Lithgow Small Arms Factory - Request for review of proposed listing on the State Heritage Register

26286

Redacted

24/03/2026

Object

Email

In such uncertain times around the world it is a priority to secure the future of Australian’s military forces and our capability to build sovereign weapons. Thales is a world leading manufacturer of weapons and military devices and a heritage listing on the Lithgow site could be detrimental to the future viability of expanding operations. Whilst recognising the importance of our heritage, this state heritage listing would cross the line between keeping our history alive and stifling the future. Thales are upstanding contributors of the local and business community employing hundreds of locals and heavily contributing to the local economy. Thales have indicated their willingness to continue giving the Small Arms Museum a long lease to continue on this site. It would be detrimental, to not only Lithgow but also the country should we lose this manufacturing business.

26051

Thales Australia

17/03/2026

Object

Email

Dear Commission Panel, We attach Thales Australia’s submission as landowner of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory.

Thales Australia - Submission to IPC re Proposed State Heritage Register Listing of LSAF - 16 March 2026_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 231.37 KB)

25931

Member for Barwon

12/03/2026

Object

Email

Good afternoon, I write to provide input into the investigation of the merit of the request to provide a heritage listing over the entire Lithgow Small Arms Factory Site. I am a supporter of preserving our manufacturing and defence heritage, I do not though support this request. Listing the entire site would effectively finish the site as an ongoing defence manufacturing facility and interfere with contractual obligation in the event of a defence mobilisation. I would support a future request for a sensible partial listing, but my preference is for Thales and the Lithgow Small Arms Museum to agree on a contractual basis to secure tenure for the museum. Regards, Roy Butler MP Member for Barwon

25951

Deputy Secretary Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group, Department of Defence

12/03/2026

Object

Email

OFFICIAL Dear IPC, Please find attached a submission from Mr Chris Deeble, Deputy Secretary Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group, Department of Defence. He objects to the case. His name and location may be publicly displayed. Please disregard this e-mail if this submission has already been received.

25951 Chris Deeble_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 150.61 KB)

25891

New South Wales 2210

11/03/2026

Object

Email

I am strongly opposed to the suggested inclusion of the Lithgow small arms factory being included on the NSW Government heritage register. The reason being the present parlous state of our defence forces and industry. Our ADF does not have a dedicated drone industry. This facility is ready made For light manufacturing Ukraine and the present war against Iran tell us that now is the era of the drone (and anti-drone ). I propose that the lithgow small arms factory not be registered so it can be used To produce drones for the Australian Defence Forces. I am happy for my details be disclosed to the inquiry. John Hoban

25861

Lithgow Branch, Australian Labor Party

2790

10/03/2026

Object

Email

Submission from - Lithgow Branch, Australian Labor Party Opposes listing Name to be public Submission attached Thank you

25861 Susan Gregory.pdf (PDF, 142.38 KB)

25786

06/03/2026

Object

Email

To the Independent Planning Commission Small Arms Factory Heritage Listing Lithgow is a dying town. Whilst that is an unpopular thing to say, it is true. The mines are closing and, despite many attempts, no new industry is moving to Lithgow. The community of Lithgow does not have the resources to maintain a disused and largely dilapidated site. Who would actually be responsible for the renovation and upkeep of such a site? Lithgow City Council could not be expected to do so. Any heritage listing would require vast amounts of money simply to prevent further disintegration of the existing buildings. The buildings visible from Methven Street are in very poor condition. Windows are broken and there is clear structural damage. Apart from the buildings which are part of the Thales operation there is no reason to believe that the rest of the site is in better condition. A heritage listing would simply result in “demolition by neglect.” However, this site has enormous potential for redevelopment. The population of Lithgow is barely rising. Population growth is well below the State average. But imagine a site in the centre of a country town, only half a kilometre from a major shopping precinct, on an established bus route and only an hour and forty minutes by train to Penrith. Such a site is ideal for a major low income housing project. Much of the support for a heritage listing comes from a concern that the Small Arms Factory Museum would be forced to move without this legal protection. A Government supported housing development would be able to maintain and support the Small Arms Factory Museum on the site which is central to its history.. In 1945 Lithgow was honoured by being made a City in recognition of the contribution we made to the war effort. We don’t need a decaying set of buildings to know we “did our bit”. I also speak as a person whose father worked at the SAF for eighteen years. I object to any heritage listing for this site. Stephen Lesslie

25226

17/02/2026

Object

Email

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed heritage listing of the Small Arms Factory site. My name is Nathan, and I am an employee at Thales Lithgow (Lithgow Arms). I am concerned that this decision will negatively impact the future growth of the business and limit employment opportunities within our town. While I appreciate the historical significance of the site, restricting the ability to construct new buildings or renovate existing facilities to meet the changing needs of the business could significantly hinder its development. In today’s evolving manufacturing and defence environment, adaptability is essential. If the business is unable to modernise or expand its infrastructure, it risks losing competitiveness, which ultimately affects local jobs and the broader Lithgow community. Lithgow has long relied on the Small Arms Factory as a key employer and economic contributor. Decisions that limit operational flexibility may unintentionally reduce future investment and growth within our region. I respectfully ask that careful consideration be given to the long-term economic and employment impacts this heritage listing may have on our town and its workforce. Thank you for considering my concerns. Kind regards,Nathan

25231

17/02/2026

Object

Email

Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed heritage listing of the Small Arms Factory site in Lithgow. My husband is an employee at Thales Lithgow (Lithgow Arms), and as a local family who relies on the stability of this workplace, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact this decision could have on the future growth of the business and employment opportunities within our town. While I understand and respect the historical significance of the site, I am worried that imposing restrictions on constructing new buildings or renovating existing facilities to meet the changing needs of the business could significantly limit its ability to adapt and grow. In today’s evolving manufacturing and defence environment, flexibility and modernisation are essential. If the business cannot expand or upgrade its infrastructure as required, it risks losing competitiveness — something that would ultimately affect local jobs and families like ours. The Small Arms Factory has been a cornerstone of the Lithgow community for generations. It supports not only its employees but also the broader local economy. Any decision that limits operational flexibility could unintentionally discourage future investment and reduce long-term employment opportunities in our region. I respectfully ask that careful consideration be given to the long-term economic and community impacts this heritage listing may have on Lithgow and the many families who depend on the factory for their livelihood. Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns. Kind regards, Bekk Gurney

24471

17/02/2026

Object

Email

IPCN NSW Government. Dear Sir/Madam After making my initial submission, information was also received and reported in the Lithgow Mercury that Thales, the french owner of the Lithgow Smalls Arm Factory was not in agreement with making the building they own into a State Heritage Listed Property. Further they indicated that jobs would be lost and the Factory closed down if this was to occur. I do not wish to make any further submissions regarding this matter. Regards Mariyn Evans.

22396

Redacted

16/02/2026

Object

Email

To whom it may concern. I totally disagree with the small arms factory being heritage listed as it will have a negative effect on the future development of the factory. With the impending closures of the coal mines and the power station in the local area, everything has to be done to try and keep job in Lithgow to support the future generations. Please keep my name and details private. Sent from my iPhone

22346

16/02/2026

Object

Email

I object to the Lithgow Thales site N.S.W 2790 becoming heritage listed. For reasons of future employment. Being listed will stop further development and job Security. Wade McMiilan.

25206

15/02/2026

Object

Email

I am writing to you about the submission for the small arms factory in lithgow I strongly object to this submission as I am worried about what will happen to the site and any future development that will be available to be done The site is currently a major employer in the area and if they can't develop and increase production how will people still be employed It is about time council and the government start to think of employment opportunities in the Lithgow LGA as once the coal mines and power station start to close and if the small arms factory can't expand where will the future residents (our children) be able to work I feel that the minority of people in Lithgow that are against development and have their eyes closed to what is actually happening around should be ashamed of even thinking about this submission just because the people who have run the museum in the past weren't doing what they should've been doing with security and the way that the museum was being run The break in was only a matter of when it was going to happen not if it was going to happen Please DO NOT publish my name in regard to this submission thanks

25211

15/02/2026

Object

Email

Please note that my location and name can be publicly displayed. I object to the heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. Thales, a significant employer in the LGA, owns and operates the factory. A heritage listing could impede business expansion and affect operations. The site has ample space for further development, which could boost local employment. Given that the mining and energy sectors in Lithgow are scaling down, losing another major employer would be catastrophic for the town. I'm uncertain if those advocating for the heritage listing are even local residents. Having lived in Lithgow for 63 years, recently retired from the mining industry, I completed part of my apprenticeship and high school work experience at the Small Arms Factory, as have thousands of other Lithgow and ex-Lithgow residents. In my opinion, the buildings lack structural or architectural significance, and the push for heritage listing seems politically motivated by external agencies. Greg Guest Resident of Lithgow

