the mine. My understanding is that the project allows operations to continue within the currently approved mine life, ensuring continuity rather than escalation. When I visit the region, it is clear that the mine plays an integral role in sustaining the local economy and supporting community initiatives. This kind of economic anchor is particularly important in regional areas, where employment diversity can be limited and where the presence of a major employer can stabilise entire communities. I appreciate that developments of this nature must be carefully assessed against environmental and planning considerations. However, I believe it is equally important for decision-makers to hear from families like mine who directly experience the benefits of responsible regional industry. In my view, maintaining stable employment and economic continuity in the district is a compelling reason to support the proposal. For these reasons, I respectfully support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Sincerely, (redacted) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2321 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Commission, The proposed extension of the Moolarben open cut mine is vital for my small business and family. I reside in the Hunter Valley NSW and often travel out to Moolarben for work on the mining equipment. Whilst at Moolarben I stay at the Ulan Village Green for up to 1 week at a time. During my stay I am supporting local jobs and small businesses from all aspects of the accommodation from builders, gardeners, catering, local produce suppliers, staff and cleaning services. This has an effect on many local Mudgee residents. During my travels I purchase fuel and meals from other small local companies further spending my hard earned money supporting the greater Mudgee area. Coal mines also have a vital part of our community and economy. From power generation to exports. OEM support for new machines, parts, logistics, servicing and labour are all vital ongoing costs that Yancoal pay to a lot of local companies. In essence contributing to providing and securing hundreds of jobs locally and further away to keep the wheels turning. Everything from nuts and bolts to oils to fabrication to trades (including apprectices) to operators and planners/managers etc. There is a lot on the line for many local (and not so local) families. There is also a large number of people that work permanantly at Moolarben coal that travel more than 1.5hrs to get to work. This says a lot about the culture of the business. Would you travel that far for a workplace that is toxic? Most people there really enjoy their job and it really shows. They also rent accommodation and buy food/drinks etc. further supporting local businesses. Moolarben Coal has a high drive for efficient coal production and are in touch with the latest technologies and opencut mining methods. They have many new more efficient trucks and diggers that have cost millions of dollars to further improve their emissions and efficiency. As far as some of the opposing comments from the public, a large portion do not live or have anything to do with Mudgee or the local area. Yes I understand the flora and fauna "issues" but they need to have a long hard look at themselves before voicing their negative thoughts publicly. Every bit of technology the modern word uses comes from the ground. Than gets made in factories and shipped then sold to the consumer. None of that is possible without power stations (mostly coal powered) to melt down the raw materials to create the end product. Big picture. If the proposed extension does not go through then there will be a large reduction of locals not having as much money to support local businesses. I know first hand that my own business will be heavily impacted as Moolarben coal provides me with 40-50% of my work load. Mudgee will not be able to be Mudgee as we know it with tourism and wineries alone. Mudgee needs the coal mines in the area. I am 100% in support for all mining (as long as it is carried out in accordance with the mining regulators guidelined) as it creates so much employment and drives people and local businesses to keep pushing the limits of technology and producing world class minerals for everyone to some way or another enjoy modern life as we know it. |
Beau Lea
|
ID |
20436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2307 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension project at Moolarben OC coal mine in Mudgee NSW. Both the direct and indirect employment that Moolarben OC brings to the community with the associated direct financial input into both the local community and NSW government makes the extension a postive for both employee's and the community. Yancoal as a business ensure the adequate offset area's are delivered, rehabilitation of mined area's are returned to suitable farmland/grazzing area's for future cattle/harvesting. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a proud employee of Moolarben Coal, I have seen first-hand the care and responsibility that goes into planning and operating our site. The Extension Project will be delivered entirely within our existing approvals and on land already owned by the business, without increasing production rates or extending the approved life of the mine. This approach allows us to continue operating in a practical and responsible way, maintaining benefits for the region while avoiding unnecessary new impacts. Moolarben Coal also places a strong emphasis on giving back to the community. Over $2 million has been invested in local programs, events and organisations that support education, sport, health and overall community wellbeing. The Extension Project will allow this commitment to continue, ensuring that local groups and initiatives remain supported into the future. Overall, this project will help protect local jobs, support small and regional businesses, and contribute to the long-term strength and resilience of the Mid-Western region. For these reasons, I am proud to support the Moolarben Extension Project and strongly encourage its approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Assessment Team, I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Extension Project from the perspective of someone who works as a contractor at the site. My work at Moolarben provides for me and my family, and like many others in the region, my livelihood is closely tied to the continued operation of the mine. Projects like this provide stability and certainty, allowing contractors like myself to plan for the future, support our families, and remain part of the local community. The flow-on benefits go well beyond those working directly on site. The mine supports a wide network of contractors, suppliers and small businesses across the region. From trades and transport to accommodation, fuel, food and local services, many businesses rely on ongoing mining activity to stay viable. When the mine is strong, the broader regional economy is strong. Importantly, the Extension Project represents a continuation of existing operations rather than a major expansion. It will operate within current approvals and allows the benefits of the mine to continue without introducing significant new impacts. For contractors and small business operators, this kind of continuity is incredibly important. From my perspective, the Extension Project helps keep people employed, supports families, and keeps money circulating through regional communities. Without opportunities like this, many regional towns would struggle to maintain the same level of economic activity and stability. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Extension Project and the continued role it plays in supporting workers, families and regional communities. |
Dayne Fialkowski
|
ID |
20501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. As a local resident, a parent of a young family, and an employee at Moolarben, I have a direct stake in the continued success of this operation. 1. Job Security and Family Stability My primary reason for support is the long-term security this extension provides. For young families like mine, the ability to plan for the future—buying a home, schooling our children, and spending our lives in this region—depends entirely on the continuity of local employment. The OC3 extension ensures that hundreds of well-paying jobs remain in the area, preventing the "boom and bust" cycle that can tear rural communities apart. 2. Supporting Local Business and Economy The benefits of Moolarben extend far beyond the mine gate. As a local, I see every day how mining wages are reinvested into our towns. From the local mechanic and grocery store to regional contractors, the economic "multiplier effect" of this project is vital. Without this extension, the local economy would face a significant downturn, impacting the services and small businesses we rely on. 3. Community Contribution Moolarben has proven to be a responsible neighbor. The project’s commitment to community grants, local sporting clubs, and school programs has a tangible impact on our quality of life. I believe the OC3 extension will allow these voluntary contributions to continue, ensuring our region remains a vibrant place to raise children. 4. Conclusion I believe the Moolarben OC3 Extension represents a balanced approach to resource management that prioritizes the people who live and work here. It offers the certainty my family needs and the economic stimulus our region deserves. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Assessment Team, I am writing to share my support for the proposed Moolarben Extension Project from a personal and community perspective. My connection to the mine is very real — both of my sons work there, along with my daughter-in-law. Like many local families, our livelihoods are closely tied to mining, and the stability it provides means a great deal to us. The mine gives them secure employment, allows them to support their families, and helps keep our family rooted in the Mudgee region. Mining brings so much to the local community. It supports jobs not only on site, but right across the region through local businesses, trades, services and small operators who rely on the flow-on economic activity. When mining is strong, the whole community benefits. Without mining, towns like Mudgee would face significant decline. Local businesses would struggle, families would be forced to move away, and the sense of community that makes this region special would be at risk. The mine plays a vital role in keeping the local economy alive and giving younger generations a reason to stay. Yancoal has also made a meaningful contribution to the community over the years. Through sponsorships, local support and community investment, they have helped schools, sporting groups and local initiatives thrive. These contributions make a real difference to everyday life in the region. For families like mine, the mine represents opportunity, stability and community strength. I strongly support the Extension Project and the continued role the mine plays in supporting local families and the future of the Mudgee region. |
TODD THURKETTLE
|
ID |
20511 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is my work, it is my way to look after my family and send my kids to the local schools and sports. The extension project is such a well thought out and planned area with focus on rehabilitation and provides the local economy with security and resources to build and maintain a bright future for Mudgee and surrounds. This is needed, this is essential and this extension is vital for us that work here and extends to the greater community |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I work in the local mining industry and understand firsthand how important this operation is to the livelihoods of the people who live and work in this region. The extension will provide ongoing job security for employees and contractors and help maintain stability for their families and the wider community. Continuing operations at Moolarben allows skilled local workers to remain employed in a safe, well-regulated environment, rather than seeking work elsewhere. The project makes responsible use of existing infrastructure and established environmental controls, and I believe it represents a sensible and necessary step to support both the workforce and Mudgee's economy |
Mark K
|
ID |
20521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am currently employed by Yancoal @Moolarben open cut mine as a full-time employee. I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed extension project of OC3. The contribution of this project represents significant economic and social benefits for our region. Yancoal has contributed over $2 millions to Mid-Western communities with grants and sponsorships supporting organisations and initiatives in areas such as education, sports, health and Arts. Extending operations will help maintain jobs, create further economic certainty, and sustain long-team growth within our community. In regional areas especially industries such as mining play a vital role in supporting livelihoods and strengthening local services. I acknowledge the importance of environmental responsibility and regulatory compliance, and I am confident that the project will continue to operate within the strict environmental and safety standards required. For these reasons, I fully support the proposed mine Extension and encourage approval of the application. Yours sincerely Mark Knight |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write to support the project’s extension. The jobs and impact to the community if no approved would be awful for the town. Thanks Emily riley |
Annie Reding
|
ID |
20546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Mine has provided my family with jobs and security for the region. This extension and development would be so beneficial to the area with an additional longer mine life and support for the community through funding. (redacted) plays football and (redacted) does dancing in Mudgee, both of which rely on funding from Moolarben and welcome the extension project. This is a great thing for the region and the area will immensely benefit. We need this extension!! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This extension will be great for local employment. |
Noah Thurkettle
|
ID |
20561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I currently live in Mudgee and I support the proposed extension project as it will continue to deliver significant economic benefits and opportunities for young people to join the workforce. The project to me, looks like it has excellent environmental considerations and outlines a clear management of and community consultation regarding environment and resource development. Approving this extension will provide long term opportunities for families and businesses to continue to grow and prosper in a sustainable manner |
zara Thurkettle
|
ID |
20576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I endorse the proposed mining project, noting it's thorough environmental planning and strong commitment to sustainable operations. The assessment outlines practical measures to protect the environment and minimalizes and long term impacts. In addition the project invest in local training and job security, which in turn protects jobs and builds a great community and economy. |
Kylie Aarons
|
ID |
20601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support this mining extension project as it will provide stable, long-term employment and strengthen job security for local workers and families. The flow-on economic benefits will support small business, contractors and essential services throughout the region, By boosting household incomes and sustaining local spending, the project will help families thrive and contribute to a resilient growing regional economy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20731 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension to the moolarben project will allow many young families to remain in the area. Mudgee is a great community and a friendly town made up of coal mining families and their friends. A denial of the proposed extension will be detrimental to the local economy. Not just for the direct employees of the mine but the for the small business' who rely on their patronage, the hundreds of contractors and sub contractors who will miss out on ongoing work and the domino affect into each aspect of life eg. Less families means child care centres lay off staff or close, schools won't require as many staff, clothing shops, supermarkets, cafes... the list goes on. The proposed extension needs to happen to continue to grow the community in a positive way. |
Peter Wolfgang
|
ID |
20751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local community member, I fully support the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. This proposal is essential for protecting local jobs, strengthening our economy, and ensuring continued support for the many businesses and suppliers who rely on the mine. The project secures around 700 existing jobs and maintains approximately $180 million in annual investment in our region. For a community like ours, this stability matters. These are the livelihoods of families, neighbours, and local businesses that help keep our area strong and thriving. Importantly, the extension makes efficient use of existing infrastructure on land that has already been historically cleared. This is a practical, low‑impact way to continue operations responsibly. The project extension delivers a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation, removes the need for any final voids in the Moolarben Valley, increases setbacks from creeks and reserves, and expands rehabilitation efforts. The extension area is also naturally screened, meaning minimal visual impact on nearby residences. This proposal delivers real economic and environmental benefits. For the future of our region, I strongly support the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support — Rebecca, Local Resident To whom it may concern, My name is Rebecca and I’m 24 years old. I moved to Cumbandry about four years ago and I’m writing to support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. One of the main reasons I moved here was because my dad works at the mine and his job is stable and reliable. Knowing he has secure employment made it possible for me to relocate and build my life here with confidence. For young adults like me, having that kind of financial stability in the family makes a huge difference — it affects where we live, the opportunities we can take, and the plans we can make for our future. Having stability in the family financially has allowed me to start up my own business. Since moving here, I’ve seen how important the mine is for the area. A lot of people in the district work there or rely on it indirectly, and you can tell it supports local businesses and the community. From what I’ve seen and heard, the company is also involved locally and contributes to things that benefit the region, which makes it feel like it’s part of the community rather than separate from it. The extension sounds like a practical continuation of the existing operation rather than something new or drastic. From my understanding, it doesn’t extend the overall life of the mine beyond what’s already approved — it just allows it to keep operating within that timeframe. That’s important because it means continued jobs and stability for local families, including mine. For me personally, having a major employer nearby that provides steady work for residents gives me confidence about living in a regional area. It makes the future feel more secure and gives people my age more reason to stay rather than move away for opportunities. For these reasons, I support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Sincerely, Rebecca |
Aaron Murrell
|
ID |
20891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2328 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben Open Cut 3 extension project for several reasons. Not only will it secure ongoing full time employment for 700 locals, but it will also provide ongoing contract work for 123 local suppliers injecting millions of dollars into the local economy. Moolarben Coal also makes significant economic contributions to the local Mid-Western Regional Council, not to mention its state and national contributions, and supports local organisations and initiatives in areas such as education, sports, health and the arts. Environmentally, this extension makes no change to the mine life or production rates. A net increase of over 550 hectares of land rehabilitated to native woodland vegetation. Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserves. Maximising the use of existing infrastructure. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences and no final voids. In conclusion, for the above mentioned reasons, I strongly support Moolarben Coal’s Open Cut 3 Extension Project. |
Cameron Skewes
|
ID |
20906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project as someone who works at the mine and lives in the local community. My experience on site has shown me how much this operation contributes to the stability and wellbeing of the Mudgee region. The flow on benefits from steady employment are obvious every day, local shops stay busy, services keep expanding, and families can build secure lives here because the mine provides reliable, long term work opportunities. Mining remains the largest employer in the Mid Western Regional LGA, and it continues to be a major pillar of our regional economy. For many of us, this job is more than a paycheque. It’s what allows us to remain in the region, raise families here, and be part of a strong, connected community. The OC3 extension helps safeguard that future by giving workers certainty and ensuring that local businesses, from mechanics and fuel suppliers to cafés, supermarkets, and trades, can rely on a stable customer base supported by the mining workforce. While the benefits are widespread, they are especially significant in areas like Mudgee, where mining has helped sustain growth and opportunity for decades. As someone who sees the impacts of the mine, both at work and within our small towns, I believe the OC3 Extension is essential for maintaining the economic strength and stability of our region well into the future. It supports local families, strengthens local business, and provides the security that allows our community to keep growing. For these reasons, I fully support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. |
Tod Morley
|
ID |
21006 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Molarben Lodge - Mining Energy Union (MEU) |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please see attached letter |
Robbie MacLean
|
ID |
21081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write in support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Moolarben has long been part of the fabric of our local community. Beyond employment, it supports families, sporting clubs, schools, small businesses and community organisations throughout the Mudgee region. The continuation of operations provides stability for households who rely on the certainty of ongoing work and the ability to plan for their future in this region. The project represents the extension of an existing operation that already has established environmental management and regulatory oversight in place. Maintaining continuity at Moolarben helps avoid disruption to the social and economic wellbeing of our community. Approving the OC3 Extension will help ensure that our region remains strong, connected and sustainable for the families who call it home. I respectfully request that the project be approved. |
Ben Lewis
|
ID |
21181 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
One Key Resources |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
One Key Resources supports the proposed OC3 Extension Project on the basis of its significant contribution to sustained regional employment, workforce development, and broader economic stability in the Mudgee and Central West NSW region. The project provides continuity of employment for hundreds of existing workers while preserving and expanding local job opportunities across mining, trades, maintenance, and support services. Importantly, long-term project certainty underpins structured training pathways, apprenticeships, and upskilling opportunities for local community members — ensuring regional talent can access meaningful, skilled employment close to home. Ongoing investment of this scale also strengthens local supply chains and creates multiplier effects for small and medium businesses throughout the region. Sustained operations support local contractors, service providers, training organisations, and community enterprises, contributing to overall economic resilience and growth. Projects that extend existing, approved operations while maximising current infrastructure provide stability for regional communities. The OC3 Extension Project represents a practical pathway to maintaining employment, enhancing workforce capability, and delivering continued economic uplift across the Moolarben Valley and broader Central West. |
Brendan Tobin
|
ID |
21246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in favour of the proposed extension at Moolarben as it a major contributor to the community in all surrounding areas be it through direct employment, community support, local sponsorship or huge positive economic benefits for the region. Great care is taken out in site to ensure all native species are not disturbed in the mining process and that the rehabilitation of the mined areas is carefully constructed so to ensure that wildlife and plant life can thrive in the area again. I believe the extension could only benefit the community in the long run. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21271 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Pacific National |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Independent Planning Commission NSW Government To Whom it May Concern, Submission of support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project I write to express Pacific National’s support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Complex (OC3) in the Moolarben Valley. Pacific National is Australia’s largest private rail freight company with a long history of providing haulage services in the Hunter Valley Coal Chain and to Yancoal. Expanding the Moolarben Coal Complex will beneficially impact the economies of NSW, the Midwestern Regional Council Area and the supporting rail freight supply chain. The economic contribution of freight rail in NSW Freight rail is fundamental to the value of Australia’s coal exports, moving coal from regions to ports and international markets. In NSW, coal haulage comprised 90% of the freight task in 2023, and in 2024, the added economic value of freight rail to NSW was $1.9 billion, contributing 6,697 jobs to the state, many of which are in regional NSW. In 2024, the direct economic contribution of Moolarben Coal Operations to the Mid-Western Regional Council area was $187 million, providing stable employment that supports a range of local businesses. Approximately 60 Pacific National employees live in the region and will benefit from the long-term stability afforded by the expansion of the Moolarben Coal Complex. Pacific National hauls 18 million tonnes of high-quality thermal coal from Yancoal’s Moolarben mine to Newcastle Port each year. This volume equates to approximately 1950 annual rail freight services, directly employing 120 highly skilled crew who are located out of our Mudgee, Greta and Newcastle depots. In total, Pacific National employs 680 staff in support of our NSW coal operations across eight depots. Pacific National also spends over $31 million per year maintaining locomotives and approximately $27 million per year on wagon repairs, wheelset maintenance and fleet upgrades. These services underpin approximately 1000 jobs in NSW at employers such as UGL, Progress Rail, Varley Group, Downer Group, and Gemco Rail. The stability of our coal contracts in NSW has also allowed Pacific National to purchase 50 new fuel efficient diesel electric locomotives that are being manufactured by UGL at their facility in Broadmeadow, supporting local manufacturing jobs in the region. Approving the Moolarben Coal Complex (OC3) Extension Project will preserve rail haulage, maintenance and manufacturing services, providing for continued economic activity in the region and help to ensure that long term, high paying freight and manufacturing jobs remain in NSW. Thank you for your consideration of our submission. Pacific National believes that the Moolarben Coal Complex (OC3) Extension Project is vitally important to the ongoing economic stability of the Mid-Western Regional Council area and freight operations in the region. Kind regards, [redacted] |
|
Attachments |
21271_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 163.61 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21311 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Phoenix Underground |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local business owner located in heavy industrial area of Mudgee, we strongly support the Moolarben extension to support our local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2261 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 project, which represents a significant investment in regional jobs, economic stability, and long-term energy security. The project will continue to provide valuable employment opportunities and flow-on benefits to local businesses while operating under strict environmental regulations and oversight. I encourage decision-makers to approve OC3 to ensure the ongoing prosperity of the community and the responsible development of our natural resources. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben operation has 1200 full time employees and another 400 additional contractors. It is one of the largest employers in the Mudgee area and it is in the best interests of this community's future and prosperity that this operation continues for the sustainability of Mudgee and surrounding communities. The Moolarben operation has an impeccable record in the area of environmental management and rehabilitation of mined areas which is evident when travelling along Ulan Rd past the operation and clearly evident in the submission application. Moolarben has certainly demonstrated responsibility in the past and present. People would be hard pressed it they did not know that the area had been mined to identify this given the extensive rehabilitation works which has returned the flora back to as good if not better condition than pre-mining and allowed fauna to flourish. Sensitive and unique habitat is identified and excluded or offset by the nature of the approval process. The Moolarben operation contributes significant investment with infrastructure such as the Ulan Rd upgrade and various community projects (pump tack, grants, Drip walking track, etc) that have provided a better standard of living and quality of life for the residents in this area. These projects additionally enhance the area and provide benefit through tourism. Whilst it is recognised the world is transitioning from non-renewable to renewable energy, it is not practicable that this change can occur as rapidly as the ill-informed believe. Common sense needs to prevail so that these existing operations can continue and by nature of the available mining reserves and economics they will end at a sensible time when alternatives are embedded, available to all and reliable. This is in the best interests of Australia given the taxes, royalties and associated employment. Australia needs time to adjust its economic models and strategies and these smaller expansions in mining areas must be supported in the medium term to allow this transition. |
Kelton McDonnell
|
ID |
21446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The moolarben submission highlights a business that has continued to surpass legal & moral requirements when it comes to safety for not only the individuals that work at this company, but for the environment they work & the community they assist. The focus on native flora & fauna that can potentially be affected by the project & the extensive offsetting they plan & will provide is tried & true based on previous works. Making this submission not only a application of promise for the area but an acknowledgement of their responsibility. The overwhelming support by local members from the community in the mid-west region shows that Moolarben has built confidence in the locals for a long time. I would like to see this approval go ahead as the submission states they will leave a positive impact on major factors to our region. Our backyard will be left better than they found it, the community supported with economic injection & infrastructure. |
Martin Burns
|
ID |
21481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2280 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mining is still a big part of Australia and provides many jobs to the local community that thrive due to it's existence. This needs to continue as long as possible. Solar and wind is not the answer only part. |
Pat Hudson
|
ID |
21486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex, operated by Yancoal Australia. The proposed extension will sustain local employment, support regional businesses, and continue generating significant economic benefits for the community and for New South Wales. The project builds on existing approved infrastructure, allowing for efficient operations while remaining subject to strict environmental regulations and oversight. Ongoing mining at Moolarben provides important job security for workers and contractors in and around Mudgee. Maintaining established operations helps ensure economic stability in the region. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Scott Redfern
|
ID |
21491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing this submission in full support of the OC3 extension at Moolarben Coal. I am employed at Moolarben. I am proud of the mine and business. My employment with Moolarben is the reason my wife and young family now call this area home. This extension will be great for my family along with a lot of family’s in this area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is a great place for job opportunities and supports the local community in different ways. It helps support the businesses in the communities by bringing business to town and is a great place to work. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mine provides stable employment, supports local businesses, and plays an important role in sustaining the local economy. From my perspective as a nearby resident the mine has operated responsibly and I have not experienced negative impacts on my property or lifestyle I believe the extension will continue to deliver benefits to the community while maintaining appropriate environmental and operational standards |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a lifelong resident of Mudgee in regional New South Wales. I understand and respect the environmental considerations associated with coal mining. However, I am writing in support of the conditional approval of the proposed lease extension for the Moolarben Coal Mine. Coal mining is not only a major employer in our region — it is the backbone of the local economy. If the Moolarben operation were to cease, it would coincide with the imminent closure of other local operations. Without the mining industry, Mudgee’s economic foundation would be severely weakened. A significant proportion of local households depend on mining-related employment for financial stability. The town’s rising cost of living — including housing and rental prices — means many families are reliant on mining income to meet everyday expenses. The downturn or closure of mining activity would not only reduce direct employment, but also diminish spending in local businesses, creating flow-on job losses well beyond the mine itself. Mining activity supports a broad network of local services and industries, including: • Mining engineering and maintenance firms • Heavy vehicle mechanics • Electrical and auto electrical service providers • Conveyor belt and equipment specialists • Underground contractors • Irrigation and pump supply companies • Other small and medium enterprises that serve mining personnel and operations These businesses are firmly established in Mudgee’s industrial areas and rely on the demand created by mining operations. The contraction of this industry would not only impact mining employees, but also the viability of these ancillary businesses and their workforce. While agriculture, viticulture, and tourism contribute to the regional economy, these sectors alone do not generate the scale of employment or economic activity necessary to sustain Mudgee in the absence of mining. Tourism, in particular, is seasonal and does not provide the consistent economic base that a diversified regional economy requires. Members of the mining sector, including the operators at Moolarben, also contribute to community events and local organisations, supporting social programs, charity events, and community cohesion. I support a conditional approval that includes robust environmental safeguards and regulatory oversight. I believe that a balanced approach — one that protects community wellbeing, supports environmental responsibility and recognises the economic realities of our region — is in the best interests of Mudgee’s future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4074 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the extension project, as it will provide security and continuity of employment for the existing open cut workforce. It will also continue to provide significant economic benefits to the state and particularly to Mudgee Region. Mudgee is a beautiful town and is directly affected by the amount of jobs in Moolarben. This project would maintain around 700 jobs in the area, and continue to inject around $180 million into the local economy each year. As a spouse of a current employee, this project directly affects me, and I strongly submit that it should be allowed to proceed. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I write to express my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The OC3 Extension Project represents a responsible and strategically important continuation of mining operations in the region. The project will deliver significant economic, employment, and community benefits while building on the existing operational footprint and infrastructure of the approved complex. Economic and Employment Benefits The extension will: • Sustain and create direct and indirect employment opportunities for workers across the region. • Provide continued economic stimulus to local businesses, contractors, and service providers. • Generate substantial royalties and tax revenues that contribute to public services and infrastructure. For regional communities within the Mid-Western Regional Council area, continued operation of the Moolarben complex is vital to economic stability. The project will help secure long-term employment and maintain the strong economic base that supports families, schools, healthcare services, and local enterprises. Efficient Use of Existing Infrastructure A key strength of the OC3 Extension Project is that it leverages existing, approved infrastructure. By extending operations within an established mining complex, the project minimizes the need for new disturbance areas and maximizes the efficiency of current facilities, transport networks, and operational systems. This approach reduces environmental impacts compared to establishing a new standalone operation, while ensuring that land use is optimized in a practical and responsible manner. Environmental Management and Regulatory Oversight The mining industry in New South Wales operates under one of the most stringent regulatory frameworks in the world. The OC3 Extension Project will be subject to comprehensive environmental assessment, strict operating conditions, and ongoing compliance monitoring. With modern mining practices, progressive rehabilitation, water management controls, and biodiversity mitigation measures, the project can continue to operate in a way that balances economic benefits with environmental stewardship. Contribution to Energy Security and Economic Transition Coal continues to play a significant role in domestic and international energy markets, as well as in steel production. Responsible Australian coal projects such as Moolarben contribute to global energy security while maintaining high environmental and workplace safety standards. At the same time, the revenues and employment generated by projects like OC3 support broader economic resilience as Australia navigates long-term energy transitions. Conclusion The OC3 Extension Project represents a practical, economically sound, and responsibly managed continuation of an existing mining operation. It will: • Protect and sustain regional employment • Support local and state economies • Maximize use of established infrastructure • Operate under robust environmental safeguards For these reasons, I strongly support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Yours sincerely, |
Annette Everingham
|
ID |
21626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coal mine employs lots of local people including myself, my husband, our son and many of our friends. It's conveniently close to home and allows us a wonderful lifestyle in the Mudgee area which we love. Moolarben coal mine contributes to the community in many ways including supporting local sporting clubs which has a flow on effect for our kids and volunteers. Myself my husband and my son have all seen first hand that the mine operates in a safe and environmentally responsible way, we have experienced first hand the posative work culture there as do many local employees. Many of these employees contribute to the community as volunteers in sporting clubs such as myself and to community services such as VRA which my son volunteers for, they contribute as volunteers to rural fire services, and have coaching and mentoring roles in community organisations such as the agulgong community boxing gym, all of these roles are made possible by the lifestyle roster that Moolarben offers giving its employees plenty of days off recouperate and be involved in the community. We support the expansion as we think it will be a very important and posative project for our community to expand the life term of the mine and to allow Moolarben to keep mining responsibly and with respect and consideration for the environment and the community in which we live. The mine also brings economic support to the mudgee region which is essential for our local businesses to thrive and for community services to continue. |
Justin Punales
|
ID |
21641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi Team at the Independent Planning Commission, My name’s Justin and I’ve been working at Moolarben Coal for the last eight years. I’m also a local – I live just down the road in Mudgee with my wife and two kids. This place isn’t just a job to me, it’s home. I’m writing because I really want you to give the thumbs up to the Open Cut 3 extension. It’s not some big new mine – it’s just extending what’s already there, on land that’s been cleared for years. For me and the other 895 blokes who work here (684 of us actually live in the district), this means we keep our jobs. It keeps the pay cheques coming so we can pay the mortgage, put food on the table, and keep the kids in the local schools. When the mine does well, the whole town does well – the pubs, the shops, the footy club, all of it. Moolarben’s been part of this community for 15 years now. They’ve chucked over two million bucks into local stuff – kids’ sport, the hospital, the arts, you name it. That’s real money staying right here. On the environment side, they’ve actually made it better with this one. More trees going back in than what’s coming out, bigger setbacks from the creeks and the nature reserve, and they’re already the cleanest coal mine in the country when it comes to emissions. I see the rehab work every day – the land looks better after they’re finished than before. Look, I get that not everyone loves coal mines, but this one’s been done properly. It’s given hundreds of families like mine a decent life out here in the bush. Shutting it down early would hurt a lot of good people for no good reason. I’m asking you to please approve the OC3 extension so we can keep going strong into the future. Happy to chat if you want – just give me a call. Thanks for taking the time to read this. Cheers, Justin Mudgee local & Moolarben Coal worker |
Dale Lomas
|
ID |
21646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the proposed extension to Moolarben’s OC3. I recognise that there are certain negative impacts mining can have but I firmly believe the positives well and truly outweigh those negative impacts people may like to highlight. The obvious impact this mine and others like it have on the wider community is economic. The main reason this region has the prosperity and growth it has experienced I think solely comes down to the industry, namely mining, that is located here. It provides opportunity and income for such a large amount of the local community and encourages people to potentially call this beautiful region home. I’m a prime example of this, as I would have never moved to the region and purchased a home had this industry not been here to provide the opportunity. The result, my partner and I are now local members with a vested interest in the prosperity and maintenance of the area. Encouraging visitors or those wishing for a tree change wherever we get the chance. Without this industry and its extended operation, we will likely have to leave the area in search of stable employment that suits our skills. The environment is of huge concern and should be to any logical human being as it’s critical to our existence. But I believe Yancoal goes over and above in considering the real impacts as well as potential impacts its operations may have on its surrounding environment and the greater environment of the world. By thoroughly assessing these impacts they have developed a proposal that will allow their production to continue not at the expense of the environment. Not to mention, the rehabilitation of the area could almost challenge Mother Nature herself. I believe Yancoal’s proposal is fair and just as it does not ask for approval of any more mining life than is currently approved and they have considered the environmental impacts of their proposal and adjusted it accordingly. |
Joelene Tabone
|
ID |
21656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Introduction I am writing to express my support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at Moolarben Coal Operations. This submission is made in recognition of the project’s economic, employment, and regional stability benefits, as well as the role the operation plays in sustaining local communities and industries. Regional mining projects like this are not abstract developments — they directly underpin jobs, small businesses, infrastructure, and long-term financial security for families across the district. Regional Employment and Economic Stability The OC3 Extension Project will help maintain long-term employment across a wide range of roles including mining, civil works, transport, maintenance, environmental services, and contracting. These are skilled, well-paid positions that support households and keep regional towns economically active. Flow-on effects matter just as much as direct employment. Mining operations sustain: • Local contractors and civil construction crews • Equipment suppliers and mechanical services • Accommodation and hospitality providers • Local retail and trade businesses • Transport and logistics operators Without project continuity, those income streams don’t just “adjust” — they drop sharply. Extension projects prevent boom-and-bust cycles and allow families and businesses to plan ahead instead of constantly reacting to uncertainty. Support for Local Businesses and Contractors Projects like the OC3 Extension create predictable demand for local services and suppliers. That stability encourages businesses to invest in equipment, training, apprenticeships, and workforce development. When project pipelines are clear, contractors hire and train. When pipelines are uncertain, they freeze spending and reduce staff. Extension approvals directly influence whether regional businesses grow or stall. Responsible Resource Development Coal remains a significant export and energy input resource. Regardless of long-term energy transition goals, the current reality is that demand still exists domestically and internationally. Meeting that demand through regulated, monitored Australian operations is more responsible than shifting supply to jurisdictions with weaker oversight. Operations in NSW operate under strict environmental and safety conditions. Extension within an existing, regulated mining footprint is far more controlled and manageable than opening entirely new sites elsewhere. Infrastructure and Community Contributions Large mining operations contribute to: • Road upgrades and maintenance • Emergency services funding and support • Community grants and sponsorship programs • Training and apprenticeship pathways • Regional infrastructure investment These contributions are not minor — they materially improve the resilience and capability of surrounding towns Environmental Management and Oversight Modern mining extensions operate under comprehensive environmental controls, monitoring, and reporting requirements. Extension projects within established operations benefit from: • Existing monitoring systems • Proven management plans • Established compliance frameworks • Ongoing regulatory oversight Continuous improvement in rehabilitation, water management, and land use planning is standard practice in regulated extensions. Regional Reality Regional communities understand the trade-offs and benefits of resource projects because they live with them every day. For many families, mining is not a political issue — it is how mortgages are paid, businesses stay open, and young people can stay in the region instead of relocating to cities. Stopping or restricting extensions doesn’t remove demand — it removes opportunity from regional areas. Conclusion The OC3 Extension Project represents practical, regulated, economically meaningful development within an existing mining operation. It supports employment, business continuity, regional infrastructure, and responsible resource production. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in full favour of the extension project as it ensures job stability for the current open-cut workforce. It also to contributes substantial economic benefits to the state and to Mudgee Region. Mudgee is directly affected by the amount of jobs in Moolarben, which generates approx. $159 million in wages. Additionally, Moolarben injects around $180 million into the local economy each year, directly affecting the people of Mudgee. As the daughter of a current employee, this project directly affects me, and I strongly believe that it should be allowed to continue. |
George Ling
|
ID |
21701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4817 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support coal miners |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Mudgee region thrives on mining, it helps the region continue to grow and be desirable to a lot of people across the state and country. Until renewable energy is capable of powering the masses, coal will forever be required to keep our lights on. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I will keep my submission short as i am sure you need to ready many. My stance on the mines in the local area are that they constantly pump money into the community, helping fix roads, aiding with getting doctors etc. Im sure over the years there has been big projects they have funded. Moorlarben coal is no different. On top of local funding they also employ quite a large amount of local people. Without mines places like mudgee will cease to exist, tourism does not keep a town like mudgee alive. I whole heartedly believe they deserve this extension and i am no way employed or coerced at the time of writing this. |
Kandice Edmunds
|
ID |
21811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have family that work in the mine and would be directly affected by the closure of this mine site. Not only would they be affected by loss of employment but their community would also be affected. The mine supply hundreds of jobs for people in the surrounding area, to people that have moved to that area specifically for work. I also work for a contracting company that would be affected by the closure as we generate revenue from this mine site. |
Rowen Lindley
|
ID |
21866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi my name is Rowen Lindley, I have been employed by Yancoal Moolarben coal mine for the last 4 years. Without being employed my Moolarben I wouldn’t have been able to buy a property in the region which I love. I believe that moolarben has greatly enhanced the community in positive ways from the ongoing community funding to employing many locals and supporting many local businesses. The extension will keep the funding and cash flowing through the community, whether it be through simple things like getting a coffee or having out of town family and friends visit and going to wineries too buying large ticket items like cars and houses. The last 4 years of employment have been great and I’d love for it to continue. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
22036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
By granting this will provide for the community funding/donations to organisations in the local area . With over 700 employees and contractors. Without the ability to continue producing Once the extension is completed and the land is rehabilitated there will be more habitat area for native animals. With my partner employed at moolarben coal, it keeps us living locally and supports our family. |
Sam Bullock
|
ID |
19976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Mudgee local, father of a young family and mine worker. The Moolarben pit 3 extension directly affects me and my family. Being able to stay in the area where I have roots, family and work is extremely important. I have worked for Yancoal for over 8 years. They have a massive positive influence on the community, through grants, employment and local projects. I whole heartedly support this project. The benefits far out weigh the negatives. |
Kurt Nightingale
|
ID |
19981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I write to provide a formal submission regarding the proposed OC3 Extension at Moolarben Coal Operations in New South Wales. The Moolarben operation has been a significant contributor to the regional economy through employment, local procurement, and infrastructure investment. Any proposed extension, including the OC3 Extension, should be carefully assessed to ensure that economic benefits are balanced with environmental protection, community wellbeing, and long-term land stewardship. In considering this proposal, I respectfully request that decision-makers give thorough consideration to the following matters: 1. Environmental Impacts The extension’s potential impacts on air quality, groundwater systems, biodiversity, and rehabilitation outcomes must be rigorously evaluated. Clear, enforceable environmental management plans should be implemented, with transparent monitoring and reporting mechanisms accessible to the public. 2. Water Resources Given the importance of groundwater and surface water systems in the region, detailed hydrogeological assessments should demonstrate that surrounding landholders and ecosystems will not experience unacceptable impacts. Ongoing independent monitoring is recommended. 3. Community and Social Impacts The cumulative impacts of mining activities on nearby communities must be considered, including noise, dust, traffic movements, and social infrastructure pressures. Meaningful and ongoing community consultation should remain a priority throughout the life of the project. 4. Economic Considerations The extension has the potential to support continued employment and economic activity in the region. Clear commitments to local employment, training, and procurement would strengthen the proposal’s social licence. 5. Rehabilitation and Closure Planning A detailed and funded rehabilitation strategy should be maintained to ensure that land is restored to a safe and productive post-mining use. Progressive rehabilitation should remain a key requirement. In conclusion, while the OC3 Extension may provide ongoing economic benefits, it is essential that approval—if granted—be subject to strict environmental safeguards, transparent compliance measures, and continued community engagement. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this submission. Yours faithfully, Kurt Nightingale |
Oleksandr Taylor
|
ID |
19986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I lodge my submission to support project. I think it is a great opportunity to support local businesses. |
douglas stephenson
|
ID |
19991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern I Douglas Stevenson would like to give my support to the open cut three malabin coal project for the following reasons Mudgee is a regional town that without mining would struggle to give opportunity for people to live their life with hope of ever buying a house or gathering the objects that one would use to measure a successful life Maji wants had a ever tour and a large amount of seasonal work for the people to gain a reliable well paid income when the Avatar alone clothes it caused a devastating strain on the Mudgee and surrounding working community and now the seasonal work has slide right up due to mechanical harvesting and pruning of grapes this now leaves mining as one of the only large employers that pays above award rates so people can actually get ahead in their life and have the opportunity to actually own a house or property instead of renting their entire life now let's consider the effect of the mining industry closing down around Mudgee first thing 800 people lose their jobs people need to work to provide for their families so no work means they have to move to a location there is work so now all those families move out of Mudgee you no longer need so many school teachers so those families now need to move as well to find work now the mining community let's consider all the trade shops mechanics coffee shops specialty services Medical Doctors we've no population in mudji they all close down or worse gave bankrupt the majority of the magic community realise degree that without mining Mudgee would die we do not get the tourism needed to support the town and not everyone can work at Woolworths so if you choose to reject this extension project congratulations that wrong decision will force so many people to move and sell up in the Mudgee region causing the township to go backwards and slowly die because you decided to listen to people who do not understand mining and have nothing better to do then destroy regional growth and winds about an industry they don't understand the mining industry supports regional communities in more ways than just jobs they donate large amounts of money to the regional councils they were the ones that supported the doctors for Mudgee initiative and they often hold events for the children of the community these things cannot largely be accomplished by local councils the Mudgee region needs to keep mining in this region for as long as possible also mining is one of the only Industries that can give people with a average education that have not been able to attend a colleagues a successful start to life as an apprentice or an unskilled labour through hard work to make a meaningful contribution to their family situation farmers in drought situations also use mining work to supplement their income through the hard times of a drought the environment is important but so our regional people and we deserve the right to work and Australia deserves the right to keep mining and pay off their debts Australia will not be a first world country without mining so please make the right decision and support the open cut three malavan project |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19996 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2343 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the development |
Shannon Sunderland
|
ID |
20051 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The approval of this submission will be widely beneficial to the community and surrounding communities with job security and keeping the local franchisee in business. |
Glenn Kurtz
|
ID |
20156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The approval of the OC3 extension at moolarben is vital and very important to the local community in Mudgee. Moolarben Coal mine employees over 1000 people from the local area and would be catastrophic to the local area if these people lose there jobs. Being a Mudgee local all my life I would hate to see the effects this would have on the area. |
Ian Sanford
|
ID |
20181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support — from Ian, Local Resident and (redacted) Employee To whom it may concern, My name is Ian and I am a resident of (redacted). I have lived here for four years and been employed at the (redacted) for three years. I am writing in support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. As someone who works at (redacted) and lives locally, I see firsthand the positive contribution this operation makes to the community and local economy. The extension project proposes to extend the existing OC3 open-cut operations within the footprint of the current mine. This extension will not extend the overall life of the mine beyond its current approved term, nor increase production rates — it will simply allow mining activity to continue in a managed way alongside the existing operations. From my perspective: • Employment Stability and Economic Contribution The Moolarben Coal Complex is a major employer in this region, providing direct work to hundreds of people — many from Cumbandry and surrounding towns. These stable, long-term jobs mean security for families, ongoing local spending, and support for small businesses. The extension will help maintain employment for the workforce through the approved mine life. • Responsible Management and Safety From my experience working at (redacted), the company appears committed to responsible practices and the wellbeing of its staff. Management treat employees fairly, and safety is prioritised on site. • Community Support and Local Contribution I have observed the company supporting local sporting clubs, schools, charities, and emergency services. In times of need, such as during bushfire events, they have contributed resources and support to fire-affected properties and volunteer groups. • Continued Regional Benefits Beyond direct employment, the operation injects significant funds into regional service providers, contractors, and suppliers. This broader economic contribution enhances services and opportunities for the broader Mid-Western Regional community. For these reasons, I respectfully request the Independent Planning Commission approve the OC3 Extension Project so that continued employment, economic stability, and community support negotiated through these operations can endure. Signed, Ian |
Nick Bligh
|
ID |
20196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i am a local resident of Mudgee and I wish to make a submission in support of the OC3 extension. The Moolarben mine has been an important contributor to the local and regional economy for many years. It provides ongoing employment opportunities both direct and indirect for local people and supports a wide range of businesses and contractors in the area. Many families such as mine in our community rely directly or indirectly on the mine, and its continued operation helps maintain economic stability in the region. I am directly hired in the underground operations, and my wife runs a local swim school which gives young kids in the region the opportunity to learn to swim many of her clients are hired directly by the Moolarben operations which gives her the needed stability for a small business. Moolarben operations are very important to contributing to local community and sporting groups which is integral to the prosperity and future of the Mudgee region there is currently a lot of young families in the region, and this extension would be fundamental in securing the social fabric for the community's future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
20201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to show my support of the proposed development of open cut 3. I am a local of the area and currently work at Moolarben, therefore I am well versed on the benefits for the community and myself and my family. These include more job opportunities for locals, economic contributions, local business revenue and support for organisations such as education, sports, health and the arts. With reduced disturbance of the surrounding wildlife habitat and increased land rehabilitation I am certain this will be a positive decision going forward for all. |
Nathan Brown
|
ID |
20206 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m talking today to show how much yancoal means to the community and the state.Having this extension is a huge impact on our state not only showing figures but the support yancoal give us we couldn’t live without them.supporting so many jobs and providing energy and turning every light on for our own comfort in our home.We are a great team and do so much out of work supporting charity’s and functions and giving people the knowledge and interest how important having coal around us and what it does for everyone.so please make this go ahead we have been nothing but so supportive to everyone and our country and want to keep On giving that’s what where best at. |
Philip Searle
|
ID |
20211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of this proposed development to extend mining at Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Pit to secure ongoing jobs for those employed at Moolarben and see the continuation of contributions to the local Mid-Western region with the numerous grants and sponsorships which sees improvements in our area, supports education, sports, health and the arts. Their support of local communities has helped achieve more Doctors 4 Mudgee among many other things......please see link which shows their support of this. https://doctors4mudgee.com.au/ |
Amanda Searle
|
ID |
20216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
15/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making a submission that supports the conditional approval of the proposed development at Moolarben Coal open cut 3. Moolarben Coal is a low emissions coal mine in the Mid-Western Region of NSW. This region has benefited greatly from the support Moolarben brings to the local communities through grants, spinsorships and initiatives which have injected finances into education, sports, health and the arts. As a community we have also benefited from their support of Doctors 4 Mudgee, which has recently secured a number of much needed new doctors for our medical centres. |
Brent Giarratano
|
ID |
19841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am submitting my support for the oc3 extension for yancoal moolarben . This project is imperative to my families longevity in the Mudgee region and would force hundreds of workers to relocate being detrimental to Mudgee regions economy stability and growth. |
Lilly Lonsdale
|
ID |
19846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m a 27 year old saving for my house, my future. I have been with moolarben now for 2 years & am and oc3 sider myself with out this extension my job along with 700 others that’s a whopping 700 families with out income to support themselves and a community that will be left to struggle if we are unable to succeed with this venture. Here at moolarben we support a wide range of the community and families and it would be devastating if we were to go without. I love my job and I love that it is local and only a short 40 min trip from mudgee cbd. Please support me and many other workers and our livelyhoods. We love it here. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. The continuation of operations at Moolarben represents an important opportunity to sustain employment, regional investment, and economic stability within the Mid-Western region of New South Wales. The project will help secure ongoing jobs for local workers and contractors while supporting numerous small and medium businesses that rely on the mine’s operations. In addition to direct employment, the extension will continue to generate royalties and contributions that benefit essential infrastructure, community programs, and local services. I acknowledge the importance of maintaining high environmental and safety standards, and I am confident that the project will continue to operate under strict regulatory oversight and established management plans. Responsible resource development remains critical to supporting energy supply and economic growth during the transition to lower-emissions technologies. For these reasons, I support approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension and its continued contribution to the local community and broader economy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19861 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben coal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moved myself an family here 20 years ago to establish a better life style for our family . The mining industry here at moolarben has given us the opportunity to hold a sustainable career an oportunity to create a great lifstyle an kickstart for our children for the future. I strongly value an hope moolarben can continue developing to secure our future comfortably, lets face it the economy is not getting any cheaper the cost of living has risen rediculously an the mines itself follow every protocal to protect the enviroment wilst helping alot of people adapt an reduce stress from cost of day to day living. Im one of these people along side my husband who desperatly want to see the expansion go ahead as we plan on living here many more years to come . |
Paul Willis
|
ID |
19866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to add a positive submission to the hopeful success of the oc3 extension, I'm employed by yancoal and this would further my employment into the future and help with skill growth and future employment. I also have a son that has started an apprenticeship which keeps local jobs in the community. There are also many benefits for financial help towards the mudgee district. We live close to the mines and have not experienced any negative impacts from them. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an apprentice at Yancoal Moolarben and I support the OC3 extension. This will not only support my career but also the others on site and locals in the community. Minning generates many jobs and opportunities for those in the surrounding areas and this extension will contiue to generate more jobs/opportunities. There are many pollutants that come from minning but those are managed in regulation to thr government but also to protect the community. Living quite close to the mines, I have never experienced any of the negatives impacts of minning. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19886 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m am apart of the work force at Moolarben and have been employed here for 15 years and and will continue to work here as long as I can moving into the future. My 3 kids have been apart of this community for over 18years going to school here and also working in the local community. My family has been apart of the sport community in Mudgee for 18 years also. My wife and I have been business owner’s in the past,in Mudgee our local region. Mining has led to my family having a good upbringing in a safe environment and a great country town. This approval will give my family security for the future and will mean my family and I won’t need to move to another state or town in the future. We consider ourselves locals in the community and would like to continue to live in this town. Please consider approving this proposal for the betterment of this town and community. Regards, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2765 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an employee of Yancoal and I have 2 kids and a husband who benefit from my ongoing employment at the Moolarben mine. Moolarben is a fantastic place to work that provides me and my family with financial security. With rising costs of living across all of Australia I know how important it is for not only my family, but all employees at Moolarben to have on going financial security. The OC3 extension will also provide more jobs and more families to also have financial security during these uncertain economical times. I see first hand how compliant Yancoal is and how much time and effort is put into rehabbing areas that are impacted by mining. I also see how respectful they are in managing the mine in a way that reduces unwanted environmental impacts and any adverse affects our operations have on local residents. I see how much money mining pours into the local community through the workers that are supporting the local community and local businesses. The mine also financially contributes to the community. In the event that the extension doesn’t go ahead we run the risk of locals not having employment and having to work away from their families- miss out on watching their kids grow up or move out of the area. Australia already has a living crisis with homelessness rates higher than they have ever been. Relocating may not even be an option given the housing crisis. I am in full support of the OC3 extension going ahead, not only to secure my kids future and their quality of life, but for my fellow colleagues and those that are in need of an opportunity to get ahead financially. The extra jobs that this extension would create could change so many lives for the better by providing much needed financial security in these times where cost of living are seeing many struggling and living on the streets. |
Gregory Brown
|
ID |
19901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I live with my family in the Mudgee region and I along with my children support and represent local sporting clubs. The Moolarben Coal Mine makes a significant contribution to employment in the local area and supports many local organisations and businesses. The mining industry, including Moolarben, represents a large portion of our local community. |