20351

New South Wales 2790

14/02/2026

Object

Email

Elizabeth Fredericks (Redacted) 1. Executive Summary This submission objects to the proposed statutory heritage listing of the Small Arms Factory Museum building in Lithgow, NSW. The proposed listing is: •Disproportionate to the heritage outcomes sought. •Inconsistent with the planning principles of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. •Operationally incompatible with an active Commonwealth defence manufacturing facility. An unnecessary regulatory intervention given the existence of enforceable and demonstrable alternative heritage preservation mechanisms. •The building is privately owned and forms part of an operational defence manufacturing environment contracted by the Commonwealth of Australia for the production of military apparatus, weapons, and ammunition. •The industrial operator has already: Provided a ten-year rent-free lease to the Small Arms Factory Museum. Included contractual provisions guaranteeing full relocation funding and construction of a modern compliant armoury facility if operational defence requirements necessitate use of the building. Accordingly, statutory listing is neither necessary nor the least restrictive means of achieving heritage preservation. 2.Legislative and Planning Framework 3.1 Heritage Act 1977 – Principles of Conservation •The Heritage Act supports conservation where it is appropriate, reasonable, and practicable. Heritage protection mechanisms must be balanced against: •Lawful use of property. Public interest considerations. Economic and functional realities of the site. •A listing that materially interferes with strategic defence manufacturing infrastructure without clear necessity risks exceeding reasonable regulatory intervention. 3.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Key objects of the EP&A Act include: •Promotion of economic development and employment. •Proper management and development of land. •Integration of environmental, social, and economic considerations. •Facilitation of infrastructure necessary for community and state needs. The proposed listing introduces planning controls that may: Restrict lawful industrial operations. •Delay infrastructure modifications required for Commonwealth defence contracts. •Impede compliance with evolving safety and security obligations. Such outcomes conflict with the Act’s balanced planning objectives. 3.3 Administrative Law Principles Decisions imposing regulatory burdens must be: •Proportionate. •Reasonable. •Supported by evidence of necessity. The least restrictive method available to achieve the intended outcome. Where alternative mechanisms already preserve heritage values, imposing additional statutory constraints risks being considered unreasonable or excessive under administrative review. 3. Strategic Defence and Operational Considerations. The building exists within an operational defence manufacturing environment. Facilities engaged in military production must retain the capacity to: •Undertake rapid structural modifications. •Implement evolving armoury and weapons-handling standards. •Apply security upgrades without procedural delay. •Comply with Commonwealth contractual timelines. Statutory heritage controls introduce approval pathways that may: •Delay urgent works required under national defence contracts. •Restrict internal and external adaptations necessary for compliance. •Create conflicts between heritage conservation requirements and defence security obligations. Planning decisions must consider national interest factors. Strategic defence capability is a significant public interest consideration that weighs strongly against restrictive heritage controls on active operational infrastructure. 4. Private Property Rights and Lawful Industrial Use. The building is privately owned infrastructure within an established industrial environment. Heritage listing introduces: •Additional consent requirements for alterations. •Potential constraints on lawful industrial activity. •Ongoing regulatory oversight affecting operational autonomy. Where voluntary heritage preservation measures already exist, the imposition of statutory restrictions may represent an unnecessary interference with lawful land use. 5. Existing Alternative Heritage Preservation Measures. The industrial operator has implemented substantial heritage preservation mechanisms that achieve the intended heritage objectives without statutory restriction: 1.A ten-year rent-free lease enabling continued museum operation. Ongoing voluntary preservation of artefacts and public history access. 2.A contractual clause guaranteeing that, if operational defence needs arise: The museum will be fully relocated at the operator’s expense. 3.A new, modern, compliant, and fully legislated armoury facility will be constructed. All associated relocation and establishment costs will be covered. These measures demonstrate that heritage conservation is already being achieved through enforceable private arrangements. Under principles of proportional planning regulation, statutory listing is unnecessary where effective alternative protections exist. 6. Economic and Regional Planning Considerations. Lithgow’s economic base includes strategic manufacturing and defence industry employment. A restrictive heritage listing may: •Introduce planning uncertainty for a Commonwealth-contracted facility. •Discourage future investment in defence manufacturing infrastructure. Reduce the operational flexibility necessary to maintain local employment. •Undermine state policy objectives supporting regional economic resilience. Planning decisions must consider cumulative economic impacts and the strategic importance of industrial employment lands. 7. Proportionality and Availability of Less Restrictive Measures. Alternative approaches capable of preserving heritage significance without constraining industrial operations include: •Archival recording and documentation. Interpretation programs and public education initiatives. •Conservation of movable heritage items and artefacts. •Integration of heritage interpretation into any future purpose-built museum facility. Where less restrictive tools achieve equivalent heritage outcomes, statutory listing fails the proportionality test. 8. Conclusion. The proposed heritage listing is not supported. The evidence demonstrates that: •The building forms part of an active Commonwealth defence manufacturing environment. •Operational flexibility is essential to national defence capability and compliance obligations. •The industrial operator has already provided substantial, enforceable heritage preservation measures, including a rent-free lease and guaranteed fully funded relocation to a modern compliant facility if required. Less restrictive planning mechanisms exist that preserve heritage values without imposing unnecessary regulatory constraints. In these circumstances, the proposed statutory heritage listing is disproportionate, unnecessary, and inconsistent with the balanced objectives of NSW planning legislation. 9.Recommendation. It is respectfully requested that the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure: Decline the proposed heritage listing in its current form; and Consider alternative heritage recognition measures that do not impose statutory constraints on operational defence manufacturing infrastructure. Yours sincerely, Elizabeth Fredericks

25196

Redacted

12/02/2026

Object

Email

Location & name to be redacted I strongly object to the proposed plan to heritage list the site of Lithgow Small Arms Factory (also known as THALES) Listing the Small arms factory as heritage has an incredibly high chance to cripple the industry and also take away hundreds of jobs of people who live in the Lithgow region, Not only would it potentially ruin the small arms manufacturing here in Lithgow/Australia whom supply the defence force with tools and equipment to be able to protect our nation but it would also have a severe impact on future upgrades and any renovations possibly required for future proofing our nations capabilities as a whole. It should be against the nations interest as a whole for this very reason as we would be loosing a huge asset we currently hold and have held for over 113 years

26041

13/03/2026

Support

Email

I am writing in support of listing the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. The Museum and accompanying buildings should be listed as historical. I also agree that the rest of the site not crucial for the historical listing should be able to be developed.

26016

New South Wales 2785

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I support the proposed listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the NSW State Heritage Register. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is a unique and highly significant part of Australia’s industrial and military history. Established in 1912, the factory played a critical role in supplying rifles and other small arms for Australian forces, particularly during the First and Second World Wars. Its contribution highlights the important role that Lithgow and regional manufacturing played in Australia’s wartime effort and national development. In addition to its historical significance, the site and the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum represent an important tourism opportunity for the Lithgow region. Lithgow benefits greatly from strong and distinctive visitor attractions, and this facility offers something truly unique in Australia. Protecting and recognising the site through State Heritage listing will help preserve this important part of our national story while supporting the development of meaningful cultural tourism for the region. For these reasons, I strongly support the proposal to list the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register.

26021

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I write this email in support of the listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the NSW Heritage Register. The Factory has a unique history within the Australian Manufacturing Industry and it's connection with both the design and production of Small Arms for the Australian and Commonwealth Armed Forces and civilian markets. This historical connection, the manufacturing excellence created and maintained over this time must be protected at its original site, now and into the future. Thank you for considering my support.

26026

Redacted

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Hi I wish to make known my support of the heritage listing of the Lithgow small arms factory. The protection and retention of our military and manufacturing history is important. Heritage protection is a way to ensure future generations can understand the past and can appreciate the role and development places like the small arms factory can and have had in Australia. Not listing it would be a failure in our heritage duty and a loss nationally. Name and location to be redacted.

25926

Redacted

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I support the heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory.

25936

National Trust of Australia (NSW)

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Mr Bailey, Please find attached a letter from the National Trust of Australia (NSW) supporting the proposed listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register. Kind regards, Charlotte

25936 Charlotte Anlezark redacted.pdf (PDF, 232.34 KB)

25941

National Trust of Australia (NSW)

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Please find attached a submission to the Independent Planning Commission in support of the State Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. Fran White Chairperson Bathurst & District Branch National Trust of Australia (NSW)

Submission by Bathurst National Trust to Independent Planning Commission_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 112.69 KB)

25946

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I support heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site because it is an important part of Australia's history. Heritage listing would help protect the site and recognise the efforts of the many people who worked there and supported Australia's defence. It is a very special place to the many relatives of these workers who visit the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum and who may find their relative's employee records there.

25956

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I certainly support listing the site of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register, as an exemplary site of architectural diversity and one that tells an important story. Due to the insufficient protections currently afforded to the site, important and prominent buildings have already been demolished, and those that remain are not only in disrepair, but under threat. Too often demolitions are endorsed with misconceptions that later generations will not value such heritage. In my own experience this is woefully misguided, as I myself and my gen Z cohort are so often dismayed by the loss of old buildings, regardless or whether or not they fit the current conventional beauty standard. To lose what remains would be a tragedy to anyone who values this history, with its important lessons, and the beautiful, inimitable buildings. I am happy for my submission to be displayed publicly along with my name. Sincerely, Jared Andrew

25961

12/03/2026

Support

Email

This museum is a huge part of Australian history manufacturing and military history it is a testament to what Australia can do when our men and women get behind something and is something that all the next generations of Australia should be able to experience. It must be protected at all costs. Kind regards Joel Martin

25966

12/03/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern. I fully support the listing of the Lithgow small arms factory. This site is a significant part of Australia's history. The site was the birthplace of our sovereign capacity and should be preserved to showcase our proud manufacturing history. I proudly compete in historic service rifle as my chosen sport with a Lithgow built 303 that will be taking to the UK later in the year to compete on the world stage. My name can be publicly displayed. Dayne Huntington. Somersby.

25976

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Sent from my iPad I believe that it is important that our military and manufacturing history be protected and retained as an in situ and intact example at the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF). The future of the SAF Museum is intertwined with the retention and heritage listing of the Factory site. Together they demonstrate the significance of Australia’s first and pre-eminent high production ammunition facility. Esther Birchall Yarragon, Victoria

25981

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I am fully in support of the case to have the Lithgow Small Arms Factory included on the Heritage Listing. It is my understanding that the history and character of the factory is unique not only at a state level but even more significantly at a national level. It appears to be Australia’s earliest example of large scale industrial activity - this fact alone would justify any effort to preserve as much of it as possible in the cultural memory. A Heritage Listing would go a long way to achieve this. Currently the future of the site is highly uncertain while most of the site is under commercial management. Even the future of limited cultural guardianship in the form of the Small Arms Factory Museum is highly dubious since long term tenure of this small portion of the site has still not been satisfactorily determined. Historically the Small Arms Factory has been fundamental to the growth and evolution of the town and community of Lithgow and by extension the State of New South Wales.It has also played a huge role in the development of Australia and its national security. For these reasons I believe the Small Arms Factory should rightly be Heritage Listed and preserved not only for the sake of the community of Lithgow but also for the national remembrance of the evolution and growth of Australia. Regards, Andrew Robertson

25986

Custodian Lithgow SAF Museum

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear IPC panel, please find below my further submission in support of heritage listing of the Litghow Small Arms Factory site. Kind regards, Donna White Custodian Lithgow SAF Museum --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Having read the transcript of the meeting between Lithgow City Council and the Independent Planning Commission, I would like to make this additional submission in response to a number of statements made by the Mayor and council staff. Mayor Coleman stated that while the community values its industrial heritage, it cannot afford for that heritage to stand in the way of its future. While many people recognise the significant value of Lithgow’s industrial past, it is disappointing that Council appears not to see this heritage as contributing to Lithgow’s future. Heritage is not simply about preserving the past; it can also be a powerful driver of economic and cultural renewal. Notably, the Lithgow Emerging Economy Plan (LEEP) Action Plan 2025/2026 makes no reference to heritage assets as a contributor to the local economy, identifying eco-tourism as the only form of tourism development. This overlooks the significant potential of Lithgow’s industrial heritage to attract visitors, investment, and new forms of cultural and creative enterprise. Mayor Coleman also expressed the belief that heritage listing of anything beyond the Museum building would cause greater harm to the Museum. It is unclear which of the two buildings housing the Museum’s collections is being referred to. However, from the perspective of the Museum’s volunteers, this assessment is difficult to understand. The Museum’s volunteers have been clear that they would not continue to operate the Museum on a flattened site in the shadow of modern arms manufactory buildings. The heritage context of the site is fundamental to the Museum’s purpose and meaning. Without that context, the Museum’s continued operation in Lithgow would be highly uncertain. It is also important to clarify that the Museum is a community-managed institution and is not owned by either Thales or Council. Neither LEEP nor Council has sought the Museum’s perspective in preparing its position on heritage listing. During the IPC meeting, Mr Bruce Mills suggested that the Museum’s archives alone provide sufficient interpretation of the site. While the archives are indeed internationally recognised, interpretation through documents alone cannot replace the experience of the physical place where this nationally significant history occurred. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum holds archives listed with UNESCO and collections assessed as being of national significance. However, the survival of the Museum is dependent on two key factors. First, Thales must honour the long-standing commitment made over many years to transfer the Museum’s small part of the site to the Museum, providing security of tenure. Second, the broader heritage site must remain substantially intact, for the reasons outlined in my earlier submission. Without these two elements, the long-term survival of the Museum in Lithgow is far from assured. The Museum did make efforts to communicate its vision to Council. Shortly after Council voted to oppose the heritage listing, following advice contained in a late report prepared in collaboration with Thales, the Museum delivered a presentation outlining the value it contributes to the Lithgow community and the considerable potential for future development. These plans include, subject to the promised transfer of the Museum site, the adaptive reuse of the former factory canteen building as a café, function space, community facility and potential evacuation centre. They also include the creation of a purpose-built Australian Firearms History Centre as an adjunct to the Museum. Such developments would expand Lithgow’s cultural tourism offering and create new opportunities for community use and economic activity. The suggestion that heritage listing would render “a large portion of the site incapable of reasonable or economic use” is also strongly disputed. The fact that the site was previously used for heavy industry does not mean that it must remain so. Across Australia and internationally, former industrial sites have been successfully adapted for a wide range of purposes. With imagination, the buildings at Lithgow could support museums, galleries, creative industries, film production spaces, community facilities, and other enterprises that both respect the site’s history and contribute to the town’s future. Significantly, Thales itself was negotiating the sale of the Museum’s small portion of the site in 2021 and again in a revised contract in 2022. This clearly indicates that at that time Thales did not intend to incorporate this area into its operational footprint. Furthermore, Thales possesses substantial vacant land at the rear of the site, much further away from residential areas, should additional industrial buildings be required. The heritage buildings located toward the front of the site could instead form the basis of a revitalised precinct capable of attracting new and more suitable industries or community uses. Council also indicated that it is seeking to partner with Thales to enable the site to achieve its full economic potential. However, it is important to recognise the imbalance in such a relationship. On one side is a nationally significant museum with UNESCO-listed archives, operated by a community group that has invested thousands of volunteer hours into preserving and sharing Lithgow’s history. On the other side is a multinational, profit-driven corporation whose presence in Lithgow is based on operational convenience and could change at any time. Councils are entrusted with representing the interests of the entire community, including the protection of heritage, culture, and public assets. Decisions affecting places of national significance must therefore carefully balance corporate interests with the long-term interests of the community. Concerns were also raised regarding the economic viability of the site, including the suggestion that heritage and contamination issues have left it underutilised for decades. However, in 2020 an Australian manufacturing company sought to purchase and operate part of the disused site from Thales and was refused. This was after many years during which the land had remained largely vacant and without any indication that Thales intended to use it. In that instance, an opportunity to bring new jobs to Lithgow was prevented. Finally, Council has supported an application for approximately $1.2 million in public funding for a feasibility study into turning the site into brownfields land, with the possibility of further taxpayer funding for remediation should that study proceed. It is worth considering whether such public investment would be better directed toward enabling development on Lithgow’s existing greenfield industrial lands, which were specifically intended to support future economic growth. For all of these reasons, we remain concerned that the potential value of the Small Arms Factory site—both as a heritage place of national significance and as the home of a community-run museum—is being misunderstood. Heritage listing offers an opportunity to protect an irreplaceable part of Australia’s history while still allowing thoughtful and imaginative future uses for the site.

25991

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Hello, I am writing in support of the State Heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site. As a current Master's student of Art Curating, and as young appreciator of heritage and history, I highly value this site. It is a vestige of many important stories and memories significant to its local community, as well as to the rest of Australia. It is also currently home to a fantastic museum working to preserve these. I would like my name and location to be publicly displayed in support of this application. Many thanks, Erin Frances Sydney, NSW

25996

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Good evening, The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is an important cultural site and tourist attraction, and I would like to voice my support for it to be heritage listed. The Factory museum is staffed by wonderful volunteers and receives visitors from all over the world. Please save this site for the people of Lithgow and future generations. History matters. Cameron Murray

26001

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I wish to voice my support of the Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. There has been some concern in the community regarding restrictions to the viable commercial use of the Small Arms Factory site if it is heritage listed. Thales did say in a Lithgow Council meeting that they would leave the site if the proposed (now recommended) heritage listing is enacted. However, I noted that it was the NSW Heritage Council’s view that a NSW Heritage listing would not impede commercial operations on the site, including Thales’ business. I am aware it is generally understood by heritage authorities that promoting current-day use is the best way to ensure heritage will be preserved. As the curtilage has been purposefully reduced to just the “heritage core”, there remains a large amount of land that can be redeveloped without destroying heritage and avoiding the high cost of demolition and remediation. Thales has expressed concern that a heritage listing would require ongoing maintenance of the buildings. However, this would be a reasonable expectation of corporate citizenship for any company privileged to operate on an internationally significant site. There have been a number of proposals over the years to utilise disused buildings for both cultural and commercial pursuits which have been rejected by Thales. These would have ensured the buildings’ upkeep and may have created more jobs and small businesses for Lithgow than high precision manufacturing enterprises, which are becoming increasingly automated. I hope that a heritage listing will mean that these iconic buildings are returned to their former glory. Given the international significance of the site, this could be an ongoing source of revenue which would have flow-on effects for Lithgow generally. This living museum’s main value depends on the historic factory site remaining intact. If the site was destroyed, the museum would cease to continue in its current form. The museum’s future plans—plans that would greatly benefit Lithgow and its visitors—would not proceed. If one of the council’s LEEP proposals has its way, only a relatively small, symbolic portion of the collection will remain in Lithgow, separated from the historic factory site that gives the museum its essential context and meaning. The significance of the historic factory is recognised internationally. Museum supporters from England, Canada and the US who have lost their own similar heritage factories, value Lithgow’s all the more because so few remain anywhere in the world, and no others which have a world class museum interpreting the history of the site. For the sake of our own and future generations, we need to take a broader and longer-term view. There is a possibility that it will become impractical for a present day arms manufacturer to operate in the middle of a town or that Thales will cease operations in Lithgow for other reasons. Lithgow may well lose Thales jobs despite sacrificing the heritage site and the Museum. That would be a travesty. It would also leave a big hole in Lithgow. Streets named for the factory, local family histories, heritage factory housing, an Engineering Heritage listing, UNESCO listed archives forever reminding us of the historic Commonwealth Factory, of a unique and proud Australian heritage, that our generation failed to protect. Kind regards, Kathryn White Wollongong

26006

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I believe that it is important that our military and manufacturing history be protected and retained as an in situ and intact example at the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF). The future of the SAF Museum is intertwined with the retention and heritage listing of the Factory site. Together they demonstrate the significance of Australia’s first and pre-eminent small arms production facility.

25971

National Trust of Australia (NSW)

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Submission to Independent Planning Commission In Support of State Heritage Listing: Lithgow Small Arms Factory The Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF) factory was established by the Federal Government in 1910 and closed in c2000, when the whole site, including the much-reduced remaining arms manufacture operations, were sold to a consortium of Transfield and the French Company Thompson CSF/Thales. Thales still manufacture small arms on a portion of the original factory site, have sold off some of the remaining site to a local business and lease three buildings in the site to the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum. Over the years there have been several proposals to list the SAF site on the State Heritage Register. It is currently listed in the Register of the National Estate, in the Lithgow City Council Local Environment Plan, the National Trust Register and the Australian Institute of Architects Register of 20th Century Buildings. In addition, the SAF museum archives are listed on the UNESCO Australian Memory of the World register. There is a new proposal now being considered by the State heritage Council to list the whole SAF site on the New South Wales State Heritage Register. We support this proposal. The SAF site is the oldest munitions and armaments factory in Australia, it dates from 1912 and is still operational in part, manufacturing armaments for the ADF. At the time it was established, it was remarkable for its use of advanced American technology and precision manufacturing equipment. A lot of the equipment originally acquired from the United States, and later equipment acquisitions, (around 135 machines plus accessories) are still preserved in the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum on site. The 55 odd buildings that make up the suite of buildings on the site, represent a remarkable portfolio of buildings that demonstrate the evolving architecture of factory buildings over virtually the whole of the 20th Century. The whole site is hugely significant for the role it played in the war effort supplying armaments and munitions during both World War I and World War II. It is also powerfully significant for its association with the women, migrants, and servicemen who worked in the SAF as it made its crucial contribution to Australia’s war effort. Within the site is located the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum that has been run for some twenty-six years by a dedicated group of volunteers, it is included as an element of the SAF heritage site nomination. The museum is an important tourist asset for the region and a key element of Lithgow’s industrial heritage story. The museum has two sections, the better-known section devoted to the display of firearms, some three hundred square metres, and the historic equipment area some five times this area, devoted to the display of machinery employed in the Australian Defence Industries operation of the small arms factory. At its peak during the Second World War some 6000 people worked at the SAF site. Some of the equipment in the museum dates right back to the very early years of the factory’s operation during the First World War. In short, these buildings and their content are a key element of Australia’s industrial heritage and the nomination of the whole site including the museum’s buildings will significantly enhance the museums sustainability The Lithgow Branch of the National Trust strongly supports the proposed listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (LSAF) on the NSW State Heritage Register. Based on all the available evidence, the site clearly satisfies multiple criteria for State significance under the NSW Heritage Act. Below we addresses each criterion for listing in turn. Criterion (A): Historical Significance • The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is of outstanding historical significance as: • Australia’s first precision mass-production engineering facility, a fact recognised by Engineering Heritage Australia, which notes the site’s national importance as the birthplace of high-tolerance industrial manufacturing. • A direct response to 19th-century defence anxieties, including the 1838 unannounced arrival of U.S. naval vessels and later geopolitical tensions, which highlighted the colonies’ vulnerability and drove the push for domestic arms production. • A central contributor to Australia’s defence capability across First World War, Second World War, Korea, Vietnam and later conflicts, producing weapons essential to national security. The factory represents a pivotal moment in the development of Australian industrial self-reliance. Criterion (B): Associative Significance The site is closely associated with: • The Commonwealth’s Government’s early nation-building agenda, particularly the establishment of sovereign defence capability. • Generations of skilled workers, engineers and apprentices whose expertise shaped Australian industry. • The Lithgow community, where the factory served as a major employer and social anchor for more than a century. These associations are deeply embedded in the cultural identity of Lithgow and NSW. Criterion (C): Aesthetic and Technical Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory demonstrates: • A rare industrial landscape, including the historic General Machine Shop, original machinery and early 20th century factory design, as documented by the Museum’s public materials. • Outstanding technical achievement in repetition manufacturing, the foundation of modern mass production, which the Museum identifies as a defining innovation of the factory’s early decades. • A physical record of the evolution of mechanised production from 1912 through the 20th century. The site’s surviving fabric provides an exceptional window into Australia’s industrial and engineering history. Criterion (D): Social Significance The factory holds profound social significance for the Lithgow community: • It shaped the town’s economic, social and cultural life for generations, with many families maintaining multi-generational connections to the site. • The Museum’s own narrative emphasises the centrality of the factory to local identity and community cohesion. The depth of the community attachment is evident in ongoing local advocacy for the site’s preservation. Criterion (E): Research and Technical Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory possesses exceptional research value due to: • Its UNESCO Australian Memory of the World-recognised archival collection, which documents the history of Australia’s first precision manufacturing facility and provides unparalleled insight into industrial, military and engineering development. • The survival of original machinery, production records, prototypes and technical drawings, offering a rare opportunity for research into early 20th-century industrial processes. This material is of national importance for historians, engineers and industrial archaeologists. Criterion (F): Rarity The site is rare because: • It is one of the few surviving large-scale wartime industrial complex’s in NSW with intact machinery and production spaces. • It represents are unique combination of defence, industrial and social history not replicated elsewhere in the State. The rarity of its intact state and documentary is reinforced by the UNESCO recognition. Criterion (G): Representative Significance • The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is an outstanding representative example of: • Early Commonwealth industrial policy. • Large-scale wartime mobilisation and manufacturing. • The development of skilled engineering and technical labour in regional NSW. It’s buildings, machinery and archival holdings collectively demonstrate the characteristics of a major 20th century industrial enterprise. Support from the Cultural and Museum Sector Museums & Galleries NSW has formally stated that the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum is a unique and nationally significant site representing Australia’s industrial, military and social history and strongly supports its inclusion on the State Heritage Register This endorsement underscores the site’s exceptional value. CONCLUSION The Lithgow Small Arms Factory clearly meets multiple criteria for State heritage significance. It’s historical, technical, social and documentary values are of the highest order and its preservation is essential to understanding Australia’s industrial and defence history. The Lithgow Branch of the National Trust (NSW) therefore strongly supports its listing on the NSW State Heritage Register. Yours Faithfully, Danny Whitty Chair, Lithgow Branch National Trust of Australia (NSW)