Bruce Birchall
|
ID |
19906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Mudgee local who has been fortunate to have been involved in the Mudgee mining industries for many years from trades apprentice to manager. I have worked around 30 years locally and near 10 at other mines around Australia and overseas. I have seen the benefits and opportunities that mining has provided me, my family and the entire local region. The Mudgee region would not be the success it is with mining, therefore I am fully supportive of the OC3 expansion project. I have seen many operations in my time and have returned to work at Moolarben Mine as it is a high quality and responsible world class operation. There is always environmental and social impacts with any human endeavour. Mining is no different, however it is the management of these impacts that makes all the difference. I have first hand seen the land of the Moolarben mine, cleared, mined and rehabilitated responsibly and to high quality. Moolarben mine is a proven responsible miner in many ways, including the environmental issues, I have no hesitation in putting my support behind the project and therefore behind everyone in the local community to continue to be able to have ongoing opportunity for employment and business prosperity, knowing the land will be returned to a high standard once mining is completed. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as a resident of New South Wales and someone with strong ties to the Mudgee region to express my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex, operated by Yancoal. The Mid-Western Region, including Mudgee and surrounding areas, has long relied on the resources sector as a cornerstone of its economy. The existing Moolarben Coal Complex is a major employer and contributor to the local community. Approving the OC3 Extension would secure the continuation of these vital benefits by extending mining operations of the current OC3 area. Key reasons I support this project include: • Job security and regional employment — The extension is expected to maintain employment for approximately 700 workers. In a region where mining provides high-quality, well-paid jobs and training opportunities, this continuity is essential to prevent unemployment and support families who depend on these roles. • Ongoing economic contribution — The project would sustain an estimated $180 million annual injection into the local and state economy through wages, local procurement, contractors, and services. This supports businesses in Mudgee and beyond, from suppliers and retailers to hospitality and trades, helping maintain strong community services and infrastructure. • Energy security and export value — Thermal coal from Moolarben continues to play an important role in meeting domestic and international energy needs during the transition to lower-emissions sources. Supporting this extension helps ensure reliable supply while regional economies adapt to future opportunities. I understand there are environmental considerations, and I trust the assessment process—including the Department of Planning’s review and the IPC’s independent evaluation—will appropriately balance these with the clear social and economic advantages for the people of the Central West. In summary, the OC3 Extension Project represents a practical opportunity to safeguard jobs, sustain regional prosperity, and maintain the economic strength of the Mudgee area for the coming decade. I urge the Commission to approve the project so that these benefits can continue for local workers, families, and businesses. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am supporting the continuation of an existing industry within our LGA. I support the industries commitment to our LGA, through meaningful employment. This in turn supports families to remain within our region. |
James Field
|
ID |
19941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I personally have worked within the Moolarben complex directly and now currently work in a contracting capacity. Moolarben support and sponsor a lot of local events and community groups and have a strong positive presence within the Mudgee and surrounding areas. I would love to see the Moolarben complex have their OC3 extension go ahead so they can continue to be involved in providing jobs and support in the area. |
Steven Dollisson
|
ID |
19951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Extension Project. As a local resident and one of the 700+ employees currently working at Moolarben, I can see the valuable impact the approval of this extension would continue to have on the families and small businesses in the wider Mudgee region. Speaking from experience with a young family in Mudgee, the towns daycares, schools, restaurants, sporting clubs, health services and other varying community organisations would have the ongoing support from the families of those employed by Moolarben. The extension itself is planned to operate with the existing infrastructure, teams and operational equipment already in place, while rehabilitation continues in parts of the mine which are no longer active. Moolarben has generously contributed to many projects within the community, a recent example being the BMX Pump Track at Glen Willow. My reason for wanting to work at Moolarben was because I wanted to support the industry that supports the town - it would be a sad day for the future of the Mudgee Region and its people should this extension not go ahead and the mine comes to an end earlier than it needed to. I appreciate the opportunity to submit in support for this extension. |
Cyrus Bakes
|
ID |
19966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Commissioners, I am writing as a local resident of Mudgee, a husband and father, and someone who works responsibly and safely within the mining industry. My family lives here, my son attends school here, and our future is tied to the strength and sustainability of this region. Mining is not just an industry in the Mid-West — it is a major contributor to local employment, small businesses, infrastructure, and community services. The continuation of projects such as the Moolarben OC3 Extension provides stability for families like mine and many others across the district. I take great pride in working in an industry that operates under strict environmental, safety, and regulatory standards. Modern mining in NSW is highly regulated, and those of us who work in it are committed to responsible practices and continuous improvement. We understand the importance of balancing economic contribution with environmental management, because we live in the same community that is directly impacted. The OC3 Extension represents ongoing employment, local investment, and economic certainty during a time when cost-of-living pressures are significant for Australian families. It supports not only direct mining jobs, but contractors, trades, local suppliers, and service industries throughout the region. I respectfully ask the Commission to consider the real and tangible benefits this project provides to local families and the broader NSW economy. Continued responsible mining supports energy security, export revenue, and regional livelihoods. Thank you for taking the time to read my submission. Sincerely, Cyrus Bakes |
Scott Redfern
|
ID |
19971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
14/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 40 yr old family man that works at Moolarben coal. I am writing this submission in full support of the OC3 extension. My wife and I settled in Mudgee around 12 years ago for the sole reason of my employment with Yancoal Moolarben. We quickly found Mudgee to be our home, started a family and our 2 boys have now started school and are thriving here. All this is thanks to the yancoal. The mining industry and in particular Moolarben are a big reason Mudgee is so good. I personally know that all the mining team from top to bottom take our responsibilities very important in lead up to this extension and would certainly going forward with this approval. This extension would be great for the town, area all of our friends family’s along with my own family. I strongly support this OC3 Moolarben extension to be approved. Scott Redfern |
April Smith
|
ID |
19556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Yancoal Moolarben coal mine extension because it brings real and lasting benefits to our local community. The extension will help protect and create local jobs in Gulgong and surrounding towns, which is vital for families, youth and regional stability. It supports the local economy by generating business for suppliers, contractors and service industries, strengthening our main street and boosting growth. The project also contributes royalties and investment back into our region, helping fund infrastructure, services and community projects. Responsible mining with modern environmental controls can be done alongside strong community engagement and rehabilitation planning. I believe the extension provides long-term economic security and supports the wellbeing of our community now and into the future. |
Graeme Draper
|
ID |
19561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for Yancoal’s OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The coal industry has long been a cornerstone of the Mudgee region’s economy. Projects such as OC3 provide stable, well-paid employment for local families and support hundreds of flow-on jobs in small businesses, contractors, transport operators, hospitality, retail, and essential services throughout the district. In a regional town like ours, maintaining employment opportunities is critical to keeping families in the area, sustaining schools, sporting clubs, medical services, and community organisations. The continuation of mining at Moolarben will help secure long-term economic stability for the region. Without projects like OC3, there is a real risk of job losses, reduced local spending, declining property values, and the gradual weakening of the broader community. The economic contribution from wages, local procurement, and royalties benefits not only Mudgee but also the wider state economy. Yancoal has an established presence in the region and operates within strict regulatory frameworks. The extension represents a continuation of an existing operation rather than a new standalone development, which allows for ongoing employment while maintaining environmental management obligations. Regional communities deserve the opportunity to remain strong and self-sufficient. Supporting the OC3 Extension Project will help ensure that Mudgee continues to thrive as a working country town with real employment opportunities for current and future generations. I respectfully urge the relevant authorities to approve the OC3 Extension Project in the interests of local jobs, economic stability, and the long-term prosperity of the Mudgee region. Sincerely Graeme Draper |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I moved to the region in the 90's and have seen the benefits to the community through employment growth, sponsorship and economic flow throughout generated from the locals that work for Moolarben directly or indirectly. Our son is employed through a subcontractor. He is indigenous and, on the spectrum, so employment opportunities were not plentiful for him. Both his employer and Moolarben staff have been incredibly supportive of him, shown patience and understanding resulting in his personal growth to the point where we now see him full time employed and operating machinery/trucks even taking the reigns of the team recently for the day when his employer suffered a loss. None of this would have occurred if we did not have such a great organisation in our region (verified by the fact he previously worked in a coal mine in another region where he was bullied personally and to the point where he was conducting risky tasks that should never happen and was not in a great place mentally or physically, to the point we needed to bring him home to keep him safe. Devastating for him after all he had achieved to be able to leave home and move to another town). On top of our deep gratitude for Moolarben/his employer we also have seen the area being rehabilitated over my time here and see they are putting the land back to better than what it was prior to mining commencing. A much better scenario than the renewables we see infiltrating and destroying our community. the only benefit renewables have is to the cities that are not looking at the horrid things, not putting local communities and volunteers at risk through the fire season. I fully support the extension and appreciate the time and consideration taken by the organisation to look after our region |
Nathan Bowerman
|
ID |
19611 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Bowermech Heavy Diesel Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom it may concern, My name is Nathan Bowerman and I own a small mechanical business in the local community. We have supported Moolarben Coal and their Sub contracting Company’s for the past three years. Without the support of Moolarben coal, our business would not be as successful as we are today. I am in favour of this extension and support the work that Moolarben Coal Operations do in our local community by supporting local businesses like mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19616 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
IXOM Operations Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
IXOM Watercare has a long-standing relationship with Yancoal through the supply and delivery of water treatment plants and associated services. Through this work, we have gained a strong appreciation of Yancoal’s commitment to environmental stewardship, operational reliability, and responsible resource development. From our experience up to date, Yancoal consistently prioritises the protection of local ecosystems, safe operations, and constructive engagement with suppliers and community stakeholders. We support the Commission’s consideration of the OC3 Extension Project and encourage submissions based on the Assessment Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Environment, noting that it contains the most up‑to‑date and comprehensive information regarding the proposal. We acknowledge the improvements incorporated into the project design and environmental commitments, and we believe the extension will enable continued regional employment, economic stability, and responsible operation within an established mining footprint. We appreciate the IPC’s transparent process and support its thorough assessment of this development application, including any further information published on the Commission’s website. |
Wes Pirie
|
ID |
19626 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben coal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing in support of the OC3 Extension at Moolarben Coal. As an apprentice in the mining industry, this project means a lot to people like me who are just starting out. An apprenticeship is a big commitment — four years of learning, training, and working hard to build a career. Knowing there will be ongoing work in the area gives me confidence that I’ll have a future once I’m qualified. Mining gives young people in our region real opportunities. It allows us to stay close to family, build skills, and create stable careers without having to move away. Projects like OC3 help make that possible. I hope the extension is approved so apprentices like me can continue building our future here in the Mudgee region. |
Nicholas Belton
|
ID |
19631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an Electrician who works at the Moolarben Coal Mine complex. My wife and two daughters (6 and 4) all benefit greatly from the economic conditions created by allowing industry to responsibly mine minerals in this region. I support the expansion as it will allow the Mudgee region to remain prosperous. Australia has some of the most stringent environmental policies in the world. I would argue that on a global scale it is our duty to mine coal in Australia as we will do it with the least amount of impact to the environment. Nicholas Belton |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Nothing required |
Tony Hayes
|
ID |
19651 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Orica mining services |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2280 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the sumbmission to extend OC3 mining area |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As I am at a age of reducing my working hours I am greatly concerned for all the people who work in the black coal industry in the Mudgee region who support communities & who have heavily invested in buying a home to live & support the region to see there future & comintment taking away from them by not extending coal mines in general. It's very depressing to see such a valuable recourse giving away & not used to its full capacity in our country to take the pressure of the average Australian power bills. As a ex Orchardist I'm so proud working at Moolarben Coal mine driving around the site its amazing to see beautiful regenerated grass & tree areas also the large amount of wildlife with dams the water birds seem to love the never ending water supply. As for someone who loves nature its amazing to see black Swans regularly it would be so sad to see so many people affected by the closing down & shortening of the Coaling industry in Mudgee so yes to the future & extended life of Moolarben Coal. |
Michael Anthony
|
ID |
19681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2280 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing to show my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben Open Cut Mine. After looking through the available information and thinking about what it means for the local area and the state more broadly, I believe the extension offers real benefits especially in local employment (both directly and indirectly). With the right safeguards in place, I think it can move forward in a way that supports jobs and the economy while still taking environmental and community responsibilities seriously. |
Sam Turnbull
|
ID |
19696 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Long Necks Developments Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2582 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We own an accommodation Village in the small Village of Ulan. We provide accommodation for some of the mine workers at Moolarben Mine. Our Accommodation facility is known as Ulan Village Green. We have made a significant investment along with an ongoing commitment to service the needs of the people who work in the mine. Our village is crucial for OH&S purposes as it prevents the travel of workers after working long shifts back into Mudgee. This was identified as a safety risk to workers several years ago, and hence the establishment of this facility for not only the mine workers but also the people employed there, and the upgrade to the existing community hall that is still available and used by locals. As a business that relies heavily on the mines, we support Yancoal's application to expand and continue to operate in the local area. It provides badly needed jobs and economic sustainability for many families. |
elliot baume
|
ID |
19701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension of the Moolarben Open Cut would extend the life of a coal mine that produces good quality thermal coal with very low gas content. The Ulan seam carries extremely low green house gas making it a comparatively low emissions operation. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19716 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a proud employee of Moolarben Coal, I have seen first-hand the care and responsibility that goes into planning and operating our site. The Extension Project will be delivered entirely within our existing approvals and on land already owned by the business, without increasing production rates or extending the approved life of the mine. This approach allows us to continue operating in a practical and responsible way, maintaining benefits for the region while avoiding unnecessary new impacts. Moolarben Coal also places a strong emphasis on giving back to the community. Over $2 million has been invested in local programs, events and organisations that support education, sport, health and overall community wellbeing. The Extension Project will allow this commitment to continue, ensuring that local groups and initiatives remain supported into the future. Overall, this project will help protect local jobs, support small and regional businesses, and contribute to the long-term strength and resilience of the Mid-Western region. For these reasons, I am proud to support the Moolarben Extension Project and strongly encourage its approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a member of the community and own property that i reside at close to the mine. I fully support the extension project that will in my opinion have a positive impact on the local community. If the project goes ahead they will provide jobs for the local community, extract the resources they want and rehabilitate the area ensuring that the area will only be impacted once without a chance for future disturbance of the land. Seeing as they are already inn the area it makes sense to continue operations. I believe they will keep providing community support with outreach programs improving the local community. Also keeping more local businesses working with all the support they will need to provide with mine operation. The longer the mine is operational the better the community will be. These are the main reasons I believe this extension project should go ahead. |
Deborah O'Brien
|
ID |
19736 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
O'Brien Pub Group |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This expansion will bring more people to the community. As an owner of a pub in the local area this will bring more patrons to our hotel and strengthen our business. Gulgong is looking for growth and as a small pub this will help with being able to provide better services through economy of scale. |
Christopher Smith
|
ID |
19741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have worked at Moolarben Coal as a contractor for over 4 years. I believe that Yancoal's Moolarben Coal operation is run with a high level of respect for the community and compliance with environmental standards and controls. The Open Cut 3 Extension will support local jobs, the economy and the community by extending mining operations south of the existing mining area. It will ensure jobs for around 700 people, and continued injection of around $180m per year into the economy. The proposal will deliver:- • significant economic benefits to the state • continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce including contractors • no changes to the approved mine life or production rates • a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley • setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve • maximization of use of existing infrastructure • minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. • no final voids |
Deborah O'Brien
|
ID |
19746 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
PERCIE GROUP PTY LTD |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Expansion will have flow on benefits to the community. Run mining camp and transport company that is supported by Moolarben. This expansion will have a beneficial flow on for my business |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2287 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
There is a number of benefits that will be provided to the community, state and nation. Providing ongoing employment for a large number of people plus monetary injection into the economy. |
Timothy Oliphant
|
ID |
19756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom it May Concern I fully support the Open Cut 3 Extension Project for the following reasons: • there are annual economic benefits to the state economy of $1.2B and local economy of $187M • continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce of approx 700 people and their families • no changes to the approved mine life or production rates • a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley • mining in areas that have been previously disturbed by agricultural activities and setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve • maximising use of existing infrastructure • minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography • no final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 extension application following feedback from the community and Government. These improvements will result in: • a reduced disturbance footprint • reduced coal extraction • increased setbacks to protect environmental assets • reduced disturbance of wildlife habitat • increased land rehabilitation. Please approve the OC3 Extension to support our employees, their families and the local communities. Regards Tim Oliphant |
Anthony Banton
|
ID |
19761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. This proposal represents a continuation of mining activities within an existing, established operation that has demonstrated a strong commitment to safety, environmental management, and regulatory compliance. The extension will enable the efficient utilisation of existing infrastructure and workforce, supporting operational continuity and regional economic stability. Projects such as this are essential to maintaining a reliable supply of coal while operating under NSW’s robust planning and environmental framework. In my view, the OC3 Extension Project is a logical progression of the current operation and can be undertaken responsibly within the existing regulatory environment. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The moolarben oc3 extension is extremly important to the community and the employees that work there and could lead to employees losing there jobs if the mines cant get an extension. Yancoal Moolarben sponsers local businesses and helps teens get the skills needed to become involved members on scioty and valuable tradesmen. This means more potentiol bussinesses and more community support for schools, roads, employment, and many other opportunitys. Moolarben does a great job at making the land look untouched after there finished mining in that area. They have great safty measures and land rehabilitation and take care of the employees comunity and nature around them. |
Jonathan Marchant
|
ID |
19786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a person that has lived in the community and have done for the past 39 years, this extension will be great for the town. This business has provided a solid platform for myself and my family, to be able to be home each night and see my family is priceless. I personally promote this extension and see the good that Moolarben Yancoal has done for there people and the community as a whole. |
Adam Croake
|
ID |
19791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coal is a pillar to the mid western council, providing money for business and jobs to the local community. They are very generous with donations to the town ie the new pump track that kids has spent afternoons and holidays enjoying. It would really hurt the community if this extension did not go through and I am in favor of it. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making this submission in support of the proposed OC3 Extension Project. I am employed at the mine and live in the local region. The continuation of this operation is important to me, my family, and many other families who rely on the mine for stable employment. The extension will provide ongoing job security and certainty for workers, contractors, and local businesses who depend on the mine’s operation. Mining plays a significant role in the Mudgee and Ulan region. The income generated supports local shops, trades, sporting clubs, schools and community organisations. Without project extensions such as this, there would be a substantial economic impact on the wider community. From my experience working on site, I have seen the strong focus placed on safety, environmental management and compliance with conditions of consent. I believe the mine has demonstrated its ability to operate responsibly and in accordance with regulatory requirements. The proposed extension will continue under strict environmental conditions and oversight. The OC3 Extension Project provides certainty for the workforce and supports the long-term future of the local community. I respectfully ask the Commission to approve the project, subject to the recommended conditions. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Glen O’Brien
|
ID |
19816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2354 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
YANCOAL has obviously done their due diligence on the expansion. This project will have a continuing economic benefit for the community including local employment., business stimulus, and ongoing community contributions. I would like to see this project go ahead. I have worked with YANCOAL in the Past and believe that they are professional company and a huge benefit to the LGA. It’s important we allow them to have visibility via this expansion to allow reinvesting back into the LGA |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write in support of the proposed project by Moolarben Coal and urge that it be given full and fair consideration for approval. Coal mining remains a critical industry for Australia, making a substantial contribution to national economic stability, regional employment, and energy security. Since commencing operations, Moolarben Coal has demonstrated a strong commitment to responsible mining practices and compliance with regulatory requirements. The company has consistently operated in accordance with environmental and operational standards, reflecting its role as a responsible industry participant. This project has been subject to rigorous environmental assessments designed to ensure that impacts are carefully managed and mitigated. These comprehensive evaluations provide confidence that the project can proceed in an environmentally responsible manner while maintaining appropriate safeguards for the surrounding environment and community. The economic contribution of Moolarben and the broader coal mining industry is significant, supporting jobs, local businesses, and regional development. The continuation and expansion of such operations provide important economic certainty for communities within the Mid-Western Region. Without this project, the region may face increased economic uncertainty and reduced opportunities for sustained growth and employment. For these reasons, I support the approval of this project and recognise its importance to the region’s economic stability, employment, and ongoing development. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2298 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Regional NSW relies heavily on employment within the Coal Mining Sector, I recall the Mudgee region as quite depressed when I first worked in the region in the mid 80s. Since the commencement of large scale coal mining, the region feels much more vibrant. It is also noteworthy that the agricultural and mining industries appear to co exist together around the mining activities of Ulan. The proposed mine life through to 2038, also ensures employment opportunity for the next generation and continues stimulation of the regional economy. Since commencing in the industry the requirements to maintain social license have become more demanding, and I believe Moolarben are proactive in ensuring the community is kept informed and take all feedback seriously. |
Nick Peninton
|
ID |
19016 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am currently employed at Moolarben Coal as an mechanical fitter and have been working at the site for 14 years and 6 months. I am making this submission to express my concern regarding the potential impacts on my employment should the OC3 Extension not be approved. My role at Moolarben Coal is directly linked to the continuation of mining operations associated with the OC3 extension. Without the extension the ongoing viability of my postion would be significantly affected and I face the real prospect of losing my employment. This would have substantial consequences not only for me personally but also for my family and our finacial security. Employment provided by the Moolarben operations supports skilled workers like myslef who live in the local and regional community. The loss of jobs would have flow-on effects for local businesses, contractors and services that rely on a stable workforce an ongoing operations at the mine. I acknowledge that the independent planning commison must carfully consider environmental, social and economic factors when assessing this project. However, I beleive that the social and economic impacts associate with job losses and reduced employemnt opportunities in the region should be given significant weight. Continued employment allows workers to remain in the area to support loacal econmies and maintain stable livelihoods. The OC3 Extension provides certainty of employment for myslef and many other workers at the site. Approval of the extension would support job security, workforce retention and the broader economic stability of the region. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards, Nick Peninton - Moolarben Coal |
Bruce Coulter
|
ID |
19111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2155 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
There is no evidence or proper scientific interrogation that burning coal or increasing CO2 is responsible for human induced sudden climate change. Climates have always changed. Humans are responsible for 3% of global CO2 emissions..so how can our contributions even be problematic at such low levels. CO2 has been demonized & along with it, coal. This is more of a UN driven fad, than any threat to human existence & in fact more CO2 means more plant life, microbe life, bio plankton life in the seas & improvements in the whole ecosystem. Using our coal for our energy production should be our primary ficus, as it it cheap, abundant & a very reliable form of power which the unrenewables cannot currently meet. In fact we have to continue using it as we'll run out of locations for wind mills & solar farms before we run out of coal...except our country & economy will be destroyed in the ideological fantasy pursuit. Coal produces jobs & cheap reliable power, and should be Australia's primary source of power & provide a good return selling it overseas at higher prices. |
Gerald Tinney
|
ID |
19121 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Coalroc (NSW) Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We support the approval of Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Expansion Project as this will ensure the continued operations and engagement of employees, contractors, suppliers and service providers. As a contractor we employ over 60 personnel from mining operations in this region including at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The continued operations ensures that the Greater Mudgee region and businesses connected to these operations also thrive and the economic benefit of the continued operations is enjoyed by all. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben OC3 extension as it will directly impact me and my family, as well as countless others who are directly and indirectly employed by Moolarben. If this extension is not approved, it will have a knock-on effect into the local community with many families living in Mudgee for employment in the mining industry. If this employment is taken away, it will cause many families having to move elsewhere for work. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The impact from this extension is all positive. More work for the local community along with more money going back to the local community aswell. Moolarben Coal alone generated 123 local suppliers which made $56 million dollars in revenue for local businesses in the mid western region council area. The extension is all previously farmed areas and it will be better than ever after the rehabilitation works is complete. 535 hectares of native woodland to restore it with. Will be better than ever it ever was across that section of land. Some people don’t realise how much the mines have a positive impact. Please let this extension go ahead, for all the communities of the mid western region council areas. Thank you |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The development would secure jobs for the workforce (almost 1000 people) which would boost the local economy for years to come |
Stacey Chen
|
ID |
19156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2119 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project itself can boost the state economy, secure more employment with maximised utilisation of the current infrastructure and machinery. |
Lee Adam
|
ID |
19181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the proposed extension would be great for ongoing mine life of the projects, supporting employment and the business of the local community |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish for the Project to be approved. Predominantly for economic reasons to do with:- A large number of long term jobs. The provision of a product that is still in extraordinarily high demand. The contribution of royalties to the State of NSW is another benefit that is often overlooked. The existance of an existing mine site. Thank you for your consideration. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission is made in support of the proposed OC3 Extension of the Moolarben Coal Operations. The Moolarben Coal Complex is a significant contributor to the regional and state economy, providing substantial direct and indirect employment opportunities. The continuation and extension of OC3 will ensure ongoing job security for hundreds of workers on site, as well as for the many contractors, suppliers, and service providers who rely on the operation. These jobs support families across the region and contribute to the sustainability of local businesses in surrounding towns. Beyond employment, Moolarben Coal has demonstrated a long-standing commitment to investing in and supporting the local community. The operation regularly contributes to community programs, infrastructure, sporting groups, schools, and local initiatives, helping to strengthen social and economic outcomes in the region. Their engagement with local stakeholders and willingness to support community development projects highlights their role as a responsible and active corporate citizen. The OC3 Extension represents not only the continuation of a vital economic asset but also the preservation of ongoing community partnerships and investment. For these reasons, I strongly support approval of the OC3 Extension. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To be aware of environmental impact to the community to said project |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Directly link to the mine through maintenance on equipment and repairs through our work shop in Beresfield that supports workshop employees and family's generating income for my family and others supporting local businesses of which I am a big supporter of local businesses and local employees and family that can only benefit the wider community, and so I'm in support of the extension, Which will provide employment for me and my local community. |
Seb Hewitt
|
ID |
19296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe Moolarben has done an outstanding job so far in creating jobs and local income while also prioritising their role in protecting the environment. It is my opinion that they have the trust of the local community to look after the leased land and its surrounds. |
George WARE
|
ID |
19301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally express my strong support for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. I have lived in Mudgee for the past 10 years and am currently employed at Moolarben Coal Operations. Over this time, I have seen firsthand the positive contribution the mine makes to our local community. Moolarben provides stable, well-paid employment for many local families, including my own, and supports numerous contractors, suppliers, and small businesses throughout the region. The continuation of operations through the OC3 Extension is critical to maintaining job security for workers and contractors. For many of us who have built our lives in Mudgee, the certainty of ongoing employment allows us to invest in our homes, support local schools and sporting clubs, and contribute meaningfully to the broader community. Beyond employment, Moolarben has demonstrated a genuine commitment to supporting the local community. The company has contributed to the development of community infrastructure such as the local pump track, creating a positive recreational space for young people and families. It also provides sponsorship to local sporting groups, including the local dirt bike club, helping ensure these community organisations can continue to operate and provide opportunities for residents. These contributions strengthen the social fabric of Mudgee and improve quality of life for many families. In addition to community investment, the mine contributes significantly to the regional and state economy through royalties, taxes, and local spending. These contributions help fund essential services and infrastructure across New South Wales. Having worked at the site, I am confident in the company’s commitment to safety, environmental management, and progressive rehabilitation. The project operates under strict regulatory oversight, and I believe the proposed extension can continue to be managed responsibly while delivering strong economic and social benefits. For these reasons, I respectfully support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and encourage the consent authority to approve the extension. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours faithfully, George Ware |
Jake Watson
|
ID |
19311 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
ABON |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a subcontractor for moolarben and am for extended mining areas |
Ronald Minchin
|
ID |
19321 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Through out my dealings with the business yancoal and moolarban coal in particular. I find there is major benefits in there continued development of it's mine not only for the local community but also for communities around the state and beyond. They investment in innovation and entrepreneurialism encourages people to think about the possibilities of unlocking new advantages of coal production. Always looking and asking questions about how to improve what they are about as a business and what they do with the business. Therefore I support the application as I know there will be new discoveries and new innovation as a result. |
Andrew Forbes
|
ID |
19336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2300 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Essential for Jobs, Economic Stability & Regional Prosperity The proposed OC3 Extension will secure jobs for approximately 700 workers, ensuring long‑term employment stability for families and contractors in the Mudgee/Western Coalfields region. [yancoal.com.au] Yancoal notes the project will continue to inject around $180 million per year into the regional economy, supporting local businesses, services, hospitality, trades, transport operators, and community initiatives. [yancoal.com.au] Employment, procurement and contractor continuity remain critically important in regional NSW, particularly in a diversified economy where mining continues to be a major anchor industry. 2. Continuity of an Existing, Mature, Well‑Regulated Mining Operation The OC3 Extension does not extend the mine life beyond its current approval to 2038, nor does it change production rates; instead, it allows mining to proceed efficiently within the already approved operational horizon. [yancoal.com.au] This is not a new greenfield mine — it is a logical continuation of an established operation with existing infrastructure, environmental management systems, workforce, supply chains, and community relationships. Furthermore, the project is positioned within the Moolarben Valley surrounded by elevated topography, which helps to minimise amenity impacts on surrounding communities. [yancoal.com.au] 3. Strong Compliance & Oversight Framework Already in Place The Moolarben Coal Complex is a 24/7 integrated mining operation with a long history of compliance under NSW’s rigorous State Significant Development framework. It already operates under: extensive environmental licences and monitoring programs, ongoing community consultation mechanisms, and federal oversight under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC). [planningpo...nsw.gov.au] The project has gone through the multi‑stage assessment process including: Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs), a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), public exhibition, a Response to Submissions package, and preparation for an Independent Planning Commission (IPC) hearing. [yancoal.com.au] These layers of scrutiny ensure that biodiversity, cultural heritage, groundwater, blasting, air quality, and climate considerations are fully addressed and mitigated. 4. Supports Existing Export Markets & Energy Security Moolarben Coal continues to supply coal to long‑established international trading partners and energy markets. Continued access to reliable supply from NSW reduces volatility in international markets and provides export income for the State. [yancoal.com.au] The mine is also a major contributor to NSW’s export economy, supporting royalties that fund public infrastructure, essential services, and regional development. 5. Strong Record of Community Investment & Local Support Moolarben has demonstrated long‑term commitment to the Mid‑Western Region through its Community Support Program, delivering over $1 million in grants and sponsorships since 2010 to education, environment, health, arts, sport, and research initiatives. [yancoal.com.au] The extension project will help ensure ongoing support for local programs, events, and community groups. 6. Efficient Use of Existing Disturbance & Minimised Contextual Impacts Extending OC3 south of the existing pit is a more efficient and lower‑impact option than developing new areas or establishing new standalone pits. By leveraging existing: haul roads, CHPP infrastructure, water systems, workforce and management teams, the project reduces the need for major new disturbance that would otherwise be required. The site layout and valley‑landform setting help contain visual, noise, and dust impacts. [yancoal.com.au] 7. Clear, Transparent Public Engagement The Independent Planning Commission has laid out an extensive consultation process, including: written submissions accepted through 17 February 2026, a public hearing at Mudgee Showground, stakeholder meetings, and site inspections by Commission Panel members. [ipcn.nsw.gov.au] This demonstrates transparency and provides ample opportunity for robust public and expert input. Conclusion The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project represents a responsible, carefully assessed, economically vital continuation of an existing mining operation that supports hundreds of families and underpins the Mid‑Western Region’s economic health. It enables the region to retain jobs, maintain export contributions, continue community investment, and utilise existing mining infrastructure efficiently — all within a rigorous regulatory and environmental oversight framework. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Luke McKinley
|
ID |
19361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2335 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Creates jobs and opportunities for local families and supports the region and small businesses |
Amanda Chetcuti
|
ID |
19386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the Yancoal extension proposal as an employee of almost four years and as a local community member. Prior to commencing employment in the coal industry, I held negative views about mining. Like many people, my understanding was shaped by what I had seen and heard, rather than by firsthand experience. I initially applied for my role because of the lifestyle roster, which allowed me to spend more quality time with my family. What I did not expect was to gain such a deep appreciation for the work being done behind the scenes. Since joining Yancoal, I have witnessed firsthand the extensive effort that goes into minimising environmental impact and progressing rehabilitation. Seeing rehabilitation in action has been genuinely eye opening. The level of planning, monitoring and long term commitment involved has given me a completely different perspective. I am proud to be part of a team that takes this responsibility seriously and actively works to restore land for the future. Last weekend, while driving through the Hunter Valley, I reflected on how visible delayed rehabilitation can be when viewed from the roadside. Large open pits left untreated are confronting and understandably shape public perception. In contrast, the structured and ongoing rehabilitation efforts I have seen at Yancoal demonstrate what responsible mining looks like when a company is committed to doing the right thing. Beyond environmental management, Yancoal contributes significantly to our local community. Our town and surrounding businesses thrive because of the economic stability and employment opportunities provided by mining. Families, small businesses, sporting clubs and community organisations all benefit from this continued investment. I strongly support the extension proposal and hope to see the project carried through to completion. From both a professional and personal perspective, I believe this extension will continue to provide economic security, community benefit and accountable environmental management for our region. |
Chris McDonnell
|
ID |
19396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, My name is Chris McDonnell, and I am a lifelong resident and local farmer in Gulgong. I was born and raised in this community, as were generations of my family before me. I am writing to express my strong support for the continued operation and/or proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal project. As a farmer, I understand first hand the importance of stable, reliable industries in regional communities. Agriculture, mining, and other primary industries form the backbone of our local economy. The coal mine has played a critical role in sustaining jobs, supporting local businesses, and ensuring families can continue to live and work in our area rather than being forced to relocate to larger cities. Both of my sons are currently employed by the mine. Their employment has allowed them to remain in the community where they grew up, close to family, and actively contributing to the local economy. Without the mine, it is highly likely they would have had to seek work elsewhere, taking their skills, income, and future families out of the district. The opportunity for young people to stay local is vital to maintaining the long-term strength and continuity of our community. Beyond direct employment, the economic benefits of the mine flow throughout the region. Local contractors, suppliers, small businesses, schools, sporting clubs, and community organisations all benefit from the economic activity generated by the mine and its workforce. This level of economic contribution helps maintain services and infrastructure that regional towns depend on. From my perspective as a landholder and farmer, the mining operation has demonstrated the importance of operating responsibly and in consultation with the community. Ongoing engagement with local stakeholders is essential, and I encourage continued transparency and cooperation as the project moves forward. In closing, I strongly support the Moolarben coal project due to its significant economic benefits, employment opportunities, and positive contribution to the sustainability of our local community. I respectfully ask that this support be taken into consideration during the assessment process. Yours sincerely, Chris McDonnell |
Ashley Leonard
|
ID |
19506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to make a personal submission in support of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. I have lived in the Mid-Western region my entire life and come from a family with an extensive history and connection to this area. I worked at Moolarben Coal as a contractor for approximately three to four years before commencing direct employment in 2022. Through this work I have gained valuable skills, training and experience that are specific to mining, processing and heavy industry. These opportunities have allowed me to build a stable life and support my family in the region we call home. For many workers like myself the OC3 Extension represents certainty for the workforce and the broader community. The impact of this extends far beyond the mine site. It would mean families facing the real possibility of having to uproot their lives, leave established support networks, disrupt children’s schooling and relocate to entirely new areas in search of work. Finding alternative employment is not as simple as moving to a new town. The skills developed in mining and industrial operations are specialised and not always easily transferable to other industries or regions. Workers may be forced to accept lower-paid or insecure work, commute longer distances or spend extended periods away from their families. These outcomes place significant strain on families and communities and are often overlooked when projects like this are considered. Moolarben Coal provides long term, well paid employment to hundreds of workers who mostly live locally, and supports many local suppliers and businesses. The wages earned are spent in the local community, helping sustain small businesses, services, and the broader regional economy. The mine has also demonstrated a strong commitment to the community through ongoing support for local education, sport, health and community initiatives. The OC3 Extension is proposed within the existing approved mining complex and on land that has historically been cleared. It does not increase approved production rates or extend the overall mine life beyond existing approvals, and it maximises the use of existing infrastructure. In my view, this is a sensible approach that limits additional disturbance while maintaining employment and economic stability. Environmental impacts have been carefully considered in the project design. The extension includes increased setbacks from sensitive areas, protection of creeks and nature reserves, habitat enhancement zones, and large-scale rehabilitation to native woodland vegetation. The project avoids the creation of final voids and reduces overall disturbance compared to earlier proposals. Approval of the OC3 Extension would allow people like myself to continue working, supporting our families, and remaining in the communities we have lived in our entire lives. I respectfully support approval of this project and ask that the Commission consider the very real social and family impacts that would result if the extension were not approved. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Elizabeth Hamilton
|
ID |
19511 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
12/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. The OC3 Extension is an important project that will help secure ongoing employment and investment in the Mid-Western region. Moolarben Coal has been operating in the region since 2010 and has made a significant contribution to the local and state economy through direct employment, local procurement, and community investment. The project supports hundreds of full-time jobs, with a large proportion of employees residing in the Mid-Western Regional Council area. In addition, Moolarben Coal engages a substantial number of local suppliers, generating significant revenue for regional businesses. These economic benefits flow directly into the community and provide stability for local families and services. Moolarben Coal has also demonstrated a strong commitment to the local community through the provision of community grants and sponsorships supporting education, sport, health, and the arts. These contributions play an important role in strengthening the social fabric of the region. The OC3 Extension has been designed to integrate within the existing approved Moolarben Coal Complex. The proposal is located on land that has historically been cleared, maximises the use of existing infrastructure, and does not involve any increase to approved production rates or an extension of the overall mine life beyond existing approvals. This approach helps limit additional disturbance while maintaining continuity of operations. Environmental considerations have been carefully addressed through extensive assessment and project design. The proposal includes increased setbacks from sensitive environmental areas, protection of creeks and nature reserves, habitat enhancement areas, and significant rehabilitation of land to native woodland vegetation. The project also avoids the creation of final voids and reduces the overall disturbance footprint compared to previous designs. The Moolarben Coal Complex has been identified as having low emissions intensity relative to other coal operations in Australia and has committed to further reducing its environmental footprint through efficiency improvements and reduced haul distances. In my view, the OC3 Extension represents a balanced outcome that delivers ongoing economic and employment benefits to the region while incorporating appropriate environmental safeguards. I respectfully support approval of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Sean Fitzsimmons
|
ID |
18756 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Southern Mine Hire Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
South Australia 2574 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support continued operations at the mine and the value that the operation delivers to it client, employees and contract partners. |
Darrin Smith
|
ID |
18761 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Yancoal Moolarben OC3 extension as the mine has proven to be an environmental and community responsible development providing continued employment and local community benefits with minimal negative long term impact on the environment. Although only a small portion of the coal produced from Moolarben is used within Australia, I feel the demand for coal within Australia will continue well into the future despite the push for "renewable" energy which is already showing signs falling well short of supporting Australia's ever increasing need for power. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a permanent resident of Mudgee of 33 years, and over that time have seen the town grow into what it is today. Since Moolarben started development in around 2008 and then into production, I have benefited both indirectly and directly from the work they brought to town as I have been predominantly employed in both the transport industry and civil construction industry over the last 27 years. Many local businesses have grown exponentially as a result of Moolarben, turning mudgee into the hub it is today. Along with tourism, Moolarben coal mine has made Mudgee a very financially safe place to live and I believe that the longer we can make that possible, the better it is for all of us. With the understanding that open cut and underground mining has its environmental impacts, I beleive that Moolarben places a very strong emphasis on minimising the damage that can occur and puts a lot of time into rehabilitation of the area upon completion of coal extraction, in some cases, returning the area in a better condition than it was due to being stripped for farming. I think, as long as Moolarben continue with these good practices, it would be of great benefit to the Mudgee community to have this great employment opportunity in our area last as long as it possibly can whilst we transition to whatever happens to present itself next. Kind regards |
Grace Mawby Loebel
|
ID |
18776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2460 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am all in favour of mining anywhere in Australia, providing its done with the guidelines set by any of the appointed watch dog,I am 79 young seen many disturbances over the years,this always mining,always major,we have great resources to be used,being the lucky country of the world(when Labour communist party are ousted)thank you. |
Michael Butt
|
ID |
18786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been living in the mid-western region for 17 years and am an Emergency Services employee and I promote for the Moolarben open cut three (OC3) extension to go ahead and be approved. I have seen first-hand the support and contributions that Moolarben Coal and Yancoal as a company, have provided to our local communities including schools, not-for-profit organisations and initiatives placed forward by small volunteer lead groups, have received a direct impact to persons that would otherwise not have received different benefits and funding which sums up into millions of dollars. The overall employment tally for the mine, looks after local workers to the tune of almost 1200 persons and their families, this is combined with the natural attachment of thousands more smaller contracting groups and workers whose success is reliant on the consistent work provided by Moolarben Coal. The flow-on effects to our local communities for investment and spending sees our local Midwestern region thrive along with many small businesses and Family owned businesses which are well supported throughout that local spending and everything that I’ve seen demonstrates that Yancoal are a very responsible partner when dealing with the environment and the land in which they occupy and the rehabilitation areas and effort and cost put into restoring water flow and natural habitats is impressive to say the least. All things that I know regarding Moolarben Coal, prove that there is a great reporting culture and the expansion of open cut three would see longevity for all of our people businesses, families and communities that are supported by the work that is conducted at moolarben Coal. The known persons and groups that actively participate to object and demonstrate against Mining in the region are largely not attached or contribute to our communities and don’t participate in our local society and I have seen firsthand the criminal actions and associated activism. With the obvious demonstrations of responsibility to environmental custodianship there is very little concern that Mining will be conducted irresponsibly by Yancoal at the Moolarben Coal mine and I am in support of the extension application fully aware of the priority and emphasis placed on rehabilitation and compliance with the requirements to have the land given back in typically a better fashion. This approval is vital for the sustainability of our region and employment opportunities. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in full support of the Moolarben OC3 extension based on the ongoing mudgee region support and investments in the local area, ongoing post mine area rehabilitation work is outstanding from Yancoal. |
Adam Perini
|
ID |
18801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal is a cornerstone of the Mudgee region’s strength and stability. Its operations provide dependable jobs, stimulate local businesses, and keep families supported through consistent economic activity. The mine’s investment in community programs, infrastructure, and services helps the district grow with confidence. By maintaining responsible environmental practices and long‑term planning, Moolarben ensures the region continues to benefit from secure employment, local opportunities, and a stronger, more resilient future. |
Chris Brazel
|
ID |
18806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m in favour of of the expansion for job security in the area and keeping Australia strong in the production of coal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the new extension by Yancoal Moolarben should be approved. It will not only benefit the employees and contractors but the Mid western region as a whole. Current and future employees will benefit from the extension as jobs will remain for a longer period of time and most of these workers will support the Mudgee region communities through living expenses such as housing and shopping which will also drive local employment indirectly. The mine themselves also contribute vasts amounts of money to the mid west region and to the Australian economy as a whole. On the environmental side of things the Moolarben mine has undergone rigorous environmental assessments in order to meet all the criteria that will ensure the protection of the environment.It is because of this well planned out proposal I’m convinced that everyone will benefit from it if it is approved form the locals, to the employed , to the mine itself and Australia as a whole. It is a high inflationary period and this is what the region needs in order to support the people. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I was born in Mudgee and my four children and two grandchildren as well, I have raised my family locally, I have worked in the coal industry for 45 years and currently at Moolarben, my son and son in-law as well, Four of my grandchildren go to school in Mudgee and two of my partners grandchildren, my partner and stepdaughter work in the local schools , there is around 700 Moolarben employees that live locally so that could possibly mean that 1000 kids going to school in the local area, if Moolarben doesn’t get the extension, a lot of teachers will be out of work, they say for every miner employed they create 4 jobs out of the industry, so that is a huge amount of jobs gone if moolarben doesn’t get the extension, The OC3 extension will be in the area of land that has previously been cultivated farm land and minimal disturbance to bush land, so please consider the effect this will have on the community if the project doesn’t go ahead .Thank you |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18931 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Pickles mining |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Job security for hundreds of mine employees and contractors and their families. Boosting the economy in the local towns and nsw. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We neeed this development not only for the workers and their families but also the town. Yancoal put a lot of money into the town that affects everyone. Without that a lot of it wouldn’t go ahead |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this project. Working in the environmental planning sphere, all projects have an impact. And the requirements for a major project submission are extensive. Coal mines such as this one are heavily regulated and have consistent environmental monitoring. This and solid environmental investigation and planning for each stage of the project allows for reasonable consideration of pros and cons. Towns such as Mudgee and others in the region who have residents working in mines need ongoing support to maintain their communities. If mines shut prematurely towns will loose residents and have vital economic components which help support the local region. Overall I support the approval of this project with appropriate conditions and continues ongoing monitoring. |
Nicole Gjessing
|
ID |
18961 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Strait Up Projects Pty Ltd trading as Strait Up Cranes & Rigging |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, Strait Up Cranes & Rigging is a proud local crane and rigging supplier based in the Mudgee region. For over five years, the team at Strait Up has provided cranage and rigging support to the Moolarben Coal Mine. Throughout this time, we have experienced firsthand the professionalism, operational standards, and genuine commitment to local engagement demonstrated by Moolarben Coal Mine and Yancoal. We are pleased to offer our full support for the proposed extension of mining operations at the Open Cut 3 Pit. Working alongside Moolarben has strengthened our business considerably. The scale, technical requirements, and safety expectations of the operation have challenged us to continually refine and improve our systems, invest in higher-capacity equipment, and elevate our workforce capability. As a result, our business is stronger, more capable, and better positioned to deliver safe, efficient, and innovative lifting solutions across the region. The experience gained through our work for Moolarben Coal Mine has directly contributed to the professionalism and operational maturity of our business. Since our establishment in 2008, we have worked alongside many of the region’s major industries and have seen the significant positive impact that long-term projects such as this have on our local economy. Sustained operations of this scale provide stability and continuity for local contractors, underpin employment across multiple sectors, and generate meaningful flow-on benefits throughout the Mid-Western Region. The extension of the OC3 Pit represents more than an operational expansion, it represents certainty for local businesses, families, and the broader community. For Strait Up, continued activity at Moolarben Coal Mine enables us to maintain and grow our local workforce, invest in training and skills development, upgrade and expand our fleet to meet evolving site requirements, and continue reinvesting into the Mudgee community. Projects of this nature provide the confidence required for small and medium-sized businesses to plan ahead, invest responsibly, and create long-term regional employment opportunities. Moolarben Coal Mine has consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to safety, compliance, and high operational standards. Just as importantly, they have maintained a clear focus on engaging local suppliers and supporting regional capability. This approach strengthens the local supply chain, builds technical expertise within the region, and contributes to the long-term economic resilience of our area. The continuation of the OC3 Pit will support sustained regional employment, economic stability, and local business growth. It will also ensure that established, experienced local contractors remain positioned to deliver safe and efficient outcomes in support of the mining operation. For these reasons, Strait Up Cranes & Rigging strongly supports the proposed extension and respectfully encourages its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours sincerely, Grant Gjessing, Managing Director Andrew Sharp, Director of Operations Nicole Gjessing, Commercial Manager Michelle Sharp, Office Manager STRAIT UP CRANES & RIGGING |
Justin Turner
|
ID |
18971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal is a cornerstone of the Mudgee region’s strength and stability. Its operations provide dependable jobs, stimulate local businesses, and keep families supported through consistent economic activity. The mine’s investment in community programs, infrastructure, and services helps the district grow with confidence. By maintaining responsible environmental practices and long‑term planning, Moolarben ensures the region continues to benefit from secure employment, local opportunities, and a stronger, more resilient future. |
Andrew Boydell
|
ID |
18981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an employee and local Mudgee resident I strongly support Moolarben Coal’s OC3 extension project. The OC3 extension project will continue to bring significant economic and community benefits to the region as Moolarben has done since the commencement of operations in 2009. The direct and indirect benefits that coal mining and Moolarben Coal contribute to the beautiful Mudgee region and state is significant and should not be underestimated. Moolarben Coal has supported me and my family through employment for the past 8 years, and we wish to remain living, working and schooling in the area. Approval of the OC3 extension project would ensure security of employment and regional benefits continue. The extension is being integrated within the existing mining complex, is visually isolated due to topography and leaves no final voids following rehabilitation. Moolarben has low fugitive emissions and has already proven its commitment to leading industry practices in safety and environmental management, and these would continue under the OC3 extension project. It is therefore logical the project should be supported and go ahead. As President for a local community sporting club we have experienced first hand Moolarben’s positive contribution and support through community grants which has allowed our club to continue to provide activities for local kids and families. The OC3 extension project will strengthen our local community and economy and receives my full support for approval. If the Federal and State Government are serious about supporting regional areas then the OC3 extension project should be granted and allow Mudgee and surrounding regions to continue to prosper. Thanks for the consideration. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2324 |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need mining in Australia |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
19001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
11/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mine is great for the area. Employs over 700 workers and brings in over $180m in wages and donations/sponsorships to the town. |
Andrew Fotheringham
|
ID |
18161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe that giving Moolarben the OC3 extension would be a good thing for the local community and economy, as it will continue to employ many local people and ensure that local businesses can continue to operate. Moolarben has given me a career since leaving the British military and has given me the opportunity to start a new life here in Australia. Something which I will always be grateful for. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Coal Mine has been a vital contributor to the Mudgee community and the surrounding local government areas for more than a decade. The proposed expansion will support the continuation of local employment and help sustain economic stability and growth across the region. Its benefits extend well beyond those employed directly at the mine, providing ongoing opportunities for businesses, families, and the broader community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coal has given me the opportunity to get away from working FIFO to support my family. I now get to be home every night instead of working thousands of km away for weeks on end. The extension will benefit the town and keep people employed until the end of year life. If the approval doesn’t happen people will loose jobs forcing families to leave the town or move into fifo which will lead to money and revenue being lost for the town off Mudgee . |
Molly Boyd
|
ID |
18186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local that’s has lived in the region for most of my 27 years, I support the submission. Yancoal provides a lot of community support and opportunities for young people especially. As a teenager I got the privilege to see the pit and being able to work here 10 years on and see the work that they do, to minimise environmental impacts and create opportunities the way they do is amazing. Both my brother and I have worked on site and neither of us would have the career developments we’ve had without the ongoing support that Yancoal provides. It would be a missed opportunity for this extension to be passed over. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a member of the community who grew up in Mudgee I am know how important these projects are to the area. My family have lived and worked in the area for generations and every business we have owned has in some way been involved in mining. I fully support this project to continue to see our community thrive and for it’s future |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2844 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed oc3 extension plan in my opinion is good for the community it will help keep local people employed and keeping the community together, the company is a good place to work at and helps progress your development within the business and cares about you. The business helps the community projects and and raises awareness about key environmental challenges and keeps them in check, I believe in my own opinion that the extension will help the community and is a good thing to go ahead |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18201 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension of moolarbens pit 3 extension is vital for community growth and development. Without this extension many local residents and distance workers will be adversely effected having to look for new employment and opportunities elsewhere taking money and future opportunities for locals and there families. It is vital for community growth and development for our families and children |
Brooke Thompson
|
ID |
18206 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Elite Industrial Equipment |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2326 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I write in support of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. As a small business and supplier operating in the region, the Moolarben Coal Complex is critical to our ongoing viability. Continued mining operations provide certainty for local suppliers, allow small businesses to retain staff, invest with confidence, and continue supporting the regional economy. The OC3 Extension Project will help maintain employment for around 700 workers and sustain approximately $180 million in annual economic activity. This flow-on benefit is vital for small and medium enterprises that rely on consistent, long-term projects rather than short-term or stop-start operations. Importantly, the project does not increase approved production rates or mine life and will operate within existing mining tenements on historically cleared land. The use of existing infrastructure, minimal amenity impacts, and the removal of final voids demonstrate a responsible and well-considered approach. I also acknowledge the significant improvements made to the project following community and government feedback, including a reduced disturbance footprint, increased environmental setbacks, greater rehabilitation commitments, and additional environmental management measures. The OC3 Extension Project provides an opportunity to support local jobs, strengthen small businesses, and deliver improved environmental outcomes at the same time. For these reasons, I strongly support its approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a Mudgee local who has been here since 2019. I have 2 x kids the oldest being in primary school and the youngest to start next year. MCO has directly helped support programs my kids are involved in through sponsorship, providing equipment and resources. Some of these programs would not have been able to go ahead without MCO’s support. MCO provides financial security for my family. Without that security and the support systems MCO helps to provide and keep going my family would have to leave this beautiful area to have those ongoing support systems for my children. I wish to stay in this beautiful Mudgee region and raise my kids in our wonderful country town. |
Joshua Harriman
|
ID |
18216 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a new member of the mudgee community in the last few years, i whole heartedly support the approval for moolarben coals extension. I believe that approving this extension will directly result in extra revenue generated in the mudgee community, helping our town to thrive in this struggling economic climate. As well as the economic improvement, this extension also brings with it the chance for extra employment opportunities in all aspects of the mine, from production, to maintenance and everything in between. In regards to environmental concerns, i have seen first hand the effects of mining rehabilitation and the effectiveness of such. I believe that this would help the landscape to improve and exceed expections. Overall, i hope my submission makes a positive effect on the outcome. |
James Young
|
ID |
18221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the extension of OC3 at Moolarben coal. I am a current worker at Moolarben and member of the Mudgee community. I have recently changed career paths and have been overwhelmed about about caring and considerate nature which mining here at Moolarben is undertaking, before starting my career I had many misconceptions about how mining would effort both areas and environments within the mining areas. But whilst working within the company many tools and procedures have been taken into account before the mining even begins. Along with these considerations Moolarben supports the community and its growth within many areas, including sports, areas and projects which have grown the town and region immensely. I support the extension and the work within MCO too help support myself, my family and my town, there ongoing support until 2038 will greatly help the Mudgee region greatly. |
Andrew Mcguirk
|
ID |
18226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’ve been working for yancol for three and a half years now and since working out in the open cut have made some great mates and find coming to work easy. I’ve never worked in the mining industry before working here at moolarben but was surprised to see the amount of effort that goes into rehabilitating the land and the biodiversity. Since working here I’ve purchased a house in the beautiful Mudgee town and have become a member at the Mudgee golf club. Friends and family love coming to Mudgee to visit and hit the winery’s and pubs. I love this to continue for years to come |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The OC3 Extension Project will provide: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates ● A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley ● Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve ● Maximise use of existing infrastructure ● Minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography ● No final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) |
Gregory Auckett
|
ID |
18261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I Support the OC3 extension project as working in the industry and seeing firsthand Yancoals commitment to protecting the environment alongside their mining projects assures me that all projects will have a minimal effect on the surrounding environment. Another reason for my support of this project is the ongoing large number of sustainable employments that mining and projects such as this provides for the local community. Also mining companies such as Yancoal inject much needed funds into the local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Expansion Project. Moolarben Coal provides significant employment and economic benefits to the local community. The number of jobs and level of income generated by the operation are vital to the prosperity of the Mudgee region. In my view, these tangible benefits to local families and businesses far outweigh many of the environmental concerns that are often raised by people who do not live in, or directly depend on, our community. The mine directly supports hundreds of families throughout the region. If this expansion does not go ahead, many of these people will be forced out of work and may have no option but to relocate in search of employment. This would not only disrupt families and livelihoods, but would further weaken Mudgee’s economy, which is largely built on and supported by the mining industry. For many years, Moolarben Coal has been a committed and responsible corporate citizen. The company invests heavily in local sporting groups, community events and regional initiatives, and plays an essential role in supporting the social and economic wellbeing of the area. Without this ongoing contribution, the local economy would suffer severe and long-lasting damage. If the expansion does not proceed, the impact on Mudgee and surrounding towns would be substantial. It would create major financial distress for many people in the region and result in significant job losses. The knock-on effects would also be immense, as Moolarben Coal relies heavily on local industrial services and contractors to support its operations. Many small and medium-sized businesses depend on this work to survive, and their future would be placed at serious risk. Moolarben Coal has consistently demonstrated that it operates responsibly and in accordance with strict environmental guidelines. The company has a strong track record of complying with regulatory requirements and working to minimise its environmental footprint while continuing to support the town and its people. For these reasons, I strongly support the OC3 Expansion Project and believe it is essential for the future economic stability and growth of our region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally express my concern for the Mudgee and surrounding regions if the Moolarben coal mine extension was not approved. This mine currently operates in my local area and region. I have lived in the area my entire life and have first-hand seen the positive effects this mine and surrounding mines have had on the region. The mine currently upholds the regional values and often donates hundreds of thousands of dollars to the community and surrounds as have the mines that have come before it. Mudgee and surrounding regions was not built on agriculture or tourism; the area was solely built by mining and the people both near and far that the industry brings to the area. If the OC3 extension project was not approved, this would see the collapse of the local area and with catastrophic effects of financial losses and businesses crumbling as far as the Hunter Valley, Newcastle and Sydney. Executive Summary The Moolarben OC3 extension is not simply a continuation of mining—it is a stabilising pillar for the broader regional economy, a source of dignified employment for local families, and a proven partner in community development. The extension will: • Preserve hundreds of direct on-site jobs and thousands of indirect roles across the supply chain—from diesel fitters and boilermakers to earthmoving contractors, quarry operators, electricians, mechanics, and small businesses such as cafés, accommodation providers, accountants, and local retailers. • Maintain the local government area’s economic base, sustaining rate revenue, essential services, school enrolments, and the viability of regional healthcare and sporting associations. • Continue Moolarben’s track record of responsible environmental management, progressive rehabilitation, water stewardship, and dust/noise mitigation consistent with best practice and regulatory requirements. • Uphold significant community investment, apprenticeship programs, and pathways for local youth that would otherwise evaporate, accelerating outward migration and hollowing out the talent base. • Support energy market reliability and key industrial export commitments while the state and the nation continue their careful, staged energy transition. Conversely, a non-approval risks sudden and severe economic dislocation. The mine’s payroll and procurement ripple through the region’s towns daily. The loss of this anchor would not be replaced by tourism and agriculture under current market realities; instead it would lead to higher unemployment, business closures, housing distress, and a reduction in community cohesion. The region is resilient—but sudden structural shocks of this magnitude are historically damaging and slow to recover from. The OC3 extension should be approved subject to clear, enforceable conditions that lock in ongoing environmental protection, community benefit outcomes, and transparent monitoring. This submission outlines a practical, balanced pathway to do exactly that. 1) Economic and Social Significance to Mudgee, Ulan, Gulgong, and the Wider Region 1.1 Regional Income, Jobs, and Business Activity Mining has underpinned the region’s economic fabric for generations. The Moolarben operation contributes a large and dependable wage base that supports mortgages, sporting clubs, childcare, vehicle purchases, tradies, and local shops. It also props up specialist industrial services (hydraulics, fabrication, welding, electrical, safety, mechanical overhaul), which in turn employ apprentices and trainees who often remain in the area and start families. If OC3 is not approved, the following impacts are expected: • Direct job losses cascading into indirect roles (fleet maintenance, tyre services, parts suppliers, civil contractors, fuel delivery, cleaning, security, catering, accommodation, and more). • Business closures and consolidation, especially small and mid-sized enterprises that lack the capital reserves to survive sudden downturns. • Loss of apprenticeships and traineeships, which are typically tied to large anchor employers. • Housing market instability (vacancy spikes, declining rentals and property maintenance), impacting council rate revenue and household wealth. • Shrinkage in sporting clubs, volunteer organisations, and school enrolments, which are sensitive to job certainty and family budgets. 1.2 Local Government and Community Services The flow-through of mining-associated income supports council budgets and essential services, including road maintenance, parks, local libraries, aged care services, and community safety initiatives. Reductions in employment and population typically strain council finances through lower rates and charges while increasing demand for hardship support. 1.3 Cost-of-Living and Affordability Stable regional employment anchors household incomes, which buffer families from cost-of-living pressures. Sudden loss of industry increases unemployment and underemployment, pushing families to relocate or accept lower-income work, affecting food security, health outcomes, and educational attainment for children. 2) Community Contributions and Social License Moolarben has a strong, consistent record of philanthropic support, sponsorships, and targeted community investment. These include sporting associations, youth initiatives, mental health programs, Indigenous partnerships, cultural events, and infrastructure upgrades. The continuation of OC3 means: • Predictable, recurring funding for local community groups. • Expanded apprenticeships and traineeships with structured mentoring. • Local procurement with small business capability-building and timely payment terms. • Sustained partnerships with schools (STEM programs, site visits, work experience). • Support for emergency services and disaster resilience (equipment, training support). I also encourage formalising these good practices into conditions or publicly reported commitments (see Section 11), ensuring the community’s benefit is durable and transparent. 3) Environmental Management, Compliance, and Continuous Improvement 3.1 Air Quality (Dust) Management OC3 should be conditioned to continue (and where feasible, enhance) existing dust controls: • Water carts, sprays, and atomisers across haul roads and active areas. • Real-time dust monitoring (PM10/PM2.5) integrated with weather stations and predictive models to trigger proactive responses. • Progressive rehabilitation and windbreaks to reduce exposed surfaces. • Operational protocols during adverse conditions (ramp-down thresholds tied to forecast wind speeds/directions). • Transparent reporting through public dashboards and quarterly community reports. 3.2 Noise and Blasting • Noise bunds, acoustic barriers, and design of pit sequencing to minimise noise propagation. • Equipment selection and maintenance (mufflers, attenuators) to reduce tonal and low-frequency noise. • Blast design optimisation and strict scheduling to avoid sensitive times (e.g., school hours, local events, and known wildlife sensitivities), with real-time vibration monitoring at sensitive receptors. • Complaint management with rapid investigation and response protocols, recorded and publicly summarised. 3.3 Water Management and Stewardship • Water balance optimization prioritising recycled and captured mine water for dust suppression. • Sediment and erosion controls, sediment basins sized to design rainfall events, and progressive revegetation. • Groundwater monitoring with trigger action response plans (TARPs). • Protecting downstream water users through compliance with discharge criteria and contingency planning for extreme events (drought/flood). 3.4 Biodiversity and Rehabilitation • Progressive rehabilitation matching local ecotypes and targeted habitat complexity (logs, hollows, microhabitats). • Weed and pest control integrated into annual rehabilitation plans. • Biodiversity offsets (if required) that prioritise locally significant species, active restoration, and long-term stewardship. • Success criteria for rehab (survival rates, canopy closure, floristic diversity, fauna utilisation), reported annually and verified by independent ecologists. 3.5 Cultural Heritage • Ongoing cultural heritage surveys and open engagement with Traditional Owners. • Cultural heritage management plans co-designed with Indigenous stakeholders, including avoidance where possible, salvage protocols, and interpretive initiatives supporting cultural continuity. 3.6 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management While thermal coal’s downstream combustion contributes to global emissions, the applicant can mitigate Scope 1 and 2 through: • Electrification where feasible, renewable PPA procurement, and high-efficiency equipment. • Optimised truck/shovel cycles, idle reduction, automated dispatch to reduce fuel burn. • Methane capture if encountered, or offsetting residual emissions through verified projects. • Transparent annual GHG reporting, with absolute targets aligned to company-wide decarbonisation pathways. Approving OC3 within a framework of clear, enforceable environmental conditions is more likely to protect the local environment than creating a vacuum of operational and accountability standards. 4) Safety, Workforce Welfare, and Training Moolarben has consistently invested in safety systems, critical risk controls, and workforce training. The OC3 extension will support: • Continuous improvement in safety leadership, field verification of critical controls, and high-potential incident learning loops. • Mental health and fatigue management (including shift design, transport safety, and peer-support networks). • Apprenticeships and trade upskilling—electricians, fitters, boilermakers, heavy diesel mechanics, HV technicians, instrument techs, and safety professionals. • Local procurement training to uplift small business safety and compliance capability. A healthy, well-resourced operation tends to be safer than one under existential pressure to cut corners; stability supports safety culture. 5) Regional Transition and Energy Reality Australia is undergoing an energy transition, but reliability, affordability, and industrial competitiveness remain non-negotiable for households and manufacturing. A managed, staged transition is essential. Prematurely removing stable supply before alternatives are fully built, integrated, and affordable creates: • Energy market volatility and price spikes. • Strain on manufacturing and regional industries dependent on competitively priced energy. • Incentives for imports from jurisdictions with lower environmental and labour standards, which increases global emissions, not lowers them. OC3 approval does not mean the region ignores the transition; rather, it enables a responsible bridge while continuing investment in renewables, storage, transmission, and workforce reskilling—without collapsing the existing economic base. 6) Addressing Common Concerns 6.1 “Tourism can replace mining” Tourism enhances regional identity, but it is seasonal, lower-wage, and smaller-scale compared to mining. A healthy region has both—mining’s high-wage base sustains the infrastructure, services, and amenity that make tourism attractive. Removing mining first and hoping tourism scales dramatically is not realistic. 6.2 “Agriculture alone can carry the region” Agriculture is vital but subject to droughts, commodity price swings, and biosecurity risks. It also does not typically generate the same wage density or procurement value as mining. Again, the right answer is coexistence, diversification, and mutual support. 6.3 “Environmental impacts are unacceptable” Impacts must be tightly controlled, monitored, and enforced. That is precisely why robust conditions, transparency, and independent auditing are essential (see Section 11). OC3 can and should operate within strict safeguards, with progressive rehabilitation and publicly visible performance reporting. 6.4 “The extension delays the energy transition” Approving OC3 with defined timeframes and emissions reduction plans maintains regional stability while the transition ramps up. It is not a binary choice. Refusing the project does not make emissions disappear; it likely shifts production overseas, along with jobs and standards. 7) Cumulative Impacts and Regional Planning The Commission can manage cumulative effects through coordinated conditions: • Cumulative dust and noise baselines with all mines contributing to shared monitoring and response. • Integrated traffic management plans to minimise heavy vehicle peak conflicts with school runs and local events. • Shared biodiversity initiatives, such as corridor plantings and predator control across tenures. • Regional workforce housing strategies, avoiding pressure on rentals and ensuring affordability for non-mining residents. Moolarben is well-placed to be a constructive partner in such coordinated approaches. 8) Procurement, Local Content, and SME Resilience A condition to maintain or increase local procurement targets would: • Lock in spend with local SMEs (mechanical, electrical, fabrication, civil, safety gear, PPE, fuel, tyres, lubrication, ICT support, accommodation, catering). • Support prompt payment terms to protect SME cash flow. • Provide capability-building programs (ISO systems, safety, environmental, cyber-security readiness). • Require annual public reporting of local spend by category. This ensures real, measurable benefits—and makes the supply chain more competitive and resilient. 9) Indigenous Partnerships and Inclusion The OC3 approval should reinforce: • Meaningful engagement with Traditional Owners, with regular forums, transparent decision-making on cultural heritage matters, and access to independent advisors. • Targeted employment and training pathways for Indigenous workers, including mentorship and advancement plans. • Supply chain inclusion, preferring Indigenous-owned or joint-venture suppliers where competitive. • Support for cultural initiatives—language, on-Country programs, and local educational partnerships. 10) Transparency, Reporting, and Community Trust Trust grows with transparency. I support conditions requiring: • Public dashboards for dust, noise, water, and blasting data, updated in near real-time or at defined intervals. • Quarterly environmental performance summaries in plain English. • Annual independent audits with findings published and corrective actions tracked. • A 24/7 community contact line with response KPIs and published complaint resolution statistics. • Community Consultative Committee (CCC) meetings at regular intervals, with minutes and action registers. 11) Suggested Approval Conditions and Proactive Commitments To give confidence that OC3 will operate safely, responsibly, and for the community’s benefit, the following conditions (or voluntary commitments embedded in the development consent) are proposed: 11.1 Environmental Performance 1. Air Quality: Maintain real-time monitoring at agreed locations; implement predictive dust mitigation; publish monthly summaries and exceedance investigations. 2. Noise/Blasting: Maintain noise bunds and equipment attenuation; publish blast schedules in advance; monitor vibration at sensitive receptors; adopt strict exceedance TARPs. 3. Water: Maintain site water balance model; prioritise water recycling; publish annual water stewardship report; protect downstream users with defined discharge criteria. 4. Biodiversity/Offsets: Commit to net ecological gain where feasible; independent ecological monitoring; public reporting of rehabilitation success metrics. 5. Rehabilitation: Progressive rehab targets by year; transparent maps showing rehab progression; independent verification of completion criteria. 6. GHG Management: Publish Scope 1 & 2 inventory annually; set reduction targets; implement fuel efficiency and electrification projects; source renewable electricity where available. 11.2 Social Performance 7. Local Procurement: Minimum local content targets (by value and vendor count), with annual reporting and SME capacity building. 8. Apprenticeships/Traineeships: Defined annual intake targets and completion support; partner with local TAFEs and schools. 9. Indigenous Participation: Employment targets; cultural heritage protection plans; Indigenous procurement pathways and mentorship for suppliers. 10. Community Investment: Maintain or increase annual contribution levels to local programs; public grants round with independent panel oversight. 11.3 Governance and Accountability 11. Public Reporting: Quarterly environmental and social performance reports; annual independent audit with corrective actions tracked. 12. CCC: Regular meetings with published minutes; escalation pathways for unresolved issues. 13. Complaints and Incident Management: 24/7 line; response and resolution KPIs; monthly summary reporting. 14. Emergency Preparedness: Up-to-date emergency response plans, including bushfire and flood contingencies; exercises coordinated with local services. 11.4 Regional Coordination 15. Cumulative Impact Management: Collaborate with neighbouring operations on regional monitoring and mitigations (air, noise, biodiversity, traffic). 16. Housing and Services: Participate in regional housing strategies; avoid undue pressure on rental markets; support essential services. 12) Why Non-Approval Would Be Disproportionately Harmful • Economic Shock: The sudden contraction of a major employer, with no equivalent industry to absorb labour at similar wages, would reverberate through every town in the area. • Social Dislocation: Families would relocate to seek work, undermining school viability, junior sport, and volunteer networks. Once gone, they rarely return soon. • Business Attrition: Hard-won supply chain capabilities built over a decade or more would disperse, making future investment harder. • Reduced Public Services: Lower rates and charges result in fewer services and deferred maintenance—visible decline that affects confidence and livability. • Lost Youth Opportunities: Without apprenticeships and structured training pathways, young people either leave or disengage from work and study. Approving OC3 avoids this preventable harm while placing the operation under clear environmental and social performance obligations. 13) Coexistence: Mining, Agriculture, Tourism, and Lifestyle The region has always balanced multiple land uses. With disciplined planning and ongoing investment: • Mining and agriculture can coexist—the mine can support local roads, bridge upgrades, and biosecurity awareness that also benefit farmers. • Tourism benefits from a prosperous local economy—well-maintained main streets, vibrant festivals, tidy parks, and strong hospitality businesses are funded by a stable wage base. • Lifestyle and amenity rise when employment is secure, crime is low, and families are confident about the future. OC3’s approval keeps this balance intact. 14) Evidence of Continuous Improvement and Modern Practice Modern open-cut operations like Moolarben incorporate: • High-quality environmental management systems, with ISO-aligned procedures, risk assessments, and TARPs. • Data-driven operational decisions (dispatch systems, real-time monitoring, meteorological forecasting). • Progressive rehabilitation and materials balance planning to minimise open areas. • Scheduled maintenance for equipment efficiency and emissions reduction. • Independent reviews of critical risks (blasting, geotechnical stability, water management). These practices are maintained and strengthened when operations remain viable and long-term, because long-term operators invest in capability, people, and technology. 15) A Practical, Balanced Path Forward The key question is not whether mining has impacts—it does, like any major industry—but whether those impacts are responsibly managed, transparently reported, and outweighed by community benefits. The answer here is yes, provided the Commission sets the right conditions, and the proponent continues its demonstrable commitment to best practice and community partnership. OC3 approval ensures: • Certainty for families and businesses, sustaining the region’s backbone. • Measured environmental protection, with hard performance requirements and transparent oversight. • Opportunities for young people through apprenticeships and stable career pathways. • A realistic energy transition, balanced with reliability and affordability. Refusal would impose heavy, immediate, and avoidable harm on the community, with no guaranteed environmental gain and a high risk of emissions leakage through imports from jurisdictions with lower standards. 16) Specific Requests to the Decision-Makers 1. Approve the Moolarben OC3 extension with clear, enforceable environmental, social, and governance conditions (as outlined in Section 11). 2. Require annual public reporting on air, noise, water, biodiversity, rehabilitation, GHG, local procurement, apprenticeships, and community investment. 3. Mandate participation in regional cumulative impact frameworks and local housing/service planning. 4. Encourage independent auditing and CCC transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and accountability. 17) Personal Closing Statement As a lifelong resident of this region, I’ve seen what happens when we have strong industry partners: communities thrive. Young people find purpose and employment. Local businesses invest and grow. Clubs survive. Schools flourish. The roads get maintained. Hospitals are staffed. Families plan futures here instead of somewhere else. I’ve also seen what happens when major employers vanish suddenly: houses go dark, shopfronts empty out, and the spirit of the place dims. That is not a risk we should take lightly, especially when there is a balanced solution available—approve OC3 with stringent, transparent conditions. The Moolarben Open Cut Extension is not just a mine plan—it is a commitment to the people who have built their lives here, and a prudent step in a carefully managed energy transition. It preserves what is good about our region today while providing the stability to invest in the future we all want. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben coal mine OC3 extension, with the outlined conditions and commitments. Appendices (Optional to Attach) Appendix A: Proposed Monitoring and Reporting Framework • List of monitoring locations for dust, noise, water. • Data publication schedule and format. • TARPs and escalation steps for exceedances. Appendix B: Annual Community Benefits Report Template • Local procurement spend (by LGA and category). • Number of apprentices/trainees (by trade, gender, Indigenous participation). • Community investment programs and outcomes. • Indigenous engagement metrics and case studies. Appendix C: Rehabilitation Progress Maps • Year-on-year progressive rehab areas. • Species lists, survival rates, and habitat complexity indicators. • Independent ecologist sign-off statements. Appendix D: Safety and Workforce Wellbeing • Critical risk control verification schedule. • Fatigue management parameters. • Mental health program details and participation rates. Appendix E: GHG Reduction Roadmap • Scope 1 & 2 baseline and targets. • Efficiency projects (idle time reduction, dispatch optimization, equipment upgrades). • Renewable energy procurement milestones. |
Blake Brouff
|
ID |
18281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension project will ensure Moolarben coal will support the ongoing economic viability of Mudgee and surrounding towns. From providing employment to supporting key local industries and business. Especially the quality of the local schools, resourcing and education as a direct and indirect outcome of Moolarbens ongoing business in the region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Without coal this country will fail. We have the cleanest coal and other countries will just buy dirty coal |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Primary Source of Employment – Yancoal Moolarben Mine provides a large proportion of direct and indirect jobs, sustaining household incomes and supporting community stability. Economic Backbone of the Region – Yancoal operations inject significant revenue into local economies through wages, local procurement, and service contracts, helping small businesses thrive. Infrastructure and Community Investment – Moolarben Coal invests in essential infrastructure including recreational facilities, and community programs that improve overall community. Support for Local Services – The presence of Moolarben boosts demand for health, education, retail, and hospitality services, helping maintain facilities in Mudgee that may not otherwise be viable in remote areas. Population Retention and Town Vitality – Steady employment opportunities at Moolarben encourage families to remain in the area, preserving the social fabric, culture, and long-term viability of mining towns. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18301 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal Australia |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to encourage the continuation of Yancoal's Moolarben coal mine. Reading Moolarben's OC3 Extension Project proposal highlights key ways in which Moolarben is mitigating emissions and trying to keep people in jobs. I am for the continuation of Moolarben. While I have highlighted that I am writing on behalf of a business, I am doing this from my own volition |
Sam Varcoe
|
ID |
18306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. I occasionally work at the Moolarben operation and, through this work, I have developed a strong appreciation for the importance of the site to both its workforce and the wider local economy. I also have colleagues and friends whose ongoing employment would be directly affected if this project does not proceed. In addition to direct employment, the Moolarben operation makes valuable contributions to the local community. Local businesses, contractors, and service providers rely on the continued operation of the mine, and many community initiatives and services benefit from the economic activity generated by the site. If the OC3 extension does not go ahead, these flow-on impacts would be felt well beyond the mine itself. From my experience, the operation is well managed, professionally run, and places a strong emphasis on safety, compliance, and environmental responsibility. The continuation of mining activities through the OC3 extension would provide certainty for workers and contractors, support local businesses, and help maintain stable employment in the region. Importantly, the extension would contribute to long-term economic and social stability in the area. By securing ongoing employment, supporting local businesses, and sustaining community initiatives, the project helps ensure that the region remains vibrant and resilient well into the future. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project and encourage decision-makers to consider the significant long-term benefits it provides to workers, local businesses, and the broader community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18311 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a member of the community and industry, I wish to express my support for the proposed conditional development extension. Like many families who live and work in the industry, my livelihood and future are closely connected to the ongoing operation of this mine. It is not simply an industrial site – it is a cornerstone of our local economy. The mine provides stable employment for thousands of residents and supports countless small businesses that rely on the activity it generates. From local trades and suppliers to shops, schools, and community services, the economic benefits flow well beyond the mine gates. Without an extension to current approvals, our community faces significant uncertainty. The potential loss of jobs would affect not only direct employees but also contractors, transport operators, and family-run businesses that depend on the mine’s presence. Many local families have built their lives here based on the expectation of ongoing employment opportunities. For them, the extension represents security – the ability to pay mortgages, support children through school, and continue contributing to the community they call home. At the same time, I recognise that development must be balanced with responsible environmental and social management. My support is therefore for a conditional extension that ensures strong safeguards remain in place. I believe the company has demonstrated over many years that it can operate within such frameworks, and I support continued oversight to ensure this remains the case. The mine and the community have co-existed for a long time. Many improvements have been made to environmental performance and community engagement, and I encourage regulators to continue requiring high standards. I also ask that decision-makers carefully consider the human impact of not granting an extension. The social and economic consequences for the local region would be severe and long-lasting. Approving this extension with sensible and enforceable conditions will allow our community to plan for the future with confidence. |
Andrew Dunn
|
ID |
18316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Given the tight regulatory framework and conditions attached to mining consent, I support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Ongoing monitoring of local ecosystems and appropriate conservation planning have historically ensured that rehabilitation returns land to its natural state, and in some cases improves it. I travel from outside the local area for work, extending the project’s economic benefits beyond the immediate community and into the wider Hunter region. With the correct controls in place, the extension project can continue to demonstrate a cohesive integration of mining operations, local ecology, local community and the regional economy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I support its approval due to its economic value, reduced community impact, and contribution to regional employment and stability. Several key factors supporting the project’s approval are summarised below: • The OC3 Extension is essential for maintaining the ongoing operations and economic stability of the Moolarben Coal Complex, supporting jobs and regional economic activity. • The project’s location within the Moolarben Valley and surrounding topography helps naturally minimise impacts on nearby residences. • It has undergone comprehensive environmental and regulatory assessment, including EIS exhibition, NSW Department of Planning review, and EPBC Act oversight. • The IPC has implemented a transparent process involving public submissions, hearings, stakeholder meetings, and site inspections, ensuring robust community engagement. • Approval would secure long-term regional employment, economic resilience, and continued investment in local infrastructure and services. For these reasons, the OC3 Extension Project represents a responsible and economically beneficial continuation of existing operations. With thorough environmental scrutiny and clear community safeguards in place, the project should be approved. |
Phillip Morley
|
ID |
18331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have attached a letter of support. |
|
Attachments |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project Morley.pdf (PDF, 51.19 KB) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2515 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Proposed Moorlarben Coal Mine Expansion I am writing to express my support for the proposed expansion of the Moorlarben OC3 expansion project. After reviewing the available information and considering the economic and social context of the region, I believe the expansion represents a valuable opportunity for the local community while maintaining strong environmental and regulatory safeguards. 1. Strengthening Local Employment and Economic Stability for the Mudgee region The expansion will deliver meaningful, long-term employment opportunities for the region. Coal mining has historically been a major contributor to local economies, sustaining families, small businesses, and essential services. Additional jobs created through the project—both direct operational roles and indirect positions in transport, maintenance, retail, and contracting—will help stabilise the workforce and provide economic security in the years ahead. As someone who is considering relocating to Mudgee, the availability of stable, skilled employment is a significant factor. The project would support that decision, helping ensure the town remains vibrant, economically active, and attractive for new residents and families. 2. Supporting Mudgee and surrounding towns Community Growth and Livelihoods A thriving mine supports more than just miners. It sustains the broader community by injecting spending into local shops, hospitality businesses, sporting clubs, community facilities, and schools. Population stability and growth—driven in part by job availability—also help maintain essential services such as healthcare, education, and emergency response. The ongoing investment associated with the expansion will help ensure Mudgee continues to develop as a welcoming regional centre with strong prospects for the future. 3. Robust Environmental and Safety Controls Modern mining operates under stringent environmental regulations, with oversight mechanisms designed to ensure responsible resource development. The project’s commitment to dust suppression, water management, land rehabilitation, and continuous monitoring demonstrates that environmental values are being appropriately considered and protected. The regulatory frameworks at both state and federal levels provide substantial assurance that mining activities will be undertaken responsibly, with clear accountability and transparent reporting requirements. With these controls in place, I am confident the expansion can proceed without compromising community health, local ecosystems, or the broader environment. 4. A Personal Commitment to the Area My interest in moving to Mudgee reflects my belief in the region’s potential. The proposed expansion further strengthens that confidence, offering long-term industrial activity, career opportunities, and community stability. I am particularly encouraged by the prospect of being part of a town that grows around safe, responsible resource development. Conclusion The proposed coal mine expansion represents an important opportunity for the region—one that supports local jobs, strengthens the community, and operates within a well-defined and robust regulatory environment. For these reasons, I support the project and see it as a positive step toward ensuring the long-term prosperity and resilience of Mudgee. Coal is a necessary commodity to produce for Australia's national income |
Will Cannon
|
ID |
18356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2529 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Project must go ahead for job security and for Australia’s economy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Economic Contribution and Regional Stability The OC3 Extension will unlock additional coal reserves, extending the mine’s productive life and supporting continued investment in the local economy. Coal remains a cornerstone export for Australia, contributing billions in export revenue annually and supporting the balance of trade. Moolarben’s continued operations will bolster this contribution, enhancing economic stability at a time when global markets remain volatile. Supporting Communities and Local Services The Moolarben Coal Complex is already a major contributor to surrounding communities. Extending operations ensures ongoing financial contributions through wages, procurement, and community partnerships. Local councils benefit from enhanced rates base and infrastructure support, enabling improvements to roads, community facilities, and essential services. In addition, the project’s Community Investment Program is designed to fund local initiatives in education, health, and environmental stewardship, amplifying positive social outcomes over time. Energy Security and Market Demand Australia plays a central role in meeting Asia-Pacific energy demand, and high-quality thermal and metallurgical coals remain critical inputs for reliable power generation and steel production. The OC3 Extension supports this role by ensuring consistent supply to international customers, reinforcing Australia’s reputation as a dependable trading partner. This consistency is crucial for countries investing in infrastructure and manufacturing, contributing to regional economic development across multiple nations. Alignment with Policy and Sustainable Development Goals The OC3 Extension is consistent with regional planning frameworks that recognise the importance of mining to economic prosperity while requiring high standards of environmental protection. The project supports sustainable regional development by balancing economic benefits with rigorous environmental and social safeguards. By extending the mine life responsibly, the project promotes a measured approach to resource development that benefits current and future generations. Conclusion In summary, the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project offers substantive benefits: long-term employment, enhanced economic activity, continued community investment, reliable contributions to export markets, and well-structured environmental management. Approving this project will support regional prosperity, uphold Australia’s role in global energy and commodities markets, and demonstrate a balanced approach to responsible resource development. |
cheyne hanson
|
ID |
18406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a proud supplier to Moolarben Coal for almost 20 years, we value the strong relationship we’ve built and the ongoing work you provide in the region. Moolarben’s continued operations are critical not only to our business, but i also there ongoing involvement in the local community — including through sporting support and sponsorships. |
Daniel Jerabek
|
ID |
18411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2321 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, we need to keep the Coal flowing like a river out of the Hunter Valley to keep jobs and money coming in to the country. Yancoal keeps a great relationship with the community and manages environmental impacts well. |
Jake Peake
|
ID |
18416 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Double R PTY |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
On behalf of Double R, we strongly support Moolarben Coal’s proposed Open Cut 3 Extension Project. As a long-term supplier to Moolarben, Double R has seen firsthand the importance of this operation to local jobs, regional businesses and ongoing investment in the Mid-Western community. For businesses like Double R, the extension provides certainty, stability and confidence to continue investing in local jobs, skills and services. We value our partnership with Moolarben and believe the OC3 Extension is vital to the ongoing strength of the region’s economy while being managed in a responsible and considered manner. Double R fully supports the approval of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Extension Project. |
Hamish Bryant
|
ID |
18421 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Hot engineering |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to provide a submission in support of the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. As a supplier to Moolarben Coal, I have direct experience with the positive economic contribution the operation makes to the region. The continuation of mining at OC3 is important for maintaining ongoing work, investment certainty, and business stability for local and regional suppliers. The proposed OC3 Extension Project will be integrated with the existing approved Moolarben Coal Complex and does not seek to extend the approved mine life beyond 2038 or increase production rates. Importantly, it maximises the use of existing infrastructure and operates within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. I acknowledge the significant improvements made to the project following community and government feedback, including a reduced disturbance footprint, reduced coal extraction, increased environmental setbacks, increased rehabilitation outcomes, and further commitments to environmental management. The proposal to eliminate final voids in the Moolarben Valley and deliver a net increase in native woodland vegetation represents a strong rehabilitation outcome. The project will deliver substantial benefits, including continuity of employment for around 700 people, ongoing economic investment of approximately $180 million per year, and broader flow-on benefits to suppliers and local businesses. These outcomes are critical for sustaining the regional economy and workforce. Based on these factors, I support the OC3 Extension Project and consider it to be a responsible and well-considered proposal that balances economic, environmental, and community outcomes. Yours sincerely, Hamish Bryant |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2075 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposed development application. Having reviewed the Assessment Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Environment, I consider the proposal to be appropriate and well-assessed. I believe the recommended conditions of consent are reasonable and will ensure the development is managed responsibly. |
Luke Tudman
|
ID |
18446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2328 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension is a vital part to keeping jobs and families local to the area. Yancoal and Moolarben have always ensured the community in which it operates in is well looked after and funded to better the economy and the families in which are situated here. I believe this extension will ensure jobs and a strength of economy that can ensure Mudgee and all surrounding areas can thrive in times of difficulty. Moolarben Coal has been an integral part of keeping families in the region and this extension will ensure families can stay and work local. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18456 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Haul Tek Electrical Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2380 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We currently have multiple workers at Moolarben Coal on a full-time basis. Loosing their positions means they are no longer able to provide for their families. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi Support this extension in the interest of the local community, Moolarben has supported the region for many years and should continue to do so. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the ongoing development at Moolarben based on their goals to support the community and environment surrounding them to the best of their abilities and I believe that by supporting our local environment and business and employment opportunities especially in small communities is highly important |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this proposed development, the benefits this will bring to the community and the business's that operate in this area will be huge. |
Samara Scholberg
|
ID |
18516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making a submission that supports the conditional approval of this proposed development. |
Andrew Goodlet
|
ID |
18526 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
P&A Engineering Management Co PTY LTD |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this project due to the ongoing positive impact it will have on the local community including but not limited to Ongoing employment Support to local business and service providers Support of local charities and not for profit organisations Taxes and royalties supporting local infrastructure and services |
Brad Hickey
|
ID |
18531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2340 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this commission, because i work in the industry & the industry supports my employer |
Rusty Russell
|
ID |
18541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to provide my submission in support of the proposed extension to Moolarben Coal’s Open Cut 3 (OC3) operations. Having lived and engaged in business in the Mid Western Regional Council area for over 20 years, I have seen first hand the importance of stable, well managed resource projects to the long term health of our regional community. Since commencing operations around 2009 to 2010, Moolarben Coal has established a strong record as a responsible operator and a constructive corporate citizen within the Mid Western region. From a regional perspective, the continuity of employment and investment associated with the OC3 Extension is important. Mining operations of this scale in the Mudgee region underpin livelihoods for hundreds of local families, support skills development and career pathways, and provide flow on benefits to local suppliers, contractors and service businesses. These benefits translate directly into stronger towns across the Mid Western Council region. Moolarben Coal’s broader contribution to the community is also noteworthy. Its long standing support for local organisations, sporting groups, education, health and cultural initiatives has helped strengthen the viability of the region. This kind of sustained community investment matters, particularly in regional areas where economic shocks are felt more acutely. I acknowledge that all resource developments must be carefully assessed, and I support the Independent Planning Commission’s role in ensuring projects meet appropriate planning, environmental and operational standards. Based on Moolarben Coal’s operating history, its engagement with the assessment process, and the improvements reflected in the current proposal, I am comfortable that the OC3 Extension Project represents a balanced and responsible approach to development. For these reasons, I am in favour of the OC3 Extension being approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent. I believe the project will provide ongoing economic and social benefits to the region while maintaining high standards of safety, environmental management and community responsibility. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Amanda Stephens
|
ID |
18546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for proposed local community housing and development initiatives within our region, particularly those that prioritise and directly benefit local businesses and the wider community. these developments help attract and retain workers who are essential to local industries, trades, and service providers. This, in turn, supports business continuity, workforce stability, and long-term economic growth. Local developments provide immediate and tangible benefits to local businesses through the use of local contractors, suppliers, and trades during construction and ongoing maintenance. Keeping investment within the community strengthens local enterprises, supports employment, and builds resilience within the local economy. Beyond the economic benefits, community-focused housing developments contribute to stronger, safer, and more connected neighbourhoods. Residents who live and work locally are more likely to support local shops, schools, and services, creating a positive cycle of community engagement and economic activity. Supporting local development is not only an investment in infrastructure, but an investment in people, businesses, and the future sustainability of our community. For these reasons, I fully support initiatives that encourage responsible development while ensuring local businesses and residents benefit directly from growth within our region. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this submission. I encourage continued support for projects that strengthen our local community and economy. |
Elizabeth Davis
|
ID |
18551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I want to see more Australians employed in the coal industry, I want to see economic benefits to the local and surrounding areas. I wish to see my state of NSW reap economic benefits from this project. Solar power is NOT a reliable or consistent source of energy. Solar Farms ruin the landscape which would be much better used for cropping, growing Australian fruit, vegetables and cereal, breeding and raising animals for human consumption .Coal Power is much needed for energy supply in NSW and other places. Just maybe it might lead to a decrease in electricity prices. Please allow this project to go ahead. Yours faithfully, Elizabeth Davis |
Wayne Taylor
|
ID |
18556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2031 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this project and believe the benefits provided far outweigh the impacts: * significant state economic benefits (c. $180Mpa) * employment continuity for the existing workforce (c. 700) * effective ongoing use of existing infrastructure * minimal impacts to nearby residences * incorporation of community feedback resulting in a reduced disturbance footprint, additional protection to identified environmental areas and increased land rehabilitation. |
Shayne Ryan
|
ID |
18561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe it will be good for the area because of the employment it generates as well as the money that goes into the local community and the local businesses that benefit from the extra workers and their families. |
Paul Mallett
|
ID |
18566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. This project is important to the future of mining in our region and to the people and communities who rely on it. The OC3 Extension will allow continued operations at Moolarben and, in doing so, will help secure ongoing employment for the local workforce. For many families in the area, these jobs provide financial stability, career pathways, and the ability to continue living and working in the community they call home. The mine is a major contributor to the local economy, supporting not only direct employees but also contractors, suppliers, and local businesses. The continuation of operations through the OC3 Extension will help maintain economic activity in the region and provide confidence for the future. I also acknowledge Yancoal’s commitment to addressing the recommendations of the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure through the proposed project amendment, including additional environmental management measures. This demonstrates a willingness to balance responsible environmental stewardship with the need for sustainable employment and regional development. For these reasons, I respectfully encourage the Independent Planning Commission to support the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Yours faithfully, Paul Mallett |
Brett Tristram
|
ID |
18571 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal OC3 Expansion Project. Moolarben Coal provides significant employment and economic benefits to the local community. The number of jobs and level of income generated by the operation are vital to the prosperity of the Mudgee region. In my view, these tangible benefits to local families and businesses far outweigh many of the environmental concerns that are often raised by people who do not live in, or directly depend on, our community. The mine directly supports hundreds of families throughout the region. If this expansion does not go ahead, many of these people will be forced out of work and may have no option but to relocate in search of employment. This would not only disrupt families and livelihoods, but would further weaken Mudgee’s economy, which is largely built on and supported by the mining industry. For many years, Moolarben Coal has been a committed and responsible corporate citizen. The company invests heavily in local sporting groups, community events and regional initiatives, and plays an essential role in supporting the social and economic wellbeing of the area. Without this ongoing contribution, the local economy would suffer severe and long-lasting damage. If the expansion does not proceed, the impact on Mudgee and surrounding towns would be substantial. It would create major financial distress for many people in the region and result in significant job losses. The knock-on effects would also be immense, as Moolarben Coal relies heavily on local industrial services and contractors to support its operations. Many small and medium-sized businesses depend on this work to survive, and their future would be placed at serious risk. Moolarben Coal has consistently demonstrated that it operates responsibly and in accordance with strict environmental guidelines. The company has a strong track record of complying with regulatory requirements and working to minimise its environmental footprint while continuing to support the town and its people. For these reasons, I strongly support the OC3 Expansion Project and believe it is essential for the future economic stability and growth of our region. |
james thompson
|
ID |
18576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2357 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The moolarben coal mine is extremely important to the mid western area and supports more than just the direct employees of the mine, i have worked with Moolarben coal for the past 18 years and they have been honest and fair since day one. |
Shane Pettitt
|
ID |
18586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an employee at Moolarben Coal and i am writing to show my strong support for the proposed Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. My employment provides stable work for me and my family and allows us to live in the local area. The OC3 Extension is important in maintaining ongoing employment for the existing workforce and provides certainty for employees in the future. Continued operations means job security for workers like myself and help ensure that skilled employees can remain in the area rather than having to seek work elsewhere. As an employee, i see firsthand the standards applies to safety, environmental management, and compliance at the site. The project makes use of existing infrastructure and established work areas, which helps limit disturbance and allows operations to continue in a controlled and well managed manner. I am confident that the proposed environmental and rehabilitation measures will be implemented responsibly, as this reflects current practices at Moolarben. The project also supports local businesses and services that rely on the continues operation of the mine. Many employees, including myself, spend and invest in the local community, contributing to the regions economy. Extending OC3 will allow for better long term planning across the site, including progressive rehabilitation and an orderly transition through the life of mine. From an employee prospective, this provides clarity and stability both operationally and personally. For these reasons i support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and respectfully request that it be given favorable consideration. Yours Sincerely Shane Pettitt Employee, Moolarben Coal Complex. |
Johannes Greeff
|
ID |
18591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension as it helps create a better life for Mudgee and its people. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Living in area all my life I can see what mining brings to the the community with jobs for local people, money and sponsorship of many events around the mining area.working in mining for 20 years I see first hand what the company's do for environment.when mining and after .mining not perfect, but not ready for anything else need power to run the everything we use. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2159 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Australian coal workers. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. In my view, this project represents a responsible and well‑considered continuation of mining operations that deliver significant economic, social, and environmental outcomes for the region. The OC3 Extension will ensure continuity of employment for approximately 700 people who rely on the Moolarben operations for stable, long‑term work. This level of ongoing regional employment is crucial for families, local businesses and service providers throughout the Mudgee and broader Mid‑Western region. The project also contributes around $180 million each year into the New South Wales economy through wages, contracts, supply chains and community spending. Importantly, the extension does not increase the approved mine life or production rates. Instead, it focuses on maximising the efficient use of existing land, infrastructure and operational capability. The project will be integrated with the current Moolarben Coal Complex, operating entirely within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. From an environmental perspective, the project includes several meaningful improvements that have resulted from community and Government feedback. These include a reduced disturbance footprint, reduced coal extraction volumes, increased setbacks from sensitive areas, and reduced impacts on wildlife habitat. The project also commits to increasing land rehabilitation, delivering an overall net gain of approximately 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley. The design also ensures no final voids, which improves the long‑term environmental outcome of the site. Amenity impacts have been carefully managed. The extension area is visually isolated from neighbouring residences by natural landforms, and the project is expected to maintain minimal impacts on local amenity. Setbacks from creek lines and the nearby nature reserve further demonstrate a commitment to environmental and community considerations. Given the project’s economic importance, environmental improvements, and its focus on responsible use of existing mining areas and infrastructure, I fully support the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. I believe it provides a balanced and carefully planned approach that will continue to deliver benefits to the community, the state, and the region’s workforce. I encourage the Independent Planning Commission to approve the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18616 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
ASG Equipment Group |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We are writing to express our strong support for Moolarben Coal’s proposed extension to its Open Cut 3 (OC3) mining operations. The proposed extension, which will expand mining south of the existing open cut area on historically cleared land, represents a well-considered and responsible continuation of the approved Moolarben Coal Complex. The Project will be fully integrated with existing operations, operate within approved mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land, and remain consistent with the current approval to mine until 2038. Importantly, the extension will deliver significant economic and social benefits to New South Wales, including the continuity and security of employment for the existing workforce. By extending the life of the operation, the Project will support around 700 ongoing jobs and contribute approximately $180 million in annual investment to the regional and state economy. The Project has been designed to maximise the use of existing infrastructure, with no changes to approved mine life or production rates. It will result in minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences, with the extension area visually isolated by intervening topography. Setbacks from creek lines and nearby nature reserves have been incorporated to protect environmental values. We also commend Moolarben Coal for its strong environmental commitments. The Project will deliver a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley, eliminate final voids by reducing them from one to zero, and enhance long-term land rehabilitation outcomes. These measures demonstrate a clear focus on sustainable land management. Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 extension application following community and Government feedback. These include a reduced disturbance footprint, reduced coal extraction, increased environmental setbacks, reduced impacts on wildlife habitat, and increased rehabilitation. As one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia, Moolarben Coal continues to set a strong benchmark for responsible resource development. The OC3 extension represents a practical, environmentally conscious, and economically valuable project that builds on an established and well-regulated operation. For these reasons, we strongly support approval of the proposed OC3 Extension Project and encourage the Independent Planning Commission to give it favourable consideration. |
Geoff Shapland
|
ID |
18626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2866 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully endorse Moolarbens extension project securing jobs and longetivety to the local community, well done team . |
Tegan Harrison
|
ID |
18641 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
United Safety and Survivability Corporation |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local business provider, we support the proposed development |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
the mine is such an important part of the local Mudgee economy and the Australian way of life. Without mines, the standard of living will drop - no metals, coal and gas means very little electricity for energy and metals for construction. I do not want a lower standard of living for my children and grandchildren. ( I have a cute 3 1/2 year old grandson). The mine provides many valuable jobs that are necessary for locals. Please encourage and support Australian mines. |
Edward George
|
ID |
18676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this plan. It is good for the local regions economy. |
Julie-Anne Marchant
|
ID |
18681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4165 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Don't get rid of mining as it brings jobs |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a long term employee of moolarben coal operations and I feel that the oc3 extension is a positive project for the life of the mine and also has significant economic benefits for both mudgee and Gulgong residents it is also continued security of employment for the work force at moolarben coal operations. |
Frank Roberts
|
ID |
18691 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
TCX Services |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2322 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As one of the owners of a small business in mining in NSW, Moolarben Coal has been a critical customer which has allowed us to provide local jobs and with our growth, reinvest our costs back into the NSW and Hunter economy. Growing up around Merriwa, I've seen first hand how projects like Moolarben and neighboring Wilpinjong has given regional areas of NSW a thriving ecosystem with cafes and small businesses growing because of the presence of these mining operations. These mines are the sole reason why young people in small country towns can afford to stay in the country and not leave. I have worked in the area of mining which is concerned with environmental and social compliance and have seen and benefited directly by the huge investment and continued requirement of compliance that mining operations have to spent to maintain their "license to operate". The number is in the millions if not billions over the life of mine. Whether it be emissions control, machinery sound suppression, environmental incident reporting in real time and rehabilitation once the operations are placed into care and maintenance, these costs are borne by these companies and adhered to fiercely. To not approve this extension will have a material impact on the Upper Hunter, Mudgee and Central West region and that impact will not be a positive one. Please consider these factors when making your decision. |
Craig Tilney
|
ID |