25901

Redacted

12/03/2026

Support

Email

I am writing in support of the proposal to list the Small Arms Factory on the State Register. The attachment addresses issues found in the transcript of the meeting with Lithgow City Council.

IPC Small Arms Factory.pdf (PDF, 46.37 KB)

25911

New South Wales

12/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear submissions committee, I support the case for listing the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register and would like to make a brief comment in that regard. Feel free display my name and location (as “Sydney, NSW”). Given the present state of the world and the increasing likelihood that we will need to rapidly expand our armed forces in the near future, now is certainly not the time to be reducing the public visibility of those forces, especially in regional areas from where, traditionally, we have drawn many of our recruits. My understanding is that Army, for reasons of supposed financial “rationality”, is planning on reducing its public visibility by closing down and selling off many public-facing barracks and other facilities. This is short-term thinking at its worst - not only does this reduce the current profile of Army and make it more difficult to recruit let alone support an effective Army Reserve, it reduces the public awareness of our proud military heritage, and weakens remembrance of the past sacrifices made in the defense of our country and way of life. Our children will not know of the sacrifices and hardships their ancestors endured and will not know that the past few decades of “peace” (at least in Australia) are an exception to, rather than the norm of, modern Australian life. Not only does the Lithgow Small Arms Factory have its own proud heritage that is worth preserving and celebrating in its own right, it is part of the vital public facing infrastructure that will be necessary if we are to grow and support Australia’s future armed forces. Please list the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register and let it not be reduced to just another plaque on the wall – keep it and its history available to the public, especially to school children who may one day have to emulate their ancestors and defend our country. Your faithfully, Michael Marston Sydney, NSW Australia

25921

Redacted

12/03/2026

Support

Email

To the IPC, My name is (name redacted) from Lithgow and I would like my name redacted. I fully support Heritage Listing of the Small Arms Factory Site at Lithgow NSW. Thankyou (name redacted)

25906

12/03/2026

Support

Email

My name is Chris Salakas I am currently Vice President of Davistown RSL and I support Lithgow Small Arms Factory in their actions with the NSW State Heritage Register.

26046

Redacted

11/03/2026

Support

Email

I wish to make a submission in support of the heritage listing for Lithgow SAF Museum. This is Australia's last remaining historical manufacturing sites. It is vital to the nation as a whole. I have met interstate and international visitors to the sites, whi all say that they have never seen anything like it. Once the museum is granted full independent status as a heritage sight, it will be able to make the grounds a tourist destination. The 1960s cafeteria will be restored and allow small businesses establish themselves and provide employment to this much needed district. The museum will further be free to employ retail staff, tour guide staff and general maintenance staff..this will bring great employment opportunities to Lithgow. I do not wish my application to be made available to the general public. Regards

26011

11/03/2026

Support

Email

I totally believe that the Lithgow Small Arms Factory should be included on the heritage listings, as it is an organisation that has acheived so much for over 125 years for Australia's benefit, and must be given heritage status. Ed McKenzie

25881

11/03/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern: I with to register my support for the Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum. Having visited the museum and read its published history, I feel that preservation of the site is essential. Its role in the defence of Australia has been critical, and its story must be shared with all Australians. Failure to properly protect the site and its associated records and memorabilia would be a disaster for Australia's historical record. Granting protection will enable the restoration of the buildings so that the magnificent historical displays can again be accessible to the public. I am an Australian Army Veteran and I have a strong interest in Military History generally, and that of Australia in particular, so I know the importance of preserving sites like this one. Please do not miss the opportunity to properly protect this institution for all Australians. I am happy for my name and details to be published. Regards and Ubique Michael Potts Editor - Sapper Summit Royal Australian Engineers Association (Vic)

25886

11/03/2026

Support

Email

Greetings, My name is Ben Crampin, and I am a primary producer and diesel mechanic from Moree in New South Wales' Northwest. Recently, I took my children to the Lithgow small arms Factory in Lithgow, New South Wales. I was both amazed and impressed at the things on display and how much of an important role this factory played in early manufacturing in our country - not just providing top quality firearms during the second World War, but also many other things such as golf clubs cutlery machinery and aircraft parts and so many other things. I found it equally amazing that there seem to be a lack of interest from the Australian government to preserve this museum has a heritage listed treasure trove of our manufacturing history and supply to the war effort during the second World War. The efficiency and Equipment And expertise used During the war Surpassed that of the United Kingdom And I still produce Quality Firearms to this day. Last year I purchased Lithgow 17 HMR rifle and it is Second to None in quality and accuracy. My children found it very interesting and we used the information gathered there as part of their homeschooling Program That we Administering while we are travelling In a caravan this year. Furthermore I would encourage any schools to make an excursion of visiting the factory and learning some fascinating facts of not only things produced here, but also it's strategic location and abundance of raw materials that were mined nearby. Kind Regards, Ben Crampin

25896

Redacted

11/03/2026

Support

Email

I wish to submit an endorsement for the heritage listing of Small Arms Factory located in Lithgow NSW. This factory site is an incredibly unique and important part of not only the local Lithgow history, but of national history. The site being over 100 years old, and being one of the largest and most critical factory’s in Australia history should justify its heritage listing. The fact that Australia is lucky enough to have this tangible connection to its military and industrial past makes it all the more disappointing that it could potentially face destruction. As an local and a proud Australia I would sincerely hope that such an important part of our history is preserved for future generations, and I believe heritage listing would ensure as such.

25876

Davistown RSL sub-Branch

11/03/2026

Support

Email

Good morning IPC Chair, Letter of Support for the Inclusion of Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF) in the NSW State Heritage Register On behalf of the President and members of the Davistown RSL sub-Branch, I write to express our strong support for the inclusion of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF) on the NSW State Heritage Register. We are aware that the matter has been referred by the Heritage Minister to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) for further consideration, and we wish to add our voice in favour of recognising this important site. The Lithgow SAF has played a significant role in Australia’s military and industrial history, particularly in supplying arms and equipment that supported our nation’s defence efforts throughout the twentieth century. Many of our members, their families, and the broader veteran community have direct or familial connections to the Factory, underscoring its importance to our shared heritage and identity. We believe that heritage listing is essential to ensure the preservation and continued recognition of the Lithgow SAF’s remarkable contribution to Australia’s story. Protecting this site will honour not only the workers and servicemen and women associated with its history but also provide future generations the opportunity to learn about its legacy. We respectfully urge the IPC and the New South Wales Government to endorse/approve the inclusion of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory in the State Heritage Register Thank you for your attention to this matter and for considering our support. Yours sincerely, Peter Grothen Hon. Secretary Davistown RSL sub-Branch

25856

New South Wales 2590

10/03/2026

Support

Email

Submission to the Independent Planning Commission: Dear Commissioners, I am in favour of the heritage listing of this site. I have been to the Museum here and we need to keep it as it was, and substantially still is, thanks to decades of loving stewardship by volunteer enthusiasts. It is an inspiring and vital part of our Anzac story when "mateship" was strong. Yours truly, Dorothy White

25846

10/03/2026

Support

Email

To Whom it may concern, My name is Josiah. I'm thirteen years old and live on a farm in Moree NSW. I recently visited the Lithgow Small Arms Factory with my Family and thoroughly enjoyed it.Coming from a farm, guns are needed to keep the pig population down. My Dad who is a licensed gun owner, just recently purchased a Lithgow 17hmr. He has been very happy with it. Firstly I believe, that the Lithgow Small Arms Factory should be heritage listed because it has been around since the very early parts of Australian history. It was established during the Second World War, with the latest manufacturing machinery. Secondly I believe, it would be shame to see it closed down, seeing as it was a very active service in wartimes and early Australian Wartimes. Please see the attached photos below from our recent visit.