18706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I whole heartedly support Moolarben Coals OC3 extension. As a 38 year local of the Mudgee region, I have seen Mudgee and the surrounds flourish due to the local mining sector thriving. Unfortunately the region cannot support itself solely on tourism, seeing Moolarben and other mines in the area close down, will without a doubt, see the Midwestern region die. The entire region relies on the income bought in by these companies and the supporting businesses that are in the region for that one reason. Pubs, clubs, cafes, restaurants, speciality shops, hairdressers, the housing market and even the local car dealerships all rely on the incomes bought in by employees of Moolarben and the surrounding mine sites. Australia as a whole is in no way ready to switch to renewable energy and even when the country is close, it will still rely on mining minerals in order to produce all associated materials required to build the monstrosities that are solar farms and wind farms. Please don't let an entire region die due to a mine wanting to move into an area that has mostly already been cleared in the past for farming and grazing activities. Listen to the locals, we want it to happen. We want to secure a future in the area for ourselves and our children. |
Bowie Bowie
|
ID |
18741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to provide my support for the proposed Moolarben Coal extension project I am currently employed at Moolarben Coal Mine. I work within the mining industry and have firsthand experience with the importance of operations such as Moolarben to employees, contractors, and the broader regional community. The Moolarben operation provides stable employment for a large number of workers and supports many families throughout the region. The continuation and extension of the mine will help ensure ongoing job security and create opportunities for future workers entering the industry, including apprentices and trainees. From my experience working on site, the operation also supports a wide network of local businesses, contractors, and service providers. Many regional businesses rely on the mining industry for their livelihood, and projects like Moolarben provide ongoing economic stability for towns and rural communities across the area. I also recognise the importance of responsible environmental management and community engagement in mining operations. Based on my experience, the site operates under strict regulatory and environmental controls, and it is important that these continue alongside the proposed extension to ensure sustainable and responsible development. Overall, I support the Moolarben Extension Project due to the employment opportunities, economic contribution, and long-term regional benefits it provides. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this submission. Kind regards, Lachlan Bowie |
Jim Porter
|
ID |
18746 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
10/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, My name is James Porter, and I am writing to lodge a submission in full support of the proposed OC3 Extension at Moolarben. I support this proposal as it represents a logical and well-planned extension of existing operations within the Moolarben mining precinct. The OC3 Extension builds on established infrastructure and land use, helping to ensure the continued efficiency and viability of mining activities in the area. The proposal will provide ongoing economic benefits to the local and regional community, including employment opportunities and continued support for local businesses and services. Maintaining a stable workforce and sustaining regional investment is important for the long-term resilience of the Upper Hunter region. I also acknowledge that the project will continue to operate within a comprehensive regulatory framework, with appropriate environmental management and monitoring measures in place. Extending operations in an established area is a more sustainable approach than opening new sites elsewhere. For these reasons, I fully support the proposed OC3 Extension at Moolarben and respectfully request that it be approved. Yours sincerely, James Porter |
matthew Annis brown
|
ID |
17596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben coal mine extension. I have worked at Moolarben for 2 years and have developed strong friendships and connections. The mine provides secure employment for me and many others in the region. As an employee of a contracting company, I can see first hand the significant flow on effect to other businesses in the region from the mine. During employee engagement sessions Moolarben has convinced me the mine will have minimal impact to the environment and will make significant contributions to community, the economics of the district and culture. For these reasons, I support approval of the proposed coal mine extension. Thank you for considering my submission. Matthew Annis-Brown |
Alex Warren
|
ID |
17606 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Crtical Risk Group |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making this submission as a mining professional and local supplier who works with coal operations in NSW. I support approval of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Extension Project. The proposed extension represents a logical continuation of existing mining activities within the approved Moolarben Coal Complex. It is located within current mining tenements, relies on established infrastructure, and does not seek to extend the approved mine life or increase production rates. In my view, this significantly limits additional impacts and avoids unnecessary risk. The changes made to the Project following feedback from the community and government are important. Reduced disturbance, increased environmental setbacks, additional rehabilitation commitments and the removal of final voids are all positive outcomes that improve the long-term result for the Moolarben Valley. From an operational and safety perspective, continuing mining within an established operation with experienced people and proven systems is preferable to disruption or relocation of activities. This supports more consistent, lower-risk outcomes over time. The Project also provides clear benefits to the local and regional economy through continued employment and ongoing work for local suppliers. Long-term certainty allows businesses and workers in the region to plan, invest and retain skills. Overall, the OC3 Extension Project appears to be a reasonable and balanced proposal that manages environmental, safety and economic considerations appropriately. I support its approval by the Independent Planning Commission. |
Glenn Gricks
|
ID |
17626 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ongoing jobs for contractors and investment in our region, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I whole heartedly support this submission. Mining is very important to the region and the community. Yancoal respects the local towns & community, they employee locals & support local businesses. The companies, rehabilitation program is top notch, returning the land back the same, if not in better condition, taking great care & consideration for Traditional owners, water quality & native fauna & flora. The mining companies in the MWC do a great job of leaving a small footprint in the towns and the local area. The towns definitely do not have the feel or appearance of traditional mining towns this is something we can all be proud of from the Companies, council & community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed extension will be of enormous benefit to the community that surrounds the mine. Mining in the area has been largely responsible for a huge economic boost to the local community through direct employment and through property values rising due to the positive that employment with the mines offers. Mining complies with strict controls on their activities, and in the absence of any indication that those controls will be eased by regulation, or ignored by mining operators, there should be no good reason to delay or hinder the activity. The mines will shut one day, and planning needs to be happening now for that time, to provide a transition to other industries. failure to do so will result in a local slump. Any slump will be a failure of planning from governments. Not approving this extension will only promote the transition necessary, and as a local who hasn't seen any indication of economic alternatives to the mining, it will only accelerate a downturn in the local economy. |
Debbie Fletcher
|
ID |
17656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have lived in Mudgee all my life, the cultural advantages that our town and surrounding areas have received from the people and the money that Yancoal have invested has made an incredible difference to our area is fabulous. I am also an employee of the company and while I agree Coal Mining is possibly not the most green industry, however in saying that the company will encourage stopping production to protect Koalas, emus or any other wildlife, also the rehabitation of bush land is extremely well executed and personally I can only see the expansion of the mine in the long run to be of an advantage. it |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17661 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
KE Solutions Group Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mine development is essential for creating employment opportunities and to stimulate economic growth. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in strong support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 Extension Project. I was born and raised in the Gulgong/Mudgee area and have an extended and ongoing family history in the area. I have seen the enormous benefits that mining in general has provided to the local Gulgong/Mudgee area, in particular, good safe, enjoyable and rewarding employment for local people. Prior to mining, many local people, unless owning a farm or highly educated, were only able to gain lower paid, less secure and less satisfying employment. The introduction of mining to the area has provided significant employment opportunities, diversified the population, brought prosperity to the towns and generally enhanced the local area. In respect of the proposed Open Cut 3 Extension Project, the proposed mining is planned to be undertaken in areas already disturbed by farming and with adequate stand-off distances to broader areas of flora and fauna. The Development is an extension of an existing operation, thereby minimising the level of impact that may occur from a greenfields development. Yancoal and Moolarben have a history of effective management of environmental impacts and active local community support and are a significant employer of local people. On balance, the Development is a sound and suitable use of the state resources proving economic benefit to the local area and New South Wales whilst effectively managing environmental impacts. Regards |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2529 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this submission, as I am directly supported by this organisation. This allows many NSW residents to be able to continue to work within this industry. This submission should be granted approval as it supports not only the NSW government but also supports the Australian government. This not only has a financial impact to the government bodies but also has a financial impact on the local government, community groups and lastly the local residents. With the cost of living rising, we need all governments to review these submissions and make the appropriate decision to help our hard-working labour forces, not only with employment but the support within their local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17676 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
GB Auto Group |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
GB Auto are a local provider of a range of auto electrical, air conditioning and mechanical services based in Ulan. Moolarben has been a customer of the business for many years. The Moolarben extension will continue to provide local employment, work for our business and other support to the community. |
JOYCE PURTLE
|
ID |
17686 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Cooyal Hall Association Incorporated |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I consider the proposed development of Moolarben Mine is necessary to provide much needed employment within the Mudgee district. Also our Cooyal community is extremely grateful for the recent grant from Moolarben Mine for improvements to Cooyal Hall which will be 100 years old next year. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed extension to the Moolarben Open Cut mine has been thoroughly researched and planned by qualified geologists and environmental scientists employed by Yancoal. This proposal will actually increase the amount of woodland in the planned area once the rehabilitation process is finalised, benefitting the environment in the longterm. Moolarben Coal employs 700 people in the Mudgee Region, supports community groups in the region having provided millions of dollars in community support in this region. As a member of the Gulgong community, Yancoal donated funds to help Doctors for Mudgee to attract a doctor to the community after 18 months without a doctor. Since I have been a member of the Gulgong Show Society Yancoal Moolarben have donated funds toward the annual Show each year. To deny this proposal will impact the future of 700 workers, their families and their community - your community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am local to the Ulan area and am in support of the extension. I am supporting of the jobs this creates and what mining does to increase population in the mudgee area leading to increased services and resources etc |
Kevin Nelson
|
ID |
17746 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben employee |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I suggest to all people who are against the extension. To go to the moolarben mine site and see for yourself how little of an impact is really made and how much money and time goes into the total rehabilitation of mined areas. The areas are left in a better condition for wild life habitation than before, with more native plants and more habitation natural structures made for breeding etc. As you drive down haul rds, you will see families of emus, pigs, deer, kangaroos, hawks etc. But the mine also provides money for away of life and habitation for the people who live in the region of the mines. Mining has made Australia 🇦🇺 without mining Australia would never have prospered as it has and will suffer for generations,if we let this short foresighted unrealistic over capitalising Government continue, to ruin this country. Destroying habitation for acres of solar panels and habitation for wind farms which don't work without sun and wind and not sustainable. There is 1100 hundred years of coal left, which keeps the power running 24/7 and modern power stations cause very little carbon emissions. Time to get off the sheep treadmill mentally and start to look at the real carbon emitters issue 8.6 Billion PEOPLE! |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17766 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the extension of Moolarbens OC3 project, as it brings money to the local towns and Moolarben help support the local community by donating time and money into the roads, schools and local businesses. Not only has Moolarben employed a lot of local people these people also bring their family's and relatives to the area to make Mudgee what it is. Without Moolarben running the town wouldn't be what it is today. |
Caleb McGarry
|
ID |
17771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Operations plays a vital role in supporting surrounding towns and the regional economy through stable employment, strong local business partnerships, and ongoing community investment. The operation is well managed, with a strong focus on safety, environmental responsibility, and long-term sustainability. I currently work at Moolarben and can confidently say it is a great place to work, with supportive crews, quality training, and real opportunities to grow. Because of the stability and income the mine provides, I have been fortunate enough to purchase my first home at 21 years old, which would not have been possible without this job. I strongly support the mine extension, as it will secure jobs into the future and allow me to continue developing my career, with the goal of operating large excavators. The extension will benefit workers, families, and the entire community. |
David Jackson-Wills
|
ID |
17776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I whole heartedly support this extension submission in order to support local jobs and Australian industry. |
Darren Price
|
ID |
17781 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben Coal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been working for Moolarben Coal since the day it opened in 2009 as an OCE / Drill and blast / services supervisor , with these rolls the compliance to the environment and community is taken very seriously and from a personal view coming from 4 generations of farmers I have a very strong connection towards the land and the community as I have lived here all of my life and now have kids and grand kids that are settled here in Mudgee as well .Moolarben has progressive rehabilitation and is seeded with local timers and pastures leaving a better environment behind than was stared with and this is something that a lot of people that oppose the extension will never see or acknowledge. |
Robynn Cook
|
ID |
17786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I totally support coal mining for all our power needs . It is ridiculous that we export it when we should be using |
Barry McKay
|
ID |
17791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal mining in the Mudgee area has created a great source for employment resulting in strong local townships. It is important continued investment and subsequent approvals for Moolarben and other coal mines in this area continue. Whether it be cafes, restaurants sporting clubs or hotels, coal miners spend their money liberally. Evidence of this spend and workers participation are the quality sporting facilities like Mudgee golf course and Glen Willow complex. Moolarben Coal continues to sponsor things like the Community Support Programme, Celebrity Golf Classic, Mathematical Minds Competition & other community events. Without these sponsorships groups like these would struggle to exist. Finally, Moolarben Coal has proven to be responsible by completing quality land rehabilitation activities, managing the effects of all mining activities and proactively working with local councils and all other regulatory bodies. |
Ben Smit
|
ID |
17806 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Breathalyser Sales & Service Pty Ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2020 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Breathalyser Sales & Service Pty Ltd fully supports this Project for the following reasons: The extension Project proposes to extend mining south of the existing open cut mine area, on land that has historically been cleared. The extension Project will be integrated with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, which has approval to mine until 2038. It will operate within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. There would be: • significant economic benefits to the state • continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce • no changes to the approved mine life or production rates • a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley • setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve • maximising use of existing infrastructure • minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography • no final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 extension application following feedback from the community and Government. These improvements will result in: • a reduced disturbance footprint • reduced coal extraction • increased setbacks to protect environmental assets • reduced disturbance of wildlife habitat • increased land rehabilitation. The project will ensure ongoing jobs for around 700 people and annual investment of around $180 million into the economy, from one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. |
Allen Soxsmith
|
ID |
17811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4055 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal mining is necessary to help keep our energy costs at a level to allow Australia to become competitive ONCE AGAIN in the world markets. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Project is conscious of responsibilities and we require coal into the future as current environmental measures being taken are not fixing the real issues |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need coal mining for jobs & economy! |
Lesley Harding
|
ID |
17836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2154 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
People need to earn a living. Australias carbon footprint is 1% hardly life changing. My own grandfather was a miner in Cessnock NSW. Cessnock hasn't suffered for it at all. Don't Kow Tow to the latte sippers in our sookie society. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17841 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2107 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support extending Moolarben Coal's mining operations at its OC3 mine. Australia will be relying on coal for many years to come and renewables alone cannot supply the reliable energy this country needs. |
Michael Lynch-Gardner
|
ID |
17846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2257 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. Coal will be required for decades to come irrespective of the climate-change alarmists. 2. The NSW government will receive significant economic benefits. 3. Employment will be boosted which, for a country area, is a blessing. 4. Stringent planning codes will undoubtedly be enforced. 5. The extension will be integrated with the existing complex which has approval to mine until 2038. |
edwin landicho
|
ID |
17851 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2287 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i support the extending the mining operations at its open cut 3 (oc3) mine. i believe that mining is the back bone of the nsw economy and that i will be directly and indirectly benefited by the mining operation. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support approval of this coal mine. The project has been carefully planned, with strong safety systems and practical environmental controls. It will create local jobs, support the regional economy, and operate responsibly while managing impacts on land, water, and surrounding communities. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The local area has always been known as a tourist area. I’m sorry to disagree on this because without mining I’d hate to imagine how many businesses would close their doors. I work in one of the neighbouring coal mines, I have many friends that work in the local coal mines. I am all for extensions as I honestly know how important they are and how supportive and generous of our community these businesses are. |
Lutzia Scherrer
|
ID |
17866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2265 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support Moolarben extension. It provides economic benefits to the State and Australia as a whole. Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce. |
Hamish Russell
|
ID |
17871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project appears to be a well conceived proposal that will provide for the continued benefit of Australian families and their businesses. The Moolarben Coal Complex have proven to be a very good thing for Mudgee and the MWRC. They have a proven track record of contributing significantly to the community. Royalties from the project are much needed, direct and indirect employment generated by the project is significant and other flow on economic benefits far outweigh and counter arguments. |
Sanjeev Unni
|
ID |
17876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an employee of Moolarben coal mines and as such my livelihood and that of my family depends on the continued operation of the mine. The OC3 extension means that we will be able to maintain about 1000 jobs in the region and deliver ~$180m to the local economy every year. Moolarben supports various local businesses in the Mid-Western region but also supports a large number of suppliers across Australia and makes a meaningful contribution to the community it operates in. |
andrew lanser
|
ID |
17891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in support of the granting of the mining approval for the Moolarben OC3 Extension. Mining generally has greatly contributed to the economic prosperity of the region for many years and should be allowed to continue to do so. The stringent controls on mining developments continue to underpin the low risk nature in which our resources can be responsibly extracted for the benefit of not only the local community but NSW more generally. |
Grant Lockrey
|
ID |
17911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4152 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support all responsible mining in Australia for the future economic growth and technological developments and opportunities provided to Australians. I do not believe that any greenhouse gas emissions are altering the earths climate in any way. |
Ken Doig
|
ID |
17981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extenston project for oc3 because it well give job to local and there family for years to come. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i work and support our local and distant community with my wages that i earn from this venture it also cools my house and heats it up without coal im going into a depressive mode which will affect my family my lifestyle |
David Byrnes
|
ID |
18071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2340 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have two sons who are employed in the mining industry and fully support any future expansions as a continuing legacy for the local community and the betterment of hard working people who want to make a better future for themselves and their families!!! |
Peter Paterson
|
ID |
18076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension is needed for lkcal employment and growth of the local and state |
Jennifer Lewis
|
ID |
18086 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Having being a resident of the Mudgee Region for the past 25 years, I have seen the development and growth of the town since the mining industry expanded and new mines opened. The mines are far enough away from the township to not have a negative impact on the town and have added to the wealth, development and diversity of the town. Families associated with the mines and those wishing to commence a new venture where it is reasonably cost effective to establish a business have moved and settled in Mudgee, creating more jobs, more industries who have the mines as their major customers, housing growth, broader shopping and dining experiences, adding to the educational courses offered in the schools to name a couple of positive outcomes for having the mining industry in the Mudgee Region. Mining is the bread and butter of the Mudgee Region, whereas tourism is the icing. In recent years, the Mudgee Wine industry has been on the decline with fewer Cellar Doors and vineyards being in the Region. This is what attracts tourists. If the Mining Industry also declines what will be left for the Mudgee Region? The Mines support not only tourism, but the schools, sporting facilities etc so without the continued support of the Mining Industry, these facilities would not be able to continue to exist. Mudgee would essentially die without mining. A loss of 700 jobs plus the associated families, an injection of $180 billion to the economy of the region is something that needs to be taken seriously. I believe the mines redevelop areas that have been mined, returning to as much as possible to the lands former state. Time will continue this process. Is a mine worse than a "renewable project" such as a solar farm or wind farm? I believe not! I am in support of the expansion of the OC3 mine at Moorlarben |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Yancoal- Moolarben Coal - Open cut 3 extension is very desired by myself and community members. The coal mine provides a huge economic advantage to the Mudgee region, with both direct and indirect employment. The town relys on the mine to continue as it provides employment for the townsfolk as well as desired apprenticeships for youth. I do not have any concerns with the proposed open cut pit , as I am aware of and been on tours of the mines regarding its operations and importantly the regenerative phase once pits have ceased operating. Moolarben Coal has been an outstanding sponsor of community grants which has helped Mudgee Prosper. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It allows our community of Mudgee to continue to thrive, the mines create so many job opportunities and give so many families the ability to come home every night instead of FIFO. It brings more tourist to the region for the workers that travel to the mines for work. Also bringing there families out here to visit. The mines are highly regulated to maintain a level of green emission through biodiversity stewardship agreements. This is an industry that many people rely upon to continue to battle the ongoing costs of living expenses. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
18116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
09/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Im all for this project of moolarben's to go ahead as a member of the wider community moolarben coal complex do alot for our community. Having job security is also a big thing for me and my family this project will boost the workforce and the region for sustainability. |
Sandra Cook
|
ID |
17431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local community member I feel the extension should go ahead because it benefits not only the Mudgee community but also the surrounding areas. Moolarben contribute a lot to the Mudgee economy which in turn makes Mudgee a nice place for locals to live in. We can have places like Glen Willow which attracts big football matches and tourists because we're supported by the mining community who inject the money into projects like these. Moolarben are ecologically minded and are responsible. Personally I see nothing but opportunity for Mudgee if the extension goes ahead. |
Will Bateman
|
ID |
17436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Stable employment for locals. |
Sam Muller
|
ID |
17441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am supporting the approval for the OC3 extension because I believe it has so many benefits to the surrounding communities. I have worked here for 2.5 years and In that time alone I have noticed an increase in tourism but also people moving to Mudgee & gulgong permanently as both towns have grown ergonomically and sustainably and I am confident that this would not of happened to this degree without Moolarben coal. I have always been a coal mine worker mostly associated with other mines further north from here and I can honestly say I’m yet to be exposed to another coal mine that has such a strong push for the community in a positive manner. Moolarben’s past and future rehabilitation plans for the environment and its biodiversity have and will be sufficient for its life of the mine and I am confident the impact of the OC3 extension not getting approved will have heavy negative impacts not only on the surrounding towns and communities but for the people full time employed there as well as the contractors and businesses associated with it. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of the project because it will benefit the community in regards to job opportunities and business opportunities. Also, the mine supports the local council for its development and activities. MCO is also responsible in mining hence, rehab for them is paramount. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposed extension. |
Adam Ledger
|
ID |
17481 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Reflex Total Cleaning |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2340 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project will provide local jobs and will continue to support local business a real positive for the Mudgee area. |
Tim Pace
|
ID |
17486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2087 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This project should absolutely be given the go ahead because as a nation we need to utilise our natural resources to their FULLEST extent. We DO NOT need to curtail our usage for the sake of fanciful ideological beliefs that would have us believe that we are saving the world from devastation by ruining our local industries, reliant on coal (amongst other resources) to survive and thrive. |
Daniel Freeman
|
ID |
17491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this development. It will continue to support the economy, the local community and the resources industry. The practices used by Yancoal are to a high standard and are environmentally responsible. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local resident and employee at Moolarben Coal. The OC3 Extension is important to me because it provides job security and long-term certainty for my family and others in the region. The project maintains existing employment without extending the mine life or increasing production, while delivering environmental improvements through rehabilitation. If the extension is not approved, it would create uncertainty for workers and negatively impact the local economy. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension. |
Maureen Playdon
|
ID |
17511 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2067 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Local jobs, the economy & community will be ensured of security, it will help around 700 people in the area & help our economy. We need to ensure that our electricity is secure for the future. We know that over 400 coal power plants are being built around the world, I see that the people & government are blind to this fact. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OC 3 Extension Submission To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine. I do so both as an employee of the operation and as a lifelong member of the Gulgong community. Moolarben is a significant contributor to the local economy, providing direct employment to over 850 workers and has a huge flow on too many other businesses in the area. Moolarben contributes a lot to local community events, clubs and infrastructure including the Gulgong Show Society, Gulgong Rescue Squad and Gulgong Pre-School. All of these have direct impacts on myself, my immediate and extended family. Managing environmental impacts is something that is important to me, particular with a family connection to farming in the area. I am convinced the company uses best practice to manage these issues. For the reasons outlined above, I support the approval of the Moolarben coal mine extension. I believe it is best for my family and community that the life of mine is extended. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, (Redacted) |
Alexander Campbell
|
ID |
17521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
OC 3 Extension Submission To Whom It May Concern, As an employee and a resident of Mudgee for over a decade I am writing in support for the proposed OC3 extension for Moolarben coal mine. Supporting employment for over 850 workers/contractors Moolarben is a significant contributor to the local economy, assisting in local vendor work flow and donations in to the community The management of the environmental impacts is something that is important to me, my wife and my kids who are going through the local Mudgee school system. Knowing that local family friends and other work colleagues having own farming blocks and land close to the Moolarben complex facing no issues with current operations ensures me that I have absolutely no issues with any mine extensions or future extensions moving forwards For the reasons outlined above, I support the approval of the Moolarben coal mine extension. I believe it is best for my family and community that the life of mine is extended. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Alexander Campbell |
Mathew Skofic
|
ID |
17581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
08/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Big supporter of the local Mudgee community. We must back these organisations that invest in regional communities |
TROY RYAN
|
ID |
17241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a homeowner in the nearby town of Gulgong, I strongly believe the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project should go ahead for a number of reasons, Firstly the biggest reason is that of a homeowner would hate to see the value of our family's home go down on account of the complex no longer in operation, If the local coal mines seize to exist so does a huge demand for housing for the local community, and with this is home value would decrease, Secondly the complex itself makes community contributions with infrastructure and community events that my family all at some point in time have utilised and will continue to utilise, If the Complex seizes to operate then ongoing community benefits will be impacted and the community will possibly no longer have access to these benefits, Thirdly No matter which way any person in our entire planet looks at coal power, not only does coal mining create jobs and financial growth for individuals but huge tax contributions from those employees employed by coal mining to our government, If you take away our coal mines you take away huge government revenue, Coal mining is essential for Australia to not become a third world country, Wind and solar are not the answer to energy crisis, Coal is and always will be, weather we utilise coal here in Australia or sell it overseas, Australia needs coal mining and Mudgee/Gulgong needs this proposed extension to go ahead, If not only for my family, but for our countries interest, |
Jason Steinbeck
|
ID |
17256 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I feel this is very necessary for the local community as the closure of the mines in the area will sadly be the end of this flourishing town. |
Trent McDonnell
|
ID |
17261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to lodge my support for the proposed Moolarben coal mine extension. I do so as both an employee of the mine and a local resident with a family who has a strong and ongoing connection to this community. The mine provides secure and meaningful employment for me and many others in the region. This work allows families like mine to remain living locally, contribute to the community, and plan for the future with confidence. An extension of the operation would help maintain this stability by ensuring continued employment and supporting the many local businesses and contractors that rely on the mine’s ongoing operation. From my experience as a community member, the mine has also made a positive contribution beyond direct employment. Its support of local services, sporting clubs, community organizations, and suppliers plays an important role in sustaining the social and economic health of the region. These contributions help keep our town strong and ensure it remains a place where families can live, work, and raise children. As a local resident, I am very mindful of environmental and safety considerations and have a personal interest in seeing these matters managed responsibly. Based on my experience, the company demonstrates a strong commitment to meeting regulatory requirements and to continually improving its environmental management and engagement with the community. For these reasons, I support approval of the proposed coal mine extension. I believe it represents a practical balance between maintaining vital employment and economic benefits while ensuring appropriate protections for the local environment and community. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, Trent McDonnell Mudgee, NSW |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17266 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben coal mine extension. I do so as an employee of the mine. Moolarben provides secure employment for me and many others in the region. For employees like myself who have joined the workforce more recently, the operation offers important opportunities to develop skills, build a stable career, and continue living and working locally. Approval of the Moolarben extension would provide greater certainty around ongoing employment and support the local businesses and contractors that rely on the mine’s continued operation. From my perspective as a local resident, the mine also contributes positively beyond direct employment. Its support for local services, sporting clubs, community organisations, and local suppliers plays an important role in maintaining the social and economic strength of the area. As a local resident and employee, I am mindful of environmental and safety considerations and have a personal interest in seeing these matters managed responsibly. Based on my experience over the past two years, the company demonstrates a strong commitment to meeting regulatory requirements and to continually improving its environmental management and engagement with the community. For these reasons, I support approval of the Moolarben coal mine extension. I believe it represents a balanced outcome that maintains employment and economic benefits while ensuring appropriate protections for the local environment and community. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, (Redacted) Mudgee |
Scott Parramore
|
ID |
17271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed Moolarben coal mine extension. I am a full-time contractor engaged at the mine and have recently relocated to the region to take up this role. Like many others, I made this move to secure stable employment during a time when cost-of-living pressures across Australia are significant and ongoing. The opportunity to work at Moolarben has allowed me to build a sustainable livelihood while continuing to live and work locally. Moolarben provides secure employment for hundreds of individuals and supports many families throughout the region. For contractors such as myself who have joined the workforce more recently, the operation offers valuable opportunities to develop skills, build a long-term career, and work with advanced technology and modern production systems. These systems not only improve efficiency but also contribute to reduced emissions and safer working conditions. Approval of the proposed extension would provide important certainty around ongoing employment, particularly in the current economic and political climate where job security is a growing concern for many Australians. Continued operation of the mine also supports local contractors, suppliers, and small businesses that rely on its presence and activity. As a local resident, I have seen firsthand that Moolarben's contribution extends beyond direct employment. Its support for local services, sporting clubs, community organizations, and regional suppliers plays a meaningful role in maintaining the social and economic strength of the area. I am mindful of environmental and safety considerations and have a personal interest in seeing these matters managed responsibly. Based on my experience working at the site over the past two years, I believe the company demonstrates a strong commitment to meeting regulatory requirements, improving environmental performance, and engaging constructively with the local community. For these reasons, I support approval of the proposed Moolarben mine extension. I believe it represents a balanced and responsible outcome that supports employment, economic stability, and regional communities while maintaining appropriate environmental and safety standards. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Scott Parramore Contractor and Local Resident |
Beauy Fernance
|
ID |
17276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the proposed Moolarben Extension Project from both a personal and community perspective. I made the decision to move to Mudgee for work almost 10 years ago and like many others I have built a life here and made new friends and often have family and friends visit who then explore the township and local area supporting the local community. Mining has a played a major role in keeping the local economy strong and provides additional opportunities for local people and families. The Moolarben Coal Operations alone have contributed over $350 million to the Mid-Western regions economy supporting over 120 local suppliers and businesses and currently provides over 680 jobs to local residents. Without a sustainable mining industry the region and towns like Mudgee would face significant economic decline with flow-on impacts to local businesses, services, schools, sporting clubs and healthcare. This Extension Project will help ensure this contribution continues, providing job security, economic support and ongoing community investment which is essential for regional towns to grow, thrive and remain vibrant places to live. In my view, continued responsible mining is critical to the future of the Mid-Western region and Australia as a whole. The Moolarben Extension Project will help protect jobs, sustain businesses, and keep the local economy strong. For these reasons, I strongly support its approval. |
Rebecca Willis
|
ID |
17281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe that the mines are a key supporter for the Mudgee and Gulgong community. We need the mines to continue so the surrounding areas can grow stronger and better. It supports the community by creating many jobs and opportunities for individuals to build their multiple skills and careers. |
Paul Posetti
|
ID |
17286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The development will support and sustain employment in the region. In addition, Australia must use coal to keep the "lights on". The Albanese government's misguided obsession with so called renewables will be a complete disaster for this country. Surely that is obvious now. |
Lyn Hicks
|
ID |
17311 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Country Women's Association Grattai Branch |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Our community organisation is grateful to Moolarben Coal for the generous financial contributions it has made to our organisation. Moolarben Coal are also a vital contributor to the town of Mudgee by employing a significant number of local people. It seems that this extension of existing coal fields has been thoughtfully planned in order to minimise disruption to social and natural environments. Overall Moolarben Coal is a good corporate citizen in our community. |
Jacob Woods
|
ID |
17326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom it May Concern: I Write in support of Moolarben's extension project. I have been an employee of the mine for six years and have established close connections within the workforce and the community and hope these can continue for as long as possible. Moolarben contributes significantly to a variety of community groups. They support me as a member of the Lawson Brigade in the Rural Fire Service by providing paid emergency service leave. A number of other Moolarben employees are members of this brigade. Thanks for the opportunity to make the submission. Regards Jacob Woods |
Damian Walsh
|
ID |
17336 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of the mine workings |
Matt Swords
|
ID |
17346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben Coal Project Extension Near Mudgee, NSW 1. Introduction I make this submission in strong support of the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Project near Mudgee. My support is based on over 30 years’ experience in the civil and mining industry, combined with my current role as a trainer and assessor, actively involved in developing new entrants into the mining and civil workforce. Through decades of practical involvement across construction, mining operations, and rehabilitation works, I have gained firsthand knowledge of how modern mining is conducted, how impacts are managed, and—critically—how rehabilitation can deliver long-term improvements to land stability and sustainability when done correctly. In my professional opinion, the Moolarben Project demonstrates these principles in practice. ________________________________________ 2. Importance of the Project to the Local Community The Moolarben Coal Project is a major employer and economic contributor to the Mudgee region and surrounding communities. The proposed extension will: • Maintain long-term employment opportunities for local workers and families • Provide certainty for apprentices, trainees, and early-career workers entering the industry • Support local businesses, contractors, and service providers that rely on the Project From a community perspective, continuity of operations is essential. Sudden closures or uncertainty place unnecessary strain on families, local services, and small businesses. The extension allows for stability and planned transition rather than disruption. ________________________________________ 3. Workforce Development and Training As a trainer and assessor, I have a strong personal and professional interest in workforce development. I genuinely enjoy training new workers and helping trainees build safe, productive, and long-term careers in the mining and civil industries. The Moolarben Project provides: • Structured training environments for new entrants • Opportunities for apprenticeships, traineeships, and upskilling • A pathway for young people in the region to remain local while building a career The extension will allow this training pipeline to continue. Without projects like Moolarben, regional communities lose not only jobs but also the ability to pass skills and experience from one generation of workers to the next. ________________________________________ 4. Ground Disturbance and Rehabilitation Outcomes Mining inevitably disturbs the ground—this is well understood by those of us who have worked in the industry for many years. However, modern rehabilitation practices, when properly planned and executed, can result in land that is more stable and sustainable after mining than it was beforehand. At Moolarben, the rehabilitation process involves: • The large-scale mixing of paleo materials through controlled earthworks • Improved soil structure and profile consistency • Reduced erosion potential compared to pre-mining conditions In my experience, areas rehabilitated in this way are often less prone to erosion, better drained, and more structurally stable than undisturbed land that may have been degraded through historical grazing or natural erosion processes. The deliberate reshaping and reconstruction of landforms, combined with vegetation establishment, creates a more resilient landscape over the long term. ________________________________________ 5. Environmental Management and Responsible Operations The Moolarben Coal Project has demonstrated that mining and environmental responsibility are not mutually exclusive. The use of existing disturbed areas, progressive rehabilitation, and continuous monitoring shows a commitment to responsible land stewardship. The extension provides the opportunity to: • Continue progressive rehabilitation rather than delaying it • Apply lessons learned to further improve rehabilitation outcomes • Ensure final landforms are stable, safe, and fit for agreed post-mining land uses Rehabilitation on site is at a high standard, improving the structural integrity of this country and improving biodiversity of the land after mining completion, ________________________________________ 6. Long-Term Community Benefits The extension of the Moolarben Coal Project offers long-term benefits that extend beyond the life of mining, including: • A skilled local workforce with transferable skills • Rehabilitated land that is more sustainable and erosion-resistant • Economic stability that supports regional services, schools, and health facilities From my perspective, the Project provides a balanced approach—supporting today’s community while responsibly planning for the future. ________________________________________ 7. Conclusion Based on my 30+ years of experience in the civil and mining industry, my role in training and mentoring new workers, and my direct understanding of rehabilitation practices, I strongly support the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Project near Mudgee. The Project delivers real benefits to the community, provides meaningful employment and training opportunities, and demonstrates that disturbed land can be rehabilitated to a condition that is more stable and sustainable than before mining commenced. For these reasons, I believe the extension is in the best interests of the local community, the regional economy, and responsible resource development in NSW. |
|
Attachments |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben Coal Project Extension_0.docx (DOCX, 18.88 KB) |
Courtney Szloch
|
ID |
17351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine should be viewed as a positive outcome for the local community. I have lived in Mudgee since 2001. Like many young people from the area, my three siblings left Mudgee to attend university, as they had little interest in the limited career pathways available locally. I remained in town because my partners employment depended on the mining industry. After more than a decade working in customer service, I was given the opportunity to begin a new career at Moolarben Coal Mine. This role has provided me with more opportunities, experience, and room for professional growth than I ever found in local businesses. It was also my first experience working within a large organisation, yet despite its size, the mine has a strong sense of local community. You don’t feel like just a number. At Moolarben you also feel supported, valued, and connected to the people around you. Prior to working at the mine, I spent eight years employed at a local shop, where a significant portion of our customers were mine workers. Their ongoing support was vital to the business. I also know many local businesses that rely heavily on employment and activity generated by the mining industry. Without mining in Mudgee, I believe the town would suffer economically. This is already evident through the ongoing sale of vineyards and the removal of vines, highlighting that the hospitality and wine industries alone cannot sustain the community in the way mining does. If I were to lose my job at the mines, I would be forced to leave Mudgee to continue my career. That decision would not affect just me, it would most likely mean the rest of my remaining family would also leave, breaking even more ties to a town we love. The extension of the Moolarben Coal Mine is more than just providing jobs & work to local businesses, it is about keeping families together, supporting local businesses, and ensuring Mudgee remains a living, thriving community rather than a place people are forced to leave behind. I have seen many families relocate to Mudgee and grow to love this town as their home. These families are noticeably happier, no longer burdened by the strain of the FIFO lifestyle. They are able to live together, share everyday moments, and see their children grow up. Something that many mineworkers never get the opportunity to experience during their careers. Having been part of the Mudgee community for such a long time, through sporting clubs and local businesses, it is hard to imagine a single one that would not be affected by the closure of the mines. The mining industry supports far more than jobs, it supports families, strengthens community connections, and keeps Mudgee alive. |
mitchell blewitt
|
ID |
17366 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine. I do so both as an employee of the operation and as a long-time community member of the Mid-Western region with a family who lives and works in the area. My employment with Moolarben provides a lifestyle that I enjoy within the Mid-Western Regional Council Area. The mine employs over 700 people from within the area and provides a career pathway for the local youth. Moolarben contributes a lot to local community events, clubs an infrastructure including the local running festival, sculptures in the garden, the local pump track and many sporting teams. Managing environmental impacts is something that is important to me as a keen fisherman and lover of the outdoors. I am convinced the company uses best practice to manage these issues. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben coal mine extension. I believe it represents a balanced approach that recognises the economic and social importance of the operation while maintaining appropriate safeguards for the local environment and community. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Mitchell Blewitt |
Gina Forster
|
ID |
17391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the project as it will sustain local jobs and supports broader economic growth within the community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Oc3 should expand because it will keep jobs in the community and moolarben also contributes to the community which is great, also being a low emission mine is great |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
07/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the extension will benefit the local community , local businesses and the 700 employees of Yancoal. Many workers are local, some like myself permanently moved here for work. Local businesses enjoy financial support from money being spent locally plus the extra tourism from family and friends visiting . |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am fully supportive of the OC3 extension project at Moolarben. This extension will help sustain the local economies by giving back more jobs for the future and continue to provide a reliable energy resource that is still vital, sustainable and important for Australia's future as an energy provider. This approval is important for the region and future mining in NSW. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2264 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Full support of MCO OC3 Extension Project. Yancoal has maintained a high reputation for environmental performance and social license to operate. MCO employment for local families is critical for the Mudgee region. |
Margaret Davis
|
ID |
16521 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2338 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Increasing native woodland is the big reason for me. |
Lewis Wolthers
|
ID |
16526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the submission as it supports rural towns and familys |
Jordan Wolthers
|
ID |
16531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the submission as it supports rural towns and familys |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2300 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have worked in the coal industry for over 20 years and have seen the employment and training opportunities provided. I would like these opportunities to be provided for future generations. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe that this extension should be approved as it provides advantages to the mudgee region such as housing, economic growth and the fact the moolarben coal has been a great supporter of the Mudgee region since opening and giving back to the local community. The jobs this creates only puts our region in a better place moving forward given the times we live in. The mudgee region needs mining to survive and had been that way for over 50 years. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed extension of the coal mine. I do so both as an employee of the operation and as a long-term member of the local community with a family who lives and works in the area. My employment at the mine provides stable work that supports my household and contributes directly to the wellbeing of many families across our community. The mine is a major local employer and plays a critical role in sustaining jobs, apprenticeships, and flow-on employment for contractors and small businesses in the region. The proposed extension would provide continuity of employment and economic certainty, which is especially important for families planning their futures here. Beyond employment, the mine has been a consistent contributor to the local community. This includes support for community groups, sporting clubs, local suppliers, and regional infrastructure. From my perspective as a resident, these contributions make a tangible difference to the quality of life in our town and help ensure the community remains viable and resilient. I am also aware of the importance of managing environmental and social impacts responsibly. As someone who lives locally and is raising a family here, I have a strong personal interest in ensuring that operations are conducted safely, responsibly, and in line with regulatory requirements. Based on my experience, the company takes its environmental and community obligations seriously and continues to work to minimise impacts while maintaining open communication with stakeholders. For these reasons, I support the approval of the coal mine extension. I believe it represents a balanced approach that recognises the economic and social importance of the operation while maintaining appropriate safeguards for the local environment and community. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, |
Andy Davison
|
ID |
16551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission is provided in strong support of the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) mining expansion. The proposal represents a critical opportunity to secure and sustain approximately 1,200 direct local jobs, while also underpinning thousands of indirect jobs across contracting, supply chains, professional services, retail, hospitality, tourism, education, health, and community services throughout Mudgee and the broader Central West region of New South Wales. The Moolarben operation has, over many years, demonstrated its role as a cornerstone employer and economic driver for the region. The OC3 expansion is not merely a continuation of mining activity; it is an investment in people, families, skills development, regional stability, and long-term community resilience. The expansion will ensure continuity of employment for the existing workforce, create further opportunities for local businesses, and maintain the economic conditions that have enabled Mudgee to thrive as both a regional service hub and a nationally recognised tourist destination, including being named Tourist Town of the Year for two consecutive years. Importantly, the proposal balances economic, social, and environmental considerations. Modern mining practices, stringent regulatory oversight, continuous improvement in safety and environmental performance, and strong community engagement are embedded within the Moolarben operation. The OC3 expansion builds on this foundation, enabling responsible resource development while delivering enduring benefits to the local and regional economy. This submission outlines the employment, economic, social, and community benefits of the OC3 expansion, the importance of the project to local families and supporting industries, and the role the mining sector has played—and will continue to play—in enabling Mudgee’s growth, diversification, and success. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2321 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m writing to support Moolarben Coal’s proposal to extend mining at Open Cut 3. I regularly visit the Mid‑Western Region and have seen how important Moolarben is to local jobs, local businesses, and the overall stability of the community. The mine employs hundreds of people, many of whom live locally, and the flow‑on benefits to small businesses, suppliers, and services are clear. Keeping those jobs secure matters for families and for the future of the region. From what I’ve read, the extension doesn’t increase the mine’s life or production rates — it simply allows mining to continue in an area that has already been cleared in the past. I also understand that the project has gone through detailed environmental assessments and that improvements were made after feedback from the community and government. Reducing the disturbance footprint, increasing setbacks, protecting habitat, and committing to more rehabilitation all seem like sensible changes. It’s also reassuring to see that the project would lead to a net increase in native woodland in the Moolarben Valley over time, and that there will be no final voids left behind. The mine’s efforts to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency are important too, especially given that Moolarben is already one of the lowest‑emissions‑intensity coal mines in Australia. Beyond the environmental side, Moolarben has supported the community for many years through grants and sponsorships that help local groups, schools, sporting clubs, and events. That kind of contribution makes a real difference in a regional area. Overall, I believe the OC3 extension is a responsible way to maintain jobs and investment in the region while continuing to manage environmental impacts carefully. For these reasons, I support the project. |
Bibek Shah
|
ID |
16561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2217 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The OC3 Extension Project will provide: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates ● A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley ● Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve ● Maximise use of existing infrastructure ● Minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography ● No final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) |
Trent Wehr
|
ID |
16586 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Liebherr |
|
Location |
South Australia 5096 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Support of the Moolarben OC3 Extension project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension for local business local jobs and the benefits it brings to the local and state economy |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The operations have previously provided me with employment and offer significant economic benefits to the state. They also ensure continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of work for the existing open-cut workforce. Additionally, there will be a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley. The project aims to maximise the use of existing infrastructure, a sustainable approach to physical assets, and eliminate final voids, reducing voids in the Moolarben Valley from one to zero. |
Steven Chandler
|
ID |
16601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Supports the Mudgee community with incomes from the mines Supports Mudgee community with grants from the mines to Mudgee Council Supports upkeep of Ulan Road Yancoal make donations to many community events and charities |
Mikee Alarcon
|
ID |
16611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally express my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mining site. I believe the extension represents a positive opportunity for the local community and the region more broadly. The continued operation and expansion of the site will help sustain local employment, support associated businesses, and contribute to economic stability at a time when secure, long-term jobs are increasingly important. I also acknowledge that the mining site has an established operational history, and I am encouraged by the commitments made to responsible environmental management, regulatory compliance, and ongoing monitoring. Extending an existing, well-managed site is a practical approach that makes use of current infrastructure while minimising the need for entirely new developments elsewhere. With appropriate oversight and adherence to environmental and safety standards, I believe the proposed extension can deliver meaningful benefits while responsibly managing potential impacts. For these reasons, I support the approval of the mining site extension. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2469 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Job creation is very important as we struggle under the federal governments continued imagination intake. Coal has always been the best option for generating power not these eyesaw wind turbines that create noise and are non renewable.Turbines made with inferior quality materials and asbestos.Turbines are worse for our environment they take up our land and kill wildlife.Coal burns much cleaner in 2026 than 1926. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need these resources |
Warwick Smyth
|
ID |
16686 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
GeoConsult |
|
Location |
Queensland 4006 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension Project proposes to extend mining south of the existing open cut mine area, on land that has historically been cleared. The extension Project will be integrated with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, which has approval to mine until 2038. It will operate within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. There would be: • significant economic benefits to the state • continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce • no changes to the approved mine life or production rates • a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley • setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve • maximising use of existing infrastructure • minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography • no final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16696 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Pacific National |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
# Submission to the Commission in Support of Approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project ## 1. Introduction This submission is made in support of the approval of the proposed Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project (the Extension Project). The Extension Project represents a logical and responsible continuation of existing mining operations within the Moolarben Coal Complex and delivers substantial economic, social, and environmental benefits while maintaining strict environmental and amenity safeguards. The proposal has been refined in response to extensive community and Government feedback and demonstrates a strong commitment to minimising impacts, protecting environmental values, and maximising positive outcomes for the State of New South Wales and the local community. ## 2. Project Overview The Extension Project proposes to extend mining activities south of the existing open cut mine area, entirely within land that has historically been cleared. The project will be fully integrated with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, which is already approved to operate until 2038. Importantly, the Extension Project will: * Operate within existing mining tenements * Be located on Moolarben-owned freehold land * Utilise existing approved infrastructure * Not alter the currently approved mine life or production rates This approach ensures operational continuity without introducing new or intensified impacts beyond those already assessed and approved. ## 3. Economic and Employment Benefits The Extension Project delivers significant economic benefits at both the State and regional level, including: * Continued and reliable contributions to the NSW economy through royalties, taxes, and local procurement * Ongoing support for regional businesses and service providers * Sustained economic activity in the Upper Hunter region Critically, the project provides continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce. This reduces uncertainty for employees and their families and supports long-term workforce stability without the need for workforce expansion or additional accommodation pressures. ## 4. Environmental Outcomes and Land Rehabilitation The Extension Project demonstrates strong environmental performance and results in a net positive ecological outcome within the Moolarben Valley. Key environmental benefits include: * A **net increase of approximately 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation**, delivering long-term biodiversity gains * Increased setbacks from creek lines and the Goulburn River National Park to protect riparian and conservation values * Reduced disturbance of wildlife habitat compared to earlier project concepts * Enhanced land rehabilitation outcomes, with progressive rehabilitation integrated into mine planning * Elimination of final voids, reducing the number of voids in the Moolarben Valley from one to zero The removal of final voids represents a significant improvement in long-term landform stability, safety, and post-mining land use outcomes. ## 5. Amenity and Community Impacts The Extension Project has been designed to minimise amenity impacts on nearby residents. In particular: * The extension area will be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography * There will be minimal visual, noise, or dust impacts beyond those already approved * No additional residences are brought into proximity with active mining areas These design features ensure that community amenity is protected while allowing the existing operation to continue responsibly. ## 6. Efficient Use of Existing Infrastructure The project maximises the use of existing, approved infrastructure, including haul roads, processing facilities, and supporting services. This avoids the need for new disturbance areas, reduces construction impacts, and ensures that the Extension Project operates within an established and regulated operational footprint. ## 7. Improvements Following Community and Government Feedback Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 Extension Project application following consultation with the community and Government agencies. These improvements include: * A reduced overall disturbance footprint * Reduced coal extraction volumes * Increased setbacks to better protect environmental assets * Reduced disturbance to native vegetation and wildlife habitat * Increased land rehabilitation commitments These changes clearly demonstrate responsiveness to stakeholder concerns and materially improve the environmental and community outcomes of the project. ## 8. Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project represents a well-considered and balanced proposal that delivers strong economic and employment benefits while achieving meaningful environmental improvements and maintaining community amenity. The project does not extend the approved mine life or increase production rates, operates within existing tenements and freehold land, and results in a net positive environmental outcome for the Moolarben Valley. The elimination of final voids, increased rehabilitation, and reduced disturbance footprint further strengthen the merits of the proposal. For these reasons, this submission strongly supports the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and respectfully requests that the Commission grant approval. |
PAUL RODGERS
|
ID |
16751 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Dear Commissioners, I am writing as a long-term contractor working at the Moolarben Coal Mine to express my strong support for the proposed extension to the Open Cut 3 (OC3) operations. I was employed at Moolarben from 2009 -2016 and my business has been contracted at Moolarben from 2023. I have personally witnessed the dedication and effectiveness of the mine's environment and community teams over many years. They consistently meet and often exceed their environmental commitments, including outstanding efforts to rehabilitate and look after the land. The rehabilitation work I have seen on site is impressive and demonstrates a genuine commitment to restoring the landscape post-mining. The Moolarben project has been a tremendous benefit to our local Mudgee community and the broader Mid-Western Region. The mine actively supports numerous community initiatives through its sponsorships and grants program, contributing positively to local organisations, education, health, sports, and other areas. It has injected significant economic value into the region by supporting local businesses, contractors, and services providers. Many workers, including myself, live in the surrounding towns and directly contribute to keeping local shops, services, and the economy thriving. The mine and Mid-Western Regional Council have maintained an excellent collaborative relationship, always prioritising the best interests of the community as a whole. This partnership has helped ensure that operations are conducted responsibly while delivering real, ongoing benefits to residents. On a personal level, the mine has provided stable employment and supported my family financially since 2009. The proposed extension would secure these opportunities for the future, continuing the positive social and economic impacts that the operation has delivered for well over a decade. In light of the strong environmental management I have observed firsthand, the proven community benefits, and the mine's track record of responsible operations, I urge the Commission to approve the OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission and for the opportunity to have my say as someone directly involved in the mine's operations. Yours sincerely, Paul Rodgers |
Craig Tanzer
|
ID |
17091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We support the Commission’s determination of the development application having regard to the Assessment Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Environment, including all recommended conditions of consent. The Assessment Report provides the most current, detailed and comprehensive assessment of the proposed development, including consideration of environmental, social and economic impacts. As a supplier to Yancoal, we acknowledge the importance of the proposed development in supporting the continuity of approved mining operations and maintaining certainty for the established supply chain. Ongoing operations enable suppliers to plan, invest and maintain employment, particularly within regional New South Wales, and contribute to broader economic stability. We note that the Assessment Report demonstrates that the proposed development has been subject to extensive technical review and regulatory scrutiny, with appropriate mitigation and management measures identified where required. We support the application of reasonable and enforceable conditions of consent to ensure ongoing compliance with relevant planning, environmental and operational standards. We therefore encourage the Commission to give significant weight to the findings and recommendations of the Assessment Report in determining the application, and to recognise the demonstrated economic and operational benefits associated with the proposed development. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17096 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
HOT ENGINEERING PTY LTD |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hot Engineering Pty Ltd is pleased to express its full support for the proposed Ulan West Continued Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project being advanced by Yancoal. Hot Engineering is a locally owned and operated manufacturing and engineering company based in Mudgee. We employ 25 full-time staff and engage several local contractors. Our company provides high-quality fabricated products, maintenance services, and skilled labour to mining operations across the Central West region. We have proudly supported all Yancoal operated mines in the Mudgee region and other local operations for many years, contributing to the reliability, safety, and efficiency of their operations. The proposed pit extension represents an important opportunity to sustain local employment, enhance regional economic activity, and ensure continued engagement of local suppliers such as Hot Engineering. We commend Moolarben coal, Moolarben for its responsible approach to environmental management, community consultation, and commitment to local procurement. The expansion will help secure long-term benefits for the Mudgee community and provide ongoing opportunities for regional businesses. Hot Engineering looks forward to continuing our partnership with Moolarben coal, Moolarben and providing services that support the safe and sustainable development of the mine. Please don’t hesitate to contact me should further information be required. |
|
Attachments |
Truman Goonrey - Letter of Support Redacted.pdf (PDF, 630.34 KB) |
Vince Carrabs
|
ID |
17101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2217 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This project presents an opportunity for employment, improvement of ammenities and the current environment. Please consider how this project will Positively impact on all involved. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I whole heartedly support this submission. Mining is very important to the region and the community. Yancoal as a company respects their employees, the local towns & the community, they employee locals, & support local charities & businesses. The companies, rehabilitation program is top notch, returning the land back the same, if not in better condition, taking great care & consideration for Traditional owners, water quality & native fauna & flora. The mining companies in the MWC do a great job of leaving a small footprint in the towns and the local area. The towns do not have the feel or appearance of traditional mining towns this is something we can all be proud of from the Companies, council & community. I whole heartedly support this submission. This submission is a win, win for the Community, MWC, NSW & Australia. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I whole heartedly support this submission. Mining is very important to the region and the community. Yancoal as a company respects their employees, the local towns & the community, they employee locals, & support local charities & businesses. The companies, rehabilitation program is top notch, returning the land back the same, if not in better condition, taking great care & consideration for Traditional owners, water quality & native fauna & flora. The mining companies in the MWC do a great job of leaving a small footprint in the towns and the local area. The towns do not have the feel or appearance of traditional mining towns this is something we can all be proud of from the Companies, council & community. I whole heartedly support this submission. This submission is a win, win for the Community, MWC, NSW & Australia. |
Ross Tito
|
ID |
17116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben coal mine. I do so both as an employee of the operation and as a long-time community member of the Mid-Western region with a family who lives and works in the area. My employment at the mine provides stable work that supports my household and contributes directly to the wellbeing of many families across our community. The mine employs over 700 people and is a pathway for young people to develop lifelong skills through apprenticeships, traineeships and cadetships. Moolarben provides economic benefit and flow-on employment for contractors and small businesses in the region. The proposed extension would provide continuity of employment and economic certainty, which is especially important for families planning their futures in the region. Beyond employment, Moolarben has been a consistent contributor to the local community. This includes support for community groups, sporting clubs, events, local suppliers, and regional infrastructure. Some of these include a significant financial contribution to the construction of the local pump bicycle track and sponsorship of major community events such as the annual running festival, Flavours food and wine festival and Tunes on the turf in Dunedoo. These contributions make the region what it is – A vibrant community with a lot to offer. I am also aware of the importance of managing environmental and social impacts responsibly. As someone who lives locally and is raising a family here, I have a strong personal interest in ensuring that operations are conducted safely, responsibly, and in line with regulatory requirements. Based on my experience, the company takes its environmental and community obligations seriously and continues to work to minimise impacts while maintaining open communication with stakeholders. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben coal mine extension. I believe it represents a balanced approach that recognises the economic and social importance of the operation while maintaining appropriate safeguards for the local environment and community. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Ross Tito |
Tristan Botha
|
ID |
17126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2324 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I personally support the extension; this project will support the local community and the Hunter Region. It will benefit both direct employees and local suppliers, along with hundreds / thousands of people who are contract workers at the site. |
Trish Elsegood
|
ID |
17131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This expansion is vital for our community and country to continue to prosper. The jobs and economic value of the expansion is critical for our town. The organisations that undertake this industry in our region are strong supporters of community and sporting organisations and without them our community will suffer. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2469 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe it is essential that clean coal (where all precautions are taken to reduce emissions from good quality coal mining)-helps Australia bridge the gap between fossil fuel & alternate power. |
Adam Nolan
|
ID |
17151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been working in the coal industry in the Mudgee region for more than 20 years and have been a Mudgee council rate payer for the past 35 years. I am currently employed by Yancoal and have been for the past 11 years during this time I can say there mine technics and environmental practices are world class and I have no doubt the 0C3 extension project would be dealt with the greatest of care. The extension is critical for the town ship of Mudgee the community relies on the ongoing operations of our local coal industry with out them Mudgee will become a gost town over night the region can not rely on tourism that only supplies a tiny amount of income to the region. I extremely hope the proposed expansion is approved. Cheers Adam |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i support the coal mine extension |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2278 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the approval |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2449 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of this mine as I believe coal to be a cheap reliable fuel to power our electricity generation, it is not dependent upon weather and modern coal power stations are efficient and cleaner that at any time in the past |
Garreth Bridgland
|
ID |
17196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension project will allow Yancoal Moolarben to continue supplying jobs to its local communities for a longer period. This detrimental to Locals such as myself, who would like to stay in the Mudgee region and raise a family. |
Lincon Costello
|
ID |
17201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Commissioners, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. I am a current Yancoal employee and have worked at Moolarben for three years as a Multi-Skilled Operator. I live locally in Mudgee with my wife and three children, and I am the sole income earner for my household. The continuation of this project is extremely important to the stability and security of my family. Moolarben provides stable employment in a regional area where opportunities of this scale are limited. The income I earn allows my family to live, work, and contribute to the Mudgee community. The extension will help maintain employment for many workers and support local contractors, suppliers, and small businesses that rely on mining activity. I have also seen the positive contribution Moolarben makes to the local community through sponsorships, grants, and support for local organisations. These contributions help strengthen the region and support local families. The project has undergone extensive environmental assessment and includes measures to minimise impacts, utilise existing infrastructure, and support land rehabilitation. This demonstrates a responsible approach to ongoing mining operations. I respectfully ask the Commission to consider the important economic and community benefits this project provides. Approval of the OC3 Extension Project would provide certainty and stability for many local families, including my own. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Lincon Costello Mudgee NSW Multi-Skilled Operator – Moolarben Coal Complex |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
17206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local who lives in the area. I support this development as it brings a lot of local jobs to the area. this development will bring future job employment for a younger generation |
Darren Upton
|
ID |
17211 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Fuchs Lubricants |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2283 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Operation Complex which includes the Opencut pit, Underground mine and CHPP employee a large amount of people from the local community and it also support hundreds of suppliers and contractors from the surrounding areas. The money generated by this operation has a major positive impact on the local economy. I am supporting this proposed extension as it provides many direct and indirect jobs and it provides a livelihood for so many people and it is a huge part of the local economy. |
william browne
|
ID |
17236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
06/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Mine has been an important part of our local region for many years and continues to provide stable employment and economic security for families like mine. The proposed extension will allow ongoing operations, which is critical in maintaining jobs, supporting local businesses, and ensuring the long-term economic health of our community. For my family, the continuation of the Moolarben Mine provides certainty and stability. Secure employment means we can continue to live locally, support our children’s education, and contribute positively to the community. It allows families to plan for the future, remain in the region, and avoid the need to relocate for work. This stability is invaluable, particularly in regional areas where employment opportunities can be limited. The mine also delivers broader community benefits. Local businesses rely on the mine and its workforce, from shops and services to contractors and suppliers. Continued operations help keep these businesses viable, strengthen the local economy, and support community facilities, sporting clubs, and events. These contributions help maintain a strong and connected community. Importantly, mining in this region has demonstrated that mining and community can coexist responsibly. With appropriate management and oversight, the extension can continue to deliver economic and social benefits whilst minimising impacts on the surrounding environment and community. I believe Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project is essential to ensuring the ongoing prosperity of our region. It supports local jobs, strengthens families, and helps sustain the community we are proud to be part of. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission |
ty marshall
|
ID |
15866 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing in support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project as both a local worker and a long-term member of the surrounding community. My family and I chose to move to this area because of the job opportunities provided by the mining industry and the stable future it offered. Like many others, we were drawn by the prospect of meaningful, well-paid work and the chance to raise our family in a supportive regional town. The decision has proven to be the right one. Working locally has allowed me to provide for my family, build long-term security, and remain actively involved in the community where we live. Through my work at Moolarben and my involvement in the local area, I see firsthand the positive impact mining has on our community. The industry contributes significantly to local sports clubs, schools, and community groups through funding and sponsorships that simply would not be possible otherwise. These contributions help keep local clubs alive, give young people opportunities to participate in sport, and strengthen the sense of connection within our town. The mine also supports local businesses, contractors, and families, creating a flow-on effect that benefits the wider region. Many families, including my own, rely on the continued operation of the mine for employment and economic stability. The OC3 Extension Project represents ongoing job security and confidence in the future of our community. Raising a family here has shown me how important stable employment and a strong local economy are to regional towns. The fulfilment that comes from working locally, contributing to the community, and living in a town that supports its people cannot be overstated. Projects like this help ensure that our town remains a place where families can live, work, and thrive for years to come. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and believe it is vital for the continued wellbeing and sustainability of our local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission in support of the continued operation and proposed extension of Moolarben Coal Operations. I am a permanent local resident and have lived and worked in the area for many years. My livelihood, like many others in this community, is directly connected to the mining industry. Moolarben Coal Operations has provided me with stable, long-term employment and the opportunity to support my family and plan for the future. Moolarben Coal Operations plays a vital role in sustaining our local economy. It provides well-paid jobs not only for mine workers but also for contractors, local businesses, and service providers. The income generated by the mine supports shops, schools, sporting clubs, and community organisations, helping to keep our towns viable and thriving. An extension of Moolarben Coal Operations would provide certainty for workers like myself, allowing us to remain employed locally rather than being forced to relocate or seek work elsewhere. This stability is important for families, housing, and the overall social fabric of the community. Having lived near Moolarben Coal Operations for many years, I am familiar with its operations and believe it has operated responsibly and with consideration for the local area. Continued operation and extension of the mine will allow the company to keep investing in safety, environmental management, and community contributions. For these reasons, I strongly support Moolarben Coal Operations and its proposed extension. Keeping the mine operating will secure jobs, sustain local towns, and provide long-term economic benefits for the region. Thank you for considering my submission. (Redacted) |
Daniel Steel
|
ID |
15876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am personally I big supporter of the moolarben extension. With the extension in place that would mean there would be no ramping down in coal production in the years leading up to the end of mine life. This would be very positive financially for the local community and also nation wide. If moolarben can continue with high coal recovery closer to the end of mine life it would mean more local jobs for a longer period which in turn keeps a lot more money locally (if ramping down production in coal has to happen it would mean less and less available jobs every year and less money for the local communities) and as for nation wide with the extension it would mean continued high coal recovery so more royalties more tax more outsourced work, so financially it will have continued positive effects for a longer period of time. As for the environmental side of the extension, the proposed extension has been carefully thought out to have minimal impact, they have planned to mine the areas that are already cleared of trees by the old farmlands that were cleared many years ago for grazing and agriculture, so in reality after the rehabilitation process that land will actually have a lot more woodlands which will have positive effects for the environment into the future after mining has ceased. So all in all I personally think the extension has a lot to offer financially and environmentally locally and nationally, the positives would outweigh any negatives in my opinion |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15881 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia needs and benefits from coal, and it provides people with jobs. |
Jason Bell
|
ID |
15891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. This initiative will secure long-term employment for hundreds of workers like myself, while contributing significantly to the local economy through sustained coal production and community investments. Yancoal has demonstrated a commitment to responsible mining practices, including robust environmental management plans that minimize impacts on surrounding areas and incorporate the latest sustainability measures. By extending operations south of the existing OC3 pit, the project will optimize resource recovery, support Australia's energy needs, and foster regional growth without compromising safety or ecological standards. Approving this extension is essential for maintaining the vitality of our industry and the communities it supports. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2071 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It would be great to see OC3 Extension Project at Moolarben on board. This will support the local community economically while impacting local communities in the least way possible as Yancoal never compromise with their high safety standards. |
Mitchell Armstrong
|
ID |
15901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I very strongly support the OC3 extension at Moolarben. It will create long term jobs for members of the community and deliver significant investment into the local economy. Responsible coal production is vital to Australia's energy needs. Approval is essential for our workforce and the economy of the Moolarben and greater Mudgee region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2380 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposed Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The Project will provide continued employment and economic stability for the Mudgee region, supporting around 700 ongoing jobs and contributing approximately $180 million annually to the New South Wales economy. Extending operations within existing mining tenements and historically cleared land is a responsible approach that maximises the use of existing infrastructure, with no increase to the approved mine life or production rates. I also support the significant improvements made to the Project following community and Government feedback, including a reduced disturbance footprint, increased environmental setbacks, reduced impacts on wildlife habitat, increased land rehabilitation, and a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation. The removal of final voids and minimal amenity impacts further demonstrate a balanced and considered proposal. Overall, the OC3 Extension Project delivers strong economic, employment, and environmental outcomes and should be supported. |
Samuel Ervin
|
ID |
15916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2870 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Note of Support – Yancoal OC3 Project I am writing in support of Yancoal’s IPCC application to progress the OC3 project. As a subject matter expert with professional experience in mining operations and regional resource‑sector development, I consider this project critical to sustaining the economic success of regional New South Wales. The OC3 continuation ensures long‑term employment, contractor stability, and ongoing economic contribution to local communities. By maximising recovery within an existing mining complex and utilising established infrastructure, the project offers a responsible and efficient pathway for extending the life of a major regional employer while limiting additional surface impact. Given the continuing demand for reliable, high‑quality thermal coal and the importance of stable energy‑linked exports to the state’s economy, the OC3 project provides certainty for workers and supports broader regional growth. I encourage the Commission to recognise both the strategic and community‑level benefits associated with advancing this application. |
Micheal Lindstrom
|
ID |
15921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2287 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project will keep the economy of Mudgee and Ulan areas flourishing. Without this extension, there will be loss of jobs and diminished economic activity in the area. There will be a flow on effect to the local community. The NSW government relies heavily on the tax income revenue and the royalties generated by mining in NSW. The State government is struggling to support and having to make cut backs into hospitals, police, schools and other key areas of infrastructure that need to be supported. The case in point is the issues at the Mater hospital in Newcastle where cancer patients and hospital staff health have been compromised due to funding issues. I support the extension project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15926 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need Coal for the security of our Country, we need more coal generation to reduce prices as families are suffering around the country. |
Annette Rhodes
|
ID |
15931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My family has been a part of the community since settlement, some of them before that, traditionally in the farming industry and I have seen the benefits of mining to the local region. Also have been lucky enough to have seen the rehabilitation requirements and results after mining and have seen the area burned out in the 80's to come back with scrubby vegetation that was damaging to the soil, seeing the areas that have been rehabilitated with careful consideration to a variety of native species that attract native fauna is a fabulous thing. The mining industry goes to great lengths to look after our region, provide work for locals, both directly and indirectly. The industry is sensitive to traditional owners of the land, support our community through grants/workers volunteering within the community or sometimes just lending some gazebos or workers for a local event. In short, the end results are much more attractive to people who have been here for generations rather than the solar and wind farms being imposed on and destroying the beauty and tourism of our region, and I whole heartedly support the expansion proposal. |
Troy Taylor
|
ID |
15936 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an employee of strongly support the Extension Project at Moolarben. This extension will secure long-term jobs, sustain local economic benefits, and continue responsible coal production vital to our country's energy needs. I believe Yancoal’s proven environmental management, safety standards, and community commitment ensure the project will deliver positive outcomes with minimal impact. This approval is essential for the workforce, region, and our industry & most importantly sustains the local businesses, contractors & their suppliers. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is a fantastic asset to the community. They provide many jobs and families would struggle if they were to close. They help very much in the community as well |
Geoff Henning
|
ID |
15946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2845 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to voice my support for the OC3 Extension Project at Moolarben Mine, via Mudgee, NSW. The flow on benefits to the staff at the mine; including contractors and suppliers, the local community and the broader community are too great a loss to endure by this project not being approved. We all understand and agree that a Greener solution for the future will be a better long term solution, however in the short term; 20 to 50 years we have to ensure a smooth and reliable transition. This project extension will go a long way to helping that happen. The Mudgee district has worked extremely hard over many years to get to its current status as a busy vibrant destination and home to thousands of families who are reviling in the community spirit that is currently a major part of the town. To remove or reduce any of the current mining projects in the region would spell disaster for Mudgee as it simply cannot survive on a tourist industry alone. Literally thousands of people would be displaced and with Australia’s current economic position this would only seek to worsen it. The royalties and revenue generated will only assist in helping Australia move to a Green Future over the next 50 years without having a huge impact on the people of the Mudgee Region and Australians as a whole. Yancoal has to date have always been diligent and mindful of its obligations and due diligence to the environment and surrounds, and there is nothing to indicate that they would not continue to do so with any continuing or future projects such as the OC3 Extension Project. I fully support this and have no concerns with its approval. |
Katie Seckold
|
ID |
15951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This community depends on the approval of this development for the economic survival of this town. It supports a very large portion of the local community through employment, community donations and sponsorships. Without the mines our town unemployment would skyrocket and for people to move away in droves and then crash the local housing market. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Approval for the proposed extension will continue to support jobs in the area and provide a boost to the economy in the region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15961 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2380 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Good for the continued growth and economic development of the region |
MITCH STAIT
|
ID |
15966 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal provides almost endless benefits to the community area of Mudgee and surrounds, creating 1000s of jobs directly and indirectly bolstering the local community and businesses with millions of dollars. Mudgee community would not be the same with out the ongoing support of the local mines. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15971 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the OC3 Moolarben Coal Extension and its approval by the Commission. The proposed extension represents a continuation of an established mining operation that has long contributed to the local and regional community. Moolarben Coal has provided stable employment, supported local businesses, and played an important role in sustaining the economic wellbeing of the Mudgee region. The OC3 extension will help maintain these benefits by securing ongoing jobs for workers and contractors and providing certainty for families who rely on the operation. Importantly, the proposal builds on an existing, well-managed site rather than introducing a new development in a previously undisturbed area. The Assessment Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Environment demonstrates that the extension has been carefully assessed, with appropriate mitigation measures and recommended conditions to manage potential environmental and social impacts. This gives confidence that the project can proceed responsibly and in accordance with regulatory requirements. The continuation of operations will also support essential community services and infrastructure through ongoing investment, rates, and contributions to the local economy. In a region where employment opportunities can be limited, the OC3 extension provides long-term economic stability and helps retain skills and experience within the community. Overall, I believe the OC3 Moolarben Coal Extension strikes an appropriate balance between economic benefit and environmental management. For these reasons, I support the proposed development and encourage the Commission to approve the application, subject to the recommended conditions of consent outlined in the Assessment Report. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15976 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission as a long-term local resident, local business owner, and employee of Moolarben Coal. I strongly support the proposed OC3 Extension of the Moolarben Coal Project. As someone who lives and works in this community, I see firsthand the positive role Moolarben Coal plays in the local area. The operation provides stable, well-paid employment for many local families, including my own, and supports a wide network of local contractors, suppliers, and small businesses like mine. The continuation of mining through the OC3 Extension is critical to maintaining this economic stability. Moolarben Coal has consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to the local community. The company supports local jobs, invests in local services, and contributes to community initiatives that benefit the wider region. This support makes a real difference in keeping our towns viable, helping local businesses survive, and ensuring people can continue to live and work locally rather than being forced to leave the area for employment. From my experience working at Moolarben Coal, the operation is run professionally with a strong focus on safety, environmental management, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The company takes its responsibilities seriously and has shown it can operate while managing impacts appropriately. The OC3 Extension will provide certainty for workers, their families, and local businesses by extending the life of the operation. Without this extension, there would be significant negative flow-on effects for employment, local businesses, and the broader regional economy. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension and believe it is in the best interests of the local community, the workforce, and the region as a whole. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15981 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This will help to support the local community. It will provide more employment for the expanding workforce |
Matthew Clarke
|
ID |
15986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2847 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 30 your old first national male. We need coal for the for see able future because as we have already seen. Renewable energy such as wind and solar does not work. We need nuclear energy. But in the meantime we will have to make do with coal. Or we (as in the local area and australia) will continue to have power outages. Apart from this the amount of local jobs is over 1000. So I a first national person 100% encourages/ backs this coal mine extension. |
Peter Heinrichson
|
ID |
15996 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Eilbeck Cranes |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2565 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing in strong support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. My perspective comes from the position of a long‑established Australian family business — Eilbeck Cranes — and the many hundreds of Australian families whose livelihoods depend on a stable and continuous resources sector. Eilbeck Cranes is a family‑owned manufacturing and engineering company employing around 450 people across Australia, with more than 1,600 direct family members relying on the incomes generated by this work. In addition, through contractors, suppliers, visa‑based skilled workers, and our national supply chain, we estimate the welfare of over 6,000 indirect family members—many of them overseas—also depends on the continuity of large‑scale industrial projects in Australia, including coal mining and coal‑related infrastructure. 1. Economic Stability for Australian Manufacturing Australian manufacturing remains viable only when major industries such as mining and energy remain active. Coal operations like Moolarben directly and indirectly create demand for cranes, lifting systems, fabrication work, maintenance services, and site infrastructure — all of which Eilbeck Cranes provides. An extension of the OC3 project means: Continued production schedules Predictable procurement cycles Stability for manufacturers and service providers who rely on long‑term resource projects The ability for us to retain, train and upskill Australian tradespeople, apprentices, engineers and technicians When coal investment contracts, Australian manufacturing contracts with it. When coal expands or continues steadily, we survive and grow. 2. Protecting 450 Direct Jobs — and Thousands More Indirect Jobs Eilbeck Cranes employs 450 Australians whose work is tied, in part, to the continuation of mining, heavy industry and major infrastructure. These employees support over 1,600 direct family members. Additionally, the flow‑on economic impact of our supply chain — including riggers, steelworkers, machinists, electrical subcontractors, transport operators, and specialist overseas technicians working on visa programs — supports more than 6,000 indirect family members globally. A strong resources sector enables us to: Maintain secure, long‑term employment Offer apprenticeships and skilled trade pathways Invest in local workshops instead of offshoring Keep production onshore instead of relying on imported cranes and components Any loss of momentum in coal projects has a direct effect on Australian families far beyond the mine gate. 3. Coal Projects Provide Predictability That Manufacturing Depends On Unlike many sectors that fluctuate wildly, mining projects — especially established, low‑impact, low‑emission operations such as Moolarben — offer predictable, multi‑year planning horizons. This predictability is critical: It allows us to invest in new CNC machines, foundry capacity, automation equipment, and modern fabrication lines It supports stable production forecasting It justifies expanding Australian workshops rather than importing foreign equipment It secures local trades and rare‑skill jobs that would otherwise leave the country The OC3 extension continues operations within existing approvals, existing infrastructure, and already‑disturbed land, meaning the benefits come with minimal additional environmental footprint. 4. Community and State Economic Benefits Flow All the Way to Australian Workshops The extension project ensures: Continued employment for ~700 workers at Moolarben Ongoing capital injection estimated around $180 million annually Lower‑emission coal supply from one of Australia’s lowest‑intensity mines Greater regional economic stability, which directly feeds into manufacturing supply chains For companies like ours, a stable mining workforce means continued demand for safety‑critical lifting equipment, maintenance, service contracts, and site upgrades — work that keeps hundreds of Australians in stable, skilled trades. 5. Supporting a Family Business That Has Supported Australia for Generations Eilbeck Cranes has been operating for over a century, contributing to: Australian engineering sovereignty Local manufacturing capability Skilled trade development Regional economic resilience Industrial safety and infrastructure reliability Our company’s survival and growth rely on a healthy industrial economy — and coal remains a central pillar of that economy for the foreseeable future. The OC3 extension is not simply a mine expansion. It is a continuation of the broader industrial ecosystem that supports tens of thousands of Australian families, including ours. Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project offers: Economic stability Secure, long‑term employment Strong regional investment Continuation of critical industrial supply chains Minimal additional environmental disturbance Net increases in rehabilitated land and vegetation For a family business like Eilbeck Cranes — and the 450 employees, 1,600 direct dependents, and over 6,000 indirect dependents who rely on us — the continuation of responsible, well‑regulated Australian coal projects is essential. I strongly support approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and thank the Commission for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the OC3 Extension Project as the mine provides jobs and a community support program for locals in the area |
Ryan Powers
|
ID |
16006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the submission, I believe the benefits to the local community will be immense |
Kiera Lawrence
|
ID |
16011 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Morgan Engineering NSW PTY LTD |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Morgan Engineering employs more than 130 people across our operations. Our workforce is made up of skilled tradespeople, apprentices, engineers, and support staff who live locally or within the wider Central West and Upper Hunter regions. These are long-term jobs that support families, local businesses, and the broader community. Mining operations such as Moolarben are critical to sustaining regional employment and ongoing investment in areas like Mudgee. The continuation of operations through the Extension Project provides certainty for the existing workforce and for local and regional businesses that support the mine, including engineering, maintenance, transport, and supply services. The project’s ability to deliver ongoing employment for approximately 700 people and continued investment into the regional and state economy is significant. For businesses like ours, this continuity is essential to maintaining skilled employment, training opportunities, and long-term regional stability. For these reasons, Morgan Engineering supports the extension of operations at OC3. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2322 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the OC3 extension project at Moolarben, the extension will continue to grow and support the surrounding communities not only with jobs for local workers but also with partnerships within the community. |
Lewis Howells
|
ID |
16026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to whom this may concern. I am in support of the OC3 extension of Moolarben's open cut mine. Reasons on why this extension will greatly benefit the local and wider community is because this development provides and secures long term employment for the region and for the local community, allowing regional job continuity. With the development, this will aid in helping sustain local businesses in nearby towns and will also aid in support of local Australian owned contractors and suppliers. This extension will play a vital role for Australia's energy supply in future, especially with a lack of renewable energy coming to fruition to support Australia's growing energy demand. Yancoal's Moolarben open cut coal mine operation is well regarded for responsible environmental management and effective rehabilitation of the region. Finally, this extension of the OC3 will provide positive local engagement, and community investment which in result will keep locals and the wider community more prosperous for years to come. |
Paul Williamson
|
ID |
16031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2283 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission to support the Extension of Moolarben Mine; this business supports 700 direct jobs plus numerous contract employees and the money that Moolarben has donated to support local sporting and community events is a true sign of how important they see their role in the community and the greater Mudgee area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16036 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2068 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This is essential development for the community and for families prosperity. This is in line with the original plan. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission is made in strong support of the proposed OC3 Extension Project, which represents a responsible and economically vital expansion of the existing Moolarben Coal Complex. The project is a logical extension of current operations that leverages existing infrastructure while delivering substantial benefits to the local region and the State of New South Wales. The Project is expected to generate a significant net benefit of approximately $182 million to $190 million in Net Present Value (NPV) terms to the State of NSW. This includes substantial royalty payments and taxes that would not be realized if the Project were not to proceed. Furthermore, the Project ensures the continued employment of the existing Stage 1 open cut workforce of approximately 400 personnel until 2036, providing critical job security within the Mid-Western Regional Local Government Area (LGA). The Moolarben Coal Complex is a major employer, with mining accounting for 15% of workers in the LGA as of 2016. Beyond direct employment, the Project supports local contractors and businesses through ongoing operating expenditure and an estimated $140 million in construction capital expenditure. These social benefits are essential for the continued economic health of communities like Mudgee and Gulgong. The Project aligns with the NSW Government’s Strategic Statement on Coal Exploration and Mining, which supports responsible coal production in suitable areas to provide investment certainty. By utilising the existing Stage 1 processing and transport infrastructure, the Project represents an efficient use of resources and minimizes the need for additional surface disturbance. A key reason for supporting this Project is the proactive approach taken to avoid and minimise environmental impacts. In response to public and agency feedback, Moolarben Coal Operations (MCO) amended the Project to reduce the surface disturbance extent by 150 hectares. Significant improvements in the amended design include: • Biodiversity Protection: A 59% reduction in disturbance to Box-Gum Woodland CEEC and a 56% reduction in disturbance to Regent Honeyeater important habitat compared to the original EIS. • Buffer Zones: Mining-related disturbance will avoid a 100-metre buffer from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and a 200-metre setback from Moolarben Creek. • Vibration Management: Implementation of strict blast vibration limits (50 mm/s) to protect sensitive geological features and rocky habitats. The Project offers a superior final landform outcome compared to the "No Project" scenario. By using waste rock to backfill the approved OC3 final void, the Project will result in no final voids remaining in the Moolarben Valley, creating a free-draining landform suitable for post-mining uses. Additionally, the Project will achieve a long-term net increase of approximately 557 hectares of native woodland in the Moolarben Valley through targeted rehabilitation and the establishment of a Habitat Enhancement Area. The Project is visually isolated from surrounding private residences by steep slopes and ridgelines, which act as a natural barrier to noise, air, and visual impacts. Detailed assessments indicate that no additional residences will require acquisition or mitigation compared to the existing complex, and no exceedances of relevant noise, air, or blasting criteria are predicted at any privately owned residences. The OC3 Extension Project is a balanced and well-justified proposal that integrates social, economic, and environmental considerations. It provides essential economic continuity and employment for the region while delivering a significant net gain in native vegetation and the removal of final mining voids. For these reasons, the Project is clearly in the public interest and is strongly favored for approval |
Tait Mack
|
ID |
16046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarbin coal mine extension. It will bring more people the the local community and boost the supply chain of the community’s businesses. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is necessary for the energy needs of this country. It is also a valuable export resource. To object to the mining of something that benefits you domestically and in the global market is unethical. It is also important for the employment and social development of Aboriginal descendants who originally lived in the area where the coal is being mined. Jobs not Welfare. |
iain winton
|
ID |
16066 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
we need to maintain coal until such time that new power sources are fully reliable ; if that means new coal mines , I support it. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local business owner and I support the proposed OC3 Extension. The mine makes a significant contribution to the local community through ongoing support and donations, including assistance to schools and medical services. This support has a real and positive impact on the area and the people who live here. Through my work and dealings with people across the region, I consistently hear positive feedback about the company, particularly in relation to its approach to environmental management. There is strong confidence in the way water treatment and rehabilitation activities are managed, and in the company’s commitment to operating responsibly. The operation also provides substantial employment and economic benefit to the region. The number of jobs supported directly and indirectly by the mine, along with the flow-on benefits to local businesses, is critical to the ongoing viability of the community. For these reasons, I support the OC3 Extension and believe it is important for the continued economic and social wellbeing of the region. |
edmund brailey
|
ID |
16081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2103 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
this is an important development supporting the economic well being of Australia and its people. |
William Moncrieff
|
ID |
16091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2759 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My Business will prosper if this application is approved. I see first hand how Mining n NSW has a positive impact on both local and supporting businesses. There is a profound flow-on effect for all when all the proposed application conditions are met. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the project as I believe it will generate value for Australia. |
Lesley Harding
|
ID |
16111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2154 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australias Carbon footprint is 1%, not bad while using coal and keeping our population restricted. If it ain't broke don't fix it. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an employee at Moolarben coal and I strongly agree with the proposed extension of the open cut mine as it will secure my employment for longer and it will also provide more money into the local economy. Helping local businesses strive. It creates more local jobs not only at the mine but also in town, all the way from supermarkets, restaurants, bars, hairdressers, schools etc. I love living in Mudgee and in particular cooks gap which is very convenient for me as I am only 10 minutes to work. |
Simon Bestmann
|
ID |
16156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I'm looking to support the Extension Project for Moolarben, Mining is still the future of our local support for generations to come. supporting the future of Mining will ensure the support for local communities and family's in reginal areas. |
Ian Flood
|
ID |
16161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am lodging my support for the OC3 extension project on the basis that; the proposed project is aligned with the NSW governments current policy on coal mining being the 'Future Statement on Coal' and the intent to allow continuation of mining in existing coal mining areas Moolarben Coal has been operating since 2009, with a demonstrated track record of protecting the environment, complying with consent conditions and contributing significantly in a positive way to the communities of the MWRC and state of NSW for regional communities to be viable they need a strong foundational base of employment, this base of employment requires industry. The coal mining industry is by fay the greatest employment generator, both direct and indirect, in the MWRC and surrounds and Moolarben is the largest coal mine in the area. If the NSW and Federal government truly support regional communities then they must support the industries that make regional communities viable. I strongly believe the OC3 extension project should be approved for the benefit of the MWRC and state of NSW. |
Julie Flood
|
ID |
16166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben extension proposal due to the benefits that it provides to my family and the communities of the MWRC, without the coal mining industry Mudgee would not be the town it is today offering great facilities and services for young families. through Moolarben's employment opportunities and significant positive contribution to the community, families like ours are able to remain in rural communities and not have to relocate to larger cities. I strongly believe the OC3 extension project should be approved for the benefit of the MWRC and state of NSW. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have worked in mining in this area for the past 10 years and and have been a local resident for over 20 years and have seen first-hand the role Moolarben plays in supporting the local community. My wife is a school teacher in the region and the funding and support provided by Moolarben to local schools, medical services and community organization's and community events and groups has had a clear and lasting benefit throughout the region, and continues to do so. without this support many community events would be unable to be held or run. without these event's it would have a negative effect on the local community. I also volunteer with the local Rural fire brigade. Moolarben provides donations that assist with purchase of essential equipment that is not otherwise supplied, and this support directly improves our ability to respond to incidents and keep the community safe. I have also witness first hand Moolarben's willingness to support the local RFS brigade's in the times of emergency with supply of water sources, machines and aerial photography aids in helping identify and stop the spread of bushfires boarding or nearby to the Moolarben area. Through both my professional experience and community involvement, the company has built a strong reputation for operating responsibly and being engaged with the community. Moolarben is well regarded and welcomed as a contributor to the region. For these reasons, I support the continuation and extension of the Moolarben project and believe it will continue to deliver positive outcomes for the local area and its people. as well as supporting the growth and sustainment of the local area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16181 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2262 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support continuing employment at site and believe there more advantages than disadvantages in the submission |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the application as I believe that coal fired power plants will continue to be important until we have nuclear or other reliable sources of electricity. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2148 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this extension |
Nola Griffiths
|
ID |
16221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2529 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It is high time that someone listens and continues to mine our coal. Time to ignore zero emissions. |
Matthew Wall
|
ID |
16226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2159 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Mining clean highly efficient energy coal will provide long term revenue benefits for the region and the country. High quality energy coal contributes significantly to reducing carbon emissions whilst ensuring long term sustainability of reliable and cheap fuel. The benefit of utilising energy coal in the power mix is well documented. This project must go ahead. |
Linda Rogers
|
ID |
16231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to support the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project at Mudgee NSW. The project will provide major contribution to the region's future, by supporting local businesses and securing jobs for local families. The overall economic benefits are not just in favour to the locals of the Mudgee region, the impact is state and national wide. The project is well planned with usage of existing infrastructure, minimal impact on surrounding neighbours and operating within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. Coal is vital to our existence, with mining extension projects like this one, our country its people and our economy will benefit greatly. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2303 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Support renewable energy and reduction of greenhouse emissions but we need a planned and gradual process that provides for alternative employment and industry in the interim. Also the government revenue stream through taxes and royalties needs to be protected through mining until other revenue sources are developed. |
Mathew Murphy
|
ID |
16241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission represents my formal support for the Moolarben Coal Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. As a member of the workforce at the Moolarben Coal Complex, I am providing this feedback based on the public facts and figures that demonstrate why this project is a critical necessity for our region's future. My perspective is shaped by the daily reality of working at the lowest emissions intensity coal mine in Australia. To us, this extension isn't just about mining more coal; it is about the continuity and security of our livelihoods and the continued health of the Mudgee community. 1. The Economic Lifeblood of the Mid-Western Region The public economic data for Moolarben is not just a collection of impressive numbers; it represents the primary engine of our local economy. The extension ensures that the $1.6 billion direct economic contribution to Australia continues to flow through our region. Supporting Local Business: We engage 123 local suppliers. This partnership generates $56 million in revenue for these businesses in the Mid-Western Regional Council area alone. From the local bakery that serves us every morning to the specialized engineering firms, our mine's presence is the reason many of these doors stay open. A Multiplier Effect: The total value-added economic contribution to our local council area is $357 million. This isn't just "mining money"—it is the money that circulates through our cafes, real estate, and retail sectors. Funding Public Services: Through the $241 million in state royalty payments, our operations directly fund the public infrastructure—the roads, schools, and hospitals—that every resident in NSW relies on. 2. Workforce Stability: Protecting 895 Families The most significant impact of the OC3 extension from my perspective is the stability of our workforce. We are a team of 895 full-time employees. Crucially, 684 of us live locally in the Mid-Western Regional Council area. Local Residency: We aren't fly-in-fly-out workers; we are your neighbors, your kids' soccer coaches, and your fellow volunteers. Wage Security: The $159 million generated in annual wages provides the financial backbone for hundreds of local families. A Continuous Future: The OC3 project does not increase production rates or change the approved mine life past 2038; instead, it provides the necessary access to extend the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce. Without this extension, the security of these 895 jobs is placed at unnecessary risk. 3. Environmental Stewardship and Net Positive Outcomes A point of pride for those of us on-site is that Moolarben is the lowest emissions intensity coal mine in Australia. The OC3 project is built on this foundation of responsibility. A Net Increase in Woodland: While the project requires some disturbance, it is planned for land that has been historically cleared. The end result is actually a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley. Vanishing Voids: One of the most significant environmental wins is the commitment to no final voids. This ensures the landscape is restored for future generations. Habitat Protection: We have implemented a 100m setback from the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve and specific rock habitat features. This is designed to protect vulnerable species like the broad-headed snake and threatened bat populations. Efficiency as a Goal: We are actively reducing our carbon footprint by minimizing haul distances for our heavy trucks and improving equipment fuel efficiency. 4. Deepening Our Social and Community Investment The social impact of Moolarben goes far beyond the mine gate. Since 2010, the company has invested over $1.2 million (rising to over $2 million in total grants and sponsorships) back into the community. This support isn't just "corporate social responsibility"—it's a lifeline for local services. Healthcare and Life-Saving Support Doctors 4 Mudgee Region: Moolarben is a key backer of this initiative, which has successfully attracted new GPs to Mudgee and Gulgong. This has directly reduced appointment wait times and eased the life-and-death pressure on our local emergency departments. Lifeline Central West: The establishment of the Lifeline Central West Hub in Mudgee was made possible through Moolarben's funding. This hub provides critical mental health and crisis support services, ensuring that no one in our region has to face their darkest moments alone. The Can Cruise: For 17 years, long-term sponsorship of the Can Cruise has helped raise $263,000 to provide support for local residents battling cancer. Community Spirit and Safety Rural Fire Service (RFS): As my brigades Deputy Captain I am encouraged and supported to be a member of the RFS, with leave provided specifically so I can assist in firefighting activities during times of crisis. Regional Culture: From the annual Henry Lawson Heritage Festival that keeps our history alive to Tunes on the Turf in Dunedoo, Moolarben's sponsorship is what keeps these vital community celebrations thriving. Youth and Recreation: The recently executed planning agreement includes a community contribution for the construction of a Pump Track in Mudgee, providing a safe and active space for our local youth. These are all ammenities and service my myself, my family and my friends use and would not be here without the assistance of Moolarben. 5. A Project Refined by Feedback It is important for the Commission to recognize that this proposal has been significantly improved based on feedback from the community and the Government. We have listened and adapted by: Reducing the disturbance footprint to protect more land. Reducing coal extraction to better balance environmental concerns. Increasing setbacks to protect environmental assets and wildlife habitats. Increasing land rehabilitation efforts beyond initial requirements. Final Conclusion The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project is a balanced, responsible, and essential proposal. It secures the future of 895 workers and their families, provides a $1.6 billion boost to our national economy, and actually delivers a net gain for our local environment. As someone who works on this site every day, I see the care taken to protect our surroundings and the pride my colleagues take in their work. This project ensures that Mudgee remains a place where families can thrive, where healthcare is accessible, and where our environment is actively regenerated. I strongly urge the Independent Planning Commission to approve the OC3 extension for the continued prosperity and security of the Mid-Western region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the application as I believe that coal fired power plants will continue to be important until we have nuclear or other reliable sources of electricity. |
Rachel Murphy
|
ID |
16256 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As the spouse of a worker at the Moolarben Coal Complex, I am writing to share how vital the OC3 Extension Project is for the families who call the Mudgee region home. While much of the discussion around this project focuses on technical data, for those of us living here, it is about the continued health and vitality of our community. Moolarben is far more than just a workplace; it is a primary partner in the services we rely on every day. My family and I personally benefit from the amenities and support systems that simply wouldn't be as robust without the mine’s presence. From local sports clubs and schools to regional health initiatives, their sponsorship is woven into the fabric of our daily lives. Knowing that the extension will secure the long-term employment of my husband and hundreds of our neighbors provides our family with the stability to keep investing in our local shops and participating in community life. Furthermore, it is reassuring to see the commitment to a net-positive environmental impact, such as the significant increase in native woodland and the protection of local wildlife habitats. Seeing the company listen to community feedback and refine their plans—like ensuring there are no final voids—gives me confidence that our beautiful landscape is being protected for our children’s future. The Mudgee region is a thriving place to live because of the balance Moolarben helps maintain between industry and community well-being. I fully support this extension to ensure our town continues to prosper for years to come. |
Stephen Groen
|
ID |
16271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work in the coal industry in NSW and my roving staff role takes me to multiple sites in the Hunter Valley. I believe that the Moolarben OC3 will provide significant economic benefit to the Mudgee Region & NSW and continuity and security of employment for hundreds of staff and contractors working at Moolarben to 2038 and will continue to provide economic benefit to small business's in the areas that rely in coal mining to survive. I understand that the proposed expansion will occur on existing Yancoal Mining Leases and on Moolarben owned freehold land. It is very clear to me and a growing tidal wave of people that Coal Mining in NSW & Australia will be needed for a longer period than politicians originally guessed. This is not a surprise to people who think pragmatically, logically and realistically about the slow transition to a higher percentage of renewables in Australia & globally. The Moolarben OC3 Expansion needs to be part of this pragmatic energy future. Finally, the Moolarben OC Coal Mine contains relatively low percentages of greenhouse gasses and therefore further expansion is not expected to adversely impact Yancoals GHG fugitive emissions profile. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16281 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2333 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of this Coal Project due to benefiets to NSW, continuity & security of employment, maximising use of existing intrastructure, annual investment into the economy. MAY just increase PRODUCTIVITY which is saldy lacking in Australia today. |
Todd Jeffs
|
ID |
16291 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4053 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support more trains to Moolarben. |
Dan Thorn
|
ID |
16296 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to provide my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Mine. I am a long-term employee in the coal mining industry and currently work at the Moolarben operation. I live in the Central West and have a deep personal and professional connection to the Mudgee region. My support for this project is based on direct experience with the operation, its people, and its long-standing relationship with the local community. First and foremost, the OC3 Extension Project is critical to the continued provision of high-quality, well-paid employment in the Mudgee region. Moolarben directly employs a large workforce and supports many more indirect jobs through contractors, suppliers, and service providers. These are skilled, stable jobs that allow families to live, work, and raise children locally. The certainty provided by an extension to existing operations is essential for workforce retention, skills development, and long-term regional stability. Beyond direct employment, the mine delivers substantial economic benefits to local and regional businesses. A wide range of Mudgee-based and NSW-based companies rely on the mine for ongoing work, including engineering services, earthmoving, transport, maintenance, accommodation, retail, and professional services. This project helps sustain a diverse local economy and keeps money circulating within the region rather than flowing elsewhere. At a state level, the project will continue to generate significant economic value through royalties, taxes, and export income. These revenues support essential public services across New South Wales, including health, education, and infrastructure. At a time when the state is facing increasing fiscal pressure, responsibly developed resources remain an important contributor to funding community outcomes. I acknowledge that concerns are often raised about the climate impacts of coal mining and use. Climate change is a serious and complex issue that requires thoughtful and coordinated global action. However, it is also important to recognise that there remains strong global demand for coal, particularly for energy security and industrial applications. In this context, it is preferable that coal is produced in jurisdictions such as New South Wales, where operations are subject to rigorous environmental regulation, transparency, and continuous improvement. From an environmental and technical perspective, the coal mined at Moolarben is characterised by very low gas content, resulting in comparatively low fugitive emissions. This is an important consideration when assessing the project’s emissions profile relative to other operations, both within Australia and internationally. Producing lower-emission coal in a jurisdiction with strong regulation and oversight is preferable to shifting supply to regions with weaker environmental and safety standards. Moolarben has a strong track record of safe and responsible mining. Safety performance is taken seriously at all levels of the operation, with a genuine focus on continuous improvement, learning, and risk reduction. This culture extends beyond safety into environmental management and operational efficiency. The site consistently seeks opportunities to improve performance, reduce impacts, and optimise outcomes across all aspects of the operation. Environmental management at Moolarben reflects industry best practice. Controls for noise, dust, light, and water management are comprehensive and actively managed, not simply documented. Importantly, there is a strong commitment to rehabilitation and landform design, with the clear objective of returning the land to a condition that is stable, productive, and, where possible, improved from its pre-mining state. I am personally involved in rehab planning and execution and this is not treated as an afterthought, but as a core responsibility of the operation. The mine also demonstrates meaningful community engagement. Through sponsorships, local events, open days, and ongoing consultation. This engagement helps build trust, transparency, and mutual understanding, and reflects a genuine desire to be a positive and contributing member of the region rather than simply an operator within it. In my view, the OC3 Extension Project represents a logical and responsible continuation of an existing, well-regulated operation. It balances economic, social, and environmental considerations in a practical and realistic way, and delivers clear benefits at local, regional, and state levels. For these reasons, I strongly support approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