25846 Josiah redacted redacted.pdf (PDF, 25.42 MB)

25851

10/03/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern, My name is Eva, and I am eleven years old. I live on a farm in Moree NSW. I visited the factory museum recently with my family and really enjoyed it. It is an impressive collection of machinery and history. It would be a shame to see it go. I believe the site should be listed because it dates back a long way in Australian history. It is important for our generation to learn about the past and what made Australia. -- Kind Regards, Eva Crampin

25866

10/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear IPC team, Please find below my submission in support of heritage listing the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site. I am happy for my name and location to be publicly displayed. Kind regards, Donna White Lithgow 2790 -------------------------------- I fully support the heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. State Heritage listing is required because the current operator has openly discussed the demolition of the entire factory complex. Without heritage protection, the buildings that make up this iconic site remain at risk. If heritage listing does not proceed, the only protection for the site would be Lithgow Council’s Local Environmental Plan. Given the circumstances, this provides little confidence that the site would be preserved. Council and parts of the community have expressed fears about possible job losses if the operator were to leave Lithgow, as they have indicated they would have to if heritage listing proceeds . While those concerns are understandable, they overlook the long-term opportunities the preserved site could offer. A large group of historic factory buildings, including at least one with a modern fit-out, in close proximity to Sydney would likely attract other industries or businesses and could potentially employ more people. Indeed, over the years Thales has refused approaches from other parties interested in using the disused buildings on the site. With planning, imagination and creativity, other parts of the site could also be opened up for commercial and community uses. Perhaps because much of Australia’s built heritage is relatively young, we do not always recognise its value in the same way that older nations do. There are good local examples, like Carriageworks, and the restored wool stores at The Rocks, which show what can be achieved when historic buildings are respected and imaginatively reused - but too often commercial pressures win out and places of meaning are lost. In the UK they generally show strong appreciation for their heritage. They adaptively reuse with imagination and they create wonderful mixed-use precincts - places that retain their historic character while becoming centres of activity, employment, and community pride. Lithgow would have the opportunity to do something similar: to create a place that provides employment and fosters connection, identity, and pride in the city’s past. A place where people want to live, rather than just commute to for work. As the custodian of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum, I am acutely aware of all that would be lost if this nationally significant site were demolished. The museum is a bucket-list destination not only for firearms enthusiasts, but for family members of ex-workers, for those who love learning, for those who appreciate and value our nation's heritage, for those seeking connection to something that matters. It has the potential to grow significantly, with plans to expand its services and value to the community, but only if it survives intact on its largely original site. The Museum cannot simply be moved elsewhere. Its meaning and authenticity are inseparable from the site itself. Without the surviving buildings and the context they provide, much of the Museum’s meaning would be lost. If the site were demolished, the museum would not simply be diminished - it would cease to exist. The volunteers who run it have made clear there would be little purpose in continuing. If Thales were to demolish the surrounding historic buildings, the museum would become a monument to a vandalised site and, without the buffer of the historic buildings, would stand directly beside a weapons manufacturer - a setting entirely incompatible with a cultural institution. Generations of Australians would lose the chance to learn about the resilience, ingenuity, and innovation of the people who worked there. I interact with most of the visitors who come to the Museum, and the buildings clearly capture their imagination with many expressing a strong interest in exploring them and seeing inside. I know that, while there are those who see dilapidated buildings with broken windows there are also those who see a window into the past. They feel the industry that went on inside those buildings. They feel a deep connection to their forebears who worked in those buildings producing for our nation's needs. This is heritage that belongs to all Australians. If the site is destroyed, the effects on the town would be felt for decades, and many Australians and international supporters would regret its loss. I respectfully urge the IPC to take this into account when making their recommendation to the minister.

25871

10/03/2026

Support

Email

Good evening. I am writing to state that I support the listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. Kind regards Susannah Hall

25841

09/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Sir /Madam, Please list the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum as Heritage. I am a sporting shooter and a Military Small Arms Collector for over 50 years and that name Lithgow means a lot. Thankyou for hearing my support and god bless our heritage.

25836

New South Wales 2847

09/03/2026

Support

Email

Please see attached my statement in support of the listing of the Small Arms Factory

Steven Ring attachment.pdf (PDF, 55.07 KB)

25821

New South Wales 2790

08/03/2026

Support

Email

I support the heritage listing of the Lithgow SAF site. I have attached the issues I would like to bring up. Thank you

K submission to IPC.pdf (PDF, 38.37 KB)

25816

08/03/2026

Support

Email

My goal is to move LSAF into an area of public involvement, not completely dependent on FIREARMS, my proposals are based around Musical Entertainment and preserving proven “Australian Based”.manufacturing skill. 1. Transport a former LSAF, BSA 128 machine and accessories to your premises. Set up some sort of presentation that indicates this machine made Slazenger Golf Club heads, in an effort to find civilian replacement work for the LSAF Machine Shop. AND better yet "Slazenger " was an outstanding “machine shop” success story against impossible odds. 2. Provide space and transport for another four similar BSA machines I have saved, These items are British made, by the same company as the larger machine. During World War Two, LSAF was unable to obtain these machines during hostilities because of the submarine threat around British shores. These are all working demonstration models with cams and fixtures suitable to commence manufacturing again. So instead American machines made British designed guns, not a good recipe for making British firearms. LSAF would have preferred to use BSA instead of American gear to make British firearms. I also have one very special “demonstration” only machine that illustrates how "post war" Britain recycled crashed German War Planes into BSA Automatic production lathes by recycling the aluminium the motors and gearboxes were made from. 3. I have in my lifetime run numerous successful "AUSGRASS" Music Festivals and I always saw LSAF as a possible ideal venue. I have at least five very successful weekend events to my credit, the issue is “venues”.? NSW is a poor state to run music festivals, greed by venue owners the major concern, should we commence Music Events at LSAF, the town would gain from providing food and accommodation, My last most successful venues were located in Canberra but the cost of hire has trebled, so finance considerations closed down the event. If we proceed, the LSAF venue need only provide the location of the music events. There is good money to be made ? The Victorian venues now dominate the industry and NSW events have had notorious event owner problems. TOO GREEDY. For example there are a number of very suitable venues in Tumbarumba . BUT the greedy local council wants the festival promoter to insure THEIR premises. Local Government is nothing but greedy wasteful "no hopers". Can you really expect an aged injured ex-serviceman to support overpaid council officers.? 4. Associated with the Music Events I would like to commence a Historical Venue where folks who contributed to "AUSGRASS Music Events” might be remembered. One room is enough and I have hundreds of music recordings and brochures awaiting such a venue. A recent loss of one of Australia's prominent music performers has alerted me to this need. I see hundreds of people patronise the Victorian venues and ask ” Why can’t NSW meet this demand.?” 5. I am the only legitimate Australian promoter for “BLUEGRASS USA “ a worldwide distribution scheme to promote the music style, I have hundreds of approved promotion tapes and a unit to allow persons to hear the promotion material. This material went to air on localAustralian Radio for some years at 2WKT Radio Station located at Mittagong, NSW. In the 1970-80. The program exists today but I no longer have a Radio Station nearby. AUSGRASS is a registered music event and business name and a proven successful Music Event. I am the owner of this name, so any future rights will be signed over to LSAF, on the proviso they continue to promote the events and music style. No argument from me. The alternative is a huge lorry on its way to Tumbarumba Rubbish Dump, as my wife has promised me will occur should I decease her ? Howard Miller

25811

07/03/2026

Support

Email

To IPC. I believe that it is essential to preserve sites such as the Lithgow SAF, established as part of the initial sovereign making decisions of the new government of a new country. The contribution this factory and the thousands of people who worked there made to Australia, and as I now know after visiting, to Great Britain during WW2 should be remembered. My father was a fitter and turner conscripted during Vietnam and would have been using weapons produced in a way he would have admired from this factory. Also known he could have relied on what they manufactured for him and his company. As a nation being stripped of its industrial heritage I truly hope you can understand the importance of preserving how capable and efficient we were (and still can be) for future generations to perhaps aspire to be again. Regards Geoff Crook

25806

07/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Sir / Madam . I wish to lodge a protest on the threat of demolition of the Lithgow small arms factory site & Museum ,that is now in the hands of foreign ownership with a company from France .I consider this property to be of great significance & an Australian national treasure . The factory has played a great part in the winning of the first & second world wars . The manufacture of rifles, Bren guns & bayonets contributed greatly to the victory over the enemies of our country & is why we have the freedom to enjoy life as it is today .The French also are enjoying their freedom today & not under German rule , also because of the weapons manufactured here ,lest they forget. This history in Lithgow & the museum need to be preserved ,teaching all visitors of the past manufacturing skills . I & many others would consider it a criminal act & very short sighted, to allow demolition of this wonderful historical site that continues to amaze visitors to the Museum . Kind regards John Ellis

25801

New South Wales

06/03/2026

Support

Email

I would like to register my support for the preservation and ongoing use of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site as a part of Australia’s military and industrial heritage, this includes the Small Arms Museum currently located at the site. I feel that Australia has an obligation to maintain our manufacturing and military heritage as there is very little of this type of facility still available for viewing by the public and its history is intertwined in the Australian culture and heritage. Please take whatever steps that are necessary to keep this facility in Australian control and the museum functioning as it is a fantastic piece of Australia’s history and can not be replaced with AI or a digital presentation. Once it is gone we have lost our heritage. Regards Brett Collins

25796

New South Wales 2217

06/03/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern, I am writing this in full support of keeping our oldest small arms factory as it should be preserved for now and future generations of Australians. It has played a vital role in our military history, rural and every day firearms owners over the last century and it would be a tragedy to lose a huge part of the history of small arm of Australia and Lithgow. She deserves to be heritage listed Kind regards Karen Williams

25791

06/03/2026

Support

Email

This ikon of Lithgow should be allowed to continue so much history in this amazing Museum, Lithgow needs to support this great facility, come on Lithgow Community get behind this amazing place.

25701

Associate Editor, ARMAX - the Journal of Contemporary Arms

05/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Sir/Madam, I write in support of the application to include the Lithgow Small Arms Factory in the State Heritage listing to ensure its future survival as I understand that it is under threat of demolition and the future of the museum housed there therefore under threat. Our own Royal Small Arms Factory site at Enfield was substantially demolished in the 1980s and we would not wish to see the same happen to this unique heritage site in your country, and just as importantly, the loss of the museum would be disastrous to the global preservation and understanding of arms and military history. I am happy for this information to be published online as appropriate. Yours sincerely, Jonathan Ferguson Keeper of Firearms & Artillery Associate Editor, ARMAX - the Journal of Contemporary Arms

25691

04/03/2026

Support

Email

To the Independent Planning Commission and the Heritage Council of NSW - I am writing to express my strong support for the heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. As a resident of the City of Lithgow government area and as a volunteer working at the Small Arms Factory Museum I fully appreciate the important role that the factory has played in the history of Lithgow, both economically and socially. The factory employed and trained thousands of local men and women since it was opened in 1912. Visitors to the museum come from all over Australia because an ancestor or family member was employed at the factory and through the displays and exhibits they can get a real feel of what it was like to work there. I've not met one visitor to the museum who wasn't impressed by the quality of engineering and diversity of production which was achieved there. And the history of the factory is part of the soul of Lithgow. And its importance is far from being just local. As the producer of arms for the Australian military for decades the Small Arms Factory also has great national significance, since it armed Australian soldiers from World War One onwards. There is no other site like it in the country and therefore should be protected by a heritage listing. Lithgow was home to so much industry, mining and manufacturing in the past, and unfortunately a lot of that history has disappeared or is under appreciated. Don't let the Small Arms Factory site go that way too . Lithgow needs this! Yours respectively Genni Siudek

25686

04/03/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern, Please see attached letter You may include my name in the submissions. I support the Heritage Listing Thanks kindly Tegan

Support letter for Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum to IPC _Redacted.pdf (PDF, 248.82 KB)

25626

City of Penrith RSL Sub Branch

04/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Submission Team, The City of Penrith RSL sub-Branch supports the proposed ''State Heritage Listing'' of the Lithgow Small Arms factory site. We collectively support the formal recognition of the site’s historic and cultural significance within the established NSW statutory framework. It is our belief that heritage recognition and contemporary industrial and commercial use can be complimentary, and in this case a clear identification of the heritage significance in the future. The submission for State Heritage Listing is Highly Supported by the City of Penrith RSL sub-Branch. The publishing of my name and the name of the sub-Branch is approved, where appropriate. Sincere Regards,

25631

04/03/2026

Support

Email

To allow this property which is no in Australian hands is criminal, the building of this complex is a testament of there strength and endurance the site is a story of the employees who worked here through the years during wars an DC conflicts. Today many come through the doors to see what was achieved. Lithgow could be a destination for tourists spot and visitors.