David Freeman
|
ID |
16306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2769 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
All qualified commentary in respect to future energy supplies supports the continuing need for coal and similar core minerals/resources and NOT renewables which have no chance of supporting the needs of consumers and business/industry by themselves over at least the next 30 years. Coal mining and projects should be given due consideration and speedy approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16331 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the oc3 extension project and I hope the MCO can stay open longer so they can continue to support local workers, local businesses and charities for years to come. I believe the environment group and the rehabilitation team have been doing a great job. |
Peter Cunningham
|
ID |
16341 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2576 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Time to "Do A Trump" and detach WHOLLY from the so called "United" Nations .... the monster behind the global social and economic restructure. Ckearly the UN has escaped its cage, aided and abetted by indifferent bureaucrats most of it's Member States. Common bloody sense (a rare trait in todays compliant and impotent society) indicates that 0.34% of the worlds population (which includes NZ) can have NIL / ZIPPO / NAUGHT effect on the climate ... and that re warming or cooling. Wake up you DANGEROUS FOOLS! |
Troy Morrison
|
ID |
16356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the expansion should be approved as it creates job and necessary services and funding to the community and surrounding areas |
Tegan Donoghoe
|
ID |
16361 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2285 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is needed to survivor or unpractical weather. Plus everything else is currently used for i.e phone charging, AC, dryers etc We can survive without it |
Penelope Todman
|
ID |
16376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2800 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
My name is penny and I’m a concerned citizen to what is happening to the environment around the world. At 63 years of age I have seen growth and devastation to the environment and I am concerned as to what will be left for the future generation- my children and my grandchildren The moolarben coal project just breaks my heart. Have you ever visited this area. Years ago it was full of biodiversity and now you see devastation and sadness as this land is ripped apart. I beg you to listen to the requests of the people in that area whose homes are being destroyed through mines that are not even for the Australian benefit. Please protect our land, people, water ways as once it’s gone, it’s gone. We can’t live without water. We can’t live without the trees. Please take a moment to stop and think about the long term impact this mine is doing. Where do you live and what is happening around you? Do you really care about your children’s future and the planet you are leaving behind. Penelope Todman (Redacted) |
Todd Munn
|
ID |
16381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support approval of the Moolarben Coal Extension due to its proven economic, employment, and community benefits to the Mid-Western Region and NSW. The project supports 895 full-time jobs, hundreds of local suppliers, and has contributed billions to the state and national economy while operating under rigorous environmental oversight. Refusing the extension would put local jobs and businesses at risk and undermine regional stability during a critical energy transition. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposal to provide jobs and support the economic growth in the local area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I think that the government needs to have a look at the small towns and how much they rely on the mines to keep them alive. The coal industry has supported Australia for over 100years. Its provided people with the life they have now. Coal is used to make everything. Australia would not be Australia without the coal industry. We cannot survive without it. You cannot tax us more. I’ve not seen any change in the last 50years in the industry for the next stage to not be passed. It’s needed to back up all this unreliable green energy. China is opening more coal fired power stations they are the reliable energy source we need . The mines support the community in so many ways the schools,the health system which is a disgrace in the country. Honestly how is a couple hundred acres of mining which leaves the country in a better state than when it was first mined be any worse than the thousands of acres of solar panels being installed with no place for them to go in 20 years when there finished with. Australia cannot run without the royalties from mining full stop. For this next stage to not get passed it is not only going to devastate the local community but will hurt the entire country. Green energy is made from burning coal! My young family has been relying on this mine for over 10years for employment and will need it for a few more years yet. |
Paul Moodie
|
ID |
16471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2285 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am 65, I have seen all the Net Zero nonsense and how it has affected myself, my family, my friends and the Australian community overall. We have Minister Bowen sprouting how we need to get rid of coal while China builds 500 new coal power stations a year. The Govt admits that our Net Zero nonsense will not make any difference to the overall global CO2 emissions and yet this incompetent minister pushes blindly on. We, the Australian people need to continue mining coal as it is a required global resource for reliable power. When wind towers freeze, fall apart, catch on fire, or don't work due to lack of wind, cost a fortune to be recycled and maintained and produce huge amounts of CO2 to stand up then the argument for them is mute. Solar panels are the same. They are subject to damage from hail and fire in this country. I have read papers that talk about the land Solar Panels are placed on cannot be classed as rural again due to chemical leaching over their lifetime. If there is a fire that goes through them it is much worse. Countries that are serious about supporting industry and a growing population have Coal and Nuclear. We have coal and we can build on that once we have a grown up talk about Nuclear. Nuclear has been approved for the moon by NASA. Then it will be Mars after that. The issue with the transmission lines can be solved by replacing the current lines with graphene wrapped in steel if my memory serves me. Carries twice the capacity of current lines. Lets look at the UAE. They use Natural gas to power most of the grid. They are increasing their nuclear capacity to 20% and solar is 8% when the panels are clean, and we all know solar panels do not work well in the heat. So back to Coal. It can be transported anywhere anytime and spin up those generators. The experiment with wind and solar needs to be shut down as I am sick and tired of paying for every entitled person as a retiree. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
16486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
05/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a Mudgee local, these mines have had such a positive impact on our region. Bringing in plenty of job opportunities for locals and funding to this community. Moolarben has made a positive contribution to the Mid-Western region since operations began in 2010. They have provided over $2 million in local community grants and sponsorships, supporting organisations and initiatives in areas such as education, sports, health and the arts. Without them this wouldn’t be possible. |
Timothy Cusack
|
ID |
14871 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi, I am a local living in Mudgee also a proud aboriginal man. I live in Mudgee with my family of 3 children and wife. The opportunity the local mining industry has given not only my self but my family and the local community has been more then I could have imagined. I fully support this extension and the benefits it gives our local community. I believe the strict regulations the mining sector follows in the rehabilitation of the country after the completion of the mining is commendable and the genuine care I have personally witnessed fills me with the upmost confidence the mine will only be a befit for the community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14876 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Go for gold |
James McGeachie
|
ID |
14881 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
WTC Group pyt ltd |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Supporting Submission Moolarben Coal Complex – OC3 Extension Project On behalf of WTC Group Pty Ltd WTC Group Pty Ltd welcomes the opportunity to provide this submission in support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. About WTC Group Pty Ltd WTC Group Pty Ltd is a locally based contractor with a strong and longstanding presence in the region. We operate a local branch employing more than 25 people, many of whom reside in the surrounding communities. Our workforce includes skilled operators, supervisors, and support staff who rely on ongoing regional projects for stable employment and career development. WTC Group has an established working relationship with Moolarben Coal Operations and is currently engaged on a number of earthmoving and mining-related contracts. Through this work, we have developed a detailed understanding of site operations, safety systems, environmental controls, and compliance requirements. Support for the OC3 Extension Project WTC Group Pty Ltd strongly supports the OC3 Extension Project and considers it a positive and necessary development for the following reasons: 1. Employment and Economic Stability Approval of the OC3 Extension Project will provide continuity of work for local contractors such as WTC Group and will directly support ongoing employment for our local workforce. Project certainty allows us to retain skilled employees, invest in training, and plan future workforce needs with confidence. Beyond direct employment, the project contributes to the broader regional economy by supporting local suppliers, service providers, and businesses that rely on mining-related activity. 2. Support for Local Industry and Contractors The continuation of mining operations through the OC3 Extension enables Moolarben to maintain established relationships with local contractors. This ensures that work is delivered by companies with proven site knowledge, strong safety performance, and a demonstrated commitment to local employment. WTC Group’s involvement in earthmoving works reflects Moolarben’s continued engagement with regional businesses, which is critical for sustaining the local industrial base. 3. Proven Operational and Environmental Standards Based on our direct experience working on site, WTC Group recognises Moolarben Coal Operations’ commitment to high standards of: • Workplace health and safety • Environmental management • Rehabilitation and land management • Community and stakeholder engagement We are confident that these standards will continue to be applied throughout the OC3 Extension Project, ensuring that operations are conducted responsibly and in accordance with all regulatory approvals. Conclusion WTC Group Pty Ltd considers the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project to be of significant benefit to the local workforce, regional economy, and contracting sector. The project will provide employment certainty, support local businesses, and allow established contractors to continue delivering safe and efficient services. Accordingly, WTC Group Pty Ltd supports the approval of the OC3 Extension Project and encourages the consent authority to give favourable consideration to the proposal. |
Nelsha du Preez
|
ID |
14886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension project as it this will contribute greatly to the economy of the community, not only providing job opportunities, but also economic support to businesses in the area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14891 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a direct employee of Moolarben Coal, and have been for the past 3 years after moving to the Mudgee region with my family. My employment at Moolarben has given us the ability to purchase our first home in a difficult time for first home buyers who are not young people to get a foot in the door. I love my job and am supported in my role to learn and grow, and my family is supported through the many financial and wellbeing benefits of being an employee. Without this employment, and the ongoing benefits Moolarben provides to the local region and community, I would be unable to continue living in this area, and would need to move to an area that provides enough support to stay afloat with the current cost of living conditions in Australia. To give an idea, I lived in Sydney for 2 years after moving from Perth, and could not afford to continue to rent let alone purchase a house. We barely scraped by and my husband was in a "well paying" national role with his company and I was also employed full time. I now earn more than he does and am not in a leadership position, so the opportunity for me to earn further is there. We also feel the effects of the community support programs and events that Moolarben support in our local region. Without this financial support, many events and programs would possibly not go ahead. I look forward to seeing the extension go ahead. |
Simon Campbell
|
ID |
14896 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work at Moolarben my family is dependent on Moolarben and it's extension for future longevity. We are local to the area and contribute to many local buisness. Working at Moolarben I can vouch to the contribution to the local economy. I can also confirm the high level of effort that goes into mitigating environmental impacts and rehabilitation of land that has been mined. I can't see anything but positives regarding the opencut extension. |
Brentan Partridge
|
ID |
14901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to make a submission in support of the proposed extension to the Moolarben Coal Mine (OC3 Extension Project). I live locally in the Mudgee region and work full time at the mine. Like many others in our community, my livelihood and my family’s financial security depend on the ongoing operation of the mine. The extension is important to me not only as an employee, but as a local resident who wants to see stable employment and continued investment in our region. The proposed extension provides certainty and continuity of work for the existing workforce, without increasing production rates or extending the overall life of the mine beyond current approvals. This is a sensible approach that supports local jobs while making use of existing infrastructure, rather than creating new disturbance elsewhere. I am also supportive of the environmental measures outlined in the project, including increased setbacks, habitat enhancement areas, and progressive rehabilitation. From my experience working on site, Moolarben places a strong focus on safety, environmental responsibility, and continuous improvement, and these commitments are reflected in the proposed extension. Mining plays a vital role in the Mudgee economy. It supports not only direct employment, but also local contractors, small businesses, schools, and services. The loss of secure, long-term employment would have a significant negative impact on families and the broader community. As someone who lives and works locally, I believe the OC3 Extension strikes a reasonable balance between environmental management and economic sustainability. I strongly support the approval of this extension so that local people can continue to work, live, and raise their families in the Mudgee region. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, Brentan Partridge |
Corey Dunk
|
ID |
14906 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal , l This submission is made in recognition of the project’s demonstrated economic, social, and operational benefits, as well as the proponent’s commitment to responsible environmental management and regulatory compliance. 2. Economic Benefits The proposed expansion will deliver substantial economic benefits at the local, regional, and national levels, including: Continued and expanded employment opportunities, both directly at the mine site and indirectly through contractors and service providers Increased royalty and tax revenues to government Long-term support for local businesses and supply chains Strengthened investment confidence in the regional resources sector The expansion will help sustain mining operations beyond the current mine life, providing economic certainty for workers and the broader community. 3. Employment and Community Outcomes The project will maintain and potentially increase skilled and unskilled employment, supporting families and communities that rely on the operation. The proponent has demonstrated a commitment to: Local workforce participation and training Ongoing engagement with community stakeholders Support for community programs and infrastructure These outcomes contribute positively to social stability and regional development. 4. Environmental Management and Compliance The expansion proposal outlines comprehensive environmental management measures, including: Avoidance and minimisation of environmental impacts where practicable Monitoring and mitigation strategies consistent with best-practice standards Progressive rehabilitation and closure planning Compliance with all relevant environmental legislation and approval conditions Based on the information provided, the proposed expansion can be undertaken responsibly, with impacts appropriately managed and monitored. 6. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I support the approval of the [Mine Name] expansion. The proposal represents a balanced approach to economic development and environmental responsibility and will deliver lasting benefits to the region and broader economy. |
Bethany Nicholson
|
ID |
14911 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to confirm my support for the proposed OC3 extension at the Moolarben Coal Mine. I am currently employed at Moolarben and have reviewed the information provided regarding the OC3 extension. I understand that the extension will allow continued operations within the existing mining area and will help maintain production and employment at the site. From my perspective, the continuation of mining through the OC3 extension is important for job security, the ongoing operation of the mine, and the economic benefits it provides to the local community and surrounding region. Moolarben is a significant employer in the area, and extending OC3 will help ensure stability for workers and their families. I acknowledge that environmental management and regulatory compliance are important, and I support the mine continuing to operate in accordance with all relevant approvals, conditions, and environmental controls. For these reasons, I support the approval of the OC3 extension. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I think if it wasnt for the mines around mudgee it will be a ghoast town they support so many business owners schools fund raiser events jobs keeps mudgee alive |
Owen Kearns
|
ID |
14936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the proposed extension and think it would continue to benefit the community as a whole. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a direct employee of Moolarben and this extension would benefit my family. 17 years in the mining industry I have seen the rehabilitation process and it is world class. I have no doubt that the country affected by this proposal will be far more beneficial once mining is complete. This extension will allow my family to stay residing in Mudgee, where we have been for 20 years. We have put our children through the local schools, supported local businesses and genuinely enjoyed life |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14946 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to support the MCOL extension, I have worked for the company for 6 + years and seen the company support the local economy as well as supporting locals through employment, the company supports numerous local charities and employs predominantly from the local area . This includes numerous young locals through apprenticeships . |
Mark Meurer
|
ID |
14951 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I Completely Support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and positive impact it will have on our Community |
Bronwyn McCall
|
ID |
14956 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I moved to Mudgee in 2013 and was fortunate enough to gain employment at Moolarben. It is a fantastic place to work with people from all different walks of life. Moolarben gives back to the Mudgee (and surrounding towns) community with not only investment in monetary value but also employing so many people with a decent wage so they can enjoy life with travel or/and quality time with their families. This extension will ensure the continued employment of almost 7% of Mudgee population (this does not include contractors that are also working at the mine). |
James McRae
|
ID |
14986 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is required in many overseas countries where the environment conditions do not allow solar and wind turbine to operate successfully This is due to northern hemisphere winter snowfall and extreme weather events that wind turbines can’t handle. Our region has grown on the back of coal mining since the 1980’s . We should not let this extension opportunity get diluted by the negative online so called environmental impact assessments that will arise . Coal is a long term mining process and in many respects the land Is rehabilitated better than it was before the mining process began. The extension makes great sense as the resources are already there to extract it. Please consider that this will extend the thriving nature of our wonderful region and local economy |
Kathryn Hands
|
ID |
14991 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing this submission as a local resident of 17 years. I moved to Mudgee when my 3rd daughter was a baby, she is now 17 and our family loves living in this beautiful town. We relocated from Sydney after my husband secured employment at Ulan Coal Mine, as we were seeking a fresh start in the country. As my daughter grew older, I applied for work and commenced employment at Moolarben Coal in 2015. Since working at Moolarben I have gained a strong understanding of how the mine actively looks after both the environment and the local community. I have seen firsthand the diligence and care shown by the environment and Health and Safety team both on site and at a corporate level to ensure the mine has minimal impact on the land, flora and fauna. Over the years, I have explored Mudgee and it's surrounding areas many times. The region continues to attract tourists from all over the world who come to enjoy the wineries and visit natural attractions such as The Drip and Ferntree Gully. These places remain well visited and in my experience are just as beautiful if not more so than at any time during the 17 years I have lived here. At Moolarben, I believe there is a strong respect for the land. Local Indigenous community members regularly work with us both in the field and in training roles, and their knowledge is invaluable to the sustainability of Moolarben Coal's Operations. I believe that some objections may not fully reflect the benefits that Moolarben brings to the Mudgee community. Mudgee has won Best Town in Australia twice and this is largely due to the significant contributions made by local mines to the community. Moolarben in particular, actively supports and raises funds for important causes such as breast cancer awareness and domestic violence prevention. I am very proud to work there and be part of a company that gives back to the community in many ways. I feel if Moolarben didn't get this next approval it would significantly impact the local community, employment and eventually tourism, it would change the Mudgee I've been such a strong part of forever. |
Rebecca Shanks
|
ID |
15001 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally express strong support for the approval of the Moolarben Extension Project, which represents a highly positive and responsible continuation of existing mining operations within the approved Moolarben Coal Complex. The Extension Project is proposed entirely within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land and will be seamlessly integrated into the current operation, which already holds approval to mine until 2038. Importantly, the project does not seek any increase in the approved mine life or production rates. Instead, it optimises the existing operational footprint to deliver substantial environmental, social, and economic benefits to New South Wales. Economic and Employment Benefits The Extension Project will deliver significant economic benefits to the State, building on Moolarben Coal’s established contribution to the NSW and Australian economies. Since operations commenced in 2010, Moolarben Coal has made a direct economic contribution of approximately $1.6 billion to Australia. Critically, the project provides continuity and security of employment for the existing open cut workforce, extending the duration of employment in a region where stable, long-term jobs are vital. This employment certainty supports local families, strengthens regional communities, and underpins economic resilience across the Mid-Western region. Positive Community Outcomes Moolarben Coal has demonstrated a long-standing commitment to supporting its local community. Since commencement, over $2 million has been invested in community grants and sponsorships, directly benefiting education, sporting organisations, health services, and the arts. Approval of the Extension Project ensures the continuation of these contributions, reinforcing positive social outcomes and sustaining community partnerships well into the future. Strong Environmental Outcomes From an environmental perspective, the Extension Project delivers substantial net benefits. The proposal includes: A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation within the Moolarben Valley, representing a significant long-term environmental gain. Setbacks from creek lines and the adjacent nature reserve, protecting sensitive environmental receptors. The elimination of final voids, reducing the number of voids in the Moolarben Valley from one to zero, which is a highly positive rehabilitation outcome. Maximisation of existing infrastructure, thereby reducing land disturbance and avoiding unnecessary environmental impacts. These measures demonstrate a strong commitment to responsible environmental management, progressive rehabilitation, and long-term land stewardship. Minimal Amenity Impacts The Extension Project has been designed to ensure minimal amenity impacts to surrounding residences. The extension area is visually isolated from nearby private residences by intervening topography, and operations will continue to comply with established environmental management controls. As a result, the project is not expected to materially alter existing amenity outcomes for local residents. Conclusion In summary, the Moolarben Extension Project represents a well-considered, low-risk, and high-value proposal that: Delivers significant economic benefits to NSW, Provides continuity and security of employment, Enhances environmental outcomes through increased native vegetation and removal of final voids, Minimises impacts through the use of existing infrastructure, and Continues meaningful contributions to local communities. The project aligns strongly with the NSW Government’s objectives for responsible resource development, regional economic growth, environmental stewardship, and community wellbeing. For these reasons, approval of the Extension Project is firmly in the best interests of New South Wales. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this submission and for your consideration of this important project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15006 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This project provides continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing workforce |
Clancy Power
|
ID |
15011 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This extension of moolarben opencut is great for the local community. Good for local employment. Good for future employment opportunities directly and indirectly within the mine and surrounding supporting industries. Keeps employees in the community with their family members at home every night. Allows spending in the local community. I am a 5th generation in the local area and i have never had a drama with the mines or anything they have done for the community and the people. |
Jason Edwards
|
ID |
15021 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am pleased to provide this submission in support of the Moolarben Extension Project, which presents a compelling opportunity to deliver long-term national, state and regional benefits through the continuation of a well-established, responsibly operated mining complex. At a national level, the project plays an important role in maintaining Australia’s economic strength and energy security. Since commencing operations in 2010, Moolarben Coal has contributed approximately $1.6 billion to the Australian economy, supporting domestic energy supply, international export markets, and extensive national supply chains. Approval of the Extension Project will ensure that these contributions continue, strengthening Australia’s position as a reliable energy producer and export partner while underpinning economic stability during the ongoing global energy transition. Equally important are the significant benefits delivered at a regional and community level. The Extension Project will provide certainty of employment for the existing open cut workforce, enabling families to remain in the region and supporting long-term community stability. Secure, ongoing employment underpins local business confidence, population retention, and the viability of essential services across the Mid-Western region, delivering economic and social resilience that extends well beyond the mine gate. Moolarben Coal has consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to the communities in which it operates. Over $2 million has been invested in local community grants and sponsorships across education, health, sporting organisations and the arts. These partnerships have generated lasting positive outcomes, and approval of the Extension Project will ensure the continuation of this meaningful community investment. From an environmental and land stewardship perspective, the project delivers clear and enduring improvements. The proposal includes a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley, significantly enhancing biodiversity values and landscape connectivity. The design incorporates setbacks from creek lines and the adjacent nature reserve, ensuring protection of sensitive environmental features, while maximising the use of existing infrastructure to minimise additional land disturbance. A particularly important outcome of the Extension Project is the elimination of final voids, reducing the number of voids in the Moolarben Valley from one to zero. This represents a major step forward in rehabilitation performance, long-term land stability, and post-mining land use potential, delivering tangible environmental benefits for future generations. Potential amenity impacts have been carefully considered in project planning. The extension area is naturally screened from surrounding private residences by intervening topography, and operations will continue to be managed in accordance with strict environmental controls. As a result, the project is expected to generate negligible additional impacts to visual amenity, noise, dust and traffic. Overall, the Moolarben Extension Project reflects a balanced and forward-looking approach to resource development — one that delivers substantial economic and employment benefits, strengthens regional communities, and improves long-term environmental outcomes. Its approval would represent a positive and responsible planning outcome for New South Wales and Australia. Thank you for your consideration of this submission. |
Clarine Fourie
|
ID |
15026 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project will help secure ongoing employment, investment, and community benefits within the region. The continuation of this operation supports not only the local economy but also contributes to Australia’s broader economic and energy security objectives. While the energy sector is undergoing a transition, mining remains an essential component during the shift toward reliable and scalable alternative energy sources. In this context, it is important to support existing operations that demonstrate responsible resource development and strong environmental and regulatory performance. The OC3 Extension represents a continuation of existing, approved operations and will maximise the use of current mining infrastructure. As a continuation of established mining activities, the OC3 Extension is expected to have a comparatively lower environmental impact than many new surface mining developments, as it is located largely within existing tenements on agricultural land primarily used for grazing, rather than undisturbed native forest. Importantly, the extension will provide greater certainty for workers and their families by supporting long-term employment in the region. It will also help sustain local businesses and services that rely on the ongoing operation of the mine, contributing to the social and economic stability of surrounding communities. The project’s reliance on a predominantly local workforce and the use of regional contractors will further amplify positive economic outcomes for the Mudgee and Mid-Western Regional areas. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and consider it to be in the broader public interest. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15031 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe this will be very good for the future of Mudgee township, the Moolarben extension is crucial for Mudgee to continue to prosper. It secures employment into the future, for local residents. Moolarben has, and will continue to attract more people to the area, which in turn is continue growth to the local area. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15041 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We are a local family that has relied on the Moolarben mine for employment for many years and aimed to continue to do so. A rejection of this proposal would have a drastic impact on local families - particularly those who have purchased homes in the town based on their employment. If Moolarben mine does not receive the extension I am very worried what impact this would have on housing prices, job stability and the overall community. Many families would be forced to leave the area. This has a far reaching impact, and would disrupt many local businesses as well as schools etc. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Coal Complex has been an established and important operation in the region for many years, providing ongoing employment, economic stability, and flow-on benefits to local businesses and communities. The proposed OC3 extension represents a continuation of this contribution, allowing existing operations to be extended rather than creating an entirely new development footprint. The extension utilises existing infrastructure and operational systems, which helps minimise additional disturbance and supports a more efficient use of already-approved facilities. The project’s continuation will help maintain local jobs and skills, provide certainty for workers and their families, and support the broader regional economy at a time when economic stability is particularly important. In addition, the project contributes to state and national energy security and export income, which remain important considerations during the ongoing transition of the energy sector. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and encourage the Commission to give due consideration to the economic, social, and operational benefits it provides alongside the proposed environmental safeguards. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, |
Luke mayberry
|
ID |
15056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2527 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
let it go ahead |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15061 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This proposed extension will continue to allow members of the Mudgee continue future employment in the area which stimulates the local (and currently struggling economy), brings new people to our town from Sydney, Wollongong, Newcastle and other large regions; and continues to keep coal exports alive within Australia. |
Tammy Caswell
|
ID |
15071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of Moolarben Coal. Without this extension, Mudgee and Gulgong townships would be directly affected resulting in hundreds of jobs lost. Community members depend on Moolarben for their livelihood, without it this area will become a ghost town . Moolarben has contributed millions to council and local community groups, always willing to provide support when asked. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mining in the Mudgee region benefits the community though both direct and indirect opportunities. As a small business owner, i directly see the positive effects it brings to our local community. Coming from a farming background, I am well aware of the additional constraints and level of protection the Mining industry has to abide by to remain compliant. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the expansion on the basis of continued employment and funding onto the community. |
Teke Vernon
|
ID |
15101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I Believe that the OC3 extension project will be good for employment in the area and the funds that will be put back into local communities will support growth in the region, Yancoal is a Professional organization with great values therefore i defiently support this Projects approval. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project will ensure ongoing jobs for around 700 people and annual investment of around $180 million into the economy, from one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15111 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the NSW jobs this mine has created and will continue to support in this regional area The NSW and Federal governments need to wake up and realize that Coal will be needed to support Australia into the future Mines need extensions, workers need jobs, Government need tax money, it's not rocket science |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15116 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in strong support of the proposed extension of the Moolarben Mine OC3 project. This operation has proven to be a significant contributor to the economic stability and growth of our local region. The mine provides reliable employment for many families, supports local businesses, and plays a vital role in sustaining the broader economy of our area. In communities like ours, employers of this scale and reliability are essential, and their continued presence ensures long‑term economic resilience. Beyond its economic contribution, Moolarben Mine has consistently demonstrated a responsible and proactive approach to environmental management. Their rehabilitation works are carried out promptly and to a high standard, showing a genuine commitment to restoring the land and protecting the surrounding environment. This responsible stewardship gives our community confidence that development can proceed without compromising the health of our local ecosystems. For these reasons, I fully support the extension of the OC3 project. It represents ongoing employment, economic security, and environmentally responsible practices benefits our region both needs and values |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15121 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the OC3 Extension Project as a member of the wider community and as part of a family that relies heavily on the mining industry for ongoing employment and financial stability. Continued work in this industry is essential for meeting everyday living costs and supporting our children through school. The project will help secure ongoing jobs for more than 700 workers and continue contributing to the Australian economy, without increasing approved mine life or production levels. It also makes use of existing infrastructure, which helps limit additional impacts. Environmental considerations have been strengthened through increased rehabilitation, improved protection of creeks and nearby conservation areas, and a net increase in native woodland vegetation. The project will also remove final voids in the Moolarben Valley and has minimal impact on nearby residences due to natural landscape screening. Overall, the OC3 Extension Project represents a balanced and responsible approach that supports working families while improving environmental outcomes. |
Andy Barrow
|
ID |
15126 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2382 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the conditional approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Mining has long been a cornerstone of the regional economy, and this extension will help maintain stable employment and ongoing investment for local families and businesses. Yancoal has demonstrated it can operate professionally and contribute positively to the area through its workforce, local procurement and continued engagement with the community. Provided the project continues to be managed under strong conditions—particularly around water resources, biodiversity impacts and emissions management—I believe the benefits to the region are clear. Approving the extension will provide certainty for workers and contractors, support local services, and help sustain the broader community that relies on the mine’s ongoing operation. |
Pauline Ahern
|
ID |
15131 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the project as I believe there is broad support for the coal industry to continue (through projects like Moolarben OC3 Extension) and the significant tangible benefits provided to local communities, the state and the nation. The project will ensure ongoing jobs for the local and surrounding communities and contribute an annual investment of around $180 million into the economy, from one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. |
Luke Croudace
|
ID |
15136 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hi all. My name is Luke and I am employed by Yancoal and work underground at Moolarben. I was given an opportunity to work underground without any experience. Over the past 3 years I have been trained and now a competent member of the team. This opportunity has changed my life and my family’s. If the extension is not approved I am concerned about the mines life and therefore my family’s future . I would have to seek alternate employment out side of Mudgee and therefore move away. Mudgee is a great town and been amazing for us. I am not the only one who thinks this. You ask around I’d say it’s barely 1 separation from someone who works at these mines/or for a business who’s associated with the mines. I’d hate to see what will happen to employment opportunitys / house prices and much more when the mines go. Please approve the extension. Warm regards Luke |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15141 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2289 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the project, particularly in context of coal providing lower increases to wholesale electricity prices, and continuity of work sectors related to mining, manufacturing, and services. Not to mention the secondary economic benefit to local businesses from mining families spending in the local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Yancoal is a fantastic company that makes large contributions to the local community, this extension going ahead means more money going into the local economy, more jobs and growth for Mudgee/Gulgong. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project will support the local community, provide important tax revenue to the broader community and deliver cheap and reliable energy to populations that require this to sustain and enhance their way of life. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
There is broad support for the coal industry to continue and significant tangible benefits Moolarben OC provide to local communities, the state and the nation. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15166 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a current employee of Moolarben Coal, I strongly support the OC3 Extension Project. Mining is a major industry in our local region and over ten years of employment and 30 years of living locally, I have seen the growth & development of not only the site but also our region. Our local towns are booming, house prices increasing. Moolarben has a high volume of local employees and support our region financially. Sponsoring multiple local events in our region annually - covering Ulan, Mudgee, Gulgong, Kandos & Rylstone. The extension approval will allow the mine to continue to employ many of our locals & contribute to the region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15176 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The project will ensure ongoing jobs for around 700 people (including me) and annual investment of around $180 million into the economy, from one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. The OC3 Extension Project will provide: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates ● A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley ● Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve ● Maximise use of existing infrastructure ● Minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography ● No final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 extension application following feedback from the community and Government. These improvements will result in: ● Reduced disturbance footprint ● Reduced coal extraction ● Increased setbacks to protect environmental assets ● Reduced disturbance of wildlife habitat ● Increased land rehabilitation. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15186 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is important for the Mudgee community and provides jobs, opportunities and royalties for the australian public. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15191 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am making a submission that supports the conditional approval of this proposed development based on: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment for the current workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2790 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposed Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The extension is important for maintaining around 700 local jobs and continuing significant economic benefits to the Mid-Western region, without increasing production rates or extending the approved mine life beyond 2038. It provides certainty for workers, local businesses and the wider community. I support the project’s use of existing infrastructure and historically cleared land, and the substantial improvements made following community and government feedback. These include a reduced disturbance footprint, increased environmental setbacks, protection of sensitive habitats, and a net gain of 557 hectares of native woodland through rehabilitation. The removal of final voids in the Moolarben Valley is also a positive outcome. Overall, the OC3 Extension achieves a balanced outcome by supporting local employment and the regional economy while incorporating strong environmental protections. For these reasons, I support approval of the project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15201 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2021 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project because it delivers clear and lasting benefits for NSW and the Mudgee region while maintaining high standards of environmental management and safety. The project provides continuity and security of employment for the existing open cut workforce—around 700 jobs—and supports many additional local and regional jobs through contracting, supply, maintenance, transport, and services. It also represents around $180 million in annual investment that helps sustain the local economy, strengthens state revenues, and supports community wellbeing. Importantly, the OC3 Extension is designed to integrate with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, maximising use of existing infrastructure, with no changes to the approved mine life or production rates. The application also reflects meaningful improvements following community and government feedback, including a reduced disturbance footprint, increased setbacks to environmental assets, reduced disturbance of habitat, and increased rehabilitation. In a period of energy transition, it is essential that mining operations are carried out by experienced operators with strong track records and robust governance. Australia’s regulatory framework is among the most stringent, and responsible operators can deliver the required coal supply while meeting high expectations for safety and environmental performance. For these reasons, I support approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. |
Brendan Fitzpatrick
|
ID |
15206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2047 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Stability of employment and investment in the local region, as well as economic contributions to the State from a mine operating within its apporved mine life and production rates need to be prioritised. Particularly in light of the net increase in native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley, and reduction of voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero. |
Gary Schweizer
|
ID |
15211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2150 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The OC3 Extension Project will provide: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates ● A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley ● Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve ● Maximise use of existing infrastructure ● Minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography ● No final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) |
Paul DELboux
|
ID |
15226 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2429 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern , I’m writing this submission in favour of the proposed expansion of the Moolarben coal mine simply because I have resided on and off in the local area for over ten years and have made life long friends and family in the local electret! Anyone that resides around here can tell you that the mining industry in the Mudgee area makes a massive benefit for local people and business in the area? I was born in the central west and I know first hand of how hard other local communities are finding it in the current economic times! (Shops closing down) The region is glowing and should remain healthy and strong with the economic benefits from this mine! If this mine extension gets rejected the hole region will suffer exponentially and economically. I say yes for the future? Thanks for your time! |
Eugene Sysoev
|
ID |
15236 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The proposal extends existing approved operations within current mining tenements and makes efficient use of existing infrastructure, while providing continued employment and economic benefits to the region, state and nation. The environmental impacts to water resources, biodiversity and amenity can be appropriately managed through the proposed mitigation measures, monitoring and conditions of consent, including increased setbacks, reduced disturbance footprint and progressive rehabilitation. |
Julian Ferris
|
ID |
15246 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2304 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
supporting local jobs and the economy |
Br4ian Boitano
|
ID |
15256 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Liebherr |
|
Location |
Queensland 4170 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
In the interest of the community, the state, and Australia, I support the conditional approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Melissa Chaplin
|
ID |
15261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the proposed extension because it provides long-term job security for workers and stability for their families. The mine plays a vital role in supporting the local economy, with many businesses relying on it directly and indirectly. Extending operations allows continued investment in safety, training, and community infrastructure, ensuring the region remains strong, sustainable, and able to support current and future generations. |
Christopher Ray
|
ID |
15271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension as it protects local employment and allows the community time to plan for the future responsibly. The mine supports skilled jobs, apprenticeships, and contractors, keeping people living and spending locally. An extension also enables a more measured transition, rather than sudden closures that harm families, businesses, and services that rely on stable, ongoing operations. |
Leigh Shoemark
|
ID |
15301 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project will provide and contribute significant benefits to the local workforce, regional economy, and contracting sector. The project will provide employment certainty, support local businesses, and allow established contractors to continue delivering safe and efficient services. I fully support the approval of the OC3 Extension Project and encourage the consent authority to give favorable consideration to the proposal to support the local Mudgee economy and business. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15316 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to support the extension of OC3 at Moolarben Coal Operations, as it strengthens the community as a whole, creating hundreds of jobs, locally and afar, |
Kristen Andresen
|
ID |
15326 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local resident and an employee at Moolarben Coal, and I am writing to express my support for the Moolarben Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. Living and working in the Mudgee region, I see firsthand the importance of the Moolarben Open Cut Mine to local families and businesses. The mine provides stable, well-paid employment for around 700 people, many of whom live locally and support schools, sporting clubs, small businesses, and community organisations. For my family, many other mine worker families and the boarder local community, the continuation of mining operations at OC3 provides job security and certainty for the future. From my understanding the OC3 Extension will operate as part of the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, within current mining tenements and on Moolarben-owned land. The OC3 Extension would allow the project to continue operating within an established mining footprint, utilising existing infrastructure, workforce skills, and operational systems. This minimises the need for new disturbance while maximising the value of prior investment and previously approved development. Continued operation also supports orderly mine planning and rehabilitation, rather than forcing premature closure that could increase environmental and social risks. As someone who lives in the area, environmental protection is very important to me. I would not support any mining if it made an impact on the environment I live in. I see the hard work and dedication the Moolarben team put into their work, every day and I know we as a team will do everything in our power to protect the land on which we work on. I acknowledge the importance of environmental protection and the need to manage impacts responsibly. Ongoing regulatory oversight, environmental management plans, and rehabilitation commitments provide mechanisms to ensure that impacts on air quality, water resources, biodiversity, and surrounding land uses are appropriately managed. With these controls in place, the OC3 Extension can operate in a way that balances environmental responsibility with economic and social needs. Moolarben is one of the lowest emissions-intensity coal mines in Australia, and the OC3 Extension represents a responsible way to continue supplying energy and export markets while maintaining strong environmental standards. Importantly, it allows for a planned and orderly transition for workers and the community, rather than creating uncertainty through premature closure. For these reasons, as a worker and local resident, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Open Cut 3 Extension Project. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Harrison Livingston
|
ID |
15341 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I as a local resident of the mudgee community strongly support the proposed extension of moolarben open cut 3. As someone who lives here full time I see the massive positive impacts that yancoal has on the local community along with the impact that the jobs created have. Without moolarben a large percentage of local residents would be without employment and thus move away being a major drain on the local economy. Further I have seen first hand how effective moolarbens environmental controls are and have the utmost confidence in there ability to maintain the eco systems. |
Damon Hooker
|
ID |
15346 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am fully in support of this extension for Moolarben Coal. I have visited this site previously and have seen first hand on their environmental comitment to compliance and rehabilitation, and it is first class. Additionally, when visiting the local community of Mudgee, it is clearly visible and talking to the locals how much mining, especially Moolarben commit and contribute to the economy of this town, and further out into the region. |
Craig Tilney
|
ID |
15351 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a Moolarben Coal employee, I believe the OC3 extension should be granted permission. The project will provide support for not only the employees and thier families, but the entire Midwestern Shire region. This support will come from the wage generation being earned and spent in the area in the many different speciality stores, the wineries, cafes, hotels and everything else that makes the region the way it is. Mudgee and surrounds cannot survive the way it is relying on tourism alone. The area needs the money generated from the mining industry if it is to have any hope of surviving and thriving into the future. Please don't let this small, loved town die. For the sake of everyone who lives and works in the Midwestern Regional Council, this extension needs to go ahead |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15356 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension project will provide valuable jobs to the current Mudgee area and bring in more people encouraging higher development for the region. And in doing so the expansion project has been thoroughly planned to not disrupt the protected species habitats. I personally believe this will be a huge benefit for the region and its population. |
Lachlan Skelly
|
ID |
15361 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal Moolarben |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work at Moolarben and would like to continue to. I support this extension |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15366 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Bridgestone Mining Solutions PTY LTD |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I approve application for extension to be approved, Local businesses, Local families/Local community would benefit from this extension. Yancoal suppor local businesses and charity events - EG: local fun runs. This ensure long term investments in the are. Yancoal corporate ethics align with Bridgestone hence our support |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2799 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Best things for the economy |
David Molesworth
|
ID |
15376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2315 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I ask the commission to approve the Moolarben extension based on the positive financial benefit to the local community through high paying employment and financial benefit to the mining industry and its suppliers in N.S.W. It is also time to stop agressively harming our economy and employment based on the nonsensical concept of Net Zero to "save the planet" when reducing the availability of coal from Australian sources will happily be replaced by neighbouring suppliers like Indonesia. |
David livingston
|
ID |
15381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2845 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this proposal and further development Because of the wide spread benefits to the local community and state |
Richard Bennetts
|
ID |
15386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2629 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this extension as energy security and economic strength are vital for NSW and Australia. |
Marianne Melnikas
|
ID |
15391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2486 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is necessary for growth and development of our regional and rural commuities. It supports these communities in many ways. Coal is absolutely essential for the production of electricity. I am fully in favour of this extension, to ensure electricity supply into the future and sustainability to local communities. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2315 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Nothing wrong with clean coal. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2428 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
We need clean coal to power homes and businesses |
robert styles
|
ID |
15411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2446 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
i agree for it to go ahead |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2259 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Bring on the jobs |
Chris Papallo
|
ID |
15421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2107 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Go ahead and pull our most reliable fuel source and use it for Australians. Stop giving the stuff away to other countries who make us buy it and it’s by products for exorbitant amounts of profits to everyone else except Australians. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2575 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Support for the Development Application The development application presents compelling arguments regarding the positive impacts of the mine on employment, particularly in the Mudgee and western plains district. Supporting this application aligns with the current economic needs of the region and addresses the challenges posed by the ideological pressures facing the coal mining industry. Economic Benefits Job Creation: The mine is instrumental in providing employment opportunities in an era where many Australian jobs are being lost due to opposition to coal mining. Supporting the application helps maintain and create jobs in the area. Regional Manufacturing: Mining operations contribute to regional manufacturing jobs, bolstering local economies. This creates a ripple effect that benefits various sectors, ensuring the sustainability of communities. Community Vitalization: Increased employment and economic activity can lead to revitalized townships. A thriving economy encourages improvements in local infrastructure and services, thus enhancing the quality of life for residents. Environmental Considerations Strict Compliance: The proposal indicates that it will meet strict environmental standards, which addresses concerns about the ecological impact. Minimal Impact: Given that the development will occur on an existing mining site, the expected disruptions to the environment will be minimal, further supporting the case for approval. |
joy gough
|
ID |
15431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2103 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is a cornerstone of the Australian economy, contributing approximately $99.3 billion in value-added impact in 2022-23. It ranks as Australia's second-largest export earner after iron ore. For Yancoal, a major operator, the value lies in generating significant export revenue and dividends, with a 2024 economic contribution of $16.0 billion (including supply chain effects). |
Anthony Ford
|
ID |
15436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Western Australia 6054 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is easily used (scrubbers etc) as a cheap form of energy production. Essential in the creation of steel, a life blood material in so many industries globally. The world will not stop using coal or steel, so why should Australia. Climate change is not man made, coal production will have a negligible effect on anything climate? |
Leanne Crumpton
|
ID |
15441 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2482 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the expansion of this mine in order to secure essential energy. Mining contributes to our economy and to cheaper power for the community as well as jobs and skills that will remain in the area |
Luke Nelson
|
ID |
15446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a born and bred local of the Mudgee township. I have personally seen the benefits that Moolarben Coal mine has given to the region such as funding for small organizations, school initiatives, local charities and even roads and infrastructure that benefits from direct funding. On a personal level I see huge benefits from mining in the area, things such as multiple small businesses that are propped up from partners or family members that work at Moolarben Coal, I know of 2 hobby retail shops, a gaming arcade, 2 cafes and a winery which are co-owned by Moolarben employees. Another example is housing, I live in a small cul-de-sac which has 22 houses, within my cul-de-sac alone there is 4 direct Moolarben employee houses and 3 indirect contractors employed by Moolarben Coal, if Moolarben was forced to wind down the impact on the town would be huge. I can't help but feel the huge positive impact mining has on the Mudgee community massively outweighs negatives that are mostly fed from groups and individuals that are not local or have no skin in the game with the town. Mudgee is spoken about as an extremely popular tourism destination, but I expect even the tourism industry would suffer if we were to lose day to day money that keeps the boutique businesses and cafes afloat between peak tourist times. Times like COVID is a prime example of this, thankfully most mine workers were classed as essential workers and that alone is a huge part of keeping trades and small business alive which has allowed the town to since improve it's tourism industry and prosper. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15451 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal is essential to the provision of low cost affordable electricity and must be allowed to be mined for the benefit of all Australians . Substantial Government revenue relies upon coal . Hundreds of well paid jobs rely upon coal mining. The substantial conditions and controls that will apply to the project are such that there is no good reason why this project should not proceed. I urge you to approve it asap. |
peter aplin
|
ID |
15456 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2260 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe that this extension will create more jobs, give more certainty and security to the workers involved which will have a flow on effect to all in the community. Not only does this extension create further jobs which in turn provides more taxes to the government but the royalties and taxes received by the government for the mining and export go to improve our balance of payments and GDP. |
Robert Nelson
|
ID |
15461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2431 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to advance Australia. Coal is one of the backbones of our economy. It’s a great export revenue. It’s a great cheap source of energy for our country. It’s a great employer creating many jobs and opportunities. It’s also a wonderful contributor to local towns. A great revenue for the Government |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal equals jobs |
steven McNaughton
|
ID |
15476 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2325 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this project expansion for the benefit of the state and its citizens. |
Yvonne Coutis
|
ID |
15481 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2753 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am opposed to the lack of coal power we now have. The economy is suffering and we are experiencing blackouts and exorbitant power bills. We should not be selling our coal to countries that don’t give a damn about emissions at the cost of our own country. Let’s get back to making Australia strong again |
Lealey Wood
|
ID |
15486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2036 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Very simply, I believe in Coal a d nuclear as our future and i am against renewables. They are destroying out farmers land, our beautiful and natural forests and are an extremely costly form of e energy. |
Paul White
|
ID |
15491 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work in mining myself, so the financial benefits are extremely rewarding. In this climate job security is more important than ever. |
Rebecca Vass
|
ID |
15496 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben employs many locals. The net effect of expanding the mine will not be any different to it's current operations. They will have the same amount of trucks and diggers. Mining at the same rate. There are no valid reasons to deny this expansion. |
Hugh Doherty
|
ID |
15501 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in support for the extension of OC3, many of those opposed to this are far from Mudgee, with a likelihood of never having visited the region. Moolarben contributes an enormous amount to the local region in employment, grants and utilising local businesses. Coal is something that this country will rely on for years to come and to say that this country has the ability to retrain and employ the thousands of people employed by this industry is ridiculous |
Raymond Wadeley
|
ID |
15506 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2750 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As an ex underground miner I support the coal industry as it provides work wealth and in this situation environmental balance. |
Geoff Henning
|
ID |
15511 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2845 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to voice my support for the OC3 Extension Project at Moolarben Mine, via Mudgee, NSW. The flow on benefits to the staff at the mine; including contractors and suppliers, the local community and the broader community are too great a loss to endure by this project not being approved. We all understand and agree that a Greener solution for the future will be a better long term solution, however in the short term; 20 to 50 years we have to ensure a smooth and reliable transition. This project extension will go a long way to helping that happen. The Mudgee district has worked extremely hard over many years to get to its current status as a busy vibrant destination and home to thousands of families who are reviling in the community spirit that is currently a major part of the town. To remove or reduce any of the current mining projects in the region would spell disaster for Mudgee as it simply cannot survive on a tourist industry alone. Literally thousands of people would be displaced and with Australia’s current economic position this would only seek to worsen it. The royalties and revenue generated will only assist in helping Australia move to a Green Future over the next 50 years without having a huge impact on the people of the Mudgee Region and Australians as a whole. Yancoal has to date have always been diligent and mindful of its obligations and due diligence to the environment and surrounds, and there is nothing to indicate that they would not continue to do so with any continuing or future projects such as the OC3 Extension Project. I fully support this and have no concerns with its approval. |
ROBERT ALDER
|
ID |
15516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2067 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This project will have significant economic benefits for NSW; will extend security of employment for the existing workforce; has minimal impact to both nearby residences and actually increases native woodlands in the Moolarben Valley, so should be supported by all thinking citizens. |
Craig Nosworthy
|
ID |
15526 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to see more coal mines open in Australia to raise revenue and create more jobs |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15531 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the submission, it supports the community and the employees currently working at the mine. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15536 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in support of the proposed Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project. MCO has been an established part of the region for many years, providing significant economic and social benefits to the local community and the broader region. The extension is important for maintaining employment and economic stability in the area. Continued operations will support local jobs, contractors, and businesses. I also acknowledge the extensive environmental assessment and planning processes that have been undertaken for this proposal. The proponent has demonstrated a commitment to managing environmental impacts through established monitoring, mitigation, and rehabilitation practices. I respectfully request that the Panel give favourable consideration to this proposal. |
Harley Henning
|
ID |
15541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. This project is critically important to the Mudgee region and the thousands of families who rely directly and indirectly on the mining industry for their livelihoods, including myself and my family. Moolarben Coal has been a long-standing contributor to local community through employment, community initiatives & Projects and economic security throughout the region, with the approval of the OC3 Extension this will provide certainty for workers, contractors, and local businesses at a time when regional communities need it most. I am well aware that the project has been subject to very thorough assessments and environmental management plans. With appropriate regulatory oversight and continued commitment to responsible mining practices, I believe the OC3 Extension can be managed in a way that balances economic benefits with environmental protection and community interests. The extension will allow the operation to continue utilising existing infrastructure and workforce, reducing the need for new disturbance while maintaining productivity and operations efficiency within the set out guidelines and rules, this approach supports both sustainable resource development and regional growth. For these reasons, I am supportive of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension and believe it is in the best interests of the local community and the broader region that it is approved. |
🍍Jayden Williams
|
ID |
15546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing as a member of the local community to express my support for the proposed Moolarben Open Cut Extension Project. I have lived in the area for a number of years and have seen firsthand the positive contribution that the Moolarben operation has made to our local community and regional economy. The mine provides stable employment for many families in our area, supports local businesses, and contributes significantly to the long-term economic sustainability of the region. The continuation of the Moolarben operation through the proposed extension is important in maintaining local jobs and ensuring ongoing economic activity for our community. Many small businesses rely on the workforce associated with the mine, and without this project, there would likely be negative flow-on effects for local services and employment opportunities. I acknowledge that mining activities must be managed responsibly, and I am encouraged by Yancoal’s commitment to operating in accordance with strict environmental and regulatory requirements. The company has demonstrated a willingness to engage with the community and implement measures to minimise impacts on air quality, noise, water, and surrounding land uses. I believe the proposed extension can be undertaken in a way that balances economic benefits with appropriate environmental management. It is important that regional communities like ours are given opportunities for continued development and employment. The Moolarben Open Cut Extension Project represents a practical way to support the local workforce while maintaining responsible resource development. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Open Cut Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely |
simon MERRICK
|
ID |
15566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have just started working at Moolarben and planning to move to the local area, i am currently looking at real state but investing in the area is concerning if this submission does not get approved. I have already joined a local volunteer group and look forward to being an active member of the Mudgee community |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am employed by this company and first hand have seen what they put back into the community (sport sponsorships, etc) I believe this will only benefit the area and community if this is granted approval. Not only for people for keeping their jobs and future employment opportunities for the community but also the support Moolarben shows the community itself outside of employment. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The economic benefit to NSW and the local area outweigh any other negative response or alternative option. |
Peter Fyfe
|
ID |
15591 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am in total support of all extensions for coal mining in the Ulan area. I am a second generation Coal Miner with my son just starting an apprenticeship at Moolarben. Being a local for over 40 years I have seen only benefits that mining has given this community. Financial support, assisting with rebuilding after the devastating Sir Ivan bush fires, providing opportunities for local jobs, community grants and much much more. I have witnessed the township of Mudgee thrive and explode with what I believe is 90% due to mining alone. I seen hundreds of business boom, new ones starting all the time employing more locals. The Mudgee area will not survive as it is without mining. Tourism will not keep what we have let alone grow! I have seen no negative effects on the environment in my 40 plus years. I am and always have been a regular attendee of the Drip (first trip was at 10years old) and have only seen it get better! The water quality better and the amount of flow more consistent since the mines started treating and releasing, the amount animal life has boomed since I was a kid! |
Martinus Hendriksz
|
ID |
15596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to show my support for the OC3 expansion as this will affect my future in the area of Gullgong. Not having job security in the area will mean I will have to move my family away. |
Allan Searant
|
ID |
15621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I was part of the commissioning team for the CHPP facilities back in 2010 (?), a long term industry supporter & well qualified chemical engineer to boot, stop the ignorant professional agitators hell bent on destroying Australia’s industry & natural resources, let this magnificent resource be fully exploited for the benefit of the last remaining utopia on the planet!! Sick to death of those that protest as if it were a real profession, go to work, create wealth for our beautiful country!! |
Paige Henning
|
ID |
15636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to formally express my strong support for the approval of the Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension. I support this proposal because it delivers clear and balanced outcomes across economic, environmental, and social considerations for the Mid-Western Region and New South Wales. The project will secure ongoing employment and investment in the Mudgee region by extending the life of the existing open cut workforce, without increasing approved production rates or extending the overall mine life beyond 2038. Importantly, the project has been refined in response to community and government feedback, resulting in a reduced disturbance footprint, increased environmental setbacks, reduced impacts on wildlife habitat, and increased land rehabilitation. The proposal to rehabilitate over 535 hectares of land to native woodland vegetation, along with the creation of habitat enhancement areas and the removal of final voids, demonstrates a strong commitment to environmental responsibility and long-term land stewardship. I also acknowledge the significant economic contribution Moolarben Coal makes locally and statewide, including employment, local supplier engagement and community initiatives and investments. These benefits are critical to the sustainability of the regional economy and the livelihoods of many local families. Given the rigorous environmental assessment process already undertaken, the integration of the extension within existing approved operations, and the substantial improvements made to reduce impacts, I believe the OC3 Extension Project is well-justified and deserves approval. |
David Edwards
|
ID |
15661 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It seems to me that the impact on the environment is minimal when following the strict guidelines. As one who has been involved in the mining industry in the past, the financial benefits for the region are great. |
Matthew Downes
|
ID |
15671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support Moolarben OC3 extension project as it provides job security within the community and brings much needed investment into the local economy. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support Moolarben Coal OC3 Extension Project as it will provide job security within the community and brings much needed investment into the local economy. |
Bryson Bryson Gilbert
|
ID |
15681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2580 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a former Pacific National employee. I was once employed as a freight train driver. One job l particularly enjoyed was driving 45 Wagon full loads of black coal to Port Kembla for export. I personally do not support green energy targets or Solar panels and wind turbines as l feel that this is a false economy. I am continually astonished that we have all these wonderful resources in Australia and they are exported over seas so that countries like China and Japan and lndia can use our coal to make wind turbines and solar panels and sell them back to Australia whilst we are told that our coal fired power stations must be blown up or dismantled in order to reduce greenhouse gasses and be penalised under the Paris Ckimate Accord. This was one if Prime Munister Malcolm Turnbulls greatest blunders in Australian politics. Has he got shares in Green energy ? I bet he has. |
|
Attachments |
20251006_155919.jpg (JPG, 826.13 KB) |
Bryson Bryson Gilbert
|
ID |
15686 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2580 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a former Pacific National employee. I was once employed as a freight train driver. One job l particularly enjoyed was driving 45 Wagon full loads of black coal to Port Kembla for export. I personally do not support green energy targets or Solar panels and wind turbines as l feel that this is a false economy. I am continually astonished that we have all these wonderful resources in Australia and they are exported over seas so that countries like China and Japan and lndia can use our coal to make wind turbines and solar panels and sell them back to Australia whilst we are told that our coal fired power stations must be blown up or dismantled in order to reduce greenhouse gasses and be penalised under the Paris Ckimate Accord. This was one if Prime Munister Malcolm Turnbulls greatest blunders in Australian politics. Has he got shares in Green energy ? I bet he has. |
Arna Gillott
|
ID |
15701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2446 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support this extension project as I strongly believe we definitely need to continue mining coal in Australia to provide the essential energy requirements needed to provide power at a consistent and stable level for both business and private use and to keep energy prices at a respectable cost thank you |
Liz Fritz
|
ID |
15706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2463 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a private citizen, I support the project which will- Provide employment and flow on support to local businness. Industry support for Australia |
Vince Sunter
|
ID |
15716 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
iPUT Technologies |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This proposal will really lift the spirit, and reality, for many of the people of the Mudgee region. It is long overdue for we city slickers to make that our absolute top priority rather than allow lesser, virtue-signalling matters to treat our fellow human beings as unimportant victims of these conflated 'desires'. We need to provide urgent, real support of our country friends, that are only asking for permission to do sensible things, not handouts. So refreshing. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia’s prosperity and more specifically NSW is built from mining,with coal mining playing a significant role in delivering jobs and royalties that help fund our economy and way of life. While ever coal mining is used across the world for energy,NSW coal should be the last to close due to the higher energy content and lower trace elements combined with the strictest and safest mining practices in the world. Closing these assets will create more emissions globally due to lower quality coals and softer environmental regulations making other countries more prosperous than our own as well as harming the global environment. |
harry stefanou
|
ID |
15726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2500 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this because i believe it is a great asset for the local community, it will give approx 700 jobs to people. It will bring money in the economy and hopefully help with increasing power prices. |
David Barnes
|
ID |
15736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2290 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe very strongly that the mining of coal is highly desirable for the generation of base load electrical energy as so called renewables will never be up to the job.I also believe That coal mining is a sustainable source of revenue for the economies of not only the state of NSW but also of the Commonwealth of Australia and on that basis alone it should be continued. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Mine has been an important part of our local region for many years and continues to provide stable employment and economic security for families like mine. The proposed extension will allow ongoing operations, which is critical in maintaining jobs, supporting local businesses, and ensuring the long-term economic health of our community. For my family, the continuation of the Moolarben Mine provides certainty and stability. Secure employment means we can continue to live locally, support our children’s education, and contribute positively to the community. It allows families to plan for the future, remain in the region, and avoid the need to relocate for work. This stability is invaluable, particularly in regional areas where employment opportunities can be limited. The mine also delivers broader community benefits. Local businesses rely on the mine and its workforce, from shops and services to contractors and suppliers. Continued operations help keep these businesses viable, strengthen the local economy, and support community facilities, sporting clubs, and events. These contributions help maintain a strong and connected community. Importantly, mining in this region has demonstrated that mining and community can coexist responsibly. With appropriate management and oversight, the extension can continue to deliver economic and social benefits whilst minimising impacts on the surrounding environment and community. I believe Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project is essential to ensuring the ongoing prosperity of our region. It supports local jobs, strengthens families, and helps sustain the community we are proud to be part of. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Michael Dodd
|
ID |
15776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The OC3 Extension Project will provide: ● Significant economic benefits to the state ● Continuity and security of employment by extending the duration of employment for the existing open cut workforce ● No changes to the approved mine life or production rates ● A net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation in the Moolarben Valley ● Setbacks from creek lines and nature reserve ● Maximise use of existing infrastructure ● Minimal amenity impacts to nearby residences. The extension area would be visually isolated from surrounding private residences by intervening topography ● No final voids (reducing voids in Moolarben Valley from one to zero) |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal make money, coal good |
Geoff Cheetham
|
ID |
15786 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a member of the Mudgee Region Community, and have lived in the Mudgee area since 1990. I am a retired Chartered Accountant, who has worked with and witnessed the growth and strengthening of the regions economy as a result of mining in this area. But mining has opened up not just a stronger regional economy for mining, but for agriculture, tourism and the Arts. So many people have benefited. Mining money from both wages and contractors, from short term visits and to a degree by underwriting life in the Mudgee Region has made things here a lot better and more stable. As one sector experienced a downturn, another would prop it up, and so things were on the up. Our region’s facilities for residents and visitors have all benefited from this stability. Our schools, remote university centre, medical capacity, housing snd infrastructure, social support all reflect the strength of a broad regional economy, that many areas would be jealous of. The extension of the Moolarben mine facility is consistent with the past and ongoing contribution that mining makes to Mudgee. That it makes possible a continued mine operation within it’s already approved area, provides for an environmentally positive outcome, a continued contribution to both local, State and National wealth is a potentially amazing result! I believe strongly that the changes should be approved. I have no stake in this beyond a belief that it will be a positive result for my local areas stability, amenity and growth, as well as for NSW and Australia. And we all have a stake in those things! I would be happy to speak to this submission in support of Moolarben and can be contacted on (Redacted), or by email (Redacted). Regards and well wishes for you deliberations, Geoff Cheetham CA |
Matthew Clarke
|
ID |
15806 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2847 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 30 your old first national male. We need coal for the for see able future because as we have already seen. Renewable energy such as wind and solar does not work. We need nuclear energy. But in the meantime we will have to make do with coal. Or we (as in the local area and australia) will continue to have power outages. Apart from this the amount of local jobs is over 1000. So I a first national person 100% encourages/ backs this coal mine extension. |
Mitchell Amos
|
ID |
15816 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support Moolarben's OC3 Extension Project as it brings job security to the region and injects around $180 million into the local economy every year. There are a lot of businesses in the local area that are owned and run by the partners of the 700+ mine workers, as well as teachers and healthcare professionals/specialists that are currently employed in the area that would have to move. In a town that is already hard enough to get into a doctor or have a long wait time at the hospital, it's only going to get worse. Also, if most of the little boutique close due to relocation, the tourism will soon start to decline, and the area will no longer be a tourist hotspot. This approval isn't only beneficial for the workers, its beneficial for all of our area to continue to be a thriving hotspot for tourists and be on the radar of major events organizers to keep bringing big events to the town. As well as upgrading parks and donating to local charities and developments. |
Matthew Clarke
|
ID |
15821 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2847 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 30 your old first national male. We need coal for the for see able future because as we have already seen. Renewable energy such as wind and solar does not work. We need nuclear energy. But in the meantime we will have to make do with coal. Or we (as in the local area and australia) will continue to have power outages. Apart from this the amount of local jobs is over 1000. So I a first national person 100% encourages/ backs this coal mine extension. |
Matthew Clarke
|
ID |
15826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2847 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a 30 your old first national male. We need coal for the for see able future because as we have already seen. Renewable energy such as wind and solar does not work. We need nuclear energy. But in the meantime we will have to make do with coal. Or we (as in the local area and australia) will continue to have power outages. Apart from this the amount of local jobs is over 1000. So I a first national person 100% encourages/ backs this coal mine extension. |
Shane Howe
|
ID |
15836 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work in the maintenance department at the Moolarben Coal Complex and I am writing in support of the OC3 Extension Project. I’ve seen first-hand how the site is run day to day. The mine operates under strict safety and environmental requirements, and a lot of effort goes into keeping equipment safe, reliable, and compliant, as well as progressively rehabilitating disturbed areas. The OC3 extension is a continuation of an existing operation using the same workforce, plant, and infrastructure already in place. It makes sense to extend what is already approved and well regulated rather than opening up new mining areas elsewhere. My job at Moolarben provides the income that supports my family. Continued operation of the mine gives certainty to maintenance workers like myself and to the many other local workers and businesses that rely on the site. For these reasons, I support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
15846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4011 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Globally the coal industry is important and Australia’s should be enabled to benefit from this resource. |
Michelle dobson
|
ID |
15861 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project near Mudgee, proposed by Yancoal. I fully agree that thermal coal has no long-term future. It’s environmentally damaging, the world is rightly moving to cleaner energy, and this transition is both needed and inevitable. We should keep pushing renewables and phase out coal as soon as practical alternatives are ready. Australia is already doing a lot here with huge investments in solar and other renewables. As someone who previously lived in Sydney , I do sympathise with people worried about climate change and extreme heat. I’ve felt those brutal summer days in western Sydney that push close to 50°C, they are a living hell, and those raising concerns in opposing submissions are doing so based on current lived experiences, those concerns are completely valid. However, Australia’s average temperature has risen about 1.5°C over the past century (according to Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO data), but the really intense local heat in those areas, often 8 to 10°C hotter than eastern or coastal suburbs during heat events comes largely from the urban heat island effect created by rapid development and all that concrete and asphalt. It feels particularly short-sighted to mainly blame far-away coal mining for this excessive local heat when so much of it is driven by urban sprawl, heavy concrete development, and the lifestyle choices fuelling growth in those areas. This extension is almost entirely thermal coal exported to Asia. It’s a global market, and unfortunately many objectors appear to overlook how global markets work. Demand won’t vanish overnight. If this small extension gets blocked, the coal will just be mined somewhere else, either another Australian site or overseas. Power stations abroad will keep burning thermal coal. those facilities will continue to operate whether the coal comes from Moolarben or not. Cutting supply from a responsible Australian source doesn’t reduce overall demand; it simply shifts it to other location. Potentially another country without the environmental regulations Australia has in place for mining and rehabilitation. When legitimately looking at the whole picture, if the concern is emissions related, Rejecting this extension would achieve no meaningful reduction in global emissions while putting regional families livelihoods at serious risk. Right now, what realistic alternative is there for the hundreds of direct local jobs and thousands of indirect jobs this mine provides in the Mudgee area? Moolarben mostly employs people who live and spend in the community, not fly-in fly-out workers. Until buying countries have proper large-scale sustainable energy options in place, stopping a responsible company like Yancoal from this modest, well-managed extension feels unfair and punishing to those who rely on it. On the concerned raised around biodiversity, This is a small extension on old farmland in the flat plains, cleared and deforested generations ago for farming. The plan has solid rehabilitation commitments to turn the land back into woodland or forest. It doesn’t touch koala habitat. Concerns about koalas are understandable, particularly for those whose main exposure to them is through zoos or media. In reality, this site is long-established farmland on open plains, lacking the eucalypt woodland and suitable food trees that koalas require. Just look at former mining towns in NSW like parts of the Hunter Valley or Lithgow to see what happens after mining winds down without something to back it up. Falling populations, struggling services, and long-term economic pain. In Lithgow, the loss of mining has helped create big infrastructure problems, including an $88 million backlog for road repairs alone. As I mentioned in the beginning, the world is moving away from thermal coal, power stations are going offline around the world for better cleaner alternatives. This extension gives the Mudgee region breathing room to keep growing and prepare properly. We’re not prepared for a sudden stoppage in the next few years. Without time to adapt to a coal-free future, like we’ve seen in struggling places such as Lithgow, the damage could be permanent. This project helps manage an orderly transition while keeping high environmental standards and supporting the local community. I urge the Commission to approve it. Thank you for considering this submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2848 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
as someone who lives in the small town of Kandos a lot of us travel to moolarben for work including myself. it not only keeps locals in mudgee but also kandos, rylstone, lue and others. without the mines continued work and support these small towns will suffer Aswell as the mudgee community. |
Michael Kirkpatrick
|
ID |
14586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2580 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Every one mining job creates five more jobs externally within the community. The extension provides and generates incomes and support growth to Mudgee and surrounding areas that secure a future. I support the extension and Moolarben Coal commitment to meet compliance standards to mine safely to protect people and the environment. |
Justin Griffiths
|
ID |
14591 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal Moolarben |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I'm currently employed by Yancoal Moolarben, I have been employed by the Moolarben complex for the last 5 years. Within this time I've moved my family from neighboring town to Mudgee to continue my employment with Yancoal. I currently work with a great team at Moolarben and with these Opportunities I've currently build a house in mudgee and without the extension will find it difficult to support my family and pay my mortgage. The money generated by Moolarben to the local community is massive, and a vital part of local sporting charity and council events. Thank you for receiving my submission. |
Benjamin Jacobs
|
ID |
14596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am strongly in favour of the proposed extension project. Moolarben is a fantastic employer and community partner and the significant economic contributions it makes to the local town of Mudgee and the broader Central Western community, from wages to engaging local suppliers to grants and royalties, has been one of the core drivers behind the growth and prosperity that has been enjoyed across the region over the last decade. Given Moolarben is statistically the lowest emissions intensity coal mine in Australia, and has a proven track record of prudent environmental custodianship through world-class operating and rehabilitation practices (which extends to Yancoal’s successful demonstration of the same at other sites across Australia), I am confident that this project can be executed in an environmentally conscientious and sustainable manner, whilst continuing to contribute positively to the wonderful community with which the mine engages. |
Colm Foran
|
ID |
14601 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Yancoal Moolarben |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have lived in the local community for the past 16 years residing approx 15km from the proposed extension of OC3. Moolarben has given myself the opportunity to come home to work after working away for 5 years. It has made a huge difference to myself and my family life. Also being involved in the local community Moolarben has made a huge contribution to the local encomony and has provided grants to local sporting clubs. Mid western region continues to grow we need this extension to be approved to contribute to this growth. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2329 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am proud to work at Moolarben mine. I’ve been employed here for 16 years and have enjoyed working at a mine which undertakes its operations in such an environmentally responsible manner, whilst contributing so significantly to the fantastic community and surrounding region here in the Central West |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m a born and raised local from the Mudgee area and I currently work at Moolarben Coal while also living in the local community. The OC3 Extension is important for keeping steady jobs in the region and supporting local families like mine. Moolarben Coal also does a lot to support the local community through sponsorship of sporting clubs, local events, and community activities, which makes a real difference in a town like Mudgee. Ongoing operations help keep people living and working locally rather than having to leave the area for employment. Supporting the OC3 Extension helps provide certainty for workers and continues to support the Mudgee community into the future. |
Matthew Court
|
ID |
14616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local resident of the Moolarben/Mudgee region and I wish to make a submission in support of the Yancoal Moolarben Coal operation. The Moolarben mine has been an important contributor to the local and regional economy for many years. It provides ongoing employment opportunities for local people and supports a wide range of businesses and contractors in the area. Many families in our community rely directly or indirectly on the mine, and its continued operation helps maintain economic stability in the region. |
Peter Sinnett
|
ID |
14621 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write in support of the continued operation and development of the Moolarben Coal Mine. The mine plays a significant role in supporting local employment, regional businesses, and economic stability in the Mudgee area. It provides secure jobs for families and contributes to essential infrastructure, training, and community programs. Moolarben operates under strict environmental and safety regulations, and ongoing improvements in monitoring and rehabilitation demonstrate a commitment to responsible resource management. The mine also contributes royalties and taxes that fund public services across New South Wales. For these reasons, I believe the Moolarben Coal Mine delivers clear social and economic benefits and should continue to be supported as part of a balanced and practical approach to energy and regional development. |
Sean Constable
|
ID |
14631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have lived in the Mudgee region now for over 30 years. Without mining for jobs and opportunities for young people with apprenticeships. |
Jack Tolhurst
|
ID |
14636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2519 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I enjoy working here and see that there will be no impact to the environment and that it should be |
William Byrnes
|
ID |
14641 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Jobs, businesses and people's livelihoods in the region should outway the small environmental impacts that an extension to the mine would have. Australian's need coal for decades to come. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Supportive of the continued economic benefits provided by Moolarben Coal to the broader community. |
matthew staff
|
ID |
14656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2315 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Independent Planning Commission, Thank you for the opportunity to provide a submission regarding the Commission’s determination of the development application currently under consideration. Having reviewed the Department of Planning and Environment’s Assessment Report and the recommended conditions of consent, I wish to express my strong support for the proposed development. The Assessment Report provides a comprehensive and up‑to‑date evaluation of the project, including its environmental, social, and economic aspects. Based on this assessment, it is clear that the proposed development has been rigorously examined and demonstrates a responsible approach to managing potential impacts. The recommended conditions of consent further ensure that the project will operate within strict environmental and community safeguards. Importantly, the application reflects a project that is well‑aligned with existing planning frameworks and is supported by established infrastructure, minimising additional disturbance. The proposal sits within current operational footprints and lease areas, resulting in limited incremental impact while providing ongoing regional benefits. The project will continue to play a significant role in supporting local employment, contributing to the regional economy, and sustaining the services and businesses that rely on mining activity within the area. Its contribution to the stability and vibrancy of the local community should not be understated. I also appreciate the Commission’s commitment to transparency, particularly the practice of publishing all additional information received after the matter is referred. This ensures that the community remains informed throughout the assessment process. For these reasons, I believe the proposed development represents a balanced and responsible progression, and I support its approval subject to the conditions outlined by the Department. Thank you for considering this submission. |
Damien Ryba
|
ID |
14666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am an ecologist and Yancoal Moolarben employee and fully support the Moolarben OC3 extension project. The project has undergone a rigorous biodiversity assessment and the proposed disturbance area is a highly disturbed agricultural area with no significant biodiversity values. Approval of the project will allow continuation of the considerable economic contribution in employment and spending that Moolarben makes to the local, state and national economies. In particular it will allow Mudgee and the Central West region to continue to thrive. Moolarben undertakes a high standard of mined land rehabilitation which focuses on the re-establishment of box gum grassy woodlands and over time will provide a net increase in functional ecosystems compared to the widespread areas of cleared land which were present prior to mining. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write in support of the proposed OC3 Extension Project at Moolarben Coal Operations. The continuation of this project is important for the ongoing social and economic wellbeing of the local community and the wider region. The OC3 Extension Project provides critical employment opportunities for local workers and contractors, allowing families to remain in the area and maintain stable, long-term employment. In a region where mining plays a significant role in the local economy, the project supports existing jobs and helps sustain local skills, apprenticeships, and workforce development. This continuity of employment reduces uncertainty for workers and contributes to stronger, more resilient communities. Beyond employment, Moolarben Coal Operations has demonstrated a strong commitment to supporting the local community. As a mining business operating in the region, it provides meaningful support to local schools, sporting clubs, community groups, community improvements and initiatives that benefit children and young people. These contributions help improve educational opportunities, promote healthy lifestyles, and strengthen community connections. Support for local schools and youth programs is particularly important, as it helps invest in the next generation and ensures the region remains a positive place for families to live and raise children. The flow-on benefits of this support are felt across the community, fostering pride, stability, and long-term social outcomes. In addition, the project delivers substantial economic benefits to the region through local spending, support for small and medium businesses, and ongoing contributions to regional prosperity. These economic flows help maintain essential services, community programs, and infrastructure, benefiting both current and future generations. For these reasons, I support the approval of the OC3 Extension Project and recognise its importance in providing employment, supporting local communities, investing in young people, and contributing to the long-term economic stability of the region. |
Dylan Clarkson
|
ID |
14706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The approval of the Moolarben Coal mining extension represents a strong and balanced step forward for regional economic growth and long-term community prosperity. The project will continue to deliver significant employment opportunities, support local businesses, and provide stable economic contributions to the region and the state. Importantly, the extension has been shaped through ongoing consultation with the local community, reflecting a clear commitment to responsible operations and shared benefits. With established infrastructure already in place, the extension allows continued economic output while maintaining a focus on environmental management and community wellbeing. Overall, the project demonstrates how resource development can coexist with community support, economic resilience, and sustainable regional development. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14711 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The proposed expansion of the Moolarben Coal operation represents a significant opportunity to strengthen the regional economy and support long-term community growth in the local area and surrounding areas. The project will sustain and create local jobs, providing stable employment for workers and contractors while supporting families who rely on the mining sector for their livelihoods. Beyond direct employment, the expansion will deliver broader economic benefits by stimulating local businesses, suppliers, and service industries. Increased activity across transport, maintenance, retail, and professional services will help maintain a strong and resilient regional economy, particularly during times of broader economic uncertainty. The continuation of Moolarben Coal also supports investment in local infrastructure and community initiatives. Contributions to roads, services, and community programs help improve liveability and ensure the region remains an attractive place to live and work. Importantly, the project builds on existing operations, allowing economic benefits to be realised while utilising established infrastructure and experienced local workforces. With appropriate environmental management and regulatory oversight, the Moolarben Coal expansion can balance economic development with responsible land use. Supporting this project means supporting local jobs, regional growth, and the ongoing prosperity of communities that have long contributed to New South Wales’ energy and resources sector. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Thank you for considering my submission. Moolarben Coal and Yancoal in general is a significant supporter of the local community, NSW and Australia as a whole. With over $2million in local community grants, $187 million direct economic contribution to MWRC area and over $1.2 BILLION in direct economic contribution to NSW, Moolarben's OC3 expansion is a project we need to fully support. There are so many things that would suffer without mining contribution. Mudgee is one of them. 684 employees from Moolarben live in the area. This doesn't include the husbands, wives and families. These are the people that help keep Mudgee going. There are nurses, bunnings employees, teachers, essential contributors to the town that affiliated with the mine. If the extension isn't approved, it means loss of jobs as the mines tones wind down. It means families that would have to move. Businesses that would have to close. Supporting this extension is supporting Mudgee, supporting jobs, supporting families. Moolarben has taken great care to have as minimal impact to the environment as possible during the planning of this project. Minimal natural habitat, minimal tress and waterways are impacted. This land has been cleared and farmed for hundreds of years. Munghorn won't be impacted. The koalas wont be impacted. In fact, Moolarben will be replacing the old farmland with over 535ha of woodlands to help support and GROW local habitats and wildlife populations. Moolarben not only supports Mudgee, it supports NSW and Australia. It supports habitat growth, jobs and families. Please support the extension. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I would like to put forward my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Moolarben Coal (Yancoal) contribute a significant amount of Financial and Economical Support to the Greater Mudgee Region, and an even greater amount to the Australian Economy. Each Year, they invest heavily in community orientated events and facilities and also support the locally economy by way of employing a significant number of Local Families. The OC3 Extension Project will allow Moolarben Coal to continue to support the local economy for the foreseeable future, and give employees confidence moving foward that they will be able to provide for their families and support the surrounding communities. I believe that Moolarben Coal puts the Environment and Environmental Impacts of Mining at the forefront of their operations, through sustainable mining and exploration practices as well as rehabilitation work. I am of the opinion that it would be in the best interest of our Community and Moolarben Coals Employees to continue to support the project by way of considering approval of the OC3 Extension Project Thankyou |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14736 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission to OC3 – Moolarben Coal Mine Extension I am writing to lodge a formal submission regarding the proposed Moolarben Coal Mine Extension. I wish to express my concern and objection to the proposed extension due to its potential impacts on the local community, environment, and surrounding landholders. Firstly, I am concerned about the environmental impacts associated with the extension, particularly in relation to air quality, dust generation, and noise pollution. Increased mining activity has the potential to significantly affect the health and wellbeing of nearby residents. Dust emissions, blasting, and ongoing operational noise may exceed acceptable levels and reduce the liveability of the area. Secondly, the proposal raises concerns regarding water resources. The extension may pose risks to groundwater and surface water systems, including potential contamination and reduced water availability. These impacts could have long-term consequences for local landholders, agriculture, and the broader ecosystem. Traffic and infrastructure impacts are also a significant concern. Increased heavy vehicle movements associated with the extension may lead to road safety risks, additional noise, and further deterioration of local roads that are already under strain. In addition, the cumulative impacts of continued and expanded mining in the region must be carefully considered. The Moolarben Mine has been operating for an extended period, and further expansion will prolong disruption to the community, delay land rehabilitation, and negatively affect property values and future land use. I am also concerned that the social impacts on the local community, including stress, reduced quality of life, and uncertainty for affected residents, have not been adequately addressed. For these reasons, I respectfully request that OC3 give serious consideration to the concerns raised by the community and carefully assess whether the proposed Moolarben Extension is in the public interest. Should the project proceed, I urge that strict conditions be imposed to minimise environmental harm, protect water resources, reduce dust and noise impacts, and ensure genuine community consultation and accountability. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, (Redacted) |
Craig Clare
|
ID |
14741 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2539 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I moved to Mudgee area 15 years ago for a job in the local coal industry. In that time I have made the area my home and raised a family here. I have recently moved my family to the south coast of NSW to be closer to the ocean but I continue to work and commute as the opportunity I have here is better than I can find anywhere else. The coal industry has provided my family and I with a great income and life in the country. The benefits of MCo to the community are enormous and most in the community benefit in some way from coal mining. The areas in question for the extension are farmland and will be returned to bush at the end of mine life. Let it pass for the benefit of the community and the prosperity it brings. |
Cody McIntosh
|
ID |
14756 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Keep local jobs |
Marlenn Guihot
|
ID |
14761 |
|---|---|
|
Organisation |
Moolarben coal |
|
Location |
New South Wales 2307 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as an employee at Moolarben coal to express my support for the proposed Open Cut 3 (OC3) Extension Project. I have a strong connection to the local area and recognise the important role that the Moolarben Coal plays in supporting local families, jobs, and businesses. The mine has operated for many years and is an established part of the region, providing stable employment and economic certainty in an area where these opportunities matter. I acknowledge that mining must be carefully managed, and from the information available, it appears that environmental, land, and community impacts have been thoroughly assessed, with appropriate mitigation and monitoring measures proposed. Allowing the OC3 Extension to proceed will help ensure continuity of operations, protect existing jobs, and support the ongoing viability of the local economy. For these reasons, I support approval of the project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14771 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mines around mudgee are very important as an employer and providing grants to local sporting teams, schools, charities and other groups. This expansion will allow them to continue to support this amazing community and continue to employ locals and keep them in work and provide more jobs |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14776 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to express my support for Moolarben Coal’s proposed Open Cut 3 extension project. As someone working at a neighbouring mine, this is my local community, and I see firsthand how responsible, ongoing mining activity contributes to the economic and social wellbeing of our region. The extension will help maintain stable, long-term employment for local workers and contractors, supporting families and sustaining the many small businesses that rely on mining-related activity. This economic stability underpins the strong standard of living our community enjoys and provides confidence for households and businesses investing in their future. While our region continues to grow and remain resilient, many other regional areas of similar size across Australia are experiencing population decline as industries contract and opportunities diminish. Some regional towns in Victoria’s north‑west have lost significant portions of their population over the past two decades, and well‑known centres such as Port Augusta, Broken Hill, and Mount Isa have also experienced population decreases in recent years. These examples highlight how unusual and valuable it is for a regional community to continue thriving — a strength closely tied to ongoing employment and investment driven by mining. Mining in our region also provides essential career and educational pathways, supporting apprenticeships, traineeships, and professional development. This gives young people and local workers the opportunity to build secure, skilled careers without needing to leave the area. Beyond these direct benefits, the mining industry plays a key role in promoting broader economic diversification through targeted investment. Mining operations often fund or stimulate industries such as engineering services, manufacturing, transport and logistics, environmental management, renewable energy pilot programs, and local supply-chain development. For example, mining-related investment has helped grow local businesses in fields like civil construction, equipment maintenance, rehabilitation services, and technical consulting — all sectors that support the long-term resilience and adaptability of regional economies. In several mining regions across Australia, investment has also contributed to the establishment of new training facilities, innovation hubs, and small business development programs that create opportunities well beyond the mining workforce itself. Moolarben Coal also makes significant contributions to community life through sponsorships and funding programs that support local sporting clubs, schools, volunteer organisations, and community services. These initiatives strengthen community connections, enhance wellbeing, and help ensure that regional services remain active and accessible. I strongly believe that responsible mining, conducted with a clear commitment to environmental management and community engagement, is essential for sustaining the strength, diversity, and long-term growth of our region. The Open Cut 3 extension represents an important opportunity to secure our economic future and ensure that our community remains vibrant, supported, and capable of sustainable prosperity. For these reasons, I support the Open Cut 3 extension project. |
Tracey Brown
|
ID |
14781 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2330 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The extension project is a positive, environmentally sustainable project that will continue to provide significant economic and employment benefit to the local area, region and state of NSW. |
Simon Rock
|
ID |
14791 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2305 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Coal mining contributes to both the local community and the wider population. We need to maximise the benefits we can get from mining now, before we move to a liw carbon future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14796 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support this extension as a local in the area, and employee at Moolarben, as it supports jobs and businesses in the area and keeps Mudgee and Gulgong alive and bustling. Moolarben also provides many community benefits such as sporting facilities and the mudgee pump track. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14801 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as a local community member to express my strong support for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Coal Complex has been an important part of the Upper Hunter and Mudgee region for many years, providing stable employment, supporting local businesses, and contributing significantly to the regional economy. Many families in our community rely directly or indirectly on the continued operation of this mine. The OC3 extension represents an opportunity to maintain these benefits while making use of existing infrastructure and established mining operations. From a community perspective, this is far preferable to new standalone developments, as the impacts are already well understood and managed within an existing framework. I also acknowledge the environmental considerations involved in mining projects. However, I am satisfied that the regulatory processes in place, along with modern environmental management practices, ensure that impacts are appropriately assessed, monitored, and mitigated. The company’s ongoing rehabilitation and compliance commitments are important and should continue to be enforced. In a time where regional employment and economic certainty are critical, especially in mining communities, the continuation of operations at Moolarben provides long-term stability for workers, contractors, and small businesses throughout the region. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project and believe it is in the best interests of the local community and the broader region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14811 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe this extension will boost the mudgee and surrounding communities as it will offer plenty more jobs and opportunities for locals and others. |
Mitchell Brown
|
ID |
14826 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2795 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben Coal is a critical contributor to the economic stability and social fabric of the Mid-Western Regional Council area, New South Wales, and Australia. The continuation of its approved operations will ensure the ongoing delivery of well-established economic, employment, and community benefits. Within the Mid-Western Regional Council area, Moolarben Coal provides a direct economic contribution of $187 million, with a total value-added contribution of $357 million. These figures demonstrate the operation’s importance not only as a standalone employer but as a driver of broader regional economic activity. The operation has a strong and proven commitment to local procurement, engaging 123 local suppliers and generating $56 million in revenue for businesses in the Mid-Western region. Continued approval will allow these businesses to maintain certainty, retain staff, and plan for the future with confidence. Moolarben Coal is a major regional employer, generating $159 million in wages paid to 895 full-time employees, with 684 employees residing locally. This local workforce ensures wages are reinvested back into the community, supporting housing, retail, education, and essential services. Maintaining approval is essential to preserving these jobs and the flow-on benefits they provide to families and the wider community. At a state level, Moolarben Coal delivers a direct economic contribution of $1.2 billion to New South Wales, including $241 million in state royalty payments. These royalties provide a reliable and ongoing funding source for public infrastructure, health, education, and regional services. Nationally, the operation contributes $1.6 billion directly to the Australian economy, reinforcing Australia’s position as a reliable supplier of energy resources and supporting broader economic resilience. Moolarben Coal has an established operational history and continues to deliver significant economic and social outcomes in line with existing approvals. Continued approval will provide certainty for workers, local businesses, and government revenue streams, while supporting the long-term viability of the Mid-Western regional economy. For these reasons, continued approval of Moolarben Coal is in the clear public interest and will ensure ongoing economic, employment, and community benefits at the local, state, and national level. |
Wesley Peters
|
ID |
14831 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben coal is a very responsible coal mine that takes it's environmental responsibilities very seriously. The continued operation of the mine is key for all towns and regions surrounding it with the many many jobs it provides primarily, secondary and financial flow on affects to every business in the it's surrounding areas as well as the huge royalties enjoyed by every single Australian and other countries supported by our nation. |
Heath Montgomery
|
ID |
14846 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I and my family who have moved here for work fully support this application. |
Kym Leyson
|
ID |
14856 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2113 |
|
Date |
03/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To the Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. I am currently employed as a Drill Operator at the site. Although I reside in Macquarie Park and travel to the Mudgee region for work, the success of this operation is central to my professional stability and personal livelihood. Beyond my personal employment, I support this project because of the substantial financial benefits it provides to the local community and the state government, as well as its robust environmental safeguards: State & Local Financial Benefits: Government Revenue: The project contributes to the billions in coal royalties collected by the NSW Government annually—estimated at $3.2 billion for 2024-25—which funds essential public services like schools and hospitals. Economic Injection: The extension ensures the continued injection of approximately $180 million per year into the economy and supports hundreds of local suppliers. Community Investment: Moolarben has invested over $1.2 million into regional groups through its Community Support Program, directly funding local GP recruitment and mental health services like Lifeline Central West. Environmental Safeguards: Net Gain in Woodland: The project is designed to deliver a net gain of 557 hectares of native woodland through a combination of progressive rehabilitation and biodiversity offsets. Water & Infrastructure Efficiency: By integrating with the existing complex, the project maximizes the use of current haul roads and processing facilities, reducing the need for new, high-impact industrial footprints. Job Security: Approval provides long-term certainty for approximately 790 full-time employees, ensuring specialized roles like mine remain viable through 2034 and beyond. I urge the Commission to approve the OC3 extension to protect these vital economic contributions and the livelihoods of the Moolarben workforce. Sincerely, |
Nicholas Roxby
|
ID |
14231 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe that the expansions to Moolarbens 0c3 complex will greatly help the mid-western area by creating / maintaining a large number of jobs for people within the area with extremely minor environmental effects. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14241 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to formally express my full support for the proposed Moolarben OC3 Mine Extension project operated by Yancoal Australia. The Moolarben Coal Mine has demonstrated its importance to the local and regional economy through the provision of secure employment, strong local procurement, and ongoing contributions to community development. The continuation of the OC3 operation will help maintain these economic benefits, providing job security for workers and stability for local businesses that rely on the mine’s operations. I acknowledge that the project has been subject to detailed environmental and technical assessments. It is reassuring that Yancoal has committed to operating within strict regulatory requirements and implementing mitigation measures to manage potential impacts on the environment, surrounding land uses, and local communities. The extension represents a logical and responsible use of an existing, well-established mining area, rather than expanding into new or undeveloped land. The OC3 Mine Extension will also support the continued supply of coal during the transition to a lower-emissions future, ensuring energy reliability while regional communities continue to benefit from resource development. Projects such as this play a vital role in balancing environmental responsibility with economic and social outcomes. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Mine Extension and encourage the relevant authorities to give it favorable consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14251 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This approval will have a huge positive impact on the local community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am supportive of the extension for Moolarben Coal Mine. The company is important for ongoing employment and job availability for the local community. It is important to continue to produce coal for our country and I believe the investment in alternative power methods are not sustainable and create different risks and impacts to the country. |
Adam Williams
|
ID |
14271 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Ulan coal mines are the lifeblood of Mudgee and surrounding towns. If they close it will seal Mudgees demise. Tourism and wineries are only there to support what the mines have given the region. No mines will see Mudgee become another small, has been rural town, with no infrastructure and residents stuck due to circumstance. Tourism will dry up as most of the shops in town are run by mining families, most the wineries in the region are propped up my mine wages, and most the residents in the area are here, in some part, for the mines. |
Nicholas Wright
|
ID |
14276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have been a mudgee shire resident my entire life and have. Seen how the area flourished due to the 3 mines in the area. Employment and community donations. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14281 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2329 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission must go ahead. We allow the destruction of land to build solar farms which have no way of recycling or plan of reclamation. Mines have strict regulations on rehab and the land is often better than pre mining |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14286 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mine's ongoing operations contribute millions annually to the Mid-Western region, helping sustain businesses and services in the area. Through its Community Support Program since 2010, Moolarben has distributed millions in grants and sponsorships to local organizations, funding initiatives in health, education, infrastructure and more which fosters stronger community ties and positive social impacts. It sustains hundreds of jobs, supporting around 700 positions directly and indirectly, while injecting substantial funds into the regional economy through wages, local contractor use, and procurement. Overall, Moolarben plays a key role in providing economic stability and community investment in the Mudgee region. |
David Riley
|
ID |
14371 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I have worked at the Moolarben Coal Complex for approximately 15 years and have firsthand experience with the operation, its people, and its engagement with the local community. Over this time, Moolarben has consistently demonstrated itself to be a company that operates with integrity, accountability, and a strong commitment to doing the right thing by its workforce and surrounding communities. The project provides significant and ongoing benefits to the local and regional community through direct employment, contractor engagement, and support of local businesses. Moolarben has also maintained strong support for local charities, sporting clubs, community organisations, and initiatives that contribute positively to the wellbeing of the area. This support has been consistent and meaningful. From an operational and environmental perspective, I have observed that rehabilitation activities at Moolarben have been well planned, well executed, and completed in a timely manner. Progressive rehabilitation has been undertaken effectively, demonstrating a genuine commitment to land restoration and responsible mine closure outcomes. The workforce culture at Moolarben places a strong emphasis on safety, training, and continuous improvement. Employment provided by the operation supports local families and helps maintain economic stability in the region, particularly in an area where long-term employment opportunities are critical. Based on my long-term experience at the site, I believe the OC3 Extension Project represents a responsible continuation of existing operations and will allow Moolarben to maintain employment, community support, and high operational standards into the future. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Dylan McDonald
|
ID |
14376 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as someone who was born and raised in the Mid Western Region and has spent my life watching our community grow and adapt. I have seen firsthand the positive impact the Moolarben Coal Complex has had on local families, businesses and community organisations since it began operating. My Key Points of Support •Jobs for Local People: The OC3 Extension will secure around 700 existing jobs—jobs that support local families, keep young people in the region, and drive stability in our towns. •Strong Contribution to the Local Economy: Moolarben contributes roughly $180 million each year to the local economy. This spending keeps our small businesses operating and supports long-term community growth. •Demonstrated Community Support: Since 2010, Moolarben has provided over $2 million in grants and sponsorships across education, sport, health, and the arts. I’ve personally seen how much this support means to local groups who rely on it. •Environmentally Responsible Expansion: oNo change to approved mine life (to 2038) or production rates oReduced disturbance footprint and increased environmental setbacks o557 ha net gain in woodland vegetation through rehabilitation o535 ha of native woodland rehabilitation and 188 ha of Habitat Enhancement Areas oNo final voids—a major long term landscape improvement oCareful buffers around creeks, nature reserves and habitat for threatened species •Uses Existing Disturbed Areas and Infrastructure: The extension area is south of the current mine on historically farmed land, with minimal amenity impact due to natural topography shielding residences. •Lowest Emissions Intensity Coal Mine in Australia: Moolarben continues to reduce emissions through shorter haul distances and more efficient equipment. Why I Support This Project Growing up here, I’ve watched coal mining help keep our region strong. The OC3 Extension doesn’t increase production or extend the life of the mine, it simply lets Moolarben continue operating responsibly while supporting the people who live here. This project provides certainty for local families, strengthens our economy, and continues a long track record of environmental improvement and community investment. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14381 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of OC3 pit for Moolarben on the fact that the Moolarben Operation is a major contributor to the local economy in more than one aspects. It provides jobs for the locals in the communities and with most of its workforce residing in Mudgee and nearby communities it sustains the local economy tremendously. This extension will allow longevity to the mine life and ensure continuous support to the local economy into the future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14386 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I moved to the Gulgong region 4 years ago and work at Moolarben Coal. I have decided to raise my family in this beautiful region, and this is only possible for us due to my work at Moolarben coal. Without this operator in the local area hundreds of jobs will be directly lost from Moolarben, whilst hundreds more from other local businesses will be lost from wives, husbands, children moving away if Moolarben was too close. This expansion of the mine is critical to maintain its feasibility in the current coal market, without it the operation risks the continued support by its owners due to low coal prices, meaning that the potential for downsizing is high with job losses likely. Moolarben along with the other coal mines in the area have been instrumental in shaping the region and without their continued support of the local economy the Mudgee region would fade into nothing. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14391 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a long-standing local business owner in the Mudgee region, I wish to express my support for the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. The mining sector is the largest employing industry in the Mid-Western Regional LGA, supporting approximately 17.6% of the local workforce and underpinning regional economic stability. For businesses like mine, the continuation of mining operations provides a reliable customer base, drives local spending, and sustains the flow of goods and services that keep our economy thriving. The OC3 Extension Project will help maintain employment for roughly 1,000 workers across the Moolarben complex, ensuring that families continue to live, work, and spend locally, which is essential for the long-term viability of small and medium businesses throughout the Mudgee region. This stability also supports downstream industries (transport, trades, hospitality, retail) and allows local enterprises to plan, invest, and grow with confidence. Mining royalties from this project will make a substantial contribution to the NSW economy, and these returns help strengthen regional infrastructure, community services, and local programs that improve quality of life across the greater Mudgee area. As a region that has prospered alongside mining for decades, the continuation of local mining operations ensures our community remains economically stable and resilient, particularly during periods of broader economic transition. The Moolarben OC3 Extension Project represents not just continuity, but long-term economic security for the Mudgee region. It supports local jobs, sustains local businesses, and strengthens the foundations upon which future generations will continue to build. For these reasons, I strongly support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
GRAHAM WHITE
|
ID |
14401 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2337 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
this is a great project and needs approval granted it will only be of benefit to the local area there is no negatives it's a great mine full of great people |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14406 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project because it provides ongoing economic stability, secure local jobs, and vital investment in the Mid‑Western Region. The project helps sustain local businesses through contracting and procurement, while also supporting apprenticeships and training that keep young people skilled and employed in the region. Moolarben has a strong record of contributing to community programs, sporting clubs, schools, and local infrastructure. The continuation of the project ensures these benefits remain in place and that the region continues to grow with a stable economic base. The extension has been designed to operate responsibly, with environmental management and rehabilitation measures that reflect the company’s long-standing commitment to sustainable operations. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Phil Maslen
|
ID |
14411 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
With this extension being granted it will provide the community with added and continued employment and security for the future of current employees. This will then assist in the small community based businesses to continue and support the Mudgee and surrounding areas. This will also help to continue to deliver around $180M into the local economy |
Wayne Kirkhope
|
ID |
14416 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The operation underpins stable, regional employment and sustains many local contractors, small businesses and service providers across the Mid-West. Continued production helps fund training and apprenticeships, local spending, and community investment through grants and sponsorships. I recognise the need to protect water, biodiversity, cultural heritage and amenity; the project should have transparent monitoring, and enforceable rehabilitation and offset commitments. With robust regulation and ongoing community engagement, the extension can deliver important economic and social benefits for the region while maintaining high environmental performance standards. |
Hannah McDonald
|
ID |