25606

Cowra Breakout Association

03/03/2026

Support

Email

On behalf of the Cowra Breakout Association, I write in strong support of the application for State Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site, including the Lithgow Small Arms Museum. We note that the NSW Heritage Council recommended State Heritage listing and that the matter has now been referred to the Independent Planning Commission for further review. We respectfully urge the Commission to affirm that recommendation. I wish to provide a regional and historical perspective from Cowra. Cowra and Lithgow share a significant wartime connection. During the Second World War, Cowra operated as a feeder factory to the Lithgow Small Arms Factory, manufacturing critical components for firearms used by Australian forces. That contribution forms part of our town’s wartime history and identity. Since 1998, the Cowra Breakout Association has maintained a close and constructive relationship with the Lithgow Small Arms Museum. Through all appropriate legal processes, the Museum generously provided us with a permanently loaned, decommissioned Vickers machine gun for display in our Cowra Breakout exhibition at the Cowra Visitor Information Centre. That item is an important interpretive piece, helping visitors understand the broader wartime context in which both Lithgow and Cowra played vital roles. While Australia rightly seeks peace and avoids conflict wherever possible, history shows that our nation has been called upon to defend itself and its allies. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory was central to that effort during the Second World War and remains an important part of Australia’s industrial and defence heritage. The Museum provides an appropriate, professional and historically responsible setting in which this story — and many others relating to Australian industrial capability — can be told. The volunteer staff at the Lithgow Small Arms Museum demonstrate a high level of professionalism, historical integrity and community responsibility. Their stewardship of this important heritage resource deserves formal recognition. The proposed State Heritage listing is not intended to impede appropriate commercial or industrial activity. Rather, it seeks formal recognition of the site’s historic and cultural significance within the established NSW statutory framework. In our view, heritage recognition and contemporary industrial or commercial use are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, clearly identifying heritage significance can provide certainty, reduce ambiguity and create a structured framework within which future development can occur responsibly. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory site is of State significance. Its preservation and formal recognition will benefit not only Lithgow, but the broader historical understanding of communities such as Cowra whose wartime contributions were intrinsically linked to it. For these reasons, the Cowra Breakout Association strongly supports the granting of State Heritage Listing. Yours faithfully, Graham Apthorpe Secretary on behalf of the Cowra Breakout Association

25571

03/03/2026

Support

Email

I seek the IPC's support in protecting the historic Lithgow Small Arms Factory site and the site of the Small Arms Museum. This site is incredibly important historically in the provision of small arms weapons to the Australian military since WW1. I trust that the IPC will recommend that this site be suitably protected.

25576

03/03/2026

Support

Email

I support the efforts to obtain heritage protection for the lithgow small arms factory museum. You may print my name. The museum is a great draw for tourism.

25601

03/03/2026

Support

Email

The instrument in writing is a formal letter of support to assist the longevity or the Lithgow small arms factory. History is too easily thrown away, what is rubbish or not useful today is sought after by later generations. Tearing down a building and disbanding a collection of Australian History is very nonproductive. For every problem there is a solution, but the problem has to be the want to assist in enacting this solution. There are plenty would want to assist the Lithgow Small Arms Factory museum but it would seem there very few of those who can finalise this assistance willing to help. I ask that all those with the power to assist and do so for the benefit of All Australians.

25611

03/03/2026

Support

Email

Good day,     My name is Nicholas Schmitz, and I am an avid collector of WW1 and WW2 artifacts. Alongside original militaria items, I am also pleased to be the caretaker of some Enfields that were made at the small arms plant in Lithgow and at Orange between the years of 1917 to 1945. The qualify of manufacturer is quite high and not something you see anymore.     I currently reside in Toronto, near to where the Long Branch Small Arms Limited was located. This facility was demolished in the 1980s and all that remains are the old water tower and vacant inspection building. The remainder of the land is overgrown and used as a dog walking park. The fences are all overgrown and mostly pulled over to one side and completely neglected. The main entrance gates, once prominent, are pulled off their hinges, carelessly stored to one side, and the entrance blocked with wood stumps and garbage cans. If it weren't for some small signs pushed into the ground at a few spots, you would never know the area was once home to a small arms factory. There are pictures and few period videos online showing the daily life and work of the workers who assembled Enfield rifles and other pieces of equipment as the war dictated. Now, nothing remains of their accomplishments, say what you may find in the collector marker. With the number of high rise buildings currently being built next day, it is simply a matter of time before the local government gives up the land and what is left of the small arms plant will be erased and forgotten.     With that in mind, I was pleased to realize that the Lithgow Small Arms plant had an active museum that was caretaking the grounds and the equipment and boosts an impressive display of arms, materials, and daily life items that was were made there and doubtlessly used and enjoyed by locals throughout the decades. The pride one can take, knowing that items they are using were made at home and not imported, is quite a strong feeling. Given the current urge to protect national identity and heritage, it is imperative that what remains of this once proud and respected facility be maintained for current and future generations to enjoy, not just locals, but ones from abroad. You may also set the pretendant that pushes other countries to preserve their history as well.     In closing, I do hope you vote to preserve the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site and the Museum that is located nearby, preserve and display the amazing and unique collection of arms and equipment, and support the volunteers efforts to guide and educate the next generation in Australian national history and pride. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectively, Nicholas Schmitz Toronto, Ontario, Canada

25616

03/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear IPC I support the SHR listing of the LSAF & its museum. Indeed I nominated it for SHR listing to the Heritage Council of NSW. As you must know, it should have been listed on the SHR before being sold by the Federal Government into private hands. An overwhelming majority of submissions supported its listing (more than 500), but the Heritage Minister has evidently referred it to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) for further review. The proposed SHR listing would not impede appropriate commercial or military activity. Rather, it would give formal recognition of the site’s historic and cultural significance within the established NSW statutory framework. Heritage recognition and contemporary industrial and commercial use can be complimentary. In many cases, clear identification of heritage significance provides certainty and reduces future ambiguity for all parties. This is a fine and increasingly rare technical and architectural testament to Australian ingenuity and resilience. The future of our living museum depends on its site remaining intact. Kind regards Dr Bronwyn Hanna

25621

CASTLE HILL & DISTRICT RSL SUB-BRANCH

03/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Commissioners, On behalf of our organisation, I am writing to express our strong support for the State Heritage Register listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site, with a particular focus on the essential role of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum. The NSW Heritage Council has already recognised the historic and cultural significance of the site and recommended it for listing, supported by an overwhelming majority of public submissions. Independent heritage bodies further confirm the Factory’s rare and nationally important legacy in industrial, defence, and technical achievement. [ipcn.nsw.gov.au] [mgnsw.org.au] For the museum, the integrity of the heritage site is not incidental—it is fundamental. The museum sits within the original factory precinct, occupying less than 2% of the overall property, yet it holds a nationally significant archival and object collection that derives much of its meaning from its physical context. The buildings, layout, and industrial fabric are themselves part of the collection, forming a living link between Australia’s manufacturing past and the present. [savelsafm.au] The museum also preserves and interprets the Factory’s vital contribution during the world wars. At the height of World War II, the site supported approximately 6,000 on site workers and another 6,000 at feeder factories, producing around 4,000 rifles per week—a scale of wartime effort central to Australia’s defence capability and national identity. The museum is the only place where this remarkable history is preserved, told, and made accessible to the public. [openaustralia.org.au] Today, the museum remains a key cultural asset for the Lithgow region and Australia more broadly, attracting visitors from across the country and supporting ongoing education, tourism, and community identity. Its continued existence depends on retaining an intact heritage setting. Threats of demolition or redevelopment jeopardise not just buildings, but the museum’s ability to function at all, especially given the long standing uncertainty surrounding site control and commitments made to transfer the museum precinct into community hands. [savelsafm.au] We firmly believe that heritage protection and contemporary industrial activity can coexist. The history of the site clearly shows that industrial growth can take place without impacting the museum precinct, and heritage listing will simply provide clarity and structure for how this dual purpose can continue effectively. For these reasons, we respectfully urge the Commission to support the proposed State Heritage Register listing to safeguard the future of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum and the irreplaceable history it preserves. Thank you for considering our organisation’s submission. Warm regards, Paul Harris-Walker

25536

03/03/2026

Support

Email

Good day. Please pardon me if I have already made a submission to you. I have no objections to having my name, or location, published. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory was a driving reason for our vacation to Australia in 2019. The area made such an impression on us, that we returned for another visit in 2024. Our major small arms production facility here in Canada has been mostly built over and sadly forgotten. I find it admirable that such a similar historically significant site has been, and should continue to be, a draw for those interested in how your nation produced arms for the defence of your country. Without Lithgow, things might very well have turned out differently for you. As a veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces, I wholeheartedly support the effort to keep such a splendid history alive, and continue it's role in educating your citizens. Rest assured, should the opportunity to visit the Lithgow area again one day come about, the Small Arms Factory, and associated Museum, will be on the itinerary again. Regards

25916

Redacted

02/03/2026

Support

Email

To Whom it may concern, My husband and I will be in Lithgow in April. The reason for stopping there was to visit the musuem as it holds the history of so many. We make it a point of stopping and learning from war musuems because it allows us to learn about the historical significance . Please consider supporting the musuem as we know that once gone you loose a substantial piece of history. Respectfully ,