14421 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the OC3 Extension Project as the wife of a miner who has proudly worked at Moolarben Coal for several years. In that time, I’ve seen firsthand the positive impact the operation has had not only on my own family, but on the wider community around Mudgee and the Ulan region. When the mine first opened, we were a young family trying to build stability. The employment opportunities provided by Moolarben gave us that foundation. The mine has created hundreds of secure, well‑paid jobs that allow families like mine to put down roots, buy homes, and contribute to the local economy. These jobs don’t just support the workers, they support the businesses, schools, sports clubs, and community services that make this region strong. Beyond the direct employment, I’ve noticed genuine investment in community programs, local suppliers, and regional initiatives. Whether it’s funding local events, supporting charities, or working with schools and training organisations, the presence of the mine has increased opportunities that simply didn’t exist before. It has brought diversity, growth, and confidence back into the area. Most importantly, I’ve seen how the mine has brought people together. Families who might otherwise have been forced to move away for work can stay in the region, maintain connections, and build strong community ties. Many of us have formed lifelong friendships with other mining families. The sense of community spirit, supported in part by stable employment and shared experiences has never been stronger. I know mining projects are complex and require careful consideration, but from where I stand, the OC3 Extension represents continued stability for local families, ongoing economic strength for businesses, and more opportunities for the next generation. The mine has already shown a strong commitment to responsible operations, safety, and environmental management, and I am confident that will continue as the project progresses. For our family, for our neighbours, and for the broader community, the extension of Moolarben’s operations means security, opportunity, and ongoing positive contribution to the region we love. I fully support the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14426 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the open cut 3 project as I feel it will have great economic benefits to the state and the local community as well as the continued and new employment of local people. The extension can only benefit the township of Mudgee with local businesses being supported by Moolarben by using local industry to make the extension a complete success. The state and the town can only move forward with this project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14431 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe there is a clear requirement for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project to be approved, not only in the interests of the local community but also in the national interest. Coal continues to play a critical role in supporting everyday living in Australia, contributing to both local and national revenue, providing job security, and sustaining regional economies. The project would help maintain economic stability and employment for workers and families who rely on the coal industry. While the transition to renewable energy is important, it is evident that renewable energy sources have not yet been implemented at a scale or level of reliability that allows Australians to have full confidence in a complete transition. At present, there is no secure, reliable, and consistent alternative capable of fully replacing coal-fired power without risking energy security and affordability. Until a proven and dependable green energy solution is established, coal remains necessary to ensure continuity of power supply and economic stability. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Please note that my submission is in support of approving the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. |
Steven Gale
|
ID |
14436 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2844 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Continuing the life of Moolarben Coal Mine secures my job and income, allowing my family to remain in Mudgee, support local businesses, and raise our children in the community we call home. Ongoing operations means stability, opportunity, and the ability to keep a roof over our heads, long term security. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14446 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support this extension because it helps provide many local employment opportunities and supports our community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14461 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2281 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This project represents an opportunity to continue employment and investment in the Mudgee region for the future. This is a region that has co-existed with mining since the late 1800s, with coal mining being the backbone of the community since the 1920s. Mining is not new in this region. It is supports industries that keep the region thriving. It has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits to the region and state over many years, and the expansion will ensure that proceeds from mining continue to benefit local people. It is vital that Government supports regional Australia, and the best way to do that is to ensure there are jobs and investment, and a diversity of opportunity to attract, and keep people in the region. The mines recently provided funding to attract doctors to the Mudgee region - which supports the health and wellbeing of the rural and regional lifestyle. Mining supports a wide range of industries in the region. It provides income for small businesses, and opportunity for small business that would not exist without mining. Mines have to meet strict Government standards, and the monitoring regime for emissions is extremely regulated. While mining does have environmental impacts, the products from mining are required for renewable alternatives. Coal mining is essential to sustain human existence at the moment. There are no alternatives at the moment that would ensure our communities could be appropriately powered, and no alternatives that would allow development of renewable energy suitable to sustain communities. Coal mining is vital to the transition of power to renewables, and it is vital to ensure out rural and regional centres continue to thrive. |
David Bennett
|
ID |
14466 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2320 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the approval of the Moolarben Open Cut OC3 Extension project. Moolarben coal operate responsibly, ethically and are a community minded business. This is evidenced by employing local people, doing business locally and supporting local charities and organisations through the Community Support Program. MCO also operate withing their current environmental conditions. This Mine has been in operation for many years and the continuation is essential for the local economy and for the families who rely on the employment it generates. The standards set at Moolarben in terms of their progressive rehabilitation program is of a very high standard and further demonstrates their commitment to being responsible environmental stewards of the land. Given this is a Mine extension, all of the infrastructure and management systems are in place to give certainty to the OC3 extension being a further success and good news story for the local economy and community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14471 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is an important employer in the Mudgee region as well as NSW. Not approving this project will mean 895 people's jobs will be at risk and the majority of those live in the local area meaning further impact to the local community and businesses that rely on the mine and workers for support. |
Tim Slater
|
ID |
14486 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the extension of the existing open cut mine for the following benefits that it will provide; Ongoing employment of over 1,100 permanent jobs (900 full time employees which is $160M in wages), being employees and contractors, the vast majority of which live locally in the Mudgee area, directly supporting local shops and businesses. Continued Royalties to the government. There are no changes to the approved mine life or production rates. Spend with local and NSW suppliers/vendors that support the mine operation, with direct economic contribution to NSW >$1 billion No final voids (reducing final voids from one to zero). The operation has operated under consent conditions, and will continue to do so, with an extremely high level of compliance and governance to the mining conditions that are reviewed and assessed by the Department. We support a significant amount of local charities and NFP organizations' that support the Mudgee community across many areas through our Community Support Program. |
Alex Sevil
|
ID |
14516 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Hundreds of jobs would be lost, humdreds of families would be affected if the mines life would be cut short, resulting in families having to leave the Mudgee area to find more work |
Patrick Elsegood
|
ID |
14541 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I see Moolarben extension vital to the community, workers and local businesses in the area Most of all it’s important for my family and kids in the area where Moolarben contributes to great community facilities |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Queensland 4715 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This will be a great project for the local community as Yancoal provides jobs and security in resources. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work for a contractor who services Moolarben Coal. Should this expansion go ahead it would ensure that my company would continue to gain work, therefore keeping myself in employment. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
It’s very beneficial for the Mid-Western area with more opportunities for growth, skills for workers, locals and other businesses |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2422 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the development proposal, and feel it will benefit the community in many ways. |
Alex Byrnes
|
ID |
14566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2380 |
|
Date |
02/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support this project that will increase local jobs and benefit all Australians through the mining of our rich natural resources. |
Damian Oshea
|
ID |
14106 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my personal support for the proposed mining extension and associated approval currently under consideration. I understand that mining plays an important role in supporting local employment, regional economic stability, and the ongoing supply of essential resources. The continuation and extension of existing operations allows these benefits to be maintained while making use of established infrastructure, workforce expertise, and regulatory frameworks. I also acknowledge the importance of environmental management and community consultation in projects of this nature. Based on the information provided, I am satisfied that appropriate measures are in place to manage environmental impacts, ensure worker safety, and meet relevant regulatory requirements. I support the ongoing monitoring and compliance processes that accompany the extension. From a community perspective, the extension provides continuity for workers and their families and contributes positively to local businesses and services. I believe that approving this extension represents a balanced approach that considers economic, social, and environmental factors. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this matter. I respectfully request that this submission be taken into consideration as part of the assessment process. Yours sincerely, Damian Oshea |
Chris Kinsela
|
ID |
14146 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the proposed development Moolarben supports the surrounding communities greatly and there are a great asset to the region |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14151 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2830 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my support for the proposed extension of OC3 at the Moolarben Coal Mine. I make this submission as a local contractor who currently works at the site and has done so for a number of years. My business is based locally, and a significant portion of our work and employment is directly linked to ongoing operations at Moolarben. The continuation of OC3 is critical to maintaining stable work for myself, my employees, and many other contractors and suppliers in the region. The mine supports not only direct jobs on site but also a wide network of local businesses, including transport operators, maintenance providers, accommodation, and retail services. From my firsthand experience, Moolarben is a well-managed operation with strong safety, environmental, and compliance standards. The workforce is professional, and there is a clear focus on minimising impacts and operating within approved conditions. As a contractor working on site, I have seen consistent efforts to improve safety systems, environmental controls, and communication with workers and stakeholders. The extension of OC3 will provide certainty of work and income, which is especially important in regional areas like ours where employment opportunities can be limited. This certainty allows local businesses to invest in equipment, training, and apprenticeships, and helps families remain in the area rather than having to relocate for work. Without the OC3 extension, there would be a real risk of job losses and reduced economic activity in the region. This would have flow-on effects for the wider community and undermine the stability that the mine currently provides. Based on my experience as a local contractor working at Moolarben, I strongly support the proposed extension of OC3 and believe it is in the best interests of workers, local businesses, and the broader regional economy. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14156 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, My name is (Redacted), and I am a local resident of Mudgee. My family has strong ties to the Moolarben Coal, with several members employed there. I am writing to express my support for the proposed OC3 Extension Project. Moolarben Coal is not only a significant employer in our community, but it also provides stability and opportunities for local families like mine. Employment at the mine allows our community to thrive and supports local businesses, schools, and services. Extending the operations through the OC3 project will ensure that these benefits continue into the future, providing security for current workers and creating opportunities for the next generation. As locals, we have seen firsthand the commitment Moolarben has to environmental management, safety, and community engagement. The company invests in initiatives that support both the local economy and community wellbeing. The proposed OC3 Extension Project demonstrates responsible planning and aligns with the region’s long-term economic needs. I strongly support the OC3 Extension Project and encourage its approval, as it will safeguard jobs, support local families, and contribute to the ongoing prosperity of our region. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) |
Aaron Nolan
|
ID |
14161 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am currently employed at Moolarben Coal as an electrician and have been working at the site for 5 years and 6 months. I am making this submission to express my concern regarding the potential impacts on my employment should the OC3 Extension not be approved. My role at Moolarben Coal is directly linked to the continuation of mining operations associated with the OC3 extension. Without the extension the ongoing viability of my postion would be significantly affected and I face the real prospect of losing my employment. This would have substantial consequences not only for me personally but also for my family and our finacial security. Employment provided by the Moolarben operations supports skilled workers like myslef who live in the local and regional community. The loss of jobs would have flow-on effects for local businesses, contractors and services that rely on a stable workforce an ongoing operations at the mine. I acknowledge that the independent planning commison must carfully consider environmental, social and economic factors when assessing this project. However, I beleive that the social and economic impacts associate with job losses and reduced employemnt opportunities in the region should be given significant weight. Continued employment allows workers to remain in the area to support loacal econmies and maintain stable livelihoods. The OC3 Extension provides certainty of employment for myslef and many other workers at the site. Approval of the extension would support job security, workforce retention and the broader economic stability of the region. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards, Aaron Nolan Electrican- Moolarben Coal |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14171 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to make a submission in support of the proposed Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I am a local resident, and my family has long-standing ties to the Moolarben Coal Complex, with several family members employed at the site. I am also currently employed at Moolarben Coal as an apprentice. The operation plays a significant role in supporting not only my family, but many other local families throughout our region. As an apprentice, Moolarben provides me with valuable training, skills development, and long-term career opportunities that allow me to remain living and working locally. The continuation of operations through the OC3 Extension Project is critical to ensuring that apprentices like myself can complete our training, gain meaningful employment, and build stable futures within our community. From my experience working at Moolarben, I have seen a strong commitment to safety, environmental management, and responsible operations. The site provides secure employment and contributes positively to the local economy by supporting local businesses, contractors, and community services. Approval of the OC3 Extension Project will provide certainty for workers, apprentices, and their families, and will help maintain economic stability in the region. It will allow Moolarben to continue investing in its workforce and the surrounding community. I strongly support the proposed OC3 Extension Project and respectfully encourage its approval. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Yours sincerely, |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14196 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Project will create more jobs for the locals and also attract other businesses to the area which will increase the local economy. |
Chris Deer
|
ID |
14206 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local community member and I support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The project provides ongoing employment and economic benefits to the local area. Extending OC3 will help maintain stable jobs and support local families and businesses, which is important for the long-term viability of our community. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14211 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to lodge a positive submission in support of the proposed Moolarben Open Cut Extension Project. I acknowledge that any land-use development has environmental impacts, and it is appropriate these impacts are assessed seriously and transparently. However, it is equally important that assessments are balanced, evidence-based, and grounded in regional and environmental reality, rather than driven by perception alone. One of the most overlooked aspects of this project is the demonstrated rehabilitation performance already achieved across the Moolarben mining lease. Progressive rehabilitation has resulted in large areas of land being actively restored, revegetated, and monitored. These rehabilitated areas now support a clear and ongoing presence of native wildlife, including birds, reptiles, and mammals. This provides practical evidence that well-managed mining land can be rehabilitated into functioning ecosystems rather than left as permanent environmental damage. In many cases, the mining lease provides more stable and protected habitat than surrounding land subject to unmanaged clearing, grazing pressure, or residential expansion. The presence of native animals across the lease is observable and ongoing, and reflects deliberate environmental management rather than incidental outcomes. It is also critical to consider the broader land-use and climate context in which this proposal is being assessed. Large-scale metropolitan development results in permanent land clearing, extensive hard surfaces, and the loss of vegetation that plays a role in carbon sequestration, temperature regulation, and water absorption. Urban expansion contributes directly to urban heat island effects, increased energy demand, higher transport emissions, and long-term increases in greenhouse gas output. Unlike mining operations, metropolitan developments typically offer no meaningful rehabilitation pathway. Once bushland is converted to housing, roads, and infrastructure, the loss of habitat, carbon sinks, and climate-regulating landscapes is effectively irreversible. These developments also rely on continuous population growth, vehicle use, and energy consumption, compounding their long-term climate impact. By contrast, mining projects such as Moolarben operate under strict regulatory frameworks, including biodiversity management plans, rehabilitation targets, progressive land restoration, and legally binding closure obligations. These requirements ensure that land is not only managed during operations but actively returned to a rehabilitated state over time, with environmental outcomes monitored for decades. Beyond environmental considerations, the economic and social contribution of the mining industry to the Mudgee region is substantial. The Moolarben operation supports direct employment, local contractors, and a wide range of flow-on business opportunities, including transport, maintenance, accommodation, hospitality, and regional services. This activity underpins population stability, sustains local businesses, and enables regional growth that would not otherwise occur. The mining industry has played a key role in allowing Mudgee to develop as a resilient regional centre, providing employment pathways and economic security for local families. Restricting responsibly managed projects such as this extension would have real and immediate consequences for employment and business viability within the region. Many objections to this project come from individuals who do not live in, work in, or depend on the Mudgee region, and therefore do not experience the direct environmental, social, or economic trade-offs involved. While all perspectives should be considered, it is essential that decision-making gives appropriate weight to the views and needs of host communities who live with both the responsibilities and benefits of regional development. In my view, the Moolarben Open Cut Extension represents a project where environmental management, climate considerations, rehabilitation performance, and regional economic sustainability have been appropriately balanced. The proposal demonstrates that mining, when properly regulated and responsibly operated, can coexist with environmental stewardship while supporting regional livelihoods. For these reasons, I support the approval of the Moolarben Open Cut Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. Kind regards, |
Michael Connor
|
ID |
14221 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
01/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to make a submission in support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I am currently employed at the Moolarben site and I live in a nearby local town with my family. I have three young children, and the stability of ongoing work at Moolarben is extremely important to us. My job at the mine provides secure employment, allows me to support my family, and enables us to continue living and contributing to the local community. I genuinely enjoy my role at the site and take pride in working for an operation that maintains strong safety standards and provides opportunities for local workers. The project supports not only my own family, but many others in the region through direct employment and flow-on benefits to local businesses, schools, and services. The continuation of mining through the OC3 Extension would provide long-term job security for workers like myself and help ensure the economic stability of our community. Being able to work close to home also means I can spend valuable time with my children, which is especially important while they are young. I respectfully ask that my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project be taken into consideration during the assessment process. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. Kind regards, Michael |
Jyi Crowley
|
ID |
13921 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed OC3 Extension at Yancoal Moolarben Coal. I have lived and worked in the Mudgee region for many years and am currently employed at Moolarben Coal as a Field Service Mechanic and Asset Health Technician. From both a personal and professional perspective, I believe the continuation of this project will deliver significant long-term benefits to the local community, workforce, and regional economy. One of the most important impacts of the OC3 Extension is job security. The project supports hundreds of direct jobs and many more indirect roles through contractors, suppliers, and service providers. For people like myself, this means the ability to continue living locally, raising families in the region, and contributing to the community without needing to relocate for work. The project also plays a major role in supporting local businesses. From fuel suppliers, mechanical workshops, accommodation providers, cafes, transport companies, and trades, the flow-on economic effects of mining activity in the area are substantial. These businesses rely heavily on the stability that projects like OC3 provide. Yancoal has consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to safety, training, and workforce development. The company provides ongoing upskilling, apprenticeships, and career pathways for local people, including young workers entering the industry. This helps build a skilled, resilient workforce in the region and creates real long-term career opportunities. In addition, Yancoal has made positive contributions to the community through sponsorships, donations, and involvement in local events and organisations. These contributions directly benefit schools, sporting clubs, emergency services, and community groups, helping strengthen social connections across the region. From an operational perspective, I have seen first-hand the high standards applied to safety, environmental management, and responsible operations on site. The continuation of OC3 allows these standards to remain in place while supporting regional employment and economic stability. In summary, I strongly support the OC3 Extension as it provides: Ongoing employment and job security Economic stability for local businesses Skills development and career pathways Community investment and sponsorship The ability for families to remain living locally I believe the OC3 Extension is in the best interests of the Mudgee region and will continue to deliver positive outcomes for the local community for many years to come. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13931 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the continued operation and future development of the Moolarben Coal Mine. The mine is an important contributor to both the local and regional economy and provides significant benefits to the community. The Moolarben Coal Mine plays a vital role in supporting local employment, providing hundreds of jobs directly and indirectly to families in the region. These opportunities are crucial for sustaining communities, supporting local businesses, and ensuring the long-term economic stability of the area. Beyond employment, the mine contributes to essential infrastructure and services, including roads, utilities, and community programs, which benefit residents and surrounding towns. Additionally, coal remains a key component of Australia’s energy supply, helping to provide reliable and secure energy for both domestic and industrial use. I also acknowledge the company’s commitment to responsible environmental management. The mine operates under strict regulations to manage impacts on air, water, and land. Rehabilitation programs ensure that land affected by mining is restored and maintained for future use. This demonstrates that economic development and environmental stewardship can coexist. Furthermore, the Moolarben Coal Mine actively supports the local community through sponsorships, educational initiatives, and social programs. The company’s engagement helps strengthen community ties and provides opportunities for future generations. For these reasons, I fully support the Moolarben Coal Mine and encourage the relevant authorities to continue to approve and support its operations. The mine is a vital asset to the region, providing employment, economic growth, and responsible management of natural resources. Thank you |
Vincent Lugg
|
ID |
13936 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing as a local resident and member of the Moolarben community to express my support for the proposed Open Cut 3 Extension. Our community is closely connected to the Moolarben Coal Mine, not only through employment but through the stability it provides to local families, businesses, and services. Many households in the area rely directly or indirectly on the mine for their livelihoods. For families like mine, the continuation of operations is critical to maintaining financial security and remaining part of the local community. I am aware that there is concern from some members of the public regarding potential impacts on koalas and other native wildlife. Protecting the local environment is important to those of us who live here, and it is something that should be taken seriously. From what I have seen firsthand, Moolarben Coal has demonstrated a strong commitment to environmental management and rehabilitation. The mine’s rehabilitation program has created areas that are actively attracting native animals back into the landscape, showing that responsible mining and environmental care can coexist. The extension of Open Cut 3 will allow the mine to continue supporting local employment while maintaining and expanding its rehabilitation and environmental management efforts. Without this extension, the consequences for local workers, their families, and the broader community would be significant. I believe that the proposed extension represents a balanced approach that considers economic, social, and environmental factors. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that the Open Cut 3 Extension be approved, ensuring continued support for our community while maintaining responsible environmental practices. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
matthew eccleston
|
ID |
13941 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
This submission expresses my support for the proposed extension of the Moolarben Coal Operations on the basis of its demonstrated and ongoing benefits to local employment, regional infrastructure, and environmental rehabilitation outcomes. The extension presents an opportunity to balance economic continuity with responsible land stewardship and biodiversity outcomes. The mine extension will sustain and create long-term employment opportunities for local residents, apprentiships for school leavers, contractors, and service providers. Continued operation supports workforce retention, skills development, and economic stability in the region, reducing reliance on short-term or transient employment cycles. Flow-on benefits to local businesses, suppliers, and community services further strengthen the social and economic fabric of the community. |
John Sewell
|
ID |
14071 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work at moolarben and have done for 15 years ,it is a company that has looked after its people the community and the environment by rehabilitation and other means. My future employment hear allows me to contribute to the community, the future of moolarben also affects members of my family as my son drives trains that take coal to the port ,reducing the life of moolarben will have a flow on effect to us all. |
Michael Bethune
|
ID |
14076 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I live in the area, I am FOR the extension as it will bring heaps of work into our town and boost the local shops and will do extremely well to help all locals and not locals. If it doesn't go ahead thousands of people will lose jobs and thousands of people will be homeless and have to relocate, kids, families etc etc. This has to be approved or the country will and small towns will collapse. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14081 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a local community member and I support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The mine provides essential long-term jobs and supports many local families and businesses. Extending OC3 will help protect employment and economic stability in our region, where there are limited alternative job opportunities. For these reasons, I support approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14091 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my support for the proposed 0C3 Moolarben Coal Extension. The Moolarben operation has been an important contributor to the local and regional economy for many years. The proposed extension provides an opportunity to continue this contribution by supporting ongoing employment, local businesses, and economic stability in the region. For many families, the mine represents secure jobs and livelihoods, and extending operations would help maintain certainty for workers and the broader community. I also acknowledge the importance of responsible environmental management. It is encouraging that the project is subject to strict regulatory oversight and environmental controls, and I support the continued implementation of measures to minimise impacts on land, water, and surrounding ecosystems. With appropriate monitoring, compliance, and rehabilitation commitments, the extension can be managed in a way that balances economic benefits with environmental responsibility. In addition, the extension makes practical use of existing infrastructure and approved mining areas, which helps reduce the need for new disturbance compared to developing entirely new sites. This approach supports a more efficient and considered use of resources. For these reasons, I believe the 0C3 Moolarben Coal Extension is in the best interests of the local community and the region more broadly, and I respectfully support its approval. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
14096 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mudgee has a growing population that will be greatly affected by the mines in the local area not continuing. Thousands of people rely directly on the mines. I’ve just bought a house in Mudgee and wish to grow our family here and if the mines do not continue we will be forced to move as there is no other work in the area for the vast tradesman and operators |
Matthew Holt
|
ID |
14101 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
31/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Moolarben is a major supporter of the community and employs a large amount of locals, without this extension a lot of people will be without work in the area and be forced to move or work away. I fear Mudgee and surrounding suburbs will suffer dramatically without the investment from Moolarben and its employees. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13546 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The Moolarben Coal Mine has been a significant and longstanding contributor to the Mudgee community and the surrounding local government areas for more than a decade. The proposed expansion will help ensure the continuity of local employment and support ongoing economic stability and growth across the region. Its positive impacts extend well beyond the mine’s direct workforce, providing continued opportunities for local businesses, families, and the broader community. I offer my personal support for this expansion, alongside many others within the community who recognise the value it brings to our region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13551 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Please approve this extension for our local community! |
Simon Bell
|
ID |
13556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I write this submission in support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The proposed extension represents an important opportunity to maintain economic stability, employment, and long‑term sustainability for the local community and the broader Upper Hunter and Mid‑Western regions. Mining has long been a cornerstone of the regional economy, and the continuation of existing operations through the OC3 Extension will provide certainty for workers, families, businesses, and local communities while ensuring responsible resource development aligned with current environmental and regulatory standards. The OC3 Extension focuses on the continuation and optimisation of an existing mining footprint rather than the establishment of a new greenfield operation. This approach supports sustainable land use by: Maximising the value of existing infrastructure and operational approvals Minimising additional disturbance and reducing the need for new supporting works Allowing progressive rehabilitation to continue in parallel with active mining areas By extending the life of the operation, the project enables ongoing investment in environmental management, monitoring, and rehabilitation strategies that are already in place, ensuring land is returned to stable and productive post‑mining use. The project provides significant benefits through the preservation of direct and indirect employment. The OC3 Extension will: Maintain hundreds of highly skilled direct mining jobs Support indirect employment across contractors, suppliers, and service industries Retain local knowledge, skills, and experience within the workforce Job security allows workers and their families to remain in the region, supporting population stability and long‑term community cohesion. Without this extension, job losses would have broader flow‑on effects across the local economy. The continuation of the Moolarben operation contributes materially to economic growth at the local and regional level through: Ongoing wages and household spending that support small businesses Continued procurement from local and regional suppliers Royalties, rates, and contributions that support public services and infrastructure This economic activity underpins the viability of local towns and helps ensure continued investment in community facilities, transport networks, and services. Stable employment and economic activity directly benefit community wellbeing. The OC3 Extension supports: Continued enrolments in local schools Sustained demand for local health and community services Stronger volunteer networks and sporting clubs Uncertainty around project continuity can have negative social impacts. The extension provides reassurance for families planning their futures in the region, promoting confidence and resilience within the community. Long‑term employment and economic certainty are key factors that influence property values and investment confidence. The project helps to: Maintain demand for housing in nearby towns Support property values by reducing economic volatility Encourage further private and public investment in the region Communities that retain stable industries are better positioned to attract and maintain residents, services, and infrastructure. The Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project offers clear and tangible benefits to sustainability, employment, economic growth, and community wellbeing. By extending an existing operation with established environmental controls and infrastructure, the project represents a responsible approach to resource development. I strongly support the approval of the OC3 Extension and encourage decision‑makers to consider the significant social, economic, and regional benefits it delivers to local communities and New South Wales more broadly. |
Chad Chandler
|
ID |
13561 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I believe the extension for OC3 is a key milestone for the Mudgee Community. We, as a community are thriving with young families who have relocated to the town making a positive impact. Moolarben Coal are major contributors to the town we call home, and provide assistance to many organisations throughout the region. Their place of work has no negative impact on the town, being approx 40km away. They drive a strong culture to not bring work into the community, allowing it to be a strong regional tourism and agriculture town. I fully support this extension and future extensions within the region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13566 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Its extremely important for the district and for bussinesses |
Thomas Hudson
|
ID |
13576 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I fully support the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Coal Complex are a major employer in the Mid Western Region of NSW and contributes significant funding each year to local community organizations. The location of this extension will have no effect to the local towns or residents that live in the Mudgee / Gulgong community as the Mine is situated well outside the populated regions. Moolarben Coal Complex has been a major driver in bringing new families to the Mid Western Region supporting growth and sustainability of the local community. |
Nicholas Kuhne
|
ID |
13581 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed Open Cut 3 Extension at Moolarben Coal Operations. The extension represents a critical opportunity to sustain employment, strengthen the local economy, and continue delivering long-term benefits to the Upper Hunter region and surrounding communities. Employment Security and Job Creation: The Open Cut 3 Extension will play a vital role in securing ongoing employment for a large local workforce. Moolarben Coal Operations is a major employer in the region, providing stable, well-paid jobs across a wide range of roles including mining, maintenance, engineering, environmental management, and administration. Approval of the extension will: Maintain existing jobs that local families rely on Support apprenticeships, traineeships, and skills development Provide certainty for contractors and service providers who depend on mine operations In an industry where long-term planning and job security are essential, the extension offers confidence and stability for workers and their families. Benefits to the Local Economy: The continued operation of Open Cut 3 will generate significant economic benefits for the local and regional economy. Mining operations support not only direct employment, but also a large network of local businesses including equipment suppliers, transport operators, engineering firms, accommodation providers, and retail services. These economic flows help: Sustain small and medium businesses in nearby towns Increase local spending and investment Strengthen the economic resilience of the Upper Hunter region. Without projects such as this extension, many of these businesses would face uncertainty and potential decline. Community Investment and Regional Support Moolarben Coal Operations has a strong track record of supporting the local community through investment in infrastructure, community programs, and local initiatives. Ongoing operations allow continued contributions to: Community groups and sporting clubs Local training and education pathways Infrastructure upgrades and regional development The extension ensures these positive contributions can continue well into the future. The Open Cut 3 Extension at Moolarben Coal Operations is essential for protecting jobs, supporting families, and maintaining the economic health of the local community. The project provides long-term employment certainty, underpins regional businesses, and enables continued investment in community outcomes. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Open Cut 3 Extension and encourage decision-makers to recognise the significant social and economic benefits it will deliver to the region. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13586 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I wish to express my support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The OC3 Extension allows Moolarben to make continued use of its established infrastructure, reducing the need for additional land disturbance and enabling the site to operate more sustainably within its existing footprint. The project also provides long‑term stability for the region by maintaining a reliable economic base for contractors, suppliers, and associated industries that depend on the mine’s ongoing operations. This continuity is important for the overall resilience of the Mid‑Western Region’s economy. |
Haydn West
|
ID |
13596 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
1. Introduction I am a local resident and worker in the region, and I make this submission in support of approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. I ask the Independent Planning Commission to approve the Project, subject to appropriate conditions, as it represents a sensible continuation of an existing operation that is important to local jobs and economic stability. 2. Existing Operation and Managed Extension The OC3 Extension Project is not a new mine. It is a limited extension of an established operation that has been operating for many years under strict regulatory controls. From a local perspective, this matters. The Project: Uses existing infrastructure Extends an already-approved mining area Avoids the impacts associated with opening a new greenfield site This is a managed continuation, not a major expansion. 3. Local Jobs and Community Stability As someone who lives and/or works in the area, I see firsthand how important the mine is to: Ongoing local employment Supporting families and local businesses Maintaining stability in nearby towns Sudden project closures or refusals create uncertainty for workers and the broader community. Extending the life of an existing operation allows people to plan, retrain if needed, and transition in an orderly way. 4. Environmental Management and Oversight I acknowledge that mining has impacts, but I am satisfied that: The Project has been thoroughly assessed Environmental impacts are regulated through enforceable conditions Monitoring and compliance provide safeguards for surrounding land and water Importantly, the mine is already operating in this environment, and impacts are understood and managed within the current regulatory framework. 5. Public Interest In my view, approval of the Project is in the public interest because it: Supports local jobs and the regional economy Builds on an existing, approved development Balances environmental management with social and economic realities This is consistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development and responsible resource management. 6. Conclusion For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Independent Planning Commission approve the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, subject to appropriate conditions. Thank you for considering this submission and the perspectives of people who live and work in the local area. |
Lee Stewart
|
ID |
13601 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Mining in Australia has kept this country moving along for decades. Preventing another mining project from going ahead, especially here in the Mudgee region will have a huge ripple effect, that could potentially be felt for generations. My family & thousands of other families have invested in housing, education & their own business ventures. Which has made Mudgee what it is today. Mudgee is the best town with the best people & this comes from a person that has travelled this great country & has come back home to roost. So, preventing this project will stop economic growth in the area, families will be forced to move away & employment opportunities for the young Australian will disappear & we the people, don't want this to happen. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13606 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2323 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a contractor from the Newcastle area who works for Moolarben both onsite and from home from time to time. So, I have a personal interest in this extension being approved. As a result of working onsite, I have spent hundreds of dollars in Mudgee, contributing to the local economy. This mine has already greatly benefitted the local area and I believe this extension will continue to do that. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13611 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the approval of Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project, as it will continue to support the local area and provide numerous jobs and opportunities to the local community. |
william browne
|
ID |
13616 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2820 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
the expansion of Moolarben coal mine will continue to support the community by continuing to support the community financially, supporting local businesses and providing locals with a secure job and income. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13631 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the expansion project at Moolarben Coal as i live and work in Mudgee. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13636 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Continue employment for local families Continue funding sports with grants Continue support within the community with community events such as Carols/Fireworks etc |
scott Turner
|
ID |
13646 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I have lived and worked in Mudgee since 2012 where i have been employed by the mining company's in this area. I am in favor of the extension as this will directly affect my family if it is not approved. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13651 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
As a local resident of the Mudgee community I strongly support the approval of the proposed OC3 expansion project. I moved to the region in 2017 and have been in support of mining the whole time. Undeniably Mudgee is the successful and prosperous town that it is directly as a result of mining projects. I have seen the mining companies in this area all act with diligence and integrity when it comes to all aspects of operating mines in the area. With the strict regulations that are imposed on mining i have no doubt that the mines can continue to operate in a manner that minimises any effect on the local community and the environment. In fact I would challenge that no other industry in the area including primary production have such strict regulations imposed on how they operate. Again i fully support this project and all other mining projects in the area and more broadly across NSW and Australia. we need to support these projects if we are serious about the future of this country and wish to maintain a high standard of living that we are used to as Australians. |
Robbie Knowles
|
ID |
13656 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am happy for the OC3 extension project to move forward. I feel that the mining industry makes a positive impact within our community. |
Daniel Delahunty
|
ID |
13666 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the Moolarben OC3 Extension project. I am an employee at Moolarben and have been since May 2017. I moved to the Mudgee area in order to work at Moolarben. I support the OC3 extension project because I see it as an important source of continued positive economic impact in the Mid-Western region by ensuring higher levels of mining activity in the region for longer. Over the years that Moolarben has been in operation it has been a significant employer of people in the region who have generally been able to earn incomes well above NSW’s median salary. This in turn has had positive economic effects on Mudgee and Gulgong, and other parts of the region leading to increased investment in housing and growth in the region’s businesses. Moolarben together with the other coal mines in the region also helped to ensure the presence of steady incomes in many households in the region lessening the negative impacts of events like the COVID 19 lock downs and different periods of decreased tourist numbers visiting the region. The OC3 Extension Project will help Moolarben to continue to make positive economic contributions to the region into the future. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13671 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I would like to submit that the Moolarben extension of OC3 should go ahead and I support the request. The local community relies on mining and we have seen some really great benefits to the area due to having a healthy community environment and funding from the mines. The legal obligations around regard and the environment currently are quite extensive which is positive for the future of that area once the mining lease has finished. If this extension was not to go through, what would that land be used for that could currently support the community of Mudgee instead? I strongly urge to take into consideration the positive alignment yancoal has with the environment and allow this to progress or the outcome for families and the current land with be significantly worse off. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13676 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
The mines provide support to the community and employs majority of families it would be a shame to see it not continue |
Thomas Budd
|
ID |
13681 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Myself and my family will be directly affected by the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project not going ahead, as we have recently moved to the area to work at the Moolarben coal operation with the plan on working there well in to the future, this extension not being approved will force myself and my family to have to leave the area and find alternative work along with everyone else that is employed at Moolarben Coal. |
Tyron Reynolds
|
ID |
13691 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2849 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am a member of the local community and currently employed at Moolarben coal mine. Not only will the effect myself, but it will affect the entire town. Moolarben coal mine is the biggest coal mine that we have in the central west by far, and if this mine was rejected and was forced to close it would have a significant overall effect on the local community. |
Graeme Tourle
|
ID |
13696 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the coal mine extension. The project is vital for preserving existing jobs and creating ongoing employment opportunities in our community. Mining remains a key contributor to local businesses, infrastructure funding, and regional development. Extending the mine ensures continuity for workers and their families while supporting Australia’s energy and export sectors. Coal is still currently the most reliable source of energy and needs to play a role until other reliable infrastructure can be implemented. This project can keep many families in the reginal town of Mudgee. |
Andrew Penfold
|
ID |
13701 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2852 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Without the continued support of mining in this community, we stand to lose those who are directly and indirectly employed by mines such as moolarben from said community. We have seen this happen with countless other towns when industry closes, and the workforce moves on. If we continue down the path of demonizing all mining, we stand to lose a large portion of the economic input into the town and surrounding businesses. I feel that this submission should be assessed not on the political ideology, but on its merit and contribution to the families and businesses of the community. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the OC3 Extension Project. |
Jonathan Chapman
|
ID |
13721 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Public Submission in Support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and to highlight the significant positive contribution that coal mining has made—and continues to make—to the Mudgee region. Coal mining has been a cornerstone of the local economy for decades, delivering substantial benefits to the community well beyond direct employment. Moolarben Coals community support program continues to support local schools, sporting clubs, health services, community groups, and critical regional infrastructure. These contributions have had a lasting and meaningful impact on the social fabric and liveability of the Mudgee area. In addition, the direct and indirect economic benefits generated by mining workers and contractors are vital to the region. Wages and business income support local shops, accommodation providers, hospitality venues, trades, and service industries, creating strong flow-on effects throughout the local economy. This sustained economic activity underpins employment, population stability, and business confidence across the region. The OC3 Extension Project is an important piece of infrastructure that supports the continued operation and efficiency of the mining sector while providing certainty for workers, contractors, and local businesses. By enabling existing operations to continue in a planned and responsible manner, the project helps protect jobs, maintain investment, and ensure ongoing community and economic benefits for Mudgee and surrounding areas. I support the progression of the OC3 Extension Project and recognise its importance in maintaining a strong regional economy, supporting community outcomes, and securing long-term benefits for the Mudgee area. Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13726 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
THE COAL MINES BRING LOTS OF JOBS TO LOCALS |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13886 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
Redacted |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I support the approval of the project. Moolarben is a huge supporter of the local community. Have a busy town with plenty of employment brings services and support businesses to the communty allowing Mudgee to stay the best country town in NSW. Yancoal is a great employer and supports families and locals this town had nothing going before mining. Now it has great investment and tourism which wouldnt be anywhere near its current state without the steady support of the mining industry. Dont ruin a good thing by not approving this project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13901 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2291 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing in support of the OC3 Extension Project at the Moolarben Coal Complex. The OC3 Extension Project will be integrated with the existing Moolarben Coal Complex, which is already approved to operate until 2038, and will take place entirely within existing mining tenements on Moolarben-owned freehold land. Importantly, the project does not propose any changes to the approved mine life or production rates and maximises the use of existing infrastructure, reducing the need for new disturbance. The project delivers significant economic and social benefits at both a local and state level. It will provide continuity and security of employment for the existing open cut workforce, supporting around 700 ongoing jobs and injecting approximately $180 million annually into the economy. This continuity is critical for workers, families, and the broader community that relies on stable employment and economic activity in the region. These benefits are delivered by one of the lowest emissions intensity coal mines in Australia. From an environmental perspective, the OC3 Extension Project represents a net positive outcome for the Moolarben Valley. The project will result in a net increase of 557 hectares of native woodland vegetation, with increased setbacks from creek lines and the adjacent nature reserve to further protect environmental assets. Significant improvements have been made to the OC3 Extension application in response to feedback from the community and Government. These improvements include a reduced disturbance footprint, reduced coal extraction, increased setbacks to protect sensitive environmental areas, reduced disturbance to wildlife habitat, and increased land rehabilitation. These changes demonstrate Moolarben's commitment to listening, responding, and delivering a balanced outcome. Overall, the OC3 Extension Project represents a responsible and well-considered proposal that balances economic, social, and environmental outcomes. It supports ongoing employment, delivers strong economic benefits and builds on existing, approved operations. For these reasons, I support the approval of the OC3 Extension Project. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
13916 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
30/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project To the Independent Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project and to outline the positive benefits this proposal would deliver for the local community and regional New South Wales if approved. 1. Supporting Jobs and Economic Stability The existing Moolarben Coal Complex has been a cornerstone of employment in the Mid-Western Regional Council area for many years. By extending the life of the operation, the OC3 project will sustain jobs directly at the mine and indirectly across the local economy — including for contractors, suppliers, service providers, and small business operators. This stability is especially important in regional communities where alternative employment opportunities can be limited. Ongoing operations mean that families can remain in the area, children can continue attending local schools, and household income remains stable. This continuity fosters community cohesion and supports services such as retail, hospitality, health and education. 2. Boosting Local Businesses and Investment Mining activity at Moolarben has long had a ripple effect throughout the region, supporting local businesses ranging from accommodation and transport services to hospitality and retail. An active workforce with disposable income helps ensure that local enterprises remain viable and can continue to contribute to the economic vibrancy of towns like Mudgee and surrounding villages. Moreover, the presence of a long-term operational mine encourages ongoing investment into regional infrastructure and services, helping to attract new residents and businesses who want to be part of a thriving rural community. 3. Community Support and Contribution Programs Yancoal and the Moolarben operation have an established track record of engaging with and supporting the community. The company’s Community Support Program has contributed over $1 million in grants and sponsorships to local organisations, sporting clubs, and community initiatives since 2010. These contributions help fund grassroots programs, foster social wellbeing, and build community capacity — benefits that extend far beyond mining itself. 4. Responsible Management and Regulatory Compliance Moolarben operates under a comprehensive suite of environmental and safety regulations designed to manage impacts responsibly. The proposed OC3 extension would continue to adhere to strict environmental management plans and regulatory oversight to ensure operations meet all required conditions. This means that while the project supports economic and social goals, it will also maintain high standards for land rehabilitation, water and air quality management, and workplace safety. Conclusion In summary, the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension is a project that delivers tangible and meaningful benefits to the local region through sustained employment, economic resilience, business support, and ongoing community contributions. Its approval would help ensure that the Mid-Western Region continues to prosper, with secure jobs, thriving local services, and a strong and connected community fabric. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Commission recommend approval of the Moolarben OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. Sincerely, (Redacted) |
James McGeachie
|
ID |
12056 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
27/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I am writing to express my strong support for the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. The Moolarben Mine has been an important part of our local region for many years and continues to provide stable employment and economic security for families like mine. The proposed extension will allow ongoing operations, which is critical in maintaining jobs, supporting local businesses, and ensuring the long-term economic health of our community. For my family, the continuation of the Moolarben Mine provides certainty and stability. Secure employment means we can continue to live locally, support our children’s education, and contribute positively to the community. It allows families to plan for the future, remain in the region, and avoid the need to relocate for work. This stability is invaluable, particularly in regional areas where employment opportunities can be limited. The mine also delivers broader community benefits. Local businesses rely on the mine and its workforce, from shops and services to contractors and suppliers. Continued operations help keep these businesses viable, strengthen the local economy, and support community facilities, sporting clubs, and events. These contributions help maintain a strong and connected community. Importantly, mining in this region has demonstrated that mining and community can coexist responsibly. With appropriate management and oversight, the extension can continue to deliver economic and social benefits whilst minimising impacts on the surrounding environment and community. I believe Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project is essential to ensuring the ongoing prosperity of our region. It supports local jobs, strengthens families, and helps sustain the community we are proud to be part of. For these reasons, I strongly support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex OC3 Extension Project. Thank you for considering my submission. |
Hayden Cosgrove
|
ID |
11396 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2780 |
|
Date |
23/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I work at moolarben open cut as a contractor on rehabilitation projects and pit maintenance. Gaining my role at moolarben open cut has allowed my family and I to relocate to Mudgee for a much better lifestyle, aside from the obvious amount of employment and economic benefits to the community Moolarben is a very professional operator with fantastic safety, quality and environmental procedures with a team culture that actually promotes exceeding those standards through every stage of mining. Having worked on rehabilitation projects at Moolarben I have witnessed the progression from initial rehab works to previously completed works already thriving with native flora and fauna in the restored habitat. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10706 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
17/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
After review of the Assessment Report, I support the approval of the Moolarben Coal Complex Extension Project. I believe that the conditions that have been recommended will appropriately meet the considerations required in order to balance the competing needs of the environment and the community. The mining industry is integral to not only those that are employed, but to ensure that our community is offered the opportunity to prosper. The town has not yet been supported by the NSW government to make the appropriate transition away from the mining industry. If approvals are not made to extend the life of mining, many locals will be left unemployed and potentially forced to leave the region. As many of our miners and their families are integral members of our communities, we will not only be loosing miners, we would potentially be facing the lose of many essential workers that are vital to our towns. I encourage the IPC to consider the immediate humans who are impacted. |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
10306 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2750 |
|
Date |
14/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I’m fully supportive of the mine extension . Job and community will benefit. |
Christine Shearman
|
ID |
10256 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben Mine Extension My husband and I moved to Mudgee in 2019 to start a family and pursue careers in the mining industry. Having grown up in regional areas before spending time in the city, Mudgee gave us the opportunity to return to country living while maintaining secure employment and make it possible for families like ours to live and thrive in regional areas. My husband has worked at Moolarben Mine for the past five years, and during this time we have become well established members of the local community. I also work within the mining industry, and we are both proud to be part of a sector that provides stable employment and long-term opportunities for families in the region. Mining plays a vital role in supporting Mudgee and surrounding communities. Beyond direct employment, operations like Moolarben contribute significantly to local businesses, community groups, charities and sporting organisations. These contributions help keep the town strong, vibrant and sustainable for current and future generations. We also recognise and value the high level of regulation, safety standards and environmental protocols that are in place within the mining industry. Moolarben operates under strict requirements to manage environmental impacts and prioritise the safety of its workforce and the surrounding community. For these reasons, we strongly support the proposed Moolarben Mine extension. Continued operation will help provide job security, economic stability and ongoing community support, allowing families like ours to continue living, working and contributing positively to the Mudgee region. |
David Shearman
|
ID |
10261 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Submission in Support of the Moolarben Mine Extension My wife and I relocated to Mudgee in 2019 to build our lives in a regional community supported by secure local employment in the mining industry. I have worked at Moolarben Mine for the past five years, during which time my family has become well established in the area. My wife also works in the mining sector, and we value the stable, long-term employment opportunities it provides for regional families. Mining plays a critical role in supporting Mudgee and surrounding communities. In addition to direct employment, operations such as Moolarben underpin local businesses, services, community groups and sporting organisations, contributing to the ongoing social and economic sustainability of the region. I recognise and support the strict environmental, safety and regulatory frameworks governing mining operations. Moolarben operates under comprehensive approval conditions with strong oversight to ensure responsible environmental management and the safety of workers and the community. These controls enable mining to coexist with other regional land uses. Should mining cease, there are limited alternative employment opportunities in the region that align with my skills and experience, which would significantly affect my family’s ability to continue living and working in Mudgee. The mine’s continued operation supports workforce stability and allows families like mine to remain active contributors to the local community. For these reasons, I strongly support the proposed Moolarben Mine extension and its role in sustaining employment and regional communities. |
Paul Norris
|
ID |
10276 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
13/01/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Support |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I strongly support the coal mine extension. The project is vital for preserving existing jobs and creating ongoing employment opportunities in our community. Mining remains a key contributor to local businesses, infrastructure funding, and regional development. Extending the mine ensures continuity for workers and their families while supporting Australia’s energy and export sectors. |
| ID | Name | Date | Submission |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21046 | Name Redacted | 16/02/2026 | |
| 15556 | Tony Thompson | 04/02/2026 |
Name Redacted
|
ID |
21046 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2850 |
|
Date |
16/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Comment |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
I feel that the exaction should go ahead due to the rail link that can be used already and that Moolarben do employ each year apprentices each year. My only concern is the lack of accommodation in Mudgee with Moolarben employing most of its staff outside of the area. They only stay during there work days and return home again. Maybe Moolarben should be made to accomate its employees who live outside of the area to free up rentals in Mudgee and Gulgong. Less traffic on the public roads also. Which could result in less wildlife deaths and injuries |
Tony Thompson
|
ID |
15556 |
|---|---|
|
Location |
New South Wales 2650 |
|
Date |
04/02/2026 |
|
Submitter position |
Comment |
|
Submission method |
Website |
|
Submission |
Australia has the cleanest coal in the world which is why ir is in such high demand. Just like automotive gasolines, we have learned to clean up the combustion processes such as moving from leaded fuels to unleaded fuels, so we are continually moving to cleaner coal combustion to that of the cleanest burn in the world. If we, as a whole, are hoping to achieve autonomous production by resuming the Industrial strengths we once had, we require more power with punch and cannot rely on Solar or Wind generation to achieve this. |