25586

Chair, UNESCO Australian Memory of the World Committee

02/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear IPC, I wish to register my support for State Heritage listing for the Lithgow Small Arms Factory, based on two circumstances: 1. I conducted a significance assessment of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum (LSAFM) in 2017. The statement of significance articulates the national significance of the collection and the site where it is located, as follows: The LSAFM collection is a complex collection with several major elements: firearms, machinery, archival materials, and other manufactured items and artworks. The whole collection [and the site] tells the story of the Commonwealth Small Arms Factory at Lithgow, from its inception in the first decade of Federation, through two world wars, the Korean War and Vietnam, and up to the twenty-first century. The story involves the birth of precision engineering in Australia, the evolution of manufacturing and workplace practices, adaptation to times of boom and bust, and the social history of Lithgow and its surrounding district. It is thus of national historical significance for its capacity to demonstrate how manufacturing industry made a massive contribution to Australia's defence through the work of the Commonwealth Small Arms Factory at Lithgow, as Australian soldiers carried firearms made there to battlefields across the world. 2. Subsequent to the significance assessment of the LSAFM Collection, the archival collection was nominated to the UNESCO Australian Memory of the World Register of documentary heritage of significance to Australia, and was inscribed on the Register in 2019 - see https://www.amw.org.au/register/listings/lithgow-small-arms-factory-archive The preservation of both the movable heritage collection and the archival collection within the site where they were created is critical to the significance of the whole. The crucial contribution made by the Lithgow Small Arms Factory to Australia's wartime and civilian history cannot be underestimated. State Heritage listing will assist in the preservation of this significant State and national site. Best regards, Roslyn Russell PhD Chair, UNESCO Australian Memory of the World Committee

25591

02/03/2026

Support

Email

Dear Independent Planning Commission, I wish to make a submission in support of the proposed State Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site. Name and location: I am happy for my name and general location to be publicly displayed. Position on the proposal: I support the proposed State Heritage Listing. Key issues and reasons for support: The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is a place of exceptional historical, cultural, and technical significance to New South Wales and to Australia more broadly. Its role in Australia’s industrial development, defence manufacturing, and skilled workforce training across the twentieth century is well established and widely recognised. Importantly, the proposed heritage listing does not seek to freeze the site in time or prevent appropriate commercial or industrial activity. Rather, it provides clarity and certainty by formally recognising what elements of the site are of heritage value, allowing future development to proceed in an informed and responsible manner. In many cases, this clarity reduces conflict and ambiguity for all parties involved. The Factory is also increasingly rare as an intact example of large-scale twentieth-century industrial architecture and planning. Once such places are demolished or fragmented, their heritage value cannot be recreated or meaningfully interpreted elsewhere. Retaining the site as a coherent whole is therefore critical to preserving its significance. Heritage recognition and adaptive reuse are not opposing goals. Across NSW and internationally, former industrial sites have demonstrated that conservation, employment, education, and contemporary commercial use can coexist successfully when guided by a clear heritage framework. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is well suited to this approach. For these reasons, I strongly support the Heritage Council’s recommendation and encourage the Independent Planning Commission to endorse the State Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site. Thank you for considering my submission. Yours sincerely, Lachlan Davidson Katoomba, NSW

25596

02/03/2026

Support

Email

I support this case Issues I would like to raise I understand fellow Lithgow residents may be concerned if this Heritage order is given. I feel they have been misguided by Thales. There are significant aspects that should be considered. One is that it is not possible ever find another world war one manufacturing plant in existence or as significant to Australia as this one is in Lithgow Also, it houses a significant and specialised museum. I hope that this museum and building will be saved for future Australian generations and historians worldwide. Thank you for considering my submission

25551

New South Wales 2779

02/03/2026

Support

Email

I support the inclusion of Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the heritage register. As an Australian Army veteran, I consider that this is an incredibly important part of the country’s military and industrial heritage. Its loss would make the country and NSW poorer as a result.

25546

02/03/2026

Support

Email

I support this submission Aspects I would like you to consider I understand that fellow Lithgow residents are concerned if this heritage order is given. They may find the factory closing altogether. I believe they have been misguided by Thales, which has plenty of area to expand, possibly only being able to negotiate the demolition of one or two items that are necessary for their factory. I am concerned that it is not possible to ever find another early manufacturing plant in Australia with such significant history with strong social ties not only to Lithgow but also to many many people that have worked there over the years. It is a rare thing to find a museum that is recognised worldwide; this is of the utmost importance. I am majorly concerned that a compromise will not come and the bulldozers will come. Some aspects of development need to be done hand in hand with Thales. I feel the bulldozer is an easy solution, and Australian history is not significant to a French company. Thank you

25541

Newnes Hotel Cabins

02/03/2026

Support

Email

See attachment.

LSAF Mar 26_Redacted.pdf (PDF, 185.88 KB)

25521

02/03/2026

Support

Email

Hello, I would like to express my full support for the Lithgow Small Arms Factory's submission to be granted state Heritage listing status. This site is an extremely valuable example of when Australia was a capable manufacturing nation and needs to be preserved for future generations. The sit has a proud heritage of employing many Australians that produced firearms that were used to protect Australia from the well documented threats of war. The site manufactured many other products that provided domestic products to the Australian community. Sadly Australia has lost the majority of our manufacturing capabilities and this site needs to be preserved as a reminder to future generations of our capabilities and Australian ingenuity. Thank You

25516

02/03/2026

Support

Email

The Lithgow Small Arms buildings is very important to our town and is of historical value! We have lost a lot of things of value in our town please don’t let us lose this significant asset!

25511

01/03/2026

Support

Email

I write in support of maintaining the Lithgow Small Arms Factory and Museum for Heritage listing. This site, and these buildings have been the backbone of Australia's military supply chain sovereignty for well over 100 years. Its historical significance is unmatched in this country. If it were to be shut down, there is nothing that would come close to replacing it. To lose it would be an historical tragedy. To lose this irreplaceable corporate history, knowledge and local significance would be very sad indeed Further, should it be desired that the site be re-established in the future, the costs would be significantly greater than its current maintenance. Please keep it open! Thank you for taking the time to consider my position.

25506

New South Wales 2800

27/02/2026

Support

Email

This is submission to support the heritage listing of the Lithgow Firearms Factory Buildings. For more than a century, this site has shaped Australia’s manufacturing story, representing skilled trades, innovation and generations of workers. Many apprentices trained there and took the skills to build other parts of Australia. It is important that the history be preserved and it adds the existing manufacturing and engineering history of Lithgow such as Australia's first blast furnace. Heritage listing helps ensure its story and this museum is protected into the future.

25216

Blue Mountains Branch, National Trust

23/02/2026

Support

Email

INTRODUCTION The Blue Mountains Branch of the National Trust strongly supports the proposed listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (LSAF) on the NSW State Heritage Register. Based on all the available evidence, the site clearly satisfies multiple criteria for State significance under the NSW Heritage Act. The following submission addresses each criterion in turn. Criterion (A): Historical Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is of outstanding historical significance as: . Australia’s first precision mass-production engineering facility, a fact recognised by Engineering Heritage Australia, which notes the site’s national importance as the birthplace of high-tolerance industrial manufacturing. . A direct response to 19th-century defence anxieties, including the 1838 unannounced arrival of U.S. naval vessels and later geopolitical tensions, which highlighted the colonies’ vulnerability and drove the push for domestic arms production. . A central contributor to Australia’s defence capability across First World War, Second World War, Korea, Vietnam and later conflicts, producing weapons essential to national security. The factory represents a pivotal moment in the development of Australian industrial self-reliance. Criterion (B): Associative Significance The site is closely associated with: . The Commonwealth’s Government’s early nation-building agenda, particularly the establishment of sovereign defence capability. . Generations of skilled workers, engineers and apprentices whose expertise shaped Australian industry. . The Lithgow community, where the factory served as a major employer and social anchor for more than a century. These associations are deeply embedded in the cultural identity of Lithgow and NSW. Criterion (C): Aesthetic and Technical Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory demonstrates: . A rare industrial landscape, including the historic General Machine Shop, original machinery and early 20th century factory design, as documented by the Museum’s public materials. . Outstanding technical achievement in repetition manufacturing, the foundation of modern mass production, which the Museum identifies as a defining innovation of the factory’s early decades. . A physical record of the evolution of mechanised production from 1912 through the 20th century. The site’s surviving fabric provides an exceptional window into Australia’s industrial and engineering history. Criterion (D): Social Significance The factory holds profound social significance for the Lithgow community: . It shaped the town’s economic, social and cultural life for generations, with many families maintaining multi-generational connections to the site. . The Museum’s own narrative emphasises the centrality of the factory to local identity and community cohesion. The depth of the community attachment is evident in ongoing local advocacy for the site’s preservation. Criterion (E): Research and Technical Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory possesses exceptional research value due to: . Its UNESCO Australian Memory of the World-recognised archival collection, which documents the history of Australia’s first precision manufacturing facility and provides unparalleled insight into industrial, military and engineering development. . The survival of original machinery, production records, prototypes and technical drawings, offering a rare opportunity for research into early 20th-century industrial processes. This material is of national importance for historians, engineers and industrial archaeologists. Criterion (F): Rarity The site is rare because: . It is one of the few surviving large-scale wartime industrial complex’s in NSW with intact machinery and production spaces. . It represents are unique combination of defence, industrial and social history not replicated elsewhere in the State. The rarity of its intact state and documentary is reinforced by the UNESCO recognition. Criterion (G): Representative Significance The Lithgow Small Arms Factory is an outstanding representative example of: . Early Commonwealth industrial policy. . Large-scale wartime mobilisation and manufacturing. . The development of skilled engineering and technical labour in regional NSW. It’s buildings, machinery and archival holdings collectively demonstrate the characteristics of a major 20th century industrial enterprise. Support from the Cultural and Museum Sector Museums & Galleries NSW has formally stated that the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum is a unique and nationally significant site representing Australia’s industrial, military and social history and strongly supports its inclusion on the State Heritage Register This endorsement underscores the site’s exceptional value. CONCLUSION The Lithgow Small Arms Factory clearly meets multiple criteria for State heritage significance. It’s historical, technical, social and documentary values are of the highest order and its preservation is essential to understanding Australia’s industrial and defence history. The Blue Mountains Branch of the National Trust (NSW) therefore strongly supports its listing on the NSW State Heritage Register. Rod Stowe Chair 21 February 2026

24716

17/02/2026

Support

Email

To whom it may concern. I am writing to implore you to grant the Lithgow Small Arms Factory recognition under your State Heritage Register. As a veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces, I have a great appreciation for the national production of arms. Our small arms facility near Toronto, Ontario - Long Branch - has been long built over. It was a very similar operation to Lithgow, producing #4 rifles, BREN LMG's, STEN guns, and Browning Hi Power handguns. As the Long Branch grounds were built over, an irreplaceable part of Canadian military history, and civilian mobilization during wartime, has been lost. Your history should not be forgotten. Lithgow's contribution to your war efforts is a tremendous example of National pride, and engineering success. Sadly Canada made no effort to preserve much of ours. During the last decade my wife and I, have made two visits to the Factory, and it's associated museum. Should I be fortunate enough to make another trip to Australia, I shall certainly visit there again. We enjoyed visiting the town of Lithgow, and the local attractions were scenic, and fascinating. Please make sure the Small Arms Factory - and the absolutely incredible museum - are protected, and preserved, for the future to appreciate. Yours sincerely, Patrick Cade

25201

13/02/2026

Support

Email

To the Independent Planning Commission / NSW Heritage Council, I strongly support the proposed heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factorysite on the State Heritage Register. I live in Sydney and have visited the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum twice with family and friends. On both visits the significance of the site — socially, technically, and historically — was evident. The museum showcases not only firearms history but also the broader story of early Australian industry, manufacturing innovation, and community life in the 20th century. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory was Australia’s first high-precision mass production facility. From its establishment in 1912 it drove local economic development and became a national asset, supplying rifles and machine guns through both World Wars. It also preserved and expanded critical manufacturing skills at times when these capabilities were strategically vital to the young nation. This industrial and technological narrative is rare in Australia’s heritage landscape and deserves statutory protection. The site’s museum collection is exceptional. It includes original machinery, tools, artefacts, historic photographs, and documents that span the factory’s operational life. The archival collection, recognised on the UNESCO Australian Memory of the World register, contains tens of thousands of unique records essential for understanding Australia’s industrial and military history. Importantly, the museum experience goes beyond firearms enthusiasts. Exhibits contextualise how the Factory shaped the local community, provided work across generations, and interacted with broader social trends, including the expanded role of women in industry during wartime. The volunteers who operate the museum share these stories with a wide audience, making this history accessible to people of all backgrounds. Without heritage protection at the state level, there is a real risk of losing not only physical buildings but also the ability to preserve this integrated industrial landscape and its collections for future generations. Recent events — including thefts, ongoing security and ownership challenges — highlight how vulnerable the site and its historical material are without stronger legal safeguards and stewardship. Heritage listing will ensure the continued protection of a place that reflects NSW’s cultural, technical, and social history. It will enable community access to this story, support educational opportunities, and preserve an extraordinary piece of our industrial heritage that cannot be replicated. For these reasons I urge the Commission to recommend the Lithgow Small Arms Factory for inclusion on the State Heritage Register. Respectfully submitted, Michael Jones Sydney, NSW

20306

New South Wales

13/02/2026

Support

Email

Dear Sir / Madam Please treat this email to reaffirm my previous submission of support for the Lithgow Small Arms Factory: Proposed Listing on the State Heritage Register. It is well and good to have memorial cenotaphs of servicemen and women that defended and shaped this country in their service during world wars one & two, but those bronze figures are holding Lithgow rifles that enabled them to do so, and the efforts of the Lithgow factory men and women who tirelessly produced firearms in keeping this Country free of tyranny must also be remembered. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory museum must remain open in the interest of future kin having the opportunity to see and keep a significant part of Australian history that remains since its opening in 1912. If this government can protect heritage dwellings with no real significance other than their age, then it can only be deemed irreconcilable to not protect the heritage value of Lithgow Small Arms Factory Anthony Patti – NSW Resident of 55 years

20316

13/02/2026

Support

Email

I heartily endorse that the Lithgow Small Arms Factory be listed on the State Heritage Register. The factory is the last existing factory that manufactured goods for the defence of Australia in the Second World War. Registering the factory will ensure that this last bastion of our all out effort to protect Australia and the Commonwealth will not be destroyed for a carpark or a fast food joint. With the recent releasing of reports of the Australian troops exploits which were covered up by the US Military with the stated aim of making US citizens feel that their soldiers were heroes and the Australians which spearheaded most of the invasions were merely helpers. Don't let the truth of Australian efforts during WW2 be denigrated or forgotten

20336

13/02/2026

Support

Email

From: Max Underhill (Member Engineering Heritage Sydney and Committee Leader – Joint ICOMOS/TICCIH National Scientific Committee on Industrial Heritage) Since my earlier submission on the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Site Listing, Engineering Heritage Australia has recognised the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum collection with an Engineering Heritage National Marker (EHNM). My earlier submission (and EHS submission) supported the NSW State Heritage Listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory (LSAF) site it emphasised the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum (LSAFM) collection, although currently housed within buildings on the site, is separate to the buildings and this remains. However, to have a collection associated with the site and feeder factories, enhances the significance of the site to one of the most significant industrial sites in Australia. The LSAFM collection provides evidence of the history and evolution of the LSAF – a precision engineering site that played a critical role in the nation’s military and civil/domestic development from 1908. The LSAFM Industrial & Engineering Heritage Collection consists of machinery, manufacturing process, and manufactured exhibits together with a world recognised collection of associated archives & records. Description of Collection recognised under Engineering Heritage National Marker (EHNM) The Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum (LSAFM) showcases an extensive collection of firearms, machinery, tools, and memorabilia from the Lithgow Small Arms Factory. It highlights over a century of Australian military and civilian firearm production, engineering innovation, and craftsmanship. The museum preserves the legacy of the workers and offers a unique insight into industrial heritage and technological advancement. The estimated collection or 42,760 items are made up of: Exhibits – Machinery, manufacturing process and products 1. Manufacturing machinery (including original Pratt & Whitney machines) 2. Manufacturing processes and tools 3. Testing apparatus 4. Training and education material 5. Factory process and tools (moveable heritage) – signs, factory whistle, etc 6. Firearms manufactured (including Factory designed and/or produced prototypes, pre-production including components and 14 x Feeder factory components/processes) 7. Other non-military manufactured items and components 8. Manufacturing methodology, processes and samples Archives UNESCO Australian Memory of the World Program 1910 to 1986 1. Manufacturing drawings, documents and production records 2. Factory and associated buildings/work plans/documents/records 3. Factory life from activities, working environment and complete employee records • WWI honor board 4. Research library of relevant books, magazines and documents including original blueprints 5. Photographic records covering the life of the factory Max Underhill

20281

New South Wales 2000

12/02/2026

Support

Email

To the Independent Planning Commission / NSW Heritage Council, I strongly support the proposed heritage listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory site on the State Heritage Register. I live in Sydney and have visited the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum twice with family and friends. On both visits the significance of the site — socially, technically, and historically — was evident. The museum showcases not only firearms history but also the broader story of early Australian industry, manufacturing innovation, and community life in the 20th century. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory was Australia’s first high-precision mass production facility. From its establishment in 1912 it drove local economic development and became a national asset, supplying rifles and machine guns through both World Wars. It also preserved and expanded critical manufacturing skills at times when these capabilities were strategically vital to the young nation. This industrial and technological narrative is rare in Australia’s heritage landscape and deserves statutory protection. The site’s museum collection is exceptional. It includes original machinery, tools, artefacts, historic photographs, and documents that span the factory’s operational life. The archival collection, recognised on the UNESCO Australian Memory of the World register, contains tens of thousands of unique records essential for understanding Australia’s industrial and military history. Importantly, the museum experience goes beyond firearms enthusiasts. Exhibits contextualise how the Factory shaped the local community, provided work across generations, and interacted with broader social trends, including the expanded role of women in industry during wartime. The volunteers who operate the museum share these stories with a wide audience, making this history accessible to people of all backgrounds. Without heritage protection at the state level, there is a real risk of losing not only physical buildings but also the ability to preserve this integrated industrial landscape and its collections for future generations. Recent events — including thefts, ongoing security and ownership challenges — highlight how vulnerable the site and its historical material are without stronger legal safeguards and stewardship. Heritage listing will ensure the continued protection of a place that reflects NSW’s cultural, technical, and social history. It will enable community access to this story, support educational opportunities, and preserve an extraordinary piece of our industrial heritage that cannot be replicated. For these reasons I urge the Commission to recommend the Lithgow Small Arms Factory for inclusion on the State Heritage Register. Respectfully submitted, Terry Zollia Sydney, NSW

25241

19/02/2026

Comment

Email

I feel very strongly about this and ask you to please keep this complex in mind it part of our history if loss the young of today will lose our history. The history started back in 1882 please go and read it at the Museum. Thank you

25236

18/02/2026

Comment

Email

Lithgow really needs the Small Arms Factory. It’s a large part of Lithgow’s history. The factory was a very large part of my mother’s life. She was the managers secretary for many years.

25221

Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc

17/02/2026

Comment

Email

To Independent Planning Commission of NSW Re: Lithgow Small Arms Factory request for proposed listing on State Heritage Register We acknowledge that the Minister for Heritage, the Hon Penelope Sharpe, MLC, has requested the Commission review the proposed listing of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register. It is noted, however, that the Museum and its collection will now be excluded from the revised curtilage, for consideration under a future SHR listing. As per BMACHO’s previous submissions/s, the significance of the overall SAF site cannot be discounted. We request that the following comments should be considered within the pending review process. The Lithgow Small Arms Factory (SAF) is a precinct comprising current and former factory buildings including the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum. It is the oldest munitions factory in Australia and the only pre-World War II facility which remains operational. It was considered remarkable for its use of advanced American technology including precision manufacturing, and it remained at the forefront of munitions manufacturing throughout the 20th century. It played a critical role in both World War I and World War II. The Lithgow SAF is rare for its ability to demonstrate the evolution of architecture of factory buildings, retaining elements associated with each key period of the site, pre–World War I, the inter war period, World War II and post war period. Munitions were supplied during both World War I and World War II. The SAF, together with its Museum, is of importance for its association with women, migrants, servicemen and local people whose crucial contribution to the war effort was in the manufacturing of munitions. It also continues to hold social value to retired and serving military personnel and the Lithgow community for its role in providing weapons and ammunition to Australian soldiers in every conflict since World War I. Many former and current service people in NSW, and Australia generally, feel a strong connection to the place. Production of the Vickers Machine Gun commenced in the late 1920s, leading to the construction of the Vickers Building, which would also go on to manufacture the Vickers anti-aircraft and tank guns. The Bren Gun was also produced at the site from 1939, after personnel went to England in 1937 to study manufacturing techniques. In the interwar period there was uncertainty over the future of the Lithgow SAF. With declining demand for munitions, the operations at Lithgow were diversified. The General Machine Shop was constructed and along with the original facilities was used to produce various civilian items, including combs and cutters for sheep shearing, handcuffs and machinery parts. Post World War II other commercial production included refrigerator and Sunbeam Mixmaster parts, Westrex film projector spares, Slazenger golf club heads and turn-handle pencil sharpeners. The Factory was both retailer and wholesaler of its own Zircaloy brand open-ended, ring and adjustable spanners. Pinnock sewing machines were entering production in 1950. The site is representative of extant Australian industrial heritage and the growing importance of defence manufacturing in the context of national security. It is of State, if not National, significance and should be listed on the State Heritage Register. You can publicly display our name and location. This submission is also attached in PDF format. Yours sincerely Patsy Moppett BTP (UNSW) Dip. ELM (Tocal) President Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc (BMACHO)

Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc submission.pdf (PDF, 106.77 KB)

20446

16/02/2026

Comment

Email

It's always too easy to throw our history out Our history is critical to understand so we make better decisions going PLEASE keep our Small Arms Factory in Lithgow NSW open to the public John Morgan

20276

New South Wales

12/02/2026

Comment

Email

Please accept my brief submission as a NSW resident and Australian Citizen. I oppose the sale of our heritage Lithgow Small Arms Factory on the State Heritage Register as well as all the other defence sites and heritage sites proposed for sale within Australian NSW WA SA QLD NT VIC TAS. Sincerely Mary Boyle